BSCC
Sacramento (2025-2026 inspection cycle)
Read the report at Sacramento ↗
June 3, 2025
Julie Wherry, Interim Chief Probation Officer
Sacramento County Probation Department
8745 Folsom Boulevard
Sacramento, California 95826
2025-2026 UNANNOUNCED INSPECTION, WELFARE & INSTITUTION S CODE
SECTIONS 209 & 885, SACRAMENTO COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT
DETENTION FACILITIES
Dear Chief Wherry:
An Unannounced I nspection of the Sacramento County Probation Department was
completed for the following facilities between Tuesday, May 13, 2025, and Wednesday,
May 14, 2025:
FACILITY NAME BSCC # FACILITY TYPE
Sacramento County Youth Detention Facility 7437 JH
Valley Oaks Youth Academy (VOYA) 7439 SYTF
These inspections were conducted pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code Sections
209 and 885 to determine compliance with the Minimum Standards for Juvenile Detention
Facilities as outlined in Titles 15 and 24, California Code of Regulations.
INSPECTION RESULTS
The focus of the Unannounced Inspection was to evaluate Classification, Grievance, and
Visiting Processes based on technical assistance recommendations made in the 2024
Targeted Inspection. We were provided draft policy changes and documentation of
grievances requested. Additionally, we interviewed youth and staff while on site to
confirm practices have improved regarding classification and visiting status, as well as a
reduction in Grievances based on clarification of a complaint versus a suggestion.
We identified no items of noncompliance with Title 15 Minimum Standards. Refer to the
attached Title 15 Modified Procedures Checklist for detailed information.
* * *
Please email me at elizabeth.gong@bscc.ca.gov or call (916) 704-2503 if you have any
questions.
Julie Wherry
Interim Chief Probation Officer
Page 2
Sincerely,
ELIZABETH GONG
Field Representative
Facilities Standards and Operations Division
Enclosures
Cc: Presiding Judge, Sacramento County Juvenile Court*
Chair, Juvenile Justice Commission, Sacramento County*
Chair, Board of Supervisors, Sacramento County*
County Administrator, Sacramento County*
Kristalyn McDonald, Chief Deputy Probation Officer, Sacramento County Juvenile
Facilities
*Copies of the inspection are available upon request or online at www.bscc.ca.gov.
7437+ Sacramento JH SYTF UI LTR 25-26
JUVENILE HALLS, SPECIAL PURPOSE JUVENILE HALLS AND CAMPS
Board of State and Community Corrections
PROCEDURES CHECKLIST1,2
BSCC Code: 7437
FACILITY NAME: Sacramento County Youth Detention Facility FACILITY TYPE: JH
PERSON(S) INTERVIEWED: Kristalyn McDonald, Chief Deputy Probation Officer; Jessica Elorduy, Assistant Chief
Deputy Probation Officer; Michelle Bettega, Administrative Services Officer II; Kim Anklam, Administrative Services
Officer I; Memory Soliveen, Supervising Probation Officer – Grievances; Youth: Baca, age 17; Emily, age 17.
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: Elizabeth Gong DATE: May 14-15, 2025
TITLE 15 SECTION YES NO N/A P/P REFERENCE – COMMENTS3
1352 CLASSIFICATION
Chapter 21, Classification
The facility administrator shall develop and implement
written policies and procedures on classification of youth
Youth detained in JDF are housed in the
for the purpose of determining housing placement in the
Orientation Unit for evaluation of the criteria
facility.
included in policy and regulation to determine
Such procedures shall:
the most appropriate Unit Placement. The
team of staff in this unit reviews a youth's
personal/physical information, offense history,
risk, and assessments of all the screening
tools at admission. At any time during a
☒
☐ ☐ youth's stay, a re-classification may occur by
a Supervisor to best meet the youth’s needs,
but each youth is reassessed by a
Classification SPO a minimum of every 90
days.
Our review of youth placement is specific to
agency criteria, within regulation
requirements, and includes an override
component when appropriate.
(a) provide for the safety of the youth, other youth, facility
staff, and the public by placing youth in the appropriate, Chapter 21, Purpose and Scope, ¶ 1
least restrictive housing and program settings. Housing ☒
☐ ☐
assignments shall consider the need for single, double
or dormitory assignment or location within the dormitory;
1 This document is intended for use as a tool during the inspection process; this worksheet may not contain each Title 15
regulation that is required. Additionally, many regulations on this worksheet are SUMMARIES of the regulation; the text on this
worksheet may not contain the entire text of the actual regulation. Please refer to the complete California Code of Regulations,
Title 15, Minimum Standards for Juvenile Facilities, Division 1, Chapter 1, Subchapter 5 for the complete list and text of
regulations.
2 This is a modified version of the Procedures Checklist and is only intended for the 2025 Unannounced Inspection of the
Sacramento County Youth Detention Facility.
3 Excerpts from facility policies, procedures, or other reference documents are indicated in italicized text.
7437 Sacramento JH UI PRO 25-26 Page 1 of 5 J453 JUV PRO eff. 01.01.25
TITLE 15 SECTION YES NO N/A P/P REFERENCE – COMMENTS3
(b) consider facility populations and physical design of
the facility; ☒ Chapter 21, Purpose and Scope, ¶ 1
☐ ☐
(c) provide that a youth shall be classified upon
admittance to the facility; classification factors shall Chapter 21, Purpose and Scope, ¶ 2
include, but not be limited to: age, maturity,
sophistication, emotional stability, program needs, legal ☒
☐ ☐
status, public safety considerations, medical/mental
health considerations, gender and gender identity of the
youth;
(d) provide for periodic classification reviews, including
provisions that consider the level of supervision and the Chapter 21, Guideline V Classification
youth's behavior while in custody; and, Reviews
The agency reviews all youth classifications a
minimum of every 90 days or when a
significant event occurs. Agency staff and
partners have the ability to request a change
in classification when they articulate a need.
We recommended during the Targeted
Inspection in 2024 that the agency consider
adjusting its Security 1 Classification for the
most serious and violent offenders to include
other elements than just the youth’s offense
at admission. A draft change in policy allows
for a Security 1 High and Security 1 Low
Classification, to include more opportunities
upon the evaluation of behavior elements and
☒
☐ ☐ progress while in custody. The most notable
issue with the S1 classification was that the
youth only had the opportunity for no-contact
visits. Because of the separation within the
S1 Classification, youth on an S1Low can
have contact visits and may move within the
facility unescorted, if appropriate. The draft
should be operational by June 2025, after
training staff in the new process of
documentation and review.
We feel this modification allows long-term
youth more opportunities for access to family
and to gain responsibilities within their
program. The current policy was not non-
compliant, but did not take into consideration
the youth’s growth in the program to allow for
incentivized opportunities.
(e) provide that facility staff shall not separate youth from
the general population or assign youth to a single Chapter 21, Purpose and Scope, ¶ 3
occupancy room based solely on the youth's actual or
perceived race, ethnic group identification, ancestry,
national origin, color, religion, gender, sexual orientation,
☒
gender identity, gender expression, mental or physical ☐ ☐
disability, or HIV status. This section does not prohibit
staff from placing youth in a single occupancy room at
the youth's specific request or in accordance with Title
15 regulations regarding separation.
7437 Sacramento JH UI PRO 25-26 Page 2 of 5 J453 JUV PRO eff. 01.01.25
TITLE 15 SECTION YES NO N/A P/P REFERENCE – COMMENTS3
(f) facility staff shall not consider lesbian, gay, bisexual,
transgender, questioning or intersex identification or Chapter 21, Guideline II-M, 2
status as an indicator of likelihood of being sexually
abusive. ☒ Security 8 Classification is based on
☐ ☐
screenings at admission, factoring in Special
Needs, not for housing decisions.
1361 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
Chapter 33, Grievances
The facility administrator shall develop and implement
Chapter 33, Guideline I-A
written policies and procedures whereby any youth may
Chapter 33, Guideline I-B
appeal and have resolved grievances relating to any
condition of confinement, including but not limited to
We reviewed 213 grievances for the
health care services, classification decisions, program
detention program for March and April 2025.
participation, telephone, mail or visiting procedures,
We considered technical assistance
food, clothing, bedding, mistreatment, harassment or
recommendations from the 2024 Targeted
violations of the nondiscrimination policy. There shall be
Inspection, when we recommended
no time limit on filing grievances. Policies and
educating youth of the difference between a
procedures shall include provisions whereby the facility
complaint and a suggestion, or a request.
manager ensures:
The agency had a process in place, like the
Grievance process called My Voice, which
was supposed to be responsive to youth
requests or suggestions. Over the years,
youths would circle My Voice on the
grievance form, but the noted comments
were not grievances of a condition of
confinement. We had suggested a Youth
Council to allow representatives from each
unit/program to have group meetings to make
requests or suggest changes to the program.
As such, the agency is moving a Probation
Officer from the field to be in charge of the
☒
☐ ☐ program to educate and assist youth using
the Council Person process. By including
youth involvement, it is hoped that the youth
will better communicate with staff and not
automatically file a grievance. Our review of
the 213 YDF Grievances found 31 were
requests to speak with someone (14) and
requests for unit reassignment (17). This is
almost 15%, significant if you consider the
overall numbers.
Overall, however, each of the grievances
reviewed was well within regulation timelines,
most being resolved within four days. The
facility’s ability to track a youth’s location
through the electronic activity tracker,
therefore, this tracker and video are reviewed
by supervising staff to verify the youth’s
statements. This allows for the timely
reconciliation of the youth's grievance.
We look forward to assessing the Youth
Council Program and the anticipated positive
response from youth. We spoke to three
long-term youths in the facility, and each was
aware of the upcoming change, looking
7437 Sacramento JH UI PRO 25-26 Page 3 of 5 J453 JUV PRO eff. 01.01.25
TITLE 15 SECTION YES NO N/A P/P REFERENCE – COMMENTS3
forward to being a part of the process within
the facility.
(a) a grievance form and instructions for registering a
grievance, which includes provisions for the youth to ☒ Chapter 33, Guideline I-C
☐ ☐
have free access to the form;
(b) the youth shall have the option to confidentially file
the grievance or to deliver the form to any youth ☒ Chapter 33, Guideline II-B
☐ ☐
supervision staff working in the facility;
(c) resolution of the grievance at the lowest appropriate
staff level; ☒ Chapter 33, Purpose and Scope
☐ ☐
(d) provision for a prompt review and initial response to
grievances within three (3) business days, grievances Chapter 33, Guideline II-D
☒
that relate to health and safety issues must be ☐ ☐
addressed immediately;
(1) The youth may elect to be present to explain
his/her version of the grievance to a person not Chapter 33, Guideline II-F
directly involved in the circumstances which led to the ☒ Chapter 33, Guideline II-F, 2-a
☐ ☐
grievance. Chapter 33, Guideline II-F, 2-c
(2) Provision for a staff representative approved by
the facility administrator to assist the youth. ☒ Chapter 33, Guideline II-A
☐ ☐
(e) provision for a written response to the grievance
which includes the reasons for the decisions; ☒ Chapter 33, Guideline III-A, 5
☐ ☐
(f) a system which provides that any appeal of a
grievance shall be heard by a person not directly ☒ Chapter 33, Guideline IV-A
☐ ☐
involved in the circumstances which led to the grievance;
(g) resolution of the grievance must occur within ten (10)
business days unless circumstances dictate a longer ☒ Chapter 33, Guideline II-D
☐ ☐
time frame. The youth shall be notified of any delay; and,
(h) the policy shall provide multiple internal and external
methods to report sexual abuse and sexual harassment. ☒ Chapter 33, Guideline I-C
☐ ☐
Whether or not associated with a grievance, concerns of
parents, guardians, staff or other parties shall be Administrative Policy Reference: Citizen
☒
addressed and documented in accordance with written ☐ ☐ Complaint
policies and procedures within a specified timeframe.
7437 Sacramento JH UI PRO 25-26 Page 4 of 5 J453 JUV PRO eff. 01.01.25
TITLE 15 SECTION YES NO N/A P/P REFERENCE – COMMENTS3
1374 VISITING
Chapter 38, Visiting
The facility administrator shall develop and implement
Chapter 38, Guideline I
written policies and procedures for visiting, that include
Chapter 38, Guideline II-A
provisions for special visits. Youth shall be allowed to
Chapter 38, Guideline II-B
receive visits by parents, guardians or persons standing
Chapter 38, Guideline II-C
in loco parentis, and children of youth. Other family
members, such as grandparents and siblings, and
The facility allows approved visitors to come
supportive adults, may be allowed to visit with the
to the facility seven days a week from 8 am to
approval of the facility administrator or designee, and in
☒ 8 pm.
conjunction with the youth’s case plan or in the best ☐ ☐
interest of the youth.
Our review of this regulation was to confirm
the transitional change to visiting for S1
youth. The Classification policy, currently in
Draft to become operational in June 2025, will
allow S1 youth with good behavior and
positive status to have contact visits with their
family.
All visits shall occur at reasonable times, subject only to
the limitations necessary to maintain order and security. Chapter 38, Guideline I
Visitation shall not be denied solely based on the visitor’s Chapter 38, Guideline II-D
criminal history. The staff shall determine in each case,
whether the visitor’s criminal history represents a risk to ☒
☐ ☐
the safety of youth or staff in the facility. Any denial of
visitation or limitation on visitations shall be
communicated to the youth, person denied and facility
administrator.
Opportunity for visitation shall be a minimum of two hours
per week. Visits may be supervised, but conversations Chapter 38, Guideline I
shall not be monitored unless there is a security or safety
need. ☒ Each youth is allowed a 45-minute visit each
☐ ☐
day, with opportunities for five hours and 15
minutes of visits each week.
Provisions for special visits, in addition to the two-hour
minimum and/or outside of the regular visiting hours, shall Chapter 38, Guideline II-A, 5 Special Visits
be accommodated as necessary and within the discretion
of the facility administrator or designee. Family therapy
☒
and professional visits shall be accommodated outside ☐ ☐
the provisions of this regulation. Facilities may provide
visitation opportunities outside of normal visiting hours to
accommodate special visits.
The facility may provide access to technology as an
alternative, but not as a replacement, to in-person visiting. ☒ Chapter 38, Purpose and Scope
☐ ☐
7437 Sacramento JH UI PRO 25-26 Page 5 of 5 J453 JUV PRO eff. 01.01.25
JUVENILE HALLS, SPECIAL PURPOSE JUVENILE HALLS AND CAMPS
Board of State and Community Corrections
PROCEDURES CHECKLIST1,2
BSCC Code: 7439
FACILITY NAME: Sacramento Secure Youth Treatment Facility (Valley Oaks FACILITY TYPE: SYTF
Youth Academy / VOYA)
PERSON(S) INTERVIEWED: Kristalyn McDonald, Chief Deputy Probation Officer; Jessica Elorduy, Assistant Chief
Deputy Probation Officer; Michelle Bettega, Administrative Services Officer II; Kim Anklam, Administrative Services
Officer I; Memory Soliveen, Supervising Probation Officer – Grievances; Youth: Jeffrey F, age 19; Kammanen F, age 19;
Arlis H, age 22.
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: Elizabeth Gong DATE: May 14, 2025.
TITLE 15 SECTION YES NO N/A P/P REFERENCE – COMMENTS3
1352 CLASSIFICATION
Chapter 21, Classification
The facility administrator shall develop and implement
written policies and procedures on classification of youth
Youth detained in VOYA are housed in one of
for the purpose of determining housing placement in the
several SYTF Living Units, determined by an
facility.
assessment of criteria included in policy and
Such procedures shall:
regulation to ascertain the most appropriate
Unit Placement. The Classification team
reviews a youth's personal/physical
information, offense history, risk, and
assessments of all the screening tools at
☒
☐ ☐ admission. At any time during a youth's stay,
a re-classification may occur by a Supervisor
to best meet the youth’s needs, but each
youth is reassessed by a Classification SPO
a minimum of every 90 days.
Our review of youth placement is specific to
agency criteria, within regulation
requirements, and includes an override
component when appropriate.
(a) provide for the safety of the youth, other youth, facility
staff, and the public by placing youth in the appropriate, Chapter 21, Purpose and Scope, ¶ 1
least restrictive housing and program settings. Housing ☒
☐ ☐
assignments shall consider the need for single, double
or dormitory assignment or location within the dormitory;
1 This document is intended for use as a tool during the inspection process; this worksheet may not contain each Title 15
regulation that is required. Additionally, many regulations on this worksheet are SUMMARIES of the regulation; the text on this
worksheet may not contain the entire text of the actual regulation. Please refer to the complete California Code of Regulations,
Title 15, Minimum Standards for Juvenile Facilities, Division 1, Chapter 1, Subchapter 5 for the complete list and text of
regulations.
2 This is a modified version of the Procedures Checklist and is only intended for the 2025 Unannounced Inspection of the
Sacramento Secure Youth Treatment Facility.
3 Excerpts from facility policies, procedures, or other reference documents are indicated in italicized text.
7439 Sacramento SYTF UI PRO 25-26 Page 1 of 5 J453 JUV PRO eff. 01.01.25
TITLE 15 SECTION YES NO N/A P/P REFERENCE – COMMENTS3
(b) consider facility populations and physical design of
the facility; ☒ Chapter 21, Purpose and Scope, ¶ 1
☐ ☐
(c) provide that a youth shall be classified upon
admittance to the facility; classification factors shall Chapter 21, Purpose and Scope, ¶ 2
include, but not be limited to: age, maturity,
sophistication, emotional stability, program needs, legal ☒
☐ ☐
status, public safety considerations, medical/mental
health considerations, gender and gender identity of the
youth;
(d) provide for periodic classification reviews, including
provisions that consider the level of supervision and the Chapter 21, Guideline V Classification
youth's behavior while in custody; and, Reviews
The agency reviews all youth classifications a
minimum of every 90 days or when a
significant event occurs. Agency staff and
partners can request a change in
classification when they articulate a need.
We recommended during the Targeted
Inspection in 2024 that the agency consider
adjusting its Security 1 Classification for the
most serious and violent offenders to include
other elements than just the youth’s offense
at admission.
Our review of a draft change in policy allows
for a Security 1 High and Security 1 Low
Classification, to include more opportunities
☒ upon the evaluation of behavior elements and
☐ ☐
progress while in custody. The most notable
issue with the S1 classification was that the
youth only had the opportunity for no-contact
visits. Because of the separation within the
S1 Classification, youth on an S1Low can
have contact visits and may move within the
facility unescorted, if appropriate. The draft
should be operational by June 2025, after
training staff in the new process of
documentation and review.
We feel this modification allows long-term
youth, specifically the SYTF population, more
opportunities for access to family and to gain
responsibilities within their program. The
current policy was not non-compliant, but did
not take into consideration of the youth's
growth in the program to allow for
incentivized opportunities.
7439 Sacramento SYTF UI PRO 25-26 Page 2 of 5 J453 JUV PRO eff. 01.01.25
TITLE 15 SECTION YES NO N/A P/P REFERENCE – COMMENTS3
(e) provide that facility staff shall not separate youth from
the general population or assign youth to a single Chapter 21, Purpose and Scope, ¶ 3
occupancy room based solely on the youth's actual or
perceived race, ethnic group identification, ancestry,
national origin, color, religion, gender, sexual orientation,
☒
gender identity, gender expression, mental or physical ☐ ☐
disability, or HIV status. This section does not prohibit
staff from placing youth in a single occupancy room at
the youth's specific request or in accordance with Title
15 regulations regarding separation.
(f) facility staff shall not consider lesbian, gay, bisexual,
transgender, questioning or intersex identification or Chapter 21, Guideline II-M, 2
status as an indicator of likelihood of being sexually
abusive. ☒ Security 8 Classification is based on
☐ ☐
screenings at admission, factoring in Special
Needs, not for housing decisions.
1361 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
Chapter 33 Grievances
The facility administrator shall develop and implement
Chapter 33, Guideline I-A
written policies and procedures whereby any youth may
Chapter 33, Guideline I-B
appeal and have resolved grievances relating to any
condition of confinement, including but not limited to
We reviewed 45 grievances for the VOYA
health care services, classification decisions, program
program for March and April 2025. We
participation, telephone, mail or visiting procedures,
intended to consider technical assistance
food, clothing, bedding, mistreatment, harassment or
recommendations from the 2024 Targeted
violations of the nondiscrimination policy. There shall be
Inspection to provide a more aggressive
no time limit on filing grievances. Policies and
education to youth regarding a complaint and
procedures shall include provisions whereby the facility
a suggestion, or a request. The agency had
manager ensures:
a process in place, like the Grievance
process called My Voice, which was
supposed to be responsive to youth requests
or suggestions. Over the years, youths would
circle My Voice on the grievance form, but the
noted comments were not grievances of a
condition of confinement. We had suggested
a Youth Council to allow representatives from
each unit/program to have group meetings to
☒
☐ ☐ make requests or suggest changes to the
program.
As such, the agency is moving a Probation
Officer from the field to be in charge of the
program to educate and assist youth using
the Council Person process. By including
youth involvement, it is hoped that the youth
will better communicate with staff and not
automatically file a grievance. Our review of
the 45 VOYA Grievances found 9 were
requests to speak with someone (5) and
requests for something unrelated to
complaints of the facility (4). This is almost
20%, significant if you consider the overall
numbers.
Overall, however, each of the grievances
reviewed was well within regulation timelines,
most being resolved within three to four days.
The facility’s ability to track a youth’s location
7439 Sacramento SYTF UI PRO 25-26 Page 3 of 5 J453 JUV PRO eff. 01.01.25
TITLE 15 SECTION YES NO N/A P/P REFERENCE – COMMENTS3
through the electronic activity tracker,
therefore, this tracker and video are reviewed
by supervising staff to verify the youth’s
statements. This allows for the timely
reconciliation of the youth’s grievance.
We look forward to assessing the Youth
Council Program and the anticipated positive
response from youth. We spoke to three
long-term youths in the facility, and each was
aware of the upcoming change, looking
forward to being a part of the process within
the facility.
(a) a grievance form and instructions for registering a
grievance, which includes provisions for the youth to ☒ Chapter 33, Guideline I-C
☐ ☐
have free access to the form;
(b) the youth shall have the option to confidentially file
the grievance or to deliver the form to any youth ☒ Chapter 33, Guideline II-B
☐ ☐
supervision staff working in the facility;
(c) resolution of the grievance at the lowest appropriate
staff level; ☒ Chapter 33, Purpose and Scope
☐ ☐
(d) provision for a prompt review and initial response to
grievances within three (3) business days, grievances Chapter 33, Guideline II-D
☒
that relate to health and safety issues must be ☐ ☐
addressed immediately;
(1) The youth may elect to be present to explain
his/her version of the grievance to a person not Chapter 33, Guideline II-F
directly involved in the circumstances which led to the ☒ Chapter 33, Guideline II-F, 2-a
☐ ☐
grievance. Chapter 33, Guideline II-F, 2-c
(2) Provision for a staff representative approved by
the facility administrator to assist the youth. ☒ Chapter 33, Guideline II-A
☐ ☐
(e) provision for a written response to the grievance
which includes the reasons for the decisions; ☒ Chapter 33, Guideline III-A, 5
☐ ☐
(f) a system which provides that any appeal of a
grievance shall be heard by a person not directly ☒ Chapter 33, Guideline IV-A
☐ ☐
involved in the circumstances which led to the grievance;
(g) resolution of the grievance must occur within ten (10)
business days unless circumstances dictate a longer ☒ Chapter 33, Guideline II-D
☐ ☐
time frame. The youth shall be notified of any delay; and,
(h) the policy shall provide multiple internal and external
methods to report sexual abuse and sexual harassment. ☒ Chapter 33, Guideline I-C
☐ ☐
Whether or not associated with a grievance, concerns of
parents, guardians, staff or other parties shall be Administrative Policy Reference: Citizen
☒
addressed and documented in accordance with written ☐ ☐ Complaint
policies and procedures within a specified timeframe.
7439 Sacramento SYTF UI PRO 25-26 Page 4 of 5 J453 JUV PRO eff. 01.01.25
TITLE 15 SECTION YES NO N/A P/P REFERENCE – COMMENTS3
1374 VISITING
Chapter 38, Visiting
The facility administrator shall develop and implement
Chapter 38, Guideline I
written policies and procedures for visiting, that include
Chapter 38, Guideline II-A
provisions for special visits. Youth shall be allowed to
Chapter 38, Guideline II-B
receive visits by parents, guardians or persons standing
Chapter 38, Guideline II-C
in loco parentis, and children of youth. Other family
members, such as grandparents and siblings, and
The facility allows approved visitors to come
supportive adults, may be allowed to visit with the
to the facility seven days a week from 8 am to
approval of the facility administrator or designee, and in
8 pm.
conjunction with the youth’s case plan or in the best
interest of the youth.
☒ Our review of this regulation was to confirm
☐ ☐
the transitional change to visiting for S1
youth. The Classification policy, currently in
Draft to become operational in June 2025, will
allow S1 youth with good behavior and
positive status to have contact visits with their
family.
Our interview with three VOYA youth
supported the change in classification to
allow better visits with family.
All visits shall occur at reasonable times, subject only to
the limitations necessary to maintain order and security. Chapter 38, Guideline I
Visitation shall not be denied solely based on the visitor’s Chapter 38, Guideline II-D
criminal history. The staff shall determine in each case,
whether the visitor’s criminal history represents a risk to ☒
☐ ☐
the safety of youth or staff in the facility. Any denial of
visitation or limitation on visitations shall be
communicated to the youth, person denied and facility
administrator.
Opportunity for visitation shall be a minimum of two hours
per week. Visits may be supervised, but conversations Chapter 38, Guideline I
shall not be monitored unless there is a security or safety
need. ☒ Each youth is allowed a 45-minute visit each
☐ ☐
day, with opportunities for five hours and 15
minutes of visits each week.
Provisions for special visits, in addition to the two-hour
minimum and/or outside of the regular visiting hours, shall Chapter 38, Guideline II-A, 5 Special Visits
be accommodated as necessary and within the discretion
of the facility administrator or designee. Family therapy
☒
and professional visits shall be accommodated outside ☐ ☐
the provisions of this regulation. Facilities may provide
visitation opportunities outside of normal visiting hours to
accommodate special visits.
The facility may provide access to technology as an
alternative, but not as a replacement, to in-person visiting. ☒ Chapter 38, Purpose and Scope
☐ ☐
7439 Sacramento SYTF UI PRO 25-26 Page 5 of 5 J453 JUV PRO eff. 01.01.25