All bodies  ›  Board of State and Community Corrections  ›  Tulare PROB (2025-2026 inspection cycle)

BSCC

Tulare PROB (2025-2026 inspection cycle)

Board of State and Community Corrections · inspection-7703-2025-2026 · Juvenile inspection · 2026-04-13 · Tulare PROB

Read the report at Tulare PROB ↗

Initial Inspection Report 2025-2026 Biennial Inspection Cycle Date of Exit Briefing/Notice of Noncompliance: 4/13/2026 Inspection Type: Targeted County: Tulare Facility Name: Tulare County Juvenile Detention Facility BSCC #: 7703 BSCC Type: Juvenile Hall Facility Representative(s): Mike Santos BSCC Field Representative: Eric Raley CAP Day 60 – Maximum Statutory CAP Due/Approval Date: 6/12/2026 Maximum Statutory Resolution Date: 09/10/2026 Current Items of Noncompliance Title 15. Section Description Subsection (a) (1) states: “Room confinement shall not be used before other, less restrictive, options have been attempted and exhausted, unless attempting those options poses a threat to the safety or security of any youth or staff.” During the inspection, multiple dates during the inspection period were identified whereupon some of the youth on a unit remained in their locked rooms while other youth on the unit were out of their rooms; then those youth in their rooms rotated out to the unit while those youth who had been out on the unit were § 1354.5. Room Confinement. locked in their rooms. This was attributed in documentation and interviews to the use of “Split Programming” which was being used to keep youth separate due to tension between various youth on the unit. Additional documentation reviewed used phrases such as “behavior split”, “on a two-way behavior split”, and “on split schedule”. This also resulted in multiple occasions of youth in the unit eating their meals in their locked rooms, rather than eating meals out on the unit, keeping groups of youth separate from other groups of youth. Tulare County Initial Inspection Report Page 2 Title 15. Section Description This constitutes room confinement; however, no documentation was provided indicating the youth in their rooms were on room confinement or that the criteria necessary to meet regulatory requirements for room confinement, such as less restrictive attempts or administrative approval, had been met.