BSCC
Board of State and Community Corrections
Read the report at Board of State and Community Corrections ↗
2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT ACT:
REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMMUNITY
CORRECTIONS PARTNERSHIP PLANS
June 2013
BOARD OF STATE AND
COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
600 Bercut Drive, Sacramento, CA 95811
916.445.5073 PHONE
916.327.3317 FAX
bscc.ca.gov
bscc.ca.gov Local Adult Detention Facilities: The First Year of Public Safety Realignment 1
Leadership Excellence Support
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 1-2
INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 3-6
METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................................... 7
INDIVIDUAL COUNTY PROFILES ......................................................................................... 9-125
BSCC/PPIC RESEARCH INITIATIVE ............................................................................... 126-127
CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................... 128
APPENDIX .............................................................................................................................. 130
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2011 Rea lignment In 2011, Governor Jerry Brown signed Assembly Bill (AB) 109, (Chapter 15, Statutes of
Legislation 2011) a landmark law that gave responsibility for lower level offenders and parolees
(AB 109 , Ch.15, from the state to local jurisdiction. AB 109 and the subsequent related legislation
Statutes of 2011) implemented public safety realignment, the most substantial reform to California’s
criminal justice system to occur in decades. Prevailing concerns surrounding prison
“Realigning low-level overcrowding, recidivism rates, medical care for offenders, the cost of incarceration,
felony offenders who the construction of additional correctional facilities and the state’s economic outlook
do not have prior w e r e paramount topics at the time. Under this platform, the Legislature and the
convictions for serious, Governor enacted public safety realignment with an understanding that California must
violent, or sex offenses reinvest its criminal justice resources to support community-based corrections
to locally run commu- programs, and evidence-based practices that will achieve improved public safety
nity-based corrections r e turns on this state’s substantial investment in its criminal justice system.
programs, which are
strengthened through Public safety realignment empowered each county to make local public safety decisions
community-based b a s e d on local needs. It recognized local community involvement is essential to
punishment, evidence- improving public safety; that diverse approaches would emerge to address public safety;
based practices, a n d that successful offender reintegration into the community could be addressed
improved supervision more efficiently at the local level.
strategies, and
enhanced secured Through June 2013, the evolution of realignment has resulted in significant quantifiable
capacity, will improve measures both at the state and the local level. The passage of Proposition 30 in 2012
public safety outcomes established a dedicated revenue stream to fund public safety services realigned to local
among adult felons government. In FY 2011-12 and FY 2012-13 respectively, counties received
and facilitate their $ 3 5 4 ,300,000 and $842,900,000 statewide for community corrections programs to
reintegration back into support the implementation of public safety realignment. In FYs 2011-12 and 2012-13,
society.” $7,850,0001 was allocated to counties to support each local Community Corrections
Partnership’s (CCP) efforts in developing a local plan for the implementation of
Penal Code § realignment. These allocations have facilitated the implementation of meaningful
17.5(a)(5) systemic change at the local level. Counties have used realignment program dollars in a
variety of ways. Funds have been used for contracts with community-based
organizations, to open
Statewide Allocation for AB 109 Programs
day reporting centers,
$998,900,000.00 facilitate hiring staff at
$842,900,000.00 the local level (e.g.
Victim Witness Advo-
$1,000,000,000.00
cates, Deputy Sheriffs,
Probation Officers, etc.),
$800,000,000.00
support evidence-based
$354,300,000.00 training and program-
$600,000,000.00
ming, facilitate data
collection efforts, as
$400,000,000.00
start up money for sub-
stance abuse and transi-
$200,000,000.00
tional housing needs,
and frequently to begin
$0.00
or expand the use of
FY 2011‐12 FY 2012‐13 FY 2013‐14
risk and needs assess-
ment instruments. Information collected from 57 CCP plans on the use of risk and
1Note that while the Budget authorized $7.9 million, funding is based on a population-based formula and $7.85 million has gone out each year.
1
needs assessment instruments for probation supervision and intervention programs revealed there are
predominately seven instruments in use in California: the Correctional Assessment and Intervention System
(CAIS), the Correctional Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions (COMPAS), the Level of Service/
Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI), the Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R), the Ohio Risk
Assessment System (ORAS), the Static Risk and Offenders Needs Guide (STRONG), and the Wisconsin Risk
Assessment Instrument. More than 50% of counties use the STRONG as the predominant instrument for
probation supervision and intervention programs.
The establishment of CCPs has resulted in creative yet divergent approaches to community-based
corrections statewide, as counties identify the needs of offenders and the types of services the county can
provide and support to improve outcomes and reduce recidivism rates. Qualitatively, local stakeholders from
justice and non-justice professions have met for the first time or expanded the frequency with which they
meet, cross-collaboration among local justice stakeholders and public health officials has increased,
community-based organizations have been invited to participate and contribute in local CCP meetings,
discussions have occurred on what meaningful community reintegration resembles, and tangible cultural shifts
are well underway as dialogue evolves towards using locally collected data to inform local decision making.
Significant accomplishments have been made by CCPs statewide dating back to 2011 when dialogue centered
around what realignment was, how to implement it, where to begin, and how to inform the community about
whether funded efforts have been effective.
In reviewing the realignment implementation plans from all 58 counties for FY 2011-12 and FY 2012-13, we
have identified ways the Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) can assist counties as they
continue to develop approaches for effectively managing offenders in smart and cost effective ways while
protecting public safety, including the following:
1. Facilitate the development of local evaluation methodology.
2. Develop collaborative approaches to data and evaluation.
3. Facilitate sustained local strategic planning and implementation.
4. Continue public education and the implementation of evidence-base practices at the local
level.
5. Provide targeted training and technical assistance throughout the state.
The BSCC will continue to work with counties on these issues. In addition, the Budget Act of 2013 (AB 110,
Chapter 20, Statutes of 2013) appropriates $7,900,000, which will be allocated to those counties that submit
a report to the Board of State and Community Corrections by December 15, 2013, that provides
information about the actual implementation of the Community Corrections Partnership plan accepted by
the County Board of Supervisors. The report shall include, but not be limited to, progress in achieving
outcome measures as identified in the plan or otherwise available.
2
INTRODUCTION
Overview
The enactment of AB 109 (AB 109, Ch. 15, Statutes of 2011) and subsequent related legislation resulted in
fundamental changes to California’s correctional system. Public safety realignment reaffirmed the Legislature’s
commitment to reducing recidivism among criminal offenders, acknowledged that building more prisons and
jails wasn’t the answer, and affirmed that California needed to reinvest its criminal justice resources into cost
effective, community-based corrections programs and evidence-based practices that will improve public
safety outcomes among adult offenders and facilitate their reintegration back into society.
Key components of public safety realignment included the following:
• Revised the definition of a felony to provide that non‐violent, non‐serious, non‐sex offenses are
punishable in county jail.
• Transferred responsibility for post release supervision of lower-level offenders (those released from
prison after having served a sentence for a non-violent, non-serious, and non-high-risk sex offense with
the creation of a Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) offender category.
• Established that all persons released from prison on and after October 1, 2011, after serving a prison
term for a felony, shall upon release from prison and for a period not exceeding three years immediately
following release, be subject to community supervision provided by a county agency designated by each
county’s board of supervisors.
• Enhanced local custody and supervision tools by authorizing counties to use a range of community-based
options, which may be provided by local public safety entities directly or through public or private
correctional service providers and include, but are not limited to, the following:
(A) Flash incarceration is a period of detention in county jail due to a violation of an offender’s
conditions of post release supervision. The length of the detention period can range between one
and ten consecutive days.
(B) Intensive community supervision.
(C) Home detention with electronic monitoring or GPS monitoring.
(D) Mandatory community service.
(E) Restorative justice programs, such as mandatory victim restitution and victim-offender
reconciliation.
(F) Work, training, or education in a furlough program
(G) Work, in lieu of confinement, in a work release program
(H) Day reporting.
(I) Mandatory residential or nonresidential substance abuse treatment programs.
(J) Mandatory random drug testing.
(K) Mother-infant care programs.
(L) Community-based residential programs offering structure, supervision, drug treatment, alcohol
treatment, literacy programming, employment counseling, psychological counseling, mental health
treatment, or any combination of these and other interventions
3
Board of State and Community Corrections
In conjunction with the enactment of AB 109, the Governor signed into law Senate Bill (SB) 92 (Chapter 26,
Statutes of 2011), which established the Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC). The BSCC’s
mission is to provide statewide leadership, coordination, and technical assistance to promote effective state
and local efforts and partnerships to effectively manage California’s adult and juvenile criminal justice
population. The enabling legislation authorizes the BSCC to collect, evaluate, publish, and disseminate
statistics and other information on the condition and progress of criminal justice in the state. It also requires
the BSCC to collect the Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) realignment implementation plans
adopted by each county’s Board of Supervisors, and prepare a report on the implementation of those plans,
effective July 1, 2013, and annually thereafter. This report is the BSCC’s first annual report on the
implementation of the local CCP realignment plans.
Community Corrections Partnership
In 2009, the enactment of SB 678 (Chapter 608, Statutes of 2009) CCP Meeting Frequency
implementing the California Community Corrections
Performance Incentives Act on criminal recidivism introduced the Other
concept of a local community corrections advisory board known as 7%
the CCP. AB 109 required each county’s local CCP to form an
Bi‐Monthly
executive committee to develop and recommend a local plan to the 9%
county board of supervisors (Penal Code section 1230.1). Consistent
with local needs and resources, the plan could include Q u a r t e r l y
recommendations to maximize the effective investment of criminal 46%
justice resources in evidence-based correctional sanctions and Monthly
programs, including, but not limited to, day reporting centers, drug 38%
courts, residential multiservice centers, mental health treatment
programs, electronic and GPS monitoring programs, victim
restitution programs, counseling programs, community service N = 5 5 Responses. This chart does not include
Executive Committee or work group meetings.
programs, educational programs, and work training programs.
CCPs are chaired by the chief probation officer and are comprised of the following membership:
( A) The presiding judge of the superior court, or his or her designee.
(B) A county supervisor or the chief administrative officer for the county or a designee of the board of
supervisors.
(C) The district attorney.
(D) The public defender.
(E) The sheriff.
(F) A chief of police.
(G) The head of the county department of social services.
(H) The head of the county department of mental health.
(I) The head of the county department of employment.
(J) The head of the county alcohol and substance abuse programs.
(K) The head of the county office of education.
(L) A representative from a community-based organization with experience in successfully providing
rehabilitative services to persons who have been convicted of a criminal offense.
(M) An individual who represents the interests of victims.
CCP plans are voted on by the executive committee of each county’s CCP, which consists of the chief
probation officer of the county as chair, a chief of police, the sheriff, the district attorney, the public
defender, the presiding judge of the superior court, or his or her designee, and one department
representative from the head of the county department of social services, the head of the county department
4
of mental health or the head of the county alcohol and substance abuse programs, as designated by the
county board of supervisors for purposes related to the development and presentation of the plan. CCP
plans are deemed to be accepted by the county board of supervisors, unless the board rejects the plan by a
vote of four-fifths of the board, in which case the plan goes back to the CCP executive committee for further
consideration.
Report Intent
This report is intended to provide the reader with a snapshot of each county’s unique experience in
implementing the locally developed CCP realignment implementation plan. BSCC gleaned the information in
the report from reading the 58 county plans for FY 2011-12 and county plans or plan updates submitted to
BSCC for FY 2012-13, as well as follow-up telephone conversations with the chair of each county’s CCP to
confirm, clarify, or add to that information. The report includes which risk and needs assessment instruments
are used by the county; the CCP plan objectives, identified outcomes, outcome measures, and data results;
how the county used the realignment funding; and any revisions the county made to the initial plan for the
second year of implementation.
Using the principles embedded in realignment of local decision making, based on local needs and local system
capacity, the county profiles in this report represent each county’s individual efforts. County to county
comparisons are not a focal point of this report. Each county CCP approached the implementation of
realignment with different needs, resources, perspectives, capacities, and goals. Each CCP profile will be
unique in its content and format, as the CCPs were not provided with a realignment implementation plan
template to follow, nor were the CCPs required to collect or track uniform data, outcomes, or goals, as a
condition of compliance with AB 109. The following caveats and subsequent variances in the CCP profiles in
this report are also important to note:
• CCPs have experienced membership turnover from FY 2011-12 through FY 2012-13, and in some
instances CCP chairs were contacted regarding activities that may have preceded them.
• To provide uniformity in the collection and reporting of CCP activities, BSCC created a template to ask
the same questions of each county. Responses that appear less than voluminous are a reflection of the
lack of a preexisting template and do not reflect a lack of information or show a lack of cooperation by
the CCPs.
• The availability of data and results of outcome measures will vary from each CCP with common
reasons including that the CCP will be meeting at a future date to finalize outcome measures for
collection and tracking, the county was implementing a data collection system at the time this report
was printed and data would be available at a later date, extracting data from an existing database was
labor intensive, data is also available on the Chief Probation Officers of California website, and data
could be found in a county’s end of year report. It is important to note that there is no requirement
for CCPs to provide data or outcome measures results to the BSCC.
• CCPs were not required to revise or draft new CCP plans beyond year one of AB 109 (FY 2011-12)
and the absence of information does not reflect a lack of information or show a lack of cooperation by
the CCPs.
• Allocation recommendations are reflective of the local decision-making process.
• The Budget Act of 2013 appropriates $7,900,000, which will be allocated to those counties that
submit a report to the Board of State and Community Corrections by December 15, 2013, that
provides information about the actual implementation of the Community Corrections Partnership
5
plan accepted by the County Board of Supervisors. The report shall include, but not be limited to,
progress in achieving outcome measures as identified in the plan or otherwise available.
• Allocation of public safety realignment funds is diverse, some counties allocate funds to local
stakeholders based on an existing need, some have identified a need they would like to address (e.g.
Day Reporting Center, purchase of a case management system, etc.) and direct funds accordingly, and
a variety of other decision making models are also utilized.
• This report includes information provided to the BSCC from October 2011 through June 2013. As
CCP members have engaged in countless meetings, subgroup sessions, activities, and conversations
over this time, despite the BSCC’s best efforts all activities will not be captured in this report.
• CCP plans may also be accessed electronically from the BSCC website.
In addition to the information included in this report, the BSCC also asked questions of the county CCPs
related to their training and technical assistance needs. That information is not the focus of this report and is
not included in this report. The BSCC will compile, analyze, and use that information in consultation with its
justice system partners to develop and provide individualized technical assistance to county CCPs, develop
and support training events to address common needs between counties, and facilitate information sharing in
FY 2013-14 and beyond.
As the BSCC works with stakeholders to refine its approach in the gathering and evaluation of available
realignment data and information, the composition of future CCP realignment implementation plan reports
will continue to evolve. For example, an analysis of FY 2011-12 and FY 2012-13 CCP plans revealed counties
identified a range of outcomes (qualitative) and outcome measures (quantitative) during the first two years of
realignment. Prevalent themes included implementation of a streamlined and efficient system to manage
additional responsibilities under realignment, implementation of a system that maintains public safety and
utilizes evidence-based practices/best practices in recidivism reduction, implementation of a system that
effectively utilizes alternatives to pretrial and post-conviction incarceration, where appropriate; development
of recidivism rates for offenders, provision of evidence-based training for staff and community partners, and
identification of socioeconomic measures, including but not limited to mental health and transitional housing
needs.
In FY 2011-12 and FY 2012-13 CCPs also reported use of a range of evidence-based tools and programs,
including but not limited to, Motivational Interviewing Techniques, Cognitive Thinking Behavior Therapy,
Thinking for a Change curriculum, Courage to Change Interactive Journaling, and the continued use or
implementation of risk/needs assessments.
6
METHODOLOGY
Penal Code Section 6027(b)(10) requires the Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) to submit
a report to the Office of the Governor and the Legislature by July 1, 2013, and annually thereafter, on the
implementation of the plans submitted to the BSCC by each county’s Community Corrections Partnership
(CCP). The following steps were undertaken to gather the information contained in this report.
• CCP plans were submitted to the BSCC from all counties in year one.
• CCPs submitted a variation of plans, emails, budget documents and supplemental information to the
extent available to the BSCC in year two regarding their CCP plans.
• BSCC staff read each CCP plan and corresponding correspondence for year one and year two.
• Subsequently, BSCC developed a format to report each county’s response. To further reduce the
workload on CCPs, BSCC pre-populated information based on year one, and if applicable, year two
CCP plans submitted to the BSCC.
• To further streamline the collection of this information, BSCC contacted each CCP Chair to provide
input on behalf of the CCP, to discuss the pre-populated information gathered from year one and
year two CCP plans, and to afford the county an opportunity to review and edit language to ensure
its accuracy.
Penal Code (PC)1170(h)(5) describes sentencing options available to each county on or after October 1, 2011. Several counties
capture this PC in divergent manners (e.g., 1170h, 1170(h), etc.) however the variations reference the same PC. The following
pages include PC variations to accurately convey county reporting.
7
This page intentionally left blank.
8
INDIVIDUAL COUNTY PROFILES
9
Community
Corrections
ALAMEDA COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
LaDonna Harris*
Chief Probation Officer The Alameda CCP convenes monthly. The membership roster is listed in the left hand
Chair column.
Adrianne Forshay* Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Presiding judge or designee
Kai Mander Alameda County utilizes an internal risk assessment tool designed in conjunction with
County supervisor or chief the National Council on Crime and Delinquency for probation supervision and
administrative officer or
intervention programs.
designee
CCP Objectives
Nancy O'Malley*
District Attorney
• Protect the public through transparent and accountable administration and service.
Brendon Woods*
• Ensure effective and supportive transitions from detention to the community.
Public Defender
• Develop innovative and therapeutic supports for clients focused on health, housing,
Gregory Ahern* and improving access to family sustaining employment.
Sheriff
Michael Noonan* CCP Data Collection
Sean Whent
Chief of Police
The county collects the following offender related data:
Lori Cox
Department of • Post-Release Community Supervision (PRCS) - Total number of clients received,
Social Services
inactive cases/warrant bank, cases closed, pending cases, terminations at 6 months,
terminations at 1 year, transfers out of Alameda County, and transfers into
Alex Briscoe*
Departments of Mental Alameda County
Health and Alcohol and
• Violations Filed on PRCS Clients - Total violations filed to date, new arrests, no
Substance Abuse Programs
shows, AWOLs, and other violations
Nick Schultz • Average caseload size per Deputy Probation Officer
Department of
• Total cases actively supervised in the community
Employment
• Violations for new arrests
Sheila Jordan • Violation rate for PRCS clients
County Office of Education
• Percent of violation types
Jerry Macklin • Individual Achievement Plan (IAP) initial top need
Community-based • PRCS offenders received from the California Department of Corrections and
organization
Rehabilitation (CDCR) vs. estimate
• City of release for PRCS clients
Harold Boscovich
Victims’ interests • PRCS client prior conviction history
• Average days in CDCR custody for PRCS clients
*Indicates member of the PRCS Caseload Data October 2011 – March 2013
Executive Committee
• Total clients received - 1,102
• Total inactive cases/warrant bank - 38
• Total cases closed - 401
• Total pending cases - 80
• Terminations at 6 months - 117
• Terminations at 1 year - 99
• Transfers out of Alameda County - 90
• Transfers into Alameda County - 93 10
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
Alameda County allocated funding to support the following:
• 6 Deputy Probation Officers
• 2 Clerical Support positions
• A Realignment Coordinator
• A housing services contract
• An employment services contract
• Implementation of individual case plans for all offenders
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $10,381,180 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $29,795,718
$200,000
Planning
$200,000
$650,650
Training*
$0
$4,000,000
Sheriff**
$20,300,000
$2,500,000
Probation
$1,700,000
$250,000
Public Defender ***
$250,000
$330,530
DA/PD****
$395,718
$250,000
District Attorney
$250,000
$2,200,000
CBO(s)+
$6,700,000
*Training and retention purposes
**Sheriff In‐Custody Supervision
***Public Defender includes community‐based supervision and supports
****District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
+Community‐Based Organization(s), includes behavioral health contracts
11
Community
Corrections
ALPINE COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Gordon Morse*
Chief Probation Officer The Alpine CCP membership roster is listed in the left hand column.
Chair
Dave DeVore* CCP Goals
Presiding judge or designee
• Maintain offender accountability and public safety.
Pamerla Knorr
Health and Human Services • Responsibly manage impact on jail population capacity.
• Successful alternative sentencing options.
Terese Drabec*
• Inspire public confidence.
District Attorney
• Offender rehabilitation.
Rick Meyer*
Public Defender
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
John Crawford*
Sheriff
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $185,064 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2)+
Sheriff
$130,906
$36,085
Probation
$8,434
Health Services
$2,756
DA/PD*
$2,628
$6,883
Community‐Based**
+Year two CCP budget allocations were not provided at the time this report was prepared.
*District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
**Community‐Based Services and Supports
*Indicates member of the
Executive Committee
12
This page intentionally left blank.
13
Community
Corrections
AMADOR COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Mark Bonini*
Chief Probation Officer The Amador CCP convenes monthly. The membership roster is listed in the left hand
Chair column.
Barbara Cockerham*
Presiding judge or designee Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Vacant
County supervisor or chief Amador County utilizes the Correctional Assessment and Intervention System (CAIS)
administrative officer or instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs and the Virginia
designee
Pretrial Risk Assessment Instrument for pretrial supervision decisions.
Todd Riebe*
District Attorney
CCP Objectives
Randall Shrout*
Public Defender
• Effectively monitor the Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) population.
Martin Ryan* • Effectively monitor the mandatory supervision population.
Sheriff
• Run an effective pretrial supervision program.
Scott Morrison* • Run an effective Moral Recognition Therapy program for the realigned population.
Chief of Police
• Have a positive effect on the jail population.
Jim Foley*
Departments of
Social Services
CCP Data Collection (not exhaustive)
Vacant
Department of
The county collects offender data in the following categories:
Mental Health
Vacant • PRCS violations
Department of
• 1170(h) violations
Employment
• Split sentences
Vacant • Mentally Disordered Offenders
Department of Alcohol and
• Electronic monitoring
Substance Abuse Programs
• Flash incarceration
Vacant • Mandatory supervision
County Office of Education
• PRCS offenders received from the California Department of Corrections and
Vacant Rehabilitation (CDCR) vs. estimate
Community-based • PRCS cases transferred in and out of county
organization
• Warrants
Vacant • Terminations
Victims’ interests
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
*Indicates member of the
Executive Committee
• Approved an allocation of $100,000 to the Sheriff’s Department for jail beds.
14
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $701,328 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $1,251,879
$19,482
DA/PD*
$21,550
$681,846
Programming**
$1,230,329
*District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
**Programming, training and planning funds ‐ Amador County approaches the Community Corrections budget as a task
force and funds those functions and/or staff as needed. If a need arises, it is brought to the CCP and if allowed, is
funded.
15
Community
Corrections
BUTTE COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Steve Bordin*
Chief Probation Officer The Butte CCP convenes bi-monthly. The membership roster is listed in the left hand column.
Chair
Stephen Benson * Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Presiding judge or designee
Butte County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG) instrument for
Paul Hahn
County supervisor or chief probation supervision and intervention programs and the Ohio Risk Assessment System
administrative officer or (ORAS) with the jail population regarding release decisions.
designee
Mike Ramsey* Outcome Measures Identified in FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
District Attorney and
Victims’ interests
• Released offender engagement in and compliance with locally available services and
Ron Reed* programs (i.e., day reporting center programs).
Public Defender • Recidivism rates for non-violent, non-serious, non-sex offenders, cross-tabulated by
offense, criminal history, engagement in the local treatment processes, and other measures
Jerry Smith*
of compliance and utilization of services.
Sheriff
• Recidivism rates for Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) participants currently
Gary Keeler* under Butte County jurisdiction.
Chief of Police • Released offenders employed or engaged in job training or school, and living in stable
housing.
Anne Robin*
Departments of Social • Released offenders enrolled in entitlement programs for which they qualify (i.e., Office of
Services, Mental Health, Veterans Affairs, Medi-Cal, SSI).
and Alcohol and Substance • Number and type of offenders sentenced to county jail and state prison, cross-tabulated by
Abuse Programs
descriptive information on each offender.
• Number and type of offenders sentenced to probation or alternative programs, cross-
Cathi Grams
Department of tabulated by descriptive information on each offender.
Employment • Released offender and family member assessments of the transfer to county control and
local engagement process.
Tim Taylor
• Butte County partner satisfaction, i.e., probation officers, deputies, behavioral health
County Office of Education
clinicians, with the effectiveness of strategies and mechanisms that have been developed to
Vacant collaboratively address realignment.
Community-based • Successful completion of programming for PRCS and 1170(h) offenders.
organization
Outcome Measure Results for FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
Reporting Period 10/1/2011 to 9/30/2012
*Indicates member of the
Executive Committee
• During the reporting period, 186 inmates were transferred into the Sheriff's Alternative
Custody Program (ACS) and participated in the Day Reporting Center (DRC). In addition,
participants were allowed to attend narcotics anonymous and alcoholics anonymous
support groups at the DRC and in the community.
• During the reporting period, and as referenced in the Chico State Study dated 4/10/13, the
ACS population had a 14% recidivism rate based on arrests for new charges.
• 6 Month Felony Recidivism Rate for PRCS Population is 8.1%, based on 306 PRCS clients
released from CDCR between 10/1/2011 and 6/30/2012 who were convicted in Butte
County of a felony within 6 months of release. 12 month felony recidivism rate for PRCS
Population is 16.2%, based on 130 PCS clients released from CDCR between 10/1/2011
and 12/31/2012 who were convicted in Butte County of a felony within 12 months of
release.
16
Outcome Measure Results for FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
(continued)
Reporting Period 10/1/2011 to 9/30/2012
• During the reporting period, approximately 25% of the ACS population were employed or going to school. Based
on ACS program requirements, all participants must have stable housing prior to entering the alternative custody
program.
• During the reporting period, 3 ACS participants were enrolled in and connected to the Office of Veterans Affairs.
Based on the custodial nature of the ACS participants, most participants do not qualify for entitlement programs.
• During the reporting period, 310 offenders were sentenced to county jail. Of that amount, approximately 7% were
sentenced to mandatory supervision. 266 offenders were sentenced to state prison, of whom, 58% will be returned
to Butte County and supervised by probation under PRCS.
• During the reporting period, 182 offenders were transferred to the ACS program and assessed for services that
were provided at the DRC.
• The Butte County CCP and all the collaborative partners have successfully worked together to implement multiple
strategies to address the impacts of AB 109 and are satisfied with the strategies that have been implemented thus
far. Additional strategies using the latest data and research are continuing to be explored to address the complex
needs of the population.
• During the reporting period, 55 PRCS clients successfully complied with the conditions of their probation,
completed any program requirements, and were discharged from supervision. Further information regarding
offenders sentenced under Penal Code 1170(h) was not available at the time this report was completed.
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
• The Probation Department, Behavioral Health Department and Sheriff’s Department received an increase in
budget line items to hire additional staff.
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $2,631,112 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $6,619,688
$83,203
DESS*
$171,195
$1,821,612
Sheriff
$3,719,370
$628,228
Probation
$1,362,507
$0
Mental Health Agency
$1,256,401
$98,069
DA/PD**
$110,215
*Department of Employment and Social Services
**District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
17
Community
Corrections
CALAVERAS COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Stephen Siegel*
Interim Chief Probation The Calaveras CCP convenes bi-monthly. The membership roster is listed in the left
Officer hand column.
Chair
Hugh Swift* Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Presiding judge or designee
Lori Norton Calaveras County utilizes the Correctional Offender Management Profiling for
County supervisor or chief Alternative Sanctions (COMPAS) instrument for probation supervision and
administrative officer or
intervention programs and with the jail population for release decisions.
designee
Barbara Yook*
District Attorney CCP Objectives
Scott Gross*
Public Defender • Develop outcome measures and data elements to be collected.
• Revise original CCP Plan to reflect the reality of committee meetings and their
Gary Kuntz*
procedures, outcome measures, and the Day Reporting Center.
Sheriff
• Develop jail reentry programs.
Todd Fordahl*
Chief of Police
FY 2011-12 (Year 1) Goals
Mary Sawicki
Department of
• Successfully hire and train staff.
Social Services
• Conduct safety/crisis intervention training.
Colleen Tracy* • Develop and implement a Day Reporting Center and reentry curriculum.
Department of
• Identify eligible participants for the Day Reporting Center.
Mental Health
• Open the Day Reporting Center.
Elena Linehan • Create data tracking methods.
Department of
• Develop methods for increasing CCP member collaboration and information
Employment
sharing.
David Sackman • Conduct community outreach regarding approaches and anticipated outcomes.
Department of Alcohol and
Substance Abuse Programs
CCP Data Collection (not exhaustive)
Kathy Northington
County Office of Education
The county collects the following offender related data:
Kelly Fraguero
Community-based • Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) population profile stats: Number of
organization and
flash incarcerations; revocations filed; arrests/citations; referrals made to the Day
Victims’ interests
Reporting Center and other partner agencies such as mental health; substance
abuse; housing assistance; employment services and adult education.
*Indicates member of the • Mandatory supervision population profile stats: Number of revocations filed;
Executive Committee arrests/citations; referrals made to Day Reporting Center and other partner
agencies such as mental health; substance abuse; housing assistance; employment
services; adult education.
• Jail AB 109 population stats.
18
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
Calaveras County allocated funding to support the following:
• 1.5 FTE Correctional Officer
• 1.45 FTE Probation Aide
• 0.75 FTE Substance Abuse Counselor III
• Funding for a Day Reporting Center Contract with BI, Inc. Programs provided at the Day Reporting
Center will include cognitive behavioral therapy, substance abuse counseling, GED tutoring, and
employment readiness training among others.
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $373,329 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $928,245
$100,000
Planning $100,000
$24,750
Training*
$24,000
Law Enforcement** $80,000
$0
Day Reporting Center $91,350
$353,366
Sheriff $31,322
$249,454
Probation $26,526
$138,154
Behavioral Health $2,191
$49,387
$12,573
DA/PD***
$13,885
Contingency**** $2,500
$0
CBO+ $2,117
$0
*Allocation for training and retention purposes
**Law Enforcement Reimbursement Emergency Fund
***District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
****Contingency Fund ‐ Housing Reimbursement Emergency Fund
+Community‐Based Organization ‐ Job Connection
19
Community
Corrections
COLUSA COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
William Fenton*
Interim Chief Probation
Officer The Colusa CCP convenes quarterly. The membership roster is listed in the left hand
Chair column.
Jeffrey Thompson*
Presiding judge or designee Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Kim Dolbow Vann
County supervisor or chief Colusa County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG)
administrative officer or instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs.
designee
John Poyner* CCP Objectives
District Attorney
Albert Smith* • Develop additional resources for all adult offenders.
Public Defender -
• Further integrate and utilize evidence-based practices.
Contracted Services
• Further utilize risk/need matrixes.
Scott Marshall* • Continue to train all staff in Motivational Interviewing.
Sheriff
• Attend the Chief Probation Officers of California AB 109 Realignment Series.
Jim Sasso*
Chief of Police
Elizabeth Kelly* Outcomes Identified in FY 2011-12 and FY 2012-13
Department of
Social Services
• Identify relevant processes and practices.
Terence Rooney • Re-evaluate offenders with risk assessment tool at six months or with new law
Department of violation.
Mental Health
• Subsequent sentencing of offenders according to risk/need.
Vacant
Department of
Employment Outcome Results for FY 2011-12 and FY 2012-13
Vacant
Department of Alcohol and • 100% of the offenders remain in high risk supervision.
Substance Abuse Programs
• Successful termination due to compliance at 6-9 months.
Kay Spurgeon • Successful termination due to compliance after one year of probation supervision.
County Office of Education
Laura Ceccon FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
Cricket Razo
Community-based
The county allocated funding to support the following:
organization
Vacant • .25 FTE Educator position to the County Office of Education
Victims’ interests
• .5 FTE Correctional Officer
• Day Reporting Center, which opened in January 2013
*Indicates member of the
Executive Committee
20
CCP Data Collection (not exhaustive)
Colusa County collects offender data in the following categories:
• Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) violations
• 1170(h) violations
• Split sentencing
• Electronic monitoring/GPS
• Flash incarceration
• Mandatory supervision
• Offenders received from the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) vs.
estimate
• Warrants
• Terminations
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $286,156 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $440,235
$40,290
Other
$34,728
$32,000
Sheriff
$142,869
$206,182
Probation
$254,462
$7,684
DA/PD*
$8,176
*District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
21
Community
Corrections
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Philip Kader*
Chief Probation Officer The Contra Costa CCP convenes monthly. The membership roster is listed in the left
Chair hand column.
Mimi Lyster
Zemmelman* Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Presiding judge or designee
David Twa Contra Costa County utilizes the Correctional Assessment and Intervention System
County supervisor or chief (CAIS) instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs. The county
administrative officer or
uses internal risk assessment instruments for the jail population regarding release
designee
decisions and referrals to in-custody programs.
Mark Peterson*
District Attorney
CCP Objectives
Robin Lipetzky*
Public Defender • Increase public safety.
• Following arrest, better identify persons who can safely be released and those
David Livingston*
Sheriff who should be held in physical custody pretrial so as to reduce the pretrial jail
population to maximize capacity for the sentenced AB 109 population.
Chris Magnus*
• Provide timely, informed, and appropriate adjudication of all cases.
Chief of Police
• Utilize evidence-based practices in sentencing.
Cynthia Belon*
• Maintain safe facilities (in and out of custody) for inmates, visitors, and staff.
Departments of Social
Services, Mental Health, • House AB 109 inmates in the rated facility appropriate for their classification.
and Alcohol and Substance
• Ensure that programs and services are responsive to individual needs.
Abuse Programs
• Establish and maintain an entry point to an integrated reentry system of care.
Kathy Gallagher • Maximize public safety, accountability, and service referrals.
Department of
• Assist in providing access to a continuum of reentry and reintegration services.
Employment
• Provide and enhance integrated programs and services for successful reentry of
Joseph Ovick
the AB 109 population.
County Office of Education
• Increase mentoring, encourage family and community engagement in reentry and
Willie Moffett reintegration.
Community-based
• Use and encourage professional training to advance system-wide knowledge.
organization
• Maximize interagency coordination.
Deborah Levine
• Institute use of data collection and analysis across system of care.
Victims’ interests
Outcomes Identified in FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
*Indicates member of the
Executive Committee • Implement a system that protects public safety and utilizes best practices in
recidivism reduction.
• Develop a system that uses alternatives to pretrial and post-conviction
incarceration, where appropriate.
22
Outcome Results for FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
• Increased collaboration by local stakeholders is resulting in comprehensive responses to public safety
needs. Systemic adjustments will continue to be made, as needed.
• The District Attorney’s Office, Public Defender’s Office and the Court implemented the, Arraignment
Court Early Representation (ACER) during 2013, to efficiently manage court appearances and the use of
jail space.
CCP Data Collection
Contra Costa County collects the following offender data:
• Recidivism Outcomes - Number of arrests for technical violations; arrests for new law violations;
convictions for technical violations; convictions for new law violations; number of flash incarcerations;
days detained in jail for flash incarcerations; county jail sentences for new law violations; days sentenced
in county jail for new law violations; probation revocations; clients completing probation; and clients
sentenced to state prison.
• Quality of Life Outcomes - Number and percent of clients maintaining sobriety, as evidenced by urinalysis
test results, clients with appropriate housing; clients working (full-time); clients working (part-time);
clients enrolled in MediCal; and clients completing Clean Slate.
• Average time in-custody
• Offenders sentenced to county jail
• Flash incarceration - Number of jail beds
• Split sentences
• Parolees pending hearing
• Successful completion
• Terminations
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds FY 2012-13 CCP Plan
Revisions
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $4,736,869 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $15,664,411
Allocated funding for the following
new staff positions:
$895,109
Health Services
$2,132,000 • 30 to the Sheriff’s Department
$2,489,750
Sheriff • 13.45 to the Probation
Department
$1,025,596 $6,413,000
Probation
$2,338,000 • 9.25 to the Behavioral Health
$94,995 Department
Public Defender
$778,000
• 5 to the District Attorney's
$163,919
DA/PD* Office
$206,911
$67,500 • 5 to the Public Defender's Office
District Attorney
$753,000 • 2 to the County Administrator’s
Contingency** $0 Office
$3,000,000
$0
CBO(s)***
$43,500
*District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
**Contingency Fund (portion of allocation designated for pretrial services)
***Community‐Based Organization(s)
23
Community
Corrections
DEL NORTE COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Linda Sanford*
Acting Chief Probation The Del Norte CCP convenes quarterly. The membership roster is listed in the left
Officer hand column.
Chair
Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
William Follett*
Presiding judge or designee
Del Norte County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG)
Jay Sarina
County supervisor or chief instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs.
administrative officer or
designee
CCP Objectives
Katie Micks*
Acting District Attorney
• Successful termination of offenders.
Darren McElfresh* • Increase the use of Motivational Interviewing.
Public Defender
Dean Wilson* Outcome Measures Identified in FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
Sheriff
• Number of law enforcement contacts
Doug Plack*
Chief of Police • Number of completions
• Number of failures
Gary Blatnick*
Departments of, Social CCP Data Collection
Services, Mental Health,
a
A
n
b
d
u s
A
e
l c
P
o
r
h
o
o
g
l
r a
a
m
nd
s
Substance
The county collects the following offender data:
Vacant
Department of • Post Release Community Supervision: Recidivism data for offenders to include the
Employment number of technical violations, technical violations diverted from incarceration,
number of offenders referred to different programs and services, successful
Donnie Olsen
County Office of Education completion of programs, successful completion of probation, number of offenders
contacted, types of contact (phone, in person, etc.), violation for which contact was
Sandy Morrison
initiated, and number of contacts per offender.
Community-based
organization • Jail/Contract Beds: Number of offenders sentenced to jail, length of stay for
offenders, number of inmates released to alternative custody options, number of
Jodi Hoone
beds occupied by offenders and number of flash incarcerations
Victims’ interests
• Work Release: Number of offenders participating in work release and number of
offenders successfully completing work release.
• Mandatory Home Detention with Electronic Monitoring: Number of offenders
*Indicates member of the
participating, number of offenders who violate home detention requirements, and
Executive Committee
number of offenders successfully completing.
• Other Programs and Services: Number of law enforcement contacts, number of
completions, and number of failures.
24
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
• In December 2012, the Day Reporting Center opened.
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $345,000 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $653,646
$100,000
Planning*
$100,000
$35,559
Sheriff
$78,807
$201,503
Probation **
$466,152
$7,938
DA/PD***
$8,687
*Allocation for CCP planning (one‐time)
**Probation ‐ Year 1 funding includes evidence‐based practices training and a vehicle for the field. Year 2 funding
includes a day reporting center and cognitive behavioral therapy groups.
***District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
25
Community
Corrections
EL DORADO COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Gregory Sly*
Chief Probation Officer
The El Dorado CCP convenes quarterly. The membership roster is listed in the left
Chair
hand column.
Jackie Davenport*
Presiding judge or designee
Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Don Ashton
County supervisor or chief
El Dorado County utilizes the Correctional Offender Management Profiling for
administrative officer or
designee Alternative Sanctions (COMPAS) instrument for probation supervision and
intervention programs, jail population release decisions, and referral to in-custody
Vern Pierson*
programs.
District Attorney and
Victims’ interests
CCP Objectives
Teri Monterosso*
Public Defender
• Open the Community Corrections Center.
John D’Agostini*
• Prepare and plan for the increased medical costs and needs related to AB 109.
Sheriff
• Identify data needs and conduct analysis of data.
George Nielsen*
Brian Uhler
Chief of Police CCP Data Collection (not exhaustive)
Jan Walker-Conway*
Departments of Social The county collects offender data in the following categories:
Services, Mental Health,
Employment, and Alcohol
• Number and type of offenders
and Substance Abuse
Programs • Number of interventions
• Transitional planning
David Publicover
• Referrals for post release services
County Office of Education
• Electronic monitoring
Judy Strauss • Violations
Community-based
• Flash incarceration
organization
• Recidivism
• Warrants
*Indicates member of the
• Terminations
Executive Committee
• Numbers of referrals to Health and Human Services
• Types of referrals to Health and Human Services
• Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) contacts
• Mandatory supervision contacts
• PRCS and state parole offenders in jails
26
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
El Dorado County allocated funding to support the following:
• 1 FTE to collect data (assigned to the Chief Administrative Office)
• 8 FTE Correctional Officer
• 3 FTE Deputy Probation Officer and 1 FTE Supervising Probation Officer
• The Community Corrections Center (transition and reporting center), which is tentatively scheduled to
open August 2013
• l FTE mental health staff at the Community Corrections Center under the direction of the Health and
Human Services Agency
• $400,000 for contracted services for inpatient, out-patient, residential, counseling, drug treatment,
transitional housing, rehabilitation services, and mental health interventions
• $100,000 for services to include individual and group counseling, programs, education, assessment, and
case planning
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $1,254,039 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $3,379,722
$50,000
Law Enforcement*
$50,000
$274,066
HHS**
$981,308
$464,033
Sheriff
$1,193,000
$422,544
Probation***
$1,105,000
$43,396
DA/PD****
$50,414
*Local Law Enforcement Enhancement
**Health and Human Services Department, includes Mental Health and community‐based organizations in Year 2
***Probation includes allocation for transitional housing in Year 1
****District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
27
Community
Corrections
FRESNO COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Linda Penner*
Chief Probation Officer The Fresno CCP convenes monthly. The membership roster is listed in the left hand
Chair column.
Sheran Morton*
Presiding judge or designee Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
John Navarrette
Fresno County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG)
Jeannie Figueroa
County supervisor or chief instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs, the Offender Needs
administrative officer or
Guide for the jail population regarding release decisions and referral to in-custody
designee
programs, and the Virginia Pretrial Risk Assessment Instrument for court pretrial
Elizabeth Egan* release decisions.
District Attorney
Kenneth Taniguchi* CCP Objectives
Public Defender
Margaret Mims* • Expand services to non-mentally ill and non-drug addicted offenders.
Sheriff • Expand the amount of available beds for the homeless population.
Jerry Dyer*
Chief of Police CCP Data Collection
Howard Himes
Department of Social The county collects the following offender data:
Services and Department
of Employment
• Warrants - Out of contact, out of contact/deported, new misdemeanor offense,
Donna Taylor* new felony offense, and technical violations
Department of • Average caseload
Mental Health
• Offender characteristics (Probation)
Dennis Koch • Offender characteristics (County Jail)
Department of Alcohol and • Split sentences
Substance Abuse Programs
• Flash incarcerations
Pam Coronado • Revocation hearings
County Office of Education • Offenders received from the California Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation (CDCR) vs. estimate
Shawn Riggins
Community-based • Offender risk level
organization • Program referral
• Mandatory supervision
Pam Colson
Laurie Willits
Victims’ interests
*Indicates member of the
Executive Committee
28
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
Fresno County allocated funding to support the following:
• Expansion of behavioral health contracts to meet growing needs
• Adult Compliance Team to address overtime costs
• Jail medical services
• Probation supervision and referral services - Provision of in and out of custody services in conjunction
with the Fresno Sheriff's Department and the Department of Behavioral Health for Turning Point of
Central California
• Fresno County Probation Pretrial Services program, which became operational in September, 2012
• Fresno County was selected in 2012 by the National Institute of Corrections (NIC) and the Urban
Institute (UI) to be a part of the national Transition from Jail to Community (TJC) Initiative. The NIC and
UI partnered together in 2007 to launch their initiative in response to the need for jurisdictions across
the country to address jail/community transition. The TJC initiative involves the development,
implementation, and evaluation of a model for jail to community transition. It is not a discrete program;
it is a new way of doing business that entails systems change and the development of collaborative
relationships between jail and community partners. The goal of the TJC model is to improve public safety
and reintegration outcomes (http://www.urban.org/projects/tjc/)
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $9,155,182 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $20,004,085
$424,620
Public Health
$2,077,740
$95,247
Fresno Police $151,277
$93,924
Clovis Police
$157,727
$517,216
Evidence‐Based*
$1,538,246
$100,000
Day Reporting**
$0
$75,000
Contracted Program ***
$0
$5,256,380
Sheriff
$2,146,001 $11,215,671
Probation
$4,303,612
$316,814
DA/PD+
$363,175
$129,980
District Attorney
$196,637
*Evidenced‐based treatment
**Day Reporting Center
***Contracted program evaluation
+District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
29
Community
Corrections
GLENN COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Brandon Thompson*
Chief Probation Officer
Chair The Glenn CCP convenes bi-monthly. The membership roster is listed in the left hand
column.
Janelle Bartlett*
Presiding judge or designee
Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
John Viegas
County supervisor or chief
Glenn County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG)
administrative officer or
designee instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs and the Ohio Risk
Assessment System (ORAS) Pretrial Tool for court pretrial release decisions.
Robert Maloney*
District Attorney
CCP Objectives
Albert Smith*
Public Defender
Identify and close service delivery gaps in an effort to provide comprehensive services
Larry Jones*
to offenders.
Sheriff
Outcomes Identified in FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
Jason Dahl*
Interim Chief of Police
Scott Gruendl* • Implementation of a streamlined and efficient system to manage the additional
Departments of Social
responsibilities under realignment.
Services, Mental Health,
and Alcohol and Substance • Implementation of a system that maintains public safety and utilizes evidence-based
Abuse Programs practices/best practices in recidivism reduction.
• Implementation of a system that effectively utilizes alternatives to pretrial and
Lucy Hernandez
Department of post-conviction incarceration, where appropriate.
Employment
Outcome Results Identified for FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
Tracey Quarne
County Office of Education
• The development of a streamlined and efficient system continues to evolve as
weekly meetings are held with the Probation Department, Sheriff’s Department,
Sharon Darsey
Community-based Department of Mental Health and the Social Services Department to delve into
organization
case management. During these meetings conversations are held surrounding
existing service delivery gaps and methods to address them.
Lucy Hernandez
Victims’ interests • The Probation Department has adopted the STRONG to assess the needs of
offenders and continues to develop case plans based on offenders’ primary
criminogenic needs.
• The CCP has allocated $160,000 to the Sheriff’s Department for the development
*Indicates member of the of a pretrial program.
Executive Committee
30
CCP Data Collection (not exhaustive)
Glenn County’s realignment related data collection included the following:
• Percentage of offenders successfully completing traditional felony probation supervision, N3 (non-violent,
non-serious, non-sex offenders) supervision, and Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) supervision
• Felony recidivism rates for traditional felony probation, N3, and parolees now under county jurisdiction
(PRCS)
• Misdemeanor recidivism rates for felony probation, N3, and parolees now under county jurisdiction
(PRCS)
• Number and type of offenders sentenced to county jail and state prison
• Number and type of offenders sentenced to probation or alternative programs
• Percentage of PRCS, N3, and traditional probation offenders participating/completing treatment referral,
employed at time of grant/release and quarterly thereafter, and participating in and successfully
completing GPS/Early Release (ER) alternative release programs
• Percentage of GPS or other ER program slot days used
• Percentage of offenders on GPS programs/percentage of offenders on other ER programs (types of
programs)
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
Glenn County allocated funding to support the following:
• $160,000 for the development of a pretrial program
• 1 FTE Deputy Sheriff to administer the pretrial program
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $343,145 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $742,407
$2,000
Police*
$4,000
$62,949
Human Resource/Health**
$150,952
$37,306
Sheriff
$196,913
$229,015
Probation
$11,875 $365,555
DA/PD***
$12,892
$0
Contingency Fund
$12,095
*Willows and Orland Police Departments
**Human Resource Agency/Health Services
***District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
31
Community
Corrections
HUMBOLDT COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Bill Damiano*
The Humboldt CCP convenes monthly. The membership roster is listed in the left
Chief Probation Officer
hand column.
Chair
Kerri Keenan*
Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Presiding judge or designee
Philip Smith-Hanes
Humboldt County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG)
County supervisor or chief
administrative officer or instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs and the Ohio Risk
designee Assessment System (ORAS) Pretrial Tool for court pretrial release decisions.
Paul Gallegos*
District Attorney
CCP Objectives
Kevin Robinson*
Public Defender
• Fully implement the FY 2012-13 CCP Plan.
Michael Downey* • Reconfigure current pretrial program with assistance from the Crime and Justice
Sheriff
Institute.
Bret Smith* • Employ a data consultant to conduct a review of data for the first 15 months of
Chief of Police realignment (jail demographics/makeup, community supervision population/makeup
and outcomes, pretrial services/electronic monitoring/jail alternatives utilization,
Phillip Crandall*
Departments of and general CCP plan services implemented).
Social Services, Mental • Train a community-based organization in cognitive behavioral treatment
Health, Employment, and
curriculum (evidence-based practice).
Alcohol and Substance
Abuse Programs • Develop a plan for future data needs (hire or contract staff, review/modify/add to
data collected).
Garry Eagles
County Office of Education
Outcome Measures Identified in FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
Arlette Large
Diana Livingston The Department of Health and Human Services collects the following outcome data:
Community-based
organization
• Number to enter employment (within 3 months of completion of services)
Dawn Watkins • Number retained in a job (still in a job 6-9 months after completion of services)
Victims’ interests • Number of GEDs or Certificates of Proficiency attained
• Multnomah Community Ability Scale Course completion (Work Readiness
*Indicates member of the Workshops)
Executive Committee • Where applicable, total number of certificates attained (Vocational Training)
• Number of master applications, resumes and job search plans created (Work
Readiness Workshops)
• Completion of training (Vocational Training)
• Average earnings of clients who entered employment
• Treatment attendance
• Alcohol Use Scale
• Substance Use Scale
32
CCP Data Collection FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
(not exhaustive)
• Department of Health Humboldt County allocated funding to support the following:
and Human Services;
1096 Assessment
• Augmented mental health (MH) services with a Supervising Mental Health Clinician
Form, 1166–Dual
Recovery Program to oversee all MH components of the plan, and 0.6 FTE Psychiatrist changed to 0.2
Intake Form, 3002 FTE Psychiatrist and 1.0 FTE Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner
Assessment, and
• 20 on-the-job and work experience placements for PRCS/split sentence offenders
Alcohol and Other
Drug Programs Form • Three additional Deputy Probation Officers for supervision of PRCS/split sentence
offenders and adjusted the caseload ratio from the original 1:50 to 1:40 based on
• Jail Population in the high percentage of High Risk/High Needs offenders in this realignment
relation to capacity
population
(broken out by
gender) • Sheriff’s Work Alternative Program received additional funding to subsidize
participant-paid fees to remove a barrier to indigent or low income sentenced
• Post Release
offenders, thus potentially expanding the utilization of that custody alternative
Community
Supervision (PRCS) program for appropriate offenders
and 1170(h) - • Enhance perimeter security to a residential treatment program property due to
Projected/actual,
increased violence/volatility of client population.
completions/
terminations, new • Community-based organization staff training in the University of Cincinnati
convictions cognitive behavioral drug treatment curriculum. It is hoped that this will increase
the quality of community-based drug/alcohol treatment services.
• Risk classification from
• Backfill lost state parolee housing reimbursement revenue to Sheriff's Office (FY
STRONG Assessment
12/13 forward) and County Administrative Office (for FY 11/12 to reimburse
• Split and straight county General Fund, which covered the cost).
sentences -
numbers/%, length of
term, term suspended,
risk levels Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
• Pre-trial release
participants: FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $1,789,128 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $4,298,556
total screened,
total ordered into
program, $553,256
DHHS*
total completions
$0 $1,155,862
• CBO contract services CAO**
utilized - residential, $197,206
alcohol or drug
$202,473
treatment, supervised Sheriff
living environment, $474,795
etc. $729,858
Probation
$54,724 $1,149,890
DA/PD***
$61,773
$131,967
Contingency Fund
$942,570
$116,850
CBO****
$316,460
*Department of Health and Human Services (integrated Mental Health, Public Health,
Department of Social Services, Employment Training Division, and additional social services)
**County Administrative Office
***District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
****Community‐Based Organization(s) 33
Community
Corrections
IMPERIAL COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Benny Benavidez*
The Imperial CCP convenes monthly. The membership roster is listed in the left hand
Chief Probation Officer
Chair column.
Kristie Kussman*
Presiding judge or designee Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Ralph Cordova Jr.
Imperial County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG)
County supervisor or chief
administrative officer or instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs.
designee
Gilbert Otero*
CCP Objectives
District Attorney
Tim Reilly* • Maintain offender accountability and public safety.
Public Defender
• Responsibly manage the impact on jail population capacity.
Raymond Loera* • Provide successful alternative sentencing options.
Sheriff
• Inspire public confidence.
Vacant* • Provide quality offender rehabilitation services.
Chief of Police
CCP Data Collection (not exhaustive)
Mike Horn*
Department of Social
Services and Department
The county collects offender data in the following categories:
of Alcohol and Substance
Abuse Programs
• Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) violations
Peggy Price
• 1170(h) violations
Department of
Mental Health • Split sentences
• Electronic monitoring
Rodolfo Aguayo
• Flash incarceration
Department of
Employment • Mandatory supervision
• Offenders received from the California Department of Corrections and
Anne Mallory
Rehabilitation (CDCR) vs. estimate
County Office of Education
• Warrants
Don Gorham • Terminations
Community-based
organization
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
Elizabeth Castro
Victims’ interests
The county allocated funding to support the following:
*Indicates member of the • 1 FTE Data Analysis position
Executive Committee
• 1 FTE Investigator for the District Attorney's Office
• 1 FTE Attorney for the Public Defender's Office
• 1 FTE Supervisory Correctional position for the Sheriff Department
• 2 FTE Victim Witness Advocate
• 1 FTE Office Assistant
• Day Reporting Center is scheduled to open in July 2013
34
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $1,245,469 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2)+
Sheriff*
$699,000
$380,000
Probation
$120,000
Mental Health Agency
$46,469
DA/PD**
$53,042
+Year 2 CCP budget allocations were not final at the time this report was prepared.
*Sheriff includes office staffing and jail reimbursement
**District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
35
Community
Corrections
INYO COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Jeffrey Thomson*
Chief Probation Officer
Chair The Inyo CCP convenes monthly. The membership roster is listed in the left hand
column.
Virginia Bird*
Dean Stout
Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Presiding judge or designee
Kevin Carunchio
Inyo County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG)
County supervisor or chief
administrative officer or instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs and the Ohio Risk
designee Assessment System (ORAS) Pretrial Tool for court pretrial release decisions.
Arthur Maillet*
District Attorney
CCP Objectives
Victims’ interests
Elizabeth Corpora*
• Expand educational and life skills programming in the jail.
Public Defender
• Expand evidence-based programming in the jail and for 1170(h) offenders.
Bill Lutze* • Expand Alcohol and Other Drugs programs in the jail and for 1170(h) offenders.
Sheriff
• Review future use of reentry court.
Chris Carter*
Chief of Police
Outcomes Identified in FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
Jean Turner*
Department of
Social Services • Monitor recidivism rates for non-violent, non-serious, non-sex offenders.
• Monitor recidivism rates for the Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS)
Dr. Gayle Zweir
population.
Department of
Mental Health • Number and type of offenders sentenced to county jail prison terms and state
prison terms.
Vacant
Department of • Number and type of offenders sentenced to probation, split sentences, and
Employment alternative programs.
• Program efficacy, so that limited funding and resources can be directed to
Marilyn Mann
Department of Alcohol and programs that work.
Substance Abuse Programs
Dr. Terri McAteer FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
County office of Education
Carlos Hernandez • Allocated 1FTE Realignment Liaison within the jail for reentry services.
Darcia Lent
Community-based
organization
*Indicates member of the
Executive Committee
36
CCP Data Collection (not exhaustive)
Inyo County collects offender data on the following categories:
• PRCS violations
• 1170(h) violations
• Recidivism
• Split sentences
• Electronic monitoring
• Flash incarceration
• Mandatory supervision
• Offenders received from the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) vs.
estimate
• Warrants
• Terminations
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $311,288 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $502,576
$6,845
DA/PD*
$7,256
$304,443
Other**
$495,320
**Other ‐ Funds go into a Public Safety Trust fund. Budgets are approved by the CCP Executive Committee and sent to
the Board of Supervisors for approval each year. Expenditures are reimbursed as they occur with the approval of the
CCP Chair, including AB 109 allocation, training, and one‐time planning funds.
*District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
37
Community
Corrections
KERN COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
David Kuge*
Chief Probation Officer The Kern CCP generally convenes quarterly. The membership roster is listed in the
Chair left hand column.
Terry McNally*
Presiding judge or designee Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Leticia Perez*
County supervisor or chief Kern County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG)
administrative officer or instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs, which will also be
designee
adapted for referral to in-custody programs.
Lisa Green*
District Attorney CCP Objectives
Konrad Moore*
Public Defender • Further inclusion of Community-Based Organizations (CBOs).
• Manageable caseloads for Probation, Sheriff, and Mental Health.
Donny Youngblood*
Sheriff • Continuation of development and collaboration with local justice stakeholders
(CBOs, jails, Mental Health, etc).
Greg Williamson*
Chief of Police
CCP Data Collection (not exhaustive)
Patricia Chewable
Department of
The county collects offender data in the following categories:
Social Services
Dr. James Waterman* • Number of employed offenders
Department of
Mental Health • Percent of offenders employed
• Number of offenders enrolled in services
Daniel Smith • Referrals to Probation
Department of
Employment • Barriers to employment
• By Probation Status: number and percent of offenders on Post Release
Lily Alvarez Community Supervision (PRCS), felony probation, mandatory supervision, number
Department of Alcohol and
and percent of non-violent, non-serious, non-sex offenders, and the use of an in-
Substance Abuse Programs
custody/matrix
Christine Lizardi- • By Substance Abuse Services: number and percent of offenders on PRCS, felony
Frazier
probation, mandatory supervision, number and percent of non-violent, non-
County Office of Education
serious, non-sex offenders, and the use of an in-custody/matrix
Tom Corson • Health care funding sources (e.g. Medi-Cal, Medicare, unfunded, etc.)
Community-based
organization • Recidivism
• Day Reporting Center caseload
TR Merickel • Flash incarceration
Victims’ interests
• 1170(h) violations
• Alternative sentencing (virtual jail, Sheriff's parole, electronic monitoring)
• Jail programming (GED, anger management, child support services, faith-based)
*Indicates member of the
Executive Committee • Referrals to Employers' Training Resource
38
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
Kern County allocated funding to support the following:
• Adult Transition Team: 3 FTE Recovery Specialist, 1 FTE Recovery Specialist III and 8 hours/week
Psychiatrist
• A portion of CCP funds to Community-Based Organization Projects
• Community-Based Treatment: 1 FTE Substance Abuse Specialist and 1 FTE Office Services Technician
• District Attorney’s Office: Deputy District Attorney
• Employer's Training Resource - Expanded employment and training resources for offenders
• Increased allocation to Street Interdiction Team
• Mental Health Department: 3 FTE Vocational Nurse,16 hours/week Psychiatrist, 1 FTE Nurse
Practitioner, and 1 FTE Office Services Technician
• Probation Department: 1 FTE Assistant Division Director, 2 FTE Probation Supervisor, 4 FTE Deputy
Probation Officer III, 16 FTE Deputy Probation Officer, 1 FTE Office Services Technician, I FTE Database
Analyst, and 1 FTE Programmer
• Sheriff’s Department: 1 FTE Sheriff’s Lieutenant, 1 FTE Senior Deputy Sheriff, 18 FTE Detention Deputy's,
9 FTE Deputy Sheriff, 1 FTE Sheriff’s Support Specialist, 1 FTE Administrative Coordinator, 1 FTE
Programmer II, and 1 FTE Maintenance Worker III
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY2011‐12 (Year 1) $12,158,117 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $24,405,069
$115,927
Employer*
$250,000
$5,164,403
Sheriff
$9,934,431
$4,855,626
Probation**
$1,539,553 $8,998,509
Mental Health
$3,332,526
$0
District Attorney
$232,000
$388,353
DA/PD***
$440,730
$94,256
Contingency Fund****
$233,569
$0
CBO(s)+
$983,304
*Employer's Training Resource
**Probation includes Street Interdiction Team
***District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
****Contingency Fund includes $200,000 from planning funds
+Community‐Based Organization(s) includes carry over from FY 11‐12 of $312,364
39
Community
Corrections
KINGS COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Steve Brum* The Kings CCP generally convenes quarterly. The membership roster is listed in the
Chief Probation Officer left hand column.
Chair
Todd Barton* Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
James LaPorte
Presiding judge or designee
Kings County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG)
Larry Spikes instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs.
County supervisor or chief
administrative officer or
designee
CCP Objectives
Greg Strickland*
District Attorney
• Monitor inmate increases.
Marianne Gilbert* • Reduce inmate early releases.
Public Defender • Find ways to house inmates in other facilities or alternative sentencing programs.
David Robinson*
Sheriff Outcome Measures Identified in FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
Carlos Mestas*
• Recidivism rates for non-sex, non-violent, and non-serious offenders.
Chief of Police
• Number of offenders sentenced to alternative and probation programs.
Peggy Montgomery* • Number of offenders sent to state prison and county jail.
Department of
Social Services
CCP Data Collection (not exhaustive)
Mary-Ann Ford
Sherman
The county collects offender data in the following categories:
Department of Mental
Health and Department of
Alcohol and Substance • Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) violations
Abuse Programs
• 1170(h) violations
John Lehn • Recidivism
Department of • Split sentences
Employment
• Electronic monitoring
Timothy Bowers • Flash incarceration
County Office of Education • Mandatory supervision
• Offenders received from the California Department of Corrections and
Jeff Garner
Community-based Rehabilitations (CDCR) vs. estimate
organization • Warrants
• Terminations
Marge Wilhelm
Victims’ interests
*Indicates member of the
Executive Committee
40
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
Kings County allocated funding to support the following:
• 1 FTE Electronic Monitoring Technician to expand from 100 to 150 the number of offenders served
• 2 FTE Probation Officer to attain a 53 to 1 caseload
• 1 FTE to work in the Narcotics Task Force
• 2 FTE Court Investigator
• .75 Victim Witness Advocate
• The Day Reporting Center which opened in April 2013
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $3,011,327 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $6,041,064
$0
Day Reporting*
$300,000
$2,035,997
Sheriff
$3,882,431
$640,092
Probation
$1,510,266
$68,652
Human Resources
$68,652
$102,591
DA/PD**
$115,720
$84,832
Defense***
$84,832
$79,163
County Counsel
$79,163
*Day Reporting Center/Samuel's House
**District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
***Defense of the Accused (Contracted services as there is no public defender in the county)
41
Community
Corrections
LAKE COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Rob Howe*
The Lake CCP convenes quarterly. The membership roster is listed in the left hand
Chief Probation Officer
Chair column.
Steven Hedstrom* Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Presiding judge or designee
Matt Perry Lake County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG) instrument
County supervisor or chief
for probation supervision and intervention programs.
administrative officer or
designee
CCP Data Collection (not exhaustive)
Don Anderson*
District Attorney
The county collects offender data in the following categories:
Steven Carter*
Public Defender
• Recidivism
Frank Rivero* • Aftercare data
Sheriff
• Successful completion of contracted services with BI Incorporated
Brad Rasmussen* • Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) violations
Chief of Police • 1170(h) violations
• Split sentences
Carol Huchingson
Department of • Flash incarceration
Social Services • Terminations
• Offenders received from the California Department of Corrections and
Kristy Kelly*
Department of Mental Rehabilitation (CDCR) vs. estimate
Health and Department of
Alcohol and Substance
Abuse Programs
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
Kathy Ferguson
Department of
Employment The county allocated funding to support the following:
Wally Holbrook
County Office of Education • 1 FTE Deputy Probation Officer
• Increased electronic monitoring
Dr. Robert Gardner
Community-based • Purchase of a new case management system
organization • Contract with BI Incorporated to provide evidence-based programming
• Establish a new Day Reporting Center
Debbie Wallace
Victims’ interests
*Indicates member of the
Executive Committee
42
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $850,339 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $1,766,971
$0
DBH*
$97,797
$0
Sheriff
$645,000
$820,913
Probation
$903,636
$29,426
DA/PD**
$32,806
$0
Contingency Fund
$87,732
*Department of Behavioral Health
**District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
43
Community
Corrections
LASSEN COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Jennifer Branning*
Acting Chief Probation The Lassen CCP convenes quarterly. The membership roster is listed in the left hand
Officer column.
Chair
Andi Ashby* Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Presiding judge or designee
Jim Chapman Lassen County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG)
Martin Nichols instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs and the Ohio Risk
County supervisor or chief
Assessment System (ORAS) instrument for the jail population regarding release
administrative officer or
designee decisions and referral to in-custody programs.
Bob Burns*
District Attorney
Outcomes Identified in FY 2011-12 and FY 2012-13
Rhea Giannotti*
Public Defender • Implementation of a streamlined and efficient system to manage our additional
responsibilities under realignment.
Dean Growdon*
Sheriff • Implementation of a system that protects public safety and utilizes best practices in
reducing recidivism.
Tom Downing*
• Implementation of a system that effectively utilizes alternatives to pretrial and
Chief of Police
post-conviction incarceration, where appropriate.
Melody Brawley*
Department of
Social Services Outcome Results for FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
Barbara Pierson • Hired new staff for Probation and the Sheriff's Department to include a fulltime
Department of
Deputy Probation Officer, half-time Deputy Probation Officer, a 3/4 time
Mental Health
Probation Assistant, and two Correctional Officers for the jail. In addition, the
Anita Harsh Sheriff's Department was able to retain a retired annuitant to assist in the
Department of Alcohol and
development of policies and programs for the Classification Committee.
Substance Abuse Programs
• The Sheriff's Department implemented the Nation Institute of Corrections (NIC)
Richard Duvarney classification tool. Every newly booked inmate undergoes the classification at
County office of Education
intake with follow up review. The Sheriff's Department implemented the ORAS
Darla Dwinell for all alternatives to custody programs. ORAS is an evidenced-based risk tool to
Community-based help make an objective assessment for the community release program.
organization
• During FY 2011-12, the county worked towards developing program guidelines
regarding pretrial release, which will be a collaboration between the Sheriff and
the District Attorney.
*Indicates member of the
Executive Committee
This list includes
representation as required
by law. The CCP has
additional members not
listed.
44
Outcome Results for FY 2012-13 (Year 2)
• The Lassen CCP established its compliance team in FY 2012-13. The compliance team includes a Deputy
Probation Officer, a Sheriff's Deputy, and a Susanville Police Officer. The compliance team spends
approximately 32 hours per month in the field providing intensive supervision of the Post Release
Community Supervision (PRCS) population as well as the population of offenders who are in an
alternative program to incarceration, i.e., electronic monitoring, work furlough, etc.
• The Lassen CCP established an Adult Day Reporting Center (DRC) for all probationers and pretrial
offenders released from jail on an alternative program. The DRC is a specified location near the county
jail and local services. The facility is open daily for certain hours where offenders are required to report
for services, including behavioral health, alcohol and drug services, vocational and employment services,
education services, and veteran services.
Data
Lassen County collected and reported the following data:
Recidivism rates for N3s (non-violent, non-serious, non-sex offenders) from October 2011 through June
2012 - Lassen County had a caseload of 37 under Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS). In that time
period, 6 offenders committed new crimes, which is 16% of that caseload. Recidivism rates for N3s through
March 2013 - Five PRCS offenders out of a caseload of 35 have committed new crimes, which is 14% of the
PRCS offender population.
Number and type of offenders sentenced to county jail and state prison - Lassen County sentenced 16
offenders to state prison. Of those sent to prison 6 were drug offenders, 4 property offenders, 3 domestic
violence offenders, 1 sex offender, and 2 violent offenders. Of the 23 sentenced to jail, 12 were drug
offenders, 8 property offenders, 1 sex offender, 1 violent offender, and 1 offender convicted of threatening
letters.
Number and type of offenders sentenced to probation or alternative programs - Lassen County sentenced
54 felony offenders to probation. Of those sentenced to probation, 23 were drug offenders, 7 property
offenders, 11 violent offenders, 3 sex offenders, 2 child abuse offenders, 2 offender convicted of conspiracy, 1
perjury offender, 2 domestic violence offenders, 2 offenders failing to appear upon release on Own
Recognizance, and 1 offender convicted of reckless driving and fleeing from a pursuing peace officer.
*The CCP provided additional data not included in this report. due to space limitations
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
*Susanville Police Department ‐ Salary and
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $525,712 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $973,912 Benefits of .20 FTE Officer for
Compliance Team
$0
Police*
$18,340 **Shared Services and Supplies (local
Services** $0 Community Corrections budget)
$179,949
$0
Health*** ***Health and Human Services
$50,000
$134,775
Sheriff
****District Attorney/Public Defender
Probation $71,039 $587,110 (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
$113,446
$0
Public Defender
$5,000
$13,792
DA/PD****
$15,067
$0
District Attorney
$5,000
$306,106
Contingency Fund 45
$0
Community
Corrections
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Jerry Powers*
Chief Probation Officer In Los Angeles County the Countywide Criminal Justice Coordination Committee’s (CCJCC)
Chair Public Safety Realignment Team (PSRT), was created by the Board of Supervisors (BOS) to
report and advise the BOS on public safety realignment matters. The PSRT serves as the CCP
David Wesley*
and convenes monthly. The membership roster is listed in the left hand column.
Charlaine Olmedo
Presiding judge or designee
Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
William Fujioka
County supervisor or chief Los Angeles County utilizes the Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI)
administrative officer or instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs, the Correctional Offender
designee
Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions (COMPAS) instrument with the jail population
release decisions, and referral to in-custody programs. The county also uses COMPAS and the
Jackie Lacey*
District Attorney and modified Wisconsin Risk/Needs assessment tool for court pretrial release decisions.
Victims’ interests
CCP Objectives
Ronald Brown*
Public Defender
• Enhance Public Safety.
• Provide comprehensive reentry services.
Leroy Baca*
Sheriff • Practice fiscal responsibility.
• Create and maintain an environment for effective collaboration.
Charlie Beck*
Jim McDonnell CCP Data Collection
Chief of Police
The county collects the following offender related data:
Sheryl Spiller
Department of
Social Services Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS)
• Pre-Release Packets: number of pre-release packets received, packets processed, and
Dr. Marvin Southard*
deemed ineligible (of those processed), Post Release Supervised Persons (PSPs) with
Department of
special handling requirements, PSPs who are registered sex offenders, address verifications
Mental Health
conducted, and homeless/transient PSPs, per the California Department of Corrections
Cynthia Banks and Rehabilitation (CDCR).
Department of
• PSP Reporting Population: number of PSPs released to county per pre-release packet,
Employment
directly released to county per CDCR, released to federal custody with Immigration and
John Viernes Customs Enforcement (ICE), released to the community by ICE, released to other
Department of Alcohol and jurisdiction custody, transferred to L.A. County from other counties, PSPs transferred
Substance Abuse Programs from L.A. County to other jurisdictions, processed at hubs (intake/assessment), by risk tier,
as assessed at hubs, and number of PSPs who are veterans.
Dr. Arturo Delgado
County Office of Education • PSP "No-Show" and Absconder Population: number of; "no-show" notifications to Sheriff,
Sheriff and L.A. Police Department attempts to contact "no-show" PSPs, warrants
Troy Vaughn requested for absconders, all warrants issued, warrants recalled, and number of active
Community-based
warrants remaining.
organization
• PSP Violations/Revocations/New Charges: number of petitions for revocations (other than
warrants), pending revocation hearing, revocation hearings, revocation results,
intermediate sanctions, custody 11-45 days, custody 46-90 days, custody 91-180 days,
other (continuances, bench warrants, etc.), PSP arrests/ bookings, and number of cases
*Indicates member of the
presented to the District Attorney for filing.
Executive Committee
• Sanctions: number of verbal warnings, increased reporting (to Deputy Probation Officer)
requirements, additional conditions of supervision, referrals to Probation Adult Alternative
Work Service PAAWS (Cal Trans), Community Assessment Service Centers (CASC),
Mental Health, flash incarcerations (AB 109 supervision only), flash incarceration
(warrants), referrals for probable cause hearing, revocation hearing, and GPS/electronic
monitoring.
46
CCP Data Collection
(continued)
Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS)
• Mental Health Treatment Services: number of pre-release packets forwarded to Department of Mental Health
(DMH) for review, mental health treatment conditions added by Probation, DMH determinations-treatment
needed, PSPs refusing Mental Health Services at HUBs, referrals made to CASCs for substance abuse treatment
only assessment, substance abuse treatment conditions added by Probation, narcotics testing orders added by
Probation, PSPs showing at CASCs for assessment, and number of PSPs entering services.
• Referrals for Other Services (based on month of assessment): number of PSPs screened for benefits eligibility by
Department of Social Services (DPSS), PSPs who DPSS referred to local DPSS office, and PSPs referred to
Department of Health Services (DHS) for Healthy Way L.A. screening.
• Referrals for Haight-Ashbury: number of PSPs referred this month, referrals to transportation, sober living, sober
living with child, transitional housing, transitional housing with child, shelter, and job readiness.
• PSP Supervision Terminations: number of petitions submitted to terminate supervision and number of
terminations.
Custody
• Jail Population and Sentencing: number of total court sentences pursuant to Penal Code1170(h), sentenced to
"split" sentence, actual defendants sentenced pursuant to Penal Code 1170 (h), sentenced non-violent, non-serious,
non-sex offenders (N3s) currently in jail (at end of the month), N3s released after serving full term (month of
occurrence), Station Worker Program (at end of month) and number of N3s currently on alternative custody (at
end of the month).
Risk Management and Liability
• Realignment Claims/Lawsuits: number of claims/lawsuits filed with the county identified as realignment related.
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
• Creation of a law enforcement subcommittee
• Development of sanctions matrix for PRCS violations
• Expansion of Transitional Reentry Services
• Creation of an additional HUB (HUBs are designed as multi-disciplinary assessment and orientation centers for
PSPs returning to county jurisdiction from state prison for supervision)
• Collocation of substance abuse assessment staff at initial HUB visit
• Screening/enrollment in Low Income Health Plan initiated by DPSS at HUB
• Development and implementation of probation officers at law enforcement agencies as regional law enforcement
liaisons
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
*Countywide Criminal Justice Coordination
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $124,734,000 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $273,007,000 Committee (CCJCC) - one-time planning
grant for CCP/Public Safety Realignment
$0
Fire Camp
$1,540,000 Team
CCJCC* $125,000 **Interpreters - revocation proceedings
$200,000
***Sheriff includes funding for jail beds
$75,000
CCJCC $115,000 ****Probation includes $12 million to
$0 Community-Based Organization(s) in
Interpreters**
$500,000
FY 2011-12
$10,000
Conflict Panel $50,000 +Alternate Public Defender's Officer
$75,294,000 ++Public Health - Substance Abuse
Sheriff***
$149,549,000 Prevention and Control
$28,823,000
Probation**** +++Contingency Fund - Provisional
$72,000,000
$735,000 Funding Unit
Alternate+
$566,000
$1,429,000
Public Defender
$1,480,000
$2,178,000
Health Services
$9,170,000
$2,419,000
Public Health++
$8,000,000
$11,691,000
Mental Health
$22,000,000
$1,455,000
District Attorney
$1,660,000 47
$500,000
Contingency +++
$6,177,000
Community
Corrections
MADERA COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Rick Dupree* The Madera CCP membership roster is listed in the left hand column.
Chief Probation Officer
Chair
Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Joseph Soldani*
Presiding judge or designee
Madera County utilizes the Correctional Assessment and Intervention System (CAIS)
Frank Bigelow instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs and the Virginia
County supervisor or chief
Pretrial Risk Assessment Instrument for pretrial supervision decisions.
administrative officer or
designee
Outcomes Identified in FY 2011-12
Michael Keitz*
District Attorney • Implementation of a system that promotes public safety and utilizes best practices
in recidivism reduction.
Ciummo and
Associates* • Implementation of a system that effectively utilizes alternatives to pretrial and
Public Defender – post-conviction incarceration where appropriate.
contracted services
John Anderson*
CCP Data Collection (not exhaustive)
Sheriff
Mike Kime* Madera County collects offender data in the following categories:
Chief of Police
• Recidivism rates for non-violent, non-serious, and non-sex offenders
• Recidivism rates for offenders under Madera’s jurisdiction
• Number and type of offenders sentenced to county jail and county prison
• Number and type of offenders sentenced to probation or alternative programs
*Indicates member of the
Executive Committee • Number and type of offenders successfully completing post-release community
supervision
Evidence-Based Supervision Models
Madera Probation Department contracted with Behavioral Interventions in August of
2010 to implement a Day Reporting Program (DRP). The DRP model was linked
directly to the implementation of the nationally recognized evidenced-based
supervision model and its core principles. The principles of effective interventions, the
use of validated assessment tools, the application of motivational interviewing
techniques, and the facilitation of Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) interventions have
shown positive effects on targeted populations.
48
Forensic Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) Program
The Madera County Behavioral Health Services (BHS) will use the FACT approach to treatment services in
its AB 109 program. This is the same treatment model that BHS used in the MIOCR (Mentally Ill Offender
Crime Reduction) Program, which was in operation in Madera County in 2007-09 before its funding base
lapsed in September 2009. FACT is a modified version of the Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) Model.
This model was chosen because it has been proven to be effective in helping mentally ill adults with multiple
problems, which include substance abuse, to remain in the community, out of psychiatric hospitals and other
locked institutions, and greatly improve their quality of life and treatment outcomes. In addition, ACT has
been shown to increase residence stability, promote independent living and continuity of care, and increase
family and participant satisfaction.
The goal of the FACT program is to reduce recidivism of individuals with mental illness and/or substance
abuse and increase the individual’s tenure in the community; reduce incarcerations, reduce hospital/
residential admissions, decrease symptoms and improve the individual’s quality of life. The FACT program
will seek to break the revolving door cycle of individuals who often end up incarcerated or hospitalized due
to their untreated psychiatric or addictive disorders. The FACT program’s sole focus will be to provide these
individuals with services and supports which will allow them to stabilize and remain safely in the community.
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $1,967,881 FY 2012‐13 Year 2) $3,609,349
$60,516
DA/PD*
$67,788
$119,125
AB 109 Training Funds
$0
$100,000
AB 109 Planning Funds
$100,000
$1,688,240
AB 109 Programs
$3,441,561
*District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
49
Community
Corrections
MARIN COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Michael Daly* The Marin CCP generally convenes quarterly or as needed. The membership roster is
Chief Probation Officer listed in the left hand column.
Chair
Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Kim Turner*
Presiding judge or designee
Marin County utilizes the Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI),
Susan Adams
instrument, Spousal Assault Risk Assessment (SARA), and the Static 99-R Sex Offender
County supervisor or chief
administrative officer or Risk Assessment for probation supervision and intervention programs; the Level of
designee Service Inventory (LSI) with the jail population regarding release decisions, the Global
Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN) for referral to in-custody programs, and the Ohio
Edward Berberian*
District Attorney and Risk Assessment System (ORAS) Pretrial Tool for court pretrial release decisions.
Victims’ interests
CCP Objectives
Jose Varela*
Public Defender
• Emphasize and ensure public safety.
Robert Doyle*
Sheriff • Utilize evidence-based practices.
• Assist in behavior change.
Diana Bishop*
• Be collaborative.
Chief of Police
• Be data driven.
Larry Meredith*
Departments of Social
Community Care Partnership
Services, Mental Health,
Employment, and Alcohol
and Substance Abuse Marin County has a collaborative Community Care Partnership that provides a
Programs continuum of services to AB 109 clients. Needs identified, funded, and developed by
the Community Care Partnership for AB 109 clients include the following:
Mary Jane Burke
County Office of Education
• Provide housing and homeless services.
Laura Kantorowski
• Make available recovery coaches/care managers.
Community-based
organization • Provide comprehensive mental health and substance use assessments, including
medication.
• Provide employment and training services.
*Indicates member of the • Offer veteran services through Health and Human Services.
Executive Committee • Use detoxification services as an alternative to incarceration.
• Provide assistance for Substance Use Disorders and Mental Health Services (SUD/
MH) from re-entry treatment services.
• Provide in-custody mental health services through Health and Human Services.
• Offer alcohol and drug intensive outpatient and residential treatment.
• Offer Cognitive Behavior Therapy groups in-custody as well as in the community.
50
CCP Accomplishments
• All persons released early from supervision (6-12 months) did not reoffend within 12 months of their
supervision period per CII (Criminal Information Index)
• 100% of offenders anonymously polled at discharge believe their Probation Officer was (a) firm but fair,
(b) a good role model, and (c) acknowledged their successes during their period of supervision
• 100% of realigned population has been sheltered
• 100% of realigned population has received a drug and alcohol assessment and has been referred to
general assistance as well as employment training and placement
• Only 7% of the total realigned population have been convicted of a new felony or misdemeanor offense
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
The county allocated funding to support the following:
• Coordination of Probation Enforcement (COPE) Task Force for staffing and supplies
• Custody Treatment Program
• Community based Treatment for Change
• Detoxification services
• Recovery Coach
• $50,000 for transitional housing
• 1 Deputy Probation Officer Supervisor.
• $49,000 to the Sheriff's Department for lost parole bed revenue from the state
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $1,590,421 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $4,769,619
Planning* $150,000
$150,000
Training** $92,025
$0
Police $31,483
$125,931
HHS*** $39,588
$248,783
Sheriff**** $269,952
$992,571
Probation+ $385,397
$785,809
Mental Health $0
$175,273
DA/PD++ $46,749
$56,546
Contingency+++ $575,227
$1,669,894
CBO(s)++++ $0
$564,812
*Allocation for planning (one time)
**Allocation for training and retention purposes (one time)
***Health and Human Services
****Sheriff includes contingency funds
+Probation includes equipment, training, contingency funds and pre-trial services
++District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
+++Contingency Fund is reserved for developing programs and includes FY2011-12 unallocated funds
++++Community-Based Organization(s)
51
Community
Corrections
MARIPOSA COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Pete Judy*
Chief Probation Officer The Mariposa CCP generally convenes quarterly. The membership roster is listed in
Chair the left hand column.
Vacant*
Dana Walton Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Presiding judge or designee
John Carrier Mariposa County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG)
County supervisor or chief instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs and with the jail
administrative officer or
population regarding release decisions.
designee
Thomas Cook*
District Attorney
CCP Objectives
Mike Fagalde*
Gary Collins • Formalize data collection efforts with University of California, Merced to produce
Public Defender –
evaluation reports.
Contracted Services
• Solidify relationship with the Center for Opportunity, Reentry and Education
Doug Binnewies*
(C.O.R.E - Day Reporting Center) on the provision of offender services.
Sheriff
N/A*
Outcomes Identified in FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
Chief of Police
Jim Rydingsword* • Train all probation staff on STRONG and Positive Achievement Change Tool
Departments of Social (PACT) assessments within six months of receiving CCP funds.
Services, Mental Health,
• Train Mountain Crisis staff (community-based organization) on Moral Recognition
and Alcohol and Substance
Abuse Programs Therapy (MRT) within six months of receiving CCP funds.
• Complete risk assessments for all 500 offenders.
Aaron Rosander
County Office of Education • Develop resources for C.O.R.E. Center.
• Impact on jail population.
Tyson Welcome
• Success rates of 1170(h), Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS), mandatory
Community-based
organization probation, and regular probation.
Meghan Kehoe
Victims’ interests Outcome Results for FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
• Successfully trained 11 probation staff on STRONG & Positive Achievement
Change Tool (PACT).
*Indicates member of the • Successfully trained 6 Mountain Crisis staff on MRT.
Executive Committee • Successfully completed risk assessments for all 500 offenders.
• Developed community-based program to provide evidence-based services.
This list includes
representation as required • Tracking impact of PRCS/1170(h) impact on average daily population in jail.
by law. The CCP has • PRCS Failure to Report is initially 3%.
additional members not
listed.
52
CCP Data Collection Outcome Measures Identified in FY 2012-13 (Year 2)
(not exhaustive)
Mariposa County collects the following offender related data:
• Violations of
probation
• Successful completion of Moral Recognition Therapy (MRT).
• Number of 1170(h) • Track number of transitional home assistance.
offenders
• Track number of transportation assistance provided.
• Split sentences
Outcome Measure Results for FY 2012-13 (Year 2)
• Electronic monitoring
• 6 Successful MRT completions.
• Flash incarceration • 2 clients transitioned to homes and emergency home assistance.
• Assisted 24 Center for Opportunity, Reentry and Education Program (C.O.R.E)
• Mandatory supervision
clients with transportation.
• Offenders
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions:
received from the
California Department
of Corrections and The county allocated funding to support the following:
Rehabilitation
(CDCR) vs. estimate
• $100,000 of reserves for medical insurance incidents for the jail population
• Warrants • $237,520 to the (C.O.R.E) Program
• $7,000 for a District Attorney Victim Witness Advocate
• Terminations
• $10,056 for jail staffing
• Failure rate
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
• Training hours
• New criminal FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $171,577 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $344,735
violations
• Medical expenses Sheriff* $24,069
incurred due to $10,056
realignment $21,198
Probation
$21,000
$0
DA**
$7,000
$14,733
Mental Health***
$10,000
$15,000
Overtime****
$15,000
$5,931
DA/PD+
$6,205
$60,626
Contingency Fund
$37,954
$30,000 $237,520
CBO++
*Sheriff includes jail alternatives and jail support services
**District Attorney's Office ‐ Victim Witness Advocate
***Mental Health Agency ‐ Drug and Alcohol/Medical Eligibility/Treatment
****Overtime Community Supervision
+District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
++Community‐Based Organization ‐ C.O.R.E
53
Community
Corrections
MENDOCINO COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Jim Brown* The Mendocino CCP convenes monthly. The membership roster is listed in the left
Chief Probation Officer hand column.
Chair
Julie Lyly* Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Presiding judge or designee
Kyle Knopp Mendocino County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG)
County supervisor or chief instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs.
administrative officer or
designee
CCP Objectives
David Eyster*
District Attorney
• Reduce recidivism.
Linda Thompson*
• Community Corrections (making streets safer).
Public Defender
• Maintain population control in jails.
Tom Allman*
Sheriff
Outcomes Identified in FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
Chris Dewey*
Chief of Police • Improve the rate of successful outcomes for offenders under supervision.
• Increase overall community safety, and decrease victimization, as the result of
Stacey Cryer*
Departments of Social successful outcomes.
Services, Mental Health, • Implement a system that utilizes proven and cost-effective evidence-based
Employment, and Alcohol
practices throughout the criminal justice system.
and Substance Abuse
Programs
Outcome Results for FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
Vacant
County Office of Education
• Hired 4 FTE Probation Officer and reduced case loads from 130 to 1 to 50 to 1.
Vacant • Trained probation officers in Motivational Interviewing Techniques.
Community-based
• Trained probation officers in Cognitive Thinking Behavior Therapy.
organization
• Secured a professional services contract to provide treatment to sex offenders.
Vacant • Secured a professional services contract to operate a Day Reporting Center.
Victims’ interests
• Enhanced jail staffing with the addition of 3 corrections deputies.
• Hired a one-half time Eligibility Worker.
*Indicates member of the • Hired a Mental Health Rehabilitation Specialist.
Executive Committee
54
CCP Data Collection (not exhaustive)
Mendocino County collects the following offender data:
• Rates of closed cases for Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) and formal probationers, and the
utilization of split sentencing
• Sentencing for local prison, split sentencing, and formal probation
• Rate of technical violations of PRCS population in relation to new violations
• Rate of success for PRCS population participating in the Day Reporting Center
• Flash incarceration
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
The county allocated funding to support the following:
• 3 FTE Corrections Officer
• .5 FTE Alcohol and Drug Counselor
• .5 FTE for a Police Officer to work with probation on compliance checks
• Electronic monitoring
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $1,029,436 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $2,103,219
$32,227
Other*
$87,706
$187,639
Sheriff
$848,252
$479,468
Probation
$933,100
$43,560
Mental Health Agency
$98,000
$35,624
DA/PD**
$39,800
$250,918
Contingency Fund
$96,361
*Other ‐ .5 FTE Eligibility Worker includes $32,227 in Year 1 and $34,000 in Year 2; Alcohol and Other Drug Program of
$53,706 added in Year 2.
**District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
55
Community
Corrections
MERCED COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Scott Ball* The Merced CCP convenes as needed. The membership roster is listed in the left
Chief Probation Office hand column.
Chair
Brian McCabe* Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Presiding judge or designee
Jim Brown Merced County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG)
County supervisor or chief instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs.
administrative officer or
designee
CCP Objectives
Larry Morse*
District Attorney
• Expand program development alternatives to include additional in-custody
Eric Dumars*
programming.
Public Defender
• Add jail reentry and rehabilitation services to the menu of services offered to
Mark Pazin* offenders.
Sheriff
Outcomes Identified in FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
Norman Andrade*
Chief of Police
• Implementation of a streamlined and efficient system in the County of Merced to
Ana Pagan manage additional responsibilities under realignment.
Department of
• Implementation of a system that protects public safety and utilizes best practices in
Social Services
recidivism reduction.
Manuel Jimenez*
• Implementation of a system that effectively utilizes alternatives to pretrial and
Department of
post-conviction incarceration, where appropriate.
Mental Health and
Department of Alcohol and
Substance Abuse Programs
Outcome Results for FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
Robert Morris
Department of • Efforts to facilitate a streamlined and efficient system continue to evolve as
Employment collaboration with local stakeholders improves.
• Concerted efforts have been made to educate local stakeholders on evidence-
Steve Gomes
County Office of Education based practices, the implementation of risk assessment instruments, and additional
training on topics, including but not limited to motivational interviewing and case
Lamar Henderson
planning.
Community-based
organization • Opened a comprehensive service center to effectively utilize alternatives to
pretrial and post-conviction incarceration. Participating agencies in the center
Lisa DeSamtis
include the Sheriff’s Department, Human Services Agency, Mental Health
Victims’ interests
Department, and the Probation Department.
*Indicates member of the
Executive Committee
56
CCP Data Collection FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
(not exhaustive)
• Recidivism rates for In March 2013, the Trident Center opened with a mission to enhance public safety
non-violent, non- through a multi-disciplinary effort utilizing evidence-based practices for offender
serious, non-sex
rehabilitation. The center adapted a three-pronged approach that emphasized
offenders
providing effective public safety, reducing recidivism through rehabilitation, and
• Recidivism rates for exploring available alternatives to custody options. Services under development
parolees now under include alcohol and other drug counseling (Mental Health Department), Leadership for
Merced jurisdiction
Life (Human Services Agency), child support collection efforts (Department of Child
• Number and type of Support Services), literacy (Library – to be held at the County Library), employment
offenders sentenced to testing (Workforce Investment Agency), behavioral health client services (MH),
county jail and state
education and career assessments and referrals (HSA), homeless assistance (HSA/Cal-
prison
Works), Section 8 Housing Assistance (HSA), General Relief/Food Stamps (HSA),
• Number and type of driver’s license assistance (HSA) and PACT re-entry meeting representation (HSA,
offenders sentenced to MH, Probation, DCSS).
probation or
alternative programs
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
• Number of Post
Release Community
Supervision (PRCS)
violations FY2011‐12 (Year 1) $3,034,384 FY2012‐13 (Year 2) $5,399,843
• 1170(h) violations
$39,520
Service and Supplies
$66,915
• Recidivism
$733,748
• Split sentences Probation
$1,591,546
• Electronic monitoring $89,200
Fixed Assets
$50,500
• Flash incarceration
$89,560
DA/PD*
• Mandatory supervision $100,813
• Offenders Contract Services** $1,962,356
received from the
California Department $3,500,069
of Corrections and $120,000
Contingency Fund
Rehabilitation $90,000
(CDCR) vs. estimate
*District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
• Warrants
**Contract Services includes costs associated with the Sheriff, (e.g.) electronic monitoring,
• Terminations alternative custody, residential treatment and the Day Reporting Center.
• Number of contacts
• Number of searches
• New law violations
57
Community
Corrections
MODOC COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Elias Fernandez*
Chief Probation Officer The Modoc CCP convenes quarterly. The membership roster is listed in the left hand
Chair column.
Linda Ostoja*
Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Rhonda Gysin*
Francis Barclay
Presiding judge or designee
Modoc County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG)
Chester Robertson instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs.
County supervisor or chief
administrative officer or
CCP Goals
designee
Christopher Brooke* • Maintain public safety and offender accountability.
District Attorney and • Responsibly manage impact on jail population capacity and safety.
Victims’ interests
• Successful alternative sentencing options.
Sam Kyllo* • Inspire public confidence.
Public Defender • Offender rehabilitation.
Mike Poindexter*
Sheriff
Outcome Measures Identified in FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
Ken Barnes*
Chief of Police
• Recidivism rates for non-violent, non-serious, non-sex offenders
Karen Stockton* • Recidivism rates for parolees now under probation's jurisdiction
Health Services
• Number and type of offenders sentenced to county jail and state prison
Tom Sandage • Number and type of offenders sentenced to probation or alternative programs
Department of
Social Services
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
Tara Shepherd
Michael Traverso
Department of Mental The county allocated funding to support the following:
Health and Department of
Alcohol and Substance
Abuse Programs • 1 FTE to the Sheriff’s Department
Diane Fogle
Department of
Employment
Jim Schiffman
County Office of Education
Carol Callaghan
Community-based
organization
*Indicates member of the
Executive Committee
This list includes
representation as required
by law. The CCP has
additional members not
listed.
58
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $114,046 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $175,987
$5,000
Alturas Police Department
$5,000
$38,000
Sheriff
$157,500
$28,290
Probation
$10,830
$2,756
DA/PD*
$2,657
$40,000
Contingency Fund
*District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
59
Community
Corrections
MONO COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Dr. Karin Humiston* The Mono CCP convenes quarterly. The membership roster is listed in the left hand
Chief Probation Officer column.
Chair
Stan Eller* Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Presiding judge or designee
Byng Hunt Mono County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG) risk and
County supervisor or chief needs assessment instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs.
administrative officer or
designee
Tim Kendall* Outcomes Identified in FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
District Attorney
Randy Gephart* • Implementation of a streamlined and efficient system in Mono County to manage
Public Defender our additional responsibilities under realignment.
• Implementation of a system that protects public safety and utilizes best practices in
Ralph Obenberger *
recidivism reduction.
Sheriff
• Implementation of a system that effectively utilizes alternatives to pretrial and
Dan Watson* post‐conviction incarceration where appropriate.
Chief of Police
Kathy Peterson
Department of Results of Outcomes Identified in FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
Social Services
• While anecdotal, sustained communication among local justice partners indicates
Vacant
continued improvement.
Department of
Mental Health • Implemented a continuum of evidence-based practices in the county.
• Progress continues to be made towards effectively utilizing alternatives to pretrial
Vacant
and post‐conviction incarceration, where appropriate.
Department of
Employment
CCP Data Collection (not exhaustive)
Vacant
Department of Alcohol and
Substance Abuse Programs
The county collects the following offender related data:
Dr. Stacy Adler
County Office of Education • Recidivism rates for non‐violent, non‐serious, non‐sex offenders
• Recidivism rates for parolees now under Mono County jurisdiction
Vacant
Community-based • Number and type of offenders sentenced to county jail and state prison
organization • Number and type of offenders sentenced to probation or alternative programs
• Number of Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) violations
Vacant
Victims’ interests • 1170(h) violations
• Split sentences
• Flash incarceration
*Indicates member of the • Electronic monitoring
Executive Committee • Mandatory supervision
• Warrants
• Terminations
• Offenders received from the California Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation (CDCR) vs. estimate
60
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $220,094 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $950,549
$1,000
DSS*
$0
$57,500
Sheriff**
$416,000
$158,000
Probation***
$198,076
$1,797
Public Defender
$3,000
$1,797
District Attorney
$13,000
$0
Contingency Fund
$53,000
$0
CBO(s)****
$267,473
*Department of Social Services
**Sheriff includes Omnocom communication services
***Probation includes electronic monitoring, in‐custody and mental health costs
****Community‐Based Organization(s)
61
Community
Corrections
MONTEREY COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Manuel Real* The Monterey CCP convenes quarterly. The membership roster is listed in the left
Chief Probation Officer hand column.
Chair
Marla Anderson* Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Presiding judge or designee
Jane Parker Monterey County utilizes the Ohio Risk Assessment System (ORAS) for probation
County supervisor or chief supervision and intervention programs.
administrative officer or
designee
CCP Objectives
Dean Flippo*
District Attorney • Creation of pretrial services.
• Implementation of evidence-based supervision.
James Egar*
Public Defender • Work with courts on evidence-based sentencing.
• Tenant Improvements for Reentry Services Center ("one-stop").
Scott Miller*
Sheriff • Jail expansion and in-custody program.
• Expand treatment, employment, and housing services for offenders.
Edmundo Rodriguez*
Chief of Police
Outcome Measures Identified in FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
Elliott Robinson*
Department of • Program completion rates
Social Services
• Local incarceration rates
Wayne Clark • Number and type of offenders sentenced to county jail
Departments of Mental • Number and type of offenders sentenced to state prison
Health and Alcohol and
Substance Abuse Programs
David Spaur Outcome Measure Results for FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
Department of
Employment • During FY 2011-12, Monterey County Behavioral Health provided 171
assessments. Of those assessed, 46 were referred for substance abuse treatment
Nancy Kotowski
County Office of Education and 33 participated in treatment programs. An additional 17 clients received
assistance with psychotropic medications, rehabilitative, and crisis services.
Robin McCrae
Community-based • During FY 2011-12, 77 individuals received employment related services through
organization the KickStart Program. These services included workshops, case management, job
placement, and financial assistance for employment related activities.
Pam Patterson
Victims’ interests • The Turning Point Homeless Incentive Program served a total of 11 individuals
during FY 2011-12. These services included emergency housing, sustainable
housing stipends, and case management.
*Indicates member of the • Local Incarceration Rates: The pretrial program was not implemented until
Executive Committee October of 2012 and did not significantly impact the jail incarceration rates during
FY 2011-12.
• In the first year of AB 109 implementation, 31 probation officers were trained in
providing the ORAS Risk Assessments, and probation officers and community
partners participated in over 3,500 hours of training relating to evidence-based
practices.
62
CCP Data Collection
• Number of individuals released for Post • Number of days flashed each month • Demographic data for PRCS and mandatory
Release Community Supervision (PRCS) • Number of CR 300 waivers accepted supervision
• Active PRCS Supervisions at the end of • Number of CR 300 petitions filed • PRCS arrests made by local law enforcement
each month • Number of PRCS cases terminated agencies
• Number of individuals who absconded • Number of individuals sentenced to a split • Jail population and analysis
before PRCS supervision sentence • Jail releases per own recognizance policy
• Number of warrants issued (excluding • Number of active mandatory supervisions at• AB109 Homeless Incentive Program
those that absconded before supervision) the end of month participation data
• Total number of individuals who have • Number of warrants issued • Office for Employment and Training-
had a warrant Issued • Number of active warrants at the end of the KickStart Program participation
• Number of active warrants remaining at month • Monterey County Behavioral Health
the end of month • Mandatory supervision revocation petitions participation and service delivery data
• Number of flash incarcerations filed • Behavioral Interventions: Day Reporting
• Number of individuals flash incarcerated • Number of mandatory supervision cases Center participation count
terminated
The CCP identified the following accomplishments from FY 2011-12
Plan Creation - Defined strategies, designed and prepared plan, approved plan.
Training and Staffing -Trained Probation Officers working with adult offenders on ORAS tool. trained staff on evidence-based practices
(Motivational Interviewing, Trauma Informed Treatment, Seeking Safety, Courage to Change); and added and filled positions incrementally, as
groups of offenders were transferred to local authority.
Alternatives to Detention - Revised and expanded Own Recognizance (OR) policy; and expanded Electronic Monitoring program to include
involuntary status.
Evidence-based Supervision - Revised Adult Supervision protocol; reorganized caseloads based on classification (intensive supervision
caseloads capped at 60); implemented use of ORAS assessments, adopted matrix for different levels of intervention based on criminogenic needs;
established graduated sanctions; initiated incentive program and created a reentry assessment process.
Treatment and Rehabilitation - Expanded capacity of the Day Reporting Center from 50 to 100 on-going participants; coordinated with
service providers of substance abuse services to identify current capacity; allocated additional resources to expand substance abuse services; and
administered behavioral health psychosocial assessment.
Custody - Managed available jail beds maintaining the existing capacity without need of out-of-county custody beds.
Data Collection and Evaluation - Allocated resources to data collection and evaluation, Identified evaluation team; held preliminary meetings
with stakeholders; evaluated current data collection and technology capacity; and Identified needs and established data elements and parameters.
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $4,406,336 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $11,335,298
Allocated funding as follows:
DSES* $275,333 • 1 FTE Sr. Psychiatric Social Worker
$752,266
• 1 FTE Probation Services Manager
$348,846 • 1 FTE Probation Officer III
Health**
$933,318 • 4 FTE Probation Officer II
$742,000 • 1 FTE Probation Office Assistant II
Day Reporting***
$1,122,000 • 1 FTE Deputy Sheriff - Corrections
$1,181,903 • 1 FTE Criminal Intelligence Specialist
Sheriff
• 1 FTE Workforce Investment Board
$3,685,017 Representative II
$1,392,400
Probation
$3,063,119
$137,897
DA/PD****
$155,300
$327,957
Contingency Fund+
$1,624,278
*Department of Social and Employment Services **Department of Health, Behavioral Health Bureau
***Day Reporting Center and Evaluation ****District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
+Contingency Fund includes unspent funds from FY 2011-12
63
Community
Corrections
NAPA COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Mary Butler* The Napa CCP convenes monthly. The membership roster is listed in the left hand
Chief Probation Officer column.
Chair
Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Mark Boessenecker*
Presiding judge or designee
Napa County utilizes the Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI
Mark Luce instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs and the Ohio Risk
County supervisor or chief
Assessment System (ORAS) Pretrial Tool for court pretrial release decisions.
administrative officer or
designee
CCP Objectives
Gary Lieberstein*
District Attorney
Safety - Assure that the proposed program or policy maintains sufficient control over
Ron Abernethy* defendants and offenders to minimize risk to the community when they are not
Public Defender confined.
Punishment - Assure that the proposal is consistent with the deterrent and
John Robertson*
Sheriff retributive functions of law enforcement, both for participants and for the public at
large.
Rich Melton*
Recidivism - Implement programs or policies shown to produce a reduction in
Chief of Police
recidivism. Recidivism is measured by returns to incarceration for supervision
Randy Snowden* violations and failures to appear as well as by the commission of new offenses. These
Department of Social
multiple measures will allow Napa County to measure success in terms of jail bed use
Services and Department
of Employment as well as community safety, and to account for pretrial defendants as well as
sentenced offenders.
Jaye Vanderhurs
Cost - Determine what investment is required by the county to establish a program
Department of
Mental Health and then to maintain it. Assure that there is evidence that enough people would qualify
for or be referred to the program to justify it.
Connie Moreno-Peraza
Rehabilitation services - Assure that rehabilitation services are given to medium and
Department of Alcohol and
Substance Abuse Programs high risk offenders matching their needs to the services offered.
Barbara Nemko
CCP Data Collection (not exhaustive)
County Office of Education
Vacant
The county collects the following offender related data:
Community-based
organization
• Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) violations
Jamie Johnson
Victims’ interests • 1170(h) violations
• Recidivism
• Split sentences
• Electronic monitoring
*Indicates member of the • Flash incarceration
Executive Committee
• Mandatory supervision
• PRCS offenders received from the California Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation (CDCR) vs. estimate
• Warrants
• Terminations
64
The County has Implemented Eight Precepts of
Evidence-Based Practices
• Assess risk and needs - Napa County Probation assesses all offenders using the LS/CMI assessment
tool. This information is included in pre-sentence reports to the court and used to develop supervision
plans for offenders.
• Enhance motivation - Napa County Probation and Department of Corrections staff have all been
trained in Motivational Interviewing and utilize these skills in their everyday assignments.
• Target intervention - Probation officers develop supervision plans based on the top criminogenic
needs of the offender. Best practice is to focus on the top three areas of concern.
• Skill train - Programs utilized by Napa County offenders are skill-based and are generally cognitive
behavioral skill building groups. These programs are utilized by probation officers and contractors.
• Positive reinforcement - Napa County Probation is using a rewards/sanctions grid that provides
behavior change for negative behavior and rewards for positive behavior. Staff has rewards available to
them to use with offenders.
• Support in natural communities - Napa County has opened a day reporting center called the
Community Corrections Service Center. This allows offenders to receive programs while living in their
community. Referrals are made to other local programs, including mental health, substance abuse
treatment, batterers intervention programs and sex offender treatment.
• Measure process - Napa County has a criminal justice analyst who will be monitoring the evidence-
based programs offered in the community.
• Provide feedback - Napa County continues to monitor programs and give feedback to staff as well as
the criminal justice system partners.
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $1,090,834 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $2,646,361
$26,986
Training*
$0
$0
Re‐entry facility**
$500,000
$121,594
Jail***
$552,500
$216,449
Probation
$466,382
$0
Mental Health Agency
$14,386
$37,706
DA/PD****
$42,793
$688,099
Contingency Fund+
$1,070,300
*Allocation for training and retention purposes
**Reserved for a re‐entry facility
***Jail is operated by the Napa County Department of Corrections
****District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
+Contingency Fund includes money set aside for training
65
Community
Corrections
NEVADA COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Michael Ertola* The Nevada CCP convenes bi-monthly. The membership roster is listed in the left
Chief Probation Officer hand column.
Chair
Tanya Clark* Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Presiding judge or designee
Hank Weston Nevada County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG)
County supervisor or chief instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs.
administrative officer or
designee
CCP Objectives
Cliff Newell*
District Attorney and
Victims’ interests • Develop a community-wide, front-loaded assessment protocol.
• Assess correctional intervention needs (treatment).
Donald Lown*
Public Defender • Assess health care needs.
• Assess mental health needs.
Keith Royal*
• Impacts on cities and neighborhoods and service planning by geography.
Sheriff
• Impacts on front-line law enforcement and efficiencies through partnership.
John Foster* • Housing for homeless offender/re-entry population.
Chief of Police
• Employment vocational training, readiness, and placement.
Jeffrey Brown* • Assess educational needs.
Department of • Streamline referral processes for existing programs.
Social Services
• Identify available resources.
Darrell Quinn • Analyze need information for clients on an aggregate level to drive planning.
Department of • Match needs to available resources and identify service gaps.
Mental Health
• Identify places where resources can be re-purposed to increase effectiveness.
Jim Dunkel • Develop partnerships in a program for community service for offenders.
Department of • Identify and evaluate areas where partnerships can more efficiently meet
Employment
community needs.
Mary Lowe • Evaluate efficiencies of current system and recommend modifications.
Department of Alcohol and • Establish outcome reporting and feedback loops for collaborative review to ensure
Substance Abuse Programs
transparency and maximize accountability for the criminal justice system.
Holly Hermansen • Assess alcohol and drug treatment needs.
County Office of Education
Warren Daniels Outcome Measures Identified in FY 2012-13 (Year 2)
Joe Festerson
Community-based
organization • Number of individuals in need of housing
• Number of individuals with substance abuse needs
*Indicates member of the • Number of individuals who received a GED
Executive Committee • Number of individuals convicted while under supervision
• Number of individuals on flash incarceration
• Number of individuals on PC3056 holds
66
CCP Data Collection
Nevada County collects the following offender data:
• Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) violations
• 1170(h) violations
• Parole revocations
• Flash incarceration
• Recidivism
• Jail population (daily population, alternative sentencing program, and number of individuals due to
overcrowding)
• Electronic monitoring
• Number of referrals to Behavioral Health
• Number of assessments provided by Behavioral Health
• Number of individuals provided treatment by Behavioral Health
• Number of outpatient placements
• Number of residential placements
• Number of individuals receiving transitional housing
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
The county allocated funding to support the following:
• 1 FTE Probation Officer
• 1 FTE Deputy Sheriff
• Contract for transitional housing
• Day Reporting Center, which was fully implemented in September 2012
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $533,618.00 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $1,234,179.61
$2,000.00
Education
$0.00
$279,557.25
Sheriff*
$693,236.50
$119,958.00
Probation**
$377,073.11
$24,250.00
Mental Health***
$86,675.00
$18,466.00
DA/PD****
$21,973.00
$89,386.75
Contingency Fund
$55,222.00
*Sheriff includes GPS/electronic monitoring
**Probation includes residential treatment, outpatient treatment, One Stop Shop, and education
***Mental Health Agency ( Behavioral Health Therapist/ supplies)
****District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
67
Community
Corrections
ORANGE COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Steven Sentman*
Chief Probation Officer The Orange CCP convenes monthly. The membership roster is listed in the left hand column.
Chair
Thomas Borris* Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Cherie Garofalo
Presiding judge or designee
Orange County utilizes the Wisconsin Risk Assessment Instrument (WRAI) for probation
John Moorlach supervision and intervention programs, and uses the Hawaii Proxy tool and WRAI with the jail
County supervisor or chief population regarding release decisions.
administrative officer or
designee
CCP Objectives
Tony Rackauckas*
• Health Care and Orange County Probation Department (OCPD): In January of 2013
District Attorney
sober living beds were made available to Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) and
Frank Ospino* Mandatory Supervision offenders (male, females, and females with children) who will also
Public Defender
be required to participate in outside care through OCPD's Day Reporting Center or
other county approved outpatient treatment services.
Sandra Hutchens*
Sheriff • CCP Research Committee: Partner with a local university and/or an independent
think-tank to evaluate the county-wide impact of AB 109 on public safety and other
Kevin Raney*
important measures.
Chief of Police
Outcomes Identified in FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
Dr. Michael Riley
Department of
Social Services • Implementation of a streamlined and efficient system in Orange County to manage our
additional responsibilities under realignment.
Mary Hale*
• Implementation of a system that protects public safety and utilizes best practices in
Department of
recidivism reduction.
Mental Health
• Implementation of a system that effectively utilizes alternatives to pretrial and
Andrew Munoz post-conviction incarceration, where appropriate.
Department of
Employment
Outcome Results for FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
Brett O'Brien
Department of Alcohol and • Orange County (OC) has a history of collaboration between agencies including Probation,
Substance Abuse Programs Sheriff, Health Care, Social Services, District Attorney, Public Defender, Courts,
Education, and many community-based organizations. Under AB 109, several informal
Dr. Bryon Fairchild
workgroups were established where decision-makers tackle various issues and make
County Office of Education
recommendations to the CCP for formal adoption.
Bobbi Johnson • In response to AB 109, the OCPD created the PRCS Division to handle the offenders
Community-based
being released from prison. As of March 2013, the Probation Department received 2,805
organization
prison releases under PRCS and currently supervises an additional 499 new offenders
Margot Carlson under Mandatory Supervision. In the Fall 2011, OCPD’s Adult Assessment Instrument was
Victims’ interests revalidated. The use of a validated actuarial assessment instrument is a key principle
underlying the community corrections evidence-based practices model advocated by the
National Institute of Corrections.
*Indicates member of the • The OC Sheriff's Department uses a combination of methods to adjust to the increase in
Executive Committee inmate populations: assigning inmates to Community Work Program (CWP); placing
inmates on Supervised Electronic Confinement (SEC); and the opening of previously
closed sections of jail facilities. The OC Sheriff's Department designed and developed a
pilot program modeled after the National Institute of Corrections Transition from Jail to
Community (TJC) grant. The program will designate a special housing unit that will
provide for a structured therapeutic environment with the goal of transitioning AB 109
inmates from the jails to the community post-incarceration.
68
CCP Data Collection (not exhaustive)
• Recidivism rates for the PRCS population
• Recidivism rates for non-violent, non-serious, non-sex offenders now under local jurisdiction
• Number and type of offenders sentenced to county jail and state prison
• Number and type of offenders sentenced to supervised release or alternative programs
• Releases from prison
• Flash incarceration
• Revocations
• Warrants
• Identifying information
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
• Day Reporting Center providing services as of July 2012.
• Orange County Sheriff will partner with Orange County Probation to develop new programs modeled after the
"Transition from Jail to Community (TJC)" to find alternative solutions to the incarceration and recidivism of
inmates.
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $24,125,646 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $56,302,998
$692,354
Police*
$1,028,798
$2,077,055
Health Care**
$12,545,961
$13,616,251
Sheriff
$27,881,899
$6,692,733
Probation
$14,346,340
$523,627
Public Defender
$250,000
$523,627
District Attorney
$250,000
*Orange County Municipal Law Enforcement includes FY 2011‐12 funds
**Orange County Health Care Agency
69
Community
Corrections
PLACER COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Marshall Hopper* The Placer CCP convenes quarterly. The membership roster is listed in the left hand column.
Chief Probation Officer
Chair
Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Jake Chaters*
Presiding judge or designee Placer County utilizes the Ohio Risk Assessment System (ORAS) for probation supervision
and intervention programs and the Virginia Pretrial Risk Assessment Instrument is used for
Jack Duran
pretrial release decisions.
County supervisor or chief
administrative officer or CCP Data Collection
designee
• Number of defendants (case numbers included) sentenced pursuant to PC 1170(h) to jail/
Scott Owens*
no split sentence, the length of sentence.
District Attorney
• Number of defendants (case numbers included) sentenced pursuant to PC 1170(h) and
Mark Berg* date of sentencing with a "split sentence," and the length of jail time in the split sentence.
Public Defender • Number of defendants sentenced pursuant to 1170(h) for a term of less than one year, 1
+ year, 2+ years, 3+ years.
Ed Bonner*
• Number of defendants who are on electronic monitoring or home detention pretrial
Sheriff
supervision and defendants who were released on electronic monitoring after being
Ron Lawrence* incarcerated on an 1170(h) offense.
Chief of Police • Number of defendants who violate a term of release while on electronic monitoring or
home detention pretrial supervision (violations should be counted without regard to
Richard Burton*
whether the violation led to termination of electronic monitoring or home detention
Departments of Social
Services, Mental Health, pretrial supervision) and the type of violation.
Alcohol and Substance • Number of defendants on 1170(h) probation who violate a term of supervision (the type
Abuse Programs and
of violation should be noted so it can be categorized and counted) while participating in
Employment
an alternative to custody, broken down by category so it is apparent how defendants
Renee Regacho- function in the various alternatives to custody.
Anaclerio • Number of Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) offenders (released from prison
County Office of Education to be supervised by probation) released to Placer County, organized by date of release
and number who violate a term of supervision (without regard to whether the violation
Walter Stockman
leads to any sanction or a parole revocation hearing) and identification of the nature of
Community-based
organization the term violated so it is apparent how PRCS offenders function after their release from
prison.
Michelle Colman
• Number of hearings seeking parole revocation of a PRCS and the number of PRCS who
Victims’ interests
have their supervision revoked, broken down by category of type of defendant, e.g.,
commitment offense was drug, theft or violence related, and amount of custody time
imposed on the PRCS.
*Indicates member of the • Number of flash incarcerations and length of time of each incarceration, broken down by
Executive Committee
commitment offense category.
• Number of early releases from custody of realignment population (PRCS and non
serious, non violent, no-sex offenders), including information on how much time remained
on sentence at time of early release and their commitment offense.
• Recidivism rates (as defined by CDCR) for 1170(h) defendants versus non 1170(h)
defendants. (To the extent that records are available and allowed to be accessed by law
following release from custody, how many defendants have new criminal charges filed
against them within 1 year, 2 years, 3 years.)
• A list of programs that are being used by Health and Human Services and Probation and
the number of defendants that are referred to them. This should include the number of
people who complete the program successfully and the recidivism data (as defined by
CDCR) on those in that program.
• A complete accounting of all funds allocated to evidence-based programming to
70
include the type of program, the provider of the program, an offender identifier,
and the cost of the program.
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
• Allocation for a full body scanner in the jail.
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $4,757,373 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $6,307,749
$0
CEO*
$1,847,169
$200,000
Law Enforcement**
$400,000
$816,200
Health Services***
$816,200
$2,381,499
Sheriff
$1,879,706
$1,097,628
Probation
$1,172,628
$70,000
Public Defender
$0
$192,046
District Attorney
$192,046
*CEO ‐ County Executive Office Criminal Justice Fund (additional funding requests from this fund are approved by the
Board of Supervisors)
**County/City Law Enforcement Collaborative
***Health and Human Services Department includes $416,000 set aside for community treatment contracts and
services
71
Community
Corrections
PLUMAS COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Sharon Reinert* The Plumas CCP convenes monthly. The membership roster is listed in the left hand
Chief Probation Officer column.
Chair
Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Debbie Norrie*
Presiding judge or designee
Plumas County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG)
Jon Kennedy
County supervisor or chief instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs, and for referral to
administrative officer or in-custody programs.
designee
David Hollister* CCP Objectives
District Attorney
• Expand the Day Reporting Center to include a new location.
Douglas Prouty*
Public Defender • Define recidivism and implement a tracking process.
• Increase evidence-based services for in-custody clients to include life skills,
Greg Hagwood*
vocational training, and a horticulture program.
Sheriff
• Continue implementation of Adult Substance Abuse Court, which may evolve to
N/A* include a Mental Health and Veterans Court with increased participation.
Chief of Police
Outcomes Identified in FY 2011-12 and FY 2012-13
Elliott Smart
Department of
Social Services
• To purchase and initiate a case management system for the Probation Department.
Kimball Pier • To update the current database for the District Attorney's Office and other CCP
Department of
agencies.
Mental Health
• Identify gaps and areas of needs regarding services.
Vacant • To provide in-custody and out-of-custody alcohol and drug services to clients.
Department of
• To provide in-custody and out-of-custody mental health services to clients.
Employment
• Increase Child Protective Services coordination.
Mimi Hall* • Implement evidence-based assessments and programs.
Department of Alcohol and
Substance Abuse Programs
Outcome Results for FY 2011-12 and FY 2012-13
Vacant
County Office of Education • The Probation Department implemented CaseloadPRO.
• Modified/updated existing case management system for the District Attorney's
Victoria Metcalf
Office and other CCP agencies.
Community-based
organization • Increased mental health, and alcohol and drug services.
• Increased alcohol and drug services assessments, as well as increased group and
Vacant
individual sessions.
Victims’ interests
• Expanded targeted mental health case management.
• Provided in-custody Moral Recognition Therapy (MRT) to groups.
*Indicates member of the
• Provided evidence-based assessments and programs at the Day Reporting Center.
Executive Committee
72
CCP Data Collection (not exhaustive)
Plumas County collects offender data in the following categories:
• Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) violations
• Intermediate Sanctions (e.g. Flash Incarceration)
• Jail Population (daily population, number of individuals due to overcrowding, etc.)
• Alternative sentencing programs
• 1170(h) Sentencing
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
The county allocated funding to support the following:
• .5 Case Manager to assist the Alternative Sentencing Coordinator
• 1 Probation Officer
• Day Reporting Center, which opened in March 2013
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $225,512.00 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $498,992.00
$25,000
Public Health Department
$0
$46,500
Sheriff
$220,301
$75,000
Probation
$48,000 $225,958
Mental Health Agency
$0
$5,512
DA/PD*
$5,825
$0
District Attorney
$28,609
$15,000
Contingency Fund
$11,055
$10,500
Community‐Based Organization(s)
$7,244
*District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
73
Community
Corrections
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
The Riverside CCP convenes annually. The membership roster is listed in the left hand
Mark Hake*
Chief Probation Officer column.
Chair
Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Mark Cope*
Sherri Carter*
Riverside County utilizes the Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative
Presiding judge or designee
Sanctions (COMPAS) instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs, jail
John Benoit population release decisions, and referral to in-custody programs.
County supervisor or chief
administrative officer or CCP Objectives
designee
• Continue sub-work group committees.
Paul Zellerbach* • Develop plans for two additional Day Reporting Centers.
District Attorney
• Fully implement re-entry and transitional housing options.
Steve Harmon* • Explore, develop, and implement alternatives to custody.
Public Defender • Develop and implement incentives for compliant Post Release Community Supervision
(PRCS) and Mandatory Supervision offenders.
Stanley Sniff*
• Continue using evidence-based practices and programming.
Sheriff
• Evaluate performance measurements to ensure meaningful data collection.
Frank Coe* • Continue quality assurance efforts and refresher training for staff to ensure fidelity to
Chief of Police
evidenced-based practices (such as Courage to Change, Motivational Interviewing, and
COMPAS assessment tool).
Susan Lowe
Department of • Enhance and expand information sharing between agencies.
Social Services
Outcomes Measures Identified in FY 2011-12 and FY 2012-13
Jerry Wengerd*
Department of • Recidivism percent based on closures.*
Mental Health
• Revocation percent based on population: Calculated by taking the number of offenders
whose supervision was revoked at any point in the reporting period, divided by the total
Barbara Olivier
Department of number of offenders. Offenders will only be counted once in the reporting period
Employment regardless of how many times their case(s) was revoked.
• Arrest rates: Calculated by taking the total number of bookings for this reporting period
Karen Kane
and determining the number and percentage which were attributed to a PRCS violation
Department of Alcohol and
Substance Abuse Programs or flash incarceration.
• Deputy Public Defender Court Appearances: The Law Office of the Public Defender
Kenneth Young handled both PRCS cases and cases adjudicated under Penal Code section 1170(h), and
County Office of Education
tracked court appearances during this reporting period. (Note: Recently the Board of
Supervisors has appointed Steven Harmon as the new Public Defender. The office is
Eva Guenther-James
Community-based undergoing a complete review of all data; thus, the numbers reflect the current
organization information available).
• Post-release Accountability and Compliance Team (PACT) compliance checks and arrests:
La Chelle Crivello
Compiled numbers of compliance checks conducted and arrests preformed by PACT.
Victims’ interests
Identifying specifically out of arrests performed, the number of PRCS offenders arrested.
• COMPAS Assessment Realignment Risk level rates: Calculated by taking the total number
of realignment assessments completed and determining the number and percentage which
were attributed to High, Medium, and Low.
*Indicates member of the
Executive Committee
*CPOC Definition: An offender is counted if he/she was convicted of a new felony offense during the term of their supervision. This information is
only reported at the time of closure. DISCLAIMER: This count does not include those returned to custody for technical or flash incarcerations. This
count does not include those who were arrested for a new felony offense during the term of their supervision, but were not convicted during their
term of supervision and/or prior to supervision closing. Riverside County Probation Department is collecting data on arrests, filings, convictions,
revocations, and flash incarcerations, and is in the process of deciding upon a definition of recidivism that will serve their purposes locally.
74
CCP Data Collection Outcome Measure Results for FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
• Total post-release
• PRCS recidivism percent based on closures (CPOC Def): 19.4%.
community
• PRCS revocation percent based on population: 19.2%.
supervision population
• Mandatory supervision revocation percent based on population: 15.1%.
• Total mandatory • Arrest rates: Per the Riverside County Sheriff's booking statistics, 488 PRCS offenders
supervision population were booked into jail for a violation of PRCS supervision or received a flash incarceration
sanction. This represents 1.2% of their total bookings. The Sheriff does not have similar
• Number PRCS/
data for the Mandatory Supervision offenders. The Sheriff received 2,415 bookings for
Mandatory Supervision
parole violations (3056PC), representing 6% of total bookings.
offenders whose
case(s) were revoked • Deputy Public Defender court appearances: Approximately 716 appearances related to
realignment cases.
• Number of PRCS/ • Post-release Accountability and Compliance Team: 319 compliance checks conducted, 98
Mandatory Supervision
arrests performed of which 57 were PRCS offenders.
offenders who were
• COMPAS assessment realignment risk level rates: High 69%, Medium 14%, Low 17%.
terminated with final
statuses of sentenced
to county jail or state Outcome Measure Results for FY 2012-13 (Year 2)
prison
• Number of PRCS/ • PRCS recidivism percent based on closures (CPOC Def): 16.5% (7/12-12/12).
Mandatory Supervision • Mandatory supervision recidivism percent based on Closures (CPOC Def): 33.7% (10/12-
closures per reporting 12/12.
period
• PRCS revocation percent based on population: 24.8% (7/12-3/13).
• Mandatory supervision revocation percent based on population: 31% (7/12-3/13).
• Riverside county
• Arrest rates: Per the Riverside County Sheriff's booking statistics, 1,156 PRCS offenders
Sheriff's booking
information were booked into jail for a violation of PRCS supervision or received a flash incarceration
sanction. This represents 2.8% of their total bookings. The Sheriff does not have similar
• Post-release data for the Mandatory Supervision offenders. The Sheriff received 2,262 bookings for
Accountability
parole violations PC3056, representing 5.3% of total bookings (7/12-4/13).
• Public Defender Court Appearances: Approximately 3,141 appearances related to
• Compliance Team
realignment cases (7/12-5/13).
compliance check and
arrest data • Post-release Accountability and Compliance Team: 862 compliance checks conducted, 445
arrests performed (7/12-4/13).
• COMPAS assessment • COMPAS Assessment Realignment Risk level rates: High 64%, Medium 18%, Low 18%
realignment Risk level (7/12-4/13).
rates
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
Year 1 total includes one-time allocation of $1,487,050
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $22,561,518 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $52,729,414 (allocated based on each agency's percentage share of the total
CCP funding); it does not include the DA/PD allocation
$755,421, the Courts allocation of $662,000, nor the $200,000
$755,960 CCP Planning Allocation Fund).
Police
$1,419,940 Year 2 total includes FY11/12 rollover funds of $8,808,627;
FY11/12 Contingency funds of $737,606; and, does not
$10,044,948 include the Courts allocation of $344,000 and the $200,000
Sheriff
CCP Planning Allocation Fund).
$21,753,740
Police Departments includes rollover funds from FY11/12,
Probation $5,838,955 contingency funds, and 9 month approved FY11/12 budgets.
$12,372,106
Sheriff includes rollover funds from FY11/12, contingency funds,
and 9 month approved FY12/13 budgets.
$451,419
Public Defender Probation includes rollover funds from FY11/12, contingency
$453,445
funds, and 9 month approved FY12/13 budgets.
Public Defender includes rollover funds from FY11/12 and
$4,142,247
Mental Health Agency contingency funds.
$12,534,051
Mental Health Agency includes rollover funds from FY11/12,
contingency funds, and 9 month approved FY12/13 budgets.
$590,383
District Attorney $1,122,270 District Attorney includes rollover funds from FY11/12,
contingency funds, and 9 month approved FY12/13 budgets
$737,606 Contingency Fund represents a 3.5% share of each agency's
Contingency
$3,073,862 allocation in year one. In year two the CCP
Executive Committee approved a 7.12% share 75
of the total $43.2M program allocation.
Community
Corrections
SACRAMENTO COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Lee Seale* The Sacramento CCP convenes monthly. The membership roster is listed in the left hand
Chief Probation Officer column.
Chair
Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Chris Volkers*
Presiding judge or designee
Sacramento County utilizes the Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI) and the
Britt Ferguson
County supervisor or chief Washington State Risk Assessment instrument for probation supervision and intervention
administrative officer or programs, the Virginia Pretrial Risk Assessment Instrument (VPRAI) and Correctional Offender
designee Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions (COMPAS) instrument with the jail population
regarding release decisions, the COMPAS, an internal pre-screen assessment tool, an addiction
Jan Scully*
screening index for substance abuse/addiction, a risk/needs responsivity model for program
District Attorney
development and offender re-entry programming, and the VPRAI for referrals to in-custody
Paulino Duran* programs. The VPRAI is also used for court pretrial release decisions.
Public Defender
CCP Objectives
Scott Jones*
Sheriff
Community safety - Program goals will strive to maintain maximum public safety through
Sam Somers* enhanced sanctions and reducing recidivism.
Chief of Police
High-risk offenders - Identify and target offenders with the highest risk to reoffend using
Ann Edwards* evidence-based risk assessment tools and providing intensive supervision within the
Department of community.
Social Services Efficient use of jail capacity - Minimize the impact of the increased jail population by
employing recognized techniques to increase efficient use of current pretrial and sentenced jail
Dr. Sherri Heller
bed capacity by reserving jail beds for the most serious and violent offenders while diverting
Department of Mental
Health and Department of those manageable to community alternative programs.
Alcohol and Substance Targeted interventions - Use research and evidence-based needs assessment tools to
Abuse Programs identify criminogenic needs and find, create, or contract for target interventions. This will
include the need to provide services to cover factors such as employment, education, housing,
Bill Walker
Department of physical and mental health, and drug / alcohol treatment.
Employment Incorporate reentry principles into the jail custody environment - Reduce recidivism
through the development and improvement of an offender’s life skills that are necessary for
Dave Gordon
successful reintegration into the community by expanding in-custody jail programming using
County Office of Education
evidence-based practices.
Vacant Incorporate evidence-based practices into supervision and case management of
Community-based post release offenders - Utilize principles and practices proven to reduce recidivism through
organization more effective supervision and intervention services for offenders sentenced to local terms of
imprisonment as well as offenders returning from prison to post-community release
Kerry Martin
Victims’ interests supervision.
Sentencing for felony offenders - Presentence recommendations should be guided by static
risk scores (low risk – minimal sanction, increasing sanctions for higher risk levels). Encourage
the use of evidence-based practices in the sentencing for felony offenders by utilizing principles
proven to lower recidivism through more effective sentencing.
*Indicates member of the
Executive Committee Offender accountability - Focus resources on providing alternatives to criminal behavior.
Increase offender accountability through effective use of graduated violation sanctions, custody,
and custody alternatives.
Monitoring and reporting performance - Regularly measure and assess data and
programs, followed by community reporting and adjustments in programs and services as
determined to reduce recidivism. The local justice system will be guided by research to
implement the most cost-effective practices that reduce recidivism, victimization and program
failure. 76
Data
Current Month Year to Date
(Fiscal Year 2012-2013 - Current Month: May 2013)
• Total number of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) 94 930
p
p
r
ro
er
b
e
a
l
t
e
io
as
n
e
d
P
e
o
pa
st
r tm
Re
e
l
n
e
t
a se Community Supervision (PRCS) packets received by the
2 6 6
• Number of denied PRCS packets
• Count of PRCS offenders released and accepted into probation jurisdiction during 5 5 70 5
•
t
C
h
D
e
C
pe
R
r i
p
o
r
d
o jected releases (not automated, as reported by CDCR) 6 3 75 6
• Number of PRCS offenders who absconded prior to reporting to probation 3 61
• Number of PRCS offenders who absconded after reporting to probation 62 448
4 138
• PRCS closures (6-12 months) with no custodial violations
• PRCS closures (1 year) with no custodial violations 32 321
• PRCS closures (18 plus months) 7 10
• PRCS closures with a felony conviction in between release and closure date 30 197
• Count of all PRCS closures 74 855
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
Sacramento County allocated funding to support the following:
• Crime Analyst to assist law enforcement with trends and proactive intervention
• Psychotropic medication and monitoring for in-custody and probation AB 109 clients
• In-custody long-term mental health treatment
• GPS/Kiosk monitoring for probation
• District Attorney criminalist, forensic lab technician, and dedicated AB 109 prosecutor
• Medi-Cal eligibility specialists (one for jail and one for probation)
• 40 bed emergency and transitional housing with services through Volunteers of America
• Revised the average daily population numbers of offenders on electronic monitoring (EM) from 300 to 200.
Referrals who are unsuitable for the EM program include inmates who have (a) a history of recent suicidal attempts
and/or gestures, (b) severe psychiatric problems, (c) prior episodes of violent behavior toward family or others
including police or emergency personnel, (d) extensive drug / alcohol abuse, and (e) live within close proximity to
victims.
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
*One time start up costs
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $14,859,523 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $30,858,495
**District Attorney/
Public Defender (direct
$0 allocation, non CCP funds)
Other
$158,851 ***Contingency Fund includes
$0 unallocated planning funds
Social Services
$434,388 ****Community-Based
Correctional Health $0 Organization(s)
$501,088
$152,027
Planning allocation
$301,827
$1,022,367
Start up costs*
$0
$8,485,806
Sheriff
$19,381,702
$4,067,832
Probation
$8,010,037
$471,018
DA/PD**
$534,303
$0
District Attorney
$352,391
$47,973
Contingency Fund***
$34,167
$612,500
CBO(s)****
$1,149,741
77
Community
Corrections
SAN BENITO COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Brent Cardall* The San Benito CCP convenes quarterly. The membership roster is listed in the left
Chief Probation Officer
hand column.
Chair
Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Steve Sanders*
Presiding judge or designee
San Benito County utilizes the Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI)
Ray Espinosa
County supervisor or chief and Wisconsin Risk/Needs assessment tool for probation supervision and intervention
administrative officer or programs; the Virginia Pretrial Risk Assessment Instrument with the jail population
designee
regarding release decisions, referrals to in-custody programs, and for court pretrial
Candice Hooper* release decisions.
District Attorney
CCP Objectives
Greg LaForge*
Public Defender
• Maintain community safety through supervision and programming.
Darren Thompson* • Enhanced evidence-based practices, such as a Community Review Board, Thinking
Sheriff
for a Change, etc.
Carlos Reynoso* • Continue the use of flash incarceration, which is an alternative event to change
Chief of Police negative behavior.
• Provide mental health treatment, substance abuse counseling, orientation and in-
Maria Corona
Department of and-out patient programming.
Social Services
CCP Data Collection (not exhaustive)
Alan Yamamoto*
Department of
Mental Health • Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) violations
• 1170(h) violations
Yuko Duckworth
• Recidivism
Department of
Employment • Split sentences
• Electronic monitoring
Renee Hankla
• Flash incarceration
Department of Alcohol and
Substance Abuse Programs • Mandatory supervision
• PRCS offenders received from the California Department of Corrections and
Mike Sanchez
Rehabilitation (CDCR) vs. estimate
County Office of Education
• Warrants
Diane Ortiz • Terminations
Community-based
• Mental Health Services
organization
• Substance Abuse Services
Julie Roybal
Victims’ interests Data from July 2012 – June 2013
• Number of PRCS Violations - 24
*Indicates member of the
• Number of 1170(h) violations - 14
Executive Committee
• Recidivism - 2 PRCS
• Split sentencing - 29
• Straight sentence 3
• Flash incarceration - 19
• PRCS Warrants - 14
• 1170(h) Warrants -12
78
• PRCS Terminations - 26
• 1170(h) Terminations - 3
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
San Benito County allocated funding to support the following:
• 3 Correctional Officers at the jail
• Provided "Thinking for a Change" training to staff
• Electronic Monitoring Program
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $706,032.99 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $1,217,393
$333,890
AB 109 Funds*
$513,711
$211,792
Services and Supplies**
$137,725
$140,717
Salaries and Benefits***
$544,334
$19,634
DA/PD****
$21,623
*Funds in this line item have been set aside for future activities. AB 109 funds are deposited into a Public Safety Trust
fund and budgets are approved by the CCP executive committee and sent to the Board of Supervisors for approval each
year. Expenditures are reimbursed as they occur with the approval of the CCP Chair.
**Services and Supplies includes training costs, electronic monitoring, and jail capacity expansion
***Salaries and Benefits includes behavioral health, probation, and jail staff
****District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
79
Community
Corrections
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Michelle Brown* The San Bernardino CCP convenes semiannually. The membership roster is listed in
Chief Probation Officer the left hand column.
Chair
Marsha Slough* Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Presiding judge or designee
Gary McBride San Bernardino County utilizes the Correctional Offender Management Profiling for
County supervisor or chief Alternative Sanctions (COMPAS) instrument for probation supervision and intervention
administrative officer or
programs.
designee
Michael Ramos* CCP Objectives
District Attorney
Phyllis Morris* • Update the Board of Supervisors on AB 109 activities and its implementation prior
Public Defender
to May 2013.
John McMahon* • Complete an 18 month report on the impact of realignment in San Bernardino
Sheriff County.
Chair of the San
Bernardino Police CCP Data Collection (not exhaustive)
Chiefs and Sheriffs
Association (rotated
The county collects the following offender related data:
annually)
Chief of Police
• Flash incarceration
Linda Haugan*
Department of • Home confinement and house arrest
Social Services • Electronic monitoring
• Work release
Casonya Thomas
Department of • Number of parolees absconding from supervision
Mental Health • Risk scores
• Split sentences
Miguel McQueen
Department of • Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) cases
Employment • Number of new cases filed
• Number of revocation hearings
Gary Atkins
Department of Alcohol and • Offender received from the California Department of Corrections and
Substance Abuse Programs Rehabilitation (CDCR) vs. estimate
• Recidivism
Dr. Thomas
County Office of Education • Housing referrals
• Drug and alcohol referrals
Inland Valley Recovery • Completed orientation
Services
Community-based • Employment
organization • New arrests by police agency
• Closure/termination reasons
Stacy Smith
Victims’ interests
*Indicates member of the
Executive Committee
80
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
San Bernardino County allocated funding to support the following:
• FTEs to the Sheriff’s Department
• Contracted services for transitional housing
• Three Day Reporting Centers, which became operational in June 2013
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY2011‐12 (Year 1) $28,529,368 FY2012‐13 (Year 2) $56,895,306
$344,070
Other*
$556,464
$3,903,668
Sheriff $25,141,920
$19,809,666
Probation
$18,762,404
$664,689
Public Defender**
$1,535,434
$349,824
Mental Health Agency
$3,845,216
$1,357,452
District Attorney***
$1,953,869
$2,100,000
CBO(s)****
$5,100,000
*Other includes Workforce Development, Children and Family Services, Department of Aging and Adult Services, and
Human Resources
**Public Defender includes direct allocation of $462,146.50 in FY 2011‐12 and $524.867.50 in FY 2012‐13
***District Attorney includes direct allocation of $462,146.50 in FY 2011‐12 and $524.867.50 in FY 2012‐13
****Community Based‐Organization(s) or contracts
81
Community
Corrections
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Mack Jenkins* The San Diego CCP convenes quarterly. The membership roster is listed in the left hand
Chief Probation Officer column.
Chair
Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
David Danielsen*
Presiding judge or designee
San Diego County utilizes the Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative
Ron Lane
Sanctions (COMPAS) instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs and for
County supervisor or chief
referral to in-custody programs.
administrative officer or
designee CCP Objectives
Bonnie Dumanis*
District Attorney • Enhance pretrial processes to more effectively utilize current jail capacity.
• Improve and streamline felony settlement.
Henry Coker* • Encourage the use of evidence-based practices in sentencing for felony offenders.
Public Defender
• Employ alternative custody options and in-custody programming.
• Provide evidence-based supervision and intervention services for Post Release Community
William Gore*
Sheriff Supervision (PRCS) Offenders.
Frank McCoy*
Chief of Police Data 10/1/11 - 9/30/12 10/1/11 - 3/31/13
Nick Macchione* • Number of PRCS offenders released from prison 2,736 3,4 98
Department of Social • Number of PRCS offenders under supervision 2,3 75 3,0 46
Services and Department
• Number of PRCS offenders released to other custody 20 2 24 7
of Mental Health
• Number of PRCS offenders initially failed to appear/on warrant status 15 9 20 5
Nick Macchione • Number of probation officers face to face contacts: 15,6 00 31,0 00
Susan Bower • Number of drug tests conducted: 4,4 00 11,4 00
Department of Alcohol and • Number of arrests for violations of the terms of supervision 1,8 35 2,1 50
Substance Abuse Programs
• Count of Flash incarcerations 1,460 of 761 Individuals 1428 o f 1,327
Mark Nanzer • Full revocations 73 4 1,3 07
Department of • Electronic monitoring 4 0 6 8
Employment • Average daily jail population 5,073 -
• Average number of inmates requiring specialty housing 781 1,065
Dr. Randy Ward • Longest projected stay in-custody 4 Years, 9 Months 12 Years, 4 Months
County Office of Education
• Percentage of total inmate population that are realigned 31 % 32 %
Vacant • Six month early discharge 24 0 42 0
Community-based • PRCS Risk Assessment - High Risk to reoffend 67 % 70 %
organization • PRCS Risk Assessment - Medium Risk to reoffend 20% 14%
• PRCS Risk Assessment - Low Risk to reoffend 13 % 16 %
Vacant • Number of 1170(h)(5)(b) releases from local jail 13 1 -
Victims’ interests • Number of 1170(h) (5)(b) under supervision 10 3 33 5
Kelly Duffek • Number of 1170(h)(5)(b) on warrant: 2 0 -
Housing and Community • Number of 1170(h)(5)(a) sentences 1,8 10 3,0 05
Representative • Number of 1170(h)(5)(b) sentences 37 2 71 4
• Percentage of Split sentences 21% 24 %
• Number of admissions to Behavioral Health Services 1,081 -
• Percentage of admissions to Substance Abuse Services 60% -
*Indicates member of the
• Percentage of admissions to Mental Health Services 40 % -
Executive Committee
• Percentage of 1170(h)(5) offenders with a new misdemeanor or felony - 24 %
charge
• Percentage of PRCS Offenders with a new misdemeanor or felony charge - 42%
82
Outcomes Identified in FY 2011-12
• Use of jail space (length of stay for various populations)
• Amount and type of in-custody programming
• Use of risk / need assessment in sentencing, supervision and case management
Results of Outcomes Identified in FY 2011-12
The following is a summarization of information provided by San Diego County in FY 2011-121:
Use of jail space – The average number of realigned offenders detained locally continued to increase with the
percentage of sentenced inmates increasing from 38% in calendar year 2011 to 44% as of September 2012. The inmate
jail population reached a critical point in January 2012, which required the release of inmates early to adhere to
court-ordered population limits. With public safety being the primary concern of the Sheriff in any early release
decision, the Sheriff implemented two jail population mitigation strategies: (1) accelerated release credits, resulting in
recalculating 1,665 inmate sentences; (not all inmates were eligible for immediate release); and (2) the County Parole
and Alternative Custody (CPAC) Unit to determine inmate eligibility for electronic monitoring/GPS supervision. The
Probation Department also implemented a Residential Reentry Center (RRC) where suitable inmates receive job
readiness training and are allowed to seek employment in a Work Furlough setting. Probation, the District Attorney,
Public Defender, and the courts are expediting the sentencing process, and reaching plea agreements earlier in the
process to sentence inmates earlier, which may result in an earlier release from jail.
Amount and type of in-custody programming – In August 2012, the Sheriff began to transform the East Mesa Detention
Facility (EMDF) into a reentry facility to provide new programs targeting recidivism risk factors and evidence-based
reentry practices. EMDF is being expanded to increase facility capacity to 1,000 beds, when completed in 2014, to offer
wraparound services for inmates in reentry programming. The Sheriff also expanded capacity for Thinking for a Change
classes at EMDF and Las Colinas Detention Facility (LCDF) to include realigned offenders.
Use of risk/needs assessment in sentencing, supervision, and case management – The county approved funding for 108
additional probation officers to form a new division with six supervision units through the county to provide services
and supervision to 3,000 realigned offenders using a new intervention model called Integrated Behavior and Integration
Strategies. The CCP also established a Behavioral Health Screening Team (BHST) to meet with each post release
offender upon his/her release from prison to screen for substance abuse and mental health needs. A part-time nurse
works with probation and BHST to link offenders with physical health needs to appropriate services. Analysis of the
COMPAS risk/needs assessment results for the realigned offender population show 66% are in high need of substance
abuse treatment, half are in need of vocational training, 47% are in need of stable housing, and 27% are identified as
having criminal thinking as their highest need. As a result, the county expanded contracts for substance abuse and
mental health services; procured services for work readiness training. The CCP also agreed to set aside funding for
housing assistance for offenders in need and treatment services for offenders enrolled in the County’s Reentry Court.
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
**District Attorney/Public Defender
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $26,005,620 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $60,034,657
(direct allocation, non CCP funds)
*Community-Based Organizations/
treatment and intervention services
$16,800,000
Sheriff
$26,200,000
$5,000,000
Probation
$15,315,000
$899,922
DA/PD**
$900,000
$0
District Attorney
$227,000
$305,698
Contingency Fund
$3,392,657
$3,000,000
CBO(s)*
$14,000,000 83
1The CCP provided additional information which is not included in this report due to space limitations.
Community
Corrections
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Wendy Still*
Chief Probation Officer The San Francisco CCP convenes quarterly. The membership roster is listed in the left hand
Chair column.
Vacant*
Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Presiding judge or designee
Paul Henderson San Francisco County utilizes the Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative
County supervisor or chief
Sanctions (COMPAS) instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs, a local
administrative officer or
tool for court pretrial release decisions, and the COMPAS for the jail population regarding
designee
release decisions and for referral to in-custody programs is pending.
George Gascón*
District Attorney
CCP Objectives
Jeff Adachi*
Public Defender
• Create a public-private partnership (inclusive of community-based organizations) to
improve outcomes for reentry that reduce victimization, break the intergenerational
Ross Mirkarimi*
Sheriff cycle of violence and increase public safety.
• Opening the Community Assessment and Service Center in June 2013.
Gregory Suhr*
Chief of Police
Outcomes Identified in FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
Steve Arcelona
Department of • Implementation of a streamlined and efficient system in the City and County of San
Social Services Francisco (CCSF) to manage additional responsibilities under realignment.
• Implementation of a system that protects public safety and utilizes best practices in
Barbara Garcia*
Department of Mental recidivism reduction.
Health and Department • Implementation of a system that effectively utilizes alternatives to pretrial and post-
of Alcohol and Substance conviction incarceration, where appropriate.
Abuse Programs
Outcome Results for FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
David Taylor
Department of
Employment • San Francisco County has made significant strides in the implementation of a streamlined
and efficient system, as the probation failure rate has been reduced by 75%, only 2% of
Steve Good Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) offenders have been prosecuted for a new
County Office of Education
offense, and terminations for realigned PRCS offenders have been occurring at the twelve
month mark.
Mimi Silbert
Gary Grellman • San Francisco County has utilized a mixture of initiatives to incorporate best practices in
Community-based recidivism reduction, as the prevalence of drug courts, mental health courts, and probation
organization
accountability courts have been instrumental in reducing the probation failure rate. In
addition, the county examined national research on evidence-based practices and created a
Beverly Upton
five year strategic plan that resulted in the revision of existing policy and procedure
Victims’ interests
manuals as well as mission statements to reflect the importance of evidence-based
practices.
• Pretrial efforts in the county date back to 1980’s, where the court has established
*Indicates member of the
relationships with local entities to provide pretrial services. The District Attorney, Public
Executive Committee
Defender’s office, and the courts have been trained on an array of evidence-based
practices that have been further supplemented by the creation of a local sentencing
commission that reviews evidence-based sentencing. In addition, the Probation
Department provides the court with family impact statements as additional information for
the court to consider when rendering decisions.
84
Public Comments and Recommendations
On March 29, 2012, the Community Corrections Partnership Executive Committee (CCPEC) presented the draft of
The City & County of San Francisco Public Safety Realignment and Post Release Community Supervision 2012
Implementation. The following is a summary of the public comments and recommendations, and how the CCPEC is
addressing them:
Comment: Improve job training and readiness services by including job placement and actual job referrals for
individuals who are ready to work. Response: The Adult Probation Department released a Request for Proposals for
Reentry Services in May 2012. $500,000 of the funding available for this RFP is dedicated to transitional jobs.
Comment: Ensure that services are provided by people who clients can relate to, for example, people who have been
in jail and/or prison in the past and have successfully exit the system. Response: The City and County of San Francisco
recognizes the importance of cultural competency and has regularly incorporated requests for culturally competent
staff and services in competitive RFP processes. The City and County of San Francisco is committed to working with
organizations that have staff with extensive criminal justice, corrections, and reentry expertise. The City and County of
San Francisco values working with organizations that create employment opportunities for previously incarcerated
people.
Comment: Indicate what specific substance use treatment programs will be available for clients. Response:
The Department of Public Health’s system of care include a variety of treatment modalities, such as residential/in-
patient treatment, intensive outpatient, outpatient, prevention, care coordination, etc.
Comment: Include services specific to the transitional age youth population (18 to 24 years old). Response: About 6%
of the population on PRCS and 10% of the population on mandatory supervision is transitional age youth. Deputy
probation officers have received training on the specific needs and barriers faced by this population and mechanisms to
appropriately and effectively respond them. The Adult Probation Department is working with other city partners and
community-based organizations, such as the Department of Children, Youth and Their Families and Goodwill Industries
to expand services to transitional age youth under probation supervision.
CCP Data Collection Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
• Probation revocations sent to state prison
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $5,787,176 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $17,657,502
• Individuals newly processed under AB 109 countywide
• Most common need factors of PRCS and PC § 1170(h) clients
$350,938
supervised by Adult Probation Department (APD) Sheriff
• PC §1170(h) straight and split sentences by month
$8,539,301
• PC §1170(h) sentence lengths
$5,055,224
• APD’s AB109 service partnerships, referrals, and enrollment Probation*
• PRCS compliance
$8,539,301
• PRCS sanctions: reasons for flash incarcerations
$190,507
• PRCS sanctions: reasons for PC § 3455a violations Public Defender**
$109,755
• PC § 3455 violations resulting from new arrests: reason for arrest
• Individuals newly processed under AB109 countywide
$0
• Average daily AB 109 population DA/PD***
$359,390
• Average daily AB 109 population by month
• Average daily AB 109 population by department
$190,507
• Individuals processed under AB109 as part of jail population District Attorney****
$109,755
• Actual vs. state-projected PC § 1170(h) sentences
• Length of PC § 1170(h) straight sentences ordered vs. actual length of
PC § 1170(h) straight sentences to be served *Probation includes APD supervision and operations, City Attorney, APD
• State parole violators average daily population in county jail pre- and services, treatment, and housing, the Community Assessment and
post-AB109 implementation Services Center, workforce development (via OEWD in FY11/12; direct to
• State parole violators in local custody community FY 12/13), rental subsidies (via HSA), stabilization units (via
• Length of state parole violator sentences ordered vs. actual length of DPH) and assessment and placement in behavioral treatment and
transitional housing (via DPH). All services, treatment, housing provided
state parole sentences to be served
through community based organizations.
• AB 109 men in county jail - participation in in-custody programs
**Public Defender includes Realignment Attorney and a Criminal Justice
• In-custody program participants by type of AB 109 sentence
Specialist
• PRCS active clients vs. successful and returned to custody completions ***District Attorney/Public Defender includes direct allocation, non CCP
• PRCS compliance by month and characteristics of PRCS clients funds
• Characteristics of AB 109 individuals ****District Attorney - Includes Alternative Sentencing 85
Planner and realignment operations
• Characteristics of 1170(h) sentenced individuals
• Characteristics of parole violators in local custody
Community
Corrections
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
The San Joaquin CCP convenes bi-weekly. The membership roster is listed in the left hand
Stephanie James* column.
Chief Probation Officer
Chair
Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Helen Ellis*
Presiding judge or designee
San Joaquin County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG) instrument
Steve Bestolarides for probation supervision and intervention programs and the Virginia Pretrial Risk Assessment
County supervisor or chief Instrument will be used for court pretrial release decisions.
administrative officer or
designee
CCP Objectives
James Willett*
District Attorney
• Continue the successful implementation of a comprehensive AB 109 framework in San
Joaquin County with a focus on collaboration, public safety, innovation, and the utilization
Peter Fox*
Public Defender of evidenced-based programs.
• Implement a pretrial assessment tool as well as a continuum of pretrial supervision
Steve Moore*
services.
Sheriff
• Continue evaluation of programs and strategies implemented since realignment.
Mark Helms* • Replicate "The Impact of Probation and Parole Populations on Arrests in Four California
Chief of Police Cities" study.
• Implement the parole revocation process through the San Joaquin Superior Court.
Joe Chelli
Department of
Outcome Measures Identified in FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
Social Services
Vic Singh* • Percentage of split sentences v. straight sentences in San Joaquin County
Department of Mental • Percentage of Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) offenders returned to jail for a
Health and Department of
technical violation
Alcohol and Substance
• Percentage of PRCS offenders arrested for a new crime
Abuse Programs
• Percentage of PRCS offenders convicted of a new crime
John Solis • Percentage of 1170(h) offenders returned to jail for a technical violation
Department of • Percentage of 1170(h) offenders arrested for a new crime
Employment
• Percentage of 1170(h) offenders convicted of a new crime
Mick Founts
County Office of Education Results of Outcome Measures Identified in FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
Courtney Warfield- • 552 new cases were sentenced under AB 109 of which 360 (65.2%) received split
Gibbs
sentences and 192 (34.8%) were straight sentences
Community-based
• 125 (13.7%) PRCS offenders returned to jail for a technical violation
organization
• 150 (16.5%) PRCS offenders arrested for a new crime
Gabriela Jaurequi • 93 (10.2%) PRCS offenders convicted of a new crime
Victims’ interests • 4 (6.8%) 1170(h) offenders returned to jail for a technical violation
• 5 (8.5%) 1170(h) offenders arrested for a new crime
• 3 (5.1%) 1170(h) offenders convicted of a new crime
*Indicates member of the
Executive Committee
86
CCP Data Collection* FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
Intensive Probation Supervision: San Joaquin County allocated funding to support the following:
• Recidivism data for offenders
• Number of technical violations Sheriff's Department - 4 FTE Correctional Officer, overtime
• Number of technical violations diverted from for minimum staffing, part time Domestic Counselor, 1 FTE
incarceration
Deputy Sheriff, 2 FTE Correctional Sergeant, 3 FTE Senior Office
• Number of EBP individual classes completed by type
Assistant and 1 FTE Accounting Technician I
• Number of EBP series completed by type
• Number of validated risk assessments completed
Probation Department - 6 FTE Probation Officer I/II, 1 FTE
• Number of offenders referred to educational services
Probation Unit Supervisor, 1 FTE Probation Officer III, 1FTE
• Number of offenders referred to WorkNet for
vocational services Accountant III, and 1 FTE Management Analyst
• Number of offenders referred to Behavioral Health
Services Behavioral Health Services - 1 FTE Mental Health Specialist II, .22
• Number of offenders referred to HSA for eligibility FTE Mental Health Clinician II, .22 FTE Substance Abuse Counselor
assessment
II, 1 FTE Office Assistant Specialist, and a .25 FTE Psychiatrist
• Number of offenders referred to Community Service
• Number of offenders sentenced to State Prison
Community-Based Organizations - Fathers and Families of San
Joaquin, Mary Magdalene, Community Partnership for Families, El
Evidence-Based Programming
• Common Sense Parenting – FACES IV pre and post test Concilo, and Friends Outside - Warrant Reduction Advocacy Program
self‐evaluation
• Aggression Replacement Training – Student Skill San Joaquin County Superior Court - Post Release Re-Entry Court/
streaming Checklist, How I Think (HIT) Questionnaire, Parole Re-Entry Court/Violent Re-Entry Court, 2 FTE Compliance
ART Control Group Satisfaction Questionnaire Officer, 2 FTE Program Assistant, .20 FTE Collaborative Court's
• Program completion Manager, and 1 FTE Probation Officer III
Home Detention with Electronic Monitoring (EM) or GPS
Employment and Economic Development Department - .25 FTE
• Number of offenders placed on Home Detention with
EM Employment Training Supervisor, 1 FTE Employment
• Number of offenders satisfactorily completed EM Training Specialist, and a .50 FTE Intake and Referral Specialist
commitment
• Number of offenders placed on Home Detention with Implemented the Community Corrections Partnership Task Force,
GPS
Pretrial Assessment and Supervision Program, and the San Joaquin
• Number of offenders satisfactorily completed GPS
County Community Data Co-Op
commitment
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
Day Reporting Center Expansion
• Acceptance/Failure/Completion Date FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $7,414,733 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $14,779,690
• Failure reason $200,500
Other* $234,000
• Recidivism
$448,000
Residential**
• Violation of Probation (technical) $847,333
• Additional terms and conditions added to grant Post Supervision*** $194, $ 2 6 1 9 7 9,075
of probation Pretrial Assessment**** $70,000
$370,000
• Type and number of contacts (office, field, Local Law Enforcement $0 $500,000
telephone)
Data Co‐op $47,000
• Referred out of treatment type (residential, program $138,280
$600,038
completion, program failure, reason) Correctional Health
$1,050,051
• Offender risk level Sheriff+ $2,423,795
• Top criminogenic risk factors Probation++ $1,860,923 $4,802,233
• Evidence-based program (type, completion date, $330,000 $3,596,869
Mental Health Agency
failure date, phase, reason) $852,366
$143,877
• Referred to education program (completion type Human Services Agency $208,942
and date, failure date, reason) Employment+++ $287,509
$591,682
• Enrolled in job readiness (completion date, failure Contingency Fund $745,267
$45,550
date, reason)
$63,607
CBO(s)++++
$843,309
*The CCP has provided additional data not
*Other - GPS, evidence-based programming and transportation. **Residential treatment/housing.
included in this report due to space
***Post Supervision Release Re-Entry Court, Parole Re-Entry Court, and Violent Offender Re-Entry
limitations.
Court. ****Pretrial Assessment Tool. +Sheriff includes programming and alternatives to
Incarceration. ++Probation includes an Assessment Center, Day Reporting Center, and
87
overhead costs. +++Employment and Economic Development Department. ++++Community-
Based Organization(s) includes community based contracts and transitional housing.
Community
Corrections
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
James Salio* The San Luis Obispo CCP convenes monthly. The membership roster is listed in the
Chief Probation Officer left hand column.
Chair
Susan Matherly* Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Presiding judge or designee
Geoff O'Quest San Luis Obispo County utilizes the Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R)
County supervisor or chief instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs and with the jail
administrative officer or
population regarding release decisions.
designee
Gerald Shea*
District Attorney CCP Objectives
Patricia Ashbaugh*
• To maintain maximum public safety.
Public Defender
• To improve offender success rates and reduce recidivism.
Ian Parkinson* • To increase alternatives to incarceration and treatment support for low-level
Sheriff
offenders.
Robert Burton*
Outcome Data Results FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13
Interim Chief of Police
Tracy Schiro • Recidivism rates for post-release N3 (non-violent, non- 17.8% 40.4%
Department of serious, non-sex offender) under San Luis Obispo County
P
S
Je
o
u
f
b
c
f
i
l
a
i
H
c
l S
a
H
e
m
e
r
a
v
m
l
i
t
c
h
e
*
s
S ervices •
j
N
ur
u
i
m
sd
b
ic
e
t
r
i o
o
n
f offenders sentenced to county jail 13 0 16 7
Karen Baylor • Number of offenders sentenced to probation or alternative 864 950
Department of
programs
Behavioral Health
Vacant • Number of offenders who complete treatment 22 56
Department of
Employment • Number of offenders who secure housing and/or 1 2 58
employment post release
Star Graber
Department of Alcohol and
Substance Abuse Programs • Number of Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) 118 100
violations
Julian Crocker
County Office of Education
• Number of 1170(h) violations
0 3
Grace McIntosh
Community-based • Split sentences
30 10
organization
Cindy Marie Absey • Electronic monitoring 7 17
Victims’ interests
• Mandatory supervision 9 12
• Offenders received from the California Department of Cor-
*Indicates member of the
rections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) vs. estimate
Executive Committee 175/171 77/89
• Warrants
39 22
• Terminations 88
0 35
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
San Luis Obispo County allocated funding to support the following:
• 1 FTE Correctional Technician to the Sheriff’s Department
• 2.5 full-time Licensed Vocational Nurse/Mental Health Therapists
• Up to 208 hours of temporary nurse staffing, as needed
• Up to 404 hours of Correctional Nurse Supervisor time
• 520 additional psychiatric hours
• 1 FTE Deputy Probation Officer (FTE reallocated from Pretrial Services to Community Supervision)
• .5 FTE Deputy District Attorney
• Part-time attorney position to expand Public Defender services to local specialty courts
• Inmate Program Manager for Collaborative Re-Entry Program
• Data Automation Specialist for Collaborative Re-Entry Program
• 1 FTE Deputy Probation Officer (FTE reallocated from Pretrial Services to Collaborative Re-entry)
• In-Custody Drug and Alcohol Therapist for Collaborative Re-Entry Program (FTE reallocated from Day
Reporting Center)
• 3 Community-Based Drug and Alcohol Therapists for Collaborative Re-Entry Program
• Allocated 1 Administrative Services Officer for Collaborative Re-Entry Program.
• Expanded capacity for Sober Living Environment to cover costs of additional 24 sober living beds for
homeless offenders with co-occurring substance abuse (open to women and men with children)
• Supportive Housing Program that provides rental assistance, utility payments, and related supports for up
to ten individuals who have achieved their goals (successful completion of sober living, referral from
Re-Entry program, etc.) and are ready to enter into permanent housing
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $2,434,712 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $5,423,074
$385,918
Collaborative Re‐Entry*
$1,104,424
$1,358,712
Sheriff
$2,252,832
$366,859
Probation
$495,901
$0
Public Defender**
$40,000
$139,929
Health Agency***
$533,435
$0
DA****
$36,539
$78,880
DA/PD+
$90,067
$20,179
Contingency Fund++
$648,219
$84,235
CBO(s)+++
$221,657
*Collaborative Re‐Entry Programs includes drug and alcohol services, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, electronic
supervision and treatment programs. **Public Defender Specialty Court Advocate. ***Health Agency includes
in‐custody law enforcement medical and mental health care. ****District Attorney PRCS and Parole Violation
Prosecution Unit. +District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds). ++ Contingency Fund includes
FY 2011‐12 unspent funds. +++Community‐Based Organization(s)
89
Community
Corrections
SAN MATEO COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Cal Remington* The San Mateo CCP convenes quarterly. The membership roster is listed in the left
Interim Chief Probation hand column.
Officer
Chair Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
John Fitton*
Presiding judge or designee San Mateo County utilizes the Correctional Assessment and Intervention System
(CAIS) instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs, for referrals to
John Maltbie
Adrienne Tissier in-custody programs and for court pretrial release decisions.
County supervisor or chief
administrative officer or
CCP Objectives
designee
Steve Wagstaffe* • Protect public safety through appropriate custody, supervision, and law
District Attorney
enforcement activities.
John Digiacinto* • Create opportunities for rehabilitation and recovery.
Public Defender • Provide case management, substance abuse, mental health, vocational and housing
support services.
Greg Munks*
Sheriff
Outcome Measures Identified in FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
Susan Manheimer*
• Percent of Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) individuals successfully
Chief of Police
completing supervision in 6 months
Beverly Johnson* • Percent of 1170(h) mandatory supervisees successfully completing supervision
Department of
within court-ordered timeframe
Social Services
• Percent of PRCS individuals revoked to custody
Jean Fraser • Percent of 1170(h) mandatory supervisees revoked to custody
Department of
• Percent of released individuals rearrested
Mental Health
• Percent of released individuals rebooked into the jail
John Joy • Percent of released individuals returned to custody for a revocation
Department of
• Percent of released individuals convicted of a new offense
Employment
• Percent of custody alternative participants rearrested
Steve Kaplan • Percent of custody alternative participants rebooked into the jail
Department of Alcohol and
• Percent of custody alternative participants returned to custody for a revocation
Substance Abuse Programs
• Percent of custody alternative participants convicted of a new offense
Anne Campbell • Percent of supervisees achieving the goals of their case management plans
County Office of Education
• Percent supervisees successfully completing mental health or substance use
Vacant treatment
Community-based • Percent of supervisees placed in jobs
organization
• Percent of supervisees who experienced reductions in their mental health
Rebecca Arredondo symptoms
Victims’ interests • Percent of supervises who experienced reductions in their alcohol and other drug
use
• Percent of supervisees retaining jobs after 3, 6, 9 months
*Indicates member of the • Percent of supervisees in stable housing after 6 months
Executive Committee
• Arrests for three years following release, including offense description and date
• Subsequent criminal adjudications/convictions for three years following release,
including offense description and date of conviction
• Probation/parole violations
• Warrants or remands 90
• New open charges
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
San Mateo County allocated funding to support the following:
• $1,000,000 for community-based organizations
• Day Reporting Center scheduled to open in FY 2013-14
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $4,822,248 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $10,377,741
$150,000
Planning*
$150,000
$297,975
Training**
$0
$0
Competitive***
$1,004,653
$225,730
Law Enforcement****
$129,822
$0
Sheriff
$3,100,000
$0
Program Evaluation
$502,326
$1,152,128
Probation
$2,009,305
$1,302,244
Human Services
$1,637,697
$1,083,258
Health System
$1,376,260
$151,371
DA/PD+
$181,215
$459,542
Contingency Fund
$286,463
*Allocation for planning (one time)
**Allocation for training and retention purposes (one time)
***Competitive Grant Program
****Local Law Enforcement Collaborative
+District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
91
Community
Corrections
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Beverly Taylor* The Santa Barbara CCP convenes quarterly. The membership roster is listed in the left hand
Chief Probation Officer column.
Chair
Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Arthur Garcia*
Presiding judge or designee
Santa Barbara County utilizes the Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative
Janet Wolf Sanctions (COMPAS) instrument, Hawaii Proxy Tool, Spousal Assault Risk Assessment (SARA),
County supervisor or chief and the STATIC 99-R Sex Offender Risk Assessment for probation supervision and
administrative officer or
intervention programs, and for referral to in-custody programs.
designee
CCP Objectives
Joyce Dudley*
District Attorney
• Strategize to increase the use of split sentencing.
Rai Montes De Oca* • Maintain a balanced allocation of funding between custody, supervision, and treatment.
Public Defender
• Improve data collection within the Sheriff's jail operations.
Bill Brown* • Eliminate the use of one-time funding for ongoing operations.
Sheriff
Outcomes Identified in FY 2011-12 and FY 2012-13
Larry Ralston*
Chief of Police
• Implement a streamlined and efficient system to manage the additional responsibilities
Daniel Nielson under Realignment.
Department of • Implement a system that maintains public safety and utilizes evidence-based practices/best
Social Services
practices in recidivism reduction.
• Implement a system that effectively utilizes alternatives to pretrial and post-conviction
Takashi Wada , M.D.*
Department of Mental incarceration, where appropriate.
Health and Department of • Implement a system that maintains public safety.
Alcohol and Substance • Ongoing assessment of the system’s impacts on criminal offender outcomes, using data to
Abuse Programs
make adjustments to continually improve the system.
Ray McDonald
Department of Outcome Results for FY 2011-12 and FY 2012-13
Employment
• Through the cooperation and collaboration of the CCP, partner agencies, and trial and
Bill Cirone
error, the year one realignment plan has been modified and improved upon. On-going
County Office of Education
review of offender needs will remain a priority.
John Gannon • Santa Barbara County has maintained a balanced approach allocating resources across
Community-based
supervision, custody and, treatment. The county is requesting technical assistance grants
organization
and soliciting training resources offered throughout the state to improve the local criminal
justice system.
Megan Riker-
Rheinschild • Santa Barbara County is recipient of a technical assistance grant from the National Institute
Victims’ interests of Corrections (NIC) and the Urban Institute (UI) to be apart of the national Transition
from Jail to Community (TJC) Initiative.
• The CCP agreed upon a set of data elements that will be collected on all realigned
offenders and will be evaluated by University of California, Santa Barbara. Additionally,
*Indicates member of the
Executive Committee probation and the jail collect data on recidivism, service needs, risk levels, etc., to
determine service needs.
92
CCP Data Collection
Santa Barbara County collects the following offender data:
• 1170(h)(5): General information, sentence, demographic information, offender characteristics, release from jail,
connection to services in jail, connection to services (split sentences), violations of split sentence supervision,
completion for split sentences, and recidivism.
• Released from State Prison to Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS): General information, demographic
information, characteristics (tracked at release, at regular intervals during PRCS and at discharge), supervision and
services, mental health services, medical/mental health services provided by a PhD, terms of PRCS, violation of
PRCS (each instance), completion of PRCS, and recidivism.
• Violation of State Parole: General information, demographic information, and sentence.
• PC 1203.018: Pretrial release on electronic monitoring.
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
The county allocated funding to support the following:
• Detention Release Services/Alternatives: 1 FTE Deputy Probation Officers Assessors, 2 FTE Custody Deputies, 2
Administrative Office Professionals for GPS monitoring, and 150 additional GPS units
• Domestic violence and sex offender services
• .5 FTE Psychiatrist and .5 FTE Site Tech at the Day Reporting Center
• Public Defender’s Office: 2 FTE Rehabilitation Service Coordinators (contracted)
• District Attorney's Office: 1 FTE attorney for collaborative courts
• Sheriff Department: 1 FTE Social Worker
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $4,441,616 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $10,043,155
$273,700
Implementation Activities
$0
$150,000
Planning Grant
$150,000
$165,000
Transitional Housing*
$320,000
$993,079
Jail custody**
$2,292,112
$40,000
Evaluation***
$103,331
$1,096,820
Community Supervision****
$2,476,275
$401,440
Community Services+
$2,483,000
$342,000
Law Enforcement++
$801,900
$139,040
DA/PD+++
$156,527
$709,367
Detention Release++++
$840,729
$131,170
Administration
$419,281
*Transitional housing/sober living
**Jail custody and early release
***Evaluation and Data Analysis
****Community supervision and case management
+Community services includes mental health and drug and alcohol treatment
++Collaborative law enforcement efforts
+++District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
++++Detention release services/alternatives includes assessment and treatment 93
Community
Corrections
SANTA CLARA COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Sheila Mitchell* The Santa Clara CCP membership roster is listed in the left hand column.
Chief Probation Officer
Chair
Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Richard Loftus, Jr.*
Presiding judge or designee
Santa Clara County utilizes the Correctional Assessment and Intervention System
Gary Graves (CAIS) instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs, with the jail
County supervisor or chief
population regarding release decisions, for referral to in-custody programs and for
administrative officer or
designee court pretrial release decisions.
Jeff Rosen*
Outcomes Identified in FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
District Attorney
Mary Greenwood* • Increase the use of community sanctions and programs (both for lower level felons,
Public Defender
parole violators, and community supervision clients).
Laurie Smith* • Increase the connections and coordination between offenders and potentially
Sheriff helpful people, and services in the community, including family, educators, potential
employers, and faith-based agencies.
Kevin Kyle*
Chief of Police • Develop an efficient system that strengthens cross-agency coordination and use of
services.
Gina Sessions*
• Increased outcomes as it pertains to housing, sobriety, and employment.
Department of
Social Services • Reduce offender recidivism rates.
• Reduce prison commitments from the counties, thus reducing the overall prison
Nancy Pena
• population.
Department of
Mental Health • Reduce racial and ethnic disparities in key decisions across the criminal justice.
Bob Garner*
CCP Data Collection (not exhaustive)
Department of Alcohol and
Substance Abuse Programs
The county collects offender data in the following categories:
David Tran
Victims’ interests
• PRCS violations
• 1170(h) violations
• Split sentences
*Indicates member of the • Electronic monitoring
Executive Committee
• Flash incarceration
• Mandatory supervision
• PRCS offenders received from the California Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation (CDCR) vs. estimate
• PRCS cases transferred in and out of county
• Warrants
• Terminations
94
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) 14,740,554 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $14,401,207
$200,000
Planning
$0
$886,700
Training/Retention
$0
$3,653,077
Programs and Services
$4,887,435
$3,469,588
Sheriff
$4,265,085
$3,339,692
Probation
$4,362,649
$450,444
DA/PD*
$526,038
$2,741,053
Contingency Fund
$0
*District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
95
Community
Corrections
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Scott MacDonald* The Santa Cruz CCP convenes biannually. The membership roster is listed in the left
Chief Probation Officer hand column.
Chair
Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
John Salazar*
Presiding judge or designee
Santa Cruz County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG)
Susan Mauriello
and Correctional Assessment and Intervention System (CAIS) for probation
County supervisor or chief
administrative officer or supervision and intervention programs, a needs assessment based on criminogenic
designee principles for referrals to in-custody programs, and the Virginia Pretrial Risk Assessment
Instrument for court pretrial release decisions.
Bob Lee*
District Attorney
Larry Bigham* CCP Objectives
Public Defender
• Establish an array of effective alternatives to incarceration to address the impacts
Phil Wowak*
Sheriff that the realigned population will have at the county jail in order to avert crowding
and poor conditions of confinement without jeopardizing public safety outcomes.
Manny Solano*
• Implement evidence-based probation supervision that properly assesses risk factors
Chief of Police
associated with recidivism and provides effective probation interviewing, case
Giang Nguyen* planning, and community supervision to ensure public safety and reduce recidivism.
Department of
• Develop community partnership interventions and treatment that adhere to the
Social Services
principles of evidence-based practices for maximum recidivism reduction.
Vacant
Department of
CCP Data Collection
Mental Health
David Lundberg The county collects the following offender related data:
Department of
Employment
• Non-violent, non-serious, non-sex offenders (N3), 1170(h) and Post Release
Bill Manov Community Supervision (PRCS) population: Technical/rule violations (not new
Department of Alcohol and
offenses), new arrests (felony and misdemeanor) during the period of supervision,
Substance Abuse Programs
new convictions (felony and misdemeanor) during the period of supervision, new
Michael Watkins arrests during the period of supervision that subsequently result in a new
County Office of Education
conviction, new arrests and convictions following termination of supervision at
Karen Delaney specified intervals (1, 2, 3 years), flash incarceration of PRCS (days, reason),
Community-based number of 1170(h) sentences, number incarcerated, length of sentence, length of
organization
custody served, 1170(h) proportion of total sentence in jail, proportion of total
Sylvia Nieto sentence in community, offender risk and criminogenic needs at intake and 6 month
Victims’ interests intervals, and compliance with court-ordered fines and restitution.
• Custody alternative program : Length and proportion of sentence in jail, length and
proportion of sentence in community, new arrests and convictions (felony and
misdemeanor) during the period of community supervision, and new arrests during
*Indicates member of the
the period of supervision that subsequently result in a new conviction.
Executive Committee
• Evidence-based treatment and services - Total number of participants served; in-
custody and in community, service delivery fidelity to evidence-based practice; in-
custody and in community, dosage of services (total number of hours of services
per offender and type of service); in-custody and in community, and correlation
between service dosage and recidivism outcomes.
96
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
Santa Cruz County allocated funding to support the following:
• 5 FTE Deputy Probation Officer II
• 1 FTE Deputy Probation Officer III
• 2 FTE Correctional Officers
• 2 FTE Account Technicians
• Service contracts including; Janus of Santa Cruz, New Life Community Services, Santa Cruz Community
Counseling Center, Sobriety Works, Inc., Community Action Board of Santa Cruz County, Volunteer
Center of Santa Cruz County, Santa Cruz Barrios Unidos, Walnut Avenue Women’s Center, Santa Cruz
County Health Services Agency, Conflict Resolution Center of Santa Cruz, Janus of Santa Cruz and Pajaro
Valley Prevention and Student Assistance, Watsonville/Aptos Adult Education and the County Office of
Education, Homeless Service Center, Pajaro Valley Shelter Services, United Way of Santa Cruz County,
The Watsonville Law Center and the Santa Cruz County Superior Court
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $1,989,656 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $5,395,344
$150,000
CCP Planning (one time)
$150,000
$117,325
Training*
$0
$0
Administration**
$200,000
$554,243
Sheriff
$1,658,188
$554,243
Probation***
$1,658,188
$59,601
DA/PD****
$70,781
$554,243
CBO(s)+
$1,658,188
*Allocation for training, retention purposes
**Administration of AB109 Community Corrections Partnership
***Probation includes evidence‐based programming, interventions, and reentry services and supports
****District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
+Community‐Based Organization(s)
97
Community
Corrections
SHASTA COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Wesley Forman* The Shasta CCP convenes quarterly. The membership roster is listed in the left hand column.
Chief Probation Officer
Chair
Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Melissa Fowler-Bradley*
Presiding judge or designee
Shasta County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG) instrument for
Donnell Ewert* probation supervision and intervention programs and the Virginia Pretrial Risk Assessment
County supervisor or chief Instrument for court pretrial release decisions.
administrative officer or
designee, department of
CCP Objectives
Social Services, Mental
Health and Alcohol and
Substance Abuse Programs
• Maximize the use of alternative custody options.
• Increase data collection and evaluation capabilities.
Stephen Carlton*
District Attorney
Jeffrey Gorder* Outcomes Identified in FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
Public Defender
• Enhancing community safety by reducing offender recidivism.
Tom Bosenko*
• Identify offenders with the highest risk to reoffend using evidence-based risk assessment
Sheriff
tools and providing intensive supervision within the community.
Robert Paoletti* • Use research and evidence-based needs assessment tools to identify criminogenic needs
Chief of Police
and find, create, or contract for targeted interventions to address those needs, includes
but are not limited to, programs and services oriented to anti‐social and pro‐criminal
Vacant
Department of attitudes and behaviors and other therapeutic interventions, employment supports,
Employment education, housing, physical and mental health care, and drug and alcohol treatment.
• Increasing offender accountability through effective use of intermediate sanctions, custody,
Tom Armelino
and custody alternatives.
County Office of Education
• Focus resources on providing alternatives to criminal behavior.
Tom Wright • Regularly measuring and assessing offender outcomes and modifying programs, services,
Community-based
supervision, and other elements of AB 109 with the goal to reduce recidivism.
organization
Michael Burke
Outcome Results for FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
Victims’ interests
• Recidivism was 4% for subsequent convictions and 16% for arrests for new law violations
through 12/31/12.
• All offenders receive an evidence-based risk assessment and high-risk offenders are placed
on intensive caseloads.
*Indicates member of the
• All high-risk offenders receive an evidence-based needs assessment and their top three
Executive Committee
criminogenic needs are targeted via services in the community.
• Offender accountability is managed through a system of graduated sanctions, custody, and
custody alternatives. The county increased jail space by opening a previously closed floor
of the jail, and increased the capacity of alternative custody programs, i.e., work release
and electronic monitoring.
• In addition to the above responses, the ability to find, create, and buy services to address
the top three criminogenic needs have aided in the county’s ability to provide alternatives
to criminal behavior in offenders.
• Outcomes are monitored regularly and adjustments are made when necessary.
98
CCP Data Collection
Shasta County collects the following offender related data:
• Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) - recidivism data for offenders, number of technical violations,
number of technical violations diverted from incarceration, number of offenders referred to different programs and
services, successful completion of programs, and successful completion of probation
• Compliance Team - Number of offenders contacted, types of contact (phone, in person, etc.), violation for which
contact was initiated, and number of contacts per offender
• Jail/Contract Beds - Number of offenders sentenced to jail, length of stay for offenders, number of inmates
released to alternative custody options, number of beds occupied by offenders, and number of flash incarcerations
• Work Release - Number of offenders participating in work release, and number of offenders successfully
completing work release
• Mandatory Home Detention with Electronic Monitoring - Number of offenders participating, number of offenders
who violate home detention requirements, and number of offenders successfully completing
• Assessment Center - Number of offenders participating, treatments participated in by offenders, and treatment
outcomes for offenders
• Other Programs and Services - Number of referrals, number of completions, and number of failures
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
The county allocated funding to support the following:
• Hire a Probation Division Director to manage AB 109 programs
• Pretrial program that utilizes the Virginia Pretrial Risk Assessment Instrument
• Approximately 20 contract beds
• Community Correction Center opened in April 2013
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $3,096,012 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $7,774,300
$961,468
Sheriff
$2,888,919
$1,046,758
Probation
$2,166,127
$334,308
Health & Human Services*
$249,169
$107,137
DA/PD**
$120,757
$10,000
Conflict Attorney
$10,000
$240,000
Contingency Fund
$0
$396,341
Treatment, Programs and Services
$2,339,328
*Health & Human Services Agency includes Assessment Center
99
**District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
Community
Corrections
SIERRA COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Jeff Bosworth* The Sierra CCP convenes monthly. The membership roster is listed in the left hand
Chief Probation Officer column.
Chair
Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
William Pangman*
Presiding judge or designee
Sierra County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG)
Scott Schlefstein
County supervisor or chief instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs.
administrative officer or
designee
CCP Objectives
Larry Allen*
District Attorney
• By the end of 2013, fund a Drug Court Coordinator.
J Lon Cooper* • By the end of 2013, add a Probation Officer to work on realignment related tasks.
Public Defender • Consider an allocation to fund two correctional officer positions and other jail
improvements.
John Evans*
Sheriff
CCP Data Collection (not exhaustive)
N/A*
Chief of Police
The county collects offender data in the following categories:
Janice Maddox*
Departments of Social
• Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) offenders released
Services, Mental Health
and Alcohol and Substance • PRCS warrant-before
Abuse Programs • PRCS closures (6-12 months)
• PRCS closures (first year)
Vacant
Department of • PRCS closures (18 months +)
Employment • Active population snapshot of PRCS cases
• Active population snapshot of PRCS warrants - after
Vacant due to
retirement • All PRCS completions
County Office of Education • 1170(h)(5)(a) jail custody only
• 1170(h)(5)(b) split sentences
Vacant
Community-based • Active 1170(h)(5)(b) mandatory supervision
organization • 1170(h)(5)(b) felony recidivism
• All 1170(h)(5)(b) supervision completions
Vacant
Victims’ interests • 1170(h)(5)(b) unsuccessful completions
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
*Indicates member of the
Executive Committee
CCP plan revisions were not final at the time this report was prepared.
100
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $185,064 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $284,024
$38,442
AB 109*
$76,704
$100,000
Planning**
$100,000
$5,425
Training***
$0
$38,442
CDCR****
$76,704
$2,756
DA/PD+
$30,616
*AB 109 funds are deposited into a Public Safety Trust fund and budgets are approved by the CCP Executive Committee
and sent to the Board of Supervisors for approval each year. Expenditures are reimbursed as they occur with the
approval of the CCP Chair.
**Allocation for planning
***Allocation for training and retention purposes
****Contract with CDCR includes unallocated funds from FY 2011‐12
+District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
101
Community
Corrections
SISKIYOU COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Todd Heie* The Siskiyou CCP generally convenes monthly. The membership roster is listed in the
Chief Probation Officer left hand column.
Chair
Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Mary Francis McHugh*
Presiding judge or designee
Siskiyou County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG) risk
Tom Odom
instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs and are working
County supervisor or chief
administrative officer or towards implementing the Ohio Risk Assessment System (ORAS) Pretrial Tool for
designee court pretrial release decisions.
Kirk Andrus*
Outcomes Identified in FY 2012-13 (Year 2)
District Attorney
Lael Kayfetz*
• Reduce jail overcrowding while maintaining community safety and improving
Public Defender
criminal justice outcomes.
Jon Lopey* • Increase probation’s capacity to implement recognized best practices.
Sheriff
• Increase use of probation best practices shown to improve criminal justice
outcomes.
Martin Nicholas*
Chief of Police • Increase funding to support costs directly related to managing the AB 109
population.
Terry Barber*
Departments of Social • Increase access to evidence informed services and supports to reduce recidivism.
Services, Mental Health
and Alcohol and Substance
Abuse Programs Outcome Results for FY 2012-13 (Year 2)
N/A
Department of
• Probation Officers were trained on the use of Interactive Journaling, Moral
Employment
Recognition Therapy (MRT) and other evidence-based practices.
Kermith Walters • Allocations have been made to support costs directly related to managing the AB
County Office of Education
109 population.
Toby Reusze • Evidence-based programs and services are provided via a Day Reporting Center.
Community-based • The county has a successful recidivism rate for Pre File Diversions.
organization
Collen Chiles --------------------------------
Victims’ interests Siskiyou’s Day Reporting Center provides services for out-of-custody work groups,
daily internal and contracted services, high school completion courses, anger
management classes, MRT, Change Companies Interactive Journaling groups, life-skills,
*Indicates member of the job skills, individual and group counseling, and equine therapy.
Executive Committee
102
CCP Data Collection (not exhaustive)
Siskiyou County collects offender data in the following categories:
• Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) violations
• 1170(h) violations
• Split sentences
• Electronic monitoring
• PRCS offenders received from the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) vs.
estimate
• Flash incarceration
• Mandatory supervision
• Warrants
• Terminations
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
• Formation of a Realignment Team for the PRCs Offender Population. This Team consists of line level staff
who work on a daily basis with the offenders. The Team meets 1 – 2 times a month to discuss specific
cases and conduct case management with the goal of keeping clients from falling through the cracks. The
Team includes participation from probation officers, jail staff, Siskiyou County Mental Health and Alcohol
and Drug Services, Human Services, non governmental service providers, Family Resource Centers, and
local law enforcement.
• A Data/Evaluation Subcommittee was also established. This committee is tasked with recommending data
and is needed in order to determine program effectiveness. The county is exploring hiring a Crime
Analyst.
• The CCP Executive Committee voted to recruit a CCP Program Coordinator. The Program Coordinator
will work under the direction of the CCP Executive Committee to support establishment of reporting,
evaluation and data systems, support coordination and application for funding and training opportunities,
support the meeting functions of the CCP, and provide the day-to-day support to assure effective
implementation of the CCP Plan.
• Allocated funding to a CCP Coordinator position.
• Allocated funding to the overtime compliance operation fund.
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $304,851 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $1,459,862
$100,000
Planning*
$150,000
$31,400
Training**
$24,493
Overtime*** $0
$20,000
CCP Coordinator $0
$100,000
Sheriff $97,500 $347,500
Probation $60,000
Public Defender**** $0 $439,550
$18,000
Public Health $0
$90,000
District Attorney+ $0
$54,250
DA/PD++ $15,951
$17,491
District Attorney+++ $0
$18,000
CBO(s)++++ $0 $180,578
*Allocation for planning, includes FY 2011-12 unallocated funds. **Allocation for training and retention purposes, includes FY 2011-12 unallocated
funds. ***Overtime reimbursement for Corrections Compliance Operations. ****Public Defender - Specialty Court Attorney. +District Attorney
- Pre file Diversion Program. ++District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds). +++District Attorney -
Specialty Court Attorney ++++Community-Based Organization(s) 103
Community
Corrections
SOLANO COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Christopher Hansen*
Chief Probation Officer The Solano CCP convenes monthly. The membership roster is listed in the left hand
Chair column.
William Pendergaste
III* Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
D. Scott Daniels
Presiding judge or designee
Solano County utilizes the Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R) and Level of
Birgitta Corsello Service - Case Management Inventory (LS-CMI) for probation supervision and
County supervisor or chief
intervention programs.
administrative officer or
designee
CCP Objectives
Donald du Bain*
District Attorney
• Addition of a Pretrial Services Program.
Lesli Caldwell*
• Addition of a Victim Witness Coordinator.
Public Defender
CCP Data Collection
Thomas Ferrara*
Sheriff
Richard Word* • Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) - Number under supervision,
Chief of Police number of grants expires/revoked, failure to report, number transferred out of
Solano County, number transferred into Solano County, number required to
Patrick Duterte*
report to probation, number of packets received, number of bench warrants
Department of
Social Services ordered/cleared, cities with highest number of PRCS offenders, risk level of
re-offending, ethnic profile, gender profile, committing offenses (males) theft,
Halsey Simmons
drugs, and weapon charges and committing offenses (female) theft, drugs, and
Department of
Mental Health forgery/check fraud
• Jail population
Robert Bloom
Department of • Parolees PC3056 in-custody
Employment • 1170(h) (non-serious, non-violent, non-sex offenders) in-custody
Andrew Williamson
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
Department of Alcohol and
S ubstance Abuse Programs
Solano County allocated funding to support the following:
Jay Speck
County Office of Education
• 1 FTE Probation Service Manger
Lloyd Gieg • 1 FTE Researcher
Community-based • 2 FTE Mental Health Clinicians
organization
• 1 FTE Mental Health Assessor
Carolyn Wold • Solano Center for Positive Change (Day Reporting Center), which is scheduled to
Victims’ interests open in 2013
*Indicates member of the
Executive Committee
104
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $4,362,824 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $11,223,972
$50,000
Task Force*
$100,000
$23,196
Substance Abuse
$456,629
$0
Employment Development
$250,000
$0
Day Reporting Center
$192,150
Start Up $1,807,851
$76,525
$90,102
CCP Planning
$159,999
$846,001
Sheriff
$3,692,350
$424,650
Probation
$2,127,428
$0
Conflict Defender
$40,355
$57,509
Public Defender
$108,029
$136,941
Mental Health Agency
$392,975
$56,488
DA/PD**
$227,478
$0
District Attorney
$163,833
$2,485,787
Contingency Fund***
$1,620,520
*Task Force (Police Department)
**District Attorney/Public Defender (Direct allocation, non CCP funds)
***Contingency Fund (available for appropriation)
105
Community
Corrections
SONOMA COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Robert Ochs* The Sonoma CCP generally convenes monthly. The membership roster is listed in the
Chief Probation Officer left hand column.
Chair
Jose Guillen* Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Presiding judge or designee
Jennifer Murray Sonoma County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG) risk
County supervisor or chief
instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs.
administrative officer or
designee
CCP Objectives
Jill Ravitch*
District Attorney
• Reduce recidivism amongst offenders to enhance public safety.
Kathleen Pozzi* • Promote evidence-based programming and upstream investments in health,
Interim Public Defender
education, and human services to decrease the need for, and costs of,
Steve Freitas* enforcement and incarceration.
Sheriff
• Fund programs that align with both Sonoma County’s over-arching strategic goals
of enhancing public safety and investing in the future and with the tenets of the
Tom Schwedhelm*
Chief of Police County’s Criminal Justice Master Plan.
• Minimize use of jail beds through utilization of detention alternatives.
Jerry Dunn
Department of • Provide programming for offenders in-custody, as well as out-of-custody, and use
Social Services validated risk assessments to inform programming decisions and ensure continuity.
• Implement a Day Reporting Center to serve as the central point of evidence-based
Michael Kennedy*
Department of programming to help offenders reintegrate into the community.
Mental Health and
Department of Alcohol and
CCP Data Collection (not exhaustive)
Substance Abuse Programs
Karen Fies
The county collects offender data in the following categories:
Department of Employment
Steven Herrington • Number of admissions by risk level and average length of stay
County Office of Education
• Number of jail days used as sanctions
Marlus Stewart • Percent of successful program completions
Community-based • Re-arrest/conviction by exit type and risk level
organization
• Recidivism
Gloria Eurotas • 1170(h) violations
Victims’ interests • Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) violations
• Number of split sentences
*Indicates member of the
Executive Committee
106
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
Additions: 3.0 FTE Probation Officer III positions to supervise increased offender population at a 1:35
caseload ratio, 1.0 FTE Probation Officer IV Supervisor to manage the second AB109 unit, 1.0 FTE Probation
Officer III to conduct risk assessments of jail inmates to help guide programming, both in jail and upon release
to supervision, 1.0 FTE Cook to support existing staff at the jail unit opened to house AB 109 inmates, 1.0
Inmate Services Program Manager responsible for administering an array of in-custody programs designed to
rehabilitate inmates, 1.0 FTE Correctional Deputy and 1.0 FTE Correctional Sergeant to administer the
Sheriff's Electronic Monitoring Program, which provides a detention alternative to help the county manage its
jail population
Additions: 2.0 FTE Probation Officer III, 1.0 FTE Legal Processor, and 6.0 Correctional Deputies to staff the
county's Pre-Trial Services Program, currently under development, which will provide universal front-end
screening for all persons booked into jail. 1.50 FTE Licensed Clinical Social Worker, 0.10 FTE Psychiatric
Nurse, and 0.25 FTE Staff Psychiatrist to support “1370” Restoration Services to provide evidence-based
interventions to restore inmates to competence and enable their participation in the legal process. 1.0 FTE
Alcohol and Other Drug Specialist to provide referral and case management for those individuals who are
determined to need substance use disorder services, 1.0 FTE Employment and Training Program
Coordinator
Additions: 1.0 FTE Eligibility Worker II to provide services in collaboration with Probation and Health
Services, GED preparation courses and testing services for AB 109 offenders, transitional housing subsidies
for transient AB 109 offenders. Funding to support Probation's Supervised Adult Crew, which allows Work
Release offenders to work on community construction projects in lieu of jail. Added data management
funding to support programming needs for the Integrated Justice System that relates to capturing, measuring,
and reporting information on state realignment populations
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $3,735,366 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $10,671,513
$112,500
Other *
$473,189
$1,202,000
Sheriff
$2,505,426
$‐
Public Defender
$78,182
$1,709,500
Probation
$4,795,158
$337,500
Mental Health Agency
$1,425,607
$116,154
DA/PD**
$136,028
$‐
District Attorney
$168,182
$257,712
Contingency Fund
$1,089,741
*Other — Human Services/Information Systems/County Counsel/Local Law Enforcement
**DA/PD — District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
107
Community
Corrections
STANISLAUS COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Jill Silva* The Stanislaus CCP convenes monthly. The membership roster is listed in the left
Chief Probation Officer hand column.
Chair
Rebecca Fleming* Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Presiding judge or designee
Bill O'Brien Stanislaus County utilizes the Level of Services Inventory-Revised (LSI-R) and Level of
County supervisor or chief Services Inventory-Revised: Screening Version (LSI-R: SV) instruments for probation
administrative officer or
supervision and intervention programs, and the Ohio Risk Assessment System (ORAS)
designee
Pretrial tool is used with the jail population regarding release decisions and court pre-
Birgit Fladager* trial release decisions.
District Attorney
Tim Bazar* Top Priorities for the CCP to Measure
Public Defender
• Impacts on jails
Adam Christianson*
• Impacts on police
Sheriff
• Impacts on prosecution
Galen Carroll*
• Impacts on defense
Chief of Police
• Impacts on judges
Kathryn Harwell
• Impacts on probation
Department of
Social Services • Impacts on parole
• Impacts on crime rates
Madelyn Schlaepfer*
• Impacts on community life
Department of
Mental Health and
Department of Alcohol and CCP Data Collection
Substance Abuse Programs
Jeff Rowe The county collects the following offender related data:
Department of
Employment
• Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) violations
Tom Chagnon • 1170(h) violations
County Office of Education
• Recidivism
Cindy Duenas • Split sentences
Community-based • Electronic monitoring
organization
• Flash incarceration
Gay McDaniel • Mandatory supervision
Victims’ interests • Offenders received from the California Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation (CDCR) vs. estimate
• Warrants
*Indicates member of the • Terminations
Executive Committee
• Sex offenders
• Average daily population in adult facilities
• Monthly snapshot inmate population including race, gender, type of offense
• Mentally ill offenders under supervision assigned to treatment
108
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
Stanislaus County allocated funding to support the following:
• Sheriff’s Department - 24 FTEs and increased contracted programming and treatment services. Added
staff as the result of increased beds. Adding mental health deputies, assessment/classification officers,
transportation officers, and alternative to custody staffing.
• Probation Department - 6 FTEs to provide supervision services for increases in the AB 109 population,
as well as increased programming and treatment services. Added a Crime Analyst to assist in tracking
impacts of realignment.
• Behavioral Health and Recovery Services - 9 FTEs to increase capacity of the Integrated Forensics Team,
added a medication clinic and in-custody mental health services.
• 2 FTEs to the Community Services Agency to assist with eligibility and linkage to services.
• Reopen beds at the Honor Farm to expand jail capacity.
• Expand contracted services at the Day Reporting Center.
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $6,800,281 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $15,725,531
$150,000
CCP Planning Funds
$150,000
$0
Temporary Day*
$1,000,000
$100,000
Regional**
$100,000
$57,525
Community***
$132,904
$3,203,200
Sheriff ****
$6,826,500
$2,468,400
Probation+
$3,562,832
$186,960
Mental Health Agency
$1,445,344
$215,456
DA/PD++
$242,608
$418,740
Contingency Fund
$2,179,593
$0
CBO+++
$85,750
*Temporary Day Reporting Facility Modular Building
**Regional Apprehension Task Force
*** Community Services Agency includes Integrated Forensics Team Expansion in FY12‐13
****Sheriff includes $498,305 in contracted programming and treatment services in FY11‐12
and $826,500 in FY12‐13
+ Probation includes $317,438 for contracted programming and treatment services in FY11‐12
and $681,714 in FY 12‐13
++District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
+++Community‐Based Organization ‐ Second Chances California
109
Community
Corrections
SUTTER COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
The Sutter CCP generally convenes quarterly. The membership roster is listed in the
Christine Odom*
Chief Probation Officer left hand column.
Chair
Mary Beth Todd* Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Brian Aronson
Presiding judge or designee
Sutter County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG)
Jim Whiteaker
instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs and the Virginia
County supervisor or chief
administrative officer or Pretrial Risk Assessment Instrument for pretrial release decisions.
designee
Carl Adams*
CCP Objectives
District Attorney and
Victims’ interests
• Complete implementation of pretrial services in conjunction with local
Mark Van den Heuvel*
stakeholders and evaluation of the new program on courts, District Attorney,
Public Defender
Public Defender, Probation, and the jail.
J. Paul Parker* • Continue to evaluate the needs of all CCP agencies, including law enforcement
Sheriff
and court services by assessing crime and filing data.
Rob Landon* • Continue to evaluate the true impact of the realignment population on the jail and
Chief of Police health services.
• Continue to assess the needs of the entire offender population to assure that
Lori Harrah
Department of non-realigned offenders receive the services necessary to prevent them from
Social Services
impacting the jail population via probation revocations or by the commission of
new crimes. Potentially shore up probation services lost with the loss of SB 678
Dr. Brad Luz
Department of Community Corrections Performance Incentives Fund.
Mental Health
• Determine the appropriate amount of funds to reserve in contingencies for
Tom Sherry* unanticipated events.
Department of Alcohol and
Substance Abuse Programs Outcomes Identified in FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
Rinky Basi
• Address the immediate needs of the offender population, the county jail, and
Department of
Employment probation.
• Assess the impact of realignment on all CCP agencies and the local community;
Bill Cornelius
and develop programs, services, and practices in response.
County Office of Education
• Respond to stakeholder concerns regarding jail capacity by using jail space
Ed Anderson
efficiently.
Community-based
organization • Implement evidence-based supervision and services for all offenders.
• Continue to carefully and thoughtfully assess the needs of the local criminal justice
system, funding sustainable services, programs, and practices, as deemed necessary
*Indicates member of the
Executive Committee and appropriate.
• Determine the appropriate amount of funds to reserve in contingencies for
unanticipated events.
110
CCP Data Collection Outcome Results for FY 2011-12 (Year 1)
(not exhaustive):
• Determined risk level score for 100% of AB 109 offenders supervised by Sutter
• Post Release
Community County; used risk level to determine level of supervision; hired additional staff to
Supervision (PRCS) help lower the caseload ratio toward 1:50, trained all staff and fully implemented
violations
core principles of evidence-based practices.
• 1170(h) violations • Created Resource Center at Adult Probation Department, including substance
abuse services, evidence-based programming, employment, and educational
• Split sentences services. Approved a Mental Health Therapist position, but not yet filled.
• Employed a data analyst to develop a strategy to monitor the AB 109 impact on jail
• Flash incarceration
population and added jail staff to address immediate needs. Presented data
• Mandatory supervision reports at every CCP meeting and encouraged reports from all stakeholders about
the impacts of realignment. Received formal requests for funding from stakeholders
• Warrants for staffing, services, and programs directly related to identified needs of the local
criminal justice population and realignment.
• Terminations
• Implemented graduated sanctions, including flash incarceration for all offenders to
• Offenders lessen impact on court system and jail and to improve offender outcomes.
received from the Continued training in basic evidence-based practice and principles, including
California Department
assessments and motivational interviewing.
of Corrections and
Rehabilitations
(CDCR) vs. estimate FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
Sutter County allocated funding to support the following:
• Impact of realignment
on jail population by
tracking bookings by • Approved the Resource Center location, staffing, and services in late FY 2011-12.
classification and
• On-the -Job Training and Work Experience.
length of stay
• 1 FTE Victim Advocate in the District Attorney's Office.
• Jail overtime.
• 2 FTE Probation Officers for Pretrial Services Program.
• Requests are pending to allocate funds for jail medical and other jail operating
costs.
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $1,209,266 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $3,556,825
$0
Pre‐Trial
$232,028
$38,041
Research*
$59,000
$280,074
Resource**
$702,731
$257,665
Sheriff
$703,770
$192,626
Probation
$382,089
$0
Public Defender
$20,924
$41,847
DA/PD***
$0
$0
District Attorney
$58,985
$399,013 $1,397,299
Contingency****
*Research/Data (planning)
**Resource Center (staffed by multiple agencies)
111
***District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
****Contingency Fund includes carryover from FY 11/12/Pending Allocation
Community
Corrections
TEHAMA COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Richard Muench* The Tehama CCP generally convenes monthly. The membership roster is listed in the
Chief Probation Officer left hand column.
Chair
Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Gina Setter*
Presiding judge or designee
Tehama County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG) and
Dennis Garton
Positive Achievement Change Tool (PACT) for probation supervision and intervention
County supervisor or chief
administrative officer or programs, and the Wisconsin Risk Assessment instrument with the jail population
designee regarding release decisions.
Gregg Cohen*
CCP Objectives
District Attorney
Ron McIver*
• To create a criminal justice realignment data system to evaluate program
Public Defender
effectiveness in support of public safety, resulting in fewer crimes and fewer victims.
Dave Hencratt* • Monitor offenders in the community, enforce a continuum of sanctions, and share
Sheriff
information with law enforcement partners to assure the most serious offenders
are in-custody.
Paul Nanfito*
Chief of Police • To support the financing for the AB 109 Public Safety Realignment Plan by: (1)
identifying revenue opportunities for one-time costs, including dedicated revenue
Valerie Lucero*
streams, grants and low interest loans; (2) identifying opportunities for matching
Health Services Agency
funds and volunteers to leverage ongoing costs for alternatives to traditional
Charlene Reid
sentencing and treatment.
Department of
Social Services • To identify state and federal legislative and regulatory actions needed to clarify and
implement the criminal justice realignment.
Michael Pena
• To develop policy and procedures to keep the most serious offenders in-custody
Department of
to assure public safety.
Mental Health
• To provide prevention services executed through evidence-based practices that
Vacant
would decrease the number of students and young adults entering the judicial
Department of
system.
Employment
• To provide factual information to the citizens of the intent, effects, and planning to
Susan McVean
implement the 2011 Public Safety Realignment Legislation, AB 109.
Department of Alcohol and
Substance Abuse Programs • To identify and recommend evidenced-based programs and services for the
criminal justice population in all service locations, with the intent of reducing
Larry Champion
recidivism and thereby promoting public safety.
County Office of Education
• To investigate the feasibility and develop the facilities and infrastructure plans for a
Jeanne Spurr physical location for alternatives to traditional incarceration.
Community-based
• To design programs for work farm implementation that prepares offenders for
organization
reentry into the community.
Jean Moran
Victims’ interests
*Indicates member of the
Executive Committee
112
CCP Data Collection (not exhaustive)
Tehama County collects offender data in the following categories:
• Offense type
• Length of sentence
• Evidence-based drug and alcohol programs
• Anger abatement programs
• Parenting classes
• Recidivism
• PRCS violations
• 1170(h) violations
• Split sentences
• Flash incarceration
• Mandatory supervision
• PRCS cases transferred in and out of county
• Warrants
• Terminations
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $2,047,174.00 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $2,376,334.80
$100,000
Planning*
$100,000
$85,550
Training**
$0
$950,000
Day Reporting Center****
$1,052,359
$395,741
Sheriff
$498,100
$262,961
Probation
$365,320
$121,063
Mental Health Agency
$223,422
$43,459
DA/PD****
$48,735
$88,400
CBO(s)+
$88,400
*Allocation for planning (one time)
**Allocation for training and retention purposes (one time)
***Day Reporting Center is a collaboration between the Probation and Sheriff Department
****District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
+Community Based Organization(s)
113
Community
Corrections
TRINITY COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Terry Lee* The Trinity CCP convenes bi-monthly. The membership roster is listed in the left hand
Chief Probation Officer column.
Chair
Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Elizabeth Johnson*
Presiding judge or designee
Trinity County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG)
Judy Pfluger
instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs and the Virginia
County supervisor or chief
administrative officer or Pretrial Risk Assessment Instrument for court pretrial release decisions.
designee
CCP Objectives
Michael Harper*
District Attorney
• Supervise offenders using a risk/needs assessment instrument.
Victims’ interests • Utilize a pretrial program.
Derrick Riske* • Purchase a new case management system.
Public Defender • Direct services to veterans.
Bruce Haney*
Outcomes Identified in FY 2011-12
Sheriff
Mark Loveless* • Implementation of a streamlined and efficient system in the County of Trinity to
California Highway Patrol manage additional responsibilities under realignment.
Commander
• Implementation of a system that protects public safety and utilizes best practices in
Linda Wright* recidivism reduction.
Department of • Implementation of a system that effectively utilizes alternatives to pretrial and post
Social Services
conviction incarceration where appropriate.
Noel O'Neil
Department of
Result of Outcomes Identified in FY 2011-12
Mental Health
N/A • Expanded case management of the AB 109 population prior to the arrival of
Department of offenders in the county.
Employment
• Implemented an alternative incarceration program and increased transitional
Anne Lagorrio housing services.
Department of Alcohol and • The CCP continues to tabulate the effectiveness of pretrial and post conviction
Substance Abuse Programs
incarceration.
Betina Blackwell
County Office of Education
Marjorie Lee
Community-based
organization
*Indicates member of the
Executive Committee
114
CCP Data Collection (not exhaustive)
• Recidivism rates for non-violent, non-serious, non-sex offenders
• Recidivism rates for parolees under Trinity County jurisdiction
• Number and type of offenders sentenced to county jail and state prison
• Number and type of offenders sentenced to probation or alternative programs
• Revocations
• Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) violations
• State parole violations
• Flash Incarcerations
• PRCS offenders received from the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) vs.
estimate
• Number of days PRCS offenders are spending in-custody
• Number of offenders on electronic monitoring
• Number of days offenders spend in jail (Pretrial)
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
Trinity county allocated funding to support the following:
• 2 FTE positions in the Probation Department
• 1 FTE position in the Sheriff’s Department
• Added Moral Recognition Therapy training for Probation, Jail and Mental Health Staff
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $165,221 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $436,355
$10,000
Human Response*
$100,000
$0
Training**
$6,000
$0
Administrative Costs
$8,157
$0
Case Management System
$16,560
$0
Jail Needs Study
$8,500
$10,000
Sheriff
$57,831
$126,554
Probation***
$0
Virginia Risk**** $17,638 $189,509
$2,591
Public Defender
$5,894
$5,894
Mental Health Agency
$15,894
$5,182
DA/PD+
$5,373
$5,000
District Attorney
$5,000
*Human Response Network (transitional housing provider)
**Training for use by all local stakeholders
***Probation includes 2 FTEs, electronic monitoring, drug testing, and office supplies in FY 2012‐13
****Virginia Risk Assessment Tool ‐ Costs split between the Sheriff's Department and Probation
+District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
115
Community
Corrections
TULARE COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Christie Myer* The Tulare CCP convenes quarterly. The membership roster is listed in the left hand column.
Chief Probation Officer
Chair
Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
LaRayne Cleek*
Presiding judge or designee
Tulare County utilizes the Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative
Jean Rousseau Sanctions (COMPAS) instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs, with the
County supervisor or chief jail population release decisions, for referrals to in-custody programs, and for court pretrial
administrative officer or
release decisions.
designee
Outcomes Identified in FY 2011-12
Timothy Ward*
District Attorney and
Victims’ interests • Implement a streamlined and efficient system to manage additional responsibilities under
realignment.
Michael Sheltzer* • Implement a system that protects public safety and utilizes best practices in recidivism
Public Defender
reduction.
Bill Wittman* • Implement a system that effectively utilizes resources necessary to manage the realignment
Sheriff population, inclusive of jail incarceration, alternative sentencing, and community
supervision.
Colleen Mestas*
Chief of Police
CCP Phase One Goals in FY 2011-12
Cheryl Duerksen, Ph.D.
Probation Department:
Department of Social
Services and Department of
Alcohol and Substance • Develop the AB 109 Adult Supervision Unit to provide intensive supervision, court
Abuse Programs investigation, and case management services to felony probationers, utilizing an evidence-
based supervision model, in a continuing effort to reduce recidivism.
Jason Britt
• Institute electronic monitoring/GPS services as an alternative to incarceration.
Department of
• Develop Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) and 1170(h) client resources to
Mental Health
address offender recidivism through the use of evidence-based curriculum and programs;
Adam Peck residential in-patient/outpatient substance abuse treatment services; transitional housing
Department of
needs; transportation needs; clothing needs; educational support; tattoo removal services;
Employment
and job training and placement services.
Jim Vidak • Fund and implement the Multi-Disciplinary Assessment Team in collaboration with the
County Office of Education Health and Human Services Agency, Mental Health Department.
• Fund the District Attorney’s Victim/Offender Reconciliation Team.
Mary Alice Escarsega-
• Fund the Public Defender’s AB-109 Realignment Team.
Fechner
Community-based
organization Sheriff’s Department:
• Utilize vacant cells at the Tulare County Adult Pre-Trial Detention Facility to
accommodate the overall growth in the County’s inmate population as a result of AB 109.
*Indicates member of the • Consolidate booking operations for county jail system at the adult pretrial detention
Executive Committee facility.
• Enhance kitchen capacity at the Bob Wiley Detention Facility to accommodate additional
meal production demands.
• Enhance inmate transportation services.
• Establish counseling services to assist inmates in successfully transitioning back into society
and thus lower recidivism rates.
116
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
Tulare County allocated funding to support the following:
• 1 FTE Division Manager
• 1 FTE Deputy Probation Officer III
• 13 FTE Deputy Probation Officer I/II
• 1 Staff Services Analyst I/II/III
• 1 Office Assistant III
• Expansion of GPS and electronic monitoring services, in-patient residential substance abuse treatment, transitional
housing, emergency clothing supplies, transportation, tattoo removal services, out-patient treatment services,
educational costs, officer training expenses, and other related charges
• Established an Alternatives to Incarceration working group through the CCP to explore viable resources
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $802,806 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $13,533,958
$0
Medical Trust Account
$1,000,000
$0
Sheriff
$6,959,095
$0
Probation
$4,746,125
$300,000
Public Defender
$300,000
$202,806
DA/PD*
$228,738
$300,000
District Attorney
$300,000
*District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
117
Community
Corrections
TUOLUMNE COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Adele Arnold* The Tuolumne CCP convenes quarterly or as needed. The membership roster is
Chief Probation Officer listed in the left hand column.
Chair
Eric DuTemple* Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Presiding judge or designee
Maureen Frank Tuolumne County utilizes the Correctional Assessment and Intervention System
County supervisor or chief (CAIS) instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs, the Ohio Risk
administrative officer or
Assessment System (ORAS) tool with the jail population regarding release decisions,
designee
and for referral to in-custody programs, and the ORAS Pretrial tool for court pretrial
Michael Knowles* release decisions.
District Attorney
Robert Price*
CCP Objectives
Public Defender
James Mele* • Develop evidenced-based alternatives to incarceration for offenders.
Sheriff
• Protect community safety.
Mark Stinson* • Allocate funds to provide the most beneficial services to offenders.
Chief of Police
Ann Connelly FY 2011-12 (Year 1) Goals
Department of
Social Services
• Complete the Implementation Plan with summary strategies and actions for
Rita Austin* approval by the Board of Supervisors.
Department of Mental
• Open the Day Reporting Center with partners, contractors, and equipment in
Health and Department of
Alcohol and Substance place.
Abuse Programs • Begin operational and programming status of the first four components of Phase I
Realignment Implementation: Day Reporting Center, Day Treatment Center,
Jill Olsen
Department of Electronic Monitoring, and Expanded Work Release Program.
Employment • Design a basic monitoring process to track internal and external impacts of the AB
109 Implementation as identified by the CCP, Board of Supervisors, and community
Margie Bulkin
County Office of Education partners. The internal impacts would include references to budget, training, and
implementation milestones. The external impacts would include information
Beetle Barber
regarding community safety and crime statistics.
Community-based
organization
Ginger Martin
Victims’ interests
*Indicates member of the
Executive Committee
118
CCP Data Collection
Tuolumne County collects the following offender related data:
• Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) violations
• 1170(h) violations
• Recidivism
• Split sentences
• Electronic monitoring
• Flash incarceration
• Mandatory supervision
• Offenders received from the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) vs.
estimate
• Warrants
• Terminations
• Employment rate
• PRCS by age and gender
• PRCS by supervisorial district
• Risk assessment level
• Registered sex offenders
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
The county allocated funding to support the following:
• Creation of a pretrial services and assessment program for offenders in jail
• Deputy Probation Officer
• Legal Clerk at the Probation Department
• Probation Technician
• Jail Deputy/Classification Officer
• An assessment tool for the Sheriff's Department
• Behavioral Health Offender Treatment Team
• PRCS Medication
• District Attorney Victim Witness
• District Attorney Victim Impact
• T1 line for computer networks
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $677,231 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $1,573,159
*T1 line for computer networks
$57,000
Planning **Probation includes Day Reporting
$0
Center
$0
T1 Line* ***District Attorney/Public Defender
$5,000
(direct allocation, non CCP funds)
$0
Behavioral Health ****Contingency Fund represents funds
$45,563
placed into a trust and includes
$49,113
Sheriff unallocated funds from FY 11-12
$294,304
$445,112
Probation**
$21,463 $902,218
DA/PD***
$23,681
$0
District Attorney
$14,000
Contingency Fund **** $104,543 119
$288,393
Community
Corrections
VENTURA COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Mark Varela* The Ventura CCP convenes monthly. The membership roster is listed in the left hand
Chief Probation Officer column.
Chair
Brian Back* Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Michael Planet
Presiding judge or designee
Ventura County utilizes the Ohio Risk Assessment System (ORAS) tool for probation
Michael Powers supervision and intervention programs, for referral to in-custody programs, and use of
County supervisor or chief
the ORAS Pretrial tool for court pretrial release decisions is pending.
administrative officer or
designee
Outcomes Identified in FY 2011-12
Greg Totten*
District Attorney
• Reduce the recidivism of AB 109 offenders.
Stephen Lipson*
Public Defender • Develop and implement effective forms of evaluation, treatment, supports and out-
reach/engagement for AB 109 individuals with mental health and/or substance
Geoff Dean*
abuse needs and their families.
Sheriff
• Increase alternatives to incarceration and services for offenders by fiscal year 2015.
Ken Corney* • Use risk/needs information at front end of system and at sentencing by July 1, 2015.
Chief of Police
CCP Data Collection
Barry Zimmerman
Departments of Social
Services, Employment, and The county collects the following offender related data:
Alcohol and Substance
Abuse Programs
Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) Received: Reported as instructed, never
Meloney Roy* reported, transferred out prior to scheduled release date, Immigration Custom
Patrick Zarate
Enforcement (ICE) holds (never reported), initial failure to appear (arrested on), and
Department of
initial failure to appear (arrested on new offense)
Mental Health
Warrants: Current outstanding warrants, return on warrants, and ICE bench warrants.
Stanley Mantooth
Supervision outcomes: Terminated due to new CDCR commitment, terminated due to
County Office of Education
reaching one year mark with no violations, transferred out of county, deceased, and
Caroline Sutton discharge date completions (with no new offense or violation, with new offense, with
Community-based
PRCS violation)
organization
Total PRCS currently being supervised: By region and gender.
Katherine Duggan PRCS outcomes: With no new arrests, PRCS with violations only, never reported –
Victims’ interests
bench warrant, bench warrant after reporting, with new offenses, with violations, and
new offenses
Arrests and violations: Flash only, flash/revocation, revocation, and re-offender by
*Indicates member of the
number of arrests (new offenses and violations)
Executive Committee
Arrests for new offenses: Felony, misdemeanor, type (drug related, theft related, violence
related, weapons, resisting/evading arrest, domestic violence), by region, and timeline
since released from CDCR
1170(h) Sentence Type: Suspended prison sentence, mandatory supervision (by region),
and jail only
Split Sentences outcomes: Currently supervised, outstanding warrants, transferred out,
In-custody pending release and mandatory supervision terminations
120
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
Ventura County allocated funding to support the following:
• District Attorney:2 FTE Attorney III and 2 FTE Victim Advocates
• Public Defender: 2 FTE Attorney III, 2 FTE Social Worker IV and 1 FTE Law Clerk
• Probation: 3 FTE Supervising Deputy Probation Officers, 21.4 FTE Deputy Probation Officers, 1 FTE
Clerical Supervisor, 4 FTE Office Assistant III, 1 FTE LPA II/III, .5 FTE Accounting Officer II, and .5 FTE
Fiscal Assistant IV
• Sheriff: 3 FTE electric monitoring staff, 2 FTE Inmate Services Program Analysts, 1 FTE Crime Analyst I,
and1 FTE Regional Deputy
• 3 FTE Behavioral Health Clinician
• $1.25 million to community-based organizations (CBOs) to identify service delivery gaps and develop
evidence-based approaches to meet those needs. In turn, the CBOs have formed a local coalition with a
goal of providing targeted services to offenders, victims and families.
• Through a contract with the Human Services Department, 45 post release offenders are provided
employment services. These services include résumé development, interviewing skills, and skill set
matching to available jobs.
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $6,600,993 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $15,538,664
$320,000
Law Enforcement*
$525,313
$943,000
Behavioral Health
$1,507,340
$1,592,284
Sheriff **
$6,836,735
$1,570,383
Probation***
$4,335,433
$155,714
Public Defender ****
$596,048
$210,637
District Attorney+
$487,795
$1,808,975
Contingency Fund++
$0
$0
CBO(s)+++
$1,250,000
*Local Law Enforcement
**Sheriff includes portion of allocation for training and retention purposes
***Probation includes one time planning funds
****Public Defender includes portion of direct allocation
+District Attorney includes portion of direct allocation
++Contingency Fund includes a portion of funds from all stakeholders
+++Community-Based Organization(s)
121
Community
Corrections
YOLO COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Marlon Yarber*
Interim Chief Probation The Yolo CCP convenes monthly. The membership roster is listed in the left hand column.
Officer
Chair
Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Steve Basha*
Shawn Landry
Yolo County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG) instrument for
Presiding judge or designee
probation supervision and intervention programs and the Ohio Risk Assessment System
Jim Provenza (ORAS) Pretrial tool for court pretrial release decisions.
County supervisor or chief
administrative officer or CCP Objectives
designee
Jeff Reisig* • Identify gaps in needs/risks and existing programs.
District Attorney • Decide as a team how failure in each type of program will be handled.
• Determine what outcomes to measure. How will we know if it works? What incentives
Tracie Olson *
are built in to achieve those outcomes?
Public Defender
• Determine what other key community issues to address with the realignment plan and
Ed Prieto* customize efforts to match community needs.
Sheriff • Develop communications, education, and public engagement strategies.
Landy Black*
CCP Goals In FY 2011-12
Chief of Police
Ed Smith, Acting Director
• Increase jail bed capacity at the Leinberger Facility.
Department of Social
• Expand electronic monitoring capacity.
Services and Department
of Employment • Implement community corrections case management
• Develop contingency funding for unforeseen costs associated with health/mental health
Kim Suderman* needs.
Department of Mental
• Provide supplementary funding to the District Attorney and Public Defender.
Health and Department of
Alcohol and Substance • Review data analysis and support for the development of evidence-based policing strategies
Abuse Programs and partnership.
• Conduct long-term analysis, planning, and resource development.
Dr. Jorge Ayala
County Office of Education
Outcome Measures Identified in FY 2012-13 (Year 2)
Karen Larsen
Community-based • Percentage of defendants on supervised own recognizance who do not commit a new
organization crime while pending trial.
• Percentage of defendants on supervised own recognizance who appear for a court hearing.
Laura Valdez
Jonathan Raven • Percentage of offenders who do not commit a new crime while on work program.
Victims’ interests • Percentage of offenders who successfully complete work program.
• Percentage of offenders who do not commit a new crime while on electronic monitoring.
• Percentage of offenders who successfully complete electronic monitoring.
• Percentage of high risk clients who commit a new crime while under supervision.
*Indicates member of the
Executive Committee • Percentage of high risk offenders who successfully complete supervision.
• Percentage of offenders who successfully complete treatment plan expectations.
• Percentage of offenders who are employed/housed/sober after 1 year of completion.
• Percentage of cases where restitution is ordered.
• Percent of restitution collected.
122
CCP Data Collection
Yolo County collects the following offender related data:
• Total probation population (high, medium and low risk)
• Total in-custody jail population (felony and misdemeanor offenders)
• Number of Post Release Community Supervision (PRCS) releases
• Number of PRCS releases by city
• PRCS police department contacts
• Jail population (sentenced, pending court and holds)
• Number of local prison offenders sentenced
• Intensive supervision population (PRCS active population, high risk felony probation and 1170h mandatory
supervision)
• Alternatives to custody (electronic monitoring, home custody, offenders on work program and pretrial supervision)
• AB 109 jail population (1170h offenders in-custody, sentenced parole violators, PRCS or mandatory supervision
violations)
• Split sentences
• Number of active treatment referrals
• Highest priority criminogenic need
• Static Risk and Dynamic Need Assessment
• Crime rates per 100,000 adults
• Part 1 crime rates per 100,000 residents
• Property crime trends
• Violent crime trends
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
Yolo County allocated funding to support the following:
• 8 Correctional Officers
• Deputy District Attorney
• Increased AB 109 dedicated beds to total 75 at the Leinberger Facility
• Day Reporting Center, which opened in April 2013
• Costs associated with a pretrial program
Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $3,359,232 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $6,398,432
$300,000.00
Law *
$400,000.00
$1,518,282.00
Sheriff **
$2,156,683.00
$1,346,321.00
Probation***
$3,297,000.00
$106,629.00
DA/PD****
$119,749.00
$0
District Attorney
$425,000.00
$88,000.00
Contingency Fund+
$0
*Local Law Enforcement. **Sheriff includes jail beds and electronic monitoring. *** Probation includes community corrections
case management, long term planning, treatment services/day reporting center and a pretrial program. $242,000 from FY2011-12 123
rolled over for treatment. ****District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds). +Contingency Fund
(associated with health and /or mental health needs)
Community
Corrections
YUBA COUNTY
Partnership (CCP)
Members:
Community Corrections Partnership Realignment Implementation Plan
Jim Arnold* The Yuba CCP convenes quarterly or as needed. The membership roster is listed in
Chief Probation Officer the left hand column.
Chair
Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument
Bonnie Sloan*
Presiding judge or designee
Yuba County utilizes the Static Risk and Offender Needs Guide (STRONG)
Andy Vasquez
County supervisor or chief instrument for probation supervision and intervention programs.
administrative officer or
designee
CCP Objectives
Patrick McGrath*
District Attorney • Continue to evaluate the needs of all CCP agencies, including law enforcement
and court services.
Brian Davis*
Public Defender • Continue to evaluate the true impact of the realignment population on jail and
health services.
Steve Durfor*
• Continue to assess the needs of the entire offender population to assure that non-
Sheriff
realigned offenders receive the services necessary to prevent them from impacting
Wally Fullerton*
the jail population via probation revocations or by the commission of new crimes.
Chief of Police
Susan Nobles*
Outcomes Identified in FY 2011-12 and FY 2012-13
Department of
Social Services
• Address the immediate needs of the offender population, the county jail, and
Dr. Brad Luz probation.
Department of Mental
• Assess the impact of realignment on jail medical services.
Health and Department of
Alcohol and Substance • Assess the impact of realignment on all CCP agencies and the local community;
Abuse Programs and develop programs, services, and practices in response.
• Respond to stakeholder concerns regarding jail capacity by using jail space
Jennifer Vasquez
Department of efficiently.
Employment • Implement evidence-based supervision and services for all offenders.
• Continue to carefully and thoughtfully assess the needs of the local criminal justice
Scotia Holmes Sanchez
County Office of Education system, funding sustainable services, programs, and practices, as deemed necessary
and appropriate.
Dr. Joe Cassidy
Community-based • Determine the appropriate amount of funds to reserve in contingencies for
organization unanticipated events.
Jason Roper
Victims’ interests
*Indicates member of the
Executive Committee
124
CCP Data Collection Results of Outcomes Identified in FY 2011-12 and FY 2012-13
(not exhaustive)
• Determined risk level score for 100% of AB 109 offenders supervised by Yuba
• Post Release
Community County; supervised offenders based on risk level; hired additional staff to help
Supervision (PRCS) lower the caseload ratio toward 1:50. Trained all staff and fully implemented core
violations
principles of evidence-based practices.
• 1170(h)(5)(B) • Developed a strategy to help off set financial impact to jail; began to evaluate
violations responses to increased jail medical needs.
• Created resource center at the Adult Probation Department that provides
• Split sentences
substance abuse services, evidence-based programming, employment, and
educational services. Emphasized the use of non-custodial sanctions, flash
• Flash incarceration
incarceration, and the importance of split sentences. Reassessed drug court and
• Mandatory supervision substance abuse services to better address needs of population and improve
offender outcomes. Added victim advocate for Victim Services program.
• Offenders
• Trained all Probation staff in motivational interviewing, evidence-based
received from the
California Department programming principles. Established SMART (Specific, Measureable, Applicable,
of Corrections and Realistic, Timely) goals and case planning with offenders.
Rehabilitation (CDCR)
• Employed a data analyst to develop a strategy to monitor the AB 109 impact on
vs. estimate
jail population and added jail staff to address immediate needs. Encouraged data
• Warrants reports from stakeholders on the impact of realignment. Received formal
requests for funding from stakeholders for staffing, services, and programs directly
• Terminations
related to identified needs of the local criminal justice population and realignment.
• Impact of realignment
on jail population by
FY 2012-13 CCP Plan Revisions
tracking bookings by
classification and
length of stay • Provided funding to hire 2 FTE Drug Counselors.
• Recidivism rates for Allocation of Realignment (AB 109) Funds
PRCS offenders under
Yuba County
jurisdiction FY 2011‐12 (Year 1) $1,212,888 FY 2012‐13 (Year 2) $2,236,588
• Number and type of
offenders sentenced to
$0
probation or 1170(h) Day Reporting Center
(5)(A) $256,933
$588,417
Sheriff
$1,098,146
$588,417
Probation
$841,213
$36,055
DA/PD*
$40,296
*District Attorney/Public Defender (direct allocation, non CCP funds)
125
BSCC/PPIC RESEARCH INITIATIVE
The Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) works in partnership with local corrections systems
and assists efforts to achieve continued improvement in reducing recidivism through evidence- based decision
making. To further this cause the BSCC and the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) have formed a
partnership to assist counties in identifying effective strategies for implementing realignment related services.
Project Description
The BSCC in conjunction with the PPIC have proposed a joint partnership to conduct a ten county research
project that identifies realignment’s most effective and efficient practices. The PPIC has offered to assist
counties in identifying data that will enhance county decision making in the short term, facilitate management
of community corrections populations in the long term, and provide an empirical basis for evaluating various
policies in relation to public safety and other outcomes.
County Selection
The first phase in this project involves selecting counties for analysis based on their representativeness of the
state as a whole and the diversity of their approaches to realignment. As a group, these counties should
capture the majority of the California population and the majority of the projected realignment population.
This group of counties should also approximate the state population well in terms of demographic and
economic characteristics, as well as the regional and urban/rural diversity of the state.
Data Collection
The second phase of the project involves identifying the data elements needed to assess the impacts of
realignment policy at the county and state level. Assistance will be sought from selected counties and
statewide data holders (e.g., California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and the California
Department of Justice) in assembling an individual level dataset that includes the following data elements:
Individual Identifier: The individual identifier will allow for tracking of individuals over time and as they
move through systems. The most common individual identifier is the Criminal Investigation and
Identification number (CII number). However, different agencies and departments may use different
individual identifiers. In the process of preparing the dataset for analysis, other forms of individual
identifiers (such as name or address) may need to be retained to allow for matching across systems.
Once the matching is completed, the data will be stripped of any personally identifying information.
Demographic Characteristics: The inclusion of demographic characteristics in the dataset will allow
researchers to control for differences in population composition across counties, as well as allow for
subgroup analysis. Commonly collected demographic characteristics include date of birth, gender, race
and ethnicity.
Criminogenic Characteristics: Criminogenic characteristics include criminal histories and current offenses, as
well as assessed risks and needs related to the likelihood of recidivism. The inclusion of criminogenic
characteristics, like demographic characteristics, will allow researchers to control for differences in
population compositions across counties. Criminogenic characteristics will also be used to
analyze the match between the risks and needs identified and the sanctions and services received.
Sanctions and Services: Given the size of the realigned population relative to jail capacity, many counties
are utilizing alternative sanctions and services to mitigate the potential risk to public safety induced by
lower levels of incarceration. In addition to the time held in-custody for the current offense, information
will also be collected on any alternative sanctions imposed on the offender and any services received by
the offender during the period of incarceration and/or supervision.
126
Recidivism Outcomes: This study captures the following three measures of recidivism: arrest, conviction,
and return to custody (jail or prison). The data will permit measurement for any time period (6 months,
I-year, 3-year) or offense (e.g., violent, property, drug, or sexual). As a result, individual counties can
select their own recidivism measures for use locally and the BSCC can create a standardized measure.
Outcomes
The information collected via this collaboration will at a minimum provide quantifiable measures and tangible
assistance to counties and Community Corrections Partnerships to consider when utilizing data driven
approaches to tactically address community corrections decision making.
127
CONCLUSION
Since the enactment of public safety realignment, local Community Corrections Partnerships (CCP) have
diligently worked together to provide a continuum of structured care and support to individuals returning to
their communities. Countless workgroups, subcommittees, and executive committees have convened with
the common goal of improving public safety. Stakeholders who otherwise may not have been engaged in
strategic community planning now hold vital membership roles in the CCP; difficult dialogues on the meaning
of comprehensive wraparound services are occurring with greater frequency; CCP stakeholders from
divergent backgrounds continue rich discussions on steps that can be taken to make local communities
stronger.
The CCP plans and local feedback from CCP chairs provided information on ways the BSCC can assist in the
implementation of realignment and community corrections systems. These include the development of
common definition of terms and outcomes, facilitation of the development of local evaluation methodologies,
and continued training and education to the general public and local stakeholders about community
corrections. In addition this information is available and can be used by independent researchers.
As counties provide additional evidence-based programming to offenders, further integrate community-based
organizations into evidence-based practices, cope with turnover at key stakeholder positions, and discuss
how to strategically address emerging local trends, the need for assistance will continue. The BSCC, in
consultation with justice system partners and stakeholders, will provide targeted training and technical
assistance that meets identified needs of counties to further assist in realignment implementation.
128
This page intentionally left blank.
129
APPENDIX
130
2011-12 AB 109 Allocations
[2] [4]
2011-12 [1] [3]
2011-12 Allocation 2011-12 allocation for
Allocation 2011-12 Allocation 2011-12 allocation for
County for AB 109 DA/PD Comm Corrections Total
Percentage for AB 109 training, retention
Activities Partnership planning
(AB 109) PROGRAMS purposes (one-time)
(revocation) (one-time)
354,300,000 12,700,000
ALAMEDA 2.6026% $9,221,012 $330,530 $650,650 $200,000 $10,402,192
ALPINE 0.0217% $76,883 $2,756 $5,425 $100,000 $185,064
AMADOR 0.1534% $543,496 $19,482 $38,350 $100,000 $701,328
BUTTE 0.7722% $2,735,905 $98,069 $193,050 $150,000 $3,177,024
CALAVERAS 0.0990% $350,757 $12,573 $24,750 $100,000 $488,080
COLUSA 0.0605% $214,352 $7,684 $15,125 $100,000 $337,160
CONTRA COSTA 1.2907% $4,572,950 $163,919 $322,675 $200,000 $5,259,544
DEL NORTE 0.0625% $221,438 $7,938 $15,625 $100,000 $345,000
EL DORADO 0.3417% $1,210,643 $43,396 $85,425 $100,000 $1,439,464
FRESNO 2.4946% $8,838,368 $316,814 $623,650 $200,000 $9,978,832
GLENN 0.0935% $331,271 $11,875 $23,375 $100,000 $466,520
HUMBOLDT 0.4309% $1,526,679 $54,724 $107,725 $100,000 $1,789,128
IMPERIAL 0.3659% $1,296,384 $46,469 $91,475 $100,000 $1,534,328
INYO 0.0539% $190,968 $6,845 $13,475 $100,000 $311,288
KERN 3.0579% $10,834,140 $388,353 $764,475 $200,000 $12,186,968
KINGS 0.8078% $2,862,035 $102,591 $201,950 $100,000 $3,266,576
LAKE 0.2317% $820,913 $29,426 $57,925 $100,000 $1,008,264
LASSEN 0.1086% $384,770 $13,792 $27,150 $100,000 $525,712
LOS ANGELES 31.7692% $112,558,276 $4,034,688 $7,942,300 $200,000 $124,735,264
MADERA 0.4765% $1,688,240 $60,516 $119,125 $100,000 $1,967,880
MARIN 0.3681% $1,304,178 $46,749 $92,025 $150,000 $1,592,952
MARIPOSA 0.0467% $165,458 $5,931 $11,675 $100,000 $283,064
MENDOCINO 0.2805% $993,812 $35,624 $70,125 $100,000 $1,199,560
MERCED 0.7052% $2,498,524 $89,560 $176,300 $150,000 $2,914,384
MODOC 0.0217% $76,883 $2,756 $5,425 $100,000 $185,064
MONO 0.0283% $100,267 $3,594 $7,075 $100,000 $210,936
MONTEREY 1.0858% $3,846,989 $137,897 $271,450 $150,000 $4,406,336
NAPA 0.2969% $1,051,917 $37,706 $74,225 $100,000 $1,263,848
NEVADA 0.1454% $515,152 $18,466 $36,350 $100,000 $669,968
ORANGE 6.5138% $23,078,393 $827,253 $1,628,450 $200,000 $25,734,096
PLACER 0.8429% $2,986,395 $107,048 $210,725 $150,000 $3,454,168
PLUMAS 0.0434% $153,766 $5,512 $10,850 $100,000 $270,128
RIVERSIDE 5.9482% $21,074,473 $755,421 $1,487,050 $200,000 $23,516,944
SACRAMENTO 3.7088% $13,140,278 $471,018 $927,200 $200,000 $14,738,496
SAN BENITO 0.1546% $547,748 $19,634 $38,650 $100,000 $706,032
SAN BERNARDINO 7.2779% $25,785,600 $924,293 $1,819,475 $200,000 $28,729,368
SAN DIEGO 7.0860% $25,105,698 $899,922 $1,771,500 $200,000 $27,977,120
SAN FRANCISCO 1.4253% $5,049,838 $181,013 $356,325 $200,000 $5,787,176
SAN JOAQUIN 1.9153% $6,785,908 $243,243 $478,825 $150,000 $7,657,976
SAN LUIS OBISPO 0.6211% $2,200,557 $78,880 $155,275 $150,000 $2,584,712
SAN MATEO 1.1919% $4,222,902 $151,371 $297,975 $150,000 $4,822,248
SANTA BARBARA 1.0948% $3,878,876 $139,040 $273,700 $150,000 $4,441,616
SANTA CLARA 3.5468% $12,566,312 $450,444 $886,700 $200,000 $14,103,456
SANTA CRUZ 0.4693% $1,662,730 $59,601 $117,325 $150,000 $1,989,656
SHASTA 0.8436% $2,988,875 $107,137 $210,900 $100,000 $3,406,912
SIERRA 0.0217% $76,883 $2,756 $5,425 $100,000 $185,064
SISKIYOU 0.1256% $445,001 $15,951 $31,400 $100,000 $592,352
SOLANO 1.0747% $3,807,662 $136,487 $268,675 $150,000 $4,362,824
SONOMA 0.9146% $3,240,428 $116,154 $228,650 $150,000 $3,735,232
STANISLAUS 1.6965% $6,010,700 $215,456 $424,125 $150,000 $6,800,280
SUTTER 0.3295% $1,167,419 $41,847 $82,375 $100,000 $1,391,640
TEHAMA 0.3422% $1,212,415 $43,459 $85,550 $100,000 $1,441,424
TRINITY 0.0408% $144,554 $5,182 $10,200 $100,000 $259,936
TULARE 1.5969% $5,657,817 $202,806 $399,225 $150,000 $6,409,848
TUOLUMNE 0.1690% $598,767 $21,463 $42,250 $100,000 $762,480
VENTURA 1.6079% $5,696,790 $204,203 $401,975 $200,000 $6,502,968
YOLO 0.8396% $2,974,703 $106,629 $209,900 $150,000 $3,441,232
YUBA 0.2839% $1,005,858 $36,055 $70,975 $100,000 $1,212,888
TOTAL 1.0000 $354,300,000 $12,700,000 $25,000,000 $7,850,000 $399,850,000
http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/realignment/docs/BASE-REALIGNMENT-FUNDING.pdf
2012-13 AB 109 Allocations
[3]
2012-13 [1] [2]
2012-13 2012-13 allocation for
Allocation 2012-13 Allocation 2012-13 Allocation for
County Allocation Comm Corrections Total
Percentage for AB 109 AB 109 DA/PD
Percentage (DA/PD) Partnership planning
(AB 109) PROGRAMS Activities (revocation)
(one-time)
842,900,000 14,600,000
ALAMEDA 3.4667% $29,220,814 2.7104% $395,718 $200,000 $29,816,533
ALPINE 0.0182% $153,408 0.0180% $2,628 $100,000 $256,036
AMADOR 0.1341% $1,130,329 0.1476% $21,550 $100,000 $1,251,879
BUTTE 0.6646% $5,601,913 0.7549% $110,215 $150,000 $5,862,129
CALAVERAS 0.0943% $794,855 0.0951% $13,885 $100,000 $908,739
COLUSA 0.0513% $432,408 0.0560% $8,176 $100,000 $540,584
CONTRA COSTA 2.2880% $19,285,552 1.4172% $206,911 $200,000 $19,692,463
DEL NORTE 0.0647% $545,356 0.0595% $8,687 $100,000 $654,043
EL DORADO 0.3950% $3,329,455 0.3453% $50,414 $100,000 $3,479,869
FRESNO 2.4658% $20,784,228 2.4875% $363,175 $200,000 $21,347,403
GLENN 0.0786% $662,519 0.0883% $12,892 $100,000 $775,411
HUMBOLDT 0.3964% $3,341,256 0.4231% $61,773 $100,000 $3,503,028
IMPERIAL 0.3709% $3,126,316 0.3633% $53,042 $100,000 $3,279,358
INYO 0.0469% $395,320 0.0497% $7,256 $100,000 $502,576
KERN 2.7823% $23,452,007 3.0187% $440,730 $200,000 $24,092,737
KINGS 0.7167% $6,041,064 0.7926% $115,720 $100,000 $6,256,784
LAKE 0.2054% $1,731,317 0.2247% $32,806 $100,000 $1,864,123
LASSEN 0.0923% $777,997 0.1032% $15,067 $100,000 $893,064
LOS ANGELES 31.7692% $267,782,587 31.7692% $4,638,303 $200,000 $272,620,890
MADERA 0.4083% $3,441,561 0.4643% $67,788 $100,000 $3,609,349
MARIN 0.5414% $4,563,461 0.3873% $56,546 $150,000 $4,770,006
MARIPOSA 0.0402% $338,846 0.0425% $6,205 $100,000 $445,051
MENDOCINO 0.2448% $2,063,419 0.2726% $39,800 $100,000 $2,203,219
MERCED 0.6179% $5,208,279 0.6905% $100,813 $150,000 $5,459,092
MODOC 0.0198% $166,894 0.0182% $2,657 $100,000 $269,551
MONO 0.0343% $289,115 0.0258% $3,767 $100,000 $392,882
MONTEREY 0.9410% $7,931,689 1.0637% $155,300 $150,000 $8,236,989
NAPA 0.2927% $2,467,168 0.2931% $42,793 $100,000 $2,609,961
NEVADA 0.2100% $1,770,090 0.1505% $21,973 $100,000 $1,892,063
ORANGE 6.6797% $56,303,191 6.5321% $953,687 $200,000 $57,456,878
PLACER 0.7340% $6,186,886 0.8254% $120,508 $150,000 $6,457,394
PLUMAS 0.0422% $355,704 0.0399% $5,825 $100,000 $461,529
RIVERSIDE 5.1232% $43,183,453 5.8375% $852,275 $200,000 $44,235,728
SACRAMENTO 3.3308% $28,075,313 3.6563% $533,820 $200,000 $28,809,133
SAN BENITO 0.1300% $1,095,770 0.1481% $21,623 $100,000 $1,217,393
SAN BERNARDINO 6.6254% $55,845,497 7.1875% $1,049,375 $200,000 $57,094,872
SAN DIEGO 7.0156% $59,134,492 7.0735% $1,032,731 $200,000 $60,367,223
SAN FRANCISCO 2.0262% $17,078,840 1.5002% $219,029 $200,000 $17,497,869
SAN JOAQUIN 1.7534% $14,779,409 1.8909% $276,071 $150,000 $15,205,480
SAN LUIS OBISPO 0.6145% $5,179,621 0.6169% $90,067 $150,000 $5,419,688
SAN MATEO 1.5961% $13,453,527 1.2412% $181,215 $150,000 $13,784,742
SANTA BARBARA 0.9457% $7,971,305 1.0721% $156,527 $150,000 $8,277,832
SANTA CLARA 4.0037% $33,747,187 3.6030% $526,038 $200,000 $34,473,225
SANTA CRUZ 0.6139% $5,174,563 0.4848% $70,781 $150,000 $5,395,344
SHASTA 0.7419% $6,253,475 0.8271% $120,757 $100,000 $6,474,232
SIERRA 0.0182% $153,408 0.2097% $30,616 $100,000 $284,024
SISKIYOU 0.1065% $897,689 0.1198% $17,491 $100,000 $1,015,179
SOLANO 1.0024% $8,449,230 1.0620% $155,052 $150,000 $8,754,282
SONOMA 1.0710% $9,027,459 0.9317% $136,028 $150,000 $9,313,487
STANISLAUS 1.4525% $12,243,123 1.6617% $242,608 $150,000 $12,635,731
SUTTER 0.2978% $2,510,156 0.3221% $47,027 $100,000 $2,657,183
TEHAMA 0.3032% $2,555,673 0.3338% $48,735 $100,000 $2,704,408
TRINITY 0.0353% $297,544 0.0368% $5,373 $100,000 $402,917
TULARE 1.3899% $11,715,467 1.5667% $228,738 $150,000 $12,094,205
TUOLUMNE 0.1422% $1,198,604 0.1622% $23,681 $100,000 $1,322,285
VENTURA 1.7880% $15,071,052 1.6280% $237,688 $200,000 $15,508,740
YOLO 0.7162% $6,036,850 0.8202% $119,749 $150,000 $6,306,599
YUBA 0.2487% $2,096,292 0.2760% $40,296 $100,000 $2,236,588
TOTAL* 1.0000 $842,900,000 1.0000 $14,600,000 $7,850,000 $865,350,000
*Does not Include Growth
http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/realignment/docs/BASE-REALIGNMENT-FUNDING.pdf
2013-14 AB 109 Allocations
[3]
2013-14 [1] [2]
2013-14 2013-14 allocation for
Allocation 2013-14 Allocation 2013-14 Allocation for
County Allocation Comm Corrections Total
Percentage for AB 109 AB 109 DA/PD
Percentage (DA/PD) Partnership planning
(AB 109) PROGRAMS Activities (revocation)
(one-time)
998,900,000 17,100,000
ALAMEDA 3.4667% $34,628,866 2.7104% $463,478 $0 $35,092,345
ALPINE 0.0182% $181,800 0.0180% $3,078 $0 $184,878
AMADOR 0.1341% $1,339,525 0.1476% $25,240 $0 $1,364,765
BUTTE 0.6646% $6,638,689 0.7549% $129,088 $0 $6,767,777
CALAVERAS 0.0943% $941,963 0.0951% $16,262 $0 $958,225
COLUSA 0.0513% $512,436 0.0560% $9,576 $0 $522,012
CONTRA COSTA 2.2880% $22,854,832 1.4172% $242,341 $0 $23,097,173
DEL NORTE 0.0647% $646,288 0.0595% $10,175 $0 $656,463
EL DORADO 0.3950% $3,945,655 0.3453% $59,046 $0 $4,004,701
FRESNO 2.4658% $24,630,876 2.4875% $425,363 $0 $25,056,239
GLENN 0.0786% $785,135 0.0883% $15,099 $0 $800,235
HUMBOLDT 0.3964% $3,959,640 0.4231% $72,350 $0 $4,031,990
IMPERIAL 0.3709% $3,704,920 0.3633% $62,124 $0 $3,767,044
INYO 0.0469% $468,484 0.0497% $8,499 $0 $476,983
KERN 2.7823% $27,792,395 3.0187% $516,198 $0 $28,308,592
KINGS 0.7167% $7,159,116 0.7926% $135,535 $0 $7,294,651
LAKE 0.2054% $2,051,741 0.2247% $38,424 $0 $2,090,164
LASSEN 0.0923% $921,985 0.1032% $17,647 $0 $939,632
LOS ANGELES 31.7692% $317,342,539 31.7692% $5,432,533 $0 $322,775,072
MADERA 0.4083% $4,078,509 0.4643% $79,395 $0 $4,157,904
MARIN 0.5414% $5,408,045 0.3873% $66,228 $0 $5,474,273
MARIPOSA 0.0402% $401,558 0.0425% $7,268 $0 $408,825
MENDOCINO 0.2448% $2,445,307 0.2726% $46,615 $0 $2,491,922
MERCED 0.6179% $6,172,203 0.6905% $118,076 $0 $6,290,279
MODOC 0.0198% $197,782 0.0182% $3,112 $0 $200,894
MONO 0.0343% $342,623 0.0258% $4,412 $0 $347,035
MONTEREY 0.9410% $9,399,649 1.0637% $181,893 $0 $9,581,542
NAPA 0.2927% $2,923,780 0.2931% $50,120 $0 $2,973,900
NEVADA 0.2100% $2,097,690 0.1505% $25,736 $0 $2,123,426
ORANGE 6.6797% $66,723,523 6.5321% $1,116,989 $0 $67,840,512
PLACER 0.7340% $7,331,926 0.8254% $141,143 $0 $7,473,069
PLUMAS 0.0422% $421,536 0.0399% $6,823 $0 $428,359
RIVERSIDE 5.1232% $51,175,645 5.8375% $998,213 $0 $52,173,857
SACRAMENTO 3.3308% $33,271,361 3.6563% $625,227 $0 $33,896,589
SAN BENITO 0.1300% $1,298,570 0.1481% $25,325 $0 $1,323,895
SAN BERNARDINO 6.6254% $66,181,121 7.1875% $1,229,063 $0 $67,410,183
SAN DIEGO 7.0156% $70,078,828 7.0735% $1,209,569 $0 $71,288,397
SAN FRANCISCO 2.0262% $20,239,712 1.5002% $256,534 $0 $20,496,246
SAN JOAQUIN 1.7534% $17,514,713 1.8909% $323,344 $0 $17,838,057
SAN LUIS OBISPO 0.6145% $6,138,241 0.6169% $105,490 $0 $6,243,730
SAN MATEO 1.5961% $15,943,443 1.2412% $212,245 $0 $16,155,688
SANTA BARBARA 0.9457% $9,446,597 1.0721% $183,329 $0 $9,629,926
SANTA CLARA 4.0037% $39,992,959 3.6030% $616,113 $0 $40,609,072
SANTA CRUZ 0.6139% $6,132,247 0.4848% $82,901 $0 $6,215,148
SHASTA 0.7419% $7,410,839 0.8271% $141,434 $0 $7,552,273
SIERRA 0.0182% $181,800 0.2097% $35,859 $0 $217,659
SISKIYOU 0.1065% $1,063,829 0.1198% $20,486 $0 $1,084,314
SOLANO 1.0024% $10,012,974 1.0620% $181,602 $0 $10,194,576
SONOMA 1.0710% $10,698,219 0.9317% $159,321 $0 $10,857,540
STANISLAUS 1.4525% $14,509,023 1.6617% $284,151 $0 $14,793,173
SUTTER 0.2978% $2,974,724 0.3221% $55,079 $0 $3,029,803
TEHAMA 0.3032% $3,028,665 0.3338% $57,080 $0 $3,085,745
TRINITY 0.0353% $352,612 0.0368% $6,293 $0 $358,905
TULARE 1.3899% $13,883,711 1.5667% $267,906 $0 $14,151,617
TUOLUMNE 0.1422% $1,420,436 0.1622% $27,736 $0 $1,448,172
VENTURA 1.7880% $17,860,332 1.6280% $278,388 $0 $18,138,720
YOLO 0.7162% $7,154,122 0.8202% $140,254 $0 $7,294,376
YUBA 0.2487% $2,484,264 0.2760% $47,196 $0 $2,531,460
TOTAL* 1.0000 $998,900,000 1.0000 $17,100,000 $0 $1,016,000,000
*Does not Include Growth
http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/realignment/docs/BASE-REALIGNMENT-FUNDING.pdf