BSCC
Board of State and Community Corrections
Read the report at Board of State and Community Corrections ↗
Community Corrections in California:
A Report on the 2020-2022 Biennial
Inspection Cycle
Fiscal Years 2020-2022 Legislative Report Pursuant to
Penal Code Section 6031.2
BOARD OF STATE AND COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
Board Members*
Chair, Board of State and Community Corrections Linda M. Penner
The Chair of the Board is a full-time paid position appointed by the Governor and
subject to Senate Confirmation
Secretary, CA Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) Jeffrey Macomber
Director, Adult Parole Operations, CDCR Guillermo Viera Rosa
County Sheriff Dean Growdon
A sheriff in charge of local detention facility with a BSCC rated capacity of 200 inmates San Diego County
or less appointed by the Governor and subject to Senate confirmation
County Sheriff Shannon Dicus
A sheriff in charge of local detention facility with a BSCC rated capacity of more than San Bernardino County
200 inmates appointed by the Governor and subject to Senate confirmation
County Supervisor Cindy Chavez
A county supervisor or county administrative officer appointed by the Governor subject Santa Clara County
and to Senate confirmation
County Chief Probation Officer Kirk Haynes
A chief probation officer from a county with a population over 200,000 appointed by Fresno County
the Governor and subject to Senate confirmation
County Chief Probation Officer Kelly Vernon
A chief probation officer from a county with a population under 200,000 appointed by Kings County
the Governor and subject to Senate confirmation
Retired Judge Honorable Janet Gaard
A judge appointed by the Judicial Council of California Yolo County
Chief of Police Andrew Mills
A chief of police appointed by the Governor and subject to Senate confirmation City of Santa Cruz
Community Provider Scott Budnick
A community provider of rehabilitative treatment or services for adult offenders Founder of the Anti-Recidivism
appointed by the Speaker of the Assembly Coalition
Community Provider Vacant
A community provider or advocate with expertise in effective programs, policies and
treatment of at-risk youth and juvenile offenders appointed by the Senate Committee
on Rules
Public Member - Office of Public Safety Accountability Norma Cumpian
A public member appointed by the Governor and subject to Senate confirmation Anti-Recidivism Coalition
BSCC Staff
Executive Director Kathleen T. Howard
Chief Deputy Director/ General Counsel Aaron R. Maguire
Communications Director Tracie Cone
Deputy Director Standards and Training for Corrections Division Colleen Curtin
Deputy Director Facility and Standards Operation Division Allison Ganter
*Board member composition is pursuant to Penal Code 6025
Table of Contents
Introduction 1
Section I: Adult Local Detention Facility Biennial Inspections 3
Section II: The Jail Profile Survey 4
Section III: Detention System Capital and Operation Expenses 5
Section IV: Standards and Training for Corrections 6
Appendix A: Adult Detention Facilities Noncompliance Report: 13
2020-2022 Inspection Cycle
Appendix B: Jail Profile Survey - 2022 2nd Quarter Results 17
PC 6031.2 2020-2022 Biennial Inspection Cycle Legislative Report
Local Corrections in California:
A Report on the 2020-2022 Biennial Inspection Cycle
INTRODUCTION
Penal Code section 6031.2 requires the Board of State and Community Corrections to
submit, by the end of even-numbered years, a report to the Legislature showing results
of its biennial facility inspections and monitoring of compliance with training standards.
Penal Code section 6031.2 states:
The Board of Corrections shall file with the Legislature on December 30, in each
even-numbered year, reports to the Legislature which shall include information on
the following:
(a) Inspection of those local detention facilities that have not complied with the
minimum standards established pursuant to Section 6030. The reports shall
specify those areas in which the facility has failed to comply and the estimated
cost to the facility necessary to accomplish compliance with the minimum
standards.
(b) Information regarding the progress and effectiveness of the standards and
training program contained in Sections 6035 to 6037, inclusive.
(c) Status of funds expended, interest earned, actions implementing the
prerequisites for funding, any reallocations of funds pursuant to Sections
4497.04 to 4497.16, inclusive, and a complete listing of funds allocated to each
county.
(d) Inmate accounting system data to be maintained on an annual basis by the
sheriff, chief of police, or other official in charge of operating the adult detention
system in a county or city, including the following:
(1) Average daily population of sentenced and unsentenced prisoners classified
according to gender and juvenile status.
(2) Jail admissions of sentenced and unsentenced prisoners, booking charge,
date and time of booking, date and time of release, and operating expenses.
(3) Detention system capital and operating expenses.
(Amended by Stats. 1996, Ch. 805, Sec. 5. Effective January 1, 1997.)
In the 2020-2022 Biennial Inspection cycle, the Board of State and Community
Corrections (BSCC) implemented an enhanced inspection system in accordance with the
Governor’s directive to “more actively engage counties regarding deficiencies identified
as part of its inspections through its public board meeting process and by more frequent
follow-up inspections.” This included regular reporting to the BSCC Board on outstanding
items of noncompliance, requesting heads of departments that operate local detention
facilities to appear before the BSCC Board when there were significant areas of concern,
requiring local detention facility administrators to submit corrective action plans to BSCC
staff within a prescribed time frame, more frequent follow-up site visits by BSCC staff to
local detention facilities, and unannounced inspections.
PC 6031.2 2020-2022 Biennial Inspection Cycle Legislative Report 1
Due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and limitations on statewide travel, the
BSCC Board approved a six-month extension to the 2020-2022 Biennial Inspection Cycle;
the cycle, which would have concluded on June 30, 2022, was extended through
December 31, 2022. This report covers the items of noncompliance through November
30, 2022; while all required inspections were conducted prior to the close of the inspection
cycle, BSCC staff are finalizing reports and compliance status for a small number of
facilities. An addendum of items of noncompliance through December 31, 2022 will be
submitted in February 2023.
Beginning with the 2023-2024 Biennial Inspection cycle, adult local detention facilities will
be subject to newly adopted standards and BSCC Field Representatives will be
conducting annual inspections of all Type II, III and IV Jails.
• This report covers Fiscal Years 2020-2022 and includes the 504 local detention
facilities operating in California.
Estimated Cost of Compliance to Accomplish Compliance:
Penal Code section 6031.2, subdivision (a) requires the BSCC to include information on
the estimated cost to local detention facilities to accomplish compliance with the minimum
standards. At the time of publication of this report, there were 11 outstanding items of
noncompliance in eight (8) counties.
Table 1
Estimated Cost
Reason for
County Item of Noncompliance to Correct
Cost
Noncompliance
Title 15 § 1053. Administrative New
Butte $118,764
Segregation Construction
Del Norte Title 15 § 1027. Number of Personnel $500,000 Personnel
Del Norte Title 15 § 1027.5 Safety Checks $18,355 Equipment
Kern Title 15 § 1027. Number of Personnel No cost Policy update
Lassen Title 24 § 1231.2.5 Safety cell. $200,000 Remodel
Title 15 § 1032. Fire Suppression Policy update
Marin No cost
Preplanning
Modoc Title 15 § 1027. Number of Personnel $11,123 Personnel
Monterey Title 24 § 1231.2.5 Safety cell. $101,366 Remodel
New
Ventura Title 24 § 1231.3.5 Beds $200,000,000
Construction
Ventura Title 24 § 1231.2.10 Exercise area. $5,500,000 Remodel
Title 24 § 1231.2.22 Audio monitoring Remodel /
Ventura $150,000
system. Equipment
Most of the estimated cost to correct noncompliance is related to new construction and
remodeling. Equipment and new positions make up the remainder of estimated cost. The
chart below outlines the portion of estimated cost in each of four categories. Two counties,
PC 6031.2 2020-2022 Biennial Inspection Cycle Legislative Report 2
Kern and Marin, reported no cost since the noncompliance can be corrected by policy
change that would be absorbable into existing costs.
Figure 1
SECTION I: Adult Local Detention Facility Biennial Inspections
In the 2020-2022 Biennial Inspection Cycle, there were 504 adult local detention
facilities operating in California; each of those facilities was inspected during this two-
year cycle. Facilities are inspected for compliance with Title 15 and Title 24 minimum
standards outlined in the California Code of Regulations. Title 15 regulations establish
minimum standards for administration and operation of the facilities, medical and mental
health care, nutritional quality of food, and environmental standards (cleanliness). Title
24 regulations are building standards that establish minimum design and construction
requirements.
During the biennial inspection cycle, BSCC Field Representatives visit each facility to
conduct a pre-inspection briefing that outlines BSCC expectations for the inspection,
including a review of previous deficiencies, any changes in regulations, and
requirements for review of documentation of applicable jail operations. The pre-
inspection briefing is designed to facilitate the process and ensure compliance with
standards. Following the pre-inspection briefing, Field Representatives conduct an on-
site inspection to determine compliance.
Inspection activities include, but are not limited to, interviews with individuals housed at
the facility, facility staff, program staff, and medical/mental health staff; review of
applicable policies and procedures; review and observation of documentation of facility
procedures, such as grievances, intake screening, and safety checks; and, a walk-
through of the physical plant to verify compliance with Title 24.
Following the inspection, BSCC staff provides a detailed exit interview to inform
facility administrators of any outstanding compliance issues and to request a corrective
PC 6031.2 2020-2022 Biennial Inspection Cycle Legislative Report 3
action plan. BSCC staff continue to work with facility staff, providing on-going technical
assistance, following the on-site inspection, to implement any necessary corrective
action. This final phase of the inspection includes a detailed report, follow-up visits and
technical assistance to ensure continued compliance. Technical assistance and
unannounced visits continue throughout the remainder of the inspection cycle, even
after the completion of the inspection process.
The most frequently noted items of noncompliance during the 2020-2022 Biennial
Inspection Cycle are as follows (except where noted, these items of noncompliance
occurred in all types of local detention facilities):
• Facility policy and procedures manuals
o Policies were not updated every two years in accordance with regulation
o Policy areas were inconsistent with facility procedures
o Manuals missing elements required by Title 15
• Lack of fire-suppression planning with local fire authorities
o Biennial fire and life safety inspections not being conducted by State Fire
Marshal or designee
• Safety checks occurring with more than 60 minutes between them
• Policies for use of restraint devices, sobering cells, and safety cells were not
updated to align with current Title 15 regulations
• Orientation manuals missing elements required by Title 15
Appendix A provides a detailed summary of compliance issues by facility and Title 15 or
Title 24 regulation.
Appendix A is a county-by-county list of items of noncompliance.
SECTION II: The Jail Profile Survey
Since 1996 the BSCC has collected information on adults in the custody of local
detention facilities using the Jail Profile Survey (JPS). (Appendix B) The survey relies
on jail administrators to input local data into BSCC’s web-based portal. BSCC staff
review the data for inconsistencies that could indicate errors in reporting and follow up
with the counties to correct if necessary.
Only Type II and III facilities are surveyed through the JPS. Type II facilities house
people that are pending arraignment, awaiting trial, in trial, or sentenced locally. Type
III facilities hold people that are serving sentences locally.
The results of the Second Quarter 2022 Adult Jail Profile Survey Results, as required
by Penal Code section 6031.2, subdivision (d)(1) are as follows:
Average Daily Population: 58,088 (of those 44,635 – or 77 percent -- were non-
sentenced)
• 90 percent of non-sentenced inmates are male
• 10 percent of non-sentenced inmates are female
• 88 percent of sentenced inmates are male
• 12 percent of sentenced inmates are female
The BSCC’s data collection systems do not support the collection of individual data,
including booking charges, date and time of booking, and date and time of release that
PC 6031.2 2020-2022 Biennial Inspection Cycle Legislative Report 4
is requested for inclusion under Penal Code section 6031.2, subdivison (d)(2), so it is
not included in this report.
SECTION III: Detention System Capital and Operating Expenses
The California State Controller’s Office keeps records of local detention facility capital
and operational costs. The costs of safely operating and adequately staffing local
detention facilities have increased in recent years. The most recent data is from FY
2021.
Figure 2 shows the cost of local adult detention from 2009 to 2021. The most recent
cumulative local detention cost available, for 2021, is $3.934 billion. This is an increase
of $18,099,000 from the previous year.
Figure 2
Cost of Local Adult Detention
$4,500,000,000.00
$4,000,000,000.00
$3,500,000,000.00
$3,000,000,000.00
$2,500,000,000.00
$2,000,000,000.00
$1,500,000,000.00
$1,000,000,000.00
$500,000,000.00
$0.00
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Adult Linear (Adult)
Source: All County Data, State Controller’s Office
Datasets of Counties Reported Annual Expenditures
https://bythenumbers.sco.ca.gov/browsel
PC 6031.2 2020-2022 Biennial Inspection Cycle Legislative Report 5
SECTION IV: Standards and Training for Corrections
Penal Code sections 6030, 6035, and 6036 require the BSCC to establish selection and
training standards for local corrections personnel. The annual state budget act provides
subvention funding to local agencies to help offset the costs of complying with those
standards. The BSCC carries out these responsibilities through the Standards and
Training for Corrections (STC) Program. This section summarizes program participation,
activities and compliance with STC standards.
Program Participation
Participation in the STC Program is voluntary and is open to any local corrections agency
that employs adult corrections officers (ACOs), juvenile corrections officers (JCOs),
and/or probation officers (POs). This includes sheriff’s departments, county correctional
agencies, police departments that operate a jail, and probation departments.
Local agencies that choose to participate in the STC Program receive a wide variety of
benefits. These include:
• Funding: Participating agencies receive funding administered by STC to apply
toward their selection and training costs.
• Selection and Training Standards: Participating agencies receive access to
validated selection and training tools designed specifically for the community
corrections job. These standards also provide legal defensibility in the event of
litigation.
• Course Certification System: Participating agencies have access to a catalog
of corrections training courses that have been certified to a professional standard
of quality and job relatedness.
• STC-Delivered Training: Participating agencies have access to training designed
to support their training programs.
• Technical Assistance and Support: Participating agencies are assigned an STC
Field Representative to provide ongoing program review and support.
During Fiscal Years (FYs) 2020/21 and 2021/22, 152 and 150 agencies participated in
the STC Program, respectively, including all county probation departments and sheriff’s
departments/departments of corrections that operate a jail. That number also includes
police departments that operate a Type I or higher-rated jail. Until FY 2021/22, that
number also included modified community correctional facilities that operated under
contract with the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR). The
modified community correctional facilities were required to comply with the STC
standards but did not receive state subvention funding. CDCR has now terminated its
contracts with these types of facilities. Table 2 shows a breakdown of the types of
agencies that participated in the STC Program.
PC 6031.2 2020-2022 Biennial Inspection Cycle Legislative Report 6
Table 2
STC Participating Agencies
Participating Agencies FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22
Probation Departments* 59 59
Sheriff’s Departments** 54 55
Police Departments 37 35
Departments of Corrections*** 2 1
Modified Community Correctional Facilities 4 0
Total 152 150
*San Francisco has an adult and a juvenile probation department.
**Alpine County does not operate a jail and Sierra County’s jail closed in FY 15/16.
*** Madera County consolidated its Department of Corrections and Sheriff’s Office in
FY 20/21.
Table 3 shows the number of local STC-eligible corrections staff who were trained
through the STC Program during FYs 2020/21 and 2021/22. These staff are employed
by the participating agencies listed in Table 1.
Table 3
Number of STC-Eligible Positions
Positions FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22
Adult Corrections Officers 15,346 15,408
Juvenile Corrections Officers 5,161 4,907
Probation Officers 6,449 6,331
Supervisors
- Adult Corrections 1,641 1,690
- Probation* 1,571 1,590
Managers
- Adult Corrections 438 451
- Probation* 495 479
Administrators
- Adult Corrections 120 120
- Probation* 150 141
Total 31,371 31,117
*includes Juvenile Corrections
PC 6031.2 2020-2022 Biennial Inspection Cycle Legislative Report 7
Selection and Training Standards
The STC Program standardizes the selection and training of local corrections staff across
the state. This standardization results in a skilled and flexible corrections workforce and
significant cost savings. The BSCC sets standards in accordance with Federal Uniform
Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures, which is the professional and legal
standard for selection practices. By following these procedures, the BSCC ensures the
job relevance of each standard. Establishing job relevance ensures that the community
corrections workforce is selected and trained appropriately and provides protection for
local agencies in the event of a legal challenge to the standard. The statewide standards
also achieve cost savings by eliminating the need for each county to develop its own
selection and training standards. Finally, it facilitates the movement of corrections
professionals between counties by establishing a community standard and eliminating
the need to conduct duplicative selection assessments and training.
The BSCC’s seven selection standards include:
1. Basic abilities and other characteristics important for successful job performance
as demonstrated by achieving a passing score on a written selection examination.
2. Competence in oral communication as demonstrated in an interview.
3. Past behavior compatible to job requirements as demonstrated by a background
investigation conducted by the hiring agency.
4. Competence in the knowledge, skills and abilities necessary for entry-level job
performance, as demonstrated by successful completion of entry-level core
training.
5. Competence in the performance of entry-level duties as demonstrated by
successful completion of an on-the-job probationary period.
6. The ability to perform essential job functions as demonstrated by meeting
guidelines for vision, hearing, and medical screening.
7. A minimum of 18 years of age prior to appointment.
Written Selection Examination
As part of the BSCC’s role in setting selection standards for local corrections personnel,
the STC Program provides validated written selection examinations for the ACO, JCO
and PO classifications. The written selection examination measures basic abilities and
characteristics for successful job performance. Providing the selection examinations
offers a significant benefit to counties and cities in that test development is expensive,
time consuming and requires a large sample size and highly technical staff to complete
such an endeavor.
While the regulations allow participating agencies to use an alternative selection
examination, 126 agencies elected to use the BSCC selection examination in FY
2020/21 and 123 agencies in FY 2021/22. The alternative examination most frequently
used is the Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) examination because adult
correctional staff can be hired as sheriff’s deputies or police officers. During FYs 2020/21
and 2021/22, close to 20,000 correctional staff candidates took the STC written selection
exam. Figure 4 shows statewide use of the BSCC’s selection examinations in those years
by classification.
PC 6031.2 2020-2022 Biennial Inspection Cycle Legislative Report 8
Figure 4
Selection Examination Usage
Fiscal Year 2020/21 Fiscal Year 2021/22
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
ACO JCO PO
Training Standards
Pursuant to the selection standards, each newly hired or promoted local corrections
professional must successfully complete a core training course within the first year of job
assignment. Although the specific duties and responsibilities of these personnel may
differ from one agency to another and from one assignment to another in the same
jurisdiction, the core training courses address the activities or tasks performed by most
local corrections workers throughout the state, regardless of the location, size, or budget
of the employing agency. The core training requirements include prescribed learning
objectives, instructional hours and testing methods. The BSCC released updated core
training curriculum for the ACO, JCO and PO classifications in July 2020. Core training
providers worked closely with STC to update their course outlines and lesson plans to
meet the new training requirements.
Once entry-level skills are mastered through the core training curriculum, local
corrections employees move on to develop journey-level skills through annual training.
These courses provide in-depth coverage of topics that enhance skills and update
employees on changes in their specific job assignments. The BSCC’s standard requires
that all corrections personnel (line staff through top management) complete a prescribed
number of training hours each year, from 24 to 40 hours (depending on job classification).
Table 4 shows the minimum number of training hours that correctional staff received in
training FYs 2020/21 and 2021/22, by classification. This is the minimum number of
hours required by the STC Program. Oftentimes, participating agencies exceed these
minimum training hours.
PC 6031.2 2020-2022 Biennial Inspection Cycle Legislative Report 9
Table 4
Number of Minimum Training Hours Completed by Classification
Classification FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22
Adult Corrections Officers 661,300 555,633
Juvenile Corrections Officers 188,080 173,208
Probation Officers 308,080 304,827
Supervisors 126,000 128,392
Managers 35,040 31,616
Administrators 8,280 7,536
Total Staff Training Hours 1,326,780 1,201,212
Course Certification and Monitoring System
To support its training standards and the delivery of quality training, STC administers an
electronic Learning Management System (LMS). Training providers must submit
prospective courses through the LMS to have them certified by STC. Approximately 5,000
training courses are certified by STC each year. The LMS contains a large library of job-
relevant courses offered by private training providers, colleges and other local corrections
agencies. Local corrections agencies can search STC’s course catalog and calendar to
identify courses of interest as well as scheduled presentation dates and locations.
The quality of training is assessed through evaluations administered to students and
course monitoring by the participating agency’s training manager. Each course is also
subject to onsite monitoring by STC Field Representatives as a tool to ensure training
quality, adherence to approved learning objectives and instructor competence. STC
provides technical assistance when needed. Only courses that are STC-certified can be
used to meet the BSCC’s core and annual training standards.
Program Review
Local corrections agencies that choose to participate in the STC Program agree to meet
the prescribed program standards, which include the core and annual training
requirements outlined above. Penal Code section 6035 and section 318 of Title 15 of the
California Code of Regulations mandates that STC annually monitor participating
agencies’ adherence to the standards, policies and procedures of the STC Program.
These annual “compliance monitoring reviews” take place each year between July and
September.
During the year-end compliance review, agencies are found to be either “in compliance”
or “out of compliance” with STC program standards. When training requirements have
not been met, it is often due to circumstances beyond the control of the individual agency,
such as extended medical or administrative leave. In such cases, STC staff may make a
PC 6031.2 2020-2022 Biennial Inspection Cycle Legislative Report 10
recommendation for a finding of full compliance when there are approved mitigating
circumstances.
Beginning with FY 2019/20, COVID-19 was included as an approved mitigating
circumstance for non-compliance with training requirements. COVID-19 had a
devastating impact on training efforts across the state as courses across the state were
cancelled due to safety concerns. Through FYs 2020/21 and 2021/22, travel restrictions,
social distancing requirements and other measures continued to interrupt the ability to
deliver training. Agencies responded by reducing class size, employing safety protocols
and moving to online courses yet, despite these adjustments, some agencies were still
unable to meet training requirements. BSCC continued to consider COVID-19 as a
mitigating circumstance if training requirements could not be met.
Table 5 shows the compliance status of STC-participating agencies for FYs 2020/21 and
2021/22.
Table 5
Compliance Status
FY 2020/21 FY 2021/22
Total STC Agencies 152 150
In Compliance 148 136
Out of Compliance 4 14
Technical Assistance and Training
STC Field Representatives work with participating agencies throughout the year to
provide technical assistance in support of local training programs and to help them meet
training standards. Technical assistance can range from assessing the appropriateness
of a particular training intervention to helping craft action plans intended to improve
compliance with selection and training standards. It also includes providing in-house
training to support local agencies in their delivery of quality training programs. STC offers
two in-house certified training courses: A Training Managers’ Course (TMC) and an
Instructor Development Course (IDC). The TMC is a two-day course offered at least four
times per year, to new training managers and their staff, to familiarize them with STC
policies and procedures, their agency’s roles and responsibilities as a participant in the
STC program, and funding, reimbursement and course certification processes. STC
offered this course online for the past two years but will offer the course in both a virtual
and in-person setting in the coming year. The IDC was suspended during the pandemic
because it relies on student/instructor interaction and small group exercises that cannot
be taught effectively in a virtual setting. Prior to the end of FY 2021/22, however, STC
relaunched the course and will now offer it up to eight times per year, as there is always
a high demand for it among STC participating agencies.
PC 6031.2 2020-2022 Biennial Inspection Cycle Legislative Report 11
Appendix A
PC 6031.2 2020-2022 Biennial Inspection Cycle Legislative Report 12
Adult Detention Facilities Noncompliance Report: 2020‐2022 Inspection Cycle
APPENDIX A
County Facility Type Standard Article Title Item of NC
Alameda Berkely Public Safety Center I 1052 Classification and Segregation Mentally Disordered Inmates.
Amador Amador County Court Holding CH 1027.5 Training, Personnel and Management Safety Checks
Amador Amador County Jail II 1027.5 Training, Personnel and Management Safety Checks.
1053 Classification and Segregation Administrative Segregation.
Butte Butte County Jail II
1280 Facility Safety and Security Facility Sanitation, Safety, and Maintenance.
1024 Training, Personnel and Management Court Holding and Temporary Holding Facility Training
Conta Costa Martinez Police Department THJ
1032 Training, Personnel and Management Fire Supression Preplanning
Conta Costa San Pablo Police Department TH 1027.5 Training, Personnel and Management Safety Checks
1280 Facility Safety and Security Facility Sanitation, Safety, and Maintenance.
1032 Training, Personnel and Management Fire Suppression Preplanning.
Del Norte Del Norte County Jail II
1027 Training, Personnel and Management Number of Personnel.
1027.5 Training, Personnel and Management Safety Checks.
Del Norte Del Norte Court Holding CH 1032 Training, Personnel and Management Fire Suppression Preplanning.
1024 Training, Personnel and Management Court Holding and Temporary Holding Facility Training
1028 Training, Personnel and Management Fire and Life Safety Staff
Fresno Huron Police Holding Facility THJ 1032 Training, Personnel and Management Fire Suppression Preplanning.
1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
1027.5 Training, Personnel and Management Safety Checks.
1280 Facility Safety and Security Facility Sanitation, Safety, and Maintenance.
Humboldt Humboldt County Correctional Facility II 1032 Training, Personnel and Management Fire Suppression Preplanning.
1027.5 Training, Personnel and Management Safety Checks.
Humboldt Humboldt County Court Holding CH 1032 Training, Personnel and Management Fire Suppression Preplanning.
1032 Training, Personnel and Management Fire Suppression Preplanning.
Kern California City Police Department Temporary Hold THJ
1027.5 Training, Personnel and Management Safety Checks.
Kern Kern River Valley THJ 1027 Training, Personnel and Management Number of Personnel.
Kern Ridgecrest Substation CH 1027 Training, Personnel and Management Number of Personnel.
Kern Shafter Court Holding CH 1027 Training, Personnel and Management Number of Personnel.
Kern Taft Police Department IJ 1025 Training, Personnel and Management Continuing Professional Training
Kings Corcoran Police Department TH 1024 Training, Personnel and Management Court Holding and Temporary Holding Facility Training
1027.5 Training, Personnel and Management Safety Checks.
Lake Adult Detention Facility II 1058 Classification and Segregation Use of Restraint Devices.
1055 Classification and Segregation Use of Safety Cell.
1032 Training, Personnel and Management Fire Suppression Preplanning.
Lassen Adult Jail II 1027 Training, Personnel and Management Number of Personnel.
1027.5 Training, Personnel and Management Safety Checks.
Lassen Court Holding CH 1032 Training, Personnel and Management Fire Suppression Preplanning.
1032 Training, Personnel and Management Fire Suppression Preplanning.
Lassen Lassen County Adult Jail Annex II 1027 Training, Personnel and Management Number of Personnel.
1027.5 Training, Personnel and Management Safety Checks.
1020 Training, Personnel and Management Corrections Officers Core Course
Los Angeles Culver City Jail IJ 1021 Training, Personnel and Management Jail Supervisory Training
1027 Training, Personnel and Management Number of Personnel.
Los Angeles LASD Airport Court CHJ 1280 Facility Safety and Security Facility Sanitation, Safety, and Maintenance.
1027 Training, Personnel and Management Number of Personnel.
1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
Los Angeles LASD Avalon Station Jail IJ
1027.5 Training, Personnel and Management Safety Checks.
1056 Classification and Segregation Use of Sobering Cell.
1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
Los Angeles LASD Carson Station Jail IJ 1056 Classification and Segregation Use of Sobering Cell.
1062 Inmate Programs and Services Visiting
1032 Training, Personnel and Management Fire Suppression Preplanning.
1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
Los Angeles LASD Century Type I Booking Ctr. I
1027.5 Training, Personnel and Management Safety Checks.
1058 Classification and Segregation Use of Restraint Devices.
Los Angeles LASD Cerritos Station Jail IJ 1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
Los Angeles LASD Compton Superior Ct. CHJ 1280 Facility Safety and Security Facility Sanitation, Safety, and Maintenance.
Los Angeles LPASCD C r6es0ce3nta1 V.a2lle y2 S0tat2ion0 Ja-i2l 022 Biennial IIJnspec10t2io9 n CTryaincinlge, P Lerseongneils alnad Mtiavnaege mRenetport Policy and Procedures Manual 13
1027.5 Training, Personnel and Management Safety Checks.
Page 1 of 3
Adult Detention Facilities Noncompliance Report: 2020‐2022 Inspection Cycle APPENDIX A
1027 Training, Personnel and Management Number of Personnel.
Los Angeles LASD East LA Station Jail IJ 1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
1027.5 Training, Personnel and Management Safety Checks.
1032 Training, Personnel and Management Fire Suppression Preplanning.
Los Angeles LASD Industry Station Jail IJ 1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
1056 Classification and Segregation Use of Sobering Cell.
Los Angeles LASD Lakewood Station Jail IJ 1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
Los Angeles LASD Lancaster Station Jail IJ 1027.5 Training, Personnel and Management Safety Checks.
1056 Classification and Segregation Use of Sobering Cell.
1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
Los Angeles LASD Lomita Station Jail IJ
1056 Classification and Segregation Use of Sobering Cell.
1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
Los Angeles LASD Lost Hills Station Jail IJ
1027.5 Training, Personnel and Management Safety Checks.
Los Angeles LASD Marina Del Rey Station Jail IJ 1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
1027 Training, Personnel and Management Number of Personnel.
1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
Los Angeles LASD Norwalk Station Jail IJ
1027.5 Training, Personnel and Management Safety Checks.
1056 Classification and Segregation Use of Sobering Cell.
Los Angeles LASD Palmdale Station Jail IJ 1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
Los Angeles LASD Pico Rivera Station Jail IJ 1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
Los Angeles LASD San Dimas Station Jail IJ 1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
Los Angeles LASD South LA Station Jail IJ 1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
1032 Training, Personnel and Management Fire Suppression Preplanning.
Los Angeles LASD Temple City Station Jail IJ
1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
Los Angeles LASD Walnut Station Jail IJ
1056 Classification and Segregation Use of Sobering Cell.
Los Angeles LASD West Hollywood Station Jail IJ 1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
Madera Madera County Jail II 1065 Inmate Programs and Services Exercise and Recreation.
Madera Madera Superior Courthouse CHJ 1065 Inmate Programs and Services Exercise and Rcreation
Marin Marin County Court Holding CH 1032 Training, Personnel and Management Fire Suppression Preplanning.
Marin Marin County Jail II 1032 Training, Personnel and Management Fire Suppression Preplanning.
1058 Classification and Segregation Use of Restraint Devices.
Mariposa Adult Detention Facility II
1056 Classification and Segregation Use of Sobering Cell.
1280 Facility Safety and Security Facility Sanitation, Safety, and Maintenance.
Modoc Modoc County Court Holding CH 1027 Training, Personnel and Management Number of Personnel.
1056 Classification and Segregation Use of Sobering Cell.
1280 Facility Safety and Security Facility Sanitation, Safety, and Maintenance.
Modoc Modoc County Jail II 1027 Training, Personnel and Management Number of Personnel.
1056 Classification and Segregation Use of Sobering Cell.
1055 Classification and Segregation Use of Safety Cell.
Monterey Monterey Main Jail II
1056 Classification and Segregation Use of Sobering Cell.
Orange Brea City Jail THJ 1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
Orange Newport Beach City Jail IJ 1056 Classification and Segregation Use of Sobering Cell.
1027.5 Training, Personnel and Management Safety Checks.
Orange Santa Ana Police Facility II 1058 Classification and Segregation Use of Restraint Devices.
1056 Classification and Segregation Use of Sobering Cell.
Orange Tustin Police Department THJ 1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
San Bernardino San Bernardino Co-Foothill CHJ 1027.5 Training, Personnel and Management Safety Checks.
1065 Inmate Programs and Services Exercise and Recreation.
San Bernardino West Valley Detention Center II
1056 Classification and Segregation Use of Sobering Cell.
San Diego Alpine Sheriff's Substation THJ 1147 Minors in Temporary Custody in a Law Enforcment Facility Supervision of Minors in Secure Custody Inside a Locked Enclosed
San Diego El Cajon PD THJ 1058 Classification and Segregation Use of Restraint Devices.
San Diego Fallbrook Substation THJ 1027.5 Training, Personnel and Management Safety Checks.
San Diego George Bailey Detention Center II 1280 Facility Safety and Security Facility Sanitation, Safety, and Maintenance.
San Diego San Diego Mens Central II 1280 Facility Safety and Security Facility Sanitation, Safety, and Maintenance.
San Diego Borrego Springs Substation THJ 1032 Training, Personnel and Management Fire Suppression Preplanning.
San Diego East Mesa Reentry Facility II 1280 Facility Safety and Security Facility Sanitation, Safety, and Maintenance.
PC 6031.2 2020-2022 Biennial Inspec10t4io6n CReyccordles a nLd ePugbliics Inlfaormtiavtioen Report Death in Custody 14
Page 2 of 3
Adult Detention Facilities Noncompliance Report: 2020‐2022 Inspection Cycle APPENDIX A
1032 Training, Personnel and Management Fire Suppression Preplanning.
San Francisco S.F. Bayview Police Station THJ
1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
1058.5 Classification and Segregation Restraints and Pregnant Inmates
1046 Records and Public Information Death in Custody
1032 Training, Personnel and Management Fire Suppression Preplanning.
San Francisco S.F. Ingleside Police Station THJ
1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
1058.5 Classification and Segregation Restraints and Pregnant Inmates
1046 Records and Public Information Death in Custody
1032 Training, Personnel and Management Fire Suppression Preplanning.
San Francisco S.F. Mission Police Station THJ
1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
1058.5 Classification and Segregation Restraints and Pregnant Inmates
1046 Records and Public Information Death in Custody
1032 Training, Personnel and Management Fire Suppression Preplanning.
San Francisco S.F. Northern Police Station THJ
1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
1058.5 Classification and Segregation Restraints and Pregnant Inmates
1046 Records and Public Information Death in Custody
1032 Training, Personnel and Management Fire Suppression Preplanning.
San Francisco S.F. Park Police Station THJ
1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
1058.5 Classification and Segregation Restraints and Pregnant Inmates
1046 Records and Public Information Death in Custody
1032 Training, Personnel and Management Fire Suppression Preplanning.
San Francisco S.F. Richmond Police Station THJ
1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
1058.5 Classification and Segregation Restraints and Pregnant Inmates
1046 Records and Public Information Death in Custody
1032 Training, Personnel and Management Fire Suppression Preplanning.
San Francisco S.F. Taraval Police Station THJ
1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
1058.5 Classification and Segregation Restraints and Pregnant Inmates
1046 Records and Public Information Death in Custody
1032 Training, Personnel and Management Fire Suppression Preplanning.
San Francisco S.F. Tenderloin Station THJ
1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
1058.5 Classification and Segregation Restraints and Pregnant Inmates
San Francisco San Francisco Co. Jail #3 Closed 1058 Classification and Segregation Use of Restraint Devices.
San Francisco San Francisco County Jail #2 II 1032 Training, Personnel and Management Fire Suppression Preplanning.
1046 Records and Public Information Death in Custody
1032 Training, Personnel and Management Fire Suppression Preplanning.
San Francisco Southern Police Station THJ
1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
1058.5 Classification and Segregation Restraints and Pregnant Inmates
San Joaquin John J. Zunino II 1027.5 Training, Personnel and Management Safety Checks.
San Joaquin San Joaquin County Honor Farm II 1027.5 Training, Personnel and Management Safety Checks.
San Mateo Maguire Correctional Facility II 1280 Facility Safety and Security Facility Sanitation, Safety, and Maintenance.
Santa Clara Mountain View Police Department THJ 1032 Training, Personnel and Management Fire Suppression Preplanning.
1081 Discipline Plan for Inmate Discipline.
Santa Clara Elmwood Female Jail II
1058 Classification and Segregation Use of Restraint Devices.
1081 Discipline Plan for Inmate Discipline.
Santa Clara Elmwood Men's Jail II
1058 Classification and Segregation Use of Restraint Devices.
1081 Discipline Plan for Inmate Discipline.
Santa Clara Main Jail II
1058 Classification and Segregation Use of Restraint Devices.
Santa Clara Mountain View Police Department THJ 1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
1027.5 Training, Personnel and Management Safety Checks.
Santa Clara Santa Clara PD Levi Stadium THJ
1056 Classification and Segregation Use of Sobering Cell
Solano Claybank Facility II 1027.5 Training, Personnel and Management Safety Checks.
Solano Solano County Justice Center II 1027.5 Training, Personnel and Management Safety Checks.
Solano Solano County Justice Center Courts CHJ 1027.5 Training, Personnel and Management Safety Checks.
Solano Solano Vallejo Justice Center CH 1027.5 Training, Personnel and Management Safety Checks.
Solano Stanton Correctional Facility II 1027.5 Training, Personnel and Management Safety Checks.
1032 Training, Personnel and Management Fire Suppression Preplanning.
Solano Vacaville Police Department THJ
1029 Training, Personnel and Management Policy and Procedures Manual
Tulare Tulare Police Department THJ 1024 Training, Personnel and Management Court Holding and Temporary Holding Facility Training
PC 6031.2 2020-2022 Biennial Inspection Cycle Legislative Report 15
Page 3 of 3
Appendix B
PC 6031.2 2020-2022 Biennial Inspection Cycle Legislative Report 16
Jail Profile Survey - 2022 2nd Quarter Results APPENDIX B: Page 1
EXPLANATION OF RESULTS
The following pages contain the Jail Profile Survey (JPS) results for the Second Quarter of
Calendar Year 2022. Page 3 contains the quarterly totals based upon the monthly and quarterly
data submitted to us by the participating jurisdictions. The information below provides
explanations and clarifications of the data presented.
Page 3
• Unless otherwise noted, projected totals are based upon the average per day for the variable
in question. For example, there was an average of 58,088 inmates per day in local jails
(excluding Type I’s) during April through June 2022.
• For some variables (other than “ADP”), we did not receive complete data from all jurisdictions.
In such instances, we used statistical procedures to estimate the statewide total.
• The number of “Bookings Per Month” is the average of the monthly totals for April, May, and
June 2022.
• For the following variables, the numbers presented are the totals as of the mid-quarter
(i.e., May 15, 2022): “Pretrial Release” and “Early Release”.
• “Assaults On Staff” are defined as the total number of serious inmate assaults on staff
(resulting in a crime report), statewide, during the Second Quarter of Calendar Year 2022.
• Note: Totals are subject to slight variation due to rounding.
Please note:
Proposition 47 was voted into law on November 4, 2014, reducing penalties for certain
low-level drug and property crimes from felony to misdemeanor.
Each quarter, every county with Type II, III, and IV detention facilities submits their data
to the BSCC. While we make every effort to review data for accuracy, including contacting
individual counties for clarification, the BSCC cannot be responsible for data reporting
errors made at the county level. This survey results report presents county data at the
specific point in time in which it was retrieved (November 28, 2022). However, upon
request of the county, data can be updated as needed.
At the start of the 2016 calendar year, JPS quarterly reports are no longer posted on the
BSCC website. In an effort to create a better experience for users, the historical graphs
have been transitioned over into our Tableau Public Dashboard, “Jail Population Trends.”
(http://www.bscc.ca.gov/m_data&research.php). By transitioning into the use of our
existing Jail Population Trends Dashboard, users will see newly added visualizations that
mimic those graphs previously featured in the Quarterly Report. These summary graphs
include statewide data for particular JPS variables (i.e. Average Daily Population, Non-
Sentenced & Sentenced ADP, etc), without jurisdiction exclusions seen in other
dashboard tabs. Users can control these statewide graphs and exclude/include specific
counties to create custom visualizations. The source data for these visualizations is the
same data found in the JPS Online Querying tool
(https://app.bscc.ca.gov/joq//jps/QuerySelection.asp).
BPoCar d6 o0f S3t1at.e2 a n2d0 C2om0m-2un0it2y 2Co Brreiectinonnsial InspecJtiaoil nP roCfilye cSluerv eLyegislative Report Second Calendar Year 201272
Jail Profile Survey - 2022 2nd Quarter Results APPENDIX B: Page 2
Based on input from Executive Steering Committees’ review of the Jail Profile Survey in
previous years, the BSCC has eliminated the collection of the following variables in
September 2018, due to their lack of data accuracy, usefulness and reliability: “ADP
Maximum Security Inmates”, “ADP Medium Security Inmates”, “ADP Minimum Security
Inmates”, “2 Strike Inmates”, “3 Strike Inmates”, “Felony Warrants”, “Misdemeanor
Warrants”, and “Criminal/Illegal Aliens”.
BPoCar d6 o0f S3t1at.e2 a n2d0 C2om0m-2un0it2y 2Co Brreiectinonnsial InspecJtiaoil nP roCfilye cSluerv eLyegislative Report Second Calendar Year 201282
Jail Profile Survey - 2022 2nd Quarter Results APPENDIX B: Page 3
BOARD OF STATE AND COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
JAIL PROFILE SURVEY
Reporting Period: April to June, 2022
County Jail Populations Special Use Beds
a b
ADP 58,088 Medical Beds 1,010
Holding Areas 997 Mental Health Beds 7,111
c d
Average "Under the Roof" 59,085
e
Highest One Day Count 60,272
Released Per Month Due to Lack of Space
f
Pretrial Release 4,717
County Jail Populations f
Early Release 2,089
Felony 51,839
Total 6,806
Misdemeanor 6,249
Total 58,088
Inmates with 2 and 3 Strikes
Non-Sentenced Males 40,208
g
2 Strike Inmates 0
Non-Sentenced Females 4,427
g
3 Strike Inmates 0
Sentenced Males 11,888
Total 0
Sentenced Females 1,565
Total 58,088
Maximum Security Inmates 0 Unserved Warrants
g
Medium Security Inmates 0 Felony Warrants 0
g
Minimum Security Inmates 0 Misdemeanor Warrants 0
Total 58,088 Total 0
Inmates From Other Jurisdictions Other Jail Profile Survey Variables
f
Housed on Federal Contract 1,285 Bookings Per Month 53,951
f
Housed on Contract with CDC 182 Juveniles in Custody 0
From Other Counties on Contract 80 Criminal / Illegal Aliens 0
Awaiting Transport 2,882 Assaults On Staff 541
Total 4,429
a. The Average Daily Population for all jurisdictions (excluding Type I's) does not include inmates in holding areas.
b. Unless otherwise indicated, the numbers reported are the average across the days in the quarter.
c. "Under the Roof" is the sum of the Average Daily Population plus the average daily number of inmates in Holding Areas.
d.Totals may not be the exact sum of the subtotals due to rounding.
e. The sum of all Highest One Day inmate population counts from all jurisdictions.
f. These data are collected on a monthly basis, this figure is an average of the total numbers collected each month during this quarter.
g.These data are one-day snapshots collected at the end of the quarter.
BPoCar d6 o0f S3t1at.e2 a n2d0 C2om0m-2un0it2y 2Co Brreiectinonnsial InspecJtiaoil nP roCfilye cSluerv eLyegislative RepSoerctond Quarter Calendar Year 201292
Jail Profile Survey - 2022 2nd Quarter Results APPENDIX B: Page 4
Jail Profile Survey
2022
Average Daily Population Quarterly Results
10 Year Summary Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Average
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2021 60,199 59,938 59,382 58,333 59,458
77,818 81,818 81,551 73,714 74,743 75,065 73,117 73,528 59,635 59,458 2022 57,604 58,088 57,847
100000
80000
60000
40000
20000
0
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Non-sentenced ADP Quarterly Results
10 Year Summary Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Average
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2021 44,049 44,370 45,151 45,453 44,761
48,975 51,296 50,806 46,378 48,507 48,580 47,614 49,313 43,504 44,761 2022 44,840 44,634 44,736
60000
50000
40000
30000
20000
10000
0
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Sentenced ADP Quarterly Results
10 Year Summary Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Average
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2021 16,150 15,568 14,231 12,880 14,697
28,844 30,522 30,746 27,336 26,236 26,485 25,503 24,214 16,130 14,697 2022 12,764 13,454 13,111
35000
30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
BPoCar d6 o0f S3t1at.e2 a n2d0 C2om0m-2un0it2y 2Co Brreiectinonnsial Inspection Cycle LegislaJatiivl Pero Rfilee Spuorvrety Second Quarter Calendar Year 202202
Jail Profile Survey - 2022 2nd Quarter Results APPENDIX B: Page 5
Jail Profile Survey
2022
Percentage Non-sentenced Quarterly Results
10 Year Summary Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Average
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2021 73% 74% 76% 78% 75%
63% 63% 62% 63% 65% 65% 65% 67% 73% 75% 2022 78% 77% 77%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Average Number of Persons Booked Per Month Quarterly Results
10 Year Summary Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Average
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2021 48,660 55,299 54,840 49,065 51,975
87,560 86,718 86,855 79,116 79,634 77,702 77,527 75,762 50,628 51,975 2022 49,620 53,951 51,797
100000
80000
60000
40000
20000
0
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Average Length Of Stay Quarterly Results
10 Year Summary Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Average
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2021 38.8 36.9 29.5 34.0 34.7
21.3 22.1 21.6 21.7 21.8 19.7 29.5 31.6 31.8 34.7 2022 33.8 37.9 35.9
40
30
20
10
0
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
BPoCar d6 o0f S3t1at.e2 a n2d0 C2om0m-2un0it2y 2Co Brreiectinonnsial Inspection Cycle LegislaJatiivl Pero Rfilee Spuorvrety Second Quarter Calendar Year 202212
Jail Profile Survey - 2022 2nd Quarter Results APPENDIX B: Page 6
Average Daily Population
Non-sentenced / Sentenced Male / Female
California County Jails - For Months Of April - June 2022
Non-sentenced Sentenced
Male Female Total Male Female Total Total
Jurisdiction # % # % # % # % # % # % #
1. Alameda Sheriff's Dept. 1,879 94% 126 6% 2,005 92% 159 94% 10 6% 170 8% 2,175
2. Amador Sheriff's Dept. 54 84% 10 16% 64 71% 21 83% 4 17% 26 29% 90
3. Butte Sheriff's Dept. 335 86% 56 14% 391 75% 108 84% 20 16% 128 25% 520
4. Calaveras Sheriff's Dept. 50 88% 7 12% 57 78% 13 83% 3 17% 16 22% 73
5. Colusa Sheriff's Dept. 34 83% 7 17% 41 72% 15 94% 1 6% 16 28% 58
6. Contra Costa Sheriff's Dept. 665 92% 58 8% 723 83% 131 90% 15 10% 146 17% 870
7. Del Norte Sheriff's Dept. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
8. El Dorado Sheriff's Dept. 236 82% 53 18% 289 73% 94 90% 11 10% 105 27% 394
9. Fresno Sheriff's Dept. 2,167 90% 231 10% 2,398 90% 250 89% 30 11% 280 10% 2,678
10. Glenn Sheriff's Dept. 42 88% 6 12% 48 80% 11 89% 1 11% 12 20% 60
11. Humboldt Sheriff's Dept. 208 85% 38 15% 245 89% 26 83% 5 17% 32 11% 277
12. Imperial Sheriff's Dept. 141 85% 24 15% 165 56% 110 85% 20 15% 129 44% 295
13. Inyo Sheriff's Dept. 34 89% 4 11% 39 73% 12 81% 3 19% 14 27% 53
14. Kern Sheriff's Dept. 1,396 91% 146 9% 1,541 92% 125 88% 17 12% 142 8% 1,684
15. Kings Sheriff's Dept. 335 92% 30 8% 366 81% 78 92% 7 8% 84 19% 450
16. Lake Sheriff's Dept. 86 83% 17 17% 103 68% 41 84% 8 16% 48 32% 152
17. Lassen Sheriff's Dept. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
18. Los Angeles Sheriff's Dept. 7,870 90% 905 10% 8,775 69% 3,512 89% 422 11% 3,933 31% 12,708
19. Madera Corrections Dept. 291 88% 39 12% 329 88% 39 84% 8 16% 47 12% 376
20. Marin Sheriff's Dept. 188 93% 14 7% 201 86% 28 82% 6 18% 34 14% 235
21. Mariposa Sheriff's Dept. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
22. Mendocino Sheriff's Dept. 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
23. Merced Sheriff's Dept. 326 91% 34 9% 360 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 360
24. Modoc Sheriff's Dept. 12 78% 3 22% 15 61% 7 76% 2 24% 10 39% 25
25. Mono Sheriff's Dept. 11 85% 2 15% 13 68% 6 100% 0 0% 6 32% 19
26. Monterey Sheriff's Dept. 508 92% 42 8% 550 62% 284 86% 48 14% 332 38% 882
27. Napa Corrections Dept. 142 88% 20 12% 163 74% 48 86% 8 14% 56 26% 219
28. Nevada Sheriff's Dept. 107 87% 17 13% 123 86% 16 81% 4 19% 20 14% 143
29. Orange Sheriff's Dept. 2,129 91% 212 9% 2,341 71% 869 90% 101 10% 970 29% 3,310
30. Placer Sheriff's Dept. 433 91% 44 9% 478 75% 129 80% 32 20% 161 25% 639
31. Plumas Sheriff's Dept. 15 82% 3 18% 19 62% 9 80% 2 20% 12 38% 30
32. Riverside Sheriff's Dept. 2,840 90% 318 10% 3,158 89% 349 93% 27 7% 376 11% 3,535
33. Sacramento Sheriff's Dept. 2,210 90% 240 10% 2,450 72% 856 89% 101 11% 956 28% 3,406
34. San Benito Sheriff's Dept. 59 91% 6 9% 65 83% 13 98% 0 2% 13 17% 79
35. San Bernardino Sheriff's Dept. 3,731 91% 384 9% 4,115 86% 576 86% 90 14% 666 14% 4,781
BPoCar d6 o0f S3t1at.e2 a n2d0 C2om0m-2un0it2y 2Co Brreiectinonnsial Inspection Cycle LegislaJatiivl Pero Rfilee Spuorvrety Second Quarter Calendar Year 202222
Jail Profile Survey - 2022 2nd Quarter Results APPENDIX B: Page 7
Average Daily Population
Non-sentenced / Sentenced Male / Female
California County Jails - For Months Of April - June 2022
Non-sentenced Sentenced
Male Female Total Male Female Total Total
Jurisdiction # % # % # % # % # % # % #
36. San Diego Sheriff's Dept. 2,290 88% 322 12% 2,613 64% 1,273 88% 173 12% 1,446 36% 4,059
37. San Diego Work Furlough 1 50% 1 50% 2 1% 209 84% 41 16% 250 99% 252
38. San Francisco Sheriff's Dept. 594 94% 35 6% 629 85% 104 94% 6 6% 111 15% 739
39. San Joaquin Sheriff's Dept. 903 91% 91 9% 994 78% 241 88% 33 12% 274 22% 1,268
40. San Luis Obispo Sheriff's Dept. 257 91% 26 9% 283 68% 116 87% 18 13% 134 32% 417
41. San Mateo Sheriff's Dept. 641 90% 71 10% 712 76% 204 89% 25 11% 229 24% 941
42. Santa Barbara Sheriff's Dept. 353 89% 45 11% 398 76% 113 92% 10 8% 124 24% 521
43. Santa Clara Sheriff’s Office 2,190 93% 167 7% 2,357 91% 220 93% 18 7% 237 9% 2,595
44. Santa Cruz Sheriff's Dept. 224 91% 21 9% 245 81% 50 88% 7 12% 56 19% 302
45. Shasta Sheriff's Dept. 201 87% 30 13% 231 73% 75 87% 11 13% 86 27% 317
46. Siskiyou Sheriff's Dept. 79 90% 9 10% 88 99% 1 100% 0 0% 1 1% 90
47. Solano Sheriff's Dept. 443 90% 47 10% 490 87% 66 88% 9 12% 75 13% 565
48. Sonoma Sheriff's Dept. 422 92% 38 8% 460 67% 208 90% 24 10% 232 33% 692
49. Stanislaus Sheriff's Dept. 825 89% 101 11% 926 74% 283 86% 45 14% 329 26% 1,255
50. Sutter Sheriff's Dept. 102 85% 18 15% 120 90% 10 79% 3 21% 13 10% 133
51. Tehama Sheriff's Dept. 86 84% 17 16% 103 75% 27 80% 7 20% 34 25% 138
52. Trinity Sheriff's Dept. 41 78% 12 22% 53 94% 4 100% 0 0% 4 6% 57
53. Tulare Sheriff's Dept. 831 89% 107 11% 939 77% 243 86% 38 14% 281 23% 1,220
54. Tuolumne Sheriff's Dept. 51 82% 11 18% 63 75% 17 82% 4 18% 20 25% 83
55. Ventura Sheriff's Dept. 770 86% 123 14% 893 66% 391 85% 69 15% 460 34% 1,353
56. Yolo Sheriff's Dept. 210 93% 17 7% 227 80% 52 90% 6 10% 58 20% 285
57. Yuba Sheriff's Dept. 154 88% 21 12% 175 75% 43 76% 14 24% 57 25% 232
Statewide 40,207 90% 4,427 10% 44,634 77% 11,888 88% 1,565 12% 13,454 23% 58,088
BPoCar d6 o0f S3t1at.e2 a n2d0 C2om0m-2un0it2y 2Co Brreiectinonnsial Inspection Cycle LegislaJatiivl Pero Rfilee Spuorvrety Second Quarter Calendar Year 202232
Jail Profile Survey - 2022 2nd Quarter Results APPENDIX B: Page 8
Jail Populations: Quarter 2, 2021 Versus Quarter 2, 2022
Jurisdiction Qtr 2, 2021 Qtr 2, 2022 Qtr 2, 2022 Qtr 2, 2021 To % of Total Cum Cum
Minus Qtr 2, Qtr 2, 2022 % Increase % Total
2021 +/- or Decrease
Sacramento Sheriff's Dept. 3,138 3,406 268 8.5% 14.3% 14.30% 268
Santa Clara Sheriff’s Office 2,359 2,595 236 10.0% 12.6% 26.89% 504
San Mateo Sheriff's Dept. 731 941 210 28.7% 11.2% 38.10% 714
Orange Sheriff's Dept. 3,116 3,310 194 6.2% 10.4% 48.45% 908
San Diego Sheriff's Dept. 3,872 4,060 188 4.9% 10.0% 58.48% 1,096
El Dorado Sheriff's Dept. 302 395 93 30.8% 5.0% 63.45% 1,189
Imperial Sheriff's Dept. 212 295 83 39.2% 4.4% 67.88% 1,272
Contra Costa Sheriff's Dept. 787 870 83 10.5% 4.4% 72.31% 1,355
Stanislaus Sheriff's Dept. 1,182 1,254 72 6.1% 3.8% 76.15% 1,427
Tehama Sheriff's Dept. 83 137 54 65.1% 2.9% 79.03% 1,481
Yolo Sheriff's Dept. 232 286 54 23.3% 2.9% 81.91% 1,535
Alameda Sheriff's Dept. 2,128 2,174 46 2.2% 2.5% 84.36% 1,581
Sonoma Sheriff's Dept. 648 692 44 6.8% 2.3% 86.71% 1,625
Ventura Sheriff's Dept. 1,309 1,352 43 3.3% 2.3% 89.01% 1,668
Marin Sheriff's Dept. 196 234 38 19.4% 2.0% 91.04% 1,706
San Diego Work Furlough 214 251 37 17.3% 2.0% 93.01% 1,743
Napa Corrections Dept. 192 219 27 14.1% 1.4% 94.45% 1,770
Yuba Sheriff's Dept. 207 233 26 12.6% 1.4% 95.84% 1,796
Amador Sheriff's Dept. 69 90 21 30.4% 1.1% 96.96% 1,817
San Luis Obispo Sheriff's Dept. 402 417 15 3.7% 0.8% 97.76% 1,832
Tuolumne Sheriff's Dept. 70 83 13 18.6% 0.7% 98.45% 1,845
Monterey Sheriff's Dept. 873 882 9 1.0% 0.5% 98.93% 1,854
Siskiyou Sheriff's Dept. 83 90 7 8.4% 0.4% 99.31% 1,861
Placer Sheriff's Dept. 633 638 5 0.8% 0.3% 99.57% 1,866
Riverside Sheriff's Dept. 3,531 3,534 3 0.1% 0.2% 99.73% 1,869
Trinity Sheriff's Dept. 53 56 3 5.7% 0.2% 99.89% 1,872
Calaveras Sheriff's Dept. 70 72 2 2.9% 0.1% 100.00% 1,874
Mono Sheriff's Dept. 19 19 0 0.0% 0.0% 100.00% 1,874
Mendocino Sheriff's Dept. 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 100.00% 1,874
San Benito Sheriff's Dept. 81 79 -2 -2.5% 0.1% 0.05% -2
Nevada Sheriff's Dept. 145 143 -2 -1.4% 0.1% 0.11% -4
Colusa Sheriff's Dept. 59 57 -2 -3.4% 0.1% 0.16% -6
Inyo Sheriff's Dept. 56 53 -3 -5.4% 0.1% 0.24% -9
Modoc Sheriff's Dept. 28 25 -3 -10.7% 0.1% 0.32% -12
Plumas Sheriff's Dept. 39 31 -8 -20.5% 0.2% 0.54% -20
Glenn Sheriff's Dept. 70 59 -11 -15.7% 0.3% 0.83% -31
Humboldt Sheriff's Dept. 288 277 -11 -3.8% 0.3% 1.13% -42
Lake Sheriff's Dept. 167 152 -15 -9.0% 0.4% 1.53% -57
Santa Cruz Sheriff's Dept. 326 303 -23 -7.1% 0.6% 2.14% -80
Madera Corrections Dept. 400 376 -24 -6.0% 0.6% 2.79% -104
San Francisco Sheriff's Dept. 765 740 -25 -3.3% 0.7% 3.46% -129
Kings Sheriff's Dept. 476 450 -26 -5.5% 0.7% 4.15% -155
Butte Sheriff's Dept. 548 520 -28 -5.1% 0.8% 4.90% -183
Sutter Sheriff's Dept. 161 132 -29 -18.0% 0.8% 5.68% -212
Fresno Sheriff's Dept. 2,710 2,678 -32 -1.2% 0.9% 6.54% -244
Mariposa Sheriff's Dept. 35 0 -35 -100.0% 0.9% 7.48% -279
Kern Sheriff's Dept. 1,729 1,684 -45 -2.6% 1.2% 8.68% -324
Shasta Sheriff's Dept. 363 317 -46 -12.7% 1.2% 9.92% -370
Solano Sheriff's Dept. 641 564 -77 -12.0% 2.1% 11.98% -447
Del Norte Sheriff's Dept. 83 0 -83 -100.0% 2.2% 14.21% -530
San Joaquin Sheriff's Dept. 1,359 1,268 -91 -6.7% 2.4% 16.64% -621
Tulare Sheriff's Dept. 1,332 1,220 -112 -8.4% 3.0% 19.65% -733
Lassen Sheriff's Dept. 118 0 -118 -100.0% 3.2% 22.81% -851
Santa Barbara Sheriff's Dept. 650 521 -129 -19.8% 3.5% 26.27% -980
Merced Sheriff's Dept. 535 360 -175 -32.7% 4.7% 30.96% -1,155
San Bernardino Sheriff's Dept. 5,347 4,780 -567 -10.6% 15.2% 46.15% -1,722
Los Angeles Sheriff's Dept. 14,717 12,708 -2,009 -13.7% 53.8% 100.00% -3,731
59,939 58,082 -1,857 Note: Totals subject to slight variation due to rounding
Total Increase: 1,874
Total Decrease: -3,731
BPoCar d6 o0f S3t1at.e2 a n2d0 C2om0m-2un0it2y 2Co Brreiectinonnsial InspecJtiaoil nP roCfilye cSluerv eLyegislative RepSoerctond Quarter Calendar Year 202242
Jail Profile Survey - 2022 2nd Quarter Results APPENDIX B: Page 9
INTERPRETATION OF TABLE
Jail Populations: Second Quarter Calendar Year 2021 versus
Second Quarter Calendar Year 2022 (page 5)
This table:
• summarizes the Average Daily Population (ADP) results for the 57 jurisdictions in California
reporting data from Type II, III, and IV jails;
• summarizes jurisdiction ADP results for the most recent quarter (third column from left);
• compares jurisdiction ADP for the most recent quarter with the same quarter last year (second
column from left);
• ranks the jurisdictions in terms of gains or losses in ADP from high to low (fourth column from
left);
• lists the percentage of growth or decline in ADP for each jurisdiction (fifth column from left);
• lists the percentage of the overall state increase or decrease in ADP that is represented by
each jurisdiction (sixth column from left);
• lists by jurisdiction the cumulative percentage increase and decrease in the state ADP
(seventh column from left), starting with the jurisdiction with the largest percentage of increase
and proceeding to the jurisdiction with the largest percentage of decrease;
• lists by jurisdiction the cumulative total increase and decrease in the state ADP (eighth column
from left), starting with the jurisdiction with the highest increase first and proceeding to the
jurisdiction with the highest decrease last; and,
• lists the jurisdictions that experienced decreases in their ADP as shaded.
Some important conclusions from this table are:
1. The two numbers at the bottom indicate the “Total Increase” in ADP (in this case 1874) and
“Total Decrease” in ADP (-3,731). Specifically, the jurisdictions experiencing increases had a
total increase of 1874 ADP, and the jurisdictions experiencing decreases had a total decrease
of -3,731 ADP. Subtracting -3,731 from 1874 produces the overall decrease of -1857 between
the Second Quarter of Calendar Year 2021 and the Second Quarter of Calendar Year 2022.
2. The Sacramento Sheriff’s Department’s ADP increase of 268 is 14.3% of the total increase
of 1874. Twenty-Seven jurisdictions had increases (Sacramento Sheriff’s Department to
Calaveras Sheriff’s Department), with two jurisdictions (Mono Sheriff’s Department and
Mendocino Sheriff’s Department) reporting no change. When you get to Mendocino Sheriff’s
Department, you have accounted for 100% of the increase (100% of the cumulative total of
1874).
3. Jurisdictions that experienced a decrease in ADP are listed from smallest decrease to largest
decrease (San Benito Sheriff’s Department to Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department). When you
get to the bottom of the table, you have accounted for 100% of the total decrease of -3,731
inmates.
4. The cumulative percentage of ADP increase for the top four jurisdictions (Sacramento Sheriff’s
Department, Santa Clara Sheriff’s Department, San Mateo Sheriff’s Department, and Orange
Sheriff’s Department) is 48.5%. Four jurisdictions (Santa Barbara Sheriff’s Department,
Merced Sheriff’s Department, San Bernardino Sheriff’s Department, and Los Angeles Sheriff’s
Department) account for 77.2% of the total decrease.
BPoCar d6 o0f S3t1at.e2 a n2d0 C2om0m-2un0it2y 2Co Brreiectinonnsial InspecJtiaoil nP roCfilye cSluerv eLyegislative RepSoerctond Quarter Calendar Year 202252