Board of State and Community Corrections

Y O OUTHFUL FFENDER B G LOCK RANT M 2015 ARCH Annual Report Youthful Offender Block Grant Annual Report to the Legislature March 2015 Board of State and Community Corrections 2590 Venture Oaks Way, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95833 http://www.bscc.ca.gov STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., GOVERNOR BOARD OF STATE AND COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS Board Members Linda M. Penner, Chair Board of State and Community Corrections Jeffrey A. Beard Michael Ertola Secretary Chief Probation Officer (county under 200,000 pop.) Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation County of Nevada Daniel P. Stone William R. Pounders Director, Division of Adult Parole Operations Judge Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Retired – County of Los Angeles Dean Growdon David L. Maggard, Jr. Sheriff (jail with RC of 200 inmates or less) Chief of Police County of Lassen Irvine Police Department Geoff Dean Scott Budnick Sheriff (jail with RC over 200 inmates) Community provider or rehabilitative treatment County of Ventura or services for adult offenders Anti-Recidivism Coalition Susan Mauriello David Steinhart County Supervisor or Community Provider or advocate with expertise in County Administrative Officer effective programs, polices, and treatment of at-risk youth County of Santa Cruz and juvenile offenders Commonweal Michelle Brown Mimi H. Silbert Chief Probation Officer (county over 200,000 pop.) Public Member County of San Bernardino Delancey Street Foundation Staff Kathleen T. Howard, Executive Director Tracie Cone, Communications Director Patricia M. Pechtel, General Counsel Robert J. Takeshta, Deputy Director Mary Jolls, Deputy Director Administration & Research Division Corrections Planning & Programs Division Allison Ganter, Deputy Director Evonne Garner, Deputy Director Facilities Standards & Operations Division Standards & Training for Corrections Division Kimberly D. Bushard, Field Representative Nicole M. Woodman, Field Representative Corrections Planning & Programs Division Corrections Planning & Programs Division Corey Kai, Research Program Specialist I Administration & Research Division Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary 1 2. Background 3 History of the Youthful Offender Block Grant Program 3 YOBG Reporting Requirements 4 Key Provisions of YOBG 4 California State Auditor Review 5 Juvenile Justice Data Working Group 5 3. Expenditures Reported for FY 2013-14 7 Summary of Actual Expenditure Data 7 YOBG Expenditures by Fiscal Year Allocation 13 Leveraging of YOBG Funds 13 Planned Versus Actual YOBG Expenditures 15 4. Performance Outcome Process and Results 17 Choosing and Selecting the Target Sample 17 Assembling the Final Sample 17 Characteristics of Final Sample 18 Data Collection Instrument 19 Data Verification 19 Results 19 Comparison of Current Year Findings with Prior Year Findings 28 Summary 33 Tables Table 1 – YOBG Expenditures by Budget Line Item Table 2 – Three-Year Comparison of YOBG Expenditures by Budget Line Item Table 3 – YOBG Expenditures by Expenditure Category Type Table 4 – Three-Year Comparison of YOBG Expenditures by Category Type Table 5 – Summary of YOBG Expenditures Table 6 – Three-Year Comparison of YOBG Expenditures by Expenditure Category and Fiscal Year Table 7 – YOBG Expenditures by Allocation Year Table 8 – Expenditures from YOBG, JJCPA and Other Funding Sources Table 9 – Fiscal Year Comparisons of All Funding Sources Table 10 – Planned Versus Actual YOBG Expenditures by Budget Line Item Table 11 – Planned Versus Actual YOBG Expenditures by Expenditure Category Type Table 12 – Cases Excluded from Initial Study Sample Table 13 – Demographic Characteristics of Study Population and Final Sample Table 14 – Mean Number of Assessments, Placements and Direct Services Table 15 – Assessments, Placements and Direct Services Rates Table 16 – Frequency of YOBG Funding of Provided Assessments, Placements and Direct Services Table 17 – Baseline Characteristics of Study Sample Table 18 – Performance Outcomes During One-Year Follow-Up Period Table 19 – Performance Outcomes Relationships with Baseline Characteristics Table 20 – Performance Outcomes and Number of Direct Services Table 21 – Mean Number of Assessments, Placements and Direct Services in the Three Most Recent Reporting Years Table 22 – Percentage of YOBG Youth and Other Youth Receiving Assessments, Placements and Services in Each of the Last Five Reporting Years Table 23 – Baseline Characteristics of YOBG Youth and Other Youth by Reporting Year Table 24 – Outcomes for YOBG Youth and Other Youth by Reporting Year Appendices A – Expenditures and Per Capita Costs by Expenditure Category (All Funding Sources) B – Comparison of YOBG Expenditures by Budget Line Item C – Comparison of YOBG Expenditures by Category Type D – Comparison of YOBG Expenditures by Expenditure Category and Fiscal Year E – Allocation Year Source of FY 2013-14 YOBG Expenditures F – Summary of Per Capita Costs G – Planned and Actual YOBG Expenditures by County H – Planned and Actual YOBG Expenditures by Program Type I – County YOBG Allocation Amounts and County Representation in Performance Outcome Study Group 1 Executive Summary The Youthful Offender Block Grant (YOBG), sometimes known as “juvenile realignment,” was enacted in 2007 by legislation that reassigned from state to local control the non-violent, non-serious, non-sexual offenders within California’s juvenile justice system. The program had three primary goals: to reduce the number of offenders in Division of Juvenile Justice facilities, to reduce state costs for incarcerating lower level offenders, and to keep lower level offenders closer to home and to local support systems. In those ways, YOBG has been successful. From 2007-08 to 2013-14, the number of offenders in DJJ facilities declined from 2,439 to 523. Consistent with the population reductions, DJJ’s Institutions budget decreased from $477 million to $165 million. The DJJ parole population dropped to 0 (from 2,742) by the end of 2012-13, and the parole budget was eliminated. In recognition of the increased county responsibilities for supervising and rehabilitating youthful offenders subject to SB 81, the State provides annual funding through the YOBG program. The amount allocated to each county is based on a statutorily defined formula that gives equal weight to a county’s juvenile population and the number of juvenile felony dispositions. In FY 2013-14 statewide YOBG funding was $104.3 million to serve 42,376 young offenders. To receive YOBG funding, counties submit annual funding applications and annual reports of expenditures and performance outcomes to the Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC). In this report the BSCC has synthesized the data collected from county-submitted expenditure and performance outcome reports. Given that 58 counties have approached juvenile realignment in 58 different ways it is not possible to draw inferences about cause and effect relationships between services and outcomes. That presents a problem in reporting outcomes. Funding legislation allows counties to spend their allocations as needed. It is possible for counties to make an argument for funding nearly anything that is part of their juvenile justice programs, a notion supported by anti-supplantation language in the statute. Some counties have used YOBG funds to offset cuts elsewhere in their budgets. Some use it for infrastructure or to infill staffing needs, while others apply it to programs. Because counties can decide how best to spend YOBG funding, not all provide services. While juvenile crime rates continue to decline, the data do not paint a clear picture of the relationship between YOBG funding and outcomes for youth – especially their continued involvement in the criminal justice system. In three of the last five years, a significantly higher percentage of YOBG Youth had new felony adjudications in juvenile court compared to Other Youth in the data sample used for this report. Also during 1 three of the last five years, a significantly higher percentage of YOBG Youth had DJJ commitments. One factor might be that higher-risk youth are singled out for services. Another factor limiting usefulness of the reporting data is that only 5 percent of youthful offender cases statewide are analyzed by counties for this report. Recognizing that previous reports have not given policymakers sufficient data regarding the juvenile offender population, the BSCC has been actively working with stakeholders to reconsider the data collection, analysis and reporting processes for YOBG. In April 2013 the Juvenile Justice Standing Committee (JJSC) reviewed reporting requirements specific to YOBG and began assessing data collection and reporting requirements for California’s juvenile justice system as a whole. That work has continued in a more focused way with the Juvenile Justice Data Working Group (JJDWG) established by Assembly Bill 1468 (Chapter 26, Statutes of 2014). The JJDWG is mandated to recommend a plan for improving the reporting requirements for both YOBG and the Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act (JJCPA) by streamlining and consolidating the current requirements without sacrificing meaningful data collection. The JJDWG is required to present that plan to the BSCC Board by April 30, 2015. 2 2 Background History of the Youthful Offender Block Grant Program The Youthful Offender Block Grant (YOBG) Program was established in 2007 with the enactment of SB 81, and amended in 2009 by SBX4 13. The YOBG program realigned a segment of California’s juvenile justice population from state to county control. Under this legislation, counties are no longer permitted to send certain lower level offenders to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Division of Juvenile Justice (DJJ). Youth who are no longer eligible for DJJ commitment are those who commit an offense that is not listed in Welfare and Institutions Code (WIC) Section 707(b) and is not a sex offense as set forth in Penal Code Section 290.008(c). YOBG supports the concept that public safety is enhanced by keeping juvenile offenders close to their families and communities. In recognition of the increased county responsibility for supervising and rehabilitating youthful offenders subject to SB 81, the State provides annual funding through the YOBG program. The amount of YOBG funds allocated to each county is based on a statutorily defined formula that gives equal weight to a county’s juvenile population and the number of juvenile felony dispositions. In FY 2013-14, statewide YOBG funding was $104.3 million1. Per the statute, “allocations from the Youthful Offender Block Grant Fund shall be used to enhance the capacity of county probation, mental health, drug and alcohol, and other county departments to provide appropriate rehabilitative and supervision services to youthful offenders subject [to the provisions of SB 81].” Based on this provision, allowable uses of YOBG funds are very broad. The proposed uses of YOBG funds vary significantly, reflecting the broad differences in California’s counties and highlighting local priorities. To guide counties in appropriate use of YOBG funds, the Legislature identified several key components counties could employ to positively and effectively impact the lives of juveniles who remain under their supervision per SB 81. Those key components include: Adequate risk and needs assessments; The ability to utilize a multitude of graduated sanctions from treatment to intensive supervision and detention; Re-entry and aftercare programs; Agency capacity building; and The formation or expansion of regional networks. 1 $104.3 million is the amount that was allocated for the 2013-14 fiscal year less growth funding. On November 25, 2014, counties received an additional $9.2 million from the Juvenile Justice Growth Special Account that augmented the 2013-14 allocations. County expenditure of these funds will be included in next year’s annual report. 3 YOBG Reporting Requirements In 2009, the enactment of SBX4 13 established the following annual reporting cycle: By May 1 of each year counties must submit annual Funding Applications to the BSCC containing their proposed expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year. These Funding Applications are also referred to as Juvenile Justice Development Plans. By October 1 of each year counties must submit to the BSCC a report of actual expenditures for the previous fiscal year. Also by October 1 of each year, counties must report on performance outcomes for the previous fiscal year. By March 15th of each year based on the October reports received from counties, the BSCC must prepare and submit to the Legislature a report summarizing county utilization of block grant funds in the preceding fiscal year, including a summary of performance outcomes. The BSCC must also post an annual summary of county reports on its website; however, the due date for this posting is not specified in law. Key Provisions of YOBG YOBG is formula-driven, not competitive: Every county is included in the YOBG program and receives an annual allocation. There is no competitive aspect to YOBG; each county’s allocation is simply based on the formula prescribed in statute that gives equal weight to a county’s juvenile population and its juvenile felony dispositions. The Department of Finance (DOF) calculates each county’s allocation amount annually using its own demographic information for the juvenile population, and DOJ data for juvenile felony dispositions. Each county receives a minimum annual allocation of $117,000, regardless of what the formula yields. Broad flexibility: As provided by statute, “allocations from the Youthful Offender Block Grant Fund shall be used to enhance the capacity of county probation, mental health, drug and alcohol, and other county departments to provide appropriate rehabilitative and supervision services to youthful offenders subject [to the provisions of SB 81].” There is no other provision that addresses eligible uses of YOBG funds. Consequently, counties have tremendous flexibility in how they use YOBG funds and counties have used this flexibility to tailor YOBG-funded programs to fit local needs and priorities. No Anti-Supplantation Clause: Consistent with the intent to give counties broad flexibility to manage the realigned population, the YOBG statute does not prohibit supplantation of funds. Consequently, some counties have chosen to use YOBG funds to offset cuts elsewhere in their budgets. DOF and State Controller’s Office roles: As specified in statute, the DOF is responsible for calculating the annual amount of YOBG funding to be allocated to each county. The DOF performs this calculation each year following enactment of the State budget. In turn, the State Controller’s Office (SCO) is responsible for remitting the quarterly 4 allocation amounts to each county according to the calculation provided by the DOF. Consequently the BSCC, which is responsible for program administration and oversight for this program, is not the fiduciary agent. BSCC Oversight/Monitoring: Although the BSCC has never received funding for administration of the YOBG program, the BSCC staff reviews each annual application, as well as expenditure and outcome reports, submitted by counties. If the BSCC staff identifies an issue or receives an inquiry regarding a county’s use of YOBG funds that cannot be answered through a desk review, on-site monitoring is conducted in response. WIC Section 1962(b) provides that “The [Board of State and Community Corrections] may monitor and inspect any programs or facilities supported by block grant funds … and may enforce violations of grant requirements with suspensions or cancellations of grant funds.” While this provision seems to provide a degree of accountability, the “grant requirements” for YOBG are so broad it is possible for counties to make an argument for funding almost anything that is part of their juvenile justice programs. The lack of anti-supplantation language in the statute further supports this county flexibility. No Requirement for Evidence-Based Principles (EBP): Despite the current emphasis on evidence-based principles, there is no requirement that YOBG funds be used to support EBP. Nevertheless, some counties have opted to utilize YOBG funds in support of various evidence based practices. California State Auditor Review Commencing in February 2012, the California State Auditor (CSA) (formerly the Bureau of State Audits) conducted an audit of the YOBG program. As directed by the Joint Legislative Audit Committee, the CSA looked at a number of issues related to YOBG specifically, and juvenile realignment in general. CSA issued its report in September 20122 and the BSCC has taken steps to implement some of the recommendations, including providing county-specific expenditure data and clarifying terminology related to county reporting of services. Juvenile Justice Data Working Group As required by AB 1468, the Juvenile Justice Data Working Group is a multidisciplinary group comprised of stakeholders who represent numerous geographic regions of the State. The JJDWG is mandated to recommend a plan for improving the reporting requirements for YOBG and JJCPA by streamlining and consolidating current requirements without sacrificing meaningful data collection. The JJDWG began meeting in October of 2014 and is actively working toward developing a plan for presentation to the BSCC Board by its April 30, 2015 statutory due date. 2 BSCC’s response to the report noted disagreement with some of the recommendations, however others are still under review for implementation. For additional information, the final audit report and the BSCC’s response can be found on the CSA’s website, http://www.bsa.ca.gov/pdfs/reports/2011-129.pdf. 5 Given the data collection and reporting limitations that have been inherent in the YOBG program, the JJDWG represents an exciting opportunity for improvement. While the current methodology used to report YOBG performance outcomes is of limited utility to decision makers at either the State or local levels – and has brought scrutiny from a variety of stakeholders – the broad mandate of the JJDWG creates an opening for significant advancements in statewide juvenile justice data-collection efforts. By re- creating reporting requirements, the JJDWG is working toward a system that can be relied upon to inform policy making at the State level while significantly enhancing the ability of local governments to employ data-driven decision making. In addition to bringing increased efficiency and improved operations to both State and local components of the program, the work of the JJDWG also presents an opportunity to address some of the concerns identified by the State Auditor in its 2012 report. 6 3 Expenditures Reported for FY 2013-14 Summary of Actual Expenditure Data On October 1, 2014 the fifth annual YOBG Actual Expenditure Reports were due from counties to the BSCC. All 58 counties complied with this reporting requirement. The expenditure information that follows was extracted from the county reports. While the expenditure information reported below is focused on YOBG expenditures, it should be noted that counties reported total expenditures for those YOBG Expenditure Categories that had multiple funding sources. For example, if a county had an electronic monitoring program funded 70 percent by YOBG, 20 percent by the Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act (JJCPA) and 10 percent by the county general fund, the county reported all of those funding sources to the BSCC in its Actual Expenditure Report. For additional information regarding total funding for all YOBG Expenditure Categories, refer to Appendix A. Counties reported total YOBG expenditures of $100,158,880 in FY 2013-14. Total YOBG expenditures by budget line item are shown in Table 1. As in past years, the bulk of the funds were spent on staff Salaries and Benefits, accounting for more than 78 percent of total YOBG expenditures. Table 1: YOBG Expenditures by Budget Line Item Line Item Expenditures Percent Total Salaries & Benefits $78,401,472 78.28% Services & Supplies $9,155,040 9.14% Professional Services $7,286,047 7.28% CBOs $4,376,689 4.37% Fixed Assets & Equipment $54,325 0.05% Administrative Overhead $853,297 0.85% Other Expenditures $32,010 0.03% Total $100,158,880 100.00% YOBG budget line item expenditures for each of the past three fiscal years are reported in Table 2, while budget line item expenditures for the past five fiscal years are reported in Appendix B. Both Table 2 and Appendix B show notable consistency in the manner in which YOBG funds have been spent. 7 Table 2: Three-Year Comparison of YOBG Expenditures by Budget Line Item FY 2013-14 FY 2012-13 FY 2011-12 Line Item Amount % Total Amount % Total Amount % Total Salaries & Benefits $78,401,472 78.28% $67,997,513 76.8% $69,501,485 76.5% Services & Supplies $9,155,040 9.14% $8,124,244 9.2% $7,411,467 8.2% Professional Services $7,286,047 7.28% $5,724,583 6.5% $7,268,432 8.0% CBOs $4,376,689 4.37% $5,314,540 6.0% $3,764,557 4.1% Fixed Assets $54,325 0.05% $232,369 0.3% $143,632 0.2% Admin. Overhead $853,297 0.85% $701,427 0.8% $2,140,280 2.4% Other Costs $32,010 0.03% $388,941 0.4% $565,433 0.6% Total $100,158,880 $88,483,617 $90,795,286 Table 3 shows FY 2013-14 YOBG expenditures by each of three major Expenditure Category Types – Placements, Direct Services, and Capacity Building/Maintenance Activities. As shown in Table 3, over two-thirds of YOBG funds were spent on Placements (67.6 percent), with Direct Services accounting for nearly 30 percent of total YOBG expenditures. While this pattern of YOBG expenditures is generally consistent with prior years, the trend shows a slow increase in Direct Services expenditures. That trend is seen in Table 4, which shows YOBG expenditures by major Expenditure Category for each of the past three fiscal years, and in Appendix C, which shows the same data for the past five fiscal years. Table 3: YOBG Expenditures by Expenditure Category Type Expenditure Category Type Amount % Total Placements $67,695,958 67.6% Direct Services $29,839,086 29.8% Capacity Building/Maintenance Activities $2,623,836 2.6% Total $100,158,880 100.00% Table 4: Three-Year Comparison of YOBG Expenditures by Category Type Expenditure Category Type Fiscal Year 2013-14 Fiscal Year 2012-13 Fiscal Year 2011-12 Amount % Total Amount % Total Amount % Total Placements $67,695,958 67.6% $59,806,502 67.6% $63,039,975 69.4% Direct Services $29,839,086 29.8% $26,486,759 29.9% $25,632,549 28.2% Capacity Bld/Maint $2,623,836 2.6% $2,190,356 2.5% $2,122,762 2.3% Total $100,158,880 100.0% $88,483,617 100.0% $90,795,286 100.0% 8 Table 5 provides a more detailed breakdown of YOBG expenditures within each of the three major Expenditure Types. Specifically, results are reported for each of six types of Placements, 33 types of Direct Services, and six types of Capacity Building/Maintenance Activities. Total YOBG expenditures and the number of counties spending in the category are shown for each. In addition, the total number of youth served and the YOBG per capita cost are reported for each type of Placement and Direct Service. Among Placements, Camps accounted for the largest expenditure of YOBG funds ($37,014,095), with the second highest YOBG per capita cost ($10,524). While Other Secure/Semi-Secure Rehab Facilities accounted for only $7,435,133 of YOBG costs, this type of Placement had the highest per capita cost ($11,439). The Placement most frequently funded by YOBG was Juvenile Hall (19 counties). Mirroring last year’s data, within Direct Services, Intensive Probation Supervision accounted for the greatest expenditure of YOBG funds ($10,228,943), followed by Re- Entry or Aftercare Services ($4,223,258), Other Direct Service - which includes various other services that are not captured by the other Direct Service categories ($3,482,374), and Day/Evening Treatment Programs ($2,643,989). The Direct Service most frequently funded by YOBG was Risk/Needs Assessment (19 counties). The two Direct Service categories with the highest per capita costs were Functional Family Therapy ($5,854) and Family Counseling ($4,472). Among Capacity Building/Maintenance Activities, Staff Salaries/Benefits accounted for by far the greatest expenditure of YOBG funds ($1,281,002), while Staff Training/Professional Development was the activity most frequently funded by YOBG (10 counties). 9 Table 5: Summary of YOBG Expenditures Number of You th Per C apita Expenditure Category Expend itures Counties Served Costs Camp $37,014,095 13 3,517 $10,524 Home on Probation $8,427,844 10 6,774 $1,244 Juvenile Hall $7,416,618 19 3,622 $2,048 Other Placement $7,251,151 3 768 $9,442 Other Secure/Semi-Secure Rehab Facility $7,435,133 5 650 $11,439 Ranch $151,117 3 31 $4,875 All Placements $67,695,958 53 15,362 $4,407 After School Services $27,003 2 311 $87 Aggression Replacement Therapy $123,216 3 208 $592 Alcohol and Drug Treatment $648,721 8 671 $967 Anger Management Counseling/Treatment $485 1 8 $61 Community Service $113,312 4 209 $542 Day or Evening Treatment Program $2,643,989 7 844 $3,133 Detention Assessment(s) $165,608 2 678 $244 Development of Case Plan $456,176 3 380 $1,200 Electronic Monitoring $453,644 8 900 $504 Family Counseling $979,299 1 219 $4,472 Functional Family Therapy $152,204 1 26 $5,854 Gang Intervention $234,436 1 90 $2,605 Group Counseling $37,000 1 10 $3,700 Intensive Probation Supervision $10,228,943 15 2,554 $4,005 Job Readiness Training $88,630 1 149 $595 Life/Independent Living Skills Training $47,303 2 754 $63 Mental Health Counseling $1,359,696 9 1,155 $1,177 Mental Health Screening $294,771 2 642 $459 Mentoring $353,490 4 208 $1,699 Other Direct Service $3,482,374 17 3,894 $894 Parenting Education $2,609 1 71 $37 Programming for Boys $58,741 1 79 $744 Programming for Girls $245,110 4 583 $420 Pro-Social Skills Training $1,369,504 9 802 $1,708 Recreational Activities $127,471 5 880 $145 Re-Entry or Aftercare Services $4,223,258 8 1,267 $3,333 Restorative Justice $8,506 2 17 $500 Risk and/or Needs Assessment $1,514,072 19 8,555 $177 Special Education Services $13,250 1 360 $37 Substance Abuse Screening $4,409 1 250 $18 Transitional Living Services/Placement $36,285 1 31 $1,170 Tutoring $7,229 1 37 $195 Vocational Training $338,342 2 172 $1,967 All Direct Services $29,839,086 147 27,014 $1,105 Capital Improvements $565,810 4 N/A N/A Contract Services $184,201 6 N/A N/A Equipment $23,516 2 N/A N/A Other $348,110 6 N/A N/A Staff Salaries/Benefits $1,281,002 8 N/A N/A Staff Training/Professional Development $221,197 10 N/A N/A All Capacity Building/Maintenance Activities $2,623,836 36 N/A N/A 10 Table 6 shows YOBG expenditures within each of the three major Expenditure Category Types for each of the past three fiscal years. To provide additional detail, Appendix D shows the same data for the past four fiscal years. Both data sets show a relatively consistent pattern in the manner in which YOBG funds have been spent. Notable variations are seen with respect to the different types of Placements. As compared to FY 2012-13, expenditures for Camps and Home on Probation increased sharply, while expenditures for Juvenile Hall and Other Secure/Semi-Secure Facility decreased slightly. Since FY 2011-12, the trend shows a steady decrease in expenditures for Juvenile Hall and Other Secure/Semi-Secure Facility, while expenditures for Other Placements and Ranches have continued to increase. The total number of youth receiving YOBG-funded Placements during FY 2013-14 (15,362) increased 5.5 percent from FY 2012-13 (14,559). More significantly, the number of youth receiving YOBG-funded Placements during FY 2013-14 has increased 79 percent since reporting began in FY 2009-10 (from 8,563 to 15,362). During that same time period, total YOBG expenditures for Placements increased by 7.5 percent (from $62,944,571 in FY 2009-10 to $67,695,958 in FY 2013-14). Table 6 shows that within the major Expenditure Category Type of Direct Services, there were a number of significant changes from FY 2012-13 to 2013-14. YOBG funds were spent on Substance Abuse Screening for the first time. Sharp increases were seen in YOBG expenditures for Restorative Justice, Pro-Social Skills Training, and Intensive Probation Supervision. Sharp decreases were seen in expenditures for Programming for Boys, Parenting Education, Vocational Training, and Family Counseling. After downward spikes in FY 2012-13, the following Expenditure Categories returned to and/or exceeded FY 2011-12 levels: Development of Case Plan, Mental Health Screening, Programming for Girls, and Group Counseling. Although the number of youth receiving YOBG-funded Direct Services increased by less than one percent compared to FY 2009-10, total YOBG expenditures for Direct Services increased by 43 percent (from $20,918,716 in FY 2009-10 to $29,839,086 in FY 2013- 14). YOBG spending for Capacity Building/Maintenance Activities increased slightly over last year and has varied only minimally since FY 2009-10. Overall, compared with last year, total YOBG expenditures increased by 13 percent in FY 2013-14, while the total number of youth served only increased by 2.3 percent. Since reporting began in FY 2009-10, total YOBG expenditures have increased by 15.7 percent (from $86,570,073 in FY 2009-10 to $100,158,880 in FY 2013-14) and the total number of youth served has increased by 19.2 percent (from 35,540 in FY 2009-10 to 42,376 in FY 2013-14). 11 Table 6: Three-Year Comparison of YOBG Expenditures by Expenditure Category and Fiscal Year YOBG Expenditures Total Youth Served Expenditure Category 2013-14 2012-13 2011-12 2013-14 2012-13 2011-12 Camp $37,014,095 $31,539,106 $32,721,278 3,517 2,292 1,969 Home on Probation $8,427,844 $5,742,128 $9,062,040 6,774 4,898 4,940 Other Secure/Semi-Secure Facility $7,435,133 $7,760,575 $8,312,863 650 1,093 1,365 Juvenile Hall $7,416,618 $8,552,368 $8,719,676 3,622 5,422 4,108 Other Placement $7,251,151 $6,094,416 $4,149,027 768 816 837 Ranch $151,117 $117,909 $75,091 31 38 50 All Placements $67,695,958 $59,806,502 $63,039,975 15,362 14,559 13,269 Intensive Probation Supervision $10,228,943 $6,633,044 $5,574,312 2,554 2,745 2,461 Re-Entry or Aftercare Services $4,223,258 $3,665,753 $2,733,452 1,267 1,789 2,162 Other Direct Service $3,482,374 $4,969,585 $5,352,780 3,894 4,702 4,086 Day or Evening Treatment Program $2,643,989 $2,529,646 $2,193,519 844 1,013 879 Risk and/or Needs Assessment $1,514,072 $1,574,655 $1,525,376 8,555 7,376 4,908 Pro-Social Skills Training $1,369,504 $829,230 $799,880 802 691 889 Mental Health Counseling $1,359,696 $1,298,880 $1,503,618 1,155 1,419 1,343 Family Counseling $979,299 $1,336,173 $1,202,578 219 378 138 Alcohol and Drug Treatment $648,721 $496,650 $473,464 671 1,177 512 Development of Case Plan $456,176 $11,342 $412,299 380 295 642 Electronic Monitoring $453,644 $579,166 $714,481 900 693 1,679 Mentoring $353,490 $216,765 $214,067 208 93 108 Vocational Training $338,342 $670,301 $739,844 172 259 261 Mental Health Screening $294,771 $55,193 $212,012 642 255 588 Programming for Girls $245,110 $170,363 $234,865 583 222 217 Gang Intervention $234,436 $244,309 $200,666 90 100 96 Detention Assessment(s) $165,608 $154,713 $219,070 678 734 1,788 Functional Family Therapy $152,204 $158,287 $171,002 26 74 65 Recreational Activities $127,471 $148,147 $337,547 880 348 422 Aggression Replacement Therapy $123,216 $173,938 $191,031 208 189 247 Community Service $113,312 $103,518 $50,451 209 173 140 Job Readiness Training $88,630 $103,507 $140,458 149 205 237 Programming for Boys $58,741 $163,966 $136,745 79 360 265 Life/Independent Living Skills Training $47,303 $54,205 $55,345 754 671 491 Group Counseling $37,000 $19,158 $58,197 10 85 7 Transitional Living services./Placement $36,285 $60,476 $78,055 31 55 115 After School Services $27,003 $32,221 $28,721 311 295 413 Special Education Services $13,250 $13,250 $27,014 360 395 417 Restorative Justice $8,506 $4,950 $0 17 22 0 Tutoring $7,229 $8,950 $5,100 37 20 15 Substance Abuse Screening $4,409 $0 $0 250 0 0 Parenting Education $2,609 $6,417 $0 71 0 0 Anger Management Counseling/Treatment $485 $0 $46,600 8 0 134 All Direct Services $29,839,086 $26,486,758 $25,632,549 27,014 26,833 25,725 Staff Salaries/Benefits $1,281,002 $1,188,927 $1,198,314 Capital Improvements $565,810 $132,101 $0 Other Capacity Building/Maintenance $348,110 $315,923 $242,653 Staff Training/Development $221,197 $367,542 $299,056 Contract Services $184,201 $62,438 $37,101 Equipment $23,516 $109,343 $114,923 Other Procurements $0 $14,082 $230,715 All Capacity Building Activities $2,623,836 $2,190,356 $2,122,762 Total $100,158,880 $88,483,616 $90,795,286 42,376 41,392 38,994 12 YOBG Expenditures by Fiscal Year Allocation Counties are not required to spend YOBG funds in the year they are allocated. Table 7 shows the YOBG funding sources (fiscal year allocations) that were used by counties during FY 2013-14. As shown in the table, almost 83 percent of all YOBG funds spent in FY 2013-14 were taken from the FY 2013-14 allocation. Another 10.5 percent of the YOBG expenditures were from the FY 2012-13 allocation, followed by much smaller amounts from the allocations for FY’s 2011-12, 2010-11, 2009-10, 2008-09 and 2007- 08. The $82,816,232 spent from the FY 2013-14 allocation constitutes 79 percent of the total allocation of $104,280,195 received by the counties in FY 2013-14.3 Allocation year sources of FY 2013-14 YOBG expenditures for each county are presented in Appendix E. Table 7: YOBG Expenditures by Allocation Year Allocation Year Expenditure Amount Percent Total FY 2013-14 $82,816,232 82.68% FY 2012-13 $10,522,716 10.51% FY 2011-12 $5,540,779 5.53% FY 2010-11 $1,087,491 1.09% FY 2009-10 $164,041 0.16% FY 2008-09 $27,621 0.03% FY 2007-08 $0 0.00% All Allocations $100,158,880 100.00% Leveraging of YOBG Funds As mentioned previously, for each Expenditure Category funded by YOBG, counties are required to report expenditures from funds received under the JJCPA program, as well as other funding sources. Table 8 summarizes this information and shows that for all Placements, Direct Services, and Capacity Building/Maintenance Activities that received YOBG funding, this funding accounted for 63.2 percent of all spending reported by the counties for these items, with one percent of total expenditures coming from JJCPA funds ($1,657,708), and the remaining 35.8 percent of total expenditures coming from other funding sources ($56,833,480). Again this year, as a percentage of total reported expenditures, the contribution of YOBG funds was greatest for Direct Services (86.7 percent) and smallest for Capacity Building/Maintenance Activities (45.3 percent). Overall, these results indicate that for every $1 in YOBG funds spent by counties, an 3 By comparison, 77% of FY 2012-13 expenditures were made from the FY 2012-13 allocation, 78.0% of FY 2011-12 expenditures were made from the FY 2011-12 allocation, and 80.2%, of FY 2010-11 YOBG expenditures were made from the FY 2010-11 allocation. 13 additional $0.59 was spent from other funding sources ($0.02 from JJCPA; $0.57 from other sources).4, 5 Table 8: Expenditures from YOBG, JJCPA and Other Funding Sources YOBG JJCPA Other All Expenditures Expenditures Expenditures Expenditures Amount % Total Amount % Total Amount % Total Amount Placements $67,695,958 57.2% $1,105,174 0.9% $49,642,069 41.9% $118,443,201 Direct Services $29,839,086 86.7% $527,486 1.5% $4,052,739 11.8% $34,419,311 Cap Bldg./Maint. $2,623,836 45.3% $25,048 0.5% $3,138,672 54.2% $5,787,556 Total $100,158,880 63.2% $1,657,708 1.0% $56,833,480 35.8% $158,650,068 Table 9 shows expenditures from all sources (YOBG, JJCPA and Other Funds) in each of the past five fiscal years. Whereas YOBG expenditures accounted for a larger percentage of total expenditures in FY 2009-10 (71.6 percent), YOBG expenditures as a percentage of total expenditures were very similar for the past four fiscal years (63.2 percent in FY 2013-14, 61.9 percent in FY 2012-13; 63.9 percent in FY 2011-12; 62.0 percent in FY 2010-11). Over the five years that counties have been reporting expenditure data, both JJCPA and Other Funds expenditures have fluctuated minimally from year to year. Comparing FY 2013-14 to FY 2012-13, JJCPA and Other Funds expenditures as a percentage of total expenditures decreased to 1.0 percent and 35.8 percent, respectively. Table 9: Fiscal Year Comparisons of All Funding Sources YOBG Funds JJCPA Funds Other Funds All Funds Fiscal Year Amount % Total Amount % Total Amount % Total Amount 2009-10 $86,570,073 71.6% $2,946,940 2.4% $31,409,664 26.0% $120,926,677 2010-11 $97,103,010 62.0% $2,053,926 1.3% $57,526,537 36.7% $156,683,473 2011-12 $90,795,286 63.9% $2,884,901 2.0% $48,437,748 34.1% $142,117,935 2012-13 $88,483,617 61.9% $1,990,221 1.4% $52,542,355 36.7% $143,016,193 2013-14 $100,158,880 63.2% $1,657,708 1.0% $56,833,480 35.8% $158,650,068 4 This compares to 62 cents in other funds spent for every YOBG dollar in FY 2012-13, 56 cents in other funds spent for every YOBG dollar spent in FY 2011-12, and 61 cents in other funds spent for every YOBG dollar spent in FY 2009-10. 5 See Appendix F for breakdowns of per capita costs for each Expenditure Category for all funding sources and for YOBG expenditures only. 14 Planned Versus Actual YOBG Expenditures In addition to reporting annually to the BSCC on actual YOBG expenditures, in the spring of each year counties are required to submit a report of planned YOBG expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year. Table 10 provides comparative information on planned and actual YOBG activities and expenditures for FY 2013-14. As indicated, 16 fewer “Programs” (types of Placements or Direct Services, and Types of Capacity Building/Maintenance Activities) than planned were funded by YOBG, and more than 5,000 fewer youth were served. Total YOBG expenditures were about $1 million less than anticipated due to fewer-than-expected YOBG dollars being spent on Professional Services, Administrative Overhead, Other Expenditures, Salaries & Benefits, Community Based Organizations and Fixed Assets & Equipment. Conversely, spending on Services and Supplies was higher than anticipated. Table 10: Planned Versus Actual YOBG Expenditures by Budget Line Item Planned Actual Difference Programs 252 236 -16 Youth Served 47,657 42,376 -5,281 Salaries & Benefits $79,022,012 $78,401,472 -$620,540 Services & Supplies $5,745,439 $9,155,040 $3,409,601 Professional Services $8,464,953 $7,286,047 -$1,178,906 CBOs $4,927,073 $4,376,689 -$550,384 Fixed Assets & Equipment $403,898 $54,325 -$349,573 Administrative Overhead $1,860,297 $853,297 -$1,007,000 Other Expenditures $875,000 $32,010 -$842,990 Total Expenditures $101,298,672 $100,158,880 -$1,139,792 Table 11 provides a further breakdown of planned versus actual activities and expenditures within each of the three major Expenditure Category Types. As indicated in this table, actual expenditures were far less than planned in the Direct Services Expenditure Category Type. There were 19 fewer Direct Services programs and 3 more Capacity Building/Maintenance Activities actually delivered in comparison to what was planned. Alternatively, there was no difference at all in the planned versus actual number of programs delivered under the Placements Category. Turning back to expenditures, actual YOBG expenditures exceeded planned expenditures for both Placements and Capacity Building/Maintenance Activities Category Types. As shown in Appendix G, the variance between planned and actual expenditures is primarily attributable to just a small number of counties. During 2013-14, Los Angeles County spent more than originally planned, while Orange and San Bernardino counties spent less. 15 Table 11: Planned and Actual YOBG Expenditures by Expenditure Category Type Program Expenditure Category Type Programs Total Expenditures Planned 53 $66,370,094 Placements Actual 53 $67,695,958 Difference 0 $1,325,864 Planned 166 $33,028,414 Direct Services Actual 147 $29,839,086 Difference -19 -$3,189,328 Capacity Planned 33 $1,900,164 Bldg./Maint. Actual 36 $2,623,836 Activities Difference 3 $723,672 While planned versus actual YOBG expenditures are presented by “County” in Appendix G, Appendix H provides information on planned versus actual YOBG expenditures by “Program Type” (i.e., individual Expenditure Category within each of the three major Expenditure Category Types). The largest variances were the result of more spending than planned for Camps and less than planned for Tutoring, Other Placement and Home on Probation. 16 4 Performance Outcome Process and Results Choosing and Selecting the Target Sample BSCC staff, based on established direction from the Executive Steering Committee, worked with the Department of Justice (DOJ) to extract a random sample of 1,200 juveniles with sustained felony offenses between July 1, 2012 and June 30, 2013 from its Juvenile Court and Probation Statistical System (JCPSS). In addition, DOJ provided a random sample of alternate cases for each county based on the number of sampled cases from each county that were subsequently excluded last year. For both the main sample and the alternate sample, juveniles with sustained felonies were selected based on the presumption that these youth reasonably approximate the types of juveniles who would have been likely candidates for DJJ commitment prior to SB 81. The specific time period was selected so that services and outcomes data could be collected for the one-year period following the disposition date for the sustained felony for each juvenile. The same general methodology has been used each of the past three years. The number of cases sampled from each county was based on the percent of total YOBG funds received by each county, with a minimum of one case selected from each county. Within counties, sampling was done randomly within each gender group. Alpine, Amador, Del Norte, Mono, San Benito, Sierra, and Trinity counties did not have any felony adjudicated youth during FY 2012-13 and therefore did not report any youth for this reporting cycle. Using these procedures the total number of cases for which data was sought was 1,260. Assembling the Final Sample A total of 104 cases were excluded to arrive at the final sample of 1,156 cases. The reasons for exclusion are shown in Table 12. As reported in the table, reasons for exclusion, in order of frequency, were early termination of jurisdiction (judiciary termination of juvenile probation either upon or shortly after disposition of the adjudicated offense), a non-felony adjudicated offense (an offense ultimately adjudicated as a misdemeanor), a sealed record (precluding collection of the desired data), transfer out of the county, an invalid case number (case not located in county records), transfer out of state, and an invalid disposition (case does not match county records). For the first time since FY 2010-11 no county reported a transfer to DJJ upon initial disposition for the adjudicated offense as a reason for exclusion. A listing by county showing the estimated YOBG allocation amount used to determine the target sample as well as the number of cases in the target sample and final sample is provided in Appendix I. 17 Table 12: Cases Excluded from Initial Study Sample Reason for Exclusion Number Percent Early Termination of Jurisdiction 39 37.5% Non-Felony Adjudicated Offense 35 33.7% Sealed Record 12 11.5% Transferred Out of County 12 11.5% Invalid ID (Could Not Locate in County Records) 3 2.9% Transferred Out of State 2 1.9% Invalid Disposition (Does Not Match County Records) 1 1.0% Total 104 100.0% Characteristics of Final Sample Table 13 compares the age and other demographic characteristics of the final sample with those of the study population, i.e., all juveniles in the JCPSS database with felony adjudications between July 1, 2012 and June 30, 2013. Inspection of the table shows that the final sample is highly similar to the study population. Table 13: Demographic Characteristics of Study Population and Final Sample Study Study Population Sample Characteristic (N=11,457) (N=1,156) Mean Age (on Date of A djudication) 16.04 16.59 Gender Female 12.68% 11.33% Male 87.32% 88.67% Race/Ethnicity American Indian 0.42% 0.61% Asian Indian 0.09% 0.17% Black 26.46% 23.96% Cambodian 0.08% 0.09% Chinese 0.12% 0.00% Filipino 0.38% 0.35% Guamanian 0.01% 0.00% Hawaiian 0.01% 0.00% Hispanic 54.96% 53.80% Japanese 0.03% 0.00% Korean 0.03% 0.00% Laotian 0.05% 0.00% Other 1.41% 2.34% Other Asian 0.53% 0.17% Pacific Islander 0.31% 0.26% Samoan 0.20% 0.35% Unknown 0.57% 0.00% Vietnamese 0.17% 0.17% White 14.17% 17.73% 18 Data Collection Instrument Performance Outcome data were collected via electronic files formatted in Excel. In addition to collecting information on selected outcomes, data were also collected for five types of Assessments, seven types of Placements, and 31 types of Direct Services. For each such applicable item, information was collected on all source(s) of funding, (YOBG, JJCPA, and Other funds). Baseline data were also collected on each juvenile as of the date of disposition (enrolled in school, case plan in place, employed, etc.). As mentioned previously, all service and outcome data were collected with reference to the one-year period following each juvenile’s adjudicated felony disposition date. Data Verification All data received from the counties were subjected to a series of data-checking procedures to identify missing or conflicting responses. Counties were alerted to all such items and worked with BSCC staff to resolve any discrepancies. All but a small number were resolved. Results YOBG-Funded Services Counties reported providing one or more YOBG-funded Assessment, Placement or Direct Service to 517 of the 1,156 youth sampled (44.7 percent). Alternatively, counties reported that 639 of the sample youth (55.3 percent) did not receive any YOBG-funded Assessments, Placements or other Direct Services. Within this report these youth are referred to as YOBG Youth and Other Youth respectively. As shown in Table 14, the average number of Assessments, Placements and Direct Services received by YOBG Youth was significantly greater than for Other Youth. Specifically, YOBG Youth received an average of 3.3 Assessments, 2.3 Placements, and 9.4 Direct Services; this compares to an average of 2.6 Assessments, 1.9 Placements, and 8.2 Direct Services for Other Youth. For each category, as well as for all categories combined, the difference in the averages is statistically significant. As in all subsequent tables, statistically significant findings are presented in bold to distinguish them from findings which are not statistically significant.6 Table 14: Mean Number of Assessments, Placements and Direct Services YOBG Youth Other Youth Assessments 3.3 2.6 Placements 2.3 1.9 Direct Services 9.4 8.2 Combined 15.0 12.7 6 As is standard practice, a probability value of .05 or less (p≤.05) was used as the criterion for statistical significance. Chi-Square was the predominant test statistic used to evaluate statistical significance. 19 The percentage of YOBG Youth and Other Youth who received each type of Assessment, Placement and Direct Service are shown in Table 15. Within each category, the specific types are ordered from highest to lowest based on the percentage rate for YOBG Youth. As reported in Table 15, YOBG Youth received more Assessments than Other Youth, with four out of five types of Assessments being significantly greater. The most frequent Assessment for each group was Risk and/or Needs Assessment, while the least frequent was Mental Health Screening, which showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups. With respect to Placements, a significantly higher percentage of YOBG Youth were placed in a Juvenile Hall or Camp, whereas significantly more Other Youth spent time Home on Probation. Juvenile Hall and Home on Probation were by far the most prevalent Placements experienced by both YOBG Youth and Other Youth. The results also reflect the fluid nature of the youth during the one-year period from the date of disposition, with many youth in both groups spending time in more than one type of Placement during this time period. The results for Direct Services show that a significantly higher percentage of YOBG Youth received 16 of the 31 Direct Services listed, and a higher percentage of Other Youth received the Direct Services of Restitution, Community Service, Restorative Justice, and Parent Education. 20 Table 15: Assessments, Placements and Direct Services Rates YOBG Youth Other Youth Assessment, Placement or Direct Service (517) (639) Assessments Risk and/or Needs Assessment 81.6% 68.4% Substance Abuse Screening 69.4% 52.6% Detention Assessment 62.9% 43.0% Educational Assessment 61.3% 46.2% Mental Health Screening 50.5% 45.1% Placements Juvenile Hall 85.9% 61.7% Home on Probation 78.1% 83.6% Camp 30.8% 13.9% Other Placement 17.0% 19.4% Private Residential Care Facility 7.5% 6.7% Ranch 4.3% 6.9% Other Secure/Semi-Secure Facility 3.7% 2.8% Direct Services Case Plan 83.9% 73.4% Intensive Probation Supervision 62.7% 30.7% Alcohol/Drug Treatment 60.2% 59.5% Gender Specific Programming for Females 49.0% 16.3% Group Counseling 46.4% 43.0% Restitution 46.2% 56.5% Pro-Social Skills Training 43.7% 37.9% Recreational Activities 43.5% 33.5% Community Service 43.5% 52.1% Individual Mental Health Counseling 43.1% 47.7% Anger Management Counseling/Treatment 40.4% 45.9% Life/Independent Living Skills Training 32.7% 35.7% Aggression Replacement Therapy 31.7% 18.2% Electronic Monitoring 31.1% 21.3% Family Counseling 27.5% 32.7% Re-Entry or Aftercare Services 26.3% 16.7% Gang Intervention Program 26.3% 17.8% Gender Specific Programming for Males 26.0% 12.0% Mentoring 22.6% 16.6% After School Services 21.1% 14.7% Transitional Living Services 20.5% 16.1% Job Readiness Training 20.5% 10.5% Day or Evening Treatment Program 19.5% 11.7% Special Education Services 19.1% 15.8% Restorative Justice 17.0% 37.7% Tutoring 13.7% 15.3% Parent Education 13.5% 21.1% Vocational Training 12.4% 5.8% Job Placement 11.0% 7.7% Functional Family Therapy 9.9% 7.8% Monetary Incentives 7.5% 5.5% 21 YOBG Funding Priorities The results reported in Tables 14 and 15 clearly indicate that youth who benefited from some YOBG funding were the recipients of greater numbers of Assessments, Placements and Direct Services. However, an important but different question not addressed by these results is that of priorities for YOBG funding. In other words, when a specific type of Assessment, Placement or Direct Service is provided to a youth, how often is it funded in whole or in part by YOBG? Results pertaining to this question are reported in Table 16. Specifically, two values are reported for each type of Assessment, Placement and Direct Service – the number of youth who were the recipients of the Assessment, Placement or Direct Service (irrespective of funding source); and for these youth, the percentage of cases where YOBG funds were used in whole or in part to fund the Assessment, Placement or Direct Service. Within each general category of Assessments, Placements and Direct Services, items are listed from highest to lowest in terms of the percentage of cases that received the intervention pursuant to the expenditure of YOBG funds. For example, as shown in the table, a total of 695 of the 1,156 cases in the Final Study Sample received Substance Abuse Screening during the one-year period from the date of disposition for their felony adjudicated offense. And for 19.1 percent of these cases, YOBG funds paid for some or all expenses associated with the Substance Abuse Screening Assessment. The results in Table 16 show little variation in the priorities given to YOBG funding, with YOBG funds being spent on 20.6 percent of all Assessments, 23.6 percent of all Placements and 23.5 percent of all Direct Services. Among the different types of Assessments, YOBG funds were most often spent on Risk and/or Needs Assessments (26.3 percent of cases) and least often on Detention Assessments (15.5 percent of cases). By a large margin YOBG funding for Placements most frequently occurred for Camp (49.6 percent of cases), whereas for the most frequently occurring Placement of Home on Probation YOBG funds were spent in only 15.7 percent of cases. YOBG funding for Other Secure Placement Facility (27.0 percent of cases) was most comparable to the funding for Juvenile Hall (31.0 percent of cases) and fairly comparable to the frequency with which YOBG funds were spent on all Placements (23.6 percent of cases). Among Direct Services, YOBG funds were most often spent on Vocational Training (41.6 percent of cases) and Gender Specific Programming for Males (41.5 percent of cases), but served a relatively small number of youth (101 and 188, respectively). By contrast, the Direct Service that was provided to the most youth received less YOBG funding. The services received by the largest numbers of youth included Case Plan Development (903 youth, 23.1 percent funded by YOBG), Alcohol/Drug Treatment (691 youth, 29.1 percent funded by YOBG), and Restitution (600 youth, 8.8 percent YOBG funds). On the whole YOBG funded 23.5% of the Direct Services provided to a total of 10,037 youth. 22 As noted above, the most striking feature of the overall pattern of results is the similarity in the percentage of cases funded across and within all Assessments, Placements and Direct Services. 23 Table 16: Frequency of YOBG Funding of Provided Assessments, Placements and Direct Services Youth Percent Funded by Assessment, Placement or Direct Service Served YOBG Assessments Risk and/or Needs Assessment 859 26.3% Mental Health Screening 549 22.8% Substance Abuse Screening 695 19.1% Educational Assessment 612 17.3% Detention Assessment 600 15.5% All Assessments 3,315 20.6% Placements Camp 248 49.6% Juvenile Hall 838 31.0% Other Secure Placement Facility 37 27.0% Home on Probation 938 15.7% Other Placement 212 11.8% Ranch 66 7.6% Private Residential Care 82 2.4% All Placements 2,421 23.6% Direct Services Vocational Training 101 41.6% Gender Specific Programming for Males 188 41.5% Aggression Replacement Therapy 280 38.6% Intensive Probation Supervision 520 37.5% Re-Entry or Aftercare Services 243 32.5% Job Readiness Training 173 30.1% Pro-Social Skill Training 468 29.7% Alcohol/Drug Treatment 691 29.1% Gender Specific Programming for Females 38 28.9% Group Counseling 515 28.2% Electronic Monitoring 297 27.6% After School Services 203 27.1% Gang Intervention 250 26.8% Recreational Activities 439 26.4% Day or Evening Treatment Program 176 25.0% Anger Management Counseling/Treatment 502 24.5% Monetary Incentives 74 24.3% Case Plan 903 21.3% Life/Independent Living Skills Training/Education 397 20.9% Job Placement 106 19.8% Special Education Services 200 19.5% Individual Mental Health Counseling 528 18.4% Transitional Living Services and/or Placement 209 18.2% Functional Family Therapy 101 17.8% Tutoring Funding 169 17.2% Mentoring 223 17.0% Parent Education 205 16.6% Restorative Justice 329 15.2% Community Service 558 12.4% Family Counseling 351 11.7% Restitution 600 8.8% All Direct Services 10,037 23.5% 24 Baseline Characteristics Certain baseline information was collected for each youth in the final sample with reference to their status on the date of disposition. Results for these status indicators are presented in Table 17, with YOBG Youth compared to Other Youth, and show some significant differences between the two groups. Although both groups had a high percentage of youth with a case plan in place and substance abuse indicated in case file, for YOBG youth the percentage for substance abuse in case file was significantly higher at 87.8 percent. A significantly greater percentage of Other Youth had a mental health diagnosis indicated in their file, although there was virtually no significant group difference with respect to the taking of psychotropic medications. There was a significantly higher percentage of Other Youth employed on the date of disposition than YOBG Youth and no significant group difference between groups with respect to educational achievement. Unlike previous years, there was a significantly greater percentage of Other Youth enrolled in school than YOBG youth. While a higher percentage of Other Youth had a WIC 300 indicated in their case file, a lower percentage received a WIC 241.1 Evaluation, and the group differences were not statistically significant. Table 17: Baseline Characteristics of Study Sample Baseline Characteristic YOBG Youth Other Youth Enrolled in School 87.7% 92.3% Employed 7.3% 12.0% High School Grad or GED Indicated in File 8.8% 10.2% Case Plan in Place 84.9% 80.9% Substance Abuse Indicated in File 87.8% 79.8% Mental Health Diagnosis Indicated in File 33.7% 45.2% Taking Psychotropic Medications 20.6% 20.3% Ever WIC 300 Indicated in Case File 11.4% 14.7% Ever Received a WIC 241.1 Evaluation 8.7% 7.6% Performance Outcomes Information was collected on seven different outcomes related to education and further involvement in the criminal justice system. All outcomes pertain to the one-year period from the date of disposition of the adjudicated felony. Results are reported in Table 18, and show no significant differences between YOBG Youth and Other Youth with respect to enrollment in school during the year, end-of-year school enrollment, or school graduation/receipt of GED or equivalent during the year. A significantly higher percentage of YOBG Youth were found for all four criminal justice outcomes: New Felony Adjudication in Juvenile Court, New Felony Conviction in Adult Court, On Probation at end of year, and Committed to DJJ during the year. It should be noted, however, that the percent of youth committed to DJJ remained very low for both groups (1.0% YOBG Youth vs. 0.5% Other Youth). 25 Table 18: Performance Outcomes During One-Year Follow-Up Period Performance Outcome YOBG Youth Other Youth Enrolled in School At Any Time During Year 96.7% 95.1% Enrolled in School At End of Year 75.2% 76.4% Graduated from High School or Achieved GED or Equivalent 11.0% 9.7% New Felony Adjudication (Juvenile Court) 20.5% 14.4% New Felony Conviction (Adult Court) 5.6% 2.5% On Probation At End of Year 84.1% 68.7% Committed to DJJ During Year 1.0% 0.5% Additional analyses were conducted to examine whether performance outcome differences for the outcomes of enrollment in school during the year, probation status at the end of the year, and commitment to DJJ during the year were associated with any of the significant baseline differences as reported in Table 17. Results of these analyses are shown in Table 19. Table entries are the percentages of cases among both YOBG Youth and Other Youth who achieved each outcome within each baseline characteristic subgroup. For example, as reported in the table, among those who had substance abuse indicated in their file on the date of disposition, 77.2 percent were on probation at the end of the year; whereas for those who did not have substance abuse indicated in their file, 67.7 percent were on probation at the end of the year. As shown in Table 19, being employed was found to be significantly related to lower rates of school enrollment during the year, and much lower rates of being on probation at the end of the year. Having substance abuse indicated in their file was found to be related to a higher rate of being enrolled in school at any time during the year and a significantly higher rate of being on probation at the end of the year. Youth with a mental health diagnosis in their file showed a higher percentage on probation at the end of the year and a significantly greater percentage enrolled in school at any time during the year. 26 Table 19: Performance Outcome Relationships with Baseline Characteristics Performance Outcome (One Year Follow-Up) Baseline Characteristic Employed Yes No Enrolled in School at Any Time During Year 90.0% 96.6% On Probation at End of Year 58.2% 77.0% Committed to DJJ During Year 0.9% 1.4% Substanc e Abuse Ind icated in Cas e File Yes No Enrolled in School at Any Time During Year 96.1% 94.8% On Probation at End of Year 77.2% 67.7% Committed to DJJ During Year 1.5% 2.1% Mental Healt h Diagnosis Indicated in Case File Yes No Enrolled in School at Any Time During Year 98.1% 94.4% On Probation at End of Year 77.3% 74.5% Committed to DJJ During Year 1.5% 1.6% Analyses were also conducted to examine whether outcomes were associated with “dosage effects” with respect to the number of Direct Services received during the year. Results of these analyses, which include all youth irrespective of whether they received YOBG funding, are presented in Table 20. The results show that being on probation at the end of the year, being enrolled in school during the year, and having a new felony adjudication were all significantly related to the number of Direct Services received, with the overall trend showing that the more direct services a youth received, the more likely youth maintained involvement in school and in the juvenile justice system. Statistically significant results were also found for the outcomes of being committed to DJJ during the year and being enrolled in school at the end of the year, however the pattern of results is less clear with respect to an increase in direct services being related to higher occurrences of these outcomes. Table 20: Performance Outcomes and Number of Direct Services Number of Direct Services Performance Outcome (One Year Follow-Up) 1-5 6-10 11-15 >15 Enrolled in School At Any Time During Year 94.0% 96.1% 98.7% 99.4% Enrolled in School At End of Year 74.9% 72.7% 80.9% 83.2% Graduated from High School or Achieved GED or Equivalent 8.9% 12.6% 11.1% 8.4% New Felony Adjudication (Juvenile Court) 12.4% 14.7% 20.0% 25.2% New Felony Conviction (Adult Court) 3.8% 4.1% 3.8% 3.2% On Probation At End of Year 66.3% 74.2% 83.8% 91.0% Committed to Division DJJ During Year 1.9% 2.4% .4% 0.6% 27 Comparison of Current Year Findings with Prior Year Findings Highlighted below are the similarities and differences in the findings for the current reporting year and prior reporting years.7 Age at Disposition for Felony Offense The mean age at the time of disposition for the felony offense upon which the juveniles were randomly selected (i.e., mean age at time of disposition for the offense that occurred during the applicable fiscal year) was 16.6, compared to 16.5 in FY 2012-13 report, 16.6 in each of the prior two years, and 16.5 the first year.8 Percentage of YOBG Youth The percentage of youth receiving one or more YOBG-funded Assessment, Placement or Direct Service increased slightly from 42.1 percent in the previous year to 44.7 percent in the current year. Two years prior, 38.3 percent of youth received one or more YOBG-funded Assessment, Placement or Direct Service. Three years prior, the rate was 43.3 percent and four years prior the rate was 33 percent. Frequency of Assessments, Placements and Direct Services In all five years YOBG Youth received, on average, a significantly greater number of Assessments, Placements and Direct Services during the one year from the date of disposition of their felony offense. As shown in Table 21, the difference in the mean number of Assessments, Placements and Direct Services decreased from FY 2011-12 to FY 2012-13, due entirely to the reduced mean number of Assessments, Placements and Direct Services for YOBG Youth from the prior reporting year. This pattern of results for each type of service is not seen between FY 2013-14 and FY 2012-13. However, as compared to the prior year, YOBG Youth are receiving more combined services than Other Youth. 7 Current reporting year (FY 2013-14) findings refer to findings for youth who were randomly sampled based on an adjudicated felony that occurred in FY 2012-13; findings for prior years are those for youth who were randomly sampled based on an adjudicated felony that occurred in FY 2011-12, FY 2010-11, FY 2009-10, or FY 2008-09. 8 Similarly, the mean ages for the populations of juveniles from which the samples were randomly selected were 16.6 in the current year, 16.5 in FY 2012-13, 16.6 in FY 2011-12 and FY 2010-11, and 16.5, 16.5 in the first reporting year. 28 Table 21: Mean Number of Assessments, Placements and Direct Services in the Three Most Recent Reporting Years FY 2013-14 FY 2012-13 FY 2011-12 YOBG Other Mean YOBG Other Mean YOBG Other Mean Youth Youth Difference Youth Youth Difference Youth Youth Difference Assessments 3.3 2.6 0.7 3.2 2.8 0.4 3.6 2.8 0.8 Placements 2.3 1.9 0.4 2.1 1.9 0.2 2.2 1.9 0.3 Direct Services 9.4 8.2 1.2 8.4 7.1 1.3 10.0 7.5 2.5 Combined 15.0 12.7 2.3 13.6 11.8 1.8 15.8 12.2 3.6 The percentage of YOBG Youth and Other Youth who received each type of Assessment, Placement and Direct Service in each of the five reporting years is presented in Table 22 Inspection of Table 22 shows a significantly greater percentage of YOBG Youth received each of the five types of Assessments in FY 2011-12, FY 2010-11 and FY 2009-10. In FY 2012-13 this was true for all but Risk/Needs Assessment, and in the current reporting year this was true for all but Mental Health Screening. In every year the Assessment most frequently conducted for the youth in both groups was a Risk/Needs Assessment. Results reported for Placements show that by far the most frequently occurring placements experienced by youth in both groups are Juvenile Hall and Home on Probation. In every year a significantly greater percentage of YOBG Youth spent some time in Juvenile Hall; whereas over the course of five years, there has either been no significant difference in the percentage of youth who were Home on Probation, or the percentage has been significantly higher for Other Youth. Among the less frequently occurring types of placements, in each of the past four years significantly more YOBG Youth were placed in a Camp. There are no discernible trends in the results for the other less frequently occurring Placements. Results for Direct Services show that YOBG Youth received consistently greater levels of such services. However, in the current reporting year a significantly higher percentage of YOBG Youth received each of 16 specific services, compared to 17 specific services the previous reporting year and 24 specific services two years prior. Although not a significant reduction from the previous year, it reflects a change in the previous trend of a significantly higher percentage of YOBG youth receiving each of a greater number of specific services from year to year. Case Plan Development has been the most frequently provided Direct Service to youth in both groups all five years. Intensive Probation Supervision and Alcohol/Drug Treatment have also been among the most highly occurring Direct Services for both groups. For all of these Direct Services, the frequency of occurrence has been significantly higher for YOBG youth in every reporting year for Intensive Probation Supervision. Alcohol/Drug Treatment had no significant group difference in the current 29 reporting year. Case Plan Development showed no significant group difference in the prior reporting year. The current reporting year also marks the third consecutive year in which Other Youth received Restorative Justice at significantly higher rates than YOBG Youth, and the first time a significantly higher percentage of Other Youth participated in a Parenting Education Program. Baseline Characteristics and Performance Outcomes Table 23 shows the baseline characteristics of YOBG Youth and Other Youth in each of the five reporting years. As indicated in the table: In all five years a significantly higher percentage of YOBG Youth had substance abuse indicated in their file at the time of disposition for their felony offense. Except for FY 2011-12, a significantly higher percentage of Other Youth had a mental health diagnosis on file. Except for FY 2012-13, the percentage of cases with a Case Plan in place has been greater for YOBG Youth; however, it was not significantly greater in FY 2013-14. There has been a two-year trend where the percentage of cases with a WIC 300 declaration indicated in their file was higher, but not significantly higher for Other Youth in the current reporting year. In the current year, there are no group differences with respect to those that had a record in their file of taking psychotropic medications. No significant group differences have been found with respect to having graduated or receiving a GED or having a WIC 241.1 evaluation indicated in case files. In FY 2013-14, for the first time, a significantly higher percentage of Other Youth were enrolled in school at some time during the one year following disposition of their felony offense. 30 Table 22: Percentage of YOBG Youth and Other Youth Receiving Assessments, Placements and Direct Services in Each of the Last Five Reporting Years9 2013-14 2012-13 2011-12 2010-11 2009-10 YOBG Other YOBG Other YOBG Other YOBG Other YOBG Other Assessment/ Placement/Direct Service YoYuot h Youth Youth Youth Youth Youth Youth Youth Youth Youth Assessments Risk/Needs Assessment 81.6% 68.4% 82.6% 80.4% 87.1% 74.6% 92.4% 74.4% 91.9% 80.4% Detention Assessment 62.9% 43.0% 61.5% 51.8% 74.3% 53.5% 71.1% 48.6% 78.4% 58.1% Substance Abuse Screening 69.4% 52.6% 67.4% 60.4% 71.0% 58.1% 81.9% 65.0% 76.3% 62.0% Educational Assessment 61.3% 46.2% 53.7% 37.9% 63.8% 50.4% 74.8% 46.8% 72.2% 59.5% Mental Health Screening 50.5% 45.1% 57.0% 51.3% 63.4% 44.1% 65.9% 51.9% 67.4% 48.3% Placements Juvenile Hall 85.9% 61.7% 76.2% 59.1% 80.8% 60.8% 77.7% 57.7% 74.3% 65.7% Home on Probation 78.1% 83.6% 84.8% 82.0% 75.6% 83.6% 78.3% 83.0% 75.4% 77.7% Camp 30.8% 13.9% 25.2% 13.5% 32.2% 16.5% 28.9% 11.6% 20.4% 24.1% Other Placement 17.0% 19.4% 9.4% 16.4% 10.7% 14.3% 12.9% 12.0% 15.0% 7.2% Private Residential Care Facility 7.5% 6.7% 4.1% 4.5% 8.5% 6.8% 4.8% 7.5% 4.2% 11.5% Other Secure/Semi-Secure Rehab. Facility 3.7% 2.8% 2.7% 3.7% 7.8% 1.6% 4.0% 6.4% 5.7% 4.4% Ranch 4.3% 6.9% 3.9% 7.1% 7.4% 7.7% 7.2% 4.1% 12.3% 3.4% Direct Services Case Plan 83.9% 73.4% 82.2% 85.0% 85.4% 77.8% 85.9% 77.3% 88.3% 73.6% Intensive Probation Supervision 62.7% 30.7% 62.1% 46.4% 66.9% 40.7% 64.9% 46.3% 60.5% 31.8% Alcohol/Drug Treatment 60.2% 59.5% 60.7% 50.9% 64.7% 51.6% 61.0% 48.1% 56.9% 36.0% Restitution 46.2% 56.5% 49.0% 49.0% 56.2% 61.9% 49.6% 43.5% 47.0% 34.4% Individual Mental Health Counseling 43.1% 47.7% 43.0% 34.5% 52.3% 36.5% 42.4% 32.9% 41.6% 41.4% Group Counseling 46.4% 43.0% 39.3% 33.8% 49.2% 37.0% 46.4% 43.4% 46.4% 35.0% Recreational Activities 43.5% 33.5% 35.7% 27.7% 48.1% 42.4% 44.4% 33.0% 39.5% 43.3% Anger Management Counseling/Treatment 40.4% 45.9% 42.6% 36.0% 45.1% 33.9% 46.8% 32.6% 44.9% 27.9% Pro-Social Skills Training 43.7% 37.9% 36.3% 22.5% 44.2% 29.7% 35.1% 24.5% 37.7% 36.0% Community Service 43.5% 52.1% 40.4% 39.9% 42.5% 45.3% 45.6% 44.9% 45.8% 34.0% Family Counseling 27.5% 32.7% 24.4% 22.2% 41.6% 29.2% 38.4% 32.6% 32.0% 23.3% Aggression Replacement Therapy 31.7% 18.2% 29.1% 15.6% 36.4% 14.5% 28.1% 12.6% 24.9% 7.1% Re-Entry or Aftercare Services 26.3% 16.7% 24.2% 14.7% 35.9% 23.2% 39.8% 25.9% 25.1% 22.6% Gender Specific Programming for Males 26.0% 12.0% 19.7% 15.3% 30.3% 7.9% 19.8% 10.8% 23.2% 17.2% Electronic Monitoring 31.1% 21.3% 33.8% 21.0% 30.1% 19.2% 24.5% 17.0% 26.9% 20.1% Gang Intervention Program 26.3% 17.8% 18.0% 13.2% 29.0% 13.2% 26.3% 14.0% 28.4% 20.8% Life/Independent Living Skills Training 32.7% 35.7% 25.4% 23.4% 25.9% 20.4% 18.9% 13.4% 28.7% 33.7% After School Services 21.1% 14.7% 14.8% 10.9% 22.4% 16.9% 24.1% 19.0% 15.9% 14.9% Mentoring 22.6% 16.6% 17.2% 11.3% 22.0% 10.1% 17.9% 21.3% 21.3% 20.4% Day or Evening Treatment Program 19.5% 11.7% 15.8% 25.3% 19.6% 17.6% 28.1% 21.0% 25.7% 14.9% Special Education Services 19.1% 15.8% 13.5% 11.3% 19.0% 13.1% 12.5% 11.0% 17.7% 11.7% Parenting Education 13.5% 21.1% 13.5% 13.1% 18.5% 11.5% 14.9% 12.2% 17.7% 7.4% Job Readiness Training 20.5% 10.5% 16.6% 8.5% 17.9% 9.6% 17.5% 8.4% 21.9% 12.6% Gender Specific Programming for Females 49.0% 16.3% 33.3% 25.8% 17.5% 15.4% 39.6% 30.5% 47.2% 24.1% Functional Family Therapy 9.9% 7.8% 9.2% 6.5% 15.9% 10.7% 9.0% 5.8% 7.8% 9.0% Tutoring 13.7% 15.3% 14.5% 12.5% 13.9% 10.3% 14.7% 10.4% 12.3% 8.9% Restorative Justice 17.0% 37.7% 13.3% 28.9% 12.9% 28.5% 6.8% 9.6% 9.0% 7.5% Vocational Training 12.4% 5.8% 12.5% 7.4% 11.3% 6.2% 12.2% 8.1% 17.4% 9.3% Transitional Living Services 20.5% 16.1% 9.4% 13.2% 10.0% 14.1% 9.4% 12.0% 15.0% 13.7% Job Placement 11.0% 7.7% 8.0% 5.8% 10.0% 4.5% 7.6% 4.6% 8.7% 8.3% Monetary Incentives 7.5% 5.5% 1.8% 1.3% 8.7% 8.1% 5.6% 6.4% 3.3% 5.0% 9 Percentages in bold indicate statistically significant differences in the given reporting year. 31 Table 23: Baseline Characteristics of YOBG Youth and Other Youth By Reporting Year 2013-2014 2012-13 2011-12 2010-11 2009-10 YOBG Other YOBG Other YOBG Other YOBG Other YOBG Other Baseline Characteristic Youth Youth Youth Youth Youth Youth Youth Youth Youth Youth Enrolled in School 87.7% 92.3% 90.9% 89.0% 89.8% 86.4% 88.3% 87.3% 89.5% 82.6% High School Grad or GED Indicated in File 8.8% 10.2% 7.5% 7.5% 5.8% 7.1% 5.9% 6.1% 6.0% 4.7% Employed 7.3% 12.0% 11.1% 6.2% 7.1% 7.3% 6.6% 8.4% 10.2% 10.6% Case Plan in Place 84.9% 80.9% 85.4% 87.9% 85.3% 77.2% 89.7% 80.0% 82.0% 69.9% Substance Abuse Indicated in Case File 87.8% 79.8% 80.3% 72.9% 82.5% 76.1% 80.0% 70.5% 83.2% 73.9% Mental Health Diagnosis in Case File 33.7% 45.2% 32.6% 42.6% 36.2% 35.9% 38.5% 44.3% 32.9% 42.4% Taking Psychotropic Medications 20.6% 20.3% 18.8% 15.0% 19.5% 14.2% 14.8% 15.5% 16.5% 10.5% Ever WIC 300 Indicated in File 11.4% 14.7% 7.4% 15.2% 10.7% 17.0% 18.4% 24.3% 9.6% 6.2% Ever Received a 241.1 Evaluation 8.7% 7.6% 4.3% 7.1% 4.8% 5.8% 4.6% 5.3% 6.9% 4.9% Performance outcomes for the two groups in each of the five reporting years are presented in Table 24. Results for outcomes pertaining to educational status and achievement indicate the following: The percentage of YOBG Youth enrolled in school at some time during the one year historically has been significantly greater than the percentage of Other Youth; however, FY 2013-14 marked the first time in which the percentage enrolled was not significantly greater than Other Youth In all five years there was no significant difference in the percentage of youth in the two groups who were enrolled in school at the end of this one-year period. While YOBG Youth have consistently graduated or received their GED or equivalent at higher rates than Other Youth, the difference was statistically significant in just the first reporting year. With respect to criminal justice outcomes: In all five years the percentage of youth on probation at the end of the one-year period from the date of disposition was higher for YOBG Youth, and the percentage was significantly higher in each of the last three reporting years. The percentage of youth receiving a new felony adjudication has also been consistently higher for YOBG Youth. The current reporting year marks the first year since FY 2010-11 in which the percentage of new felony adjudications were significantly higher for YOBG Youth than for Other Youth. For the first time in the current reporting year, the rate of new felony convictions was significantly higher for YOBG Youth. For the third time in five years, the rate of DJJ commitments was significantly higher for YOBG Youth; however, the rate for YOBG youth did decrease from FY 2012-13 levels. 32 Table 24: Outcomes for YOBG Youth and Other Youth by Reporting Year 2013-14 2012-13 2011-12 2010-11 2009-10 YOBG Other YOBG Other YOBG Other YOBG Other YOBG Other Performance Outcome Youth Youth Youth Youth Youth Youth Youth Youth Youth Youth Enrolled in School During Year 96.7% 95.1% 96.9% 94.0% 97.6% 92.4% 95.8% 91.8% 95.2% 89.8% Enrolled in School at End of Year 75.2% 76.4% 72.5% 75.0% 73.5% 70.7% 70.6% 73.7% 72.8% 67.1% Graduated from High School/Received GED 11.0% 9.7% 9.8% 7.3% 8.5% 7.6% 7.6% 6.6% 12.0% 8.1% New Felony Adjudication (Juvenile Court) 20.5% 14.4% 18.6% 16.1% 15.7% 11.9% 17.1% 10.0% 19.8% 12.4% New Felony Conviction (Adult Court) 5.6% 2.5% 4.3% 3.0% 3.9% 4.5% 4.8% 3.7% 1.8% 6.4% On Probation at End of Year 84.1% 68.7% 81.6% 76.2% 84.5% 70.5% 76.5% 71.5% 73.1% 72.1% Committed to DJJ During Year 1.0% 0.5% 2.5% 0.3% 5.0% 4.3% 3.2% 1.4% 1.5% 1.5% Outcome Relationships with Number of Direct Services In all five years the number of Direct Services was found to be significantly related to the outcomes of Enrolled in School at any time During Year, Enrolled in School at End of Year, and On Probation at The End of the Year. That is those who received more Direct Services were more likely to be enrolled in school during the year and at the end of the year, and were also more likely to be on probation at the end of the year. Also in all five years no significant relationships were found between the number of Direct Services and the outcomes of Graduated from High School/GED and New Felony Conviction in Adult Court. No consistent pattern of results has been found to exist between the number of Direct Services and the occurrence of the outcomes of New Felony Adjudication in Juvenile Court and Commitment to DJJ. Summary Counties provided detailed information for a representative sample of 1,156 youth with felony adjudications during FY 2012-13. Among this group approximately 42.1 percent were the beneficiary of YOBG funding during the one-year period following the date of disposition of their adjudicated offense. This compares to YOBG funding rates of 42.1 percent, 38.3 percent, 43.3 percent and 33 percent in the four prior years. As in the past three years, YOBG Youth received significantly more Assessments, Placements, and other Direct Services than Other Youth. However, in the current year the total number of individual Assessments/Placements/Direct Services for which significantly more YOBG Youth benefited was 16, and marked the end of a steady increase in the number of such occurrences two years in a row. The number of YOBG Youth receiving Assessments, Placements, and other Direct Services over the previous 33 four years has been 18 in the first reporting year, 22 in the second reporting year, 24 in the third reporting year, and 17 in the fourth reporting year. For both YOBG Youth and Other Youth in all five years the most frequently administered type of Assessment was a Risk/Needs Assessment, and the most frequently occurring Direct Service was Development of Case Plan. The most frequently occurring Placements were Juvenile Hall and Home on Probation, and in every reporting year, a significantly higher percentage of YOBG Youth received a Placement in Juvenile Hall. For the fourth consecutive year, the percentage of YOBG Youth receiving a Placement in Camp was also significantly higher. For the 1,156 youth in the Study Sample, YOBG funds were spent on 20.6 percent of all provided Assessments; 23.6 percent of all provided Placements; and 23.5 percent of all provided Direct Services. Thus little differentiation was found in the frequency with which some YOBG funds were used in support of these three major types of interventions. The current year marks the first time in five years in which the percentage of YOBG Youth enrolled in school at some time during the one year following disposition of their felony offense was not significantly higher than Other Youth. The current reporting year also marks the first year since FY 2010-11 in which the percentage of new felony adjudications in Juvenile Court was significantly higher for YOBG Youth than for Other Youth. While DJJ commitment rates were lower for both groups in the current reporting year, the rate was significantly higher for YOBG Youth. For the third consecutive year a significantly higher percentage of YOBG Youth were on probation at the end of the one- year reporting period. For the first time in the current reporting year, the rate of new felony convictions was significantly higher for YOBG Youth. In all years, for all youth, the number of Direct Services was found to be associated with involvement in school, and with continued status as a probationer, but not with educational achievement or a new felony conviction. 34 Appendix A FY 2013-14 Expenditures and Per Capita Costs by Expenditure Category (All Funding Sources) Total Expenditures Per Capita Expenditure Category (All Funds) Costs Camp $59,810,550 $17,006 Home on Probation $11,882,698 $1,754 Juvenile Hall $25,377,082 $7,006 Other Placement $11,545,311 $15,033 Other Secure/Semi-Secure Rehab Facility $9,336,048 $14,363 Ranch $491,512 $15,855 All Placements $118,443,201 $7,710 After School Services $37,003 $119 Aggression Replacement Therapy $139,778 $672 Alcohol and Drug Treatment $738,179 $1,100 Anger Management Counseling/Treatment $485 $61 Community Service $113,312 $542 Day or Evening Treatment Program $2,940,121 $3,484 Detention Assessment(s) $299,452 $442 Development of Case Plan $469,476 $1,235 Electronic Monitoring $1,300,724 $1,445 Family Counseling $979,299 $4,472 Functional Family Therapy $691,096 $26,581 Gang Intervention $234,436 $2,605 Gender Specific Programming for Boys $58,741 $744 Gender Specific Programming for Girls $324,308 $556 Group Counseling $37,000 $3,700 Individual Mental Health Counseling $1,393,786 $1,207 Intensive Probation Supervision $10,818,512 $4,236 Job Readiness Training $199,167 $1,337 Life/Independent Living Skills Training $47,303 $63 Mental Health Screening $294,771 $459 Mentoring $353,490 $1,699 Other Direct Service $4,259,798 $1,094 Parenting Education $2,899 $41 Pro-Social Skills Training $1,375,228 $1,715 Re-Entry or Aftercare Services $4,567,281 $3,605 Recreational Activities $157,376 $179 Restorative Justice $8,506 $500 Risk and/or Needs Assessment $2,178,269 $255 Special Education Services $13,250 $37 Substance Abuse Screening $4,409 $18 Transitional Living Services/Placement $36,285 $1,170 Tutoring $7,229 $195 Vocational Training $338,342 $1,967 All Direct Services $34,419,311 $1,274 Capital Improvements $831,467 Contract Services $191,341 Equipment $23,516 Other $468,571 Staff Salaries/Benefits $4,051,362 Staff Training/Professional Development $221,299 All Capacity Building/Maintenance Activities $5,787,556 35 Appendix B Comparison of YOBG Expenditures by Budget Line Item FY 2013-14 FY 2012-13 FY2011-12 FY 2010-11 FY 2010-11 Line Item Amount % Total Amount % Total Amount % Total Amount % Total Amount % Total Salaries & Benefits $78,401,472 78.28% $67,997,513 76.8% $69,501,485 76.5% $76,547,445 78.8% $64,946,279 75.0% Services & Supplies $9,155,040 9.14% $8,124,244 9.2% $7,411,467 8.2% $7,053,129 7.3% $7,412,578 8.6% Professional Services $7,286,047 7.28% $5,724,583 6.5% $7,268,432 8.0% $7,532,683 7.8% $6,685,656 7.7% CBOs $4,376,689 4.37% $5,314,540 6.0% $3,764,557 4.1% $3,051,254 3.1% $2,951,852 3.4% Fixed Assets $54,325 0.05% $232,369 0.3% $143,632 0.2% $74,125 0.1% $711,554 0.8% Admin. Overhead $853,297 0.85% $701,427 0.8% $2,140,280 2.4% $851,678 0.9% $1,322,726 1.5% Other Costs $32,010 0.03% $388,941 0.4% $565,433 0.6% $1,992,696 2.1% $2,539,428 2.9% Total $100,158,880 $88,483,617 $90,795,286 $97,103,010 $86,570,073 36 Appendix C Comparison of YOBG Expenditures by Category Type Expenditure Category Type Fiscal Year 2013-14 Fiscal Year 2012-13 Fiscal Year 2011-12 Fiscal Year 2010-11 Fiscal Year 2009-10 Amount % Total Amount % Total Amount % Total Amount % Total Amount % Total Placements $67,695,958 67.6% $59,806,502 67.6% $63,039,975 69.4% $69,104,839 71.2% $62,944,571 72.7% Direct Services $29,839,086 29.8% $26,486,759 29.9% $25,632,549 28.2% $25,537,590 26.3% $20,918,716 24.2% Capacity Bldg./Maint. $2,623,836 2.6% $2,190,356 2.5% $2,122,762 2.3% $2,460,581 2.5% $2,706,781 3.1% Total $100,158,880 100.0% $88,483,617 100.0% $90,795,286 100.0% $97,103,010 100.0% $86,570,073 100.0% 37 Appendix D Comparison of YOBG Expenditures by Expenditure Category and Fiscal Year YOBG Expenditures Total Youth Served Expenditure Category 2013-14 2012-13 2011-12 2010-11 2013-14 2012-13 2011-12 2010-11 Camp $37,014,095 $31,539,106 $32,721,278 $41,622,302 3,517 2,292 1,969 2,599 Home on Probation $8,427,844 $5,742,128 $9,062,040 $7,686,682 6,774 4,898 4,940 5,975 Other Secure/Semi-Secure Facility $7,435,133 $7,760,575 $8,312,863 $7,307,863 650 1,093 1,365 712 Juvenile Hall $7,416,618 $8,552,368 $8,719,676 $6,772,688 3,622 5,422 4,108 2,094 Other Placement $7,251,151 $6,094,416 $4,149,027 $5,652,315 768 816 837 2,290 Ranch $151,117 $117,909 $75,091 $62,989 31 38 50 52 All Placements $67,695,958 $59,806,502 $63,039,975 $69,104,839 15,362 14,559 13,269 13,722 Intensive Probation Supervision $10,228,943 $6,633,044 $5,574,312 $6,568,079 2,554 2,745 2,461 2,128 Re-Entry or Aftercare Services $4,223,258 $3,665,753 $2,733,452 $2,590,080 1,267 1,789 2,162 1,658 Other Direct Service $3,482,374 $4,969,585 $5,352,780 $2,674,060 3,894 4,702 4,086 7,211 Day or Evening Treatment Program $2,643,989 $2,529,646 $2,193,519 $3,331,564 844 1,013 879 982 Risk and/or Needs Assessment $1,514,072 $1,574,655 $1,525,376 $1,412,358 8,555 7,376 4,908 5,614 Pro-Social Skills Training $1,369,504 $829,230 $799,880 $122,367 802 691 889 514 Mental Health Counseling $1,359,696 $1,298,880 $1,503,618 $1,447,942 1,155 1,419 1,343 1,010 Family Counseling $979,299 $1,336,173 $1,202,578 $1,005,196 219 378 138 326 Alcohol and Drug Treatment $648,721 $496,650 $473,464 $823,008 671 1,177 512 1,124 Development of Case Plan $456,176 $11,342 $412,299 $551,762 380 295 642 618 Electronic Monitoring $453,644 $579,166 $714,481 $141,927 900 693 1,679 672 Mentoring $353,490 $216,765 $214,067 $683,347 208 93 108 362 Vocational Training $338,342 $670,301 $739,844 $917,161 172 259 261 285 Mental Health Screening $294,771 $55,193 $212,012 $6,156 642 255 588 128 Programming for Girls $245,110 $170,363 $234,865 $621,128 583 222 217 516 Gang Intervention $234,436 $244,309 $200,666 $134,364 90 100 96 58 Detention Assessment(s) $165,608 $154,713 $219,070 $427,724 678 734 1,788 2,183 Functional Family Therapy $152,204 $158,287 $171,002 $144,884 26 74 65 135 Recreational Activities $127,471 $148,147 $337,547 $193,427 880 348 422 725 Aggression Replacement Therapy $123,216 $173,938 $191,031 $482,280 208 189 247 430 Community Service $113,312 $103,518 $50,451 $75,276 209 173 140 40 Job Readiness Training $88,630 $103,507 $140,458 $830,624 149 205 237 197 Programming for Boys $58,741 $163,966 $136,745 $56,411 79 360 265 176 Life/Independent Living Skills Training $47,303 $54,205 $55,345 $93,208 754 671 491 291 Group Counseling $37,000 $19,158 $58,197 $85,062 10 85 7 257 Transitional Living Serves./Placement $36,285 $60,476 $78,055 $0 31 55 115 0 After School Services $27,003 $32,221 $28,721 $29,128 311 295 413 470 Special Education Services $13,250 $13,250 $27,014 $26,987 360 395 417 484 Restorative Justice $8,506 $4,950 $0 $0 17 22 0 0 Tutoring $7,229 $8,950 $5,100 $4,725 37 20 15 20 Substance Abuse Screening $4,409 $0 $0 $0 250 0 0 0 Parenting Education $2,609 $6,417 $0 $245 71 0 0 N/A Anger Management Counseling/Treatment $485 $0 $46,600 $57,110 8 0 134 230 All Direct Services $29,839,086 $26,486,758 $25,632,549 $25,537,590 27,014 26,833 25,725 28,844 Staff Salaries/Benefits $1,281,002 $1,188,927 $1,198,314 $1,167,266 Capital Improvements $565,810 $132,101 $0 $27,700 Other Capacity Building/Maintenance $348,110 $315,923 $242,653 $515,637 Staff Training/ Development $221,197 $367,542 $299,056 $491,849 Contract Services $184,201 $62,438 $37,101 $5,000 Equipment $23,516 $109,343 $114,923 $188,089 Other Procurements $0 $14,082 $230,715 $65,040 All Capacity Building Activities $2,623,836 $2,190,356 $2,122,762 $2,460,581 Total $100,158,880 $88,483,616 $90,795,286 $97,103,010 42,376 41,392 38,994 42,566 38 Appendix E Allocation Year Source of FY 2013-14 YOBG Expenditures Fiscal Year Allocation Total YOBG FY 2013/14 FY 2012/13 FY 2011/12 FY 2010/11 FY 2009/10 FY 2008/09 FY 2007/08 County Expenditures Amount % Tot Amount % Tot Amount % Tot Amount % Tot Amount % Tot Amount % Tot Amount % Tot Alameda $3,651,677 $3,651,677 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Alpine $106,041 $106,041 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Amador $128,605 $36,104 28.07% $92,501 71.93% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Butte $780,812 $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $206,973 26.51% $476,058 60.97% $97,781 12.52% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Calaveras $117,010 $102,894 87.94% $14,116 12.06% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% COLUSA $121,884 $117,000 95.99% $4,884 4.01% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Contra Costa $2,311,107 $2,311,107 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Del Norte $164,964 $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $21,815 13.22% $76,889 46.61% $66,260 40.17% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% El Dorado $438,617 $364,917 83.20% $73,700 16.80% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Fresno $3,766,907 $2,978,231 79.06% $788,676 20.94% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Glenn $129,991 $80,516 61.94% $49,475 38.06% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Humboldt $211,343 $181,516 85.89% $29,827 14.11% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Imperial $492,925 $492,925 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Inyo $106,152 $106,152 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Kern $3,809,756 $3,809,756 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Kings $450,181 $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $239,074 53.11% $211,107 46.89% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Lake $154,645 $154,645 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Lassen $117,000 $117,000 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Los Angeles $29,607,064 $29,579,443 99.91% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $27,621 0.09% $0 0.00% Madera $391,025 $391,025 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Marin $613,195 $613,195 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Mariposa $129,575 $42,191 32.56% $87,384 67.44% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Mendocino $223,448 $37,688 16.87% $146,521 65.57% $39,239 17.56% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Merced $1,184,459 $965,153 81.48% $219,306 18.52% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Modoc $117,000 $117,000 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Mono $105,435 $105,435 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Monterey $1,555,415 $1,555,415 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Napa $530,032 $380,019 71.70% $150,013 28.30% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Nevada $259,345 $72,283 27.87% $177,594 68.48% $9,468 3.65% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Orange $4,225,139 $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $4,225,139 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Placer $600,000 $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $512,652 85.44% $87,348 14.56% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Plumas $79,697 $79,697 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Riverside $6,406,448 $3,791,072 59.18% $2,615,376 40.82% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Sacramento $4,290,088 $4,238,623 98.80% $51,465 1.20% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% San Benito $65,778 $0 0.00% $65,778 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% San Bernardino $7,683,512 $7,683,512 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% San Diego $5,801,947 $5,016,108 86.46% $785,839 13.54% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% San Francisco $1,187,949 $687,128 57.84% $388,465 32.70% $46,990 3.96% $65,366 5.50% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% San Joaquin $2,274,193 $1,593,372 70.06% $680,821 29.94% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% San Luis Obispo $348,927 $348,927 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% San Mateo $1,883,328 $1,018,191 54.06% $865,137 45.94% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Santa Barbara $1,199,764 $1,199,764 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Santa Clara $3,341,997 $2,930,400 87.68% $1,445 0.04% $239,429 7.16% $170,723 5.11% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Santa Cruz $465,288 $344,666 74.08% $120,622 25.92% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Shasta $427,569 $67,685 15.83% $359,884 84.17% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% SIERRA $117,000 $117,000 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Siskiyou $129,758 $81,069 62.48% $48,689 37.52% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Solano $1,195,217 $1,195,217 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Sonoma $669,412 $0 0.00% $669,412 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Stanislaus $854,507 $854,507 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Sutter $217,252 $81,318 37.43% $135,934 62.57% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Tehama $156,792 $156,792 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Trinity $117,000 $117,000 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Tulare $1,707,457 $1,386,696 81.21% $320,761 18.79% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Tuolumne $117,500 $117,500 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Ventura $2,201,676 $762,989 34.65% $1,438,687 65.35% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Yolo $399,319 $399,319 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% Yuba $218,756 $78,352 35.82% $140,404 64.18% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% All Counties $100,158,880 $82,816,232 82.68% $10,522,716 10.51% $5,540,779 5.53% $1,087,491 1.09% $164,041 0.16% $27,621 0.03% $0 0.00% 39 Appendix F Summary of Per Capita Costs All Funds YOBG Funds Expenditure Category Counties Statewide Min Max Statewide Min Max Camp 13 $17,006 $76 $62,662 $10,524 $76 $39,200 Home on Probation 10 $1,754 $18 $15,728 $1,244 $18 $11,226 Juvenile Hall 19 $7,006 $178 $37,799 $2,048 $122 $24,385 Other Placement 3 $15,033 $9,892 $35,000 $9,442 $2,645 $35,000 Other Secure/Semi-Secure Rehab Facility 5 $14,363 $2,490 $129,533 $11,439 $2,490 $109,829 Ranch 3 $15,855 $15,228 $25,523 $4,875 $3,071 $25,523 All Placements 53 $7,710 $18 $129,533 $4,407 $18 $109,829 After School Services 2 $119 $91.47 $244.25 $87 $66 $91 Aggression Replacement Therapy 3 $672 $306 $832 $592 $306 $714 Alcohol and Drug Treatment 8 $1,100 $72 $3,289 $967 $12 $3,289 Anger Management Counseling/Treatment 1 $61 $61 $61 $61 $61 $61 Community Service 4 $542 $150 $655 $542 $150 $655 Day or Evening Treatment Program 7 $3,484 $589 $16,963 $3,133 $586 $16,963 Detention Assessment(s) 2 $442 $35 $687 $244 $35 $371 Development of Case Plan 3 $1,235 $115 $6,252 $1,200 $18 $6,172 Electronic Monitoring 8 $1,445 $54 $4,085 $504 $54 $4,085 Family Counseling 1 $4,472 $4,472 $4,472 $4,472 $4,472 $4,472 Functional Family Therapy 1 $26,581 $26,581 $26,581 $5,854 $5,854 $5,854 Gang Intervention 1 $2,605 $2,605 $2,605 $2,605 $2,605 $2,605 Programming for Boys 1 $744 $744 $744 $744 $744 $744 Programming for Girls 4 $556 $246 $2,136 $420 $49 $2,136 Group Counseling 1 $3,700 $3,700 $3,700 $3,700 $3,700 $3,700 Individual Mental Health Counseling 9 $1,207 $151 $17,400 $1,177 $151 $17,400 Intensive Probation Supervision 15 $4,236 $298 $15,955 $4,005 $298 $15,955 Job Readiness Training 1 $1,337 $1,337 $1,337 $595 $595 $595 Life/Independent Living Skills Training 2 $63 $26 $82 $63 $26 $82 Mental Health Screening 2 $459 $43 $734 $459 $43 $734 Mentoring 4 $1,699 $158 $3,333 $1,699 $158 $3,333 Other Direct Service 17 $1,094 $33 $72,551 $894 $33 $72,058 Parenting Education 1 $41 $41 $41 $37 $37 $37 Pro-Social Skills Training 9 $1,715 $151 $7,458 $1,708 $151 $7,458 Re-Entry or Aftercare Services 8 $3,605 $383 $22,886 $3,333 $383 $22,886 Recreational Activities 5 $179 $69 $1,610 $145 $69 $1,224 Restorative Justice 2 $500 $409 $1,956 $500 $409 $1,956 Risk and/or Needs Assessment 19 $255 $4 $3,375 $177 $4 $3,375 Special Education Services 1 $37 $37 $37 $37 $37 $37 Substance Abuse Screening 1 $18 $18 $18 $18 $18 $18 Transitional Living Services/Placement 1 $1,170 $1,170 $1,170 $1,170 $1,170 $1,170 Tutoring 1 $195 $195 $195 $195 $195 $195 Vocational Training 2 $1,967 $311 $2,223 $1,967 $311 $2,223 All Direct Services 147 $1,274 $4 $72,551 $1,105 $4 $72,058 Note: Costs shown are those based on total funds (all sources) and YOBG funds only. Statewide Per Capita Costs are based on total costs divided by total youth served. Also shown are Minimum and Maximum Per Capita Costs at the County level. 40 Appendix G Planned and Actual YOBG Expenditures by County Fixed Youth Salaries & Services & Professional Assets & Administrative Other Total County Programs Served Benefits Supplies Services CBOs Equipment Overhead Expenditures Expenditures Planned 2 450 $2,634,403 $45,600 $112,000 $0 $0 $450,883 $25,000 $3,267,886 Alameda Actual 2 298 $2,933,552 $52,034 $194,220 $0 $0 $463,111 $8,760 $3,651,677 Difference 0 -152 $299,149 $6,434 $82,220 $0 $0 $12,228 -$16,240 $383,791 Planned 4 291 $0 $0 $67,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $117,000 Alpine Actual 4 703 $0 $28 $47,699 $58,314 $0 $0 $0 $106,041 Difference 0 412 $0 $28 -$19,301 $8,314 $0 $0 $0 -$10,959 Planned 7 116 $0 $0 $89,800 $44,000 $0 $0 $0 $133,800 Amador Actual 7 143 $0 $102 $79,003 $49,500 $0 $0 $0 $128,605 Difference 0 27 $0 $102 -$10,797 $5,500 $0 $0 $0 -$5,195 Planned 7 2,493 $208,324 $4,000 $178,679 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $441,003 Butte Actual 5 1,690 $209,130 $559,455 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,227 $780,812 Difference -2 -803 $806 $555,455 -$178,679 -$50,000 $0 $0 $12,227 $339,809 Planned 2 0 $109,095 $0 $7,905 $0 $0 $0 $0 $117,000 Calaveras Actual 2 0 $109,010 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,000 $117,010 Difference 0 0 -$85 $0 -$7,905 $0 $0 $0 $8,000 $10 Planned 5 260 $85,000 $29,350 $0 $0 $2,650 $0 $0 $117,000 Colusa Actual 5 331 $98,355 $23,529 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $121,884 Difference 0 71 $13,355 -$5,821 $0 $0 -$2,650 $0 $0 $4,884 Planned 2 100 $2,011,042 $0 $45,900 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,096,942 Contra Costa Actual 2 96 $2,299,460 $11,647 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,311,107 Difference 0 -4 $288,418 $11,647 -$45,900 -$40,000 $0 $0 $0 $214,165 Planned 6 241 $56,000 $66,000 $7,500 $0 $19,000 $0 $0 $148,500 Del Norte Actual 6 76 $76,207 $71,743 $0 $0 $17,014 $0 $0 $164,964 Difference 0 -165 $20,207 $5,743 -$7,500 $0 -$1,986 $0 $0 $16,464 Planned 2 122 $281,868 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $132,644 $0 $444,512 El Dorado Actual 2 136 $283,548 $0 $25,523 $0 $0 $129,546 $0 $438,617 Difference 0 14 $1,680 $0 -$4,477 $0 $0 -$3,098 $0 -$5,895 Planned 3 2,635 $2,914,935 $500,000 $380,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,794,935 Fresno Actual 3 2,916 $2,833,204 $506,699 $427,004 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,766,907 Difference 0 281 -$81,731 $6,699 $47,004 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$28,028 Planned 1 40 $167,801 $13,699 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $181,500 Glenn Actual 1 50 $123,571 $6,420 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $129,991 Difference 0 10 -$44,230 -$7,279 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$51,509 Planned 1 48 $234,468 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $234,468 Humboldt Actual 1 38 $211,343 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $211,343 Difference 0 -10 -$23,125 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$23,125 Planned 3 331 $0 $0 $480,854 $0 $0 $0 $0 $480,854 Imperial Actual 2 174 $0 $0 $12,958 $479,967 $0 $0 $0 $492,925 Difference -1 -157 $0 $0 -$467,896 $479,967 $0 $0 $0 $12,071 Planned 10 680 $5,850 $38,300 $67,500 $0 $17,000 $5,850 $0 $134,500 Inyo Actual 10 233 $5,850 $56,481 $17,475 $0 $20,496 $5,850 $0 $106,152 Difference 0 -447 $0 $18,181 -$50,025 $0 $3,496 $0 $0 -$28,348 Planned 4 1,380 $2,359,377 $146,741 $693,882 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000 Kern Actual 4 1,365 $3,027,638 $139,783 $642,335 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,809,756 Difference 0 -15 $668,261 -$6,958 -$51,547 $0 $0 $0 $0 $609,756 Planned 9 2,525 $352,314 $124,016 $183,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $659,730 Kings Actual 9 1,788 $295,729 $26,874 $127,578 $0 $0 $0 $0 $450,181 Difference 0 -737 -$56,585 -$97,142 -$55,822 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$209,549 Planned 5 138 $98,600 $5,000 $92,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $196,000 Lake Actual 4 89 $94,551 $0 $58,744 $0 $1,350 $0 $0 $154,645 Difference -1 -49 -$4,049 -$5,000 -$33,656 $0 $1,350 $0 $0 -$41,355 Planned 3 220 $30,000 $0 $72,000 $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $117,000 Lassen Actual 3 220 $30,000 $0 $72,000 $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $117,000 Difference 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Planned 4 2,250 $18,800,000 $382,000 $1,124,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $150,000 $20,806,000 Los Angeles Actual 4 1,470 $24,589,305 $3,070,496 $1,690,269 $256,994 $0 $0 $0 $29,607,064 Difference 0 -780 $5,789,305 $2,688,496 $566,269 -$93,006 $0 $0 -$150,000 $8,801,064 Planned 7 1,935 $382,892 $47,215 $51,048 $0 $0 $0 $0 $481,155 Madera Actual 8 1,330 $317,282 $22,141 $18,323 $32,199 $465 $615 $0 $391,025 Difference 1 -605 -$65,610 -$25,074 -$32,725 $32,199 $465 $615 $0 -$90,130 Planned 9 1,440 $115,000 $5,000 $35,500 $455,000 $0 $0 $0 $610,500 Marin Actual 8 421 $142,204 $2,693 $155,262 $313,036 $0 $0 $0 $613,195 Difference -1 -1019 $27,204 -$2,307 $119,762 -$141,964 $0 $0 $0 $2,695 Planned 3 42 $114,250 $43,300 $10,000 $0 $0 $2,856 $0 $170,406 Mariposa Actual 3 290 $101,144 $22,519 $5,912 $0 $0 $0 $0 $129,575 Difference 0 248 -$13,106 -$20,781 -$4,088 $0 $0 -$2,856 $0 -$40,831 Planned 4 780 $55,400 $16,762 $21,200 $165,000 $0 $2,366 $0 $260,728 Mendocino Actual 3 399 $20,163 $1,662 $15,241 $186,382 $0 $0 $0 $223,448 Difference -1 -381 -$35,237 -$15,100 -$5,959 $21,382 $0 -$2,366 $0 -$37,280 Planned 1 45 $922,326 $455,265 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,377,591 Merced Actual 1 59 $895,648 $288,811 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,184,459 Difference 0 14 -$26,678 -$166,454 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$193,132 Planned 6 130 $78,000 $2,500 $28,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $108,500 Modoc Actual 3 28 $60,405 $0 $56,595 $0 $0 $0 $0 $117,000 Difference -3 -102 -$17,595 -$2,500 $28,595 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,500 41 Appendix G (continued) Planned and Actual YOBG Expenditures by County Fixed Youth Salaries & Services & Professional Assets & Administrative Other Total County Programs Served Benefits Supplies Services CBOs Equipment Overhead Expenditures Expenditures Planned 7 143 $31,000 $40,975 $128,025 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Mono Actual 6 97 $25,696 $2,577 $77,162 $0 $0 $0 $0 $105,435 Difference -1 -46 -$5,304 -$38,398 -$50,863 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$94,565 Planned 2 1,581 $1,335,219 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,335,219 Monterey Actual 2 1,521 $1,472,939 $0 $82,476 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,555,415 Difference 0 -60 $137,720 $0 $82,476 $0 $0 $0 $0 $220,196 Planned 4 200 $371,715 $61,000 $0 $129,300 $0 $0 $0 $562,015 Napa Actual 4 161 $373,081 $55,726 $0 $101,225 $0 $0 $0 $530,032 Difference 0 -39 $1,366 -$5,274 $0 -$28,075 $0 $0 $0 -$31,983 Planned 8 1,395 $175,000 $0 $42,000 $37,000 $0 $0 $0 $254,000 Nevada Actual 10 1,803 $183,802 $2,953 $72,590 $0 $0 $0 $0 $259,345 Difference 2 408 $8,802 $2,953 $30,590 -$37,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,345 Planned 3 3,426 $7,379,248 $391,368 $633,688 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,404,304 Orange Actual 2 3,217 $4,225,139 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,225,139 Difference -1 -209 -$3,154,109 -$391,368 -$633,688 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$4,179,165 Planned 5 375 $75,000 $14,500 $510,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000 Placer Actual 5 232 $78,807 $24,305 $496,888 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000 Difference 0 -143 $3,807 $9,805 -$13,612 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Planned 9 243 $112,751 $38,520 $170,000 $3,500 $38,000 $6,911 $0 $369,682 Plumas Actual 6 232 $57,950 $2,120 $9,545 $0 $0 $7,059 $3,023 $79,697 Difference -3 -11 -$54,801 -$36,400 -$160,455 -$3,500 -$38,000 $148 $3,023 -$289,985 Planned 1 150 $5,762,348 $517,923 $565,780 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,846,051 Riverside Actual 2 606 $5,024,559 $889,923 $491,966 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,406,448 Difference 1 456 -$737,789 $372,000 -$73,814 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$439,603 Planned 4 630 $4,123,480 $258,856 $107,866 $565,164 $0 $0 $0 $5,055,366 Sacramento Actual 4 1,828 $3,684,223 $217,882 $57,140 $330,843 $0 $0 $0 $4,290,088 Difference 0 1198 -$439,257 -$40,974 -$50,726 -$234,321 $0 $0 $0 -$765,278 Planned 5 254 $59,272 $4,449 $0 $53,279 $0 $0 $0 $117,000 San Benito Actual 3 95 $21,549 $7,229 $0 $37,000 $0 $0 $0 $65,778 Difference -2 -159 -$37,723 $2,780 $0 -$16,279 $0 $0 $0 -$51,222 Planned 2 2,540 $7,773,046 $586,499 $459,195 $0 $0 $881,874 $0 $9,700,614 San Bernardino Actual 2 2,540 $6,611,960 $673,188 $381,281 $17,083 $0 $0 $0 $7,683,512 Difference 0 0 -$1,161,086 $86,689 -$77,914 $17,083 $0 -$881,874 $0 -$2,017,102 Planned 7 1,184 $3,441,716 $1,005,001 $725,228 $630,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,801,945 San Diego Actual 7 1,220 $3,083,038 $1,598,512 $496,881 $623,516 $0 $0 $0 $5,801,947 Difference 0 36 -$358,678 $593,511 -$228,347 -$6,484 $0 $0 $0 $2 Planned 6 150 $754,669 $58,000 $482,000 $62,916 $0 $0 $0 $1,357,585 San Francisco Actual 6 130 $723,570 $120,916 $318,645 $24,818 $0 $0 $0 $1,187,949 Difference 0 -20 -$31,099 $62,916 -$163,355 -$38,098 $0 $0 $0 -$169,636 Planned 6 3,268 $2,268,815 $39,592 $13,228 $34,646 $0 $0 $0 $2,356,281 San Joaquin Actual 6 3,943 $2,182,622 $62,131 $20,840 $8,600 $0 $0 $0 $2,274,193 Difference 0 675 -$86,193 $22,539 $7,612 -$26,046 $0 $0 $0 -$82,088 Planned 2 150 $379,475 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $379,475 San Luis Obispo Actual 3 180 $316,440 $1,826 $30,661 $0 $0 $0 $0 $348,927 Difference 1 30 -$63,035 $1,826 $30,661 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$30,548 Planned 7 2,652 $1,234,532 $13,000 $0 $543,336 $300,000 $104,905 $0 $2,195,773 San Mateo Actual 7 1,882 $1,331,850 $12,243 $57,736 $440,794 $0 $40,705 $0 $1,883,328 Difference 0 -770 $97,318 -$757 $57,736 -$102,542 -$300,000 -$64,200 $0 -$312,445 Planned 5 1,440 $1,213,594 $20,000 $44,000 $175,625 $0 $0 $0 $1,453,219 Santa Barbara Actual 5 843 $1,008,405 $14,719 $0 $176,640 $0 $0 $0 $1,199,764 Difference 0 -597 -$205,189 -$5,281 -$44,000 $1,015 $0 $0 $0 -$253,455 Planned 3 750 $2,931,291 $83,964 $50,000 $218,985 $0 $15,311 $0 $3,299,551 Santa Clara Actual 3 750 $3,000,011 $22,031 $139,263 $175,380 $0 $5,312 $0 $3,341,997 Difference 0 0 $68,720 -$61,933 $89,263 -$43,605 $0 -$9,999 $0 $42,446 Planned 5 1,668 $404,282 $48,586 $12,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $464,868 Santa Cruz Actual 5 667 $437,731 $23,318 $4,239 $0 $0 $0 $0 $465,288 Difference 0 -1001 $33,449 -$25,268 -$7,761 $0 $0 $0 $0 $420 Planned 1 375 $362,477 $272 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $362,749 Shasta Actual 1 287 $427,569 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $427,569 Difference 0 -88 $65,092 -$272 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $64,820 Planned 1 0 $117,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $117,000 Sierra Actual 1 0 $117,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $117,000 Difference 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Planned 5 515 $0 $0 $29,000 $89,107 $0 $0 $0 $118,107 Siskiyou Actual 5 265 $0 $355 $129,403 $0 $0 $0 $0 $129,758 Difference 0 -250 $0 $355 $100,403 -$89,107 $0 $0 $0 $11,651 Planned 7 1,718 $221,422 $1,500 $69,000 $567,515 $0 $15,297 $700,000 $1,574,734 Solano Actual 6 1,880 $139,995 $0 $528,000 $527,222 $0 $0 $0 $1,195,217 Difference -1 162 -$81,427 -$1,500 $459,000 -$40,293 $0 -$15,297 -$700,000 -$379,517 Planned 8 579 $617,410 $13,814 $165,000 $619,700 $0 $0 $0 $1,415,924 Sonoma Actual 6 466 $116,202 $13,422 $13,250 $526,538 $0 $0 $0 $669,412 Difference -2 -113 -$501,208 -$392 -$151,750 -$93,162 $0 $0 $0 -$746,512 Planned 2 756 $946,170 $223,823 $202,024 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,372,017 Stanislaus Actual 2 601 $845,630 $8,877 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $854,507 Difference 0 -155 -$100,540 -$214,946 -$202,024 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$517,510 42 Appendix G (continued) Planned and Actual YOBG Expenditures by County Fixed Youth Salaries & Services & Professional Assets & Administrative Other Total County Programs Served Benefits Supplies Services CBOs Equipment Overhead Expenditures Expenditures Planned 4 215 $339,785 $3,700 $11,059 $0 $0 $1,781 $0 $356,325 Sutter Actual 4 196 $207,531 $2,596 $6,059 $0 $0 $1,066 $0 $217,252 Difference 0 -19 -$132,254 -$1,104 -$5,000 $0 $0 -$715 $0 -$139,073 Planned 1 0 $155,160 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $155,160 Tehama Actual 2 0 $156,792 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $156,792 Difference 1 0 $1,632 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,632 Planned 2 80 $90,478 $16,522 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $117,000 Trinity Actual 2 93 $90,478 $16,522 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $117,000 Difference 0 13 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Planned 4 424 $1,670,250 $42,219 $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,772,469 Tulare Actual 3 148 $1,542,235 $151,767 $13,455 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,707,457 Difference -1 -276 -$128,015 $109,548 -$46,545 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$65,012 Planned 1 50 $0 $0 $117,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $117,500 Tuolumne Actual 1 38 $0 $0 $117,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $117,500 Difference 0 -12 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Planned 6 791 $1,958,037 $316,143 $77,000 $33,000 $0 $238,419 $0 $2,622,599 Ventura Actual 5 1,020 $1,555,815 $351,464 $94,926 $638 $0 $198,833 $0 $2,201,676 Difference -1 229 -$402,222 $35,321 $17,926 -$32,362 $0 -$39,586 $0 -$420,923 Planned 5 420 $478,979 $9,005 $7,292 $0 $12,248 $0 $0 $507,524 Yolo Actual 4 184 $392,817 $6,502 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $399,319 Difference -1 -236 -$86,162 -$2,503 -$7,292 $0 -$12,248 $0 $0 -$108,205 Planned 4 843 $221,446 $11,460 $5,000 $0 $0 $1,200 $0 $239,106 Yuba Actual 4 908 $208,737 $8,819 $0 $0 $0 $1,200 $0 $218,756 Difference 0 65 -$12,709 -$2,641 -$5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$20,350 Planned 252 47,657 $79,022,012 $5,745,439 $8,464,953 $4,927,073 $403,898 $1,860,297 $875,000 $101,298,672 All Counties Actual 236 42,376 $78,401,472 $9,155,040 $7,286,047 $4,376,689 $54,325 $853,297 $32,010 $100,158,880 Difference -16 -5281 -$620,540 $3,409,601 -$1,178,906 -$550,384 -$349,573 -$1,007,000 -$842,990 -$1,139,792 43 Appendix H Planned and Actual YOBG Expenditures by Program Type Fixed Assets Salaries & Services & Professional & Administrative Other Total Program Type Progr ams Benefits Supplies Services CB Os Equipment Overhead Expenditures Expenditures Planned 4 $0 $17,300 $8,000 $105,000 $0 $0 $0 $130,300 After School Services Actual 2 $20,125 $3,678 $3,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $27,003 Difference -2 $20,125 -$13,622 -$4,800 -$105,000 $0 $0 $0 -$103,297 Aggression Planned 4 $76,567 $22,630 $30,000 $28,000 $0 $7,920 $0 $165,117 Replacement Actual 3 $71,257 $25,421 $0 $17,450 $0 $9,088 $0 $123,216 Therapy Difference -1 -$5,310 $2,791 -$30,000 -$10,550 $0 $1,168 $0 -$41,901 Planned 11 $65,622 $10,375 $248,000 $546,300 $0 $1,167 $0 $871,464 Alcohol and Drug Treatment Actual 8 $34,392 $3,883 $82,724 $526,990 $0 $732 $0 $648,721 Difference -3 -$31,230 -$6,492 -$165,276 -$19,310 $0 -$435 $0 -$222,743 Planned 1 $400 $300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $700 Anger Management Counseling Actual 1 $435 $50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $485 Difference 0 $35 -$250 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$215 Planned 12 $25,951,433 $1,818,718 $2,735,712 $350,000 $0 $64,200 $0 $30,920,063 Camp Actual 13 $30,743,056 $3,871,334 $2,142,496 $256,994 $0 $215 $0 $37,014,095 Difference 1 $4,791,623 $2,052,616 -$593,216 -$93,006 $0 -$63,985 $0 $6,094,032 Planned 3 $87,000 $1,500 $100,000 $0 $17,000 $0 $0 $205,500 Capital Improvements Actual 4 $24,428 $501,973 $18,913 $0 $20,496 $0 $0 $565,810 Difference 1 -$62,572 $500,473 -$81,087 $0 $3,496 $0 $0 $360,310 Planned 4 $122,210 $15,197 $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $137,907 Community Service Actual 4 $99,532 $9,880 $0 $3,900 $0 $0 $0 $113,312 Difference 0 -$22,678 -$5,317 -$500 $3,900 $0 $0 $0 -$24,595 Planned 3 $0 $0 $65,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $65,800 Contract Services Actual 6 $26,000 $38,300 $104,901 $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $184,201 Difference 3 $26,000 $38,300 $39,101 $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $118,401 Planned 7 $1,429,926 $242,388 $652,264 $574,000 $0 $720 $0 $2,899,298 Day or Evening Treatment Program Actual 7 $1,251,776 $218,424 $203,212 $968,992 $465 $1,120 $0 $2,643,989 Difference 0 -$178,150 -$23,964 -$449,052 $394,992 $465 $400 $0 -$255,309 Planned 1 $137,559 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $147,559 Detention Assessment(s) Actual 2 $161,369 $0 $4,239 $0 $0 $0 $0 $165,608 Difference 1 $23,810 $0 -$5,761 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,049 Planned 3 $396,926 $15,689 $12,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $425,115 Development of Case Plan Actual 3 $383,364 $72,812 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $456,176 Difference 0 -$13,562 $57,123 -$12,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $31,061 Planned 8 $676,485 $137,638 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $834,123 Electronic Monitoring Actual 8 $310,282 $37,346 $104,666 $0 $1,350 $0 $0 $453,644 Difference 0 -$366,203 -$100,292 $84,666 $0 $1,350 $0 $0 -$380,479 Planned 3 $0 $9,005 $0 $0 $69,248 $0 $0 $78,253 Equipment Actual 2 $0 $6,502 $0 $0 $17,014 $0 $0 $23,516 Difference -1 $0 -$2,503 $0 $0 -$52,234 $0 $0 -$54,737 Planned 2 $640,013 $42,259 $107,179 $565,164 $0 $0 $0 $1,354,615 Family Counseling Actual 1 $621,182 $20,287 $6,987 $330,843 $0 $0 $0 $979,299 Difference -1 -$18,831 -$21,972 -$100,192 -$234,321 $0 $0 $0 -$375,316 Planned 1 $115,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $115,000 Functional Family Therapy Actual 1 $142,204 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $152,204 Difference 0 $27,204 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $37,204 Planned 1 $284,229 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $284,229 Gang Intervention Actual 1 $232,610 $1,826 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $234,436 Difference 0 -$51,619 $1,826 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$49,793 Gender Specific Planned 3 $66,300 $29,733 $0 $0 $1,325 $1,662 $0 $99,020 Programming for Actual 1 $48,380 $10,361 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $58,741 Boys Difference -2 -$17,920 -$19,372 $0 $0 -$1,325 -$1,662 $0 -$40,279 Gender Specific Planned 4 $159,767 $16,990 $0 $48,000 $1,325 $0 $0 $226,082 Programming for Actual 4 $159,873 $44,818 $0 $38,640 $0 $1,779 $0 $245,110 Girls Difference 0 $106 $27,828 $0 -$9,360 -$1,325 $1,779 $0 $19,028 Planned 4 $0 $0 $73,500 $34,779 $0 $0 $0 $108,279 Group Counseling Actual 1 $0 $0 $0 $37,000 $0 $0 $0 $37,000 Difference -3 $0 $0 -$73,500 $2,221 $0 $0 $0 -$71,279 Planned 9 $9,102,494 $447,901 $5,000 $0 $0 $362,525 $0 $9,917,920 Home on Probation Actual 10 $8,175,499 $242,433 $9,912 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,427,844 Difference 1 -$926,995 -$205,468 $4,912 $0 $0 -$362,525 $0 -$1,490,076 Planned 11 $285,515 $60,000 $647,872 $378,107 $0 $0 $0 $1,371,494 Individual Mental Health Counseling Actual 9 $319,401 $129,001 $691,302 $219,992 $0 $0 $0 $1,359,696 Difference -2 $33,886 $69,001 $43,430 -$158,115 $0 $0 $0 -$11,798 44 Appendix H (continued) Planned and Actual YOBG Expenditures by Program Type Fixed Assets Salaries & Services & Professional & Administrative Other Total Program Type Programs Benefits Supplies Services CBOs Equipment Overhead Expenditures Expenditures Planned 17 $9,218,857 $336,879 $127,400 $175,380 $0 $469,140 $25,000 $10,352,656 Intensive Probation Supervision Actual 15 $9,077,120 $265,481 $233,008 $175,380 $0 $469,194 $8,760 $10,228,943 Difference -2 -$141,737 -$71,398 $105,608 $0 $0 $54 -$16,240 -$123,713 Planned 1 $0 $0 $114,870 $0 $0 $0 $0 $114,870 Job Readiness Training Actual 1 $0 $0 $88,630 $0 $0 $0 $0 $88,630 Difference 0 $0 $0 -$26,240 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$26,240 Planned 20 $5,773,009 $858,361 $367,025 $10,000 $300,000 $194,496 $0 $7,502,891 Juvenile Hall Actual 19 $5,177,572 $1,742,127 $289,065 $31,753 $0 $176,101 $0 $7,416,618 Difference -1 -$595,437 $883,766 -$77,960 $21,753 -$300,000 -$18,395 $0 -$86,273 Life/Independent Planned 3 $7,101 $3,049 $52,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $62,650 Living Skills Actual 2 $5,023 $1,501 $40,779 $0 $0 $0 $0 $47,303 Training/Education Difference -1 -$2,078 -$1,548 -$11,721 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$15,347 Planned 2 $0 $0 $5,000 $287,515 $0 $0 $0 $292,515 Mental Health Screening Actual 2 $10,846 $0 $0 $283,925 $0 $0 $0 $294,771 Difference 0 $10,846 $0 -$5,000 -$3,590 $0 $0 $0 $2,256 Planned 3 $0 $0 $32,000 $230,625 $0 $0 $0 $262,625 Mentoring Actual 4 $0 $0 $162,651 $190,839 $0 $0 $0 $353,490 Difference 1 $0 $0 $130,651 -$39,786 $0 $0 $0 $90,865 Planned 1 $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 Monetary Incentives Actual 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Difference -1 $0 -$5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$5,000 Planned 7 $475,192 $2,500 $12,905 $0 $0 $0 $0 $490,597 Other Actual 6 $330,141 $28 $9,941 $0 $0 $0 $8,000 $348,110 Difference -1 -$145,051 -$2,472 -$2,964 $0 $0 $0 $8,000 -$142,487 Planned 19 $2,738,003 $298,941 $431,228 $113,346 $15,000 $228,150 $0 $3,824,668 Other Direct Service Actual 17 $2,444,701 $334,590 $202,956 $312,413 $0 $187,714 $0 $3,482,374 Difference -2 -$293,302 $35,649 -$228,272 $199,067 -$15,000 -$40,436 $0 -$342,294 Planned 4 $6,855,930 $576,580 $763,646 $0 $0 $0 $700,000 $8,896,156 Other Placement Actual 3 $5,328,539 $925,493 $997,119 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,251,151 Difference -1 -$1,527,391 $348,913 $233,473 $0 $0 $0 -$700,000 -$1,645,005 Other Secure/Semi- Planned 4 $6,777,309 $416,279 $459,195 $40,000 $0 $520,149 $0 $8,212,932 Secure Rehab Actual 5 $6,546,918 $480,251 $390,881 $17,083 $0 $0 $0 $7,435,133 Facility Difference 1 -$230,391 $63,972 -$68,314 -$22,917 $0 -$520,149 $0 -$777,799 Planned 2 $4,800 $4,100 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,900 Parenting Education Actual 1 $0 $2,596 $0 $0 $0 $13 $0 $2,609 Difference -1 -$4,800 -$1,504 -$1,000 $0 $0 $13 $0 -$7,291 Planned 8 $175,433 $37,520 $267,000 $929,500 $0 $6,911 $0 $1,416,364 Pro-Social Skills Training Actual 9 $179,267 $2,711 $279,081 $898,363 $0 $7,059 $3,023 $1,369,504 Difference 1 $3,834 -$34,809 $12,081 -$31,137 $0 $148 $3,023 -$46,860 Planned 4 $817,693 $30,439 $72,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $920,132 Ranch Actual 3 $75,837 $10,157 $65,123 $0 $0 $0 $0 $151,117 Difference -1 -$741,856 -$20,282 -$6,877 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$769,015 Planned 8 $3,864,315 $75,531 $47,900 $37,000 $0 $891 $150,000 $4,175,637 Re-Entry or Aftercare Services Actual 8 $3,613,006 $37,577 $572,423 $0 $0 $252 $0 $4,223,258 Difference 0 -$251,309 -$37,954 $524,523 -$37,000 $0 -$639 -$150,000 $47,621 Planned 5 $0 $0 $75,000 $455,857 $0 $0 $0 $530,857 Recreational Activities Actual 5 $13,231 $14,163 $33,945 $66,132 $0 $0 $0 $127,471 Difference 0 $13,231 $14,163 -$41,055 -$389,725 $0 $0 $0 -$403,386 Planned 1 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Restorative Justice Actual 2 $0 $0 $8,506 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,506 Difference 1 $0 $0 -$1,494 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$1,494 Planned 22 $1,754,340 $165,399 $265,407 $0 $0 $2,366 $0 $2,187,512 Risk and/or Needs Assessment Actual 19 $1,317,752 $46,987 $137,076 $0 $0 $30 $12,227 $1,514,072 Difference -3 -$436,588 -$118,412 -$128,331 $0 $0 -$2,336 $12,227 -$673,440 Planned 1 $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 Special Education Services Actual 1 $0 $0 $13,250 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,250 Difference 0 $0 $0 -$1,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$1,750 Planned 7 $650,132 $6,050 $2,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $658,582 Staff Salaries/Benefits Actual 8 $1,275,156 $5,846 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,281,002 Difference 1 $625,024 -$204 -$2,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $622,420 Staff Planned 10 $312,452 $41,188 $47,792 $0 $0 $0 $0 $401,432 Training/Professional Actual 10 $181,198 $35,210 $4,789 $0 $0 $0 $0 $221,197 Development Difference 0 -$131,254 -$5,978 -$43,003 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$180,235 45 Appendix H (continued) Planned and Actual YOBG Expenditures by Program Type Fixed Assets Salaries & Services & Professional & Administrative Other Total Program Type Programs Benefits Supplies Services CBOs Equipment Overhead Expenditures Expenditures Planned 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Substance Abuse Screening Actual 1 $0 $4,409 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,409 Difference 1 $0 $4,409 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,409 Planned 1 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 Transitional Living Services/Placement Actual 1 $0 $0 $36,285 $0 $0 $0 $0 $36,285 Difference 0 $0 $0 -$63,715 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$63,715 Planned 1 $0 $0 $0 $18,500 $0 $0 $0 $18,500 Tutoring Actual 1 $0 $7,229 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,229 Difference 0 $0 $7,229 $0 -$18,500 $0 $0 $0 -$11,271 Planned 2 $0 $0 $479,358 $0 $0 $0 $0 $479,358 Vocational Training Actual 2 $0 $355 $337,987 $0 $0 $0 $0 $338,342 Difference 0 $0 $355 -$141,371 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$141,016 Planned 252 $79,022,012 $5,745,439 $8,464,953 $4,927,073 $403,898 $1,860,297 $875,000 $101,298,672 All Program Types Actual 236 $78,401,472 $9,155,040 $7,286,047 $4,376,689 $54,325 $853,297 $32,010 $100,158,880 Difference -16 -$620,540 $3,409,601 -$1,178,906 -$550,384 -$349,573 -$1,007,000 -$842,990 -$1,139,792 46 Appendix I County YOBG Allocation Amounts and County Representation in Performance Outcome Study Group YOBG Allocation Performance Outcome Study Group County Amount % Total Initial Exclusions Final % Total Alameda $3,651,676 3.5% 42 42 3.5% Alpine $123,155 0.1% 0 0 0.0% Amador $123,155 0.1% 0 0 0.0% Butte $544,102 0.5% 6 6 0.5% Calaveras $123,155 0.1% 2 2 0.2% Colusa $123,155 0.1% 2 2 0.2% Contra Costa $2,463,315 2.4% 29 1 28 2.4% Del Norte $123,155 0.1% 0 0 0.0% El Dorado $396,860 0.4% 5 5 0.4% Fresno $3,779,748 3.6% 43 43 3.6% Glenn $123,155 0.1% 2 2 0.2% Humboldt $268,990 0.3% 3 3 0.3% Imperial $492,925 0.5% 6 6 0.5% Inyo $123,155 0.1% 2 2 0.2% Kern $3,991,075 3.8% 46 46 3.9% Kings $574,545 0.6% 7 7 0.6% Lake $132,832 0.1% 4 2 2 0.2% Lassen $123,155 0.1% 2 2 0.2% Los Angeles $26,904,734 25.8% 365 81 284 24.6% Madera $556,980 0.5% 6 6 0.5% Marin $685,145 0.7% 5 5 0.4% Mariposa $123,155 0.1% 2 2 0.2% Mendocino $151,416 0.1% 2 2 0.2% Merced $963,153 0.9% 11 2 9 0.8% Modoc $123,155 0.1% 2 2 0.2% Mono $123,155 0.1% 0 0 0.0% Monterey $1,272,137 1.2% 15 15 1.3% Napa $462,890 0.4% 5 5 0.4% Nevada $166,331 0.2% 2 2 0.2% Orange $8,891,169 8.5% 102 102 8.8% Placer $664,201 0.6% 8 8 0.7% Plumas $123,155 0.1% 2 2 0.2% Riverside $6,620,965 6.3% 76 76 6.6% Sacramento $4,523,765 4.3% 52 52 4.5% San Benito $123,155 0.1% 0 0 0.0% San Bernardino $8,087,727 7.8% 98 13 85 7.4% San Diego $5,381,804 5.2% 62 62 5.4% San Francisco $1,360,143 1.3% 16 1 15 1.3% San Joaquin $2,193,033 2.1% 25 25 2.2% San Luis Obispo $580,134 0.6% 7 7 0.6% San Mateo $1,578,299 1.5% 18 18 1.6% Santa Barbara $1,102,738 1.1% 13 13 1.1% Santa Clara $3,520,350 3.4% 41 41 3.5% Santa Cruz $575,506 0.6% 7 7 0.6% Shasta $427,569 0.4% 6 2 4 0.3% Sierra $123,155 0.1% 0 0 0.0% Siskiyou $123,155 0.1% 2 2 0.2% Solano $1,290,984 1.2% 15 15 1.3% Sonoma $955,130 0.9% 11 1 10 0.9% Stanislaus $1,368,875 1.3% 16 16 1.4% Sutter $304,938 0.3% 4 4 0.3% Tehama $164,580 0.2% 2 2 0.2% Trinity $123,155 0.1% 0 0 0.0% Tulare $1,970,911 1.9% 23 1 22 1.9% Tuolumne $123,155 0.1% 2 2 0.2% Ventura $2,412,787 2.3% 28 28 2.4% Yolo $537,937 0.5% 6 6 0.5% Yuba $214,159 0.2% 2 2 0.2% Total 104,280,193 100% 1,260 104 1,156 100.0% 47