BSCC
Board of State and Community Corrections
Read the report at Board of State and Community Corrections ↗
Y
OUTHFUL
O
FFENDER
B G
LOCK RANT
M 2017
ARCH
Annual Report
Youthful Offender
Block Grant
Annual Report to the Legislature
March 2017
Board of State and Community Corrections
2590 Venture Oaks Way, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95833
http://www.bscc.ca.gov
STATE OF CALIFORNIA – EDMUND G. BROWN, GOVERNOR
BOARD OF STATE AND COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
Board Members*
Chair, Board of State and Community Corrections......................................................................................... Linda M. Penner
The Chair of the Board is a full-time paid position appointed by the Governor and
subject to Senate Confirmation
Secretary, CA Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) ......................................................................... Scott Kernan
Director, Adult Parole Operations, CDCR .................................................................................................... Jeffrey Green (A)
Lassen County Sheriff ..................................................................................................................................... Dean Growdon
A sheriff in charge of a local detention facility with a BSCC rated capacity of 200
inmates or less appointed by the Governor and subject to Senate confirmation
Ventura County Sheriff ............................................................................................................................................ Geoff Dean
A sheriff in charge of a local detention facility with a BSCC rated capacity of more
than 200 inmates appointed by the Governor and subject to Senate confirmation
Kern County Supervisor ...................................................................................................................................... Leticia Perez
A county supervisor or administrative officer appointed by the Governor and
subject to Senate confirmation
San Bernardino County Chief Probation Officer ................................................................................... Michelle Scray Brown
A chief probation officer from a county with a population over 200,000 appointed
by the Governor and subject to Senate confirmation
Nevada County Chief Probation Officer ............................................................................................................ Michael Ertola
A chief probation officer from a county with a population under 200,000
appointed by the Governor and subject to Senate confirmation
Retired Judge, Solano County ....................................................................................................................... Ramona Garrett
A judge appointed by the Judicial Council of California
Retired Chief of Police, .................................................................................................................................. David Bejarano
A chief of police appointed by the Governor and subject to Senate confirmation
Founder of the Anti-Recidivism Coalition and Film Producer ........................................................................... Scott Budnick
A community provider of rehabilitative treatment or services for adult offenders
appointed by the Speaker of the Assembly
Director, Commonweal Juvenile Justice Program ...........................................................................................David Steinhart
A community provider or advocate with expertise in effective programs, policies
and treatment of at-risk youth and juvenile offenders appointed by the Senate
Committee on Rules
Director, City of Sacramento Office of Public Safety Accountability .......................................................... Francine Tournour
A public member appointed by the Governor and subject to Senate confirmation
BSCC Staff
Executive Director ......................................................................................................................................... Kathleen Howard
Communications Director ...................................................................................................................................... Tracie Cone
General Counsel ............................................................................................................................................... Aaron Maguire
Deputy Director, Corrections Planning & Grant Programs........................................................................................ Mary Jolls
Field Representative, Corrections Planning & Grant Programs ................................................................... Kimberly Bushard
Research Program Specialist I, Research ....................................................................................................... Marcus Galeste
* Board member composition is pursuant to Penal Code 6025
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 1
Background ..................................................................................................................... 2
History of the Youthful Offender Block Grant Program ......................................... 2
Current Requirements .......................................................................................... 3
Expenditures Reported for FY 2015-16 ........................................................................... 5
Summary of Actual Expenditure Data ................................................................... 5
YOBG Expenditures by Fiscal Year Allocation ................................................... 12
Leveraging of YOBG Funds ............................................................................... 12
Planned Versus Actual YOBG Expenditures ...................................................... 14
County Descriptions of Highlights ................................................................................. 16
Alameda County ................................................................................................. 16
Butte County ....................................................................................................... 16
Contra Costa County .......................................................................................... 18
Napa County....................................................................................................... 19
Riverside County ................................................................................................ 20
Santa Cruz County ............................................................................................. 20
Sonoma County .................................................................................................. 21
Tables
Table 1 – YOBG Expenditures by Budget Line Item
Table 2 – Three-Year Comparison of YOBG Expenditures by Budget Line Item
Table 3 – YOBG Expenditures by Expenditure Category Type
Table 4 – Three-Year Comparison of YOBG Expenditures by Category Type
Table 5 – Summary of YOBG Expenditures
Table 6 – Three-Year Comparison of YOBG Expenditures by Expenditure
Category and Fiscal Year
Table 7 – YOBG Expenditures by Allocation Year
Table 8 – Expenditures from YOBG, JJCPA and Other Funding Sources
Table 9 – Fiscal Year Comparisons of All Funding Sources
Table 10 – Planned Versus Actual YOBG Expenditures by Budget Line Item
Table 11 – Planned Versus Actual YOBG Expenditures by Expenditure Category
Type
Figures
Figure 1 – History of All YOBG Expenditures by Category Type
Figure 2 – History of YOBG Expenditures except Intensive Probation Supervision
Appendices
Appendix A – Welfare & Institutions Code Section 1950 et seq.
Appendix B – Expenditures and Per Capita Costs by Expenditure Category (All
Funding Sources)
Appendix C – Comparison of YOBG Expenditures by Budget Line Item
Appendix D – Comparison of YOBG Expenditures by Category Type
Appendix E – Comparison of YOBG Expenditures by Expenditure Category and
Fiscal Year
Appendix F – Allocation Year Source of FY 2015-16 YOBG Expenditures
Appendix G – Summary of Per Capita Costs
Appendix H – Planned and Actual YOBG Expenditures by County
Appendix I – Planned and Actual YOBG Expenditures by Program Type
1
Executive Summary
The Youthful Offender Block Grant (YOBG), sometimes known as “juvenile
realignment,” was enacted in 2007 by SB 81 (Chapter 175, Statutes of 2007) and
reassigned from state to local control the non-violent, non-serious, non-sexual offenders
within California’s juvenile justice system. This legislation can be found in Welfare &
Institutions Code Section 1950 et seq., which is included as Appendix A.
The program has three primary goals: to reduce the number of offenders in Department
of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s Division of Juvenile Justice (DJJ) facilities, to reduce
state costs for incarcerating lower level offenders, and to keep lower level offenders
closer to home and local support systems. In all of these ways, YOBG has been
successful.
In recognition of the increased county responsibilities for supervising and rehabilitating
youthful offenders subject to SB 81, the state provides annual funding through the
YOBG program. The amount allocated to each county is based on a statutorily defined
formula that gives equal weight to a county’s juvenile population and the number of
juvenile felony dispositions.
In Fiscal Year (FY) 2015-16 statewide YOBG funding was $127.5 million and the
counties used these funds to serve 52,887 young offenders. To receive YOBG funding,
counties comply with annual plan submission and reporting requirements. In this report
the Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) has synthesized the
expenditure information collected from counties.
Pursuant to changes resulting from AB 1998 (Chapter 880, Statutes of 2016), this will
be the last report submitted as a standalone on the YOBG program. Beginning next
year, counties will submit their YOBG data with their Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention
Act data and the BSCC, in turn, will submit a combined report to the Governor and
Legislature. Although AB 1998 went into effect on January 1, 2017, the data that were
reported by the counties and is summarized here were collected, reported and analyzed
under the prior requirements. Consequently, this report relies on the same format and
data presentation as prior year reports. The report due March 1, 2018 will reflect the
changes included in AB 1998 and described in Chapter 2 of this report.
1
2
Background
History of the Youthful Offender Block Grant Program
The Youthful Offender Block Grant (YOBG) Program was established in 2007 by SB 81
(Chapter 175, Statutes of 2007), and was amended in 2009 by SBX4 13 (Chapter 22,
Statutes of 2009-10 Fourth Extraordinary Session). In 2016, further amendments were
made by AB 1998 (Chapter 880). The current statutes are included as Appendix A.
The YOBG program realigned certain youth in California’s juvenile justice population
from state to county control and prohibits counties from sending certain lower level
offenders to DJJ. Youth who are no longer eligible for DJJ commitment are those who
commit an offense that is not listed in Welfare and Institutions Code (WIC) Section
707(b) and is not a sex offense as set forth in Penal Code Section 290.008(c). YOBG
supports the concept that public safety is enhanced by keeping juvenile offenders close
to their families and communities.
In recognition of the increased county responsibility for supervising and rehabilitating
these youthful offenders, the state provides annual funding through the YOBG program.
Every county is included in the YOBG program and receives an annual allocation.
There is no competitive aspect to YOBG; each county’s allocation is based on the
formula prescribed in statute that gives equal weight to a county’s juvenile population
and its juvenile felony dispositions. The California Department of Finance (DOF)
calculates each county’s allocation amount annually using its own demographic
information for the juvenile population and California Department of Justice data for
juvenile felony dispositions. Each county receives a minimum annual allocation of
$117,000 regardless what the formula yields. In FY 2015-16, statewide YOBG funding
was $127.5 million1.
As provided by statute, “allocations from the Youthful Offender Block Grant Fund shall
be used to enhance the capacity of county probation, mental health, drug and alcohol,
and other county departments to provide appropriate rehabilitative and supervision
services to youthful offenders subject [to the provisions of SB 81].” There is no other
provision that addresses eligible uses of YOBG funds. Consequently, counties have
tremendous flexibility in how they use YOBG funds and counties have used this
flexibility to tailor YOBG-funded programs to fit local needs and priorities.
The DOF is responsible for calculating the annual amount of YOBG funding to be
allocated to each county. The DOF performs this calculation each year following
enactment of the State budget. In turn, the State Controller’s Office (SCO) is
1 $127.5 million is the amount that was allocated for the 2015-16 fiscal year less growth funding. On October 20,
2016, counties received an additional $6.8 million from the Juvenile Justice Growth Special Account that augmented
the 2015-16 allocations. Regardless of the year in which they are allocated, all YOBG funds are reported on during
the year they are spent.
2
responsible for remitting monthly allocations to each county according to the calculation
provided by the DOF. The BSCC has no fiduciary role in the program.
Current Requirements
Pursuant to Assembly Bill 1468 (Statutes of 2014, Chapter 26), a Juvenile Justice Data
Working Group (JJDWG) was established and directed to review the YOBG, along with
the Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act (JJCPA) program, in order to recommend
options for improving the reporting requirements under both programs. The
recommendations focus on streamlining and consolidating the current requirements
without “…sacrificing meaningful data collection.” In September 2016, the Governor
signed AB 1998, which among other things, codified several recommendations made by
the JJDWG. The most significant changes resulting from this new legislation are
described below.
Annual Plans
Annual plans for JJCPA and YOBG will be combined and submitted to the BSCC
each year by May 1. These plans will describe all programs, placements,
strategies, services, and system enhancements that will be supported with
JJCPA and/or YOBG funds in the upcoming fiscal year.
Counties no longer are required to include a proposed budget in their annual
plans.
Consistent with YOBG requirements, the JJCPA component of the annual plan
no longer requires Board of Supervisors’ approval.
The BSCC will no longer approve annual plans; however, all annual plans will be
posted on the BSCC website.
Year-end Expenditure & Outcome Reports
Annual year-end reports for JJCPA and YOBG will be combined and will be due
to the BSCC by October 1 of each year.
Annual year-end reports will describe programs, placements, services, strategies
and system enhancements that were funded through either program during the
preceding fiscal year, including identification of any programs that were co-
funded by JJCPA and YOBG. Reports will include line item budget detail.
In addition to expenditure information, annual year-end reports will include
countywide figures for specified juvenile justice data elements available in
existing statewide juvenile justice data systems. Reports will also include a
summary or analysis of how grant-funded programs have or may have
3
contributed to or influenced the countywide data. These revised reporting
requirements will require counties to report data on their entire juvenile justice
population and to describe how their use of JJCPA and YOBG funds has, or may
have, impacted the trends seen in that data.
The current outcome reporting requirements for both JJCPA and YOBG have
been modified to reflect the above described countywide data reporting.
BSCC Legislative Reports
The BSCC has completed this final individual report to the Legislature along with
the individual report on the JJCPA program. Both were submitted in March 2017
and include information and data collected last year under the prior statutes.
Beginning March 1, 2018, and continuing each year thereafter, the BSCC will
submit only one legislative report on JJCPA and YOBG. This report will be a
summary of the county year-end expenditure and outcome reports collected
during October of each year.
4
3
Expenditures Reported for FY 2015-16
Summary of Actual Expenditure Data
On October 1, 2016 the counties’ seventh annual YOBG Actual Expenditure Reports
were due to the BSCC. All 58 counties complied with this reporting requirement. The
expenditure information that follows was extracted from the county reports. While the
expenditure information reported below is focused on YOBG expenditures, it should be
noted that counties reported total expenditures for those YOBG Expenditure Categories
that had multiple funding sources. For example, if a county had an electronic
monitoring program funded 70 percent by YOBG, 20 percent by the Juvenile Justice
Crime Prevention Act (JJCPA) and 10 percent by the county general fund, the county
reported all of those funding sources to the BSCC in its Actual Expenditure Report. For
additional information regarding total funding for all YOBG Expenditure Categories, refer
to Appendix B.
Counties reported total YOBG expenditures of $119,557,716 in FY 2015-16.2 Total FY
2015-16 YOBG expenditures by budget line item are shown in Table 1. As in past
years, the bulk of the funds were spent on staff Salaries & Benefits, accounting for
almost 80 percent of total YOBG expenditures.
Table 1: YOBG Expenditures by Budget Line Item
Line Item Expenditures Percent Total
Salaries & Benefits $93,862,088 78.51%
Services & Supplies $10,195,540 8.53%
Professional Services $6,699,295 5.60%
CBOs $5,065,143 4.24%
Fixed Assets & Equipment $83,356 0.07%
Administrative Overhead $3,204,033 2.68%
Other Expenditures $448,261 0.37%
Total $119,557,716 100.00%
YOBG budget line item expenditures for each of the past three fiscal years are reported
in Table 2, while budget line item expenditures for the past five fiscal years are reported
in Appendix C. Both Table 2 and Appendix C show notable consistency in the manner
in which YOBG funds have been spent.
2 Since counties are allowed to carry over YOBG funds from year-to-year, the expenditure amount for any given fiscal
year is almost always different than the allocation amount for that year.
5
Table 2: Three-Year Comparison of YOBG Expenditures by Budget Line Item
FY 2015-16 FY 2014-15 FY 2013-14
Line Item Amount % Total Amount % Total Amount % Total
Salaries & Benefits $93,862,088 78.51% $84,393,358 67.04% $78,401,472 78.28%
Services & Supplies $10,195,540 8.53% $10,052,700 7.99% $9,155,040 9.14%
Professional Services $6,699,295 5.60% $7,445,280 5.91% $7,286,047 7.28%
CBOs $5,065,143 4.24% $5,372,056 4.27% $4,376,689 4.37%
Fixed Assets $83,356 0.07% $125,495 0.10% $54,325 0.05%
Admin. Overhead $3,204,033 2.68% $18,333,217 14.56% $853,297 0.85%
Other Costs $448,261 0.37% $164,012 0.13% $32,010 0.03%
Total $119,557,716 100.00% $125,886,118 100.00% $100,158,880 100.00%
Table 3 shows FY 2015-16 YOBG expenditures by each of three major Expenditure
Category Types – Placements, Direct Services, and Capacity Building/Maintenance
Activities. As shown in Table 3, over two-thirds of YOBG funds were spent on
Placements (69.69 percent), with Direct Services accounting for almost 30 percent of
total YOBG expenditures. While FY 2015-16 saw a decrease over FY 2014-15 for
Placements, YOBG funds spent on Placements has varied from year-to-year. These
amounts can be found in Table 4, which shows YOBG expenditures by major
Expenditure Category for each of the past three fiscal years, Appendix D, which shows
the same data for the past five fiscal years, and in Figure 1, which depicts a four-year
trend of the same data.
Table 3: YOBG Expenditures by Expenditure Category Type
Expenditure Category Type Amount % Total
Placements $83,322,218 69.69%
Direct Services $34,311,492 28.70%
Capacity Building/Maintenance Activities $1,924,006 1.61%
Total $119,557,716 100.00%
Table 4: Three-Year Comparison of YOBG Expenditures by Category Type
FY 2015-16 FY 2014-15 FY 2013-14
Expenditu re
Category Type Amount % Total Amount % Total Amount % Total
Placements $83,322,218 69.69% $92,458,781 $1 $67,695,958 67.60%
Direct Services $34,311,492 28.70% $31,029,248 $0 $29,839,086 29.80%
Capacity Bld/Maint $1,924,006 1.61% $2,398,089 $0 $2,623,836 2.60%
Total $119,557,716 100.00% $125,886,118 $1 $100,158,880 100.00%
6
Figure 1: History of All YOBG Expenditures by Category Type
Table 5 provides a more detailed breakdown of YOBG expenditures within each of the
three major Expenditure Types. Specifically, results are reported for each of six types
of Placements, 33 types of Direct Services, and six types of Capacity
Building/Maintenance Activities. Total YOBG expenditures and the number of counties
spending in the category are shown for each. In addition, the total number of youth
served and the YOBG per capita cost are reported for each type of Placement and
Direct Service.
Among Placements, Camps accounted for the largest expenditure of YOBG funds
($43,122,063), while Other Placements accounted for the highest YOBG per capita cost
($28,525). The Placement most frequently funded by YOBG was Juvenile Hall (19
counties).
Mirroring the last two years’ data, within Direct Services, Intensive Probation
Supervision accounted for the greatest expenditure of YOBG funds ($12,806,836),
followed by Other Direct Services, which includes various other services not otherwise
captured ($5,603,280), Re-Entry or Aftercare Services ($4,529,207), and Day/Evening
Treatment Programs ($2,664,337). The Direct Services most frequently funded by
YOBG were Intensive Probation Supervision (17 Counties), Risk/Needs Assessment
(16 counties), and Other Direct Services (15 counties). The Direct Service category
with the highest per capita cost was by far Re-Entry or Aftercare Services ($8,088) with
Day or Evening Treatment Programs ($3,895) a distant second.
Among Capacity Building/Maintenance Activities, Staff Training/Professional
Development was most frequently funded (8 counties). Staff Salaries/Benefits
accounted for the greatest expenditure of YOBG funds ($976,977).
7
Figure 2 shows a four-year trend of YOBG expenditures within each of the three major
Expenditure Types. Since YOBG Direct Service expenditures consistently have been
the greatest for Intensive Probation Supervision, Figure 2 excludes the Intensive
Probation Supervision expenditures. As seen in Figure 2, FY 2015-16 saw a noteworthy
decrease in reported expenditures for both Placements and Direct Services, while
Capacity Building/Maintenance Activities remained stable.
Figure 2: History of YOBG Expenditures Excluding Intensive Probation Supervision
8
Table 5: Summary of YOBG Expenditures
Number of Youth Per Capita
Expenditure Category Expenditures Counties Served Costs
Camp $43,122,063 13 2,107 $20,466
Home on Probation $9,157,228 7 5,073 $1,805
Juvenile Hall $11,529,324 19 4,291 $2,687
Other Secure/Semi-Secure Rehab Facility $8,904,907 5 873 $10,200
Other Placement $9,955,365 3 349 $28,525
Ranch $653,331 4 85 $7,686
All Placements $83,322,218 51 12,778 $11,895
After School Services $25,709 2 152 $169
Aggression Replacement Therapy $44,213 2 154 $287
Alcohol and Drug Treatment $419,939 7 549 $765
Anger Management $19,860 1 15 $1,324
Community Service $97,627 4 248 $394
Day or Evening Treatment Program $2,664,337 7 684 $3,895
Detention Assessment(s) $121,836 2 514 $237
Development of Case Plan $586,467 3 211 $2,779
Electronic Monitoring $915,344 8 813 $1,126
Family Counseling $297,045 2 160 $1,857
Gang Intervention $244,909 1 68 $3,602
Gender Specific Programming for Boys $46,256 3 513 $90
Gender Specific Programming for Girls $218,303 4 179 $1,220
Group Counseling $105,000 2 92 $1,141
Individual Mental Health Counseling $1,320,794 8 956 $1,382
Intensive Probation Supervision $12,806,836 17 20,435 $627
Job Readiness Training $17,396 2 159 $109
Life/Independent Living Skills Training $114,517 4 660 $174
Mental Health Screening $393,970 5 777 $507
Mentoring $395,209 3 133 $2,971
Other Direct Service $5,603,280 15 3,278 $1,709
Parenting Education $78,948 5 126 $627
Pro-Social Skills Training $1,364,764 6 509 $2,681
Re-Entry or Aftercare Services $4,529,207 6 560 $8,088
Recreational Activities $145,175 5 702 $207
Restitution $9,217 1 34 $271
Restorative Justice $29,773 2 46 $647
Risk and/or Needs Assessment $1,504,083 16 8,840 $170
Substance Abuse Screening $11,875 2 130 245
Special Education Services $13,250 1 320 $41
Transitional Living Services/Placement $26,005 1 32 $813
Tutoring $20,500 1 20 $1,025
Vocational Training $131,723 4 178 $740
All Direct Services $34,323,367 152 42,247 $1,270
Capital Improvements $152,006 2 N/A N/A
Contract Services $361,572 4 N/A N/A
Equipment $62,774 2 N/A N/A
Other Capacity Bldg./Maint. Activities $332,708 7 N/A N/A
Staff Salaries/Benefits $976,977
Staff Training/Professional Development $26,094 8 N/A N/A
All Capacity Bldg./Maint. Activities $1,912,131 23 N/A N/A
9
Table 6 shows YOBG expenditures within each of the three major Expenditure Category
Types for each of the past three fiscal years. To provide additional detail, Appendix E
shows the same data for the past four fiscal years. Both data sets show a relatively
consistent pattern in the manner in which YOBG funds have been spent.
Notable variations are seen with respect to the different types of Placements. As
compared to FY 2014-15, expenditures for Juvenile Hall, and Home on Probation
decreased sharply, while expenditures for Other Placements, Ranch, and Other
Secure/Semi-Secure Facility increased. Over the last three years, Camp expenditures
have grown each year and continue to be the highest funded category by far. There is
no consistent trend discernable in the data.
The total number of youth receiving YOBG-funded Placements during FY 2015-16
(12,778) increased 9.8 percent from 2014-15 (11,795). The number of youth receiving
YOBG-funded Placements have continued to increase since reporting began in FY
2009-10, with FY 2015-16 reporting a 49 percent increase (from 8,563 to 12,778).
During that same time period, total YOBG expenditures for Placements increased by 32
percent (from $62,944,571 in FY 2009-10 to $83,322,218 in FY 2015-16).
Table 6 also shows that within the major Expenditure Category Type of Direct Services,
there were a number of significant changes from FYs 2014-15 to 2015-16. Sharp
increases were seen in YOBG expenditures for Restorative Justice, Family Counseling,
Intensive Probation Supervision, and Other Direct Services. Decreases were noted in
expenditures relating to Aggression Replacement Therapy, Group Counseling, Job
Readiness Training, and Electronic Monitoring. In FY 2015-16, the number of youth
receiving YOBG-funded Direct Services increased from the previous year with 10,240
additional youth receiving services, while total YOBG expenditures for Direct Services
decreased slightly. Since FY 2009-10, total YOBG expenditures for Direct Services
increased by 64 percent (from $20,918,716 in FY 2009-10 to $34,323,367, in FY 2015-
16).
YOBG spending for Capacity Building/Maintenance Activities decreased slightly over
last year and has varied only minimally since FY 2009-10. Overall, compared with last
year, total YOBG expenditures decreased by 6.4 percent in FY 2015-16, while the total
number of youth served increased by 34.3 percent. Since reporting began in FY 2009-
10, total YOBG expenditures have increased by 38 percent (from $86,570,073 in FY
2009-10 to $119,557,716 in FY 2015-16) and the total number of youth served has
increased by 48.8 percent (from 35,540 in FY 2009-10 to 55,025 in FY 2015-16).
10
Table 6: Three-Year Comparison of YOBG Expenditures by Expenditure Category and Fiscal Year
YOBG Expenditures Total Youth Served
Expenditure Category 2015-16 2014-15 2013-14 2015-16 2014-15 2013-14
Camp $43,122,063 $40,384,969 $37,014,095 2,107 2,207 3,517
Home on Probation $9,157,228 $22,030,358 $7,416,618 5,073 4,322 3,622
Juvenile Hall $11,529,324 $15,922,996 $8,427,844 4,291 3,704 6,774
Other Placements $9,955,365 $5,592,611 $7,435,133 349 686 768
Other Secure/Semi-Secure Rehab Facility $8,904,907 $8,389,583 $7,251,151 873 842 650
Ranch $653,331 $138,265 $151,117 85 34 31
All Placements $83,322,218 $92,458,782 $67,695,958 12,778 11,795 15,362
After School Services $25,709 $25,896 $27,003 152 102 311
Aggression Replacement Therapy $44,213 $123,664 $123,216 154 166 208
Alcohol and Drug Treatment $419,939 $449,299 $648,721 549 437 671
Anger Management $19,860 $15,884 $485 15 15 8
Community Service $97,627 $112,892 $113,312 248 298 209
Day or Evening Treatment Program $2,664,337 $2,703,531 $2,643,989 684 568 844
Detention Assessment(s) $121,836 $182,380 $165,608 514 508 678
Development of Case Plan $586,467 $482,441 $456,176 211 212 380
Electronic Monitoring $915,344 $1,631,516 $453,644 813 1,408 900
Family Counseling $297,045 $0 $979,299 160 0 219
Functional Family Therapy` $0 $148,602 $152,204 0 88 26
Gang Intervention $244,909 $272,757 $234,436 68 100 90
Gender Specific Programming for Boys $46,256 $59,729 $58,741 513 483 79
Gender Specific Programming for Girls $218,303 $175,925 $245,110 179 194 583
Group Counseling $105,000 $250,720 $37,000 92 882 10
Individual Mental Health Counseling $1,320,794 $1,388,143 $1,359,696 956 883 1,155
Intensive Probation Supervision $12,806,836 $10,661,337 $10,228,943 20,435 5,671 2,554
Job Readiness Training $17,396 $114,376 $88,630 159 185 149
Life/Independent Living Skills Training $114,517 $71,423 $47,303 660 593 754
Mental Health Screening $393,970 $316,687 $294,771 777 435 642
Mentoring $395,209 $410,445 $353,490 133 317 208
Other Direct Service $5,603,280 $3,534,936 $3,482,374 3,278 4,415 3,894
Parenting Education $78,948 $39,216 $2,609 126 150 71
Pro-Social Skills Training $1,364,764 $1,160,562 $1,369,504 509 611 802
Re-Entry or Aftercare Services $4,529,207 $4,470,851 $4,223,258 560 1,648 1,267
Recreational Activities $145,175 $195,316 $127,471 702 1,042 880
Restitution $9,217 $25,174 $0 34 100 0
Restorative Justice $29,773 $82,957 $8,506 46 58 17
Risk and/or Needs Assessment $1,504,083 $1,537,753 $1,514,072 8,840 9,430 8,555
Special Education Services $13,250 $13,250 $13,250 320 275 360
Substance Abuse Screening $11,875 $28,679 $4,409 130 275 250
Transitional Living Services/Placement $26,005 $38,563 $36,285 32 43 31
Tutoring $20,500 $16,500 $7,229 20 35 37
Vocational Training $131,723 $287,844 $338,342 178 380 172
All Direct Services $34,323,367 $31,029,248 $29,839,086 42,247 32,007 27,014
Capital Improvements $152,006 $67,960 $23,516
Contract Services $361,572 $334,056 $348,110
Equipment $62,774 $115,940 $184,201
Other Capacity Bldg./Maint. Activities $332,708 $338,144 $565,810
Other Procurements $0 $131,396 $221,197
Staff Salaries/Benefits $976,977 $1,380,807 $1,281,002
Staff Training/Professional Development $26,094 $29,786 $0
All Capacity Building Activities $1,912,131 $2,398,089 $2,623,836
Total $119,557,716 $125,886,119 $100,158,880 55,025 43,802 42,376
11
YOBG Expenditures by Fiscal Year Allocation
Counties are not required to spend YOBG funds in the year that they are allocated.
Table 7 shows the YOBG funding sources (fiscal year allocations) that were used by
counties during FY 2015-16. As shown in the table, about 75 percent of all YOBG funds
spent in FY 2015-16 were taken from the FY 2015-16 allocation. Another 23 percent of
the YOBG expenditures were from the FY 2014-15 allocation, followed by much smaller
amounts from prior year allocations. The $89,627,917 spent from the FY 2015-16
allocation constitutes 70 percent of the total allocation of $127,465,093 received by the
counties in FY 2015-16.3 Allocation year sources of FY 2015-16 YOBG expenditures for
each county are presented in Appendix F.
Table 7: YOBG Expenditures by Allocation Year
Allocation Year Expenditure Amount Percent Total
FY 2015-16 $89,627,917 74.97%
FY 2014-15 $27,043,222 22.62%
FY 2013-14 $2,203,381 1.84%
FY 2012-13 $452,835 0.38%
FY 2011-12 $12,169 0.01%
FY 2010-11 $7,670 0.01%
FY 2009-10 $210,522 0.18%
All Allocations $119,557,716 100.00%
Leveraging of YOBG Funds
As mentioned previously, for each Expenditure Category funded by YOBG, counties are
required to report expenditures from funds received under the JJCPA program, as well
as other funding sources. Table 8 summarizes this information and shows that for all
Placements, Direct Services, and Capacity Building/Maintenance Activities reported by
counties, YOBG funds ($119,557,716) accounted for 65.62 percent of the overall
spending on those items. In addition to the YOBG funds spent on those items, 1.79
percent of the total expenditures came from JJCPA funds ($3,253,001), and the
remaining 32.59 percent of total expenditures came from other funding sources
($59,385,497). Again this year, as a percentage of total reported expenditures, the
contribution of YOBG funds was greatest for Direct Services (85.82 percent) and
smallest for Capacity Building/Maintenance Activities (19.58 percent). Overall, these
results indicate that for every $1 in YOBG funds spent by counties, an additional $0.52
was spent from other funding sources ($0.03 from JJCPA; $0.49 from other sources).4, 5
3 By comparison, 77% of 2014-15 expenditures were made from the 2014-15 allocation,
4 This compares to 48 cents in other funds spent for every YOBG dollar in 2014-15, 59 cents in other funds spent for
every YOBG dollar in 2013-14, 62 cents in other funds spent for every YOBG dollar in 2012-13, and 56 cents in other
funds spent for every YOBG dollar spent in 2011-12.
12
Table 8: Expenditures from YOBG, JJCPA and Other Funding Sources
YOBG Expenditures JJCPA Expenditures Other Expenditures All Expenditures
Amount % Total Amount % Total Amount % Total Amount
Placements $83,322,218 62.92% $1,573,755 1.19% $47,539,756 35.90% $132,435,729
Direct Services $3,323,367 85.82% $1,679,246 4.20% $3,993,534 9.99% $39,984,272
Cap Bldg./Maint. $1,912,131 19.58% $0 0.00% $7,852,207 80.32% $9,776,213
Total $119,557,716 65.62% $3,253,001 1.79% $59,385,497 32.59% $182,196,214
Table 9 shows expenditures from all sources (YOBG, JJCPA and Other Funds) in each
of the past seven fiscal years. In FY 2009-10, YOBG expenditures accounted for the
largest percentage of total expenditures (71.6 percent). Between FYs 2010-11 and
2013-14, YOBG expenditures as a percentage of total expenditures were very similar
(63.2 percent in FY 2013-14, 61.9 percent in FY 2012-13; 63.9 percent in FY 2011-12;
62.0 percent in FY 2010-11). This percentage increased slightly in FY 2014-15 and
decreased slightly in FY 2015-16. Over the seven years that counties have been
reporting expenditure data, both JJCPA and Other Funds expenditures have fluctuated
minimally from year to year. Comparing FY 2015-16 to FY 2014-15, JJCPA and Other
Funds expenditures as a percentage of total expenditures increased to 1.79 percent
and 32.59 percent, respectively.
Table 9: Fiscal year Comparisons of All Funding Sources
YOBG Funds JJCPA Funds Other Funds All Funds
Fiscal Year Amount % Total Amount % Total Amount % Total Amount
2015-16 $119,557,716 65.62% $3,253,001 1.79% $59,385,497 32.59% $182,196,214
2014-15 $125,886,118 67.80% $2,321,554 1.30% $57,459,896 30.90% $185,667,568
2013-14 $100,158,880 63.20% $1,657,708 1.00% $56,833,480 35.80% $158,650,068
2012-13 $88,483,617 61.90% $1,990,221 1.40% $52,542,355 36.70% $143,016,193
2011-12 $90,795,286 63.90% $2,884,901 2.00% $48,437,748 34.10% $142,117,935
2010-11 $97,103,010 62.00% $2,053,926 1.30% $57,526,537 36.70% $156,683,473
2009-10 $86,570,073 71.60% $2,949,940 2.40% $31,409,664 26.00% $120,926,677
5 See Appendix G for breakdowns of per capita costs for each Expenditure Category for all funding sources and for
YOBG expenditures only.
13
Planned Versus Actual YOBG Expenditures
In addition to reporting annually to the BSCC on actual YOBG expenditures, in the
spring of each year counties are required to submit a report of planned
YOBG expenditures for the upcoming fiscal year. Table 10 provides comparative
information on planned and actual YOBG activities and expenditures for FY 2015-16.
As indicated, 25 fewer “Programs” (Placement, Direct Service, or Capacity
Building/Maintenance Activity) than planned were funded by YOBG, and over 27,000
fewer youth were served. Total YOBG expenditures were about $3.7 million more than
anticipated due to more-than-expected YOBG dollars being spent on Salaries and
Benefits, Services and Supplies, and other expenditures. Conversely, spending on
Professional Services, Community Based Organizations, Fixed Assets & Equipment,
and Administrative Overhead6 were lower than anticipated.
Table 10: Planned Versus Actual YOBG Expenditures by Budget Line Item
Percent
Planned Actual Difference Change
Programs 260 235 -25 -9.6%
Youth Served 82,112 55,025 -27,087 -33.0%
Salaries & Benefits $86,532,290 $93,862,088 $7,329,798 8.5%
Services & Supplies $7,958,126 $10,195,540 $2,237,414 28.1%
Professional Services $9,876,124 $6,699,295 -$3,176,829 -32.2%
CBOs $5,897,684 $5,065,143 -$832,541 -14.1%
Fixed Assets & Equipment $201,238 $83,356 -$117,882 -58.6%
Administrative Overhead $4,968,592 $3,204,033 -$1,764,559 -35.5%
Other Expenditures $412,211 $448,261 $36,050 8.7%
Total Expenditures $115,846,265 $119,557,716 $3,711,451 3.2%
Table 11 provides a further breakdown of planned versus actual activities and
expenditures within each of the three major Expenditure Category Types. As indicated
in this table, actual expenditures were far more than planned in the Placement
Expenditure Category Type, even with only three less Placement types delivered from
what was planned. There were 10 fewer Direct Services programs and 15 fewer
Capacity Building/Maintenance Activities actually delivered in comparison to what was
planned. Turning back to expenditures, actual YOBG expenditures exceeded planned
expenditures for Placements. Direct Services and Capacity Building/Maintenance
Activities expenditures were reported far less than originally planned—over $10 million
less than planed was expended for Direct Services and more than $41 million less was
expended for Capacity Building/Maintenance in FY 2015-16.
6 Administrative Overhead includes all costs associated with administration of the program, placement, service,
strategy, activity and/or operation being supported by YOBG funds. This could include the cost of management
positions, program evaluation, information systems, utilities, etc.
14
As shown in Appendix H, the variance between planned and actual expenditures is
primarily attributable to just a small number of counties. During FY 2015-16, Los
Angeles spent over $9 million more than originally planned, while Riverside County
spent $2.4 million less than planned.
Table 11: Planned and Actual YOBG Expenditures by Expenditure
Category Type
Category Total
Program Expenditure Type Programs Expenditures
Planned 44 $36,977,780
Placements Actual 41 $83,322,218
Difference -3 $46,344,438
Planned 17 3 $45 ,296,613
Direct Services Actual 163 $34,323,367
Difference -10 -$10,973,246
Capacity Planned 4 6 $42 ,955,324
Bldg./Maint. Actual 31 $1,912,131
Activities Difference -15 -$41,043,193
While planned versus actual YOBG expenditures are presented by County in Appendix
H, Appendix I provides information on planned versus actual YOBG expenditures by
Program Type (i.e., individual Expenditure Category within each of the three major
Expenditure Category Types). The largest variances were the result of more spending
than planned for Camps and Juvenile Hall and less than planned for Intensive Probation
Supervision and Other Placement.
In comparing planned versus actual expenditures, it is important to keep in mind the
funding structure of the YOBG program. When counties submit their planned
expenditures in May of each year, it is unknown how much they will actually receive.
This has been particularly true since enactment of Public Safety Realignment, which
created the possibility of growth funding for YOBG. In fact, counties have received
funding augmentations each of the past four years as a result of higher-than-anticipated
Sales Tax revenues; i.e., growth funding. Looking specifically at FY 2015-16, counties
received an additional $6.8 million in YOBG funding due to growth. However, these
funds were not disbursed until October 2016, six months after the deadline for counties
to submit expenditure plans. As a result of this timing, county expenditure plans do not
include growth funds. In reporting actual expenditures for each year, growth funds – if
spent during the reporting year – are included. The variance between planned and
actual expenditures may be partially explained by this occurrence. AB 1998 addresses
this by eliminating the requirement for counties to submit planned expenditures.
15
4
County Descriptions of Highlights
In an effort to showcase some of the work being done by counties with YOBG funds,
this year counties were offered the opportunity to highlight one or more of their YOBG-
funded programs. Included below are the submissions the BSCC received as prepared
by the counties.
ALAMEDA COUNTY – Intensive Supervision Unit
“The Alameda County Probation Department Intensive Supervision Unit (ISU) is
committed to preserving, strengthening and assisting families within their communities.
Youth and families are provided with community based services and interventions as
well as intensive supervision services to include regular contact by the probation officer
up to three times per month. In addition to these services, the Alameda County
Probation Department ISU also organizes and provides pro-social activities for ISU
youth. Pro-social activities are a staple of the program which strives to expose youth to
the arts while giving them the opportunity to travel outside of their local community to
engage in a variety of new activities. One such activity occurred on December 3, 2016,
where the ISU sponsored and chaperoned youth to the Lion King musical in San
Francisco. Prior to the musical, the youth were also treated to lunch at a popular local
restaurant. The youth had a great time and had the opportunity to be enriched by the
arts, culture, theater, travel and more.
In the spring of 2017, the Alameda County Probation ISU will be providing its youth with
hygiene kits. Staff determined there is a need for very basic health and beauty
products, such as: soap, toothpaste, mouth wash, dental floss, foot powder, finger nail
clippers, etc.”
BUTTE COUNTY – Strengthening Families & Fresh Start Youth Farm
“Butte County Probation has multiple programs and projects that are funded through
YOBG. Two of the programs the Department feels are exceptional are the
Strengthening Families Program and the Fresh Start Youth Farm.
The Strengthening Families Program is a nationally and internationally recognized
evidence-based family skills training program. It has been found to significantly reduce
problem behaviors, delinquency, and alcohol and drug use in children. The program is
designed to decrease maltreatment of children as parents strengthen the bond with their
children and learn effective parenting skills.
16
The program is three hours per week for fourteen weeks. Each night begins with a sit-
down family dinner. Staff model and assist families during mealtime with communication
skills being introduced as session topics. After dinner, break-out sessions begin and are
divided by age. Each group lasts an hour and then during the final hour the families
work on a skill together. Topics include: managing stress, encouraging good behavior,
communication, family meetings, peer pressure, problem solving, and anger.
The uniqueness from Butte County Probation’s perspective is that the department has
trained over forty-five staff members to directly facilitate this curriculum. The
commitment to train this many staff ensures the department’s ability to provide this
valuable program to the families that need it. Approximately 18 families have already
completed the full 14-week training cycle.
The Fresh Start Youth Farm was developed to provide youth with work readiness
skills and critical thinking skills, while increasing vocational and educational skills. The
farm was built from the ground up by the youth in the program. They have learned to
build raised beds, install irrigation systems, plant, tend, and harvest vegetables. During
the last two seasons, the youth have sold (by suggested donation) the produce at a
farmer’s market style booth in front of the juvenile hall. The money raised from the
sales of the produce are placed in a scholarship fund and at the end of the season
youth apply for a scholarship. The money they receive from the scholarship fund is first
used to pay off any outstanding victim restitution or Court obligations.
Additionally, during the season, youth are trained in customer service, food handling,
and financial literacy. Youth involved in the program leave with a work readiness
portfolio. The portfolio includes the following: a resume, their social security card, birth
certificate, California identification card, California Food Handlers Certification, First Aid
and CPR card, a customer service training certificate, certification from Hunter Irrigation,
and any additional certifications they complete. The youth working at the Fresh Start
Youth Farm leave prepared to obtain employment.”
17
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY – Work Experience Program
“The Contra Costa County Juvenile Hall currently operates a work experience program
for youth who have graduated high school and are committed to the Youthful Offender
Treatment Program (YOTP). The Work Experience Program, while not an Evidence
Based practice at this time, serves to fill a gap for youth who are not appropriate to
continue to attend High School classes and are also not necessarily college bound in
the traditional sense. Lead by two dedicated retired Juvenile Institution Officers (JIOs)
the participants in the program complete landscaping, custodial and construction
projects. The JIOs assigned to the program are skilled in these trades.
In 2014, the Work Experience projects began with landscaping of the playfield at the
Juvenile Hall. Working collaboratively with the County General Services Department,
participants cleaned up an unkempt area, pulled weeds, laid bark and planted
landscaping. To this day, the playfield landscaping has been maintained and proven to
be an essential asset for providing fresh air and large muscle activities to the residents
of Juvenile Hall.
Shortly after the landscaping project was complete, the Work Experience participants
began to work on wood working projects in collaboration with the County General
Services Department and during these projects they were in contact with the Local
Carpenter’s union. The first project included the building of a shed that exposed the
participants to carpenters, electricians, and painters. They participated in many
different aspects of the construction including laying the concrete foundation, forming
the structure, installing insulation and finishing the roof. One youth involved in the
project was given an apprenticeship with the Carpenter’s Union, two are on the wait list
and many more will surely follow. The participants have moved on to smaller projects
and are currently building Adirondack chairs and jewelry boxes. As part of the program
the young men receive a lot of one on one time from the JIOs, learning to clean and
care for the tools they use, and developing a real understanding of the importance of
work ethic.
Throughout their time in the program, the participants not only gain tangible skills that
are translatable to desirable employment later, but also grow as young men. Most enter
the program with no tangible skills at all, but after a lot of patience and repetition,
something clicks. Working in an environment that fosters respect, they connect to the
projects and their JIO leaders on a personal level. Participants overcome conflict, are
able to express themselves, and are given an opportunity to think and make their own
decisions. This project pairs well with the Evidence Based treatment that they receive
in their YOTP curriculum, as they are able to use the concepts taught in a hands-on
environment.
For the past two years the Work Experience program has proven to be a successful
project that has touched the lives of 40+ youth, eight of which, have since graduated
from the YOTP program and moved on into adulthood.”
18
NAPA COUNTY – Evening Reporting Center
“The Evening Reporting Center (ERC) is a program we have been using in Napa
County since 2009. We have seen many youth make positive changes during and post
program. The program is a community based alternative to detention which provides
highly structured evidence-based programming and prosocial activities during high-risk
time periods. The ages of youth in the ERC are between 14 and 17 ½ years. Eligible
youth have been assessed at a moderate or high risk to reoffend by the Youth Level of
Service Assessment and do not have a prior or pending violent felony or sex offense.
ERC is a 60 day program (Mon-Fri) and is a collaboration between Napa County
Probation and Aldea Behavioral Health at the Wolfe Center. The youth meet each day
at the ERC building which is off site from 3:30pm-7:00pm. While attending the program
youth receive evidence-based programming by staff trained as cognitive behavior
facilitators targeting their criminogenic needs. The evidence-based programming
provided at the ERC includes 50 hours of cognitive behavioral training groups, weekly
drug and alcohol education groups, guest speakers, pro-social activities, job skills and
groups for the parents. Each ERC youth has an individualized case plan and is
supervised by the Senior Probation Officer dedicated to coordinating the ERC program.
Additionally, dinner is provided for youth which brings them together with staff for a
“family style” dinner each evening.
Youth who complete the ERC program return to the community with a better
understanding of the factors that contribute to their own delinquency, an increased
knowledge about the consequences of crime, improved life skills with a focus on
empathy and problem solving, and job skills. Although, the youth face many obstacles
and the ERC alone will not completely change their life situations it offers them a
chance to take control of their life and choose a path to a more successful future. We
have seen our youth make great change around their education, family dynamics and
their attitudes while in the program. Many of them start the ERC counting down the
days until they are finished and leave able to say “this program really helped me.”
During Fiscal Year (FY) 2015-2016, the ERC program participants were ordered a total
of 730 days in Juvenile Hall, of which only 270 days were served resulting in Juvenile
Hall bed savings of 460 days. Due in part to the success of the ERC program, the
average daily juvenile hall population was reduced drastically from 20 youth in FY 14-15
to 14 youth in FY 15-16. During this same time frame the ERC served 47 youth and 40
of them successfully completed the 60-day program.
Many of our youth have not experienced many successes in their lives, which is why it
is so important that we celebrate with an ERC graduation every few months for each
youth who successfully completes the program. The graduations include the youth,
families, ERC staff, and probation officers. In addition, the Chief Probation Officer
19
always attends and offers them kind words about their success. We believe the ERC is
a great program and offers youth a variety of services that will support future successes
throughout their lives.”
RIVERSIDE COUNTY – Intensive Re-integration Services
“In July 2015, Riverside County was awarded $948,510 through the Mentally Ill
Offender Crime Reduction (MIOCR) Grant to fund the implementation of Intensive Re-
Integration Services (IRIS), which is a program within our YOBG funded Youth
Treatment and Education Center (YTEC) program. IRIS is a comprehensive three-
phase treatment program collaboratively designed by probation and behavioral health
staff to reduce recidivism among mentally ill youthful offenders and assist them with
successful community re-entry. In January 2016, a 10-15 bed IRIS unit was established
at Riverside Juvenile Hall. Youth who are committed to the YTEC program are
screened for IRIS and accepted if they meet the program criteria. During IRIS’s initial
phase, youth receive intensive treatment through multi-modal, evidence-based
practices. Aggression Replacement Training, Moral Reconation Therapy, and Trauma-
Based Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy, Seeking Safety, and Functional Family Therapy
were programs specifically chosen for the IRIS unit because they have been identified
as therapy approaches with strong empirical research supporting their effectiveness
with juvenile offenders. In the second phase, re-entry planning focuses on the youth’s
post-custody needs, such as appropriate housing, educational services, employment
preparation, and life skills development. In the final phase, the youth are supervised in
the community by an Enhanced Aftercare probation officer who has been trained in
Functional Family Probation Supervision, an evidence-based case management
approach that engages the entire family in the youth’s rehabilitation. Of the sixteen
youth who have been accepted into the IRIS program, seven have completed the in-
custody phase and are currently being supervised in the community. Only one youth
has been returned to court for a new law violation. There have been five high school
graduates, two junior college enrollments, and two job placements. IRIS youth who
demonstrate appropriate behavior are rewarded with increased outings to educational
and recreational events and are given opportunities to perform community service. The
IRIS program is having a positive impact on the lives of youth with mental health needs,
and Riverside County is deeply appreciative of the more than $12 million in YOBG
funds that help sustain the YTEC program and its various activities.”
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY – Luna Evening Center Program
“Youthful Offender Block Grant (YOBG) funds support partial costs associated with the
Santa Cruz Probation Luna Evening Center Program (LEC). The LEC started in 2005 as
a short term, immediate intervention and detention alternative program for pre and post
adjudicated youth. Services are provided to youth who are struggling to meet their terms
of probation and/or committing new offenses. The LEC also provides counseling and
targeted treatment for alcohol and substance abuse. Snacks and meals are also
20
provided but most important is the fact that youth attending the LEC are off of the
streets and in a safe environment after school and, for the majority of them, before their
parents/guardians return home from work.”
SONOMA COUNTY – Juvenile Sex Offender Program
“For many years, Sonoma County Probation Department has had a community-based
program for youth who have sexually offended. These lower risk youth are able to
remain in the community while receiving intensive treatment. The Probation Department
currently partners with San Francisco Forensic Institute and there are two specialized
Probation caseloads for youth in the program. These probation officers meet and
communicate regularly with clinicians from San Francisco Forensic Institute to ensure
quality treatment and appropriate supervision of the delinquent youth are met.
While the program is relatively small, it provides an alternative to out of home placement
for low-risk youth who have committed an offense of a sexual nature. In addition to
receiving services from a provider specializing in sex offender treatment, youth may
also participate in other services such as Healthy Relationships, a dating violence
prevention program funded by JJCPA. With continuum of care reform and the expanded
availability of foster homes for delinquent youth, we may see the expansion of this
program, allowing even more youth to remain in less restrictive environments.
In July 2015, the Probation Department moved to the Collaborative Model for treating
juveniles who have sexually offended. The model is described in a position paper
published by the California Coalition on Sexually Offending: Guidelines for the
Assessment and Treatment of Sexually Abusive Juveniles. The paper articulates the
research which supports the model and how best to assess and treat sexually abusive
juveniles. Important components of the model are:
1. The use of a collaborative team (probation, treatment provider and the youth and
family);
2. Treatment focused on skill building and a strengths-based approach;
3. A supportive relationship between treatment staff and juveniles;
4. The use of prosocial treatment interventions;
5. The use of interventions which fit the juvenile’s needs; and,
6. The use of quality program design.
This model draws upon other important models in the field of community corrections,
such as the Risk-Needs-Responsivity model and the Positive Youth Justice model,
while providing an alternative to the Containment Model of sex offender treatment,
designed for treatment of adults.”
21
Appendix A
(See page 1 of the report)
Welfare & Institutions Code
1950. The purpose of this chapter is to enhance the capacity of local communities to
implement an effective continuum of response to juvenile crime and delinquency.
1951. (a) There is hereby established the Youthful Offender Block Grant Fund.
(b) Allocations from the Youthful Offender Block Grant Fund shall be used to enhance
the capacity of county probation, mental health, drug and alcohol, and other county
departments to provide appropriate rehabilitative and supervision services to youthful
offenders subject to Sections 731.1, 733, 1766, and 1767.35. Counties, in expending
the Youthful Offender Block Grant allocation, shall provide all necessary services
related to the custody and parole of the offenders.
(c) The county of commitment is relieved of obligation for any payment to the state
pursuant to Section 912 for each offender who is not committed to the custody of the
state solely pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 733, and for each offender who is
supervised by the county of commitment pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 1766 or
subdivision (b) of Section 1767.35.
1952. For the 2007–08 fiscal year, all of the following shall apply:
(a) An amount equal to the total of all of the following shall be transferred from the
General Fund to the Youthful Offender Block Grant Fund:
(1) One hundred seventeen thousand dollars ($117,000) per ward multiplied by the
average daily population (ADP) for the year for wards who are not committed to the
custody of the state pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 733, and Sections 731.1 and
1767.35.
(2) Fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) per parolee multiplied by the ADP for the year for
parolees who are supervised by the county of commitment pursuant to subdivision (b) of
Section 1766.
(3) An amount equal to 5 percent of the total of paragraphs (1) and (2). This amount
shall be reserved by the Controller for distribution by the Department of Finance, upon
recommendation of the Corrections Standards Authority, in collaboration with the
Division of Juvenile Facilities, for unforeseen circumstances associated with the
implementation of the act that added this chapter. This amount is a one-time allocation
and shall not be built into the base described in subdivision (a) of Section 1953 unless
the Department of Finance finds a continuation of unforeseen circumstances. A county
that wishes to seek funds from this reserved amount shall submit a request to the
Corrections Standards Authority that outlines the unusual circumstances that exist in the
22
county and why the county’s Youthful Offender Block Grant is inadequate to meet the
county financial needs to accommodate and supervise youthful offenders pursuant to
the act that added this chapter. The Corrections Standards Authority shall submit its
recommendation to the Department of Finance for approval.
(b) Any portion of the funds described in paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) that is unused
during the 2007–08 fiscal year shall revert to the General Fund.
1953. For the 2008–09 fiscal year, the total of the following amounts shall be transferred
from the General Fund to the Youthful Offender Block Grant Fund:
(a) The amount transferred to the Youthful Offender Block Grant Fund for the 2007–08
fiscal year, as described in subdivision (a) of Section 1952, adjusted to account for full-
year impacts.
(b) One hundred seventeen thousand dollars ($117,000) per ward multiplied by the ADP
for the year for wards who are not committed to the custody of the state pursuant to
subdivision (c) of Section 733, and Sections 731.1 and 1767.35.
(c) Fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) per parolee multiplied by the ADP for the year for
parolees who are supervised by the county of commitment pursuant to subdivision (b) of
Section 1766.
1953.5. For the 2009–10 fiscal year, the total of the following amounts shall be
transferred from the General Fund to the Youthful Offender Block Grant Fund:
(a) The amount transferred to the Youthful Offender Block Grant Fund for the 2008–09
fiscal year, as described in subdivision (a) of Section 1952, adjusted to account for full-
year impacts.
(b) One hundred seventeen thousand dollars ($117,000) per ward multiplied by the ADP
for the year for wards who are not committed to the custody of the state pursuant to
subdivision (c) of Section 733, and Sections 731.1 and 1767.35.
(c) Fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) per parolee multiplied by the ADP for the year for
parolees who are supervised by the county of commitment pursuant to subdivision (b) of
Section 1766.
1954.1. For each fiscal year, the Director of Finance shall determine the total amount of
the Youthful Offender Block Grant and the allocation for each county, pursuant to
Sections 1955 and 1956, and shall report those findings to the Controller. The Controller
shall make an allocation from the Youthful Offender Block Grant Fund to each county in
accordance with the report.
1955. (a) The allocation amount for each county from the Youthful Offender Block Grant
Fund for offenders subject to Sections 733, 1766, and 1767.35 shall be allocated in four
equal installments, to be paid in September, December, March, and June of each fiscal
23
year, until June 30, 2013. Commencing with the 2013–14 fiscal year, the allocation
amount for each county from the Youthful Offender Block Grant Special Account
established in paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section 30025 of the Government
Code for offenders subject to Sections 733, 1766, and 1767.35 shall be allocated in
monthly installments. In each fiscal year, the allocation amount shall be determined as
follows:
(1) Fifty percent based on the number of the county’s juvenile felony court dispositions,
calculated as a percentage of the state total. By July 10 of each year, the Department of
Justice shall provide to the Department of Finance the number of juvenile felony court
dispositions for each county for the previous calendar year.
(2) Fifty percent based on the county’s population of minors from 10 to 17 years of age,
inclusive, according to the most recent data published by the Department of Finance,
calculated as a percentage of the state total.
(b) Each county shall receive a minimum block grant allocation of fifty-eight thousand
five hundred dollars ($58,500) for the 2007–08 fiscal year, and a minimum block grant
allocation of one hundred seventeen thousand dollars ($117,000) for each fiscal year
thereafter.
(c) Commencing with the 2008–09 fiscal year, allocations shall be available to counties
that have met the requirements of Section 1961.
1956. The allocation for any eligible county from the Youthful Offender Block Grant
Fund for offenders subject to Section 731.1 shall be determined by the Department of
Finance, consistent with the ADP methodology and fiscal parameters used in Sections
1952, 1953, and 1953.5, for the corresponding fiscal year.
1960. The Legislature finds and declares that local youthful offender justice programs,
including both custodial and noncustodial corrective services, are better suited to
provide rehabilitative services for certain youthful offenders than state-operated
facilities. Local communities are better able than the state to provide these offenders
with the programs they require, in closer proximity to their families and communities,
including, but not limited to, all of the following:
(a) Implementing risk and needs assessment tools and evaluations to assist in the
identification of appropriate youthful offender dispositions and reentry plans.
(b) Placements in secure and semisecure youthful offender rehabilitative facilities and in
private residential care programs, with or without foster care waivers, supporting
specialized programs for youthful offenders.
(c) Nonresidential dispositions such as day or evening treatment programs, community
service, restitution, and drug-alcohol and other counseling programs based on an
offender’s assessed risks and needs.
24
(d) House arrest, electronic monitoring, and intensive probation supervision programs.
(e) Reentry and aftercare programs based on individual aftercare plans for each
offender who is released from a public or private placement or confinement facility.
(f) Capacity building strategies to upgrade the training and qualifications of juvenile
justice and probation personnel serving the juvenile justice caseload.
(g) Regional program and placement networks, including direct brokering and
placement locating networks to facilitate out-of-county dispositions for counties lacking
programs or facilities.
1960.5. (a) The State Commission on Juvenile Justice, pursuant to Section 1798.5,
shall develop a Juvenile Justice Operational Master Plan. On or before January 1, 2009,
the commission shall develop and make available for implementation by the counties
the following strategies:
(1) Risk and needs assessment tools to evaluate the programming and security needs
of all youthful offenders and at-risk youth.
(2) Juvenile justice universal data collection elements, which shall be common to all
counties.
(3) Criteria and strategies to promote a continuum of evidence-based responses to
youthful offenders.
(b) In drafting the Juvenile Justice Operational Master Plan, the commission shall take
into consideration both of the following:
(1) Evidence-based programs and risk and needs assessment tools currently in use by
the counties.
(2) The costs of implementing these strategies.
(c) On or before May 1, 2008, the commission shall provide an interim report to the
Legislature, which shall include the status of the work of the commission and the
strategies it has identified to date.
1961. (a) On or before May 1 of each year, each county shall prepare and submit to the
Board of State and Community Corrections a Juvenile Justice Development Plan on its
proposed programs, strategies, and system enhancements for the next fiscal year from
the Youthful Offender Block Grant Fund described in Section 1951. The plan shall
include all of the following:
(1) A description of the programs, placements, services, strategies, and system
enhancements to be funded by the block grant allocation pursuant to this chapter,
including, but not limited to, the programs, tools, and strategies outlined in Section
1960.
25
(2) A description of how the plan relates to or supports the county’s overall strategy for
dealing with youthful offenders who have not committed an offense described in
subdivision (b) of Section 707, and who are no longer eligible for commitment to the
Division of Juvenile Facilities under Section 733 as of September 1, 2007.
(3) A description of any regional agreements or arrangements to be supported by the
block grant allocation pursuant to this chapter.
(4) A description of how the programs, placements, services, or strategies identified in
the plan coordinate with multiagency juvenile justice plans and programs under
paragraph (4) of subdivision (b) of Section 30061 of the Government Code.
(b) The plan described in subdivision (a) shall be submitted to the Board of State and
Community Corrections in a format, as specified by the board, that consolidates the
form for submission of the plan with the form for submission of the multiagency juvenile
justice plan to be developed and submitted to the board as provided by paragraph (4) of
subdivision (b) of Section 30061 of the Government Code.
(c) Each county receiving an allocation from the Youthful Offender Block Grant Fund
described in Section 1951 shall, by October 1 of each year, submit an annual report to
the Board of State and Community Corrections on its utilization of the block grant funds
in the preceding fiscal year. The report shall be in a format specified by the board that
consolidates the report required by this subdivision with the annual report required to be
submitted to the board under the provisions of subparagraph (D) of paragraph (4) of
subdivision (b) of Section 30061 of the Government Code, and shall include all of the
following:
(1) A description of the programs, placements, services, strategies, and system
enhancements supported by block grant funds in the preceding fiscal year, and an
accounting of all of the county’s expenditures of block grant funds for the preceding
fiscal year.
(2) A description and expenditure report for programs, strategies, and system
enhancements that have been cofunded during the preceding fiscal year using funds
provided under this chapter and juvenile justice funds provided under paragraph (4) of
subdivision (b) of Section 30061 of the Government Code.
(3) Countywide juvenile justice trend data available from existing statewide juvenile
justice data systems or networks, as specified by the board, including, but not limited to,
arrests, diversions, petitions filed, petitions sustained, placements, incarcerations,
subsequent petitions and probation violations, and including, in a format to be specified
by the board, a summary description or analysis, based on available information, of how
the programs, strategies, and system enhancements funded pursuant to this chapter
have or may have contributed to, or influenced, the juvenile justice data trends identified
in the report.
26
(d) The board shall prepare and make available to the public on its Internet Web site
summaries of the annual county reports submitted in accordance with subdivision (c).
By March 1 of each year, the board also shall prepare and submit to the Governor and
the Legislature a report summarizing county utilizations of block grant funds in the
preceding fiscal year, including a summary of the programs, strategies, system
enhancements, and related expenditures made by each county utilizing Youthful
Offender Block Grant funds. The annual report to the Governor and the Legislature shall
also summarize the countywide trend data and any other pertinent information
submitted by counties indicating how the programs, strategies, and system
enhancements supported by Youthful Offender Block Grant funds have or may have
contributed to, or influenced, the trends identified. The board may consolidate the
annual report to the Governor and the Legislature required under this section with the
annual report required by subparagraph (E) of paragraph (4) of subdivision (b) of
Section 30061 of the Government Code. The annual report shall be submitted in
compliance with Section 9795 of the Government Code. The annual report shall also be
posted for access by the public on the Internet Web site of the board.
1962. The Board of State and Community Corrections may monitor the forms,
documents, and information submitted by counties pursuant to Section 1961 and may
advise counties and provide technical assistance on the implementation and
requirements of Section 1961.
(Amended by Stats. 2016, Ch. 880, Sec. 6. Effective January 1, 2017.)
27
Appendix B
(See page 5 of the report)
FY 2015-16 Expenditures and Per Capita Costs by Expenditure Category (All Funding Sources)
Total Expenditures
Expenditure Category (All Funds) Per Capita Costs
Camp $43,122,063 $20,466
Home on Probation $9,157,228 $1,805
Juvenile Hall $11,529,324 $2,687
Other Placement $9,955,365 $28,525
Other Secure/Semi-Secure Rehab Facility $8,904,907 $10,200
Ranch $653,331 $7,686
All Placements $83,322,218 $12,737
After School Services $35,709 $235
Aggression Replacement Therapy $59,134 $384
Alcohol and Drug Treatment $419,939 $765
Anger Management $19,860 $1,324
Community Service $97,627 $394
Day or Evening Treatment Program $3,043,249 $4,449
Detention Assessment(s) $139,262 $271
Development of Case Plan $594,467 $2,817
Electronic Monitoring $1,914,293 $2,355
Family Counseling $615,894 $3,849
Functional Family Therapy` $0 $0
Gang Intervention $244,909 $3,602
Gender Specific Programming for Boys $130,413 $254
Gender Specific Programming for Girls $218,303 $1,220
Group Counseling $105,000 $1,141
Individual Mental Health Counseling $1,535,365 $1,606
Intensive Probation Supervision $14,794,614 $724
Job Readiness Training $17,396 $109
Life/Independent Living Skills Training $114,517 $174
Mental Health Screening $393,970 $507
Mentoring $395,209 $2,971
Other Direct Service $6,054,262 $1,847
Parenting Education $78,948 $627
Pro-Social Skills Training $1,451,151 $2,851
Re-Entry or Aftercare Services $5,177,665 $9,246
Recreational Activities $145,175 $207
Restitution $9,217 $271
Restorative Justice $29,773 $647
Risk and/or Needs Assessment $2,081,297 $235
Special Education Services $13,250 $41
Substance Abuse Screening $11,875 $245
Transitional Living Services/Placement $26,005 $813
Tutoring $20,500 $1,025
Vocational Training $131,723 $740
All Direct Services $40,119,971 $1,446
Capital Improvements $152,006
Contract Services $361,572
Equipment $62,774
Other $332,708
Staff Salaries/Benefits $976,977
Staff Training/Professional Development $26,094
All Capacity Bldg./Maint. Activities $1,912,131
28
Appendix C
(See page 5 of the report)
Comparison of YOBG Expenditures by Budget Line Item
FY 2015-16 FY 2014-15 FY 2013-14 FY 2012-13 FY 2011-12
Line Item Amount % Total Amount % Total Amount % Total Amount % Total Amount % Total
Salaries & Benefits $93,862,088 78.7% $84,393,358 67.0% $78,401,472 78.3% $67,997,513 76.8% $69,501,485 76.5%
Services & Supplies $10,195,540 8.5% $10,052,700 8.0% $9,155,040 9.1% $8,124,244 9.2% $7,411,467 8.2%
Professional Services $6,699,295 5.6% $7,445,280 5.9% $7,286,047 7.3% $5,724,583 6.5% $7,268,432 8.0%
CBOs $5,065,143 4.2% $5,372,056 4.3% $4,376,689 4.4% $5,314,540 6.0% $3,764,557 4.1%
Fixed Assets $83,356 0.1% $125,495 0.1% $54,325 0.1% $232,369 0.3% $143,632 0.2%
Admin. Overhead $3,204,033 2.7% $18,333,217 14.6% $853,297 0.9% $701,427 0.8% $2,140,280 2.4%
Oher Costs $448,261 0.2% $164,012 0.1% $32,010 0.0% $388,941 0.4% $565,433 0.6%
Total $119,557,716 100.0% $125,886,118 100.0% $100,158,880 100.0% $88,483,617 100.0% $90,795,286 100.0%
29
Appendix D
(See page 6 of the report)
Comparison of YOBG Expenditures by Category Type
FY 2015-16 FY 2014-15 FY 2013-14 FY 2012-13 FY 2011-12
Expenditure Category
Type Amount % Total Amount % Total Amount % Total Amount % Total Amount % Total
Placements $83,322,218 69.69% $92,458,781 73.40% $67,695,958 67.60% $59,806,502 67.59% $63,039,975 69.43%
Direct Services $34,323,367 28.71% $31,029,248 24.70% $29,839,086 29.80% $26,486,759 29.93% $25,632,549 28.23%
Capacity Bldg./Maint. $1,912,131 1.60% $2,398,089 1.90% $2,623,836 2.60% $2,190,356 2.48% $2,122,762 2.34%
Total $119,557,716 100.00% $125,886,118 100.00% $100,158,880 100.00% $88,483,617 100.00% $90,795,286 100.00%
30
Appendix E
(See page 10 of the report)
Comparison of YOBG Expenditures by Expenditure Category and Fiscal Year
YOBG Expenditures Total Youth Served
Expenditure Category 2015-16 2014-15 2013-14 2012-13 2015-16 2014-15 2013-14 2012-13
Camp $43,122,063 $40,384,969 $37,014,095 $31,539,106 2,107 2,207 3,517 2,292
Home on Probation $9,157,228 $22,030,358 $7,416,618 $8,552,368 5,073 4,322 3,622 5,422
Juvenile Hall $11,529,324 $15,922,996 $8,427,844 $5,742,128 4,291 3,704 6,774 4,898
Other Placements $9,955,365 $5,592,611 $7,251,151 $6,094,416 349 686 768 816
Other Secure/Semi-Secure Rehab Facility $8,904,907 $8,389,583 $7,435,133 $7,760,575 873 842 650 1,093
Ranch $653,331 $138,265 $151,117 $117,909 85 34 31 38
All Placements $83,322,218 $92,458,782 $67,695,958 $59,806,502 12,778 11,795 15,362 14,559
After School Services $25,709 $25,896 $27,003 $32,221 152 102 311 295
Aggression Replacement Therapy $44,213 $123,664 $123,216 $173,938 154 166 208 189
Alcohol and Drug Treatment $419,939 $449,299 $648,721 $496,650 549 437 671 1,177
Anger Management $19,860 $15,884 $485 $0 15 15 8 0
Community Service $97,627 $112,892 $113,312 $103,518 248 298 209 173
Day or Evening Treatment Program $2,664,337 $2,703,531 $2,643,989 $2,529,646 684 568 844 693
Detention Assessment(s) $121,836 $182,380 $165,608 $154,713 514 508 678 734
Development of Case Plan $586,467 $482,441 $456,176 $11,342 211 212 380 295
Electronic Monitoring $915,344 $1,631,516 $453,644 $579,166 813 1,408 900 693
Family Counseling $297,045 $0 $979,299 $1,336,173 160 0 219 378
Functional Family Therapy $0 $148,602 $152,204 $158,287 0 88 26 74
Gang Intervention $244,909 $272,757 $234,436 $244,309 68 100 90 100
Gender Specific Programming for Boys $46,256 $59,729 $58,741 $163,966 513 483 79 360
Gender Specific Programming for Girls $218,303 $175,925 $245,110 $170,363 179 194 583 222
Group Counseling $105,000 $250,720 $37,000 $19,158 92 882 10 85
Individual Mental Health Counseling $1,320,794 $1,388,143 $1,359,696 $1,298,880 956 883 1,155 1,419
Intensive Probation Supervision $12,806,836 $10,661,337 $10,228,943 $6,633,044 20,435 5,671 2,554 2,745
Job Readiness Training $17,396 $114,376 $88,630 $103,507 159 185 149 205
Life/Independent Living Skills Training $114,517 $71,423 $47,303 $54,205 660 593 754 671
Mental Health Screening $393,970 $316,687 $294,771 $55,193 777 435 642 255
Mentoring $395,209 $410,445 $353,490 $216,765 133 317 208 93
Other Direct Service $5,603,280 $3,534,936 $3,482,374 $4,969,585 1,270 4,415 3,894 4,702
Parenting Education $78,948 $39,216 $2,609 $6,417 126 150 71 0
Pro-Social Skills Training $1,364,764 $1,160,562 $1,369,504 $829,230 509 611 802 691
Re-Entry or Aftercare Services $4,529,207 $4,470,851 $4,223,258 $3,665,753 560 1,648 1,267 1,789
Recreational Activities $145,175 $195,316 $127,471 $148,147 702 1,042 880 348
Restitution $9,217 $25,174 $0 $0 34 100
Restorative Justice $29,773 $82,957 $8,506 $4,950 46 58 17 22
Risk and/or Needs Assessment $1,504,083 $1,537,753 $1,514,072 $1,574,655 8,840 9,430 8,555 7,376
Special Education Services $13,250 $13,250 $13,250 $13,250 320 275 360 395
31
Appendix E (continued)
YOBG Expenditures Total Youth Served
Expenditure Category 2015-16 2014-15 2013-14 2012-13 2015-16 2014-15 2013-14 2012-13
Substance Abuse Screening $11,875 $28,679 $4,409 $0 130 275 250 0
Transitional Living Services/Placement $26,005 $38,563 $36,285 $60,476 32 43 31 55
Tutoring $20,500 $16,500 $7,229 $8,950 20 35 37 20
Vocational Training $131,723 $287,844 $338,342 $670,301 178 380 172 259
All Direct Services $34,323,367 $31,029,248 $29,839,086 $26,486,758 42,247 32,007 27,014 26,833
Capital Improvements $152,006 $67,960 $565,810 $132,101
Contract Services $361,572 $334,056 $184,201 $62,438
Equipment $62,774 $115,940 $23,516 $109,343
Other $332,708 $338,144 $348,110 $315,923
Other Procurements $0 $131,396 $0 $14,082
Staff Salaries/Benefits $976,977 $1,380,807 $1,281,002 $1,188,927
Staff Training/Professional Development $26,094 $29,786 $221,197 $367,542
All Capacity Building Activities $1,912,131 $2,398,089 $2,623,836 $2,190,356
Total $119,557,716 $125,886,119 $100,158,880 $88,483,616 55,025 43,802 42,376 41,392
32
Appendix F
(See page 12 of the report)
Allocation Year Source of FY 2015-16 YOBG Expenditures
Fisca l Year Alloca tion
Total YOBG FY 2015-16 FY 2014-15 FY 2013-14 FY 2012-13 FY 2011-12 FY 2010-11 FY 2009-10
County Expenditures Amount % Total Amount % Total Amount % Total Amount % Total Amount % Total Amount % Total Amount % Total
Alameda $3,628,289 $1,757,063 48.43% $1,859,373 51.25% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $11,853 0.33% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Alpine $104,497 $104,497 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Amador $119,696 $0 0.00% $119,696 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Butte $470,517 $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $470,517 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Calaveras $101,635 $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Colusa $102,128 $102,128 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Contra Costa $2,877,451 $2,877,451 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Del Norte $88,262 $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
El Dorado $518,000 $425,375 82.12% $92,625 17.88% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Fresno $3,830,540 $1,462,659 38.18% $2,367,881 61.82% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Glenn $93,632 $0 0.00% $93,632 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Humboldt $461,545 $461,545 100.00% $0 0.00% $12,995 2.82% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Imperial $542,601 $628,736 115.87% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Inyo $64,213 $64,213 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Kern $4,540,697 $4,540,697 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Kings $394,708 $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $47,804 12.11% $346,904 87.89% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Lake $153,250 $153,250 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Lassen $117,000 $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Los Angeles $32,523,624 $28,458,164 87.50% $3,571,943 10.98% $493,517 1.52% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Madera $441,623 $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Marin $717,459 $506,937 70.66% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $210,522 29.34%
Mariposa $103,194 $45,708 44.29% $57,486 55.71% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Mendocino $161,369 $0 0.00% $161,368 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $1 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Merced $1,205,780 $887,172 73.58% $318,608 26.42% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Modoc $117,000 $117,000 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Mono $40,733 $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Monterey $1,202,508 $840,800 69.92% $361,708 30.08% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Napa $462,689 $351,082 75.88% $111,607 24.12% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Nevada $222,074 $106,555 47.98% $115,519 52.02% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Orange $12,366,080 $12,366,080 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Placer $1,200,000 $0 0.00% $433,281 36.11% $664,201 55.35% $102,518 8.54% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Plumas $127,392 $127,392 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
33
Appendix F (continued)
Riverside $8,629,529 $1,813,753 21.02% $6,815,776 78.98% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Sacramento $7,410,531 $6,514,776 87.91% $895,755 12.09% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
San Benito $136,544 $0 0.00% $45,602 33.40% $90,942 66.60% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
San Bernardino $8,050,060 $8,050,060 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
San Diego $5,010,856 $1,586,410 31.66% $3,424,446 68.34% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
San Francisco $916,378 $590,582 64.45% $276,867 30.21% $37,531 4.10% $3,413 0.37% $315 0.03% $7,670 0.84% $0 0.00%
San Joaquin $2,273,262 $1,338,671 58.89% $934,591 41.11% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
San Luis Obispo $488,414 $488,414 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
San Mateo $1,895,499 $1,025,209 54.09% $870,290 45.91% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Santa Barbara $1,263,086 $1,544,176 122.25% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Santa Clara $3,525,074 $3,525,074 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Santa Cruz $501,488 $48,101 9.59% $453,387 90.41% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Shasta $444,325 $115,686 26.04% $328,639 73.96% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Sierra $117,000 $117,000 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Siskiyou $98,723 $98,723 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Solano $1,323,349 $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Sonoma $1,103,111 $0 0.00% $775,305 70.28% $327,806 29.72% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Stanislaus $1,121,905 $1,564,467 139.45% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Sutter $191,914 $0 0.00% $133,846 69.74% $58,068 30.26% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Tehama $204,146 $204,146 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Trinity $117,000 $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Tulare $2,165,902 $1,685,059 77.80% $480,843 22.20% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Tuolumne $117,500 $117,500 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Ventura $2,803,103 $988,287 35.26% $1,814,816 64.74% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Yolo $454,190 $454,190 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
Yuba $128,333 $0 0.00% $128,333 100.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00% $0 0.00%
All Counties $119,557,716 $89,627,917 73.80% $27,043,222 22.61% $2,203,381 1.84% $452,835 0.38% $12,169 0.01% $7,670 0.01% $210,522 0.18%
34
Appendix G
(See page 13 of the report)
Summary of Per Capita Costs
All Funds YOBG Funds
Expenditure Category Counties Statewide Min Max Statewide Min Max
Camp 13 $27,638 $284 $69,460 $19,991 $284 $49,672
Home on Probation 7 $2,537 $1,185 $12,101 $1,805 $445 $9,989
Juvenile Hall 19 $8,472 $175 $50,139 $2,687 $110 $28,359
Other Placement 15 $17,347 $33,053 $161,947 $28,525 $9,280 $51,473
Other Secure/Semi-Secure Rehab Facility 5 $12,477 $1,780 $86,819 $10,200 $1,780 $72,012
Ranch 4 $43,294 $9,548 $79,574 $7,686 $2,978 $39,600
All Placements 63 $18,628 $175 $161,947 $11,816 $110 $72,012
After School Services 2 $235 $224 $262 $169 $40 $263
Aggression Replacement Therapy 2 $384 $310 $983 $287 $201 $983
Alcohol and Drug Treatment 7 $765 $16 $2,639 $765 $16 $2,639
Anger Management 1 $1,324 $1,324 $1,324 $1,324 $1,324 $1,324
Community Service 4 $394 $17 $813 $394 $17 $813
Day or Evening Treatment Program 7 $4,449 $1,032 $17,303 $3,895 $653 $17,303
Detention Assessment(s) 2 $271 $119 $311 $237 $119 $268
Development of Case Plan 3 $2,817 $236 $8,281 $2,779 $58 $8,281
Electronic Monitoring 8 $2,355 $18 $9,131 $1,126 $18 $2,163
Family Counseling 2 $3,849 $3,741 $4,283 $1,857 $1,250 $4,283
Gang Intervention 1 $3,602 $3,602 $3,602 $680 $3,602 $3,602
Gender Specific Programming for Boys 3 $254 $41 $1,259 $426 $41 $1,259
Gender Specific Programming for Girls 4 $1,220 $192 $2,780 $587 $192 $2,780
Group Counseling 2 $1,141 $455 $4,667 $14,356 $455 $4,667
Individual Mental Health Counseling 8 $1,606 $210 $7,554 $13,396 $147 $7,554
Intensive Probation Supervision 17 $724 $60 $16,412 $1 $19 $16,412
Job Readiness Training 2 $109 $107 $122 $720 $107 $122
Life/Independent Living Skills Training 4 $174 $37 $2,264 $597 $37 $2,264
Mental Health Screening 5 $507 $82 $7,938 $509 $82 $7,938
Mentoring 3 $2,971 $943 $5,722 $42,130 $943 $5,722
Other Direct Service 15 $1,847 $35 $38,474 $24 $35 $38,474
Parenting Education 5 $627 $37 $1,995 $10,831 $37 $1,995
Pro-Social Skills Training 6 $2,851 $83 $4,493 $8,898 $83 $4,493
Re-Entry or Aftercare Services 6 $9,246 $451 $29,544 $259 $451 $29,544
Recreational Activities 5 $207 $41 $1,226 $13 $41 $1,226
Restitution 1 $271 $271 $271 $876 $271 $271
Restorative Justice 2 $647 $264 $1,365 $32,697 $264 $1,365
Risk and/or Needs Assessment 16 $235 $5 $1,128 $1 $5 $1,128
Special Education Services 1 $41 $41 $41 $81 $41 $41
Substance Abuse Screening 2 $245 $2,072 $225 $245 $21 $225
Transitional Living Services/Placement 1 $813 $813 $813 $641 $813 $813
Tutoring 1 $1,025 $1,025 $1,025 $6,586 $1,025 $1,025
Vocational Training 4 $740 $141 $368 $740 $141 $368
All Direct Services 152 $1,453 $5 $38,474 $4,489 $5 $38,474
Note: Costs shown are those based on total funds (all sources) and YOBG funds only.
Statewide Per Capita Costs are based on total costs divided by total youth served. Also
shown are Minimum and Maximum Per Capita Costs at the County level.
35
Appendix H
(See pages 15 of the report)
Planned and Actual YOBG Expenditures by County
Youth Salaries & Services & Professional Fixed Assets Administrative Other Total
County Programs Served Benefits Supplies Services CBOs & Equipment Overhead Expenditures Expenditures
Planned 3 560 $2,589,264 $73,500 $85,000 $0 $0 $490,183 $172,985 $3,410,932
Alameda
Actual 3 357 $2,860,426 $5,548 $73,538 $35,000 $0 $544,243 $109,534 $3,628,289
Difference 0 -203 $271,162 -$67,952 -$11,462 $35,000 $0 $54,060 -$63,451 $217,357
Planned 5 357 $11,700 $0 $55,300 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $117,000
Alpine Actual 4 569 $0 $197 $29,755 $74,545 $0 $0 $0 $104,497
Difference -1 212 -$11,700 $197 -$25,545 $24,545 $0 $0 $0 -$12,503
Planned 7 243 $0 $46,320 $64,418 $20,052 $0 $0 $0 $130,790
Amador Actual 6 65 $0 $0 $73,090 $46,606 $0 $0 $0 $119,696
Difference -1 -178 $0 -$46,320 $8,672 $26,554 $0 $0 $0 -$11,094
Planned 19 2,289 $239,162 $57,200 $227,000 $50,000 $61,650 $0 $0 $635,012
Butte
Actual 14 746 $308,708 $106,298 $20,178 $0 $0 $0 $35,333 $470,517
Difference -5 -1,543 $69,546 $49,098 -$206,822 -$50,000 -$61,650 $0 $35,333 -$164,495
Planned 1 25 $0 $0 $117,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $117,000
Calaveras Actual 1 14 $0 $0 $101,635 $0 $0 $0 $0 $101,635
Difference 0 -11 $0 $0 -$15,365 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$15,365
Planned 5 550 $71,474 $19,438 $0 $0 $26,088 $0 $0 $117,000
Colusa Actual 5 353 $56,760 $45,368 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $102,128
Difference 0 -197 -$14,714 $25,930 $0 $0 -$26,088 $0 $0 -$14,872
Planned 2 105 $2,340,202 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,340,202
Contra Costa Actual 2 74 $2,743,024 $12,522 $121,905 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,877,451
Difference 0 -31 $402,822 $12,522 $121,905 $0 $0 $0 $0 $537,249
Planned 4 135 $40,000 $47,000 $38,700 $0 $42,000 $0 $0 $167,700
Del Norte Actual 2 45 $13,854 $30,833 $1,609 $0 $41,966 $0 $0 $88,262
Difference -2 -90 -$26,146 -$16,167 -$37,091 $0 -$34 $0 $0 -$79,438
36
Appendix H (continued)
Youth Salaries & Services & Professional Fixed Assets Administrative Other Total
County Programs Served Benefits Supplies Services CBOs & Equipment Overhead Expenditures Expenditures
Planned 2 135 $305,537 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $182,463 $0 $518,000
El Dorado Actual 2 156 $488,000 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $518,000
Difference 0 21 $182,463 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$182,463 $0 $0
Planned 3 2,450 $2,834,656 $538,539 $464,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,837,695
Fresno Actual 3 2,675 $2,835,922 $547,227 $447,391 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,830,540
Difference 0 225 $1,266 $8,688 -$17,109 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$7,155
Planned 1 40 $78,847 $41,235 $7,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $127,582
Glenn Actual 1 40 $77,974 $15,658 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $93,632
Difference 0 0 -$873 -$25,577 -$7,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$33,950
Planned 1 54 $290,689 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $290,689
Humboldt Actual 1 26 $461,545 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $461,545
Difference 0 -28 $170,856 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $170,856
Planned 1 105 $0 $0 $0 $451,123 $0 $0 $0 $451,123
Imperial Actual 1 119 $0 $0 $0 $542,601 $0 $0 $0 $542,601
Difference 0 14 $0 $0 $0 $91,478 $0 $0 $0 $91,478
Planned 10 611 $5,850 $36,000 $97,072 $0 $10,000 $5,850 $0 $154,772
Inyo Actual 4 91 $7,500 $4,393 $26,749 $0 $0 $4,200 $0 $42,842
Difference -6 -520 $1,650 -$31,607 -$70,323 $0 -$10,000 -$1,650 $0 -$111,930
Planned 4 1,530 $3,010,185 $68,672 $792,004 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,870,861
Kern Actual 4 1,336 $3,834,952 $72,235 $633,510 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,540,697
Difference 0 -194 $824,767 $3,563 -$158,494 $0 $0 $0 $0 $669,836
Planned 9 2,415 $391,576 $99,455 $190,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $681,031
Kings Actual 8 1,806 $318,481 $19,351 $56,876 $0 $0 $0 $0 $394,708
Difference -1 -609 -$73,095 -$80,104 -$133,124 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$286,323
Planned 4 103 $97,950 $3,000 $67,000 $0 $1,500 $0 $0 $169,450
Lake Actual 4 65 $94,300 $3,200 $53,750 $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $153,250
Difference 0 -38 -$3,650 $200 -$13,250 $0 $500 $0 $0 -$16,200
37
Appendix H (continued)
Youth Salaries & Services & Professional Fixed Assets Administrative Other Total
CBOs
County Programs Served Benefits Supplies Services & Equipment Overhead Expenditures Expenditures
Planned 4 500 $55,000 $2,000 $24,000 $0 $60,000 $0 $0 $141,000
Lassen Actual 4 500 $55,000 $12,000 $14,000 $0 $36,000 $0 $0 $117,000
Difference 0 0 $0 $10,000 -$10,000 $0 -$24,000 $0 $0 -$24,000
Planned 4 1,268 $18,800,000 $1,526,000 $1,000,000 $1,370,000 $0 $0 $150,000 $22,846,000
Los Angeles Actual 4 843 $26,830,964 $4,129,701 $905,820 $642,259 $0 $0 $14,880 $32,523,624
Difference 0 -425 $8,030,964 $2,603,701 -$94,180 -$727,741 $0 $0 -$135,120 $9,677,624
Planned 6 1,925 $413,830 $36,700 $15,000 $68,000 $0 $0 $0 $533,530
Madera Actual 5 1,187 $180,835 $6,417 $12,939 $0 $3,390 $9,101 $0 $212,682
Difference -1 -738 -$232,995 -$30,283 -$2,061 -$68,000 $3,390 $9,101 $0 -$320,848
Planned 9 954 $152,028 $10,000 $20,500 $446,248 $0 $0 $0 $628,776
Marin Actual 7 590 $159,991 $220 $71,434 $442,068 $0 $0 $0 $673,713
Difference -2 -364 $7,963 -$9,780 $50,934 -$4,180 $0 $0 $0 $44,937
Planned 3 135 $117,063 $15,100 $0 $0 $0 $2,341 $0 $134,504
Mariposa Actual 3 264 $71,010 $28,902 $0 $0 $0 $2,076 $1,206 $103,194
Difference 0 129 -$46,053 $13,802 $0 $0 $0 -$265 $1,206 -$31,310
Planned 4 381 $29,448 $11,662 $3,465 $116,753 $0 $2,393 $0 $163,721
Mendocino Actual 4 250 $52,593 $720 $3,465 $103,346 $0 $1,245 $0 $161,369
Difference 0 -131 $23,145 -$10,942 $0 -$13,407 $0 -$1,148 $0 -$2,352
Planned 1 50 $1,043,571 $517,757 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,561,328
Merced Actual 1 45 $887,172 $318,608 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,205,780
Difference 0 -5 -$156,399 -$199,149 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$355,548
Planned 3 50 $46,000 $0 $72,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $118,000
Modoc Actual 3 22 $50,000 $0 $67,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $117,000
Difference 0 -28 $4,000 $0 -$5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$1,000
Planned 8 108 $15,500 $15,500 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $61,000 $117,000
Mono Actual 5 39 $10,500 $16,481 $239 $0 $0 $0 $8,455 $35,675
Difference -3 -69 -$5,000 $981 -$24,761 $0 $0 $0 -$52,545 -$81,325
38
Appendix H (continued)
Youth Salaries & Services & Professional Fixed Assets Administrative Other Total
County Programs Served Benefits Supplies Services CBOs & Equipment Overhead Expenditures Expenditures
Planned 2 1,531 $1,481,659 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,481,659
Monterey Actual 2 1,045 $1,120,032 $0 $82,476 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,202,508
Difference 0 -486 -$361,627 $0 $82,476 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$279,151
Planned 3 145 $378,633 $59,620 $0 $47,704 $0 $0 $0 $485,957
Napa Actual 3 126 $367,455 $53,371 $0 $41,863 $0 $0 $0 $462,689
Difference 0 -19 -$11,178 -$6,249 $0 -$5,841 $0 $0 $0 -$23,268
Planned 6 785 $102,500 $0 $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $182,500
Nevada Actual 7 749 $143,586 $881 $77,607 $0 $0 $0 $0 $222,074
Difference 1 -36 $41,086 $881 -$2,393 $0 $0 $0 $0 $39,574
Planned 5 39,289 $7,541,152 $145,726 $1,117,504 $0 $0 $3,947,220 $0 $12,751,603
Orange Actual 5 21,184 $9,677,321 $36,438 $340,710 $0 $0 $2,311,611 $0 $12,366,080
Difference 0 -18,105 $2,136,169 -$109,288 -$776,794 $0 $0 -$1,635,609 $0 -$385,523
Planned 5 907 $680,000 $17,000 $503,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200,000
Placer Actual 5 694 $680,036 $16,964 $503,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200,000
Difference 0 -213 $36 -$36 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planned 10 324 $112,751 $41,020 $200,000 $3,500 $0 $6,911 $0 $364,182
Plumas Actual 8 180 $75,564 $6,683 $38,419 $0 $0 $5,182 $1,544 $127,392
Difference -2 -144 -$37,187 -$34,337 -$161,581 -$3,500 $0 -$1,729 $1,544 -$236,790
Planned 1 140 $9,690,810 $883,038 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,073,848
Riverside Actual 2 272 $6,895,534 $1,163,414 $570,581 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,629,529
Difference 1 132 -$2,795,276 $280,376 $70,581 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$2,444,319
Planned 4 1,165 $6,380,253 $647,278 $0 $195,000 $0 $0 $0 $7,222,531
Sacramento Actual 4 1,303 $6,276,024 $891,038 $0 $243,469 $0 $0 $0 $7,410,531
Difference 0 138 -$104,229 $243,760 $0 $48,469 $0 $0 $0 $188,000
Planned 5 239 $46,545 $1,000 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $147,545
San Benito Actual 5 175 $26,184 $0 $0 $110,360 $0 $0 $0 $136,544
Difference 0 -64 -$20,361 -$1,000 $0 $10,360 $0 $0 $0 -$11,001
39
Appendix H (continued)
Youth Salaries & Services & Professional Fixed Assets Administrative Other Total
County Programs Served Benefits Supplies Services CBOs & Equipment Overhead Expenditures Expenditures
Planned 2 2,540 $6,600,381 $960,526 $462,653 $26,500 $0 $0 $0 $8,050,060
San Bernardino Actual 2 2,568 $6,808,091 $927,781 $301,688 $12,500 $0 $0 $0 $8,050,060
Difference 0 28 $207,710 -$32,745 -$160,965 -$14,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planned 7 745 $2,722,040 $1,062,669 $596,146 $630,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,010,855
San Diego Actual 7 1,105 $2,863,029 $986,138 $1,161,689 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,010,856
Difference 0 360 $140,989 -$76,531 $565,543 -$630,000 $0 $0 $0 $1
Planned 8 274 $963,141 $25,000 $334,041 $640,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,962,182
San Francisco Actual 8 300 $458,649 $53,991 $90,576 $313,162 $0 $0 $0 $916,378
Difference 0 26 -$504,492 $28,991 -$243,465 -$326,838 $0 $0 $0 -$1,045,804
Planned 7 3,143 $2,218,446 $38,513 $22,340 $15,422 $0 $0 $0 $2,294,721
San Joaquin Actual 7 4,275 $2,187,053 $63,009 $0 $23,200 $0 $0 $0 $2,273,262
Difference 0 1,132 -$31,393 $24,496 -$22,340 $7,778 $0 $0 $0 -$21,459
Planned 3 180 $462,344 $2,997 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $495,341
San Luis Obispo Actual 3 218 $458,472 $29,942 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $488,414
Difference 0 38 -$3,872 $26,945 -$30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$6,927
Planned 7 4,746 $1,009,017 $238,515 $289,000 $368,572 $0 $40,705 $0 $1,945,809
San Mateo Actual 7 2,253 $1,252,056 $12,879 $0 $589,859 $0 $40,705 $0 $1,895,499
Difference 0 -2,493 $243,039 -$225,636 -$289,000 $221,287 $0 $0 $0 -$50,310
Planned 6 1,158 $1,168,818 $12,420 $62,816 $181,500 $0 $0 $0 $1,425,554
Santa Barbara Actual 6 752 $1,039,841 $13,315 $29,016 $180,914 $0 $0 $0 $1,263,086
Difference 0 -406 -$128,977 $895 -$33,800 -$586 $0 $0 $0 -$162,468
Planned 3 550 $3,522,198 $17,500 $243,125 $200,410 $0 $15,311 $0 $3,998,544
Santa Clara Actual 3 650 $3,225,875 $0 $260,813 $20,848 $0 $17,538 $0 $3,525,074
Difference 0 100 -$296,323 -$17,500 $17,688 -$179,562 $0 $2,227 $0 -$473,470
Planned 5 570 $544,941 $28,986 $14,000 $0 $0 $0 $21,600 $609,527
Santa Cruz Actual 5 624 $464,484 $16,438 $12,590 $0 $0 $0 $7,976 $501,488
Difference 0 54 -$80,457 -$12,548 -$1,410 $0 $0 $0 -$13,624 -$108,039
40
Appendix H (continued)
Youth Salaries & Services & Professional Fixed Assets Administrative Other Total
County Programs Served Benefits Supplies Services CBOs & Equipment Overhead Expenditures Expenditures
Planned 1 165 $675,975 $358 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $676,333
Shasta Actual 1 171 $444,325 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $444,325
Difference 0 6 -$231,650 -$358 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$232,008
Planned 1 0 $117,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $117,000
Sierra Actual 1 0 $117,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $117,000
Difference 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planned 2 240 $0 $0 $100,200 $7,200 $0 $0 $0 $107,400
Siskiyou Actual 3 149 $0 $489 $95,607 $0 $0 $0 $2,627 $98,723
Difference 1 -91 $0 $489 -$4,593 -$7,200 $0 $0 $2,627 -$8,677
Planned 9 1,339 $242,048 $31,940 $1,220,391 $340,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,834,379
Solano Actual 8 2,182 $114,019 $14,969 $10,933 $1,183,428 $0 $0 $0 $1,323,349
Difference -1 843 -$128,029 -$16,971 -$1,209,458 $843,428 $0 $0 $0 -$511,030
Planned 8 482 $641,468 $0 $100,000 $569,700 $0 $0 $0 $1,311,168
Sonoma Actual 7 542 $621,552 $3,915 $18,529 $459,115 $0 $0 $0 $1,103,111
Difference -1 60 -$19,916 $3,915 -$81,471 -$110,585 $0 $0 $0 -$208,057
Planned 3 750 $1,373,895 $20,403 $170,169 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,564,467
Stanislaus Actual 3 441 $937,467 $14,954 $169,484 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,121,905
Difference 0 -309 -$436,428 -$5,449 -$685 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$442,562
Planned 3 614 $216,306 $19,730 $0 $0 $0 $1,180 $0 $237,216
Sutter Actual 3 547 $182,324 $2,636 $5,999 $0 $0 $955 $0 $191,914
Difference 0 -67 -$33,982 -$17,094 $5,999 $0 $0 -$225 $0 -$45,302
Planned 1 0 $155,160 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $155,160
Tehama Actual 2 0 $204,146 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $204,146
Difference 1 0 $48,986 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $48,986
Planned 1 56 $98,713 $6,500 $0 $0 $0 $11,787 $0 $117,000
Trinity Actual 1 32 $97,903 $7,397 $0 $0 $0 $11,700 $0 $117,000
Difference 0 -24 -$810 $897 $0 $0 $0 -$87 $0 $0
41
Appendix H (continued)
Youth Salaries & Services & Professional Fixed Assets Administrative Other Total
County Programs Served Benefits Supplies Services CBOs & Equipment Overhead Expenditures Expenditures
Planned 3 267 $1,784,696 $80,104 $62,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,927,300
Tulare
Actual 3 132 $2,105,142 $56,585 $4,175 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,165,902
Difference 0 -135 $320,446 -$23,519 -$58,325 $0 $0 $0 $0 $238,602
Planned 1 40 $0 $0 $117,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $117,500
Tuolumne Actual 1 50 $0 $0 $117,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $117,500
Difference 0 10 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planned 5 1,070 $2,048,581 $389,703 $150,000 $0 $0 $258,828 $0 $2,847,112
Ventura Actual 4 873 $2,104,259 $412,147 $31,870 $0 $0 $254,827 $0 $2,803,103
Difference -1 -197 $55,678 $22,444 -$118,130 $0 $0 -$4,001 $0 -$44,009
Planned 6 900 $429,114 $51,172 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,626 $755,658
Yolo Actual 4 630 $394,984 $26,774 $31,150 $0 $0 $0 $1,282 $454,190
Difference -2 -270 -$34,130 -$24,398 -$68,850 $0 $0 $0 -$5,344 -$301,468
Planned 4 680 $144,173 $11,330 $5,280 $0 $0 $3,420 $0 $164,203
Yuba Actual 4 713 $120,170 $7,513 $0 $0 $0 $650 $0 $128,333
Difference 0 33 -$24,003 -$3,817 -$5,280 $0 $0 -$2,770 $0 -$35,870
Planned 260 82,112 $86,532,290 $7,958,126 $9,876,124 $5,897,684 $201,238 $4,968,592 $412,211 $116,015,012
All Counties Actual 235 57,212 $93,862,088 $10,195,540 $6,699,295 $5,065,143 $83,356 $3,204,033 $448,261 $119,557,716
Difference -25 -24,900 $7,329,798 $2,237,414 -$3,176,829 -$832,541 -$117,882 -$1,764,559 $36,050 $3,542,704
42
Appendix I
(See page 15 of the report)
Planned and Actual YOBG Expenditures by Program Type
Fixed
Salaries & Services & Professional Assets & Administrative Other Total
Program Type Programs Benefits Supplies Services CBOs Equipment Overhead Expenditures Expenditures
Planned 2 $0 $14,500 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $64,500
After School Services Actual 2 $13,888 $2,668 $9,153 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,709
Difference 0 $13,888 -$11,832 $9,153 -$50,000 $0 $0 $0 -$38,791
Planned 3 $101,503 $29,229 $0 $20,052 $0 $10,323 $0 $161,107
Aggression
Actual 2 $0 $24,998 $0 $16,716 $0 $2,499 $0 $44,213
Replacement Therapy
Difference -1 -$101,503 -$4,231 $0 -$3,336 $0 -$7,824 $0 -$116,894
Planned 10 $8,954 $8,500 $243,200 $395,000 $0 $680 $0 $656,334
Alcohol and Drug
Actual 7 $18,098 $1,883 $13,421 $386,374 $0 $163 $0 $419,939
Treatment
Difference -3 $9,144 -$6,617 -$229,779 -$8,626 $0 -$517 $0 -$236,395
Planned 1 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
Anger Management
Actual 1 $0 $0 $0 $19,860 $0 $0 $0 $19,860
Counseling/Treatment
Difference 0 $0 $0 $0 -$140 $0 $0 $0 -$140
Planned 12 $26,041,631 $2,260,519 $2,497,173 $350,000 $0 $1,836,469 $0 $32,985,792
Camp Actual 13 $34,610,284 $4,993,086 $2,160,332 $295,104 $0 $1,063,257 $0 $43,122,063
Difference 1 $8,568,653 $2,732,567 -$336,841 -$54,896 $0 -$773,212 $0 $10,136,271
Planned 3 $96,695 $25,000 $75,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $206,695
Capital Improvements Actual 2 $97,527 $53,991 $0 $0 $0 $488 $0 $152,006
Difference -1 $832 $28,991 -$75,000 $0 -$10,000 $488 $0 -$54,689
Planned 4 $132,302 $9,505 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $141,807
Community Service Actual 4 $92,811 $4,816 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $97,627
Difference 0 -$39,491 -$4,689 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$44,180
Planned 4 $10,350 $46,320 $30,340 $280,000 $0 $0 $0 $367,010
Contract Services Actual 4 $48,986 $3,120 $46,320 $263,146 $0 $0 $0 $361,572
Difference 0 $38,636 -$43,200 $15,980 -$16,854 $0 $0 $0 -$5,438
Planned 7 $1,226,202 $163,539 $307,357 $942,827 $0 $2,940 $0 $2,642,865
Day or Evening
Actual 7 $1,239,458 $147,257 $268,880 $999,734 $3,390 $5,618 $0 $2,664,337
Treatment Program
Difference 0 $13,256 -$16,282 -$38,477 $56,907 $3,390 $2,678 $0 $21,472
Planned 1 $187,091 $0 $9,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $196,091
Detention
Actual 2 $109,246 $0 $12,590 $0 $0 $0 $0 $121,836
Assessment(s)
Difference 1 -$77,845 $0 $3,590 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$74,255
43
Appendix I (continued)
Fixed
Salaries & Services & Professional Assets & Administrative Other Total
Program Type Programs Benefits Supplies Services CBOs Equipment Overhead Expenditures Expenditures
Planned 2 $0 $3,000 $13,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,500
Development of Case
Actual 3 $527,276 $59,191 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $586,467
Plan
Difference 1 $527,276 $56,191 -$13,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $569,967
Planned 11 $695,105 $79,319 $66,500 $50,000 $1,500 $219,396 $0 $1,111,820
Electronic Monitoring Actual 8 $664,868 $51,114 $7,500 $29,072 $2,000 $160,790 $0 $915,344
Difference -3 -$30,237 -$28,205 -$59,000 -$20,928 $500 -$58,606 $0 -$196,476
Planned 3 $0 $0 $0 $0 $114,650 $0 $0 $165,822
Equipment Actual 2 $0 $26,774 $0 $0 $36,000 $0 $0 $62,774
Difference -1 $0 $26,774 $0 $0 -$78,650 $0 $0 -$103,048
Planned 3 $107,028 $0 $66,000 $215,000 $0 $0 $0 $388,028
Family Counseling Actual 2 $159,991 $0 $0 $137,054 $0 $0 $0 $297,045
Difference -1 $52,963 $0 -$66,000 -$77,946 $0 $0 $0 -$90,983
Planned 1 $231,172 $2,997 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $234,169
Gang Intervention Actual 1 $244,576 $333 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $244,909
Difference 0 $13,404 -$2,664 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,740
Planned 4 $35,825 $10,494 $0 $83,981 $13,044 $0 $0 $143,344
Gender Specific
Actual 3 $14,022 $30,441 $0 $0 $0 $1,793 $0 $46,256
Programming for Boys
Difference -1 -$21,803 $19,947 $0 -$83,981 -$13,044 $1,793 $0 -$97,088
Planned 6 $147,908 $32,271 $0 $48,000 $13,044 $1,794 $0 $243,017
Gender Specific
Actual 4 $162,049 $39,934 $0 $16,320 $0 $0 $0 $218,303
Programming for Girls
Difference -2 $14,141 $7,663 $0 -$31,680 -$13,044 -$1,794 $0 -$24,714
Planned 4 $0 $0 $191,500 $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $251,500
Group Counseling Actual 2 $0 $0 $0 $105,000 $0 $0 $0 $105,000
Difference -2 $0 $0 -$191,500 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 -$146,500
Planned 7 $7,785,016 $344,289 $55,320 $1,500 $0 $1,092,080 $0 $9,278,205
Home on Probation Actual 7 $7,831,974 $396,314 $56,218 $0 $0 $872,722 $0 $9,157,228
Difference 0 $46,958 $52,025 $898 -$1,500 $0 -$219,358 $0 -$120,977
Planned 11 $27,807 $226,015 $1,215,128 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,468,950
Individual Mental
Actual 8 $343,652 $0 $686,253 $290,889 $0 $0 $0 $1,320,794
Health Counseling
Difference -3 $315,845 -$226,015 -$528,875 $290,889 $0 $0 $0 -$148,156
Planned 18 $12,583,374 $696,949 $447,625 $200,410 $0 $1,139,542 $179,611 $15,676,625
Intensive Probation
Actual 17 $11,543,787 $237,010 $341,421 $0 $0 $573,802 $110,816 $12,806,836
Supervision
Difference -1 -$1,039,587 -$459,939 -$106,204 -$200,410 $0 -$565,740 -$68,795 -$2,869,789
44
Appendix I (continued)
Fixed
Salaries & Services & Professional Assets & Administrative Other Total
Program Type Programs Benefits Supplies Services CBOs Equipment Overhead Expenditures Expenditures
Planned 2 $5,000 $2,800 $114,870 $0 $0 $0 $0 $122,670
Job Readiness
Actual 2 $660 $2,386 $14,350 $0 $0 $0 $0 $17,396
Training
Difference 0 -$4,340 -$414 -$100,520 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$105,274
Planned 20 $6,934,360 $968,522 $946,050 $21,753 $0 $407,126 $52,000 $9,018,271
Juvenile Hall Actual 19 $9,931,793 $761,674 $558,303 $8,360 $0 $260,739 $8,455 $11,529,324
Difference -1 $2,997,433 -$206,848 -$387,747 -$13,393 $0 -$146,387 -$43,545 $2,511,053
Planned 3 $0 $8,000 $52,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $60,500
Life/Independent
Actual 4 $10,433 $356 $103,728 $0 $0 $0 $0 $114,517
Living Skills Training
Difference 1 $10,433 -$7,644 $51,228 $0 $0 $0 $0 $54,017
Planned 4 $0 $0 $397,257 $0 $0 $0 $0 $397,257
Mental Health
Actual 5 $8,822 $15,875 $45,041 $324,232 $0 $0 $0 $393,970
Screening
Difference 1 $8,822 $15,875 -$352,216 $324,232 $0 $0 $0 -$3,287
Planned 4 $110,553 $0 $27,300 $276,223 $0 $0 $0 $414,076
Mentoring Actual 3 $0 $0 $25,455 $369,754 $0 $0 $0 $395,209
Difference -1 -$110,553 $0 -$1,845 $93,531 $0 $0 $0 -$18,867
Planned 1 $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000
Monetary Incentives Actual 1 $0 $220 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $220
Difference 0 $0 -$4,780 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$4,780
Planned 5 $482,938 $33,854 $0 $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $518,792
Other Actual 6 $312,166 $16,022 $4,300 $0 $0 $0 $265,424 $597,912
Difference 1 -$170,772 -$17,832 $4,300 $0 -$2,000 $0 $265,424 $79,120
Planned 17 $4,074,305 $515,451 $371,500 $616,134 $0 $246,511 $0 $6,011,901
Other Direct Service Actual 15 $4,091,229 $616,656 $58,914 $584,740 $0 $250,535 $1,206 $5,603,280
Difference -2 $16,924 $101,205 -$312,586 -$31,394 $0 $4,024 $1,206 -$408,621
Planned 4 $10,854,613 $965,930 $1,475,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,295,543
Other Placement Actual 3 $7,302,162 $1,546,572 $570,581 $536,050 $0 $0 $0 $9,955,365
Difference -1 -$3,552,451 $580,642 -$904,419 $536,050 $0 $0 $0 -$3,340,178
Planned 5 $6,801,781 $827,315 $436,333 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $8,090,429
Other Secure/Semi-
Actual 5 $7,701,426 $796,857 $394,124 $12,500 $0 $0 $0 $8,904,907
Secure Rehab Facility
Difference 0 $899,645 -$30,458 -$42,209 -$12,500 $0 $0 $0 $814,478
Planned 6 $44,500 $17,200 $20,000 $45,000 $0 $21 $0 $126,721
Parenting Education Actual 5 $32,739 $22,973 $19,950 $3,274 $0 $12 $0 $78,948
Difference -1 -$11,761 $5,773 -$50 -$41,726 $0 -$9 $0 -$47,773
45
Appendix I (continued)
Fixed
Salaries & Services & Professional Assets & Administrative Other Total
Program Type Programs Benefits Supplies Services CBOs Equipment Overhead Expenditures Expenditures
Planned 7 $220,941 $31,020 $45,868 $918,500 $0 $6,911 $0 $1,223,240
Pro-Social Skills
Actual 6 $178,452 $3,774 $1,037,940 $137,872 $0 $5,182 $1,544 $1,364,764
Training
Difference -1 -$42,489 -$27,246 $992,072 -$780,628 $0 -$1,729 $1,544 $141,524
Planned 4 $1,055,876 $13,239 $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $21,600 $1,160,715
Ranch Actual 4 $575,266 $489 $69,600 $0 $0 $0 $7,976 $653,331
Difference 0 -$480,610 -$12,750 -$400 $0 $0 $0 -$13,624 -$507,384
Planned 6 $3,945,451 $73,279 $0 $1,070,310 $0 $0 $150,000 $5,239,040
Re-Entry or Aftercare
Actual 6 $3,930,433 $207,044 $0 $376,850 $0 $0 $14,880 $4,529,207
Services
Difference 0 -$15,018 $133,765 $0 -$693,460 $0 $0 -$135,120 -$709,833
Planned 5 $5,000 $18,400 $35,000 $140,000 $0 $0 $0 $198,400
Recreational Activities Actual 5 $27,232 $7,767 $170 $109,902 $0 $104 $0 $145,175
Difference 0 $22,232 -$10,633 -$34,830 -$30,098 $0 $104 $0 -$53,225
Planned 2 $12,000 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,000 $31,000
Restitution Actual 1 $2,581 $6,636 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,217
Difference -1 -$9,419 -$3,364 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$9,000 -$21,783
Planned 2 $50,000 $1,000 $0 $27,544 $0 $0 $0 $78,544
Restorative Justice Actual 2 $6,809 $1,124 $0 $21,840 $0 $0 $0 $29,773
Difference 0 -$43,191 $124 $0 -$5,704 $0 $0 $0 -$48,771
Planned 18 $1,454,901 $437,320 $143,695 $0 $0 $2,458 $0 $2,038,374
Risk and/or Needs
Actual 16 $1,308,157 $67,275 $92,043 $0 $0 $1,275 $35,333 $1,504,083
Assessment
Difference -2 -$146,744 -$370,045 -$51,652 $0 $0 -$1,183 $35,333 -$534,291
Planned 1 $0 $0 $0 $13,250 $0 $0 $0 $13,250
Special Education
Actual 1 $0 $0 $13,250 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,250
Services
Difference 0 $0 $0 $13,250 -$13,250 $0 $0 $0 $0
Planned 1 $1,010,196 $7,650 $2,000 $0 $0 $2,341 $0 $1,022,187
Staff Salaries/Benefits Actual 9 $703,711 $3,766 $2,000 $0 $0 $2,076 $0 $711,553
Difference -8 -$306,485 -$3,884 $0 $0 $0 -$265 $0 -$310,634
Staff Planned 7 $11,912 $16,700 $49,072 $0 $0 $0 $0 $77,684
Training/Professional Actual 8 $1,670 $8,525 $10,294 $0 $0 $2,978 $2,627 $26,094
Development
Difference 1 -$10,242 -$8,175 -$38,778 $0 $0 $2,978 $2,627 -$51,590
Planned 2 $0 $29,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $29,000
Substance Abuse
Actual 2 $0 $11,875 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,875
Screening
Difference 0 $0 -$17,125 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$17,125
46
Appendix I (continued)
Fixed
Salaries & Services & Professional Assets & Administrative Other Total
Program Type Programs Benefits Supplies Services CBOs Equipment Overhead Expenditures Expenditures
Planned 1 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000
Transitional Living
Actual 1 $0 $0 $26,005 $0 $0 $0 $0 $26,005
Services/Placement
Difference 0 $0 $0 -$73,995 $0 $0 $0 $0 -$73,995
Planned 2 $0 $0 $5,000 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $25,000
Tutoring Actual 1 $0 $0 $0 $20,500 $0 $0 $0 $20,500
Difference -1 $0 $0 -$5,000 $500 $0 $0 $0 -$4,500
Planned 4 $40,000 $24,000 $367,036 $7,200 $47,000 $0 $0 $485,236
Vocational Training Actual 4 $13,854 $24,744 $51,159 $0 $41,966 $0 $0 $131,723
Difference 0 -$26,146 $744 -$315,877 -$7,200 -$5,034 $0 $0 -$353,513
Planned 260 $86,532,290 $7,958,126 $9,876,124 $5,897,684 $201,238 $4,968,592 $412,211 $116,203,012
All Program Types Actual 235 $93,862,088 $10,195,540 $6,699,295 $5,065,143 $83,356 $3,204,033 $448,261 $119,557,716
Difference -25 $7,329,798 $2,237,414 -$3,176,829 -$832,541 -$117,882 -$1,764,559 $36,050 $3,354,704
47