CO. AUD.
Cash and Internal Controls Audits, District Attorney April 2021 Follow Up Cash Procedures and Internal Control Audit Report
Read the report at San Luis Obispo ↗
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
AUDITOR - CONTROLLER TREASURER – TAX COLLECTOR
District Attorney
Cash Procedures & Internal Controls Follow-Up Audit
April 2021
JAMES W. HAMILTON, CPA
Auditor-Controller Treasurer-Tax Collector
Page 1 of 4
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
AUDITOR - CONTROLLER TREASURER - TAX COLLECTOR
James W. Hamilton, CPA Auditor-Controller Treasurer-Tax Collector
Lydia J. Corr, CPA Assistant Auditor-Controller Treasurer-Tax Collector
TO: DAN DOW, DISTRICT ATTORNEY
FROM: JAMES W. HAMILTON, CPA, AUDITOR-CONTROLLER-TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR
DATE: APRIL 27, 2021
SUBJECT: FOLLOW-UP TO RECOMMENDATIONS MADE IN THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S FY 2019-
20 CASH PROCEDURES AND INTERNAL CONTROLS AUDIT REPORT
Our office previously issued a cash procedures and internal controls audit report of the District
Attorney’s office in October 2019. We recently performed a follow-up audit to determine whether
the recommendations made in our initial report were implemented. We conducted our follow-up
audit in conformance with the International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing.
We determined one of the three recommendations were implemented. Detailed below are the
findings and recommendations from the October 2019 audit report and the results from our follow-
up. Your Department’s proposed corrective actions on the two remaining recommendations are
also included. The Internal Audit Division will perform follow-up procedures within six months to
verify appropriate actions have been taken to address the remaining recommendations.
1. Segregation of Cash Handling Duties (October 2019 Report Finding)
In one of the District Attorney’s divisions, the cash custodians receive, record, deposit, and
reconcile payments. The County’s Cash Handling Policy requires adequate separations of these
duties to ensure that no one individual controls more than one key aspect of a cash transaction.
Minimal fiscal staff within the division hindered the separation of cash handling responsibilities.
However, when one individual performs more than one aspect of cash handling then the risk of
misappropriation and mishandling of funds increases.
Recommendation (October 2019 Report Recommendation)
We recommend the department have a non-fiscal staff member who does not accept payments
review the payment deposits prepared by the cash custodians.
Follow-up Results
The audit recommendation was not implemented. Two out of five sampled deposit permits did
not document a review of the deposits.
Department Response
The District Attorney’s office has appropriate checks and balances implemented through
segregation of cash handling duties in all cash handling divisions, however, needs to add an
additional segregation of duties to Economic Crime unit’s cash handling procedure. This unit
Page 2 of 4
consists of only 2.00 FTE. Due to limited number of staff, medical leaves, staffing assignment
changes, and COVID-19 impacts, the unit had not successfully implemented the
recommendations of the prior audit, as we discovered through communications on this follow
up audit. The Economic Crime unit will update their procedures to reflect the recommended
segregation of cash handling duties in order to implement more checks and balances.
The procedure will be updated to include that the cash custodians will attach the appropriate
and necessary backup documentation into the deposit permit in SAP. Then, a designated fiscal
member in the Finance Division or Eco Crime unit, that did not accept any of the payments and
did not create the deposit permit, will review the backup documentation that was scanned into
SAP to verify that it matches the deposit in SAP, and then save-as-complete (SAC) the deposit
permit. The Auditor-Controller-Treasurer-Tax Collector’s Department will then post the deposit
permit.
2. Computers Periodically Unsecured (October 2019 Report Finding)
At the time of the cash count, staff were not locking their computers when their workstations
were unattended. Further, the computer’s automatic locking function did not activate until after
one hour of inactivity. The County's Information Security Program Policies (Policy) require users
log off the network when leaving their workstations for an extended amount of time, and
automatic password-protected screensavers be activated when computers are inactive for 10
minutes. Staff had overlooked the Policy’s security requirements of their computers because the
department maintains robust physical security around work areas. Despite the department’s
strong work area security, the failure to lock computers when not in use could result in
unauthorized access to computers and the unauthorized use, modification and/or destruction
of data.
Recommendation (October 2019 Report Recommendation)
We recommend the District Attorney's office emphasize to staff the County’s Information
Security Program Policy’s workstation security requirements and update the default computer
setting to initiate a password-protected screensaver after 10 minutes of inactivity.
Follow-up Results
The audit recommendation was implemented.
3. Victim Witness Assistance Fund’s Payment Receipts Not Marked “Paid” (October 2019 Report
Finding)
None of the receipts submitted for reimbursement from the District Attorney’s Victim Witness
Assistance petty cash fund were marked as “paid”. The Cash Handling Policy requires petty cash
related receipts be marked as “paid” immediately after reimbursement is made. Staff
inadvertently overlooked the Cash Handling Policy’s control for payment receipt documentation.
Failure to mark receipts "paid" increases the risk of loss due to misappropriation of funds by
reimbursing a receipt multiple times.
Page 3 of 4
Recommendation (October 2019 Report Recommendation)
We recommend the department update the Victim Witness Assistance Fund’s petty cash
custodian procedure to align with Cash Handling Policy and all future receipts be marked “paid”
immediately upon reimbursement.
Follow-up Results
The audit recommendation was not implemented. Four of the five receipts tested were not
marked as “paid” immediately after reimbursement was made.
Department Response
After the cash custodian has completed the reimbursement, they will stamp the receipt
immediately as ‘paid’, and initial the receipt. The back-up cash custodian will verify this by the
close of the business day when the cash box is being reconciled. The procedure has been
updated and implemented to include these recommendations of this audit and to align
procedures with the Cash Handling Policy. Annually, or immediately upon appointment to a
position with cash handling duties, staff are required to sign the Cash Handling Policy
Acknowledgment Form via NeoGov E-Forms confirming that they have read and understand the
Cash Handling Policy. The District Attorney financial team will conduct semi-annual reviews with
the Victim Witness Director to confirm staff are correctly following the updated procedure and
that new staff have been trained on this procedure.
Thank you for the courteous attitude and the continued cooperation your staff provided.
James Hamilton, CPA
Auditor-Controller-Treasurer-Tax Collector
Cc: Tiffany Johansing, Administrative Services Manager
Page 4 of 4