CSA
Status of Recommendations
Read the report at California State Auditor ↗
Recommendations
Not Fully Implemented
After One Year
The Omnibus Audit Accountability Act of 2006
January 2022
REPORT 2021‑041
CALIFORNIA STATE AUDITOR
621 Capitol Mall, Suite 1200 | Sacramento | CA | 95814
916.445.0255 | TTY 916.445.0033
For complaints of state employee misconduct,
contact us through the Whistleblower Hotline:
1.800.952.5665
Don’t want to miss any of our reports? Subscribe to our email list at auditor.ca.gov
For questions regarding the contents of this report, please contact our Public Affairs Office at 916.445.0255
This report is also available online at www.auditor.ca.gov | Alternate format reports available upon request | Permission is granted to reproduce reports
Michael S. Tilden Acting State Auditor
January 11, 2022
2021‑041
The Governor of California
President pro Tempore of the Senate
Speaker of the Assembly
State Capitol
Sacramento, California 95814
Dear Governor and Legislative Leaders:
Consistent with the Omnibus Audit Accountability Act of 2006 (California Government Code,
sections 8548.7 and 8548.9), the California State Auditor (State Auditor) presents this special
report to the Joint Legislative Audit Committee, Joint Legislative Budget Committee, and
Department of Finance. This report notes that from November 2014 through October 2020, our
office issued 208 reports on audits and investigations of state agencies. Those reports included
1,623 recommendations, and state agencies had fully implemented 1,336, or 82 percent of them, as of
November 2021. However, we identified 287 recommendations not completely addressed that were
more than one year old. Similarly, we issued 83 reports to nonstate entities, such as counties or school
districts. Those reports included 823 recommendations and as of November 2021, the nonstate entities
had implemented 647, or 79 percent of them. In addition to identifying which recommendations have
and have not been fully implemented, the State Auditor’s website contains written responses from
each state agency explaining the status of each recommendation. For recommendations that have
not been fully implemented, the website also provides agency responses regarding when or if these
recommendations will be fully implemented.
Our audit and investigative efforts bring the greatest return when agencies act upon the findings
and recommendations. For example, in November 2018, our office released an audit concerning the
California High‑Speed Rail Authority’s (Authority) contracting and cost control practices. During
the audit, we found that in nine planning, engineering, and consulting contracts we reviewed, few
contract managers could provide evidence of reviewing each monthly invoice for accuracy, none
maintained tracking logs of deliverables, and most were unable to demonstrate how they ensured the
quantity and quality of the work for which the Authority paid. As of November 2021, the Authority
fully implemented 15 of 17 recommendations designed to reduce the risk of additional cost increases.
By implementing the recommendations, the Authority can demonstrate the funds spent on its
contracts are necessary and appropriate while also reducing the risk of incurring unnecessary costs.
If you would like more information about any of the background or recommendations in this report,
please contact our Public Affairs Office, at (916) 445‑0255.
Respectfully submitted,
MICHAEL S. TILDEN, CPA
Acting California State Auditor
621 Capitol Mall, Suite 1200 | Sacramento, CA 95814 | 916.445.0255 | 916.327.0019 fax | www.auditor.ca.gov
Blank page inserted for reproduction purposes only.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 v
January 2022
Contents
Introduction 1
Table 1
Recommendations Made to State Entities That Are More
Than Five Years Old and Are Still Not Fully Implemented 5
Table 2
Recommendations Made to State Entities That Are More
Than One Year Old and Are Still Not Fully Implemented 11
Table 3
Recommendations Made to Nonstate Entities That Are More
Than One Year Old and Are Still Not Fully Implemented 59
vi California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
Blank page inserted for reproduction purposes only.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 1
January 2022
INTRODUCTION
As required by the Omnibus Audit Accountability Act of 2006 (Accountability Act), the California
State Auditor (State Auditor) presents our report on the status of recommendations that are more
than one year old and have not been fully implemented by the audited entities. The Accountability
Act requires state agencies audited or investigated by our office to provide updates on their
implementation of audit recommendations. In September 2021, we provided our annual reminder
to relevant state agencies about such recommendations that we issued more than a year ago and
that they had not yet fully implemented. Subsequently, we reviewed agencies’ responses and
corresponding evidence. The following report of the status of these recommendations is current
as of November 2021. Throughout the year, our website at www.auditor.ca.gov contains the most
up‑to‑date information on the status of all audit recommendations.
RESULTS IN BRIEF
State Entities
From November 2014 through October 2020, the State Auditor issued 208 reports that related
to audits or investigations of state agencies. These reports were requested through the Joint
Legislative Audit Committee or legislation, were initiated by the State Auditor through the state
high‑risk program, or came about as the result of an investigation.1 The State Auditor made
1,623 recommendations to the audited state agencies in those reports, of which 1,336 have been fully
implemented. However, the State Auditor identified 287 recommendations made to 46 agencies that
had been outstanding at least one year and remain not fully implemented as of November 2021.2
Nonstate Entities
From November 2014 through October 2020, the state auditor issued 83 reports that included
nonstate entities, and made 823 recommendations to these entities. As of November 2021, the State
Auditor identified 176 recommendations issued to 51 nonstate entities that are more than one year
old and not fully implemented.
Importance of Implementing Recommendations
The State Auditor’s audit and investigative efforts bring the greatest return when agencies act upon
the findings and recommendations. For example, in November 2018, the State Auditor released an
audit report concerning the California High‑Speed Rail Authority’s (Authority) contracting and
cost control practices. In nine planning, engineering, and consulting contracts the State Auditor
reviewed, we found few contract managers could provide evidence of reviewing each monthly
invoice for accuracy, none maintained tracking logs of deliverables, and most were unable to
demonstrate how they ensured the quantity and quality of the work for which the Authority paid.
1 The statewide single audit (financial and federal compliance audits) is mandated as a condition of California receiving federal funding. The State
Auditor follows up on recommendations made in those audits each year in the State Auditor’s annual report on California’s Internal Control and
State and Federal Compliance. As of January 1, 2010, the State Auditor began reporting as required on the status of recommendations made in
investigative reports. The State Auditor initiated the investigations in response to whistleblower complaints or other information suggesting
improper governmental activities.
2 Excludes recommendations for legislative changes. Those recommendations are included in a separate report to the Legislature.
2 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
The audit also found that the costs to date have been significantly greater than originally projected
because the Authority moved forward before it completed many critical tasks such as purchasing
land, planning how to relocate utility systems, or obtaining agreements with external stakeholders.
To address these and other issues found during the audit, the audit made several recommendations
that, if implemented, would improve the Authority’s contracting and cost control practices. In
response to our recommendations, the Authority has taken a number of steps including completing
an assessment of its active contracts by evaluating its contract managers’ compliance with contract
management procedures and reporting, by tracking and resolving all non‑compliance issues, and
by indicating it will continue this evaluation going forward. In addition, the Authority revised its
contract invoicing and payment policies and procedures to require its contract managers to provide
backup documentation to validate the work performed to ensure invoiced costs are allowable under
contract terms. As of November 2021, the Authority fully implemented 15 of 17 recommendations
made by the State Auditor. By implementing the recommendations, the Authority can demonstrate
the funds spent on its contracts are necessary and appropriate while also reducing the risk of
incurring unnecessary costs.
In September 2021, the State Auditor mailed notices to audited and investigated entities regarding
recommendations more than a year old and not fully implemented, corresponding to reports
issued from November 2014 through October 2020. The tables beginning on page 5 summarize
and provide information on these recommendations. Table 1 shows recommendations more than
five years old, issued to state entities between November 2014 and October 2015, which have not
been fully implemented as of the agencies’ latest response. Because the recommendations shown
in Table 1 are more than five years old, the State Auditor will not reassess them in subsequent
reports. Table 2, beginning on page 11, summarizes recommendations that have not been fully
implemented for audits and investigations pertaining to state entities and issued between
November 2015 and October 2020. As indicated on Table 2, the State Auditor did not always agree
with agency assertions that certain recommendations were fully implemented. Two columns
in Table 2 provide the State Auditor’s reason for disagreement. Table 3, beginning on page 59,
summarizes recommendations more than one year old made to nonstate entities and their current
implementation status.
The symbol appears in the tables next to the audit number whenever an audit has
recommendations to more than one agency appearing in this report. Please refer to the index
on page 3.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 3
January 2022
Index
Reference for Reports Featuring Recommendations to Multiple Entities
REPORT ENTITIES WITH RECOMMENDATIONS
State Entities With Recommendations—Included in Tables 1 or 2
A 2014‑116 California Department of Technology, Department of Consumer Affairs
B 2016‑126 California Department of Justice, California Department of Social Services
C 2016‑130 University of California, University of California, Board of Regents
D 2017‑109 California Department of Public Health, Department of Health Care Services, Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development
E 2017‑117 Department of Health Care Services, Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission
F 2018‑113 California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Prison Industry Authority, California Rehabilitation Oversight Board
G 2018‑132 California Department of Justice, California Gambling Control Commission
H 2019‑105 California Department of Public Health, Department of Health Care Services
I I2018‑1 California Correctional Health Care Services, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
J I2020‑2 California Department of Education, Department of State Hospitals
Nonstate Entities With Recommendations—Included in Table 3
K 2015‑115 County of Alameda, County of Santa Clara
L 2015‑134 City of Novato, City of Pasadena
M 2016‑141 Acton‑Agua Dulce Unified School District, Antelope Valley Union High School District, New Jerusalem Elementary School District
N 2017‑032 Bakersfield College, Peralta Community College District
O 2017‑101 Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, Sacramento County Sheriff's Department, San Diego County Sheriff's Department
P 2017‑104 Los Angeles County Office of Education, Los Angeles Regional Adult Education Consortium, Montebello Unified School District
Q 2019‑108 Sacramento City Unified School District, Sacramento County Office of Education
R 2019‑118 Fresno Police Department, Los Angeles Police Department, Marin County Sheriff's Department, Sacramento County Sheriff's Department
S 2019‑119 Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health, San Francisco Department of Public Health
State and Nonstate Entities With Recommendations—Included in Tables 2 and 3
T 2015‑112 California Department of Education, Long Beach Unified School District
U 2017‑102 Cerritos College, Chancellor of the California Community Colleges, Foothill‑De Anza Community College District, Los Rios Community College District
V 2017‑118 Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board, State Water Resources Control Board
W 2018‑106 Alameda County Sheriff's Office, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
X 2019‑103 Butte County, California Governor's Office of Emergency Services, County of Sonoma, County of Ventura
Y 2019‑104 California Department of Education, San Bernardino City Unified School District
Z 2019‑116 Board of State and Community Corrections, Kern County Probation, Los Angeles County Probation Department
California Department of Education, California Department of Public Health, Charter Academy of the Redwoods, Heartland Charter School,
AA 2019‑125
Kern High School District, San Francisco Unified School District, Ukiah Unified School District
Additional information on each recommendation is available at the State Auditor’s website. The
website includes each agency’s response to the current status of outstanding recommendations.
The website also includes the audit or investigative report and summary, the text of the
recommendation, and the State Auditor’s assessment of whether the agency has fully implemented
the recommendation, based on the agency’s response, supporting documentation, and inquiries.
4 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
Blank page inserted for reproduction purposes only.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 5
January 2022
Table 1
Recommendations Made to State Entities That Are More Than Five Years Old and Are Still Not Fully Implemented
(Reports Issued From November 2014 Through October 2015)
NUMBER OF YEARS
ESTIMATED
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT
BUSINESS, CONSUMER SERVICES, HOUSING
Department of Consumer Affairs
California Department of 17. To the extent that Consumer Affairs chooses to implement BreEZe at the 6 July
Consumer Affairs’ BreEZe phase 3 regulatory entities, it should first complete a formal cost‑benefit 2025
System: Inadequate Planning and analysis to ensure that BreEZe is a cost‑effective solution to meet these
Oversight Led to Implementation regulatory entities’ business needs. To make certain this analysis is
at Far Fewer Regulatory Entities at complete, it should include an assessment of the potential changes these
a Significantly Higher Cost regulatory entities may require to be made of the BreEZe system and
the associated costs. Consumer Affairs should complete the cost‑benefit
2014‑116
analysis before investing any more resources into the implementation
(February 2015)
of BreEZe at the phase 3 regulatory entities, and it should update this
analysis periodically as significant assumptions change.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery
California Department 2. To ensure it can demonstrate that its fraud prevention efforts are 6 December
of Resources Recycling maximizing financial recoveries for the beverage program, CalRecycle 2022
and Recovery: should both modify and annually update its fraud management plan to
The Beverage Container include the following:
Recycling Program Continues
• By December 31, 2014, formally establish a systematic process for
to Face Deficits and Requires
analyzing, monitoring, and responding to the risk of fraudulent
Changes to Become
recycling of out‑of‑state beverage containers.
Financially Sustainable
• Develop fraud estimates—by type of fraudulent activity—that
2014‑110 quantify the potential financial losses to the beverage program and
(November 2014) the methodology CalRecycle used to develop these estimates.
• Identify the amount of actual fraud in the prior year by type of
fraudulent activity, such as the financial losses resulting from the
redemption of out‑of‑state beverage containers or the falsification
of reports used to substantiate program payments.
• Identify the amount actually recovered for the beverage program in
the form of cash for restitution and penalties resulting from fraud.
3. To allow for public input and to prevent any legal challenges claiming 6 December
that its policies and procedures regarding prepayment holds constitute 2024
unenforceable underground regulations, CalRecycle should adopt
these policies and procedures as regulations in accordance with the
Administrative Procedure Act.
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
California Public Utilities Commission
California Public 3. To ensure that policy makers, enforcement officials, and the general 6 †
Utilities Commission: public have access to accurate consumer complaint data in CIMS, the
It Needs to Improve the Quality branch should continue to implement its quality management team
of Its Consumer Complaint program component focused on reviewing the categorization of
Data and the Controls Over Its complaints and correcting identified errors.
Information Systems
4. To ensure that policy makers, enforcement officials, and the general 6 †
2014‑120 public have access to accurate consumer complaint data in CIMS, the
(April 2015) branch should develop and implement tools by September 30, 2015, to
measure the quality management team program’s effectiveness.
continued on next page . . .
6 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
NUMBER OF YEARS
ESTIMATED
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT
11. The commission should ensure that it complies with all policy 6 December
requirements in SAM Chapter 5300 no later than April 2016. 2022
16. The commission should revise its existing recovery plan to include a list 6 December
of applications supporting critical business functions, their maximum 2022
acceptable outage time frames, and detailed recovery strategies for
each application.
17. The commission should revise its existing recovery plan to include 6 December
detailed procedures for rebuilding its technology infrastructure at an 2022
alternate processing site.
18. The commission should conduct regular tests and exercises to assess 6 December
the sufficiency of the revised recovery plan and refine the plan 2022
when necessary.
GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS
California Department of Technology
California Department of 14. To ensure that IT projects have the oversight needed to better position 6 †
Consumer Affairs’ BreEZe them for success, CalTech should develop thresholds relating to IT
A System: Inadequate Planning and project cost increases and schedule delays to inform and better justify
Oversight Led to Implementation its decision to allow an IT project to continue. If a department’s IT
at Far Fewer Regulatory Entities at project reaches or exceeds these thresholds, CalTech should require
a Significantly Higher Cost the department to conduct a cost‑benefit analysis for the project and
include this analysis in an SPR. CalTech should consider the results of
2014‑116
this analysis in its decision to approve or deny the SPR and, if warranted,
(February 2015)
take action to suspend or terminate the project so that it does not allow
projects with significant problems to continue without correction.
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
California Department of Public Health
California Department of 2. To increase its efforts to prevent and control diabetes, Public Health 6 Will Not
Public Health: should develop a process for identifying and applying for federal Implement
Even With a Recent Increase in funding opportunities, including routinely and proactively searching
Federal Funding, Its Efforts to for grants. In addition, Public Health should seek funding for a grants
Prevent Diabetes Are Focused on specialist position to identify and apply for federal and other grants.
a Limited Number of Counties
2014‑113
(January 2015)
Follow‑Up—California 8. To ensure it can provide effective oversight of labs as state law requires, 6 Winter
Department of Public Health: Laboratory Services should address staffing issues by preparing and 2022
Laboratory Field Services Is resubmitting to Public Health a recruitment and retention proposal,
Unable to Oversee Clinical developing a succession plan, and taking necessary steps to implement
Laboratories Effectively, but a its planned reorganization.
Feasible Alternative Exists
9. To ensure it can provide effective oversight of labs as state law requires, 6 Winter
2015‑507 Laboratory Services should ensure that its information technology data 2022
(September 2015) systems have necessary safeguards, contain accurate and complete
data, and support its program needs.
10. To ensure it can provide effective oversight of labs as state law requires, 6 Winter
Laboratory Services should update and develop its regulations as 2022
necessary to ensure consistency with existing state law.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 7
January 2022
NUMBER OF YEARS
ESTIMATED
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT
California Department of Social Services
Follow‑Up—California 4. To ensure that counties’ use of foster family agency placements 6 Will Not
Department of Social Services: is justified, Social Services should take action to implement the Implement
Although Making Progress, It recommendation we previously made in our 2011 audit. Specifically,
Could Do More to Ensure the Social Services should require counties to give licensed foster homes a
Protection and Appropriate higher priority than foster family agencies for children that do not have
Placement of Foster Children identified treatment needs.
2015‑502 5. To ensure that counties’ use of foster family agency placements 6 Will Not
(July 2015) is justified, Social Services should take action to implement the Implement
recommendation we previously made in our 2011 audit. Specifically,
Social Services should require counties to prepare a detailed justification
for any child placed with a foster family agency.
Follow‑Up—California 5. To make certain that counties receive the greatest benefit from the 6 †
Department of Social Services: resources they spend on antifraud efforts related to CalWORKs and
It Has Not Corrected Previously CalFresh cases, Social Services should, using the results from the
Recognized Deficiencies in Its recommended cost‑effectiveness analysis, determine why some
Oversight of Counties’ Antifraud counties’ efforts to combat welfare fraud are more cost‑effective
Efforts for the CalWORKs and than others.
CalFresh Programs
6. To make certain that counties receive the greatest benefit from the 6 †
2015‑503 resources they spend on antifraud efforts related to CalWORKs and
(June 2015) CalFresh cases, Social Services should seek to replicate the most
cost‑effective practices among all counties. Social Services should work
with its legal counsel to determine whether to withhold information
about these practices from public disclosure.
7. Social Services should track counties’ prosecution thresholds for welfare 6 Will Not
fraud cases and determine whether they affect counties’ decisions to Implement
investigate potential fraud, with a focus on determining best practices
and cost‑effective thresholds. If Social Services’ analysis determines that
varying prosecution thresholds do affect counties’ decisions, it should
then work with counties to implement the consistent use of these
cost‑effective prosecution thresholds.
9. To make certain that counties receive the greatest benefit from the 6 †
resources they spend on antifraud efforts related to CalWORKs and
CalFresh cases, Social Services should address and promptly act on the
four remaining recommendations that its steering committee provided
in 2008.
12. To make counties’ review of match lists more efficient, Social Services 6 †
should revive its efforts to work with the state and federal agencies that
prepare the match lists to address the counties’ concerns about match
list formats, content, and criteria.
Department of Developmental Services
California Department of 2. To ensure timelier fee assessments, Developmental Services should 6 Will Not
Developmental Services: hold regional centers accountable for providing the monthly placement Implement
Its Process for Assessing Fees Paid reports and copies of information letters required by state regulations.
by Parents of Children Living in To encourage compliance, Developmental Services should specify in
Residential Facilities Is Woefully its regional center contracts that noncompliant regional centers will
Inefficient and Inconsistent pay financial penalties equal to the amount of revenue lost because of
their inaction.
2014‑118
(January 2015)
continued on next page . . .
8 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
NUMBER OF YEARS
ESTIMATED
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT
Department of Health Care Services
California Department of 6. If Health Care Services finds significant errors in a health plan’s provider 6 December
Health Care Services: directory, it should work with that health plan to identify reasons for 2022
Improved Monitoring of Medi‑Cal the inaccuracies and require the health plan to develop processes to
Managed Care Health Plans eliminate the inaccuracies.
Is Necessary to Better Ensure
Access to Care
2014‑134
(June 2015)
California Department of 1. To ensure that it provides claiming units with reasonable opportunities 6 Will Not
Health Care Services: to address concerns with its decisions or actions, Health Care Services Implement
It Should Improve Its should, within three months, begin preparing regulations to establish
Administration and Oversight of and implement a formal appeals process that allows claiming units to
School‑Based Medi‑Cal Programs directly appeal Health Care Services’ decisions.
2014‑130 2. To ensure that it provides claiming units with reasonable opportunities 6 Will Not
(August 2015) to address concerns with its decisions or actions, Health Care Services Implement
should, within three months, inform all stakeholders, including claiming
units, of the existence of this appeals process.
4. Until the Legislature implements our recommendation in Chapter 2, 6 Will Not
Health Care Services should immediately resolve weaknesses in its Implement
oversight of local educational consortia and local governmental agencies
to ensure that these entities sufficiently meet their responsibilities
under the administrative activities program and meet the terms
of their contracts with Health Care Services. Health Care Services
should complete the oversight reviews for at least three high‑risk
local educational consortia or local governmental agencies by
December 31, 2015, and post the results to its website.
5. Until the Legislature implements our recommendation in Chapter 2, 6 Will Not
Health Care Services should immediately resolve weaknesses in its Implement
oversight of local educational consortia and local governmental agencies
to ensure that these entities sufficiently meet their responsibilities
under the administrative activities program and meet the terms of
their contracts with Health Care Services. Health Care Services should
complete the oversight reviews for any remaining high‑risk local
educational consortia or local governmental agencies by June 30, 2016,
and post the results to its website.
10. To streamline the organizational structure of its administrative activities 6 July
program and to improve the program’s cost‑effectiveness, Health 2023
Care Services should implement a single statewide quarterly random
moment time survey and develop and implement a plan to take over
responsibility for conducting quarterly time surveys and performing
related activities as soon as reasonably possible.
11. To streamline the organizational structure of its administrative activities 6 July
program and to improve the program's cost‑effectiveness, Health Care 2025
Services should implement a single statewide quarterly random moment
time survey and develop and issue a request for proposals to identify
a responsible vendor to assist in implementing a statewide quarterly
random moment time survey.
12. To streamline the organizational structure of its administrative activities 6 July
program and to improve the program's cost‑effectiveness, Health Care 2022
Services should implement a single statewide quarterly random moment
time survey and draft revisions to regulations as appropriate and to
applicable documents, including the manual, oversight strategies and
plans, and policy and procedure letters.
13. To the extent that local educational consortia and local governmental 6 Will Not
agencies are no longer involved in the administrative activities program, Implement
Health Care Services should develop and issue a standard contract for
claiming units to sign to participate in the program.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 9
January 2022
NUMBER OF YEARS
ESTIMATED
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT
17. To better maximize federal reimbursements for the administrative 6 Will Not
activities program, Health Care Services should, within six months, Implement
develop and implement a method to oversee and track the outreach
efforts that local educational consortia and local governmental
agencies use for ensuring that nonparticipating claiming units
understand the benefits and consider participating in the administrative
activities program.
21. To provide the public with the ability to participate fully in developing 6 December
the rules governing the administrative activities program, Health Care 2022
Services should, in accordance with California's Administrative Procedure
Act (APA), immediately develop and adopt the regulations cited in the
four subdivisions of Section 14132.47 of the California Welfare and
Institutions Code.
California Department of 20. To make certain that it meets the requirements of the new state law 6 Will Not
Health Care Services: and that its performance measures are accurate, Health Care Services Implement
Weaknesses in Its Medi‑Cal should establish the provider‑to‑beneficiary ratio statewide and
Dental Program Limit Children’s by county as performance measures designed to evaluate access
Access to Dental Care and availability of dental services and include this measure in its
October 2015 report to the Legislature.
2013‑125
(December 2014) 23. To ensure that Health Care Services and its fiscal intermediaries 6 August
reimburse providers only for services rendered to eligible beneficiaries, 2022
Health Care Services should obtain Social Security's Death Master
File and update monthly its beneficiary eligibility system with
death information.
HIGHER EDUCATION
University of California, Davis
University of California, Davis: 4. UC Davis should collect all late fees that its licensees owe. 6 Will Not
It Has Not Identified Future Implement
Financing for the Strawberry
Breeding Program nor Collected
All Available Revenues
2014‑121
(June 2015)
LEGISLATIVE, JUDICIAL, AND EXECUTIVE
California Health Facilities Financing Authority
Children’s Hospital Program: 1. The authority should amend its regulations to bring them into accord 6 Will Not
The California Health Facilities with the 2004 act, thus allowing any eligible hospital to apply for the Implement
Financing Authority Has 2004 act’s funds that remained as of June 30, 2014.
Generally Complied With
Laws and Regulations and
Resolved Its Issue Related to
High Fund Balances
2015‑042
(September 2015)
continued on next page . . .
10 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
NUMBER OF YEARS
ESTIMATED
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT
Judicial Council of California‡
Judicial Branch of California: 1. To ensure that the compensation the AOC provides is reasonable, 6 Will Not
Because of Questionable Fiscal the Judicial Council should adopt procedures that require a regular Implement
and Operational Decisions, and thorough review of the AOC's compensation practices including
the Judicial Council and the an analysis of the job duties of each position to ensure that the
Administrative Office of the Courts compensation aligns with the requirements of the position. This review
Have Not Maximized the Funds should include comparable executive branch salaries, along with a
Available for the Courts justification when an AOC position is compensated at a higher level
than a comparable executive branch position.
2014‑107
(January 2015) 3. To ensure that its compensation structure is reasonable, the AOC 6 Will Not
should mirror the executive branch's practices for offering leave Implement
buyback programs in terms of frequency and amount.
4. To increase its efficiency and decrease its travel expenses, the AOC 6 Will Not
should require its directors and managers to work in the same locations Implement
as the majority of their staff unless business needs clearly require the
staff to work in different locations than their managers.
11. To reduce its expenses, the AOC should cease its excessive 6 Will Not
reimbursements for meals by adopting the executive branch's meal and Implement
travel reimbursement policies.
14. To ensure that it spends funds appropriately, the AOC should develop 6 Will Not
and implement controls to govern how its staff can spend judicial Implement
branch funds. These controls should include specific definitions of
local assistance and support expenditures, written fiscal policies and
procedures as the rules of court require, and a review process.
19. The AOC should conduct a comprehensive survey of the courts on a 6 Will Not
regular schedule—at least every five years—to ensure that the services Implement
it provides align with their responses. The AOC should re‑evaluate any
services that the courts identify as being of limited value or need.
20. To justify its budget and staffing levels, the AOC should conduct the 6 Will Not
steps in CalHR's workforce planning model in the appropriate order. Implement
It should begin by establishing its mission and creating a strategic plan
based on the needs of the courts. It should then determine the services
it should provide to achieve the goals of that plan. The AOC should
base its future staffing changes on the foundation CalHR's workforce
planning model provides. Finally, the AOC should develop and use
performance measures to evaluate the effectiveness of this effort.
21. To ensure that it provides services to the trial courts as efficiently 6 Will Not
as possible, the Judicial Council should explore implementing a Implement
fee‑for‑service model for selected services. These services could
include those that are little used or of lesser value to the trial courts, as
identified in our survey that we discuss in Chapter 3.
22. To justify the budget and staff level of the AOC, the Judicial Council 6 Will Not
should implement some or all of the best practices we identified to Implement
improve the transparency of AOC spending activities.
† Contrary to the State Auditor’s determination, the audited agency believes it has fully implemented the recommendation.
‡ In July 2014, the Judicial Council of California retired the use of Administrative Office of the Courts to refer to the Judicial Council’s staff.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 11
January 2022
Table 2
Recommendations Made to State Entities That Are More Than One Year Old and Are Still Not Fully Implemented
(Reports Issued From November 2015 Through October 2020)
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
BUSINESS, CONSUMER SERVICES, HOUSING
Board of Registered Nursing
Board of 5. To ensure that BRN is using up‑to‑date, 1 December
Registered Nursing: accurate, and objective information to inform 2022
It Has Failed to Use the governing board's enrollment decisions
Sufficient Information and to assess clinical capacity for student
When Considering placements, by April 1, 2021, BRN should do
Enrollment Decisions the following: revise its regulations to require
for New and Existing nursing programs to report any changes
Nursing Programs they make to their use of clinical facilities
within 90 days of making a change and report
2019‑120
annually if the program has made no changes.
(July 2020)
6. To ensure that BRN is using up‑to‑date, 1 October
accurate, and objective information to inform 2022
the governing board's enrollment decisions
and to assess clinical capacity for student
placements, by April 1, 2021, BRN should do
the following: compile and aggregate the
information from the facility approval forms
into a database and take reasonable steps
to ensure that the information is accurate
and current.
7. To ensure that BRN is using up‑to‑date, 1 October
accurate, and objective information to inform 2022
the governing board's enrollment decisions
and to assess clinical capacity for student
placements, by April 1, 2021, BRN should do
the following: annually publish clinical capacity
information on its website for public use.
9. To identify additional facilities that 1 October
might offer clinical placement slots, by 2022
October 1, 2021, and annually thereafter, BRN
should compare its nursing program database
with OSHPD's list of health care facilities. BRN
should share the results of its comparison
with nursing programs by publishing this
information on its website.
Board of 7. To ensure that BRN resolves complaints 4 †
Registered Nursing: regarding nurses in a timely manner, by
Significant Delays and March 1, 2017, it should establish a plan to
Inadequate Oversight eliminate its backlog of complaints awaiting
of the Complaint assignment to an investigator.
Resolution Process Have
10. To increase its pool of expert witnesses, 4 Will Not
Allowed Some Nurses
by June 2017, BRN should take the steps Implement
Who May Pose a Risk
necessary to increase the hourly wage it pays
to Patient Safety to
expert witnesses.
Continue Practicing
2016‑046
(December 2016)
continued on next page . . .
12 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
Department of Housing and Community Development
California Department 14. To ensure that it maximizes the benefit of the 3 June
of Housing and funds it has invested in CAPES's development 2022
Community and to support its ongoing efforts to
Development: improve CAPES's usability, HCD should, by
Its Oversight of January 1, 2019, develop a documented
Housing Bond Funds process to ensure that all data in CAPES are
Remains Inconsistent accurate and complete. This process should
include all phases of contract management,
2018‑037
including monitoring. HCD should implement
(September 2018)
a routine periodic review of this process and
update the process as necessary.
16. To ensure that it is able to meet its 3 June
administrative monitoring obligations 2022
and that it uses housing bond funds in
compliance with state law, regulations, and
program guidelines, HCD should develop a
long‑term plan by January 1, 2019, for how
it will avoid exceeding the administrative
cost limits of those programs in the most
immediate danger of overage and for how it
will address instances when it has exceeded
administrative cost limits. The plan should
identify the programs at risk of exceeding
the limit; the actions HCD will take for each
program to gain efficiencies; its plan for
moving staff between programs; a request
for more money or legislative changes
such as modifying the statutory limit on
administrative spending, if necessary; and
an evaluation of the consequences of not
fulfilling its monitoring obligations.
18. To ensure that it complies with state law, 3 June
prudently uses administrative funding, and 2022
promotes transparency, HCD should calculate
and retain only funds equal to its actual
administrative costs in instances when it does
not disburse awarded funds to a recipient
and subsequently grants the funds to
another recipient.
19. To ensure that it does not exceed 3 June
administrative cost restrictions and that it 2022
maximizes the funds intended to address
target populations' housing needs, HCD
should estimate when it will run out of
administrative funds for any specific program,
document its projection methodology, and
provide underlying data and support for its
estimates. The projections should include,
but not be limited to, actual staff time spent
on the program, the number of awards being
monitored, and the length of monitoring.
Staff should provide these projections and
methodologies to management for review
and approval by December 1, 2018, and then
at least biannually thereafter.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 13
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
Mobile Home 20. To ensure that it is aware of any potential 1 †
Park Inspections: conflicts of interest that its inspectors may
The Department have, HCD should by September 2020
of Housing and develop procedures to review the annual and
Community assuming‑position Form 700s of all inspectors
Development Must with reportable financial interests to identify
Improve Its Inspection potential conflicts of interest.
Processes to Better
21. To ensure that it is aware of any potential 1 †
Protect Park Residents
conflicts of interest that its inspectors may
2019‑111 have, HCD should by September 2020 develop
(July 2020) procedures to ensure that staff promptly notify
the Form 700 filing officer of all inspectors
hired or leaving HCD employment.
22. To ensure that it is aware of any potential 1 September
conflicts of interest that inspectors may 2021#
have involving real property, HCD should by
January 2021 amend its conflict‑of‑interest
code to require inspectors to disclose financial
interests in real property.
26. To ensure that HCD evaluates LEA oversight 1 †
of mobile home parks effectively, by
January 2021 HCD should continue its
efforts to finalize its policies and procedures
for evaluating LEAs and ensure that staff
members follow its procedures for handling
complaints it forwards to those LEAs.
CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
California Correctional Health Care Services
Investigations of 14. Ensure that scheduling staff use the 3 April
Improper Activities appropriate post codes in the scheduling 2022
I by State Agencies software for all nursing staff so their time is
and Employees: accurately reported.
Misuse of State Time,
15. Ensure that all other nursing staff assignments 3 April
Economically Wasteful
to ad hoc posts are appropriate, and require 2022
Activities, and Misuse of
schedulers to enter a note in the scheduling
State Property
software indicating an employee’s duties
I2018‑1 while in a general ad hoc post.
(July 2018)‡
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
California Department 1. To increase public safety and reduce 1 April
of Corrections and the likelihood of recidivism, Corrections 2022
Rehabilitation: should establish a separate category in
It Has Poorly the appropriate data system to track the
Administered the individuals who would have qualified for the
Integrated Services for integrated services program. It should also
Mentally Ill Parolees ensure that staff in the institutions, including
Program, and With mental health clinicians and staff involved in
Current Funding Cuts, prerelease planning, coordinate with parole to
It Must Find Ways to assign these individuals to parole agents with
Transition Parolees to specialized caseloads who have the training
County Services and experience to serve this population.
Corrections should focus its efforts on at
2020‑103
least the eight counties that are losing the
(August 2020)
integrated services program and complete
the steps noted in this recommendation by
February 2021.
continued on next page . . .
14 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
2. To increase public safety and reduce the 1 December
likelihood of recidivism, Corrections should 2021
continue to meet with the appropriate staff
in the behavioral health departments of the
eight counties where the integrated services
program currently operates to facilitate
coordination among Corrections' staff, the
providers, and the counties. The coordination
should focus on smoothly transitioning
current program participants to the county
services they need and on developing
processes for future parolees with mental
illness and issues with homelessness who
will transition to county services. Corrections
should begin holding these meetings by
October 2020 and continue them until all
necessary processes are in place.
3. To increase public safety and reduce the 1 December
likelihood of recidivism, Corrections should 2021
create a regular forum for subject‑matter
experts to share information regarding their
respective efforts to smoothly transition
current program participants to county
services and to develop processes for future
parolees with mental illness and issues with
homelessness who will transition to county
services. Corrections should include its
staff from the eight counties in which the
integrated services program will no longer
operate, including staff in the institutions,
such as mental health clinicians and staff
involved in prerelease planning, parole
agents, and parole outpatient clinical staff.
Corrections should also include the providers
currently under contract, county services
staff, and others as necessary. The forums
should offer Corrections' staff the opportunity
to receive updated training as necessary,
and Corrections should begin hosting these
forums by October 2020.
4. To determine whether parolees with mental 1 May
illness who have housing needs are receiving 2022
necessary services and support during their
parole terms, Corrections should review its
processes for connecting these individuals
to county services by determining the
appropriate metrics to evaluate its processes
and setting goals related to those metrics.
5. To determine whether parolees with mental 1 May
illness who have housing needs are receiving 2022
necessary services and support during their
parole terms, Corrections should review its
processes for connecting these individuals
to county services by ensuring that it is
collecting sufficient, consistent data to review
those metrics.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 15
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
6. To determine whether parolees with mental 1 May
illness who have housing needs are receiving 2022
necessary services and support during their
parole terms, Corrections should review its
processes for connecting these individuals
to county services by establishing a timeline
for conducting reviews regularly, but at
least every three years. Corrections should
develop its plan by July 2021 and include at
least the eight counties formerly served by
the integrated services program. Corrections
should complete its first review by December
2021.
7. To determine whether parolees with mental 1 July
illness who have housing needs are receiving 2022
necessary services and support during their
parole terms, Corrections should review its
processes for connecting these individuals
to county services by reporting on its
success in meeting its goals to the Council
on Criminal Justice and Behavioral Health
and the public. Corrections should develop
its plan by July 2021 and include at least
the eight counties formerly served by the
integrated services program. Corrections
should complete its first review by
December 2021.
8. To determine whether parolees with mental 1 December
illness who have housing needs are receiving 2022
necessary services and support during their
parole terms, Corrections should review its
processes for connecting these individuals
to county services by using the reviews to
identify changes to improve its processes for
connecting parolees to resources, including
improving training for Corrections' staff.
Corrections should develop its plan by July
2021 and include at least the eight counties
formerly served by the integrated services
program. Corrections should complete its first
review by December 2021.
California Department 2. Corrections should immediately require 4 Will Not
of Corrections and mental health staff to score 100 percent on Implement
Rehabilitation: risk evaluation audits in order to pass. If a staff
It Must Increase Its member does not pass, Corrections should
Efforts to Prevent require the prison to follow its current policies
and Respond to by reviewing additional risk evaluations to
Inmate Suicides determine whether the staff member needs
to undergo additional mentoring.
2016‑131
(August 2017) 16. To ensure that prisons comply with its policies 4 Undetermined
related to suicide prevention and response,
Corrections should continue to develop its
audit process and implement it at all prisons
by February 2018. The process should include,
but not be limited to, audits of the quality of
prisons' risk evaluations and treatment plans.
continued on next page . . .
16 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
California Department 1. To ensure that Corrections has reliable 2 November
of Corrections and tools for assessing the needs of its inmate 2021#
F Rehabilitation: population, it should validate COMPAS and
Several Poor CSRA by January 2020 and revalidate all of its
Administrative Practices assessment tools at least every five years.
Have Hindered
8. To increase the space available for 2 †
Reductions in Recidivism
rehabilitation programs, by January 2020
and Denied Inmates
Corrections should analyze and report on its
Access to In‑Prison
current infrastructure capacity compared to
Rehabilitation Programs
its needs for the programs. The report should
2018‑113 include the current space available and the
(January 2019) square footage needed. If the report indicates
that additional space is necessary, Corrections
should work with the Legislature to address
those needs.
9. To improve the inmate enrollment rates 2 Fiscal Year
in CalPIA's vocational education programs, 2021–22
CalPIA and Corrections should require
a CalPIA representative to attend all
classification committee meetings at all
nine prisons where CalPIA offers vocational
education. Corrections should also ensure
that it enrolls eligible inmates in CalPIA's
vocational programs before filling spots in its
own vocational programs. In addition, if the
CalPIA recidivism study indicates that CalPIA's
vocational programs are better at reducing
recidivism than Corrections' vocational
programs, CalPIA should request funding
from the Legislature to expand its vocational
training program.
13. To ensure that Corrections effectively and 2 †
efficiently allocates resources and reduces
recidivism, it should collaborate with C‑ROB
during fiscal year 2019–20 to establish
annual targets for reducing recidivism and
determining the cost‑effectiveness of the
programs. Corrections should also request
federal grants tied to setting targets for
recidivism reduction.
Correctional Officer 21. To ensure the health and safety of its 3 †
Health and Safety: officers when interacting with inmates,
W Some State and County CIM should provide annual training that is
Correctional Facilities specific to preventing and responding to
Could Better Protect gassing attacks.
Their Officers From the
Health Risks of Certain
Inmate Attacks
2018‑106
(September 2018)
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 17
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
Investigations of 17. CDCR should enforce its current procedure to 4 July
Improper Activities retain Institutional Worker Supervision Pay 2022
by State Agencies (IWSP) documentation.
and Employees:
19. CDCR should train all employees, supervisors, 4 July
Misuse of Resources,
and personnel staff who receive, approve, 2022
Inaccurate Attendance
or issue the extra pay to ensure that they are
Records, Disclosure
familiar with the requirements of the IWSP
of Confidential
procedure and Pay Differential 67.
Information, and
Improper Payments
I2017‑1
(March 2017)‡
Investigations of 20. Fully implement and continue to follow 3 July
Improper Activities recommendations from prior investigative 2022
I by State Agencies reports involving similar inappropriate inmate
and Employees: supervision pay at other CDCR facilities,
Misuse of State Time, including the recommendation to train all
Economically Wasteful employees who receive, approve, or issue the
Activities, and Misuse of inmate supervision pay.
State Property
I2018‑1
(July 2018)‡
California Prison Industry Authority
California Department 10. To improve the inmate enrollment rates 2 †
of Corrections and in CalPIA's vocational education programs,
F Rehabilitation: CalPIA and Corrections should require
Several Poor a CalPIA representative to attend all
Administrative classification committee meetings at all
Practices Have nine prisons where CalPIA offers vocational
Hindered Reductions in education. Corrections should also ensure
Recidivism and Denied that it enrolls eligible inmates in CalPIA's
Inmates Access to vocational programs before filling spots in its
In‑Prison Rehabilitation own vocational programs. In addition, if the
Programs CalPIA recidivism study indicates that CalPIA's
vocational programs are better at reducing
2018‑113
recidivism than Corrections' vocational
(January 2019)
programs, CalPIA should request funding
from the Legislature to expand its vocational
training program.
California Rehabilitation Oversight Board
California Department 16. To ensure that Corrections is taking 2 Will Not
of Corrections and steps to reduce recidivism, C‑ROB should Implement
F Rehabilitation: monitor whether Corrections is developing
Several Poor appropriate recidivism targets and, in its
Administrative Practices annual report, should evaluate Corrections'
Have Hindered progress toward meeting those targets.
Reductions in Recidivism
and Denied Inmates
Access to In‑Prison
Rehabilitation Programs
2018‑113
(January 2019)
continued on next page . . .
18 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
Department of Rehabilitation
Department of 3. To comply with state laws and regulations 3 January
Rehabilitation: and help ensure that staff involved in making 2022
Its Inadequate Guidance governmental decisions during the grant
and Oversight of the process are impartial, Rehabilitation should
Grant Process Led to ensure that they receive ethics training, which
Inconsistencies and includes conflict‑of‑interest training, at least
Perceived Bias in Its every two years.
Evaluations and Awards
6. To increase transparency and ensure that 3 January
of Some Grants
applicants have the information necessary to 2022
2017‑129 understand the grant process, Rehabilitation
(July 2018) should include in its RFAs clear scoring criteria
and descriptions of the evaluation, award,
and appeals processes, including the process
it will use to address applications that receive
tied scores.
11. To increase the transparency of its selection 3 January
process and to ensure that it receives the most 2022
qualified evaluators possible, Rehabilitation
should issue a public solicitation for evaluators
for each grant that includes a description of
essential and desirable qualifications.
13. To ensure that it provides sufficient oversight 3 January
of the grant process, Rehabilitation should 2022
ensure that the technical review teams it
assigns to grants provide the director and chief
deputy with a memorandum summarizing
the evaluation process and the evaluators'
recommended grant awardees. Rehabilitation
should also designate an individual
responsible for reviewing and approving the
memorandum and recommended awardees
before it publishes its notice of intent to award.
14. If it finds errors in an evaluation that merit 3 January
restarting the grant process, rescoring of 2022
applications, or convening a new evaluation
panel, Rehabilitation should resolve any issues
before it begins the rescoring process. It should
also notify applicants to ensure that they are
aware of any changes to the process due to the
errors. Further, it should consider promulgating
regulations and amending its grant manual to
permit staff to request evaluators to rescore
applications or convene a new evaluation
panel when it finds issues with an evaluation.
15. To ensure that it consistently and thoroughly 3 December
evaluates appeals, Rehabilitation should 2022
establish in state regulations and its grant
manual that staff at the appropriate level
of authority are to acknowledge all appeal
requests, notify intended awardees that could
be affected by the appeals, and inform the
appellant of the qualifications of the review
committee members. Staff at the appropriate
level of authority must also notify all affected
parties of the review committee’s final
decision within the time frame Rehabilitation
establishes in regulations.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 19
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
16. To ensure that Rehabilitation has appropriate 3 January
oversight of its grant process and can 2022
sufficiently demonstrate that it followed the
process, it should designate staff, separate
from those involved in the respective grant
process, to conduct a review of each grant
process for procedural errors, evaluator
prejudice, and whether evaluators supported
their scores with evidence from the relevant
applications before it awards grants.
17. To comply with federal and state 3 December
requirements, and to ensure consistency and 2022
fairness in its grant process, Rehabilitation
should revise and formalize the policies and
procedures in its grant manual to incorporate
the rules adopted by regulation and to
address the recommendations in this report.
The grant manual should specify that any
deviations from the required grant process
must be for good cause and be documented.
18. To ensure that it consistently and thoroughly 3 December
evaluates appeals, Rehabilitation should 2022
establish in state regulations and its grant
manual a process for the review committees
to request additional information from
appellants or program staff. To allow time
for an adequate review of any additional
information, Rehabilitation should consider
extending the time for review committees to
issue their decision on appeals from 30 days
to 45 days.
19. To ensure that it consistently and 3 December
thoroughly evaluates appeals, 2022
Rehabilitation should establish in state
regulations and its grant manual that to be
able to rescore applications when necessary,
the review committee members should be
subject‑matter experts or, if they are not
subject‑matter experts, the review committee
should have the authority to recommend a
new evaluation panel instead of rescoring
applications itself when it identifies a reason
to invalidate previous evaluations.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Department of Toxic Substances Control
California Department 3. To ensure that the public and policy makers 1 October
of Toxic Substances have the information they need to make 2022
Control: informed decisions, DTSC should, by no later
The State’s Poor than April 2021, identify and publicize a date
Management of the by which it expects to complete cleanup
Exide Cleanup Project for all properties that meet or exceed the
Has Left Californians standard for lead contamination of 80 ppm
at Continued Risk of identified in DTSC's cleanup plan. It should
Lead Poisoning post this information on its website and, at
least every six months, publish an update that
2020‑107
indicates whether it is on track to meet
(October 2020)
that expected completion date based on its
rate of progress.
continued on next page . . .
20 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
4. To ensure that it has sufficient funding to 1 July
clean up all lead‑contaminated properties 2021#
in the cleanup site, DTSC should do
the following:
• Identify the full amount of funding it needs
to complete the cleanup of the 3,200 most
contaminated properties and the remaining
4,600 contaminated properties. It should
submit a request for funding in time
for spring 2021 budget discussions that
includes a range of funding options
that spans from funding for the full
cleanup to funding for only a portion of
the remaining contaminated properties.
• Immediately revise its cost estimation
methods to encompass the factors that
it now knows will affect its overall costs.
If needed, it should contract for expertise
in determining accurate and complete
estimates of the remaining cleanup cost.
State Water Resources Control Board
Investigations of 1. Take appropriate corrective action against 5 Unknown
Improper Activities the district engineer and the supervisors for
by State Agencies their participation in or failure to address the
and Employees: conflict of interest.
Conflict of Interest,
Violation of
Post‑Employment Ethics
Restrictions, Waste of
State Funds, Misuse of
State Resources, and
Incompatible Activities
I2016‑2
(August 2016)‡
State and Regional 7. If the State Water Board believes regulations 3 Pending
Water Boards: are necessary to ensure that the regional
V They Must Do More boards and local jurisdictions follow its
to Ensure That Local guidance regarding adequate and consistent
Jurisdictions’ Costs to information pertaining to their costs for storm
Reduce Storm Water water management, the State Water Board
Pollution Are Necessary should adopt such regulations.
and Appropriate
11. The State Water Board should revise its trash 3 Will Not
2017‑118 policy to focus it on local jurisdictions that Implement
(March 2018) have water bodies that are harmed by trash,
as identified by the polluted waters list.
In addition, the State Water Board should
review the polluted waters list at least
biannually to identify any additional water
bodies recently determined to be harmed
by trash and impose its trash policy on the
applicable jurisdictions.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 21
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
Board of State and Community Corrections
Juvenile Justice Crime 20. To ensure that counties include accurate 1 March
Prevention Act: information in their comprehensive plans and 2022
Z Weak Oversight Has year‑end reports, Community Corrections
Hindered Its Meaningful should review the information counties
Implementation submit to it and follow up with them to obtain
missing information or to clarify information
2019‑116
that seems incorrect.
(May 2020)
21. To better promote effective local efforts 1 May
related to the JJCPA, Community Corrections 2022
should include on its website the capability
for stakeholders, counties, and other
interested parties to review and easily
compare the JJCPA information of multiple
counties. Specifically, its website should allow
users to be able to select a specific type of
JJCPA‑funded program and easily review
information the counties submitted for all
programs associated with that program type.
Community Corrections should determine the
cost of providing this additional service and, if
necessary, request additional resources.
California Department of Food and Agriculture
California Department 1. In order to ensure a fair and defensible grant 1 †
of Food and Agriculture: award process for the Pet Lover’s program,
Poor Management Food and Agriculture should immediately
Threatens the Success adopt and begin following policies and
of the Pet Lover’s procedures that direct its staff to verify and
Specialized License document that grant applicants are eligible
Plate Program for funding from the Pet Lover’s program
before forwarding the applications to the
2019‑121
technical review panel.
(March 2020)
2. In order to ensure a fair and defensible grant 1 †
award process for the Pet Lover’s program,
Food and Agriculture should immediately
adopt and begin following policies and
procedures that direct its staff to have
multiple reviewers score each application that
progresses to a technical review.
3. In order to ensure a fair and defensible grant 1 †
award process for the Pet Lover's program,
Food and Agriculture should immediately
adopt and begin following policies and
procedures that direct its staff to select
the highest‑ranked applications to receive
grant awards, and document the reasons for
these selections.
4. To correct its error in making grants to 1 †
ineligible entities, by June 2020 Food and
Agriculture should complete efforts to either
cancel those contracts and recoup unspent
funds from the two ineligible organizations or
work with those organizations to ensure that
they meet eligibility requirements.
continued on next page . . .
22 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
5. To ensure that the Pet Lover's program 1 †
remains viable, Food and Agriculture should
immediately begin using marketing and
promotional strategies similar to those used
by other specialized license plate programs
to encourage vehicle owners to purchase
the Pet Lover's plate, and should continue to
ensure that the Pet Lover's plate remains on
DMV flyers.
6. To improve the effectiveness of marketing 1 June
of the Pet Lover's program, by August 2020 2022
Food and Agriculture should contract with an
eligible nonprofit organization, as state law
allows, to carry out additional marketing and
promotional activities for the program.
Gross Mismanagement 1. CDFA: Ensure that its audit office conducts 2 Unknown
Led to the Misuse of biannual compliance audits for all district
State Resources and agricultural associations and that the office
Multiple Violations of prioritizes auditing district agricultural
State Laws associations on the watch program.
I2019‑4 4. CDFA: To the extent that its authority 2 Unknown
(August 2019)‡ allows, oversee implementation of our
recommendations to the association.
5. Association: Take appropriate disciplinary 2 Unknown
action against the CEO, the maintenance
supervisor, and all other permanent and
temporary employees who engaged in
the improper governmental activities that
we identified.
12. Association: Formally adopt, train staff on, 2 Unknown
and follow the Fairs and Expositions branch’s
accounting procedures manual, as well as
CDFA’s Controlled Substances and Alcohol
and Incompatible Activities policies.
California Department of Veterans Affairs
California Department 10. To ensure that the veterans homes receive all of 2 Will Not
of Veterans Affairs the funding to which they are entitled, by the Implement
and Department of May 2019 budget revision, CalVet should seek
General Services: an augmentation to its appropriation for the
The Departments’ homes equal to the lease revenues it generated
Mismanagement of from July 2015 through June 2018. If CalVet
the Veterans Home believes the state law requiring lease proceeds
Properties Has Not to augment its appropriation is outdated, it
Served the Veterans’ should seek a change to state law.
Best Interests and Has
11. To monitor whether lessees are current on 2 September
Been Detrimental to
payments, CalVet should track payment 2022
the State
compliance for all lease payments that it
2018‑112 receives and promptly follow up with lessees
(January 2019) that do not pay as required. This should
include collecting sufficient records from
lessees that pay rent based on a percentage
of sales to calculate the amount that each is
required to pay to ensure that the lessees are
making the correct rent payments.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 23
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
Disabled Veteran 11. To ensure that its outreach efforts are 2 October
Business Enterprise effective and result in a greater number of 2022
Program: DVBE firms available that can provide the
The Departments of necessary goods and services awarding
General Services and departments are seeking, CalVet should
Veterans Affairs Have work with awarding departments to identify
Failed to Maximize the types of goods and services for which
Participation and to they struggle to find a DVBE contractor
Accurately Measure or subcontractor.
Program Success
13. To ensure that its outreach efforts are effective 2 July
2018‑114 and result in a greater number of DVBE firms 2022
(February 2019) available that can provide the necessary
goods and services awarding departments are
seeking, CalVet should develop an outreach
plan to include outreach activities found to be
effective in the past based on its assessment.
This plan should also emphasize outreach
to increase the number of DVBE firms that
provide the types of goods and services that
awarding departments struggle to obtain from
DVBE firms.
17. To ensure that its outreach efforts are 2 July
effective and result in a greater number of 2022
DVBE firms available that can provide the
necessary goods and services awarding
departments are seeking, CalVet should
conduct periodic surveys of businesses
owned by disabled veterans that attended
its outreach events but chose not to become
DVBE certified to determine the reasons
for not applying for the certification. The
department should use this information to
improve its outreach and any other areas of
the program.
California Gambling Control Commission
Bureau of Gambling 9. To prevent unnecessary delays and use of 2 July
Control and California resources and to ensure its compliance with 2022
G Gambling Control state law, the commission should, following
Commission: the Legislature's amendment of the Gambling
Their Licensing Act that we recommend, revise its regulations
Processes Are Inefficient and policies for conducting evidentiary
and Foster Unequal hearings. These revisions should specify that
Treatment of Applicants the commission may vote at regular meetings
on a final basis to approve or deny licenses,
2018‑132
registrations, permits, findings of suitability,
(May 2019)
or other matters and that it is not required
to conduct evidentiary hearings unless
applicants request that it do so.
continued on next page . . .
24 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
13. To better align the revenue in the Gambling 2 Unknown
Fund with the costs of the activities that
the fund supports, the bureau and the
commission should conduct cost analyses
of those activities by July 2020. At a
minimum, these cost analyses should include
the following:
• The entities’ personnel costs, operating
costs, and any program overhead costs.
• Updated time estimates for their
core and support activities, such as
background investigations.
• The cost of their enforcement activities.
• Using this information, the bureau and
commission should reset their regulatory
fees to reflect their actual costs. Before
conducting its fee study, the bureau
should implement our recommendations
to improve its processes for assigning
applications, ensuring the completeness
of applications, and developing
time‑reporting protocols.
California Public Utilities Commission
California Public 6. To ensure that the CPUC fulfills its statutory 2 July
Utilities Commission: requirement for auditing all water utilities, 2022
It Could Improve the it should immediately begin to follow its
Transparency of Water Standard Practice when auditing Class A water
Rate Increases by utilities, or develop policies and procedures
Disclosing Its Review by May 2019 to ensure that the reviews
Process and Ensuring Public Advocates conducts of general rate
That Utilities Notify cases demonstrate compliance with the legal
Customers as Required requirement for audits of these utilities.
2018‑118 7. To ensure that the CPUC fulfills its statutory 2 July
(December 2018) requirement for auditing all water utilities, 2022
it should immediately develop a plan to
complete audits of Class A water utilities and
small water utilities in a timely manner.
California Public 2. To ensure that the choice of a vendor is 5 †
Utilities Commission: sufficiently justified and that the vendor
It Should Reform represents the best value, the CPUC should
Its Rules to Increase explain in its final decision how the vendor
Transparency and was the most qualified in all cases when
Accountability, and Its the CPUC does not competitively select the
Contracting Practices vendor it directs utilities to contract with.
Do Not Align With
4. To avoid the appearance of inappropriate 5 Will Not
Requirements or
relationships, the CPUC should adopt a policy Implement
Best Practices
to prohibit commissioners from accepting
2016‑104 gifts from regulated utilities and energy
(September 2016) companies and free travel from organizations
with significant ties to regulated utilities
and other parties with financial interests in
CPUC proceedings.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 25
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
8. To ensure that its contracting practices align 5 February
with state requirements and best practices, 2022
the CPUC should designate a limited number
of project managers for each division at the
CPUC, and provide those individuals with
training on the CPUC's processes related
to contracting, including how to monitor
progress of a contractor's work.
13. The CPUC should update its regulations to 5 Will Not
require parties joining a proceeding by filing Implement
a protest or response to an application or
petition, or by filing comments in response to
a rulemaking proceeding to fully disclose their
interests in the proceeding.
GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS
Department of General Services
California Department 2. To ensure long‑term efficient and effective 5 February
of General Services’ delivery of projects, the division, in its 2022
Real Estate Services planned implementation of its new project
Division: management system in July 2017, should
To Better Serve Its ensure that the project management
Client Agencies, It system can centrally track and extract all
Needs to Track and data regarding project status, including
Analyze Project Data time delays, cost overages, and the reasons
and Improve Its for each.
Management Practices
3. To ensure long‑term efficient and effective 5 February
2015‑117 delivery of projects, the division, in its 2022
(March 2016) planned implementation of its new project
management system in July 2017, should
track the reasons that projects are pending to
identify its true backlog of projects. In doing
so, it should develop a process to follow up on
those projects that are pending to ensure that
they are not on hold unnecessarily and are
appropriately moving forward.
4. To ensure long‑term efficient and effective 5 February
delivery of projects, the division, in its 2022
planned implementation of its new project
management system in July 2017, should, at
least annually, use the centrally tracked data
to identify common themes in the causes for
project delays and cost overages and develop
solutions to address these issues. Further,
it should report the results of its review to
General Services’ executive management.
5. Until the division implements its planned 5 Will Not
project management system, it should, by Implement
September 2016, develop a process to, at a
minimum, identify project status and reasons
for project delays as well as cost overages.
Using these data, the division should modify
its project management processes to ensure
the efficient and effective delivery of projects.
continued on next page . . .
26 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
6. The division should develop and implement a 5 Will Not
process for preparing reasonable time frames Implement
and cost estimates for its projects within
the building management branch. To better
inform the development of this process,
the division should evaluate the branch’s
structure, which should include a staffing
analysis, to determine whether it is effectively
organized and whether it should add cost
estimator positions.
7. To ensure that client agencies are paying 5 Will Not
equitable rates, by December 2016 General Implement
Services should develop and implement a
strategy for allocating its administrative costs
equally among all the projects it completes
for client agencies, including those portions
outsourced to private firms.
8. To ensure that the project management 5 Will Not
branch charges its client agencies a Implement
competitive hourly rate, by December 2016
and every two years thereafter, the division
should conduct a rate analysis that fully
accounts for differences between the project
management branch’s rate and private
firms’ rates. If it finds that the rates are not
competitive, the division should identify
and implement strategies to ensure that
the project management branch’s rates are
as competitive as they can be with those of
its private firm counterparts. Further, the
division should explore and implement any
other reasonable methods to ensure that
it is delivering projects as cost effectively
as possible.
10. To improve its communication with client 5 February
agencies, the division should develop a 2022
process for providing periodic detailed
bills and invoices to client agencies clearly
describing the work for which it is charging.
11. To effectively evaluate the performance 5 †
of its branches in delivering projects, the
division should develop meaningful goals
and objectives and a method of measuring
its success in achieving them as part of its
strategic plan that is focused on ensuring that
projects are delivered on time and within
budgeted cost estimates.
12. To ensure that its project management 5 †
staff are adequately trained and have the
information necessary to deliver projects
as efficiently and effectively as possible, the
division should conduct a comprehensive
survey every other year of all of its client
agencies to inform necessary improvements
to its processes and training program and, in
the interest of transparency, make the survey
results public.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 27
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
Department of General 3. To improve its oversight of the State’s 4 Will Not
Services and California noncompetitive contracts, General Services Implement
Department of should, within 90 days, create plans for
Technology: regularly performing statewide analyses
Neither Entity Has to identify potential abuse or overuse of
Provided the Oversight noncompetitive contracts. These analyses
Necessary to Ensure should include, but not be limited to,
That State Agencies calculating the proportional value and
Consistently Use number of the State’s competitive and
the Competitive noncompetitive contracts and amendments,
Bidding Process examining trends in agencies’ use of
noncompetitive contracts and amendments,
2016‑124
and identifying unusual patterns among
(June 2017)
vendors receiving state contracts through
noncompetitive means.
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
California Department of Public Health
Childhood Lead Levels: 6. To ensure that local prevention programs' 1 October
Millions of Children outreach results in a reduced number of 2021#
H in Medi‑Cal Have Not children with lead poisoning, CDPH should,
Received Required by December 2020, require local prevention
Testing for Lead programs to demonstrate the effectiveness
Poisoning of their outreach in meeting this goal. If
the local prevention programs are unable
2019‑105
to demonstrate the effectiveness of their
(January 2020)
outreach in reducing the number of children
with lead poisoning, CDPH should analyze
the cost‑effectiveness of other approaches,
including proactive abatement, and
require the local prevention programs to
replace or augment outreach to the extent
resources allow.
11. To better ensure that children with lead 1 December
poisoning are identified and treated, 2022
CDPH should prioritize meeting legislative
requirements related to these issues,
including doing the following by March 2020:
Finish developing the lead risk evaluation
regulations and include in them multiple
risk factors, such as those used in lead risk
evaluation questionnaires in other states. It
should also commence the formal rulemaking
process.
continued on next page . . .
28 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
Skilled Nursing 8. As the Legislature considers changes to state 3 †
Facilities: law, Public Health should take the steps
D Absent Effective State necessary to ensure that its oversight results
Oversight, Substandard in nursing facilities improving their quality
Quality of Care Has of care by amending its application licensing
Continued reviews by developing a defined process
that specifies how an analyst will determine
2017‑109
whether an applicant has demonstrated
(May 2018)
its ability to comply with state and federal
requirements. This process also needs to
ensure that analysts conduct complete and
standardized reviews of each nursing facility
application within each class of facility.
Specifically, these processes should clearly
outline what factors analysts will consider
when determining whether an applicant is
in compliance, how analysts will weigh those
factors for each class of facility, and what
objective thresholds will prompt analysts to
elevate applications for review and approval
by higher‑level management. Additionally,
Public Health should document the additional
factors higher‑level management will
consider if applications are elevated for their
review to ensure that Public Health conducts
standardized reviews of nursing facility
applications of the same class. Finally, Public
Health should develop processes ensuring
that it documents its decisions adequately.
9. As the Legislature considers changes to state 3 August
law, Public Health should take the steps 2022
necessary to ensure that its oversight results
in nursing facilities improving their quality
of care by ensuring that it issues citations in
a timely manner, especially for immediate
jeopardy deficiencies.
11. To improve the availability and transparency 3 December
of information, Public Health should upload 2021
all inspection findings to Cal Health Find and
review ownership data by May 2019.
Youth Suicide 6. To support LEAs’ efforts to provide mental 1 Unknown
Prevention: health services, Public Health should establish
AA Local Educational the support program for school health centers
Agencies Lack the as state law requires. If Public Health lacks the
Resources and Policies funding to do so, it should request additional
Necessary to Effectively funds as needed. The support program should
Address Rising Rates assist LEAs in establishing school health centers
of Youth Suicide and and in identifying and applying for available
Self‑Harm funding as authorized by law, such as Medi‑Cal
reimbursement and MHSA funds.
2019‑125
(September 2020)
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 29
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
California Department of Social Services
California Department 10. To ensure that Social Services evaluates 4 January
of Social Services: the risk individuals may pose to vulnerable 2021#
B Its Caregiver populations in its licensed care facilities
Background Check as quickly as possible, by July 2017 Social
Bureau Lacks Services should establish time frames
Criminal History for staff to evaluate individuals who are
Information It Needs present in their facilities and who have
to Protect Vulnerable received administrative actions from other
Populations in Licensed departments. In addition, it should monitor
Care Facilities and follow up with the appropriate staff
regarding the status of their assessments of
2016‑126
these individuals and their final decisions.
(March 2017)
13. To comply with state law and better protect 4 Will Not
vulnerable populations in California’s Implement
licensed care facilities, Social Services should
immediately change its policy to require
that its exemption analysts evaluate all
infraction convictions, other than minor traffic
violations, before granting exemptions to
individuals. If Social Services believes it is not
feasible to evaluate all of these convictions, it
should report to the Legislature by June 2017
how it ensures that vulnerable populations
are not at risk and should request that the
Legislature change the law to eliminate
infraction convictions as a crime category that
Social Services must evaluate in order to grant
an exemption.
16. Until the Legislature requires that Social 4 January
Services receive both California and federal 2021#
criminal history information before issuing
a clearance or processing an exemption,
to better protect vulnerable populations,
Social Services should immediately revise its
policy to require its regional offices to obtain
all self‑disclosure forms for individuals who
submit fingerprints to Justice as part of an
application to be present in a licensed facility.
The regional offices should then forward to
the CBCB all self‑disclosure forms that identify
a conviction.
17. Until the Legislature requires that Social 4 January
Services receive both California and federal 2021#
criminal history information before issuing
a clearance or processing an exemption,
to better protect vulnerable populations,
Social Services should immediately change
its practice of allowing individuals who have
not submitted a self‑disclosure form to Social
Services to have access to licensed facilities,
thus reflecting the requirements of state
law. In addition, the CBCB should develop
a process to ensure that individuals cannot
receive a clearance or an exemption without
the CBCB first receiving both California and
federal criminal history information if a
regional office does not have a self‑disclosure
form for the individual.
continued on next page . . .
30 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
26. To ensure that regional offices pursue legal 4 January
actions in a timely manner, by July 2017 2021#
Social Services’ headquarters should identify
a resource—such as a unit—to monitor and
follow up with the regional offices regarding
the status of their legal actions related to
substantiated address matches of registered
sex offenders at licensed facilities.
California’s 30. To improve the oversight of psychotropic 5 Will Not
Foster Care System: medications prescribed to foster children, Implement
The State and Counties Social Services should collaborate with the
Have Failed to counties and other relevant stakeholders—
Adequately Oversee including Health Care Services, as
the Prescription necessary—to develop and implement a
of Psychotropic reasonable oversight structure that ensures
Medications to Children the coordination of the State’s and counties’
in Foster Care various oversight mechanisms as well as the
accuracy and completeness of the information
2015‑131
in Social Services’ data system.
(August 2016)
Department of Developmental Services
Department of 5. To ensure that in‑home respite vendors are 5 Will Not
Developmental providing quality services and that vendors Implement
Services: are adhering to state requirements, DDS
It Cannot Verify That should issue regulations requiring regional
Vendor Rates for centers to conduct periodic and ongoing
In‑Home Respite Services reviews of vendors’ programs, employees,
Are Appropriate and That and consumer records.
Regional Centers and
6. To ensure that in‑home respite vendors 5 July
Vendors Meet Applicable
comply with vendor requirements on an 2022
Requirements
ongoing basis, DDS should require the
2016‑108 regional centers to develop a process to
(October 2016) conduct biennial reviews of the vendor files
the regional centers maintain and document
the outcome of the review in the files. DDS
should require the regional centers to take
appropriate action to ensure that vendors
comply, up to and including terminating the
vendorization, if necessary.
7. To ensure that it is providing oversight 5 †
in accordance with state law and federal
requirements, DDS should ensure that it
performs audits of each regional center every
two years as required. In conducting these
audits, DDS should consistently include a
review of in‑home respite services.
Department of Health Care Services
Childhood Lead Levels: 1. Because of the severe and potentially 1 January
Millions of Children permanent damage that lead poisoning 2022
H in Medi‑Cal Have Not can cause in children, DHCS should ensure
Received Required that all children in Medi‑Cal receive lead
Testing for Lead tests by finalizing, by December 2020, its
Poisoning performance standard for lead testing of
one‑ and two‑year‑olds. DHCS should use
2019‑105
its existing data to assess the progress
(January 2020)
of managed care plans in meeting that
performance standard and impose sanctions
or provide incentive payments as appropriate
to improve performance.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 31
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
2. To ensure that families know about the lead 1 December
testing services that their children are entitled 2021
to receive, DHCS should send a reminder to get
a lead test for children who missed required
tests. It should send this reminder in the
required annual notification it is developing to
send to families of children who have not used
preventive services over the course of a year.
3. To increase California's lead testing rates and 1 Will Not
improve lead test reporting, DHCS should, Implement
by no later than June 2020, incorporate into
its contracts with managed care plans a
requirement for the plans to identify each
month all children with no record of receiving
a required test and remind the responsible
health care providers of the requirement to
test the children. DHCS should also develop
and implement a procedure to hold plans
accountable for meeting this requirement.
Department of 4. By September 2019, and periodically 2 †
Health Care Services: thereafter, DHCS should conduct another
Although Its Oversight risk assessment and ensure that it includes a
of Managed Care Health comprehensive evaluation of which contract
Plans Is Generally areas—including conflicts of interest—it
Sufficient, It Needs should focus on in its annual medical audits.
to Ensure That Their
5. Going forward, DHCS should conduct 2 †
Administrative Expenses
a comprehensive risk assessment and
Are Reasonable
ensure that it reviews health plans'
and Necessary
conflict‑of‑interest controls at least once
2018‑115 every three years.
(April 2019) 6. DHCS should develop and issue an All‑Plan 2 †
letter or other binding guidance by March
2020 to the health plans that specifically
defines what constitutes reasonable and
necessary administrative expenses.
7. DHCS should provide guidance to health 2 Will Not
plans on what is a reasonable bonus program. Implement
In doing so, DHCS should perform the
necessary oversight to ensure health plans
comply with this direction.
Department of 1. To ensure that beneficiaries in Regional 2 Will Not
Health Care Services: Model counties have adequate access to Implement
It Has Not Ensured That care, DHCS should identify by August 2020
Medi‑Cal Beneficiaries the locations requiring additional providers
in Some Rural Counties and the types of providers required. It should
Have Reasonable Access also develop strategies for recruiting and
to Care retaining providers in those locations. If it
requires additional funding to complete
2018‑122
this assessment or to implement actions to
(August 2019)
address its findings, DHCS should determine
the amounts it needs and request that
funding from the Legislature.
continued on next page . . .
32 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
11. To ensure that it makes informed decisions 2 Will Not
regarding the extension or renewal of Implement
its contracts with managed care health
plans, DHCS should immediately begin the
practice of requesting annual feedback
from the counties that the health plans
serve and of using that feedback in its
decision‑making process.
13. To ensure that beneficiaries in the Regional 2 Will Not
Model counties have reasonable access to Implement
care, DHCS should evaluate by June 2020
whether the structural characteristics of
a COHS Model would be better suited to
providing reasonable access to care in the
Regional Model counties and notify the
counties whether a COHS would improve
beneficiaries' access to care. If some or all of
these counties desire to transition to a COHS,
DHCS should assist them in making that
change after their current contracts expire.
14. To ensure that beneficiaries in the Regional 2 Will Not
Model counties have reasonable access to Implement
care, DHCS should evaluate by June 2020
whether it has the financial resources to
provide assistance to counties interested
in establishing a COHS or other managed
care model after the current Regional Model
contracts expire. If DHCS does not have the
required financial resources, it should seek
an appropriate amount of funding from
the Legislature.
Department of Health 2. To recover inappropriately spent funds, 3 December
Care Services: prevent future erroneous payments, and 2022
It Paid Billions in ensure eligible individuals' access to care,
Questionable Medi‑Cal Health Care Services should resolve the
Premiums and Claims discrepancies we identified and recover
Because It Failed erroneous payments where allowable by June
to Follow Up on 30, 2019.
Eligibility Discrepancies
3. To prevent future erroneous payments, Health 3 December
2018‑603 Care Services should implement procedures 2022
(October 2018) by December 31, 2018, to ensure the timely
resolution of system discrepancies. These
procedures should include Health Care
Services regularly following up on recurring,
unresolved system discrepancies with the
responsible county.
4. To prevent future erroneous payments, Health 3 June
Care Services should establish procedures by 2022
December 31, 2018, that define when it will
use its authority as defined in state law to
sanction unresponsive counties that do not
remedy known discrepancies.
6. To assist counties in addressing discrepancies, 3 December
Health Care Services should reevaluate and 2022
update its guidance to the counties related to
prioritizing MEDS alerts by December 31, 2018.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 33
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
Department of 6. To increase access to preventive health 2 Will Not
Health Care Services: services for children in areas where they Implement
Millions of Children are needed most, DHCS should identify by
in Medi‑Cal Are Not September 2019 where more providers who
Receiving Preventive see children are needed and propose to the
Health Services Legislature funding increases to recruit more
providers in these areas.
2018‑111
(March 2019) 8. To ensure that eligible children and their 2 †
families know about all the preventive
services they are entitled to through Medi‑Cal,
DHCS should include by May 2019 clearer
and more comprehensive information about
those services in its written materials and by
September 2019 ensure annual follow‑up with
any children and their families who have not
used those services.
11. To ensure that plans address underutilization 2 †
of children's preventive services, DHCS should
require plans by September 2019 to use their
utilization management programs to identify
barriers to usage specifically for these services
and hold the plans accountable to address the
barriers they identify.
12. To better ensure the accuracy of its data and 2 †
ensure that California receives all available
federal Medicaid funding, DHCS should
require its EQRO to perform its encounter
data validation studies annually using the
most recent set of data available, and it
should implement recommendations from its
EQRO studies.
13. To ensure that plan provider directories are 2 January
accurate, by September 2019 DHCS should 2022
begin using a 95 percent confidence level and
not more than a 10 percent margin of error on
its statistical sampling tool and should require
at least 95 percent accuracy before approving
a plan's provider directory. In addition, DHCS
should ensure that its staff adhere to its
policy to retain all documentation related to
its review of provider directories for at least
three years.
14. To mitigate health disparities for children of 2 January
differing ethnic backgrounds and language 2022
needs, DHCS should revise by September 2019
the methodology for its EQRO's health
disparity study to enable it to better make
demographic comparisons, and it should use
the findings to drive targeted interventions
within plan service areas. It should publish
this study annually.
16. To help increase utilization rates, DHCS should 2 †
begin by September 2019 to monitor and
identify effective incentive programs at the
plan level and share the results with all plans.
continued on next page . . .
34 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
18. To improve its ability to ensure that children 2 †
are receiving recommended preventive health
services, DHCS should create by September
2019 an action plan to annually address
the EQRO's recommendations relating to
children's preventive services, including
recommendations left unaddressed from the
previous two years' reports.
Mental Health 6. To ensure that local mental health agencies 3 December
Services Act: appropriately spend MHSA funds, Health 2021
E The State Could Better Care Services should publish its proposed
Ensure the Effective regulations in the California Regulatory
Use of Mental Health Notice Register by September 2018. It should
Services Act Funding then develop and implement an MHSA fiscal
audit process, independent of the Medi‑Cal
2017‑117
reviews, to review revenues and expenditures
(February 2018)
for the most recent fiscal year.
Skilled Nursing 12. Health Care Services should use current data to 3 †
Facilities: revise and update the peer groups it uses to
D Absent Effective State set Medi‑Cal rates. In doing so, it should take
Oversight, Substandard into consideration the consolidation of the
Quality of Care Has nursing facility industry.
Continued
2017‑109
(May 2018)
Department of State Hospitals
Investigations of 1. Within 30 days, the Department of State 1 Unknown
Improper Activities Hospitals (State Hospitals) should consult
J by State Agencies with the California Department of Human
and Employees: Resources (CalHR) to obtain its determination
Wasteful and about whether telepsychiatrists meet the
Improper Personnel criteria for safety retirement benefits. If CalHR
Decisions, Improper determines that telepsychiatrists do not meet
Contracting, Conflict the criteria for safety retirement benefits, take
of Interest, Misuse immediate action to reclassify telepsychiatrists
of State Resources, to the appropriate retirement category and
and Dishonesty notify all affected employees.
I2020‑2 3. Within 60 days, State Hospitals should 1 Unknown
(October 2020)‡ distribute CalHR's policy on the safety
retirement benefits designation to HR staff at
each state hospital facility and instruct staff to
consult with CalHR as the law requires.
Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission
Mental Health 10. To ensure that the MHSA‑funded triage grants 3 †
Services Act: are effective, the Oversight Commission
E The State Could Better should require that local mental health
Ensure the Effective agencies uniformly report data on their
Use of Mental Health uses of triage grants. It should also establish
Services Act Funding statewide metrics to evaluate the impact of
triage grants by July 2018.
2017‑117
(February 2018)
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 35
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development
Skilled Nursing 10. To ensure that it provides the public with 3 †
Facilities: nursing facility information that is accurate
D Absent Effective State and comprehensible, Health Planning should
Oversight, Substandard update its regulations to do the following:
Quality of Care Has
• Append additional schedules to the
Continued
template for the annual cost report to
2017‑109 enable nursing facilities to fully disclose
(May 2018) related‑party transactions.
• Provide a single location in the annual cost
report template for nursing facilities to
enter related‑party transaction amounts
next to the amounts they are claiming for
Medi‑Cal reimbursement.
• Create an additional schedule in the cost
report template that depicts how a company
is investing in quality‑of‑care improvements.
HIGHER EDUCATION
Chancellor of the California Community Colleges
California 4. To ensure that students with disabilities have 3 †
Community Colleges: equal access to instructional materials, by
U The Colleges Reviewed June 2018, the Chancellor's Office should
Are Not Adequately develop guidance for the community
Monitoring Services for colleges on periodically monitoring the
Technology Accessibility, accessibility of instructional materials and
and Districts and on providing training to all instructors in
Colleges Should making their materials accessible to students
Formalize Procedures for with disabilities.
Upgrading Technology
7. To assist all community colleges in 3 Will Not
2017‑102 increasing transparency of their shared Implement
(December 2017) governance decision‑making processes,
by September 2018, the Chancellor's Office
should issue guidance to the community
colleges on establishing procedures to
document the attendees, input received,
and agreements reached during department
meetings, including those to consider
technology equipment requests.
The California State University
California State 3. To improve CSU's financial transparency 2 †
University: with students and other stakeholders,
It Failed to Fully the Chancellor's Office, with the approval
Disclose Its $1.5 Billion of the trustees, should revise CSU policy
Surplus, and It Has Not by October 2019 to require that it publish
Adequately Invested in information about CSU's discretionary surplus.
Alternatives to Costly At a minimum, the Chancellor's Office should
Parking Facilities revise its reserve policy to establish and
justify a minimum sufficient level of reserve
2018‑127
for economic uncertainty and require the
(June 2019)
Chancellor's Office to provide additional
oversight to ensure that CSU maintains that
level. This oversight should include monitoring,
approving, and notifying the trustees of any
uses of the reserve for economic uncertainty.
continued on next page . . .
36 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
9. The Chancellor's Office should require that, 2 March
by October 2019, the campuses publish 2020#
the names of the alternate transportation
committee members, the committee meeting
minutes, and the committee meeting
schedule on their parking and transportation
services websites.
California State 3. To improve the oversight of CSU’s 4 May
University: management personnel, the Chancellor’s 2022
Stronger Oversight Office should work with campuses, bargaining
Is Needed for Hiring unit representatives, the Public Employment
and Compensating Relations Board, and others as necessary to
Management Personnel come to an agreement on the appropriate
and for Monitoring classification of coaches. The Chancellor’s
Campus Budgets Office should take into account the concerns
that San Diego State has raised about the
2016‑122
labor market for these employees.
(April 2017)
10. The Chancellor’s Office should finish 4 December
developing the Common Human Resources 2024
System and implement it as scheduled by
December 2019.
California State 3. To ensure that CSU campuses adequately 1 April
University: identify the need for their proposed 2022
The Mandatory Fees mandatory fee amounts, the Chancellor's
Its Campuses Charge Office should revise its fee policy to require
Receive Little Oversight campuses to justify amounts for new or
Yet They Represent an increasing fees by providing supporting
Increasing Financial documentation demonstrating the need
Burden to Students for the fees, how they calculated the fee
amounts, and how they determined that no
2019‑114
other source of funding could pay for the
(May 2020)
needed services.
4. To ensure that CSU campuses adequately 1 April
identify the need for their proposed 2022
mandatory fee amounts, the Chancellor's
Office should extend its review
responsibilities to include increases to
existing mandatory fees.
5. To ensure that CSU campuses adequately 1 April
identify the need for their proposed 2022
mandatory fee amounts, the Chancellor's
Office should increase the rigor of its fee
proposal review and approval process to
better ensure that it detects campuses'
violations of the fee policy.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 37
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
University of California
Native American 2. To ensure that the affiliation, repatriation, 1 December
Graves Protection and and disposition processes are timely and 2021
Repatriation Act: consistent across all campuses as the
The University of Legislature intended, the Office of the
California Is Not President should publish its final systemwide
Adequately Overseeing NAGPRA policy no later than August 2020.
Its Return of Native
3. To increase oversight and ensure that 1 November
American Remains campuses consistently review claims, the 2021#
and Artifacts
Office of the President should require
2019‑047 campuses to provide reports about all
(June 2020) current claims for affiliation, repatriation,
and disposition, as well as any associated
decisions, to the systemwide committee for
biannual review no later than January 2021.
4. To ensure that tribal perspectives are 1 November
appropriately represented in repatriation 2021#
decisions, the Office of the President should
ensure that membership of campus and
systemwide committees complies with
state law by including appropriate tribal
representation no later than November 2020.
The University of 5. To determine the amount of money that it can 4 †
California Office reallocate to campuses and to ensure that it
C of the President: publicly presents comprehensive and accurate
It Failed to Disclose Tens budget information, by April 2018 the Office
of Millions in Surplus of the President should implement our
Funds, and Its Budget recommended budget presentation shown in
Practices Are Misleading Figure 11 on page 40. Specifically, the Office
of the President’s budget presentation to the
2016‑130
regents should include a comparison of its
(April 2017)
proposed budget to its actual expenditures
for the previous year. It should also include
all its expenditures and identify changes to
the discretionary and restricted reserves. The
Office of the President should combine both
the disclosed and undisclosed budgets into
one budget presentation.
22. To determine the amount of money that it 4 †
can reallocate to campuses and to ensure
that it publicly presents comprehensive and
accurate budget information, by April 2019
the Office of the President should continue
to present a comprehensive budget based
on the presentation in Figure 11 to the
regents, the Legislature, and the public.
23. To ensure that its staffing costs align with the 4 †
needs of campuses and other stakeholders,
by April 2019 the Office of the President
should set targets for any needed reductions
to salary amounts using the results from its
public and private sector comparison and
adjust its salaries accordingly.
continued on next page . . .
38 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
32. To determine the amount of money that it 4 †
can reallocate to campuses and to ensure
that it publicly presents comprehensive and
accurate budget information, by April 2020
the Office of the President should evaluate its
budget process to ensure that it is efficient
and has adequate safeguards that ensure
that staff approve and justify all budget
expenditures. If the Office of the President
determines that its safeguards are sufficient,
it should begin developing a multiyear
budget plan.
34. To ensure that its staffing costs align with the 4 †
needs of campuses and other stakeholders, by
April 2020 the Office of the President should
adjust its salary levels and ranges to meet its
established targets.
36. To ensure that its staffing costs align with the 4 †
needs of campuses and other stakeholders,
by April 2020 the Office of the President
should reallocate funds to campuses when
adjustments to its salaries and benefits result
in savings.
39. To ensure that its staffing costs align with the 4 †
needs of campuses and other stakeholders,
by April 2020 the Office of the President
should report to the regents on the amount of
funds it reallocates to campuses as a result of
implementing our recommendations.
The University of 8. To ensure that the university achieves its goals 4 †
California Office of obtaining services at the lowest cost or
of the President: best value and of providing vendors with fair
It Has Not Adequately access to contracting opportunities, the Office
Ensured Compliance of the President should revise the university’s
With Its Employee contract manual to incorporate the best
Displacement and practices found in the State Contracting
Services Contract Manual for limiting the use of amendments to
Policies repeatedly extend existing contracts.
2016‑125.1 9. To ensure that the university achieves its 4 †
(August 2017) goals of obtaining services at the lowest
cost or best value and of providing vendors
with fair access to contracting opportunities,
the Office of the President should revise the
university’s contract manual to narrow the
exemption from competition to only selected
professional services, similar to the State
Contracting Manual.
15. To maximize benefits from the systemwide 4 September
procurement initiative and to ensure that the 2022
university uses those benefits for its teaching,
research, and public service missions, the Office
of the President should study ways to measure
actual procurement benefits—possibly
focusing this effort on benefits from larger
dollar amounts—and if such measurement is
not possible, it should clearly disclose to the
regents and the public that the amounts it
reports are based on estimates.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 39
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
16. To maximize benefits from the systemwide 4 September
procurement initiative and to ensure that the 2022
university uses those benefits for its teaching,
research, and public service missions, the
Office of the President should, if actual benefits
are measurable, implement a process to
monitor and report annually to the regents the
estimated and actual benefits.
The University 1. To meet its commitment to California 5 Will Not
of California: residents, the university should replace Implement
Its Admissions and its “compare favorably” policy with a
Financial Decisions new admission standard for nonresident
Have Disadvantaged applicants that reflects the intent of the
California Resident Master Plan. The admission standard should
Students require campuses to admit only nonresidents
with admissions credentials that place them in
2015‑107
the upper half of the residents it admits.
(March 2016)
2. To meet its commitment to California 5 Unknown
residents, the university should amend its
referral process by taking steps to increase
the likelihood that referred residents
ultimately enroll.
3. To ensure that campuses’ interpretations of 5 Ongoing
admission standards do not adversely impact
residents, the university should implement
a thorough process to annually evaluate the
qualifications of students who apply and
students who are admitted. These evaluations
should highlight instances when campuses
admit nonresidents who are less qualified
than residents and should include corrective
action steps. Moreover, this evaluation
should include resident and nonresident
undergraduate enrollment in majors at each
campus. The university should make the
results of this evaluation—including details
of the academic qualifications of students
who applied and who were admitted—
publicly available.
8. To ensure the reasonableness of the 5 Unknown
compensation the university pays its
executives, it should include—to the extent
possible—all items of compensation when
setting or adjusting salaries and benefits,
when conducting surveys and studies, and
when comparing the compensation packages
of its executives to those in similar positions
outside the university.
10. To improve the transparency and timeliness of 5 Will Not
its annual compensation report, the university Implement
should streamline the process it uses to
prepare the report so it can be issued by April
of each year.
continued on next page . . .
40 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
12. To maximize the savings and new revenue 5 Ongoing
from the Working Smarter initiative and
ensure that the university uses them for its
academic and research missions, the Office
of the President should immediately require
that the campuses fully participate in all
projects unless they can provide compelling
evidence demonstrating a harmful effect.
13. To maximize the savings and new revenue from 5 †
the Working Smarter initiative and ensure that
the university uses them for its academic and
research missions, the Office of the President
should, by June 30, 2016, to the extent possible,
implement a process to centrally direct these
funds to ensure that campuses use them
to support the core academic and research
missions of the university.
14. To maximize the savings and new revenue 5 Ongoing
from the Working Smarter initiative and
ensure that the university uses them for
its academic and research missions, the
Office of the President should ensure that
it substantiates that projects are actually
generating savings and new revenue and that
it can demonstrate how the university uses
these funds.
15. To ensure that its recruiting efforts benefit 5 Will Not
residents, the university should prioritize Implement
recruiting residents over nonresidents. In
particular, the university should focus its
recruiting efforts broadly to ensure that it
effectively recruits resident underrepresented
minorities. For example, the university
could establish a limit on the amount of
funds it dedicates to nonresident recruiting.
Further, it should develop a process to
better track its nonresident and resident
recruiting expenditures.
16. To determine if the campuses are using 5 †
funds to further the goals of the University
of California system and the Legislature, the
Office of the President should begin regularly
monitoring and analyzing how campuses
are using both state funds and nonresident
supplemental tuition. If, after the close of
the fiscal year, the Office of the President
determines that campuses are not using
state funds and/or nonresident supplemental
tuition in accordance with those goals, the
Office of the President should take steps to
correct the campuses’ spending decisions as
soon as possible.
17. To ensure that it spends state funds prudently 5 †
for programs that do not directly relate to
educating students, the university should track
spending from state funds for programs that
do not relate to educating students.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 41
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
18. To ensure that it spends state funds prudently 5 †
for programs that do not directly relate to
educating students, the university should
reevaluate these programs each year to
determine whether they continue to be
necessary to fulfill the university’s mission.
19. To ensure that it spends state funds prudently 5 June
for programs that do not directly relate to 2022
educating students, the university should
explore whether the programs could be
supported with alternate revenue sources.
22. To ensure that its rebenching efforts lead to 5 June
equalized per‑student funding among the 2022
campuses, the university should adopt a
methodology that it can use, at least every
three to five years, to update its weighting
system to ensure the weight factors take into
account campuses’ actual costs of instruction,
using the cost study that we recommend
in Chapter 1 and other revenue sources
if necessary.
23. To ensure that its rebenching efforts lead to 5 Will Not
equalized per‑student funding among the Implement
campuses, the university should exclude from
its rebenching calculation all state funding
it uses for programs that do not directly
relate to educating students. The university
should exclude these programs only after it
has evaluated them in accordance with the
recommendation we made previously.
The University 1. To protect the fairness and integrity of its 1 †
of California: admissions processes, the Office of the
Qualified Students President should establish systemwide
Face an Inconsistent protocols for admissions processes by the
and Unfair Admissions fall 2021 admissions cycle that prohibit
System That Has Been the following:
Improperly Influenced
• Giving authority to any one person to make
by Relationships and
a final admissions decision.
Monetary Donations
• Consideration of an applicant’s familial or
2019‑113 other personal relationships to university
(September 2020) staff or faculty in an admissions decision.
• Communication between a campus’s
development office and its admissions
office about applicants and
prospective applicants.
continued on next page . . .
42 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
2. To protect the campuses’ athletics 1 †
admissions process from abuse, the Office
of the President should require each
campus to do the following by the fall 2021
admissions cycle:
• Have at least two reviewers verify the
athletic talent of all prospective student
athletes before their admittance. At least
one of these reviewers should be from
a department other than the athletics
department. Each campus should develop
standards for the level of talent that
prospective student athletes for each of
its teams must possess and then use those
standards to verify the talent.
• Track student athletes’ participation in the
sport for which they were recruited. If a
student does not participate in the sport for
longer than one year, the campus should
determine the reason why the athlete
stopped participating and, if necessary,
conduct a review of the circumstances that
led to the student’s admission to identify
signs of inappropriate admissions activity.
• Review donations to athletic programs to
determine whether those donations made
before or after an athlete’s admission may
have influenced the athletic department’s
decision to request the athlete’s admission.
4. Beginning with the fall 2021 admissions cycle, 1 Will Not
the Office of the President should oversee Implement
UC Berkeley’s admissions process for at least
three years. The Office of the President should
ensure that all admissions decisions are
merit‑based and conform to the university’s
policies on admissions. Further, the Office
of the President should facilitate the
establishment of a culture of ethical conduct
in admissions by providing regular training
to admissions and development staff,
conducting reviews of admissions decisions,
and monitoring the admissions office’s
communications about applicants to
ensure no inappropriate factors influence
admissions activities.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 43
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
5. To ensure that the university maintains a fair 1 †
and consistent admissions process, the Office
of the President should require each campus
to take the following actions:
• By March 2021, document and implement
a selection methodology that describes
how it will choose applicants for admission,
particularly when the applicants have
received similar ratings from application
readers. Further, the selection strategy
should specify the reasons why a campus
may choose an applicant with a low or
uncompetitive rating instead of an applicant
with a higher rating.
• Develop and implement processes to use
when selecting applicants for admission for
identifying applicants whom it has selected
for admission and who are not eligible for
admission to the university, and record their
rationale for admitting those applicants
despite their ineligibility.
6. To provide assurance that campuses' use 1 †
of the admission by exception policy is
aligned with the policy's purpose, beginning
in June 2021, the Office of the President
should annually select a random sample of
applicants admitted by exception and verify
that campuses recorded a rationale for each
admission and that each rationale aligns with
BOARS's guidance.
7. To ensure that the university maintains a fair 1 †
and unbiased admissions process, the Office
of the President should require each campus
to take the following actions:
• By March 2021, establish acceptable
levels of application reader proficiency
and maintain training and monitoring
programs that ensure that its readers attain
and sustain those levels. In addition, it
should report annually to BOARS on those
efforts and on reader consistency levels,
including the frequency with which reader
ratings align with campus guidelines for
rating applications.
• Beginning with the academic year 2021–22
admissions cycle, require each campus
that does not admit all eligible transfer
applicants to ensure that two readers review
all transfer applications.
• Beginning with the academic year 2021–22
admissions cycle, ensure that the
second readers cannot see the ratings
of first readers for both freshman and
transfer applications.
continued on next page . . .
44 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
8. To better ensure that implicit bias in the 1 Will Not
evaluation of applications does not affect Implement
applicants' chances at admission, the Office
of the President should remove potentially
biasing information from the application
information that campuses can access.
9. To ensure that it properly protects all 1 †
admissions activity against improper
influence, the Office of the President should
require each campus’s undergraduate
admissions office to do the following:
• Identify all other campus departments that
participate in or provide information that
affects admissions decision making.
• Obtain, evaluate, and approve a description
of the criteria and processes that these
departments use in rating and selecting
applicants to recommend for admission.
• Annually obtain a roster from each of these
departments of the individuals who will
participate in admissions decision making
and their roles and ensure that no single
individual is responsible for such decisions
in any given department.
• Ensure that each individual whom a
department includes on the roster
it submits has received training on
appropriate and inappropriate factors
on which to base admissions decisions
and has agreed to abide by the campus’s
conflict‑of‑interest policies with respect
to admissions.
10. To better safeguard the integrity of the 1 †
university’s admissions processes, the Office
of the President should, by July 2021, begin
conducting regular audits of the admissions
processes at each of its undergraduate
campuses, ensuring that it reviews each
campus at least once every three years. These
audits should be conducted by systemwide
audit staff and include, but not be limited to,
verification of special talents, communication
between admissions staff and external parties
regarding applicants, and other avenues
for inappropriate influence on admissions
discussed in this report. The audits should also
endeavor to identify inappropriate admissions
activity and deficiencies in the admissions
process. The Office of the President should
make the results of the audits public.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 45
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
University of California, Board of Regents
The University of 7. To ensure the ongoing accountability of the 4 †
California Office Office of the President, the regents should
C of the President: require it to implement our recommendations
It Failed to Disclose Tens and report periodically on its progress.
of Millions in Surplus
14. To ensure that the Office of the President’s 4 †
Funds, and Its Budget
staffing levels are justified and that costs
Practices Are Misleading
are reasonable and align with the needs of
2016‑130 campuses and other stakeholders, the regents
(April 2017) should require the Office of the President to
implement our recommendations and report
periodically on its progress.
K–12 EDUCATION
California Department of Education
California Department 1. To strengthen its administrative reviews 4 Will Not
of Education: and help ensure that school food authorities Implement
It Has Not Ensured That comply with the Buy American requirement,
School Food Authorities Education should update its written
Comply With the procedures to include a requirement that
Federal Buy American reviewers collect and retain evidence for
Requirement all items they evaluate for compliance with
the Buy American requirement. This update
2016‑139
should occur no later than October 1, 2017.
(July 2017)
Community 4. To make its appeal process more accessible 3 Will Not
Child Care Council of to families who may not receive a satisfactory Implement
Santa Clara County: resolution from its contractors, Education
Because It should, by October 2018, require that its
Disadvantaged Some contractors share key information in their
Families and Misused communications with families about the
State Funds, It Could process for appealing notices. The required
Benefit From Increased information should include valid grounds for a
Monitoring by the family to file an appeal as well as information
California Department or documentation Education would need in
of Education order to review the family’s appeal of adverse
decisions regarding their child‑care services.
2017‑116
Education should also require contractors to
(April 2018)
incorporate this information into contractually
mandated staff training and into publicly
available policies and procedures.
11. To ensure that its contractors can effectively 3 Will Not
make program improvements and maintain Implement
successes in ways that are meaningful to
their stakeholders, Education should adopt
measures to ensure its contractors follow the
terms of their contracts by demonstrating
that their board members conduct a critical
appraisal of each education program.
continued on next page . . .
46 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
Investigations of 6. Education should work with the California 1 October
Improper Activities Department of Human Resources (CalHR) to 2021#
J by State Agencies determine whether Education's delegated
and Employees: authority to approve higher‑than‑minimum
Wasteful and salaries should be withdrawn. If CalHR allows
Improper Personnel Education to retain the authority, Education
Decisions, Improper should work with CalHR to develop eligibility,
Contracting, Conflict review, and documentation criteria for
of Interest, Misuse of higher‑than‑minimum salary approval and to
State Resources, provide training to HR staff.
and Dishonesty
I2020‑2
(October 2020)‡
School Library 23. To better understand the condition of school 4 Will Not
Services: libraries statewide and to raise stakeholders’ Implement
Vague State Laws and awareness of the State Education Board’s
a Lack of Monitoring adopted model standards, Education should
Allow School Districts to identify school districts that reported
Provide a Minimal Level employing significantly fewer teacher
of Library Services librarians in fiscal year 2015–16 than in
previous years and verify the accuracy of their
2016‑112
fiscal year 2015–16 reports.
(November 2016)
Student Mental 3. To ensure that all LEAs comply with federal 5 Will Not
Health Services: special education requirements, Education Implement
T Some Students’ Services should require them to include directly in
Were Affected by a a student’s IEP document reasons for any
New State Law, and the changes to student placement or services.
State Needs to Analyze
8. To enable it to review additional areas of 5 Will Not
Student Outcomes and
its special education program for quality Implement
Track Service Costs
assurance, Education should collect
2015‑112 information about the frequency of the
(January 2016) provision of each service contained in all
students’ IEPs. Education should then use this
information to annually review the frequency
of mental health services and follow up
with SELPAs when it observes a significant
reduction in the frequency of services.
9. To ensure that LEAs comply with federal 5 Will Not
and state requirements, Education should Implement
require all LEAs to use the IEP document to
communicate the rationale for residential
treatment and any potential harmful effects
of such placement.
18. Education should analyze and report to the 5 Will Not
Legislature, by May 30, 2016, on the outcomes Implement
for students receiving mental health services
statewide, including outcomes across the six
performance indicators we identified, in order
to demonstrate whether those services are
effective. Once it has reported this statewide
information, Education should provide each
LEA throughout the State a report regarding
the outcomes for the students the LEA served.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 47
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
20. To ensure that the State knows the amount 5 Will Not
LEAs spend to provide mental health Implement
services for student IEPs, before the start
of the 2017–18 fiscal year, Education should
develop, and require all LEAs to follow, an
accounting methodology to track and report
expenditures related to special education
mental health services.
29. To ensure that the State provides special 5 Will Not
education and related services to all eligible Implement
students, Education should investigate the
difference between the estimated number of
school aged children statewide who have a
severe emotional disturbance and the number
receiving mental health services through
an IEP and determine the reason for such a
discrepancy. Education should then take any
steps necessary to assist LEAs in identifying
and providing services to children who are
severely emotionally disturbed.
Uniform Complaint 3. To ensure that it consistently processes 4 December
Procedures: complaints and appeals in a timely manner 2022
The California and that it investigates and reviews all UCP
Department of complaints and appeals in compliance with
Education’s Inadequate state law and regulations, by July 2017
Oversight Has Led to Education should designate a central office
a Lack of Uniformity to receive all complaints and appeals. This
and Compliance in central office should distribute complaints
the Processing of and appeals to the correct divisions for
Complaints and Appeals investigation or review.
2016‑109 4. To ensure that it consistently processes 4 December
(January 2017) complaints and appeals in a timely manner 2022
and that it investigates and reviews all UCP
complaints and appeals in compliance
with state law and regulations, by July 2017
Education should designate a central office
to receive all complaints and appeals. This
central office should establish a single
database to record and track all investigations
of complaints and reviews of appeals. This
database should capture all data necessary
for Education to effectively make informed
decisions related to UCP complaints or appeals.
At a minimum, the database should capture
the date on which Education received each
complaint or appeal, the date on which it
forwarded the complaint or appeal to the
appropriate division for investigation or review,
and the date on which it sent the decision to
the complainant. The database should also
include the type of complaint or appeal, the
LEA involved, and the decision.
continued on next page . . .
48 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
5. To ensure that it consistently processes 4 December
complaints and appeals in a timely manner 2022
and that it investigates and reviews all UCP
complaints and appeals in compliance
with state law and regulations, by July 2017
Education should designate a central office to
receive all complaints and appeals. This central
office should track the divisions’ progress in
processing complaints and appeals to ensure
the divisions meet all UCP requirements,
including documenting exceptional
circumstances that constitute good cause for
extending investigations beyond 60 days.
6. To ensure that it consistently processes 4 December
complaints and appeals in a timely manner 2022
and that it investigates and reviews all UCP
complaints and appeals in compliance with
state law and regulations, by July 2017
Education should designate a central office
to receive all complaints and appeals. This
central office should work with divisions to
establish policies and procedures for the
divisions to follow when investigating UCP
complaints and reviewing appeals. The
procedures should identify the individuals or
units responsible for investigating complaints
and reviewing appeals, the steps and
time frames for conducting investigations
and reviews, the requirements for issuing
decisions, and the documentation that should
be retained in the files.
7. To ensure that it consistently processes 4 December
complaints and appeals in a timely manner 2022
and that it investigates and reviews all UCP
complaints and appeals in compliance
with state law and regulations, by July 2017
Education should designate a central office
to receive all complaints and appeals. This
central office should establish and distribute
a standard investigation report format that
includes the required elements for the divisions
to use when processing UCP complaints.
8. To ensure that it consistently processes 4 December
complaints and appeals in a timely manner 2022
and that it investigates and reviews all UCP
complaints and appeals in compliance
with state law and regulations, by July 2017
Education should designate a central office to
receive all complaints and appeals. This central
office should monitor the divisions’ decisions
and reports on complaints and appeals to
ensure that they comply with requirements.
16. To increase the efficiency and effectiveness of 4 Will Not
LEAs’ UCP processes, Education should work Implement
with those LEAs throughout the State that
receive a disproportionately high number of
non‑UCP complaints through the UCP process
to assess the potential benefits of establishing
similar mechanisms.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 49
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
22. To ensure that its regulations are consistent 4 Will Not
and align with state and federal requirements, Implement
Education should revise its regulations to
allow LEAs to extend investigations under
exceptional circumstances that constitute
good cause if the LEAs document and support
with evidence the reasons for the extensions.
23. After it makes the recommended regulatory 4 Will Not
changes to allow extensions under exceptional Implement
circumstances, Education should review LEAs’
extensions to investigations as part of its
Federal Program Monitoring to ensure that
LEAs’ documentation is sufficient and that their
reasons adequately justify such extensions.
Youth Experiencing 34. To ensure that it has the resources necessary 1 Unknown
Homelessness: to effectively meet its responsibilities under
Y California’s Education federal law, Education should complete a
System for K–12 staffing analysis by May 2020 to determine the
Inadequately Identifies resources needed to meet its responsibilities
and Supports for homeless education. This analysis should
These Youth consider the resources needed to implement
all of the recommendations in this report.
2019‑104
(November 2019) 35. If Education determines that it needs 1 Unknown
additional resources, it should take the
necessary steps, including reallocating
existing resources within the department, to
secure the needed resources.
38. To ensure that all LEAs receive necessary 1 †
guidance and training, Education should
review the guidance documents and templates,
including the housing questionnaire and poster,
that Education makes available on its website
for LEAs and ensure that all the documents
reflect current best practices. For example, the
questionnaire and the posters should include
the rights and protections afforded to youth
experiencing homelessness and their families
to alleviate any apprehensions of identifying
themselves as experiencing homelessness.
Education should then make all LEAs aware of
these revised documents.
Youth Suicide 2. To promote the adoption of the best practices 1 November
Prevention: that it has identified, Education should remind 2021#
AA Local Educational LEAs of the elements in its model policy. To do
Agencies Lack the so, it should annually send a notice to all LEAs
Resources and Policies that describes suicide prevention resources,
Necessary to Effectively such as the model policy, and encourages their
Address Rising Rates use. Education should also work with external
of Youth Suicide and organizations that maintain model policies,
Self‑Harm including the School Boards Association,
to encourage the development of policies
2019‑125
that are consistent with state law and best
(September 2020)
practices by no later than September 2021.
continued on next page . . .
50 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
3. To encourage LEAs to incorporate elements 1 November
of suicide prevention training that provide 2021#
teachers and staff with the knowledge
necessary to assist students at risk of
self‑harm and suicide, Education should
remind all LEAs of the statutorily required
elements for suicide prevention training.
4. To support the provision of suicide prevention 1 November
education to students at LEAs operating 2021#
through distance learning, Education should
complete and issue to LEAs the resources and
guidance it is developing on how to conduct
suicide prevention education remotely.
LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT
Department of Industrial Relations
Department of 4. To ensure consistency and transparency in 1 May
Industrial Relations: overseeing QMEs, DWC should, by April 2020, 2022
Its Failure to Adequately develop and implement written policies and
Administer the Qualified procedures that define and specify its internal
Medical Evaluator processes for disciplining QMEs, including
Process May Delay timelines for taking disciplinary action and
Injured Workers’ Access for scheduling hearings or responding to
to Benefits settlement proposals.
2019‑102 5. To ensure consistency and transparency in 1 May
(November 2019) overseeing QMEs, DWC should, by April 2020, 2022
develop and implement written policies
and procedures that define its internal
process for reappointing QMEs and how that
process should proceed if any disciplinary
investigations are pending.
Employment Development Department
Employment 2. To reduce the risk of identity theft for 2 April
Development its claimants before it completes its 2022
Department: modernization project, EDD should, by
Its Practice of Mailing December 2021, implement one or more of
Documents Containing our proposed solutions or another viable
Social Security Numbers solution to discontinue its use of full SSNs as
Puts Californians at Risk unique identifiers on all documents that it
of Identity Theft mails to claimants. Further, it should prioritize
addressing documents with the highest mail
2018‑129
volumes, and it should make changes to these
(March 2019)
documents by March 2020. When providing
us with the status of its implementation of
this recommendation at 60 days, six months,
and one year after the issuance of this report,
and annually thereafter, EDD should note
which documents it has addressed since the
release of our report, how it has addressed
them, and the dates by which it expects to
address the remaining documents containing
full SSNs that it mails to claimants.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 51
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
3. To ensure that it eliminates any unnecessary 2 December
uses of personal information in its external 2021
communications and to ensure that it
fully protects its claimants' privacy, EDD
should, by May 2019, implement its recently
developed plan for reviewing new, revised,
and existing documents. EDD should
provide documents to us indicating the
progress it has made to implement this
recommendation at 60 days, six months,
and one year following the release of this
report. Finally, it should, by December 2021,
complete its full review of existing documents
and remove any unnecessary instances of
personal information.
LEGISLATIVE, JUDICIAL, AND EXECUTIVE
California Department of Justice
Bureau of Gambling 7. To minimize the degree to which its process 2 September
Control and California to change its regulations may result in the 2021#
G Gambling Control disparate treatment of card room owners,
Commission: the bureau should temporarily approve or
Their Licensing deny its backlogged games applications by
Processes Are Inefficient July 2019.
and Foster Unequal
12. To better align the revenue in the Gambling 2 June
Treatment of Applicants Fund with the costs of the activities 2021#
2018‑132 that the fund supports, the bureau and
(May 2019) the commission should conduct cost
analyses of those activities by July 2020.
At a minimum, these cost analyses should
include the following:
• The entities’ personnel costs, operating
costs, and any program overhead costs.
• Updated time estimates for their core and
support activities, such as background
investigations.
• The cost of their enforcement activities.
Using this information, the bureau and
commission should reset their regulatory
fees to reflect their actual costs. Before
conducting its fee study, the bureau should
implement our recommendations to improve
its processes for assigning applications,
ensuring the completeness of applications,
and developing time‑reporting protocols.
21. To ensure that it can provide useful and 2 Dependent on
accurate data on the locations where Funding
enforcement employees spend their time,
the bureau should equip its time‑reporting
system by November 2019 with the capacity
to track all hours employees spend at each
card room and casino
continued on next page . . .
52 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
California Department 19. To ensure that it has complete disposition 4 †
of Social Services: information, Justice should coordinate with
B Its Caregiver the Judicial Council at least once a year to
Background Check share information about court reporting
Bureau Lacks Criminal gaps and to determine the need to distribute
History Information additional information to courts about
It Needs to Protect reporting requirements and the manner in
Vulnerable Populations which to report. In addition, Justice should
in Licensed Care reconvene its advisory committee and meet
Facilities on a regular basis to discuss, at a minimum,
improving the frequency and timeliness with
2016‑126
which courts report dispositions to Justice
(March 2017)
and law enforcement agencies report arrest
information to Justice.
20. To ensure that it is receiving all arrest 4 Will Not
information from law enforcement agencies, Implement
at a minimum, Justice should consider trends
in the number of arrest reports each law
enforcement agency sends it and the number
of reports that it might expect to receive from
an agency given the agency’s size, location,
and reporting history. Whenever Justice
identifies a law enforcement agency that it
determines may not be reporting all required
information, it should request that the agency
forward all required arrest information.
Hate Crimes 4. To increase the effectiveness of hate crime 3 †
in California: prevention and response efforts, DOJ should
Law Enforcement provide additional guidance to law enforcement
Has Not Adequately agencies by analyzing reported hate crimes
Identified, Reported, in various regions in the State and sending
or Responded to advisory notices when it detects hate crimes
Hate Crimes happening across multiple jurisdictions. It
should also seek the resources to implement
2017‑131
these efforts, if necessary.
(May 2018)
7. To ensure that law enforcement agencies 3 †
effectively engage with communities regarding
hate crimes, DOJ should provide guidance and
best practices for law enforcement agencies
to follow when conducting hate crime
outreach to vulnerable communities within
their jurisdictions, such as collaborating with
a county human rights commission. It should
make the outreach materials available to law
enforcement agencies and should include
in them presentation materials for various
types of communities, including immigrants
and Muslims, among others. It should seek
the resources to implement these efforts,
if necessary.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 53
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
The CalGang Criminal 10. As the Legislature considers creating a public 5 †
Intelligence System: program for shared gang database oversight
As the Result of Its Weak and accountability, Justice should guide
Oversight Structure, It the board and the committee to identify
Contains Questionable and address the shortcomings that exist in
Information That May CalGang’s current operations and oversight.
Violate Individuals’ The guidance Justice provides to the board
Privacy Rights and the committee should address, but not
be limited to, developing best practices
2015‑130
based on the requirements stated in the
(August 2016)
federal regulations, the state guidelines and
state law, and advising user agencies on the
implementation of those practices. The best
practices should include, but not be limited to
reviewing criminal intelligence, appropriately
disseminating information, performing robust
audit practices, establishing plans to recover
from disasters, and meeting all of the State’s
juvenile notification law requirements. Justice
should guide the board and the committee to
develop these best practices by June 30, 2017.
11. As the Legislature considers creating a public 5 †
program for shared gang database oversight
and accountability, Justice should guide
the board and the committee to identify
and address the shortcomings that exist in
CalGang’s current operations and oversight.
The guidance Justice provides to the board
and the committee should address, but not
be limited to, instructing user agencies that
use CalGang to complete a comprehensive
review of all the gangs documented in CalGang
to determine if they meet the necessary
requirements for inclusion and to purge from
CalGang any groups that do not meet the
requirements. Justice should guide the board
and the committee to ensure that user agencies
complete this review in phases, with the final
phase to be completed by June 30, 2018.
continued on next page . . .
54 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
12. As the Legislature considers creating a public 5 †
program for shared gang database oversight
and accountability, Justice should guide
the board and the committee to identify
and address the shortcomings that exist in
CalGang’s current operations and oversight.
The guidance Justice provides to the board
and the committee should address, but not
be limited to, instructing all user agencies
to complete a comprehensive review of the
records in CalGang to determine if the user
agencies have adequate support for the
criteria associated with all the individuals they
have entered as gang members. If the user
agencies do not have adequate support, they
should immediately purge the criteria—and,
if necessary, the individuals—from CalGang.
In addition, the user agencies should ensure
that all the fields in each CalGang record are
accurate. Justice should guide the board
and the committee to ensure that user
agencies complete this review in phases,
with the final phase to be completed by
September 30, 2019.
California Department of Tax and Fee Administration§
State Board of 2. Unless the Legislature directs the board 5 †
Equalization: to eliminate the compliance fund’s excess
Its Tobacco Tax fund balance within a time frame of more
Enforcement Efforts than a year, the board should eliminate the
Are Effective and excess fund balance by June 30, 2017 by
Properly Funded, but using it to offset the licensing program’s
Other Funding Options annual funding shortfall. The board should
and Cost Savings also limit the fund’s future balance to no
Are Possible more than two months’ worth of licensing
program expenditures.
2015‑119
(March 2016)
The Bradley‑Burns 6. To help address California’s e‑commerce tax 3 Will Not
Tax and Local gap and further ensure out‑of‑state retailers’ Implement
Transportation Funds: compliance with state law regarding nexus,
Changing the Allocation Tax Administration should implement a
Structure for the two‑year pilot of its authorized reward
Bradley‑Burns Tax program for information resulting in the
Would Result in a More identification of unreported sales and
Equitable Distribution use taxes.
of Local Transportation
Funding
2017‑106
(November 2017)
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 55
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services
California Is Not 12. To ensure that it fulfills its responsibilities 1 October
Adequately Prepared under state law, Cal OES should, by no later 2022
X to Protect Its Most than June 2020, issue the guidance that state
Vulnerable Residents law requires it to produce related to access
From Natural Disasters and functional needs, including guidance
related to establishing disaster registries and
2019‑103
guidance on evacuating people with access
(December 2019)
and functional needs.
13. To ensure that it adequately equips local 1 †
jurisdictions to send alert and warning messages
in languages that their residents will easily
understand, Cal OES should do the following:
provide clear direction to individuals who
speak English so that they know which of the
translated messages they should use in what
specific circumstances; revise the messages it
has provided so that local jurisdictions can more
easily adapt them for use in a variety of disaster
situations; expand its style guide to include
terminology that emergency managers are likely
to need to effectively modify their local messages
and also to include translations for the other
commonly spoken languages in the State.
California State Lottery Commission
California State Lottery: 4. To adhere to the Lottery Act's education 1 Will Not
The Lottery Has funding requirements, beginning with Implement
Not Ensured That It fiscal year 2020‑21, the Lottery Commission
Maximizes Funding should require its staff to demonstrate that
for Education they have planned for education funding
to be maximized and aligned with the
2019‑112
proportionality requirement of the Lottery
(February 2020)
Act, and approve only those budgets that
plan for such funding. It should then monitor
actual education funding and ensure that it
complies with the requirement.
7. To ensure that it receives value for the funding 1 Unknown
it spends on its fairs program, by January
2021, the Lottery should determine whether
the program has increased its brand strength,
customer loyalty, customer satisfaction, ticket
sales, and profits. If the analysis determines
that the Lottery has not achieved these
benefits, it should terminate the program.
continued on next page . . .
56 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
Commission on Judicial Performance
Commission on 14. To maximize the resources available for its 2 Unknown
Judicial Performance: core functions, CJP should immediately begin
Weaknesses in Its exploring options for relocating its office to a
Oversight Have Created less expensive location and relocate as soon
Opportunities for as possible.
Judicial Misconduct
to Persist 15. To ensure that it obtains the resources 2 May 2022
necessary to fulfill its mission, CJP should
2016‑137
report to the Legislature by May of each of the
(April 2019)
next three years about the following:
• Its progress in implementing our
recommendations and any associated
effects on its workload.
• The steps it has taken to realize efficiencies
in its operations.
• Its evaluation of whether the investigations
manager is a full‑time position and any
funding it will need in the future to support
that position.
• Its progress in purchasing and
implementing a new electronic case
management system.
• Its progress in relocating its office space to
a more affordable location.
• Any savings or unforeseen costs arising
from the changes we identify above.
Secretary of State’s Office
Santa Clara County 11. The Secretary of State should adopt 4 December
Registrar of Voters: regulations establishing clear criteria for 2022
Insufficient Policies mistakes in election‑related materials that
and Procedures Have constitute reportable errors and require
Led to Errors That May counties to report these errors to it after
Have Reduced Voters’ each election.
Confidence in the
12. Beginning in December 2018, the Secretary 4 December
Registrar’s Office
of State should implement annual risk‑based 2022
2017‑107 reviews of a selection of county election
(October 2017) officials' offices to ensure their compliance
with state election laws and regulations.
13. To inform and enhance the guidance it 4 December
provides to county election officials, the 2022
Secretary of State should analyze error reports
and its risk‑based review results to focus its
guidance on topics most relevant to improving
elections throughout the State.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 57
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
State Bar of California
State Bar of California: 10. To ensure that it maximizes the revenue from 2 Unknown
It Should Balance its San Francisco building, State Bar should
Fee Increases With lease all available space and ensure that
Other Actions to its leases reflect market rates.
Raise Revenue and
11. To ensure that it maximizes the revenue from 2 Unknown
Decrease Costs
its San Francisco building, in the event of any
2018‑030 future staff growth, State Bar should avoid
(April 2019) adding space by reducing its space allocations
when practical to more closely match
industry standards.
The State Bar 6. To assign purchasing cards only to 4 †
of California: appropriate staff, ensure that the State Bar's
It Needs Additional records of employees' credit limits reflect
Revisions to Its Expense those established with the bank, and to
Policies to Ensure That It verify that staff use purchasing cards only for
Uses Funds Prudently allowable and necessary expenses, the State
Bar should immediately develop a policy that
2017‑030
requires justification of the business needs
(June 2017)
for employees to receive purchasing cards,
and use this policy to limit the number of staff
issued a purchasing card.
7. To assign purchasing cards only to 4 †
appropriate staff, ensure that the State Bar's
records of employees' credit limits reflect
those established with the bank, and to
verify that staff use purchasing cards only
for allowable and necessary expenses, the
State Bar should immediately restrict the use
of purchasing cards to its original purpose,
which was for low‑dollar and frequently
occurring purchases. For purchases above
$5,000, the State Bar should require the
vendor to bill for payment.
9. To ensure that its costs are reasonable and 4 †
appropriate, the State Bar should update its
meal and catering policy to align with the
meal policy of the State's Executive Branch
and should require individuals attending
committee meetings for the State Bar to
comply with standard meal per diem rates.
State Controller’s Office
Investigations of 24. The SCO should determine whether other 2 Pending
Improper Activities managers or supervisors at the SCO also
by State Agencies allowed employees to informally switch
and Employees: their RDOs. If so, the SCO should review
Inefficient Management the attendance records for the relevant
of State Resources, employees to verify that they accurately
Misuse of State recorded their time off and hours worked.
Time and Inaccurate To the extent that the SCO determines
Attendance Records, other employees improperly accounted
and Inadequate for their time, the SCO should recover
Supervision any overpayments or adjust their leave
balances accordingly.
I2019‑2
(April 2019)‡
continued on next page . . .
58 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION DATE OF
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
COMPLETION
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo
Judicial Branch 13. To ensure that it properly authorizes 4 Will Not
Procurement: payments and purchases only allowable Implement
The Five Superior Courts items, the San Mateo court should
We Reviewed Mostly process payments in accordance with the
Adhered to Required requirements and recommended practices of
and Recommended the Judicial Council and the State. Specifically,
Practices, but Some the San Mateo court should amend its bottled
Improvements water service contract to ensure that water is
Are Needed purchased for use by jurors and court room
staff only.
2016‑301
(November 2016)
NATURAL RESOURCES
Department of Water Resources
Department of 7. To ensure that DWR manages WaterFix in an 4 June
Water Resources: effective manner, DWR should complete both 2024
The Unexpected the economic analysis and financial analysis
Complexity of the for WaterFix and make the analyses publicly
California WaterFix available as soon as possible.
Project Has Resulted
in Significant Cost
Increases and Delays
2016‑132
(October 2017)
TRANSPORTATION
California High‑Speed Rail Authority
California High‑Speed 4. To enable policymakers and the public to 2 †
Rail Authority: track the Authority's progress toward meeting
Its Flawed Decision the federal grant deadline of December 2022,
Making and Poor the Authority should, by January 2019, begin
Contract Management providing quarterly updates to the Legislature
Have Contributed to detailing the progress of the three Central
Billions in Cost Overruns Valley construction projects using an earned
and Delays in the value model that compares construction
System’s Construction progress to the projected total completion
cost and date. The Authority should
2018‑108
base these updates on the most current
(November 2018)
estimates available.
5. To ensure that it is adequately prepared if it 2 †
is unable to meet the federal grant deadline
of December 2022, the Authority should, by
May 2019, develop a contingency plan for
responding to such a scenario.
† Contrary to the State Auditor’s determination, the audited agency believes it has fully implemented the recommendation.
‡ Before publishing a report of an investigation, the State Auditor provides the head of each department or agency involved with a copy of the
investigative report, including any recommendations. Therefore, in calculating how long a recommendation has been outstanding, the State
Auditor uses the date the investigative report was provided to the department or agency, not the date the report was published.
§ In July 2017, the State Board of Equalization was restructured and transferred certain duties to the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration.
# In its latest response, the audited agency did not update its estimated date of completion.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 59
January 2022
Table 3
Recommendations Made to Nonstate Entities That Are More Than One Year Old and Are Still Not Fully Implemented
(Reports Issued From November 2015 Through October 2020)
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
NONSTATE ENTITIES
Acton‑Agua Dulce Unified School District
Charter Schools: 11. To ensure that it has a method to hold charter 4 †
Some School schools accountable for their educational
M Districts Improperly programs, Acton‑Agua Dulce Unified should,
Authorized and as a best practice, strengthen its authorization
Inadequately Monitored process by using the State Education Board’s
Out‑of‑District criteria for evaluating petitions.
Charter Schools
13. To ensure compliance with state law, 4 †
2016‑141 Acton‑Agua Dulce Unified should
(October 2017) immediately review petitions to ensure they
include all of the requirements in state law at
the time of their approval.
18. To better ensure effective oversight of its 4 †
charter schools’ finances, Acton‑Agua Dulce
Unified should place a district representative
as a nonvoting member on each charter
school’s governing board.
Alameda County Sheriff’s Office
Correctional Officer 27. To ensure that it is able to identify high 3 †
Health and Safety: risk situations and deter repeat offenders,
W Some State and County Santa Rita should specifically track all gassing
Correctional Facilities attacks and use the tracking data as a tool to
Could Better Protect prevent future gassing attacks.
Their Officers From the
Health Risks of Certain
Inmate Attacks
2018‑106
(September 2018)
Alum Rock Union School District
Alum Rock Union 3. To strengthen its ability to oversee district 2 November
Elementary expenditures, the board should require the 2021#
School District: district by August 2019 to prepare monthly
The District and summaries that report the total amounts
Its Board Must it paid to each of its contractors, along
Improve Governance with descriptions of the purpose of those
and Operations to payments, and to include the summaries
Effectively Serve the with the monthly warrant lists it provides to
Community the board.
2018‑131 5. By November 2019, the district should 2 †
(May 2019) develop contract monitoring procedures
with defined staff roles and responsibilities,
including retaining evidence of monitoring
efforts. The district should also train its staff
to follow these procedures.
continued on next page . . .
60 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
6. By November 2019, the district should 2 June
develop procedures specifying a designated 2021#
location for staff to retain contracts and
related documentation and identifying those
staff who are responsible for ensuring that
these documents are stored appropriately.
The district should also train staff to follow
these procedures.
7. By November 2019, the district should 2 †
work with the county office to ensure
that its new financial system includes
unique identifiers for contract payment
authorization documents.
8. To identify its contracted personnel's 2 †
potential conflicts of interest, the district
should develop and implement a process by
November 2019 to assess whether contracted
personnel should be classified as consultants
and are therefore subject to the district's code
for disclosing financial interests.
9. The district should immediately follow its 2 †
conflict‑of‑interest code to ensure that all
required individuals file Forms 700.
12. To ensure compliance with government 2 †
transparency laws in future meetings, the
board should ensure that it publicly identifies
all parties involved in real estate negotiations
prior to entering closed sessions.
17. To ensure that it provides a clear strategic 2 January
direction for the district, the board should 2020#
develop a vision and establish goals for the
district by November 2019 and regularly
monitor progress toward achieving these
goals, as district policy requires.
19. To increase the board's accountability and 2 †
ensure the prudent spending of district
funds, the board should implement
procedures by August 2019 requiring that
its members document on their requests for
reimbursement how their travel complies
with district policy.
22. To demonstrate its commitment to 2 †
improving its governance over the district's
operations, the board should immediately
direct district staff to track and prioritize the
implementation of the remaining outstanding
recommendations from the FCMAT audit
report. The board should also direct staff
to analyze the recommendations relating
to its terminated contracts with Del Terra,
identify those recommendations that will
continue to be relevant after the appointment
of a new construction manager and a new
program manager, and implement policies to
strengthen the district's monitoring of those
contractors. The board should then monitor
the status of the recommendations to ensure
their implementation.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 61
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
24. To reinforce the ethical principles, laws, 2 †
and policies that the board must follow,
the district should establish a policy by
July 2019 to provide biennial training
to board members on ethics, applicable
government transparency, conflict‑of‑interest
requirements, and district policies.
26. To ensure that the bond committee 2 †
includes representatives from all required
constituencies, the district should verify and
document representation of the committee
members that the board appoints.
28. To ensure that district staff have appropriate 2 †
guidance when awarding contracts under
emergency conditions, the district should
create and implement by November 2019
policies and procedures describing the
protocol for awarding emergency contracts,
including the use of the district's standard
contracting forms. The district should
also train staff to follow these policies
and procedures.
Antelope Valley Union High School District
Charter Schools: 30. To better ensure effective oversight of its 4 Will Not
Some School charter schools’ finances, Antelope Valley Implement
M Districts Improperly Union should place a district representative
Authorized and as a nonvoting member on each charter
Inadequately Monitored school’s governing board.
Out‑of‑District
Charter Schools
2016‑141
(October 2017)
Bakersfield College
Clery Act 19. To ensure Bakersfield requests and reports 3 July
Requirements and Clery Act crimes from local law enforcement, 2022
N Crime Reporting: the institution should by August 2018
Compliance Continues create and begin following a procedure,
to Challenge California’s in conjunction with a written agreement
Colleges and with local law enforcement, to obtain crime
Universities statistics for the annual security report.
2017‑032
(May 2018)
Butte County
California Is Not 2. To best prepare to protect and care for 1 †
Adequately Prepared people with access and functional needs,
X to Protect Its Most the county should revise its emergency
Vulnerable Residents plans by following the best practices that we
From Natural Disasters included in our report. The county should
begin implementing these practices as soon
2019‑103
as possible. By no later than March 2020,
(December 2019)
the county should develop a schedule for
completing updates to its emergency plans.
continued on next page . . .
62 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
5. To ensure that the county maintains updated 1 Will Not
emergency plans that are consistent with Implement
current best practices, the county should
adopt ordinances establishing requirements
for the frequency with which the county must
update its emergency plans and should set
that frequency at no greater than five years.
8. To ensure that the county’s emergency 1 Will Not
planning efforts more fully account for people Implement
with access and functional needs in the future,
the county should adopt county ordinances
that require the county’s emergency managers
to do the following during each update to the
county’s emergency plans: when planning
to protect people with access and functional
needs, adhere to the best practices and
guidance that FEMA, Cal OES, and other
relevant authorities have issued; report
publicly to the boards of supervisors during
emergency planning about the steps they
have taken to address access and functional
needs; consult periodically with a committee
of community groups that represent people
with a variety of access and functional needs;
require that representatives of the community
group committees present to the board of
supervisors their review of the adequacy of
the emergency plans.
Central Basin Municipal Water District
Central Basin Municipal 23. To ensure it is efficiently using its resources, 5 Will Not
Water District: the district should eliminate its board Implement
Its Board of Directors members’ automobile or transportation
Has Failed to Provide the allowances and instead reimburse them
Leadership Necessary for based on their business mileage or
It to Effectively Fulfill Its transit use.
Responsibilities
2015‑102
(December 2015)
Cerritos College
California 11. To ensure that all instructors are aware of 3 †
Community Colleges: the accessibility standards for instructional
U The Colleges Reviewed materials, Cerritos should include in its
Are Not Adequately next collective bargaining negotiations a
Monitoring Services requirement for instructors to periodically
for Technology attend accessibility trainings.
Accessibility, and
13. To ensure that its technology master plan 3 †
Districts and Colleges
supports the strategic goals of the district,
Should Formalize
Cerritos should update its master plan by
Procedures for
June 2018, and should ensure that the plan
Upgrading Technology
includes detailed steps to accomplish its goals.
2017‑102 14. To increase the transparency of its annual 3 †
(December 2017) review process, by June 2018, Cerritos
should establish procedures requiring
its departments to document attendees,
input received, and agreements reached
during meetings to consider instructional
technology equipment requests.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 63
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
Charter Academy of the Redwoods
Youth Suicide 7. To ensure that their teachers and staff 1 †
Prevention: have the information necessary to respond
AA Local Educational consistently, promptly, and appropriately to
Agencies Lack the reduce suicide risk, the six LEAs we reviewed
Resources and Policies should revise their policies by March 2021 to
Necessary to Effectively comply with state law and incorporate the
Address Rising Rates best practices in Education's model policy.
of Youth Suicide and
19. To improve their students' access to mental 1 †
Self‑Harm
health professionals, Kern High School
2019‑125 District, Ukiah Unified, Gateway Charter,
(September 2020) Redwoods Charter, and Heartland Charter
should coordinate with their respective
counties to request MHSA funding to
employ additional school counselors, school
nurses, school social workers, and
school psychologists.
City of Irvine
City of Irvine: 2. To improve fiscal accountability and 5 Will Not
Poor Governance of to ensure that audits are performed to Implement
the $1.7 Million Review appropriate standards, Irvine should adopt
of the Orange County an internal audit function by December 2017.
Great Park Needlessly
6. To make certain that Irvine complies with 5 Will Not
Compromised the
the intent of competitive bidding for Implement
Review’s Credibility
professional services, beginning immediately
2015‑116 it should not include provisions in its RFPs for
(August 2016) potential future services that are above and
beyond the desired scope of work.
9. To maintain appropriate, transparent fiscal 5 Will Not
accountability, Irvine should amend city Implement
contracting and purchasing policies by
December 2016 to make certain that all of
its contracts and contract amendments with
a proposed cost exceeding the threshold
requiring city council or other approval
receive the appropriate approvals, including
approval for sole‑source contracts. Further,
city policies should require appropriate
approvals when increases in spending
authority are accomplished through a
purchase order or other means.
10. To provide the public with adequate 5 Will Not
information regarding the city council’s Implement
spending decisions, Irvine’s city council
should, by December 2016, include in its
policies a requirement that motions by the
council to appropriate revenue to fund a
specific contract should name the recipients
and proposed use of the funds.
continued on next page . . .
64 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
11. To foster public confidence in its processes 5 Will Not
and findings, Irvine should conduct Implement
self‑initiated investigations, reviews, or audits
in an open and transparent manner that
ensures independence. Specifically, Irvine
should not establish advisory bodies exempt
from open meeting laws to oversee these
investigations, reviews, or audits. Instead, any
required reports from contractors conducting
such investigations, reviews, or audits should
go to the city council or a standing committee
of the city council to be discussed in either
open or closed session, as appropriate.
City of Irwindale
City of Irwindale: 1. To address the structural deficit in 4 †
It Must Exercise More its general fund, the city should seek
Fiscal Responsibility long‑term solutions to balance its budget
Over Its Spending So so that its expenditures do not exceed its
That It Can Continue to revenues. These solutions should include
Provide Core Services eliminating the reliance on one‑time gains
to Residents to fund ongoing expenses and identifying
opportunities to further reduce spending.
2016‑111
The city should document its approach in a
(November 2016)
long‑term financial plan that should account
for the following: a forecast of at least
five to 10 years into the future, updates to
long‑term planning activities as needed to
provide direction to the budget process, and
an analysis of its financial status; revenue and
expenditure forecasts; and plan‑monitoring
mechanisms, such as a scorecard of key
indicators of financial health.
2. To ensure that employee compensation 4 †
aligns with job statements, the city should
review its salary incentives and modify the
eligibility criteria so that they match the
job requirements.
3. Considering that the city’s retirement benefits 4 Will Not
are more generous than those of most Implement
comparable cities, and in light of its financial
situation, the city should reduce its employee
benefits costs by negotiating with employee
bargaining groups and key management
employees for the elimination of further
city contributions to the PARS supplemental
benefit plan or at least and increase in
participant contributions to cover the full
employee share of the plan’s costs, recognizing
that under California case law the city may not
destroy vested pension rights legislatively.
4. To minimize the use of its reserves to reduce 4 Will Not
long‑term liabilities, the city should annually Implement
determine whether it has sufficient funding
to cash out employee leave balances.
Additionally, in future labor negotiations,
the city should explore the possibility of
eliminating or reducing voluntary leave
balance cash‑outs by employees, and
eliminate sick leave cash‑outs altogether.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 65
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
6. To reduce costs, the city should consider 4 Will Not
eliminating its current resident prescription Implement
drug benefit program and replacing it with
the prescription discount card program
offered by the League of California Cities that
would provide discounts on prescriptions to
residents at no cost to the city.
7. If the city chooses not to participate in the 4 Will Not
prescription discount card program offered Implement
by the League of California Cities, it should
at least take the following step related to its
current prescription drug benefit program:
Align its prescription drug benefit program
with its established purpose —to treat
conditions proven to be caused or worsened
by the city’s mining activities—and limit
the availability of benefits to only those
medications approved for the treatment of
such conditions.
8. If the city chooses not to participate in 4 Will Not
the prescription discount card program Implement
offered by the League of California Cities,
it should at least reduce the cost of its
current prescription drug benefit program
by enacting limits‑‑similar to those in its
resident vision benefits‑‑on the number or
dollar amount of prescriptions an individual
can receive each year.
9. To reduce the costs of its resident 4 Will Not
prescription drug benefit program, the city Implement
council should follow the recommendations
of its consultant by approving the following:
align copayments by increasing those paid
by residents 50 years of age and older to the
same level as those paid by residents who
are 49 years or younger.
10. To reduce the costs of its resident 4 Will Not
prescription drug benefit program, the city Implement
council should follow the recommendations
of its consultant by approving the following:
implement coordination of benefits
provisions, where applicable, to designate
the city as a secondary payer to residents’
primary insurance coverage.
11. To eliminate the need for police officer 4 Will Not
overtime, the city should evaluate the Implement
possibility of contracting for police services
with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s
Department or another law enforcement
agency as an alternative to operating its own
police department.
13. While the city is considering 4 Will Not
recommendation #11, and if it should choose Implement
not to contract for police services, it should
promote public safety and equity among its
police officers by implementing a rotational
order for scheduled overtime to prevent
some officers from working excessive shifts.
continued on next page . . .
66 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
16. The Housing Authority should consider 4 Will Not
options to provide low‑income housing Implement
opportunities to more people. Additionally,
if the Housing Authority intends to continue
providing low‑income housing opportunities
in the future, the city should examine the
available funding mechanisms to continue
providing low‑income housing before it
exhausts its Housing Authority Fund balance.
17. To ensure that all residents have an equal 4 June
chance to participate in the Housing 2025
Authority’s housing programs, the city
should remove the long‑term residency
priorities from any future housing programs.
City of Lincoln
City of Lincoln: 1. To ensure that it complies with state law, 2 August
Financial Lincoln should immediately review all of its 2022
Mismanagement, outstanding interfund loans to determine
Insufficient whether the borrowing funds can repay
Accountability, and the loans according to the terms. For any
Lax Oversight Threaten loan that is from a restricted fund and that
the City’s Stability does not have the capacity to be repaid,
Lincoln should develop a plan that ensures
2018‑110
repayment within a reasonable time frame,
(March 2019)
including seeking possible alternative
financing or revenue sources, such as the
general fund, bonds, one‑time revenue, or a
tax increase, to address the obligation.
17. To ensure that it applies the correct fee 2 August
credits to developers, Lincoln should develop 2022
policies and procedures by September 2019
for establishing fee credits and maintaining
adequate documentation to justify
modifications to fee credits, including credits
it awards based on changes in fee schedules
and updated development agreements.
City of Novato
Residential 2. To ensure that it is aware of the degree of 5 Will Not
Building Records: property owners’ compliance with its resale Implement
L The Cities of San Rafael, record ordinance, Novato should implement
Novato, and Pasadena procedures that can help it monitor the sale
Need to Strengthen the or exchange of properties that require resale
Implementation of Their record inspections. The city should work with
Resale Record Programs applicable stakeholders, such as realtors, to
aid in this effort.
2015‑134
(March 2016) 5. To verify that new property owners are aware 5 Will Not
of the health and safety concerns at their Implement
properties and any corrections they need
to make, Novato should develop a process to
ensure that it receives homeowners’ cards.
34. To ensure that the resale record fees it charges 5 Will Not
is appropriate, Novato should establish a time Implement
frame to periodically determine whether
the fees are commensurate with the cost of
administering the resale record program.
The city should ensure that it retains any
documentation used to support its analyses
and any subsequent adjustments to fees.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 67
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
City of Pasadena
Residential 9. To ensure that it can monitor the satisfaction 5 †
Building Records: individuals have with the resale record
L The Cities of San Rafael, program and that it has a uniform approach
Novato, and Pasadena for resolving complaints, Pasadena should
Need to Strengthen the develop a formal process for tracking the
Implementation of Their complaints it receives. In addition, Pasadena
Resale Record Programs should develop a formal policy that describes
how staff should evaluate complaints, and it
2015‑134
should document its activities associated with
(March 2016)
resolving complaints, such as the resolution
and the rationale for the resolution. The city
should also establish a designated location in
its database to record this information.
40. If Pasadena subsequently requires its resale 5 Will Not
record inspectors to have International Code Implement
Council certifications, it should ensure that
those staff maintain them in good standing
to perform their necessary job functions.
County of Alameda
Dually Involved Youth: 9. Alameda County probation department should 5 December
The State Cannot update its existing procedures to ensure 2022
K Determine the that its staff are accurately recording family
Effectiveness of Efforts reunification service components within the
to Serve Youth Who statewide case management system.
Are Involved in Both
the Child Welfare and
Juvenile Justice Systems
2015‑115
(February 2016)
County of Fresno
Indian Gaming Special 1. If the Legislature appropriates funding from 4 Depends on
Distribution Fund: the distribution fund for mitigation grants Legislative
The Method Used to in the future, to comply with state law, Action
Mitigate Casino Impacts the benefit committee for Fresno County
Has Changed, and should ensure that it obtains sufficient
Two Counties’ Benefit documentation from grant applicants to
Committees Did Not demonstrate that the requested funding
Ensure Compliance represents the correct proportionate share of
With State Law When the costs attributable to casino impacts.
Awarding Grants
2. If the Legislature appropriates funding from 4 Depends on
2016‑036 the distribution fund for mitigation grants Legislative
(March 2017) in future years, Fresno County’s benefit Action
committee should revise its procedures to
include specific steps to verify that grantees
will place grant funds into interest‑bearing
accounts when awarding any mitigation
grants. These steps should include requiring
grantees to report the interest accrued in
their quarterly reports and to substantiate
those reports with bank statements or other
reports of interest earned, and following up
with the grantee when the grantee reports
no earned interest for the period.
continued on next page . . .
68 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
County of Los Angeles
County Pay Practices: 7. To ensure that they consistently demonstrate 5 Will Not
Although the Counties that candidates are hired for permanent Implement
We Visited Have Rules in civil service positions based on valid and
Place to Ensure Fairness, job‑related criteria, regardless of their
Data Show That a Gender sex, each county should develop policies
Wage Gap Still Exists requiring hiring managers to document
the reasons why they chose the selected
2015‑132
candidate over others from the certified
(May 2016)
eligibility list.
County of Santa Clara
Dually Involved Youth: 16. To identify their population of dually involved 5 Will Not
The State Cannot youth, Santa Clara County’s CWS and Implement
K Determine the probation agencies should designate the data
Effectiveness of Efforts system they will use for tracking the dates and
to Serve Youth Who results of joint assessment hearings.
Are Involved in Both
22. To identify their population of dually 5 Will Not
the Child Welfare and
involved youth, Santa Clara County’s CWS Implement
Juvenile Justice Systems
and probation agencies should provide
2015‑115 guidance or training to staff on recording
(February 2016) joint assessment hearing information
consistently within the designated system.
County of Sonoma
California Is Not 3. To best prepare to protect and care for 1 January
Adequately Prepared people with access and functional needs, 2022
X to Protect Its Most the county should revise its emergency
Vulnerable Residents plans by following the best practices that we
From Natural Disasters included in our report. The county should
begin implementing these practices as soon
2019‑103
as possible. By no later than March 2020,
(December 2019)
the county should develop a schedule for
completing updates to its emergency plans.
9. To ensure that the county's emergency 1 †
planning efforts more fully account for
people with access and functional needs
in the future, the county should adopt
county ordinances that require the county's
emergency managers to do the following
during each update to the county's
emergency plans: when planning to protect
people with access and functional needs,
adhere to the best practices and guidance
that FEMA, Cal OES, and other relevant
authorities have issued; report publicly to
the boards of supervisors during emergency
planning about the steps they have taken to
address access and functional needs; consult
periodically with a committee of community
groups that represent people with a variety
of access and functional needs; require
that representatives of the community
group committees present to the board of
supervisors their review of the adequacy of
the emergency plans.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 69
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
County of Ventura
California Is Not 4. To best prepare to protect and care for 1 †
Adequately Prepared people with access and functional needs,
X to Protect Its Most the county should revise its emergency
Vulnerable Residents plans by following the best practices that we
From Natural Disasters included in our report. The county should
begin implementing these practices as soon
2019‑103
as possible. By no later than March 2020,
(December 2019)
the county should develop a schedule for
completing updates to its emergency plans.
7. To ensure that the county maintains updated 1 June
emergency plans that are consistent with 2021#
current best practices, the county should
adopt ordinances establishing requirements
for the frequency with which the county
must update its emergency plans and
should set that frequency at no greater than
five years.
10. To ensure that the county's emergency 1 June
planning efforts more fully account for 2021#
people with access and functional needs
in the future, the county should adopt
county ordinances that require the county's
emergency managers to do the following
during each update to the county's
emergency plans: when planning to protect
people with access and functional needs,
adhere to the best practices and guidance
that FEMA, Cal OES, and other relevant
authorities have issued; report publicly to
the boards of supervisors during emergency
planning about the steps they have taken to
address access and functional needs; consult
periodically with a committee of community
groups that represent people with a variety
of access and functional needs; require
that representatives of the community
group committees present to the board of
supervisors their review of the adequacy
of the emergency plans.
Fallen Leaf Lake Community Services District
Fallen Leaf Lake 7. To rectify the excessive reimbursement 2 †
Community Services amounts it received for strike team
District: assignments, the district should, by
Its Billing Practices December 31, 2019, develop and implement
and Small Electorate a plan for returning to the paying agencies
Jeopardize Its Ability to the excessive reimbursements it received for
Provide Services 2016 through 2018.
2018‑133 8. To rectify the excessive reimbursement 2 June
(July 2019) amounts it received for strike team 2021#
assignments, the district should, by
December 31, 2019, work with Cal OES to
identify the amounts of excess reimbursements
the district received for 2013 through 2015
and then develop and implement a plan for
returning those amounts to the paying agency.
continued on next page . . .
70 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
10. To improve its financial viability and 2 June
safeguard its ability to continue providing 2021#
services to the Fallen Leaf Lake community,
the district should, by December 31, 2019,
monitor the financial risks it may face in the
future, forecast their impact on its finances
and budget, and plan and implement
appropriate changes to its budget as
necessary throughout the fiscal year.
11. To improve its financial viability and 2 June
safeguard its ability to continue providing 2021#
services to the Fallen Leaf Lake community,
the district should, by December 31, 2019,
limit the extent to which it relies on volatile
revenue sources to balance its budget.
13. To improve its financial viability and safeguard 2 September
its ability to continue providing services to 2020#
the Fallen Leaf Lake community, the district
should, by December 31, 2019, develop a
five‑year forecast of estimated revenues and
expenditures and a plan to guide its decisions
and actions in the event of fluctuations.
Foothill‑De Anza Community College District
California 15. To ensure that it is fulfilling requests for 3 †
Community Colleges: alternate media services from students with
U The Colleges Reviewed disabilities in a timely manner, by June 2018,
Are Not Adequately De Anza should establish procedures for
Monitoring Services monitoring its timeliness in responding
for Technology to such requests so that it can periodically
Accessibility, and Districts review its performance in completing the
and Colleges Should requests. Specifically, it should record
Formalize Procedures for and track sufficient information to be able
Upgrading Technology to review how long it takes to complete
requests. Additionally, De Anza should
2017‑102
calculate the number of days it takes to
(December 2017)
complete requests, and periodically evaluate
its performance against its time‑frame goals.
Further, to evaluate its performance, De Anza
should establish a time‑frame goal for
completing alternate media requests.
16. To ensure that it promptly addresses any 3 †
complaints it receives related to web
accessibility and alternate media requests,
De Anza should follow its new procedures for
tracking and reviewing complaints related
to accessibility.
17. To ensure that students with disabilities 3 †
have equal access to instructional materials,
by June 2018, De Anza should develop
procedures to monitor and periodically
review the accessibility of instructional
materials. For example, De Anza could
develop an accessibility checklist for
instructors to complete when developing
or selecting instructional materials, from
which the college could periodically review
a sample of course content to ensure that
instructors completed the checklist and
that the instructional materials comply with
accessibility standards.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 71
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
18. To ensure that its website complies with 3 †
accessibility standards, by June 2018,
De Anza should develop procedures
to monitor website accessibility and
incorporate steps to prevent instructors
from publishing inaccessible content on
the college’s website. These procedures
should include a tracking mechanism to
demonstrate how many accessibility errors
the college identifies and how long it takes
to fix those errors.
19. To ensure that all instructors are aware of 3 †
the accessibility standards for instructional
materials, De Anza should include in its
next collective bargaining negotiations a
requirement for instructors to periodically
attend accessibility trainings.
21. To increase the transparency of its annual 3 †
review process, by June 2018, De Anza
should establish procedures requiring
its departments to document attendees,
input received, and agreements reached
during meetings to consider instructional
technology equipment requests.
Fresno Police Department
Automated License 1. To ensure that its ALPR policy contains all of 1 †
Plate Readers: the required elements as specified in state
R To Better Protect law, by August 2020, Fresno should review
Individuals’ Privacy, its policy and draft or revise it as necessary.
Law Enforcement Must Also by August 2020, Fresno should post its
Increase Its Safeguards revised policy on its website in accordance
for the Data It Collects with state law.
2019‑118 3. To protect ALPR data to the appropriate 1 †
(February 2020) standard, by August 2020 Fresno should
perform an assessment of its ALPR
system data‑security features, and make
adjustments to its system configuration
where necessary to comply with CJIS policy
best practices based on that assessment.
9. To ensure that ALPR system access is 1 †
limited to agency staff who have a need
and a right to use ALPR data, by April 2020
Fresno should review all user accounts
and deactivate accounts for separated
employees, inactive users, and others
as necessary.
continued on next page . . .
72 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
Heartland Charter School
Youth Suicide 9. To ensure that their teachers and staff 1 †
Prevention: have the information necessary to respond
AA Local Educational consistently, promptly, and appropriately to
Agencies Lack the reduce suicide risk, the six LEAs we reviewed
Resources and Policies should revise their policies by March 2021 to
Necessary to Effectively comply with state law and incorporate the
Address Rising Rates best practices in Education’s model policy.
of Youth Suicide and
15. To ensure that their teachers and staff 1 †
Self‑Harm
have the knowledge necessary to identify
2019‑125 and assist students at risk of self‑harm and
(September 2020) suicide, the six LEAs we reviewed should do
the following:
• Revise their suicide prevention training
materials by June 2021 to align with state
law and incorporate the best practices in
Education’s model policy.
• LEAs that provide suicide prevention
training should conduct it at the beginning
of the school year.
21. To improve their students’ access to mental 1 †
health professionals, Kern High School
District, Ukiah Unified, Gateway Charter,
Redwoods Charter, and Heartland Charter
should coordinate with their respective
counties to request MHSA funding to
employ additional school counselors,
school nurses, school social workers,
and school psychologists.
Kern County Probation
Juvenile Justice 6. To determine the effectiveness of its 1 May
Crime Prevention Act: use of JJCPA funds, Kern should include 2022
Z Weak Oversight Has in its year‑end reports to Community
Hindered Its Meaningful Corrections descriptions or analyses of how
Implementation its JJCPA‑funded programs influenced its
juvenile justice trends, as required by law.
2019‑116
(May 2020)
Kern High School District
Youth Suicide 22. To improve their students' access to mental 1 October
Prevention: health professionals, Kern High School 2021#
AA Local Educational District, Ukiah Unified, Gateway Charter,
Agencies Lack the Redwoods Charter, and Heartland Charter
Resources and Policies should coordinate with their respective
Necessary to Effectively counties to request MHSA funding to
Address Rising Rates employ additional school counselors,
of Youth Suicide and school nurses, school social workers,
Self‑Harm and school psychologists.
2019‑125
(September 2020)
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 73
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
Long Beach Unified School District
Student Mental 14. To better understand the effectiveness of 5 †
Health Services: the mental health services in its special
T Some Students’ Services education program, Long Beach should use
Were Affected by a the six performance indicators we identified
New State Law, and the to perform analysis annually on the subset of
State Needs to Analyze students receiving mental health services.
Student Outcomes and
Track Service Costs
2015‑112
(January 2016)
Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health
Lanterman‑Petris‑Short 6. To ensure that it connects patients who have 1 January
Act: been placed on multiple short‑term holds to 2022
S California Has appropriate ongoing treatment, Los Angeles
Not Ensured That should, by no later than August 2021, adopt
Individuals With Serious a systematic approach to identifying such
Mental Illnesses Receive individuals, obtaining available mental health
Adequate Ongoing Care history information about these individuals,
and connecting these individuals to services
2019‑119
that support their ongoing mental health.
(July 2020)
8. To ensure that conservatorships do not 1 Will Not
terminate because of the absence of Implement
testimony from doctors, Los Angeles should
immediately implement a comprehensive
solution to this problem, such as using
its own staff as expert witnesses when
individuals’ treating physicians are unable to
testify. In addition, by no later than August
2021, it should develop a revised approach
to scheduling conservatorship hearings and
trials so that it significantly reduces the rate
at which doctors’ failures to testify result in
terminated conservatorships.
Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services
Los Angeles County 6. To ensure that its staff appropriately 2 December
Department of Children use SDM assessments to identify safety 2022
and Family Services: threats and risks, the department should
It Has Not Adequately incorporate SDM instructions into its policies
Ensured the Health and and procedures by July 2019 and provide
Safety of All Children in mandatory annual SDM training for applicable
Its Care staff, supervisors, and other members of
management by May 2020.
2018‑126
(May 2019)
Los Angeles County Office of Education
Montebello Unified 1. To ensure that Montebello takes the steps 4 Unknown
School District: necessary to prevent state intervention and
P County Superintendent regain its positive financial certification,
Intervention Is Necessary the county superintendent should direct
to Address Its Weak Montebello to submit a corrective action plan
Financial Management to address the issues identified in this report
and Governance including balancing its budget, amending
and adhering to its hiring procedures, and
2017‑104
establishing adequate safeguards to ensure
(November 2017)
that policies related to bond proceeds,
conflicts of interest, and the approval of
expenditures are implemented and followed.
continued on next page . . .
74 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
2. To ensure that Montebello takes the steps 4 Undetermined
necessary to prevent state intervention and
regain its positive financial certification,
the county superintendent should assist
Montebello in developing a plan to justify
its workforce size and cost in terms of its
current and projected enrollment, including
evaluating the necessity of current staff
levels and personnel costs.
3. To ensure that Montebello takes the steps 4 Undetermined
necessary to prevent state intervention and
regain its positive financial certification, the
county superintendent should evaluate
the necessity of executive positions and
adjust executives’ salaries based on an
analysis of the number and cost of executives
in comparable districts.
4. To ensure that Montebello takes the steps 4 Undetermined
necessary to prevent state intervention and
regain its positive financial certification,
the county superintendent should ensure
that Montebello implements all of the
recommendations detailed in the report.
Los Angeles County Probation Department
Juvenile Justice 11. To adequately assess the effectiveness of 1 Fall
Crime Prevention Act: its programs at reducing juvenile crime and 2022
Z Weak Oversight Has delinquency, Los Angeles should collect data
Hindered Its Meaningful on all participants in each JJCPA program
Implementation and for each service it provides.
2019‑116 15. To accurately assess the effectiveness of its 1 Fall
(May 2020) programs, Los Angeles should determine 2022
how to accurately identify in its case
management system the JJCPA programs
and services in which each individual
participates or should enhance its system to
provide this capability.
Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department
Concealed Carry 1. To ensure that its CCW licensing decisions 3 Will Not
Weapon Licenses: align with its CCW policy, Los Angeles Implement
O Sheriffs Have should only issue licenses to applicants
Implemented Their Local after collecting documentation of specific,
Programs Inconsistently personal threats against the applicants so
and Sometimes as to satisfy its definition of good cause. If
Inadequately Los Angeles believes that its public licensing
policy does not include all acceptable good
2017‑101
causes for a CCW license, then by March 2018
(December 2017)
it should revise that policy and publish the
new policy on its website. It should then
immediately begin processing applications
according to that revised policy.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 75
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
2. To ensure that it only issues licenses to 3 March
individuals after receiving evidence of 2018#
residency, firearms training, and good
moral character that aligns with its policy,
Los Angeles should only issue licenses after
verifying that it has received this evidence.
To avoid overlooking required evidence,
Los Angeles should create procedures by
March 2018 for its staff to follow to ensure
that each CCW file contains the evidence its
policy requires before issuing the license.
10. To ensure that it is only charging fees 3 †
that state law allows, Los Angeles should
immediately cease charging applicants fees
in addition to its license processing fee.
Los Angeles should reimburse applicants
who paid the unallowable fees. Further, if
Los Angeles believes its license fee does not
recover its entire cost of processing an initial
application, it should complete a cost study
and, if appropriate, revise its fee according to
the results of that study and the maximum
allowed fees under state law.
Los Angeles Police Department
Automated License 15. To ensure that its ALPR policy contains all of 1 †
Plate Readers: the required elements as specified in state
R To Better Protect law, by August 2020, Los Angeles should
Individuals’ Privacy, review its policy and draft or revise it as
Law Enforcement Must necessary. Also by August 2020, Los Angeles
Increase Its Safeguards should post its revised policy on its website
for the Data It Collects in accordance with state law.
2019‑118 16. To protect ALPR data to the appropriate 1 †
(February 2020) standard, by August 2020, Los Angeles should
identify the types of data in its ALPR system
and, as Los Angeles reviews or drafts its
ALPR policy, ensure that it clarifies the types
of information its officers may upload into
its ALPR system, such as, but not limited to,
information obtained through CLETS.
17. To protect ALPR data to the appropriate 1 †
standard, by August 2020, Los Angeles should
perform an assessment of its ALPR system
data‑security features, and make adjustments
to its system configuration where necessary
to comply with CJIS policy best practices
based on that assessment.
21. To ensure that ALPR system access is 1 †
limited to agency staff who have a need
and a right to use ALPR data, by April 2020,
Los Angeles should review all user accounts
and deactivate accounts for separated
employees, inactive users, and others
as necessary.
continued on next page . . .
76 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
25. To enable auditing of user access to and user 1 †
queries of ALPR images, Los Angeles should
ensure that its ALPR policy makes clear how
frequently Los Angeles will audit its ALPR
system, who will perform that audit, who will
review and approve the audit results, and
how long Los Angeles will retain the audit
documents. Los Angeles should have in place
by February 2021 an audit plan that describes
its audit methodology, including, but not
limited to, risk areas that will be audited,
sampling, documentation, and resolution
of findings.
26. To enable auditing of user access to and 1 January
user queries of ALPR images, by June 2021, 2022
Los Angeles should implement its audit plan
and complete its first audit.
Los Angeles Regional Adult Education Consortium
Montebello Unified 31. To ensure that state adult education 4 June
School District: funds are used in the most efficient and 2020#
P County Superintendent effective manner, the consortium should,
Intervention Is within one year, complete an assessment
Necessary to Address of Montebello’s ability to meet the
Its Weak Financial requirements of its adult education plan to
Management and determine whether its use of state funds
Governance has been effective. If Montebello is found to
be consistently ineffective, the consortium
2017‑104
should immediately recalculate the adult
(November 2017)
program’s fund allocation for the future.
32. To ensure that state adult education funds 4 December
are used in the most efficient and effective 2019#
manner, the consortium should, within one
year, develop policies and procedures to
ensure the proper collection and reporting
of enrollment, attendance, and expenditure
data by consortium members. Periodically
review enrollment, attendance, and
expenditure data to ensure their accuracy.
Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board
State and Regional 18. Los Angeles should correct its pollutant 3 June
Water Boards: control plan where it miscalculated two 2022
V They Must Do More pollutant limits.
to Ensure That Local
Jurisdictions’ Costs to
Reduce Storm Water
Pollution Are Necessary
and Appropriate
2017‑118
(March 2018)
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 77
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
Los Rios Community College District
California Community 24. To ensure that students with disabilities have 3 †
Colleges: equal access to instructional materials, by
U The Colleges Reviewed June 2018, American River should develop
Are Not Adequately procedures to monitor and periodically
Monitoring Services review the accessibility of instructional
for Technology materials. For example, American River
Accessibility, and could develop an accessibility checklist for
Districts and Colleges instructors to complete when developing
Should Formalize or selecting instructional materials, from
Procedures for which the college could periodically review
Upgrading Technology a sample of course content to ensure that
instructors completed the checklist and
2017‑102
that the instructional materials comply with
(December 2017)
accessibility standards.
25. To ensure that its website complies with 3 December
accessibility standards, by June 2018, 2019#
American River should develop procedures to
monitor website accessibility and incorporate
steps to prevent instructors from publishing
inaccessible content on the college’s website.
These procedures should include a tracking
mechanism to demonstrate how many
accessibility errors the college identifies and
how long it takes to fix those errors.
26. To ensure that all instructors are aware of 3 Will Not
the accessibility standards for instructional Implement
materials, American River should include in
its next collective bargaining negotiations
a requirement for instructors to periodically
attend accessibility trainings.
28. To ensure that it fully implements its 3 December
technology master plan, by June 2018, 2019#
American River should establish an
implementation plan with detailed steps for
achieving the goals in its technology master
plan that it has not yet accomplished. Further,
it should develop an implementation plan
in conjunction with the development of its
future technology master plan.
29. To increase the transparency of its annual 3 †
review processes, by June 2018, American
River should establish procedures requiring
its departments to document attendees,
input received, and agreements reached
during meetings to consider instructional
technology equipment requests.
continued on next page . . .
78 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
Marin County Sheriff’s Department
Automated License 27. To ensure that its ALPR policy contains all of 1 March
Plate Readers: the required elements as specified in state 2021#
R To Better Protect law, by August 2020, Marin should review
Individuals’ Privacy, its policy and draft or revise it as necessary.
Law Enforcement Must Also by August 2020, Marin should post its
Increase Its Safeguards revised policy on its website in accordance
for the Data It Collects with state law.
2019‑118 37. To ensure that ALPR system access is limited 1 †
(February 2020) to agency staff who have a need and a right
to use ALPR data, by August 2020, Marin
should develop and implement procedures
for granting and managing user accounts that
include, but are not limited to, requiring that
supervisors must approve accounts for users,
providing training to users before granting
accounts, suspending users after defined
periods of inactivity, and requiring regular
refresher training for active users and training
for users before reactivating previously
inactive accounts. Marin should also ensure
that it has procedures in place to deactivate
an account immediately for an account holder
who separates from the agency or who no
longer needs a user account.
39. To enable auditing of user access to and 1 †
user queries of ALPR images, Marin should
ensure that its ALPR policy makes clear
how frequently Marin will audit its ALPR
system, who will perform that audit, who
will review and approve the audit results,
and how long Marin will retain the audit
documents. Marin should have in place by
February 2021 an audit plan that describes its
audit methodology, including, but not limited
to, risk areas that will be audited, sampling,
documentation, and resolution of findings.
40. To enable auditing of user access to and 1 †
user queries of ALPR images, by June 2021,
Marin should implement its audit plan and
complete its first audit.
Montebello Unified School District
Montebello Unified 5. To improve its current financial condition and 4 †
School District: ensure future viability, Montebello should,
P County Superintendent within 60 days, revise its fiscal stabilization
Intervention Is plan and make the necessary cuts to fund its
Necessary to Address ongoing commitments.
Its Weak Financial
6. To improve its current financial condition 4 †
Management and
and ensure future viability, Montebello
Governance
should create a robust budgeting process
2017‑104 within 90 days using best practices of the
(November 2017) Government Finance Officers Association
to ensure Montebello’s ability to meet its
priorities while maintaining the required
level of reserves that buffers the district from
drastic cuts in times of economic instability.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 79
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
7. To improve its current financial condition and 4 †
ensure future viability, Montebello should,
within 90 days, implement an effective
budget monitoring process with regular
budget‑to‑actual comparisons. This process
should include safeguards against spending in
excess of budgeted expenditures and require
advance board approval of such spending
before it occurs. For example, Montebello
should require that the budget manager
perform monthly reviews of budget‑to‑actual
figures and provide detailed explanations to
the board for any variances.
8. To ensure that Montebello hires the most 4 †
qualified executive and management staff,
Montebello should immediately adhere to
its policies for hiring classified employees,
including screening candidates to ensure
that they meet the minimum qualifications.
Montebello should also hold provisional
employees to the same standards for
minimum qualifications as its policy requires.
9. To ensure that Montebello hires qualified 4 †
classified employees, the personnel
commission should, within 90 days, revise
its policies to require the classified director
to provide it with the education and work
experience of any candidates on eligibility
lists for high‑ranking positions. It should
also require the director of the personnel
commission—the classified director—to
provide it with a list of all provisional
appointments, including information
on how those employees meet the
minimum qualifications.
10. To ensure that it does not violate state law, 4 †
Montebello should immediately adhere
to its policies and ensure that provisional
employees do not work more than the legal
maximum number of days of service.
12. In order to rebuild trust with its community, 4 †
Montebello should adhere to its policies
for hiring certificated personnel and fill any
vacant positions for executives through
a competitive hiring process, including
advertising the positions, screening to
ensure that minimum qualifications are
met, and interviewing to ensure that it
hires and retains the most qualified and
talented leaders.
13. To ensure that Montebello creates employee 4 †
positions only when necessary, it should
establish a policy within 30 days that
requires a justification for why the district is
creating a position. Additionally, in order to
maintain transparency when creating new
positions, Montebello should immediately
begin to document its justifications.
continued on next page . . .
80 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
14. To ensure that Montebello hires qualified 4 †
certificated and classified employees, within
90 days the board should revise its policies
to require the superintendent or his or her
designee to provide information to the
board about recruitments for high‑ranking
employees. The board should consider, at a
minimum, the following information when
approving appointments:
• The number of initial applicants.
• The number of candidates who passed the
screening and interviewing steps.
• The education and work experience
of the final candidate recommended by
the superintendent or designee.
15. To ensure that Montebello is making hiring 4 †
decisions free of bias or favoritism, within
90 days it should strengthen its hiring
policies related to nepotism and conflicts
of interest for classified and certificated
personnel to include the following:
establishing restrictions on immediate family
members being involved in the screening
and interviewing processes and definitions
of what types of personal relationships
fall under the nepotism policy, which
work relationships the nepotism policy
applies to, and what factors to consider
when evaluating the potential impact of a
personal relationship.
24. To ensure that Montebello spends its funds for 4 †
allowable and reasonable purposes, it should
implement an inventory tracking system
that allows it to know where its equipment is
located. Montebello should also periodically
review its inventory listing to ensure that
equipment is being properly used.
New Jerusalem Elementary School District
Charter Schools: 44. To better ensure effective oversight of its 4 December
Some School Districts charter schools’ finances, New Jerusalem 2021
M Improperly Authorized should place a district representative as a
and Inadequately nonvoting member on each charter school’s
Monitored Out‑of‑District governing board.
Charter Schools
2016‑141
(October 2017)
Peralta Community College District
Clery Act Requirements 32. To ensure that its campuses provide the 3 Will Not
and Crime Reporting: necessary resources and information to Implement
N Compliance Continues students about campus safety, Peralta
to Challenge California’s should by December 2018, develop all
Colleges and Universities required policies related to campus safety in
compliance with the Education Code.
2017‑032
(May 2018)
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 81
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
Sacramento City Unified School District
Sacramento City 6. To address its current financial problems, 1 July
Unified School District: Sacramento Unified should do the following: 2022
Q Because It Has • By March 2020, adopt a detailed plan to
Failed to Proactively resolve its fiscal crisis. The plan should
Address Its Financial estimate savings under multiple scenarios
Challenges, It May Soon and include an analysis that quantifies the
Face Insolvency impact of reductions the district can make
to ongoing expenditures. Specifically,
2019‑108
Sacramento Unified should consider the
(December 2019)
impact of possible salary adjustments for
employees in different bargaining units and
include the impact those salary adjustments
would have on postemployment benefits,
such as pensions. It should also use the
most recently available data to estimate
net savings from modifying the health
care benefits it provides to employees,
as well as the impact those modifications
would have on the total compensation of
the employees. Finally, it should calculate
the impact of possible changes to district
and employee contributions to fund future
retiree health benefits. The district should
use the plan it develops as the basis for its
discussions of potential solutions with its
teachers union.
7. To address its current financial problems, 1 July
Sacramento Unified should do the following: 2022
• Revise its multiyear projections and
update them at least quarterly until it
has taken action that would cause it to
no longer project insolvency. It should
disclose these projections to the board.
8. To address its current financial problems, 1 July
Sacramento Unified should do the following: 2022
• The district should adopt and disclose
publicly a multiyear projection
methodology. This methodology should
disclose the assumptions and rationale
used to estimate changes in salaries,
benefits, contributions, and LCFF
revenue—including changes in enrollment
and the source and reliability of the data
used to make these projections.
9. To address its current financial problems, 1 July
Sacramento Unified should do the following: 2022
• Before it imposes an agreement on its
teachers union or accepts state assistance,
the district should publicly disclose the
likely effects that such actions will have
on the district’s students, faculty, and
the community, and its plans to address
these effects.
continued on next page . . .
82 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
10. To prevent a similar fiscal crisis in the future, 1 July
Sacramento Unified should do the following 2022
by July 2020:
• Have the board adopt a budget
methodology, including guidance on
the use of one‑time funds, the use
and maintenance of district reserves, and
the maintenance of a balanced budget.
The methodology should use the
Government Finance Officers Association’s
best practices as a guide and should
address at least the following areas:
• Including administrators from different
divisions of Sacramento Unified into the
budget development process to help
ensure the accuracy of projections.
• Establishing criteria and measures for
success in the budget process, such as
whether budget decisions were made
with adequate input and deliberation and
whether the budget was balanced without
using reserves or one‑time revenues for
ongoing expenditures.
• Developing and adhering to a multiyear
funding budget plan, with the goal of
realigning resources where necessary
to fund ongoing expenses with
ongoing revenue.
• Conducting an analysis of variances
in budgeted and actual revenues and
expenditures at each interim reporting
period. Sacramento Unified should then
use this information to inform its estimates
for the upcoming fiscal year’s budget.
11. To prevent a similar fiscal crisis in the future, 1 July
Sacramento Unified should do the following 2022
by July 2020:
• Develop a long‑term funding plan to
address its retiree health benefits liability.
The plan should include appropriate
action necessary to ensure the district
will be able to meet its obligations to its
employees and retirees.
12. To prevent a similar fiscal crisis in the future, 1 July
Sacramento Unified should do the following 2022
by July 2020:
• Adopt a policy that guides staff on steps
they should take to ensure that special
education expenditures are cost‑effective.
The policy should include consideration
of options for offering services, including
those provided by district staff or by
contracted providers.
14. To prevent a similar fiscal crisis in the future, 1 July
Sacramento Unified should do the following 2022
by July 2020:
• Develop and adopt a succession plan
that ensures that it has staff who have
the training and knowledge necessary to
assume critical roles in the case of turnover.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 83
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
15. To prevent a similar fiscal crisis in the future, 1 July
Sacramento Unified should do the following 2022
by July 2020:
• Develop effective employee orientation
programs, including mentorship, to allow
incoming leaders to better adapt to the
organization’s structure and culture.
Sacramento County Office of Education
Sacramento City 3. To ensure that Sacramento Unified takes the 1 December
Unified School District: steps necessary to address its fiscal crisis, 2021
Q Because It Has the county office superintendent should
Failed to Proactively do the following:
Address Its Financial
• Direct Sacramento Unified to submit a
Challenges, It May Soon
corrective action plan by March 2020 that
Face Insolvency
consolidates the district’s plans to resolve
2019‑108 its fiscal crisis.
(December 2019) 4. To ensure that Sacramento Unified takes the 1 June
steps necessary to address its fiscal crisis, 2022
the county office superintendent should
do the following:
• Ensure that Sacramento Unified addresses
the issues identified in this report,
including its executive management
turnover and lack of policies guiding its
budget process.
5. To ensure that Sacramento Unified takes the 1 June
steps necessary to address its fiscal crisis, 2022
the county office superintendent should
do the following:
• Ensure that Sacramento Unified
implements all of the recommendations
detailed below.
Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department
Automated License 43. To protect ALPR data to the appropriate 1 †
Plate Readers: standard, by August 2020, Sacramento should
R To Better Protect perform an assessment of its ALPR system
Individuals’ Privacy, data‑security features, and make adjustments
Law Enforcement Must to its system configuration where necessary to
Increase Its Safeguards comply with CJIS policy best practices based
for the Data It Collects on that assessment.
2019‑118 44. To ensure that the agreement with its cloud 1 †
(February 2020) vendor offers the strongest possible data
protections, by August 2020, Sacramento
should enter into a new contract with
Vigilant that contains the contract provisions
recommended in CJIS policy.
45. To ensure that ALPR images are being shared 1 †
appropriately, by April 2020, Sacramento
should review the entities with which it
currently shares images, determine the
appropriateness of this sharing, and take all
necessary steps to suspend those sharing
relationships deemed inappropriate
or unnecessary.
continued on next page . . .
84 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
51. To ensure that ALPR system access is limited 1 †
to agency staff who have a need and a right to
use ALPR data, by August 2020, Sacramento
should develop and implement procedures
for granting and managing user accounts
that include, but are not limited to, requiring
that supervisors must approve accounts
for users, providing training to users before
granting accounts, suspending users after
defined periods of inactivity, and requiring
regular refresher training for active users
and training for users before reactivating
previously inactive accounts. Sacramento
should also ensure that it has procedures in
place to deactivate an account immediately
for an account holder who separates from
the agency or who no longer needs a
user account.
52. To enable auditing of user access to and 1 †
user queries of ALPR images, by April 2020,
Sacramento should assess the information its
ALPR system captures when users access it
to ensure that the system’s logs are complete
and accurate and that the logs form a
reasonable basis for conducting necessary,
periodic audits.
54. To enable auditing of user access to and 1 †
user queries of ALPR images, by June 2021,
Sacramento should implement its audit plan
and complete its first audit.
Concealed Carry 3. To ensure that staff are gathering consistent 3 Unknown
Weapon Licenses: evidence from applicants to demonstrate
O Sheriffs Have residency, good moral character, and firearms
Implemented Their Local training and are including which requirement
Programs Inconsistently applicants did not meet in its denial letters, by
and Sometimes March 2018 Sacramento should create formal
Inadequately CCW processing procedures and train its staff
to follow these procedures. These procedures
2017‑101
should require staff to gather and evaluate
(December 2017)
the information the department believes
is required to demonstrate that each of the
criteria for a CCW license has been met, and
they should also require staff to include which
requirement applicants did not meet in its
denial letters.
4. To ensure that staff are following its newly 3 Unknown
established procedures and to identify
any need for additional guidance, by
March 2018 Sacramento should establish a
review process wherein it regularly reviews
a selection of license files and denied
applications to determine whether its staff
are collecting sufficient and consistent
documentation in accordance with its
policies and are appropriately including
which requirement applicants did not meet
in its denial letters.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 85
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
7. To ensure that it provides all required 3 Unknown
information to Justice, Sacramento should
immediately inform Justice when it revokes
a CCW license, including when it receives a
prohibition notice from Justice.
11. To ensure that it is maximizing allowable 3 Unknown
revenue from the CCW program and reducing
its program deficits, Sacramento should
perform a cost study of its initial application
processing and, on completion of the study,
immediately increase its CCW license fees
and begin charging the maximum amounts
allowable under state law.
San Bernardino City Unified School District
Youth Experiencing 10. To comply with federal law and best 1 June
Homelessness: practices, San Bernardino should, before 2021#
Y California’s Education academic year 2020‑21, ensure that
System for K–12 school staff who provide services to
Inadequately Identifies youth experiencing homelessness receive
and Supports training as federal law requires. Further, as
These Youth set forth in best practices, the LEA should
provide this training at least annually, and
2019‑104
the training should include the definition
(November 2019)
of homelessness, signs of homelessness,
the impact of homelessness on youth, and
the steps an LEA should take once school
staff has identified a youth as possibly
experiencing homelessness.
16. To comply with federal law and best 1 June
practices, San Bernardino should, before 2021#
academic year 2020‑21, distribute
information about the educational rights of
youth experiencing homelessness in public
places, including schools, shelters, public
libraries, and food pantries frequented
by families of such youth, as federal law
requires. Further, to mitigate families’
and youth’s hesitance to disclosing their
living situation the LEA should include the
protections set forth in federal and state laws
in the information it distributes.
continued on next page . . .
86 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
San Diego County Air Pollution Control District
San Diego County 5. To ensure that the permit fees it charges are 1 December
Air Pollution sufficient to pay for its permitting program, 2021
Control District: the San Diego Air District should, by
It Has Used Vehicle December 2020, monitor the impact of the
Registration Fees to COVID‑19 pandemic on San Diego County’s
Subsidize Its Permitting economy and, when economic conditions
Process, Reducing allow, propose to the district board that
the Amount of Funds it increase fees annually by the maximum
Available to Address percentage allowed until the district’s
Air Pollution revenue from permit fees is equal to the full
cost of the permitting program.
2019‑127
(July 2020) 6. To ensure that it is responsive to its stakeholders 1 April
and encourages public participation in the 2022
creation of its regulatory and permitting
policies, the San Diego Air District should
create and implement a public participation
plan by January 2021 that includes both public
outreach and public engagement activities.
8. Because the new district board will include 1 November
additional stakeholders who represent some of 2021#
the interests that the advisory committee was
intended to represent, the district board should
determine whether the advisory committee is
still necessary. If the district board determines
that the advisory committee is still necessary,
it should immediately publicize the vacancies
on the advisory committee on its website and
in the monthly and annual county reports
of vacancies on boards, commissions, and
committees, and actively seek nominations to
fill these positions.
9. Because the new district board will include 1 November
additional stakeholders who represent 2021#
some of the interests that the advisory
committee was intended to represent, the
district board should determine whether the
advisory committee is still necessary. If the
district board determines that the advisory
committee is still necessary, it should ensure
that the district's legal counsel monitors the
advisory committee meetings beginning
immediately, and advises the committee
when it does not comply with state public
meeting requirements.
12. To ensure that it effectively manages its 1 November
complaint investigation process and provides 2021#
accurate information to the public regarding
the complaints it receives, the San Diego
Air District should, by June 2021, establish a
process for validating the accuracy of the data
it previously entered into its database.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 87
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
San Diego County Sheriff’s Department
Concealed Carry 5. To ensure that its staff appropriately renew 3 Unknown
Weapon Licenses: CCW licenses, by March 2018 San Diego
O Sheriffs Have should establish a routine supervisory review
Implemented Their of a selection of renewed licenses.
Local Programs
6. To ensure that it consistently obtains sufficient 3 Unknown
Inconsistently
evidence to demonstrate that an applicant
and Sometimes
satisfies its requirements for a license, by
Inadequately
March 2018 San Diego should develop
2017‑101 guidance and train its staff on what good
(December 2017) cause documentation staff should request
from applicants. Further, it should train its
staff regarding the expected documents for
residency and training.
8. To ensure that it follows state law’s 3 Unknown
requirements for revoking licenses, San Diego
should immediately revoke CCW licenses and
should then inform Justice that it has revoked
licenses whenever license holders become
prohibited persons. Additionally, San Diego
should notify Justice when it suspends a
license or a license is surrendered.
12. To ensure that it maximizes allowable 3 Unknown
revenue from its CCW program, San Diego
should immediately pursue increasing its
initial, renewal, and amendment fees to the
maximum amounts allowable under state law.
San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission
San Francisco Bay 10. To ensure that it maximizes the efficiency 2 †
Conservation and and effectiveness of its enforcement and
Development permitting programs, the commission
Commission: should by January 2020 develop guidance
Its Failure to Perform that enumerates the violation types that
Key Responsibilities Has the commissioners deem worthy of swift
Allowed Ongoing Harm enforcement action, those that staff can
to the San Francisco Bay defer for a specified amount of time, and
those that do not warrant enforcement
2018‑120
action or that can be resolved through fines.
(May 2019)
12. To ensure that it maximizes the efficiency 2 December
and effectiveness of its enforcement and 2021
permitting programs, the commission should
by January 2020 create a penalty calculation
worksheet. The commission should require
the worksheet’s use for all enforcement
actions that will result in fines or penalties,
and it should create formal policies,
procedures, and criteria to provide staff with
guidance on applying the worksheet.
16. To ensure that it maximizes the efficiency 2 Will Not
and effectiveness of its enforcement and Implement
permitting programs, the commission should
by January 2020 appoint a new citizens’
advisory committee as required by law and
determine a schedule for the committee to
conduct regular meetings.
continued on next page . . .
88 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
17. To ensure that it uses the abatement fund 2 October
for the physical cleanup of the Bay, the 2021#
commission should create a policy by
January 2020 identifying the minimum
amounts it will disburse and prioritizing
the projects that it will support through
disbursements to the appropriate entities.
18. To build on prior recommendations and 2 January
ensure that it maximizes the effectiveness of 2022
its enforcement program, the commission
should by January 2021 conduct a workforce
study of all its permit and regulatory
activities and determine whether it requires
additional staff, including supervisors, to
support its mission.
19. To build on prior recommendations and 2 July
ensure that it maximizes the effectiveness of 2022
its enforcement program, the commission
should by January 2021 implement a permit
compliance position to support the efforts of
enforcement staff and the implementation
of process changes. If necessary, it should
seek additional funding for such a position.
20. To build on prior recommendations and 2 July
ensure that it maximizes the effectiveness of 2022
its enforcement program, the commission
should by January 2021 update its existing
database or create a new database to ensure
that it can identify and track individual
violations within each case, including the
date staff initiate the standardized fines
process for each violation. As part of this
process, the commission should review
its database and update it as necessary to
ensure that it includes all necessary and
accurate information, specifically whether
staff initiated the standardized fines process
for open case files and for those case files
closed within the past five years.
22. To ensure consistency in its enforcement 2 December
program, the commission should by 2021
January 2021 create and implement
regulations that define substantial harm,
provide explicit criteria for calculating the
number of violations present in individual
enforcement cases, and specify a process to
handle any necessary exceptions to the criteria.
23. To ensure consistency in its enforcement 2 †
program, the commission should by
January 2021 create and implement
regulations to allow it to use limited monetary
fines to resolve selected minor violations that
do not involve substantial harm to the Bay.
24. To ensure consistency in its enforcement 2 December
program, the commission should by 2021
January 2021 update its regulations on permit
issuance to offer greater clarity on the types
of projects for which staff may issue permits
without commissioners’ hearings.
California State Auditor Report 2021-041 89
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
San Francisco Department of Public Health
Lanterman‑Petris‑Short 7. To ensure that it connects patients who have 1 June
Act: been placed on multiple short‑term holds to 2022
S California Has appropriate ongoing treatment, San Francisco
Not Ensured That should, by no later than August 2021, adopt
Individuals With Serious a systematic approach to identifying such
Mental Illnesses Receive individuals, obtaining available mental health
Adequate Ongoing Care history information about these individuals,
and connecting these individuals to services
2019‑119
that support their ongoing mental health.
(July 2020)
San Francisco Unified School District
Youth Suicide 17. To ensure that their teachers and staff 1 November
Prevention: have the knowledge necessary to identify 2022
AA Local Educational and assist students at risk of self‑harm and
Agencies Lack the suicide, the six LEAs we reviewed should do
Resources and Policies the following:
Necessary to Effectively • Revise their suicide prevention training
Address Rising Rates materials by June 2021 to align with state
of Youth Suicide and law and incorporate the best practices in
Self‑Harm Education’s model policy.
2019‑125 • LEAs that provide suicide prevention
(September 2020) training should conduct it at the
beginning of the school year.
Tulare Local Healthcare District
Tulare Local 1. To ensure that the district can demonstrate 3 June
Healthcare District: that its decisions for selecting contractors 2022
Past Poor Decisions are justified and are in the best interest of
Contributed to the the district’s residents, by April 2019 the
Closure of the Medical district should establish formal procedures
Center, and Licensing designed to ensure that it follows a rigorous
Issues May Delay and appropriate evaluation and contract
Its Reopening awarding process.
2018‑102 2. To ensure that the district pays only 3 June
(October 2018) reasonable and appropriate contract 2022
administrative costs, before the district signs
any future management contract, it should
prepare estimates of the costs for all proposed
contract terms related to compensation.
8. To ensure that it uses bond proceeds 3 June
for allowable purposes and improves its 2022
consistency and accountability in processing
payments from bond proceeds, by April 2019
the district should formalize and document
policies and procedures for verifying that it
uses bond proceeds for allowable purposes
and for approving expenditures paid from
general obligation bond proceeds.
90 California State Auditor Report 2021-041
January 2022
STATE AUDITOR’S ASSESSMENT
NUMBER OF YEARS AUDITEE DID NOT AUDITEE DID NOT
REPORT TITLE, NUMBER, RECOMMENDATION ESTIMATED DATE SUBSTANTIATE ADDRESS ALL
RECOMMENDATION
AND ISSUE DATE HAS APPEARED IN OF COMPLETION ITS CLAIM OF FULL ASPECTS OF THE
THIS REPORT IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATION
Ukiah Unified School District
Youth Suicide 23. To improve their students’ access to mental 1 †
Prevention: health professionals, Kern High School
AA Local Educational District, Ukiah Unified, Gateway Charter,
Agencies Lack the Redwoods Charter, and Heartland Charter
Resources and Policies should coordinate with their respective
Necessary to Effectively counties to request MHSA funding to
Address Rising Rates employ additional school counselors,
of Youth Suicide and school nurses, school social workers,
Self‑Harm and school psychologists.
2019‑125
(September 2020)
† Contrary to the State Auditor’s determination, the audited agency believes it has fully implemented the recommendation.
# In its latest response, the audited agency did not update its estimated date of completion.