FCMAT
Mineral Elementary School District Report
management review
Read the report at Mineral Elementary School District ↗
Mineral Elementary School District
Management Review
June 29, 2009
Joel D. Montero
Chief Executive Officer
June 29, 2009
Brenda Wolfe, Superintendent/Principal
Mineral Elementary School District
38355 Scenic Ave
P.O.Box 130
Mineral, CA 96063
Dear Superintendent Wolfe:
In April 2009, the Fiscal Crisis and Management Assistance Team (FCMAT) entered into an
agreement with the Mineral Elementary School District for a review that required FCMAT to
perform the following:
1) Review the present administrative (leadership) structure of the district, including
charter school organization and make recommendations for long-term delivery system
that would be most effective and efficient.
a. Review state testing policy and procedures used to test students in the charter
School.
b. Review entrance and exit criteria for students at the charter school.
2) Review board adopted developer fee resolution and make recommendations on how the
district can proceed forward with collecting and appropriately utilizing developer fees.
3) Review charter school compliance with special education laws including but not
necessarily limited to assessment and identification of special education students,
development of Individualized Education Plans (IEP’s) and delivery of special
education services.
4) Review other aspects of charter school and elementary school operations as identified
by Superintendent/Principal.
5) Review the personnel and staffing structure in relation to NCLB compliance for core
and elective curriculum courses, and monitoring of the service time to the charter
school.
FCMAT
Joel D. Montero, Chief Executive Officer
. .
1300 17th Street - CITY CENTRE, Bakersfield, CA 93
.
301-4533 Telephone 661-6
.
36-4611 Fax 661-63
.
6-4647
422 Petaluma Blvd North, Suite. C, Petaluma, CA 94952 Telephone: 707-775-2850 Fax: 707-775-2854 www.fcmat.org
Administrative Agent: Larry E. Reider - Office of Kern County Superintendent of Schools
FCMAT visited the district to conduct fieldwork, interview staff, and review documents.
This report is the result of that effort. We hope this document is helpful to all concerned,
and please give our regards to all the employees of the Mineral Elementary School
District.
Sincerely,
Joel D. Montero
Chief Executive Officer
TABLE OF CONTENTS i
Table of Contents
Foreword ...........................................................................iii
Introduction ...................................................................... 1
Executive Summary ......................................................... 3
Findings and Recommendations ................................... 5
Administrative Structure ...................................................................................................................5
State Testing Procedures ..................................................................................................................9
Charter School Entrance and Exit Criteria ..........................................................................11
Developer Fees ....................................................................................................................................13
Special Education ...............................................................................................................................15
Operations ..............................................................................................................................................17
No Child Left Behind ........................................................................................................................19
Appendix ..........................................................................21
FOREWORD iii
Foreword - FCMAT Background
The Fiscal Crisis and Management Assistance Team (FCMAT) was created by legislation
in accordance with Assembly Bill 1200 in 1992 as a service to assist local educational
agencies (LEAs) in complying with fiscal accountability standards.
AB 1200 was established from a need to ensure that LEAs throughout California were
adequately prepared to meet and sustain their financial obligations. AB 1200 is also a statewide
plan for county offices of education and school districts to work together on a local level to
improve fiscal procedures and accountability standards. The legislation expanded the role of the
county office in monitoring school districts under certain fiscal constraints to ensure these dis-
tricts could meet their financial commitments on a multiyear basis. AB 2756 provides specific
responsibilities to FCMAT with regard to districts that have received emergency state loans.
These include comprehensive assessments in five major operational areas and periodic reports
that identify the district’s progress on the improvement plans.
In January 2006, SB 430 (charter schools) and AB 1366 (community colleges) became law and
expanded FCMAT’s services to those types of LEAs.
Since 1992, FCMAT has been engaged to perform nearly 750 reviews for local educational
agencies, including school districts, county offices of education, charter schools and community
colleges. Services range from fiscal crisis intervention to management review and assistance.
FCMAT also provides professional development training. The Kern County Superintendent of
Schools is the administrative agent for FCMAT. The agency is guided under the leadership of
Joel D. Montero, Chief Executive Officer, with funding derived through appropriations in the
state budget and a modest fee schedule for charges to requesting agencies.
Study Agreements by Fiscal Year
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
92/93 93/94 94/95 95/96 96/97 97/98 98/99 99/00 00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09
Projected
Total Number of Studies......................743
Total Number of Districts in CA ....982
Management Assistance ..........705 (94.886%)
Fiscal Crisis/Emergency ...............38 (5.114%)
Note: Some districts had multiple studies.
Districts (7) that have received emergency loans
from the state. (Rev. 1/22/09)
Mineral Elementary School District
seidutS
fo
rebmuN
Fiscal Crisis & Management Assistance Team
INTRODuCTION 1
Introduction
Background
Located in East Tehama County, the Mineral Elementary School District serves
approximately six students in grades kindergarten through eight at Mineral Elementary
School, which is approximately 45 miles east of the city of Red Bluff.
The district also operates an online charter high school in Red Bluff. The eScholar
Academy charter school serves 125 students in K-12, although most are in high school.
In April 2009, the district entered into an agreement with the Fiscal Crisis and
Management Assistance Team (FCMAT) that requires FCMAT to perform the following:
1. Review the present administrative (leadership) structure of the district, including
charter school organization and make recommendations for a long-term delivery
system that would be most effective and efficient.
a. Review state testing policy and procedures used to test students in charter
school.
b. Review entrance and exit criteria for students at charter school.
2. Review board adopted developer fee resolution and make recommendations on
how the district can proceed forward with collecting and appropriately using
developer fees.
3. Review charter school compliance with special education laws including but not
necessarily limited to assessment and identification of special education students,
development of Individualized Education Plans (IEPs) and delivery of special
education services.
4. Review other aspects of charter school and elementary school operations as
identified by superintendent/principal.
5. Review the personnel and staffing structure in relation to NCLB compliance for
core and elective curriculum courses, and monitoring of the service time to the
charter school.
Study Team
The study team was composed of the following members:
William P Gillaspie, Ed.D. Robert Rice, Ed.D.
FCMAT Chief Management Analyst FCMAT Consultant
Sacramento, CA Rio Vista, CA
Mineral Elementary School District
2 DRAFT
Leonel Martínez
FCMAT Public Information Specialist
Bakersfield, CA
Study Guidelines
FCMAT visited the district on May 11, 12, 13, 2009 to collect data and review documents.
This report is the result of those activities and is divided into the following sections:
I. Executive Summary
II. Administrative Structure
III. State Testing Procedures
IV. Charter School Entrance and Exit Criteria
V. Developer Fees
VI. Special Education
VII. Operations
VIII. No Child Left Behind
IX. Appendix
Fiscal Crisis & Management Assistance Team
ExECuTIvE SummARy 3
Executive Summary
The Mineral Elementary School District has experienced declining enrollment for several
years. The district receives necessary small school funding which mitigates the impact of
declining enrollment at Mineral Elementary School. With only six children attending this
site, the district could be forced to close the school if enrollment falls to zero. The district
also operates a charter school in Red Bluff.
The Mineral site includes two classrooms, a library, a multipurpose room and a spacious
playground. Each child can receive an individualized education. With such a small
enrollment, the demands to meet educational and social needs are challenging. However,
the governing board and community are committed to maintaining the school and take
pride in having a small facility where each child can receive individual attention.
The charter school receives ADA funding through the Charter School General Purpose
Block Grant and the Charter School Categorical Block Grant. Mineral Elementary School
is funded through the Necessary Small Schools Funding Model, in which it receives a set
amount for one teacher when maintaining an ADA of one to 24.5 students. The district
maintains a stable reserve, but is deficit spending.
To maintain state funding the district must have at least on full-time student and one full-
time teacher. The decline in enrollment is caused by broad and long-term demographic
shifts and patterns in the area. A loss of timber harvesting has reduced overall
employment, decreasing the population. Reductions of employees of the National Park
and National Forest Services and Cal-Trans have also affected enrollment as well as a
change in requirements for on-site residential living for some employees.
eScholar Academy opened in 2002 in an attempt to support the district enrollment
numbers and provide students in contiguous counties with an opportunity to receive an
education through online instruction. The charter school has succeeded in increasing the
district’s overall enrollment.
It is essential for the district to continue operating the charter school and develop
administrative arrangements between the school and the district. When one of the
administrators leaves the district for any reason, the district should reduce administrative
costs by employing only one administrator and contracting with Tehama County of
Education for administrative and fiscal technical support.
In the meantime, the charter school administrator and the district superintendent/teacher/
principal should communicate and work together to maintain fiscal and educational
program requirements. Each has strengths that benefit the district.
Mineral Elementary School District
4 ExECuTIvE SummARy
The district superintendent has extensive background and knowledge in special education
that could help the charter school identify and serve special education students. The
superintendent should be involved in all placements and in the development of individual
programs for these students.
Fiscal Crisis & Management Assistance Team
ADmINISTRATIvE STRuCTuRE 5
Findings and Recommendations
Administrative Structure
The Mineral Elementary School District administrative staff is composed of one
superintendent/principal/teacher and a director of the charter school. In addition a chief
business official works one day per week, an insufficient amount of time to provide
oversight for both the charter school and Mineral Elementary.
The district’s administrative organizational structure is appropriate as long as both
positions are filled with the present employees. There is a lack of communication between
the superintendent and the director, largely because of different interpretations of the
chain of command.
The perception of the director and the chief business official (CBO) is that they report
directly to the board, not the superintendent. This results in poor communication and
strained relationships.
The district contracts one day a week for the services of a CBO that works with two other
small districts. The workload necessary to handle charter school and district operation
requires a CBO that can work two or three days per week. If the CBO’s workdays were
increased, the district would need to clearly define the responsibilities between working
with eScholar and the district.
The charter expires June 30, 2011, and the board is considering a request to increase
the director’s salary over the next two years. The board is pleased with the director’s
performance, and the addition of the charter school has increased overall district
enrollment. As a result, the district plans to review the extension of the charter school
agreement.
The director has discussed an increase in salary with the governing board. The board
supports the increase with the stipulation that the charter school agreement is extended.
Several tasks are required of the superintendent/principal, including coordinating
numerous meetings, compiling board meeting agendas and minutes, developing policy
updates of education requirements, initialing all invoices, coordinating site councils,
developing safety plans, and monitoring insurance inspection logs. When the district
superintendent and the charter school director are consolidated into one position,
the county office should be able to provide fiscal and program oversight through a
memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the district. Administrative and fiscal
technical support from the Tehama County Office of Education would be beneficial
because of the many responsibilities involved in serving as charter school director and
district superintendent.
Mineral Elementary School District
6 ADmINISTRATIvE STRuCTuRE
Several steps can be taken to improve communication and professional working
relationships. They include the following:
• The charter school director should invite the superintendent to weekly charter
school staff meetings, and should inform the superintendent in advance of
other school functions involving teachers, students and/or the community. The
superintendent should also be provided with minutes to all staff meetings.
• The director should consider holding staff meetings on a day that allows the
superintendent to attend more frequently. The director should also be more
diligent and timely in attending to issues such as the site council, the safety plan,
fire drills, insurance inspection log sheets, and physical education testing.
• Before each board meeting, the director should provide the superintendent with
a written report on the charter school. This report should be discussed with the
superintendent before being presented to the board. The director should provide
the superintendent and board with regular updates on student academic progress.
The director and the chief business official should also provide the superintendent
with regular reports on budget expenditures. Expenditures of more than $500
should have the prior approval of the superintendent.
• The director should invite the superintendent to school site council meetings and
provide agendas and minutes. The director should also involve the superintendent
in all matters related to hiring and other personnel issues.
• The director should provide the superintendent with online access to all student
work. The superintendent should assist in evaluating student progress so that the
program can be appropriately individualized for each student.
• The director should provide the superintendent with access to Google School
to allow communication with students and teachers. Any communications to
teachers and students should first go through the director. The chain of command
should be followed and respected in both directions.
• The director should give the superintendent access to the student information
system, which will provide information such as reports of student progress,
student enrollment and average daily attendance calculations.
• The director should discuss with the superintendent any significant plans for
changing programs, policies or procedures. In implementing or changing plans, all
pertinent laws, district policies, rules and regulations are to be followed.
Fiscal Crisis & Management Assistance Team
ADmINISTRATIvE STRuCTuRE 7
• The superintendent should help arrange staff development for the charter school
in areas such as special education and all state testing programs and should assist
as necessary in organizing and directing Standardized Testing and Reporting
(STAR). The superintendent should also provide input and direction regarding
entrance and exit criteria and procedures for charter school students.
• The superintendent should schedule and lead administrative team meetings that
include the superintendent, the director, the CBO and the office managers from
the district and the eScholar Academy. These meetings should be held at least
monthly and more often if necessary. All four positions should have advance input
into the agenda items for these meetings.
• The superintendent and the CBO should meet weekly to review district income
and expenditures, budget planning, interim reports and other relevant business
matters concerning the district and the charter school. It would be beneficial for
the Tehama County Office of Education business office to provide some on-site
support, training, mentoring and advice to these business matters. The budget is
developed with limited communication between the director, the CBO and the
superintendent. No base budget development occurs.
Recommendations
The district should:
1. Consider consolidating the positions of district superintendent and charter
school director when there is an opening in either position. At that time, a half-
time teacher should be hired at Mineral Elementary School since the district
administrator position will no longer be able to teach.
2. Consider entering into an MOU with the county office for administrative support
when the administrative positions are consolidated.
3. Consider revising and renewing the charter on a rollover basis before June 30,
2009, which would extend the charter to June 30, 2014. Two years remain on the
current charter agreement. If the board extends the agreement by three years, it
would cover a total of five years.
4. Base budget development and planning on school and student programs as well as
on the money available. The budget should be jointly developed and planned by all
members of the administrative team after receiving input from teachers regarding
student needs and the budgetary support required to fulfill those needs.
5. Grant the requested salary increase to the director after the extension of the
charter to a new five-year agreement. This increase should include agreed-upon
additional increases during the five year period.
Mineral Elementary School District
8 ADmINISTRATIvE STRuCTuRE
6. Approve the salary increase of the director based on renewal of the charter before
June 30, 2009. The rollover renewal and the increase should be contingent on each
other.
7. Increase the CBO position to two or three days per week to provide more fiscal
expertise and responsibility for human resources, particularly with respect to
credentialing issues.
8. Implement the recommendations included in the section above regarding
communication between the director and the superintendent.
Fiscal Crisis & Management Assistance Team
STATE TESTING pROCEDuRES 9
State Testing procedures
The district administers STAR and the California High School Exit Examination
(CAHSEE) in accordance state requirements. The director and the teacher testing
coordinator of the eScholar Academy do not receive annual in-service training on
administering the state tests. Students complete the writing portion of the STAR test
on a computer that includes spelling and grammar correction applications. Using these
applications could invalidate test results.
Recommendations
The district should:
1. Closely monitor students completing the STAR writing test on computers to
ensure they do not use spell check or any other device that alters the measurement
and score of their writing samples.
2. Provide the director and the teacher testing coordinator with annual training on
the administration of state tests.
Mineral Elementary School District
10 STATE TESTING pROCEDuRES
Fiscal Crisis & Management Assistance Team
ChARTER SChOOL ENTRANCE AND ExIT CRITERIA 11
Charter School Entrance and Exit Criteria
The charter school’s entrance and exit criteria have recently been updated and improved.
Entrance and placement criteria are based on objective data such as test scores, interviews
with students and parents, information in student files and a completed enrollment
application that is detailed and reflects student needs. Special education qualification
is part of the entrance criteria. However, no student is denied admission to the charter
school regardless of whether he or she is identified as a special education student.
Several students have been enrolled in the charter school for as long as three consecutive
semesters without completing the minimum required assignments, yet others were
dropped after one semester of not completing these assignments. The school should
develop a more consistent process for dropping students.
Recommendations
The district should:
1. Assign the director and superintendent to develop clear, written and detailed
entrance and exit criteria and procedures and submit them to the board for
approval.
2. Include teachers in the process of developing the student academic action plan.
3. Review the entrance and exit criteria for students at charter school.
Mineral Elementary School District
12 ChARTER SChOOL ENTRANCE AND ExIT CRITERIA
Fiscal Crisis & Management Assistance Team
DEvELOpER FEES 13
Developer Fees
In August 2008, the district performed a detailed developer fee justification study. This
study primarily demonstrated the continuing need for school facilities modernization and
new construction eligibility because of new development in the community. The board
adopted a resolution establishing developer fees of 97 cents per square foot of residential
construction and 47 cents per square foot of commercial industrial construction. The
district had not previously levied developer fees. The board may levy developer fees in
accordance with Education Code Section 17620. The district has signed a memorandum
of understanding with the Red Bluff Joint Union High School District to share future fees.
Recommendations
The district should:
1. Identify facility projects that are growth related and related to Education Code
requirements.
2. Consider spending general fund money reserves on facilities projects until
adequate developer fees are available.
3. Hire a consultant to perform a cost analysis of projects, write bid specifications,
advertise and seek bids and assist in the selection of the contractor for various
projects.
4. Reimburse the general fund from developer fees once these fees are collected.
Funds for facility project expenditures can initially come from the general fund
(fund 01). Developer fees are received into the capital facilities fund (Fund
25), and transferred to the general fund for reimbursement and proper project
accounting.
Mineral Elementary School District
14 DEvELOpER FEES
Fiscal Crisis & Management Assistance Team
SpECIAL EDuCATION 15
Special Education
The eScholar Academy serves some students who have been identified as requiring
special education services. In the past year, problems with records have arisen because
there is no consistent system of identifying students who previously received special
education services.
Some students were identified with a checkmark on the school application/enrollment
form, but no follow-up occurred in the form of an IEP meeting that would review the
placement and determine the educational needs of the student.
Recommendations
The district should:
1. Thoroughly review the records of students entering the charter school to deter-
mine whether they were previously identified as qualifying for special education
services.
2. Ensure IEP meetings are provided to review the placement and determine the edu-
cational needs of students who were identified as qualifying for special education
services.
3. Ensure the superintendent and the director are present at IEP meetings with other
appropriate and required staff members.
4. Continue to ensure the director and teachers work together to identify students
already served by the charter school who qualify for special education services.
Mineral Elementary School District
16 SpECIAL EDuCATION
Fiscal Crisis & Management Assistance Team
OpERATIONS 17
Operations
Teacher contracts at the charter school require a seven-hour workday and 183 workdays
per year, 175 for student instruction and five for staff development. Teacher contracts
for Mineral require a 7½-hour work day. Since charter school teachers spend part of
their workday at home or away from the charter work site, it is impossible to determine
whether teachers routinely work a seven-hour day. The director’s perception is that
teacher workload is determined by the number of student assigned to each teacher rather
than by work hours.
Community consultants are used as needed to provide instruction in music piano, guitar,
photography, computer graphics and sewing. These consultants are paid $35 per hour for
time spent with students, and some are paid for planning time.
FCMAT verified with the California Department of Education’s Charter School Division
that charter school enrollment is included with the district that authorized the charter. As
long as the district has at least one full-time teacher and one pupil enrolled at Mineral
Elementary who generates more than zero average daily attendance, it is eligible to
receive necessary small school funding. This information was verified by the California
Department of Education School Fiscal Services Division.
Recommendations
The district should:
1. Implement an accountability system to document that charter school teachers are
working a verifiable seven-hour workday and a 180-day work year.
2. Require accountability of teacher work hours to prevent audit exceptions and meet
community expectations. It is appropriate to assign a specific number of students
to a teacher, but accountability should still be expected.
3. Discontinue the practice of paying community consultants for planning time. If
necessary, hourly rates could be increased, but consultant pay should be based
only on actual instructional time spent with students. It is not an acceptable fiscal
practice for community consultants to submit invoices that includes hours for
planning time because this time is not verifiable.
Mineral Elementary School District
18 OpERATIONS
Fiscal Crisis & Management Assistance Team
NO ChILD LEFT BEhIND 19
No Child Left Behind
All charter school teachers are credentialed, but some have multiple subject credentials
without supplementary single-subject authorization for the subjects they teach. The
superintendent, CBO, and director have worked with the county office and State
Department of Education Commission on Teacher Licensing and Preparation to develop a
plan for properly credentialing all teachers in the subjects they teach.
Recommendations
The district should:
1. Ensure all teachers are properly credentialed in the subjects they teach.
2. Put the plan to remedy the credentialing issue in writing even if it is only partially
completed.
3. Assign the superintendent and director to make periodic presentations to the board
on the progress made in bringing the charter school into compliance with NCLB
credentialing requirements.
Mineral Elementary School District
20 NO ChILD LEFT BEhIND
Fiscal Crisis & Management Assistance Team
AppENDIx 21
Appendix
A. Study Agreement
Mineral Elementary School District
22 AppENDIx
Fiscal Crisis & Management Assistance Team
AppENDIx 23
Mineral Elementary School District
24 AppENDIx
Fiscal Crisis & Management Assistance Team
AppENDIx 25
Mineral Elementary School District
26 AppENDIx
Fiscal Crisis & Management Assistance Team