LAFCO
Effect of soil PH on the transport, fractionation, and oxidation of chromium (iii)
Read the report at Local Agency Formation Commissions ↗
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 195 (2020) 110459
ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecoenv
ff
E ect of soil pH on the transport, fractionation, and oxidation of chromium
T
(III)
TengXua,FengNanb,XiaofengJianga,YulingTangb,YunhangZengb,WenhuaZhanga,b,∗ ,BiShia
aKeyLaboratoryofLeatherChemistryandEngineeringofMinistryofEducation,SichuanUniversity,Chengdu,610065,China
bNationalEngineeringLaboratoryforCleanTechnologyofLeatherManufacture,SichuanUniversity,Chengdu,610065,China
ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT
Keywords: ThisworkwasconductedtostudytheeffectofsoilpH(4.0,6.0,and8.0)onthetransport,fractionation,and
Trivalentchromium oxidationoftrivalentchromium[Cr(III)].VariationinpHalteredsoilchemicalandmineralogicalproperties
Hexavalentchromium suchaszetapotential,cationexchangecapacityandredoxpotentialofnaturalsoil.Breakthroughcurvesand
SoilpH batchsorptionexperimentscoupledwithfouriertransforminfraredspectroscopy(FTIR)andX-rayphotoelectron
FTIR
spectroscopy(XPS)analysesdemonstratedthattheeasymobilityofCr(III)inpH4.0soilwasdominatedbythe
XPS limitedcoordinationeffect.ThehighretentionofCr(III)inpH8.0soilwasmainlyascribedtothehydrolysis.
IncubationexperimentsindicatedthattheproportionsofCrinexchangeablefractiondecreasedwithincreasing
of soil pH and incubation time, and kinetics analysis revealed that the time dependent transformation was
controlledbymasstransferandchemicalprocesses(e.g.,hydrolysis,ionassociation).TheXPSconfirmedthe
oxidationofCr(III)inpH8.0soilduringtheincubationperiod.Furthermore,thecontentoftoxichexavalent
chromium[Cr(VI)]waspositivelyassociatedwithtimeandinitialconcentrationofCr(III)released.Theseresults
revealedthehazardousnessofCr(III)insoilcontaminatedsimultaneouslybyinorganicacidandalkali.
1. Introduction California(USA)hastotalCrof130–22,000mgkg−1,Cr(VI)of1<to
187 mg kg−1, and pH of 4.6–7.8 (Makdisi, 1991). These site in-
Soilcontaminationbyanthropogenicchromium(Cr)isaworldwide vestigations reveal that soil in tannery sites is contaminated simulta-
problem (Shahid et al., 2017). Several industrial activities such as neouslybyCr(III)andinorganicacidandalkali,suchassulfuricacidin
leather tanning, wood preservation and metal finishing are the main the pickling and sodium hydroxide in the soaking during leather
sourcesofCrpollution(Choppalaetal.,2018;Faridetal.,2018).Inthe manufacture(Covington,2009).Assessmentoftheenvironmentalrisk
leather industry, large amounts of Cr-containing effluents, shavings, ofCrinsoilisofutmostimportanceanddependsonthoroughunder-
and sludge are produced due to the common use of basic chromium standing ofthetransport, solid-phase fractionation, and oxidation be-
sulfate(Zhangetal.,2017).Environmentalseepagemayoccurthrough haviorofCr(III)insoilswithdifferentpHlevels.
multiple pathways, such as inadvertent dripping of Cr tanning liquor TheverticaldistributionofCr(III)insoilscanbestronglylocalized
(containing Cr 3000 mg L−1) (Zhou et al., 2012), leaking of tannery by transport limitations, and laboratory column experiments of Cr-
wastewater(upto1500mgL−1)(Religaetal.,2011),andpoorstorage containingliquidflowingthroughsoilmediaarecommonlydesignedto
or indiscriminate dumping and landfill of sludge (up to simulate Cr transport and retention (Banks et al., 2006; Zhang et al.,
40,000 mg kg−1) (Alibardi and Cossu, 2016). The released Cr would 2018b). Scholars have extensively investigated factors influencing Cr
eventuallyentersoil,andthespatialdistributionofCrandsitepHare transport and retention particularly for cases involving soil structure,
closelyrelatedtoleatherproduction.OnlyCr(III)isusedintheleather soilminerals,organicmatter,microbialexopolymeric substances,and
industry,whichisconsideredtobelesstoxicandmobilethanCr(VI).Cr flow rate (Akhtar et al., 2011; Hu et al., 2010; Jardine et al., 1999;
(III)isthemaincontaminantinthesoiloftannerysites,butCr(VI)has Kantaretal.,2011).However,informationabouttheeffectofsoilpH
alsobeendetected.Soilwithinthevicinityofthetannerywastewater onthebehaviorofCr(III)transportislacking.
dischargesiteintheSialkotofPakistanhastotalCrof21–675mgkg−1 ThegeochemicalfractionationofCriscrucialinunderstandingthe
and pH of 7.1–10.6 (Ali et al., 2015). Soil in a tannery room in mobilityandbioavailabilityofCrinsoils(Ertanietal.,2017),among
∗Correspondingauthor.TheKeyLaboratoryofLeatherChemistryandEngineeringofMinistryofEducation,SICHUANUniversity,No.24SouthSection1,Yihuan
Road,Chengdu,610065,China.
E-mailaddress:zhangwh@scu.edu.cn(W.Zhang).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110459
Received19December2019;Receivedinrevisedform25February2020;Accepted7March2020
Available online 14 March 2020
0147-6513/ © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-NC-ND/4.0/).
T.Xu,etal. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 195 (2020) 110459
whichtheexchangeableCrisconsideredtobethemosteasilymobile dryweightbasisbyovendrying(3gofsoilat105°Cfor~15h).
and bioavailable fraction using sequential extraction method (Tessier The soils used for column experiment were divided into three
etal.,1979).Acevesetal.(2007)foundtheexchangeableCrintannery groups and chemically adjusted to pH 4.0 ± 0.1, 6.0 ± 0.1, and
sludge-amendedsoildecreasedwithprolongedincubationtime.How- 8.0 ± 0.1, respectively, which represented a range of soil pHs ac-
ever,TaghipourandJalali(2015)reportedtheexchangeableCrinsoil cordingtotheactualinvestigationresultsattannerypollutionsites(Ali
with 5% leather factory waste increased from 7.4 to 201.6 mg kg−1 etal.,2015;Makdisi,1991).SoilpHwasloweredbyadditionofH SO
2 4
when incubation lasting from 15 to 90 days. Different phenomena solution(1molL−1)andelevatedbyNaOHsolution(0.5molL−1)to
suggest that the factors affecting the fractionation of Cr in soil are obtaintargetpHs.H SO andNaOHwereusedtoadjustsoilpH(Obia
2 4
complicated, and previous studies have mainly focused on applying et al., 2015) for their common use in pickling, soaking, and liming
substancestoaffectthefractionationofCr.Variousamendments,such during leather manufacture (Covington, 2009; Font et al., 1998). Soil
ascitricacid,polyasparticacid,soilorganic,andzerovalentiron,affect pHwascontinuouslyadjustedfortwoweekstoensurepHstabilityand
fractionationbymobilizationorimmobilizationofCrinsoil(Balasoiu airdriedbeforeuse.Thepre-adjustedpHsoilsamplesamendedwithCr
et al., 2001; Fu et al., 2017; Li et al., 2017; Su et al., 2016). Never- (OH)SO ,whichwaswidelyusedintannery(Pandaetal.,2016),were
4
theless, limited studies have focused on the effect of soil pH on the usedforincubationexperimentandmaintainedattargetpHvaluesby
fractionationofCr. periodicallyadditionofH SO orNaOHsolution.
2 4
Theconversion ofCr(III)intoCr(VI)isundesirable andhazardous
from an environmental perspective because Cr(VI) is a known carci-
2.2. Designoftheexperiments
nogen(HausladenandFendorf,2017).TheoxidationofCr(III)toCr(VI)
was highly concerned and extensively studied in solution system.
2.2.1. Columntransportandbatchsorptionexperiments
However,thebehaviorofmetalinhomogenoussystemisverydifferent
Transport of Cr(III) solutions was examined with a plexiglass
fromthatinheterogenoussystemespeciallyinmediaofsoil.Theeffects
column (12 cm long, 1.6-cm i. d.) packed with pH-preadjusted soil
ofpHonthefateofCr(III)insoilwasmainlycenteredontheoxidation
samples without addition of Cr(III). 23.2 g air-dried soil sample was
according to existing literature, and studied by using soil/water sus-
packedinthecolumnwithapproximately8cmheight.Thecolumnwas
pensiontosimulatethebehaviorofCrinsoil.Forexample,Bartlettand
fittedwithquartzsand(2-cmthicklayer)andnylonsieve(50-μmpore
James (1979) devised a suspension system containing 1:2000 of su-
size)atthebottomandtoptoreducesoildeformationandsoilcolloid
persoil-to-solutionofCrCl tostudytheeffectsofpHonCr(III)oxida-
3 releasecausedbysolutioninfiltration.Thecolumnwaspreconditioned
tionbyadjustingliquidphasepHfrom3.0to10.0.Theyfoundlower by pumping 5 mmol L−1 NaCl solution in the upward direction. The
pH facilitated the formation of Cr(VI), and at pH 3.2 all Cr(III) was flow rate was set as 1 mL min−1and controlled by a calibrated peri-
oxidized to Cr(VI). Reijonen and Hartikainen (2016) used soils in-
stalticpump(siliconetubing).Atotalofatleast50porevolumeswere
cubatedatpH4.4,5.5and6.2tostudytheoxidationofCrCl solution
3 elutedduringconditioning.Theequilibrationperiodensuredthatwater
insuspensionsystemwithsoil/solutionratioof1:10,andnoCr(VI)was
flowandionicstrengthinthesoilcolumnremainedstableduringthe
foundinsoilwithoutadditionofMnO .Obviously,thesestudieswere
2 experiments. After soil colloid stabilization, the feed solution was re-
verydifferentfromtherealenvironmentwhichwasconductedinsemi-
placed with 3000 mg L−1 (57.69 mmol L−1) Cr(III) [as Cr(OH)SO ].
aridsoil.Hence,theeffectofpHontheoxidationofCr(III)insemi-arid 4
TheconcentrationwasselectedconsideringthetypicalCrcontentinCr
soilrequiressystematicstudy.
tanning liquor (Zhou et al., 2012) and was higher than the limit of
Inthisstudy,weinvestigatedthesoilpH-dependentmechanismsof 1.5 mg L−1 defined by the Chinese Environmental Protection Agency
thetransport,fractionation,andoxidationofCr(III)torevealtheriskof
(GB 30486–2013). Following injection, column effluent was collected
the release of Cr(III) from tannery sites. Experiments on soil column
at intervals of 3 min by using an automatic collector to analyze Cr
were carriedout to obtain theretention characteristics ofCr(III), and content. Br− (0.75 mmol L−1) of NaBr was injected as a tracer to
the results were quantified and compared using sorption isotherms.
confirmthecloselyidenticalhydrodynamicpropertiesofeachpacked
Incubation experiments were performed to determine the behavior
soilcolumn(Caldereretal.,2014).Theporevolumewasestimatedto
underlying the transformation of Cr into various fractions and the
beapproximately0.3mLbyusingthemethodsofKantaretal.(2011).
oxidation of Cr(III) into Cr(VI) in semi-arid soils. The kinetics of
The diagram of the soil column experimental device is shown in
transformation and oxidation of Cr(III) were also investigated in soil
SupplementaryFig.S1,andtheparametersofthesoilcolumnarelisted
withthreepHlevels.
inTableS1.
Two different sets of sorption experiments were conducted to un-
2. Materialsandmethods
derstandthemechanismsofCr(III)retentioninsoilcolumns.Thefirst
set of experiments aimed at understanding the general sorption equi-
2.1. Materials
libriumandtheeffectofsoilpHonsorptioncapacity.Inthesecondset
of experiments, the contact time of the Cr-soil suspension was varied
2.1.1. Chemicals
from 1 min to 24 h to test the sorption kinetics of Cr(III) in soils of
All chemicals including magnesium chloride (MgCl ), sodium
2 different pH levels. The experimental procedures are detailed in sup-
acetate (NaOAc), hydroxylamine hydrochloride (NH OH·HCl), acetic
2 plementarydatasection2.
acid (HOAc), nitric acid (HNO ), ammonium acetate (NH OAc), sul-
3 4
furicacid(H SO ),sodiumhydroxide(NaOH),basicchromiumsulfate
2 4
[Cr(OH)SO ], sodium chloride (NaCl), sodium bromide (NaBr), and 2.2.2. Incubation
4
diphenylcarbazidewereanalyticalreagentgrade,andpurchasedfrom Incubation experiment was used to study the fractionation and
Aladdin(Shanghai,China).Milli-Qwaterwasusedforthepreparation oxidation of Cr in soil at three pH levels. Cr(III) was added to soil at
ofsamplesandstandardsolutions. 600 mg kg−1. The dose was selected as a criterion near the value of
typicalCrcontentintannerysite(Alietal.,2015)andwashigherthan
2.1.2. Soil the limit of 350 mg kg−1 defined by the Chinese Environmental Pro-
Thetestsoilusedintheexperimentwascollectedfromthetopsoil tectionAgency(GB15618–2018).Theincubationsoilsamplesretained
(0–20 cm) of bare arable land in eastern China (37°22′N 118°02′E), watercontentequivalentto15%ofthesoilweightbyperiodicaddition
homogenized, air dried, crushed, and sieved (stainless steel sieve, Ø ofdistilledwater.Thesoilsampleswereincubatedforupto150daysat
2 mm). Sieved soil was stored at 4 °C until use as natural soil. The 303KandthesoilswerecollectedfordeterminationoftotalCrcontent
resultsofthecontentofeachsubstanceinthesoilwereexpressedona ineachfractionandCr(VI)contentatcertaintimeintervals.
2
T.Xu,etal. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 195 (2020) 110459
2.3. Analyticalmethods 2.4.2. Mobilityindex(MI)
The mobility of Cr could be associated with the amount of ex-
Soil properties including soil texture, soil pH, cation exchange ca- changeable Crinthesoil, whichcouldbecalculated according tothe
pacity (CEC), organic matter (OM), redox potential (Eh), Cr(VI), and equationasfollowing(TaghipourandJalali,2015):
soil digestion were analyzed using Chinese standard methods. The
standardmethodnumbersarelistedinSupplementaryTableS2.Cr(VI) MI=∑
n CeiTi
wasextractedfromthesoilsamplesbyusingthemethodofBartlettand i=1 n (2)
James(1979),asdescribedindetailinsupplementarydata(section4). whereC istheCrconcentrationinexchangeablefraction(mgkg−1),T
The extracts were then analyzed by spectrophotometric colorimetric istheto e talconcentrationoftheCr(mgkg−1),andnisthenumberof
method.
thesoilsamples.
Metal elemental analyses were performed by inductively coupled
plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES, OPTIMA 8000DV,
PerkinElmer,USA),λ =267.7/283.5nm,λ =238.2/259.9nmand 2.4.3. Kineticmodels
Cr Fe
λ =257.6/259.3nm.Totalcarbon,inorganiccarbon(IC)andtotal
Mn (1) Diffusionkineticsmodel
nitrogen(TN)insoilsweredeterminedbyusingacarbonandnitrogen
analyzer (Primacs100, Skalar, Netherlands). Zeta potential of the soil
InordertoanalyzethetransformationprocessofexchangeableCr,
samples was measured by an autotitrator and zeta potential analyzer
diffusionkineticsmodelwasappliedtofitthetransformationkinetics
(NanoBrook Omni, Brookhaven, USA). The concentration of tracer
bromide ion (Br−) in the column effluent was determined by ion data.ThedecreasesofCrinexchangeableformscouldbesimulatedina
linearrelationshipwithtimeasthefollowingequation(Luetal.,2005):
chromatography (ICS-600, Thermo Fisher, USA) with IonPac CS12A
column(4×250mm)and30mmolL−1KOHasthemobilephaseata
lnC =A+Bt (3)
e
flow rate of 1 mL min−1. The main mineral of the natural soil was
determined by X-ray diffractometer (XRD, DX-2000, Aolong, China).
wheretisthecontacttime(day),AandBaretheconstantofdiffusion
equation.
TheXRDpatternsofnaturalsoilandmineralcomponentsinnaturalsoil
areshowninsupplementarydata(Fig.S2andTableS3).Theproperties
(2) Reactionkinetics-basedmodels
ofsoilsamplebeforeandafterpHadjustmentarelistedinTable1.
The sequential extraction method (supplementary data, Table S4)
Thepseudosecond-orderkineticmodelwasusedtofitthesorption
wasusedtoclassifyandquantifyindividualCrfraction(Tessieretal.,
data. The pseudo second-order kinetics model is given as (Sun et al.,
1979). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, IS10, Thermo
Fisher Scientific, USA) was used to characterize functional group 2011):
changesinthesoilsamplesafterpHadjustmentandCr(III)treatment. t 1 t
= +
Surface elemental analysis of natural and Cr(III)-amended soils was q t k 2 q e 2 q e (4)
conducted by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, XSAM800,
Kratos,UK).ThesoilwithaninitialCr(III)contentof5000mgkg−1and where q
e
and q
t
are the sorption capacity (mmol kg−1) of Cr(III) at
after 90 days of incubation was used for XPS analyses because XPS equilibriumandattimet(h),respectively,andk 2 [kg(mmolh)−1]is
spectra cannot display characteristic peaks if Cr content was low thepseudosecond-orderrateconstant.
(Boursiquotetal.,2002).
TheElovich,first-orderandsecond-orderkineticmodelshavebeen
widely usedto describe thekineticsofsoil chemicalprocesses, inthe
presentexperiment,thesemodelswereappliedtofitthetransformation
2.4. Dataanalysis of exchangeable Cr (Sparks, 2003). These equations can be expressed
as:
2.4.1. Retardationfactor Elovichmodel:
Theretardationfactor(R)ofthreesoiltypeswasdeterminedfrom 1 1
the breakthrough curves according to the following equation (Godoy q t = β lnαβ+ β lnt (5)
etal.,2019):
Firstordermodel:
PV
R= i kt
PV (1) logq =logq − 1
t 0 2.303 (6)
where PV i is the corresponding pore volume number when outflow Secondordermodel:
concentration (C) of Cr(III) reaches half of the initial concentration
1 1
( w C h 0 e ), n i. t e h . e ,C tr / a C c 0 e = rb 0 ro .5 m , i a d n e d i P o V n i o s u t t h fl e o c w or c r o e n sp ce o n n t d r i a n t g io p n o C re /C vo 0 l = um 0 e .5 n . umber q t = q 0 +k 2 t (7)
Table1
PropertiesofsoilsamplebeforeandafterpHadjustment.
pH(H2O) Eha CECa OMa ICa OCa TNa Cr Fe Mn Soiltexture
mV cmol+kg−1 gkg−1 %
8.64(natural) 476 6.79 7.96 10.26 3.22 1.21 0.041 23.11 0.42 C6.20I29.73A64.07 b
8.0 ± 0.1 491 6.71 7.83 9.32 3.09 0.46 0.047 24.09 0.41 C6.05I28.45A65.50
6.0 ± 0.1 540 5.97 7.37 1.94 2.85 0.55 0.038 24.92 0.45 C10.48I27.71A61.81
4.0 ± 0.1 557 5.36 7.72 0.19 2.89 0.76 0.045 22.15 0.41 C4.26I23.67A72.07
a Eh,redoxpotential;CEC,cationexchangecapacity;OM,organicmatter;IC,inorganiccarbon;OC,inorganiccarbon;TN,totalnitrogen.
b Numericalsubscriptsrefertoweightpercentageofeachtextureinnaturalsoil.C,clay;I,silt;A,sand.Accordingtointernationalsoiltextureclassification,the
soilusedinthisexperimentissandyloam.Allsoilpropertiesweremeasuredaftertwoweeksofincubation.
3
T.Xu,etal. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 195 (2020) 110459
Fig.1.BreakthroughcurvesofCr(III)invariouspHsoilscolumn:(A)soilpH4.0;(B)soilpH6.0;(C)soilpH8.0.(D)Cr(III)sorptiononsoilsampleasafunctionof
pH.(E)KineticsofCr(III)sorptiononsoilswiththreepHlevels.Pointsrepresenttheexperimentaldata.Continuouslinesrepresentthefittingdata.
whereq andq (mgkg−1)aretheamountsofCrintheexchangeable that is difficult to leach from soil, which was determined to be 5.36,
t 0
fraction per unit mass of soil at time t (day) and initial time, respec- 5.97, and 6.71 cmol+/kg for soils with pH 4.0, 6.0, and 8.0, respec-
tively;αandβareconstantsduringtheexperiment;k (day−1)isthe tively.ThehigherCECvalueofsoilshowedstrongerretentionforso-
1
constantinthefirst-ordermodel;andk (kgmg−1day−1)isthecon- luble cationic Cr(III) in soil columns. Meanwhile the point of zero
2
stantinsecond-ordermodel.Thefirst-orderkineticmodelwasalsoused chargeofthesoilsurfacewasdeterminedas2.48(SupplementaryFig.
to describe the oxidation kinetics of Cr(III). Then the q and q (mg S3), indicating the soil surface charged negatively at the threepH le-
t 0
kg−1)aretheamountofCr(III)perunitmassofsoilattimet(day)and vels.TheelectrostaticattractionofsoilwithcationicCr(III)speciesalso
initial time, respectively, k (day−1) is the apparent reaction rate resultedintheretentionofCr(III)insoilcolumns.Intheory,themain
1
constant.Cr(III)contentwasdeterminedbysubtractingCr(VI)fromthe species of soluble inorganic Cr(III) varied from mononuclear Cr ions,
totalCrcontent. such as free Cr3+,CrOH2+, and CrSO +, to polynuclear Cr ions with
4
more positive charges (e.g., Cr (OH) 4+ and Cr (OH) 5+), and the
2 2 3 4
precipitationCr(OH) becameeventuallydominantaccordingtoVisual
3
3. Resultsanddiscussion MINTEQver.3.0(Lövetal.,2017)withincreasingpH(Supplementary
Fig.S4andTableS5).Theelectrostaticattractionandcationexchange
3.1. TransportofCr(III)insoilsatthreepHlevels of soil with soluble cationic Cr(III) species contributed part of the re-
tention of Cr(III) in soil columns with increasing pH. Indeed, pre-
Fig.1A–CshowsthebreakthroughcurvesoftracerBr−asNaBrand
cipitation would occur at pH 4.4 with the initial Cr(III) of
Cr(III) as Cr(OH)SO 4 in the soil columns at pH 4.0, 6.0 and 8.0, re- 57.69 mmol L−1 in soil column experiments based on the solubility
spectively. The breakthrough curves of Br− were similar in the three productconstantofCr(OH) (k =6.3×10−31)(Dean,1999).Thena
3 sp
soiltypes.However,themigrationofCr(III)wasweakenedcompared large amount of Cr(III) would be retained as immobile precipitate in
withBr−anddelayedwithincreasingsoilpH.Approximately3.01PV
soil with pH 6.0 and 8.0 because of the ion product beyond k , re-
sp
wasnecessarytoreachC/C 0 =0.5forpH4.0soil,4.85PVforpH6.0 sultingindelayofbreakthroughcurves.Thecharacteristicsofsoilsat
soil,and54.21PVforpH8.0soil,indicatingsignificantCr(III)retention thethreepHlevelsandtheprecipitationprocesswouldconstitutethe
inthecolumnwithpH8.0soil. mechanismoftransport,whichcouldbefurtherelucidatedbysorption
According to Eq. (1), the retardation factors (R) were 1.18, 1.90, processofCr(III)insoilwithvariouspHlevels.
and21.26,forsoilswithpHof4.0,6.0,and8.0,respectively.Ahigh
value of R suggested low transport, indicating that Cr(III) was more
mobileinacidicsoilthaninalkalinesoil,consistentwiththeprevious 3.2. SorptionofCr(III)insoilsatthreepHlevels
survey (Makdisi, 1991). The breakthrough curves also indicated that
thepollutionrangeshouldeasilyexpandwhenCr(III)solutionentered SorptionexperimentscanintuitivelyexplainthemigrationofCr(III)
acidicsoil,whereaslargeamountsofCr(III)wereretainedinalkaline in soil columns with different pH levels. Sorption capacity of Cr(III)
soil. This result may be ascribed to the difference in pH-dependent showedapositivecorrelationwithsoilpH(Fig.1D).Thecapacitywas
surfacecharacteristicsofsoils(e.g.,cationicexchangecapacityandzeta characterized by a sorption edge (Sparks, 2003), which significantly
potential)andtheprecipitationofCr(III)asCr(OH) athighpH. increasedfrom3.6mmolkg−1toapproximate46.6mmolkg−1within
3
ThesoilCECvaluesignifiedthecapacitytoretaincationinaform anarrowpHrange(about2units).ThesorptionstartedataroundpH
4
T.Xu,etal. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 195 (2020) 110459
4.0(Fig.1D).Intheory,precipitationwouldoccuratpH4.8forinitial Exchangeable fraction was considered to be the most mobile and
Cr(III) concentration of 1.92 mmol L−1 in the batch sorption experi- bioavailableportionandthemostimportantformofCrthatcouldcause
ments,suggestingthatsorptionwasmainlytriggeredbytheadsorption environmental risks(Ertanietal.,2017).Thehigh MIvalues ofCrin
(chemical complexation) (Flogeac et al., 2005) (confirmed further by soilsindicatedhighenvironmentalrisk.Atthebeginningofincubation,
FTIR results, section3.5), electrostatic attraction, cation exchangera- theMIvalueswere0.66forpH4.0soil,0.10forpH6.0soil,and0.024
therthanhydrolysisatpH4.0.AsmallamountofCr(III)wasfixedin forpH8.0soil(Fig.2C).MIvaluesgenerallydecreasedovertimeinthe
acidicsoilsduetothelimitedquantityoffunctionalgroupsonthesoil threesoiltypes.Attheendoftheincubation(150days),theMIvalues
surfacetocoordinate,lowcationexchangecapacityandweakelectro- werereducedto0.025(pH4.0),0.0035(pH6.0),and0.0029(pH8.0),
staticattraction.WithincreasingsoilpH,thesorptionofCr(III)onsoil respectively.Moreover,thevalueofMIwasgenerallyintheorderofpH
mainlyinvolvedhydrolysis,whichplayakeyroleinthesharpincrease 4.0 > pH 6.0 > pH 8.0 soil during the entire incubation period,
in the sorption edge. Hydrolysis equilibrium would shift toward Cr consistent with the order of the retardation factor. Hence, soil acid-
(OH) ,leadingtomoreCr(III)wasprecipitatedonthesoilwithhighpH ificationwouldspreadthepollutionrangeandenhancebioavailability
3
values. The batch sorption experiments illustrated that alkaline soils ofCr(III),therebyposinghighriskstotheenvironment,particularlyat
hadhigher affinityforCr(III) thanacidicsoil, therebyconfirmingthe theearlystageofCr(III)pollution.
highretentionofCr(III)inalkalinesoilcolumn. InordertofurtherstudythetransformationofEXCrwithincuba-
Fig.1EshowsthesorptionkineticsofCr(III)onsoilsatthethreepH tiontime.TransformationkineticsofCrinexchangeable fractioninto
levels.ThesorptionofCr(III)bypH8.0soilalmostreachedequilibrium otherstableformswerefittedtothelinearizeddiffusion-basedkinetic
within5min,whereasbysoilwithpH4.0whichneededmorethan4h. model and reaction kinetics-based empirical models such as first-or-
On account of the slow formation of complex, the findings further deredequation,second-orderedequation,andElovichmodeltoexplore
speculatedthatadsorption(chemicalcomplexation)shouldbethemain the time-dependent process. The calculated parameters are given in
transportmechanismofCr(III)atpH4.0(Gustafssonetal.,2014;Zhou Table2.Thevaluesofcorrelationcoefficient(R2)forthediffusionki-
et al., 2019). With increasing soil pH, the quick sorption equilibrium neticmodelwerehigh(>0.9342),indicatingthatthereductionofEX
involved the fast formation of precipitate, because when the ion pro- Crwaspartlyattributedtothediffusiveprocessthroughthemacropores
ductfarexceededK ,thesupersaturatedsolutionisextremelyunstable and micropores of the soil. The absolute values of the transformation
sp
andhastoprecipitatetolowertheconcentrations(Bradyetal.,1990). rateconstantBwereintheorderofpH6.0soil > pH4.0soil > pH
ThehydrolysisofCr(III)couldbethemainfactorforthefastsorption 8.0soil,indicatingeasierdiffusionofEXCrinacidsoilsthaninalkaline
onalkalinesoilandthusledtothetransportofCr(III)waslimitedinthe soils.
alkaline soil column due to the dominant deposition of Cr(OH) pre- Thereactionkinetics-basedempiricalmodelsalsowelldescribedthe
3
cipitate on the soil. The sorption kinetics can be well fitted by the ratedatabasedoncorrelationcoefficients.ThevaluesofR2indicated
pseudo second-order kinetic equation, and the fitting parameters are thattheElovichequationwasthebestfitforpH4.0soil(0.9973),the
listedinTableS6(supplementarydata). first-orderedequationforpH6.0soil(0.9645),andthesecond-ordered
equationforpH8.0soil(0.9967).Thesuitabilityofaparticularkinetic
3.3. TransformationofCrfractioninCr(III)-amendedsoilsatthreevarious model to each pH was due to the fact that the study was conducted
pH before the transformation equilibrium. The difference inthe mostap-
propriate model for soils at the three pH levels indicated various re-
Soilsamendedby600mgkg−1Cr(III)wereincubatedfrom1dayto action-controlled steps during the transformation of exchangeable Cr.
150daysatthethreepHlevels.TheeffectsofsoilpHandincubation The good fit of the diffusion and reaction models indicated that ex-
time on the percentage of Cr fraction are shown in Fig. 2A, and the changeableCrmasstransferandchemicaltransformationoccurredsi-
contentsofCrineachfractionarelistedinSupplementaryTableS7.In multaneouslyandtheseweredifficulttoseparate.
natural soils with threepH levels (Fig. 2B), Cr was associated mainly
withresidual(RS)fraction(>68.4%)andverylowexchangeable(EX) 3.4. OxidationofCrinCr(III)-amendedsoils
fraction(<1.8%)inthefollowingorder:RS > OX(fractionboundto
Fe–Mnoxides)>OM(fractionboundtoorganicmatter)>CB(fraction
The oxidation of Cr(III) in soil would result in hazardous Cr(VI),
bound to carbonates)>EX. However, the release of Cr significantly which is considered more mobile and toxic than the former. Cr(VI)
changedthefractionationofCrinthethreesoiltypes,andsoilpHhad contentwasmeasuredfrom1dayto90daystostudyCr(III)oxidation
considerableinfluenceonthefractiondistributionattheearlystageof
in the soils at the three pH levels. Cr(VI) was undetectable in all soil
incubation.Forexample,theproportionofEXCrwas66.1%forpH4.0 samples after 1 day of incubation, however significantly increased in
soil,10.1%forpH6.0soil,and2.4%forpH8.0soiljustafteraddition pH8.0soilwithprolongedincubationtime.Meanwhile,noCr(VI)was
ofCr(III)(control).Withtheextensionofincubationtime,thepercen- detected in soils with pH 4.0 and 6.0 soil during the experimental
tage ofEX and CB Cr fractions decreased significantly over time, and period.After90daysofapplication(Fig.3A),theconcentrationofCr
theOXfractionincreasedevidently.Meanwhile,RSandOMfractions (VI)inpH8.0soilincreasedto5.74mgkg−1,whichwashigherthan
varied slightly during the 150-day incubation in the three soil types. thelimitationofChineseSoilEnvironmentalQuality(<3.0mgkg−1,
Afterincubationfor150days,OXCrbecamethepredominantfraction GB36600–2018)inspiteoftheoxidationratioofCr(III)onlyaslowas
inallCr(III)-amendedsoilsandreachedashighas75.4%inpH4.0soil, 0.96%. Therefore, the release of Cr(III) into alkaline soil would pose
78.8%inpH6.0soil,and81.1%inpH8.0soil.ThepercentageofEXCr environmentalriskswithprolongedincubationtime.
reducedto2.5%,0.35%,and0.29%insoilswithpH4.0,6.0,and8.0, The behavior of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) in environment is closely de-
respectively.Thesefindingscouldbeattributedtothetransformationof
pendedonpHandEhofthesoil.Fig.3BdisplaystheEhmeasurements
Crfromlooselyboundfractionstostronglyboundfractionsduringin- insoilsatthethreepHlevelsamendedwithCr(III).AsshowninFig.3B,
cubationandconsistentwiththepracticalsurveyofthecontaminated theEhvaluesofsoilswithpH4.0,6.0,and8.0weretypicallywithinthe
site(Castilloetal.,2012).Therefore,transformationofCrfractionwas rangesof540–556mV,529–539mVand480–491mV,respectively.A
spontaneous and proceeded once Cr(III) was released into soil. In ad- significant shift to high potentials occurred with decreasing soil pH.
dition, no significant increase in RS Cr fraction indicated that the Theseresultswerelikelytobeexplainedbytheequationproposedby
amendedCrwasunlikelytoenterthecrystallinelatticeduringthein- Patricketal.(Sparks,2003):
cubationperiod.
ThemobilityofCrinsoilscanbeevaluatedbythemobilityindex Eh=E0− 59 log (Red) −59 m pH
(MI),whichcanbecalculatedfromtheexchangeablefraction(Eq.(2)). n (Ox) n (8)
5
T.Xu,etal. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 195 (2020) 110459
Fig.2.(A)EffectofincubationtimeontheCrfractionation(%)inthreesoiltypesafteradditionofCr(III).ThecontentofCrinsoilswas600mgkg−1.(B)The
fractionationofCrinnaturalsoilswithdifferentpHlevels(withoutadditionofCr(III)).ThecontentofCrinnaturalsoilwas41mgkg−1.(C)MobilityindexofCrin
variouspHsoilswithadditionofCr(III)asinfluencedbyincubationtime.
Table2
Parametersofdiffusionmodelandreactionkinetics-basedmodel.
Diffusionequation Elovichequation First-orderequation Second-orderequation
SoilpH A B R2 α×10−2 β R2 k1 R2 k2×10−4 R2
pH4.0 5.58 −0.021 0.9427 −40.13 −0.015 0.9973 0.021 0.9427 4.5 0.9252
pH6.0 3.91 −0.023 0.9645 −3.81 −0.10 0.8000 0.023 0.9645 30.7 0.9245
pH8.0 2.34 −0.014 0.9254 −0.46 −0.50 0.9384 0.014 0.9254 34.7 0.9967
whereEh(mV)istheelectrodepotential,E0(mV)isthestandardpo- wasdependentontheinitialconcentrationofCr(III)releasedintosoils
tential,nisthenumberofelectronsexchangedinthereaction,misthe according to the kinetic analysis. These findings may help to under-
numberofprotonsexchanged,andparenthesesincludetheactivitiesof stand the serious environmental risks associated with alkaline soils
theoxidizedandreducedspecies.Qualitativelyanalysisindicatedthat contaminatedbyCr(III)foralongtimeduetothecontinuousconver-
Eh increased with decreasing pH. However, Eh did not vary linearly sionofCr(III)intohazardousCr(VI).
withpH.Thus,m/nintheaboveequationwasnotconstantinthesoil.
Thisinconsistencycouldbeascribedtocomplexsoilcomponents,such
as silicates and oxides. In accordance with the Eh-pH diagram (Kaur 3.5. SpectralcharacterizationofsoilsamendedwithCr(III)atthreepH
andCrimi,2014),Cr(VI)/Cr(III)couplefavoursCr(VI)stabilizationin levels
soilwith pH8.0.Incontrast, Cr(VI)/Cr(III) couplefavoursCr(III) sta-
bilizationinsoilswithpH6.0and4.0. SoilwithpreadjustedpH(pH4.0,6.0,and8.0)wereamendedwith
Thefirst-orderequationwasusedtofitCr(III)oxidationdatainpH Cr(III)(600mgkg−1)andincubatedfor90daysat303KbeforeFTIR
8.0soil(Fig.3C).ThehighcorrelationcoefficientR2(0.9891)indicated analysis.Fig.4(A-C)displaysthecomparisonoftheFTIRspectraofsoils
thattheoxidationprocesswasofthefirstorder,andtheapparentrate beforeandafteramendmentwithCr(III).BeforetheapplicationofCr
constantwas1.04×10−4day−1.ThetimerequiredforhalfofCr(III) (III),abroadintensebandappearednear3437cm−1,whichcouldbea
tobeconvertedintoCr(VI)was6357daysbasedonthehalf-time(t ) characteristic of hydroxy (Ramrakhiani et al., 2011). The bands then
1/2
of(ln2)/k forthereaction.OxidationofCr(III)totoxicCr(VI)byMnO shiftedto3415cm−1aftertheacidificationofsoilduetotheformation
1 2
has been identified as probably the important oxidation pathway in of new H-bonded hydroxyl groups. The band around 1430 cm−1 re-
soils(HausladenandFendorf,2017).InpH8.0soil,theactiveoxidizing presentedcarbonateinthespectraofpH8.0soil(Ghorbel-Abidetal.,
sites on MnO may be partly covered by the precipitation Cr(OH) 2009).Meanwhile,thepeakdisappearedforpH4.0and6.0soilsdueto
2 3
whichlimitedtheoxidationprocessandledtothelowoxidationratio thedecompositionofcarbonate,resultinginthelowerproportionofCB
ofCr(III)(MilacicandStupar,1995).However,thequantityofCr(VI) Cr in acid soil than in alkaline soil (Fig. 2A). The decomposition of
carbonate was also related to the decrease of the content of soil
6
T.Xu,etal. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 195 (2020) 110459
Fig.3.(A)KineticofformationofCr(VI)inthreetypesofsoil,(B)redoxpo-
tentialinsoilswithCr(III)treatmentasafunctionofincubationtimeatthree
pHlevels,(C)first-orderkineticmodelfittingofCr(III)oxidationkineticsdata
inpH8.0soil.Errorbarsrepresentedtheresultsofthreemeasurements.The
initialconcentrationofCr(III)inthesoilwas600mgkg−1andwithoutCr(VI).
inorganiccarbon(Table1).Thepeaksaround1032cm−1inthethree
spectrarepresentedthestretchingvibrationofSi–OandC–O(Lietal.,
2011; Zhang et al., 2018a). The bands for soils with pH 4.0 and 6.0
appearedanewpeakandcenteredat1140cm−1and1141cm−1,re-
Fig.4.FT-IRspectraof(A)pH8.0soilbeforeandafterCr(III)treatment,(B)pH
spectively,possiblybecausethequartzwasreallyhadtobebrokenand
6.0soilbeforeandafterCr(III)treatment,(C)pH4.0soilbeforeandafterCr(III)
some phyllosilicates were changed due to the soil acidification. The treatment.TheinitialcontentofCr(III)inthesoilwere600mgkg−1andthe
resultsshowedthatsoilpHresultedinvariationsinsoilcompositions incubationtimewere90days.
7
T.Xu,etal. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 195 (2020) 110459
Fig.5.TheCr2pXPSspectraofsoilswithorwithoutadditionofCr(III)at(A)pH4.0,(B)pH6.0,and(C)pH8.0.TheO1sXPSspectraofsoilswithorwithout
additionofCr(III)at(D)pH4.0,(E)pH6.0,and(F)pH8.0.TheinitialcontentofCr(III)insoilswere5000mgkg−1andtheincubationtimewere90days.
and mineralogical properties, thereby altering soil surface properties, fractionation and retention. In addition, the peak intensity at
suchasCECandcharge. 1140 cm−1 or 1032 cm−1 representing the stretching bands of Si–O
After the application of Cr(III), the bands at 3415 cm−1 split into increasedobviouslyaftertheamendmentofCr(III),justasthefinding
twopeaksaround3544cm−1and3406cm−1forsoilswithpH4.0and ofFathimaetal.(2012).ThismaybeascribedtotheinitialCr(III)so-
6.0,indicatingtheinteractionofCr(III)withthehydroxylofsoils,such lutionwithlowpH(about4.0)resultinginphyllosilicateschanged.
as silanol or carboxyl. In the meantime, a new peak appeared at SoilswithpreadjustedpHwereamendedwith5000mgkg−1Cr(III)
1681cm−1forpH4.0soiland1684cm−1forpH6.0soilrespectively, and incubated for 90 days prior to XPS analyses. The wide-scan XPS
signifyingthechelationofcarboxylwithCr(III)(Fathimaetal.,2012), spectraofsoilsbeforeandafteramendedwithCr(III)atthreepHlevels
whichisverydifferentfromthatofsoilwithpH8.0.Whereasthein- were displayed in supplementary date (Fig. S5). Fig. 5A–C shows the
tensityofpeaksat774to776cm−1slightlyincreasedinallsoilsdueto comparisonofCr2pXPSspectraofsoilswithorwithoutadditionofCr
Cr–O vibration (Mishra et al., 2012), indicating the binding of the (III)atthreepHlevels.BeforeaddingCr(III)tothesoil,therewereno
functional groups in soils with Cr(III). The different combinations of obviousCrpeakinthespectrumduetothelowCrcontentinthenatural
anthropogenicCr(III)withfunctionalgroupsinsoilsmayaffectCr(III) soil. The Cr 2p peaks clearly appeared in the spectrum of soils after
8
T.Xu,etal. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 195 (2020) 110459
addition of Cr(III). The 2p lines were located at 577.3, 576.9 and environmentalrisksofCr(III)inalkalinesoilwererelatedtotheinitial
3/2
576.6 eV for soils with pH of 4.0–8.0, respectively. These lines were concentration of Cr(III) released and increased with incubation time.
characteristicofCr(III),andthebindingenergydecreasedwithsoilpH. Thisworkprovidesabasisforunderstandingtheenvironmentalimpact
Accordingtoliterature(Jungetal.,2007),theCr2p bindingenergies ofanthropogenicCr(III)affectedbysoilpH.
3/2
ofchromichydroxideswerewithin576.5–576.9eV.Then2p peaks
3/2
indicatedchromichydroxidesasdominantspeciesinpH8.0soilrather CRediTauthorshipcontributionstatement
thaninpH4.0soil,verifyingtheprecipitateretentionmechanismofCr
(III)inalkalinesoilsuggestedinbatchsorptionexperiments.Further- TengXu:Conceptualization,Methodology,Writing-originaldraft.
more,thebindingenergyofthe2p signalwascenteredat579.4eV FengNan:Investigation,Resources.XiaofengJiang:Formalanalysis.
3/2
for pH 8.0 soil, which was characteristic of Cr(VI) (Boursiquot et al., Yuling Tang: Software. Yunhang Zeng: Writing - review & editing.
2002). This was consistent with the presence of Cr(VI) in incubation Wenhua Zhang: Writing - review & editing, Supervision. Bi Shi:
experiments(section3.4).Noevidentshoulderwasfoundnear579eV Supervision.
for soils with pH 4.0 and 6.0. Accordingly, the use of a component
attributable to Cr(VI) did not achieve a satisfactory fit. The con- Declarationofcompetinginterests
centration-enhancedincubationsamplesfurtherconfirmedthatCr(III)
inalkalinesoilswasconvertedintoCr(VI)incontrasttothatinacidic Theauthors declarethattheyhavenoknown competingfinancial
soils.Thisresultwasconsistentwiththeoxidationkineticsexperiment. interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influ-
Fig.5D–FdisplaystheO1sspectraofsoilswithvariouspHlevels encetheworkreportedinthispaper.
before and after amended with Cr(III). The O 1s spectra could be re-
solved into four peaks. Before adding Cr(III) to soils, the binding en- Acknowledgement
ergiesofthesignalswerelocatedat530.7,531.3,531.8,and532.4eV
inpH8.0soil,representingmetal-oxide,metal-hydroxide(e.g.,Fe–OH), This work was funded by the National Key Research and
C–O,andO–Hbonds,respectively(Lyuetal.,2018).Asillustratedin DevelopmentProgramofChina(No.2018YFC1802201).
Fig.5D–F,anobviousincreaseoftherelativepeakareaassociatedwith
metal-OHbondscouldbefoundinsoilswithpH8.0(about3.68%)after AppendixA. Supplementarydata
the addition of Cr(III), indicating the formation of Cr–OH and corro-
borating chromic hydroxide as dominate species in alkaline soil Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://
showing in Cr 2p spectra. In pH 4.0 soil, the relative peak area at doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110459.
3/2
531.2 eV increased little (about 0.31%) after the addition of Cr(III),
indicating that no chromic hydroxide was formed and also corrobor- References
atingtheCr2p spectraofpH4.0soil.
3/2
Aceves,M.B.,Hernandez,J.C.,Vazquez,R.R.,2007.Chromiumfractionationinsemi-arid
4. Conclusions soilsamendedwithchromiumandtannerysludge.J.HazardMater.146(1–2),
91–97.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.12.001.
Akhtar,M.S.,Stüben,D.,Norra,S.,Memon,M.,2011.Soilstructureandflowrate-con-
ThisstudyaimedtoinvestigatetheeffectofsoilpHonthetransport, trolledmolybdate,arsenateandchromium(III)transportthroughfieldcolumns.
fractionation,andoxidationbehaviorofCr(III).Thesoilcolumnstudy Geoderma161(3–4),126–137.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.12.005.
Ali,Z.,Malik,R.N.,Shinwari,Z.K.,Qadir,A.,2015.Enrichment,riskassessment,and
showedthatthealkalinesoilhadthebestabilitytoretardthetransport
statisticalapportionmentofheavymetalsintannery-affectedareas.Int.J.Environ.
of Cr(III) and the easy occurrence of transport of Cr(III) in the acidic Sci.Technol.12(2),537–550.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0428-4.
soil.Thebatchsorptionexperimentsrevealedthatthehighretentionof Alibardi,L.,Cossu,R.,2016.Pre-treatmentoftannerysludgeforsustainablelandfilling.
Cr(III) in pH 8.0 soil was mainly attributed to the precipitate. The
WasteManag.52,202–211.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.04.008.
Balasoiu,C.F.,Zagury,G.J.,Deschenes,L.,2001.Partitioningandspeciationofchro-
limitedchemisorptionelucidatedthelowretentionofCr(III)inacidic mium,copper,andarsenicinCCA-contaminatedsoils:influenceofsoilcomposition.
soils. The FTIR spectra confirmed the interaction of Cr(III) with hy- Sci.TotalEnviron.280(1–3),239–255.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(01)
droxyl and carboxyl in soils with pH 4.0 and pH 6.0. XPS analysis 00833-6.
confirmed the formation of higher amounts of chromic hydroxides in Bank s s o , il M a . s K. a , ff S e c c h t w ed ab b , y A s . o P i . l , o H r e g n a d n e ic rs c o o n n , t C e . n , t 2 a 0 n 0 d 6. p L la e n a t c s h . i C ng he a m nd os r p e h d e u r c e ti 6 o 2 n ( o 2 f ) c , h 2 r 5 o 5 m – i 2 u 6 m 4. in
the alkaline soil than in the acidic soil. These findings may help us https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.05.020.
understand that Cr(III) was likely to expand the pollution range in Bartlett,R.,James,B.,1979.Behaviorofchromiuminsoils:III.Oxidation1.J.Environ.
Qual.8(1),31–35.https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1979.00472425000800010008x.
acidicsoilsandfurthercontaminategroundwater.
Boursiquot,S.,Mullet,M.,Ehrhardt,J.J.,2002.XPSstudyofthereactionofchromium
ThefractiondeterminationresultsindicatedhigherexchangeableCr (VI)withmackinawite(FeS).Surf.InterfaceAnal.34(1),293–297.https://doi.org/
intheacidicsoilthaninthealkalinesoil,especiallyattheearlystageof 10.1002/sia.1303.
incubation.ThisfindingconfirmedtheeasymobilityofCrinacidicsoils Brady,J.E.,Humiston,G.E.,Heikkinen,H.,1990.GeneralChemistry:Principlesand
Structure.Wiley,pp.288.
incaseswhereseepageofCr(III)occurred.TheexchangeableCrwould Calderer,M.,Martí,V.,De-Pablo,J.,Guivernau,M.,Prenafeta-Boldu,F.X.,Vinas,M.,
transformintoothermorestablespeciesovertime.Attheendof150 2014.Effectsofenhanceddenitrificationonhydrodynamicsandmicrobialcommu-
nitystructureinasoilcolumnsystem.Chemosphere111,112–119.https://doi.org/
daysincubation,thecontentofEXCrfractioninthethreetypesofsoils
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.03.033.
wasreducedtoverylowlevel.Thetime-dependenttransformationwell Castillo,A.N.,García-Delgado,R.A.,Rivero,V.C.,2012.Electrokinetictreatmentofsoils
fittedbythediffusion-andreaction-kineticsmodels,therebyindicating contaminatedbytannerywaste.Electrochim.Acta86(30),110–114.https://doi.
themasstransferoftheexchangeableCrthroughsoilmicroporesand org/10.1016/j.electacta.2012.04.132.
Choppala,G.,Kunhikrishnan,A.,Seshadri,B.,Park,J.H.,Bush,R.,Bolan,N.,2018.
mesoporesandaschemicaltransformingoccurredsimultaneously.This ComparativesorptionofchromiumspeciesasinfluencedbypH,surfacechargeand
transformationstudyillustratedthehighriskattheearlystageofthe organicmattercontentincontaminatedsoils.J.Geochem.Explor.184,255–260.
anthropogenicCr(III)enteringtheacidicsoilbecauseexchangeableCr https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2016.07.012.
Covington,A.D.,2009.TanningChemistry:theScienceofLeather.RoyalSocietyof
was considered high mobility and represented bioavailability for the
Chemistry,pp.185.
ecosystem. Dean,J.A.,1999.In:Esposito,R.(Ed.),Lange'sHandbookofChemistry.McGraw-Hill,
HazardousCr(VI)wasspontaneously formedinpH8.0soildue to
pp.8–9.
the appropriate Eh, confirmed by XPS spectra. The Cr(VI) content in- Ertani,A.,Mietto,A.,Borin,M.,Nardi,S.,2017.Chromiuminagriculturalsoilsandcrops:
areview,Water.Air.Soil.Poll.228,190.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-017-
creased with incubation time, and the first-ordered kinetics equation 3356-y.
couldbetterdescribedtheoxidationrate,whichwasproportionaltothe Farid,M.,Ali,S.,Rizwan,M.,Ali,Q.,Saeed,R.,Nasir,T.,Abbasi,G.H.,Rehmani,M.I.A.,
first power of the initial Cr(III) concentration. Hence, the potential Ata-Ul-Karim,S.T.,Bukhari,S.A.H.,Ahmad,T.,2018.Phyto-managementof
9
T.Xu,etal. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 195 (2020) 110459
chromiumcontaminatedsoilsthroughsunflowerunderexogenouslyapplied5-ami- Makdisi,R.S.,1991.Tannerywastesdefinition,riskassessmentandcleanupoptions,
nolevulinicacid.Ecotoxicol.Environ.Saf.151,255–265.https://doi.org/10.1016/j. Berkeley,California.J.HazardMater.29(1),79–96.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-
ecoenv.2018.01.017. 3894(91)87075-D.
Fathima,A.,Rao,J.R.,Nair,B.U.,2012.Trivalentchromiumremovalfromtanneryef- Milacic,R.,Stupar,J.,1995.Fractionationandoxidationofchromiumintannerywaste-
fluentusingkaolin‐supportedbacterialbiofilmofBacillusspisolatedfromchromium andsewagesludge-amendedsoils.Environ.Sci.Technol.29(2),506–514.https://
pollutedsoil.J.Chem.Technol.Biotechnol.87(2),271–279.https://doi.org/10. doi.org/10.1021/es00002a029.
1002/jctb.2710. Mishra,R.R.,Dhal,B.,Dutta,S.K.,Dangar,T.K.,Das,N.N.,Thatoi,H.N.,2012.
Flogeac,K.,Guillon,E.,Aplincourt,M.,2005.Adsorptionofseveralmetalionsontoa Optimizationandcharacterizationofchromium(VI)reductioninsalineconditionby
modelsoilsample:equilibriumandEPRstudies.J.ColloidInterfaceSci.286(2), moderatelyhalophilicVigribacillussp.isolatedfrommangrovesoilofBhitarkanika,
596–601.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2005.01.027. India.J.HazardMater.227–228(15),219–226.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.
Font,R.,Gomis,V.,Fernandez,J.,Sabater,M.C.,1998.Physico-chemicalcharacterization 2012.05.063.
andleachingoftannerywastes.WasteManag.Res.16(2),139–149.https://doi.org/ Obia,A.,Cornelissen,G.,Mulder,J.,Dorsch,P.,2015.EffectofsoilpHincreaseby
10.1177/0734242X9801600206. biocharonNO,N2OandN2productionduringdenitrificationinacidsoils.PloSOne
Fu,R.,Wen,D.,Xia,X.,Zhang,W.,Gu,Y.,2017.Electrokineticremediationofchromium 10(9),e0138781.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138781.
(Cr)-contaminatedsoilwithcitricacid(CA)andpolyasparticacid(PASP)aselec- Panda,R.C.,Selvasekhar,S.,Murugan,D.,Sivakumar,V.,Narayani,T.,Sreepradha,C.,
trolytes.Chem.Eng.J.316(15),601–608.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.01. 2016.Cleanerproductionofbasicchromiumsulfate–withareviewofsustainable
092. greenproductionoptions.J.Clean.Prod.112(Part5,20),4854–4862.https://doi.
Ghorbel-Abid,I.,Jrad,A.,Nahdi,K.,Trabelsi-Ayadi,M.,2009.Sorptionofchromium(III) org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.123.
fromaqueoussolutionusingbentoniticclay.Desalination246(1–3),595–604. Ramrakhiani,L.,Majumder,R.,Khowala,S.,2011.Removalofhexavalentchromiumby
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.05.029. heatinactivatedfungalbiomassofTermitomycesclypeatus:surfacecharacterization
Godoy,V.A.,Zuquette,L.V.,Gómez-Hernández,J.J.,2019.Stochasticupscalingofhy- andmechanismofbiosorption.Chem.Eng.J.171(3),1060–1068.https://doi.org/
drodynamicdispersionandretardationfactorinaphysicallyandchemicallyhet- 10.1016/j.cej.2011.05.002.
erogeneoustropicalsoil.Stoch.Environ.Res.RiskAssess.33(1),201–216.https:// Reijonen,I.,Hartikainen,H.,2016.Oxidationmechanismsandchemicalbioavailability
doi.org/10.1007/s00477-018-1624-z. ofchromiuminagriculturalsoil–pHasthemastervariable.Appl.Geochem.74,
Gustafsson,J.P.,Persson,I.,Oromieh,A.G.,van-Schaik,J.W.J.,Sjostedt,C.,Kleja,D.B., 84–93.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2016.08.017.
2014.Chromium(III)complexationtonaturalorganicmatter:mechanismsand Religa,P.,Kowalik,A.,Gierycz,P.,2011.Applicationofnanofiltrationforchromium
modeling.Environ.Sci.Technol.48(3),1753–1761.https://doi.org/10.1021/ concentrationinthetannerywastewater.J.HazardMater.186(1),288–292.https://
es404557e. doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.10.112.
Hausladen,D.M.,Fendorf,S.,2017.Hexavalentchromiumgenerationwithinnaturally Shahid,M.,Shamshad,S.,Rafiq,M.,Khalid,S.,Bibi,I.,Niazi,N.K.,Dumat,C.,Rashid,
structuredsoilsandsediments.Environ.Sci.Technol.51(4),2058–2067.https://doi. M.I.,2017.Chromiumspeciation,bioavailability,uptake,toxicityanddetoxification
org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04039. insoil-plantsystem:areview.Chemosphere178,513–533.https://doi.org/10.1016/
Hu,L.,Diez-Rivas,C.,Hasan,A.R.,Solo-Gabriele,H.,Fieber,L.,Cai,Y.,2010.Transport j.chemosphere.2017.03.074.
andinteractionofarsenic,chromium,andcopperassociatedwithCCA-treatedwood Sparks,D.L.,2003.In:Crumly,C.R.(Ed.),EnvironmentalSoilChemistry.Elsevier,pp.
incolumnsofsandandsandamendedwithpeat.Chemosphere78(8),989–995. 214–215.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.12.019. Su,H.,Fang,Z.,Tsang,P.E.,Zheng,L.,Cheng,W.,Fang,J.,Zhao,D.,2016.Remediation
Jardine,P.M.,Fendorf,S.E.,Mayes,M.A.,Larsen,I.L.,Brooks,S.C.,Bailey,W.B.,1999. ofhexavalentchromiumcontaminatedsoilbybiochar-supportedzero-valentiron
Fateandtransportofhexavalentchromiuminundisturbedheterogeneoussoil. nanoparticles.J.HazardMater.318(15),533–540.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
Environ.Sci.Technol.33(17),2939–2944.https://doi.org/10.1021/es981211v. jhazmat.2016.07.039.
Jung,Y.,Choi,J.,Lee,W.,2007.Spectroscopicinvestigationofmagnetitesurfaceforthe Sun,X.,Huang,X.,Liao,X.,Shi,B.,2011.AdsorptiveremovalofCu(II)fromaqueous
reductionofhexavalentchromium.Chemosphere68(10),1968–1975.https://doi. solutionsusingcollagen-tanninresin.J.HazardMater.186(2–3),1058–1063.
org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.02.028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.098.
Kantar,C.,Demiray,H.,Dogan,N.M.,2011.Roleofmicrobialexopolymericsubstances Taghipour,M.,Jalali,M.,2015.Effectofclaymineralsandnanoparticlesonchromium
(EPS)onchromiumsorptionandtransportinheterogeneoussubsurfacesoils:II. fractionationinsoilcontaminatedwithleatherfactorywaste.J.HazardMater.297
BindingofCr(III)inEPS/soilsystem.Chemosphere82(10),1496–1505.https://doi. (30),127–133.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.04.067.
org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.11.001. Tessier,A.,Campbell,P.G.C.,Bisson,M.,1979.Sequentialextractionprocedureforthe
Kaur,K.,Crimi,M.,2014.Releaseofchromiumfromsoilswithpersulfatechemical speciationofparticulatetracemetals.Anal.Chem.51(7),844–851.https://doi.org/
oxidation.Groundwater52(5),748–755.https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12116. 10.1021/ac50043a017.
Li,G.,Yang,X.,Liang,L.,Guo,S.,2017.Evaluationofthepotentialredistributionof Zhang,C.,Xia,F.,Long,J.,Peng,B.,2017.Anintegratedtechnologytominimizethe
chromiumfractionationincontaminatedsoilbycitricacid/sodiumcitratewashing. pollutionofchromiuminwet-endprocessofleathermanufacture.J.Clean.Prod.154
Arab.J.Chem.10(S1),S539–S545.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2012.10.016. (15),276–283.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.216.
Li,Y.,Li,T.,Jin,Z.,2011.StabilizationofFe0nanoparticleswithsilicafumeforenhanced Zhang,J.,Yin,H.,Wang,H.,Xu,L.,Samuel,B.,Liu,F.,Chen,H.,2018a.Reduction
transportandremediationofhexavalentchromiuminwaterandsoil.J.Environ.Sci. mechanismofhexavalentchromiumbyfunctionalgroupsofundissolvedhumicacid
23(7),1211–1218.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(10)60534-7. andhuminfractionsoftypicalblacksoilfromNortheastChina.Environ.Sci.Pollut.
Löv,A.,Sjöstedt,C.,Larsbo,M.,Persson,I.,Gustafsson,J.P.,Cornelis,G.,Kleja,D.B., Res.25(17),16913–16921.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1878-5.
2017.SolubilityandtransportofCr(III)inahistoricallycontaminatedsoil–evidence Zhang,X.,Tong,J.,Hu,B.,Wei,W.,2018b.Adsorptionanddesorptionfordynamics
ofarapidlyreactingdimericCr(III)organicmattercomplex.Chemosphere189, transportofhexavalentchromium(Cr(VI))insoilcolumn.Environ.Sci.Pollut.Res.
709–716.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.09.088. 25(1),459–468.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0263-0.
Lu,A.,Zhang,S.,Shan,X.,2005.Timeeffectonthefractionationofheavymetalsinsoils. Zhou,J.,Hu,S.,Wang,Y.,He,Q.,Liao,X.,Zhang,W.,Shi,B.,2012.Releaseofchromein
Geoderma125(3–4),225–234.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.08.002. chrometanningandposttanningprocesses.J.Soc.LeatherTechnol.Chem.96(4),
Lyu,H.,Zhao,H.,Tang,J.,Gong,Y.,Huang,Y.,Wu,Q.,Gao,B.,2018.Immobilizationof 157–162.
hexavalentchromiumincontaminatedsoilsusingbiocharsupportednanoscaleiron Zhou,W.,Long,W.,Xu,T.,Peng,L.,Zhang,W.,2019.Organicligandsunexpectedly
sulfidecomposite.Chemosphere194,360–369.https://doi.org/10.1016/j. increasethetoxicityofchromium(III)forluminescentbacteria.Environ.Chem.Lett.
chemosphere.2017.11.182. 17(4),1849–1855.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-019-00892-y.
10