All bodies  ›  Local Agency Formation Commissions  ›  Effect of soil PH on the transport, fractionation, and oxidation of chromium (iii)

LAFCO

Effect of soil PH on the transport, fractionation, and oxidation of chromium (iii)

Local Agency Formation Commissions · colusa-msr-unknown-effect-of-soil-ph-on-the-transport-fractionation-and-oxidati · Msr

Read the report at Local Agency Formation Commissions ↗

Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 195 (2020) 110459 ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecoenv ff E ect of soil pH on the transport, fractionation, and oxidation of chromium T (III) TengXua,FengNanb,XiaofengJianga,YulingTangb,YunhangZengb,WenhuaZhanga,b,∗ ,BiShia aKeyLaboratoryofLeatherChemistryandEngineeringofMinistryofEducation,SichuanUniversity,Chengdu,610065,China bNationalEngineeringLaboratoryforCleanTechnologyofLeatherManufacture,SichuanUniversity,Chengdu,610065,China ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: ThisworkwasconductedtostudytheeffectofsoilpH(4.0,6.0,and8.0)onthetransport,fractionation,and Trivalentchromium oxidationoftrivalentchromium[Cr(III)].VariationinpHalteredsoilchemicalandmineralogicalproperties Hexavalentchromium suchaszetapotential,cationexchangecapacityandredoxpotentialofnaturalsoil.Breakthroughcurvesand SoilpH batchsorptionexperimentscoupledwithfouriertransforminfraredspectroscopy(FTIR)andX-rayphotoelectron FTIR spectroscopy(XPS)analysesdemonstratedthattheeasymobilityofCr(III)inpH4.0soilwasdominatedbythe XPS limitedcoordinationeffect.ThehighretentionofCr(III)inpH8.0soilwasmainlyascribedtothehydrolysis. IncubationexperimentsindicatedthattheproportionsofCrinexchangeablefractiondecreasedwithincreasing of soil pH and incubation time, and kinetics analysis revealed that the time dependent transformation was controlledbymasstransferandchemicalprocesses(e.g.,hydrolysis,ionassociation).TheXPSconfirmedthe oxidationofCr(III)inpH8.0soilduringtheincubationperiod.Furthermore,thecontentoftoxichexavalent chromium[Cr(VI)]waspositivelyassociatedwithtimeandinitialconcentrationofCr(III)released.Theseresults revealedthehazardousnessofCr(III)insoilcontaminatedsimultaneouslybyinorganicacidandalkali. 1. Introduction California(USA)hastotalCrof130–22,000mgkg−1,Cr(VI)of1<to 187 mg kg−1, and pH of 4.6–7.8 (Makdisi, 1991). These site in- Soilcontaminationbyanthropogenicchromium(Cr)isaworldwide vestigations reveal that soil in tannery sites is contaminated simulta- problem (Shahid et al., 2017). Several industrial activities such as neouslybyCr(III)andinorganicacidandalkali,suchassulfuricacidin leather tanning, wood preservation and metal finishing are the main the pickling and sodium hydroxide in the soaking during leather sourcesofCrpollution(Choppalaetal.,2018;Faridetal.,2018).Inthe manufacture(Covington,2009).Assessmentoftheenvironmentalrisk leather industry, large amounts of Cr-containing effluents, shavings, ofCrinsoilisofutmostimportanceanddependsonthoroughunder- and sludge are produced due to the common use of basic chromium standing ofthetransport, solid-phase fractionation, and oxidation be- sulfate(Zhangetal.,2017).Environmentalseepagemayoccurthrough haviorofCr(III)insoilswithdifferentpHlevels. multiple pathways, such as inadvertent dripping of Cr tanning liquor TheverticaldistributionofCr(III)insoilscanbestronglylocalized (containing Cr 3000 mg L−1) (Zhou et al., 2012), leaking of tannery by transport limitations, and laboratory column experiments of Cr- wastewater(upto1500mgL−1)(Religaetal.,2011),andpoorstorage containingliquidflowingthroughsoilmediaarecommonlydesignedto or indiscriminate dumping and landfill of sludge (up to simulate Cr transport and retention (Banks et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 40,000 mg kg−1) (Alibardi and Cossu, 2016). The released Cr would 2018b). Scholars have extensively investigated factors influencing Cr eventuallyentersoil,andthespatialdistributionofCrandsitepHare transport and retention particularly for cases involving soil structure, closelyrelatedtoleatherproduction.OnlyCr(III)isusedintheleather soilminerals,organicmatter,microbialexopolymeric substances,and industry,whichisconsideredtobelesstoxicandmobilethanCr(VI).Cr flow rate (Akhtar et al., 2011; Hu et al., 2010; Jardine et al., 1999; (III)isthemaincontaminantinthesoiloftannerysites,butCr(VI)has Kantaretal.,2011).However,informationabouttheeffectofsoilpH alsobeendetected.Soilwithinthevicinityofthetannerywastewater onthebehaviorofCr(III)transportislacking. dischargesiteintheSialkotofPakistanhastotalCrof21–675mgkg−1 ThegeochemicalfractionationofCriscrucialinunderstandingthe and pH of 7.1–10.6 (Ali et al., 2015). Soil in a tannery room in mobilityandbioavailabilityofCrinsoils(Ertanietal.,2017),among ∗Correspondingauthor.TheKeyLaboratoryofLeatherChemistryandEngineeringofMinistryofEducation,SICHUANUniversity,No.24SouthSection1,Yihuan Road,Chengdu,610065,China. E-mailaddress:zhangwh@scu.edu.cn(W.Zhang). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110459 Received19December2019;Receivedinrevisedform25February2020;Accepted7March2020 Available online 14 March 2020 0147-6513/ © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-NC-ND/4.0/). T.Xu,etal. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 195 (2020) 110459 whichtheexchangeableCrisconsideredtobethemosteasilymobile dryweightbasisbyovendrying(3gofsoilat105°Cfor~15h). and bioavailable fraction using sequential extraction method (Tessier The soils used for column experiment were divided into three etal.,1979).Acevesetal.(2007)foundtheexchangeableCrintannery groups and chemically adjusted to pH 4.0 ± 0.1, 6.0 ± 0.1, and sludge-amendedsoildecreasedwithprolongedincubationtime.How- 8.0 ± 0.1, respectively, which represented a range of soil pHs ac- ever,TaghipourandJalali(2015)reportedtheexchangeableCrinsoil cordingtotheactualinvestigationresultsattannerypollutionsites(Ali with 5% leather factory waste increased from 7.4 to 201.6 mg kg−1 etal.,2015;Makdisi,1991).SoilpHwasloweredbyadditionofH SO 2 4 when incubation lasting from 15 to 90 days. Different phenomena solution(1molL−1)andelevatedbyNaOHsolution(0.5molL−1)to suggest that the factors affecting the fractionation of Cr in soil are obtaintargetpHs.H SO andNaOHwereusedtoadjustsoilpH(Obia 2 4 complicated, and previous studies have mainly focused on applying et al., 2015) for their common use in pickling, soaking, and liming substancestoaffectthefractionationofCr.Variousamendments,such during leather manufacture (Covington, 2009; Font et al., 1998). Soil ascitricacid,polyasparticacid,soilorganic,andzerovalentiron,affect pHwascontinuouslyadjustedfortwoweekstoensurepHstabilityand fractionationbymobilizationorimmobilizationofCrinsoil(Balasoiu airdriedbeforeuse.Thepre-adjustedpHsoilsamplesamendedwithCr et al., 2001; Fu et al., 2017; Li et al., 2017; Su et al., 2016). Never- (OH)SO ,whichwaswidelyusedintannery(Pandaetal.,2016),were 4 theless, limited studies have focused on the effect of soil pH on the usedforincubationexperimentandmaintainedattargetpHvaluesby fractionationofCr. periodicallyadditionofH SO orNaOHsolution. 2 4 Theconversion ofCr(III)intoCr(VI)isundesirable andhazardous from an environmental perspective because Cr(VI) is a known carci- 2.2. Designoftheexperiments nogen(HausladenandFendorf,2017).TheoxidationofCr(III)toCr(VI) was highly concerned and extensively studied in solution system. 2.2.1. Columntransportandbatchsorptionexperiments However,thebehaviorofmetalinhomogenoussystemisverydifferent Transport of Cr(III) solutions was examined with a plexiglass fromthatinheterogenoussystemespeciallyinmediaofsoil.Theeffects column (12 cm long, 1.6-cm i. d.) packed with pH-preadjusted soil ofpHonthefateofCr(III)insoilwasmainlycenteredontheoxidation samples without addition of Cr(III). 23.2 g air-dried soil sample was according to existing literature, and studied by using soil/water sus- packedinthecolumnwithapproximately8cmheight.Thecolumnwas pensiontosimulatethebehaviorofCrinsoil.Forexample,Bartlettand fittedwithquartzsand(2-cmthicklayer)andnylonsieve(50-μmpore James (1979) devised a suspension system containing 1:2000 of su- size)atthebottomandtoptoreducesoildeformationandsoilcolloid persoil-to-solutionofCrCl tostudytheeffectsofpHonCr(III)oxida- 3 releasecausedbysolutioninfiltration.Thecolumnwaspreconditioned tionbyadjustingliquidphasepHfrom3.0to10.0.Theyfoundlower by pumping 5 mmol L−1 NaCl solution in the upward direction. The pH facilitated the formation of Cr(VI), and at pH 3.2 all Cr(III) was flow rate was set as 1 mL min−1and controlled by a calibrated peri- oxidized to Cr(VI). Reijonen and Hartikainen (2016) used soils in- stalticpump(siliconetubing).Atotalofatleast50porevolumeswere cubatedatpH4.4,5.5and6.2tostudytheoxidationofCrCl solution 3 elutedduringconditioning.Theequilibrationperiodensuredthatwater insuspensionsystemwithsoil/solutionratioof1:10,andnoCr(VI)was flowandionicstrengthinthesoilcolumnremainedstableduringthe foundinsoilwithoutadditionofMnO .Obviously,thesestudieswere 2 experiments. After soil colloid stabilization, the feed solution was re- verydifferentfromtherealenvironmentwhichwasconductedinsemi- placed with 3000 mg L−1 (57.69 mmol L−1) Cr(III) [as Cr(OH)SO ]. aridsoil.Hence,theeffectofpHontheoxidationofCr(III)insemi-arid 4 TheconcentrationwasselectedconsideringthetypicalCrcontentinCr soilrequiressystematicstudy. tanning liquor (Zhou et al., 2012) and was higher than the limit of Inthisstudy,weinvestigatedthesoilpH-dependentmechanismsof 1.5 mg L−1 defined by the Chinese Environmental Protection Agency thetransport,fractionation,andoxidationofCr(III)torevealtheriskof (GB 30486–2013). Following injection, column effluent was collected the release of Cr(III) from tannery sites. Experiments on soil column at intervals of 3 min by using an automatic collector to analyze Cr were carriedout to obtain theretention characteristics ofCr(III), and content. Br− (0.75 mmol L−1) of NaBr was injected as a tracer to the results were quantified and compared using sorption isotherms. confirmthecloselyidenticalhydrodynamicpropertiesofeachpacked Incubation experiments were performed to determine the behavior soilcolumn(Caldereretal.,2014).Theporevolumewasestimatedto underlying the transformation of Cr into various fractions and the beapproximately0.3mLbyusingthemethodsofKantaretal.(2011). oxidation of Cr(III) into Cr(VI) in semi-arid soils. The kinetics of The diagram of the soil column experimental device is shown in transformation and oxidation of Cr(III) were also investigated in soil SupplementaryFig.S1,andtheparametersofthesoilcolumnarelisted withthreepHlevels. inTableS1. Two different sets of sorption experiments were conducted to un- 2. Materialsandmethods derstandthemechanismsofCr(III)retentioninsoilcolumns.Thefirst set of experiments aimed at understanding the general sorption equi- 2.1. Materials libriumandtheeffectofsoilpHonsorptioncapacity.Inthesecondset of experiments, the contact time of the Cr-soil suspension was varied 2.1.1. Chemicals from 1 min to 24 h to test the sorption kinetics of Cr(III) in soils of All chemicals including magnesium chloride (MgCl ), sodium 2 different pH levels. The experimental procedures are detailed in sup- acetate (NaOAc), hydroxylamine hydrochloride (NH OH·HCl), acetic 2 plementarydatasection2. acid (HOAc), nitric acid (HNO ), ammonium acetate (NH OAc), sul- 3 4 furicacid(H SO ),sodiumhydroxide(NaOH),basicchromiumsulfate 2 4 [Cr(OH)SO ], sodium chloride (NaCl), sodium bromide (NaBr), and 2.2.2. Incubation 4 diphenylcarbazidewereanalyticalreagentgrade,andpurchasedfrom Incubation experiment was used to study the fractionation and Aladdin(Shanghai,China).Milli-Qwaterwasusedforthepreparation oxidation of Cr in soil at three pH levels. Cr(III) was added to soil at ofsamplesandstandardsolutions. 600 mg kg−1. The dose was selected as a criterion near the value of typicalCrcontentintannerysite(Alietal.,2015)andwashigherthan 2.1.2. Soil the limit of 350 mg kg−1 defined by the Chinese Environmental Pro- Thetestsoilusedintheexperimentwascollectedfromthetopsoil tectionAgency(GB15618–2018).Theincubationsoilsamplesretained (0–20 cm) of bare arable land in eastern China (37°22′N 118°02′E), watercontentequivalentto15%ofthesoilweightbyperiodicaddition homogenized, air dried, crushed, and sieved (stainless steel sieve, Ø ofdistilledwater.Thesoilsampleswereincubatedforupto150daysat 2 mm). Sieved soil was stored at 4 °C until use as natural soil. The 303KandthesoilswerecollectedfordeterminationoftotalCrcontent resultsofthecontentofeachsubstanceinthesoilwereexpressedona ineachfractionandCr(VI)contentatcertaintimeintervals. 2 T.Xu,etal. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 195 (2020) 110459 2.3. Analyticalmethods 2.4.2. Mobilityindex(MI) The mobility of Cr could be associated with the amount of ex- Soil properties including soil texture, soil pH, cation exchange ca- changeable Crinthesoil, whichcouldbecalculated according tothe pacity (CEC), organic matter (OM), redox potential (Eh), Cr(VI), and equationasfollowing(TaghipourandJalali,2015): soil digestion were analyzed using Chinese standard methods. The standardmethodnumbersarelistedinSupplementaryTableS2.Cr(VI) MI=∑ n CeiTi wasextractedfromthesoilsamplesbyusingthemethodofBartlettand i=1 n (2) James(1979),asdescribedindetailinsupplementarydata(section4). whereC istheCrconcentrationinexchangeablefraction(mgkg−1),T The extracts were then analyzed by spectrophotometric colorimetric istheto e talconcentrationoftheCr(mgkg−1),andnisthenumberof method. thesoilsamples. Metal elemental analyses were performed by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES, OPTIMA 8000DV, PerkinElmer,USA),λ =267.7/283.5nm,λ =238.2/259.9nmand 2.4.3. Kineticmodels Cr Fe λ =257.6/259.3nm.Totalcarbon,inorganiccarbon(IC)andtotal Mn (1) Diffusionkineticsmodel nitrogen(TN)insoilsweredeterminedbyusingacarbonandnitrogen analyzer (Primacs100, Skalar, Netherlands). Zeta potential of the soil InordertoanalyzethetransformationprocessofexchangeableCr, samples was measured by an autotitrator and zeta potential analyzer diffusionkineticsmodelwasappliedtofitthetransformationkinetics (NanoBrook Omni, Brookhaven, USA). The concentration of tracer bromide ion (Br−) in the column effluent was determined by ion data.ThedecreasesofCrinexchangeableformscouldbesimulatedina linearrelationshipwithtimeasthefollowingequation(Luetal.,2005): chromatography (ICS-600, Thermo Fisher, USA) with IonPac CS12A column(4×250mm)and30mmolL−1KOHasthemobilephaseata lnC =A+Bt (3) e flow rate of 1 mL min−1. The main mineral of the natural soil was determined by X-ray diffractometer (XRD, DX-2000, Aolong, China). wheretisthecontacttime(day),AandBaretheconstantofdiffusion equation. TheXRDpatternsofnaturalsoilandmineralcomponentsinnaturalsoil areshowninsupplementarydata(Fig.S2andTableS3).Theproperties (2) Reactionkinetics-basedmodels ofsoilsamplebeforeandafterpHadjustmentarelistedinTable1. The sequential extraction method (supplementary data, Table S4) Thepseudosecond-orderkineticmodelwasusedtofitthesorption wasusedtoclassifyandquantifyindividualCrfraction(Tessieretal., data. The pseudo second-order kinetics model is given as (Sun et al., 1979). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, IS10, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) was used to characterize functional group 2011): changesinthesoilsamplesafterpHadjustmentandCr(III)treatment. t 1 t = + Surface elemental analysis of natural and Cr(III)-amended soils was q t k 2 q e 2 q e (4) conducted by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, XSAM800, Kratos,UK).ThesoilwithaninitialCr(III)contentof5000mgkg−1and where q e and q t are the sorption capacity (mmol kg−1) of Cr(III) at after 90 days of incubation was used for XPS analyses because XPS equilibriumandattimet(h),respectively,andk 2 [kg(mmolh)−1]is spectra cannot display characteristic peaks if Cr content was low thepseudosecond-orderrateconstant. (Boursiquotetal.,2002). TheElovich,first-orderandsecond-orderkineticmodelshavebeen widely usedto describe thekineticsofsoil chemicalprocesses, inthe presentexperiment,thesemodelswereappliedtofitthetransformation 2.4. Dataanalysis of exchangeable Cr (Sparks, 2003). These equations can be expressed as: 2.4.1. Retardationfactor Elovichmodel: Theretardationfactor(R)ofthreesoiltypeswasdeterminedfrom 1 1 the breakthrough curves according to the following equation (Godoy q t = β lnαβ+ β lnt (5) etal.,2019): Firstordermodel: PV R= i kt PV (1) logq =logq − 1 t 0 2.303 (6) where PV i is the corresponding pore volume number when outflow Secondordermodel: concentration (C) of Cr(III) reaches half of the initial concentration 1 1 ( w C h 0 e ), n i. t e h . e ,C tr / a C c 0 e = rb 0 ro .5 m , i a d n e d i P o V n i o s u t t h fl e o c w or c r o e n sp ce o n n t d r i a n t g io p n o C re /C vo 0 l = um 0 e .5 n . umber q t = q 0 +k 2 t (7) Table1 PropertiesofsoilsamplebeforeandafterpHadjustment. pH(H2O) Eha CECa OMa ICa OCa TNa Cr Fe Mn Soiltexture mV cmol+kg−1 gkg−1 % 8.64(natural) 476 6.79 7.96 10.26 3.22 1.21 0.041 23.11 0.42 C6.20I29.73A64.07 b 8.0 ± 0.1 491 6.71 7.83 9.32 3.09 0.46 0.047 24.09 0.41 C6.05I28.45A65.50 6.0 ± 0.1 540 5.97 7.37 1.94 2.85 0.55 0.038 24.92 0.45 C10.48I27.71A61.81 4.0 ± 0.1 557 5.36 7.72 0.19 2.89 0.76 0.045 22.15 0.41 C4.26I23.67A72.07 a Eh,redoxpotential;CEC,cationexchangecapacity;OM,organicmatter;IC,inorganiccarbon;OC,inorganiccarbon;TN,totalnitrogen. b Numericalsubscriptsrefertoweightpercentageofeachtextureinnaturalsoil.C,clay;I,silt;A,sand.Accordingtointernationalsoiltextureclassification,the soilusedinthisexperimentissandyloam.Allsoilpropertiesweremeasuredaftertwoweeksofincubation. 3 T.Xu,etal. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 195 (2020) 110459 Fig.1.BreakthroughcurvesofCr(III)invariouspHsoilscolumn:(A)soilpH4.0;(B)soilpH6.0;(C)soilpH8.0.(D)Cr(III)sorptiononsoilsampleasafunctionof pH.(E)KineticsofCr(III)sorptiononsoilswiththreepHlevels.Pointsrepresenttheexperimentaldata.Continuouslinesrepresentthefittingdata. whereq andq (mgkg−1)aretheamountsofCrintheexchangeable that is difficult to leach from soil, which was determined to be 5.36, t 0 fraction per unit mass of soil at time t (day) and initial time, respec- 5.97, and 6.71 cmol+/kg for soils with pH 4.0, 6.0, and 8.0, respec- tively;αandβareconstantsduringtheexperiment;k (day−1)isthe tively.ThehigherCECvalueofsoilshowedstrongerretentionforso- 1 constantinthefirst-ordermodel;andk (kgmg−1day−1)isthecon- luble cationic Cr(III) in soil columns. Meanwhile the point of zero 2 stantinsecond-ordermodel.Thefirst-orderkineticmodelwasalsoused chargeofthesoilsurfacewasdeterminedas2.48(SupplementaryFig. to describe the oxidation kinetics of Cr(III). Then the q and q (mg S3), indicating the soil surface charged negatively at the threepH le- t 0 kg−1)aretheamountofCr(III)perunitmassofsoilattimet(day)and vels.TheelectrostaticattractionofsoilwithcationicCr(III)speciesalso initial time, respectively, k (day−1) is the apparent reaction rate resultedintheretentionofCr(III)insoilcolumns.Intheory,themain 1 constant.Cr(III)contentwasdeterminedbysubtractingCr(VI)fromthe species of soluble inorganic Cr(III) varied from mononuclear Cr ions, totalCrcontent. such as free Cr3+,CrOH2+, and CrSO +, to polynuclear Cr ions with 4 more positive charges (e.g., Cr (OH) 4+ and Cr (OH) 5+), and the 2 2 3 4 precipitationCr(OH) becameeventuallydominantaccordingtoVisual 3 3. Resultsanddiscussion MINTEQver.3.0(Lövetal.,2017)withincreasingpH(Supplementary Fig.S4andTableS5).Theelectrostaticattractionandcationexchange 3.1. TransportofCr(III)insoilsatthreepHlevels of soil with soluble cationic Cr(III) species contributed part of the re- tention of Cr(III) in soil columns with increasing pH. Indeed, pre- Fig.1A–CshowsthebreakthroughcurvesoftracerBr−asNaBrand cipitation would occur at pH 4.4 with the initial Cr(III) of Cr(III) as Cr(OH)SO 4 in the soil columns at pH 4.0, 6.0 and 8.0, re- 57.69 mmol L−1 in soil column experiments based on the solubility spectively. The breakthrough curves of Br− were similar in the three productconstantofCr(OH) (k =6.3×10−31)(Dean,1999).Thena 3 sp soiltypes.However,themigrationofCr(III)wasweakenedcompared large amount of Cr(III) would be retained as immobile precipitate in withBr−anddelayedwithincreasingsoilpH.Approximately3.01PV soil with pH 6.0 and 8.0 because of the ion product beyond k , re- sp wasnecessarytoreachC/C 0 =0.5forpH4.0soil,4.85PVforpH6.0 sultingindelayofbreakthroughcurves.Thecharacteristicsofsoilsat soil,and54.21PVforpH8.0soil,indicatingsignificantCr(III)retention thethreepHlevelsandtheprecipitationprocesswouldconstitutethe inthecolumnwithpH8.0soil. mechanismoftransport,whichcouldbefurtherelucidatedbysorption According to Eq. (1), the retardation factors (R) were 1.18, 1.90, processofCr(III)insoilwithvariouspHlevels. and21.26,forsoilswithpHof4.0,6.0,and8.0,respectively.Ahigh value of R suggested low transport, indicating that Cr(III) was more mobileinacidicsoilthaninalkalinesoil,consistentwiththeprevious 3.2. SorptionofCr(III)insoilsatthreepHlevels survey (Makdisi, 1991). The breakthrough curves also indicated that thepollutionrangeshouldeasilyexpandwhenCr(III)solutionentered SorptionexperimentscanintuitivelyexplainthemigrationofCr(III) acidicsoil,whereaslargeamountsofCr(III)wereretainedinalkaline in soil columns with different pH levels. Sorption capacity of Cr(III) soil. This result may be ascribed to the difference in pH-dependent showedapositivecorrelationwithsoilpH(Fig.1D).Thecapacitywas surfacecharacteristicsofsoils(e.g.,cationicexchangecapacityandzeta characterized by a sorption edge (Sparks, 2003), which significantly potential)andtheprecipitationofCr(III)asCr(OH) athighpH. increasedfrom3.6mmolkg−1toapproximate46.6mmolkg−1within 3 ThesoilCECvaluesignifiedthecapacitytoretaincationinaform anarrowpHrange(about2units).ThesorptionstartedataroundpH 4 T.Xu,etal. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 195 (2020) 110459 4.0(Fig.1D).Intheory,precipitationwouldoccuratpH4.8forinitial Exchangeable fraction was considered to be the most mobile and Cr(III) concentration of 1.92 mmol L−1 in the batch sorption experi- bioavailableportionandthemostimportantformofCrthatcouldcause ments,suggestingthatsorptionwasmainlytriggeredbytheadsorption environmental risks(Ertanietal.,2017).Thehigh MIvalues ofCrin (chemical complexation) (Flogeac et al., 2005) (confirmed further by soilsindicatedhighenvironmentalrisk.Atthebeginningofincubation, FTIR results, section3.5), electrostatic attraction, cation exchangera- theMIvalueswere0.66forpH4.0soil,0.10forpH6.0soil,and0.024 therthanhydrolysisatpH4.0.AsmallamountofCr(III)wasfixedin forpH8.0soil(Fig.2C).MIvaluesgenerallydecreasedovertimeinthe acidicsoilsduetothelimitedquantityoffunctionalgroupsonthesoil threesoiltypes.Attheendoftheincubation(150days),theMIvalues surfacetocoordinate,lowcationexchangecapacityandweakelectro- werereducedto0.025(pH4.0),0.0035(pH6.0),and0.0029(pH8.0), staticattraction.WithincreasingsoilpH,thesorptionofCr(III)onsoil respectively.Moreover,thevalueofMIwasgenerallyintheorderofpH mainlyinvolvedhydrolysis,whichplayakeyroleinthesharpincrease 4.0 > pH 6.0 > pH 8.0 soil during the entire incubation period, in the sorption edge. Hydrolysis equilibrium would shift toward Cr consistent with the order of the retardation factor. Hence, soil acid- (OH) ,leadingtomoreCr(III)wasprecipitatedonthesoilwithhighpH ificationwouldspreadthepollutionrangeandenhancebioavailability 3 values. The batch sorption experiments illustrated that alkaline soils ofCr(III),therebyposinghighriskstotheenvironment,particularlyat hadhigher affinityforCr(III) thanacidicsoil, therebyconfirmingthe theearlystageofCr(III)pollution. highretentionofCr(III)inalkalinesoilcolumn. InordertofurtherstudythetransformationofEXCrwithincuba- Fig.1EshowsthesorptionkineticsofCr(III)onsoilsatthethreepH tiontime.TransformationkineticsofCrinexchangeable fractioninto levels.ThesorptionofCr(III)bypH8.0soilalmostreachedequilibrium otherstableformswerefittedtothelinearizeddiffusion-basedkinetic within5min,whereasbysoilwithpH4.0whichneededmorethan4h. model and reaction kinetics-based empirical models such as first-or- On account of the slow formation of complex, the findings further deredequation,second-orderedequation,andElovichmodeltoexplore speculatedthatadsorption(chemicalcomplexation)shouldbethemain the time-dependent process. The calculated parameters are given in transportmechanismofCr(III)atpH4.0(Gustafssonetal.,2014;Zhou Table2.Thevaluesofcorrelationcoefficient(R2)forthediffusionki- et al., 2019). With increasing soil pH, the quick sorption equilibrium neticmodelwerehigh(>0.9342),indicatingthatthereductionofEX involved the fast formation of precipitate, because when the ion pro- Crwaspartlyattributedtothediffusiveprocessthroughthemacropores ductfarexceededK ,thesupersaturatedsolutionisextremelyunstable and micropores of the soil. The absolute values of the transformation sp andhastoprecipitatetolowertheconcentrations(Bradyetal.,1990). rateconstantBwereintheorderofpH6.0soil > pH4.0soil > pH ThehydrolysisofCr(III)couldbethemainfactorforthefastsorption 8.0soil,indicatingeasierdiffusionofEXCrinacidsoilsthaninalkaline onalkalinesoilandthusledtothetransportofCr(III)waslimitedinthe soils. alkaline soil column due to the dominant deposition of Cr(OH) pre- Thereactionkinetics-basedempiricalmodelsalsowelldescribedthe 3 cipitate on the soil. The sorption kinetics can be well fitted by the ratedatabasedoncorrelationcoefficients.ThevaluesofR2indicated pseudo second-order kinetic equation, and the fitting parameters are thattheElovichequationwasthebestfitforpH4.0soil(0.9973),the listedinTableS6(supplementarydata). first-orderedequationforpH6.0soil(0.9645),andthesecond-ordered equationforpH8.0soil(0.9967).Thesuitabilityofaparticularkinetic 3.3. TransformationofCrfractioninCr(III)-amendedsoilsatthreevarious model to each pH was due to the fact that the study was conducted pH before the transformation equilibrium. The difference inthe mostap- propriate model for soils at the three pH levels indicated various re- Soilsamendedby600mgkg−1Cr(III)wereincubatedfrom1dayto action-controlled steps during the transformation of exchangeable Cr. 150daysatthethreepHlevels.TheeffectsofsoilpHandincubation The good fit of the diffusion and reaction models indicated that ex- time on the percentage of Cr fraction are shown in Fig. 2A, and the changeableCrmasstransferandchemicaltransformationoccurredsi- contentsofCrineachfractionarelistedinSupplementaryTableS7.In multaneouslyandtheseweredifficulttoseparate. natural soils with threepH levels (Fig. 2B), Cr was associated mainly withresidual(RS)fraction(>68.4%)andverylowexchangeable(EX) 3.4. OxidationofCrinCr(III)-amendedsoils fraction(<1.8%)inthefollowingorder:RS > OX(fractionboundto Fe–Mnoxides)>OM(fractionboundtoorganicmatter)>CB(fraction The oxidation of Cr(III) in soil would result in hazardous Cr(VI), bound to carbonates)>EX. However, the release of Cr significantly which is considered more mobile and toxic than the former. Cr(VI) changedthefractionationofCrinthethreesoiltypes,andsoilpHhad contentwasmeasuredfrom1dayto90daystostudyCr(III)oxidation considerableinfluenceonthefractiondistributionattheearlystageof in the soils at the three pH levels. Cr(VI) was undetectable in all soil incubation.Forexample,theproportionofEXCrwas66.1%forpH4.0 samples after 1 day of incubation, however significantly increased in soil,10.1%forpH6.0soil,and2.4%forpH8.0soiljustafteraddition pH8.0soilwithprolongedincubationtime.Meanwhile,noCr(VI)was ofCr(III)(control).Withtheextensionofincubationtime,thepercen- detected in soils with pH 4.0 and 6.0 soil during the experimental tage ofEX and CB Cr fractions decreased significantly over time, and period.After90daysofapplication(Fig.3A),theconcentrationofCr theOXfractionincreasedevidently.Meanwhile,RSandOMfractions (VI)inpH8.0soilincreasedto5.74mgkg−1,whichwashigherthan varied slightly during the 150-day incubation in the three soil types. thelimitationofChineseSoilEnvironmentalQuality(<3.0mgkg−1, Afterincubationfor150days,OXCrbecamethepredominantfraction GB36600–2018)inspiteoftheoxidationratioofCr(III)onlyaslowas inallCr(III)-amendedsoilsandreachedashighas75.4%inpH4.0soil, 0.96%. Therefore, the release of Cr(III) into alkaline soil would pose 78.8%inpH6.0soil,and81.1%inpH8.0soil.ThepercentageofEXCr environmentalriskswithprolongedincubationtime. reducedto2.5%,0.35%,and0.29%insoilswithpH4.0,6.0,and8.0, The behavior of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) in environment is closely de- respectively.Thesefindingscouldbeattributedtothetransformationof pendedonpHandEhofthesoil.Fig.3BdisplaystheEhmeasurements Crfromlooselyboundfractionstostronglyboundfractionsduringin- insoilsatthethreepHlevelsamendedwithCr(III).AsshowninFig.3B, cubationandconsistentwiththepracticalsurveyofthecontaminated theEhvaluesofsoilswithpH4.0,6.0,and8.0weretypicallywithinthe site(Castilloetal.,2012).Therefore,transformationofCrfractionwas rangesof540–556mV,529–539mVand480–491mV,respectively.A spontaneous and proceeded once Cr(III) was released into soil. In ad- significant shift to high potentials occurred with decreasing soil pH. dition, no significant increase in RS Cr fraction indicated that the Theseresultswerelikelytobeexplainedbytheequationproposedby amendedCrwasunlikelytoenterthecrystallinelatticeduringthein- Patricketal.(Sparks,2003): cubationperiod. ThemobilityofCrinsoilscanbeevaluatedbythemobilityindex Eh=E0− 59 log (Red) −59 m pH (MI),whichcanbecalculatedfromtheexchangeablefraction(Eq.(2)). n (Ox) n (8) 5 T.Xu,etal. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 195 (2020) 110459 Fig.2.(A)EffectofincubationtimeontheCrfractionation(%)inthreesoiltypesafteradditionofCr(III).ThecontentofCrinsoilswas600mgkg−1.(B)The fractionationofCrinnaturalsoilswithdifferentpHlevels(withoutadditionofCr(III)).ThecontentofCrinnaturalsoilwas41mgkg−1.(C)MobilityindexofCrin variouspHsoilswithadditionofCr(III)asinfluencedbyincubationtime. Table2 Parametersofdiffusionmodelandreactionkinetics-basedmodel. Diffusionequation Elovichequation First-orderequation Second-orderequation SoilpH A B R2 α×10−2 β R2 k1 R2 k2×10−4 R2 pH4.0 5.58 −0.021 0.9427 −40.13 −0.015 0.9973 0.021 0.9427 4.5 0.9252 pH6.0 3.91 −0.023 0.9645 −3.81 −0.10 0.8000 0.023 0.9645 30.7 0.9245 pH8.0 2.34 −0.014 0.9254 −0.46 −0.50 0.9384 0.014 0.9254 34.7 0.9967 whereEh(mV)istheelectrodepotential,E0(mV)isthestandardpo- wasdependentontheinitialconcentrationofCr(III)releasedintosoils tential,nisthenumberofelectronsexchangedinthereaction,misthe according to the kinetic analysis. These findings may help to under- numberofprotonsexchanged,andparenthesesincludetheactivitiesof stand the serious environmental risks associated with alkaline soils theoxidizedandreducedspecies.Qualitativelyanalysisindicatedthat contaminatedbyCr(III)foralongtimeduetothecontinuousconver- Eh increased with decreasing pH. However, Eh did not vary linearly sionofCr(III)intohazardousCr(VI). withpH.Thus,m/nintheaboveequationwasnotconstantinthesoil. Thisinconsistencycouldbeascribedtocomplexsoilcomponents,such as silicates and oxides. In accordance with the Eh-pH diagram (Kaur 3.5. SpectralcharacterizationofsoilsamendedwithCr(III)atthreepH andCrimi,2014),Cr(VI)/Cr(III)couplefavoursCr(VI)stabilizationin levels soilwith pH8.0.Incontrast, Cr(VI)/Cr(III) couplefavoursCr(III) sta- bilizationinsoilswithpH6.0and4.0. SoilwithpreadjustedpH(pH4.0,6.0,and8.0)wereamendedwith Thefirst-orderequationwasusedtofitCr(III)oxidationdatainpH Cr(III)(600mgkg−1)andincubatedfor90daysat303KbeforeFTIR 8.0soil(Fig.3C).ThehighcorrelationcoefficientR2(0.9891)indicated analysis.Fig.4(A-C)displaysthecomparisonoftheFTIRspectraofsoils thattheoxidationprocesswasofthefirstorder,andtheapparentrate beforeandafteramendmentwithCr(III).BeforetheapplicationofCr constantwas1.04×10−4day−1.ThetimerequiredforhalfofCr(III) (III),abroadintensebandappearednear3437cm−1,whichcouldbea tobeconvertedintoCr(VI)was6357daysbasedonthehalf-time(t ) characteristic of hydroxy (Ramrakhiani et al., 2011). The bands then 1/2 of(ln2)/k forthereaction.OxidationofCr(III)totoxicCr(VI)byMnO shiftedto3415cm−1aftertheacidificationofsoilduetotheformation 1 2 has been identified as probably the important oxidation pathway in of new H-bonded hydroxyl groups. The band around 1430 cm−1 re- soils(HausladenandFendorf,2017).InpH8.0soil,theactiveoxidizing presentedcarbonateinthespectraofpH8.0soil(Ghorbel-Abidetal., sites on MnO may be partly covered by the precipitation Cr(OH) 2009).Meanwhile,thepeakdisappearedforpH4.0and6.0soilsdueto 2 3 whichlimitedtheoxidationprocessandledtothelowoxidationratio thedecompositionofcarbonate,resultinginthelowerproportionofCB ofCr(III)(MilacicandStupar,1995).However,thequantityofCr(VI) Cr in acid soil than in alkaline soil (Fig. 2A). The decomposition of carbonate was also related to the decrease of the content of soil 6 T.Xu,etal. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 195 (2020) 110459 Fig.3.(A)KineticofformationofCr(VI)inthreetypesofsoil,(B)redoxpo- tentialinsoilswithCr(III)treatmentasafunctionofincubationtimeatthree pHlevels,(C)first-orderkineticmodelfittingofCr(III)oxidationkineticsdata inpH8.0soil.Errorbarsrepresentedtheresultsofthreemeasurements.The initialconcentrationofCr(III)inthesoilwas600mgkg−1andwithoutCr(VI). inorganiccarbon(Table1).Thepeaksaround1032cm−1inthethree spectrarepresentedthestretchingvibrationofSi–OandC–O(Lietal., 2011; Zhang et al., 2018a). The bands for soils with pH 4.0 and 6.0 appearedanewpeakandcenteredat1140cm−1and1141cm−1,re- Fig.4.FT-IRspectraof(A)pH8.0soilbeforeandafterCr(III)treatment,(B)pH spectively,possiblybecausethequartzwasreallyhadtobebrokenand 6.0soilbeforeandafterCr(III)treatment,(C)pH4.0soilbeforeandafterCr(III) some phyllosilicates were changed due to the soil acidification. The treatment.TheinitialcontentofCr(III)inthesoilwere600mgkg−1andthe resultsshowedthatsoilpHresultedinvariationsinsoilcompositions incubationtimewere90days. 7 T.Xu,etal. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 195 (2020) 110459 Fig.5.TheCr2pXPSspectraofsoilswithorwithoutadditionofCr(III)at(A)pH4.0,(B)pH6.0,and(C)pH8.0.TheO1sXPSspectraofsoilswithorwithout additionofCr(III)at(D)pH4.0,(E)pH6.0,and(F)pH8.0.TheinitialcontentofCr(III)insoilswere5000mgkg−1andtheincubationtimewere90days. and mineralogical properties, thereby altering soil surface properties, fractionation and retention. In addition, the peak intensity at suchasCECandcharge. 1140 cm−1 or 1032 cm−1 representing the stretching bands of Si–O After the application of Cr(III), the bands at 3415 cm−1 split into increasedobviouslyaftertheamendmentofCr(III),justasthefinding twopeaksaround3544cm−1and3406cm−1forsoilswithpH4.0and ofFathimaetal.(2012).ThismaybeascribedtotheinitialCr(III)so- 6.0,indicatingtheinteractionofCr(III)withthehydroxylofsoils,such lutionwithlowpH(about4.0)resultinginphyllosilicateschanged. as silanol or carboxyl. In the meantime, a new peak appeared at SoilswithpreadjustedpHwereamendedwith5000mgkg−1Cr(III) 1681cm−1forpH4.0soiland1684cm−1forpH6.0soilrespectively, and incubated for 90 days prior to XPS analyses. The wide-scan XPS signifyingthechelationofcarboxylwithCr(III)(Fathimaetal.,2012), spectraofsoilsbeforeandafteramendedwithCr(III)atthreepHlevels whichisverydifferentfromthatofsoilwithpH8.0.Whereasthein- were displayed in supplementary date (Fig. S5). Fig. 5A–C shows the tensityofpeaksat774to776cm−1slightlyincreasedinallsoilsdueto comparisonofCr2pXPSspectraofsoilswithorwithoutadditionofCr Cr–O vibration (Mishra et al., 2012), indicating the binding of the (III)atthreepHlevels.BeforeaddingCr(III)tothesoil,therewereno functional groups in soils with Cr(III). The different combinations of obviousCrpeakinthespectrumduetothelowCrcontentinthenatural anthropogenicCr(III)withfunctionalgroupsinsoilsmayaffectCr(III) soil. The Cr 2p peaks clearly appeared in the spectrum of soils after 8 T.Xu,etal. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 195 (2020) 110459 addition of Cr(III). The 2p lines were located at 577.3, 576.9 and environmentalrisksofCr(III)inalkalinesoilwererelatedtotheinitial 3/2 576.6 eV for soils with pH of 4.0–8.0, respectively. These lines were concentration of Cr(III) released and increased with incubation time. characteristicofCr(III),andthebindingenergydecreasedwithsoilpH. Thisworkprovidesabasisforunderstandingtheenvironmentalimpact Accordingtoliterature(Jungetal.,2007),theCr2p bindingenergies ofanthropogenicCr(III)affectedbysoilpH. 3/2 ofchromichydroxideswerewithin576.5–576.9eV.Then2p peaks 3/2 indicatedchromichydroxidesasdominantspeciesinpH8.0soilrather CRediTauthorshipcontributionstatement thaninpH4.0soil,verifyingtheprecipitateretentionmechanismofCr (III)inalkalinesoilsuggestedinbatchsorptionexperiments.Further- TengXu:Conceptualization,Methodology,Writing-originaldraft. more,thebindingenergyofthe2p signalwascenteredat579.4eV FengNan:Investigation,Resources.XiaofengJiang:Formalanalysis. 3/2 for pH 8.0 soil, which was characteristic of Cr(VI) (Boursiquot et al., Yuling Tang: Software. Yunhang Zeng: Writing - review & editing. 2002). This was consistent with the presence of Cr(VI) in incubation Wenhua Zhang: Writing - review & editing, Supervision. Bi Shi: experiments(section3.4).Noevidentshoulderwasfoundnear579eV Supervision. for soils with pH 4.0 and 6.0. Accordingly, the use of a component attributable to Cr(VI) did not achieve a satisfactory fit. The con- Declarationofcompetinginterests centration-enhancedincubationsamplesfurtherconfirmedthatCr(III) inalkalinesoilswasconvertedintoCr(VI)incontrasttothatinacidic Theauthors declarethattheyhavenoknown competingfinancial soils.Thisresultwasconsistentwiththeoxidationkineticsexperiment. interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influ- Fig.5D–FdisplaystheO1sspectraofsoilswithvariouspHlevels encetheworkreportedinthispaper. before and after amended with Cr(III). The O 1s spectra could be re- solved into four peaks. Before adding Cr(III) to soils, the binding en- Acknowledgement ergiesofthesignalswerelocatedat530.7,531.3,531.8,and532.4eV inpH8.0soil,representingmetal-oxide,metal-hydroxide(e.g.,Fe–OH), This work was funded by the National Key Research and C–O,andO–Hbonds,respectively(Lyuetal.,2018).Asillustratedin DevelopmentProgramofChina(No.2018YFC1802201). Fig.5D–F,anobviousincreaseoftherelativepeakareaassociatedwith metal-OHbondscouldbefoundinsoilswithpH8.0(about3.68%)after AppendixA. Supplementarydata the addition of Cr(III), indicating the formation of Cr–OH and corro- borating chromic hydroxide as dominate species in alkaline soil Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https:// showing in Cr 2p spectra. In pH 4.0 soil, the relative peak area at doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110459. 3/2 531.2 eV increased little (about 0.31%) after the addition of Cr(III), indicating that no chromic hydroxide was formed and also corrobor- References atingtheCr2p spectraofpH4.0soil. 3/2 Aceves,M.B.,Hernandez,J.C.,Vazquez,R.R.,2007.Chromiumfractionationinsemi-arid 4. Conclusions soilsamendedwithchromiumandtannerysludge.J.HazardMater.146(1–2), 91–97.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.12.001. Akhtar,M.S.,Stüben,D.,Norra,S.,Memon,M.,2011.Soilstructureandflowrate-con- ThisstudyaimedtoinvestigatetheeffectofsoilpHonthetransport, trolledmolybdate,arsenateandchromium(III)transportthroughfieldcolumns. fractionation,andoxidationbehaviorofCr(III).Thesoilcolumnstudy Geoderma161(3–4),126–137.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.12.005. Ali,Z.,Malik,R.N.,Shinwari,Z.K.,Qadir,A.,2015.Enrichment,riskassessment,and showedthatthealkalinesoilhadthebestabilitytoretardthetransport statisticalapportionmentofheavymetalsintannery-affectedareas.Int.J.Environ. of Cr(III) and the easy occurrence of transport of Cr(III) in the acidic Sci.Technol.12(2),537–550.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0428-4. soil.Thebatchsorptionexperimentsrevealedthatthehighretentionof Alibardi,L.,Cossu,R.,2016.Pre-treatmentoftannerysludgeforsustainablelandfilling. Cr(III) in pH 8.0 soil was mainly attributed to the precipitate. The WasteManag.52,202–211.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.04.008. Balasoiu,C.F.,Zagury,G.J.,Deschenes,L.,2001.Partitioningandspeciationofchro- limitedchemisorptionelucidatedthelowretentionofCr(III)inacidic mium,copper,andarsenicinCCA-contaminatedsoils:influenceofsoilcomposition. soils. The FTIR spectra confirmed the interaction of Cr(III) with hy- Sci.TotalEnviron.280(1–3),239–255.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(01) droxyl and carboxyl in soils with pH 4.0 and pH 6.0. XPS analysis 00833-6. confirmed the formation of higher amounts of chromic hydroxides in Bank s s o , il M a . s K. a , ff S e c c h t w ed ab b , y A s . o P i . l , o H r e g n a d n e ic rs c o o n n , t C e . n , t 2 a 0 n 0 d 6. p L la e n a t c s h . i C ng he a m nd os r p e h d e u r c e ti 6 o 2 n ( o 2 f ) c , h 2 r 5 o 5 m – i 2 u 6 m 4. in the alkaline soil than in the acidic soil. These findings may help us https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.05.020. understand that Cr(III) was likely to expand the pollution range in Bartlett,R.,James,B.,1979.Behaviorofchromiuminsoils:III.Oxidation1.J.Environ. Qual.8(1),31–35.https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1979.00472425000800010008x. acidicsoilsandfurthercontaminategroundwater. Boursiquot,S.,Mullet,M.,Ehrhardt,J.J.,2002.XPSstudyofthereactionofchromium ThefractiondeterminationresultsindicatedhigherexchangeableCr (VI)withmackinawite(FeS).Surf.InterfaceAnal.34(1),293–297.https://doi.org/ intheacidicsoilthaninthealkalinesoil,especiallyattheearlystageof 10.1002/sia.1303. incubation.ThisfindingconfirmedtheeasymobilityofCrinacidicsoils Brady,J.E.,Humiston,G.E.,Heikkinen,H.,1990.GeneralChemistry:Principlesand Structure.Wiley,pp.288. incaseswhereseepageofCr(III)occurred.TheexchangeableCrwould Calderer,M.,Martí,V.,De-Pablo,J.,Guivernau,M.,Prenafeta-Boldu,F.X.,Vinas,M., transformintoothermorestablespeciesovertime.Attheendof150 2014.Effectsofenhanceddenitrificationonhydrodynamicsandmicrobialcommu- nitystructureinasoilcolumnsystem.Chemosphere111,112–119.https://doi.org/ daysincubation,thecontentofEXCrfractioninthethreetypesofsoils 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.03.033. wasreducedtoverylowlevel.Thetime-dependenttransformationwell Castillo,A.N.,García-Delgado,R.A.,Rivero,V.C.,2012.Electrokinetictreatmentofsoils fittedbythediffusion-andreaction-kineticsmodels,therebyindicating contaminatedbytannerywaste.Electrochim.Acta86(30),110–114.https://doi. themasstransferoftheexchangeableCrthroughsoilmicroporesand org/10.1016/j.electacta.2012.04.132. Choppala,G.,Kunhikrishnan,A.,Seshadri,B.,Park,J.H.,Bush,R.,Bolan,N.,2018. mesoporesandaschemicaltransformingoccurredsimultaneously.This ComparativesorptionofchromiumspeciesasinfluencedbypH,surfacechargeand transformationstudyillustratedthehighriskattheearlystageofthe organicmattercontentincontaminatedsoils.J.Geochem.Explor.184,255–260. anthropogenicCr(III)enteringtheacidicsoilbecauseexchangeableCr https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2016.07.012. Covington,A.D.,2009.TanningChemistry:theScienceofLeather.RoyalSocietyof was considered high mobility and represented bioavailability for the Chemistry,pp.185. ecosystem. Dean,J.A.,1999.In:Esposito,R.(Ed.),Lange'sHandbookofChemistry.McGraw-Hill, HazardousCr(VI)wasspontaneously formedinpH8.0soildue to pp.8–9. the appropriate Eh, confirmed by XPS spectra. The Cr(VI) content in- Ertani,A.,Mietto,A.,Borin,M.,Nardi,S.,2017.Chromiuminagriculturalsoilsandcrops: areview,Water.Air.Soil.Poll.228,190.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-017- creased with incubation time, and the first-ordered kinetics equation 3356-y. couldbetterdescribedtheoxidationrate,whichwasproportionaltothe Farid,M.,Ali,S.,Rizwan,M.,Ali,Q.,Saeed,R.,Nasir,T.,Abbasi,G.H.,Rehmani,M.I.A., first power of the initial Cr(III) concentration. Hence, the potential Ata-Ul-Karim,S.T.,Bukhari,S.A.H.,Ahmad,T.,2018.Phyto-managementof 9 T.Xu,etal. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 195 (2020) 110459 chromiumcontaminatedsoilsthroughsunflowerunderexogenouslyapplied5-ami- Makdisi,R.S.,1991.Tannerywastesdefinition,riskassessmentandcleanupoptions, nolevulinicacid.Ecotoxicol.Environ.Saf.151,255–265.https://doi.org/10.1016/j. Berkeley,California.J.HazardMater.29(1),79–96.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304- ecoenv.2018.01.017. 3894(91)87075-D. Fathima,A.,Rao,J.R.,Nair,B.U.,2012.Trivalentchromiumremovalfromtanneryef- Milacic,R.,Stupar,J.,1995.Fractionationandoxidationofchromiumintannerywaste- fluentusingkaolin‐supportedbacterialbiofilmofBacillusspisolatedfromchromium andsewagesludge-amendedsoils.Environ.Sci.Technol.29(2),506–514.https:// pollutedsoil.J.Chem.Technol.Biotechnol.87(2),271–279.https://doi.org/10. doi.org/10.1021/es00002a029. 1002/jctb.2710. Mishra,R.R.,Dhal,B.,Dutta,S.K.,Dangar,T.K.,Das,N.N.,Thatoi,H.N.,2012. Flogeac,K.,Guillon,E.,Aplincourt,M.,2005.Adsorptionofseveralmetalionsontoa Optimizationandcharacterizationofchromium(VI)reductioninsalineconditionby modelsoilsample:equilibriumandEPRstudies.J.ColloidInterfaceSci.286(2), moderatelyhalophilicVigribacillussp.isolatedfrommangrovesoilofBhitarkanika, 596–601.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2005.01.027. India.J.HazardMater.227–228(15),219–226.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat. Font,R.,Gomis,V.,Fernandez,J.,Sabater,M.C.,1998.Physico-chemicalcharacterization 2012.05.063. andleachingoftannerywastes.WasteManag.Res.16(2),139–149.https://doi.org/ Obia,A.,Cornelissen,G.,Mulder,J.,Dorsch,P.,2015.EffectofsoilpHincreaseby 10.1177/0734242X9801600206. biocharonNO,N2OandN2productionduringdenitrificationinacidsoils.PloSOne Fu,R.,Wen,D.,Xia,X.,Zhang,W.,Gu,Y.,2017.Electrokineticremediationofchromium 10(9),e0138781.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138781. (Cr)-contaminatedsoilwithcitricacid(CA)andpolyasparticacid(PASP)aselec- Panda,R.C.,Selvasekhar,S.,Murugan,D.,Sivakumar,V.,Narayani,T.,Sreepradha,C., trolytes.Chem.Eng.J.316(15),601–608.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.01. 2016.Cleanerproductionofbasicchromiumsulfate–withareviewofsustainable 092. greenproductionoptions.J.Clean.Prod.112(Part5,20),4854–4862.https://doi. Ghorbel-Abid,I.,Jrad,A.,Nahdi,K.,Trabelsi-Ayadi,M.,2009.Sorptionofchromium(III) org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.123. fromaqueoussolutionusingbentoniticclay.Desalination246(1–3),595–604. Ramrakhiani,L.,Majumder,R.,Khowala,S.,2011.Removalofhexavalentchromiumby https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.05.029. heatinactivatedfungalbiomassofTermitomycesclypeatus:surfacecharacterization Godoy,V.A.,Zuquette,L.V.,Gómez-Hernández,J.J.,2019.Stochasticupscalingofhy- andmechanismofbiosorption.Chem.Eng.J.171(3),1060–1068.https://doi.org/ drodynamicdispersionandretardationfactorinaphysicallyandchemicallyhet- 10.1016/j.cej.2011.05.002. erogeneoustropicalsoil.Stoch.Environ.Res.RiskAssess.33(1),201–216.https:// Reijonen,I.,Hartikainen,H.,2016.Oxidationmechanismsandchemicalbioavailability doi.org/10.1007/s00477-018-1624-z. ofchromiuminagriculturalsoil–pHasthemastervariable.Appl.Geochem.74, Gustafsson,J.P.,Persson,I.,Oromieh,A.G.,van-Schaik,J.W.J.,Sjostedt,C.,Kleja,D.B., 84–93.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2016.08.017. 2014.Chromium(III)complexationtonaturalorganicmatter:mechanismsand Religa,P.,Kowalik,A.,Gierycz,P.,2011.Applicationofnanofiltrationforchromium modeling.Environ.Sci.Technol.48(3),1753–1761.https://doi.org/10.1021/ concentrationinthetannerywastewater.J.HazardMater.186(1),288–292.https:// es404557e. doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.10.112. Hausladen,D.M.,Fendorf,S.,2017.Hexavalentchromiumgenerationwithinnaturally Shahid,M.,Shamshad,S.,Rafiq,M.,Khalid,S.,Bibi,I.,Niazi,N.K.,Dumat,C.,Rashid, structuredsoilsandsediments.Environ.Sci.Technol.51(4),2058–2067.https://doi. M.I.,2017.Chromiumspeciation,bioavailability,uptake,toxicityanddetoxification org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04039. insoil-plantsystem:areview.Chemosphere178,513–533.https://doi.org/10.1016/ Hu,L.,Diez-Rivas,C.,Hasan,A.R.,Solo-Gabriele,H.,Fieber,L.,Cai,Y.,2010.Transport j.chemosphere.2017.03.074. andinteractionofarsenic,chromium,andcopperassociatedwithCCA-treatedwood Sparks,D.L.,2003.In:Crumly,C.R.(Ed.),EnvironmentalSoilChemistry.Elsevier,pp. incolumnsofsandandsandamendedwithpeat.Chemosphere78(8),989–995. 214–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.12.019. Su,H.,Fang,Z.,Tsang,P.E.,Zheng,L.,Cheng,W.,Fang,J.,Zhao,D.,2016.Remediation Jardine,P.M.,Fendorf,S.E.,Mayes,M.A.,Larsen,I.L.,Brooks,S.C.,Bailey,W.B.,1999. ofhexavalentchromiumcontaminatedsoilbybiochar-supportedzero-valentiron Fateandtransportofhexavalentchromiuminundisturbedheterogeneoussoil. nanoparticles.J.HazardMater.318(15),533–540.https://doi.org/10.1016/j. Environ.Sci.Technol.33(17),2939–2944.https://doi.org/10.1021/es981211v. jhazmat.2016.07.039. Jung,Y.,Choi,J.,Lee,W.,2007.Spectroscopicinvestigationofmagnetitesurfaceforthe Sun,X.,Huang,X.,Liao,X.,Shi,B.,2011.AdsorptiveremovalofCu(II)fromaqueous reductionofhexavalentchromium.Chemosphere68(10),1968–1975.https://doi. solutionsusingcollagen-tanninresin.J.HazardMater.186(2–3),1058–1063. org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.02.028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.098. Kantar,C.,Demiray,H.,Dogan,N.M.,2011.Roleofmicrobialexopolymericsubstances Taghipour,M.,Jalali,M.,2015.Effectofclaymineralsandnanoparticlesonchromium (EPS)onchromiumsorptionandtransportinheterogeneoussubsurfacesoils:II. fractionationinsoilcontaminatedwithleatherfactorywaste.J.HazardMater.297 BindingofCr(III)inEPS/soilsystem.Chemosphere82(10),1496–1505.https://doi. (30),127–133.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.04.067. org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.11.001. Tessier,A.,Campbell,P.G.C.,Bisson,M.,1979.Sequentialextractionprocedureforthe Kaur,K.,Crimi,M.,2014.Releaseofchromiumfromsoilswithpersulfatechemical speciationofparticulatetracemetals.Anal.Chem.51(7),844–851.https://doi.org/ oxidation.Groundwater52(5),748–755.https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12116. 10.1021/ac50043a017. Li,G.,Yang,X.,Liang,L.,Guo,S.,2017.Evaluationofthepotentialredistributionof Zhang,C.,Xia,F.,Long,J.,Peng,B.,2017.Anintegratedtechnologytominimizethe chromiumfractionationincontaminatedsoilbycitricacid/sodiumcitratewashing. pollutionofchromiuminwet-endprocessofleathermanufacture.J.Clean.Prod.154 Arab.J.Chem.10(S1),S539–S545.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2012.10.016. (15),276–283.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.216. Li,Y.,Li,T.,Jin,Z.,2011.StabilizationofFe0nanoparticleswithsilicafumeforenhanced Zhang,J.,Yin,H.,Wang,H.,Xu,L.,Samuel,B.,Liu,F.,Chen,H.,2018a.Reduction transportandremediationofhexavalentchromiuminwaterandsoil.J.Environ.Sci. mechanismofhexavalentchromiumbyfunctionalgroupsofundissolvedhumicacid 23(7),1211–1218.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(10)60534-7. andhuminfractionsoftypicalblacksoilfromNortheastChina.Environ.Sci.Pollut. Löv,A.,Sjöstedt,C.,Larsbo,M.,Persson,I.,Gustafsson,J.P.,Cornelis,G.,Kleja,D.B., Res.25(17),16913–16921.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1878-5. 2017.SolubilityandtransportofCr(III)inahistoricallycontaminatedsoil–evidence Zhang,X.,Tong,J.,Hu,B.,Wei,W.,2018b.Adsorptionanddesorptionfordynamics ofarapidlyreactingdimericCr(III)organicmattercomplex.Chemosphere189, transportofhexavalentchromium(Cr(VI))insoilcolumn.Environ.Sci.Pollut.Res. 709–716.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.09.088. 25(1),459–468.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0263-0. Lu,A.,Zhang,S.,Shan,X.,2005.Timeeffectonthefractionationofheavymetalsinsoils. Zhou,J.,Hu,S.,Wang,Y.,He,Q.,Liao,X.,Zhang,W.,Shi,B.,2012.Releaseofchromein Geoderma125(3–4),225–234.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.08.002. chrometanningandposttanningprocesses.J.Soc.LeatherTechnol.Chem.96(4), Lyu,H.,Zhao,H.,Tang,J.,Gong,Y.,Huang,Y.,Wu,Q.,Gao,B.,2018.Immobilizationof 157–162. hexavalentchromiumincontaminatedsoilsusingbiocharsupportednanoscaleiron Zhou,W.,Long,W.,Xu,T.,Peng,L.,Zhang,W.,2019.Organicligandsunexpectedly sulfidecomposite.Chemosphere194,360–369.https://doi.org/10.1016/j. increasethetoxicityofchromium(III)forluminescentbacteria.Environ.Chem.Lett. chemosphere.2017.11.182. 17(4),1849–1855.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-019-00892-y. 10