LAFCO
Riverview Cemetery District Service Area Plan
Read the report at Local Agency Formation Commissions ↗
Executive Officer
OCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
Jurg Heuberger, CEP
EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT
To The
Local Agency Formation Commission
TO:
Commissioner
[Supervisor]
MARIA NAVA-FROELICH
[City]
Commissioner
MICHAEL KELLEY(Chair)
Commissioner
JASON JACKSON
[City]
Commissioner
RAY CASTILLO
[Supervisor]
[Public]
Commissioner
<b>DAVID WEST</b> (Vice-Chair)
[Supervisor]
Alt Commissioner
JACK TERRAZAS
Alt Commissioner
JIM PREDMORE
[City]
[Public]
Alt Commissioner
RALPH MENVIELLE
REPORT DATE:
May 1, 2016
FROM:
Jurg Heuberger, AICP, CEP, Executive Officer
PROJECT:
Riverview Cemetery District (RCD 1-16) Sphere of Influence (SOI) update
and Service Area Plan (SAP)/Municipal Services Review (MSR)
<b>HEARING DATE:</b>
<b>TIME</b>: 8:50 AM
May 26, 2016
AGENDA ITEM NO:
13
<b>HEARING LOCATION:</b>
El Centro City Council Chambers, 1275 Main Street, El Centro, CA
RECOMMENDATION(S)
BY THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER
(In Summary & Order)
OPTION #1:
Approve the proposed Sphere of Influence (SOI) and the Service Area Plan/MSR
update as presented by the Executive Officer.
OPTION #2:
Approve the proposed Sphere of Influence (SOI) and Service Area Plan/MSR
update as requested with modifications, following the hearing by the
Commission.
OPTION # 3:
Continue the hearing for not to exceed 70 days, (end date August 15, 2016).
Deny the Sphere of Influence and Service Area Plan update, and provide
OPTION # 4:
direction to the District and EO for corrections.
1122 STATE STREET, SUITE D, EL CENTRO, CA 92243 (760)-353-4115
www.iclafco.com e-mail: jurgh@iclafco.com
An equal opportunity employer
<b>Project Data:</b>
<b>DATA & FACTS:</b>
Project ID
RCD 1-16
Riverview Cemetery District Sphere of Influence and Service Area Plan
Project Name:
Update (SAP)/MSR
Applicant/Proponent:
<b>Riverview Cemetery District</b>
LAFCO requested update
Application Type:
Application Filed:
N/A (LAFCO Direction)
Certificate of Filing:
N/A
See Plan
Area/Size:
Location/Legal:
Maps of the District Boundary and the SOI are included in this report.
Population:
NA
Proposed Project:
Service Area Plan (SAP) / Municipal Services Review (MSR) Update.
MSR/SAP:
The most recent version of the Riverview Cemetery District MSR/SAP is
2006.
<b>TAX AGREEMENT:</b>
Board of Supervisors Action:
N/A
City Resolution:
N/A (will be required upon notification by LAFCO)
Tax Split:
N/A
CEQA:
LAFCO
Lead Agency:
Exempt
Documentation:
JH\DEB\S\LAFCO\Executive Officer Reports\2016\05 26 16 Hearing EO Reports\1 EO Report Riverview Cemetery District SAP Update 5 1 16 docx
<b>ANALYSIS</b>
Legal Requirements (Historical information):
1:
Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Reorganization Act of 2000 (CKH), also referred to as Government Code 56000 et Seq.,
provides the legal basis for the requirement of the Sphere of Influence and the Service Area Plan or Municipal
service Review (MSR) being considered within the scope of this hearing.
G.C. § 56425 (a) states in part; "In order to carry out its purposes and responsibilities for planning and shaping
the logical and orderly development and coordination of local governmental agencies so as to advantageously
provide for the present and future needs of the county and its communities, the commission shall develop and
determine the sphere of influence of each local governmental agency with the county and enact policies designed
to promote the logical and orderly development of areas within the sphere."
G.C. § 56425 (b - i) provide the frame work within which the Commission may approve the sphere of influence
and the process that needs to be followed.
G.C. § 56425 (e) states in part; "In determining the sphere of influence of each local agency, the commission
shall consider and prepare a written statement of its determination with respect to each of the following:
The present and planned land uses in the area.
(1)
The present and probable need for public facilities and services in the area.
(2)
The present capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public services that the agency provides
(3)
or is authorized to provide.
The existence of any social or economic communities' of interest in the area if the commission
(4)
determines that they are relevant to the agency.
G.C. § 56425 (f) is a critical new section that changed the parameters of the prior review insofar that this section
now requires that; "Upon determination of a sphere of influence, the commission shall adopt that sphere, and
shall review and update, as necessary, the adopted sphere not less than once every five years".
There appears to be a misconception that the agencies will have to prepare a full new plan every five years,
however the intent here is to "review" the prior plan and to amend it if necessary. If there have been significant
changes, or if there has been explosive growth, then certainly the amendment will be much more comprehensive.
G.C. § 56428 (a) provides the mechanism for anyone to file a request with the executive officer for an amendment
to the sphere of influence. It states in part; "Any person or local agency may file a written request with the
Executive Officer requesting amendments to a sphere of influence or urban service area adopted by the
commission..."
Again there may be some confusion in this area as there have been numerous questions about the "limitations" of
the sphere and the process to amend.
It appears clear that the mandate is to review the plan at least every five years but there is no apparent restriction
on the number of times that it may be amended nor is there a restriction on who can request such an amendment,
there is only a process that needs to be followed. It goes without saying however that for an amendment to work
it need the consensus of the City/District, the County and the Commission.
Just as there are provisions for the addition of areas to a sphere of influence there are provisions for a process to
remove an area from an approved sphere boundary. This is found in G.C. 56429.
In addition to the SOI process G.C. § 56430 (a - d) now addresses the requirement for the review of municipal
services which in our case has been referred to for nearly a decade as the Service Area Plan (SAP).
JH\DEB\S\LAFCO\Executive Officer Reports\2016\05 26 16 Hearing EO Reports\1 EO Report Riverview Cemetery District SAP Update 5 1 16 docx
G.C. § 56430 (a) states; "In order to prepare and to update spheres of influence in accordance with Section
56425, the Commission shall conduct a service review of the municipal services provide in the county or other
appropriate area designated by the commission. The commission shall include in the area designated for service
review the county, the region, the sub region, or any other geographic area as its appropriate for an analysis of
the service or service to be reviewed and shall prepare a written statement of its determination with respect to
each of the following:
1)
Infrastructure needs or deficiencies.
2)
Growth and population projections for the affected area.
3)
Financing constraints and opportunities.
4)
Cost avoidance opportunities.
5)
Opportunities for rate restructuring.
6)
Opportunities for shared facilities
7)
Governmental structure options, including advantages and disadvantages of consolidation or
reorganization of service providers.
Evaluation of management efficiencies
8)
9)
Local accountability and governance."
G.C. § 56430 (d) also required that the Office of Planning and Research of the State, in consultation with the
commissions, and the California Association of LAFCO's and other governmental agencies, SHALL prepare a
comprehensive set of guidelines for service reviews by July 1, 2001. Since these guidelines are voluminous a
full text copy is not attached to the report however there is a PDF copy on the CD rom that has been provided to
each commissioner and every interested party. Furthermore, the Executive Officer has urged the various entities
to utilize the "draft final" version as a guide to preparing the SOI and SAP.
II:
The PLAN as submitted:
The District is a Cemetery District that provides services to a large portion of Imperial County. The review in this
case is/was the case in a number of other smaller districts pursuant to the direction of LAFCO focused primarily
on the financial viability of the District. Insofar as this is a limited purpose District the services provided appear to
be and have been provided adequately. The financials for the District as per the attached also show that it is
financially stable.
III:
District Approvals:
The District will need to accept the LAFCO approval of the SOI/MSR/SAP via a resolution to include any and all
recommendations.
IV:
CEQA:
It is argued and it is the Executive Officers opinion that the Service Area Plan fit within one or more "exemptions"
under the provisions of CEQA, not the least of which is the possible determination that this process is "not a
project".
JH\DEB\S\LAFCO\Executive Officer Reports\2016\05 26 16 Hearing EO Reports\1 EO Report Riverview Cemetery District SAP Update 5 1 16 docx
Analysis by the Executive Officer / Determinations by the COMMISSION:
V:
G.C. § 56425 (e) states in part; "In determining the sphere of influence of each local agency, the Commission
shall consider and prepare a written statement of its determination with respect to each of the following:
The present and planned land uses in the area.
(1)
The present and probable need for public facilities and services in the area.
(2)
The present capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public services that the agency provides
(3)
or is authorized to provide.
The existence of any social or economic communities of interest in the area if the commission
(4)
determines that they are relevant to the agency.
Proposed findings by the Commission:
1)
The present land use within the boundaries of the proposed SOI/SAP includes residential, but
remains predominately agricultural. The District provides only Cemetery related services and
provides no other services.
2)
Currently the services provided are according to the audited financial information being
supplied in a financially stable and adequate manner. (See audited financial information
attached).
3)
There are no known social or economic communities of interest relevant to this review.
VI:
Public Notice:
Public notice for the proposed project hearing before the Imperial County Local Agency Formation Commission
has been given, according to Section § 56427. Notice was issued in the form of a publication in the IV Press at
least twenty-one (21) days prior or said hearing, and posted on our webpage.
VII:
Report:
In accordance with Section § 56665, the Executive Officer has prepared a report, and presented said report to
your Commission and to any public member requesting such report. In addition, a copy of said report has been
issued to the Riverview Cemetery District and any party requesting a copy.
VIII:
Conflict of Interest Statement:
To date (at the writing of this report, May 1, 2016) no Commissioner has indicated that there is any conflict of
interest with regard to this project, nor has any Commissioner reported any communications with the Applicant,
Proponent or Opponent. The Commissioners will be asked to declare that during and prior to the public hearing.
The Executive Officer does not have any type of known conflict of interest or financial gain as a result of this
project and owns no property in the vicinity.
JHNDEB\S:\LAFCO\Executive Officer Reports\2016\05 26 16 Hearing EO Reports\1 EO Report Riverview Cemetery District SAP Update 5 1 16.docx
<b>EXECUTIVE OFFICERS RECOMMENDATION</b>
RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Executive Officer that LAFCO conduct a public hearing and consider all
information presented in both written and oral form. The Executive Officer then recommends, assuming no
significant public input warrants to the contrary, that LAFCO take the following action:
1:
Certify that the Service Area Plan is exempt from CEQA.
11:
Make the finding that this Sphere of Influence and Service Area Plan (SAP)/ Municipal Service Review
(MSR) is in substantial compliance with the provisions of the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Reorganization Act
of 2000 and the Imperial LAFCO Policy and Procedures.
111:
Make the findings pursuant to Government Code Section § 56425 that:
a. The Service Area Plan has been reviewed by the Executive Officer and the Commission and the
District has the capacity and ability to provide services within the area.
b. The Service Area Plan for the District shows it to be operating its service in a financially sound
manner.
c. The Sphere of Influence currently adopted remains adequate for the District and no annexations or
changes to the boundary have occurred since the prior SAP review.
IV:
The Commission finds that, the present land uses within the boundaries of the District are predominately
agricultural with urban and the services are strictly for providing Cemetery related functions.
The Commission finds that, there are no known social or economic communities of interest in the areas.
V:
Since there have been no protests received, the Commission adopts and approves the current Sphere of
Influence Boundary as previously reviewed and approved.
<b>LAFCO Policy:</b>
The proposed Sphere of Influence and Service Area Plan appears to be consistent with the Cortese-Knox-
Hertzberg Reorganization Act of 2000, the Imperial LAFCO Policies and Procedures and the County of Imperial
General Plan (Chapter IV. B. of LAFCO's Policies, Standards and Procedures). Furthermore, the District has
(according to the Service Area Plan) the ability to supply the necessary public service, and has assured LAFCO
that it has the capacity to service the areas.
NOTE: All "cc" submittals are the Executive Officer's Report only. Attachments are generally too
voluminous and are only supplied on CD. Information about the project may also be found on the
LAFCO web page at www.iclafco.com.
CC:
Riverview Cemetery District
ATTACHMENTS:
EXHIBIT A - Audited Financial Information
EXHIBIT B - Current Sphere of Influence Boundary Map
JH\DEB\S:\LAFCO\Executive Officer Reports\2016\05 26 16 Hearing EO Reports\1 EO Report Riverview Cemetery District SAP Update 5 1 16 docx
<b>EXHIBIT A</b>
<b>Audited Financial Information</b>
RCD 1-16
12
RIVERVIEW CEMETERY DISTRICT
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS WITH
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
AS OF AND FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2015
10
100
29
30
34
N
George J. Woo
Certified Public Accountant ...
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
Board of Directors
Riverview Cemetery District
Brawley, California
I have audited the accompanying financial statements of the Riverview Cemetery
District (the "District"), the business-type activities and the private purpose trust fund, as
of and for the year ended June 30, 2015, and the related notes to the financial
statements, which collectively compromise the District's basic financial statements.
Management's Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial
statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of
internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements
that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor's Responsibility
My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my
audit. I conducted the audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in
the United States of America and the State Controller's Minimum Audit Requirements
for California Special Districts. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from
material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the
auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of
the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk
assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity's preparation
and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that
are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control. Accordingly I express no such
opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies
used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.
I believe that the audit evidence I have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide
a basis for my audit opinion.
1085 State Street • El Centro, California 92243 • (760) 337-5555 • Fax 337-8796
E-mail address gjwcpa@sbcglobal.net
<b>Opinion</b>
In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the respective financial position of the business-type activities and the private
purpose trust fund of the District as of June 30, 2015, and the respective changes in
financial position and, where applicable, cash flows thereof for the year then ended in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United State of
America as well as accounting systems prescribed by the State Controller's Office and
state regulations governing special districts.
<b>Other Matters</b>
Accounting principles generally accepted in the Unites States of America require that
the management's discussion and analysis on pages 3 through 6 be presented to
supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the
basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards
Board, who considers it to be an essential part of the financial reporting for placing the
basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context.
I have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in
accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America,
which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the
information and comparing the information for consistency with management's
responses to my inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we
obtained during my audit of the basic financial statements. I do not express an opinion
or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not
provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance.
- Juso
November 19, 2015
Riverview Cemetery District
Management's Discussion and Analysis
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015
The following section of the annual financial report of the Riverview Cemetery
District (the District) includes an overview and analysis of the District's financial position
and activities for the year ended June 30, 2015. This discussion and analysis, as well as
the basic financial statements which it accompanies, is the responsibility of the
Management of the District.
Introduction to the Basic Financial Statements
This annual report consists of a series of financial statements, prepared in
accordance with the Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statements. This
reporting format is designed to improve the usefulness of the report to the primary users
of these basic financial statements.
The District presents its basic financial statements using the economic resources
measurement focus and accrual basis of accounting. As a Governmental Activity, the
District's basic financial statements include a Statement of Net Assets, a Statement of
Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets; and a Statement of Cash Flows.
Notes to the basic financial statements, required supplementary information, including
this section, support these statements. All sections must be considered together to
obtain a complete understanding of the financial position and results of operations of the
District.
Statement of Net Assets:
The statement of Net Assets includes all assets and liabilities of the District with
the difference between the two reported as net assets. Assets and liabilities are
reported at their book value, on an accrual basis, as of June 30, 2015. This statement
also identifies major categories of restrictions on the net assets of the District.
Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets:
The statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets presents the
revenues earned and expenses incurred by the District during the year ended June 30,
2015, on an accrual basis.
Statement Cash Flows:
The statement of Cash Flows presents the changes in the District's cash and
cash equivalents for the year ended June 30, 2015, summarized by operating, capital
and noncapital financing, and investing activities. The statement is prepared using the
direct method of reporting cash flows and, therefore, presents gross rather than net
amounts for the year's activities.
Riverview Cemetery District
Management's Discussion and Analysis
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015
Condensed Financial Position Information:
The following condensed financial information provides an overview of the
District's financial position for the fiscal years ended June 30:
<u>2015</u>
<u>2014</u>
Assets:
Capital assets - net
823,297
S
$
809,861
Other assets
<u>1,467,114</u>
1,404,294
Total assets
2,290,411
2,214,155
Liabilities:
Long – term debt
89,258
122,016
Other liabilities
78,492
50,381
Total liabilities
167,750
172,397
Net assets:
Invested in utility plant,
Net of related debt
701,281
656,650
Restricted for trust
885,377
845,272
Unrestricted
536,003
539,836
Total Net Assets
$ 2,122,661
$
2,041,758
a) Net Assets
Net assets, the difference between assets and liabilities, increased $80,973 or 4% from
July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2015. This increase mainly consists of $41,689 from operating
income and $40,105 from capital contributions and $5,669 from investment income.
b) Capital Assets
Net capital assets, which is made up of property, building and equipment, net of
accumulated depreciation increased $ 13,436.
c) Other Assets
Other assets consist of cash, investments, interest receivable and inventories. Other
assets increased $ 62,820. Cash and investments increased $ 85,320 during the fiscal
year.
Riverview Cemetery District
Management's Discussion and Analysis
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015
d) Other Liabilities
Other liabilities consist of accounts payable, accrued payroll, accrued interest payable
accrued compensated absences, and current portion of long-term debt. Other liabilities
increased by $ 28,111.
Summary of Operations and Changes in Net Assets
The increase in the District's net assets for fiscal year 2015 was $80,903 or
4%. This table summarizes the District's fiscal year activity.
2015
<u>2014</u>
Operating Revenues:
Current services
246,857
285,299
$
$
Property taxes
207,042
191,254
453,899
Total operating revenues
476,553
Operating expenses:
Salaries and employee benefits
237,607
219,341
Services and supplies
136,560
164,847
Depreciation
38,043
35,479
Total operating expenses
412,210
419,667
Operating income
41,689
56,886
Nonoperating revenues (expenses):
Interest income
4,620
5,876
Investment income - net
1049
-0-
Interest expense
(6,560)
(8,078)
Total nonoperating revenues
(891)
(2,202)
Capital Contributions
40,105
44,789
Change in net assets
80,903
99,473
Total net assets, beginning of year
2,041,758
1,942,285
Total net assets, end of year
$ 2,122,661
$ 2,041,758
Riverview Cemetery District
Management's Discussion and Analysis
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015
a) Operating Revenues
During fiscal year 2015, operating revenues decreased $ 22,654 or 4%.
b) Operating Expenses
Operating expenses consist of salaries, benefits, services and supplies, and
depreciation. During the fiscal year, operating expenses (including depreciation)
decreased $7,457 or 2%.
c) Nonoperating Revenues and Expenses
Nonoperating revenues and expenses consist of interest income and interest expense.
During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, nonoperating revenues (expenses)
decreased by $1,311.
d) Capital Contribution
Capital contributions are amounts paid by each purchaser of a burial plot to be used for
the perpetual care of the cemetery grounds. Capital contributions during fiscal year
ended June 30, 2015 were $ 40,105. A decrease of $ 4,684 from the prior fiscal year.
e) Restricted Resources
It is the District's policy to first apply unrestricted resources when an expense is incurred
for purposes for which both restricted and unrestricted net assets are available.
Requests for Information
If you have any questions about this report or need additional financial information, you
may contact Ms. Carrie L. Perryman, Manager, at (760) 344-4921 or by mail at Post
Office Box 597, Brawley, CA 92227.
RIVERVIEW CEMETERY DISTRICT
STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS
AS OF JUNE 30, 2015
Business
Private
Type
Purpose
Acitivity
Trust Fund
Total
<b>ASSETS</b>
Current Assets
Cash and investments
$
411,727
$ 1,050,449
$
1,462,176
Interest receivable
486
383
869
Inventory
4,069
-0-
4,069
<b>Total Current Assets</b>
416,282
1,050,832
1,467,114
Capital assets
Land
533,727
-0-
533,727
Other capital assets - net of
accumulated depreciation
289,570
-0-
289,570
Total capital assets
823,297
-0-
823,297
Total Assets
$ 1,239,579
$ 1,050,832
$
2,290,411
LIABILITIES
<b>Current Liabilities</b>
Accounts payable
$
36,354
$
$
-0-
36,354
Accrued payroll
1,993
-0-
1,993
Accrued interest payable
2,517
-0-
2,517
Accrued compensated absences
4,870
-0-
4,870
Current portion of long-term debt
32,758
-0-
32,758
Total current liabilities
78,492
-0-
78,492
Long-term debt
Loan payable, net of current portion
89,258
-0-
89,258
Total long term-debt
89,258
-0-
89,258
Total liabilities
167,750
-0-
167,750
<b>NET ASSETS</b>
Invested in capital assets.
net of related debt
701,281
-0-
701,281
Restricted:
Trust
-0-
885,377
885,377
Unrestricted
370,548
165,455
536,003
Total net assets
$ 1,071,829
$ 1,050,832
$
2,122,661
SEE ACCOMPANYING ACCOUNTANT'S AUDIT REPORT AND NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
RIVERVIEW CEMETERY DISTRICT
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2015
Business
Private
Type
Purpose
Acitivity
Trust Fund
Total
Operating revenues
Current services
$
246,857
$
-0-
$
246,857
Property taxes
207,042
-0-
207,042
Total operating revenues
453,899
-0-
453,899
Operating expenses
Salaries and employee benefits
237,607
-0-
237,607
Services and supplies
136,560
-0-
136,560
Depreciation
38,043
-0-
38,043
Total operating expenses
412,210
-0-
412,210
Operating Income
41,689
-0-
41,689
Non-operating revenues (expenses)
Interest income
1,594
3,026
4,620
Investment income - net
-0-
1,049
1,049
Interest expense
(6,560)
-0-
(6,560)
Total non-operating revenues
(4,966)
4,075
(891)
Net income before
capital contributions
36,723
4,075
40,798
Capital contributions
-0-
40,105
40,105
Increase in net assets
36,723
44,180
80,903
Total net assets - July 1, 2014
1,035,106
1,006,652
2,041,758
Total net assets - June 30, 2015
$ 1,071,829
$ 1,050,832
2,122,661
$
SEE ACCOMPANYING ACCOUNTANT'S AUDIT REPORT AND NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
RIVERVIEW CEMETERY DISTRICT
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2015
Business
Private
Type
Purpose
Acitivity
Trust Fund
Total
Reconciliation of operating income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Operating income
$
41,689
$
-0-
$
41,689
Adjustment to reconcile operating income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Due from other agencies
22,514
-0-
22,514
Increase in Inventory
(306)
-0-
(306)
Depreciation
38,043
-0-
38,043
(Increase) decrease in interest receivable
(217)
509
292
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable
30,706
-0-
30,706
Increase (decrease) in accrued payroll
698
-0-
698
Increase (decrease) accrued interest payable
(643)
-0-
(643)
Increase (decrease) in accrued
compensated absences
(4,213)
-0-
(4,213)
Total adjustments
86,582
509
87,091
Net cash provided by operating activities:
128,271
509
128,780
Cash flows from capital and related financing activities:
Retirement of debt
(31,195)
-0-
(31,195)
Purchase of equipment
(51,479)
-0-
(51,479)
Capital contributions
-0-
40,105
40,105
Interest paid
(6,560)
-0-
(6,560)
Net cash (used in) provided by capital
and related financing activities
(89,234)
40,105
(49, 129)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Investment income - net
-0-
1,049
1,049
Interest income
1,594
3,026
4,620
Net increase (decrease) in cash and investments
40,631
44,689
85,320
Cash and investments at July 1, 2014
371,096
1,005,760
1,376,856
Cash and investments at June 30, 2015
411,727
1,050,449
$ 1,462,176
SEE ACCOMPANYING ACCOUNTANT'S AUDIT REPORT AND NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Riverview Cemetery District
Notes to the Financial Statements
June 30, 2015
NOTE 1: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The financial statements of the Riverview Cemetery District (the "District") have
been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles as
applied to governmental units. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board is
the accepted standard setting body for establishing governmental accounting and
financial reporting principles. The more significant of the District's accounting
policies are described below.
The Reporting Entity
The District was formed in 1920, under the Health and Safety Code, Sections
8890 to 9225.
The District maintains a developed cemetery site on 38.25 acres of land. It
provides burial facilities for all residents of the District. The cemetery site has
been subdivided and recorded with the County Recorder's office of the County of
Imperial. Each purchaser of a burial plot is issued a Certificate of Burial Rights,
which allows the certificate holder to use the said plot for burial purposes in
accordance with the District's regulations.
Basis of Accounting/Measurement Focus
The accounts of the District are organized on the basis of funds each of which is
considered to be a separate accounting equity. The operations of each fund is
accounted for by providing a separate set of self balancing accounts which
comprise its assets, liabilities, fund equity, revenue and expenses.
The financial statements are presented using the economic measurement focus,
and the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized when earned and
expenses are recognized when incurred, regardless of when the related cash
flows take place.
Private-purpose trust funds account for assets a government holds in a trustee
capacity for others when the principal of the trust must be held intact and only the
income earned by the principal may be used for the purpose specified in the trust
agreement.
Riverview Cemetery District
Notes to the Financial Statements
June 30, 2015
NOTE 1: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES- (Continued)
Budget
The District adopts an annual budget for the enterprise fund on the basis of cash
receipts and disbursements. The Trustees annually, on or before August 1,
estimate and certify to the Board of Supervisors and County Auditor of the
County of Imperial, the amounts in the budget.
Receivables
All receivables are due from other governmental entities. Thus, the District
believes all receivables to be collectible in full; therefore, no allowance for
doubtful accounts is provided.
Interest Receivables
All interest receivables is due from the County of Imperial. This interest was
earned on District funds deposited in the Imperial County Treasurer's pooled
investment fund.
<u>Inventory</u>
Inventory is stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market.
Capital Assets
Capital assets are carried at cost. The land, building and original improvements
owned by the District were recorded at their approximate value, at the time of
acquisition, of $ 80,000. During the year ended June 30, 2009, an additional
10.19 acres were purchased for $ 455,000. The approximate value has been
prorated between the land, the buildings and improvements. Depreciation of
equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over 5-20 years.
depending on the asset's estimate useful lives.
Maintenance and repairs which neither add to the value of the property nor
appreciably prolong its life are charged as expenses when incurred.
Use of Estimates
In preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, management is required to
make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and
disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates under different
assumptions or conditions.
Riverview Cemetery District
Notes to the Financial Statements
June 30, 2015
NOTE 1: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - (Continued)
Compensated Absences
Vested or accumulated vacation leave that is expected to be liquidated with
expendable financial resources is reported as an expenditure and a fund liability
of the governmental fund that will pay it. In accordance with the provisions of the
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, no liability is recorded for non-
vesting accumulating rights to receive sick pay benefits.
Property Taxes
Secured property taxes become a lien on the property as of January 1, and are
levied in two equal installments; the first delinquent after December 10; and the
second delinquent after April 10. Property taxes on unsecured property becomes
a lien on the property as of January 1, and are delinquent after August 31, the
County of Imperial is responsible for the assessment, collection and
apportionment for all jurisdictions within the County, including the District.
Non-operating Revenues & Expenses
Non-operating revenues and expenses consist of interest earnings and interest
expense.
NOTE 2: CASH AND INVESTMENTS
California Government Code 53601 authorizes the District to invest in obligations
of the U.S. Treasury or its agencies, obligations of the State of California and any
local agency, corporate bonds rated AAA by Standard and Poor, certificates of
deposit or other interest bearing deposits of insured financial institutions and
other investments as my be allowed by law.
Deposits - At year-end, the carrying amount of the District's deposits was
$ 70,821 and the bank balance was $ 95,742. The bank balance is classified into
three categories of credit risk:
1. Insured or collateralized with securities held by the District or by its
agent in the District's name.
2. Collateralized with securities held by the pledging financial institution's
trust department or agent in the District's name.
Riverview Cemetery District
Notes to the Financial Statements
June 30, 2015
NOTE 2: CASH AND INVESTMENTS (CONTINUED)
3. Uncollateralized. (This includes any bank balance that is collateralized
with securities held by their pledging financial institution, or by its trust
department or agent but not in the District's name.)
Classification of Bank Balance by Credit Risk:
Categories
2
3
Total
Deposits
$ 70,821
$
0
$ 70,821
0
Investments - The District's investments are classified into three categories of
credit risk:
1. Insured or registered, or securities held by the District or its agent in
the District's name.
2. Uninsured and unregistered, with securities held by the counterparty's
trust department or agent in the District's name.
3. Uninsured and unregistered, with securities held by the counterparty,
or by its trust department or agent but not in the District's name.
.......................................
Riverview Cemetery District
Notes to the Financial Statements
June 30, 2015
NOTE 2: CASH AND INVESTMENTS (CONTINUED)
Classification of investments by credit risk:
<b>Categories</b>
Not
Carrying
Fair
Categorized
Amount
Value
295,893 $
Government Bonds
-0-
$ -0-
-0- $
295,893
$
$
295,893
Corporate Bonds
180,964
-0-
-0-
-0-
180,964
180,964
Foreign Bonds
44,781
-0-
-0-
-0-
44,781
44,781
Certificates of Deposit
269,396
-0-
-0-
-0-
269,396
269,396
Money Market Fund
10,015
-0-
-0-
-0-
10,015
<u> 10,015</u>
$ 2,643,805
<u>-0-</u>
-0-
801,049
-0-
801,049
County Investment
Pool
590,281
590,281
590,281
$1,391,330
$ 1,391,330
Investments are reported at fair value, which is defined as the amount at
which a financial instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction
between willing parties other than a forced or liquidation sale.
The District is a member of an external investment pool. The Treasurer of
Imperial County receives funds from the District and pools them with other
funds and invests these funds in a variety of instruments including Certificates
of Deposit and Government Agency instruments. The funds are recorded at
fair value and interest earnings are allocated quarterly based on the average
balance of the invested amount for the quarter.
The District has individual investments with a financial institution and
investment firm. These investments are reported at fair value, which was
obtained from statements provided by the institutions. Any adjustments to fair
value have been recorded to income or expense, depending on the nature of
the necessary adjustment.
Riverview Cemetery District
Notes to the Financial Statements
June 30, 2015
<b>NOTE 3: CAPITAL ASSETS</b>
Balance
Balance
June 30, 2014
<b>Additions</b>
Disposals
June 30, 2015
Land
$
533,727
$
-0-
$
-0-
$
533,727
Building and
Improvements
480,368
27,943
-0-
508,311
Equipment
305,177
23,536
<u>-0-</u>
328,713
Total
785,545
51,479
-0-
837,024
Accumulated
Depreciation
(509,411)
(38,043)
-0-
(547,454)
Total net of depreciation
276,134
(13,436)
-0-
289,570
Total capital assets
809,861
<b>$</b> (13,436)
823,297
$
<u>-0-</u>
NOTE 4: VACATION AND SICK LEAVE (COMPENSATED ABSENCES)
District employees earn hours of vacation based on years of service. Vacation
time accrues as follows:
Length of Service
Days accrued per Year
1 - 2 years
5 days
3 – 9 years
10 days
10 – 19 years
15 days
20 years or more
20 days
Sick leave is also earned by District employees at the rate of 12 days per year
regardless of the length of service. If not used, six of those days may be
accumulated, as vacation time.
Balance
Increase
Balance
June 30, 2014
(Decrease)
June 30, 2015
Totals
9,083
$
$ (4,213)
<u>$____________________________________</u>
4,870
Riverview Cemetery District
Notes to the Financial Statements
June 30, 2015
NOTE 5: RESTRICTED NET ASSETS
Trust - consists of legally segregated funds which may not be expended by the
Cemetery. The earnings of this principal are to be spent for the perpetual care of
the Cemetery grounds.
Total restricted net assets
<u>$ 885,377</u>
NOTE 6: RISK AND COVERAGE:
For the period of July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2015; the District secured the
insurance coverage outlined below through the Golden State Risk Management
Authority (GSRMA).
Policy JPA WC 032 - Workers Compensation. Coverage period July 1, 2014
through June 30, 2015. Policy limits match statutory limits on a per occurrence
(incident of illness, accident) basis. Employer's liability coverage is included with
policy limits of $5,000,000 per occurrence.
Policy JPA GLA 031- Property/Liability. Coverage period of July 1, 2014 through
June 30, 2015. Policy limits of $ 50,000,000 per occurrence for general liability.
Policy is written on an Occurrence Form and includes Automobile liability
coverage, officers and Board of Trustees Errors and Omissions and Pollution
liability coverage. There is no aggregated limit on this coverage.
Property coverage is all risk replacement cost and provides up to $ 600,000,000
maximum payment per covered loss. Coverage includes Automobile Physical
Damage, Mobile Equipment and Boiler and Machinery coverage.
The District's deductibles are:
$ 0 (first dollar) for Workers Compensation and liability coverage.
$ 1,000 per direct loss property coverage. (Earthquake and Flood deductibles are
determined by the loss)
$ 250 comprehensive/$ 500 collision for automobile physical damage loss.
The District paid $ 20,898 for the Workers Compensation coverage and
Property/Liability coverage.
The District has no outstanding indebtedness to GSRMA.
There are no assessments owed by, or dividends payable to the District.
There are no known claims not covered by insurance.
Riverview Cemetery District
Notes to the Financial Statements
June 30, 2015
NOTE 7: LONG TERM DEBT
On June 17, 2008 the District purchased 10.19 acres of vacant land for
expansion of cemetery operations for $ 455,000 and entered into a ten year
$ 300,000 installment sale agreement at a 4.95% interest rate. The note is
payable in semi-annual installments of $ 19,199, due on February 4, and August
4, and matures on August 4, 2018.
The note is secured by an assignment of revenues from Cemetery operations.
Balance
Debt
Debt
Balance
June 30, 2014
Retired
Issued
June 30, 2015
Totals
153.211
<math>(\$ 31,195)</math>
<u>-0-</u>
122,016
Year ended
June 30,
Principa!
Interest
Total
2016
$
32,758
$
5,639
$
38,397
2017
34,400
3,998
38,398
2018
36,124
2,273
38,397
2019
<u> 18,734</u>
467
19,201
Totals
122,016
12,377
S
134.393
NOTE 8: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The management of the Riverview Cemetery District have reviewed the results of
operations for the period of time from its year end June 30, 2015 through
November 19, 2015, the date the financial statements were available to be
issued, and have determined that no adjustments are necessary to the amounts
reported in the accompanying combined financial statements nor have any
subsequent events occurred, the nature of which would require disclosure.
.
<b>EXHIBIT B</b>
Current Sphere of Influence Boundary Map
RCD 1-16
Riverside County
ROE
____ R10E
R11E
RIZE
R13E R14E R15E R16E
13
R17E
SERT SHORES
MI, TON SEA BEACH O
T9S
T A O A
MHAY BEAC
SALTON
TIOS
S
T115
T125
County
Diego
Sam
T15S
T16S
T17S
R17E
RIBE
ww
RISE
---
R14E
RISE
International Border -- Mexico
RIIE
R10E
R9E
Riverview Cemetery District
local agency formation commission
EXHIBIT 17
.