LAFCO
Winterhaven County Water District Service Area Plan
Read the report at Local Agency Formation Commissions ↗
Executive Officer
OCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
Jurg Heuberger, CEP
EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT
To The
Local Agency Formation Commission
TO:
Commissioner
Commissioner
[Supervisor]
MARIA NAVA-FROELICH
[City]
MICHAEL KELLEY(Chair)
Commissioner
JASON JACKSON
[City]
Commissioner
RAY CASTILLO
[Supervisor]
[Public]
Commissioner
<b>DAVID WEST</b> (Vice-Chair)
Alt Commissioner
[Supervisor]
JACK TERRAZAS
Alt Commissioner
JIM PREDMORE
[City]
[Public]
Alt Commissioner
RALPH MENVIELLE
REPORT DATE:
May 1, 2016
FROM:
Jurg Heuberger, AICP, CEP, Executive Officer
PROJECT:
Winterhaven County Water District Sphere of Influence (SOI) update and
Service Area Plan (SAP)/Municipal Services Review (MSR)
<b>HEARING DATE:</b>
May 26, 2016
<b>TIME</b>: 9:00 AM
AGENDA ITEM NO:
15
<b>HEARING LOCATION:</b>
El Centro City Council Chambers, 1275 Main Street, El Centro, CA
RECOMMENDATION(S)
BY THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER
(In Summary & Order)
OPTION #1:
Approve the proposed Sphere of Influence (SOI) and the Service Area Plan/MSR
update as presented by the Executive Officer.
OPTION #2:
Approve the proposed Sphere of Influence (SOI) and Service Area Plan/MSR
update as requested with modifications, following the hearing by the
Commission.
OPTION # 3:
Continue the hearing for not to exceed 70 days, (end date August 15, 2016).
OPTION # 4:
Deny the Sphere of Influence and Service Area Plan update, and provide
direction to the District and EO for corrections.
1122 STATE STREET, SUITE D, EL CENTRO, CA 92243 (760)-353-4115
An equal opportunity employer
www.iclafco.com e-mail: jurgh@iclafco.com
<b>Project Data:</b>
<b>DATA & FACTS:</b>
Project ID
WCWD 1-16
Project Name:
Winterhaven County Water District Sphere of Influence and Service Area
Plan Update (SAP)/MSR
Applicant/Proponent:
Winterhaven County Water District
Application Type:
LAFCO requested update
Application Filed:
N/A (LAFCO Direction)
Certificate of Filing:
N/A
Area/Size:
See Plan
Location/Legal:
Maps of the District Boundary and the SOI are included in this report.
Population:
NA
Proposed Project:
Service Area Plan (SAP) / Municipal Services Review (MSR) Update.
MSR/SAP:
The most recent version of the Winterhaven County Water District
MSR/SAP is 2006.
TAX AGREEMENT:
Board of Supervisors Action:
N/A
City Resolution:
N/A (will be required upon notification by LAFCO)
Tax Split:
N/A
CEQA:
Lead Agency:
<b>LAFCO</b>
Documentation:
Exempt
JHIDEBIS:ILAFCO\Executive Officer Reports\2016\05 26 16 Hearing EO Reports\EO Report Winterhaven Water District SAP Update 5 1 16 1 docx
<b>ANALYSIS</b>
1:
Legal Requirements (Historical information):
Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Reorganization Act of 2000 (CKH), also referred to as Government Code 56000 et Seq.,
provides the legal basis for the requirement of the Sphere of Influence and the Service Area Plan or Municipal
service Review (MSR) being considered within the scope of this hearing.
G.C. § 56425 (a) states in part; "In order to carry out its purposes and responsibilities for planning and shaping
the logical and orderly development and coordination of local governmental agencies so as to advantageously
provide for the present and future needs of the county and its communities, the commission shall develop and
determine the sphere of influence of each local governmental agency with the county and enact policies designed
to promote the logical and orderly development of areas within the sphere."
G.C. § 56425 (b - i) provide the frame work within which the Commission may approve the sphere of influence
and the process that needs to be followed.
G.C. § 56425 (e) states in part; "In determining the sphere of influence of each local agency, the commission
shall consider and prepare a written statement of its determination with respect to each of the following:
The present and planned land uses in the area.
(1)
(2)
The present and probable need for public facilities and services in the area.
(3)
The present capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public services that the agency provides
or is authorized to provide.
The existence of any social or economic communities' of interest in the area if the commission
(4)
determines that they are relevant to the agency.
G.C. § 56425 (f) is a critical new section that changed the parameters of the prior review insofar that this section
now requires that; "Upon determination of a sphere of influence, the commission shall adopt that sphere, and
shall review and update, as necessary, the adopted sphere not less than once every five years".
There appears to be a misconception that the agencies will have to prepare a full new plan every five years,
however the intent here is to "review" the prior plan and to amend it if necessary. If there have been significant
changes, or if there has been explosive growth, then certainly the amendment will be much more comprehensive.
G.C. § 56428 (a) provides the mechanism for anyone to file a request with the executive officer for an amendment
to the sphere of influence. It states in part; "Any person or local agency may file a written request with the
Executive Officer requesting amendments to a sphere of influence or urban service area adopted by the
commission..."
Again there may be some confusion in this area as there have been numerous questions about the "limitations" of
the sphere and the process to amend.
It appears clear that the mandate is to review the plan at least every five years but there is no apparent restriction
on the number of times that it may be amended nor is there a restriction on who can request such an amendment,
there is only a process that needs to be followed. It goes without saying however that for an amendment to work
it need the consensus of the City/District, the County and the Commission.
Just as there are provisions for the addition of areas to a sphere of influence there are provisions for a process to
remove an area from an approved sphere boundary. This is found in G.C. 56429.
In addition to the SOI process G.C. § 56430 (a - d) now addresses the requirement for the review of municipal
services which in our case has been referred to for nearly a decade as the Service Area Plan (SAP).
JH\DEB\S\LAFCO\Executive Officer Reports\2016\05 26 16 Hearing EO Reports\EO Report Winterhaven Water District SAP Update 5 1 16 1,docx
G.C. § 56430 (a) states; "In order to prepare and to update spheres of influence in accordance with Section
56425, the Commission shall conduct a service review of the municipal services provide in the county or other
appropriate area designated by the commission. The commission shall include in the area designated for service
review the county, the region, the sub region, or any other geographic area as its appropriate for an analysis of
the service or service to be reviewed and shall prepare a written statement of its determination with respect to
each of the following:
1)
Infrastructure needs or deficiencies.
2)
Growth and population projections for the affected area.
3)
Financing constraints and opportunities.
4)
Cost avoidance opportunities.
5)
Opportunities for rate restructuring.
6)
Opportunities for shared facilities
7)
Governmental structure options, including advantages and disadvantages of consolidation or
reorganization of service providers.
8)
Evaluation of management efficiencies
9)
Local accountability and governance."
G.C. § 56430 (d) also required that the Office of Planning and Research of the State, in consultation with the
commissions, and the California Association of LAFCO's and other governmental agencies, SHALL prepare a
comprehensive set of guidelines for service reviews by July 1, 2001. Since these guidelines are voluminous a
full text copy is not attached to the report however there is a PDF copy on the CD rom that has been provided to
each commissioner and every interested party. Furthermore, the Executive Officer has urged the various entities
to utilize the "draft final" version as a guide to preparing the SOI and SAP.
II:
The PLAN as submitted:
The District is a Water District that provides water and wastewater services to a very small area within Imperial
County, primarily the town site of Winterhaven. The review in this case is/was the case in a number of other
smaller districts pursuant to the direction of LAFCO focused primarily on the financial viability of the District.
Insofar as this is a limited purpose District the services provided appear to be and have been provided adequately
for the most part. The District does have some challenges as do a number of similar smaller districts. The
financials for the District as per the attached also show that it is financially stable.
III:
District Approvals:
The District will need to accept the LAFCO approval of the SOI/MSR/SAP via a resolution to include any and all
recommendations.
<u>IV:</u>
CEQA:
It is argued and it is the Executive Officers opinion that the Service Area Plan fit within one or more "exemptions"
under the provisions of CEQA, not the least of which is the possible determination that this process is "not a
project".
JH\DEB\S.\LAFCO\Executive Officer Reports\2016\05 26 16 Hearing EO Reports\EO Report Winterhaven Water District SAP Update 5 1 16 1.docx
V:
Analysis by the Executive Officer / Determinations by the COMMISSION:
G.C. § 56425 (e) states in part; "In determining the sphere of influence of each local agency, the Commission
shall consider and prepare a written statement of its determination with respect to each of the following:
(1)
The present and planned land uses in the area.
(2)
The present and probable need for public facilities and services in the area.
(3)
The present capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public services that the agency provides
or is authorized to provide.
The existence of any social or economic communities of interest in the area if the commission
(4)
determines that they are relevant to the agency.
Proposed findings by the Commission:
1)
The present land use within the boundaries of the proposed SOI/SAP includes residential,
some commercial but little or no industrial. The District provides only water and wastewater
treatment related services and provides no other services.
2)
Currently the services provided are according to the audited financial information being
supplied in a financially stable and adequate manner. (See audited financial information
attached). It needs to be noted however that almost 44% of the total revenue for the District is
from one customer. Should that balance change the District could encounter serious financial
issues.
3)
There are no known social or economic communities of interest relevant to this review...
VI:
Public Notice:
Public notice for the proposed project hearing before the Imperial County Local Agency Formation Commission
has been given, according to Section § 56427. Notice was issued in the form of a publication in the IV Press at
least twenty-one (21) days prior or said hearing, and posted on our webpage.
VII:
Report:
In accordance with Section § 56665, the Executive Officer has prepared a report, and presented said report to
your Commission and to any public member requesting such report. In addition, a copy of said report has been
issued to the Riverview Cemetery District and any party requesting a copy.
VIII:
Conflict of Interest Statement:
To date (at the writing of this report, May 1, 2016) no Commissioner has indicated that there is any conflict of
interest with regard to this project, nor has any Commissioner reported any communications with the Applicant,
Proponent or Opponent. The Commissioners will be asked to declare that during and prior to the public hearing.
The Executive Officer does not have any type of known conflict of interest or financial gain as a result of this
project and owns no property in the vicinity.
JHNDEB\S.\LAFCO\Executive Officer Reports\2016\05 26 16 Hearing EO Reports\EO Report Winterhaven Water District SAP Update 5 1 16 1.docx
<b>EXECUTIVE OFFICERS RECOMMENDATION</b>
RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Executive Officer that LAFCO conduct a public hearing and consider all
information presented in both written and oral form. The Executive Officer then recommends, assuming no
significant public input warrants to the contrary, that LAFCO take the following action;
1:
Certify that the Service Area Plan is exempt from CEQA.
11:
Make the finding that this Sphere of Influence and Service Area Plan (SAP)/ Municipal Service Review
(MSR) is in substantial compliance with the provisions of the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Reorganization Act
of 2000 and the Imperial LAFCO Policy and Procedures.
111:
Make the findings pursuant to Government Code Section § 56425 that:
a. The Service Area Plan has been reviewed by the Executive Officer and the Commission and the
District has the capacity and ability to provide services within the area.
b. The Service Area Plan for the District shows it to be operating its service in a financially sound
manner.
The Sphere of Influence currently adopted remains adequate for the District and no annexations or
C.
changes to the boundary have occurred since the prior SAP review.
IV:
The Commission finds that, the present land uses within the boundaries of the District are predominately
agricultural with urban and the services are strictly for providing Cemetery related functions.
The Commission finds that, there are no known social or economic communities of interest in the areas.
V:
Since there have been no protests received, the Commission adopts and approves the current Sphere of
Influence Boundary as previously reviewed and approved.
LAFCO Policy:
The proposed Sphere of Influence and Service Area Plan appears to be consistent with the Cortese-Knox-
Hertzberg Reorganization Act of 2000, the Imperial LAFCO Policies and Procedures and the County of Imperial
General Plan (Chapter IV. B. of LAFCO's Policies, Standards and Procedures). Furthermore, the District has
(according to the Service Area Plan) the ability to supply the necessary public service, and has assured LAFCO
that it has the capacity to service the areas.
NOTE: All "cc" submittals are the Executive Officer's Report only. Attachments are generally too
voluminous and are only supplied on CD. Information about the project may also be found on the
LAFCO web page at www.iclafco.com.
CC:
Winterhaven County Water District
ATTACHMENTS:
EXHIBIT A - Audited Financial Information
EXHIBIT B - Current Sphere of Influence Boundary Map
JH\DEB\S:\LAFCO\Executive Officer Reports\2016\05 26 16 Hearing EO Reports\EO Report Winterhaven Water District SAP Update 5 1 16 1.docx
<b>EXHIBIT A</b>
<b>Audited Financial Information</b>
WCWD 1-16
WINTERHAVEN WATER DISTRICT
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WITH INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
As of and for the Year Ended June 30, 2015
11 0 0 ......
George J. Woo
Certified Public Accountant ...
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
Board of Directors
Winterhaven Water District
Winterhaven, California
I have audited the accompanying financial statements of the Winterhaven Water District (the
"District") as of June 30, 2015 and the related notes to the financial statements, which
collectively compromise the financial statements.
Management's Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial
statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant
to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor's Responsibility
My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audit. I
conducted the audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United
States of America and the State Controller's minimum audit requirements for California Special
District. Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's
judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial
statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor
considers internal control relevant to the entity's preparation and fair presentation of the
financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
entity's internal control. Accordingly I express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating
the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant
accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of
the financial statements.
I believe that the audit evidence I have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis
for my audit opinion.
1.7
1
1085 State Street • El Centro, California 92243 • (760) 337-5555 • Fax 337-8796
E-mail address gjwcpa@sbcglobal.net
Opinion
In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of the Winterhaven Water District as of June 30, 2015, and the changes in
financial position and cash flows thereof for the year then ended in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America as well as accounting systems
prescribed by the State Controller's Office and state regulations governing special districts.
Other Matters
Required Supplementary Information
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the
management's discussion and analysis on pages 3 through 6 be presented to supplement the
basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial
statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, who considers it to
be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an
appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. I have applied certain limited
procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management
about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency
with management's responses to my inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other
knowledge I obtained during my audit of the basic financial statements. I do not express an
opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not
provide me with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance.
Other Information
My audit was conducted for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements that
collectively comprise the financial statements as a whole. The supplementary schedules on
pages 17 through 18 are presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part
of the financial statements. The information is the responsibility of management and was
derived from and relate directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare
the financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied
in the audit of the financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing
and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to
prepare the financial statements or to the financial statements themselves, and other additional
procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America. In my opinion, the information is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the
financial statements taken as a whole.
1 no
December 18, 2015
Management's Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2015
The following section of the annual financial report of the Winterhaven Water District
(the District) includes an overview and analysis of the District's financial position and
activities for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014. This discussion and analysis, as
well as the basic financial statements which it accompanies, is the responsibility of the
management of the District.
Introduction to the Basic Financial Statements
This annual report consists of a series of financial statements, prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles; such report has been designed to
improve the usefulness of the report to the primary users of these basic financial
statements.
The District presents its basic financial statements using the economic resources
measurement to focus and accrual basis of accounting. As a Business-Type Activity,
the District's basic financial statements include a Statement of Net Position; a
Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position; and a Statement of
Cash Flows. Notes to the basic financial statements and this section support these
statements.
All sections must be considered together to obtain a complete
understanding of the financial position and results of operations of the District.
Statements of Net Position - The Statements of Net Assets include all assets and
liabilities of the District, with the difference between the two reported as net assets.
Assets and liabilities are reported at their book value, on an accrual basis, as of June
30, 2015, and 2014. These statements also identify major categories of restrictions on
the District's Net Position.
Statements of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position— The Statements
of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Assets present the revenues earned and
expenses incurred by the District during the years ended June 30, 2015, and 2014, on
the accrual basis of accounting.
Statement of Cash Flows - The Statements of Cash Flows present the changes in the
District's cash and investments for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014. Such
statements are summarized by operating, capital, and noncapital financing and
investing activities. The statements of cash flows have been prepared using the direct
method of reporting cash flows and, therefore, present gross, rather than net amounts,
for each respective year's activities.
Management's Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2015
Condensed Financial Position Information
The following condensed financial information provided an overview of the District's
financial position for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014.
<u>2015</u>
<u>2014</u>
Assets:
Utility plant, net
1,572,400
$ 1,605,359
$
Other assets
219,291
<u> 196,556</u>
<b>Total Assets</b>
1,791,691
1,801,915
Liabilities:
Other liabilities
10,887
30,225
<b>Total Liabilities</b>
<u> 10,887</u>
<u>30,225</u>
Net Position:
Invested in utility plant, net of related debt
1,572,400
1,605,359
Unrestricted
208,404
166,331
<b>Total Net Position</b>
1,780,804
$ 1,771,690
$
(a) Net Position
Net Position, the difference between assets and liabilities, increased $ 9,114 for
June 30, 2015 and increased $ 2,973 in 2014.
(b) Utility Plant
Net utility plant, which is comprised of property plant and equipment increased
$ 30,140 due to the current year construction in progress and decreased
$ 63,099 due to the annual depreciation associated with those assets.
(c) Other Assets
Other assets consist of cash, investments, and accounts receivable.
(d) Other Liabilities
Other liabilities consists of accounts payable, payroll taxes payable, accrued
interests payable, and customer deposits.
Management's Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2015
Summary of Operations and Changes in Net Position
Increase in the District's Net Position for the fiscal year 2015 was $ 9,114. The tables
below summarize the District's fiscal year 2015 and 2014 activity:
<u>2015</u>
2014
Operating revenues:
Water, sewer and trash revenues
346,757
$
321,893
$
Operating expenses:
Operation and maintenance
284,208
282,999
Depreciation
63,099
62,119
Total operating expenses
347,307
345,118
Operating income (Loss)
(550)
(23,225)
Non-operating revenues (expenses):
Grant Income
-0-
7,800
Other Income
26
2,960
Interest income
257
765
Property taxes
9,381
14,673
Total non-operating revenues (expenses)
9,664
<u> 26,198</u>
Increase in Net Position
9,114
2,973
Total Net Position, beginning of year
<u>1,771,690</u>
1,768,717
Total Net Position, end of year
$ 1,780,804
$ 1,771,690
Management's Discussion and Analysis
June 30, 2015
(a) Operating Revenues
During fiscal year 2015 operating revenues increased $ 24,864.
(b) Operating Expenses
Operating expenses consists of salaries, administrative expenses and operations
and maintenance costs.
During the year, operating expenses (including
depreciation) increased $ 2,189.
(c) Non-operating Revenues and Expenses
Non-operating revenues and expenses consist of interest income, property taxes,
sale of equipment and grant income.
<b>Utility Plant and Debt Administration</b>
(a) Utility Plant
Net utility plant is comprised of the water system, land and buildings.
Equipment consists of vehicles, tools and equipment, office furniture, and computer
equipment.
Request for information
This financial report is designed to provide a general overview of the Winterhaven
Water District's finances for all those with an interest in district's finances. Questions
concerning any of the information provided in this report or requests for additional
financial information should be addressed to the Office Manager, Winterhaven Water
District, 494 Second Ave., Winterhaven, California 92283-0787.
Statement of Net Position
As of June 30, 2015
<b>ASSETS</b>
<b>Current Assets:</b>
Cash & Investments
$
192,694
Accounts receivable
26,597
<b>Total Current Assets</b>
219,291
Property, plant and equipment, net of depreciation
1,572,400
<b>Total Assets</b>
$ 1,791,691
LIABILITIES AND NET POSITION
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable
$
5,845
Payroll Taxes Payable
1,753
Customer deposits
3,289
<b>Total Current Liabilities</b>
10,887
<b>Net Position</b>
Net Investment in Capital Assets
1,572,400
Unrestricted
208,404
<b>Total Net Position</b>
$ 1,780,804
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
For The Year Ended June 30, 2015
Operating revenues:
Water, sewer charges and trash removal
$ 346,757
Operating expenses:
349
Bank service charges
14,317
Chemicals
54,024
Contract Labor
63,099
Depreciation expense
12,325
Director's fees
17,362
Electricity
Employee benefits
15,936
Expense Reimbursement
1,430
Freight Charge
620
Fuel & oil
2,509
5,825
Insurance
4,802
Lab
11,334
Office expense
Payroll taxes
2,846
Permit
3,797
Professional fees
9,501
8,794
Repairs & maintenance
Returned Checks
133
55,204
Salaries & wages
Sewer plant
40,249
Supplies
2,004
Trash disposal
10,821
Truck repairs
9,832
Uniforms
194
347,307
Total operating expenses
(550)
Operating income (loss)
Nonoperating revenues (expenses):
$
Other Income
26
Interest income
257
<b>Property Taxes</b>
9,381
Total nonoperating revenues (expenses)
9,664
Net change in Net Position
9,114
$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
Statement of Changes in Net Position
For The Year Ended June 30, 2015
Balance beginning of year
$ 1,771,690
Net increase in Net Position
9,114
Balance end of year
$ 1,780,804
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Statement of Cash Flows
For The Year Ended June 30, 2015
Cash flows from operating activities:
(550)
Operating income (loss)
$
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used
in operating activities:
63,099
Depreciation
2,528
(Increase)/decrease in accounts receivable
(20,821)
Increase/(decrease) in accounts payable
(1,271)
Increase/(decrease) in payroll taxes payable
Increase/(decrease) in customer deposits
2,754
46,289
Total adjustments
45,739
Net cash used in operating activities
Cash flows from investment activities:
Interest received
257
257
Net cash provided by investing activities
Cash flows from capital and related financing activities:
Other income
26
Proceeds from property taxes
9,381
Purchase of property and equipment
(30,140)
Net cash (used in) provided by capital
and related financing activities
(20,733)
Net increase in cash and investments
25,263
Cash and restricted investments at beginning of year
167,431
$
192,694
Cash and restricted investments at end of year
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Notes to the Financial Statements
June 30, 2015
NOTE 1: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles. The significant accounting policies
followed are described below to enhance the usefulness of the financial
statements to the reader.
The Reporting Entity
The Winterhaven Water District (the "District") was formed February 24, 1971,
under the State of California Water Code Section 30322.
The District is governed by a Board of Directors consisting of five members who
are elected or appointed for four-year terms.
The financial statements consist only of the funds of the District. The District has
no oversight responsibility for any other governmental entity since no other
entities are considered to be controlled or dependent on the District.
Property, Plant and Equipment and Depreciation
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Expenditures for
maintenance and repairs are charged against operations.
Renewals and
betterments that materially extend the life of the assets are capitalized.
Depreciation on property, plant and equipment is provided over the estimated
useful lives of the respective assets on a straight-line basis. The estimated useful
lives are as follows:
Building improvements
25-50 years
Equipment
10 years
Street lights
30 years
Waste disposal
50 years
Water system
50 years
Notes to the Financial Statements
June 30, 2015
NOTE 1: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Budget
The District prepares and adopts a budget each year on the cash basis, a non-
generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") budgetary basis. The
difference between the District's budgetary basis and GAAP arises due to the
fact that the District, for budget purposes, expenses purchases of equipment
rather than capitalizing the equipment as required by GAAP.
Use of Estimates
In preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, management is required to
make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and
disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates under different
assumptions or conditions.
NOTE 2: CASH AND INVESTMENTS
The District maintains separate non-interest bearing cash accounts for checking -
general, payroll and petty cash.
The cash in County Treasury is maintained by the County of Imperial (the
"County"). The County maintains an agency fund for the District and therefore,
records a corresponding liability fund obligation. The County pools its cash and
investments from each fund to maximize the interest earning potential. Interest
earned is allocated at the end of the fiscal year based on weighted averages of
the cash and investment balances at year end.
The District considers all cash and cash deposits, investments in mutual and
similar funds and other investments with initial maturities of less than 90 days to
be cash and cash equivalents for purposes of preparing the accompanying
combined statements of cash flows
Notes to the Financial Statements
June 30, 2015
NOTE 2: CASH AND INVESTMENTS (Continued)
The District's cash deposits as of June 30, 2015 were either entirely insured by
appropriate Federal depository insurance or collateralized with collateral held by
the pledging financial institution's trust department or agent in the District's name
in accordance with provisions of the California Government Code. The carrying
amount and bank balance of the District's deposits as of June 30, 2015 are as
follows:
Carrying
Bank
Value
Balance
Insured
$ 174,011
$ 183,294
Collateralized
$ 174,011
$ 183,294
The District's investments as of June 30, 2015 are categorized by the level of
custodial risk assumed by the District. The risk categories are defined as follows:
Category 1: Includes investments that are insured or registered or for which the
securities are held by the District or its agent in the District's name.
Category 2: Includes uninsured and unregistered investments for which the
securities are held by the counterparty's trust department or agent in the District's
name.
Category 3: Includes uninsured and unregistered investments for which the
securities are held by the counterparty, or by its trust department or agent, but
not in the District's name
Notes to the Financial Statements
June 30, 2015
NOTE 2: CASH AND RESTRICTED INVESTMENTS (Continued)
Not Required to be Categorized: Investments in pools managed by other
governments or investment services in which the District owns a share of the
total pool, but does not own specific underlying investments within such pool.
This includes investments in the Imperial County Pool. The District does not have
a detail of the portfolios of the Imperial County Pool as of June 30, 2015.
Imprest Cash
$
200
Cash - checking
129,394
Cash - payroll
3,920
Certificate of Deposit
40,697
Cash in the County Treasury
16,155
190,166
Total cash deposits
Total cash
190,366
Investment- Principal Financial Stock
2,328
Total cash and investments
192,694
The District's investments as of June 30, 2015 are categorized by level of
custodial risk in the following table:
Fair
Value
Not subject to categorization:
Investment in County Pool
16,15<u>5</u>
$
Total investments
16,155
Notes to the Financial Statements
June 30, 2015
NOTE 3: PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment are summarized by major classifications as
follows:
Balance
Additions
Balance
July 1, 2014
(Retirements) June 30,2015
Buildings and improvements
$
42,760
$
-0-
$
42,760
Construction in progress
11,500
30,140
41,640
Equipment
28,682
-0-
28,682
Vehicles
43,809
-0-
43,809
Street lights
720
-0-
720
Water system
919,422
-0-
919,422
Sewer force main
1,125,758
-0-
1,125,758
Office Equipment
10,442
-0-
10,442
Sewer System improvements
375,959
-0-
375,959
Water plant improvements
375,283
-0-
375,283
Water well improvements
7,800
-0-
7,800
Tools & Equipment
<u> 16,856</u>
-0-
16,856
Total
$ 2,958,991
30,140
$
2,989,131
Less accumulated depreciation
(1,416,731)
Property, plant and equipment net of
accumulated depreciation
$ 1,572,400
NOTE 4: EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT PLAN
Plan description:
The District contributes to the Miscellaneous 2% at 60 Risk Pool of the California
Employees Retirement System (CalPERS), a cost sharing, multiple-employer
public employee defined benefit pension plan. CalPERS provides retirement and
disability benefits, annual cost-of-living adjustments, and death benefits to plan
members and beneficiaries. CalPERS acts as a common investment and
administrative agent for participating public entities within the State of California.
As of July 1, 2005, the District was mandated by the State to participate in the
risk pool. The risk pool combines the assets and liabilities across employers of
the same risk pool to provide a method to spread the risk of uncertain gains and
losses over a larger base of members. The June 30, 2003 valuations were the
first pooled valuations. Benefit provisions and all other requirements are
established by State statute and District resolutions. Copies of CalPERS' annual
Notes to the Financial Statements
June 30, 2015
NOTE 4: EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT PLAN (CONTINUED)
financial report may be obtained from their Executive Office located at, 400 P
Street, Sacramento, CA 95814.
Funding policy:
The District contributes all amounts necessary to fund benefits for its employees.
The contribution includes an employee portion of 7% of current covered payroll.
The District is also required to contribute any actuarially determined remaining
amounts necessary to fund the benefits for its members. The actuarial methods
and assumptions used are those adopted by the CalPERS Board of
Administration. The required employer contribution rate for the year ended June
30, 2015 was 13.087%. The contribution requirements of the plan members are
established by State statute and the employer contribution rate is established
and may be amended by CalPERS. The District's contributions to CalPERS for
the years ended June 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013, which were all prepaid by the
District at the beginning of the year, were $ 3,290, $ 7,181 and $ 11,294
respectively. These contributions were equal to the required contributions for
each year.
NOTE 5: WASTEWATER TREATMENT SERVICES
Pursuant to the conditions of the 1972 agreement between the City of Yuma (the
"City"), and the District, the City will furnish facilities to transmit the District's
sewage to the City for treatment. The City will charge the District for operations
and maintenance based on the actual costs incurred by the City which varies
from billing cycle to billing cycle.
NOTE 6 - MAJOR CUSTOMER
The District had one major customer during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015,
which comprised of approximately 44% of the total sales. The District had
$ 12,488 receivable from this customer as of June 30, 2015.
NOTE 7 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The management of the District have reviewed the results of operations for the
period of time from its year end June 30, 2015 through December 18, 2015 the
date the financial statements were available to be issued, and have determined
that no adjustments are necessary to the amounts reported in the accompanying
combined financial statements nor have any subsequent events occurred, the
nature of which would require disclosure.
WINTERHAVEN WATER DISTRICT
STATEMENT OF NET POSITION BY FUND
As of June 30, 2015
Water
Sewer
Fund
Fund
<b>ASSETS</b>
Cash & investments
(121,525)
332,573
$
$
Accounts receivable
12,549
12,548
<b>Total Current Assets</b>
(108, 976)
345,121
Property, plant & equipment, Net of depreciation
632,759
939,641
523,783
$ 1,284,762
$
LIABILITIES AND NET POSITION
<b>LIABILITIES</b>
Accounts payable
$
$
2,922
2,922
Payroll Taxes Payable
877
876
Customer deposits
3,289
-0-
<b>Total liabilities</b>
7,088
3,798
<b>NET POSITION</b>
Invested in utility plant
632,759
939,641
Unreserved (Deficit)
(116,064)
341,323
<b>Total Net Position</b>
516,695
$ 1,280,964
$
See accountant's report regarding supplemental information.
125
WINTERHAVEN WATER DISTRICT
STATEMENT OF OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) BY FUND
As of June 30, 2015
Trash
Total
Water
Sewer
Operating revenues:
Charges for services
148,077
$ 182,661
$ 16,019
$ 346,757
$
Operating expenses:
Bank service charges
134
215
-0-
349
11,454
716
Chemicals
2,147
14,317
Contract Labor
40,079
11,529
2,416
54,024
Depreciation expense
30,843
32,256
-0-
63,099
Director's fees
8,884
2,832
609
12,325
Electricity
11,520
5,779
63
17,362
Employee benefits
10,998
4,368
570
15,936
Freight Charge
620
-0-
-0-
620
Fuel & oil
1,720
628
161
2,509
4,659
874
292
Insurance
5,825
Lab
4,802
-0-
-0-
4,802
Office expense
8,867
2,044
423
11,334
901
Expense reimbursement
400
129
1,430
Salaries & Wages
36,356
3,699
15,149
55,204
Payroll taxes
2,110
620
116
2,846
Permit
3,378
412
7
3,797
Professional fees
7,551
1,483
467
9,501
2,578
6,039
Repairs & maintenance
177
8,794
106
20
Returned Checks
7
133
-0-
Sewer plant
40,249
-0-
40,249
Supplies
1,565
420
19
2,004
Trash Disposal
-0-
-0-
10,821
10,821
Truck repairs
7,413
2,042
377
9,832
Uniforms
119
52
23
194
Total operating expenses
196,657
129,558
21,092
347,307
53,103
(5,073)
Operating income (loss)
(48,580)
$
$
$
(550)
$
See Accountant's Report regarding supplemental information.
<b>EXHIBIT B</b>
Current Sphere of Influence Boundary Map
WCWD 1-16
INDIAN ROACK RD
DE CORSE ROAD
FOSTER ROAD
HORNE ROAD
ARNOLD ROAD
COUNTY ROAD BU
SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD
PICACHO ROAD
STATE HIGHWAY 80
FIRST STREET
INTERSTATE 8
COLORADO RIVER
Winterhaven County Water District
local agency formation commission
<b>EXHIBIT 20</b>