LAFCO
Agoura Hills, Calabasas, Hidden Hills, and Westlake Village MSR (September 9, 2020)
C I T I E S O F A G O U R A H I L L S ,
C A L A B A S A S , H I D D E N H I L L S , A N D
W E S T L A K E V I L L A G E
M U N I C I PA L S E RV I C E R E V I E W S A N D
S P H E R E O F I N F LU E N C E U P D AT E S
F I N A L
Adopted September 9, 2020
Prepared for the
Los Angeles Local Agency Formation Commission
by Policy Consulting Associates, LLC. and
Berkson Associates
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
TA B L E O F C O N T E N T S
ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS ......................................................................................................................................... IV
PREFACE ................................................................................................................................................................................... V
CONTEXT ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... V
CREDITS ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ V
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................... 1
OVERVIEW ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1
ACCOUNTABILITY AND GOVERNANCE ......................................................................................................................................................... 1
PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT .................................................................................................................................................................... 1
GROWTH AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS ................................................................................................................................................ 3
DISADVANTAGED UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITIES .............................................................................................................................. 3
MUNICIPAL SERVICES .................................................................................................................................................................................... 3
FINANCING ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3
SPHERES OF INFLUENCE ................................................................................................................................................................................ 3
2. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................................... 6
LAFCO OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 6
MUNICIPAL SERVICES REVIEW LEGISLATION ............................................................................................................................................ 6
MUNICIPAL SERVICES REVIEW PROCESS ................................................................................................................................................... 7
SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATES ............................................................................................................................................................... 7
DISADVANTAGED UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITIES .............................................................................................................................. 8
3. SETTING ........................................................................................................................................................................ 10
BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 10
LOCATION ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 10
BOUNDARIES ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 10
SPHERE OF INFLUENCE ............................................................................................................................................................................... 11
MUNICIPAL SERVICES ................................................................................................................................................................................. 11
4. CITY OF AGOURA HILLS ........................................................................................................................................... 15
CITY OVERVIEW .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 15
ACCOUNTABILITY AND GOVERNANCE ...................................................................................................................................................... 17
PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ............................................................................................................................................ 17
GROWTH AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS ............................................................................................................................................. 22
DISADVANTAGED UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITIES ........................................................................................................................... 34
FINANCIAL ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICES ............................................................................................................................................ 34
AGOURA HILLS MUNICIPAL SERVICES ..................................................................................................................................................... 38
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS MSR DETERMINATIONS .................................................................................................................................. 46
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE .................................................................................................................... 48
5. CITY OF CALABASAS ................................................................................................................................................. 52
CITY OVERVIEW .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 52
ACCOUNTABILITY AND GOVERNANCE ...................................................................................................................................................... 54
PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ............................................................................................................................................ 54
GROWTH AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS ............................................................................................................................................. 59
DISADVANTAGED UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITIES ........................................................................................................................... 70
FINANCIAL ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICES ............................................................................................................................................ 70
CALABASAS MUNICIPAL SERVICES ........................................................................................................................................................... 75
CITY OF CALABASAS MSR DETERMINATIONS ........................................................................................................................................ 84
CITY OF CALABASAS SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE .......................................................................................................................... 87
TABLE OF CONTENTS i
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
6. CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS ............................................................................................................................................ 91
CITY OVERVIEW .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 91
ACCOUNTABILITY AND GOVERNANCE ...................................................................................................................................................... 93
PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ............................................................................................................................................ 93
GROWTH AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS ............................................................................................................................................. 96
DISADVANTAGED UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITIES ......................................................................................................................... 101
FINANCIAL ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICES .......................................................................................................................................... 101
HIDDEN HILLS MUNICIPAL SERVICES .................................................................................................................................................... 106
CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS MSR DETERMINATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 113
CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE ................................................................................................................... 115
7. CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE ............................................................................................................................. 118
CITY OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 118
ACCOUNTABILITY AND GOVERNANCE .................................................................................................................................................... 120
PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES .......................................................................................................................................... 120
GROWTH AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS ........................................................................................................................................... 123
DISADVANTAGED UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITIES ......................................................................................................................... 126
FINANCIAL ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICES .......................................................................................................................................... 126
WESTLAKE VILLAGE MUNICIPAL SERVICES ......................................................................................................................................... 131
CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR DETERMINATIONS ...................................................................................................................... 137
CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE ........................................................................................................ 139
APPENDIX A ........................................................................................................................................................................ 140
REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................................................................... 141
TABLE OF CONTENTS ii
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
L I S T O F F I G U R E S
FIGURE 1-2: MSR AREA MAP ...................................................................................................................................................................... 2
FIGURE 3-1: CITY BOUNDARY AREAS ...................................................................................................................................................... 11
FIGURE 3-2: CITY MUNICIPAL SERVICES ................................................................................................................................................. 12
FIGURE 4-1: CITY OF AGOURA HILLS BOUNDARIES AND SOI .............................................................................................................. 16
FIGURE 4-2: CITY OF AGOURA HILLS EXISTING LAND USE (2010) .................................................................................................. 22
FIGURE 4-3: CITY OF AGOURA HILLS GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS ........................................................................... 24
FIGURE 4-4: CITY OF AGOURA HILLS AGOURA VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN ZONE DESIGNATIONS .................................................... 25
FIGURE 4-5: CITY OF AGOURA HILLS LADYFACE MOUNTAIN SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS ................................... 26
FIGURE 4-6: CITY OF AGOURA HILLS POPULATION, (2010 – 2020) ............................................................................................... 27
FIGURE 4-7: CITY OF AGOURA HILLS SPHERE OF INFLUENCE OPTIONS ............................................................................................ 33
FIGURE 4-8: CITY OF AGOURA HILLS MUNICIPAL SERVICE STRUCTURE ........................................................................................... 38
FIGURE 5-1: CITY OF CALABASAS BOUNDARIES AND SOI .................................................................................................................... 53
FIGURE 5-2: CITY OF CALABASAS GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS ................................................................................. 60
FIGURE 5-3: CITY OF CALABASAS POPULATION, (2010 – 2020) ..................................................................................................... 61
FIGURE 5-4: CITY OF CALABASAS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS .............................................................................................................. 62
FIGURE 5-5: CITY OF CALABASAS SPHERE OF INFLUENCE OPTIONS .................................................................................................. 69
FIGURE 5-6: CITY OF CALABASAS MUNICIPAL SERVICE STRUCTURE ................................................................................................. 75
FIGURE 6-1: CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS BOUNDARIES AND SOI ............................................................................................................... 92
FIGURE 6-2: CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS POPULATION, (2010 – 2020) ................................................................................................ 97
FIGURE 6-3: CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AREAS ............................................................................................... 100
FIGURE 6-4: CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS MUNICIPAL SERVICE STRUCTURE .......................................................................................... 106
FIGURE 7-1: CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE BOUNDARIES AND SOI .................................................................................................. 119
FIGURE 7-2: CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE EXISTING LAND USE (2019) ....................................................................................... 123
FIGURE 7-3: CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE POPULATION (2010-2020) ....................................................................................... 124
FIGURE 7-4: CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE MUNICIPAL SERVICE STRUCTURE ................................................................................ 131
LIST OF FIGURES iii
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
ACRO NYM S A ND DEF I NI TI O NS
AB: Assembly Bill
CCTV: Closed circuit television
CEQA: California Environmental Quality Act
CFPD: Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County
CIP: Capital Improvement Plan or Program
CIWMB: California Integrated Waste Management Board
CKH: Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000
CLAPLS: County of Los Angeles Public Library System
CY: Calendar year
DHS: Los Angeles County Department of Health Services
EIR: Environmental Impact Report
FTE: full-time equivalent
FY: FY
GP: General Plan
JPA: Joint Powers Authority or Agency
LACACC: Los Angeles County Animal Care and Control
LAFCO: Local Agency Formation Commission
MS4: Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems
MSR: Municipal Service Review
NPDWRs: National Primary Drinking Water Regulations
PW: Los Angeles County Public Works
RWQCB: Regional Water Quality Control Board
SMD: County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works Sewer Maintenance
SOI: Sphere of Influence
SSO: Sanitary Sewer Overflow
SWRCB: State Water Resources Control Board
WTP: Stormwater Treatment Plant
ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS iv
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
P R EFAC E
Prepared for the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) for the County of Los
Angeles, this report is a Municipal Service Review (MSR) and Sphere of Influence (SOI)
Update for the Cities of Agoura Hills, Calabasas, Hidden Hills, and Westlake Village.
CONTEXT
LAFCO is required to prepare this Service Review by the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local
Government Reorganization Act of 2000 (CKH) (Government Code §56000, et seq.), which
took effect on January 1, 2001. The service review examines services provided by four cities
in the Las Virgenes area that are subject to LAFCO jurisdiction. The Cities of Agoura Hills,
Calabasas, Hidden Hills, and Westlake Village and the municipal service provided by these
cities are the focus of this review. In order to provide comprehensive information on service
provision, other service providers—special districts, other public agencies, and private
companies—are included in this Service Review.
CREDITS
The authors extend their appreciation to those individuals at the many agencies that
provided planning and financial information and documents used in this report. The
contributors are listed individually at the end of this report.
LAFCO staff provided project coordination and GIS support. This report was prepared in
conjunction by Policy Consulting Associates, LLC and Berkson Associates, and was co-
authored by Jennifer Stephenson, Richard Berkson, and Jill Hetland. Jennifer Stephenson
served as project manager.
PREFACE v
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
1. EXECUTI V E S UM M A RY
This report is a regional municipal service review (MSR) covering the Cities of Agoura
Hills, Calabasas, Hidden Hills, and Westlake Village prepared for the Local Agency Formation
Commission (LAFCO) for the County of Los Angeles. A service review is a State-required
comprehensive study of services within a designated geographic area, in this case the Las
Virgenes area. The MSR requirement is codified in the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local
Government Reorganization Act of 2000 (CKH) (Government Code Section 56000 et seq.).
OVERVIEW
The MSR study area includes the City of Agoura Hills, the City of Calabasas, the City of
Hidden Hills, and the City of Westlake Village. Each of these communities is situated on the
western end of Los Angeles County. The MSR study map may be referred to in Figure 1-2.
The intent of this municipal service review is to conduct comprehensive Sphere of
Influence (SOI) updates for each of the subject cities. The four cities were last reviewed in
2012 and the existing SOIs were reconfirmed at that time. The Cities of Agoura Hills,
Calabasas, and Hidden Hills have proposed changes for their respective SOIs for
consideration in this review.
The proposed MSR and SOI Update determinations, as well as SOI recommendation, are
located at the end of each City’s chapter in this report.
ACCOUNTABILITY AND GOVERNANCE
The cities reviewed in the MSR meet Brown Act requirements including noticing and
posting of meetings and agendas, communication and outreach to residents, and websites
that provide links to meeting information, contacts, and documents including financial
reports.
All cities demonstrated accountability and transparency in their disclosure of
information and cooperation during the process of this MSR. The cities responded in a timely
manner to the questionnaires and cooperated with document requests.
PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
All of the cities have General Plans (GP) that guide development. The City of Calabasas
has planned for areas it wishes to annex, but the Cities of Hidden Hills and Agoura Hills do
not include potential annexation areas in the GPs; these cities should update their GP if
unincorporated areas currently within their SOIs are to be retained or expanded as
recommended in this MSR.
The City of Westlake Village has no plans to expand its SOI beyond its municipal
boundaries.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Figure 1-2: MSR Area Map
SHERMAN WY
VANOWENST
Canoga
West Hills Park
VICTORY BLVD
VENTURA COUNTY VALLEY
CIRCLE
BLVD
PLATT
AV
FALLBROOK
AV
OXNARD ST
ETHOUSANDOAKSB
LIND
L
ER
V
O
CA
D
NYON RD
THOUSANDOAKSBLVD
CO
HIDDEN HILLS
LOS A
V
N
W
EN
o
G
T
H
o
U
E
d
i
R
l
l
A
l
a
L
s
B
n
E
L
d
V
S
D
./US CO
MULHOLLANDDR
TRIUNFOCANYON
RD
WLINDEROCANYONRD AGOURA HILLS101
CALABASAS
WESTLAKE VILLAGE KANANRD
RD
VIRGENES
LAS
CO
MULHOLLANDHWY
RD
Legend
ENCINALCANYONRD
NAK
AN
DUME
Agoura Hills, Calabasas, Hid
N
MAdLIBU
CANYON
e
RD
n Hills
µ
& Westlake Village
Sphere of Influence City of Hidden Hills
City of Agoura Hills City of Westlake Village
City of Calabasas County Unincorporated 0.95 0.475 0 0.95
Miles
October 9, 2019 C:\GIS\MXDs\101corridor
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
GROWTH AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS
The four cities reviewed in this MSR are at or near buildout with no significant future
population growth from new development of vacant land. Some growth is anticipated on
remaining vacant lands and as a result of redevelopment, for example in Westlake Village’s
North Business Park area.
DISADVANTAGED UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITIES
No disadvantaged unincorporated communities (DUCs) exist within or adjacent to any of
the City’s boundaries or SOIs.
MUNICIPAL SERVICES
All the cities reviewed rely on contracts with other public agencies and private
companies for the provision of services, as summarized in Figure 1-1. No significant service
or capacity concerns were identified.
FINANCING
All the cities reviewed are in good financial condition, with moderate levels of reserves
meeting or exceeding policy goals and reasonable benchmarks. Up until the recent economic
impact caused by COVID-19, revenues were growing at a moderate pace for all cities,
reserves met or exceeded policies and reasonable benchmarks, and pension obligations
were not a significant factor.
The impacts of COVID-19 are not yet fully known, however, it is likely to have a significant
impact on the cities’ sales tax and other revenues. Property tax revenues, which are the
primary source of Hidden Hills revenue, are likely to be much less affected. Depending on
the duration and extent of “safe-distancing” measures, cities may need to implement some
combination of staff and service level reductions, project deferrals, and tap into reserves.
SPHERES OF INFLUENCE
City of Westlake Village
Westlake Village is the only city for which no SOI option is considered and no change is
recommended. The City’s municipal boundaries are coterminous with its SOI, and no growth
outside its boundaries is planned.
City of Agoura Hills
The MSR evaluates potential changes for six SOI areas for the City of Agoura Hills shown
in Figure 4-7 and recommends the following:
v Include Areas M, N, and O within an expanded SOI to improve service efficiencies and
create more logical city boundaries which integrate communities.
v Include Area L within an expanded SOI to improve the efficiency of services to the
area.
v Area P has an approved tract map for development and should be included in Agoura
Hills’ SOI for service provision should the area be developed.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
v Continue to exclude Area Q, due to lack of potential development at present.
v Area I is recommended to be a LAFCO “Area of Concern”. The MSR recommends that
the parties of interest, namely the County of Los Angeles, as the existing land use
authority of the area, and the cities of Agoura Hills and Calabasas, as the potential
future service providers and affected agencies, develop a cooperative land use
agreement covering those items previously discussed by the two cities. This
agreement would address issues of concern including allowed business activities,
land uses, and impacts on nearby neighborhoods; provision of efficient services to the
area; future configuration, landscaping and lighting of Agoura Road; preservation of
open space; and erosion issues.
The City of Calabasas
The MSR evaluates potential changes for nine SOI areas for the City of Calabasas as shown
in Figure 5-5 and recommends the following:
v Include Areas A, D, G, H and J within an expanded SOI to improve service
efficiencies and create more logical city boundaries which integrate communities.
v Include Area D (and exclude E and F) consistent with the agreement between
Hidden Hills and Calabasas whereby Calabasas will annex Area D.
v Areas B and C are recommended to remain in the Hidden Hills SOI so the City may
have an opportunity to plan for these areas during its GP Update. Should Hidden
Hills choose not to plan for these areas and eventual annexation, then it would be
appropriate for these areas to be included in Calabasas’ SOI.
v Continue to exclude Area K form the City’s SOI until the landfill is nearing closure
and the City has a more defined plan for use.
v Area I is recommended to be a LAFCO “Area of Concern”. The MSR recommends
that the parties of interest, namely the County of Los Angeles, as the existing land
use authority of the area, and the cities of Agoura Hills and Calabasas, as the
potential future service providers and affected agencies, develop a cooperative
land use agreement covering those items previously discussed by the two cities..
This agreement would address issues of concern including allowed business
activities, land uses, and impacts on nearby neighborhoods; provision of efficient
services to the area; future configuration, landscaping and lighting of Agoura
Road; preservation of open space; and erosion issues.
City of Hidden Hills
The City of Hidden Hills’ current SOI is nearly 70 percent larger than the City’s municipal
boundary; the City’s GP does not identify or plan for land uses in its SOI beyond its
boundaries. To the west, the SOI splits the community of Mountain View Estates; the SOI
extends south to Hwy 101 and to the southeast encompasses the Craftsman’s Corner area.
Figure 6-1 shows SOI options. This MSR recommends:
v Remove the Craftsman’s Corner Area D consistent with the agreement between
Hidden Hills and Calabasas whereby Calabasas will annex the area.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
v Reduce the western SOI boundary by removing Area A (which includes a portion of
the Mountain View Estates gated community).
v Leave Area B and Area C in the SOI contingent on an update of the City’s GP to include
planning for land uses, services, infrastructure and financing in those areas. If the City
does not initiate its GP update for those areas within a fixed time, LAFCO should
remove Area B and Area C from the SOI.
During the course of preparation of this MSR, the City of Hidden Hills has indicated its
interest in expanding its SOI further west to include all of Mountain View Estates to maintain
land use control over areas where development could create traffic and emergency access
problems for Hidden Hills residents, and could pose wildfire issues. The Mountain View
Estates area has been considered for annexation in the past by the City of Calabasas, and this
MSR recommends the area be included with the Calabasas SOI.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
2. B ACKGROUND
This report is prepared pursuant to legislation enacted in 2000 that requires LAFCO to
conduct a comprehensive review of municipal service delivery and update the spheres of
influence (SOIs) of all agencies under LAFCO’s jurisdiction. This chapter provides an
overview of LAFCO’s powers and responsibilities. It discusses legal requirements for
preparation of the municipal services review (MSR), and describes the process for MSR
review, MSR approval and SOI updates.
LAFCO OVERVIEW
LAFCO regulates, through approval, denial, conditions and modification, boundary
changes proposed by public agencies or individuals. It also regulates the extension of public
services by cities and special districts outside their jurisdictional boundaries. LAFCO is
empowered to initiate updates to the SOIs and proposals involving the dissolution or
consolidation of special districts, mergers, establishment of subsidiary districts, and any
reorganization including such actions. Otherwise, LAFCO actions must originate as petitions
or resolutions from affected voters, landowners, cities or districts.
MUNICIPAL SERVICES REVIEW LEGISLATION
The Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 (CKH)
requires LAFCO review and update SOIs every five years, or as necessary, and to review
municipal services before updating SOIs. The requirement for service reviews arises from
the identified need for a more coordinated and efficient public service structure to support
California’s anticipated growth. The service review provides LAFCO with a tool to study
existing and future public service conditions comprehensively and to evaluate
organizational options for accommodating growth, preventing urban sprawl, and ensuring
that critical services are provided efficiently.
Government Code §56430 requires LAFCO to conduct a review of municipal services
provided in the county by region, sub-region or other designated geographic area, or by type
of service, as appropriate, for the service or services to be reviewed, and prepare a written
statement of determination with respect to each of the following topics:
v Growth and population projections for the affected area;
v The location and characteristics of any disadvantaged unincorporated communities
within or contiguous to the SOI;
v Present and planned capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public services,
including infrastructure needs or deficiencies (including needs or deficiencies related
to sewers, municipal and industrial water, and structural fire protection in any
disadvantaged unincorporated communities within or contiguous to the SOI);
v Financial ability of agencies to provide services;
v Status of, and opportunities for shared facilities;
BACKGROUND 6
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
v Accountability for community service needs, including governmental structure and
operational efficiencies; and
v Any other matter related to effective or efficient service delivery, as required by
commission policy.
MUNICIPAL SERVICES REVIEW PROCESS
The MSR process does not require LAFCO to initiate changes of organization based on
service review findings, only that LAFCO identify potential government structure options.
However, LAFCO, other local agencies, and the public may subsequently use the
determinations to analyze prospective changes of organization or reorganization or to
establish or amend SOIs. Within its legal authorization, LAFCO may act with respect to a
recommended change of organization or reorganization on its own initiative (e.g., certain
types of consolidations), or in response to a proposal (i.e., initiated by resolution or petition
by landowners or registered voters).
MSRs are exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to §15306
(information collection) of the CEQA Guidelines. LAFCO’s actions to adopt MSR
determinations are not considered “projects” subject to CEQA.
SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATES
Pursuant to Government Code § 56425, the Commission is charged with developing and
updating the Sphere of Influence (SOI) for each city and special district within the county.1
SOIs must be updated every five years or as necessary. In determining the SOI, LAFCO is
required to complete an MSR and adopt the seven determinations previously discussed.
An SOI is a LAFCO-approved plan that designates an agency’s probable future boundary
and service area. SOIs are planning tools used to provide guidance for individual boundary
change proposals and are intended to encourage efficient provision of organized community
services and prevent duplication of service delivery. Territory cannot be annexed by LAFCO
to a city or a district unless it is within that agency's SOI.
SOIs are for planning and shaping the logical and orderly development and coordination
of local government agencies.
LAFCO cannot regulate land use, dictate internal operations or administration of any
local agency, or set rates. LAFCO is empowered to enact policies that indirectly affect land
use decisions. On a regional level, LAFCO promotes logical and orderly development of
communities as it considers and decides individual proposals. LAFCO has a role in
reconciling differences between agency plans so that the most efficient urban service
arrangements are created for the benefit of current and future area residents and property
owners.
The Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg (CKH) Act requires LAFCOs to develop and determine the
SOI of each local governmental agency within the county and to review and update the SOI
every five years, as necessary. LAFCOs are empowered to adopt, update and amend the SOI.
1 The initial statutory mandate, in 1971, imposed no deadline for completing sphere designations. When many LAFCOs
failed to act, 1984 legislation required all LAFCOs to establish spheres of influence by 1985.
BACKGROUND 7
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
They may do so with or without an application and any interested person may submit an
application proposing an SOI amendment.
LAFCO may recommend government reorganizations to particular agencies in the
county, using the SOIs as the basis for those recommendations.
In addition, in adopting or amending an SOI, LAFCO must make the following
determinations:
v Present and planned land uses in the area, including agricultural and open-space
lands;
v Present and probable need for public facilities and services in the area;
v Present capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public service that the agency
provides or is authorized to provide;
v Existence of any social or economic communities of interest in the area if the
Commission determines these are relevant to the agency; and
v Present and probable need for water, wastewater, and structural fire protection
facilities and services of any disadvantaged unincorporated communities within the
existing SOI.
By statute, LAFCO must notify affected agencies 21 days before holding the public hearing
to consider the SOI and may not update the SOI until after that hearing. The LAFCO Executive
Officer must issue a report including recommendations on the SOI amendments and updates
under consideration at least five days before the public hearing.
DISADVANTAGED UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITIES
LAFCO is required to evaluate disadvantaged unincorporated communities as part of this
service review, including the location and characteristics of any such communities.
Senate Bill (SB) 244 (Wolk) was adopted into law in 2011 and took effect on January 1,
2012. Now codified as Government Code §56425(e)5, its purpose is to begin to address the
complex legal, financial, and political barriers that contribute to regional inequity and
infrastructure deficits within disadvantaged unincorporated communities (DUCs).
Identifying and including these communities in the long-range planning of a city or a special
district which provides water, wastewater or fire protection services, is required by
Government Codes §56425(e)5.
Government Code §56033.5 defines a DUC as 1) all or a portion of a “disadvantaged
community” as defined by §79505.5 of the Water Code, and as 2) “inhabited territory” (12 or
more registered voters), as defined by §56046, or as determined by Commission policy.
The Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act (CKH) requires
LAFCO to make determinations regarding DUCs when considering a change of organization,
reorganization, SOI expansion, and when conducting Municipal Service Reviews. For any
updates to an SOI of a local agency (city or special district) that provides public facilities or
services related to sewer, municipal and industrial water, or structural fire protection,
LAFCO shall consider and prepare written determinations regarding the present and
planned capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public services, and infrastructure
BACKGROUND 8
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
needs or deficiencies for any disadvantaged unincorporated community within or
contiguous to the SOI of a city or special district providing sewers, municipal and industrial
water, or structural fire protection.2
CKH prohibits LAFCO from approving an annexation to a city of any territory greater than
10 acres if a DUC is contiguous to the proposed annexation, unless an application to annex
the DUC has been filed with LAFCO. An application to annex a contiguous DUC shall not be
required if a prior application for annexation of the same DUC has been made in the
preceding five years or if the Commission finds, based upon written evidence, that a majority
of the registered voters within the affected territory are opposed to annexation.3
According to Los Angeles LAFCO analysis, there are currently no disadvantaged
unincorporated communities in the MSR study area.
.
2 Government Codes §56425(e)5, Present and Probable need; disadvantaged unincorporated communities
3 (California Government Codes section 56375 (a) (8) (A)) (LAFCO GIS, 2020)
BACKGROUND 9
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
3. SETTING
BACKGROUND
The MSR study area includes the City of Agoura Hills, the City of Calabasas, the City of
Hidden Hills, and the City of Westlake Village. Each of these communities is situated on the
western end of Los Angeles County. All of these cities are governed by an elected five-
member city council and guided by a GP.
The City of Agoura Hills was incorporated in 1982 as the result of a vote by residents,
allowing more control over development and community standards. Similarly, the City of
Calabasas was incorporated in 1991, allowing it to take responsibility for land use decisions.
In 1961, the City of Hidden Hills was incorporated. It is a gated community with minimal
residential and commercial developments outside of its gates. Lastly, the City of Westlake
Village was developed in 1963. The original city is bisected by the Los Angeles and Ventura
County lines. The Los Angeles side incorporated as the City of Westlake Village in 1981 while
the Ventura County side was annexed to the City of Thousand Oaks. This annexation took
place in parts in 1968 and 1972.
LOCATION
The MSR study area includes the four cities under review in the Las Virgenes area and
the unincorporated areas between and adjacent to the cities. This inland area is
characterized by steep mountains, rolling hills, canyons, streams and oak woodlands.
Commercial areas are concentrated along primary transportation routes such as the Ventura
Freeway.
Much of the MSR area is open space. A substantial portion of the land in the MSR area is
state and federal parkland, including Malibu Creek State Park and part of the Santa Monica
Mountains National Recreation Area. The California State Department of Parks and
Recreation is responsible for the maintenance of these parks that are intended to benefit the
people, environment, and the economy.
The City of Agoura Hills is situated in western Los Angeles County near the eastern end
of the Conejo Valley. The City is bounded by the City of Westlake Village to the west, the
unincorporated Oak Park area and City of Thousand Oaks in Ventura County to the north and
northwest, and unincorporated Los Angeles County, as well as the Santa Monica Mountains
National Recreation Area to the south. The City of Calabasas and the City of Hidden Hills are
also located in western Los Angeles County along the Ventura Freeway while the City of
Westlake Village has cities bordering it except to the southwest and southeast where it is
County unincorporated territory.
BOUNDARIES
The following table describes the current boundaries and size for each city.
OVERVIEW 10
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Figure 3-1: City Boundary Areas
City Description Boundary Size
City of Agoura Hills The boundaries of the City are similar 5,003 acres
to the boundaries established during (7.82 square miles)
its formation. In 1989, an annexation
occurred of approximately 60 homes
in the Liberty Canyon area.
City of Calabasas The City has conducted a few 8,806 acres
boundary changes since its (13.76 square miles)
incorporation. Most recently, in 2011,
Los Angeles LAFCO approved
annexation of 493 acres into the City
of Calabasas.
City of Hidden Hills The City is a gated community located 1,080 acres
between the western foothills of the (1.68 square miles)
San Fernando Valley in Los Angeles
County.
City of Westlake Village The City is part of a master-planned 3,521 acres
community that straddles the (5.5 square miles)
Ventura-Los Angeles County border.
SPHERE OF INFLUENCE
The City of Hidden Hills is the only city to have an expansive SOI. The remaining three
cities each have coterminous SOIs and as such, their boundaries encompass the same area
as their SOI.
The City of Agoura Hills’ SOI was established shortly after its incorporation in 1985,
which included a development tract that has since been annexed. Currently, the City is
proposing four changes to its SOI. The City of Calabasas also has a coterminous SOI that was
first established in 1992 shortly after its incorporation and has been amended with each
annexation application. Calabasas is currently proposing seven changes as part of this
comprehensive update. The City of Westlake Village’s SOI also coincides with its
incorporated boundary. At this time, it does not foresee any development in unincorporated
areas along its boundaries and does not intend to modify its boundary or SOI.
As mentioned, the City of Hidden Hills adopted SOI is expansive and was established in
1991 and reconfirmed in 2004 and 2012. It includes unincorporated territory to the west
and south of the city limits as well as territory lying between the city limits and the Ventura
Freeway to the south and Mountain View Drive to the east. The SOI encompasses 1,823 acres
(2.85 square miles) compared to its boundary of 1,080 acres (1.68 square miles).
MUNICIPAL SERVICES
The cities in the MSR area offer a variety of municipal services which are provided either
directly by city staff or through contracted services. Additionally, the Hidden Hills
Community Association is responsible for certain services within its city limits. The types of
OVERVIEW 11
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
services span across multiple city departments and provide a range of offerings from
administrative and recreational to safety and development.
Generally, contracted services include maintenance of streets and parks as well as fire
and safety services that are typically contracted out to Los Angeles County. Water related
services are usually provided, in some capacity, through the Las Virgenes Municipal Water
District. A comprehensive list of all services and their providers are listed in the table below.
Figure 3-2: City Municipal Services
Service Provider Comments
Land Use Directly provided by respective
city staff (or contract staff)
Law Enforcement Los Angeles County Sheriff by The City of Calabasas is the lead
contract agency of the Las Virgenes
Parking Authority responsible
for administrating parking
citation appeals.
Animal Control Los Angeles County Animal Care
and Control by contract
Fire Protection Consolidated Fire Protection
District (CFPD) of Los Angeles
County
Paramedic Consolidated Fire Protection
District of Los Angeles County
(CFPD)
Ambulance McCormick Ambulance (per
agreement with Los Angeles
County Department of Health
Services)
Domestic Water Las Virgenes Municipal Water
District
Recycled Water Las Virgenes Municipal Water
District
Wastewater Consolidated Sewer Maintenance
Collection District maintains City-owned
collection system
Wastewater Las Virgenes Municipal Water
Treatment District
Solid Waste Franchise agreement with Waste
Management, Inc.
Street Maintenance See Comments Agoura Hills – Private
contractor/Los Angeles County
Public Works by contract
Calabasas - City of
Calabasas/private contractor
OVERVIEW 12
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Service Provider Comments
Hidden Hills – Hidden Hills
Community Association (inside
its gates) and City of Hidden Hills
(outside gates)
Westlake Village –Los Angeles
County Public Works by contract
Landscape See Comments Agoura Hills – Contract with
Maintenance private contractor
Calabasas – City of Calabasas
Hidden Hills – Hidden Hills
Community Association/City
Westlake Village – Contract with
private contractor
Stormwater/ Los Angeles County (Los Angeles Agoura Hills and Calabasas
Drainage/ County Public Works) by contract manage water quality efforts
Water Quality with city staff; Hidden Hills
contracts with a private firm
Flood Control Los Angeles County
Flood Control District
Park Maintenance See Comments Agoura Hills – Contract with
private contractor
Calabasas - City of Calabasas for
maintenance/contract with
private contractor for tree
trimming
Hidden Hills – Hidden Hills
Community Association (inside
its gates), City of Hidden Hills
outside the gates
Westlake Village – City of
Westlake Village
Recreation See comments Agoura Hills, Calabasas, and
Westlake Village directly by city
staff.
Calabasas – supplement with
contract with private
contractor/contract with Las
Virgenes Unified School District
OVERVIEW 13
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Service Provider Comments
Hidden Hills – Hidden Hills
Community Association and City
Community Services
Library See Comments Agoura Hills – County of Los
Angeles Public Library System
Calabasas – City of Calabasas
Hidden Hills – City of Calabasas
by contract
Westlake Village – County of Los
Angeles Public Library System by
contract
Transit See Comments Agoura Hills – Dial-a-Ride
provided by City of Thousand
Oaks by contract/Ventura
Transit for special event transit
Calabasas - Contract w/private
contractor for operations
Environmental County of Los Angeles
Health Services
Mosquito/Vector Los Angeles County West Vector
Control Control District
OVERVIEW 14
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
4. CI TY O F AG O URA HI L LS
CITY OVERVIEW
The City of Agoura Hills was incorporated as a general law city in 1982, when residents
voted in favor of cityhood. Proponents sought cityhood in order to have greater control over
development and community standards in the northwestern portion of Los Angeles County.
On December 8, 1982, Agoura Hills became the 83rd city in Los Angeles County.
The City is located in western Los Angeles County at the eastern end of the Conejo Valley.
The City straddles the Ventura Freeway. The City is bounded by the City of Westlake Village
to the west, the unincorporated Oak Park area and City of Thousand Oaks in Ventura County
to the north and northwest, and unincorporated Los Angeles County, as well as the Santa
Monica Mountains National Recreation Area (SMMNRA) to the south. An unincorporated
portion of Los Angeles County, the SMMNRA, and the City of Calabasas, lie to the east.
Located in the foothills of the Santa Monica Mountains, the City of Agoura Hills is
characterized by a blend of semi-rural and suburban development.
Boundaries
The City of Agoura Hills boundaries are largely similar to those established upon its
formation, with the exception of a single annexation conducted in 1989 of about 60 homes
in the Liberty Canyon area. At present, the City of Agoura Hills encompasses approximately
5,003 acres (7.82 square miles).4
Sphere of Influence
The City’s sphere of influence (SOI) is coterminous with its incorporated boundary and
thus encompasses the same area of 5,003 acres. Agoura Hills’ SOI was originally established
in 1985, shortly after its incorporation, to include the City’s existing boundaries and a single
development tract (Tract Map 34827), which has since been annexed. The SOI was then
reconfirmed by LAFCO without changes in 1986, 2004, and 2012. The City’s boundary and
SOI are depicted in Figure 4-1.
The City has proposed four changes to its SOI as part of this comprehensive update.
These options are discussed in detail in the Growth and Population section of this chapter.
4 Area estimates from LAFCO GIS, 6/4/2020.
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 15
NEARBEL MTI TS NS E T LG CA AI CA
SAL
GARDEN OAKS -NIATNU RD OF TH W G ON I D E LV A Y EA AHM D CT YLREBMIK CT 0036 AV C PS ES I TSTN Q I UA
ORBESEHC
MARLIES 00829 CT CT CT CT ATCKABERRY FO N-IATNUTS AIDACA AR S ES T I TS
RD
BAMFIELD 00692RD IMBLER LANGHALL FEN K W ER O RY R H T ILL H DO C O TW RD CT NOSELRUBOW TSDO AQUARIUSAV CAPRICORN 00728
PROVENCE NORMANDY
COLINA ST FOUNTAINWOOD DR GERMANIA GNILTSUR RIDGECTS IND T IAN TS ST 28500
DR
VISTA ST
31400 AIV33100 LABAYA E DR CORSA THOUSA DN AV
ERIOL SPIAN 5 AC T D 5 R C S O NA F E 0 L A U N CT H S R O T D O R 0 0 010 T 3 U 3 0 W 04 C 0 H O B H S T ATSIV L A I E L V K L E M S D R -KAO O M D L R DR I G 0 R D O O G P 0 O 9 R L F R 0 N D S W 3 R D A W E AIN J L B VIEW OW T L E R T A O E E D N W R R R O D O S R A S E 5 R L L B E R P 7 H K N A AH D I T D 0 R B A A B E D O 0 I E J O I O O R N O D L RD W O E M M A L I N B 5 RK D L 8 O R A E E 6 E GD O R TC I YN 0 UN S H 0 A W D A C 0 C 0 W R 0 D O R D T A D C O M R A FL IH E E O C L 3 0 U W A 0 R R 0 S V R D 9 4 T C S 0 0 T D 3 A W R L E S D R 0 A D N P O R E E P D V R A DR E O R R E R 0 S 00 R D D 6 0 D D D 3 T R D H F 0 Z T W D O A R 0 R B E R B N N A G D L D 0 E E I O A R L S C L L R O S G O N LLI T R M I 0 Z P D 5 0 O E R L A 9 D G D T L 8 N K R 0 N C 0 0 I 5 I T R L E 8 A 0 O F R T I T 5 T E R T N A A D R O N E W T E D R D L R E T A C B N G E U V G R C D D N D IR A I O R 0 D L 0 B R L 0 D R 6 R S R L T D A O N R L O G P M I R E A D R E S K E N R C N L L EI L A U E KD S L R A D AA H K D I E L W N H TC Y E SUG W N E I G O M S 6 T R E O N 1 D V 0 I R B L E D 0 A D N H N K I A E A L L R IN LI C N D D H D R E E E R L O S R E O A KCO S D R K ALIUQ A R R O D HTAPKA D LV O B RD W H Y E R TAPKAO M D I N S E A O AD WM E S T I U S M O TH R T T D A C K S W E R Y G O C T D R N S C O K E - Y I M MA V R C C W T B D I T R E R N B I W A D O G N O E C D D Y BR C O T O E K E R Y VI R EW D S R G O D D O EE YW R- L D O N S L R N W I E H E N E U B R L Q O A T D R I S N A I R C B D R K G I -OY 0 D 0 R C 0 0 1 E 9 O 2 G 9 E R DR R T 5 A E E BC N C R ETR A D B WH T S R ER D F I K A O R R O M R BROO L R T KDR A A D C B R H S Y A S D O D G L ER E- N K RD IK A A 0 K C 0 T C W 0 O 6 E E D A O R C E K AN P T C D O H R R E U R S IN N D A G R A L H R T A M C T C C V C R W R R A E OD O C W A D R E I Y E N L E E D K 0 N S L 0 C 7 T B O A 9 T D TD W H 2 C - ER C C A A T A R -EE T V M B H NL HO E L U LOW B 0 O O R 0 A S N R K 5 Y B 9 TD 2 YC O C F S T C R T E C A D B T E H R I T W R O R E A LD E H N R C D I A T R - R D R I IA N G T E G R C H I I W D A G T N M - C R A CCTT A Y R B E E T B H D T R G A T E R H T C U UN E C R E AT A H B E T R R R W H D C O R O R D E A RI G TA T GE I R E D C H E Y G A E E M W TAR RDELLEHCIM CT M HILL A GAR E N D E R T T L C G IDLE A C I A RBL D A R T Y A C L V T L S HO E L IM LO R W A V B C R A OOK 000 D D B 6 L R A E R I D F E M L L L AC EA Y GL E E S R T T B V O DAR A GA AN N VA S L E ST A EE V C B R CA A NM A ORE E A F V ST BARRAGAN TS ALLMAN VA TS TIMBERLANE
BA SN L IK LA D P R WORTH DR
RD SNKILBA 5900 FAIRVIEW PL DR 5900 590 000 0 28 R K D NSI AL B RD ODAMOC OLA 0 P 036 RD BLYTHEDALE DR
CANYON RD
NOSIRROM CAL C A T IS TC HCNAR DR YNATTIRB ECASLA DR NOYL S T E D C G R OMILMON SA T SABA R LAC D HORSHOE CT0075 DR SENEGRIV
1 TC 0700 3 DR AILEMA SENIPER ORT 2 0709 NUR DR RDNUR LIAUQ DOOWFFUB 00092 5700 6 ENGA A P M M O A L H A C P TC OREDN A I N L E E D K O NM AL DR QU IAL KAEP HGIH EGDIRTUNLAW AV NEERG KEEDR N RC UR KAVI DVLB
LN
7
YELLAVRA C DE SANILOC
LLESSUR GRUOBREHC WY TSERCWOBNIAR TR TC ADEPNROD RD PL WY GREEN RDIBEMAGSSARG TC RDHTAPKAO 00 882 8
RD LO E D 00313 DR CANYON
ELLIESRAM AVODAP TC TC D SIRAP T R C CT TC CIR LPALD C R T EN NEFKAO DR DR DR DR CT N- ET LR GAH DR E L V P OC PL RD PL OAL KAZY SILVER VALLEY TRAIL- P CT LGRASS TC YAW R LAI T C S RT C T T L C D EE STHYELLAV RDST NIAT -NUOF
PLTOTH LLIHTOOF LOTA
9 HCNAR SIENNA NAEJTNIAS ENNEYAM SLICERS LP CT FAIRGRANGE JONDODSON LP IL RA T C A RE L E F K REDO VISTA MEDEABROOK WAY NL LP DR DR LP
RD
PL
2
ADNEITAL 5400
TCTC RD EMBER TC WO I RANB CEDARHAVEN TSERC ESIRLLIH YELNLUAVSDRLN ESIRLLIHG B L R E ID NLE -KRAP
00282
5800 RD
C EH SEBRO
3
ROCAS
4
5500
CCTT ENNOYABYW TC ESIALACSALERNO O T L L D AS 0055 W EGNARGRIAF ALEACIM MICAELA CT EVITA CTANILEDA NL LAUREL BLUFF TC WY LWOLOHEDALG 922 00 RD RD ATSIV K G CO L R A E G N OURA RDHTAEH 5
DR VIA LINDERO LLESSUR
DR P -E L LA L H P W D Y R T R A N D E D E D A R W G O I C S L T E R R L B E O 9 R E P O 4 G F D O R 7 K A A 0 MS R E V S 3 D E R OI S R K G I A N C N OO G A D D N R P ET S T N O I P G L L R R TC N G IN M D G E AI R NMAST DODSON DR CEDARHAVEN T T CA C NO LU H A M IS R NA A ID R DR K R D D R DR NLSELORB CTCT 29800 DR L NL P GNOSDNIW YROTNOM L OR RD P LIHYRREBWARTS ME DNIWTFOS WY ADOW P OO A DR G I KN L T E E P ODW D A N LHSPE S E O D F TC TWIND C W T ILL A O R W GOS MEDEA D V R ALLE R Y DROCKTREE IEW V ONE C JO 00682REVIRD DR EASTERLYRD
00582 VA 560 F 0 OO D T R HILL DE L V E O W RE IS C L T N
0006 LOST
HILLS
39
TAOB RD JON DR 882 00
F 5 A 40 IR 0 VIEW
39 CT AR GOU A HCNAR
RD YEVAD LP FOREST RIDGE ALF TC ON AICITELSO CCT TBETH ELIZA- ISABELLA NATACSTHA FRANCISCAWY 5300 TREEHOLLOW KANAN DOOWNAC NL REE C K KAO NL TS DLEIFDEM DLEIFDEM
TS SIWEL 00282 REVIRD
COLODNY
DR
38
CT RD
RD ES NOJ PL C S I A R ILBOAT CANWOOD 30200 CHRISTIAN TS OOW D NA S C T MEDEA DR AV
WARING
5300
36
BELHAM CT CT 00513
LAKECREST CAPTAINS ARUOGA RF W Y RD EDISDAOR
PL
DR
38
DR KNIGHTS- CT
CLARETON TS
NL ERALUT
VA CHESEBRO
36
-DR N D A O H L - T S E C G N T I R O C F N O R T IB A R K B B R A A AP H REED S 44 H Y G E 0 O E U V 0 N I R L E D K G L N F H E A I O T A Y E E L A L L D KS TSERCELDDAS 31500 S CE T D N E R T R E LI R NG ECARRETKRAP 32100 NAME NUTIMDR
YW 00930 V E AGOURA N TU R A 00303 ECAFYDAL TC RD 00692 RD EDISDAOR 00982 DOOWNAC DERRY
DR ST 5200 COLODNYDR
5200 TS DOOWN C A YCNRD
ESWARD DR AMBRIDGEDR C5A20N0 GASDR DREDGEWARE VA RE D VRI
35
WEIV DR ETAG RD 0044 KAO SERC T NOTGNIXEL KCOTLNFLI
LN YWNL CT 00292 RA OU GA RD
DR DEBERRY DR FRW Y
35
ERIH 0 S 0T 2 P C 4 ORH RD S
VLLIAGESCHOOL
T T C C HUNT HORSE WALKNIG RD RD YNOLOC DLO
RE YWDCOAT DNALEVE 0088 L 2 C DR
00382 DOROTHY
ORBESEHC COMADO RD
CALAMINEDR 2 LMO 6 EH N 9 D 00 RD
1
CT
TC ALOTROP
33
CLUB NL LN
RAJEV
ARUTNEV
PARKVILLE
2
CT LN
TC ONROVIL
RD
DR PALO
GARRET RD
3
31700
TC OCANOM CORNELL RD
26 S 90 T 0
4
R D U R STICOAK
TC ANOREV
ARUOGA
DR DR 33
DR
RD
00182
DR
5 LP ECNASSIANER 00762 LPRIALB
LP SIWEL
VIA
DANTES VIEW 5A L 00M U 0 D BR GA ID T G E E DR
6
LN
TC YLLECREV LLENROC YW 4700
ARUAL PLNTE A
DR ASOTSIMA
CANWOOD
7
31500
TC AVONEG
LEWIS LA
ELLAC
27100 26800
8
FOXFIELD
TC ARARREF LLENROC
LLIC O ETNOM ELLAC
NWAC OO T DS
T 9 S 9 O 84 L OAK
9
BLUEMEAODW
TC ELBONERG
EENER NOYNAC DR
WILLOW
34
LN GERMAINE
NANAK
YW
CALLE ROBLEDA ATIRAGRAM
00672
269 A 0 G 0 OURA RD
34
LEAFW
M
KA
E
O
RRY
Y DR DR RD RD GL GE D E IRNB TRIUNFO SHILOH 4300 NOYNAC NHCAR DR DR
WEIV KANAN 3900 RD ES M A AEDEM LN CL R U D H B UNT RE C E RE K VLIS 0014 DR 0014 DR CALETA RD SILVER RD CREEK
00382RDTHGINK RE DR NEE
WEIV T K C R C A Y P N Y YW RE EVER NA R F T D F C IT LN NWOTEERF T NNL W FER OTE ART D ROL Y R 2 W 5700 N -N C GL UO TN E YR NK N O R R E R O O D E D R E Y K BY N R D N WE A N A T C S Y E E 0 Y H 0F0 C T 4E R L ST D L E T E B S D
ENDEA
R I OV N L OR DRLL 2 E 740 D 0 NEV D D R R R LN D S S K D AY K S IV R A A D M D MR J A IM EIWBO RRK 0 D 0 S D 9 D D E 3 RP R T A IN T U RIC 2 K 73 J 0 H 0 O R E D EN D LR E N R T L L L I YO W IH N S O D B AGRD M P OV RP ID L I EN J T
SASABAL P M L A T E L P C A T S S L C E S D N O P N N O L U U O S 3 R D C H W L T 7 I T T N T 0 R D C K G EE O R RC E 0 D DO N S O K R N C A WT A C E T R E E O T NC G D D L C S E U O C N O D R FLOW V E A R E I T G R A O E T S P O RCG TC R DLOGIRAM TSUTCCA PL 4 3 D T OR C 0 N P EDLO 8 G0 K O AO C 0 0 L P D EV O 0 A IL P R T Y LC G S R K R E S A T T O A D G VE E BO D R E D A P C D O I O O D R T T L T W TO S N T S N S R K O I A S C O G L N O S D P R C I T ER N D A E S R P W O E R P P T S E H E R D D S G S L H I I L E O N L I L C L L L I G L H S 0 CT S I N0 H 8L TRAIL 3 W OW O D R EE Y R D O D O D R L A RL K 26900 EE R R H Y I R C T W NU A O H C P S O L T SPR LIBU I A NG M S HLILS NL
VIEWCT LU ABI M CT MALIBU
FALLEN KINGSPL T 314 I 00 NAJ R A D LOBO ATSIV OBOL S S H LLI E H DO R OW DR RD
0082LIUQNART
CM31100 CANYON
RD 0013 OFNUIRT
0033
0072 NOYNAC DR KANAN 2900 3100 RD 23 00 CASTLEVIEW 00392 DR COUNTRY ESTAT W E Y S NOGAW KEERCLLMI DLO RD CRE D M EK E R DEA 00D 09R 2 DR N RY L T S N ID U E OC KAO DLO TC HCNERF RD RD 3800 LYNNLN 3300 28800 WAGON
RD
YTREBIL LIBERTY NOYNAC PARKC PA O T L R O IC N K Y RD HE PARK VISTA N C R T YP DR TIMMUS KAO L UNITED
SMHOAUDNOTWA S IN R S A LL V IHEN 2700 3200 EL DR ENCAN S T 0 O L 0 N L 9 L I 3 D N H L IH DR C E P N R I O P OU P L PYSEED RDRD
Incorporated December 8, 1982
keerCyellaVorertoP
M ubila C keer keerCaedeM
LasVirgenesCreek
CALABASAS
AGOURA HILLS
CO
WESTLAKE VILLAGE County Ventura
µ
Revised: November 28,
2012 C:\GIS\MXDs\Cities\AgouraHills
Miles Reconfirmed 10-10-12
Coterminous
R R e e c c o o n n f f i i r r m m e e d d 0 0 2 8 - - 1 2 2 5 - - 8 0 6 4 0 0.25 0.5 1
Agoura Hills Sphere of Influence
(SOI), Established 01-09-85 Action Effective Date 1 in = 0.4 miles
City of Agoura Hills
Sphere of Influence History
Legend
Agoura Hills Sphere of Influence RANCH PARAMOUNT
STATE PARK
AREA
MALIBU CREEK
Triunfo Canyon
NATIONAL
RECREATION
SANTA
MONICA MOUNTAINS
TRIUNFO CREEK PARK
./ 101 US
AREA
RECREATION NATIONAL MOUNTAINS SANTA
MONICA
Adobe Reyes
CANYON PARK CHEESEBORO
Figure 4-1
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
ACCOUNTABILITY AND GOVERNANCE
The City of Agoura Hills is governed by a five-member City Council that is elected by
residents to serve staggered four-year terms. Each year, City Councilmembers select the
mayor to serve a one-year term. There is also a City Manager appointed by the City Council.
Among its duties, Councilmembers serve as members of the City’s Financing Authority.
Compensation for City Councilmembers is a maximum of $300 per month. They also
receive a City contribution towards health, dental, and vision benefits as well as an auto
allowance.
Complaints can be anonymously submitted at City Hall via a written comment card, by
phone call to the City Manager or the City Council, or through the City’s website. Once a
complaint is received, it is routed to the appropriate department to be addressed while
maintaining direct communication with the complainant to ensure clear goals, expectations,
and outcomes.
City Council meetings occur twice monthly on the second and fourth Wednesday of each
month. Council meetings are open to the public and take place at 6:00pm in the Council
Chambers at City Hall under normal circumstances; however, due to the COVID-19 pandemic
and declared State of Emergency by the State of California, the City has transitioned to
entirely virtual meetings held on a video conferencing system at the same time as the
regularly scheduled meetings The meetings are streamed live on the City’s website and are
also televised as follows: on Channel 10 for Spectrum subscribers and Channel 99 for AT&T
U-verse subscribers. These television broadcasts air at 7:00pm the following evening and
run daily until the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting.
The meeting schedule can be found on the City’s website along with the agenda, which is
also posted in front of City Hall. Council meeting minutes are posted on the City’s website
and are also available at City Hall. Agendas are also posted in the local newspaper.
Additionally, the City updates constituents through a newsletter mailed to residents as well
as press releases and announcements on cable television.
In 2016, the State Legislature enacted Assembly Bill (AB) 2257 (Government Code
Section 54954.2) to update the Brown Act with new requirements governing the location,
platform, and methods by which an agenda must be accessible on the agency’s website for
all meetings occurring on or after January 1, 2019. The City of Agoura Hills meets the agenda
posting requirements outlined in AB 2257.
The City has demonstrated accountability and transparency in its disclosure of
information and cooperation during the process of this MSR. The City responded to the
questionnaires and cooperated with document requests.
PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
While public sector management standards vary depending on the size and scope of the
organization, there are minimum standards and best practices that should be followed by all
agencies. Well-managed organizations evaluate employees annually, track employee and
agency productivity, periodically review agency performance, prepare a budget before the
beginning of the FY, conduct periodic financial audits to safeguard the public trust, maintain
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 17
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
relatively current financial records, conduct advanced planning for future service needs, and
plan and budget for capital needs.
Staffing and Organizational Structure
The City of Agoura Hills delivers municipal services using a combination of city staff,
contracts with other agencies, private consultants and contractors. The City of Agoura Hills
consists of the following departments, as follows: the City Manager, the City Clerk, the City
Attorney, Public Facilities, Emergency Services, Building and Safety, Community Services,
Parks & Recreation, Finance and Information Technology, Human Resources, Planning and
Community Development, Public Works and Engineering, and Solid Waste Management.
Although Police and Fire are listed as departments on the City’s website, these services are,
in fact, provided through contracts with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department and
Consolidated Fire Protection District (CFPD) of Los Angeles County, respectively.
The City of Agoura Hills relies on paid professional staff to conduct the daily business and
operations of the City. According to the adopted budget for FY20-21, there are 31 full-time
equivalent (FTE) employees.
The municipal services provided by these departments are described in further detail in
the Municipal Services section of this chapter.
Management Practices
Review of Employees and City Performance
All regular City of Agoura Hills staff are evaluated on their performance annually. These
evaluations are conducted by the corresponding department head, reviewed and approved
by the Human Resources Director (the Finance Director), and finally, reviewed and approved
by the City Manager.
The performance of the City itself is also measured and evaluated. To accomplish this, the
City of Agoura Hills provides a number of operational and productivity reports that are
connected to a variety of funding and compliance related activities and programs. The first
of these reports is the National Transit Database (NTD) Report which is associated with
Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) funding that is received. There is also the
Annual Solid Waste Program Report which establishes the City’s compliance with solid waste
and recycling mandates such as CalRecycle. The Annual National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Report and the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control
Annual Report are tools used to monitor the City’s compliance with water quality mandates.
Lastly, the Annual Community Development Block Grant Report and the City’s
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) are further means to demonstrate the City’s
overall performance record.
Review of Departmental Performance
To better understand the overall adequacy of services provided by the City, individual
departments must capture historical data to evaluate their performance. This is done using
a variety of metrics. The current adopted budget, in conjunction with the CAFR, is the richest
source of information regarding the assessment of workload, capacity, and goals for Agoura
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 18
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Hills. Certainly, during the exceptional circumstances related to the COVID-19 pandemic
there are certain differences in operations and departmental performance than during
normal operational periods. The performance evaluation efforts of the City described here
are for standard times. With that in mind, the City has reported the following departmental
performance statuses.
The Department of the City Manager has been faced with increased service demands due
to recent economic trials caused by the Woolsey Fire and flooding. Despite these challenges,
many achievements have still been met, including securing FEMA Public Assistance
Reimbursement as a result of both rainstorms and the Woolsey Fire. Looking forward,
several objectives have been set for this department such as promoting business assistance
programs, installation of electric car charging stations, and replacing the City’s vehicle fleet.
Introduced in FY13-14, the SeeClickFix software remains the primary tool used to track
service requests for this department. According to this application, there has been a slight
decrease in residential inquiries received/resolved during FY19-20.
The budget lists performance indicators for three divisions that fall under the leadership
of the City Manager’s Department: Public Facilities, Emergency Services, and Los Angeles
County Animal Care and Control (LACACC). As building systems continue to age, the service
level trends for the Public Facilities Department have reportedly increased. This division has
successfully completed installation of a Civic Center HVAC compressor as well as exterior
landscape enhancements and intends to continue pursuing avenues to reduce energy use by
purchasing environmentally friendly products when possible, executing preventative facility
maintenance and audio-visual improvements, among other goals.
Service level trends for Emergency Services have increased as the City has grown.
Highlighted accomplishments include the completion of training classes for the Community
Emergency Response Team (CERT), the 2017 City Emergency Operations Plan, and the 2018
Las Virgenes COG Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan. Future expectations are that the
City CERT and Disaster Response Team (DRT) will expand and there will be recertification
of CERT DRT members CPR/AED training for 2020. Furthermore, work will commence on
the City’s Crisis Communication Plan and there will be a finalized review of the City’s
response to the Woolsey Fire. Whether these measures are achieved will be key indicators
for the division’s performance.
LACACC has reported consistent levels of service in this division. The division has met
their goals with a higher number of animal license renewals and addressed incoming reports
of dogs off leash, in addition to increasing patrols at local parks to curb this activity. LACACC
intends to continue their educational efforts, promoting pet licensing and leash laws, and
helping to resolve all animal related complaint issues. Measures of performance are kennel
services, animal licenses and penalties collected as well as animal complaints that are
reported and resolved according to SeeClickFix software. For FY19-20, there is a slight
decrease expected for all performance indicators.
The Department of the City Clerk has seen a rise in service requests for research and
public records requests. Presently, there is a citywide scanning project in effect to provide
electronic access to the City’s permanent records. In turn, this will reduce the number of staff
hours spent researching records held in offsite storage. The accomplishments reported for
the Department include administration of the 2018 General Municipal Election, 2018 Ethics
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 19
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Training, the filming of “Every 15 Minutes” by Agoura High School in the Council Chambers,
and the implementation of iPads for the Electronic Agenda Packet Process. The Department’s
objectives include continuing the citywide scanning of permanent records, implementing the
2019 citywide annual records destruction, updating the City’s records retention and
destruction schedule, facilitating the Campaign Reform Ordinance Update and the City
Council Norms Update. As for performance measures, the budget lists the number of official
records processed as well as the public records requested. The amount for both has
remained consistent between FY17-18 and FY18-19 with a slight decrease estimated
through the end of FY19-20.
Demands on the City’s Department of Finance and Information Technology have been
continually increasing, particularly with respect to the areas of business tax and grants
management. Among its accomplishments, the Department has prepared a two-year budget
plan, implemented online business tax renewals, and published the FY17-18 CAFR. It has
also set forth these objectives: publish the FY18-19 CAFR, prepare and implement the mid-
cycle operating and capital improvement program review, and submit five FY19-20
California State Controller’s Reports. Indicators for these achievements are receiving the
Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) CAFR Award, the GFOA Budget Award, and
submitting California State Controller’s reports by the established deadlines.
The City’s Planning Division reports that there is an increased number of development
applications for remodeling projects such as existing commercial centers as well as new
commercial projects, wireless telecommunication facilities, and new residential
development that includes additions. Based on the Agoura Village Specific Plan, there has
been strong interest in developing this area. Several construction permits have been
received and the City indicates many are being processed at this time. The City also reports
the Planning Division has reviewed a number of environmental documents for capital
improvement and trail projects. Examples of these projects include the Kanan Road/Agoura
Road Intersection Design and the Recreation and Event Center Trail. Additionally, the
department successfully received and approved 74 various permit applications during FY18-
19 while taking action on 14 other projects and/or use permits. Currently, the City states it
is committed to maintaining and developing professional staff and that its level of customer
service will continue to rise as a result of ongoing technological improvements and
refinements to its internal customer service protocol.
The Building and Safety Department has indicated that while there are not many new
construction submittals, there has been an increase in residential remodels, additions, solar
permits, and commercial tenant improvements. Among the Department’s many
accomplishments, in FY 18-19, 355 projects/plans were reviewed. Consultants reviewed 277
of these, while 78 were reviewed in-house. Objectives that will be used to evaluate future
performance are streamlining efforts between all City departments through the utilization
of new technology and monitoring department related assembly and senate bills and 2019
codes.
The Department of Community Services reflects changes to the City’s population in the
type of programs and services offered. A variety of accomplishments have been recorded,
such as implementing a technology program for older adults, receiving a Los Angeles County
Arts Commission Grant for entertainment at the annual Reyes Adobe Days, hosting
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 20
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
community service days, and providing a centralized volunteer program. Moving forward,
the Department would like to achieve a number of goals. These goals include increasing
offerings to teens, maintaining park equipment, and partnering with the Regional Park and
Open Space District, as well as the Department of Public Works, to implement various
programs and projects. The Department’s performance is measured by tracking rental
income for the event center and facility use, establishing increased participation at cultural
arts events, and ensuring greater teen participation.
Lastly, the Department of Public Works service levels have remained consistent despite
growing demand for services. The City reports that this disparity is due to a rise in capital
improvement projects, whereas revenue and staffing within the Department have remained
limited. Nevertheless, it is noted that the SeeClickFix software application ensures an
efficient and effective level of service. Some primary achievements of this department have
been the completion of Reyes Adobe landscaping, securing funds for the Medea/Palo
Comado Stormwater Treatment Plant (WTP), Linear Park, and Wetlands Improvement
Project, issuing 181 total permits, sweeping over 476 curb miles two times per month, and
trimming 803 trees annually. There are many goals and objectives for this department, such
as completing construction projects and designs, securing grant funding, and fulfilling
concrete repair projects. The indicators for the Department’s performance are the number
of constructed capital projects, development cases that have been processed, and SeeClickFix
issues addressed. For FY19-20, these volumes are currently on par with the previous FY.
Planning Practices
The City’s central planning document is its General Plan (GP). It addresses land use and
long-range planning for the community. The current plan was updated in March of 2010 with
a planning horizon of 2035 and was created in compliance with California Government Code
Section 653000 et seq. This plan outlines seven elements required by state law which include
housing, land use, open space, noise, circulation, safety, and conservation. In conjunction
with the GP, the City has also certified an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The City
reports that mitigation measures indicated in the EIR have been incorporated into the GP as
policy, as applicable. The City’s Housing Element was last updated in 2013.
The City utilizes a variety of additional plans to provide more detailed guidelines for
particular areas of use. The City has adopted an Agoura Village Specific Plan (AVSP) and
certified the AVSP Final Program EIR as it relates to the Agoura Village area. Additionally, the
City compiled the Ladyface Mountain Specific Plan in 1991. The following master plans are
implemented by the Los Angeles County Public Works:
v City of Agoura Hills Water Quality Master Plan (2014)
v Trails & Pathways Master Plan (2008)
v Arterial Streetscape Master Plan (2017)
v Master Plan of Drainage (1988)
v Master Sewer Plan (1987)
v Sewer System Management Plan (2015)
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 21
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
v Citywide Pavement Management System (2017)
The City’s financial planning practices are discussed in the Financial Ability to Provide
Services section of this chapter.
GROWTH AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS
Land Use
The Agoura Hills General Plan (GP) establishes eighteen land use categories. The five
residential categories allow for a variety of housing types for all densities ranging from 1
dwelling unit per 5 acres, up to 25 dwelling units per acre. Four commercial designations
and two business park/industrial designations accommodate and encourage a range of
community services and businesses. The Commercial—Shopping Center/Mixed Use
category accommodates a mix of retail commercial uses with housing development. To allow
for creative use of vacant and underutilized properties, a Planned Development designation
was established. The Public Facility, Open Water, Local Park, Restricted Open Space, and
Open Space/Deed Restricted categories are intended to protect lands for public service and
open space uses.
The City of Agoura Hills consists of a variety of land uses; however, predominant uses are
residential, open space, and commercial. Figure 4-2 provides a breakdown of the City’s most
recent land use inventory from the 2010 GP.
Figure 4-2: City of Agoura Hills Existing Land Use (2010)
Land Use Current Acres % of Total
Residential Very Low 243.1 5.57%
Density
Residential Low Density 156.7 3.59%
Residential Single Family 1,068.6 24.48%
Residential Medium Density 140.1 3.21%
Residential High Density 47.3 1.08%
Commercial Neighborhood 2.4 0.05%
Center
Commercial Shopping 8.5 0.19%
Center
Commercial Shopping 26.0 0.60%
Center – Mixed Use
Commercial Retail/Service 102.5 2.35%
Commercial Recreation 27.9 0.64%
Business Park - 129.6 2.97%
Manufacturing
Business Park – Office 78.8 1.81%
Retail
Commercial – Planned 850.4 19.48%
Development
Open Space 1,000.5 22.92%
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 22
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Deed Restricted 304.2 6.97%
Local Park 73.5 1.68%
Open Water 15.1 0.35%
Public Facilities 90.1 2.06%
Total 4,365.35 100%
Source: City of Agoura Hills, General Plan Update, 2010, p. 2-13.
A majority of the City’s residential neighborhoods lie north of Highway 101, with
commercial and business park properties clustered along the highway and major arterials
including Agoura Road, Kanan Road, and Canwood Street as shown in Figure 4-3. The areas
identified for residential uses are largely built out. Opportunities for future residential
growth are generally limited to mixed-use opportunities in the undeveloped specific plan
areas.
The southwestern portion of the City (generally south of Agoura Road and east of Kanan
Road, with some exceptions) is designated as “Planned Development District.”. This area is
partially undeveloped. Two areas designated as Planned Development by the GP are subject
to adopted specific plans: the Agoura Village Specific Plan (2008) shown in Figure 4-4 and
the Ladyface Mountain Specific Plan (1991) shown in Figure 4-5. A third area immediately
north of the Agoura Village Specific Plan area and west of Kanan Road is also designated as
Planned Development. The POM zoning district covers this area. The area is mostly
developed.
The Agoura Village Specific Plan envisions a pedestrian-oriented street with retail shops,
restaurants, theatres, and entertainment uses. The plan indicates that while retail,
restaurant, customer-friendly commercial service, and entertainment uses should remain
the focus of the Village, uses such as office and residential are appropriate as secondary uses
to help sustain a village-like environment. Residential uses are allowed as part of an
integrated mixed-use project concept. While the specific plan outlines a base potential of
235 dwelling units, the City has estimated that it can realistically anticipate 193 dwelling
units to be developed as part of the specific plan area based on development applications
received.6
The Ladyface Mountain Specific Plan allows for business park, and open space uses. The
specific plan area is largely built out.
5 Note total acreage does not match acreage within City’s boundaries as estimated by LAFCO GIS staff.
6 City of Agoura Hills, General Plan Housing Element, 2013, p. IV-4.
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 23
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Figure 4-3: City of Agoura Hills General Plan Land Use Designations
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 24
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Figure 4-4: City of Agoura Hills Agoura Village Specific Plan Zone Designations
(cid:61)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:82)(cid:88)(cid:87)(cid:75) (cid:61)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:37)(cid:98) (cid:61)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:38) (cid:61)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:3)(cid:40)(cid:68)(cid:86)(cid:87)
(cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:18)(cid:50)(cid:73)(cid:73)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:18)(cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:88)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:18)(cid:38)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:80)(cid:88)(cid:81)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:92) (cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:18)(cid:50)(cid:73)(cid:73)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:18)(cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:88)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:18)(cid:43)(cid:82)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:79)(cid:18) (cid:54)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:89)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:70)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:18)(cid:50)(cid:73)(cid:73)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:72) (cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:18)(cid:50)(cid:73)(cid:73)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:18)(cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:88)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:87)
(cid:38)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:18)(cid:43)(cid:82)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:79)(cid:18)(cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:50)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:85) (cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:50)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:18) (cid:61)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:39)(cid:3)(cid:58)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:87)
(cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:18)(cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:79) (cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:79) (cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:18)(cid:50)(cid:73)(cid:73)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:18)(cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:88)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:87)
(cid:61)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:75)
(cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:18)(cid:50)(cid:73)(cid:73)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:18)(cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:88)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:18)(cid:43)(cid:82)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:79)(cid:18)
(cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:50)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:3) (cid:15)(cid:157)(cid:208)(cid:226)(cid:2)(cid:184)(cid:150)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:151)(cid:184)(cid:212)(cid:198)(cid:117)(cid:2)(cid:41)(cid:157)(cid:173)(cid:173)(cid:202)(cid:2)(cid:86)(cid:195)(cid:140)(cid:130)(cid:157)(cid:150)(cid:157)(cid:130)(cid:2)(cid:79)(cid:173)(cid:117)(cid:179)(cid:2)
(cid:61)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:40) (cid:61)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:41) (cid:61)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:42) (cid:113)(cid:184)(cid:179)(cid:140)(cid:2)(cid:21)(cid:140)(cid:202)(cid:157)(cid:151)(cid:179)(cid:117)(cid:208)(cid:157)(cid:184)(cid:179)
(cid:50)(cid:73)(cid:73)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:18)(cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:88)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:18)(cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:79) (cid:50)(cid:73)(cid:73)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:72) (cid:50)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:54)(cid:83)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:72)
(cid:50)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:18)(cid:54)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:53)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:68)(cid:79)
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 25
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Figure 4-5: City of Agoura Hills Ladyface Mountain Specific Plan Land Use Designations
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 26
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Population
As of January 1, 2020, the California Department of Finance estimates a City of Agoura
Hills population of 20,566. The City’s residential areas are near build-out and growth has
been minimal in recent years. Since 2010, the City’s population of 20,330 increased to
20,566 in 2020, which represents 1.2 percent total change over ten years. Figure 4-6 shows
that the City’s population peaked in 2016 and has declined since then.
Figure 4-6: City of Agoura Hills Population, (2010 – 2020)
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
There is minimal potential for residential growth within the City’s existing boundaries
given limited vacant land designated for residential uses. The Southern California
Association of Governments’ (SCAG) most recent population projections from 2016,
anticipated that the City would reach a population of 20,700 in 2020 and grow to 22,700 by
2040, which equates to average annual growth of 0.5 percent over the 20-year period.7 These
projections are consistent with recent trends, remaining vacant land, and the potential for
annexation of additional residential territory into the City’s boundaries.
Planned and Proposed Development
Over the past five years, 11 permits have been issued for new homes that have been
completed or are under construction.8
Areas of potential growth within the City are concentrated along Agoura Road, in
particular, within the Agoura Village Specific Plan. There have been several proposed
projects within the Agoura Village Specific Plan area; however, most applications are
7 2016-2040 RTP/SCS Final Growth Forecast by Jurisdiction.
8 Correspondence with City of Agoura Hills, Cases and Planners Spreadsheet, January 23, 2020. (LAFCO GIS, 2020) (LAFCO
File No. 2015-10)
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 27
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
currently incomplete or withdrawn, with the exception of the AVE, West Village, and AN
Investments.
The AVE is a mixed-use proposal on approximately 12.37 acres with an additional 6.08
acres designated for open space that would not be developed. The Project would develop
residential (118 units), commercial (49,000 square feet), and hotel (120 rooms) uses at the
southeast corner of Agoura Road and Kanan Road.9 A draft Environmental Impact Review
was being compiled for the AVE project as of the drafting of this report.
West Village is a mixed-use proposal located at the southwest corner of Agoura and
Kanan Roads. The Agoura Village Specific Plan identifies this location as one of the primary
development sites intended to become Agoura’s core village center. The project site
comprises 18.06 acres across three parcels. Two parcels (totaling 7.37 acres) are the
development parcels. The third parcel (10.87 acres) will be preserved for open space. On the
two development parcels, approximately 39,468 gross square feet of commercial space and
78 apartment units are proposed.
AN Investments is proposed to be located on Agoura Road. The project is a mixed-use
development with office, retail, restaurant and multi-family residential units. The project
consists of 15 residential units, seven live-work spaces, and four retail units, all with a
subterranean garage.
Residential growth within the City is generally limited to single family housing in infill
lots in the Old Agoura and Indian Hills communities; however, this is annually two to three
houses per year on average. The City indicated that there is a lack of vacant residential
property within the City’s boundaries. As of 2013, the City identified vacant lots with space
for 107 dwelling units—84 single-family residences and 23 multi-family units.10 This
estimate does not include estimates for the Agoura Village Specific Plan area.
Growth Strategies and Constraints
The City’s primary planning document is its General Plan (GP), which was updated in
2010. The Housing Element was most recently updated in 2013. As mentioned, land use
planning is also accomplished in the City’s Agoura Village Specific Plan and the Ladyface
Mountain Specific Plan. The planning area identified within the City’s GP and supplemental
planning documents is limited to the area within its incorporated boundaries and SOI.
Basic land use patterns are well established in the City, with residential neighborhoods
predominantly developed and limited opportunities for infill development remaining.
Agoura Hills’ neighborhoods are viewed as one of the community’s most desirable features,
and preservation of these neighborhoods remains a priority of the GP. The land use policies
in the GP focus on how population and employment growth can be managed to preserve the
qualities that distinguish the City’s neighborhoods, business districts, and open spaces. They
recognize that most of the City will be conserved for its existing type and densities of land
use. At the same time, they recognize that change will occur in limited areas that 1) have
been previously planned to accept growth; 2) enable existing commercial centers and
9 City of Agoura Hills, The AVE Poject Initial Study, 2018, p. 8.
10 City of Agoura Hills, General Plan Housing Element – Appendix A, 2013, p. 8.
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 28
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
business districts to sustain their economic vitality and evolve in response to changing
market dynamics; and 3) to meet mandates for more sustainable forms of development that
reduce reliance on the automobile, consume less energy and water, and produce less
pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. In these locations, policies provide for contextual
infill that builds upon existing development and is sensitive to its environmental setting.
Growth within and adjacent to the City is constrained by topography, preference for a
rural character, and environmental issues. The City is surrounded by hills. Much of the
hillside areas in the City are under public ownership or have been deed restricted as
permanent open space. Where development is allowed, the steepness of slope dictates
permitted densities. The City’s GP states that preservation of the rural character of the City
is an important priority.
Additionally, growth within existing residential areas where space still exists (Old
Agoura and Indian Hills) is constrained by the lack of a wastewater collection system. Some
residences are served by individual septic tanks and leach lines, which will prevent the
development of higher density housing.11
Sphere of Influence
The City’s current SOI encompasses the same territory as the City’s boundaries, totaling
5,003 acres.12 There are six areas for potential inclusion in the City’s SOI to enable future
annexation. The following discussion summarizes characteristics of these areas, which are
labelled alphabetically for purposes of this MSR and map identification in Figure 4-7.
Area “L” – The City submitted an application to LAFCO for the annexation of Cheseboro
Meadow, the Agoura Equestrian Estates formerly proposed development, and the entirety of
the Cheseboro Road right of way.13 Area L consists of 116.67 acres of mostly vacant
uninhabited land with portions of Cheseboro Canyon Creek and Cheseboro Road. There are
no structures in Area L. The area is bounded on the west by the City and on the east by the
Santa Monica Mountains. The area was proposed for annexation to add the proposed Agoura
Equestrian Estates (AEE) development to the City and to add the portion of Cheseboro Road
that is partially in unincorporated territory, presenting a challenge to the County to serve.
The AEE development was proposed to include 15 low-density single-family dwelling
units on 22 acres south of Cheseboro Road. The remainder of the proposed annexation area
was planned to remain permanent open space. The EIR for the development was completed;
however, the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy (Conservancy) has since purchased the
property in an effort to preserve it, which has blocked the AEE development from occurring.
The Conservancy has indicated that it does not object to annexing into the City.
The area north of Cheseboro Road consists of open space also owned and managed by
the Conservancy. This territory has been within the SMMC inventory for at least a decade.
Although these areas are owned by the Conservancy for preservation purposes with little
potential for development, both areas were included in the City’s proposal based on guidance
11 City of Agoura Hills, GeneralPlan Housing Element, 2013, III-27.
12 Area estimates from LAFCO GIS, 6/3/2020.
13 LAFCO File No. 2015-10
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 29
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
from LAFCO that these areas should appropriately be within the city limits as dedicated open
space. Further, inclusion of these areas allowed for addressing street maintenance
inefficiencies along the brief portion of unincorporated Cheseboro Road, by including the
entire Cheseboro Road right-of-way.
The unincorporated section of Cheseboro Road was damaged by the Woolsey Fire in
2018, but the City could not unilaterally fix it because it was the County’s responsibility.
Ultimately, it was a joint County and City coordinated effort to re-open the road after the fire.
Generally, when a road has incorporated territory on one side and unincorporated territory
on the other, it has been LAFCO practice to place the jurisdictional boundary in the center of
the right-of-way. In the case of Cheseboro Road, this practice would not address the
identified service inefficiencies. Given that a primary motivation is to put responsibility for
the entirety of the Cheseboro Road right-of-way within the jurisdiction of the City of Agoura
Hills, as agreed upon by the County, the City of Agoura Hills and LAFCO, the entirety of the
Cheseboro Road right-of-way to the easterly side of the road is included as part of the
application.
Area “I” – Agoura Hills submitted an application to LAFCO in 2018 to annex Area I14 in
competition with an application from the City of Calabasas15 to annex the same property.
LAFCO ultimately denied the City of Calabasas’ application, and Agoura Hills’ application for
annexation was never processed to completion. There continues to be multiple invested
stakeholders with differing views on which agency should govern the property. Additionally,
there are varying positions on which municipality is most affected by Area I activities and
future land use decisions.
Area I is approximately 43 acres with five properties, including three with commercial
uses—two parcels where Spirent Communications is located, one parcel occupied by the
Kythera building, one vacant commercial site, and one 27-acre open space parcel. The
property is the office for Spirent Communications—a United Kingdom-based
telecommunications company—which produces significant property tax and sales tax
revenue. Area I is abutted by the City of Agoura Hills to the west and south, the City of
Calabasas to the south and east, and unincorporated Los Angeles County to the north.
Agoura Road runs through the unincorporated area between the cities of Agoura Hills and
Calabasas.
The Spirent Communications property is located just south of the 101 Highway and east
of Liberty Canyon Road, abutting the city limits of Agoura Hills. Given the proximity of the
property, Agoura Hills has concerns about uses impacting its residential community to the
immediate south along Liberty Canyon Road, as the nearest residential community to the
property. Also, Agoura Hills asserts that it is well-positioned to serve the property given its
contiguity to Agoura Hills’ city limits. However, two landowners and the two businesses in
Area I indicated support for the City of Calabasas’ bid for annexation.16
14 LAFCO File No. 2018-12
15 LAFCO File No. 2014-04
16 Los Angeles LAFCO, Staff Report Agenda Item No. 7.a. January 9, 2019, p. 7.
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 30
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Another notable concern is the unstable hillside affecting Area I, which has a history of
erosion and slumping, particularly after rain events, which raises concerns of potential
mudslides. The vacant lot in Area I has experienced landslides in the past that required
remediation. Agoura Hills reported that it had an expert conclude that there is still a chance
of geologic issues at that property and the issues pose a hazard.
Early on in the course of the annexation process, the two cities met and discussed
concerns of 1) no modification of the County conditions of approval (i.e., hours of operation,
hours of delivery and shipment) at the commercial properties, 2) no intensification or
industrialization of uses on the commercial properties, 3) preservation of the vacant and
open space lots as open space, and 4) Agoura Road will remain a two-lane road with
landscaped medians and reduced lighting.17 These issues highlight those concerns that were
and continue to be significant to Agoura Hills and its residents with regard to Area I. To
assure these issues, as well as erosion issues are addressed, the three land use agencies with
vested interest in the area should consider a joint agreement, in lieu of annexation by either
city. Other options related to this property are addressed in the SOI analysis and
recommendations in this chapter.
The City has indicated that it will continue to pursue inclusion of Area I in its SOI for the
reasons stated in its application to LAFCO, in particular because the nearest residents to Area
are within the City of Agoura Hills and the City believes that development and operations of
Area I properties would primarily affect Agoura Hills’ residents in the Liberty Canyon area.18
Conversely, the property owner of the Spirent Communications property and building
indicated that it would oppose any attempts to place the territory in Agoura Hills’ SOI.19
Additionally, the landowner asserts that the property entitlements give the City of Agoura
Hills adequate oversight over possible use impacts. The CUP (Conditional Use Permit) names
the City of Agoura Hills as a beneficiary of a restrictive covenant, which, among other things,
requires the property owner to inform the City of any future ownership changes and appear
before the Agoura Hills City Council to answer any questions regarding any proposed change
in use of the property.20
Area “M” – Area M is an unincorporated island of 40 acres surrounded by the City of
Agoura Hills to the west and the City of Calabasas to the north, east and south. The area is a
residential subdivision that is almost fully developed with two vacant lots. While Area M is
surrounded by the City of Calabasas on three sides, it is only accessible through the City of
Agoura Hills via Jim Bowie Road, making Agoura Hills the most efficient service provider to
the area.
LAFCO is charged with promoting logical boundaries and limiting islands of
unincorporated territory which create inefficient service structures. Further, to promote
annexation of islands, Government Code §56375 (a)(4)(C) precludes LAFCO from
17 City of Agoura Hills, Report to City Council – Summary of Proposed Annexation of Properties Along Agoura Road, April
23, 2014.
18 City of Agoura Hills, Comment Letter on MSR Public Review Draft, August 12, 2020.
19 Armbruster Goldsmith & Delvac LLP on behalf of Liberty Canyon Technology Center and Cypress Land Company,
Comment Letter on MSR Public Review Draft, August 11, 2020.
20 Conditional Use Permit No. 98-129 (3)
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 31
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
disapproving annexation of contiguous territory that is defined as an unincorporated island
and meets the requirements outlined in Government Code §56375.3.
Given the nature of the subdivision as an island, it is recommended that the area be
placed in the City’s SOI. Recommendations related to this property are addressed in the SOI
analysis and recommendations in this chapter.
Areas “N” and “O” – Area N is a 28.11-acre territory that is a subject of the City’s 2018
application to LAFCO for annexation.21 The application was submitted in conjunction with
the application for Area I previously referenced. Area N consists of 39 parcels with one
parcel being protected open space and the remaining 38 parcels residential, of which 37
parcels each have single-family residences and one parcel is vacant. There are no plans by
the City of Agoura Hills to change land uses in the area if annexed.
Area O is just south of Area N. Area O consists of eight parcels on 24.5 acres, which are
entirely zoned as light agricultural with lots ranging in size from one to five acres and
permitted uses of single family residences, cultivation of crops, greenhouses, raising of cattle,
horses, sheep, goats, poultry, etc. A residential development was approved in the area as
part of the Los Angeles County entitlement process, and appears to be largely complete with
seven new residences and an additional residence on the “Schott in the Dark Farm” property.
Should Agoura Hills annex Area N, then Area O should be considered for annexation as well
to promote logical boundaries and prevent a small developed area from remaining in
unincorporated territory creating service inefficiencies.
Malibu State Park is located to the west of Area O and south of Area N precluding growth
from extending beyond the two areas.
Area “P” – Area P, also known as Triangle Ranch, was once considered for development
of 60 residences by the County. However, a majority of the property has since been
purchased by the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy for the purpose of preservation. The
western portion of Phase 4 of the Triangle Ranch project consists of 84 acres. The
development has an approved tentative tract map for up to 34 ranch style homes, but the
project has not yet begun construction.
Area “Q” – This 40-acre area is an undeveloped single parcel zoned as light agriculture
with steep terrain. The area is identified as a significant ecological area (SEA) in the County’s
General Plan. SEAs are officially designated areas with irreplaceable biological resources.
Development within SEAs is controlled by the SEA ordinance, which establishes the
permitting, design standards, and review process. The new SEA ordinance went into effect
on January 16, 2020. The City considered this area for annexation in the past prior to it being
identified as an SEA. Given the parcel’s designation as an SEA and related restrictions on
growth, construction on and use of the parcel, while not prohibited, is not anticipated to
occur in the near term.
21 LAFCO File No. 2018-12.
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 32
Incorporated
December
8,
1982
keerCyellaVorertoP
ubilaM
C
keer
keerCaedeM
LasVirgenesCreek
O
CALABASAS
N
Q
M
P
I
AGOURA
HILLS
L
CO
WESTLAKE
VILLAGE
County Ventura
µ
Revised:
June
2, 2020
C:\GIS\AgouraHills_PCA
Miles
Reconfirmed
10-10-12
Coterminous
R R e e c c o o n n f f i i r r m m
e e d d
0 0 2 8 - - 1 2 2 5 - - 8 0 6 4
0
0.275
0.55
1.1
Agoura
Hills
Sphere
of
Influence
(SOI),
Established
01-09-85
Action
Effective
Date
1
in
=
0.4
miles
City
of
Agoura
Hills
Sphere
of
Influence
History
Legend
Agoura
Hills
Sphere
of
Influence
RANCH
STATE
PARK
AREA
Triunfo
Canyon
PARAMOUNT
NATIONAL
RECREATION
MALIBU
CREEK
SANTA
MONICA
MOUNTAINS
TRIUNFO
CREEK
PARK
./
101 US
AREA
RECREATION NATIONAL
Adobe
MOUNTAINS
Reyes
SANTA
MONICA
CANYON
PARK
CHEESEBORO
Figure
4-7
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
DISADVANTAGED UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITIES
No disadvantaged unincorporated communities as defined in Government Code
§56033.5 exist within or adjacent to the City’s boundary or SOI.
FINANCIAL ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICES
The California State Auditor’s Office ranked the City of Agoura Hills as being at “low risk”
of fiscal distress (based on FY17 financial statements), and ranked 336 out of 471 California
cities (“1” being at greatest risk of fiscal distress) earning 83.5 points out of 100.22
The City of Agoura Hills’ budget is composed of a mix of revenues generated from
commercial and residential uses. Sales taxes and transient occupancy tax, attributable to
commercial uses, account for approximately 54 percent of FY20 General Fund tax revenues
in addition to property and other taxes. With the City mid-year update in July 2020, FY19-20
and FY20-21 budget forecasts reduced these key revenues 10 percent to 20 percent
compared to earlier projections.
Contract services provided by the County Sheriff’s Department and CFPD, other agencies,
and private contractors comprise about 40 percent of FY19-20 General Fund expenditures.23
Balanced Budget
All agencies in California are required to adopt balanced budgets. Annual budgets should
show revenues at least equal to expenditures without relying on reserves. Unbalanced
budgets will deplete reserves and may contribute to deferred maintenance and reduced
services. Revenues in excess of expenditures can help to fund reserves, capital
improvements, and increases in service levels.
The City’s financial statements show General Fund revenues exceeding expenditures
(before capital outlay) in FY16-17 through FY17-18 by 9% and 11%, respectively; in FY18-
19 the General Fund budget was about break-even. Over the three year period from FY16-
17 through FY18-19, General Fund revenues grew at a compound annual average growth
rate of 4.6 percent, qualifying as a “moderate risk” (0 to 10 percent).
COVID-19 caused a reduction in sales taxes and transient occupancy taxes in FY19-20
and projected FY20-21. The City maintained a balanced budget through various expenditure
reductions, including reduced community services and recreation programs and
corresponding reductions in related staff costs and expenses. Some City administrative staff
cost reductions occurred, and certain Public Works costs were shifted to non-General Fund
categories. Sheriff contract cost increases of 5.5 percent in FY20-21 were partially offset by
reduction of one sheriff position.24
22 Fiscal Health of California Cities, https://www.auditor.ca.gov/bsa/cities_risk_index, downloaded 2/12/2020.
23 City of Agoura Hills Budget for the Fiscal Years 2019-20/2020-21, Consolidated Financial Schedule, pg. 2-18.
24 City of Agoura Hills Fiscal Year 2019/20 and 2020/21 Mid-Cycle Budget Review, July 8, 2020.
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 34
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Fund Balances, Reserves and Liquidity
Fund balances, reserves and cash assets should include adequate funds for short-term
cash flow and liquidity, and provide funding for longer-term cost increases and capital needs.
Total Governmental Fund balances grew in FY16-17 and FY17-18, then declined in FY18-
19 due to the use of fund balances for capital improvements. At the end of FY18-19, total
Governmental Fund balances totaled 136 percent compared to FY18-19 Governmental Fund
expenditures.
At the end of FY18-19 the General Fund’s unassigned fund balance was approximately 56
percent, or 7 months, of General Fund expenditures; this qualifies as “low” risk (greater than
50 percent, or 6 months) according to the State Auditor.
The City’s policy goal25 is to designate an amount equal to or greater than forty percent
(40%) of each year’s proposed General Fund Operating Budget as the City’s unobligated
General Fund Reserve for “cash flow requirements and contingencies, such as exposure to
natural disasters, exposure to economic impacts, and vulnerability to actions of the State.”26
The City’s FY21 budget continues to show General Fund reserves exceeding their 40
percent policy goal; the reserves did not change significantly from FY19-20 to FY20-21.
Net Position
An agency’s “Net Position” as reported in its CAFR represents the amount by which assets
(e.g., cash, capital assets, other assets) exceed liabilities (e.g., debts, unfunded pension and
OPEB liabilities, other liabilities). A positive Net Position provides an indicator of financial
soundness over the long-term and ability to fund capital improvements. A negative Net
Position is an indicator of potential fiscal distress.
The City’s financial statements show positive total and unrestricted net positions.
According to a recent survey of financial statements for 482 California cities, Agoura Hills
ranked 33rd highest in Unrestricted Net Position per resident.27
Rates and Charges
According to the City’s FY18-19 financial statements, Charges for Services totaled $1.2
million, or about 7 percent of General Fund revenues.
The City’s last review of fees and charges was in 2012.28
25 City of Agoura Hills Resolution No. 05-1378, June 2005. The calculation in the current report uses the “unassigned”
General Fund balance reported in the City’s CAFR (FY18-19, pg. 18).
26 City of Agoura Hills Budget for the Fiscal Years FY19-20 and FY20-21, pg. 2-8.
27 California Sen. John M.W. Moorlach’s Financial Soundness Rankings for California’s 482 Cities, January 16, 2020.
28 City of Agoura Hills Comprehensive User Fee Study Report, June 13, 2012, Willdan Financial Services.
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 35
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Long-Term Debt
Excessive long-term debt incurs interest charges that consume financial resources that
could otherwise fund needed services and capital improvements.
Total debt liabilities (excluding pensions and OPEB) equal approximately 50 percent of
total governmental revenues, which qualifies as a “moderate” level of risk (40-100 percent).
Annual debt service is relatively low, equaling about 3 to 5 percent of total governmental
revenues and General Fund revenues, respectively.
The City received an “AA+” rating (investment grade, high quality, with very low credit
risk) for its 2013 debt issuance.
Pension and OPEB Liabilities
Unfunded pension and OPEB liabilities present one of the most serious fiscal challenges
facing many cities and districts. However, the City of Agoura Hills’ payroll is low relative to
its total budget, and total pension payments, including “normal” costs and unfunded
liabilities (UAL), represent approximately 2 percent of the City’s total governmental
revenues, which earns the City a “low” risk designation (below 6 percent).
Projected “normal” cost, excluding unfunded liabilities (UAL), remains at 7.7 percent to
10.5 percent of covered payroll for PEPRA and other employees through FY25-26,
respectively; CalPERS projections show a 53 percent increase in pension payments towards
unfunded accrued liabilities (UAL) from FY20-21 through FY25-26.29
The City’s FY18-19 total unfunded liability represents 20 percent of total governmental
revenues which the State Auditor designates “low” risk (under 50 percent), an increase from
16 percent in FY16-17.30 The funded portion of the City’s plan is 77 percent of its total
obligation, which indicates the City is at “moderate” risk (70-80 percent).
The City currently funds OPEB benefits on a pay-as-you-go basis. The City’s net OPEB
reported by the FY18-19 CAFR as of the end of FY18-19 is $1,005,573.
Capital Assets
Capital assets must be adequately maintained and replaced over time and expanded as
needed to accommodate future demand and respond to regulatory and technical changes.
The City’s net value of depreciable capital assets slightly exceeded 50 percent of total
capital asset value at the end of FY18-19. After a significant increase in value during FY16-
17 due to the completion of construction projects, the net value declined slightly due to
depreciation.
29 Misc. Plan and PEPRA Misc. Plan of the City of Agoura Hills, CalPERS Annual Valuation Reports as of June 30, 2018,
published July 2019, pg. 5.
30 Fiscal Health of California Cities, https://www.auditor.ca.gov/bsa/cities_risk_index, downloaded 2/12/2020. The State
Auditor’s results were based on FY16-17 financial documents.
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 36
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
The City’s budget includes an annual Capital Improvement Program showing the current
budget year expenditures by funding source, and the next four years.
Financial Planning and Reporting
Achieving transparency and public accountability standards dictates that cities provide
easily accessible and clear documentation of their activities, including financial information.
Financial Policies – The City’s Financial Policy provides for the implementation, review
and update of its financial policies, policies and procedures, which address reserves,
investment, investment, debt, and independent auditor.
Website – The City’s website provides recent copies of budgets, financial statements and
supplemental reports. No documents or links to compensation information was found on the
website.
Annual Budget and CAFR/Financial Statements – The City produces an annual budget
that provides a comprehensive and detailed view of the budget, including comparisons to
recent years. The City does not prepare “fiscal health indicators”, but does monitor the
financial risk indicators prepared by the State Auditor. The City prepares its annual CAFR in
a timely manner (within 6 months of the end of the subject FY).
Financial Forecasts – The City does not prepare a long-term budget forecast.
Capital Improvement Program – The City’s budget includes an annual Capital
Improvement Program with five-year projections of costs and funding.
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 37
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
AGOURA HILLS MUNICIPAL SERVICES
The City of Agoura Hills offers municipal services through a combination of contract
services and directly by city staff. Figure 4-8 summarizes the manner in which each
municipal service is provided.
Figure 4-8: City of Agoura Hills Municipal Service Structure
Service Provider
Land Use City of Agoura Hills
Los Angeles County Sheriff by contract, Las
Law Enforcement Virgenes Parking Authority for parking
citations
Los Angeles County Animal Care and
Animal Control
Control by contract
Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los
Fire Protection
Angeles County (CFPD)
Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los
Paramedic
Angeles County (CFPD)
McCormick Ambulance (per agreement
Ambulance with Los Angeles County Department of
Health Services)
Domestic Water Las Virgenes Municipal Water District
Recycled Water Las Virgenes Municipal Water District
Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District
maintains City-owned collection system,
Wastewater Collection
treated by Las Virgenes Municipal Water
District
Wastewater Treatment Las Virgenes Municipal Water District
Franchise agreement with Waste
Solid Waste
Management, Inc.
Private contractor/County of Los Angeles
Street Maintenance (Los Angeles County Public Works) by
contract
Landscape Maintenance Contract with private contractor
City of Agoura Hills/Los Angeles County
Stormwater/Drainage/Water Quality (Los Angeles County Public Works) by
contract
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 38
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Service Provider
Flood Control Los Angeles County Flood Control District
Park Maintenance Contract with private contractor
Recreation City of Agoura Hills
County of Los Angeles Public Library
Library
System
Dial-a-Ride provided by City of Thousand
Oaks by contract/Ventura Transit provides
special event transit
Transit
Route 161 by LA Metro
Commuter Express by LA Department of
Transportation
Los Angeles County West Vector Control
Mosquito/Vector Control
District
Legislative, Administration and General Services
The City Manager is appointed by the City Council. The City Manager is relied on to carry
out the Council’s policies and guide the overall direction of the City while managing
operations such as municipal services, activities, finance, and personnel. Some
responsibilities include handling policy matters, responding to citizen requests and
inquiries, preparing the annual budget, and monitoring the City’s financial condition. The
Public Facilities Department is a division of the Department of the City Manager, which
contracts with companies and private contractors to provide maintenance for the City’s civic
center as well as its various technology.
The Department of the City Clerk is tasked with the management of records and
information for the City of Agoura Hills. It must maintain and preserve official documents as
well as the legislative history of the City. The City Clerk also serves as the City’s Election
Official and facilitates biennial Ethics Training for Fair Political Practices Commission code
filers.
The duties of the Department of Finance and Information Technology are twofold.
Fiscally, it collects revenue, reports expenses, invests City funds, and is responsible for audit
and budget coordination. In terms of technology, this department works to maintain and
advance the City’s network and infrastructure.
The Department for Human Resources collaborates with all City departments and
operates within budget constraints to fulfill staffing needs and manage personnel matters.
The Department manages benefits and compensation packages, training and development
programs, as well as health and safety initiatives, and risk management procedures. The
Department of Human Resources is under the direct supervision of the Assistant City
Manager.
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 39
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
The City of Agoura Hills contracts out for City Attorney services from the law firm of
Richards, Watson & Gershon. This department provides legal counsel and services to the City
Council, advisory boards, commissions, staff, and the Agoura Hills-Calabasas Community
Center.
Law Enforcement and Emergency Services
The City receives contract law enforcement services from the Los Angeles County
Sheriff’s Department from its Lost Hills Station located just east of the City along Agoura
Road. Law enforcement services entail patrol, traffic enforcement, public safety services,
juvenile programs, and access to air support, and specialized enforcement. The City
indicated that while the contract services are costly, that it is overall satisfied with the level
of service provided.31
The City receives monthly crime statistic reports from the Sheriff’s Department. Over the
period from January 1, 2019 to April 30, 2019, there were 11 violent crimes32 in the City of
Agoura Hills. During the same time frame in 2020, violent crimes declined to 7, which is a
36 percent decrease. Property crimes33 also declined from 105 to 93 from 2019 to 2020,
which is a 11 percent decrease.34
The City’s contract with the Sheriff’s Office does not define a minimum staffing standard
of officers per residents. The City’s General Plan contains no policies with regard to the ratio
of police officers per population to be maintained. The City’s contract with the Sheriff calls
for 10.1 deputy positions,35 which equals 0.49 deputies per 1,000 population.
The Emergency Services Department of Agoura Hills is responsible for disaster response
and preparedness, while LACACC provides animal care and control needs and educational
programs as a contracted service.
Fire Protection
Fire protection services are provided by local Fire Stations Number 65 and 89 through
Division 7 of the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County (CFPD). The
District provides suppression, rescue, and fire prevention activities on a daily basis to Agoura
Hills residents and businesses. These activities include responding to structural, mobile, and
natural vegetation fires, rescue and emergency medical calls, special incidents, and disaster
response. The City has no responsibility for fire protection and related services; all services
are funded by CFPD revenues.
The CFPD provides the City with monthly incident reports. The City did not indicate any
issues or concerns with regard to the services provided by the District.
31 Interview with Deputy City Manager, Louis Celaya, March 3, 2020.
32 Criminal homicide, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault.
33 Burglary, larceny theft, grand theft auto, and arson.
34 Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, Malibu/Lost Hills Station Part 1 Crimes, January 1-April 30, 2019 and 2020.
35 Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, Service Level Authorization, Agoura Hills, 2020-2021.
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 40
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
ISO provides ratings on a scale of 1 to 10 (with 1 being the highest) to reflect the relative
responsiveness and effectiveness of fire service, water supply, and other essential resources
to suppress fire. As of 2017, Division 7 of CFPD has an ISO rating of 2 for the region it serves,
including the City of Agoura Hills.
Building and Safety/Planning Services
The Building and Safety Department exists to ensure compliance with the City’s building
codes. These codes regulate building and structural elements such as design, use, safety,
construction, and maintenance. This office has walk-up counter hours, offers plan reviews,
and completes inspection requests.
The Department for Planning and Community Development supports and implements
the GP for the City. This entails efforts such as processing land use and development permits,
acting in accordance with the zoning ordinance and municipal codes, preparing long range
planning studies, managing affordable housing programs, planning and implementing
programs related to the use of open space, conducting environmental analysis, and
processing business licenses. The department must also provide staffing services to the City
Council and Planning Commission as it pertains to planning matters. Lastly, it is responsible
for applying for and managing grants.
Public Works
Through a combination of in-house staff and contracted services, the Department of
Public Works and Engineering oversees public infrastructure, capital improvement projects,
land development, and stormwater management. The Department must also maintain and
respond to service requests regarding the City’s streets, parks, sewers, traffic signals,
medians, and weed and litter abatement. The City maintains a contract with Burns
Construction, a private company, to supplement services provided through an existing
agreement with Los Angeles County Public Works.
Street Maintenance
The City most recently updated its Pavement Maintenance System in 2017. A majority of
the City’s 63 centerline miles of arterials and public streets are considered to be in good
condition with the entire network having an area-weighted Pavement Condition Index (PCI)
of 81.36 Although the area-weighted PCI of the network is high, there are 203 pavement
sections, comprising approximately 6.1 million square feet that are currently below or are
expected to deteriorate below the critical PCI value of 70 by 2024 without remediation. The
pavement sections in need of rehabilitation have failed for various reasons including both
climate- and load-related distresses.37
The City’s five-year capital improvement plan (CIP), through FY23-24, allocates $16.3
million towards street related projects. Major projects during that time frame include
36 A PCI of 70 to 84 is “good” and 85 to 100 is considered “excellent.”
37 City of Agoura Hills, Citywide Pavement Management System, 2017, p. 2.
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 41
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
citywide street resurfacing ($3.9 million), the Palo Comado Interchange Project ($6 million),
the Roadside Bridge Widening ($2.8 million), and the Kanan Corridor Project ($2.5 million).
Stormwater and Flood Control
Flood control, stormwater, and water quality services are related municipal services that
are provided via a multifaceted approach within and surrounding the City. The Los Angeles
County Flood Control District (LACFCD) manages and maintains all concrete structures and
major flood control facilities. Additionally, LACFCD provides maintenance of City-owned
lateral lines and catch basins under a contract service arrangement with the cities. In the
case of Agoura Hills, the City contracts with LACFCD for maintenance of a majority of its
stormwater system. However, the City has maintained responsibility for one debris basin
and one inlet for which it contracts with a private provider for cleaning.
Concerns regarding water quality of stormwater runoff having adverse impacts on area
watersheds led to requirements for municipalities to meet municipal separate storm sewer
systems (MS4) water quality NPDES permit conditions and develop stormwater
management programs (SWMPs). The SWMP describes the stormwater control practices
that will be implemented consistent with permit requirements to minimize the discharge of
pollutants from the storm sewer system. Agoura Hills stormwater runoff flows into the
Malibu Creek Watershed, which drains an area of approximately 109 square miles, including
the entirety of the MSR study area. Area cities coordinate MS4 permit (Los Angeles County
MS4 Permit Order No. R4-2012-0175) compliance efforts through the Malibu Creek
Watershed Management Group (MCWMG), of which the City of Agoura Hills is the lead
coordinator, overseeing contract water sampling services and paying invoices. The efforts
of the group are regulated by the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board
(RWQCB), and mandated outcomes are outlined in the permit order. The group plans to
meet final compliance with the permit order requirements by 2023.
As a part of its compliance efforts, Agoura Hills, in conjunction with the County, is
spearheading a water quality treatment plant that is estimated to cost $20.5 million. The
facility will remove streamflow, provide treatment, and retain the captured streamflow for
non-potable uses. Runoff that is captured and treated as part of this Project can be used for
a variety of applications to offset potable water demand. In the Los Angeles area, treated
urban runoff has been used for surface irrigation, toilet flushing, and industrial applications.38
The project is presently in the design phase, which is anticipated to be completed by the end
of 2020. The plant is to be located on County property, which the City will own and maintain
the facility. The City is in the process of identifying funding sources, which will potentially
include Proposition 1 funds and other grant funds, such as the State Revolving Fund.
Parks and Recreation
The Community Services, Parks & Recreation Department oversees activities and
resources to engage citizens and provide recreational opportunities. This department
manages senior services, volunteer opportunities, transportation, park maintenance, as well
38 Malibu Creek Watershed Management Group, Enhanced Watershed Management Program for Malibu Creek Watershed,
2018, p. 46.
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 42
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
as hosting and registration for various classes, leagues, camps, and special events. Park
maintenance is provided by contract overseen by the Department.
The City owns and maintains six parks comprising 73.5 acres of local park and
recreational space. In addition to the City-owned parks, local schools serve as joint
recreational facilities. The Las Virgenes Unified School District includes five school sites that
are available for recreational use after school hours and on weekends.
The City does not maintain a parks master plan. In its GP, the City adopted a service level
goal (CS-1.1) of eight acres of park and open space per 1,000 residents, three acres of local
park and recreational space per 1,000 persons, and five acres of open space per 1,000 acres.
It is apparent that the City is easily meeting its park and open space service level goal with
68 acres of combined parkland and open space per 1,000 residents within the City, and 3.6
acres of local parkland per 1,000 residents.
Agoura Hills is a member of the Agoura Hills/Calabasas Community Center (AHCCC) JPA.
The AHCCC gym/community center offers services to residents of both the City of Agoura
Hills and Calabasas through an enterprise fund.
Transit
As part of the City’s Parks and Recreation Department’s functions it contracts with the
City of Thousand Oaks to offer the Dial-a-Ride service and with Ventura Transit to offer
special event and recreation transit services.
Library
Library services in the City are provided by the County of Los Angeles Public Library
System (CLAPLS). Over the years, library services have been located at various sites
including several schools and, in 1970, a 7,500-square-foot storefront facility. In 2001, the
former Las Virgenes Library became the “Agoura Hills” Library, moving to a new 17,500-
square-foot facility that is part of the City Hall Civic Center. Library services include a
children’s reading room, conference rooms, multimedia services, special collections,
numerous reading and educational programs, and a bookstore.
Solid Waste
The Solid Waste Management Department is responsible for waste removal as well as the
City’s recycling efforts and other disposal needs. These services are provided through a
franchise agreement with Waste Management. The City is responsible for meeting mandated
State and federal goals for waste reduction. In order to accomplish this, the Department
offers a number of specific waste and recycling programs including hazardous and green
waste removal programs and recycling programs for Christmas trees, phone books, and
curbside recycling. A grant from the California Integrated Waste Management Board
(CIWMB) has also allowed the Department to implement a Used Oil Recycling program.
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 43
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Water
Las Virgenes Municipal Water District (LVMWD) provides potable water (as well as
wastewater treatment, recycled water and biosolids composting) to residents in the cities
of Agoura Hills, Calabasas, Hidden Hills, Westlake Village, and unincorporated areas of
western Los Angeles County.
All of the District’s water supplies must be imported from Northern California through
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD), the primary water wholesaler in
the region. Originating in the High Sierras, water is transported more than 400 miles through
the State Water Project’s California Aqueduct entering the LVMWD service area at the east
end of Calabasas. Water is then distributed throughout the District.
The most recent Consumer Confidence Report for LVMWD is for 2018. In that year, the
District did not exceed limits for any contaminants, meaning it was 100 percent compliant
with drinking water quality standards.39 By comparison, the industry standard for
compliance with National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (NPDWRs) is 99 percent
(361 days) of the year.
Wastewater
The Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District, contracted by the City, maintains the
wastewater collection system and handles any overflows. The District is managed by the
County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works Sewer Maintenance (SMD) and provides
sewage collection services to over 2 million customers in unincorporated County areas, 37
member cities, and 2 contracted cities.40 City personnel, in collaboration with SMD
personnel, administer the City’s sewer collection system operation, provide engineering
evaluation of proposed and existing sewer facilities, administer preventive maintenance and
sewer construction programs, and oversee maintenance of the wastewater collection system
facilities and related records and plans.
The City of Agoura Hills’ collection system consists of 54.1 miles of collection main and
no pump stations.41 The City most recently completed an update of its Sewer System
Management Plan (SSMP) in 2015. The SSMP identified the 19 segments between manholes
with pipe flows greater than 64 percent full. Those pipe segments equal 4,592 feet or two
percent of the total system length with an estimated replacement budget of $1,970,000.
However, further engineering evaluation and select flow monitoring were recommended in
order to establish a firm CIP for the identified capacity needs for the collection system.42
The SMD has scheduled a closed-circuit television (CCTV) inspection and evaluation of
the sewer pipe conditions for the entirety of Agoura Hills’ collection system on five-year
39 Las Virgenes Municipal Water District, Consumer Confidence Report, 2018
40 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/smd/SMD/12thEdAnnualNewsletterCSMD.pdf, downloaded 5/21/2025.
41 State Water Resources Control Board, California Integrated Water Quality SystemProject – SSO Report, 2020.
42 City of Agoura Hills, Sewer System Management Plan, 2015.
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 44
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
intervals.43 The inspection appropriately identifies and prioritizes repairs or replacement of
any structurally deficient pipe segments for repair.
All wastewater agencies are required to report sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) to
SWRCB. Sewer overflows are discharges from sewer pipes, pumps and manholes. Overflows
reflect the capacity and condition of collection system piping and the effectiveness of routine
maintenance. The sewer overflow rate is calculated as the number of overflows per 100
miles of collection piping per year. Over the last three years (2017-2020) there were six SSO
events in the City’s system. Averaged over the three-year period, the City’s SSO rate was
about 3.7 spills per 100 miles of mains. By comparison, other wastewater agencies in
California average 4.73 SSOs per 100 miles per year.
The Las Virgenes Municipal Water District provides wastewater treatment services to
the residents of Agoura Hills, Calabasas, Hidden Hills, Westlake Village and unincorporated
areas of Los Angeles County. The wastewater flows to the Tapia Water Reclamation (Tapia)
through sewer pipes where it is treated to high-quality recycled water for use on golf
courses, parklands, highway landscapes and common areas.
Located just south of Malibu Creek State Park, the wastewater treatment facility operates
under a permit issued by the RWQCB or “Water Board”, a State agency.44 Tapia is owned and
operated by the Las Virgenes - Triunfo Joint Powers Authority (JPA) that was established
between Las Virgenes and Triunfo Water and Sanitation Districts to treat wastewater within
the Malibu Creek watershed.
Between January 1, 2017 and June 1, 2020, LVMWD was issued 54 violations at the Tapia
Water Reclamation Facility. Of the violations, 12 were for late or deficient reporting and 42
were for effluent violations. None of the violations were considered priority violations.
43 City of Agoura Hills, Sewer System Management Plan, 2015.
44https://www.lvmwd.com/about-us/joint-powers-authority/wastewater-services/recycled-water/sprayfields
downloaded 5/21/2025.
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 45
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS MSR DETERMINATIONS
Growth and Population Projections
v As of January 1, 2020, the California Department of Finance estimated the City of
Agoura Hills had a population of 20,566. The City is near build-out of its residential
areas and growth has been minimal in recent years.
v The Southern California Association of Governments’ (SCAG) most recent population
projections from 2016 anticipated an average annual growth of 0.5 percent over the
20-year period from 2020 to 2040. These projections are consistent with recent
trends, remaining vacant land, and the potential for annexation of additional
residential territory into the City’s boundaries.
v Limited vacant property exists within the city limits with space for new residential
units. Minimal opportunities for new growth exist outside of the city limits due to
topography, preserved open space and recreation lands, and neighboring county/city
limits.
The Location and Characteristics of Disadvantaged
Unincorporated Communities Within or Contiguous to the
Agency’s SOI
v No disadvantaged unincorporated communities as defined in Government Code
§56033.5 exist within or adjacent to the City’s boundary or SOI.
Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities and
Adequacy of Public Services, Including Infrastructure
Needs and Deficiencies
v Municipal services offered directly by Agoura Hills’ staff are limited to recreation and
stormwater/drainage. All other services are provided by contract with a private or
public provider or by responsibility of another public agency.
v Where contract services are provided, the City indicated that it receives regular use
reports from the contracting agency, and there are generally no concerns about the
present level or capacity of contract services offered. The level of services provided
are reviewed regularly upon contract renewal.
v Significant capital improvement projects identified in the City’s CIP consist of $16.3
million in street improvements and $20.5 million for a stormwater treatment plant.
No further significant infrastructure deficiencies were identified for other municipal
services offered by the City.
v There were no capacity concerns of note identified over the course of this review
related to city municipal services. The City and contract agencies appropriately
conduct assessments and planning to address infrastructure needs associated with
capacity concerns. It is assumed that, given the minimal opportunities for growth
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 46
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
within and adjacent to Agoura Hills, the City will continue to have sufficient capacity
to serve future anticipated growth.
v City management methods appear to generally meet accepted best management
practices. The City prepares a budget before the beginning of each FY, has a detailed
Capital Improvement Program, conducts periodic financial audits, maintains
relatively current transparent financial records, regularly evaluates rates and fees,
tracks employee and department workload, and has established a process to address
complaints.
Financial Ability of Agencies to Provide Services
v The City has the financial ability to provide services. The City is at “low risk” of
financial distress, revenue growth has been moderate and exceeds inflation, and it is
meeting its adopted reserve policies which provide for adequate reserves. Its
unfunded pension and OPEB liabilities are low.
Status of, and Opportunities for, Shared Facilities
v The City shares facilities through its contract services providers, in particular public
safety providers that make use of regional facilities to service multiple cities and
unincorporated areas. The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department operates from
its Lost Hills Station which serves five cities and unincorporated communities in the
region. The City also maintains contracts with Los Angeles County Public Works,
Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District, and Waste Management, Inc., which are
offered out of each agency’s facilities.
v The City has indicated it is satisfied with its contract service providers. No other
opportunities for facility sharing were identified.
Accountability for Community Service Needs, Including
Governmental Structure and Operational Efficiencies
v Accountability is best ensured when contested elections are held for governing body
seats, constituent outreach is conducted to promote accountability and ensure that
constituents are informed and not disenfranchised, and public agency operations and
management are transparent to the public. The City demonstrated accountability
with respect to these factors.
v There are seven areas where Agoura Hills’ SOI could be expanded to incorporate
existing or potential growth areas, as well as municipal service inefficiencies resulting
from illogical boundaries.
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 47
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE
Existing Sphere of Influence
The City of Agoura Hills’ SOI is coterminous with its boundaries.
Sphere of Influence Analysis
The City of Agoura Hills’ SOI has been unchanged for over three decades. The SOI is an
indicator of LAFCO’s anticipated boundary growth for the City, which enables a City to
properly plan for service needs associated with its future service area.
Areas adjacent to Agoura Hills where future annexation could be considered are
constrained by topography, open space preservation and recreation lands, and neighboring
county/city limits. Consequently, select areas were identified for inclusion in the City’s SOI
based on available adjacent unincorporated territory, service inefficiencies, existing
unincorporated islands, potential impacts on city residents, access, and potential for growth.
These areas were discussed in detail in the Growth and Population Projections section of this
chapter and identified with lettered markers for reference in Figure 4-7.
Areas I, M, N, and O are nearly built out, and therefore land uses are not anticipated to
change, or development occur should they be annexed into the City. Additionally, all four of
these areas are separated from other developed unincorporated areas where the County
provides municipal services, which creates access challenges, service inefficiencies, and
illogical boundaries dividing communities. In particular, Area M is an island of
unincorporated territory entirely surrounded by incorporated territory, and the area is only
accessible through the City of Agoura Hills.
Area L, while not developed, also faces similar service inefficiencies as previously
described for the other proposed SOI areas. Specifically, the short stretch of Cheseboro Road
that briefly exits Agoura Hills and then reenters the City, is the responsibility of the County.
The County and the City have agreed that service provision would be more effective if the
City were to annex the territory and maintain its streets. Area L is uninhabited and
designated for open space uses to the north of Cheseboro Road and light agricultural uses to
the south. While there were plans for development south of Cheseboro Road, those plans
have since ceased due to purchase of the property for preservation by the Santa Monica
Mountains Conservancy. The Conservancy has indicated that it does not object to annexing
into the City as open space. The City does not propose any changes of land use for the areas
designated as open space within Area L.
Area I has been under contention in recent years amongst the three agencies with vested
interest in the unincorporated properties—the City of Agoura Hills, the City of Calabasas, and
Los Angeles County. As unincorporated territory, the land use authority for the five parcels
in Area I is the County of Los Angeles; however, the cities of Agoura Hills and Calabasas and
their residents may be impacted by the uses in the area. Landowners and business owners
located in the area have indicated a preference to be annexed by one of the neighboring cities.
Additionally, given that the territory is substantially surrounded by the two cities and
constrained to the north by Highway 101, the area could be considered an island with
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 48
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
associated service inefficiencies. In order to minimize illogical boundaries, one of LAFCO’s
objectives is to eliminate such islands, and therefore the territory should be included in a
city’s SOI to indicate LAFCO’s intention to accomplish this aim and allow the city to
appropriately plan for annexation of the area.
However, because of the present contentious nature of the territory, an option is to define
Area I as an “Area of Concern”, establish a cooperative land use agreement between the three
agencies, and assess which city is best suited to take on the property upon the next SOI
update. “Areas of Concern” are used by LAFCOs for geographic areas “beyond the sphere of
influence in which land use decisions or other governmental actions of one local agency
impact…another local agency.”45 Alternatively, should LAFCO not desire to adopt a definition
for an “Area of Concern” in its policies, the three agencies could formalize their mutual
commitment to coordinated land use planning in the area with their own jointly designed
agreement. Los Angeles County recognized the need for “intergovernmental land use
coordination” in its Santa Monica Mountains North Area Plan and the Ventura Freeway
Corridor Areawide Plan. Of note, the plans identify a need for coordination to establish “a
set of consistent development standards across jurisdictional boundaries to help eliminate
inter-jurisdictional impacts associated from developments adjacent to two jurisdictions,”46
much like the circumstances surrounding Area I. A cooperative agreement between the
three agencies could be a useful tool to 1) allay concerns on the part of the cities regarding
any potential changes in use, 2) ensure city involvement regarding decisions for an area that
either city might annex and serve in the future, and 3) work towards agreement on which
city may eventually annex the area.
Area P continues to have potential for development as defined in the Triangle Ranch
Phase 4 project. The project has an approved tract map and the property continues to be
privately owned. Should the area realize development, Agoura Hills would be the
appropriate service provider given its proximity to the property.
As a significant ecological area, Area Q is under more restrictive development standards.
Given the unlikelihood of development occurring in the near future on the parcel with an
associated need for city services, there is no cause to include this property within the City.
Sphere of Influence Determinations
Present and planned land uses, including agricultural and open-space lands
v Like most cities, the City of Agoura Hills consists of a variety of land uses; however,
predominant uses are residential, open space, and commercial. No areas within the
City are classified as agricultural uses.
v Vacant property within the city limits with space for new residential units is limited.
Additionally, there are minimal opportunities for new growth outside of the city
limits due to topography, preserved open space and recreation lands, and
neighboring county/city limits.
45 Butte LAFCo, Operations Manual Policies and Procedures, May 6, 2010, Section 3.1.6.1
46 Los Angeles County, Santa Monica Mountains North Area Plan, 2000, p. III-15.
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 49
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
v The southwestern portion of the City (generally south of Agoura Road and east of
Kanan Road with exceptions) is entirely designated as “Planned Development
District” for which the Agoura Village Specific Plan and Ladyface Mountain Specific
Plan apply.
v Areas M, N, and O, which are proposed for inclusion in the City’s SOI, are generally
built out residential subdivisions, with limited open space and light agricultural uses.
There are no plans on the part of Agoura Hills to change land uses in the developed
areas (Areas M, N, and O) if annexed.
v Area L is uninhabited and designated for open space uses to the north of Cheseboro
Road and light agricultural uses to the south. While there were plans for development
south of Cheseboro Road, those plans have since ceased due to purchase of the
property for preservation by the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy. The City does
not propose any changes of land use for the areas designated as open space within
Area L.
Present and probable need for public facilities and services
v Based on demand indicators, there is existing demand for all municipal services
offered by Agoura Hills. There will be a continued need for these services and related
infrastructure based on existing demand, as well as anticipated growth-related
demand within the city limits and associated with any annexations.
v Within the city limits, growth is most likely in the Agoura Specific Plan Area, where
plans for service extension will be necessary in conjunction with development
applications to ensure adequate infrastructure is in place and service capacity is
sufficient to provide a level of service similar to other areas within the city limits.
v In the areas proposed for inclusion in the SOI, municipal service infrastructure,
including water, wastewater, streets, and public safety stations already exist to serve
the areas. Additionally, many of the City’s contract agencies already serve the
developed areas, which indicates the ability and willingness to provide continued
services to the areas.
Present capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public services that the agency
provides or is authorized to provide
v Municipal services offered directly by Agoura Hills’ staff are limited to planning,
building & safety, recreation and stormwater/drainage. All other services are
provided by contract with a private or public provider or by responsibility of another
public agency.
v Where contract services are provided, the City indicated that it receives regular use
reports from the contracting agency, and there are generally no concerns about the
present level or capacity of contract services offered. The level of services provided
are reviewed regularly upon contract renewal.
v There were no capacity concerns of note identified over the course of this review
related to city municipal services. The City and contract agencies appropriately
conduct assessments and planning to address infrastructure needs associated with
capacity concerns. It is assumed that, given the minimal opportunities for growth
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 50
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
within and adjacent to Agoura Hills, the City will continue to have sufficient capacity
to serve future anticipated growth.
v City management methods appear to generally meet accepted best management
practices. The City prepares a budget before the beginning of each FY, has a detailed
Capital Improvement Program, conducts periodic financial audits, maintains
relatively current transparent financial records, regularly evaluates rates and fees,
tracks employee and department workload, and has established a process to address
complaints.
Existence of any social or economic communities of interest
v The Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy is an economic community of interest with
an aim of preserving open space in the region and surrounding the City of Agoura
Hills. Purchase of property neighboring the city limits has constrained potential
growth, thus precluding City expansion in these areas.
v The residents in the developed Areas M, N, and O are divided communities of interest
that are separated from the other subdivisions in the area due to their exclusion from
an incorporated area and related levels of service granted to residents (i.e., recreation
services).
Present and probable need for water, wastewater, and structural fire protection facilities
and service of any disadvantaged unincorporated communities within the existing SOI
v No disadvantaged unincorporated communities exist within or adjacent to the City’s
boundary or SOI.
Sphere of Influence Recommendation
LAFCO is charged with promoting logical boundaries and efficient delivery of services;
therefore, this MSR recommends that LAFCO consider inclusion of Areas M, N, O, and P as
well as Area L into the City of Agoura Hills’ SOI. It is recommended that Areas I and Q
continue to be excluded from the City’s SOI.
It is recommended that Area I eventually be included in either the City of Agoura Hills’ or
City of Calabasas’ SOI. However, it is apparent that such a recommendation is not practical
at this time. In lieu of inclusion in one of the City’s SOI, it is recommended that Area I be
identified as an “Area of Concern” and a cooperative land use agreement, covering those
issues previously discussed by the two cities, be formalized to promote collaboration
amongst the County of Los Angeles, as the existing land use authority of the area, and the
cities of Agoura Hills and Calabasas, as the potential future service providers and affected
agencies. It is recommended that the three agencies work together to define the cooperative
agreement to meet their needs and circumstances.
CITY OF AGOURA HILLS 51
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
5. CI TY O F CA L A B ASAS
CITY OVERVIEW
The City of Calabasas was incorporated as a general law city in 1991 to gain responsibility
for land use decisions. The City is located in western Los Angeles County along the Ventura
Freeway. approximately 25 miles from downtown Los Angeles. Neighboring cities include
Agoura Hills, Hidden Hills, and Los Angeles. A portion of the City's northern boundary also
borders Ventura County. Situated in the southwestern region of the San Fernando Valley,
Calabasas is tucked between the foothills of the Santa Monica and Santa Susanna Mountains.
Development of the City did not take off until the late 1960s. Unreliable water sources
remained a constraint to larger-scale subdivision and development. The formation of the Las
Virgenes Municipal Water District in 1958 and the Las Virgenes School District in 1963
facilitated a development boom.
Historic resources are fairly limited, with less than two hundred buildings in the City
predating 1960. However, the area is rich in paleontological and archaeological resources.
Preserving the historic character of Calabasas has been a long-term goal of the City and its
residents.47
Boundaries
The City has conducted a few boundary changes since its incorporation. Most recently,
in 2011, Los Angeles LAFCO approved annexation of 493 acres into the City of Calabasas.
The territory included roughly 200 acres of protected open space land, one five-acre
commercial property already entitled by the County for development, and an existing 110-
lot residential subdivision (Mont Calabasas). The Mont Calabasas territory annexation was
a six percent increase in area for Calabasas. In 2012, the City finalized the annexation.
Presently, the City of Calabasas constitutes 8,806 acres or 13.76 square miles. 48
Sphere of Influence
The City’s sphere of influence (SOI) is coterminous with its incorporated boundary and
thus encompasses the same area of 8,806 acres. Calabasas’ SOI was originally established in
1992, shortly after its incorporation. The SOI was then reconfirmed by LAFCO during MSR
and SOI updates without changes in 2004 and 2012. However, the SOI was expanded to
coincide with annexations completed over the years. The City has completed applications to
LAFCO for annexations and simultaneous SOI amendments that are not reflected as part of
the SOI update process. The City’s boundary and SOI are depicted in Figure 5-1.
The City has proposed seven changes to its SOI as part of this comprehensive update.
These options are discussed in detail in the Growth and Population section of this chapter.
47 https://www.cityofcalabasas.com/government/community-development/planning-division/city-profile
48 Area estimates from LAFCO GIS, 6/4/2020.
CITY OF CALABASAS 52
LE YE D L R KAO WODAEM DR HATRAM VATATERA H S NEVAHRIAF SREVIRNARFST NITSO NA 0 I 0 M 6 N V L 5 A R O E AH N LI L A TTAP I C W Y LE ELLAV CARARD MAN M TTS AR O AHT N KNABRUB 5601 RAOVYER CO NSILL 5601 MA AHTRD VA RANYAM STFAUST D BVL MMIRPILIHP TS 560 22200 1 TS RUDNICK WY TS AV TOPANGA CANYON BURBANK JULIANPNLA 12 9935700 DR LN VA VA VA R EGID 21999 27B 22800 27A ODAROD RAECLYELLAV YELLAV DR RA ANVTHOM MMIRPILIHP VA AV VA LE ELCRIC 5501 NODREB AV TS 00232 STNODREB SEDAAVN AV AV ST NOD BER TS DOLOROSA ST RYAN FLAORNREA- ANN JULAI RAOVJA 26B WODAEMSPRING NWALT C SER ST 23900 NOVNAAC ANIMLEHLIW ST AV OD OAS ORL AV TS ASOROLOD AV ARUTNEV 27C DR RD TS YELLAV NK ABRUB AV A B V ERDON BLVD ST ST ST ST 00342ODN C RA NE L FENWOOD ST WOODLAKE 032 00 5401 RENDON CAL SALE 00522 CAPISTRANO TS SHOUP 5401 OSNATSOC GL AR TS V A TS AFA D L CLRAENDON OR NODNE E RALCN-E 5400 A UR TNEV NODNERALCWY 27
TST Q NIUAGNEST L ACAAIC RD
ORBESEHC
PROVENCE NORMANDY
SAL ALIZIA RIC TREBLEB RD26000 DRCA 2 N 6 Y 00 O 0 N
TCDNOMCHRI B TC LV Y L E P L D NAM SREMLAHC LPEVO YD R A G HS EL Y T E S L A S C E W L E L 2 T 5 C N 5 E 0 L 0 PSREMLAC W H GA E Y N L R OR U D OBL C E T M 5700 RE P E L F LP T EV OC O Y R N W G TYDA LO H ET S E C T HCNAR 0 Y 0 SI D 5 W 5 E O L BO C D C R AJ DR LLIB N D TOMRFE EJ NHOJ C D ARS R ON 5700 KIT JED DR RD HTIMS D K R CIRTAPZTFI Y D E N LL A D E R D A L R L N V E L D P I D D V R N R H R A E O D L L L L L N I N L H I O T E D T R N P W N L I E L P P O MD U NO ARA N I L A B P LN O E R P D D T D L 5 W E R EL I L 3 F E G 0 N D L I 0 L E W E T P S - L LI E H S A R N A L 5 EB 8 V V 0 28142 0 A D G DR NO L R L 00 E 8 B 4 R 2 B E H LITTL O L E E IG A Z L N H E IE C R R I O DGE TSP L A G O RDR N C I I K R O H E N V U O R 0 S C 0 T T 35 IKLLION DR OLL A IR D D O A D G L P B C O L A V N N 2 Z 3 W A Z L 6 V L 0 O L B E 0 E A N A S D L E D R L T R E IL R WY L 2 1 3 O K 40 4 L 0 I L V O 2 U S S I 5 T E N K NCNI E D SO L 32200 E L S I R V T G V V CA R S TE ZN NO 2 L A 3 A A E 7 R M S 2 T S M A D P 6K O T R L IR I R A U H N B N C I RD LLOI I A AL S N T A O L N A PY AT R L G E E VO D ND N R U O A N B L NO RAI MA BE O RS IS D 2 E 3 L 000 LEO D N R O S RA T OST S R D E O 2 R 3 N R 0 I 0 C E 0 M 228 O 00 G TS 5 R 30 O D 1 R YER FALLBROOK ELAD T F S Y F CT E CA J D G OY E O S W A L W N LL E V ON AL 22 K 60 A 0 V S ALLE 2260 S 0 T 22700 DR BLV P 02207 D ON ST CE AV R C D ALDERONLUIS CASS 82222 ELLAVLED RDNO VA TSIM SFAETS NLICIANTSO 00122DR ZEVLAG ALEDDRCESR PI N E A V S AVILLEBDEL OSO OSNATOSCA 00022 V D TS R AN ARREUG TSART D TS A R L A A R C I SIUL VLE VALLE TS TS 00182 S S E EL LE E C C C C T A Z A E ENITR N M D N AM P A D O O R AR I R R E L G UGAL L O E A D A A A Z V E A V R A C B R D D O C EMDI M N O A E M R A E D C V R R IO C D TS D E I R O AOP V M OSNATSO A C C 28
28500
MONT RDDR
ROMKR0A09P 5 WEIVN C E IRTE R R A G N F A ARMFIELD
MO T U C N RE T C D NESP ARIN TC MRA NEDS NOSPMIS C K T INGSTON NL NO LXIAID RT HTIMS LIB N MAH RD D0R055 RD TS LP CAL DE RNDA CINORTD S R O VENTURA LNST VAAV CRESPI 00422 ANO LLDR ZENITRAM FELICIANO ZENI MATR TS 0005 VA RD TS ZEPOL COM TS ERCIO 28
00162 AD R A OM DR
VIEW SLOAN 0055 C HA T MILTON & REHSAL LP DR 23200 CRESPI FALLBROOK RD DRST TS 5100 CELES
CT SEGOMIL DR
SENEGRIV DOOWHTUR EDENPARK
L W CP I T NTON NIATNUOM DR DR KRALC GLEN 00042 VP AA LL R E A Y DISE OSTRONIC VENTURABLVD ST NAMNUD HSABALACMACFARLANE 22600 LN NILUPAC5 D 1 R 3 D 5 R BLVD TSPIO RD VELICATA TS 00212 LOPEZ
DR BLYTHEDALE
RD
CALAIS NOTYCLTC YNATTIRB ECASL D A R SASABALAC
0075DR 0075 DR DRDR
CT WELLINGTON DOOWGNILLOC5500 DOO E W L A T L N N L O I 0 A V S 0 B M 4 O 5 E H RF C 25 U 5 M 0 B 0 ERLAND DLEIFRETTUB 00942 RD ROBERT GUY HO 54 B 0 A 0 CK GNILLOR ELDIRB LIART RD FAR ORD LMD RDDR O T RA W DK IN S 1094 LEONORA BIGLER TS1094 TS A BAL V EVP TS CK OLNISPE L R E IG Y B O A L LF E O T U T R O AMROFER MA C C A FA SS RLANE RDRD V ME AY N C ID O O TTE TCDR CT ATACILEVSAN TS DON ANIDEM MEDINA D 5 R 00 OPMA 0 C AL ED ASO 29
0036 RD
TC WEIV 23248 GAINFORD CALDERON CLAVEL ASOAL TS ANIDEM NAS UEL GIM DE
OLAP
CT 0065 26300 THOUSAND 00262 AVEV 0065 OAKS
RRICEBMA RIC WEIV RD DR DR BRIDGER 00052DR DR MEADOW VIEW DRR OLLING RD DR SADDLE 00532 AVE NEVAEH 230 C 0 A 0 LABASH DOOWKRAL ST AUSTIN BRU SGEREILAVAC TS22007 C ST AVALIER RD DO SU M EN IN O G 4 O 900 CERRILLOS ED NAS TSASOAL DR MIGUEL NAS TS STSAN MIGUEL ETATSE RD AICNEDIVORP 22100 ST 29
PL ODAMOC
DR
C H IR ORSHOE LN DR ROM ROY RD C R I P R O H M IL T R AH ICH YW
0045 C TC T FFILCSNEEUQ 0035RIC RDYELESLLEW 003N5N L L REKLAW DR Y GEDIR ELHSAJIM BR R I D DGER ROB SC ER R O D T T ST ON WH R IT D MAN DR SAL R G IF UOD CREEK OAKF RD IELD VANO HO N PPE A R CLE DNAL VA LOHL R U O M DIMLA 00V7 A4EL VL A IVYEBBA T A E I R V E O S G E E D DST EUGENE LP RD TEZIB 0074 AV DARTALAD YDNUGRUB SS D A R C ASOR 0084OLAG R E H DO R LANDA DR DR RD SENTAR RD LP ONA DUME -ICIL T EF Z NAS N T C S IN TF L L A EUG L IM ANO OINACSIV AREDAL ZTEMUD 49TS00 IACNEDVOI PR RD AGONAC V A V A A NE A L V LIV 21 IB 4 A 00 NEZRD NHEA CRAM ST RD CT NL VISCANIO
BA SNLIK LA D P R WORTH DR
DR SNKIALB5900 FAIRVIEW 8000 2 AKNL SI B RD RD
CANYON
NOSIRROM HCNAR
SENEGRIV L S N AL BRA S V A O DDL L E N RIDGE 540 0 0 045 RIC ES R OR D NE R K D
ENDERBY CT BRISBANE DR JIM R COLTER OU JOH N N 53D00 RD RDYAWKRAP DLO VETNURA LNAIDNACS CRAFTSMAN DR BLVD SN YO WMMOC PARK ALBADA PARK TC SPIE D L R BERG TSERC L H P A A R NO O H M AI U L CST HEISS VA PE VA R G A RD ERS L D H L R W P P I E G L N O V E R R A E C B S M N OR ELLIW D V R A CA RD LDERON RD ET 4 N 7 E 5 L 3 ECXEDR DR A A I Z NR U O D D R C ER D P S E F O OCN R AL D N LL 22300 A IRREC ARUTNEVANEUB 4900 SOLEDROVAM 0022 0CAN TS Y DR ON N AAT O ICN D UA DR LSARR YBA Y TS B BUENAVENTURA A TC RRA OIPNOD RATA AR S C L O T S A DR RD S A R V D C O AN CR A A M SOC A R L A ASYUC VA ANA R T D ST 30
NIAT -NUOF PLTOTH LLIHTO L OF OTA RD LN
DR 5900 5900
PLATA DR 26100 DR 53 BL 0 UF 0 F RED PARKMOR
U
RMU
AE
DR UAERMU 00542 RD DR CT G T AR TRE 5000 FRWY SCHUM RE AHC 0005SASABALAC 24100 00142 PARKSORRE E NT R O TNECKRAP RD GRANADA ANE AK V R R E RG E RK A O S EP R N LA A LPA MIRASOL OTNER PAKR P R A R O R A S K MLDA PA RV RKA J D 0 A P C E 0 A L A 3 R F R 3 A K A O 2 N LI D VO A PARK ATIRAGRA A MB V A LA V C NL D K RD 4 R E F E 5 HE T R S A W U A 0 I I L E A 1 - A I R P R Q R L T U D D D S I L NT I E A 001 E 32 A C N R B Y S D L R S R A B T D C ST K A SS 4 F R R D 6 EA I 4 A M R K B R R A O N YB 9 S A V D A E D V S X R T C IA E N LENTE LLIO R S R DS E RA C N F 4 E U 65 L G 1 A IC D M LA I R R A O N D F LP R E O ELY A R OC T Y NIU B Q 4 A 70 R 0 RA A Y LI W ZOND DN O ALLOHL C UM O NI N DE D P E E R N J DE O NSCTIA AV SA D L R B O S P P A D L A L AMP T G L L A O C R LE E N I D N O A T T R T A L R D R N A S A AS T S D S PSE E G V D S A N A A N R E V L D S RA E E O C A N SN A I D R O P L O A LTLI D DE D V L A A A GAONA LUZ 30
LP DR 0028
5
2
8P 0L 0 RD
HCESEBRO
MUREAU 0074D 2R CALABASAS PARK IRP K A R C AP4600 ARORU KR AA S P IE M NN O 2 A 3 PN 40 AA 0 C R O K MINZA KR ES J PE A AR L NZA P I4V 5O PARK 0RPN0 AOR PA K R C A O K SSETN CORDERO 8 D 1 R 922 OFN PA P R L E K R RBW TO PR NE IVADO IL E B A B R L ET P R- A V R R E K F G K O N AO PL R V S O L R A K E P D L A IT - A YVDON AV TNOMELRAHCST 83722 CASS DR TS R 005 D 22 4510 DNAL RD LOH S LUM AN DR 22078 DR CT 4699 DNA DNL ALL LOOHLUH MLU R M DARGE A N RT G DIN OACN E AD A A I N S LEP E S L N G ROI ES I ST DR VA ST ALAMO STRIOS
32
DLEIFDEM EASTERLYRD NL ERALUT PL WAR S IN I G WEL 0028 TS 2D 005 E 82 L V E V O A W 5 R 6 E I 0 S F C 0 L O T N OTHILL REVIRDF 5A 40IR 0VIEW
5300COLODNY
0006 LOST
DR IHLLS DR
RD
SASABALAC RD V NE TURA TC NOL A ECRAB C R O D RD REL A IL 26400 246 G 00 RANADA RD OLEP CT UT DNIO ATLA CALAB PA A RK S CA A S RIV M I I P S E N R AA O A P RR AR KB M K A E S L C L I L R A NT OS A OS A ADANAR PARK G PARK PA A RK THENA 4500 SR O ED N N 0 U A 04 O R 2 F L K S 2 CURP E ECURPS 22 R R D I 600 D M B E DR A R TC E A P K A RAP SSERPYC RD K R P H D 1 L R 0 C S YPRES I W N MA EVER R C E A R R E 2 RD R C Y T T D O D RD DOOW A P 4 0 4 O 4 V K ONM 0 A T H TE K 1 A L 8 R F 2 R A B R P E E D A 0 2 N 4 A R B DD 0 OO K W 2 I L C 0 R P E FE L DERA P R R D TSI S S A 3 D R C I Y D L E 0 K RK Y A D 0 R R R P H N A E V T D K C I C L E D A 0 E R D R D D A A E U D A R P D T I M A P DEK A A S BL A C O C P R SMUR D D A O M M E N C K OD R ARR R E S H K V N P R I E L E A O S U O R G E R A R I I A T P A D R A R T L R OTCI N L D DN R P B P N REO D P A G G A R A L K E 0 A E C B D D E 0 K C L R M N TC A KCO K 2 C E A R EP T D R T A 4 A D P R P KRAP E B P OTEN A EV P L R L K A P SEVIL U LA A M A D F L R 2 A R 2 N T O S N I 7 4 K WI T D O KC 0 R A K 0 A Y R M V K O 3 O S A A O T K 0 A S A POR D 0 M R D P R KC L I D F F A L N A L R O A P O G R NIM 4 A R O E RT 3 L A A C 0 M 0 AO PL D KE M R 2 E O E S P P T E 3 U L S D T A T K 6 L A T E A R L N 0 L K R O A O W K R R R P R 0 P A A A N C U D P O C R P F A L S 70 A A M K R 0 M 2 A OP R I S2 A K I T E A N N I E A N R E Z R O P A P R B R A P O U E YR O N D N K K UL A N CE A N A A D D A N O GA S CDONODI S UM E L S U T SA P A L E T V T I R C I O L CL D A P A L LCA S O H M S R A 4 O D 2 T M 5 IS I S 2 L C S E O H T A A R V B E G P L O A L A L V D O S N P A G N R N P E I D L R L R O R D A N D G D E C O A N NN E A U A O Z V EC R L G O E G U AT N R IN SN C SRO I A R E D V E V T D O I T G N N NO S O L C L Z A RD I L D D I A A TS A N GLEI SIA AC N AV B R O E D LIVAR
32
DOOWNAC DR ST 5200 COLODNYDR
VA TS DOOW C NA YCN 5 R 2 D00 CHESEBRO
D A R M C E 5B A D 20R N0 G I E G D E S A W GD W S RE A A D R D R R E R D VAREVRID
26050
CT HERMOSILLAREM LA O P 00542 RDRAK P VOLTARACT PARK MIRAMAR PARK ADARTNECTTEDREGAL PARK BE2L3M70O 0NTE KRAP ANNEISPARK IDLOS KRA K M P R E A L P INPAD RKAP RAK P OC A KIL OSA MRE R H IS R A AP B K EHCI CNROLPI O DA L O O R P K OCRAM CYN LARKRD TSERC -NERW KING RD RDHOLLO O WAK O WD H D T OYOP C L I VI RLN L OD E EW U DRP NCRE E S R T W H R YW O D ACI M REMA M A P V E IC RD KN RIECR WNOT EY 00 M 04CAAG N R W N R T D O AA T R S D ELRAHCRD 22400 RD DEHCRAP OLLWI DR W RD PARKLN RD WOLLIW RABMA 21 R 90 D R 0 A D R M T D S B E A R R J C O W H O N O D S D SR L A ADN WI M NOT O OD N A E V T RDDNAL 213 L 0 O 0 H LH MU O L LL U A M N C D ARRIZAL
35
RD
DEB D ERR R Y DR FRWY
CLTUN 4 A 800
LA AMUP PRADODELOSCIERVOS M OOLC B KRA A O P NTPOANRIOK VICASA RDIBK A W C B OR M A RA A L P B S S 4 R 0 A 0 C M 0 MO E U A BL R U D EBI N R O DIN W G DR SCHUYLKILL WIND 0073 DOO R W D ENALP
35
00382
ORBESEHC
DOROTHY
CO RD MADO
CALAMINEDR 2 ELMO 6 H N 9 D 00 RD
C CI I E RLOAL R L D ERTSE
ODARP LPARSADCOABDREAS SARENTA ED P LOS SALED G OS ASN ODARP PARK 3300 2 BLUEBIRD GNIMMUH YW LLEDRD DR 390B 1ON BELL PL SEA AILEDDR DOOWSNHOJ TNIAS RD 00712
33
RD
DR PALO ARUOGA ARUTNEV
DDR R 26 S 90 T G 0 ARRET PARKVILLE RD
VI D R EL G S E OL NES
DE SASAL ZA E B D ALA O C DARP ASAS BALAC SOSLOLAL BA O C ED D ARPSED O O D DRAP R E LAOJSAP RD ANEORL RDALLIMLAP LOANTRIMPRA O DER A A PC ASOLE AAD P CM ARK 2 W 46 A 00 Y OESTE LP LAROC PALM DR RDBATCRTIS LAMR DRIB EKADODRW WY RD 22700 WINEBRANDY- E D L Y TS R R P WO R F E D KEARN R Y U TC R E G T AD A J NO A 2 W SM 2 E 500 0063 TS INUZ RD KWAH AWP O N M EE
33
NOY E N EN A E D R C RLA AR L U P A LNTEA L EW 0018 I2S LP SIWEL
DR ELLAC LLIC O ETNOM ELLA A C SOTSIMA AVI DR
NAW C OO TDS CANWOOD
27100 5A D L0M A U00 N D B T R G E A I S D T G E V E I D E R W T 9S 9O84 L26800
G W LOE IL NA T L S KOW STNEGL CAMINO
PRADO DE DE LAS AMOR PRADO PLRAASD P O RA FD D R E O U LTAS T D R E IG FL O ORES SAREP ED SAL ODARP MARIPOSA P L R OP A S D RA O DZOO RRDOES TC OTREBLA EYR TC ALLEBRAM RD AL 0 LE 0 I 9 R 42 A ORDEC ELLAC VIA AVD A LE RE S D D A A A I M L V VIA A S I C V EN L D L A ARGOPLONA VISTA 00542ESQUINA VIA CERRITOS DNALLOHLUMPEARTR P E L E HWYDECLARATION LIBERTY MAHGNID AI D RT E APILAC D V AR A D J ENN A E MESON RD TUANOGLA TS DUNMOREDR MTWY AGNA E E EH P H E CCK AN O O O AP RM LA T E B OH E C U C PANVAJO AZTEC
34
YW
RCOABLLLEEDA ATIRAGRAM
00672
269 A 0 G 0 OURA RD
4400
ODARP EDPVREARDDOE LA ODARP DR 3800 NONIPEL ELL L ACAC OE AS R O DN N AXEAL A C A L L P L TECOLO V T IA E SOU KRAP TH TS DLCO OLD 3800 0083 DR 00422 NOYNAC SUPI 1SUMMIT VUE DR W
34
DR
ODARP SAL PR M AD A O IZDEL DE S O E D LO AR B E P R D A PARKWAY BELLAVISTA DVA ELLAC 00842 TC SERRANONA CALLE DR KEERC TOPANGA 22900 DR L HHT LLI GI 2MOREA WY
RDTHGINK RENEE
DRLLEDNEV 27400
HILLS
LAS
SATOLLEB SALLERTSE SOL ANIER CALLE DR UAELLEB LE SUMMIT N EGDIRWEIV 3MADERA DR
LIBU AM
ED OESAP NIUQAOJ MC CALLE CONEJO P AR R D I IL M LA ARIO DR PL AHAR V NEY SIALAPPRADO MANS BELLINI LN 4SWEET JASMINE LN
WODAHS 26900 OWYOOLRLRIWA H P O L T SPRINGS
KEER
YC RTNUOC
ED SAVU OD SA AR LP PRADO SAL NIMZAJ ALLIVUAETCD DR 23600 CANYON FAUBION TC ENNEDRAD DR LLAGAHC 5WEEPING BANYAN LN
00382
LLEDNOR NOYNACYTREBIL
NL
DE ED 0063 ZINRODOC ALTAMIRA RD D H K A IR L R P P A T C R K EE DR NOLENAG PL P I L NDALS LP TO DVLB DRHEIDI 6FRAGRANS WY
ENDEVA RO TS EIWOBMIJ
DR EER D DR
PRADO YAWKRAP ALED O L D U AAN PR ADALLAC NONACELLA V C IA ELADELKA BALEDR DRY 00232 RD HC NR C OL AI 7CRAPE MYRTLE CT
REDNEFED ORVI P DENT
0N08L3 SLLIH
DR 1WISTERIA TR
LLIHSDAG
SLLIH TRAIL
AMARILLO FORD VA DEL TS 8BAUHINIA CT
0004ST KOORBRETSEHC PL RD
CT
HALCON DR EARN- RD TS DR 2WATSONIA TR
DRTNIOPNOTHGIEL DLOC
DR RD DR 9POMEGRANATE LN
EEKNAY
TC CSAELNMDAA CONDELL CYN EELLIAG 42200 3LOCUST TR
NL
DR DEEWREEDHILLS
10CARISSA CT
YW DR
DREGDIRKCOCAEP SGNIRPS SPRINGS
D LU E ZA ED ODARP OD PRA ORO DELASFR ASE S AGAL 0 A 063 M AVODROC SENDA GELLER RD TSUCOL FALCONET DR NONAC CT HODLER 11FLAME TREE LN
RD RD JOELTON RD
TSOL RT DR
TC AVD PAJARO DR TS VIA 12HIBISCUS HILL LN
27300
D C O O O T WTON TS PL
FUPRCASIDAO DR ALICANTE PRIMARIO CUMBRE RDMLE GLADIOLA EGDIRENOTSCT AIV SUMMIT 13MAGNOL LN
KAO
3200 3
DETINU
TC RT
ODARP DR TR DLO PINEWOOD LIDO 14AGAPANTHUS PL
CUO YRTN GLEN DR
EVIL GROVE
ED DEL RD CT ALCAMO HILL RD TC ODRANOEL VOLTAIRE 2
DR DPRATRICKHENRY 0093
KAO LOST
OZNEROL DR ROSEBUD RD 15FUCHSIA CT
25700 TOLWNN E BIWO RD
CALABASAS TC LP 4 DOR 0 N P DELGO0 O 0 PPYSEED
3800
AJNARAN TC C RLAS EONSUELO SAINTANDREWSLN DRYFIELD MLEPDRANSY MESQUITE POPPY DR ADAMSVILLE SCHWEITZER 2
RTS C UATC
2
JIM DR
DLOGIRAM TC
PRADO IV L Y IL Y D DRR TOPANGA BLUERIDGE 1
Y WRE Y REVE NAFTFCIT LN NWOTRFEE T NNLW FROTEE ARRY- RD S S D KA K YSIV R A AM D MARKS
TSOLTR D C R E D D OO K R N C WT A E R E O TC G D N D L EO O CD R V A E I T G R A E O ST P ORCG LPSUHT EEK CR ONA CT EC SUNFLOWER
ODARP RABMAE O D DARP ROSDA PRED A O DO DEL GRANDIOSO P O ASESN W N Y AM OR ADN CITELD LR A AVODROC LN ATTESN R IO TER P DN T A E N E O R LO WI Y A N IS A - C TR D OVER R CL T A RETS T R RD W VLAL EIV EY RRT T RT R R DT 3T R 5R00 RT YLLOH DALE RD DRYHTOROD CT ELLIVSMADA 1
WEIVTK CRAP CYN UN R IT D ED DR DRLN
SASA SM BA HO L A A UD C N T O SL CE T O N P N WU A S D R C SI T N I T NGS DIHC EN R IP OUL MEADOW PLNL
3700
SOLEDO S D U A EN R OSP SASABAPL R G A A R C D A O N M D PR I I S A O T D EO S R O IODEL OELSEADPRA L N E C D HO CONSUELO RD CREEK RD C WY HESTNUT MAGNTORLIA EDLRSIERT FERN TRVIOLET MI UMT S DR RT YSIAD IVY RD R L T P N OR AOPD NAT VA MTWY 0082N 1
YWH LYNNLN RD 00382
SGARC DNALLOHLUM A 2P 60 R 0IL RD MTW U Y DELL 0023
YWH YTREBIL LIBERTY 00182 D 0R 003 NOYNAC PARKC PA O T L R O I N C Y K RD HE PARK VISTA N C R T YP DR TIMMUS KAO L
0022 26800MU D LH N OL AL LAS VIRGENES 2700 3200 EL DR ENCAN S T 0L O 0 N L9 LI3 RD N H L DR R R SL A LI VH PD E O N PPYSEED
2500 STOKES 00462 HWY CANYON
2700
RD S S T EKO CANYON RD ED AND SUOHT VERKLER HEADSTROMCANYONRD AIGAMALEDODA D R A P DICILEF LA PEAKS HIERRO TNIOPKRAB SYLVA R N Y D WTM KAEP DR SASA K B E A E LAC N R O C YN D A LO C C YRDLADYB 2 IR D 4 R D 600 I D N R S D K R IP W I A L A Y A T V S M IV B L E Y A N C D D R O O N N TREE R LN D 24400 D C M R AL Y U AB L A H S O AS LL C A AN N 2 M 4 Y D 3 O O 0 DR 0N UN 3 KEER T C 0 EL 0 A T 0 R I U N TCO D L R P L R D EDL R A H ET W RET EG P V D A Y I I A NEDNIL R R K K A S C O A V T Y I E W N L N R EP T O SA S D A P E N L 2 00 D 4 R 4 J L 3 1 O T A R 0 N U Q 0 R E U E W I L L S PEAK PANSY ORCHID LN R 3120 O 0 0 S 01 E 1AGN R A DLO P E OT W D IL 2 L 3 0 D R O 5 OC 0 K R 0 W 3 0 1 LLREDNNOBGL R EN D DR T RT N N SKY E LINE D O R M S E TOPA I NG S A A N E B NT R UO O GP O A K N IN T G G RA 0 1 S V E 0 9 5 A 1 D 0 N L 0 RL I N E L R Y Y OT P K R S S O I M N SPO 2 0 E N U 1 C 0 E 0 N U T 0 T 6 R G 1 O RD D M R R O O A D S DNJA C A K 1 CHA 8 M Y K 0 Y E L 0 R I S N A E 00323 1 B 8 D U 0 D R R R 0 S D ON R RD N D EO D R V A LS R T E G R T C I I N S G B D UZ R S R E D E D N Y IOC R H D BU ENI R L S A YK GNAP S M O O R C A I T R D R N C QU 0 L 0 E 0 0 E TT 7 0 D E AG 2 T E 2 R R OP D D L R E O IF D L R N D C A A Y T N S E T Y O S P O L A A N H NGA RD TIMMUS TWM Y 0072 N LP O O N T AC DR V T 2 I 3 M 3 A 00 M L US DEZ CY T N O O L P L IL A D RT N A REF N C GA DR NL YWMT YWTM DFIELD R LO DRANCH EGDIR YRNEH RDEVG A DIR ELL Y D I R V R E SM N RD E A H DA A M TLA AHSROC SUMMITTOSUMMIT STONEWALL TER DR 10 TIMM 0 U 0 S RT NO LLIHL Y OOC NA 3012 C 0 RANCH RD D) HC ( R O O NA LD L R H F D D LI F E IEDL I RD LL HIL S L ESDI IDE W F IL A L ELNEERG GEER DR KNAT RD ESUL RTTSEW DR NOCIBUR MAHSR C R O E N R D C E EZ O R AG NWDN U D O Y Y I E R N A Z A TL N C A Y A WW 0 W 01 Y Y 2 N C C N 2 O A U R 0 L M Z 0 DIA D Y 5 I E DR R W 2 B Z YO OY W DACAL TL L A A A W A Y 00220 L V TA R T G W O R R C N IURT AC N Y ON E N E B N I A L T D R R R D AOD P YWZ O TNOOK T CO
Incorporated
April 5, 1991
CALABASAS
CO
HIDDEN HILLS
AGOURA
HILLS
LOS ANGELES
GA O RU A RD
Las Virgenes Creek LAS VIRGENES RD
YWHDNALLOHLUM CALABASAS RD ArroyoCalabasas µ AVE SAN LUIS SANFELICIANODR DVLBNOYNACAGNAPOTN CANOGA AV Revised: November 29, 2012 C:\GIS\MXDs\Cities\Calabasas Miles
Coterminous Calabasas Sphere
of Influence (SOI),
Reconfirmed
10-10-12
0 0.25 0.5 1
Reconfirmed
08-25-04
City of Calabasas
Established
07-08-92
1 in = 1 miles
Action
Effective Date
Legend
Sphere of Influence
History
Calabasas Sphere of Influence STATE PARK RED ROCK CANYON Canyon Topanga
STATE PARK MALIBU CREEK
AREA
STATE PARK
NATIONAL
RECREATION
TOPANGA
SANTA
MONICA MOUNTAINS
./ 101 US
STATE PARK
AREA
MALIBU CREEK
RECREATION NATIONAL MOUNTAINS SANTA
MONICA
Woodland Hills
Figure
5-1
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
ACCOUNTABILITY AND GOVERNANCE
The City of Calabasas is governed by a five-member City Council that is elected by
residents to serve staggered four-year terms. Each year, City Councilmembers select the
mayor to serve a one-year term. There is also a City Manager appointed by the City Council.
The annual salary for City Councilmembers is $11,712. They also receive a $3,000 vehicle
allowance, pension contributions, and contributions towards life insurance/short term
disability/long term disability premiums, and medical/dental/vision premiums.
The City uses an online and mobile application called “Connect with Calabasas” to track
filed complaints. Complaints are also accepted by email, phone, or in-person (by
appointment, depending on department).
City Council meetings occur twice monthly on the second and fourth Wednesday of each
month. Council meetings are open to the public and take place at 7:00pm in the Council
Chambers at City Hall under normal circumstances; however, due to the COVID-19 pandemic
and declared State of Emergency by the State of California, the City has transitioned to
entirely virtual meetings held on the Zoom teleconferencing system at the same time as the
regularly scheduled meetings. The meetings are streamed live on the City’s website, are
replayed on demand on the City’s website, and via CTV, which is accessible to Spectrum cable
subscribers on Channel 3.
The meeting schedule can be found on the City’s website. The City Council agenda is
posted 72 hours before each regular meeting at City Hall, Juan de Anza Park, the Calabasas
Tennis & Swim Center, Gelson’s, and on the City’s website. There is now an option to request
the agenda be sent to an email address as well. The entire agenda packet can be found online
while copies may be obtained at the Calabasas Library and the City Clerk’s Office. An agenda
packet and copies of the agenda are also available during the meeting on the back counter of
the Council Chambers.
In 2016, the State Legislature enacted Assembly Bill (AB) 2257 (Government Code
Section 54954.2) to update the Brown Act with new requirements governing the location,
platform, and methods by which an agenda must be accessible on the agency’s website for
all meetings occurring on or after January 1, 2019. The City of Calabasas meets the agenda
posting requirements outlined in AB 2257.
The City has demonstrated accountability and transparency in its disclosure of
information and cooperation during the process of this MSR. The City responded to the
questionnaires and cooperated with document requests.
PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
While public sector management standards vary depending on the size and scope of the
organization, there are minimum standards and best practices that should be followed by all
agencies. Well-managed organizations evaluate employees annually, track employee and
agency productivity, periodically review agency performance, prepare a budget before the
beginning of the FY, conduct periodic financial audits to safeguard the public trust, maintain
relatively current financial records, conduct advanced planning for future service needs, and
plan and budget for capital needs.
CITY OF CALABASAS 54
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Staffing and Organizational Structure
The City of Calabasas delivers municipal services through a combination of staff,
contracts with other agencies, and contracts with private contractors. City operations are
broken down into 13 departments consisting of the Department of Administrative Services,
the City Attorney, the City Clerk, the City Manager’s Office, as well as the departments of
Communications, Community Development, Community Services, Finance, Library Services,
Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, and Public Works. While listed as departments
on the City’s website, fire and law enforcement services are provided through contracts with
the CFPD (a dependent district of Los Angeles County) and the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s
Department, respectively and are organized under the Public Safety and Emergency
Preparedness Department.
The City of Calabasas relies on paid professional staff to conduct the daily business and
operations of the City. The FY18-19 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) reports
125.5 FTE employees in that FY. By comparison, there were 133.7 FTEs in FY17-18, which
equates to a staffing reduction of six percent between the two years.49 Following are the listed
departments and their allocation of FTE staff.
There are two divisions within the Department of Administrative Services. The first is the
Administrative Services division that is responsible for Civic Center Operations and
Maintenance as well as the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. The
other division within this department is Human Resources. Overall, this department
employees 3.13 FTE staff, one of which is allocated to Human Resources.
The City Attorney is appointed by the City Council in order to provide legal services on
behalf of the City. Currently, this position is filled through a contract with an attorney from
the law firm Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC.
The Department of the City Clerk accounts for four FTE staff positions. Not only does this
department play a vital role in the support of the City Council and the City Manager, it
maintains documents, including Council minutes and agendas, and vital records while also
presiding over official elections.
The City Manager’s Department consists of one FTE position. This position is appointed
by the Council and provides overall direction of the City and manages operations such as
municipal services, activities, finance, and personnel.
The Department of Communications employs 9.8 FTE staff members. This department is
tasked with maintaining communications systems, media relations, and ensuring the voice
of the City is consistently heard and represented.
The Department of Community Development includes two divisions—the Planning
Division and the Building and Safety Division. Altogether, this department constitutes 16.44
FTE employees who are responsible for administering the City’s development needs
whether residential, commercial, or industrial.
Sports, culture, entertainment, various leisure activities and events, as well as all of the
City’s parks are under the charge of the Community Services Department. This department
49 City of Calabasas, CAFR 2019, p. 182.
CITY OF CALABASAS 55
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
consists of 31.41 FTE staff members ranging from teachers’ aides to event coordinators and
maintenance technicians.
There are eight FTE employees allocated to the Department of Finance. The staff is
responsible for timely and accurate reporting of all financial records and information.
Library Services are operated by 14 FTEs in the building next to City Hall and serves the
areas of Calabasas and Hidden Hills. Through a variety of materials, programs, and resources,
the library is committed to providing the community with access to information.
The Department of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness consists of 1.48 FTE
positions. The Community Emergency Response Team (CERT), emergency preparedness
and emergency communications fall under the umbrella of this department and relay
essential notifications through a number of channels in an effort to help constituents remain
informed, prepared, and able to respond to emergency situations. Additionally, as previously
mentioned law enforcement and fire protection services are contracted services organized
under the Department to ensure the safety of the community as well.
The Department of Public Works accounts for 10.92 FTE staff positions. This department
represents five divisions that include Engineering and Project Management, Environmental
and Intergovernmental Relations, Inspections and Construction, the Landscape District, and
Transportation and Transit. The Department exists to improve the City through capital
projects and community development. Service requests can also be submitted to this
department.
The municipal services provided by these departments are described in further detail in
the Municipal Services section of this chapter.
Management Practices
Review of Employees and City Performance
The City of Calabasas is an equal opportunity employer and complies with the
expectations set forth in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). It provides employee
training and continuing education opportunities through a tuition reimbursement program.
When hired, permanent, full-time employees take part in a year-long probationary period in
which they must demonstrate their skills and the abilities needed to fulfill the duties of their
position. For employees who have been promoted, this probationary period is six months.
During the probationary period, performance evaluations take place at six months of
service, or more frequently if decided upon by the department head. These evaluations must
take place prior to the completion of the probationary period in order to determine if the
probationary employee will be allowed to become a permanent staff member. Current,
permanent staff members also receive performance reviews annually, at minimum. These
evaluations are conducted by the employee’s direct supervisor, reviewed by upper
management, and signed off by the City Manager and a Human Resources representative.
The performance of the City itself is also measured and evaluated. To begin, each year the
Mayor prepares and presents a “State of the City” report for the citizens of Calabasas,
businesses, and local dignitaries. This presentation includes a compilation of annual reports
CITY OF CALABASAS 56
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
that are generated by each of the City’s departments. This presentation is accessible via live
broadcast, the City’s website, and its social media channels.
Additionally, the City employs an auditor who is tasked with developing a yearly report
reviewing the City’s finances. This is reflected in the CAFR that is maintained on the City’s
website. There are also audits performed by CalPERS, the State of California Department of
Housing and Community Development, CalTrans (as it relates to gas tax funds, bicycle and
multi-modal grand funds, etc.), and by miscellaneous California Special Funds. Outside
agencies providing grants to the City, such as the Metropolitan Transportation Authority,
also undertake an audit.
Review of Departmental Performance
To better understand the overall adequacy of services provided by the City, individual
departments are responsible for capturing historical data to evaluate their performance
using a variety of metrics. The Building and Safety division, for instance, has implemented a
tracking and reporting software system, called SmartGov (provided by Paladin Data Systems
Corporation), to store the number of permits issued. The Community Services Department,
on the other hand, has incorporated the “Active” network (ActiveNet) application in order to
streamline class registrations and monitor class attendance, demographics, etc. The
information collected in these reports is intended to help determine potential departmental
needs or adjustments and budgetary allowances. The final reported numbers are made
available in the annual CAFR.
As with their ability to gauge performance, each of the City’s departments also employs
their own methodology for tracking their workload. Building and Safety’s system allows the
department to see permit processing times and ties the 10-day turnaround goal to a
percentage of fees collected.
The Planning Department is currently transitioning from a handwritten note system to
permitting software that will allow for ease of use in determining how many people are being
served as well as the type of inquiry.
Employees in the Department of Public Works who are assigned to capital improvement
projects log their time into an ADP system. This ensures the project schedule and budget are
not exceeded as it only allows for a particular percentage to be allotted for a given project.
Presently, the City reports that it has sufficient capacity to provide services and has not
experienced any significant service challenges.
Planning Practices
The City’s central planning document is its General Plan (GP). The current plan was
originally adopted in 1995. The current General Plan (“Calabasas 2030 General Plan”) was
adopted in December 2008 as a comprehensive re-write of the preceding plan. A handful of
subsequent updates to the General Plan have been accomplished since then, to appropriately
depict annexed territory and its associated pre-zoning, or to refine certain land use policies
in association with a new development project. The only substantive General Plan update
was accomplished in 2014 with the adoption of the current (5th RHNA Cycle) 2014 – 2021
Housing Element.
CITY OF CALABASAS 57
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
This plan outlines seven elements required by state law which include housing, land use,
open space, noise, circulation, safety, and conservation. The following four optional elements
are also included: community design, parks and recreation, cultural resources, and services,
infrastructure and technology. The GP has a planning area that covers territory within and
extending outside of the city limits and coterminous SOI. In conjunction with the GP, there is
also a certified environmental impact report (EIR).
In addition to the GP, there are a number of Master Plans that address specific areas or
goals for the City that require more detailed development guidelines. For the City of
Calabasas, these plans include
v The Bicycle Master Plan (1997) - a guide for creating an interconnected
transportation system intended to reduce vehicle use.
v Las Virgenes Road Corridor Master Plan (1998) - outlines recommendations for
beautification, circulation and traffic improvements for Las Virgenes Road.
v Las Virgenes Gateway Master Plan (1998) - institutes plans and guidelines for
developing the area within the boundaries of Las Virgenes Road and the Ventura
Freeway interchange.
v Mullholland Highway Master Plan (2004) - offers recommendations for capital
improvements along a portion of Mullholland Highway.
v Old Town Calabasas Master Plan (1994) - provides design guidelines to ensure
the City’s unique “sense of place” is maintained, reflecting the history and spirit of
Calabasas.
v Parks Master Plan (2004) - reviews existing and future service needs for the City’s
park and recreation areas and provides guidance for implementation of proposed
changes.
v West Calabasas Road Planning Guidelines (2006) - to provide clear and useful
recommendations for the design, construction, review, and approval of all
development in the West Calabasas Road Master Plan area.
v The Trails Master Plan (2007) - highlights the development of community trails
over the next 10 years.
v Sewer System Management Plan (2019) – plans and procedure to reduce the
occurrence of sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) throughout the City’s Sanitary
Sewer Collection System.
Occasionally, departments will create strategic business plans. In the case of Calabasas,
the City has adopted an Urban Forestry Strategic Plan. This document establishes ways to
create and maintain an urban forest that will enhance the quality of life in Calabasas.
The City’s financial planning practices are discussed in the Financial Ability to Provide
Services section of this chapter.
CITY OF CALABASAS 58
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
GROWTH AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS
Land Use
The Calabasas GP establishes 21 land use categories. The five residential categories allow
for a variety of housing types for all densities ranging from 2 to 20 dwelling units per acre.
Five urban-business designations and four urban-mixed use designations (including planned
development) accommodate a range of business and commercial activities. The planned
development designation denotes an area under single or common ownership that warrants
detailed planning because of the presence of unique features, environmental conditions, or
development constraints. The designation is intended to accommodate a mix of uses with
special standards that address the unique features, conditions, and constraints present. The
City has identified five rural uses, consisting of hillside mountainous, residential rural, rural
community, open space-recreational, and open space-resource protection.
Like most cities, the City of Calabasas consists of a variety of land uses; however,
predominant uses are single family residential and open space-resource protection as shown
in the land use map in Figure 5-2.
Calabasas' land use pattern is well established and is not intended to change over time.
CITY OF CALABASAS 59
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Figure 5-2: City of Calabasas General Plan Land Use Designations
CITY OF CALABASAS 60
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Population
As of January 1, 2020, the California Department of Finance estimates a City of Calabasas
population of 24,193. The City has limited available residential land, which has resulted in
minimal growth in recent years. Since 2010, the City has increased its population of 23,058
to 24,193 in 2020, which represents almost five percent total change over ten years. Figure
5-3 shows the City’s population rose quickly between 2011 and 2012 and has since
experienced a slow steady increase. The principal cause for the higher than average growth
between 2011 and 2012 was annexation of the Mont Calabasas territory (composed of 110
lots).
Figure 5-3: City of Calabasas Population, (2010 – 2020)
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
The Southern California Association of Governments’ (SCAG) most recent population
projections from 2016, anticipated that the City would reach a population of 24,000 in 2020
and grow to 24,500 by 2040, which equates to average annual growth of 0.1 percent over
the 20-year period.50 These projections are consistent with recent trends and remaining
vacant land within the City; however, the growth estimate may be overly conservative given
the potential for annexation of additional residential territory into the City’s boundaries, and
the future housing requirements mandated under California law and implemented through
the 6th cycle of RHNA.
Planned and Proposed Development
Over the past five years, permits have been issued for 102 new housing units that have
been completed or are under construction.
Figure 5-4 identifies proposed development projects and projects that have been
approved and are under construction within Calabasas, including two hotels, 19,800 square
feet of office space, 31,867 square feet of retail space, and 461 dwelling units. At present, 78
multi-family dwelling units are under construction and 222 multi-family dwelling units are
under consideration.
50 2016-2040 RTP/SCS Final Growth Forecast by Jurisdiction.
CITY OF CALABASAS 61
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Figure 5-4: City of Calabasas Development Projects
Name of
Number of dwelling units or
Development or Location Status
commercial square footage
Owner
Calabasas Hilton 51 rooms (28,787 sf) 24150 Park Sorrento Under construction
Expansion expansion of an existing hotel
Paxton Calabasas 78 multi-family residential 4240 Las Virgenes Rd Under construction
units
Las Virgenes Village Commercial Center w/ 25,820 5727 Las Virgenes Rd Construction completed,
sf of retail and 19,800 sf of awaiting full occupancy
office
West Village 180 multi-family residential 4790 Las Virgenes Rd Under review
units and 5,867 sf of retail
Raznick 42 multi-family residential 23480 Park Sorrento Entitled, pending
units for seniors construction
Rondell Hotel 127 room hotel (65,000 sf) 26300 Rondell St Under construction
It is anticipated that future growth will primarily consist of infill development and
redevelopment, with a focus on multi-family housing and mixed-use projects in close
proximity to commercial services and transportation systems. Only minimal new
development is anticipated at the edges of the urban area.
As of 2013, the City identified vacant lots with space for 306 dwelling units—99 single-
family residences and 207 multi-family units.51 Although the vast majority of the vacant
acreage in Calabasas is designated as hillside/mountainous (HM) only a relatively few
number of units can be developed in HM areas due to severe physical constraints, lack of
roads and sanitary sewers, and safety issues. Other vacant single-family land is limited to
areas designated rural residential (RR), also subject to significant development constraints
related to topography and access. Only 14 acres of vacant, unconstrained residential single-
family (RS) land remains in Calabasas, supporting densities up to six units/acre. In total,
approximately 212 new single-family housing units can be developed on sites that have not
already received land use entitlements.52
Growth Strategies and Constraints
The City’s primary planning document is the General Plan (GP), which dates from 2008.
The Housing Element was most recently updated in 2013 but is in the process of being
updated with a planned adoption in 2021. The planning area identified within the City’s GP
includes unincorporated areas surrounding the City that may be considered for future
annexation. These unincorporated areas total about 3.2 square miles (2,022 acres) and
include residential neighborhoods, commercial areas, open space, and a public school.
Calabasas' vision is to continue to be a low intensity, primarily residential community
nestled in a natural environmental setting. In general, urban development will not extend
beyond the areas that are now developed or designated for urban development. Rural
51 City of Calabasas, 2030 General Plan-Housing Element, 2013, p. V-6.
52 City of Calabasas, 2030 General Plan-Housing Element, 2013, p. V-7.
CITY OF CALABASAS 62
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
residential uses will be located at the fringe of the urban area, transitioning into primarily
open space uses with widely scattered home sites. Thus, consistent with Los Angeles
County’s Santa Monica Mountains North Area Plan and Local Coastal Plan, it is the City's
vision that the rural, open character of lands to the south of existing urban development and
approved urban density projects be preserved, including lands along Las Virgenes Road
south of Lost Hills Road and lands along Mulholland Highway west of Old Topanga Canyon.
The policies for growth within the GP emphasize the City’s desire to retain and protect
its natural environmental setting, neighborhood character and scenic features. As a result,
planned future growth is concentrated within the City’s existing developed urban areas
along Calabasas Road, Agoura Road and Las Virgenes Road. Vacant and underutilized sites
along Las Virgenes Road and Agoura Road are anticipated to provide for new commercial
and residential development, via higher density mixed-use redevelopment. Many of the
existing office complexes are approaching maturity and functional obsolescence, and in 2010
the City rezoned these areas to accommodate a transition into a higher density mix of office,
retail and residential uses. The City did this in response to the City’s 4th RHNA cycle
allocation, as well as to accommodate anticipated future RHNA allocations during the 2030
General Plan time horizon.
The “Community Structure” section of the GP Land Use Element identifies Old Town
Calabasas and the adjacent areas west along Calabasas Road up to Parkway Calabasas as an
area for pedestrian-oriented and transit-served mixed-use development. The City plans to
re-create a traditional small-town character and a sense of downtown within this area.
Growth within Calabasas is constrained by topography, environmental constraints, and
community preferences. The vast majority of vacant land both in and adjacent to the City
cannot be developed at high densities due to topography; the sloped terrain limits both
street access and utility connections. Growth in the area is also limited by environmental
constraints. Much of the area is designated as Significant Ecological Areas (SEAs) by the
County, meaning that they contain plants or animals that are unique, unusual, or declining;
development in these areas would require extensive and costly mitigation. The entire city is
within the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area; hence, the National Parks
Service reviews City land use decisions and development plans.
Sphere of Influence
The City’s current SOI encompasses the same territory as the City’s boundaries, totaling
8,806 acres.53 There are nine areas for potential inclusion in the City’s SOI to enable future
annexation.
The GP’s approach to city expansion is to pursue annexation of areas that have a
significant physical relationship to the City, and which are generally considered to be part of
the community. Because the City has one of the lowest property tax revenue sharing
formulas within the County of Los Angeles, it is also the policy of the City to pursue
annexations that would increase the City’s commercial base and associated tax revenue from
retail sales tax and transient occupancy tax. The need for a larger commercial base is further
53 Area estimates from LAFCO GIS, 6/3/2020.
CITY OF CALABASAS 63
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
exacerbated by recent housing legislation that threatens to turn the City’s commercial base
into housing, which provides significantly less tax revenue than commercial uses.
As outlined in the City’s GP, the central concept of Calabasas' approach to the possible
extension of its present boundaries is to emphasize the following:
v Defining those areas that have traditional social and cultural ties to Calabasas, and
which are generally considered to be part of the community of Calabasas;
v Identifying lands that have a significant physical and/or infrastructure relationship
to the City of Calabasas;
v Initiating cooperative planning programs with residents and landowners in
unincorporated areas being considered for annexation; and
v Allowing residents and landowners in adjacent incorporated and unincorporated
areas to choose through the democratic process whether they wish to become part of
Calabasas.
For the most part, land uses in the areas being considered for future annexation by
Calabasas would not be expected to change upon annexation, according to the GP. The one
exception is the Craftsman’s Corner area north of the Ventura Freeway and generally east of
Parkway Calabasas, identified for the purposes of this MSR as Area D. This area is described
further below.
The following discussion summarizes characteristics of these areas, which are labelled
alphabetically for purposes of this MSR and map identification in Figure 5-5.
Areas “A” and “B” – Area A encompasses the existing Mountain View Estates subdivision.
Area A includes 385 existing single-family homes on individual lots covering approximately
237 acres, and attendant HOA-owned and controlled permanent open space lands covering
approximately 558 acres. Area A also includes the rights-of-way for two public streets
serving the area (a portion of Mureau Road and a segment of Thousand Oaks Boulevard),
and an existing eight-acre park (Gates Canyon Park). Finally, a water storage tank owned and
operated by the Las Virgenes Municipal Water District is also included in the proposed SOI
expansion area. Area A consists of 840 acres.54
The City of Calabasas Council indicated following a presentation of the draft MSR that “it
remains fully committed in its long standing efforts to annex the territory of Mountain View
Estates, as is supported by its inclusion in the City’s 2035 General Plan.”55
As reported by the City, Area "A" has been the subject of annexation efforts by the City of
Calabasas since the City was first being formed. The territory making up Area "A" was under
construction at the time the City was incorporating (roughly 1990), and the developer
decided at the last minute to request being excluded from the incorporation citing concerns
about changing jurisdictional building and safety and public works permits during the
construction period.
54 City of Calabasas, Community Development Department Annual Report, 2011, p 25.
55 City of Calabasas Comments to LAFCO Municipal Service Review, August 20, 2020.
CITY OF CALABASAS 64
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
In 2010, based on a neighborhood petition presented to the City from residents, the City
again filed an annexation proposal for the territory. The application efforts moved through
City Council approvals to pre-zone the territory, at which point the Mountain View Estates
Board of Directors decided to oppose the annexation. The City Council elected to withdraw
the application.56
The City further notes that Area “A” is accessible only via roadways through the City of
Calabasas, and the homeowners and residents within the 385-home subdivision shop in
Calabasas, and use City of Calabasas parks and library services; the City has never met with
opposition from the City of Hidden Hills in any past annexation efforts for this area.
The City of Hidden Hills’ current SOI in Area A splits the existing residential Mountain
View Estates community, a gated community, which does not provide a logical SOI and
planning area boundary. The area has remained in Hidden Hills’ SOI for approximately three
decades and has not been planned for in the City’s planning documents, nor has Hidden Hills
sought annexation of the area.
Area B is also within the Hidden Hills SOI. The area is undeveloped with Upper Las
Virgenes Open Space Preserve making up a substantial portion of the territory. A majority
of Area B is zoned as open space, with the exception of the southeast corner, which is zoned
for heavy agricultural uses. Hidden Hills indicated concern about maintaining oversight of
new development in Area B in order to minimize potential impacts on residents of the City.
Areas A and B are part of the County’s Santa Monica Mountains North Area Plan. Much
of Area B is designated as a Significant Ecological Area (SEA) by the County, meaning that the
area contains plants or animals that are unique, unusual, or declining; and as such,
development in this area would require extensive and costly mitigation. The City of
Calabasas designated the northern two-thirds of Area B as "Open Space - Resource
Protection" in the City's General Plan. During the time when Calabasas was contemplating
annexing the Mountainview Estates area, the City also pre-zoned the northern two-thirds of
Area B for "OpenSpace - Development Restricted.” Meanwhile, the southern one-third of
Area B are designated for "Residential Single-family" use in the City's General Plan. The
southern one-third of Area B was not pre-zoned by the City .
Area “C” – Area C is unincorporated territory to the north of the City of Calabasas and to
the south of the City of Hidden Hills. Area C is outside the City of Hidden Hills’ main gate, but
within its SOI.
The area consists of 21 parcels zoned for heavy and light agriculture, residential planned
development, and single-family residential. Existing residential development in the area is
limited to the Mureau Estates off of Garrett Court. There is also a school (Mesivta of Greater
Los Angeles). The City of Hidden Hills has been approached about private development
proposals in Area C; however, no formal application has been submitted for development.
In order for the area to be included in the City of Calabasas’ SOI, it would need to be
removed from the City of Hidden Hills’ SOI. However, Hidden Hills indicated that the area is
of interest due to implications for traffic on the main access to Hidden Hills and to potentially
make use of the area for affordable housing to meet its State allocation. Hidden Hills has not
56 ibid, Calabasas Comments, August 20, 2020.
CITY OF CALABASAS 65
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
addressed the area in its planning documents. Conversely, the City of Calabasas is interested
in including the area in its SOI in order to prevent negative impacts on the City and residents.
Calabasas has identified the area as single family residential with the exception of the
existing school, which is identified as public facilities - Institutional.
If Areas A, B, and D are proposed for municipal annexation (e.g., to Calabasas), Area C
would be left as an “unincorporated island” contrary to LAFCO policies. The City of Calabasas
has expressed interest in annexing Area C, should Hidden Hills not anticipate annexation of
the territory.
Areas “D,” “E,” and “F” – Area D, also known as Craftsman’s Corner, is the subject of a
proposed annexation of approximately 145 acres of territory (including 85 parcels) to the
City of Calabasas, and approximately 12 acres of territory consisting of Areas E and F
(consisting of four parcels) to the City of Hidden Hills. This area is presently part of the
unincorporated territory of the County of Los Angeles. Area E is uninhabited and
undeveloped. Area F consists of three residences.
Area D is within the City of Hidden Hills’ SOI and would therefore need to be removed
from Hidden Hills’ SOI and included within Calabasas’ SOI prior to any annexation of that
area. If annexed in the future, that area is planned for a mix of residential and non-residential
uses, possibly including a performing arts venue or other similar facility.
Hidden Hills has a reimbursement agreement with the City of Calabasas related to costs
to remove the Craftsman’s Corner area from Hidden Hills’ SOI so it can be annexed to
Calabasas.57 The action will also require that Hidden Hills annex Areas E and Area F to avoid
the creation of “unincorporated islands” following the Calabasas annexation. The annexation
will include revenue sharing between the two cities.58
Area “G” – Area G consists of only of the Alice C. Stelle Middle School. The property is
surrounded on three sides by the City of Calabasas and is accessible only from Mullholland
Highway, which is within the City. As it exists presently, the exclusion of the school creates
an illogical boundary and service inefficiencies.
Area G had been a proposed residential subdivision at the time the City of Calabasas was
being formed, and the property owner was not interested in becoming part of the City;
therefore, this property was left out of the City’s original city limits. However, the
development project never materialized, and the property was later acquired by the Las
Virgenes Unified School District (LVUSD). LVUSDE then constructed a new middle school on
the property (Alice C. Stelle Middle School).
Area “H” – The area is composed of two lots zoned as open space. The City proposes to
include Area H in its SOI in order to create logical boundaries. Should the area be annexed
into Calabasas, the City does not have plans to change the land use. The area is planned as
open space-resource protection in its GP.
57 Reimbursement Agreement Between the City of Calabasas and the City of Hidden Hills Related to the Craftsman’s Corner
Annexation, January 1, 2015.
58 Interview with K. Kallman, City of Hidden Hills, 5/8/2020.
CITY OF CALABASAS 66
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Area “I” – Calabasas submitted an application to LAFCO in 2014 to annex Area I. 59 Agoura
Hills filed a competing application in 2018 to annex the same territory. 60 LAFCO ultimately
denied the City of Calabasas’ application, and Agoura Hills’ application for annexation was
never processed to completion. There continues to be multiple invested stakeholders with
standpoints on which agency is best positioned to manage the property in question in the
best interest of the property owner/business, the City, and City residents. Additionally, there
are varying positions on which municipality and its residents are greatest impacted by the
activities and any future land use decisions in Area I.
Area I is approximately 43 acres with five properties, including three with commercial
uses—two parcels where Spirent Communications is located, one parcel occupied by the
Kythera building, one vacant commercial site, and one 27-acre open space parcel. The
property is the office for Spirent Communications—a United Kingdom-based
telecommunications company—which produces significant property tax and sales tax
revenue. Area I is abutted by the City of Agoura Hills to the west and south, the City of
Calabasas to the south and east, and unincorporated Los Angeles County to the north.
Agoura Road runs through the unincorporated area between the cities of Agoura Hills and
Calabasas.
The Spirent Communications property is located just south of the 101 Highway and east
of Liberty Canyon Road, abutting the city limits of Agoura Hills. Given the proximity of the
property, Agoura Hills has concerns about uses impacting its residential community to the
immediate south along Liberty Canyon Road. Also, Agoura Hills asserts that it is well-
positioned to serve the property given its contiguity to the city limits. However, the two
landowners of the three developed parcels and one business tenant in Area I indicated
support for the City of Calabasas’ bid for annexation.61
Another notable concern is the unstable hillside impacting Area I, which has a history of
erosion and slumping, particularly after rain events, which indicates concerns of potential
mudslides. The vacant lot in Area I has experienced landslides in the past that required
remediation. This calls into question which agency is best-positioned to take on the liability
of a hazard such as this and address this issue at Area I.
Over the course of the annexation process, the two cities met and discussed concerns of
1) no modification of conditions (i.e., hours of operation, hours of delivery and shipment) at
the business properties, 2) no intensification or industrialization of uses on the commercial
properties, 3) preservation of the vacant and open space lots as open space, and 4) Agoura
Road will remain a two lane road with landscaped medians and reduced lighting.62 These
issues highlight those concerns that were and continue to be significant to Agoura Hills and
its residents with regard to Area I. In an effort to ensure that these issues, in addition to
erosion issues, are addressed in the long term, the three land use agencies with vested
59 LAFCO File No. 2014-04
60 LAFCO File No. 2018-12
61 Los Angeles LAFCO, Staff Report Agenda Item No. 7.a. January 9, 2019, p. 7.
62 City of Agoura Hills, Report to City Council – Summary of Proposed Annexation of Properties Along Agoura Road, April
23, 2014.
CITY OF CALABASAS 67
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
interest in the area may consider a joint agreement, in lieu of annexation by either city. Other
options for this property are covered in SOI analysis and recommendations in this chapter.
The City of Calabasas indicated its continued interest in including this area in its SOI as it
is a natural extension of the City’s boundaries, the City has pre-zoned the land in its General
Plan, and the property owners are in support of City’s efforts to annex the territory.63
Area “J” – When Calabasas incorporated in 1991, the owners of the property in Area J
declined to be a part of the new city. The property has since been sold and the new owner is
reportedly interested in being annexed into the City. Area J consists of six parcels with seven
structures operating as a business park and zoned by the County as manufacturing industrial
planned. The area is surrounded on the west, south and east by Calabasas and Highway 101
to the north. Access to the property is only from Agoura Road within Calabasas. Due to the
isolated nature of the property, it is an island, particularly with regard to service delivery.
The City has designated Area J as mixed use in its GP.
Area “K” – Area K is approximately 645 acres comprised of a combination of open space
and heavy agricultural designated uses. The Calabasas Landfill is the only
structure/development in this territory. The landfill is estimated to reach capacity and close
between 2028 and 2042. The City has identified this area for open space and regional
recreational uses in its 2030 General Plan.
The City’s Park and Recreation Master Plan identifies the landfill for a potential sports
complex, since there is a high level of community interest and no topographically suitable
location large enough for a field complex within the existing Calabasas limits. The City
determined that the Calabasas landfill offers the best opportunity for a large park and sports
complex. However, the landfill is not scheduled for closure for many years and might not be
usable for recreation purposes for years after that. Despite the drawbacks of the landfill site,
it is a large site convenient to Calabasas and that has the potential to be developed into an
attractive recreational facility that could include sport fields. The City plans to continue to
monitor the status of the landfill and seek to be involved with decisions regarding the future
use of the site.64 The City has designated the area as open space-recreation in the GP,
consistent with existing County zoning.
63 City of Calabasas, Comment Letter on the Public Review Draft MSR, August 20, 2020.
64 City of Calabasas, Park and Recreation Master Plan, 2004.
CITY OF CALABASAS 68
SREVIRNARF AN 0 I 0 M 6 N L 5 R O E AH N LI L A TTAP I C W LE 5601 WY JULIANNA LN VA VA R EGID 21999 27B 22800 27A ODAROD RAECLYELLAV YELLAV DR RA ANVTHOM MMIRPILIHP VA AV VA LE ELCRIC 5501 NODREB AV TS 00232 STNODREB SEDAAVN AV AV ST NOD BER TS DOLOROSA ST RYAN FLAORNREA- ANN JLUAI RAOVJA 26B WODAEMSPRING NWALT C SER ST 23900 NOVNAAC ANIMLEHLIW ST AV OD AOS ORL AV TS ASOROLOD AV 27C DR RD TS YELLAV NK ABRUB AV A B V ERDON BLVD ST ST ST ST 00342ODN C RA NE L FENWOOD ST WOODLAKE 032 00 5401 RENDON CAL SALE 00522 CAPISTRANO ST SHOUP 5401 OSNATSOC GL AR TS V A TS AFA D L CLRAENDON OR ENODNERALCN-E 5400 A UR TNEV 27
ORBESEHC
PROVENCE NORMANDY
SAL ALIZIA RIC TREBLEB RD26000 DRCA 2 N 6 Y 00 O 0 N
TCDNOMCHRI B TC LV Y L E P L D NAM SREMLAHC LPEVO YD R A G HS EL Y T E S L A S C E W L E L 2 T 5 C N 5 E 0 L 0 PSREMLAC W H GA E Y N L R OR U D OBL C E T M 5700 RE P E L F LP T EV OC O Y R N W G TYDA LO H ET S E C T HCNAR 0 Y 0 SI D 5 W 5 E O L BO C D C R AJ DR LLIB N D TOMRFE EJ NHOJ C D ARS R ON 5700 KIT JED DR RD HTIMS D K R CIRTAPZTFI Y D E N LL A D E R D A L R L N V E L D P I D D V R N R H R A E O D L L L L L N I N L H I O T E D T R N P W N L I E L P P O MD U NO ARA N I L A B P LN O E R P D D T D L 5 W E R EL I L 3 F E G 0 N D L I 0 L E W E T P S - L LI E H S A R N A L 5 EB 8 V V 0 28142 0 A D G DR NO L R L 00 E 8 B 4 R 2 B E H LITTL O L E E IG A Z L N H E IE C R R I O DGE TSP L A G O RDR N C I I K R O H E N V U O R 0 S C 0 T T 35 IKLLION DR OLL A IR D D O A D G L P B C O L A V N N 2 Z 3 W A Z L 6 V L 0 O L B E 0 E A N A S D L E D R L T R E IL R WY L 2 1 3 O K 40 4 L 0 I L V O 2 U S S I 5 T E N K NCNI E D SO L 32200 E L S I R V T G V V CA R S TE ZN NO 2 L A 3 A A E 7 R M S 2 T S M A D P 6K O T R L IR I R A U H N B N C I RD LLOI I A AL S N T A O L N A PY AT R L G E E VO D ND N R U O A N B L NO RAI MA BE O RS IS D 2 E 3 L 000 LEO D N R O S RA T OST S R D E O 2 R 3 N R 0 I 0 C E 0 M 228 O 00 G TS 5 R 30 O D 1 R YER FALLBROOK ELAD T F S Y F CT E CA J D G OY E O S W A L W N LL E V ON AL 22 K 60 A 0 V S ALLE 2260 S 0 T 22700 DR BLV P 02207 D ON ST CE AV R C D ALDERONLUIS CASS 82222 ELLAVLED RDNO VA TSIM SFAETS NLICIANTSO 00122DR ZEVLAG ALEDDRCESR PI N E A V S AVILLEBDEL OSO OSNATOSCA 00022 V D TS R AN ARREUG TSART D TS A R L A A R C I SIUL VLE VALLE TS TS 00182 SELEC C C T A Z A E ENITR N M D N AM P A D O O R I R L G L O E A D A A ZA R B R D D C EMDIN O A M A E D V R RC D TS D E I R O AOP V M OSNATSO A C C 28
MONT RDDR
ROMKR0A09P 5 WEIVN C E IRTE R R A G N F A ARMFIELD
MO T U C N RE T C D N A ESP RIN TC MRA NEDS NOSPMIS C K T INGSTON NL NO LXIAID RT HTIMS LIB N MAH RD D0R055 RD TS LP CAL DE RNDA CINORTD S R O VENTURA LNST VAAV CRESPI 00422 ANO LLDR ZENITRAM FELICIANO ZENI MATR TS 0005 VA RD TS COMERCIO 28
00162 AD R A OM DR
VIEW SLOAN 0055 C HA T MILTON & REHSAL LP DR 23200 CRESPI FALLBROOK RD DRST TS 5100 CELES
CT SEGOMIL DR
SENEGRIV DOOWHTUR EDENPARK
L W CP I T NTON NIATNUOM DR DR KRALC GLEN 00042 VP AA LL R E A Y DISE OSTRONIC VENTURABLVD ST NAMNUD HSABALACMACFARLANE 22600 LN NILUPAC5 D 1 R 3 D 5 R BLVD TSPIO RD VELICATA LOPEZ
DR BLYTHEDALE
RD
CALAIS NOTYCLTC YNATTIRB ECASL D A R SASABALAC
0075DR 0075 DR DRDR
CT WELLINGTON DOOWGNILLOC5500 DOO E W L A T L N N L O I 0 A V S 0 B M 4 O 5 E H RF C 25 U 5 M 0 B 0 ERLAND DLEIFRETTUB 00942 RD ROBERT GUY HO 54 B 0 A 0 CK GNILLOR ELDIRB LIART RD FAR ORD LMD RDDR O T RA W DK IN S 1094 LEONORA BIGLER TS1094 TS A BAL V EVP TS CK OLNISPE L R E IG Y B O A L LF E O T U T R O AMROFER MA C C A FA SS RLANE RDRD V ME AY N C ID O O TTE TCDR CT ATACILEVSAN TS DON ANIDEM MEDINA D 5 R 00 OPMA 0 C ED 29
0036 RD
TC WEIV 23248 GAINFORD CALDERON CLAVEL ASOAL TS ANIDEM DE
OLAP
CT 0065 26300 THOUSAND 00262 AVEV 0065 OAKS
RRICEBMA RIC WEIV RD DR DR BRIDGER 00052DR DR MEADOW VIEW DRR OLLING RD DR SADDLE 00532 AVE NEVAEH 230 C 0 A 0 LABASH DOOWKRAL ST AUSTIN BRU SGEREILAVAC TS22007 C ST AVALIER RD DO SU M EN IN O G 4 O 900 CERRILLOS ED NAS TSASOAL DR MIGUEL NAS TS STSAN MIGUEL ETATSE RD AICNEDIVORP 29
PL ODAMOC
DR
C H IR ORSHOE LN DR ROM ROY RD C R I P R O H M IL T R AH ICH YW
0045 C TC T FFILCSNEEUQ 0035RIC RDYELESLLEW 003N5N L L REKLAW DR Y GEDIR ELHSAJIM BR R I D DGER ROB SC ER R O D T T ST ON WH R IT D MAN DR SAL R G IF UOD CREEK OAKF RD IELD VANO HO N PPE A R CLE DNAL VA LOHL R U O M DIMLA 00V7 A4EL VL A IVYEBBA T A E I R V E O S G E E D DST EUGENE LP RD TEZIB 0074 AV DARTALAD YDNUGRUB SS D A R C ASOR 0084OLAG R E H DO R LANDA DR DR RD SENTAR RD LP ONA DUME -ICIL T EF Z NAS N T C S IN TF L L A EUG L IM ANO OINACSIV AREDAL ZTEMUD 49TS00 IACNEDVOI PR RD AGONAC A VA NELLIV 21400 NHEA CRAM ST RD CT NL VISCANIO
BA SNLIK LA D P R WORTH DR
DR SNKIALB5900 FAIRVIEW 8000 2 AKNL SI B RD RD
CANYON
NOSIRROM HCNAR
SENEGRIV L S N AL BRA S V A O DDL L E N RIDGE 540 0 0 045 RIC ES R OR D NE R K D
ENDERBY CT BRISBANE DR JIM R COLTER OU JOH N N 53D00 RD RDYAWKRAP DLO VETNURA LNAIDNACS CRAFTSMAN DR BLVD SN YO WMMOC PARK ALBADA PARK TC SPIE D L R BERG TSERC L H P A A R NO O H M AI U L CST HEISS VA PE VA R G A RD ERS L D H L R W P P I E G L N O V E R R A E C B S M N OR ELLIW D V R A CA RD LDERON RD ET 4 N 7 E 5 L 3 ECXEDR DR A A I Z NR U O D D R C ER D P S E F O OCN R AL D N LL 22300 A IRREC ARUTNEVANEUB 4900 SOLEDROVAM 0022 0CAN TS Y DR ON N AAT O ICN D UA DR LSARR YAB Y TS B BUENAVENTURA A TC RRA OIPNOD RATA AR S C L O T S A DR RD S A R V D C O AN CR A A M SOC A R L A ASYUC VA ANA R T D 30
PL LLIHTO L OF OTA RD LN
DR 5900 5900
PLATA DR 26100 DR 53 BL 0 UF 0 F RED PARKMOR
U
RMU
AE
DR UAERMU 00542 RD DR CT G T AR TRE 5000 FRWY SCHUM RE AHC 0005SASABALAC 24100 00142 PARKSORRE E NT R O TNECKRAP RD GRANADA ANE AK V R R E RG E RK A O S EP R N LA A LPA MIRASOL OTNER PAKR P R A O R R A S K MLDA PA RV RKA J D 0 A P C E 0 A L A 3 R F R 3 A K A O 2 N LI D VO A PARK ATIRAGRA A MB V A LA V C NL D K RD 4 R E F E 5 HE T R S A W U A 0 I I L E A 1 - A I R P R Q R L T U D D D S I L NT I E A 001 E 23 A C N R B Y S D L R S R A B T D C ST K A SS 4 F R R D 6 EA I 4 A M R K B R R A O N YB 9 S A V D A E D V S X R T C IA E N LENTE LLIO R S R DS E RA C N F 4 E U 65 L G 1 A IC D M LA I R R A O N D F LP R E O ELY A R OC T Y NIU B Q 4 A 70 R 0 RA A Y LI W ZOND D O NALLOHL C UM O NI N DE D P E E R N J DE O NSCTIA AV SA D L R B S P P A D A L AMP T G L A O C R LE E ND N O A T R T A R D R N S A AS T D S PSE E G V D S A N A A N R E L D S RA E E O C N SN A I D R O P L O A LTLI D DE D V L A A A GAONA LUZ 30
DR 0028
5
2
8P 00 L RD
HCESEBRO
MUREAU 0074D 2R CALABASAS PARK IRP K A R C AP4600 ARORU KR AA S P IE M NN O 2 A 3 PN 40 AA 0 C R O K MINZA KR ES J PE A AR L NZA P I4V 5O PARK 0RPN0 AOR PA K R C A O K SSETN CORDERO 8 D 1 R 922 OFN PA P R L E K R RBW TO PR NE IVADO IL E B A B R L ET P R- A V R R E K F G K O N AO PL R V S O L R A K E P D L A IT - A YVDON AV TNOMELRAHCST 83722 CASS DR TS R 005 D 22 4510 DNAL RD LOH S LUM AN DR 22078 DR CT 4699 DNA DNL ALL LOOHLUH MLU R M DARGE A N RT G DIN OACN E AD A A I N S LEP E S L N G ROI ES I ST DR VA ST ALAMO
32
NL ERALUT PL WAR S IN I G WEL 0028 TS 2D 005 E 82 L V E V O A W 5 R 6 E I 0 S C 0 L T N REVIRDF 5A 40IR 0VIEW
5300COLODNY
0006 LOST
DR IHLLS DR
RD
SASABALAC RD V NE TURA TC NOL A ECRAB C R O D RD REL A IL 26400 246 G 00 RANADA RD OLEP CT UT DNIO ATLA CALAB PA A RK S CA A S RIV M I I P S E N R AA O A P RR AR KB M K A E S L C L I L R A NT OS A OS A ADANAR PARK G PARK PA A RK THENA 4500 SR O ED N N 0 U A 04 O R 2 F L K S 2 CURP E ECURPS 22 R R D I 600 D M B E DR A R TC E A P K A RAP SSERPYC RD K R P H D 1 L R 0 C S YPRES I W N MA EVER R C E A R R E 2 RD R C Y T T D O D RD DOOW A P 4 0 4 O 4 V K ONM 0 A T H TE K 1 A L 8 R F 2 R A B R P E E D A 0 2 N 4 A R B DD 0 OO K W 2 I L C 0 R P E FE L DERA P R R D TSI S S A 3 D R C I Y D L E 0 K RK Y A D 0 R R R P H N A E V T D K C I C L E D A 0 E R D R D D A A E U D A R P D T I M A P DEK A A S BL A C O C P R SMU M R D D A O M E N C K OD R ARR R E S H K V N P R I E L E A O U O R G S E R A R I I A T P A D R A R T L R OTCI N L D DN R P B P N REO D P A G G A R A L K E 0 A E C B D D E 0 K C L R M N TC A KC T O K 2 C E A R EP D R T A 4 A D P R P KRAP E B P OTEN A EV P L R L K A P SEVIL U LA A M A D F L R 2 A R 2 N T O S N I 7 4 K WI T D O KC 0 R A K 0 A Y R M V K O 3 O S A A O T K 0 A S A PO D R 0 M R D P R KC L I D F F A L N A L R O A P O G R NIM 4 A R O E RT 3 L A A C 0 M 0 AO PL D KE M R 2 E O E S P P T E 3 U L S D T A T K 6 L A T E A R L N 0 L K R O A O W K R R R P R 0 P A A A N C U D P O C R P F A L S 70 A A M K R 0 M 2 A OP R I S2 A K I T E A N N I E A N R E Z R O P A P R B R U A P O E YR O N D N K K UL A N CE A N A A D D A O NGA S CDONODI S UM E LU P AV I R C L D P AS M S R A 4 O D 2 T M 5 IS I S 2 C E H A A R EV G P L A L A L V D N O P G R N P E D L R LO D A N GE C O A NN E A U AZ V EC R G E U AT N R IN SN C SRO I A R E D V E V T D I G N N NOO C L Z A RD ID D A A A N GLEI SIA N AV B R E O D LIVAR
32
DR ST 5200 COLODNYDR
VA TS DOOW C NA YCN 5 R 2 D00 CHESEBRO
D A R M C E 5B A D 20R N0 G I E G D E S A W GD W S RE A A D R D R R E R D VAREVRID
26050
CT HERMOSILLAREM LA O P 00542 RDRAK P VOLTARACT PARK MIRAMAR PARK ADARTNECTTEDREGAL PARK BE2L3M70O 0NTE KRAP ANNEISPARK IDLOS KRA K M P R E A L P INPAD RKAP RAK P OC A KIL OSA MRE R H I R SA AP B K EHCI CNROLPI O DA L O O R P K OCRAM CYN LARKRD TSERC -NERW KING RD RDHOLLO O WAK O WD H D T OYOP C L I VI RLN L OD E EW U DRP NCRE E S R T W H R YW O D ACI M REMA M A P V E IC RD KN RIECR WNOT EY 00 M 04CAAG N R W N R T D O AA T R S D ELRAHCRD 22400 RD DEHCRAP OLLWI DR W RD PARKLN RD WOLLIW RABMA 21 R 90 D R 0 A D R M T D S B E A R R J C O W H O N O D S D SR L A ADN WI M NOT O OD N A E V T RDDNALLOHLUM CARRIZAL
35
DEB D ERR R Y DR FRWY
CLTUN 4 A 800
LA AMUP PRADODELOSCIERVOS M OOLC B KRA A O P NTPOANRIOK VICASA DRIBK A W C B OR M A RA A L P B S S 4 R 0 A 0 C M 0 M E OU A BL R U D EBI N R O DIN W G DR SCHUYLKILL WIND 0073 DOO R W D ENALP
35
00382
ORBESEHC
DOROTHY
CO RD MADO
CALAMINEDR 2 ELMO 6 H N 9 D 00 RD
C CI I E RLOAL R L D ERTSE
ODARP LPARSADCOABDREAS SARENTA ED P LOS SALED G OS ASN ODARP PARK 3300 2 BLUEBIRD GNIMMUH YW LLEDRD DR 390B 1ON BELL PL SEA AILEDDR DOOWSNHOJ TNIAS RD 00712
33
RD
DR PALO ARUOGA ARUTNEV
DDR R 26 S 90 T G 0 ARRET PARKVILLE RD
VI D R EL G S E OL NES
DE SASAL ZA E B D ALA O C DARP ASAS BALAC SOSLOLLABA O C ED D ARPSED O O D DRAP R E LAOJSAP RD ANEORL RDALLIMLAP LOANTRIMPRA O DER A A PC ASOLE AAD P CM ARK 2 W 46 A 00 Y OESTE LP LAROC PALM DR RDBATCRTIS LAMR DRIB EKADODRW WY RD 22700 WINEBRANDY- E D L Y TS R R P WO R F E D KEARN R Y U TC R E G T AD A J NO A 2 W SM 2 E 500 0063 TS INUZ RD KWAH AWP O N M EE
33
NOY E N EN A E D R C RLA AR L U P A LNTEA L EW 0018 I2S LP SIWEL
DR ELLAC LLIC O ETNOM ELLA A C SOTSIMA AVI DR
NAW C OO TDS CANWOOD
27100 5A D L0M A U00 N D B T R G E A I S D T G E V E I D E R W T 9S 9O84 L26800
G W LOE IL NA T L S KOW STNEGL CAMINO
PRADO DE DE LAS AMOR PRADO PLRAASD P O RA FD D R E O U LTAS T D R E IG FL O ORES SAREP ED SAL ODARP MARIPOSA P L R OP A S D RA O DZOO RRDOES TC OTREBLA EYR TC ALLEBRAM RD AL 0 LE 0 I 9 R 42 A ORDEC ELLAC VIA AVD A LE RE S D D A A A I M L V VIA A S I C V EN L D L A ARGOPLONA VISTA 00542ESQUINA VIA CERRITOS DNALLOHLUMPEARTR P E L E HWYDECLARATION LIBERTY MAHGNID AI D RT E APILAC D V AR A D J ENN A E MESON RD TUANOGLA TS DUNMOREDR MTWY AGNA E E EH P H E CCK A O ON O AP RM LA T E B OH E C U C PANVAJO
34
YW
RCOABLLLEEDA ATIRAGRAM
00672
269 A 0 G 0 OURA RD
4400
ODARP EDPVREARDDOE LA ODARP DR 3800 NONIPEL ELL L ACAC OE AS R O DN N AXEAL A C A L L P L TECOLO V T IA E SOU KRAP TH TS DLCO OLD 3800 0083 DR 00422 NOYNAC 1SUMMIT VUE DR W
34
DR
ODARP SAL PR M AD A O IZDEL DE S O E D LO AR B E P R D A PARKWAY BELLAVISTA DVA ELLAC 00842 TC SERRANONA CALLE DR KEERC TOPANGA 22900 DR L HHT LLI GI 2MOREA WY
RDTHGINK RENEE
DRLLEDNEV 27400
HILLS
LAS
SATOLLEB SALLERTSE SOL ANIER CALLE DR UAELLEB LE SUMMIT N EGDIRWEIV 3MADERA DR
LIBU AM
ED OESAP NIUQAOJ MC CALLE CONEJO P AR R D I IL M LA ARIO DR PL AHAR V NEY SIALAPPRADO MANS 4SWEET JASMINE LN
WODAHS 26900 OWYOOLRLRIWA H P O L T SPRINGS
KEER
YC RTNUOC
ED SAVU OD SA AR LP PRADO SAL NIMZAJ ALLIVUAETCD DR 23600 CANYON FAUBION TC ENNEDRAD DR LLAGAHC 5WEEPING BANYAN LN
00382
LLEDNOR NOYNACYTREBIL
NL
DE ED 0063 ZINRODOC ALTAMIRA RD D H K A IR L R P P A T C R K EE DR NOLENAG PL P I L NDALS LP TO DVLB 6FRAGRANS WY
ENDEVA RO TS EIWOBMIJ
DR EER D DR
PRADO YAWKRAP ALED O L DA UAN PR ADALLAC NONACELLA V C IA ELADELKA BALEDR DRY 00232 RD HC NR O C L AI 7CRAPE MYRTLE CT
REDNEFED ORVI P DENT
0N08L3 SLLIH
1WISTERIA TR
LLIHSDAG
SLLIH TRAIL
AMARILLO FORD VA DEL TS 8BAUHINIA CT
0004ST KOORBRETSEHC PL RD
CT
HALCON DR EARN- RD TS DR 2WATSONIA TR
DRTNIOPNOTHGIEL DLOC
DR RD 9POMEGRANATE LN
EEKNAY
TC CSAELNMDAA CONDELL CYN EELLIAG 42200 3LOCUST TR
NL
DR DEEWREEDHILLS
10CARISSA CT
YW DR
DREGDIRKCOCAEP SGNIRPS SPRINGS
D LU E ZA ED ODARP OD PRA ORO DELASFR ASE S AGAL 0 A 063 M AVODROC SENDA GELLER RD TSUCOL FALCONET DR NONAC CT HODLER 11FLAME TREE LN
RD RD JOELTON RD
TSOL RT DR
TC AVD PAJARO DR TS VIA 12HIBISCUS HILL LN
27300
D C O O O T WTON TS PL
FUPRCASIDAO DR ALICANTE PRIMARIO CUMBRE RDMLE GLADIOLA EGDIRENOTSCT AIV SUMMIT 13MAGNOL LN
KAO
3200 3
DETINU
TC RT
ODARP DR TR DLO PINEWOOD LIDO 14AGAPANTHUS PL
CUO YRTN GLEN DR
EVIL GROVE
ED DEL RD CT ALCAMO HILL RD TC ODRANOEL VOLTAIRE 2
DR DPRATRICKHENRY 0093
KAO LOST
OZNEROL DR ROSEBUD RD 15FUCHSIA CT
25700 TOLWNN E BIWO RD
CALABASAS TC LP 4 DOR 0 N P DELGO0 O 0 PPYSEED
3800
AJNARAN TC C LARS EONSUELO SAINTANDREWSLN DRYFIELD MLEPDRANSY MESQUITE POPPY DR ADAMSVILLE SCHWEITZER 2
RTS C UATC
2
JIM DR
DLOGIRAM TC
PRADO IV L Y IL Y D DRR TOPANGA BLUERIDGE 1
Y WRE Y REVE NAFTFCIT LN NWOTRFEE T NNLW FROTEE ARRY- RD S S D KA K YSIV R A AM D MARKS
TSOLTR D C R E D D OO K R N C WT A E R E O TC G D N D L EO O CD R V A E I T G R A E O ST P ORCG LPSUHT EEK CR ONA CT EC SUNFLOWER
ODARP RABMAE O D DARP ROSDA PRED A O DO DEL GRANDIOSO P O ASESN W N Y AM OR ADN CITELD LR A AVODROC LN ATTESN R IO TER P DN T A E N E O R LO WI Y A N IS A - C TR D OVER R CL T A RETS T R RD W VLAL EIV EY RRT T RT R R DT 3T R 5R00 RT YLLOH DALE RD DRYHTOROD CT ELLIVSMADA 1
WEIVTK CRAP CYN UN R IT D ED DR DRLN
SASA SM BA HO L A A UD C N T O SL CE T O N P N WU A S D R C SI T N I T NGS DIHC EN R IP OUL MEADOW PLNL
3700
SOLEDO S D U A EN R OSP SASABAPL R G A A R C D A O N M D PR I I S A O T D EO S R O IODEL OELSEADPRA L N E C D HO CONSUELO RD CREEK RD C WY HESTNUT MAGNTORLIA EDLRSIERT FERN TRVIOLET MI UMT S DR RT YSIAD IVY RD R L T P N OR AOPD NAT VA MTWY 0082N 1
RD 00382
DNALLOHLUM A 2P 60 R 0IL RD MTW U Y DELL 0023
YWH YTREBIL LIBERTY 00182 D 0R 003 NOYNAC PARKC PA O T L R O I N C Y K RD HE PARK VISTA N C R T YP DR TIMMUS KAO L
0022 26800MU D LH N OL AL LAS VIRGENES 2700 3200 EL DR ENCAN S T 0L O 0 N L9 LI3 RD N H L DR R R SL A LI VH PD E O N PPYSEED
2500 STOKES CANYON
2700
RD S S T EKO CANYON RD ED AND SUOHT VERKLER HEADSTROMCANYONRD AIGAMALEDODA D R A P DICILEF LA PEAKS HIERRO TNIOPKRAB KAEP DR SASA K B E A E LAC N R O C YN D A LO C C YRDLADYB 2 IR D 4 R D 600 I D N R S D K R IP W I A L A Y A T V S M IV B L E Y A N C D D R O O N N TREE R LN D 24400 D C M R AL Y U AB L A H S O AS LL C A A N N 2 M 4 Y D 3 O O 0 DR 0N UN 3 KEER T C 0 EL 0 A T 0 R I U N TCO D L R P L R D EDL R A H ET W RET EG P V D A Y I I A NEDNIL R R K K A S C O A V T Y I E W N L N R EP T O SA S D A P E N L 2 00 D 4 R 4 J L 3 1 O T A R 0 N U Q 0 R E U E W I L L S PEAK PANSY ORCHID AGN R A DLO P E OT W D IL 2 L 3 0 D R O 5 OC 0 K R 0 W 3 0 1 LLREDNNOBGL R EN D DR T RT N N SKY E LINE D O R M S E TOPANG S A I A N E B NT R UO O GP O A K N IN T G G RA 0 1 S V E 0 9 5 A 1 D 0 N L 0 RL I N E L R Y Y OT P K R S S O I M N SPO 2 0 E N U 1 C 0 E 0 N U 0 T T 6 R G 1 O RD D M R R O O A D S DNJA C A K 1 CHA 8 M Y K 0 Y E L 0 R I S N A E 00323 1 B 8 D U 0 D R R R 0 S D ON R RD N D EO D R V A LS R T E G R T C I I N S G B D UZ R S R E D E D N Y IOC R H D BU ENI R L S A YK GNAP S M O O R C A I T R D R N C QU 0 L 0 E 0 0 E TT 7 0 D E AG 2 T E 2 R R OP D D L R E O IF D L R N D C A A Y T N S E T Y O S P O L A A N H NGA RD TIMMUS TWM Y 0072 N LP O O N T AC DR V T 2 I 3 M 3 A 00 M L US DEZ CY T N O O L P L IL A D RT N A REF N C GA DR NL YWMT DFIELD R LO DRANCH EGDIR YRNEH RDEV G A DIR ELL Y D I R V R E SM N RD E A H DA A M TLA AHSROC SUMMITTOSUMMIT 10 TIMM 0 U 0 S RT NO LLIHL Y OOC NA 3012 C 0 RANCH RD D) HC ( R O O NA LD L R H F D DLI F E IEDL I RD LL HIL S L ESDI IDE W F IL A L ELNEERG GEER DR KNAT RD ESUL DR MAHSR C R O E N R D C E EZ O R AG NWDN U D O Y Y I E R N A Z A TL N C A Y A WW 0 W 01 Y Y 2 N C C N 2 O A U R 0 L M Z 0 DIA D Y 5 I E DR R W 2 B Z YO OY W DACAL TL L A A A W A Y 00220 L V TA R T G W O R R C N IURT AC N Y ON E N E B N I A L T D R R R D AOD P YWZ O TNOOK T CO
Incorporated
April 5, 1991
CALABASAS
CO
HIDDEN HILLS
AGOURA
HILLS
LOS ANGELES
DR
ARUOGA
Las Virgenes Creek LAS VIRGENES RD
YWHDNALLOHLUM CALABASAS RD ArroyoCalabasas DRNOYNACAGNAPOTDLO AVE SAN LUIS VENTURA BLVD NOYNACAGNAPOT MULHOLLAND DR SANFELICIANODR DVLB DVLBNOYNACAGNAPOTN DUME D T RZ CANOGAAV H
I
J
G
K
C B A D F E µ Revised: June 2, 2020 C:\GIS\Calabasas_PCA Miles
Coterminous Calabasas Sphere
of Influence (SOI),
Reconfirmed
10-10-12
0 0.25 0.5 1
Reconfirmed
08-25-04
City of Calabasas
Established
07-08-92
1 in = 1 miles
Action
Effective Date
Legend
Sphere of Influence
History
Calabasas Sphere of Influence STATE PARK RED ROCK CANYON Canyon Topanga
STATE PARK MALIBU CREEK
AREA
STATE PARK
NATIONAL
RECREATION
TOPANGA
SANTA
MONICA MOUNTAINS
./ 101 US
STATE PARK
AREA
MALIBU CREEK
RECREATION NATIONAL MOUNTAINS SANTA
MONICA
Woodland Hills
Figure
5-5
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
DISADVANTAGED UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITIES
No disadvantaged unincorporated communities as defined in Government Code
§56033.5 exist within or adjacent to the City’s boundary or SOI.
FINANCIAL ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICES
The California State Auditor’s Office ranked the City of Calabasas as being at “low risk” of
fiscal distress (based on FY16-17 financial statements), and ranked 379 out of 471 California
cities (“1” being at greatest risk of fiscal distress) earning 84.5 points out of 100.65
The City of Calabasas’ budget is comprised of a mix of revenues generated from
commercial and residential uses. Sales taxes and transient occupancy tax, attributable to
commercial uses, account for approximately 28 percent of FY20-21 General Fund revenues,
down from 33 percent in the prior year, in addition to property and other taxes.66 The
reduction in sales taxes and transient occupancy taxes results from continuing and
anticipated adverse impacts of COVID-19.
The City’s Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts generate approximately $6.1
million of property taxes and assessments in FY20-21 to fund landscape and landscape
maintenance services.67
Contract services provided by the County Sheriff’s Department comprise about 20
percent of FY20-21 General Fund expenditures. Since 2010, Sheriff’s costs have grown an
average of 1.4 percent per year, but since FY16-17 have increased a compounded annual
average of 12.9 percent through FY19-20; the contract cost decreased 2.7 percent in the
FY20-21 budget.68 Total contractual services represent about 30 percent of total
expenditures.69
Balanced Budget
All agencies in California are required to adopt balanced budgets. Annual budgets should
show revenues at least equal to expenditures without relying on reserves. Unbalanced
budgets will deplete reserves and may contribute to deferred maintenance and reduced
services. Revenues in excess of expenditures can help to fund reserves, capital
improvements, and increases in service levels.
The City’s financial statements show General Fund revenues exceeding expenditures
(before capital outlay) in FY16-17 through FY18-19 by 4 to 5 percent. Over the three year
period from FY16-17 through FY18-19, General Fund revenues grew at a compound annual
65 Fiscal Health of California Cities, https://www.auditor.ca.gov/bsa/cities_risk_index, downloaded 2/12/2020.
66 City of Calabasas Adopted Two-Year Budget 2018-19 & 2019-20, Adopted Two-Year Budget 2020-21 & 2021-22, June 24,
2020.
67 Funds 21, 22, 24, 27, 32, City of Calabasas Adopted Two-Year Budget 2020-21 & 2021-22, June 24, 2020.
68 City of Calabasas Adopted Two-Year Budget 2020-21 & 2021-22, June 24, 2020.
69 City of Calabasas Budget Workshop FY19 and FY20 Summary Discussion (Item 11), pg. 9, 11, 18.
CITY OF CALABASAS 70
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
average growth rate of 4.1 percent, qualifying as “moderate risk” (0 to 10 percent, according
to the State Auditor).
The adopted FY10-21 General Fund revenues declined about 8.5 percent from the prior
year as a result of COVID-19. The City addressed the resulting budget shortfalls through a
combination of revenue increases including cost allocations to other funds, anticipated
investments earnings from creation of a trust for retiree medical funding, and cost
reimbursements from other funds. Various cost reductions were achieved, including changes
to employee compensation programs, elimination of vacant positions, and re-allocation of
General Fund expenses to other funds. The net budget shortfall is being filled by use of funds
from sales of vacant City land.
Fund Balances, Reserves and Liquidity
Fund balances, reserves and cash assets should include adequate funds for short-term
cash flow and liquidity, and provide funding for longer-term cost increases and capital needs.
The City’s Governmental Fund balances grew each year from FY16-17 through FY18-19.
At the end of FY18-19, Governmental Fund balances totaled 109 percent compared to
Governmental Fund expenditures. The City’s current budget projects declines in balances
through FY21-22, however, the balances still exceed policy goals.
The City of Calabasas’ reserve policy requires the City to maintain a “minimum reserve”
of at least forty percent (40%) of budgeted FY expenditures for its General Fund.70 The FY18-
19 General Fund balance of $19 million was about 85 percent of General Fund expenditures;
a portion of this balance, or $4.9 million, was shown as the fund balance at the end of FY18-
19 as “Management Reserve.”71 The adopted FY20-21 budget projects ending reserves to
exceed minimum reserve levels; the General Fund balance is $16.6 million, or 72 percent of
General Fund expenditures.72
Liquidity represents the amount of cash currently available for short-term needs after
considering current liabilities (due within one year), and is typically measured as the ratio
of current assets to current liabilities; the ratio should be equal to or greater than 1.0,
indicating sufficient cash to meet current obligations. The City’s FY18-19 financial report
shows total cash and investments nearly 8 times current obligations, including funds set-
aside into various reserves; unrestricted Governmental Fund balances compared to current
liabilities indicates a liquidity ratio of 3.8.
Net Position
An agency’s “Net Position” as reported in its CAFR represents the amount by which assets
(e.g., cash, capital assets, other assets) exceed liabilities (e.g., debts, unfunded pension and
OPEB liabilities, other liabilities). A positive Net Position provides an indicator of financial
70 City of Calabasas Reserve Policy, Standard Policy and procedure 151-903 (12/3/08).
71 City of Calabasas Budget Workshop FY19 and FY20 Summary Discussion (Item 11), pg. 20.
72 Fund Balances – All City Funds, City of Calabasas Adopted Two-Year Budget 2020-21 & 2021-22, June 24, 2020.
CITY OF CALABASAS 71
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
soundness over the long-term and ability to fund capital improvements. A negative Net
Position is an indicator of potential fiscal distress.
The City’s financial statements show positive total and unrestricted net positions.
According to a recent survey of financial statements for 482 California cities, Calabasas
ranked 111th highest in Unrestricted Net Position per resident.73
Rates and Charges
According to the City’s FY18-19 financial statements, Charges for Services totaled $3.5
million, or about 15 percent of General Fund revenues.
The City’s last cost of service review of fees and charges was its 2012 update to the
planning division fee schedule; up to that time, the City’s planning application fees had not
been changed in 21 years, and the fee revenue only recovered approximately 40 percent of
costs.74 In 2018, the City approved a comprehensive Citywide Fee Schedule consolidating
multiple separate fee resolutions and providing for an automatic annual adjustment
according to the annual change in the Consumer Price Index.75
Long-Term Debt
Excessive long-term debt incurs interest charges that consume financial resources that
could otherwise fund needed services and capital improvements.
Total debt liabilities (excluding pensions and OPEB) in FY19 equal approximately 109
percent of total governmental revenues, which qualifies as a “high” level of risk (over 100
percent) according to the State Auditor. Annual debt service equals about 6 to 11.6 percent
of total governmental revenues and General Fund revenues, respectively, in FY19.
The City received an “AA+” rating (investment grade, high quality, with very low credit
risk) for its $41 million 2015 Civic Center Certificate of Participation.76
Pension and OPEB Liabilities
Unfunded pension and OPEB liabilities present one of the most serious fiscal challenges
facing many cities and districts.
Total FY18-19 pension payments, including “normal” costs and unfunded liabilities
(UAL), represent approximately 2.4 percent of the City’s total governmental revenues, which
earns the City a “low” risk designation (below 6 percent) according to the State Auditor.
73 California Sen. John M.W. Moorlach’s Financial Soundness Rankings for California’s 482 Cities, January 16, 2020.
74 City of Calabasas Reso. No. 2012-1333, Council Agenda Report May 31, 2012 (Council meeting date 1/1312).
75 City of Calabasas Reso. No. 2017-1534, Council Agenda Report Dec. 30, 2016 (Council meeting date 1/11/17).
76 S&P Global Ratings, US$40.925 mil certificates of participation (Civic Center Project) 2015.
CITY OF CALABASAS 72
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Projected “normal” cost,77 excluding unfunded liabilities (UAL), remains at 7.7 percent to
10.5 percent of covered payroll for PEPRA and other employees through FY25-26,
respectively; CalPERS projections show a 59 percent increase in pension payments towards
unfunded accrued liabilities (UAL) from FY20-21 through FY25-26 for miscellaneous
employees.78
The City’s FY17-18 total unfunded liability represents 19 percent of total governmental
revenues which the State Auditor designates “low” risk (under 50 percent), an increase from
13 percent in FY16-17.79 The funded portion of the City’s plan in FY1718 is 79 percent of its
total obligation, which indicates the City is at “moderate” risk (70-80 percent).
City’s net OPEB liability reported by its FY17-18 CAFR as of the end of FY17-18 is $1.7
million. The City’s adopted policy is to contribute an amount sufficient to pay the current
FY’s premium. For FY18-19, the City contributed $22,886 which consisted of current
premiums, but did not include any additional prefunding of benefits.80 In FY20-21 the City is
considering creation of a 115 Trust to pre-fund a portion of its OPEB liability and generate
earnings on the funds in the Trust.
Capital Assets
Capital assets must be adequately maintained and replaced over time and expanded as
needed to accommodate future demand and respond to regulatory and technical changes.
The City’s net value of depreciable capital assets equaled 68 percent of total capital asset
value at the end of FY18-19. The net value of capital assets increased every year from FY16-
17 through FY18-19.
The City’s FY20-21 budget includes a Capital Improvement Program showing the current
budget year expenditures and funding sources; no future projections are shown.81 Funding
is entirely from the current year; no fund balance remained at the end of the prior FY.
Financial Planning and Reporting
Achieving transparency and public accountability standards dictates that cities provide
easily accessible and clear documentation of their activities, including financial information.
Financial Policies – The City of Calabasas’ reserve policy requires the City to maintain a
“minimum reserve of at least forty percent (40%) of budgeted FY expenditures for its
77 The “Normal Cost” (NC) Rate represents the annual cost of service accrual for the upcoming fiscal year for active
employees. Normal cost is shown as a percentage of payroll and paid as part of the payroll reporting process. See: (City of
Calabasas, Published July 2019)
78 Misc. Plan and PEPRA Misc. Plan of the City of Calabasas, CalPERS Annual Valuation Reports as of June 30, 2018, published
July 2019, pg. 5.
79 Fiscal Health of California Cities, https://www.auditor.ca.gov/bsa/cities_risk_index, downloaded 2/12/2020. The State
Auditor’s results were based on FY17 financial documents.
80 City of Calabasas Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, FY18-19, Note 12, pg. 90.
81 City of Calabasas Budget Workshop FY18-19 and FY19-20 Summary Discussion (Item 11), pg. 19-20.
CITY OF CALABASAS 73
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
General Fund.82 The City has no other reserve policies (e.g., capital reserves, etc.). Its
investment policy is posted on its website.
Website – The City post a link to its current budget and CAFRs on a subpage of the City
Manager page of its website. No links to employee compensation information were found.
Annual Budget and CAFR/Financial Statements – The City prepares a two-year budget
with supporting information in appendices. The budget does not include a “Fiscal Health
Report” or other financial indicators to assess the City’s financial health.
The City’s FY20-19 CAFR was prepared in a timely manner (within 6 months of the end
of the subject FY).
Financial Forecasts – The City prepares three-year General Fund financial forecasts as
part of its budget process (in addition to the two-year budget).
Capital Improvement Program – The City’s FY19-20 budget includes a Capital
Improvement Program showing the current budget year expenditures and funding sources;
no future projections are shown.
82 City of Calabasas Reserve Policy, Standard Policy and procedure 151-903 (12/3/08).
CITY OF CALABASAS 74
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
CALABASAS MUNICIPAL SERVICES
The City of Calabasas offers municipal services through a combination of contract
services and directly by city staff. Figure 5-6 summarizes the manner in which each
municipal service is provided.
Figure 5-6: City of Calabasas Municipal Service Structure
Service Provider
Land Use City of Calabasas
Law Enforcement Los Angeles County Sheriff by contract
Los Angeles County Animal Care and
Animal Control
Control by contract
Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los
Fire Protection
Angeles County (CFPD)
Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los
Paramedic
Angeles County (CFPD)
McCormick Ambulance (per agreement
Ambulance with Los Angeles County Department of
Health Services)
Domestic Water Las Virgenes Municipal Water District
Recycled Water Las Virgenes Municipal Water District
Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District
maintains City-owned collection system,
Wastewater Collection
treated by Las Virgenes Municipal Water
District
Wastewater Treatment Las Virgenes Municipal Water District
Franchise agreement with Waste
Solid Waste
Management, Inc.
City of Calabasas/private contractor for
Street Maintenance
larger projects
Landscape Maintenance City of Calabasas
City of Calabasas/Los Angeles County (Los
Stormwater/Drainage/Water Quality
Angeles County Public Works) by contract
Flood Control Los Angeles County Flood Control District
City of Calabasas for maintenance/contract
Park Maintenance
with private contractor for tree trimming
CITY OF CALABASAS 75
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Service Provider
City of Calabasas/contract with private
Recreation contractor/contract with Las Virgenes
Unified School District
Library City of Calabasas
Contract with private contractor for
Transit
operations
Los Angeles County West Vector Control
Mosquito/Vector Control
District
Environmental Health Services Los Angeles County
Law Enforcement and Emergency Services
All police services are provided through contract with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s
Department. The contract services are organized under the City’s Public Safety and
Emergency Preparedness Department. Services are provided from the Sheriff’s Lost Hills
Station located just east of the City along Agoura Road. Law enforcement services entail
patrol, traffic enforcement, public safety services, juvenile programs, and access to air
support, and specialized enforcement. The City is generally satisfied with the services
provided by the Sheriff’s Department and anticipates continuing to receive services in the
long term.83
The City receives monthly crime statistic reports from the Sheriff’s Department. Over the
period from January 1, 2019 to April 30, 2019, there were five violent crimes84 in the City of
Calabasas. During the same time frame in 2020, violent crimes rose to 13, which is a 160
percent increase. However, property crimes85 declined from 103 to 77 from 2019 to 2020,
which is a 25 percent decrease.86
The City’s contract with the Sheriff’s Office does not define a minimum staffing standard
of officers per residents. The number of deputies is driven by the cost of the Sheriff’s annual
proposed contract, as well as needs in Calabasas and neighboring areas as determined by the
Sheriff’s Office. There is no additional cost to the City when an emergency requires
additional Sheriff staffing to support, such as during fires. The City’s General Plan contains
no policies with regard to the ratio of police officers per population to be maintained. The
83 City of Calabasas, 2030 General Plan, 2015, XII-4.
84 Criminal homicide, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault.
85 Burglary, larceny theft, grand theft auto, and arson.
86 Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, Malibu/Lost Hills Station Part 1 Crimes, January 1-April 30, 2019 and 2020.
CITY OF CALABASAS 76
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
City’s contract with the Sheriff calls for 16 deputy positions,87 which equals 0.66 deputies per
1,000 population.
Fire Protection
Fire protection services are provided by local Fire Stations Number 68 and 125 through
Division 7 of the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County (CFPD). The
District provides suppression, rescue, and fire prevention activities on a daily basis to
Calabasas residents and businesses. These activities include responding to structural,
mobile, and natural vegetation fires, rescue and emergency medical calls, special incidents,
and disaster response. The City has no responsibility for fire protection and related services;
all services are funded by CFPD revenues.
The Fire District provides the City with monthly incident reports. In 2019, the District
responded to a total of 1,774 calls, of which 75.8 percent were medical calls. The City did not
indicate any issues or concerns with regard to the services provided by the District.
ISO provides ratings on a scale of 1 to 10 (with 1 being the highest) to reflect the relative
responsiveness and effectiveness of fire service, water supply, and other essential resources
to suppress fire. As of 2017, Division 7 of CFPD has an ISO rating of 2 for the region it serves,
including the City of Calabasas.
Building and Safety/Planning Services
The City’s Community Development Department provides administration of the City's
development process including residential, commercial, and industrial uses through its two
divisions—the Planning Division and the Building and Safety Division.
The Planning Division performs current and long range planning, enforces zoning and
land use regulations, reviews site and development plans, provides technical support to City
departments, including the City’s Planning Commission and other committees and boards
and implements activities relating to the enhancement of the community's economic base.
The Building and Safety Division is responsible for review of building plans, issuance of
permits, inspection of construction and property, investigation of complaints relating to
building and construction, and also code enforcement. The Building Official is also
responsible for the preparation and implementation of the City’s emergency response plan.
Over the last few years, the City has initiated two programs to streamline planning and
building projects and ensure community engagement. In 2017, the City initiated a program
to require meetings to discuss potential development with the community prior to project
applications. Since then, the ordinance has resulted in two dozen opportunities for the
public to voice their preferences, ideas and concerns on development activities within the
City.
87 Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, Service Level Authorization, Calabasas, 2019-2020 (excludes 0.29 law
enforcement technician and 0.5 community services technician).
CITY OF CALABASAS 77
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
In 2018, the City launched SmartGov, a new software permitting system which includes
online applications, public access and mapping features for the over 8,900 parcels in the City.
Public Works
Through a combination of in-house staff and contracted services, the Department of
Public Works oversees public infrastructure such as streets, capital improvement projects,
and stormwater management. The Department must also maintain and respond to service
requests regarding the City’s streets, parks, sewers, traffic signals, medians, and weed and
litter abatement.
Street Maintenance
The City of Calabasas is responsible for the on-going pavement maintenance and
rehabilitation of approximately 56 miles of arterial highways and local streets. Street
maintenance services are provided directly by city staff comprised of a crew of three. The
City contracts for larger construction projects.
The City most recently updated its Pavement Maintenance System in 2018. A majority of
the City’s 56 centerline miles of arterials and public streets are considered to be in fair
condition with the entire network having an area-weighted Pavement Condition Index (PCI)
of 69.88 It was determined that in order to maintain an average PCI of 69 that the City needs
to allocate approximately $1 million per year towards road resurfacing. In FY20-21, the City
has allocated $1.02 million towards resurfacing projects.
In 2018, the City opened an expanded four-lane bridge over the Highway 101 at Lost Hills
Road. The $23M structure greatly improves vehicular traffic on Lost Hills Road, a key arterial
linking the City’s west side businesses, and through traffic flow to Malibu.
The City is promoting “Green Streets” with medians that collect water and let it percolate.
The Green Streets are citywide now. The City requires that a certain amount of property
within a proposed development be set aside for drainage and percolation. The City has
allocated almost $2 million toward Green Street projects in FY20-21.
Stormwater and Flood Control
Flood control, stormwater, and water quality services are related municipal services that
are provided via a multifaceted approach within and surrounding the City. The Los Angeles
County Flood Control District (LACFCD) manages and maintains all concrete structures and
major flood control facilities. Additionally, LACFCD provides maintenance of City-owned
lateral lines and catch basins under a contract service arrangement with the cities.
Concerns regarding water quality of stormwater runoff having adverse impacts on area
watersheds led to requirements for municipalities to meet municipal separate storm sewer
systems (MS4) water quality NPDES permit conditions and develop stormwater
management programs (SWMPs). The SWMP describes the stormwater control practices
that will be implemented consistent with permit requirements to minimize the discharge of
pollutants from the sewer system. Calabasas stormwater runoff flows into the Malibu Creek
88 A PCI of 70 to 84 is “good” and 85 to 100 is considered “excellent.”
CITY OF CALABASAS 78
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Watershed, which drains an area of approximately 109 square miles, including the entirety
of the MSR study area. Area cities coordinate MS4 permit (Los Angeles County MS4 Permit
Order No. R4-2012-0175) compliance efforts through the Malibu Creek Watershed
Management Group (MCWMG). The efforts of the group are regulated by the Los Angeles
RWQCB, and mandated outcomes are outlined in the permit order. The group plans to meet
final compliance with the permit order requirements by 2023.
On April 2, 2014 the City executed an agreement with the Gateway Cities Council of
Governments (GCCOG) for the purpose of participating in the administration of a
“Coordinated Monitoring Plan” (CMP) for the long-term improvement and maintenance of
water quality in the Los Angeles River basin. Services provided under the agreement include
monitoring and reporting of various pollutant levels in the Los Angeles River and its
tributaries throughout the watershed. Through this agreement, the City of Calabasas
contributes its pro-rata fair share of the GCCOG’s administrative costs and the CMP program
costs. The City of Calabasas had been a partner in the Los Angeles River Basin CMP
monitoring and reporting process previously (from 2008 through 2012) through a similar
agreement with the GCCOG.
Parks and Recreation
The Community Services department is responsible for providing sports, education,
culture, entertainment and other leisure activities for the community. The Community
Services department is also responsible for all the parks within the City. Park maintenance
is provided directly by City of Calabasas staff from the Department of Public Works, while
tree trimming in the parks is provided by a private contract service provider. Recreation
services and special events are provided by a combination of city staff, contract with a
private contractor, and contract with the Las Virgenes Unified School District.
The City of Calabasas owns a total of 85.02 acres of park land, of which 39.85 acres are
considered active use as shown in Figure 5-7. Calabasas has significant recreation facilities,
including the Tennis & Swim Center, the Agoura Hills/Calabasas Community Center (gym
and climbing wall), the Klubhouse Pre-School building at Creekside Park, and meeting rooms
and offices at De Anza Park. In addition to the City-owned parks, local schools serve as joint
recreational facilities. The Las Virgenes Unified School District has eight school sites within
the City that are available for recreational use after school hours and on weekends.
Furthermore, more than two thousand acres of open space and multi-use trails in the City
are located on lands owned by the National Park Service, Santa Monica Mountains
Conservancy, County of Los Angeles, the Las Virgenes Municipal Water District, and various
homeowner associations.
Figure 5-7: City of Calabasas Parks
Park Facility Name Total Park Area Active Use Area
(acres) (acres)
Calabasas Tennis and Swim Center 8.81 8.81
Calabasas Creekside Park 12.21 3.7
CITY OF CALABASAS 79
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
De Anza Park 11.2 7.62
Gates Canyon Park 7.34 5.59
Grape Arbor Park 3.52 3.52
Wild Walnut Park 26.8 1.5
Freedom Park 1.13 1.13
Highlands Park 0.2 0.2
Parklet on Las Virgenes Road 0.44 0.44
Calabasas Senior Center & Civic Center 5.2 0.73
Park
Calabasas Bark Park 3.66 2.1
Calabasas Community Center 4.51 4.51
Totals 85.02 39.85
The City’s target service level is three acres of active parks per 1,000 residents.89 The
City’s aim is to augment its inventory of City-owned and operated recreational facilities and
park facilities as circumstances allow.
The City has initiated several recreational opportunities over the last 15 years in
conjunction with other providers. In 2005, the City launched the Pumpkin Festival, a family
friendly fall event attracting 10,000 to 12,000 persons over a two day weekend. At the Lupin
Hill School, and via a contract with Little Learners, Inc., the City’s Community Services
Department provides state-licensed before- and after-school programs, as well as pre-
school, for local children. The City contracts with Top Seed Tennis Academy to operate the
tennis programming and maintenance side of operations at the Calabasas Tennis & Swim
Center.
Calabasas is a member of the Agoura Hills/Calabasas Community Center (AHCCC) JPA.
The AHCCC gym/community center offers services to residents of both the City of Agoura
Hills and Calabasas through an enterprise fund.
Transit
The City of Calabasas transit system is owned and managed by the City. MV
Transportation provides contract operation services of the city-owned buses. A separate
89 City of Calabasas, General Plan, 2015, p. X-2
CITY OF CALABASAS 80
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
contract provider offers Dial-a-Ride services for seniors. The City does not own the
equipment associated with this service.
Library
The Calabasas Civic Center includes a library that holds 90,000 volumes of reading
material, a children’s reading room, specialty collection areas, a young adult area, technology
center, and multi-purpose room and a reading area for adults. The Library Civic Center was
completed in 2008. The Friends of the Calabasas Library, a volunteer group of citizens,
provides funds for library programs and events for Calabasas residents.
In June 2013, the City of Calabasas entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with
the City of Hidden Hills and the Las Virgenes School District for provision of Library services
for five years. The MOU was renegotiated and signed again on July 1, 2018 for an additional
five-year period.
Solid Waste
The Environmental/Intergovernmental Relations Division of the PW oversees the City’s
waste removal and recycling efforts. These services are provided through a franchise
agreement with Waste Management. The City is responsible for meeting mandated State and
federal goals for waste reduction. In order to accomplish this, the Department offers a
number of specific waste and recycling programs.
Water
Las Virgenes Municipal Water District (LVMWD) provides potable water (as well as
wastewater treatment, recycled water and biosolids composting) to residents in the cities
of Agoura Hills, Calabasas, Hidden Hills, Westlake Village, and unincorporated areas of
western Los Angeles County.
All of the District’s water supplies must be imported from Northern California through
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD), the primary water wholesaler in
the region. Originating in the High Sierras, water is transported more than 400 miles through
the State Water Project’s California Aqueduct entering the LVMWD service area at the east
end of Calabasas. Water is then distributed throughout the District.
The most recent Consumer Confidence Report for LVMWD is for 2018. In that year, the
District did not exceed limits for any contaminants, meaning it was 100 percent compliant
with drinking water quality standards.90 By comparison, the industry standard for
compliance with NPDWRs is 99 percent (361 days) of the year.
Wastewater
The Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District, contracted by the City, maintains the
wastewater collection system and handles any overflows. The District is managed by the
90 Las Virgenes Municipal Water District, Consumer Confidence Report, 2018
CITY OF CALABASAS 81
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
SMD and provides sewage collection services to over 2 million customers in unincorporated
County areas, 37 member cities, and 2 contracted cities.91 SMD personnel manage the City’s
sewer collection system operation, provide engineering evaluation of proposed and existing
sewer facilities, administer preventive maintenance and sewer construction programs, and
oversee maintenance of the wastewater collection system facilities and related records and
plans. The Districts’ maintenance services are provided from four maintenance yards
strategically located within the City of Calabasas for efficient management of maintenance
activities including SSOs and other emergencies.
The City of Calabasas’ collection system consists of 74.9 miles of collection main and two
pump stations.92 The City most recently completed an update of its Sewer System
Management Plan (SSMP) in 2019. No infrastructure needs were identified in the SSMP.
The SMD has scheduled CCTV inspection and evaluation of the sewer pipe conditions for
the entirety of all collection systems it operates on 10-year intervals.93 The inspection
appropriately identifies and prioritizes repairs or replacement of any structurally deficient
pipe segments for repair.
All wastewater agencies are required to report sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) to
SWRCB. Sewer overflows are discharges from sewer pipes, pumps and manholes. Overflows
reflect the capacity and condition of collection system piping and the effectiveness of routine
maintenance. The sewer overflow rate is calculated as the number of overflows per 100
miles of collection piping per year. Over the last three years (2017-2020) there were five SSO
events in the City’s system. Averaged over the three-year period, the City’s SSO rate was
about 2.2 spills per 100 miles of mains. By comparison, other wastewater agencies in
California average 4.73 SSOs per 100 miles per year.
The Las Virgenes Municipal Water District provides wastewater treatment services to
the residents of Agoura Hills, Calabasas, Hidden Hills, Westlake Village and unincorporated
areas of Los Angeles County. The wastewater flows to the Tapia Water Reclamation (Tapia)
through sewer pipes where it is treated to high-quality recycled water for use on golf
courses, parklands, highway landscapes and common areas.
Located just south of Malibu Creek State Park, the wastewater treatment facility operates
under a permit issued by the RWQCB or “Water Board”, a State agency.94 Tapia is owned and
operated by the Las Virgenes - Triunfo JPA that was established between Las Virgenes and
Triunfo Water and Sanitation Districts to treat wastewater within the Malibu Creek
watershed.
Between January 1, 2017 and June 1, 2020, LVMWD was issued 54 violations at the Tapia
Water Reclamation Facility. Of the violations, 12 were for late or deficient reporting and 42
were for effluent violations. None of the violations were considered priority violations.
91 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/smd/SMD/12thEdAnnualNewsletterCSMD.pdf, downloaded 5/21/2025.
92 State Water Resources Control Board, California Integrated Water Quality SystemProject – SSO Report, 2020.
93 City of Calabasas, Sewer System Management Plan, 2019, p. 29.
94https://www.lvmwd.com/about-us/joint-powers-authority/wastewater-services/recycled-water/sprayfields
downloaded 5/21/2025.
CITY OF CALABASAS 82
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Certain areas within Calabasas remain on private septic systems. These areas include
portions of Calabasas Highlands and Turtle Creek Road located west of Mulholland Highway,
Dry Canyon Cold Creek Road and the connector roads Dorothy Road, Valdez Road, and
Canyon Drive, Old Topanga Canyon Road between Mulholland Highway and Mulholland
Drive and Black Bird Way, and Hummingbird Way. As of 2011, there were 118 properties
within the city containing an active septic system and the average age of the systems was 34
years.95
95 City of Calabasas, Community Development Department Annual Report, 2011, p 17.
CITY OF CALABASAS 83
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
CITY OF CALABASAS MSR DETERMINATIONS
Growth and Population Projections
v As of January 1, 2020, the California Department of Finance estimated the City of
Calabasas had a population of 24,193.
v The Southern California Association of Governments’ (SCAG) most recent population
projections from 2016 anticipated an average annual growth of 0.1 percent over the
20-year period from 2020 to 2040 for Calabasas. These projections are consistent
with recent trends and remaining vacant land within the City; however, the growth
estimate may be overly conservative given the potential for annexation of additional
residential territory into the City’s boundaries.
v Growth within Calabasas is constrained by topography, environmental constraints,
and community preferences.
The Location and Characteristics of Disadvantaged
Unincorporated Communities Within or Contiguous to the
Agency’s SOI
v No disadvantaged unincorporated communities as defined in Government Code
§56033.5 exist within or adjacent to the City’s boundary or SOI.
Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities and
Adequacy of Public Services, Including Infrastructure
Needs and Deficiencies
v Municipal services offered directly by Calabasas’ staff are limited to recreation, park
and landscape maintenance, library, street maintenance, and stormwater/drainage.
All other services are provided by contract with a private or public provider or by
responsibility of another public agency.
v Where contract services are provided, the City indicated that it receives regular use
reports from the contracting agency, and there are generally no concerns about the
present level or capacity of contract services offered. The level of services provided
are reviewed regularly upon contract renewal.
v Significant capital improvement projects identified in the City’s CIP for FY20-21
consist of $1.02 million for street resurfacing projects and $2 million toward Green
Street projects.
v The City’s streets were identified as being in “fair” condition on average during its
2017 review. In order to prevent the pavement condition from further deteriorating,
the City must commit at least $1 million annually to its streets. Additionally, the City
recognized a need for additional community park and open space acreage to meet
identified standards. No further significant infrastructure deficiencies were
identified for other municipal services offered by the City.
CITY OF CALABASAS 84
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
v There were no capacity concerns of note identified over the course of this review
related to city municipal services. The City and contract agencies appropriately
conduct assessments and planning to address infrastructure needs associated with
capacity concerns and development-related growth.
v It is assumed that, given the minimal opportunities for new growth within and
adjacent to Calabasas, the City will continue to have sufficient capacity to serve future
anticipated growth. However, and should it pursue annexation, the City will need to
develop a plan for services for annexation of Mountain View Estates to ensure that
there is sufficient capacity to serve sizable additional demand associated with the
subdivision.
v City management methods appear to generally meet accepted best management
practices. The City prepares a budget before the beginning of each FY, has a detailed
Capital Improvement Program, conducts periodic financial audits, maintains
relatively current transparent financial records, regularly evaluates rates and fees,
tracks employee and department workload, and has established a process to address
complaints.
Financial Ability of Agencies to Provide Services
v The City has the financial ability to provide services. The City is at “low risk” of
financial distress, revenue growth has been moderate and exceeds inflation, and it is
meeting its adopted reserve policies which provide for adequate reserves. The City
received a high credit rating for its most recent debt issuances. Its unfunded pension
and OPEB liabilities are low.
Status of, and Opportunities for, Shared Facilities
v The City shares facilities through its contract services providers, in particular public
safety providers that make use of regional facilities to service multiple cities and
unincorporated areas. The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department operates from
its Lost Hills Station, which serves five cities and unincorporated communities in the
region. The City also maintains contracts with Los Angeles County Public Works,
Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District, and Waste Management, Inc., which are
offered out of each agency’s facilities.
v The City has indicated it is satisfied with its contract service providers. No other
opportunities for facility sharing were identified.
Accountability for Community Service Needs, Including
Governmental Structure and Operational Efficiencies
v Accountability is best ensured when contested elections are held for governing body
seats, constituent outreach is conducted to promote accountability and ensure that
constituents are informed and not disenfranchised, and public agency operations and
management are transparent to the public. The City demonstrated accountability
with respect to these factors.
CITY OF CALABASAS 85
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
v There are nine areas where Calabasas’ SOI could be expanded to incorporate existing
or potential growth areas, as well as municipal service inefficiencies resulting from
illogical boundaries.
v The City has not proposed any government structure options.
CITY OF CALABASAS 86
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
CITY OF CALABASAS SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE
Existing Sphere of Influence
The City of Calabasas’ SOI is coterminous with its boundaries.
Sphere of Influence Analysis
The City of Calabasas’ SOI is coterminous with its boundaries. The SOI is an indicator of
LAFCO’s anticipated boundary growth for the City, which enables a City to properly plan for
service needs associated with its future service area.
Select areas were identified for inclusion in the City’s SOI based on available adjacent
unincorporated territory, service inefficiencies, existing unincorporated islands, potential
impacts on city residents, access, and potential for growth. These areas were discussed in
detail in the Growth and Population Projections section of this chapter and identified with
lettered markers for reference in Figure 5-5.
Many of the areas proposed for inclusion have overlapping issues or concerns that make
them appropriate for adding to the City’s SOI. In particular, Areas G, I, and J are service
islands, which creates illogical boundaries and resulting service inefficiencies. All of these
areas are developed, and the City has not proposed changes in land use should they be
annexed.
A portion of Area A has remained in the City of Hidden Hills’ SOI for three decades without
indications of intent to eventually annex the territory. Additionally, the City of Hidden Hills’
current SOI in Area A splits the existing residential Mountain View Estates community, a
gated community, which does not provide a logical planning area boundary. Calabasas has
considered annexation of the Mountain View Estates subdivision in the past but determined
that 60 percent resident support at the time was not sufficient to move forward. However,
the area is developed territory adjacent to the City of Calabasas’ boundaries, which impacts
the City’s demand for services and capacity of services. Additionally, as a larger city with
greater capacity to provide services in combination with ease of access to the area, Calabasas
is best poised to serve the subdivision compared to the City of Hidden Hills.
Calabasas proposed inclusion of Areas B and C in its SOI to prevent forming an
unincorporated island should it expand its SOI and ultimately annex Areas A and D.
However, at this time it is recommended that Areas B and C remain in the City of Hidden
Hills’ SOI (with Areas E and F) to give the City an opportunity to plan for the entirety of its
SOI in the upcoming GP Update. If Hidden Hills fails to appropriately plan for these areas,
then it may be recommended that Calabasas’ SOI be expanded to include these areas.
The addition of Craftsman’s Corner (Area D) in Calabasas’ SOI (and exclusion of Areas E
and F) is consistent with an agreement between the Cities of Hidden Hills and Calabasas for
the annexation of Craftsman’s Corner by Calabasas.
The City identified Area H as an illogical boundary and proposed it for inclusion in its SOI
to address the issue. The territory is preserved as open space and the City indicated that it
does not intend to change land use in the area if annexed. Additionally, inclusion of the area
CITY OF CALABASAS 87
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
could address Calabasas’ need for additional open space to meet target open space
standards.
Area I has been under contention in recent years amongst the three agencies with vested
interest in the unincorporated properties—the City of Agoura Hills, the City of Calabasas, and
Los Angeles County. As unincorporated territory, the land use authority for the five parcels
in Area I is the County of Los Angeles; however, the cities of Agoura Hills and Calabasas and
their residents may be impacted by the uses in the area. Business owners located in the area
have indicated a preference to be annexed by one of the neighboring cities. Additionally,
given that the territory is substantially surrounded by the two cities and constrained to the
north by Highway 101, the area could be considered an island with associated service
inefficiencies. In order to minimize illogical boundaries, one of LAFCO’s objectives is to
eliminate such islands, and therefore the territory should be included in a city’s SOI to
indicate LAFCO’s intention to accomplish this aim and allow the city to appropriately plan
for annexation of the area.
However, because of the present contentious nature of the territory, an option is to define
Area I as an “Area of Concern”, establish a cooperative land use agreement between the three
agencies, and assess which city is best suited to take on the property upon the next SOI
update. “Areas of Concern” are used by LAFCOs for geographic areas “beyond the sphere of
influence in which land use decisions or other governmental actions of one local agency
impact…another local agency.”96 Alternatively, should LAFCO not desire to adopt a definition
for an “Area of Concern” in its policies, the three agencies could formalize their mutual
commitment to coordinated land use planning in the area with their own jointly designed
agreement. Los Angeles County recognized the need for “intergovernmental land use
coordination” in its Santa Monica Mountains North Area Plan and the Ventura Freeway
Corridor Areawide Plan. Of note, the plans identify a need for coordination to establish “a
set of consistent development standards across jurisdictional boundaries to help eliminate
inter-jurisdictional impacts associated from developments adjacent to two jurisdictions,”97
much like the circumstances surrounding Area I. A cooperative agreement between the
three agencies could be a useful tool to 1) allay concerns on the part of the cities regarding
any potential changes in use, 2) ensure city involvement regarding decisions for an area that
either city might annex and serve in the future, and 3) work towards agreement on which
city may eventually annex the area.
An SOI is an indicator of areas that the City may annex within a foreseeable timeline.
Many LAFCO’s have defined an SOI as having a 10- or 20-year planning horizon. Los Angeles
LAFCO has not defined SOIs as having a particular planning timeframe; however, in relation
to Area K, annexation of the property is not an immediate plan for Calabasas as use of the
territory is contingent on reuse of the yet active Calabasas Landfill. The lifetime of the
Calabasas Landfill could be extended through 2042, and the landfill may not be reusable for
Calabasas’ envisioned sports complex for years thereafter. Given that annexation and use of
Area K is not imminent, it may be prudent to wait to address this area during the City’s next
SOI Update.
96 Butte LAFCo, Operations Manual Policies and Procedures, May 6, 2010, Section 3.1.6.1
97 Los Angeles County, Santa Monica Mountains North Area Plan, 2000, p. III-15.
CITY OF CALABASAS 88
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Sphere of Influence Determinations
Present and planned land uses, including agricultural and open-space lands
v Like most cities, the City of Calabasas consists of a variety of land uses; however,
predominant uses are residential and open space. No areas within the City are
classified as agricultural uses.
v Growth within Calabasas is constrained by topography, environmental constraints,
and community preferences.
v Areas A, D, and H, which are proposed for inclusion in the City’s SOI, have some open
space and light agricultural uses. However, with the exception of Area D, the City is
not proposing to change land uses if annexed.
v Areas G and J, which are proposed for inclusion in the City’s SOI, are both built out
and do not have any open space or agricultural uses.
Present and probable need for public facilities and services
v Based on demand indicators, there is existing demand for all municipal services
offered by Calabasas. There will be a continued need for these services and related
infrastructure based on existing demand, as well as anticipated growth-related
demand within the city limits and associated with any annexations.
v In many areas proposed for inclusion in the SOI, municipal service infrastructure,
including water, wastewater, streets, and public safety stations already exist to serve
the areas. Additionally, many of the City’s contract agencies already serve the
developed areas, which indicates the ability and willingness to provide continued
services to the areas. The City will need to assess how services will be offered within
Area D to meet demand associated with the new development.
Present capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public services that the agency
provides or is authorized to provide
v Municipal services offered directly by Calabasas’ staff are limited to recreation, park
and landscape maintenance, library, planning, building & safety, street maintenance,
and stormwater/drainage. All other services are provided by contract with a private
or public provider or by responsibility of another public agency.
v Where contract services are provided, the City indicated that it receives regular use
reports from the contracting agency, and there are generally no concerns about the
present level or capacity of contract services offered. The level of services provided
are reviewed regularly upon contract renewal.
v The City’s streets were identified as being in “fair” condition on average during its
2017 review. In order to prevent the pavement condition from further deteriorating,
the City must commit at least $1 million annually to its streets. Additionally, the City
recognized a need for additional community park and open space acreage to meet
identified standards. No further significant infrastructure deficiencies were
identified for other municipal services offered by the City.
CITY OF CALABASAS 89
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
v There were no capacity concerns of note identified over the course of this review
related to city municipal services. The City and contract agencies appropriately
conduct assessments and planning to address infrastructure needs associated with
capacity concerns and project related growth.
v City management methods appear to generally meet accepted best management
practices. The City prepares a budget before the beginning of each FY, has a detailed
Capital Improvement Program, conducts periodic financial audits, maintains
relatively current transparent financial records, regularly evaluates rates and fees,
tracks employee and department workload, and has established a process to address
complaints.
Existence of any social or economic communities of interest
v The Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy is an economic community of interest with
an aim of preserving open space in the region and surrounding the City of Calabasas.
v The businesses in Area J are considered an economic community of interest, that is
divided from other businesses along Agoura Road due to their exclusion from the City
and related levels of service. Similarly, the Alice C. Stelle Middle School, its staff and
students are a community of interest as they are also isolated from the City.
Present and probable need for water, wastewater, and structural fire protection facilities
and service of any disadvantaged unincorporated communities within the existing SOI
v No disadvantaged unincorporated communities exist within or adjacent to the City’s
boundary or SOI.
Sphere of Influence Recommendation
LAFCO is charged with promoting logical boundaries and efficient delivery of services;
therefore, this MSR recommends that LAFCO consider inclusion of Areas A, D, G, H and J into
the City of Calabasas’ SOI. While it may be appropriate to include Area K when the landfill is
nearing closure and the City has a more defined plan for use, it is recommended in the
meantime the area remain excluded from the Calabasas’s SOI.
Areas B and C are recommended to remain in the Hidden Hills SOI for the City to have an
opportunity to plan for these areas. Should Hidden Hills choose not to plan for these areas
and eventual annexation, then it would be appropriate for these areas to be included in
Calabasas’ SOI. The City of Calabasas indicated that it supports this recommendation.
It is recommended that Area I eventually be included in either the City of Agoura Hills’ or
City of Calabasas’ SOI. However, it is apparent that such a recommendation is not practical
at this time. In lieu of inclusion in one of the City’s SOI, it is recommended that Area I be
identified as an “Area of Concern” and a cooperative land use agreement, covering those
issues discussed by the two cities during the recent annexation process, be formalized to
promote collaboration amongst the County of Los Angeles, as the existing land use authority
of the area, and the cities of Agoura Hills and Calabasas, as the potential future service
providers and affected agencies. It is recommended that the three agencies work together
to define the cooperative agreement to meet their needs and circumstances.
CITY OF CALABASAS 90
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
6. CI TY O F HIDDEN HILLS
CITY OVERVIEW
Development of Hidden Hills began in the 1950’s. The City of Hidden Hills was
incorporated as a general law city in 1961 and was approximately 1.3 square miles in area.98
The City is a gated community with minimal City territory, and minimal residential or
commercial development, outside of its gates.
Hidden Hills’ population of 1,86899 is represented by its elected city council. The City
Council directs its City Manager and staff of two; most public services are provided by
contract with private companies and with other public agencies.
Many civic and municipal functions, for example, maintenance of roads (within its gates),
parks, trails and community facilities are maintained by the Hidden Hills Community
Association and its elected Board. The Board also conducts architectural and aesthetic
review and enforces the communities’ codes, covenants and restrictions inside the
community’s gates. The City handles Planning, development, engineering, building & safety,
traffic safety, environmental services, and public works.
The City has an expansive SOI that extends well beyond its municipal boundaries.
Boundaries
The City is nestled between the western foothills of the San Fernando Valley in Los
Angeles County, and is a gated community. The City of Hidden Hills constitutes 1,080 acres
(1.68 square miles) of land area.100
Sphere of Influence
LAFCO adopted an expansive sphere of influence (SOI) for the City of Hidden Hills that
includes unincorporated territory to the west and to the south of the city limits. The SOI
encompasses 1,823 acres (2.85 square miles). The SOI includes the territory lying between
the city limits and the Ventura Freeway (Highway 101) to the south, and the territory
between the city limits and Mountain View Drive to the east. The SOI was established in 1991
and reconfirmed in 2004 and 2012. The City’s boundary and SOI are depicted in Figure 6-1.
98 See City of Hidden Hills website for additional history of the community https://hiddenhillscity.org/about-us/history/
99 As of January 1, 2020, as estimated by the California Department of Finance.
100 Area estimates from LAFCO GIS, 6/3/2020.
CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS 91
ELLENVIEW C ENOTSPIL VA ELBA C NOSSOR RELDA ST SAGE RAIT A O X N A R D CALIFA
ROMKR
A
A
D
P ALIZIA
A
M DR DR DR EDEN 00 P 1 AR 6 K 2 DR WEI R R V O IC N C E T I E R T R R R E A G B N L F A E A B R R M D F 2 IE 6 L 0 D 00 DR CA 2 N 6 Y 00 O 0 N
CT W ELLINGTON VIE M W OU TC N RE T C D N A EPS R IN TC M N AR DS E TC DNOMHCIR B TC LV Y L E P LN D A M SREMLAHC LP EVO YD R A G HS
DOOW DOO E W G L N A T L I N N L L O L I A 0 V S O 0 M B 4 C O 5 E 5 H 5 R 0 F 0 C 25 U 5 M 00 BE L W R P C 0 L IN T A 0 N N T 5 O D 5 O N S N C H S P T A L M I M I A O LT E I O T A S L N Y N N T E U S L O A C S K T IN M E C GST W O L N E L 2 T 5 N C 5 E 00 LPSREMLAH W C G E A N Y R LO U R O D BL C E T M 5700 RE P E L F LP T EV O C O Y R N G W T YDAH L O E S E T C T
NL
HCNAR
DLEIFRETTU D B R NO L X IA ID RT SI WEL DRLLIB C AR SO KIT
00942 DR K R ALC & 0 Y 0 D 55 OC D R D N T O M F E R EJ N H OJ DR N 5700 L G 1 IA N O 0 I R T R L R 9 T L A H W O D 4 D F O R K LE 5 I O A R O S N N 4 B O R E 0 R D L R A R D D A R L R 0 D C M D D O I B R K VEN R TU E B R R A T O E S G 0 T 0 U R 0 H G 4 O 2 L Y N L H P V C S IC E I P A N T N A O A L I L L R M L R C P D T O E A S A D S 0 T R Y L 0 O R S L D D L 5 A R I 5 E I D R S R D Y E D D N E O A LI B N N L G D L M D P B L C A O D A E R L A D N A V R H L A R D N 2 Z L V N 3 W A L Z B V 6 E O L L O 0 L D B E E 0 P C A N A I A D S L D J D E D R V N R L R T R H R A E E O I D L L L L R D W L Y L L N N 2 L I R H 1 O I 3 T O K E 4 D R T 4 0 N P 0 L I N W L L V O 2 I U E S S P L I 5 P K E T O N N M C D U T NI E R S O O A N D S A N R I L A P L B D L 2 23 00 E N L O H E R S I P R D D V T P T D L T G L V V R R G 5 S O C NA A W E N T ZO E R I 2 E L A L I M 3 3 A D L F R N E A R C 7 E M G S 0 2 N S S T I M A I 6 L D P I K D O R K L 0 E W O T R E T L S P IR - L E H L I R A N U H V D E I B N N U K C H R I O L S LO I A D R I AL A A O R N C L 5 L A E N N B P A R I Y A R 8 T R 0 JE V L E S D G T V E C V O 0 D 0 A N 28 142 T P D 0 3 T A N D R U D G Z O N R T 5 I O A F N L R B L L O AN 0 I RA M 0 K B IL E 8 L B I 4 O E Y O E R 2 L N B R L E H D LITT A S A L S O I L 00 E 34 2 E T I S R V F N G A ST Z L I A E M N A H E E I BE V R N E T L S S N O D R N C C R E AL V S D R L T E A O N T K B R I W O N D U H D R C B R L G B T O L I S D W N R W V D E O O S D N O V N A TS I T OL O R SA W O D E A A A ST C M A A D Y L C V V T CRES E M S 2 M 3 I R 9 P 00 L IL LAV P IH O L D P R E R A A T N S O D REB E A L C I A N R V V A R V 5 V S 00232 G 5 O A A A 0 R A Y N V E 1 0 N V D L E D I V L 0 R A M A T V V 6 N A K N A B R U B V V I L 5 A H A R R O M E N A O A H H T N RA M L A A Y I L M A T C L T R A I E P V N C W D D E F A L R A Y L M T T R S R K E A W E O A A R A TH R ST O R TA T H E O AS L D N D L H A A S T T TE A R A A E S S R S NILL O C N N E N 5 V T A C M OLLINS L V R I O N 7 M I D N S A A R T 0 S A ST A N V 1 V T S S O 0 T 0 A R A E O S R E O 2 C A NDA RA M I D DN A I MRAI 4 V L N R P ST 2 A S N T I A M R J E 23 E 40 L 0 O O L D O H A E L I N ATTE JOHN H C H R A L I N A I W M SA RETTA H S I P V O D T C R L S A W L A R H R A B M I R T D S E U T F R L L I R E D H L D H E D R 5 C Y N A L S N R A I R O T TAILEME 8 T N I T A 1 I T T M N S 7 T ST O M S T G T N 23500 0 A 0 A EELYRAM L 9 N A O T M A A L 2 IE 4 5 9 R 00 U V O V L R V C A ST LIFA P EI C 00732 L A S AT Y T A 5 V K 9 V S AFILAC T 0 I 5 P W S H 0 S L T 9 A T U 0 N O D 1 C R E O O O S R D U T N A L T A Y L N Y O D N AK N 29
00262 AVEV
0065 O AKS
R R IC EBMA RIC TC WEIV
RD
DR
DR
BR ID G ER 00052 DR DR MEADOW WEIV DR VIEW ROLLING RD DR SADDLE 00532 A V E 23248 29
SADDLERIDGE
SENEGRIV
0045 RI
L
C
N
R OR D NEK R O R M O Y
LN
RD R O
MTAH
Y W 5400 ES RD D R CI P R HILRICH
0045
ENDERBY CT BRISBANE RD C TC T YELSELLEW FFILCSNEEUQ 00 0 35 035 R N IC L NL
JIM
DR
YELHSA
REKLAW DR EGDIR JIM BR R I D DGER ROUND L O C TER RD JO HN 5300 ROB S E C R O R T D T S T ON WHITMAN RD RD YAWKRAP O DL CS VE N UT RA LNAI D NA CRAFTSM AN DR SAL R G IF UOD DR BLVD CREEK SN Y O W MMOC OAKFIELD RD PA R K ALBADA PARK VA TC N C O T H N OPP A ER CLE D SPIE D L N R BERG ALLOHLUM RODIMLA 30
PLATA
DR
26100 DR 53 BL 0 U 0 FF RED PARKMOR M U
R
U EA
R D
M U R UAE 00 452 RD
DR
CT G T AR T RE 5000 SC HU M AC F EH R R W Y 0005 SASABALAC 24100 00142 PARK SORRE E N R TO TNECKRAP R D GRANADA AN A E K V R R E R G E R A K S O E P R L N A L A P A MIRASOL PARK OTNER PARK ROS PARK A JA D P C E A A L R F R A K A O N LI D V A O PARK 30 M U REAU 0074 D 2 R C A LA B A S A S PAR K IRP K A R C AP4600 AROR K U R A A S P IE M NN O A 23 P N 40 A A 0 C R O K ESPERANZA PARK PARK CORDERO IN MZA KR J A L P I 4 V 5 O 0 R P N 0 A O RK C A O SSE NT
32
SASABALAC
V E N R D T U R A 24600 ATLA MARB M E A L S L IN A A PARK PARK PA A R K THENA G R NA DA A 4500 DIRDAMKRAP 2 P 36 A 00 RK ACROLLAM KRAP KRAP 4300 LASILA CO PA R R O K NA EN P S A E R N K ADA 4300 FORTUNA PARK KRAP CALABASAS
CO
Incorporated October 19, 1961 HIDDEN HILLS LOS ANGELES Arroyo Calabasas CALABASAS LAKE Hills Woodland µ Revised: December 27, 2012 C:\GIS\MXDs\Cities\Hidden Hills
1 Reconfirmed
08-25-04
Miles
Established
04-27-83
Reconfirmed
11-14-12
0 0.125 0.25 0.5
of Influence
(SOI)
Reconfirmed
08-25-04
Established
11-13-91
Hidden
Hills
Sphere
1 in = 0.2 miles
Action
Effective
Date
City of
Hidden
Hills
Sphere of Influence
History
Legend
Hidden
Hills Sphere of Influence
./
101 US
1
County Ventura
Figure
6-1
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
ACCOUNTABILITY AND GOVERNANCE
The City of Hidden Hills is governed by a five-member City Council that is elected by
residents to serve staggered four-year terms. Each year, City Councilmembers select the
mayor to serve a one-year term. Compensation for City Councilmembers allows for a
maximum of $300 per month or an annual salary of $3,600, however, this salary has been
waived by the Council.
The City Manager, City Clerk, and the Accounting Specialist are able to accept complaints
by phone. Complaints are also received via email, or in-person at City Hall during normal
hours of operation from 9am-5pm. Matters that cannot be resolved over the phone are
investigated by appropriate staff or referred to the proper agency. Complaints filed in 2019
include approximately ten traffic violation complaints, five building code violations, four
coyote sighting complaints, and three “night light too bright” complaints; no complaints
about staff were filed.101
City Council meetings occur twice monthly on the second and fourth Monday of each
month. Council meetings are open to the public and take place at 6:30pm in the Council
Chambers at City Hall under normal circumstances; however, due to the COVID-19 pandemic
and declared State of Emergency by the State of California, the City has transitioned to
entirely virtual meetings held on the Zoom teleconferencing system at the same time as the
regularly scheduled meetings. The meetings are streamed live and available on demand on
the City’s website. Council meetings are also televised live on cable TV Channel 3.
The meeting schedule can be found on the City’s website along with the agenda which is
also available at the City Clerk’s office. The City provides a direct link to its agenda on the
website thereby complying with agenda posting requirements of AB 2257.102
Council meeting minutes are likewise posted on the City’s website and are available at
City Hall. Additionally, the City updates constituents through a newsletter mailed to
residents as well as news and announcements posted on the City’s website.
The City has demonstrated accountability and transparency in its disclosure of
information and cooperation with this review. The City responded to the questionnaires and
cooperated with document requests.
PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
While public sector management standards vary depending on the size and scope of the
organization, there are minimum standards and best practices that should be followed by all
agencies. Well-managed organizations evaluate employees annually, track employee and
agency productivity, periodically review agency performance, prepare a budget before the
beginning of the FY, conduct periodic financial audits to safeguard the public trust, maintain
current financial records, plan for future service needs, and plan for future service and
capital needs.
101 City of Hidden Hills Response to Data Request, 1/28/2020.
102 Assembly Bill 2257 (Government Code Section 54954.2) updates the Brown Act in 2016 with requirements governing
the location, platform, and methods by which an agenda must be accessible on the agency’s website.
CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS 93
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Staffing and Organizational Structure
The City of Hidden Hills delivers municipal services through a combination of staff,
contracts with other agencies, and contracts with private contractors. City operations are
divided into four departments consisting of: the City Council, the City Manager, the City Clerk,
and Finance.
Four functions are run by contract staff. These include the City Attorney, the City
Treasurer, the City Engineer, and the Emergency Services Coordinator. The City handles
Planning, development, engineering, building & safety, traffic safety, environmental services,
and public works. The Hidden Hills Community Association and its elected Board conducts
architectural and aesthetic review and enforces the communities’ codes, covenants and
restrictions inside the community’s gates.
The five elected members of the City Council govern the affairs of the City through
adopted legislative policies and direction to staff. The Council also decides planning issues.
The City Manager is appointed by the City Council to implement their policies and
oversee the general management and administration of the City’s operations. The City
Manager is also the liaison to other governmental agencies and a representative on the
Technical Advisory Committee of the Las Virgenes Malibu Council of Governments.
The City Clerk is tasked with official recordkeeping for the City as well as providing
support to the City Manager. The City Clerk maintains and provides public records,
legislative documents, legal publications and contracts, while also coordinating municipal
elections.
The City’s Finance Department includes an Accounting Specialist. The Department
manages the City’s funds and accounting matters, including revenue, payments, investments,
salaries and benefits. This department is also responsible for audit and budget coordination.
Audits are provided under contract to a private firm.
The City Attorney is currently contracted through the law firm of Richards, Watson, and
Gershon.
The City Treasurer is a position provided under a contract with the City. The City
Treasurer follows the guidance of the City Manager. The City Treasurer also supervises the
Finance Department. While the Accounting Specialist oversees day-to-day financial tasks, the
City Treasurer focuses on the investment of City funds and provides reports to the City
Council and City Manager.
The City Engineer’s Department is composed of four divisions: Building, Planning, Code
Enforcement, and City Engineering and Public Works. Hence, the department handles
various aspects of development from establishing design and safety standards to
administering the GP and maintaining capital improvements like streets, storm drains, and
City facilities. The Building Inspector and the Building Official are contracted staff within this
department. These services are provided by Charles Abbott Associates through an
agreement with the City.
The Department of the Emergency Services Coordinator is responsible for implementing
plans to ensure residents’ safety and to provide access to public information and resources
CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS 94
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
in the case of a large-scale emergency or natural disaster. The department coordinates with
the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County (CFPD), Los Angeles County
Sheriff’s Department, and the Hidden Hills Community Emergency Response Team (CERT),
which is composed of resident volunteers.
A five-member commission, appointed by the Mayor, and subject to approval of the City
Council, advises the City Council on the health and safety needs of the Hidden Hills
community and recommends legislation and procedures to support and improve the public’s
welfare. The Commission also acts as a liaison to various County departments that Hidden
Hills contracts with to provide services. Elected officials may not be chosen for the
Commission, and members do not receive compensation.
The municipal services provided by these departments are described in further detail in
the Municipal Services section of this chapter.
Hidden Hills Community Association
The Hidden Hills Community Association plays a significant role in the community and
provides some services that are often the responsibility of city government. For example, the
Association is responsible for maintenance of all roads, trails, parks and recreation facilities
within the gates of the City. The Association also plays a role in reviewing and approving
construction on or modification of any of the 648 home sites as it relates to aesthetic impacts
and other requirements of conditions, covenants, and restrictions (CC&R’s) which were
originally set in place by the original developers. The seven Board members of the
Association are elected by the residents.
Management Practices
Review of Employees and City Performance
To determine the performance abilities of staff, evaluations are administered to
employees by the City Council and City Manager one to two times per year.
According to the City, there is not currently a system in place to evaluate its own level of
productivity and operations agency-wide. It is reported, however, that the City of Hidden
Hills has sufficient capacity to provide services within its current City boundaries.103
Review of Departmental Performance
The City does not indicate how or if the performance of departmental services is
assessed, however, there are certain systems in place and quantifiable resources available to
provide information that would allow for this type of evaluation.
In particular, the City Clerk has access to permits issued and requests for vital
documentation that provide a quantification of demand for services. Similarly, the City
reports calls for law enforcement service monthly and “year-to-date” in its monthly
newsletter. The Consolidated Fire Protection District also provides monthly reports to the
City documenting the number and types of calls.
103 City of Hidden Hills Response to Data Request, 1/28/2020.
CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS 95
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
The Finance Department records fiscal information that is made available in the budget
and CAFR and prepares an annual “Fiscal Health Report.” The Emergency Preparedness
Department implements Blackboard Connect, a system to aid in disseminating emergency
notifications and which tracks resident contact information. Likewise, this Department also
allows residents to subscribe for emergency alerts through Los Angeles County’s AlertLA
system.
The City reports capital improvements to be completed by the Building and Safety
Department’s Public Works Division. These include improvements to City Hall, the Long
Valley/US-101/Valley Circle On-Ramp, Round Meadow School drop-off and pick-up, catch
basin screens, traffic radar signs (V Calm) undergrounding, Round Meadow Road/Mureau
intersection landscaping, and Citywide utility undergrounding. This reporting appropriately
ensures the City’s accountability and transparency to the public.
Planning Practices
The City’s central planning document is its General Plan (GP). The current plan was
adopted in November of 1995 and does not indicate a planning horizon. This plan outlines
seven elements required by state law, which include housing, land use, open space, noise,
circulation, safety, and conservation. The GP’s planning area covers territory within the
City’s limits and its SOI. In conjunction with the GP, there is also a certified environmental
impact review (EIR). The Plan’s principles, goals, policies, and actions guide day-to-day
decisions made by the City Council, boards, and commissions on the physical development
of the City. The Housing Element of the General Plan was updated in 2014, however the rest
of the GP is dated and requires a comprehensive update to define the City’s plans for any
future development and growth within its boundaries and SOI.
Oftentimes, cities adopt additional master plans, specific plans, strategic plans,
management plans or monitoring programs to provide more detailed development
guidelines for a community or neighborhood or provide comprehensive plans for an entire
infrastructure system. Hidden Hills has not developed or adopted any of those plans.
The City’s financial planning practices are discussed in the “Financial Ability to Provide
Services” section of this chapter.
GROWTH AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS
Land Use
With the exception of four commercially zoned lots, the entire City is zoned as residential;
the minimum lot size is one acre except for lots zoned R1 which may be 20,000 square feet.
The CR zone is also zoned for affordable housing.
The City of Hidden Hills is nearly built out, with potential for development on 23 vacant
parcels.
CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS 96
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Population
As of January 1, 2020, the California Department of Finance estimates a City of Hidden
Hills population of 1,868. The City is near build-out and there has been minimal growth in
recent years. Since 2010, the City has increased its population of 1,856 to 1,868 in 2020,
which represents less than one percent total change over ten years. Figure 6-2 shows there
has been almost no change in the City’s population over the last decade.
Figure 6-2: City of Hidden Hills Population, (2010 – 2020)
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
There is little potential for growth within the City’s existing boundaries. The Southern
California Association of Governments’ (SCAG) most recent population projections from
2016, anticipated that the City would reach a population of 1,900 in 2020 and grow to 2,000
by 2040, which equates to average annual growth of 0.3 percent over the 20-year period.104
These projections are consistent with recent trends and remaining vacant land.
Planned and Proposed Development
Over the past five years, 17 permits have been issued for new homes that have been
completed.105 The City reported that there were no planned or proposed developments
within its boundaries at this time. Additionally, there are no plans for development adjacent
to the City’s boundaries that it is considering annexing.
Growth Strategies and Constraints
The City’s primary planning document is the General Plan (GP), which dates from 1995.
The Housing Element was most recently updated in 2014. The City is aware that the General
Plan is out-of-date and needs to be updated. The City has been waiting for the City of
104 2016-2040 RTP/SCS Final Growth Forecast by Jurisdiction.
105 Correspondence with City of Hidden Hills, 2020-05-23. A total of 35 permits for new homes were issued for that 5-year
period.
CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS 97
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Calabasas to complete the annexation of the Craftsman’s Corner territory before the GP is
updated.
With the exception of pre-zoning for the anticipated annexation of 12 acres in the
Craftsman’s Corner territory, the GP does not plan for the City’s current SOI area outside of
the City’s boundaries. Including the SOI territory within a GP’s “planning area” is considered
a best management practice and is recommended to guide a City’s long-term development
and growth goals. During the GP update, it is recommended that the City appropriately plan
for the entire area within its SOI as amended in response to this MSR.
Sphere of Influence
The City’s current SOI encompasses a total of 1,823 acres, including 1,080 acres within
City boundaries that generally are accessible only through its gated entrance.106 The following
description summarizes characteristics of areas within the City’s SOI and outside its
boundaries, labelled alphabetically for purposes of this MSR and map identification in Figure
6-3.
Until the current MSR update, the City has not indicated an interest in modifying its SOI
or annexing territory outside of its current municipal boundaries (other than the Craftsman
Corner area (see “Areas D, E and F”, below); this expansive SOI with no planning or
annexation activity for such a long period of time is contrary to standard planning practices
for an SOI, which is intended to represent the City’s ultimate growth boundary within a
foreseeable planning horizon. It is understood that SOI issues have not been discussed until
recently and no policies have been established by the City related to its SOI planning or
annexation of SOI areas. It is recommended that the City make appropriate plans for the
territory within its SOI (and any expansion further west) in order to determine what areas
will reasonably be annexed over the next 10 to 20 years.
Area A – The City’s current SOI in Area A splits the existing residential Mountain View
Estates community, a gated community, which does not provide a logical planning area
boundary. Optionally, the City could expand westward its SOI to the entire unincorporated
area and include all of Mountain View Estates, or reduce its SOI boundary to basically run
along Crummer Canyon Road (labeled as “Ranch Road” on Figure 6-3) as shown for Area “B”,
or further reduce the boundary to coincide with current City boundaries.
The City of Calabasas has considered annexation of Area A including unincorporated
areas to the west of Area A. The City of Hidden Hills , historically, has not made any effort to
annex Area A.
Area B – The area is undeveloped with Upper Las Virgenes Open Space Preserve making
up a substantial portion of the territory. A majority of Area B is zoned as open space, with
the exception of the southeast corner, which is zoned for heavy agricultural uses. The City
has indicated concern about maintaining oversight of new development in Area B in order
to minimize potential impacts on residents of the City, including the potential increase in
traffic on Mureau Road that also serves Hidden Hills residents. Other concerns relate to
possible wildfire issues that could be exacerbated by new development near City boundaries,
106 Area estimates from LAFCO GIS, 6/3/2020.
CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS 98
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
and basic levels of County Sheriff funding in the area that do not meet the standards of
neighboring cities that share Sheriff services, which may indirectly affect Hidden Hills.
There is a potential growth area located within the City’s SOI to the immediate west of
City boundaries. However, much of the area to the west of the City is designated as a
Significant Ecological Area (SEA) by the County, meaning that the area contains plants or
animals that are unique, unusual, or declining; development in this SOI area would require
extensive and costly mitigation. If the City is interested in constraining development in Area
B, the City could pre-zone the area as open space-resource protection, thereby protecting the
territory from development following annexation.
Area C – Area C is unincorporated territory to the south of the City’s municipal boundary
and outside its main gate, but within its SOI. The area consists of 21 parcels zoned for heavy
and light agriculture, residential planned development, and single-family residential.
Existing residential development in the area is limited to the Mureau Estates off of Garrett
Court. The City has been approached about private development proposals; however, no
formal application has been submitted for development. The area is of interest to the City
due to implications for traffic on the main access to Hidden Hills. The area, if annexed, could
also provide an opportunity for the provision of sites suitable for affordable housing which
the City is mandated by the State to accommodate through its land use and housing plans.
If Areas A, B, and D are proposed for municipal annexation (e.g., to Calabasas), Area C
would be left as an “unincorporated island” contrary to LAFCO policies. The City of Calabasas
has expressed interest in annexing Area C, should Hidden Hills not anticipate annexation of
the territory.
Areas D, E, and F – Area D is the subject of a proposed annexation of approximately 145
acres of territory (including 85 parcels) to the City of Calabasas, and approximately 12 acres
of territory consisting of Areas E and F (including four parcels) to the City of Hidden Hills.
This area is presently part of the unincorporated territories of the County of Los Angeles.
Area E is uninhabited and undeveloped. Area F consists of three residences.
The City has a reimbursement agreement with the City of Calabasas related to costs to
remove the Craftsman’s Corner area from Hidden Hills’ SOI so it can be annexed to
Calabasas.107 The action will also require that Hidden Hills annex two small areas (see Area E
and Area F on Figure 6-3) to avoid the creation of “unincorporated islands” following the
Calabasas annexation. The annexation will include revenue sharing between the two cities.108
107 Reimbursement Agreement Between the City of Calabasas and the City of Hidden Hills Related to the Craftsman’s Corner
Annexation, January 1, 2015.
108 Interview with K. Kallman, City of Hidden Hills, 5/8/2020.
CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS 99
ROD ELLENVIEW TS ENOTSPILC VA ELBA NOSSORC RELDA ST SAGE ARAIT O X N A R D 23200 CALIFA
DOOWHTUR 0095 ROMKR
A
A
DA
P ALIZIA
M DR DR DR EDEN 00 P 1 AR 6 K 2 DR WE R I R V O IC N C E T IR E R T R R E A B G N L F A E A B R R M D F 2 IE 6 L 0 D 00 DRCA 2 N 6 Y 00 O 0 N
CT W ELLINGTON VIE M W O T U C N RE T C D N A EPS R IN TC N MA SR ED TC DNOMHCIR B TC LV Y L E P LN D AM SREMLAHC LP EVO YD R A G HS
DOOW DOO E W G L N A T L I N N L L O L I A 0 V S O 0 M B 4 C O 5 E 5 H 5 R 0 F 0 C 25 U 5 M 00 BE L W R PC 0 L I T N A 0 N N T 5 O D 5 O N S N C H S P T A L M I M A I O LT E I O T A S L N Y N N T E U S L O A C S K T I M N E C GST W O L N E L 2 T 5 C N 5 E 0 L 0 PSREMLAH W C G E A N Y R LO U R O D BL C E T M 5700 RE P E L F LP T EV O C O Y R N G W T YDAH L O E S T E C T NL
HCNAR
DLEIFRETTU D B R NO L X IA ID RT SI WEL DRLLIB CARSO KIT
00942 DR K RALC & 0 Y 0 D 55 OC DR D N T O M F ER EJ N HOJ DR N 5700 L 1 G IA N O 0 I R T R L R 9 T L A H W O D D 4 F O R K LE 5 O I A R O S N N B 4 O R 0 E R D R L A D R D A R L R 0 D M D C D O I B R K VEN R TU E B R R A T O E S G 0 T 0 U R 0 H G 4 O L 2 Y N H L P V C S IC E I P A D N T N A R O A L I L L R M L R C P D T O E A S A S D 0 T R Y L 0 R O S L D D L 5 A R 5 I I E D R S R D Y E D D N E O A LI B N N L G D L M D P B C L O A D A E R L A D N A V R H L A R D N 2 Z L V N 3 W A L Z V B 6 E O L O L 0 L D B E E P 0 C A N A A I S D L D J E D D R V N R L R T R H R A E E O I D L L L L R D W L Y L L N I 2 N L H R I 1 O 3 O T K E 4 D R T 4 0 P N 0 I L W N L L V O 2 I U E S S P L I 5 K T P E O N N M C U D T I E S N R A N O O D S A N R I L A P B L D L 2 2 00 3 N E L O E H R S I P R D D V T P T L D T G L V R V CA 5 S O R G ZN O A W ET N I R E 2 E L A M L I A D 3 3 L F R N E A R C E 7 G M S 0 2 N S T S I M A I L K 6 D P D I O R K L 0 W E O T E R T L I S P R - L E L H I R U A N H V D I E B N U N K C H O R LLO I S I A I RD A AL ST A O R N L C L 5 N N A E R B P A I Y A R 8 R T 0 JE V L G D T V S E E C V O 0 D 0 N A 28 142 T D P 0 A T 3 N D R U G D Z O N R T 5 IF A O N L R B L L O N 0 AIRA M 0 K B IL E L 8 B I 4 E O O YE R 2 L N B R L E H D LITT A S S L A I O L 0 E E 0 34 2 T I S R V N F G A ST Z L I A E M A N H E E I BE V R N E L ST R O D N S R N A E L V C S C D R L E T N K T A O B R I O W N D H D U R C B R L G B T O L I D S W R N W V E D O O D S N O V N A TS I A T OD O O R L S W E A A S A C T M A A D Y L C V V T CR SE E M S 2 M 3 IR 9 P 00 L IL L P AV IH L O P R D E R A A TS N ODREB E A LC I A N R V VA R V V 5 S 00232 G 5 O A A A 0 R A Y N V E 1 0 N V D L E D I V R L 0 A M A T V V 6 N A K N A B R U B V V I L 5 A A H R R O M E N A A O H H N TRA M L A A Y I L M A T C L T R A I P E V N C W D D E F A L R A Y L T M TS R K R E A W E O R A A A TH R ST O ERA O TA T H S L D N D L HA A S T T TER A A A E S S SNILL R OC N N E N V 5 T A M COLLINS L V R I O N 7 M I D N S A A T R 0 S A T A S N V 1 0 S O TS V T 0 A R A E O S R E O 2 C A R NA M D I A D ADN RA M I I L 4 V N R P A ST 2 S N T I A M R J E 234 E 00 L O O L D O H A E L I N ATTE JOHN H C H R A L I N A I M W SARETTAH S I P V O D T R C L S A W L A H R R A B M I R E D TS U T F R L L I R D E H L D E H R D 5 C YA N L S N R A I R O L ME E T 8 ATI N T I T A 1 I T T M S N T 7 ST O M S T G T N 23500 0 A 0 A L EELYRAM 9 N A O M TA A LI 2 E 49 5 00 R U V O V L R C ST ALIF V A P EI C 00732 L S A AT Y T A 5 V K 9 V S AFILAC T 0 5 I P W S H 0 S L T 9 A T 0 U N O D 1 C R O O E O S R D U T N A L T A Y L N Y O D N AK N 29
0065 26300
THOUS
AND 00262 AVEV
0065 O AKS
R R IC EBMA RIC TC WEIV RD
DR
DR
BRIDG ER 00052 DR DR MEADOW WEIV DR VIEW ROLLING RD DR SADDLE 00532 AVE 23248 NEVAEH 29
SENEGRI
5
V
40 0 0 045 RI L
S
C N
A
E R S
B L
O
R
R D
A
N
S V
E
A O
R K
DD
D
L L E N RIDGE
DR R O R MY O
LN
RD C R I P R O H M IL T R AH ICH Y W
0045
ENDERBY CT BRISBANE RD C TC T YELSELLEW FFILCSNEEUQ 00 0 35 03 R 5 I N C L NL
JIM
DR
YELHSA
REKLAW DR EG R DI JIM BR R I D DGER ROUND O L C TER RD JO HN 5300 ROB S E C R O R T D T S T ON WHITMAN RD RD YAWKRAP O DL VENTURA LNAIDNACS CRAFTSM AN DR SAL R G IF UOD DR BLVD CREEK SN Y O W MMOC OAKFIELD RD PARK ALBADA PARK VA TC NO CT H N OPP A ER CLE D SPI D EL N R BERG ALLOHLUM RODIMLA ANOHAIL VA 30
PLATA
DR 261 00 DR 53 BL 0 U 0 FF RED PARKMOR M
U
RU
AE
DR
M RU UAE 00 452 RD DR
CT G T AR T RE 5000 SCHUM AC F R E R H W Y 0005 SASABALAC 24100 00142 PARK SORRE E NT R O TNECKRAP R D GRANADA ANE A K V R R E R G E R A K S O E P R N L A L A P A MIRASOL PARK OTNER PARK ROS PARK A J 0 A D P C 0 E A A L 3 R F R 3 A K A O 2 N LI D V A O PARK 30 M UREAU 0074 D 2 R C A LA B A S A S PAR K IRP K A R C AP4600 AROR K U R A A S P IE M NN O A 23 P N 40 A A 0 C R O K ESPERANZA PARK PARK CORDERO MIN ZA KR J A L P I 4 V 5 O 0 R P N 0 A O RK C A O SSE NT
32
SASABALAC
V E N RD T U R A 24600 ATLA MARB M E A L S L I L N A A A PARK PARK PA A R K THENA G NAR DA A 4500 DIRDAMKRAP 2 P 36 A 00 RK ACROLLAM KRAP KRAP 4300 LASILA CO PA R R O K NA EN P S A E R N K ADA 4300 FORTUNA NO M R O P D A N R T K E KRAP CALABASAS
CO
Incorporated October 19, 1961 HIDDEN HILLS LOS ANGELES Arroyo Calabasas CALABASAS C LAKE D
B
F Hills Woodland
A
E µ Revised: June 2, 2020 C:\GIS\Cities\Hidden Hills_PCA
1 Reconfirmed 08-25-04
Miles
Established 04-27-83
Reconfirmed 11-14-12
0 0.15 0.3 0.6
of Influence
(SOI)
Reconfirmed 08-25-04 Established 11-13-91
Hidden Hills
Sphere
1 in = 0.3 miles
Action Effective
Date
City of Hidden
Hills
Sphere of Influence
History
Legend
Hidden
Hills Sphere of Influence
./
101 US
1
County Ventura
Figure
6-3
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
DISADVANTAGED UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITIES
No disadvantaged unincorporated communities exist within or adjacent to the City’s
boundary or SOI.
FINANCIAL ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICES
The California State Auditor’s Office ranked the City of Hidden Hills as being at “low risk”
of fiscal distress (based on FY16-17 financial statements), and ranked 436 out of 471
California cities (“1” being at greatest risk of fiscal distress) earning 90.7 points out of 100.109
The City of Hidden Hills’ budget relies almost entirely on residential generated revenues
because the community contains no commercial land uses. Relatively high property values
support property-related revenues including General Fund property tax and library
property tax, property transfer taxes, and fees and charges related to planning and building
fees. The City receives, for general purposes, approximately 5.9 percent of each property tax
dollar paid by City residents, and 2.2 percent to fund library services. This reliance on
property tax helps to buffer the City against more significant COVID-19 impacts on sales
taxes and hotel taxes experienced by other, larger cities.
Contract services provided by the County Sheriff’s Department, other public agencies,
and private contractors comprise about 45 percent of operating expenditures.110 Several City
departments and professional services are contract employees including the City Attorney,
Treasurer, Engineer, Building Official and Inspector, and Emergency Services Coordinator.
Balanced Budget
All agencies in California are required to adopt balanced budgets. Annual budgets should
show revenues at least equal to expenditures without relying on reserves. Unbalanced
budgets will deplete reserves and may contribute to deferred maintenance and reduced
services. Revenues in excess of expenditures can help to fund reserves, capital
improvements, and increases in service levels.
The City’s financial statements show total governmental revenues exceeding total
expenditures in FY16-17 by 18 percent, growing to a margin in FY18-19 of 29 percent,
increasing the City’s fund balances. The FY19-20 budget indicated a balanced budget with
minimal change in the General Fund balance, and included draw-downs of restricted fund
balances for specific purposes. The adopted FY20-21 budget projects a six percent increase
in property tax revenues, more than offsetting reduced Building and Safety revenues, a trend
continuing from before COVID-19. The FY20-21 also reflects a reduction in Building and
Safety expenditures due to reduced activity.
109 Fiscal Health of California Cities, https://www.auditor.ca.gov/bsa/cities_risk_index, downloaded 2/12/2020.
110 Correspondence with City of Hidden Hills staff, April 7, 2020.
CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS 101
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Fund Balances, Reserves and Liquidity
Fund balances, reserves and cash assets should include adequate funds for short-term
cash flow and liquidity, and provide funding for longer-term cost increases and capital needs.
The City’s total fund balances grew from FY16-17 through FY18-19 and totaled $10
million at the end of FY18-19. The FY18-19 total balance represents approximately 240
percent of total annual expenditures. The General Fund balance also grew over that period.
The General Fund contingency reserve in FY18-19 was approximately 100 percent, or 12
months, of General Fund expenditures; this qualifies as “low” risk (greater than 50 percent,
or 6 months) according to the State Auditor.
The contingency reserve is one component of total reserve allocations. The City’s
policies111 provide that balances be allocated to the following reserves in the FY19-20 budget.
1. General Fund Contingency – Established as 80 percent of anticipated expenditures;
for FY19-20 the reserve was $2,691,960.
2. Capital Improvement Program – May include allocations in excess of the amounts
required for the General Fund Contingency reserve; for FY19-20 the reserve was
$2,250,000.
3. Building Maintenance and Replacement/Upgrade – Determined annually based on
major maintenance, upgrades and replacement required by City Hall; for FY19-20 the
reserve was $500,000.
4. Underground Utility – funds dedicated to undergrounding overhead utility lines; for
FY19-20 the reserve was $2,788,972.
5. Unrestricted – Allocations intended for cash flow purposes and minor unanticipated
expenses; for FY20 the reserve was $672,990.
The FY20-21 budget continues to appropriate unexpended funds to the adopted reserve
categories consistent with its policies.112 Fund balances total approximately $10.6 million by
the end of FY20-21, a slight reduction compared to the end of FY19-20.
Liquidity represents the amount of cash currently available for short-term needs after
considering current liabilities (due within one year), and is typically measured as the ratio
of current assets to current liabilities; the ratio should be equal to or greater than 1.0,
indicating sufficient cash to meet current obligations. The City’s FY18-19 financial report
shows total cash and investments six times current obligations, including funds set-aside
into various reserves; contingency and unrestricted reserves compared to current liabilities
indicates a liquidity ratio of 1.9.
Net Position
An agency’s “Net Position” as reported in its CAFR represents the amount by which assets
(e.g., cash, capital assets, other assets) exceed liabilities (e.g., debts, unfunded pension and
111 City of Hidden Hills General Fund Reserve Policy, Resolution No. 942, June 24, 2019.
112 Resolution No. 959, June 22, 2020.
CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS 102
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
OPEB liabilities, other liabilities). A positive Net Position provides an indicator of financial
soundness over the long-term and ability to fund capital improvements. A negative Net
Position is an indicator of potential fiscal distress.
The City’s financial statements show positive total and unrestricted net positions.
According to a recent survey of financial statements for 482 California cities, Hidden Hills
ranked 11th highest in Unrestricted Net Position per resident.113
Rates and Charges
According to the City’s FY18-19 financial statements, Charges for Services totaled $1.1
million, or about 30 percent of General Fund revenues (26 percent of total governmental
revenues).
The City’s last review of fees and charges was in 2014 when fees and charges for land use
and development services were reviewed and adjusted.114 The City anticipates updating its
fees in the near future.115
Long-Term Debt
The City has no long-term debt (other than pension and OPEB liabilities noted below).
Pension and OPEB Liabilities
Unfunded pension and OPEB liabilities present one of the most serious fiscal challenges
facing many cities and districts. However, the City of Hidden Hills’ payroll is low relative to
its total budget, and total pension payments, including “normal” costs and unfunded
liabilities (UAL), represent approximately 2 percent of the City’s total governmental
revenues, which earns the City a “low” risk designation (below 6 percent).
Projected “normal” cost, excluding unfunded liabilities (UAL), remains at 7.7 percent to
8.0 percent of covered payroll for PEPRA and other employees through FY25-26,
respectively. CalPERS projections show a 50 percent increase in pension payments towards
unfunded accrued liabilities (UAL) from FY20-21 through FY25-26.116
113 California Sen. John M.W. Moorlach’s Financial Soundness Rankings for California’s 482 Cities, January 16, 2020
114 Resolution No. 877, November 10, 2014.
115 Correspondence with City of Hidden Hills staff, April 7, 2020.
116 Misc. Plan and PEPRA Misc. Plan of the City of Hidden Hills, CalPERS Annual Valuation Reports as of June 30, 2018,
published July 2019. PEPRA payments towards UAL are projected to be zero in FY25-26.
CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS 103
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
The City’s FY18-19 total unfunded liability represents 11 percent of total governmental
revenues which the State Auditor designates “low” risk (under 50 percent), down from 15
percent in FY16-17.117 The funded portion of the City’s plan is 82 percent of its total
obligation, which assigns the City a “low” risk designation (above 80 percent).
The City currently funds OPEB benefits on a pay-as-you-go basis. The City’s net OPEB
liability measured and reported as of the end of FY18-19 is $483,671.118
Capital Assets
Capital assets must be adequately maintained and replaced over time and expanded as
needed to accommodate future demand and respond to regulatory and technical changes.
The City’s net value of depreciable capital assets slightly exceeded 50 percent of total
capital asset value. After a slight decline in value in FY17-18 due to depreciation, net value
increased in FY18-19 as a result of the completion of city hall improvement projects.
The City’s budget includes an annual Capital Improvement Program showing the current
budget year expenditures by funding source. No future year projects or funding are shown
(other than remaining portion of current year projects).
Financial Planning and Reporting
Achieving transparency and public accountability standards dictates that cities provide
easily accessible and clear documentation of their activities, including financial information.
Financial Policies – The City’s budget includes policies for the establishment,
maintenance and use of various General Fund and CIP reserves. The City also adheres to an
adopted investment policy.
Website – The City’s website provides recent copies of budgets, financial statements and
supplemental reports, and salary information.
Annual Budget – The City produces an annual budget that provides a comprehensive
and detailed view of the budget, including comparisons to recent years. The budget
document includes a “Fiscal Health Report” with an explanation of trends and conclusions
regarding fiscal health.
In 2017, the City overhauled its financial review process by adding: 1) an annual
investment report to City Council; 2) a mid-year budget review; 3) a more expanded and
detailed budget; 4) placement of the annual finance report on City website; 5) a seven-factor
analysis of fiscal health was included in budget; 6) created a detailed reserve policy.119
Financial Forecasts – The City’s Fiscal Health Report identifies factors and trends that
require close monitoring. The FY20-21 budget includes a 10-year budget forecast.
117 Fiscal Health of California Cities, https://www.auditor.ca.gov/bsa/cities_risk_index, downloaded 2/12/2020. The State
Auditor’s results were based on FY16-17 financial documents.
118 GASB Statement No. 75 Supplemental Schedules for City of Hidden Hills.
119 City of Hidden Hills Response to Data Request, 1/28/2020.
CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS 104
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Annual Audited Financial Statements – The City’s financial statements are prepared in
a timely manner and provide a clear and comprehensive picture of city financials consistent
with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).
Capital Improvement Program – The City’s budget includes an annual Capital
Improvement Program but no future costs, funding or priorities.
Cost of Service/Rate Studies – The City’s last review of fees and charges was in 2014
when fees and charges for land use and development services were reviewed and adjusted.
CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS 105
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
HIDDEN HILLS MUNICIPAL SERVICES
The City of Hidden Hills offers municipal services through a combination of contract
services and directly by city staff. Additionally, the Hidden Hills Community Association is
responsible for certain services within the city limits. Figure 6-4 summarizes the manner in
which each municipal service is provided.
The City of Hidden Hills reports three full-time staff for FY19-20. These positions are the
City Manager, City Clerk, and an accounting specialist. The City Council is authorized to add
full-time or part-time employees as well as independent contractors, as needed
Figure 6-4: City of Hidden Hills Municipal Service Structure
Service Provider
City of Hidden Hills through contract with a
Land Use
private firm
Law Enforcement Los Angeles County Sheriff by contract
Los Angeles County Animal Care and
Animal Control
Control by contract
Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los
Fire Protection
Angeles County (CFPD)
Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los
Paramedic
Angeles County (CFPD)
McCormick Ambulance (per agreement
Ambulance with Los Angeles County Department of
Health Services)
Domestic Water Las Virgenes Municipal Water District
Recycled Water Las Virgenes Municipal Water District
Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District
maintains City-owned collection system,
Wastewater Collection
treated by Las Virgenes Municipal Water
District
Wastewater Treatment Las Virgenes Municipal Water District
Franchise agreement with Waste
Solid Waste Management, Inc. and services provided
through contract with a private firm
Hidden Hills Community Association
(inside its gates), City of Hidden Hills
Street Maintenance
outside the gates managed through
contract with a private firm
Landscape Maintenance Hidden Hills Community Association
CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS 106
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Service Provider
City of Hidden Hills through contract with a
Stormwater/Drainage
private firm
Flood Control Los Angeles County Flood Control District
Hidden Hills Community Association
Park Maintenance (inside its gates), City of Hidden Hills
outside the gates
Hidden Hills Community Association and
Recreation
City Community Services
Library City of Calabasas by contract
Los Angeles County West Vector Control
Mosquito/Vector Control
District
Legislative, Administration and General Services
City councilmembers are supported by the City Manager’s office, the City Clerk, and an
accounting specialist. Other administrative and general services are provided via contracts,
including the City Attorney and City Treasurer.
Other general services obtained from outside providers and general expenditures
include data processing/IT support, financial audits and financial services, liability and
property insurance, employee benefits, memberships, utilities, and newsletter publication.
The City has an agreement for the County to provide “miscellaneous and sundry services.”120
The City Manager also oversees maintenance services including janitorial, building
repairs/maintenance, and street cleaning.
The three full-time City employees include the City Manager, City Clerk, and Accounting
Specialist.
Public Safety
The City’s contract with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department and other public
safety expenditures represent approximately 24 percent of City FY19-20 General Fund
expenditures121 and provides for general law enforcement, traffic enforcement, an emergency
services coordinator, and animal control. The contract includes an additional charge
specifically allocated to liability insurance costs; in FY19-20 the liability charge was
approximately 11 percent of the contract amount.122 The City’s General Plan contains no
120 General Services Agreement between the City of Hidden Hills and the County of Los Angeles, June 1, 2017.
121 City of Hidden Hills Annual Budget Fiscal Year 2019-20, “Budget-in-a-Glance”, pg. 19 (public safety).
122 City of Hidden Hills Annual Budget Fiscal Year 2019-20, pg. 16.
CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS 107
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
policies for police officers per population. The City’s contract with the Sheriff calls for 1.76
deputy positions,123 which equals 0.94 deputies per 1,000 population.
The City reports calls for police service monthly and “year-to-date” in its monthly
newsletter. Calendar years (CY) 2018 and 2019 showed a total of 61 and 58 calls
respectively, primarily for trespassing.124
The City’s Public Safety budget funds a contract with LACACC for animal control and
animal sheltering costs plus collection of all licensing fees.125
Fire Protection
Fire protection services are provided by local Fire Station Number 68 (24130 Calabasas
Road) through Division 7 of the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County
(CFPD). Fire Station Number 68 provides suppression, rescue and fire prevention activities
on a daily basis to Hidden Hills residents and businesses. These activities include responding
to structural, mobile and natural vegetation fires, rescue and emergency medical calls,
special incidents and disaster response.126
The CFPD provides monthly reports to the City summarizing the number and types of
calls. For 2019, the Department responded to 137 calls; approximately 42 percent of the calls
were for medical emergencies, and 23 percent for services primarily related to snake
removal. There were two fire-related calls including one 6-acre brushfire. The other calls
were responses to issues and reports of “Good Intent” that did not require Department
action.127
ISO provides ratings on a scale of 1 to 10 (with 1 being the highest) to reflect the relative
responsiveness and effectiveness of fire service, water supply, and other essential resources
to suppress fire. As of 2017, Division 7 of CFPD has an ISO rating of 2 for the region it serves,
including the City of Hidden Hills.
Fire services are funded by CFPD property taxes. The City’s FY19-20 budget considers
funding supplemental firefighting services on high risk or Red Flag Warning days through
direct contracting with CFPD and/or private firefighting services.
Building and Safety
The City provides Building and Safety Services through a contract with a private firm.128
Staff provided by the contract include the City Engineer, City Building Official, and City
123 Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, Service Level Authorization, Hidden Hills, 2020-2021 (excludes 0.07 law
enforcement technician).
124 Hidden Hills Newsletter, February 2020.
125 City-County Municipal Services Agreement between the City of Hidden Hills and Los Angeles County Animal Care and
Control, eff. July 1, 2019 until June 30, 2024.
126 City of Hidden Hills Website, https://hiddenhillscity.org/city-departments/public-safety/los-angeles-county-fire-
department/
127 County of Los Angeles Fire Dept., Hidden Hills Monthly Activity Reports 2019.
128 Agreement Between the City of Hidden Hills and Charles Abbott Associates for Professional Services, Oct. 25, 2005.
CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS 108
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Building Inspector. Services include administration and planning for capital projects, public
information, plan check and building permit issuance, building inspection, and
NPDES/environmental activities.
In addition, as a gated community, growth is constrained by conditions, covenants, and
restrictions (CC&R’s) which were originally set in place by the original developers and are
now regulated by an elected board of directors of the Hidden Hills Community Association.
The Association is responsible for reviewing and approving construction on or modification
of any of the 648 home sites for aesthetic impacts only; the City of Hidden Hills reviews,
approves and inspects all construction within the City.
Public Works
The City Engineer, as noted above, is a position contracted from a private firm; the budget
for these services fall under the category of Building and Safety. The City Engineer also
oversees capital projects, landscape and street maintenance and improvements, City Hall
improvements, coordinates utility projects, and provides for traffic safety.
Street Maintenance
The City engages private contractors for road maintenance and street sweeping outside
the main gates to Hidden Hills. The City maintains about 1,500 lineal feet (65,000 sf) of
streets outside the gates.129 Service responsibilities include sidewalks, curb and gutters,
street signage, storm drains, and a shared responsibility for a traffic signal. The City also
owns parking lots outside the gates. The average Pavement Condition Index for streets
maintained by the City (outside the gates) is good to excellent (75-100 PCI). The Hidden Hills
Hidden Hills Community Association maintains roads within the gated area of the
community.
Stormwater and Flood Control
Flood control, stormwater, and water quality services are related municipal services that
are provided via a multifaceted approach within and surrounding the City. Certain local
drains are maintained by the HHCA and the City (under contract to a private firm).
The majority of the City is in the Los Angeles River Watershed. The Los Angeles County
Flood Control District (LACFCD) manages and maintains all concrete structures and major
flood control facilities. Additionally, LACFCD provides maintenance of City-owned lateral
lines and catch basins under a contract service arrangement with the cities. In addition to
City storm drain maintenenance, the County of Los Angeles maintains certain storm drains
and cleans catch basins under contract to the City. City Public Works capital projects include
retrofit of storm drainage catch basin screens and inserts.
Concerns regarding water quality of stormwater runoff having adverse impacts on area
watersheds led to requirements for municipalities to meet municipal separate storm sewer
systems (MS4) water quality NPDES permit conditions and develop stormwater
management programs (SWMPs). The SWMP describes the stormwater control practices
129 Correspondence with Dirk Lovett, City Engineer, May 19, 2020.
CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS 109
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
that will be implemented consistent with permit requirements to minimize the discharge of
pollutants from the sewer system. Stormwater runoff flows into the Malibu Creek
Watershed, which drains an area of approximately 109 square miles, including the entirety
of the MSR study area. Area cities coordinate MS4 permit (Los Angeles County MS4 Permit
Order No. R4-2012-0175) compliance efforts through the Malibu Creek Watershed
Management Group (MCWMG). The efforts of the group are regulated by the Los Angeles
RWQCB, and mandated outcomes are outlined in the permit order. The group plans to meet
final compliance with the permit order requirements by 2023.
Other Maintenance
City maintains the City Hall property and parking lot, Round Meadow School Parking lot,
and the Round Meadow/Mureau corner landscaping.
The Hidden Hills Community Association is responsible for maintaining all of the
common areas within the gates, which include six miles of roads, three guard houses, 25
miles of bridle trails, three community riding arenas, four tennis courts, a competition-size
pool, recreation center, and a 99-seat performing arts/movie theater.
Community Services
The City’s Community Services manage special events such as its annual Fiesta. The City’s
library services, provided in conjunction with the City of Calabasas, also fall within this
category.
Transit
The City does not provide transit services. The City generally sells its allocation of Prop.
A Countywide ½ cent sales tax for transit, to another jurisdiction; those funds cannot be used
for transit stops on HHCA roads.130
Library
Library services are provided through contracted services.
The Library is run by agreement with the City of Calabasas. This allows for Hidden Hills
residents to utilize the Calabasas Library. To fund this service, the City of Hidden Hills shares
with Calabasas the portion of Hidden Hills’ property tax revenue intended for public
libraries.
The City has entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the City of
Calabasas and the Las Virgenes Unified School District for library services.131 Under the MOU,
Calabasas provides library services to the residents of Hidden Hills in the same manner as it
provides to its own residents. A portion of the Hidden Hills funding provides funds for digital
130 City of Hidden Hills Annual Budget Fiscal Year 2019-20, Special Revenues and Restricted Funds, pg. 29.
131 Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Hidden Hills, City of Calabasas and the Las Virgenes Unified School
District for the Provision of Library Services, July 1, 2018 through 2023.
CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS 110
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
books and materials to supplement its digital collection used by students and teachers; the
School District includes students residing in Hidden Hills.
In 2012, the City of Hidden Hills withdrew from the County of Los Angeles Free Library
System and assumed responsibility for providing public library services to its residents. The
City now receives a share of property taxes that would have otherwise gone to the County
for library services. The City provides its entire share of these library property taxes to
Calabasas and does not utilize any General Fund money.
Water
Las Virgenes Municipal Water District (LVMWD) provides potable water (as well as
wastewater treatment, recycled water and biosolids composting) to residents in the cities
of Agoura Hills, Calabasas, Hidden Hills, Westlake Village, and unincorporated areas of
western Los Angeles County.
All of the District’s water supplies must be imported from Northern California through
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD), the primary water wholesaler in
the region. Originating in the High Sierras, water is transported more than 400 miles through
the State Water Project’s California Aqueduct entering the LVMWD service area at the east
end of Calabasas. Water is then distributed throughout the District.
The most recent Consumer Confidence Report for LVMWD is for 2018. In that year, the
District did not exceed limits for any contaminants, meaning it was 100 percent compliant
with drinking water quality standards.132 By comparison, the industry standard for
compliance with NPDWRs is 99 percent (361 days) of the year.
Wastewater
The City of Hidden Hills owns the wastewater collection system serving the City.
Approximately 42 homes use septic systems for wastewater disposal, although the number
may vary slightly due to the possibility that some homes may have converted to sewer
without permits from the City or LVMWD.133
The Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District, contracted by the City, maintains the
wastewater collection system and handles any overflows. The District is managed by the
SMD and provides sewage collection services to over 2 million customers in unincorporated
County areas, 37 member cities, and 2 contracted cities.134
The City of Hidden Hills’ collection system consists of 15.3 miles of mains and two pump
stations. No significant infrastructure needs were identified by the City with regard to the
collection system.
All wastewater agencies are required to report sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) to
SWRCB. Sewer overflows are discharges from sewer pipes, pumps and manholes. Overflows
132 Las Virgenes Municpal Water District, Consumer Confidence Report, 2018
133 Correspondence with City Engineer, 6/11/20.
134 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/smd/SMD/12thEdAnnualNewsletterCSMD.pdf, downloaded 5/21/2025.
CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS 111
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
reflect the capacity and condition of collection system piping and the effectiveness of routine
maintenance. The sewer overflow rate is calculated as the number of overflows per 100
miles of collection piping per year. Over the last three years (2017-2020) there were three
SSO events in the City’s system. Averaged over the three-year period, the City’s SSO rate was
about 5.6 spills per 100 miles of mains. By comparison, other wastewater agencies in
California average 4.73 SSOs per 100 miles per year.
The Las Virgenes Municipal Water District provides wastewater treatment services to
the residents of Agoura Hills, Calabasas, Hidden Hills, Westlake Village and unincorporated
areas of Los Angeles County. The wastewater flows to the Tapia Water Reclamation Facility
(Tapia) through sewer pipes where it is treated to high-quality recycled water for use on golf
courses, parklands, highway landscapes and common areas.
Located just south of Malibu Creek State Park, the wastewater treatment facility operates
under a permit issued by the RWQCB or “Water Board”, a State agency.135 Tapia is owned and
operated by the Las Virgenes - Triunfo JPA that was established between Las Virgenes and
Triunfo Water and Sanitation Districts to treat wastewater within the Malibu Creek
watershed.
Between January 1, 2017 and June 1, 2020, LVMWD was issued 54 violations at the Tapia
Water Reclamation Facility. Of the violations, 12 were for late or deficient reporting and 42
were for effluent violations. None of the violations were considered priority violations.
135https://www.lvmwd.com/about-us/joint-powers-authority/wastewater-services/recycled-water/sprayfields
downloaded 5/21/2025.
CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS 112
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS MSR DETERMINATIONS
Growth and Population Projections
v Population has grown at a minimal rate, less than one percent over the past decade;
growth is projected to continue at a similar slow rate into the future.
v 17 new homes were constructed over the past five years; if this rate continued, the
remaining 23 vacant lots could be built-out in the next five to ten years, depending on
economic conditions which could extent the period of buildout.
The Location and Characteristics of Disadvantaged
Unincorporated Communities Within or Contiguous to the
Agency’s SOI
v No disadvantaged unincorporated communities exist within or adjacent to the City’s
SOI.
Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities and
Adequacy of Public Services, Including Infrastructure
Needs and Deficiencies
v No current or projected service or infrastructure deficiencies or needs were
identified within the current City boundary.
v The City receives monthly reports from some of its service providers, including the
County Sheriff’s Department and the CFPD, but should obtain regular reports from all
contract service providers, particularly city-owned infrastructure such as the sewer
collection system. All contracts should be reviewed at least annually.
v Annexation of territory within the City’s current SOI would require expansion of
current service contracts, particularly since the annexed area would not be served by
the Hidden Hills Community Association that provides certain services within the
majority of current City boundaries.
v The City should prepare a comprehensive update to its GP and include all areas within
its SOI as amended in response to this MSR. This planning will help to determine
infrastructure, service needs and expansion of City services, and funding
requirements from future annexation areas.
Financial Ability of Agencies to Provide Services
v The City has the financial ability to provide services. The City is at “low risk” of
financial distress, maintains adequate reserves, has no significant long-term
obligations, and current and projected pension obligations are not a significant risk
to the City’s budget.
CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS 113
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
v Annexation of territory within the City’s current SOI would increase funding
requirements since the territory would not be served by the Hidden Hills Community
Association.
Status of, and Opportunities for, Shared Facilities
v The City continues to fund and share Calabasas library facilities and services.
v The City shares facilities through its contract services providers, in particular public
safety providers that make use of regional facilities to service multiple cities and
unincorporated areas. The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department operates from
its Lost Hills Station which serves five cities and unincorporated communities in the
region. The City also maintains contracts with Los Angeles County Public Works,
Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District, and Waste Management, Inc., which are
offered out of each agency’s facilities.
v Access to the majority of City territory and facilities is restricted at its gated entrance,
and many of the recreational facilities are provided by the Hidden Hills Community
Association for use by its members.
v No other opportunities for shared facilities were identified.
Accountability for Community Service Needs, Including
Governmental Structure and Operational Efficiencies
v The City complies with legal requirements governing public meetings, meeting
notices and records, and website content.
v The City also communicates with residents by live streaming its City Council
meetings, newsletter mailings, and website postings. Departmental activities are
reported on a monthly and annual basis.
v Financial reports are prepared in a timely manner, and include an annual “Fiscal
Health Report” indicating financial condition. The City plans for future financial
conditions by preparing a ten-year budget forecast. The City’s Capital Improvement
Program identifies current needs but does not project longer-term priorities, costs
and funding.
v The City’s GP is dated (with the exception of its Housing Element) and requires a
comprehensive update to define the City’s plans for any future development and
growth within its boundaries and SOI.
v No governance options were identified.
Other
v The City should immediately commence the update of its General Plan.
CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS 114
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE
Existing Sphere of Influence
The City’s boundary and SOI are depicted in Figure 6-1. LAFCO adopted an expansive
sphere of influence (SOI) for the City of Hidden Hills that includes unincorporated territory
to the west and to the south of the city limits. The SOI encompasses 1,823 acres (2.85 square
miles) compared to a city boundary of 1,080 acres (1.68 square miles) of land area.
The SOI includes the territory lying between the city limits and the Ventura Freeway
(Highway 101) to the south, and the territory between the city limits and Mountain View
Drive to the east. The eastern SOI boundary splits the community of Mountain View Estates.
Sphere of Influence Analysis
Hidden Hills has retained its expansive SOI for several decades but never planned for its
eventual use and eventual annexation into the City. In addition, the current western SOI
boundary bisects the gated community of Mountain View Estates, which would be an illogical
City boundary if the area were to be annexed. Planning for eventual land uses within an SOI
is considered a “best practice” and indicate intention for future annexation. This pre-
planning also facilitates analysis of the City’s ability to serve the area following annexation.
The removal of Craftsman’s Corner from the SOI is consistent with an agreement between
the Cities of Hidden Hills and Calabasas for the annexation of Craftsman’s Corner by
Calabasas.
The City has indicated the possibility of ultimately annexing and allowing development
of Area C, and Area A and B, but have not initiated analysis and planning to-date. The City
states that it intends to initiate its GP update process in conjunction with SOI and annexation
actions for Areas D, E, and F (if not sooner), and is prepared to initiate the planning process
to include Areas A, B, and C as part of that General Plan update as well as review any potential
expansion of its Sphere of Influence.136
The City indicates that the expansion of the City's sphere west of Area A would be a
“natural complement” to the City's current municipal boundaries and would eliminate the
bisection of Mountain View Estates. The City emphasizes the importance of retaining and
managing the large amount of open space in that area to protect the City against wildfire
threats. The City is also concerned about limiting new development that would worsen traffic
impacts and emergency response on roads accessing the City.137
LAFCO may choose to allow a period of time for the City to decide upon its direction and
plan for those areas and the implications of annexation before expanding the SOI or
eliminating those areas from its SOI.
136 City of Hidden Hills Memo to PCA re: City of Hidden Hills Municipal Service Review and Sphere of Influence Update,
August 13, 2020.
137 Ibid, City of Hidden Hills Memo, August 13, 2020.
CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS 115
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Sphere of Influence Determinations
Present and planned land uses, including agricultural and open-space lands
v The current land uses within City boundaries are largely single-family residential and
the City is nearly built-out.
v Areas outside City boundaries but within its SOI include open space and single-family
residential development to the west and south, and commercial development to the
southeast.
v The City’s GP does not identify planned development in its SOI outside City
boundaries.
Present and probable need for public facilities and services
v No current or projected service or infrastructure needs were identified within the
City’s current boundary.
v Annexation of territory within the City’s current SOI would require expansion of
current service contracts to provide a similar level of service to currently
unincorporated areas.
Present capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public services that the agency
provides or is authorized to provide
v No current or projected service or infrastructure needs were identified.
v Annexation of territory within the City’s current SOI would require expansion of
current service contracts, particularly since the annexed area would not be served by
the Hidden Hills Community Association that provides certain services within the
majority of the current City boundaries.
Existence of any social or economic communities of interest
v Hidden Hills is largely a gated community and homeowners association
v Expansion of City boundaries would create two distinct communities of interest and
in the case of Area A, would split the community of Mountain View Estates unless the
City’s SOI is amended consistent with the options described in this MSR.
Present and probable need for water, wastewater, and structural fire protection facilities
and service of any disadvantaged unincorporated communities within the existing SOI
v No disadvantaged unincorporated communities exist within or contiguous to the
City’s SOI.
Sphere of Influence Recommendations
This MSR recommends the removal of Craftsman’s Corner Area D and reduction of the
western SOI boundary by removing Area A (which currently splits the Mountain View
Estates gated community).
CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS 116
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Area B and Area C should remain within the SOI contingent on an update of the City’s GP
which includes land use planning for those areas and for any further expansion westward as
currently proposed by the City. LAFCO should establish a fixed period of time within which
the City must initiate the planning process to include Area B and Area C and any additional
westward expansion; if planning is not underway by the end of a date established by LAFCO,
LAFCO should then remove Area B and Area C from the SOI.
The current illogical SOI boundary, which splits Mountain View Estates and includes no
planning designations outside the City boundaries, should be resolved by implementing the
recommendations of this MSR.
CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS 117
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
7. CI TY O F WESTL A KE V I L L AGE
CITY OVERVIEW
Westlake Village was developed as a master-planned community in 1963. The
community is transected by the Los Angeles and the Ventura County lines. The portion in Los
Angeles was incorporated as the City of Westlake Village in 1981. The portion in Ventura
County was annexed to the City of Thousand Oaks in parts in 1968 and 1972.138
Westlake Village’s population of 8,212 is represented by its elected city council.139 The
City Council directs is City Manager and staff of 14; most public services are provided by
contract with private companies and with other public agencies.
The City’s municipal boundary covers 3,521 acres (5.5 square miles)140 and coincides with
its SOI boundary; the City is bordered by other cities except to the southwest and southeast,
which is County unincorporated open space.
Boundaries
The City is the County of Los Angeles portion of a master-planned community that
straddles the Ventura-Los Angeles County border. The City of Westlake Village constitutes
3,521 acres (5.5 square miles).141
Sphere of Influence
The City’s sphere of influence (SOI) coincides with its incorporated boundary. The City
does not anticipate any development in unincorporated areas bordering its boundaries,142
and has no plans to modify its city boundaries or its SOI. The City’s boundary and SOI are
depicted in Figure 7-1.
138 See City of Westlake Village website for additional history of the community https://www.wlv.org/116/City-History
139 As of January 1, 2020, as estimated by the California Department of Finance.
140 Area estimates from LAFCO GIS, 6/4/2020.
141 Area estimates from LAFCO GIS, 6/4/2020.
142 Correspondence with City of Westlake Village, May 14, 2020.
CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE 118
CO
Incorporated
December
11,
1981
WESTLAKE
VILLAGE
RESERVOIR VIRGENES
LAS
LAKE
WESTLAKE
AGOURA
HILLS
County Ventura
LINDERO
LAKE
µ
Revised:
December
3,
2012
C:\GIS\MXDs\Cities\Westlake
Village
Coterminous
Miles
Reconfirmed
10-10-12
Sphere
of
Influence
(SOI),
Reconfirmed
08-25-04
0
0.375
0.75
1.5
Established
11-14-84
City
of
Westlake
Village
Action
Effective
Date
1
in
=
0.5
miles
Sphere
of
Influence
History
City
of
Westlake
Village
Westlake
Village
Sphere
of
Influence
Legend
./
101 US
P
V
orerto
C
yella
keer
Triunfo
Canyon
TRIUNFO
CREEK
PARK
Figure
7-1
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
ACCOUNTABILITY AND GOVERNANCE
The City of Westlake Village is governed by a five-member City Council that is elected by
residents to serve staggered four-year terms. Each year, City Councilmembers select the
mayor to serve a one-year term. Compensation for each City Councilmember is a maximum
stipend of $300 per month or an annual salary of $3,600.
Complaints are accepted by letter, phone, or through the City Care System on their
website. As part of this process, residents receive acknowledgment that their complaint was
received, an investigation into the matter, and follow up regarding the status of the result.
City Council meetings occur twice monthly on the second and fourth Wednesday of each
month. Council meetings are open to the public and take place at 6:30pm in the Council
Chambers at City Hall under normal circumstances; however, due to the COVID-19 pandemic
and declared State of Emergency by the State of California, the City has transitioned to
entirely virtual meetings held on the Zoom teleconferencing system at the same time as the
regularly scheduled meetings. The meetings are streamed live and available on demand on
the City’s website. Council meetings are also televised live on Channel 10 for Time Warner
Spectrum subscribers.
The meeting schedule can be found on the City’s website along with the agenda and
minutes which are also available at the City Clerk’s office. The City provides a direct link to
its agenda on the website thereby complying with agenda posting requirements of AB
2257.143
The City updates constituents through a newsletter for residents, a video newsletter, and
press releases posted on the City’s website. The City produces an Annual Report that
provides a clear and accessible overview of the City, its organization, budget and
accomplishments during the year, and contact information.144
The City has demonstrated accountability and transparency in its disclosure of
information and cooperation with LA LAFCO. The City responded to the questionnaires and
cooperated with document requests.
PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
While public sector management standards vary depending on the size and scope of the
organization, there are minimum standards and best practices that should be followed by all
agencies. Well-managed organizations evaluate employees annually, track employee and
agency productivity, periodically review agency performance, prepare a budget before the
beginning of the fiscal year, conduct periodic financial audits to safeguard the public trust,
maintain current financial records, and plan for future service and capital needs.
143 Assembly Bill 2257 (Government Code Section 54954.2) update the Brown Act in 2016 with requirements governing the
location, platform, and methods by which an agenda must be accessible on the agency’s website.
144 City of Westlake Village Annual Report 2019.
CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE 120
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Staffing and Organizational Structure
The City of Westlake Village delivers municipal services through a combination of staff,
contracts with other agencies, and private contractors. For FY19-20, the City’s budget
reports 13 full-time positions and two part-time staff.145 Operational departments within the
City include: the City Council, the City Manager, the City Attorney, the City Treasurer,
Finance, Planning, Administration, Engineering and Public Works, and Public Safety, and
Parks and Recreation.
Services provided by contract include law enforcement, library, and animal control.
The elected, five-member City Council is responsible for developing policies
implemented by the City Manager and City departments. The Council also appoints members
to advisory commissions, boards, and committees, and represents the City in regional and
statewide associations and organizations.
The City Manager is appointed by the City Council to implement their policies and
oversee the general management and administration of the City’s operations.
The City Attorney contracts with the law firm of Richards, Watson and Gershon to advise
the City on any legal matters.
The City Treasurer is appointed by the City Council. The City Treasurer is responsible for
the investments of the City and works in conjunction with the City Manager as well as the
Finance Department.
The Finance Department includes the Administrative Services Director and an
Accountant. The City currently does not have a Finance Director to oversee Citywide
financial operations and prepare the annual budget and CAFR. The City Treasurer supervises
the City treasury and investment of funds.
The Planning Department administers the City’s GP and ensures compliance with the
Municipal Code. This Department supports all land use, planning, and development within
the City as well as the City’s recycling program. This department includes the Division of
Building and Safety whose services are contracted through Los Angeles County to enforce
codes and local and State requirements.
The Department of Administration includes several positions including that of the City
Clerk, the Assistant City Manager, and the Administrative Services Director along with other
administrative positions. The Department of Administration and the Planning Department
share the Deputy City Manager position. The City Clerk handles the municipality’s vital
records and official documents such as City Council agendas and minutes. Additionally, the
Community Services Manager, listed as Parks and Recreation on the City’s website, supports
cultural and recreational programs offered by the City to its residents as well as special
community events. This department is also responsible for ongoing maintenance of the City’s
seven parks.
145 City of Westlake Village, City of Westlake Village Adopted Two-Year Budget 2019-20 & 2020-21,
https://www.wlv.org/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/3473, p. 102.
CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE 121
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
The Department of Engineering and Public Works coordinates services between the City
Engineer (contract with Willdan Engineering) and Public Works and through a contract
with the County of Los Angeles Road Department. This department maintains the City’s
streets, bridges, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks; maintenance within the public right-of-way.
Furthermore, this department works in agreement with private contractors for street
sweeping and traffic engineering services.
The Department of Public Safety provides general law enforcement, traffic law
enforcement, investigations, community relations, and neighborhood watch programs
through a contract with Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department. This agreement also
allows for a drug education program in cooperation with Las Virgenes Unified School
District. Public Safety also contracts with LACACC and works in agreement with CFPD for fire
protection services.
The municipal services provided by these departments are described in further detail in
the Municipal Services section of this chapter.
Management Practices
Review of Employees and City Performance
The City Manager possesses appointing authority for all positions, officers, and
employees. Each of these officers and staff are considered at-will employees in service of the
City.
To determine the performance abilities of staff, evaluations are administered to
employees by their direct supervisor. In the first year of employment, these reviews take
place at 6 months and 1 year of service. After the first year, reviews are conducted annually.
The City also provides ongoing job-related training and continuing education through the
opportunity to attend relevant meetings, seminars, and workshops.
Agency-wide performance is evaluated based on the City’s Annual Report. Every January,
the City Council adopts departmental goals it would like to accomplish. The progress
towards these goals is assessed quarterly. The employees receive ratings for their annual
performance reviews based on their efforts to meet these objectives.
Review of Departmental Performance
To better understand the overall adequacy of services provided by the City, individual
departments are responsible for capturing historical data to evaluate their performance and
workload using a variety of metrics. The most recent Annual Report used to gauge the
accomplishments and goals of the City is from FY17-18. The City indicates that there are
written departmental status reports presented to the City Council each month. These reports
are intended to continually track the status and progress of all major City functions and
projects.
In its Annual Report, the City identifies accomplishments achieved during the prior year
related to Administration, Development Services, Public Works, Parks and Recreation, and
Public Safety.
CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE 122
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Planning Practices
The City’s central planning document is its General Plan (GP). The current plan was
updated and adopted on January 9, 2019 with a planning horizon of 2029. This plan outlines
seven elements required by state law which include housing, land use, open space, noise,
circulation, safety, and conservation. The GP has a planning area that covers territory within
the City limits. In conjunction with the GP, there is also a certified environmental impact
review (EIR). Supplementing the GP, the City has adopted a Strategic Plan. The current Plan
revises the 2015 Strategic Plan and is intended to offer specific, timely guidance about
residents needs based on trends, core values, and quality of life.
The City adopted the North Business Park Specific Plan that proposes framework for
redevelopment of the City’s aging business park.
The City’s financial planning practices are discussed in the “Financial Ability to Provide
Services” section of this chapter.
GROWTH AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS
Land Use
The City of Westlake Village is a master planned community with a wide range of housing
types, industrial centers in business park settings, a golf course, and greenbelts. Westlake
Lake is situated in the center of town and straddles the Los Angeles-Ventura County line with
the southeastern portion in the City of Westlake Village and the remaining northwestern half
of the lake within the City of Thousand Oaks.146
The City consists of approximately 46.6 percent developed land, 43.4 percent
undeveloped land and permanent open space, and the remaining land is public right-of-way.
The areas of the City developed with residential, office, light industrial, and commercial uses
are likely to remain stable over the long-term; however, some areas are potentially subject
to change and/or intensification of land use. The undeveloped areas of the City consist
primarily of permanent open space areas (43.2 percent) and vacant lands (0.2 percent) for
infill development. A tabulation of existing land uses by acres is presented in Figure 7-2:
Figure 7-2: City of Westlake Village Existing Land Use (2019)
Land Use Current Acres % of Total
Commercial 154.54 4.3%
Lake/Reservoir 325.64 9.1%
Light Industrial 91.04 2.5%
Office 105.83 2.9%
Open Space 1,554.61 43.2%
Public and Quasi-public 109.81 3.1%
Residential 873.46 24.3%
Right-of-Way 381.96 10.6%
Total 3,596.89 100%
Source: City of Westlake Village, General Plan Update, 2019, p. I-3.
146 City of Westlake Village, General Plan Update, 2019. (City of Westlake Village, 2019)
CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE 123
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Population
As of January 1, 2020, the California Department of Finance estimates a City of Westlake
Village population of 8,212. The City is near build-out and growth has been minimal in recent
years as shown in Figure 7-3. Since 2010, the City population of 8,270 declined slightly to
8,212 in 2020. During that period, the City reached a peak of 8,479 residents in 2015, and
has experienced a slow decline in population since.
Figure 7-3: City of Westlake Village Population (2010-2020)
9,000
8,000
7,000
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
There is little potential for growth within the City’s existing boundaries. The Southern
California Association of Governments’ (SCAG) most recent population projections from
2016 anticipated that the City would reach a population of 8,400 in 2020 and grow to 8,800
by 2040, which equates to an average annual growth rate of 0.2 percent over the 20-year
period and an increase of 400 residents. However, current development plans for the North
Business Park Specific Plan area propose up to 607 residential units which would add 1,350
new residents147 and the proposed Cedarvalley senior housing project would add 126 units.
Those new units would increase the City’s population to equal or exceed the SCAG 2040
forecasts.
Planned and Proposed Development
Over the past five years, four permits have been issued for new homes that have been
completed.
As noted in the “Population” section above, there are plans for development of the North
Business Park Specific Plan area, a mixed-use redevelopment proposed to revitalize the
Westlake Village Business Park. The Specific Plan, covering approximately 200 acres, plans
up to 607 dwelling units, and over 1.6 million square feet of office, retail, and other service
147 Correspondence with City of Westlake Village, 3/4/2020. Population estimate assume 2.25 persons/unit per North
Business Park Specific Plan, Public Review Draft, March 2019.
CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE 124
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
and school-related uses.148 Currently the City is preparing environmental documentation for
a proposed 126-unit Cedarvalley Senior Housing Project within the North Business Park
Specific Plan area.149
At present, there are no plans for development adjacent to the City’s boundaries
requiring annexation.
Growth Strategies and Constraints
The City’s primary planning document is the General Plan (GP), which was adopted in
2019. In addition to updating the GP to incorporate updated information and planning
documents and address State planning requirements, a primary goal of the updated GP is to
“define policies and programs which promote the conservation and revitalization of existing
uses, guide new development, and focus resource management activities in a manner which
reflects community needs and objectives.”
The Westlake Village GP covers the area within the city limits. The City determined that
no other area outside of the city limits bears a relation to the City's planning efforts.150
In total, over 99 percent of the City's total land area is presently developed, public lands,
or committed to preservation as open space, with limited opportunity for new development
on vacant parcels. The only property that is currently undeveloped and subject to change is
the 6.5-acre property on Lakeview Canyon Road, formerly occupied by the Westlake
Hospital. Therefore, a majority of future growth within the City will likely be limited to
intensification of land use densities. The City has identified future opportunities within
aging, functionally obsolete business park areas, for the introduction of mixed-use
development including residential and non-residential uses.
Sphere of Influence
The City’s existing SOI is coterminous with the City limits. The City is abutted on two
sides by the incorporated territory of the cities of Thousand Oaks and Agoura Hills, which
precludes growth in these areas. There is unincorporated territory to the south and
southwest of the City; however, those areas adjacent to City boundaries are substantially
separated from developed City areas by open space areas with no direct connection through
City territory. Additionally, most adjacent unincorporated territory is publicly owned and
lies within the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area.
The City has indicated that given the lack of anticipated development in the
unincorporated areas bordering its boundaries, it does not plan to propose changes to its
boundaries or SOI at this time.
148 North Business Park Specific Plan, City of Westlake Village – SP No. 2, Public Review Draft, March 2019.
149 Memo from City Manager, December 10, 2019 re: Agenda Item New Business No. 1.
150 City of Westlake Village, General Plan Update, 2019, p. 3.
CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE 125
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
DISADVANTAGED UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITIES
No Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities exist within or adjacent to the City’s
boundary or SOI.
FINANCIAL ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICES
The California State Auditor’s Office ranked the City of Westlake Village as being at “low
risk” of fiscal distress (based on FY16-17 financial statements), and ranked 361 out of 471
California cities (“1” being at greatest risk of fiscal distress) earning 83.0 points out of 100.151
The City’s FY19-20 budget included a “Fiscal Health Report” that indicated that “the City’s
fiscal health remains strong…[due to the] addition of several new operating programs and
services this FY as well as cost increases in law enforcement and park maintenance.”152 The
cost increases are offset by budget surpluses.
The City of Westlake Village’s budget is composed of a mix of revenues generated from
commercial and residential uses. Sales taxes and transient occupancy tax, attributable to
commercial uses, account for approximately 60 percent of FY19-20 General Fund tax
revenues in addition to property and other taxes.153 COVID-19 reduced the City’s FY19-20
General Fund revenues by about 20 percent, primarily due to lower sales taxes and transient
occupancy taxes.
The City’s Landscape and Lighting Maintenance District generated approximately
$275,000 in FY20 to fund landscape services in assessed zones.
Contract services provided by the County Sheriff’s Department, other agencies, and
private contractors comprise about 35 percent of FY19-20 General Fund expenditures.
Balanced Budget
All agencies in California are required to adopt balanced budgets. Annual budgets should
show revenues at least equal to expenditures without relying on reserves. Unbalanced
budgets will deplete reserves and may contribute to deferred maintenance and reduced
services. Revenues in excess of expenditures can help to fund reserves, capital
improvements, and increases in service levels.
The City’s financial statements show total governmental revenues slightly below total
governmental expenditures for FY16-17 through FY18-19; the total governmental fund
balances declined over the period as a result, however, total fund balances represent more
than 100 percent of annual governmental expenditures, which indicates a strong position.
Revenue reductions in FY19-20 and projected reductions in FY20-21 resulted in budget
shortfalls; to achieve a balanced budget, the City transferred funds from its Capital
151 Fiscal Health of California Cities, https://www.auditor.ca.gov/bsa/cities_risk_index, downloaded 2/12/2020.
152 City of Westlake Village Adopted Two-Year Budget 2019-20 & 2020-21, pg. 134.
153 City of Westlake Village Adopted Two-Year Budget 2019-20 & 2020-21, Exh. 4, pg. 18.
CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE 126
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Improvement Program Reserves.154 The City is striving to maintain its current service levels,
which requires increases in its Sheriff contract costs, by utilizing its reserves.
Fund Balances, Reserves and Liquidity
Fund balances, reserves and cash assets should include adequate funds for short-term
cash flow and liquidity, and provide funding for longer-term cost increases and capital needs.
At the end of FY18-19, total Governmental Fund balances totaled 105 percent compared
to FY19 Governmental Fund expenditures.
At the end of FY18-19 the General Fund’s unassigned fund balance was approximately 71
percent, or 9 months, of General Fund expenditures; this qualifies as “low” risk (greater than
50 percent, or 6 months) according to the State Auditor.
The City’s financial reserve policy establishes reserves necessary to meet essential
service and funding requirements during periods of “economic downturn, unforeseen
natural disasters, reductions in revenue through actions by the State and/or Federal
governments, other unexpected circumstances such as litigation arising from lawsuits, and
cash flow constraints and working capital needs.”155 The City’s FY19-20 budget anticipates an
uncommitted reserve of $6.7 million,156 or about 50 percent of General Fund expenditures.
In its FY20-21 budget, the City is maintaining its General Fund reserves at 50 percent of
expenditures by transferring funds from its Capital Improvement Program reserves.
The City allocates funds to its capital reserves. Its CIP Fund policy states that CIP reserves
“will be calculated as a percentage amounting to between 20% and 30% of the City’s annual
operating budget”.157 The reserve is anticipated to be $1,790,605 as of June 30, 2020.158
Net Position
An agency’s “Net Position” as reported in its CAFR represents the amount by which assets
(e.g., cash, capital assets, other assets) exceed liabilities (e.g., debts, unfunded pension and
OPEB liabilities, other liabilities). A positive Net Position provides an indicator of financial
soundness over the long-term and ability to fund capital improvements. A negative Net
Position is an indicator of potential fiscal distress.
The City’s financial statements show positive total and unrestricted net positions.
According to a recent survey of financial statements for 482 California cities, Westlake
Village ranked 43rd highest in Unrestricted Net Position per resident.159
154 City of Westlake Village One-Year Budget 2020-21, June 24, 2020.
155 City of Westlake Village Adopted Two-Year Budget 2019-20 & 2020-21, pg. 122.
156 City of Westlake Village Adopted Two-Year Budget 2019-20 & 2020-21, pg. 23.
157 City of Westlake Village Adopted Two-Year Budget 2019-20 & 2020-21, pg. 130.
158 City of Westlake Village Adopted Two-Year Budget 2019-20 & 2020-21, pg. 3.
159 California Sen. John M.W. Moorlach’s Financial Soundness Rankings for California’s 482 Cities, January 16, 2020.
CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE 127
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Rates and Charges
According to the City’s FY18-19 financial statements, Charges for Services totaled
$260,800, or about 1.8 percent of General Fund revenues. In addition, the City’s CAFR reports
$1.3 million of charges for current services that primarily consist of Building and Safety fees,
as well as film permit fees, court fines, etc.160
The City’s last review of fees and charges was in 2017 when sports field usage fees were
reviewed; the City currently has no plans for other reviews of fees.161
Long-Term Debt
Excessive long-term debt incurs interest charges that consume financial resources that
could otherwise fund needed services and capital improvements.
Total debt liabilities (excluding pensions and OPEB) in FY19 equal approximately 77
percent of total governmental revenues, which qualifies as a “moderate” level of risk (40 to
100 percent), improved from a “high” risk level the prior year. Annual debt service equals
about five percent of total governmental revenues and has been declining. Long-term
liabilities includes Certificates of Participation issued in 2015 for the purpose of refunding
prior debt and to pay for phased construction of improvements to Westlake Village
Community Park
The City received an S&P rating of “AA+” rating (financial capacity to meet debt
commitment is “very strong”)162 for its 2015 Certificates of Participation.163
Pension and OPEB Liabilities
Unfunded pension and OPEB liabilities present one of the most serious fiscal challenges
facing many cities and districts. However, the City of Westlake Village’s payroll is low
relative to its total budget, and total FY18-19 pension payments, including “normal” costs
and unfunded liabilities (UAL), represent approximately 1.9 percent of the City’s total
governmental revenues, which earns the City a “low” risk designation (below 6 percent).
Projected “normal” cost,164 excluding unfunded liabilities (UAL), remains at 7.7 percent to
14.7 percent of covered payroll for PEPRA and other employees through FY26, respectively;
CalPERS projections show a 50 percent increase in pension payments towards unfunded
accrued liabilities (UAL) from FY20-21 through FY25-26.165
160 Correspondence with City of Westlake Village, May 14, 2020.
161 Correspondence with City of Westlake Village, May 14, 2020.
162 Standard and Poor’s Ratings Definitions
163 Official Statement, City of Westlake Village Certificates of Participation, September 15, 2015.
164 The “Normal Cost” (NC) Rate represents the annual cost of service accrual for the upcoming fiscal year for active
employees. Normal cost is shown as a percentage of payroll and paid as part of the payroll reporting process. See:
https://www.calpers.ca.gov/page/employers/actuarial-services/employer-contributions/public-agency-contributions
165 Misc. Plan and PEPRA Misc. Plan of the City of Westlake Village, CalPERS Annual Valuation Reports as of June 30, 2018,
published July 2019, pg. 5.
CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE 128
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
The City’s FY17-18 total unfunded liability represents 10 percent of total governmental
revenues which the State Auditor designates “low” risk (under 50 percent), a decline from
15 percent in FY17-18.166 The funded portion of the City’s plan in FY17-18 is 76 percent of
its total obligation, which indicates the City is at “moderate” risk (70-80 percent).
The City’s FY19-20 budget includes a first-year “down payment” of $1 million to
accelerate the paydown of City pension plan’s Unfunded Accrued Liability, and pre-funding
(sixth-year) of the City’s OPEB unfunded liability for medical retiree obligations
($151,000).167
City’s net OPEB reported by its FY18-19 CAFR as of the end of FY17-18 is $616,101. The
City’s adopted FY19-20 budget shows a $151,000 pre-funding of its obligation into an OPEB
Trust.168
Capital Assets
Capital assets must be adequately maintained and replaced over time and expanded as
needed to accommodate future demand and respond to regulatory and technical changes.
The City’s net value of depreciable capital assets equaled 46 percent of total capital asset
value at the end of FY17-18 and FY18-19. After a 6 percent decline in value during FY16-17,
the net value increased slightly in subsequent years.
The City’s budget includes a Capital Improvement Program showing the current budget
year expenditures and funding sources; no future projections are shown.169
Financial Planning and Reporting
Achieving transparency and public accountability standards dictates that cities provide
easily accessible and clear documentation of their activities, including financial information.
Financial Policies – The City’s budget document includes financial policies establishing
financial reserves170 and a Capital Improvement Program Fund policy.171
Website – The City posts links to its budgets and CAFRs on a subpage of the City Manager
page of its website. No links to employee compensation information were found.
Annual Budget and CAFR/Financial Statements – The City prepares a two-year budget
with supporting information in appendices. A “Fiscal Health Report” is included in the budget
document and assesses the City’s financial health.
166 Fiscal Health of California Cities, https://www.auditor.ca.gov/bsa/cities_risk_index, downloaded 2/12/2020. The State
Auditor’s results were based on FY17 financial documents.
167 City of Westlake Village Preliminary Two-Year Budget 2019-20 & 2020-21, pg. 5-6.
168 City of Westlake Village Adopted Two-Year Budget 2019-20 & 2020-21, pg. 5.
169 City of Westlake Village Adopted Two-Year Budget 2019-20 & 2020-21, pg. 77.
170 City of Westlake Village Adopted Two-Year Budget 2019-20 & 2020-21, pg. 122.
171 City of Westlake Village Adopted Two-Year Budget 2019-20 & 2020-21, pg. 130.
CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE 129
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
The City’s FY18-19 CAFR was not prepared in a timely manner (within 6 months of the
end of the subject FY).172
Financial Forecasts – The City prepares ten-year financial forecasts for different
scenarios. The forecasts in its FY19-20 budget indicate General Fund surpluses available for
its CIP in each year through FY27-28.173
Capital Improvement Program – The City’s budget includes a Capital Improvement
Program showing the current budget year expenditures and funding sources; no future
projections are shown.
172 The CAFR for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2019 was not available until the March 11, 2020 City Council meeting, which
is more than six months after the end of the FY19 year.
173 City of Westlake Village Adopted Two-Year Budget 2019-20 & 2020-21, pg. 149.
CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE 130
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
WESTLAKE VILLAGE MUNICIPAL SERVICES
The City of Westlake Village offers municipal services through a combination of contract
services and directly by city staff. Figure 7-4 summarizes the manner in which each
municipal service is provided.
For FY19-20, the City reports 13 full-time positions and two that are part-time. The full-
time positions are those of City Manager, Assistant City Manager, Planning Director/Deputy
City Manager, Assistant to the City Manager, Associate Planner, City Clerk/Executive
Assistant, Administrative Analyst, Finance Director, Accountant, Community Services
Manager, Lead Public Services Inspector, Community Services Specialist, and an
Administrative Assistant. The two part-time positions include a Public Works Inspector and
a Community Preservation Officer.
Figure 7-4: City of Westlake Village Municipal Service Structure
Service Provider
Land Use City of Westlake Village
Law Enforcement Los Angeles County Sheriff by contract
Los Angeles County Animal Care and
Animal Control
Control by contract
Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los
Fire Protection
Angeles County (CFPD)
Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los
Paramedic
Angeles County (CFPD)
McCormick Ambulance (per agreement
Ambulance with Los Angeles County Department of
Health Services)
Domestic Water Las Virgenes Municipal Water District
Recycled Water Las Virgenes Municipal Water District
Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District
maintains City-owned collection system,
Wastewater Collection
treated by Las Virgenes Municipal Water
District
Wastewater Treatment Las Virgenes Municipal Water District
Franchise agreement with Waste
Solid Waste
Management, Inc.
County of Los Angeles (Los Angeles County
Street Maintenance
Public Works) by contract
City of Westlake Village through contract
Landscape Maintenance
with a private landscape firm
CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE 131
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Service Provider
Los Angeles County (Los Angeles County
Stormwater/Drainage
Public Works) by contract
Flood Control Los Angeles County Flood Control District
City of Westlake Village through contract
Park Maintenance
with a private landscape firm
Recreation City of Westlake Village
County of Los Angeles Public Library
Library
System by contract
Los Angeles County West Vector Control
Mosquito/Vector Control
District
Legislative, Administration and General Services
City councilmembers are supported by the City Manager’s office, City Clerk services and
finance operations, and a contract City Attorney. General services, managed by the City
Manager, include data processing, financial services, liability insurance, sales tax audit
services, memberships, equipment rentals, utilities, janitorial services, and newsletter
publication.
Police
The City’s contract with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department represents nearly
28 percent of City FY19-20 General Fund expenditures174 and provides for general law
enforcement, traffic enforcement, a community relations officer, and additional deputy time
directed to special needs. FY20 staffing levels have not changed since FY17-18 deployment
increases. The City’s General Plan contains no policies for police officers per population. As
stated in its General Plan, “The desired patrol car per population ratio varies from district to
district with no one ratio considered ideal.”175 The City proposes to contract with the Sheriff
for 10.2 deputy positions,176 which equals 1.24 deputies per 1,000 population.
The City receives monthly crime statistic reports from the Sheriff’s Department. In 2019
a total of 203 incidents were reported.177
The City’s Public Safety budget also funds a contract with LACACC for animal control and
animal sheltering costs plus collection of all licensing fees.
174 City of Westlake Village Adopted Two-Year Budget 2019-20 & 2020-21, pg. 21, 42 (law enforcement).
175 City of Westlake Village, General Plan Update, 2019.
176 Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, Service Level Authorization, Westlake Village, 2020-2021 (pending signing by
the Sheriff’s Department).
177 Office of the Sheriff, County of Los Angeles, May 5, 2020.
CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE 132
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Fire Protection
Fire protection services are provided by local Fire Station Number 144 through Division
7 of the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County (CFPD). Fire Station
Number 144 provides suppression, rescue, and fire prevention activities on a daily basis to
Westlake Village residents and businesses. These activities include responding to structural,
mobile, and natural vegetation fires, rescue and emergency medical calls, special incidents,
and disaster response.
The Fire District provides the City with monthly incident reports. A complete year of
monthly reports were unavailable. A monthly report, for example for April 2020, shows that
the District responded to a total of 56 calls, of which about half involved medical responses.
Only two calls involved fire incidents: one vehicle fire and one rubbish fire.
ISO provides ratings on a scale of 1 to 10 (with 1 being the highest) to reflect the relative
responsiveness and effectiveness of fire service, water supply, and other essential resources
to suppress fire. As of 2017, Division 7 of CFPD has an ISO rating of 2 for the region it serves,
including the City of Westlake Village.
The City has no responsibility for fire protection and related services; all services are
funded by CFPD revenues.
Development Services
The City’s Development Services Department includes two full-time planning staff to
support current, advance and environmental planning activities, and one part-time position
to handle code enforcement services. Several contract services are also budgeted for various
land use planning and development activities provided by a private firm for engineering
services, and by Los Angeles County for building and safety services. The Department also
oversees the City’s recycling and housing rehab programs. The Department supports the
Greater Conejo Valley Regional Chamber of Commerce which provides business-related
services.
Public Works
The City Engineer oversees various public works maintenance activities provided
through the City’s contract with Los Angeles County Public Works and private companies.
PW services include maintenance of roads and related facilities (e.g., sidewalks and gutters),
Private contracts provide street sweeping and traffic engineering.
Street Maintenance
The City’s 32.9 centerline miles have an average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of 82,
which is considered “good” (70 to 84 is “good”, 85 to 100 is “excellent”). Westlake Village
collaborates with the City of Agoura Hills on joint maintenance projects to share costs for
rehabilitating roadways crossing common city boundary lines.
CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE 133
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Stormwater and Flood Control
Flood control, stormwater, and water quality services are related municipal services that
are provided via a multifaceted approach within and surrounding the City. The Los Angeles
County Flood Control District (LACFCD) manages and maintains all concrete structures and
major flood control facilities. Additionally, LACFCD provides maintenance of City-owned
lateral lines and catch basins under a contract service arrangement with the cities. The
County of Los Angeles maintains storm drains and cleans catch basins under contract to the
City. City Public Works capital projects include retrofit of storm drainage catch basin screens
and inserts.
Concerns regarding water quality of stormwater runoff having adverse impacts on area
watersheds led to requirements for municipalities to meet municipal separate storm sewer
systems (MS4) water quality NPDES permit conditions and develop stormwater
management programs (SWMPs). The SWMP describes the stormwater control practices
that will be implemented consistent with permit requirements to minimize the discharge of
pollutants from the sewer system. Stormwater runoff flows into the Malibu Creek
Watershed, which drains an area of approximately 109 square miles, including the entirety
of the MSR study area. Area cities coordinate MS4 permit (Los Angeles County MS4 Permit
Order No. R4-2012-0175) compliance efforts through the Malibu Creek Watershed
Management Group (MCWMG). The efforts of the group are regulated by the Los Angeles
RWQCB, and mandated outcomes are outlined in the permit order. The group plans to meet
final compliance with the permit order requirements by 2023.
Other Maintenance
Los Angeles County Public Works is responsible for managing landscape maintenance to
several areas of the City; services are funded by assessments paid by residents within the
area, and maintenance provided by private contractors to the City.
Parks and Recreation
The City’s Parks and Recreation Department funds and manages the maintenance and
utilities of 35.19 acres of parks,178 including the City’s five neighborhood parks, the new
Community Park, and the Dog Park. The Department also sponsors a number of community
programs and special events.
The City contracts with the Conejo Recreation and Park District (CRPD) for the District
to provide summer recreation programs for children, and also to provide a “field ambassador
program” to manage use of fields in the City’s Community Park. CRPD’s territory is in Ventura
County, and it primarily serves the Thousand Oaks area including the portion of the Westlake
Village community in Ventura County outside the City of Westlake Village.
178 City of Westlake Village Adopted Two-Year Budget 2019-20 & 2020-21, Statistical Information, pg. 98.
CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE 134
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
The City has seven parks totaling 35.19 acres.179 The City does not have a parks master
plan. The City maintains its City-owned open space, including the areas on Oak Crest Drive,
Lot 79, and Ridgeford Drive.180
Transit
The City supplements Westlake Transit and taxi service fare revenues for the elderly and
disabled. In the past, the City helped to fund a seasonal trolley service, however, it is not
planning to operate the trolley at this time.181
Library
The City provides funding for the library space, utilities, janitorial services, Sunday
service and other costs associated with the physical operations of its library located at the
Westlake Village Civic Center. The City contracts with CLAPLS to provide the staff, books, and
other materials.
Water
Las Virgenes Municipal Water District (LVMWD) provides potable water (as well as
wastewater treatment, recycled water and biosolids composting) to residents in the cities
of Agoura Hills, Calabasas, Hidden Hills, Westlake Village, and unincorporated areas of
western Los Angeles County.
All of the District’s water supplies must be imported from Northern California through
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD), the primary water wholesaler in
the region. Originating in the High Sierras, water is transported more than 400 miles through
the State Water Project’s California Aqueduct entering the LVMWD service area at the east
end of Calabasas. Water is then distributed throughout the District.
The most recent Consumer Confidence Report for LVMWD is for 2018. In that year, the
District did not exceed limits for any contaminants, meaning it was 100 percent compliant
with drinking water quality standards.182 By comparison, the industry standard for
compliance with NPDWRs is 99 percent (361 days) of the year.
Wastewater
The Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District, contracted by the City, maintains the
wastewater collection system and handles any overflows. The District is managed by the
SMD and provides sewage collection services to over 2 million customers in unincorporated
County areas, 37 member cities, and 2 contracted cities.183
179 Correspondence with City of Westlake Village, May 14, 2020.
180 Correspondence with City of Westlake Village, May 14, 2020.
181 Correspondence with City of Westlake Village, May 14, 2020.
182 Las Virgenes Municipal Water District, Consumer Confidence Report, 2018
183 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/smd/SMD/12thEdAnnualNewsletterCSMD.pdf, downloaded 5/21/2025.
CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE 135
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
The City of Westlake Village’s collection system consists of 33.7 miles of mains and one
pump station.184 No significant infrastructure needs were identified by the City with regard
to the collection system.
All wastewater agencies are required to report sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) to
SWRCB. Sewer overflows are discharges from sewer pipes, pumps and manholes. Overflows
reflect the capacity and condition of collection system piping and the effectiveness of routine
maintenance. The sewer overflow rate is calculated as the number of overflows per 100
miles of collection piping per year. Over the last three years (2017-2020) there were five SSO
events in the City’s system. Averaged over the three-year period, the City’s SSO rate was
about 4.95 spills per 100 miles of mains. By comparison, other wastewater agencies in
California average 4.73 SSOs per 100 miles per year.
The Las Virgenes Municipal Water District provides wastewater treatment services to
the residents of Agoura Hills, Calabasas, Hidden Hills, Westlake Village and unincorporated
areas of Los Angeles County. The wastewater flows to the Tapia Water Reclamation (Tapia)
through sewer pipes where it is treated to high-quality recycled water for use on golf
courses, parklands, highway landscapes and common areas.
Located just south of Malibu Creek State Park, the wastewater treatment facility operates
under a permit issued by the RWQCB or “Water Board”, a State agency.185 Tapia is owned and
operated by the Las Virgenes - Triunfo JPA that was established between Las Virgenes and
Triunfo Water and Sanitation Districts to treat wastewater within the Malibu Creek
watershed.
Between January 1, 2017 and June 1, 2020, LVMWD was issued 54 violations at the Tapia
Water Reclamation Facility. Of the violations, 12 were for late or deficient reporting and 42
were for effluent violations. None of the violations were considered priority violations.
184 State Water Resources Control Board, California Integrated Water Quality SystemProject – SSO Report, 2020. Note: The
City’s infrastructure valuation reports 24.25 miles of City-owned pipe 8”-33” (see FY20 Budget, pg. 127)
185https://www.lvmwd.com/about-us/joint-powers-authority/wastewater-services/recycled-water/sprayfields
downloaded 5/21/2025.
CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE 136
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR DETERMINATIONS
Growth and Population Projections
v Population has declined slightly over the past decade; growth is projected to continue
at less than a 0.2 percent annual average growth rate over the next 20 years.
v There is little potential for new development in the City, with the exception of
redevelopment planned for the North Business Park Specific Plan area.
The Location and Characteristics of Disadvantaged
Unincorporated Communities Within or Contiguous to the
Agency’s SOI
v No disadvantaged unincorporated communities as defined in Government Code
§56033.5 exist within or adjacent to the City’s SOI.
Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities and
Adequacy of Public Services, Including Infrastructure
Needs and Deficiencies
v No current or projected service or infrastructure deficiencies or needs were
identified within the current City boundary.
v The City receives monthly reports from some of its service providers, including the
County Sheriff’s Department and the CFPD, but should obtain regular reports from all
contract service providers, particularly city-owned infrastructure such as the sewer
collection system. All contracts should be reviewed at least annually.
Financial Ability of Agencies to Provide Services
v The City has the financial ability to provide services. The City is at “low risk” of
financial distress, maintains adequate reserves, has a moderate level of long-term
obligations (down from a “high” level of risk in prior years), and current and projected
pension obligations are not a significant risk to the City’s budget.
Status of, and Opportunities for, Shared Facilities
v The City shares maintenance of roads along the common border with Agoura Hills.
v The City shares facilities through its contract services providers, in particular public
safety providers that make use of regional facilities to service multiple cities and
unincorporated areas. The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department operates from
its Lost Hills Station which serves five cities and unincorporated communities in the
region. The City also maintains contracts with Los Angeles County Public Works,
Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District, and Waste Management, Inc., which are
offered out of each agency’s facilities.
v No other opportunities for shared facilities were identified.
CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE 137
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
Accountability for Community Service Needs, Including
Governmental Structure and Operational Efficiencies
v The City complies with legal requirements governing public meetings, meeting
notices and records, and website content.
v The City also communicates with residents through a newsletter for residents, a video
newsletter, and press releases posted on the City’s website. The City produces an
Annual Report that provides a clear and accessible overview of the City, its
organization, budget and accomplishments during the year, and contact information
v The City’s FY18-19 CAFR was delayed and required more than the standard six
months preparation time.
v The City prepares ten-year financial forecasts for different scenarios, and also
assesses the City’s financial health via a “Fiscal Health Report”. The City does not
forecast CIP requirements beyond the current budget year.
v No governance options were identified.
CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE 138
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE SPHERE OF INFLUENCE
UPDATE
Existing Sphere of Influence
The City’s sphere of influence (SOI) coincides with its incorporated boundary
Sphere of Influence Analysis
The City is abutted on two sides by the incorporated territory of the cities of Thousand
Oaks and Agoura Hills, which precludes growth in these areas. There is unincorporated
territory to the south and southwest of the City; however, those areas adjacent to City
boundaries are substantially separated from developed City areas by open space areas with
no direct connection through City territory. Additionally, most adjacent unincorporated
territory is publicly owned and lies within the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation
Area.
Sphere of Influence Determinations
Present and planned land uses, including agricultural and open-space lands
v The current land uses within City boundaries are mix of commercial and residential
uses; the City is nearly built-out although opportunities exist for minimal growth
through redevelopment.
Present and probable need for public facilities and services
v No current or projected service or infrastructure needs were identified within the
City’s current boundary.
Present capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public services that the agency
provides or is authorized to provide
v No current or projected service or infrastructure needs were identified.
Existence of any social or economic communities of interest
v No social or economic communities of interest were identified.
Present and probable need for water, wastewater, and structural fire protection facilities
and service of any disadvantaged unincorporated communities within the existing SOI
v No disadvantaged unincorporated communities exist within or contiguous to the
City’s SOI.
Sphere of Influence Recommendations
This MSR recommends no change to the current SOI.
CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE 139
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
A P P ENDI X A
APPENDIX A 140
Table A.1-1
Summary of Governmental Revenues
City of Agoura Hills
Fiscal Year Financials (CAFRs)
Item FY2016-17 FY2017-18 FY2018-19
Governmental Revenues (1)
Property tax (2) $5,123,505 $5,345,592 $5,503,421
Sales tax 3,805,109 3,924,897 4,330,498
Transient Occupancy Tax 2,670,834 2,788,088 2,807,317
Franchise Tax 803,717 835,457 826,523
Subtotal Taxes 12,403,165 12,894,034 13,467,759
Licenses and Permits 480,926 661,719 589,666
Intergovernmental 8,882,237 6,745,712 8,460,405
Fines and forfeitures 90,403 88793 98,186
Use of money and property 784,617 1,026,429 1,264,234
Charges for services 1,464,484 1,217,282 1,266,816
Contributions 439,322 623,431 422,310
Other (misc.) 150,715 365,823 305,845
Subtotal Other Revenues (2) 12,292,704 10,729,189 12,407,462
Total Governmental Revenues 24,695,869 23,623,223 25,875,221
Change from Prior Year na -4.3% 9.5%
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
Transfers In (offset by transfers out) 0 0 0
Other (inc. refunding bond proceeds) 11,779,248 175,000 0
Total Other Financing Sources (3) 11,779,248 175,000 0
TOTAL REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN $36,475,117 $23,798,223 $25,875,221
Source: City of Agoura Hills CAFRs - Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, Total
Governmental Funds (FY19, pg. 20).
(1) Tax revenue detail from Statement of Activities (FY19, pg. 17); other revenues from the Statement of Revenues,
Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances (pg. 20)
(2) Includes property tax, transfer tax and property tax in-lieu of VLF.
Table A.1-2
Summary of Governmental Expenditures
City of Agoura Hills
Fiscal Year Financials (CAFRs)
Item FY2016-17 FY2017-18 FY2018-19
Governmental Expenditures
General Government $4,094,097 $4,162,104 $5,064,913
Public Safety 4,459,069 4,665,151 5,051,499
Community Development 1,556,843 1,646,839 1,890,097
Public Works 2,702,303 2,709,199 3,563,487
Community Services 2,741,433 2,857,247 2,990,865
Capital outlay 7,557,446 4,302,347 8,589,367
Debt service:
Principal 10,605,000 310,000 315,000
Interest 1,157,560 599,458 595,400
Interest and fiscal charges 0 0 0
Total Expenditures 34,873,751 21,252,345 28,060,628
Change from Prior Year na -39.1% 32.0%
OTHER FINANCING USES
Transfers Out (offset by transfers in) 0 0 0
Total Other Financing Uses 0 0 0
TOTAL USES AND TRANSFERS OUT $34,873,751 $21,252,345 $28,060,628
Source: City of Agoura Hills Financial Statements - Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance,
Total Governmental Funds (FY19, pg. 20).
Table A.1-3
Fund Balances, Governmental Funds
City of Agoura Hills
Fiscal Year Financials (CAFRs)
Item FY2016-17 FY2017-18 FY2018-19
Beginning Balance $35,987,671 $37,589,037 $40,319,074
Special Item 184,159
Net Change 1,601,366 2,730,037 (2,185,407)
% Change from Prior Year 4.4% 7.3% -5.4%
Ending Balance, Governmental Funds $37,589,037 $40,319,074 $38,133,667
Ending Balance/Total Governmental Expenditures 107.8% 189.7% 135.9%
Non-Spendable $26,450,720 $26,525,470 $26,440,831
Restricted $1,723,643 $1,649,813 $2,755,603
Committed $4,067,536 $4,660,651 $3,677,915
Assigned $559,083 $595,322 $608,408
Unassigned $4,788,055 $6,887,818 $4,650,910
Total $37,589,037 $40,319,074 $38,133,667
Reconciliation to Net Position (1)
Capital Assets Net of Depreciation $118,660,686 $120,422,625 $126,733,681
Joint Venture Community Center assets $1,851,255 $1,793,851 $1,736,448
Deferred Outflows related to Pensions $1,098,516 $1,580,807 $1,431,232
Deferred Outflows related to OPEB $189,000 $222,811
Deferred outflows related to debt refunding $441,400 $423,744 $406,088
Long-term Debt (debt, absences) ($14,608,262) ($14,294,955) ($14,000,111)
Accrued interest payable ($155,899) ($89,947) ($98,175)
OPEB contribution excess or (deficiency) ($10,059) ($1,044,000) ($1,005,573)
Pension contribution excess or (deficiency) ($3,747,628) ($4,479,822) ($4,394,714)
Intergovernmental Revenues $5,222,029 $2,922,305 $4,034,846
Deferred pension inflows ($442,581) ($456,136) ($440,827)
Deferred OPEB inflows ($38,000)
Governmental Activities Ending Net Position $145,898,494 $147,248,546 $152,759,373
Change from prior year 3.7%
Source: City of Hidden Hills Financial Statements - Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance,
Total Governmental Funds (FY19, pg. 18).
(1) See also Net Change in Fund Balance, pg. 20.
(2) Reconciliation of Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Net Position (pg. 21, FY19, pg. 19).
Table A.1-4
Summary Financial Measures and Indicators
City of Agoura Hills
Fiscal Year Financials (CAFRs)
Item FY2016-17 FY2017-18 FY2018-19
1. Balanced Budget (% Revenues exceed Expenditures) (1) 5% 12% -8%
Total Governmental Revenues 36,475,117 23,798,223 25,875,221
Total Governmental Expenditures 34,873,751 21,252,345 28,060,628
Special Item 184,159
Net Change in Total Governmental Fund Balances 1,601,366 2,730,037 (2,185,407)
Balanced GF Budget (% Revenues exceed Expenditures) (1) 9% 11% 1%
Total General Fund Revenues 15,178,539 15,994,083 16,591,561
Total General Fund Expenditures 13,932,663 14,421,287 16,490,381
Net Change before Capital 1,245,876 1,572,796 101,180
Net Change before Transfers Out 1,245,876 1,572,796 101,180
Other Net Transfers In (Out) (677,418) (921,808) (1,340,363)
Net Change in General Fund Balances 568,458 650,988 (1,239,183)
Compound Annual Average Revenue Growth (vs. FY17) -5.1% -8.5%
2. Ending Gov'l Fund Balance as % Gov'l Expenditures (2) 108% 190% 136%
Total Governmental Funds Ending Fund Balance $37,589,037 $40,319,074 $38,133,667
General Fund Ending Fund Balance 36,611,066 37,262,054 36,022,871
General Fund Expenditures 13,932,663 14,421,287 16,490,381
GF Fund balance as % of GF Expenditures 263% 258% 218%
3. Unrestricted Net Position/Total Governmental Revenues (3) 102% 154% 133%
Net Position 145,898,494 147,248,546 152,759,373
Unrestricted Net Position (UNP) 37,138,624 36,535,736 34,344,460
Total Governmental Revenues 36,475,117 23,798,223 25,875,221
4. Current Ratio (Short-term Liquidity) (4) 3.8 4.4 1.9
Current Assets (Cash and Investments) 12,172,775 14,970,116 13,158,233
Current Liabilities 3,184,287 3,372,479 6,765,203
5. Change in Net Depreciable Capital Assets (5) 24.5% -1.0% -1.7%
Total Capital Assets being Depreciated, Start of Year 107,961,052 123,133,031 124,650,175
Net Depreciable Capital Assets , Start of Year 54,087,878 67,315,582 66,618,100
Change in Accumulated Depreciation 1,944,275 2,214,626 2,148,252
Net Depreciable Capital Assets , End of Year 67,315,582 66,618,100 65,482,224
Net, end of year/Total 62% 54% 53%
6. Debt Service as % of Total Governmental Revenues na 3.8% 3.5%
Debt Service (6) 11,762,560 909,458 910,400
Total Governmental Revenues 36,475,117 23,798,223 25,875,221
Total Debt (7) 13,138,926 13,138,926 13,138,926
Total Debt as a % of Total Governmental Revenues 36% 55% 51%
7. Total Reserves (% of total governmental expenditures) 14% 32% 17%
Total Governmental Reserves (unassigned Fund Balances) $4,788,055 $6,887,818 $4,650,910
General Fund Reserve (unassigned GF Fund Balance) (8) 9,815,071 10,386,556 9,229,107
General Fund Contingency/General Fund Expenditures 70% 72% 56%
GF Contingency (months of GF expenditures) (9) 8 . 5 8 . 6 6 . 7
8. Pension Payments as % of Revenues 2.0%
Total Pension Liability 18,357,580 19,836,191 21,986,497
Unfunded Pension Liability (10) 4,367,326 4,305,343 5,127,963
% Pension Liability Funded 76.2% 78.3% 76.7%
Annual Payments to Pension Normal Cost 280,687 302,098
Annual Payments to Unfunded Pension Liability 169,414 227,060
Total Payments (normal cost + unfunded liabilities) (11) 350,597 450,101 529,158
Unfunded Pension Liability as a % of Total Gov'l Revenues 12% 18% 20%
Total Annual Contribution as % of Covered Payroll 21.4% 21.4% 21.4%
9. OPEB Liability Payments (12)
Total OPEB Liability (end of FY) 2,464,000 2,687,022
Net OPEB Liability (end of FY) 1,044,000 1,005,573
% OPEB Liability Funded 57.6% 62.6%
Total OPEB Payments 197,000
Notes: 2020-06-01
(1) Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances (FY17 FY18 pg. 23, FY19, pg. 20)
(2) Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, Total Governmental Funds (FY19, pg. 20).
(3) Statement of Net Position (FY19, pg. 16)
(4) Statement of Net Position (FY19, pg. 16)
(5) FY17, Note 5, pg. 40; FY18, Note 5, pg. 41; FY19, Note 6, pg. 38. Change in Accumulated Depreciation (inc. deductions).
(6) Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, Total Governmental Funds (FY19, pg. 20). FY17
reports refinancing of 2007 revenue bonds.
(7) Statement of Net Position (FY19, pg. 16)
(8) Budget for the FY20 and FY21, pg. 2-19. Resolution No. 05-1378 endeavors to designate an amount equal to or greater
(9) GF Reserve/(GF expenditures/12 months).
(10) CalPERS Annual Valuation Report as of June 30, 2018, Plan's Funded Status, pg. 5 (Misc. and PEPRA).
(11) CalPERS Annual Valuation Report as of June 30, 2017, Req'd Employer Contributions, pg. 4. FY17 CAFR, Note 8c, pg.
44; CalPers reports na.
Table A.2-1
Summary of Governmental Revenues
City of Calabasas
Fiscal Year Financials (CAFRs)
Item FY2016-17 FY2017-18 FY2018-19
Governmental Revenues (1)
Property tax $11,079,303 10,823,626 $11,803,300
Sales tax 4,617,757 5,178,580 5,824,369
Transient Occupancy Tax 1,928,229 2,003,514 2,114,825
Utility Users tax 3,010,753 2,912,934 2,809,356
Franchise Tax 727,325 754,932 780,447
Other taxes 0 0 368,420
Subtotal Taxes 21,363,367 21,673,586 23,700,717
Licenses and fees 61,167 46,878 65,096
Intergovernmental (Motor Vehicle in-lieu) 17,763,357 8,820,788 14,375,709
Fines and forfeitures 2,156,704 2,418,738 158,343
General government 305,798 389,638
Use of money and property 432,005 888,344 1,080,086
Charges for services 4,535,184 5,009,811 3,603,432
Other, donations, and reimbursements 175,745 347,052 756,411
Subtotal Other Revenues (2) 25,429,960 17,921,249 20,039,077
Total Governmental Revenues 46,793,327 39,594,835 43,739,794
Change from Prior Year na -15.4% 10.5%
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
Transfers In (offset by transfers out)
Other
Total Other Financing Sources (3) 0 0 0
TOTAL REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN $46,793,327 $39,594,835 $43,739,794
Source: Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, Total Governmental Funds.
(1) Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, Total Governmental Funds (pg. 46-47); tax detail
shown in Statement of Activities (pg. 40-41).
Table A.2-2
Summary of Governmental Expenditures
City of Calabasas
Fiscal Year Financials (CAFRs)
Item FY2016-17 FY2017-18 FY2018-19
Governmental Expenditures (1)
General Government $11,817,939 $12,939,135 $12,941,876
Public Safety 4,537,032 4,737,613 4,899,450
Community Development 1,223,273 1,262,218 1,157,522
Public works 1,925,260 1,968,197 2,039,726
Community Services 8,033,330 8,240,498 8,182,984
Capital outlay 13,106,326 12,274,939 4,764,655
Debt service:
Principal retirement 455,000 1,065,000
Interest and fiscal charges 1,588,340 1,574,696 1,561,675
Total Expenditures 42,686,500 42,997,296 36,612,888
Change from Prior Year na 0.7% -14.8%
OTHER FINANCING USES
Transfers Out (offset by transfers in)
Total Other Financing Uses 0 0 0
TOTAL USES AND TRANSFERS OUT $42,686,500 $42,997,296 $36,612,888
Source: City of Calabasas CAFR - Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance
(1) City of Calabasas CAFR - Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, pg. 46-47.
Table A.2-3
Fund Balances, Governmental Funds
City of Calabasas
Fiscal Year Financials (CAFRs) Budget
Item FY2016-17 FY2017-18 FY2018-19
Beginning Balance $31,895,252 $36,002,079 $32,599,618
Net Change 4,106,827 (3,402,461) 7,126,906
% Change from Prior Year na -9.5% 21.9%
Ending Balance, Governmental Funds $36,002,079 $32,599,618 $39,726,524
Ending Balance/Total Governmental Expenditures 84.3% 75.8% 108.5%
Balances: (1)
Non-Spendable 9,933 4,440 4,346
Restricted 17,284,472 18,106,063 19,988,024
Committed 1,568,103 1,569,991 2,640,309
Assigned 0 0
Unassigned 17,139,571 12,919,124 17,093,845
Total $36,002,079 32,599,618 39,726,524
Reconciliation to Net Position (2)
Capital Assets Net of Depreciation $135,219,177 $141,732,638 $142,837,501
Long-term Debt (debt, absences) ($48,102,535) (49,661,833) ($48,459,786)
Debt refunding and bond premium $1,025,638 924,790 $823,942
Deferred pension inflows and outflows $2,079,788 2,377,121 $1,887,161
Long-term Notes Receivable $4,857,455 4,855,137 $4,861,199
Deferred OPEB outflows $9,118
Governmental Activities Ending Net Position $131,081,602 $132,827,471 $141,685,659
Change from prior year na 1.3% 6.7%
Source: City of Calabasas Balance Sheet, Governmental Funds
(1) Balance Sheet, Governmental Funds (FY17, FY18, FY19 pg. 42-43).
(2) Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Net Position, pg. 44.
Table A.2-4
Summary Financial Measures and Indicators
City of Calabasas
Fiscal Year Financials (CAFRs)
Item FY2016-17 FY2017-18 FY2018-19
1. Balanced Budget (% Revenues exceed Expenditures) (1) 10% -8% 19%
Total Governmental Revenues 46,793,327 39,594,835 43,739,794
Total Governmental Expenditures 42,686,500 42,997,296 36,612,888
Special Item
Net Change in Total Governmental Fund Balances 4,106,827 (3,402,461) 7,126,906
Balanced GF Budget (% Revenues exceed Expenditures) (1) 4% 4% 5%
Total General Fund Revenues 21,630,652 23,245,616 23,438,286
Total General Fund Expenditures (exc. capital) 20,786,920 22,437,028 22,296,265
Net Change before Capital 843,732 808,588 1,142,021
Capital Outlay 136,346 103,108 92,174
Net Change before Transfers Out 707,386 705,480 1,049,847
Other Net Transfers In (Out) (1,116,222) (481,298) (1,883,832)
Net Change in General Fund Balances (408,836) 224,182 (833,985)
GF Revenue Compound Annual Average Growth Rate (vs. FY17) na 7.5% 4.1%
2. Ending Gov'l Fund Balance as % Gov'l Expenditures (2) 84% 76% 109%
Total Governmental Funds, Ending Fund Balance $36,002,079 $32,599,618 $39,726,524
General Fund Ending Fund Balance 18,402,546 18,729,536 18,990,895
General Fund Expenditures (exc. capital) 20,786,920 22,437,028 22,296,265
GF Fund balance as % of GF Expenditures 89% 83% 85%
3. Unrestricted Net Position/Total Governmental Revenues (3) 20% 28% 28%
Net Position (ending) 131,081,602 132,827,471 141,685,659
Unrestricted Net Position (UNP) 9,451,612 11,271,121 12,135,480
Total Governmental Revenues 46,793,327 39,594,835 43,739,794
4. Current Ratio (Short-term Liquidity) (4) 7.4 7.9 7.8
Current Assets (Cash and Investments) 31,357,583 30,573,133 35,258,078
Current Liabilities 4,248,789 3,875,405 4,520,560
5. Change in Net Depreciable Capital Assets (5) 13.1% 4.5% 1.1%
Total Capital Assets being Depreciated, Start of Year 126,040,066 143,748,908 151,773,082
Net Depreciable Capital Assets , Start of Year 86,608,767 97,982,533 102,351,970
Increase or (reduction) in Accumulated Depreciation 6,335,076 3,654,737 3,783,642
Net Depreciable Capital Assets , End of Year 97,982,533 102,351,970 103,515,565
Net, end of year/Total 78% 71% 68%
6. Debt Service as % of Total Governmental Revenues 4.4% 4.0% 6.0%
Debt Service (6) 2,043,340 1,574,696 2,626,675
Total Governmental Revenues 46,793,327 39,594,835 43,739,794
Total Debt (7) 48,683,450 50,153,963 47,873,806
Total Debt as a % of Total Governmental Revenues 104% 127% 109%
7. Total Reserves (% of total governmental expenditures) 40% 30% 47%
Total Governmental Reserves (unassigned Fund Balances) (8) $17,139,571 $12,919,124 $17,093,845
General Fund Reserve (unassigned GF Fund Balance) (8) 18,392,613 18,725,096 18,986,549
General Fund Reserve/General Fund Expenditures 88% 83% 85%
GF Reserves (months of GF expenditures) (9) 1 0 . 6 1 0 . 0 1 0 . 2
8. Pension Payments as % of Gov'l Revenues 1.7% 2.4% 2.4%
Total Pension Liability (start of year) $25,461,625 $31,765,118 $35,901,003
Pension Unfunded Accrued Liability (10) 4,468,445 6,274,535 7,538,037
% Pension Liability Funded 82.5% 80.2% 79.0%
Annual Payments to Pension Normal Cost 632,554 670,085
Annual Payments to Unfunded Pension Liability 311,333 397,857
Total Payments (normal cost + unfunded liabilities) (11) 789,859 943,887 1,067,942
Unfunded Pension Liability as a % of Total Gov'l Revenues 10% 16% 17%
9. OPEB Liability (12)
Net OPEB Liability (end of FY) 1,237,782 1,753,132 1,906,919
Notes: 2020-06-01
(1) Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, Total Governmental Funds (pg. 46-47); tax detail
shown in Statement of Activities (pg. 40-41).
(2) City of Calabasas CAFR - Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, General Fund, pg. 46.
(3) City of Calabasas CAFR - Statement of Net Position, pg. 39.
(4) City of Calabasas CAFR - Statement of Net Position, pg. 39.
(5) City of Calabasas CAFR - Note 7, Capital Assets, FY17 pg. 76, FY18 pg. 78, FY19 pg. 76.
(6) City of Calabasas CAFR - Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, pg. 46-47.
(7) City of Calabasas CAFR - Statement of Net Position, pg. 39.
(8) Balance Sheet, Governmental Funds (FY17, FY18, FY19 pg. 42-43).
(9) GF Reserve/(GF expenditures/12 months).
(10) CalPERS Annual Valuation Report as of June 30, Plan's Funded Status, pg. 5 (Misc. and PEPRA).
(11) CalPERS Annual Valuation Report as of June 30, 2017, Req'd Employer Contributions, pg. 4. FY17 CAFR, Note 9, pg. 82;
CalPers reports na.
(12) CAFR FY17, Note 12, pg. 90-92; FY18, Note 12, pg. 91; FY19, Note12, pg. 89.
Table A.3-1
Summary of Governmental Revenues
City of Hidden Hills
Fiscal Year Financials (CAFRs)
Item FY2016-17 FY2017-18 FY2018-19
Governmental Revenues (1)
Property tax $1,243,177 $1,303,725 $1,868,985
Sales tax 25,870 49,171 34,472
Transient Occupancy Tax 0 0 0
Franchise Tax 69,598 72,194 68,850
Business License Tax 59,006 57,309 56,993
Utility Users tax 0 0 0
Motor Vehicle in lieu 839 992 908
Investment Income 29,317 58,933 435,601
Other Taxes 5,436 24,289 17,823
Subtotal Taxes 1,433,243 1,566,613 2,483,632
Licenses and fees
Intergovernmental
Fines and forfeitures
General government
Use of money and property
Charges for services 725,231 1,258,093 1,108,532
Operating Contributions and Grants 407,618 2,229,854 571,082
Subtotal Other Revenues 1,132,849 3,487,947 1,679,614
Total Governmental Revenues 2,566,092 5,054,560 4,163,246
Change from Prior Year na 97.0% -17.6%
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
Transfers In (offset by transfers out)
Other
Total Other Financing Sources 0 0 0
TOTAL REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN $2,566,092 $5,054,560 $4,163,246
Source: City of Hidden Hills Financial Statements - Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance,
Total Governmental Funds (FY19, pg. 18).
(1) Tax revenue detail from Statement of Activities (FY19, pg. 9, 15).
Table A.3-2
Summary of Governmental Expenditures
City of Hidden Hills
Fiscal Year Financials (CAFRs)
Item FY2016-17 FY2017-18 FY2018-19
Governmental Expenditures
General Government $960,977 $853,442 $1,341,876
Public Safety 516,889 520,931 571,383
Community Development
Public Works 687,617 782,191 839,377
Community Services
Capital outlay 0 1,982,810 478,107
Debt service:
Principal 0
Interest and fiscal charges 0 0 0
Total Expenditures 2,165,483 4,139,374 3,230,743
Change from Prior Year na 91.2% -22.0%
TOTAL USES AND TRANSFERS OUT $2,165,483 $4,139,374 $3,230,743
Source: City of Hidden Hills Financial Statements - Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance,
Total Governmental Funds (FY19, pg. 18).
Table A.3-3
Fund Balances, Governmental Funds
City of Hidden Hills
Fiscal Year Financials (CAFRs)
Item FY2016-17 FY2017-18 FY2018-19
Beginning Balance (1) $7,630,179 $8,159,426 $9,074,602
Net Change (2) 400,609 915,186 932,503
% Change from Prior Year 11.2% 10.3%
Ending Balance, Governmental Funds $8,030,788 $9,074,612 $10,007,105
Ending Balance/Total Governmental Expenditures 370.9% 219.2% 309.7%
Reconciliation to Net Position (3)
Capital Assets Net of Depreciation $944,104 $2,871,068 $3,401,161
Deferred Outflows related to Pensions $125,550 $164,740 $142,999
Deferred Outflows related to OPEB $33,141
Long-term Debt (absences, OPEB, pensions) ($591,813) ($909,162) ($950,788)
Deferred Inflows related to Pensions ($93,972) ($77,632) ($75,433)
Governmental Activities Ending Net Position $8,414,657 $11,123,626 $12,558,185
Change from prior year 12.9%
Source: City of Hidden Hills Financial Statements - Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance,
Total Governmental Funds (FY19, pg. 18).
(1) Beginning balances include restatements, eg, FY18
(2) See also Net Change in Fund Balance, pg. 18.
(3) Reconciliation of Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Net Position (FY19, pg. 17).
Table A.3-4
Summary Financial Measures and Indicators
City of Hidden Hills
Fiscal Year Financials (CAFRs)
Item FY2016-17 FY2017-18 FY2018-19
1. Balanced Budget (% Revenues exceed Expenditures) (1) 18% 22% 29%
Total Governmental Revenues 2,566,092 5,054,560 4,163,246
Total Governmental Expenditures 2,165,483 4,139,374 3,230,743
Special Item
Net Change in Total Governmental Fund Balances 400,609 915,186 932,503
Balanced GF Budget (% Revenues exceed Expenditures) (1) 17% 37% 30%
Total General Fund Revenues 2,152,205 2,820,355 3,602,090
Total General Fund Expenditures (includes capital outlay) 1,841,663 2,064,206 2,775,198
Net Change before Transfers Out 310,542 756,149 826,892
Other Transfers In (Out) 90,082 217,553
Net Change in General Fund Balances 310,542 846,231 1,044,445
Compound Annual Average Growth Rate (vs. FY17) na 31.0% 29.4%
2. Ending Gov'l Fund Balance as % Gov'l Expenditures (2) 371% 219% 310%
Total Governmental Funds Ending Fund Balance $8,030,788 $9,074,612 $10,007,105
General Fund Ending Fund Balance 7,128,844 8,103,703 9,148,148
General Fund Expenditures 1,841,663 2,064,206 2,775,198
GF Fund balance as % of GF Expenditures 387% 393% 330%
3. Unrestricted Net Position/Total Governmental Revenues (3) 256% 144% 199%
Net Position 8,414,657 11,123,626 12,558,185
Unrestricted Net Position (UNP) 6,568,600 7,281,649 8,295,267
Total Governmental Revenues 2,566,092 5,054,560 4,163,246
4. Current Ratio (Short-term Liquidity) (4) 6.5
Current Assets (Cash and Investments) 8,734,081 10,079,864 11,400,506
Current Liabilities 966,593 1,244,560 1,755,216
5. Change in Net Depreciable Capital Assets -2.9% 23.3%
Total Capital Assets being Depreciated, Start of Year (6) 1,853,295 1,932,714 1,995,860
Net Depreciable Capital Assets , Start of Year (5) 888,182 884,325 858,304
Depreciation (7) 83,276 79,167 82,934
Net Depreciable Capital Assets , End of Year (5) 884,325 858,304 1,057,867
Net, end of year/Total 48% 44% 53%
6. Debt Service as % of Operating Revenues (8) na na na
7. Total Reserves (% of total governmental expenditures) 303% 176% 257%
Unrestricted Net Position (9) 6,568,600 7,281,649 8,295,267
8. Pension Payments as % of Revenues 2.3% 1.1% 1.4%
Total Pension Liability (10) 2,057,267 2,524,502 na
Unfunded Pension Liability (11) 381,632 461,797 446,855
% Pension Liability Funded 81.4% 81.7% na
Annual Payments to Pension Normal Cost 46,235 38,000 36,000
Annual Payments to Unfunded Pension Liability 12,097 16,400 22,963
Total Payments (normal cost + unfunded liabilities) (12) 58,332 54,400 58,963
Unfunded Pension Liability as a % of Total Revenues 15% 9% 11%
OPEB Liability (13) 191,474 427,096 483,671
Notes to Table A.3-4
(1) Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, Total Governmental Funds (FY19, pg. 18).
(2) Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, Total Governmental Funds (FY19, pg. 18).
(3) Statement of Net Position (FY19, pg. 13)
(4) Statement of Net Position (FY19, pg. 13)
(5) Note 3 (FY19, pg. 31)
(6) Note 3 (FY19, pg. 31)
(7) Note 3 (FY19, pg. 31), Change in Accumulated Depreciation (includes deductions)
(8) The City has no debt service.
(9) Statement of Net Position (FY19, pg. 13); unrestricted net position is allocated to various reserves.
(10) CalPERS Annual Valuation Report as of June 30, 2018, Plan's Funded Status, pg. 5.; total liability not available for FY19.
(11) Statement of Net Position (FY19, pg. 13)
(12) Budget, General Fund Budget Details, FY19 pg. 12.
(13) Statement of Net Position (FY19, pg. 13)
Table A.4-1
Summary of Governmental Revenues
City of Westlake Village
Fiscal Year Financials (CAFRs)
Item FY2016-17 FY2017-18 FY2018-19
Governmental Revenues
Property tax $2,315,843 $2,461,188 $2,478,352
Sales tax 5,118,270 4,599,840 5,030,974
Transient Occupancy Tax 3,599,817 3,943,355 3,883,281
Franchise Fees 386,345 396,147 402,173
Motor Vehicle License Fees 849,110 902,044 910,805
Investment Income 322,094 515,241
Subtotal Taxes 12,269,385 12,624,668 13,220,826
Licenses and Permits 835,422 1,496,570 1,519,863
Intergovernmental 1,099,548 849,741 4,271,118
Fines and forfeitures 20,540 37,771 32,319
Use of money and property 174,450
Charges for services 1,460,161 1,541,212 2,194,102
Contributions
Other (misc.) 32,126 37,948 64,554
Subtotal Other Revenues 3,622,247 3,963,242 8,081,956
Total Governmental Revenues 15,891,632 16,587,910 21,302,782
Change from Prior Year na 4.4% 28.4%
TOTAL REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN $15,891,632 $16,587,910 $21,302,782
Source: City of Westlake Village CAFRs - Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, Total
Governmental Funds (FY18, pg. 15).
Table A.4-2
Summary of Governmental Expenditures
City of Westlake Village
Fiscal Year Financials (CAFRs)
Item FY2016-17 FY2017-18 FY2018-19
Governmental Expenditures
General Government $2,353,445 $2,656,186 $2,839,222
Public Safety 2,502,683 2,693,970 2,752,868
Public Services 3,818,274 3,833,164 4,427,311
Parks and Recreation 768,946 881,899 2,104,247
Capital outlay 6,546,973 8,654,965 8,346,509
Debt service:
Principal 455,000 465,000 475,000
Interest 681,776 672,961 659,819
Total Expenditures 17,127,097 19,858,145 21,604,976
Change from Prior Year na 15.9% 8.8%
TOTAL USES AND TRANSFERS OUT $17,127,097 $19,858,145 $21,604,976
Source: City of Westlake Village CAFRs - Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, Total
Governmental Funds (FY18, pg. 15).
Table A.4-3
Fund Balances, Governmental Funds
City of Westlake Village
Fiscal Year Financials (CAFRs)
Item FY2016-17 FY2017-18 FY2018-19
Beginning Balance $27,600,937 $26,365,472 $23,095,237
Net Change (1,235,465) (3,270,235) (302,194)
% Change from Prior Year -4.5% -12.4% -1.3%
Ending Balance, Governmental Funds $26,365,472 $23,095,237 $22,793,043
Ending Balance/Total Governmental Expenditures 153.9% 116.3% 105.5%
Non-Spendable not reported
Restricted $2,034,470 $1,109,063 $1,085,015
Committed $2,214,720 $2,277,405 $2,340,905
Assigned $16,942,342 $14,391,065 $15,045,182
Unassigned $5,173,940 $5,317,704 $4,321,941
Total (2) $26,365,472 $23,095,237 $22,793,043
Reconciliation to Net Position (3)
Capital Assets Net of Depreciation $34,382,257 $35,790,842 $40,806,216
Unearned Revenue $1,310,161 $1,200,782 $1,814,253
Deferred Outflows related to Pensions $589,516 $802,175 $695,204
Debt refunding $585,565 $562,652 $535,200
Long-term Debt (debt, absencesj, pension) ($20,237,095) ($19,816,131) ($19,073,861)
Accrued interest ($53,322) ($52,281) ($50,886)
OPEB deferred outflows $200,000 $214,271
Pension contribution excess or (deficiency)
Intergovernmental Revenues
Deferred pension inflows ($124,167) ($152,688) ($158,505)
Deferred OPEB inflows ($13,000) ($15,542)
Governmental Activities Ending Net Position $42,818,387 $41,617,588 $47,559,393
Change from prior year 14.3%
Source: City of Westlake Village CAFRs - Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, Total
Governmental Funds (FY18, pg. 15).
(1) See also Net Change in Fund Balance, pg. 20.
(2) Balance Sheet, Governmental Funds (FY17, pg. 15;
(3) Reconciliation of Balance Sheet of Governmental
Table A.4-4
Summary Financial Measures and Indicators
City of Westlake Village
Fiscal Year Financials (CAFRs)
Item FY2016-17 FY2017-18 FY2018-19
1. Balanced Budget (% Revenues exceed Expenditures) (1) -7% -16% -1%
Total Governmental Revenues 15,891,632 16,587,910 21,302,782
Total Governmental Expenditures 17,127,097 19,858,145 21,604,976
Special Item
Net Change in Total Governmental Fund Balances (1,235,465) (3,270,235) (302,194)
Balanced GF Budget (% Revenues exceed Expenditures) (1) 77% 75% 64%
Total General Fund Revenues 13,198,566 14,071,360 14,729,907
Total General Fund Expenditures (exc. capital) 7,473,248 8,048,465 8,997,021
Net Change before Capital 5,725,318 6,022,895 5,732,886
Capital Outlay 2,398,365 7,235,602 3,739,870
Net Change before Transfers Out 3,326,953 (1,212,707) 1,993,016
Other Net Transfers In (Out) (1,122,531) (1,137,856) (1,134,263)
Net Change in General Fund Balances 2,204,422 (2,350,563) 858,753
Compound Annual Average Revenue Growth (vs. FY17) 6.6% -10.4%
2. Ending Gov'l Fund Balance as % Gov'l Expenditures (2) 154% 116% 105%
Total Governmental Funds, Ending Fund Balance $26,365,472 $23,095,237 $22,793,043
General Fund Ending Fund Balance 25,291,647 22,941,084 23,799,837
General Fund Expenditures (exc. capital) 7,473,248 8,048,465 8,997,021
GF Fund balance as % of GF Expenditures 338% 285% 265%
3. Unrestricted Net Position/Total Governmental Revenues (3) 90% 75% 57%
Net Position (ending) 42,818,387 41,617,588 47,559,393
Unrestricted Net Position (UNP) 14,262,748 12,455,664 12,233,776
Total Governmental Revenues 15,891,632 16,587,910 21,302,782
4. Current Ratio (Short-term Liquidity) (4) 3.5 10.9 4.7
Current Assets (Cash and Investments) 24,399,772 22,948,319 20,725,092
Current Liabilities 6,873,753 2,102,801 4,369,983
5. Change in Net Depreciable Capital Assets (5) -5.9% 0.7% 2.5%
Total Capital Assets being Depreciated, Start of Year 63,866,789 63,845,363 65,852,776
Net Depreciable Capital Assets , Start of Year 31,212,167 29,364,258 29,584,327
Increase or (reduction) in Accumulated Depreciation 1,826,483 1,787,344 1,862,066
Net Depreciable Capital Assets , End of Year 29,364,258 29,584,327 30,327,192
Net, end of year/Total 46% 46% 46%
6. Debt Service as % of Total Governmental Revenues 7.2% 6.9% 5.3%
Debt Service (6) 1,136,776 1,137,961 1,134,819
Total Governmental Revenues 15,891,632 16,587,910 21,302,782
Total Debt (7) 20,237,095 16,943,870 16,318,897
Total Debt as a % of Total Governmental Revenues 127% 102% 77%
7. Total Reserves (% of total governmental expenditures) 30% 27% 20%
Total Governmental Reserves (unassigned Fund Balances) $5,173,940 $5,317,704 $4,321,941
General Fund Reserve (unassigned GF Fund Balance) (8) 6,134,585 6,272,614 6,413,750
General Fund Reserve/General Fund Expenditures 82% 78% 71%
GF Reserves (months of GF expenditures) (9) 9 . 9 9 . 4 8 . 6
8. Pension Payments as % of Gov'l Revenues na 1.4% 1.3%
Total Pension Liability (10) $9,298,910 $10,425,582 na
Unfunded Pension Liability (10) 2,091,909 2,469,130 2,138,863
% Pension Liability Funded 77.5% 76.3% na
Annual Payments to Pension Normal Cost (11) na 139,562 155,507
Annual Payments to Unfunded Pension Liability (11) na 91,926 117,440
Total Payments (normal cost + unfunded liabilities) na 231,488 272,947
Unfunded Pension Liability as a % of Total Gov'l Revenues na 15% 10%
Total Payments as % of Gen'l Fund Revenues na 1.6% 1.9%
9. OPEB Liability Payments as % of Total Gov'l Revenues na
Total OPEB Liability (end of FY) (12) $1,286,000 $1,410,000 $1,523,000
Net OPEB Liability (end of FY) (13) 959,372 684,000 616,101
% OPEB Liability Funded 25.4% 51.5% 59.5%
Total OPEB Payments (14) 147,000 49,000 na
Notes to Table A.4-4
(1) Statement of Revenues, Expenditures & Changes in Fund Balance, Total Gov'l Funds (FY17 pg. 17, FY18, FY19, pg. 15).
(2) Statement of Revenues, Expenditures & Changes in Fund Balance, Total Gov'l Funds (FY17 pg. 17, FY18, FY19, pg. 15).
(3) Statement of Net Position (FY17, pg. 13; FY18, pg. 11)
(4) Statement of Net Position (FY17, pg. 13; FY18, pg. 11)
(5) FY17, Note 4, pg. 28-29; FY18, Note 4, pg. 26-27.
(6) Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, Total Governmental Funds (FY17 pg. 17, FY18, pg. 15).
(7) Statement of Net Position (FY17, pg. 13; FY18, FY19, pg. 11); non-current liabilities excluding pension and OPEB.
(8) Balance Sheet, Governmental Funds, FY17 pg. 15; FY18 pg. 13; FY20 budget, pg. 3.
(9) GF Reserve/(GF expenditures/12 months)
(10) CalPERS Annual Valuation Report as of June 30, Plan's Funded Status, pg. 5 (Misc. and PEPRA).
(11) CalPERS Annual Valuation Report as of June 30, Required Employer Contributions, pg. 4 (Misc. and PEPRA).
(12) CAFR FY18, Note 7, pg. 38 for FY17 year end;
(13) CAFR FY17, Note 7, pg. 36-39; FY18, Note 7, pg. 35, FY19, pg. 24; Actuarial Valuation, March 28, 2018.
(14) CAFR FY17, Note 7, pg. 38, Annual Req'd Contribution.
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
REFERENCES
AB 2257. (n.d.). Government Code Section 54954.2.
Auditor of the State of California. (FY2016-2017, FY2017-2018). Fiscal Health of California
Cities. Retrieved from https://www.auditor.ca.gov/bsa/cities_risk_index
Butte LAFco. (2010, 05 06). Operations Manual Policies and Procedures.
California Government Code §56425(e)5. (n.d.). Present and Probable need; disadvantaged
unincorporated communities .
California Government Codes section 56375 (a) (8) (A). (n.d.). Annexations Greater than 10
acres; Contiguous to a DUC.
CalPERS. (n.d.). Public Agency Required Employer Contributions. Retrieved from
https://www.calpers.ca.gov/page/employers/actuarial-services/employer-
contributions/public-agency-contributions
Celaya, D. C. (2020, 03 03).
City of Agoura Hills. (2005, June). Resolution No. 05-1378.
City of Agoura Hills. (2013). General Plan Housing Element.
City of Agoura Hills. (2014). Report to City Council - Summary of Proposed Annexation of
Properties Along Agoura Rd.
City of Agoura Hills. (2015). Sewer System Managment Plan.
City of Agoura Hills. (2017). Citywide Pavement Management System Update.
City of Agoura Hills. (2018). The AVE Project Initial Study.
City of Agoura Hills. (2019). Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan FY 19-20 to FY 23-24.
City of Agoura Hills. (2020, 01 23). Correspondence. Case and Planners Spreadsheet.
City of Agoura Hills. (2020). Mid-Cycle Budget Review FY2019/20-2020/21.
City of Agoura Hills. (FY 2019-20/2020-21). Budget.
City of Agoura Hills. (Published July 2019). CalPERS Annual Valuation Reports as of June 30,
2018, Misc. Plan and PEPRA Misc. Plan.
City of Calabasas. (2004). Park and Recreation Master Plan.
City of Calabasas. (2008, 12 03). Reserve Policy, Standard Policy and Procedures.
City of Calabasas. (2011). Community Development Department Annual Report.
City of Calabasas. (2012, 05 31). Council Agenda Report. Resolution No. 2012-1333.
City of Calabasas. (2013). 2030 General Plan-Housing Element.
City of Calabasas. (2015). 2030 General Plan.
City of Calabasas. (2016, 12 30). Council Agenda Report. Resolution No. 2017-1534.
City of Calabasas. (2018-2019 & 2019-2020). Adopted Two-Year Budget .
City of Calabasas. (2019). CAFR. Retrieved from
https://policyconsultingassociates.sharepoint.com/sites/LAMSR2019/Shared
Documents/Agency Docs/Calabasas/Finances/CAFRs/Calab - CAFR 2018-
2019.pdf?CT=1588369361153&OR=ItemsView,
City of Calabasas. (2019). Sewer System Management Plan.
City of Calabasas. (2020-21 & 2021-22). Adopted Two-Year Budget .
City of Calabasas. (n.d.). Budget Workshop FY19 & FY20 Summary Discussion.
City of Calabasas. (n.d.). City Profile. Retrieved from City of Calabasas:
https://www.cityofcalabasas.com/government/community-development/planning-
division/city-profile
REFERENCES 141
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
City of Calabasas. (n.d.). General Fund Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Headcount p. 14. Retrieved
from Budget Summary and Discussion FY 2018-2019 & 2019-2020 Plus Additional 3-
Year Forecast:
https://www.cityofcalabasas.com/pdf/agendas/council/2018/062718/item11-Budget-
Summary-Discussion.pdf
City of Calabasas. (Published July 2019). CalPERS Annual Valuation Reports as of June 30,
2018, Misc. Plan and PEPRA Misc. Plan.
City of Hidden Hills. (2005, 10 25). Agreement with Charles Abbott Associates for Professional
Services.
City of Hidden Hills. (2014, 11 10). Resolution No. 877.
City of Hidden Hills. (2017, 06 01). General Services Agreement between City of Hidden Hills
and the County of Los Angeles.
City of Hidden Hills. (2019, 07 01). City-County Municipal Services Agreement between the
City of Hidden Hills and the County of Los Angeles Department of Animal Care and
Control.
City of Hidden Hills. (2019). County of Los Angeles Fire Dept., Hidden Hills Monthly Activity
Reports.
City of Hidden Hills. (2019, 06 24). General Fund Reserve Policy, Resolution No. 942.
City of Hidden Hills. (2020, 05 23). Correspondence.
City of Hidden Hills. (2020, 04 07). Correspondence.
City of Hidden Hills. (2020, 06 11). Correspondence with City Engineer.
City of Hidden Hills. (2020, 05 19). Correspondence with Dirk Lovett, City Engineer.
City of Hidden Hills. (2020, 02). Hidden Hills Newsletter.
City of Hidden Hills. (2020, 06 22). Resolution No. 959.
City of Hidden Hills. (2020, 01 28). Response to Data Request.
City of Hidden Hills. (2020, 01 28). Response to Data Request.
City of Hidden Hills. (FY2019-20). Annudal Budget.
City of Hidden Hills. (n.d.). GASB Statement No. 75.
City of Hidden Hills. (n.d.). History. Retrieved from City of Hidden Hills:
https://hiddenhillscity.org/about-us/history/
City of Hidden Hills. (July 1, 2018 through 2023). Memorandum of Understanding between
Hidden Hills, Calabasas and the Las Virgenes Unified School District for the Provision of
Library Services.
City of Hidden Hills. (n.d.). Los Angeles County Fire Department. Retrieved from
https://hiddenhillscity.org/city-departments/public-safety/los-angeles-county-fire-
department/
City of Hidden Hills. (Published July 2019). CalPERS Annual Valuation Reports as of June 30.
2018, Misc. Plan and PEPRA Misc. Plan.
City of Westlake Village. (2015, 09 15). Official Statement, Certificates of Participation.
City of Westlake Village. (2019). Annual Report.
City of Westlake Village. (2019). General Plan Update.
City of Westlake Village. (2019, 12 10). Memo from City Manager re: Agenda Item New
Business No. 1.
City of Westlake Village. (2019, 03). North Business Park Specific Plan .
City of Westlake Village. (2019-20 & 2020-21). Preliminary Two-Year Budget.
City of Westlake Village. (2020, 05 14). Correspondence.
City of Westlake Village. (2020, 03 04). Correspondence.
REFERENCES 142
LOS ANGELES LAFCO
AGOURA HILLS, CALABASAS, HIDDEN HILLS, AND WESTLAKE VILLAGE MSR AND SOI UPDATE
FINAL
City of Westlake Village. (2020, 06 24). One-Year Budget 2020-21.
City of Westlake Village. (n.d.). City History. Retrieved from City of Westlake Village:
https://www.wlv.org/116/City-History
City of Westlake Village. (FY2019-20 & 2020-21). Adopted Two-Year Budget. Retrieved from
https://www.wlv.org/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/3473
City of Westlake Village. (FY2019-20 & 2020-21). City of Westlake Village Two-Year Budget.
Retrieved from https://www.wlv.org/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/3473
County of Los Angeles. (2020, 05 05). Office of the Sheriff.
County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works. (n.d.). Consolidated Sewer Maintenance
District. Retrieved from
https://dpw.lacounty.gov/smd/SMD/12thEdAnnualNewsletterCSMD.pdf
Kallman, K. (2020, 05 08). City of Hidden Hills Interview.
LAFCO File No 2018-12. (n.d.).
LAFCO File No. 2015-10. (n.d.).
LAFCO GIS. (2020, 06 04).
LAFCO GIS. (2020, 06 03).
Las Virgenes Municipal Water District. (n.d.). What’s Up With the Irrigation on Las Virgenes
Road? Retrieved from https://www.lvmwd.com/about-us/joint-powers-
authority/wastewater-services/recycled-water/sprayfields
Las Virgenes Municpal Water District. (2018). Consumer Confidence Report.
Los Angeles County. (2000). Santa Monica Mountains North Area Plan.
Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department. (January 1-April 30, 2019 and 2020). Malibu/Lost
Hills Station Part 1 Crimes.
Malibu Creek Watershed Management Group. (2018). Enhanced Watershed Management
Program for Malibu Creek Watershed.
Moorlach, C. S. (January 16, 2020). Moorlach's Financial Soundness Rankings for California's
482 Cities.
(2016-2040). Regional Transportation Plan (RTP)/Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS)
Final Growth Forecast by Jurisdiction.
Reimbursement Agreement Between the City of Calabasas and the City of Hidden Hills Related
to the Craftsman’s Corner Annexation. (2015, 01 01).
S&P Global Ratings. (2015).
Standard and Poor's Ratings Definitions. (n.d.).
State Water Resources Control Board. (2020). California Integrated Water Quality System
Project - SSO Report.
Willdan Financial Services. (June, 13, 2012). Comprehensive User Fee Study Report. City of
Agoura Hills.
REFERENCES 143