Fire MSR and Sphere of Influence

MODOC LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCo) FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW (MSR) AND SPHERE OF INFUENCE (SOI) UPDATE Adopted October 10, 2017 Resolution 2017-0003 Service Review Resolution 2017-0004 Sphere of Influence MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 COUNTY OF MODOC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3 FIRE PROTECTION AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL ISSUES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4 ADIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10 5 ALTURAS RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 6 CALIFORNIA PINES COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 7 CANBY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 8 CEDARVILLE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 9 DAVIS CREEK FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 10 EAGLEVILLE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 11 FORT BIDWELL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 12 LAKE CITY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 13 LIKELY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 14 LOOKOUT FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 15 TULELAKE MULTI-COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 16 WILLOW RANCH FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 17 CITY OF ALTURAS FIRE DEPARTMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 18 OTHER MODOC FIRE PROTECTION AGENCIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 19 COMPARISON OF FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 ABBREVIATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 DEFINITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 PREPARERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 FIRE DISTRICT MAPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 1 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Role and Responsibility of LAFCo The Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, as amended (“CKH Act”) (California Government Code §§56000 et seq.), is LAFCo’s governing law and outlines the requirements for preparing Municipal Service Reviews (MSRs) for periodic Sphere of Influence (SOI) updates. MSRs and SOIs are tools created to empower LAFCo to satisfy its legislative charge of “discouraging urban sprawl, preserving open-space and prime agricultural lands, efficiently providing government services, and encouraging the orderly formation and development of local agencies based upon local conditions and circumstances (§56301). CKH Act Section 56301 further establishes that “one of the objects of the commission is to make studies and to obtain and furnish information which will contribute to the logical and reasonable development of local agencies in each county and to shape the development of local agencies so as to advantageously provide for the present and future needs of each county and its communities.” Based on that legislative charge, LAFCo serves as an arm of the State; preparing and reviewing studies and analyzing independent data to make informed, quasi-legislative decisions that guide the physical and economic development of the state (including agricultural uses) and the efficient, cost-effective, and reliable delivery of services to residents, landowners, and businesses. While SOIs are required to be updated every five years, they are not time-bound as planning tools by the statute, but are meant to address the “probable physical boundaries and service area of a local agency” (§56076). SOIs therefore guide both the near-term and long-term physical and economic development of local agencies their broader county area, and MSRs provide the near-term and long- term time-relevant data to inform LAFCo’s SOI determinations. 1.2 Purpose of a Municipal Service Review As described above, MSRs are designed to equip LAFCo with relevant information and data necessary for the Commission to make informed decisions on SOIs. The CKH Act, however, gives LAFCo broad discretion in deciding how to conduct MSRs, including geographic focus, scope of study, and the identification of alternatives for improving the efficiency, cost-effectiveness, accountability, and reliability of public services. The purpose of a Municipal Services Review (MSR) in general is to provide a comprehensive inventory and analysis of the services provided by local municipalities, service areas, and special districts. A MSR evaluates the structure and operation of the local municipalities, service areas, and special districts and discusses possible areas for improvement and coordination. The MSR is intended to provide information and analysis to support a sphere of influence update. A written statement of the study’s determinations must be made in the following areas: 1 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 1. Growth and population projections for the affected area; 2. The location and characteristics of any Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities (DUCs) within or contiguous to the sphere of influence; 3. Present and planned capacity of public facilities, adequacy of public services, and infrastructure needs or deficiencies including needs or deficiencies related to sewers, municipal and industrial water, and structural fire protection in any disadvantaged, unincorporated communities within or contiguous to the sphere of influence; 4. Financial ability of agencies to provide services; 5. Status of, and opportunities for, shared facilities; 6. Accountability for community service needs, including governmental structure and operational efficiencies The MSR is organized according to these determinations listed above. Information regarding each of the above issue areas is provided in this document. 1.3 Purpose of a Sphere Of Influence In 1972, LAFCos were given the power to establish SOIs for all local agencies under their jurisdiction. As defined by the CKH Act, “’sphere of influence’ means a plan for the probable physical boundaries and service area of a local agency, as determined by the commission” (§56076). SOIs are designed to both proactively guide and respond to the need for the extension of infrastructure and delivery of municipal services to areas of emerging growth and development. Likewise, they are also designed to discourage urban sprawl and the premature conversion of agricultural and open space resources to urbanized uses. The role of SOIs in guiding the State’s growth and development was validated and strengthened in 2000 when the Legislature passed Assembly Bill (“AB”) 2838 (Chapter 761, Statutes of 2000). This bill was the result of two years of labor by the Commission on Local Governance for the 21st Century, which traveled up and down the State taking testimony from a variety of local government stakeholders and assembled an extensive set of recommendations to the Legislature to strengthen the powers and tools of LAFCos to promote logical and orderly growth and development, and the efficient, cost-effective, and reliable delivery of public services to California’s residents, businesses, landowners, and visitors. The requirement for LAFCos to conduct MSRs was established by AB 2838 as an acknowledgment of the importance of SOIs and recognition that regular periodic updates of SOIs should be conducted on a five-year basis (§56425(g)) with the benefit of better information and data through MSRs (§56430(a)). A MSR is conducted prior to, or in conjunction with, the update of a SOI and provides the foundation for updating it. LAFCo is required to make five written determinations when establishing, amending, or updating an SOI for any local agency that address the following (§56425(c)): 2 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 1. The present and planned land uses in the area, including agricultural and open- space lands. 2. The present and probable need for public facilities and services in the area. 3. The present capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public services that the agency provides or is authorized to provide. 4. The existence of any social or economic communities of interest in the area if the commission determines that they are relevant to the agency. 5. For an update of an SOI of a city or special district that provides public facilities or services related to sewers, municipal and industrial water, or structural fire protection, the present and probable need for those public facilities and services of any Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities (DUCs) within the existing sphere of influence. 3 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 2 COUNTY OF MODOC As of the 2010 Census, the population was of Modoc County 9,686; making it the third- least populous county in California (Alpine and Sierra counties have lower populations). The county seat and only incorporated city is Alturas. The table below shows the population decline of Modoc County compared to the population increase for the State of California. Population Data Modoc County1 Modoc County California Population April 1, 2010 9,686 37,254,522 Population estimates, July 1, 2016 8,795 39,250,017 Percent change - April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2016 -9.2% +5.4% The following table shows age data in Modoc County compared to California. Since age data is not available for each fire protection district it will be assumed that the data for the individual districts is similar to the County of Modoc. Age Data Modoc County2 Modoc County California Persons under 5 years, percent April 1, 2010 5.6% 6.8% Persons under 5 years, percent July 1, 2015 4.3% 6.4% Percent change April 2010 to July 2015 -1.3% -0.4% Persons under 18 years, percent April 1, 2010 21.9% 25.0% Persons under 18 years, percent July 1, 2015 19.7% 23.3% Percent change April 2010 to July 2015 -2.2% -1.7% Persons 65 years and over, percent, April 1, 2010 19.7% 11.4% Persons 65 years and over, percent, July 1, 2015 23.9% 13.3% Percent change April 2010 to July 2015 +4.2% +1.9% For each of the categories presented above, Modoc County follows the same trend as the State of California (plus or minus). However, Modoc County has a higher percentage of elderly people than the State of California. The more elderly people in the population, the more medical emergency calls that the fire districts will have. 1 US Census Bureau, https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045216/06049,06, April 25, 2017. 2 US Census Bureau, https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045216/06049,06, April 25, 2017. 4 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 The following table shows the Median Household Income for Modoc County and the State of California: Income Data Modoc County3 Modoc County California Median Household Income (in 2015 dollars) $37,860 $61,818 Per capita income in past 12 months (in 2015 dollars) $21,001 $30,318 Persons in poverty, percent 20.3% 15.3% The Median Household Income is used to determine whether a community is a Disadvantaged Unincorporated Community (DUC). A DUC has a Median Household Income lower than 80% of the State Median Household Income ($49,454). All of Modoc County could be considered a DUC except for the City of Alturas, which is an Incorporated City. However, the various fire protection districts are too far from Alturas to be annexed to the City. In summary, the population of Modoc County is declining, the population that is left is aging, and the median household income is well below the State median household income. The declining and aging population signifies that there are fewer people available to be volunteer fire fighters or volunteer board members. The aging population also signifies there will be more medical emergency calls. 3 US Census Bureau, https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045216/06049,06, April 25, 2017. 5 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 3 FIRE PROTECTION AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES ISSUES The following is a general discussion of five fire protection issues including Mutual Aid, Dispatch, Response Time, Staffing and Water Supply. 3.1 Mutual and Automatic Aid Issues Most of the fire protection and EMS providers primarily serve their own jurisdictions. Given the critical need for rapid response, however, there are extensive mutual aid efforts that cross-jurisdictional boundaries. Mutual aid refers to reciprocal service provided under a mutual aid agreement, a pre- arranged plan and contract between agencies for reciprocal assistance upon request by the first-response agency. In addition to Mutual Aid, the jurisdictions rely on automatic aid primarily for coverage of areas with street access limitations and freeways. Automatic aid refers to reciprocal service provided under an automatic aid agreement, a prearranged plan or contract between agencies for an automatic response for service with no need for a request to be made. 3.2 Dispatch Issues Dispatch for fire and medical calls is increasingly becoming regionalized and specialized. This increased regionalization and specialization is motivated by the following nine factors: 1) Constituents increasingly expect emergency medical dispatching (EMD), which involves over-the-phone medical procedure instructions to the 911 caller and requires specialized staff. 2) Paramedics increasingly rely on EMD, which also involves preparing the paramedic en-route for the type of medical emergency and procedures. 3) Dispatch technology and protocols have become increasingly complex. 4) Modern technology has enabled better measurement and regulatory oversight of fire department (FD) response times, and increased pressure for FDs to meet response time guidelines. 5) FDs need standard communication protocols due to their reliance on mutual aid. 6) Dispatching of calls from cell phones is particularly inefficient due to multiple transfers, length of time the caller spends on hold and lack of location information. Response times are further delayed when callers that are unfamiliar with the area are unable to describe rural locations to the dispatch personnel. 6 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 7) All cell phones are now equipped with GPS; all old phones have been replaced by phones with GPS capability. Although significant portions of the County do not have cell phone capability. 8) NFPA recommends a 60-second standard for dispatch time, the time between the placement of the 911 call and the notification of the emergency responders. The Center for Public Safety Excellence recommends a 50-second benchmark for dispatch time. 9) There are clear economies of scale in providing modern fire and medical dispatch services. 3.3 Fire Protection Response Time Issues Response times reflect the time elapsed between the dispatch of personnel and the arrival of the first responder on the scene. For fire and paramedic service, there are service standards relating to response times, dispatch times, staffing, and water flow. Particularly in cases involving patients who have stopped breathing or are suffering from heart attacks, the chances of survival improve when the patient receives medical care quickly. Similarly, a quick fire suppression response can potentially prevent a structure fire from reaching the “flashover” point at which very rapid fire spreading occurs—generally in less than 10 minutes.4 The guideline established by the National Fire Protection Association5 (NFPA) for fire response times is six minutes at least 90 percent of the time, with response time measured from the 911-call time to the arrival time of the first-responder at the scene.6 Medical Aid and Emergency Fire Dispatch in Modoc County is handled by the Modoc County Sheriff’s department. The fire response time guideline established by the Center for Public Safety Excellence (formerly the Commission on Fire Accreditation International) is 5 minutes 50 seconds at least 90 percent of the time.7 Rural Fire departments may not meet these standards due to the distance from the fire department to the area where service is needed. 4 NFPA Standard 1710, 2004. 5 The National Fire Protection Association is a non-profit association of fire chiefs, firefighters, manufacturers and consultants. 6 Guideline for a full structure fire is response within ten minutes by a 12-15 person response team at least 90 percent of the time. 7 Commission on Fire Accreditation International, 2000. 7 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 3.4 Fire Protection Staffing Issues For structure fires, NFPA recommends that the response team include 14 personnel—a commander, five water supply line operators, a two-person search and rescue team, a two-person ventilation team, a two-person initial rapid intervention crew, and two support people. The NFPA guidelines require fire departments to establish overall staffing levels to meet response time standards, and to consider the hazard to human life, firefighter safety, potential property loss, and the firefighting approach. NFPA recommends that each engine, ladder or truck company be staffed by four on- duty firefighters, and that at least four firefighters (two in and two out), each with protective clothing and respiratory protection, be on scene to initiate fire-fighting inside a structure. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standard requires that when two firefighters enter a structure fire, two will remain on the outside to assist in rescue activities.8 For emergency medical response with advanced life support needs, NFPA recommends the response team include two paramedics and two basic-level emergency medical technicians. Fire protection efforts throughout Modoc County rely heavily on volunteer efforts in conjunction with State and Federal agencies. Due to the scarcity of resources throughout the County, there is a heavy reliance on volunteer personnel in the local Departments in the more remote unincorporated areas (Alturas is the only incorporated City). Every local fire protection entity in Modoc County (Community Services District/Fire Protection District) relies on volunteer staff—only the City of Alturas relies on paid Firefighter personnel and Calpines CSD has paid positions, yet these departments are primarily staffed by volunteers. There are increasing training demands for firefighting personnel. Training in firefighting skills is one component, but training also includes the skills required for responding to medical emergencies and hazardous materials events. The training required for a volunteer is estimated at 200 hours per year, and is a substantial burden for any individual wishing to maintain a volunteer relationship with a local district or the City. 3.5 Mutual and Automatic Aid Each of the fire protection districts is a member of a Mutual Aid Agreement with CALFIRE that provides for assistance for wildland fires in State Responsibility Areas (SRA’s). Each of the fire protection districts is a member of a Master Agreement that provides for assistance for fire and other emergency events that exceed the capacity of 8 29 CFR 1910.134. 8 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 any individual district. Mutual Aid Agreements are standardized throughout the state to ensure assistance can be obtained from outside fire districts across the State. Mutual aid refers to reciprocal service provided under a mutual aid agreement, a pre- arranged plan and contract between agencies for reciprocal assistance upon request by the first-response agency. Automatic aid refers to reciprocal services provided under an automatic aid agreement, a prearranged plan or contract between agencies, for an automatic response for service with no request for approval needed. In addition to mutual aid, jurisdictions may rely on automatic aid primarily for coverage of areas where the closest resources respond to fire or EMS emergencies. 3.4.4 Fire Safe Council One Fire Safe Council is in operation within the County. This Council is called the Modoc Fire Safe Council. There is a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (Fire Safe Plan) in place in Modoc County, which was revised in May 2008. The Fire Safe Council is a voluntary organization formed to enhance the effectiveness of fire protection. The cooperative nature of and educational and outreach efforts of these groups is a critical component for wildland pre-fire planning and mitigation. The Modoc Community Wildfire Protection Plan is a cooperative effort between the U.S. Forest Service, CALFIRE, Rural Fire Departments in Modoc County, Nor Cal-Neva RC&D, Modoc County Office of Emergency Services, and the Bureau of Land Management. 3.4.5 Hazardous Materials Response to hazardous materials events is coordinated with the State Office of Emergency Services (OES), through local emergency service operators. 03.5 Fire Protection Water Supply Issues For structure fires, NFPA recommends the availability of an uninterrupted water supply for 30 minutes with enough pressure to apply at least 400 gallons of water per minute (gpm). The minimum criteria for rural fire departments to obtain an ISO rating of 8B includes among other criteria that the water supply must be able to deliver an uninterrupted minimum fire flow of 200 gpm for 20 minutes for all primary and automatic aid departments (Insurance Services Offices, 2009, http://www.isomitigation.com). 9 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 4 ADIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 4.1 Adin Community Background 4.1.1 History of Adin Adin (formerly, Adinville and Aidenville) is an unincorporated community in Modoc County California.9 It is located 42 miles by road southwest of Alturas,10 at an elevation of 4203 feet. Adin, the first town in Modoc County west of the Warner Mountains, was founded in 1869 by Adin McDowell as the supply point for the mining town of Hayden in northern Lassen County, and was named for him in 1870.11 The Aidenville post office opened in 1871, and changed its name to Adin in 1876. A 1913 book described Adin as having a population of 200, and as the chief town of the Big Valley.12 It became a sawmill town in the mid-1930s when the Edgerton Brothers Mill moved into town, from the Adin Mountains. The town suffered devastating fires in 1904, 1915, 1931, and finally in 1939. Following the 1939 fire, the town organized a volunteer fire brigade.13 4.1.2 General Plan According to the “Modoc County General Plan 1988 Background Report”, Adin is a rural community of approximately 325 persons with an agriculturally-oriented population in the outlying areas. Adin has several services and offices, including a general store-grocery store, motel, service stations, fire hall, post office, State Highway maintenance station, a USDA Forest Service District Ranger Station, Adin Community Park and Adin Airport, the latter two being Modoc County facilities.14 4.1.3 Services Adin is in the Big Valley Joint Unified School District. The primary school, middle school and high school are located in Bieber (Lassen County). The former Adin School site is used for a preschool.15 The Adin Community Services District operates a wastewater collection and treatment system. The system served 127 residential customers and 19 commercial customers in 16 2011. 9 U.S. Geological Survey Geographic Names Information System: Adin, California. 10 Adin CSD, 2012. 11 Gudde, Erwin; William Bright (2004). California Place Names (Fourth ed. ed.). University of California Press. p. 3. ISBN 0-520-24217-3. Drury, Wells; Aubrey Drury (1913). California tourist guide and handbook: authentic description of routes of travel and points of interest in California. Western Guidebook Company. p. 248. http://books.google.com/books?id=yQtFAAAAIAAJ. Retrieved 2009-06-16. 12 Pease, Robert W. (1965). Modoc County; University of California Publications in Geography, Volume 17. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. pp. 84–85, 127. 13 Kean, David. W (1993). Wide Places in the California Roa d - Volume 2 of 4: The Mountain Counties. Sunnyvale, CA: Concord Press. pp. 10. ISBN 1-884261-01-9. 14 County of Modoc, “Modoc County General Plan 1988 Background Report” P. 163. 15 Adin CSD, 2012. 16 Adin Community Services District, August 31, 2011. 10 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 4.1.4 Adin Population Data The 2010 US Census reported that Adin had a population of 272. There were 124 households, out of which 28 (22.6%) had children under the age of 18 living in them, 45 households (36.3%) were made up of individuals and 19 (15.3%) had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.17. There were 71 families (57.3% of all households); the average family size was 2.82. There were 144 housing of which 77 (62.1%) were owner-occupied, and 47 (37.9%) were occupied by renters. The homeowner vacancy rate was 1.3%; the rental vacancy rate was 2.1%. There were 163 people (59.9% of the population) living in owner- occupied housing units and 106 people (39.0%) living in rental housing units. 4.2 Adin Fire Protection District Background 4.2.1 Adin Fire Protection District Contact Information Contact Information for the Adin Fire Protection District is as follows: Chief-Paul Lemke Adin Fire Department, P.O. Box 16, Adin, California 96006 530-299-4700, 530-299-3570 adinfire@frontiernet.net Paull@pmallc.net Fax 530-299-3189 Training is every Wednesday at 1800 (6:00 p.m.). 4.2.2 Adin Fire Protection District Board of Directors The Board of Directors for the Adin Fire Protection District is as follows:17 President-Steve Gagnon Clerk-Loyd Cantral Board Member-Kevin Banwarth Board meeting are the second Tuesday of every month at 1900 (7:00 p.m.).18 Mission Statement19 The Adin Fire Protection District is dedicated to minimize the damage to property and prevent the loss of life from fire, accidents, hazardous material releases, sudden illness, man-made and natural disasters. We will consistently provide safety education, skills and emergency training to all members. We will do services and educational programs in our community. We will strive to gain and hold the respect and loyalty of all community 17 Modoc County Auditor/Clerk/Elections, Amanda R. McKinney, Deputy Clerk Accountant I, Phone: 530-233-6205, amandamckinney@co.modoc,ca.us, May 2, 2017. 18 Adin Fire Protection District, http://www.adinfire.org/about.html, May 1, 2017. 19 Adin Fire Protection District, http://adinfire.org/, May 1, 2017. 11 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 members and victims. We will strive to always be financially responsible and show change and improvement in all we do. 4.2.3 Adin Fire Protection District Staff20 Currently the Adin Fire Protection District has 7 active members. Rules, regulations and mandated training are at an all-time high. Members are expected to be trained in Wildland and Structural Fire Fighting, CPR, First Aid, First Responders, Extrication, Hazardous Materials, Multi Casualty Incidents and Incident Command Systems. Members are encouraged to have class B or higher Drivers Licenses with tank, air and HAZMAT endorsements. 4.2.4 Adin Fire Protection District Equipment The Adin Fire Protection District equipment is listed in the following table: Adin Fire Protection District Equipment21 Number Name Type Equipment Engine 1983 Type 1 Two Wheel Drive 4720 Seagrave Engine 500 Gallon Tank Class A &B Foam Capable Portable Foam Unit Basic Life support Equipment Engine 2004 HME 750 Gallon Tank 4722 Urban 1250 GPM Pump Interface Jaws of Life Engine Hydraulic Ram System Class A Foam Pro System Basic Life Support Equipment Water 1980 White Type II 4,000 Gallon Tank Tender 4730 Western Star Water 750 GPM Self Priming PTO Pump Tender 450 GPM Float Pump Water 1965 Type II 4,000 Gallon Tank Tender 4731 Kenworth Water 450 GPM Float Pump Tender 4,000 Gallon Self-Supporting Fold-A-Tank Water 1989 Type II 750 GPM Self-Priming Hydraulic Drive Tender 4732 Freightliner Water Pump Tender 4,000 Gallon Tank The District needs to maintain equipment for fire protection and for medical emergencies. 20 Adin Fire Protection District, http://adinfire.org/staff.html, May 1, 2017 21 Adin Fire Protection District, http://adinfire.org/equipment.html, May 1, 2017 12 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 4.2.5 Adin Fire Protection District Finances The following table shows the budget for the Adin Fire Protection District for 2016-2017 as provided by the Modoc County Auditor: Adin Fire Protection District 218, May 201722 Account Title Credit/Debit REVENUE 4010 Current Secured Taxes 17,519.12 4020 Current Unsecured Taxes 1,058.70 4021 Supplemental Tax 87.61 4030 Prior Secured Taxes 484.43 4040 Prior Unsecured Taxes 20.86 4042 Prior Year Delinquent 0 4090 Timber Yield Tax 166.94 4200 Interest 361.11 4560 Homeowner Property Tax Relief (HOPTR) 257.23 4790 Federal Aid-Other 27,212.63 Total Revenue 47,168.63 EXPENSES 7035 Worker’s Compensation Fund 3198.00 7060 Communications 5610.01 7101 Insurance-General 5019.00 7120 Maintenance of Equipment 1246.93 7130 Maintenance/Improvement of Structure 416.00 7160 Office Expense 843.98 7180 Professional/Specialized 0 7250 Transportation and Travel 2345.71 7260 Utilities 869.29 7870 Machinery and Equipment 742.14 7901 Debt Service payment 4788.72 Total Expenses 25,079.78 The District is in a relatively good financial position since the Modoc County Auditor shows a Fund Balance Available of $40,860.82. 22 Modoc County Auditor, Trial Balance, May 10, 2017. 13 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 4.3 Adin Fire Protection District MSR Determinations MSR-1) The population of Adin is not expected to increase substantially in the near future. Planning, Zoning and Building Permits are managed by the County of Modoc. The District should maintain communication with the County Planning Department regarding these matters. MSR-2) There is no specific information on the Adin FPD to determine if it is a Disadvantaged Unincorporated Community. However, based on a median household income of $31,500 data as stated in the 2010 Census, this area is lower than the 80% of the statewide median household income of $57,708. There are no incorporated cities which could annex this area in any case. MSR-3) The Adin FPD maintains fire-fighting equipment appropriate for the area. The training schedule and training with other districts and agencies should be maintained. MSR-4) The Adin FPD should provide current financial information to the public on a website. The Modoc County Auditor shows that the District has adequate income to cover the expenses and pay back the Federal loan. MSR-5) The Adin FPD does cooperate with the other fire districts and the Modoc Fire Chiefs Association. MSR-6) The Board of Directors has regular meetings at the Fire Station. Administration of the District is necessary in order to provide fire protection and emergency medical response. 4.4 Adin Fire Protection District SOI Determinations The recommendation for the Adin Fire Protection District is that the Sphere of Influence is that the SOI remain the same as the District Boundary. The Determinations are as follows: SOI-1] No additional land is expected to be annexed to the Adin Fire Protection District. SOI-2] The need for fire protection service to the Adin area will continue. SOI-3] Fire Protection services are adequate for a rural area and will need to be maintained in the future. Efficient use of volunteer personnel and funds will be required. SOI-4] Adin provides limited community services. Schools, medical services and most commercial services are provided in other, larger communities in the area. SOI-5] There is no information to determine whether Adin is a DUC. 14 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 5 ALTURAS RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 5.1 Alturas Rural Area Community Background The Alturas Rural Fire Protection District is a separate District from the City of Alturas (2010 Population 2,827) and has a separate governing board. The area around the City of Alturas is not expected to grow substantially because growth will take place within the City where services such as sewer and water are available. 5.2 Alturas Rural Fire Protection District Background 5.2.1 Board of Directors and Contact Information The Alturas Rural Fire Protection District Board of Directors is as follows: 23 Chairman-Walt Davis Secretary-Donnetta Kinney Board Member-Jeff Tatro Board Member-Allen Cain Board Member-Jim Kinney Contact information for the District is as follows:24 Forest Winkle, Fire Chief 310 N. Rine Street, Alturas, CA 96101 Phone 530-233-3018, Cell 530-640-3018 Fax: 530-233-3018 5.2.2 Equipment The fire station for the Alturas Rural Fire District, is located at 310 North Rine Street, Alturas, CA 96101. The Alturas Rural FPD has seven vehicles used for fire protection service as reported in 2010 as follows:25 4320 H.M.E. 2005 750 gal; 750 gpm Aux 5 man cab with foam and Jaws of Life. 4322 Ford 1987 1250 gal. 500 gpm w/ foam 4323 Pierce 2009 500 gal and 750 gpm w/Aux 5 man cab 4 x 4 4324 International 1987 500 gal 500 gpm w/Aux 5 man cab 4325 International 1988 500 gal 500 gpm Aux 2/250 porta pumps 4332 Ford 1995 2500 gal 1250 gpm Water Tender 4332 Peterbuilt 1967 4000 gal 1250 gpm Water Tender 4350 Chevy 2009 4 x 4 5-man cab Rescue Squad Jaws of Life 4560 Dodge 1996 4 x 4 5-man cab Utility 2/2000 gal porta tanks 1/250 gpm porta pump 1/500 gpm porta pump 43 AIR Scott 2006 500 p.s.i. Air and Light Trailer 23 Modoc County Auditor/Clerk/Elections, Amanda R. McKinney, Deputy Clerk Accountant I, Phone: 530-233-6205, amandamckinney@co.modoc,ca.us, May 2, 2017. 24 Modoc Fire Chiefs Association, Phone: 530-233-1151, January 18, 2008. 25 “Modoc County Community Wildfire Protection Plan”, May 2008, p.31. 15 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 5.2.3 Budget The following is the Budget shown for the Alturas Rural Fire Protection District by the Modoc County Auditor. Alturas Rural Fire Protection District 219, May 201726 Account Title Credit/Debit REVENUE 4010 Current Secured Taxes 70,019.91 4020 Current Unsecured Taxes 2,896.72 4021 Supplemental Tax 240.76 4030 Prior Secured Taxes 3,205.35 4040 Prior Unsecured Taxes 79.27 4090 Timber Yield Tax 19.47 4200 Interest 878.54 4560 Homeowner Property Tax Relief (HOPTR) 1,011.91 4755 US Wildlife Refuge/Alturas 0 5436 Donations 300.00 TOTAL REVENUE 78,651.93 EXPENSES 7035 Worker’s compensation fund 8,684.20 7050 Clothing/Personal supply 241.01 7060 Communications 1,691.07 7101 Insurance-General 5,661.00 7120 Maintenance of equipment 3,171.46 7130 Maintenance/Improvement of Structure 6.44 7160 Office Expense 1,186.01 7180 Professional/Specialized 10,202.61 7220 Small Tools 2,284.35 7250 Transportation and travel 4,633.04 7260 Utilities 33,429.90 7870 Machinery and Equipment 2,127.50 7900 Contingency funds 73,318.59 TOTAL EXPENSES 185,702.36 The Modoc County Auditor showed the Fund Balance Available as $104,212.91. 26 Modoc County Auditor, Trial Balance, May 10, 2017. 16 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 5.3 Alturas Rural Fire Protection District MSR Determinations MSR-1) There is not much growth expected for the Alturas Rural FPD because most of the growth will occur within the City of Alturas. Planning, Zoning and Building Permits are managed by the County of Modoc and the District should maintain communication with the County Planning Department regarding these matters. MSR-2) There is no specific information on the Alturas Rural FPD to determine if there are Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities within the District. However, based on a median household income of $32,385 data as stated in the 2010 Census, this area is lower than the 80% of the statewide median household income of $57,708. MSR-3) The Alturas Rural FPD coordinates equipment and training with the City of Alturas Fire Department. MSR-4) The Alturas Rural FPD appears to have adequate income and reserves as reported by the Modoc County Auditor. MSR-5) The Alturas Rural FPD coordinates with the City of Alturas Fire Department but a separate Board of Directors is required. The District should become familiar with other nearby districts in case closer cooperation is required in the future. MSR-6) The Board of Directors has regular meetings but no one responded to the Modoc LAFCo questionnaire regarding this report. A website would be helpful to the District. 5.4 Alturas Rural Fire Protection District SOI Determinations The recommendation for the Alturas Rural FPD Sphere of Influence is that the SOI remain the same as the District Boundary. The Determinations are as follows: SOI-1] No additional lands are expected to be annexed to the Alturas Rural FPD unless an adjacent smaller district is willing to merge with the District. SOI-2] The need for the fire protection service of the Alturas Rural FPD will continue into the future. SOI-3] Fire Protection services are adequate for a rural area and will need to be maintained in the future. Efficient use of personnel and funds will be required. SOI-4] The Alturas Rural FPD area does not have a separate identity and services are provided in the City of Alturas. This is not a problem because of the close cooperation with the City of Alturas Fire Department. SOI-5] There is no information to determine whether there is a DUC within the Alturas Rural FPD. However, based on a median household income of $31,500 data as stated in the 2010 Census, this area is lower than the 80% of the statewide median household income of $57,708. 17 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 6 CALIFORNIA PINES COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 6.1 California Pines Community Background California Pines is a census designated place (CDP). It lies at an elevation of 4406 feet. The population was 520 at the 2010 census. There were 216 households, out of which 63 (29.2%) had children under the age of 18 living in them, 66 households (30.6%) were made up of individuals and 33 (15.3%) had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.41. There were 135 families (62.5% of all households); the average family size was 2.98. The population was spread out in age as follows: CALIFORNIA PINES AGE DISTRIBUTION 2010 Under the age of 18 129 people 24.8% Aged 18 to 24 35 people 6.7% Aged 25 to 44 79 people 15.2% Aged 45 to 64 172 people 33.1% 65 years of age or older 105 people 20.2% TOTAL 520 people 100.0% The median age was 47.2 years. For every 100 females there were 108.8 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 99.5 males. There were 276 housing units of which 183 (84.7%) were owner-occupied, and 33 (15.3%) were occupied by renters. The homeowner vacancy rate was 3.7%; the rental vacancy rate was 10.8%. There were 436 people (83.8% of the population) living in owner-occupied housing units and 84 people (16.2%) living in rental housing units. The California Pines Lodge sits on a small peninsula surrounded by California Pines Lake and features 28 rooms for guests, a restaurant and cocktail lounge, activity room with big-screen TV, ping-pong and pool tables. There is also a banquet room with a magnificent double-sided, oversized fire-pit, which also warms the reception area of the lodge. The grounds of the lodge include a swimming pool and two paddle-tennis courts. 6.2 California Pines Community Services District (CPCSD) 6.2.1 California Pines CSD Background The California Pines Community Services District (CSD) is located west of Alturas in Modoc County. The California Pines CSD was formed in 1969 to serve the needs of the California Pines Subdivision. The subdivided area included 10,700+ acres but the District included 24,700+ acres. Additional land was annexed to the District in 1970 and 1975 so that the District now includes approximately 80 square miles. The District serves a population of approximately 400 people. 18 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 California Pines Community Services District provides water, sewer, fire protection, trash, and mosquito abatement services to the community of California Pines.27 6.2.2 California Pines CSD Contact Information Contact information for the District is as follows:28 California Pines CSD HC4 Box 43002 Alturas, CA 96101 530-233-2766 (Office) 530-233-2704 (Fax) Email: calpinescsd@frontiernet.net The California Pines CSD office is located at County Road 71, Building 376, Alturas CA 96101. Website: https://cpcsd.specialdistrict.org/ 6.2.3 California Pines CSD Board of Directors The California Pines Community Services District is governed by a 5-member board of directors who are elected to serve by the people. Board members serve 4-year terms.29 Board members are as follows: President: Buck Rodgers Vice President : Stanley Ehlinger Director: Mark Bishop Treasurer: Suzanne Ehlinger Director: Terri Bishop The California Pines CSD is fortunate to have a five member Board of Directors. As members have gone off the Board new people have stepped up to serve. This is good for the District. The Mission30 Statement for the California Pines CSD is as follows: California Pines Community Service District will strive to: • Provide the full range of municipal services, • Reasonable costs, applied consistently to all customers • Maintain a healthy infrastructure • Operate with environmental integrity • Promote the economic development of our community. 27 California Pines Community Services District, https://cpcsd.specialdistrict.org/services, April 29, 2017. 28 California Pines Community Services District, https://cpcsd.specialdistrict.org/contact-us, April 29, 2017. 29 California Pines Community Services District, https://cpcsd.specialdistrict.org/board-members, April 29, 2017. 30 California Pines Community Services District, https://cpcsd.specialdistrict.org/our-mission, April 29, 2017. 19 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 6.2.4 CPCSD Staff The California Pines CSD website states that the “California Pines Community Services District is committed to providing quality services to our residents; while working together with other agencies, and members in our community, to create a safe, sustainable environment to call home.” The staff leadership is as follows: Ron Sherer, General Manager/Fire Chief Holly Sherer, Human Resource Coordinator Susan Lake, Administrative Assistant Justin Ulrich, Fire Captain 6.2.5 CPCSD Fire Department A. Equipment The following table shows the California Pines CSD vehicles for Fire Department use: California Pines CSD Vehicle List31 Number Year Brand Identification Type 4200 2012 Chevy K-1500 Squad Vehicle 4101 2006 Chevy K-1500 Squad Vehicle E-4121 1997 International 4800 Type 3 E-4122 2009 International Work Star Type 1,2,3 E-4123 1999 International 4800 Type 3 E-4125 1999 Freightliner FL-70 Type 2 E-4124 1989 International Model 5 Type 3 T-4130 2010 Kenworth 2000 High Pressure w/t T-4131 1997 Peterbuilt 377 400 w/t B. Budget The California Pines CSD operates two budgets, the Government Funds Allocation and the Enterprise Funds Allocation. The Fire Department is included in the Government Funds Allocation along with General, Roads, and Vector Control. The Budget for fire protection was $115,909.94 on June 30, 2014. This means that the Department would show a loss of $86,117.36 or 84.5%. The Fire Department does contract to the US Forest Service and to CALFIRE. In the summer of 2016 there were nine assignments ranging from one week to 21 days.32 6.3 California Pines CSD Fire Department MSR Determinations MSR-1) Although there are lots that could be developed within the California Pines CSD, the population is not expected to increase substantially from the existing population of 350 in the near future. Planning, Zoning, and Building Permits are managed by the County of Modoc and the District should maintain communication with the County Planning Department regarding these matters. 31 California Pines CSD, HC4 Box 43002, Alturas CA 96101, March 23, 2017. 32 Modoc LAFCo, California Pines CSD Questionnaire, March 24, 2017. 20 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 MSR-2) There is no specific information on the California Pines CSD to determine if it is a Disadvantaged Unincorporated Community (DUC). However, based on a median household income of $54,297 data as stated in the 2010 Census, this area is higher than the 80% of the statewide median household income of $57,708. There is no incorporated city, which could annex this area in any case. MSR-3) The California Pines CSD has fire-fighting equipment. Training volunteers and training with other districts for both fire and medical emergencies should be maintained. MSR-4) The California Pines CSD should provide the budget and audit information on the website so it is available to the public. The California Pines CSD reports to Modoc LAFCo that they are “struggling with payroll and bills.” MSR-5) The California Pines CSD does cooperate with other fire protection districts and the Modoc Fire Chiefs Association. Any shared training will be a benefit to the District. MSR-6) The Board of Directors has five members and holds regular meetings on the third Friday of each month at 4:00 p.m. Any changes are noted on the website. It would be good to show the full agenda of each meeting and the minutes of previous meetings on the website. The information provided by California Pines CSD was most helpful in the preparation of this report. 6.4 California Pines CSD Fire Department SOI Determinations The recommendation for the California Pines CSD Sphere of Influence is that the SOI remain the same as the District Boundary. The Determinations are as follows: SOI-1] No additional lands are expected to be annexed to the California Pines CSD. The fact that the California Pines is a CSD makes it more difficult to combine with a fire protection district. SOI-2] The need for the fire protection service of the California Pines CSD will continue so the service should be maintained and funded to the greatest extent possible by the District. SOI-3] Fire Protection services are adequate for a rural area and will need to be maintained in the future. Efficient use of personnel and funds will be required. SOI-4] California Pines maintains a separate small community with economic interests to maintain the value of the properties. The residents depend on Alturas for shopping, and other commercial, educational and social services. SOI-5] There is no information to determine whether California Pines is a DUC. However, based on a median household income of $54,297 data as stated in the 2010 Census, this area is higher than the 80% of the statewide median household income of $57,708. 21 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 7 CANBY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 7.1 Canby Community Background Canby is located 17 miles west of Alturas. The 2010 US Census reported that Canby had a population of 315. The Census reported that 154 people (48.9% of the population) lived in households, 133 (42.2%) lived in non-institutionalized group quarters, and 28 (8.9%) were institutionalized. There were 62 households, out of which 15 (24.2%) had children under the age of 18 living in them, 15 households (24.2%) were made up of individuals and 8 (12.9%) had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.48. There were 40 families (64.5% of all households); the average family size was 2.58. There were 76 housing of which 34 (54.8%) were owner-occupied, and 28 (45.2%) were occupied by renters. The homeowner vacancy rate was 2.9%; the rental vacancy rate was 12.5%. There were 73 people (23.2% of the population) living in owner-occupied housing units and 81 people (25.7%) living in rental housing units. Canby has a Community Services District but that District has no money and no water or sewer system has been constructed. 7.2 Canby Fire Protection District Background 7.2.1 Canby FPD Contact Information33 and Board of Directors The following is the contact information for the Canby Fire Protection District: Physical Address: Canby Volunteer Fire Department HWY 299 & County Rd 82, Canby, CA 96015 Mailing Address: Canby Fire Protection District PO Box 313, Canby, CA 96015 Ron Sherer, Fire Chief, Phone: 530-233-4804, Cell: 530-640-0024 rsherer@hdo.net The Canby Fire Protection Board of Directors34 is as follows: Secretary-Sara Marchessault Board Member-Charlie Sherer Board Member-Daniel Stossmeister Board Member-J. David Pacy 33 Modoc Fire Chiefs Association, Phone: 530-233-1151, January 18, 2008. 34 Modoc County Auditor/Clerk/Elections, Amanda R. McKinney, Deputy Clerk Accountant I, Phone: 530-233-6205, amandamckinney@co.modoc,ca.us, May 2, 2017. 22 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 There are 18 Volunteer Firefighters and one non-Firefighting Volunteer. 7.2.2 Canby FPD Equipment-2010 Canby FPD has four vehicles for fire protection services as follows:35 4222 Ford 1980 750 gal Type 1 engine 4225 Chevy 1986 250 gal 4x4 type 6 engine 4223 International 1978 4x4; 500 gal Type 3 4250 Ford 2004 4x4 Type 3 medical unit 4230 Ford 1980 4000 Gallon Water Tender The Canby fire station is funded by Special Taxes. 7.2.3 Canby FPD Finances The Modoc County Auditor presented the following information on Canby FPD finances: Canby Fire Protection District 221 , May 201736 Account Title Credit/Debit REVENUE 4010 Current Secured Taxes 17,012.36 4020 Current Unsecured Taxes 638.76 4021 Supplemental Tax 53.09 4030 Prior Secured Taxes 707.55 4040 Prior Unsecured Taxes 17.49 4200 Interest 66.15 4560 Homeowner Property Tax Relief (HOPTR) 223.14 TOTAL REVENUE 18,718.54 EXPENSES 7035 Worker’s Compensation Fund 2,766.00 7050 Clothing/Personal Supply 0 7060 Communications 252.79 7101 Insurance General 4,761.00 7120 Maintenance of Equipment 4,373.10 7160 Office Expense 0 7230 Special Departmental Expense 138.66 7250 Transportation and Travel 321.29 7260 Utilities 2,372.81 TOTAL EXPENSES 14,985.65 The Fund Balance Available is $8,810.12. 37 35 “Modoc County Community Wildfire Protection Plan”, May 2008, p.31. 36 Modoc County Auditor, Trial Balance, May 10, 2017. 37 Modoc County Auditor, Trial Balance, May 10, 2017. 23 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 7.3 Canby Fire Protection District MSR Determinations MSR-1) Development in Canby is limited by the lack of sewer and water systems. Planning, Zoning, and Building Permits are managed by the County of Modoc. The District should maintain communication with the Modoc County Planning Department regarding these matters. MSR-2) There is no specific information on Canby to determine if it is a Disadvantaged Unincorporated Community (DUC). However, based on a median household income of $19,615 data as stated in the 2010 Census, this area is lower than the 80% of the statewide median household income of $57,708. Since the City of Alturas is 17 miles away this would preclude annexation. MSR-3) There is fire-fighting equipment and volunteers in Canby. Training and working with other fire districts should be a high priority. MSR-4) Canby FPD has some tax revenue to work with. MSR-5) The Canby FPD does participate in the Fire Chiefs Association. It might be appropriate in the future for the District to merge with another Fire Protection District such as the Alturas Rural FPD provided that the fire station in Canby could be maintained. MAE-6) Even though everyone associated with the Canby Fire Protection District is a volunteer there is still a need to comply with State Law and to provide information about the District administration to the public. Use of a website or a page on the County of Modoc website would be most helpful. 7.4 Canby Fire Protection District SOI Determinations The recommendation for the Canby Fire Protection District is that the Sphere of Influence remain the same as the District Boundary. The SOI Determinations are as follows: SOI-1] No additional land is expected to be annexed to the Canby Fire Protection District. SOI-2] The need for fire protection for the Canby FPD will continue into the future so the service should be maintained. If it is too difficult to maintain the District combining with another district such as Alturas Rural FPD should be considered. SOI-3] Fire Protection services are adequate for a rural area and will need to be maintained in the future. Efficient use of personnel and funds will be required as well as coordination and cooperation with other fire protection districts. SOI-4] Canby is not a totally self-sufficient community and depends on Alturas for additional services and medical facilities. 24 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 SOI-5] There is no information to determine whether Canby is a DUC. However, based on a median household income of $19,615 data as stated in the 2010 Census, this area is lower than the 80% of the statewide median household income of $57,708. 25 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 8 CEDARVILLE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 8.1 Cedarville Background 8.1.1 Cedarville Community The unincorporated community of Cedarville is located in the Surprise Valley area of Modoc County, approximately 257 miles north of Lake Tahoe on State Route 299. The Community is located on the western shore of Middle Alkali Lake and is in close proximity to the Warner Mountains and the Modoc National Forest. 8.1.2 Cedarville Population Data The 2010 US Census reported that Cedarville had a population of 514 down from 849 in 2000. The Census reported that 490 people (95.3% of the population) lived in households, 2 (0.4%) lived in non-institutionalized group quarters, and 22 (4.3%) were institutionalized. There were 237 households, out of which 55 (23.2%) had children under the age of 18 living in them, 92 households (38.8%) were made up of individuals and 51 (21.5%) had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.07. There were 132 families (55.7% of all households); the average family size was 2.71. The population was spread out in age as follows: CEDARVILLE AGE DISTRIBUTION 2010 Under the age of 18 94 people 18.3% Aged 18 to 24 31 people 6.0% Aged 25 to 44 104 people 20.2% Aged 45 to 64 149 people 29.0% 65 years of age or older 136 people 26.5% Total 514 people 100.0% The median age was 49.5 years. For every 100 females there were 89.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 94.4 males. There were 294 housing units of which 146 (61.6%) were owner-occupied, and 91 (38.4%) were occupied by renters. The homeowner vacancy rate was 1.3%; the rental vacancy rate was 12.5%. There were 296 people (57.6% of the population) living in owner-occupied housing units and 194 people (37.7%) living in rental housing units. 8.1.3 Cedarville Services Cedarville Hospital, operated by the Surprise Valley Hospital District is located in the heart of Cedarville on Main Street, and the Cedarville Airport is located along Surprise Valley Road, 1.5 miles north of State Route 299. Cedarville is considered the center of retail trade for the Valley, with services such as groceries, gas stations, café, fire hall, bank, library and motel. Although agriculture is the dominant economic force, service employment has gradually increased. 26 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 Cedarville is served by a variety of entities, including the Modoc County Sheriff Department for law enforcement, the Cedarville Fire Protection District for fire protection, the Cedarville Hospital District for health care and ambulance services, and the Cedarville Cemetery District. The Cedarville CWD provides municipal water service, though no sewer system exists currently to serve the residents in the Cedarville area. 8.2 Cedarville Fire Protection District Background 8.2.1 Cedarville Fire Protection District Contact Information The contact information for the Cedarville Fire Protection District is as follows: Cedarville Fire Protection District, Ray Gorzell, Fire Chief PO Box 39, Cedarville, CA 96104 Phone/Fax: (530) 279-2311 E-Mail: cvfpd@frontiernet.net Additional contacts: 38 Modoc Dispatch: 911 or 530-233-4416 Chief Ray Gorzell Cell: 530-640-1097 Asst. Chief Pat Green Cell: 530-640-2333 Capt. Pete Coates Cell: 530-279-1272 8.2.2 Cedarville FPD Board of Directors The Cedarville FPD Board of Directors is as follows:39 Director Scott Conklin, Secretary (mail) Jerry Minto Joe McFarland Garth Jeffers John Benner, President Cedarville Fire Protection District Board of Directors, P.O. Box 338 Cedarville, 96104 According to Director Scott Conklin, meetings are set once a quarter (unless a special meeting is needed), all meetings are advertised to the public at least 2 weeks in advance. Meetings are held at the Fire Station, 461 Main Street, Cedarville, CA.40 The Cedarville FPD provides BLS medical services within its district and has mutual aid agreements with all Surprise Valley Departments including BLM and the USFS through the Surprise Valley Fire CO-OP. The Cedarville FPD provides mutual aid for northern Washoe County, Nevada. The Cedarville FPD is on automatic aid for structural fires to the communities of Lake City, 10 miles to the north and Eagleville, 17 miles to the south. 38 Modoc LAFCo, Cedarville Volunteer FPD Questionnaire, March 24, 2017. 39 Modoc LAFCo, Cedarville Volunteer FPD Questionnaire, March 24, 2017. 40 Modoc LAFCo, Cedarville Volunteer FPD Questionnaire, March 24, 2017. 27 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 The Cedarville FPD provides extrication services for all of Surprise Valley and northern Washoe County, Nevada 8.2.3 Cedarville FPD Mission Statement The Mission Statement for the Cedarville Fire Protection District is as follows: The primary mission of the Cedarville Fire Protection District is the protection and preservation of life from all emergencies. The District’s secondary objective is the protection and preservation of property by fires, floods, earthquakes or other disasters whether they are man-made or an act of God that may occur within the Cedarville Protection District and where ever a mutual or automatic aid request is made. 8.2.4 Cedarville FPD Equipment41 The Cedarville Fire Protection District has the following equipment: CEDARVILLE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT EQUIPMENT NAME TYPE CAPABILITIES 3 Engines Type 1 Foam, Pump and Roll, Monitors, 4X2 1990 Ford 1990 Ford 1980 GMC 1 Engine Type 3 Foam, Pump and Roll, 4x4 1992 International 1 Engine Type 6 Foam, Pump and Roll, 4x4 2004 Ford 3 Tenders Type 1 3,000 gallons W/2 3,000 gallon porta-tanks, 4x2 1986 Ford 1968 GMC 1965 KW 1 Quick Attack Type 6 Foam 4x4 1 Rescue Rescue Jaws, Lifting Bags, Air Tools, Lights, Low Angle Gear, 2003 Ford 4x4 Stabilization equipment Trailer, water 500 gallon potable water trailer Light Plant 25 KVA Generator with Light Tower Generator 150 KVA 41 Modoc LAFCo, Cedarville Volunteer FPD Questionnaire, March 24, 2017. 28 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 8.2.5 Budget A Budget is a plan for spending. An Audit examines funds actually spent. The following Budget for Fiscal Year 2014-2015 was provided by the Cedarville FPD. Cedarville Fire Protection District Budget 2012-2015 Number Category Amount 7120 Equipment Maintenance 8,500 7250 Transport Fuel 2,500 7260 Utilities (Heat) 3,000 7260 Utilities (Electric) 2,200 7101 Insurance 15,000 7060 Communications/Phone 2,200 7050 P.P.E. (Personal Protective Equipment) 2,000 7130 Building Maintenance 750 7035 Workers Compensation 8,000 7870 New Equipment 2,620 7160 Office 500 7210 Rent/Leases 1,200 TOTAL $48,470 The Modoc County Auditor reported that the Cedarville FPD had a Fund Balance Available of $96,627.70 42 8.2.6 Audit43 The independent Audit prepared for the Cedarville Fire Protection District showed the following cash on June 30, 2014: Cash in Modoc County Treasury $77,979 Cash in bank $113,730 Total Cash $191,709 The Audit did recommend that all funds be kept with the County44 but it can be cumbersome to pay bills in a timely manner when all claims are processed by the County. The Audit also recommended that better minutes be kept so it is clear that all expenses are approved by the Board of Directors in advance. This very important to maintain clarity with respect to an outside bank account. The Audit also suggested that policies and procedures be created and implemented to clarify the process for expenditure of funds. 42 Modoc County Auditor, Trial Balance, May 10, 2017. 43 Cedarville Fire Protection District, Audit for year Ending June 30, 2014, Prepared by Monica Derner, Certified Public Accountant, 1030 N. Main Street #101, Alturas CA 96101, 530-233-4984, monica@mdernercpa.com, www.dernercpa.com., January 26, 2015. 44 Cedarville Fire Protection District, Audit for year Ending June 30, 2014, Prepared by Monica Derner, Certified Public Accountant, 1030 N. Main Street #101, Alturas CA 96101, 530-233-4984, monica@mdernercpa.com, www.dernercpa.com., January 26, 2015, Page 15. 29 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 The Cedarville FPD had an audit prepared for the year ended June 30, 2014. The following two tables show the financial position of the District at that time. Cedarville Fire Protection District Statement of Net Position and Government Fund Balance Sheet, June 30, 201445 Fund Adjustments Government Financial Wide Statement, Financial General Statement, Fund Statement of Net Assets Assets Cash 191,709 - 191,709 Taxes receivable 2,286 - 2286 Prepaid expenses 4,213 - 4213 Capital assets, net of accumulated - 74,447 74,447 depreciation* Total Assets 198,208 74,447 272,655 Liabilities Accounts Payable 4,971 4,971 Fund Balances/Net Position Fund Balance, Unreserved and 193,237 (193,237) undesignated Total liabilities and fund balances $198,208 $267,684 Net Position Net investment in capital assets** 74,447 74,447 Unrestricted*** 193,237 193,237 Total net position $267,684 $267,684 *Equipment with a cost of $5,000 or more is accounted for as capital assets. All capital assets are valued at historical cost or estimated historical cost if actual historical cost is not available, except donated assets are recorded at their estimated fair market value at the date of donation. 46 Capital Assets are not a current financial resource, and therefore are not shown on the governmental fund balance sheet. 47 **Net investment in capital assets consists of capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation, and reduced by the outstanding balance of bonds, mortgages, notes of other borrowings that are attributable to the acquisition, construction, or improvement of those assets. ***Unrestricted net position consists of net position that does not meet the definition of restricted net position or invested in capital assets, net of related debt. 48 45 Cedarville Fire Protection District, Audit for year Ending June 30, 2014, Prepared by Monica Derner, Certified Public Accountant, 1030 N. Main Street #101, Alturas CA 96101, 530-233-4984, monica@mdernercpa.com, www.dernercpa.com., January 26, 2015, Page 3. 46 Cedarville Fire Protection District, Audit for year Ending June 30, 2014, Prepared by Monica Derner, Certified Public Accountant, 1030 N. Main Street #101, Alturas CA 96101, 530-233-4984, monica@mdernercpa.com, www.dernercpa.com., January 26, 2015, Page 6 47 Cedarville Fire Protection District, Audit for year Ending June 30, 2014, Prepared by Monica Derner, Certified Public Accountant, 1030 N. Main Street #101, Alturas CA 96101, 530-233-4984, monica@mdernercpa.com, www.dernercpa.com., January 26, 2015, Page 8. 48 Cedarville Fire Protection District, Audit for year Ending June 30, 2014, Prepared by Monica Derner, Certified Public Accountant, 1030 N. Main Street #101, Alturas CA 96101, 530-233-4984, monica@mdernercpa.com, www.dernercpa.com., January 26, 2015, Page 8 30 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 Cedarville Fire Protection District Statement of Activities and Governmental Fund Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances, June 30, 201449 Fund Adjustments Government Financial Wide Statement Financial General Fund Statement; Statement of Net Assets Expenditures/Expenses Current Communications 1,424 1,424 Dues 1,256 1,256 Fundraising expenses* 12,883 12,883 Insurance 16,843 16,843 Maintenance 3,650 3,650 Miscellaneous 3,714 3,714 Office expense 784 784 Rents 1,200 1,200 Small tools and equipment 4,803 4,803 Supplies 2,197 2,197 Taxes 742 742 Training 365 365 Transportation and travel 1,869 1,869 Utilities 5,695 5,695 Depreciation - 11,260 11,260 Total expenditures/expenses 57,425 11,260 68,685 Revenues Tax allocations 45,930 45,930 Interest apportionments 187 187 Equipment rent 5,355 5,355 Miscellaneous 2,886 2,886 Fundraising revenue* 23,219 23,219 Total revenues 77,577 77,577 Revenues over (under) 20,152 (11,260) 8,892 expenditures Fund Balance/Net Position Beginning of year 173,085 85,707 258,792 End of year $193,237 $74,447 $267,684 * Although the fundraising expense may seem substantial, the fundraising revenue does exceed the expense. 49 Cedarville Fire Protection District, Audit for year Ending June 30, 2014, Prepared by Monica Derner, Certified Public Accountant, 1030 N. Main Street #101, Alturas CA 96101, 530-233-4984, monica@mdernercpa.com, www.dernercpa.com., January 26, 2015, Page 4. 31 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 The Audit showed the following Capital Assets on June 30, 2014: Cedarville Fire Protection District Capital Assets June 30 201450 Government Balance Additions Retirements Balance Activities 6/30/13 6/30/14 Capital Assets not being depreciated: 598 - - 598 Land Capital Assets being depreciated Buildings 5,016 - 5,016 Fire Trucks 119,601 - 119,601 Equipment 42,000 - 42,000 Total assets being depreciated 166,617 - 166,617 Less accumulated depreciation Buildings 5,016 - 5,016 Fire Trucks 41,184 9,060 - 50,244 Equipment 35,308 2,200 - 37,508 Total accumulated depreciation 81,508 11,260 - 92,768 Net Capital Assets $85,707 $(11,260) - $74,447 The Cedarville Fire Protection District should be commended for authorizing an independent Audit and should follow the recommendations of the Independent Auditor as fully as possible. 8.3 Cedarville FPD MSR Determinations MSR-1) The existing population of Cedarville is estimated to be 514 and is not expected to increase substantially in the near future. The Fire Protection District serves a slightly larger population because it includes the surrounding area. Planning, Zoning, and Building Permits are managed by the County of Modoc and the District should maintain communication with the County Planning Department regarding these matters. MSR-2) There is no specific information on the Cedarville FPD to determine if it is a Disadvantaged Unincorporated Community (DUC). However, based on a median household income of $36,250 data as stated in the 2010 Census, this area is lower than the 80% of the statewide median household income of $57,708. There is no incorporated city which could annex this area in any case. MSR-3) The Cedarville FPD has fire-fighting equipment. Training volunteers and training with other districts for both fire and medical emergencies should be maintained. 50 Cedarville Fire Protection District, Audit for year Ending June 30, 2014, Prepared by Monica Derner, Certified Public Accountant, 1030 N. Main Street #101, Alturas CA 96101, 530-233-4984, monica@mdernercpa.com, www.dernercpa.com., January 26, 2015, Page 10. 32 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 MSR-4) The Cedarville FPD prepares a Budget and contracts with an Independent Auditor to provide an Audit. These documents should be made available to the public on a website if possible. MSR-5) The Cedarville FPD does cooperate with other fire protection districts. It may be necessary to provide a more formal system of cooperation in the future such as a joint powers agreement (JPA) to reduce expenses. A County website for all the fire protection districts would be helpful. MSR-6) The Board of Directors has five members and meets regularly. The use of a website to advertise meetings and make minutes available to the public would be useful. The information provided by the Cedarville FPD was most helpful in the preparation of this report. 8.4 Cedarville FPD SOI Determinations SOI-1] No additional lands are expected to be annexed to the Cedarville FPD. Continued cooperation with other fire districts might lead to a unified fire district for the Surprise Valley in the future. SOI-2] The need for the Cedarville Fire Protection District will continue into the future. The District will continue to receive both medical emergency and wildland fire calls. SOI-3] The Fire Protection service is adequate for a rural area. Efficient use of volunteers and funding will be required. SOI-4] Cedarville is a complete community with schools, churches, medical facilities and businesses. All of these enterprises require adequate fire protection. SOI-5] There is no information to determine whether Cedarville is a DUC. However, based on a median household income of $36,250 data as stated in the 2010 Census, this area is lower than the 80% of the statewide median household income of $57,708. 33 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 9 DAVIS CREEK FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 9.1 Davis Creek Community Background Davis Creek is an unincorporated community located 19 miles north-northeast of Alturas at an elevation of 4846 feet. The town's population is at least 100 with up to 43951 in the surrounding area according to the 1988 General Plan. There is a post office, service station, and mini-mart housed in a single structure. The Modoc County General Plan 1988 Background Report estimated that the population of Davis Creek would be 185 in 2000. There were 25 houses in 1985.52 The median age in Davis Creek is 47 years of age and the median income is $42,826. 53 The Davis Creek area gets 22 inches of rainfall per year and 85 inches of snowfall per year. 9.2 Davis Creek Fire Protection District Background 9.2.1 Davis Creek FPD Contact Information: Contact information for the Davis Creek FPD is as follows: Davis Creek Fire Protection District 137 County Rd 133b Davis Creek, CA 96108 Davis Creek Fire District P.O. Box 37 Davis Creek, CA 96108 Phone: 530-233-257854 9.2.2 Davis Creek FPD Board of Directors Davis Creek Fire Protection District Board of Directors is as follows: 55 Commissioner-Brian Ingraham Secretary-Flloyd Cornett Board Member-John Zimmerman Board Member-Don Blair Board Member-Ken Smith The volunteers meet on the third Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. The Board meets as needed following the volunteer training. 51http://realestate.yahoo.com/California/Davis_Creek/neighborhoods;_ylt=AvErqpt0fc8PQdhddYvPHnykF7kF 52 County of Modoc, “Modoc County General Plan 1988 Background Report” P. 174. 53http://realestate.yahoo.com/California/Davis_Creek/neighborhoods;_ylt=AvErqpt0fc8PQdhddYvPHnykF7kF 54 Modoc Fire Chiefs Association, Phone: 530-233-1151, January 18, 2008. 55 Modoc County Auditor/Clerk/Elections, Amanda R. McKinney, Deputy Clerk Accountant I, Phone: 530-233-6205, amandamckinney@co.modoc,ca.us, May 2, 2017. 34 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 9.2.3 Davis Creek FPD Volunteers and Equipment Davis Creek FPD Equipment is as follows: 4520 Chevy 1972 1300 gal 4521 GMC 1969 750 gal 4540 Dodge 1985 300 gal; pro/pak foam The District has five firefighters. They are using a community collaborative effort for fire chief. 9.2.4 Davis Creek FPD Financial Information The following information was provided by the Modoc County Auditor regarding the finances for the Davis Creek FPD. Davis Creek Fire Protection District 223, May 201756 Account Title Credit/Debit REVENUE 4010 Current Secured Taxes 8,148.51 4020 Current Unsecured Taxes 304.42 4021 Supplemental Tax 25.30 4030 Prior Secured Taxes 343.18 4040 Prior Unsecured Taxes 8.49 4042 Prior Year Delinquent 00 4090 Timber Yield Tax 115.45 4200 Interest 35.06 4560 Homeowner Property Tax Relief (HOPTR) 106.35 5450 Refunds 00 Total Revenue 9,086.76 7230 Special Department Expense 9,724.36 Total Expenses 9,724.36 The Fund Balance Available is $3,808.33.57 The overall picture presented by this budget is not a strong picture for the Davis Creek FPD. The expenses are not detailed but presented as “Special Department Expense” and the total for the expense is more than the revenue. This problem along with the small number of volunteers cited above and the need to rotate the duties of fire chief indicate that the District should be looking to combine with another district, such as the Alturas Rural FPD, in the future. 56 Modoc County Auditor, Trial Balance, May 10, 2017. 57 Modoc County Auditor, Trial Balance, May 10, 2017. 35 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 9.3 Davis Creek FPD MSR Determinations MSR-1) Davis Creek is not expected to increase in population. Planning, Zoning and Building Permits are managed by the County of Modoc. MSR-2) There is no specific information on Davis Creek to determine if it is a Disadvantaged Unincorporated Community (DUC). There is no incorporated city nearby in any case. MSR-3) The Davis Creek FPD has minimal fire protection equipment and volunteers. MSR-4) The Davis Creek FPD has minimal financial resources. MSR-5) The Davis Creek FPD cooperates with other fire protection districts. The relationship may need to become closer in the future if the Davis Creek FPD cannot maintain a sufficient number of trained volunteers. MSR-6) The Board of Directors maintains a regular meeting schedule but is faces with significant problems. The information provided by the Board was helpful for the preparation of this report. 9.4 Davis Creek FPD SOI Determinations The recommendation for the Davis Creek FPD Sphere of Influence is for the SOI to be the same as the District Boundary. However, the District may need to be combined with another District such as Alturas Rural FPD in the future. The SOI Determinations are as follows: SOI-1] No additional lands are expected to be annexed to the Davis Creek FPD. SOI-2] The need for fire protection service for the Davis Creek area will continue so the service should be continued even if it means that the Davis Creek FPD may ultimately have to merge with another District. SOI-3] Fire protection services need to be maintained in the future. The Davis Creek FPD may provide the model for service with minimal personnel and funds and the shared responsibility for fire chief duties. SOI-4] The Davis Creek community does not include many services but is focused on Goose Lake and tourism. The community depends on Alturas for services. SOI-5] There is no information to determine whether Davis Lake is a DUC. 36 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 10 EAGLEVILLE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 10.1 Eagleville Community Background Located in Surprise Valley, Eagleville is a small community south of Cedarville. The population was 59 at the 2010 Census. There were 29 households, out of which 4 (13.8%) had children under the age of 18 living in them, 5 households (17.2%) were made up of individuals and 2 (6.9%) had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.03. There were 20 families (69.0% of all households); the average family size was 2.30. There were 47 housing units of which 21 (72.4%) were owner-occupied, and 8 (27.6%) were occupied by renters. There were 42 people (71.2% of the population) living in owner-occupied housing units and 17 people (28.8%) living in rental housing units. There is no community water or sewer service. 10.2 Eagleville Fire Protection District Background 10.2.1 Contact Information for Eagleville FPD Contact information for the Eagleville FPD is as follows: Eagleville Fire Protection District 13730 Main St Eagleville, CA 96110 Eagleville Fire District, P.O. Box 15, Eagleville, CA 96110 Contact: Alan Berryessa Title: Director Phone: 530-640-0387 10.2.2 Board of Directors for Eagleville FPD Eagleville Fire Protection District Board of Directors is as follows: 58 Chief-Alan Berryessa Secretary-Gina Harris Board Member-Link Grove Board Member-Jesse Harris Board Member-Fred Beeman 10.2.3 Equipment for Eagleville Fire Protection District 58 Modoc County Auditor/Clerk/Elections, Amanda R. McKinney, Deputy Clerk Accountant I, Phone: 530-233-6205, amandamckinney@co.modoc,ca.us, May 2, 2017. 37 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 The Eagleville Fire Protection District did not respond to the Modoc LAFCo Questionnaire. The following equipment was reported in 2010: Eagleville FPD has four vehicles available for fire protection services as follows:59 5222 750-1000 gal engine 5230 Chevy 1977 2000 gal tender w/foam 5240 International 1975 250 gal 5244 Dodge 1970 150 gal 10.2.4 Financial Information Eagleville Fire Protection District The following financial information for the Eagleville Fire Protection District was provided by the Modoc County Auditor: Eagleville Fire Protection District 224, May 201760 Account Title Credit/Debit REVENUE 4010 Current Secured Taxes 7,707.33 4020 Current Unsecured Taxes 353.88 4021 Supplemental Tax 29.27 4030 Prior Secured Taxes 329.13 4040 Prior Unsecured Taxes 8.96 4042 Prior Year Delinquent 00 4090 Timber Yield Tax 10.00 4200 Interest 88.25 4560 Homeowner Property Tax Relief (HOPTR) 112.16 5450 Refunds 00 Total Revenue 8,638.98 EXPENSES 7035 Worker’s Compensation Fund 4,311.06 7060 Communications 90.49 7101 Insurance-General 2,479.93 7120 Maintenance of Equipment 0 7180 Professional/Specialized 0 7260 Utilities 1,373.25 Total Expenses 8,254.73 The Modoc County Auditor reports a fund balance available of $12,827.13. 61 59 “Modoc County Community Wildfire Protection Plan”, May 2008, p.33. 60 Modoc County Auditor, Trial Balance, May 10, 2017. 61 Modoc County Auditor, Trial Balance, May 10, 2017. 38 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 10.3 Eagleville FPD MSR Determinations MSR-1) Little growth is expected in Eagleville. There are approximately 20 vacant houses in the area. Planning, Zoning and Building Permits are managed by the County of Modoc. MSR-2) There is no specific information on Eagleville to determine whether it is a Disadvantaged Unincorporated Community (DUC). However, based on a median household income of $22,750 data as stated in the 2010 Census, this area is lower than the 80% of the statewide median household income of $57,708. MSR-3) The Eagleville Fire Protection District has fire protection equipment. MSR-4) The Eagleville Fire Protection District has a small budget, the majority of the funds are used for insurance. MSR-5) The Eagleville Fire Protection District is a member of the Modoc Fire Chiefs Association. MSR-6) The Board of Directors did not respond to the Modoc LAFCo Questionnaire. It is difficult to maintain a small rural fire protection district but administration as well as volunteer fire fighters is required. 10.4 Eagleville FPD SOI Determinations The recommendation for the Eagleville FPD is for the Sphere of Influence to remain the same as the District boundary. However, the Eagleville FPD may want to work on a plan to join forces with another district in the future. SOI-1] No additional land is expected to be added to the Eagleville Fire Protection District. SOI-2] The need for fire protection services in the Eagleville FPD will remain. The District should remain in place and determine if working with another District such as the Cedarville FPD, would contribute to greater service. SOI-3] The Eagleville FPD has fire-fighting equipment. The District should work with other districts to determine if insurance would be more economical if the districts worked together. SOI-4] Eagleville does not have services available but depends on other communities, primarily Cedarville, for economic, social, medical, religious, educational and commercial services. SOI-5] There is no information to determine whether Eagleville is a DUC. However, based on a median household income of $22,750 data as stated in the 2010 Census, this area is lower than the 80% of the statewide median household income of $57,708. 39 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 11 FORT BIDWELL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 11.1 Fort Bidwell Community Background Fort Bidwell is located near the north end of the Surprise Valley. The community's elevation is about 4,564 feet. The airport, (FAA identifier: A28), is about 1-mile north of the center of the community. The Fort Bidwell Indian Community is affiliated with the Paiute nation. The Fort Bidwell Native American community hosts an annual Cultural Gathering Pow Wow. Many historic sites remain in Fort Bidwell. Fort Bidwell Church, was erected circa 1885. Fort Bidwell General Store was built in 1874 of stone from Bidwell Canyon, a virtual fireproof fortress, and remains one of the longest continuously operating stores in the state. Fort Bidwell Hotel and Restaurant opened in the early 1900s and was a private residence but is now again a hotel.62 At the north end of Main Street is a stone schoolhouse erected in 1917. Students now attend school in Cedarville. Remnants of the bank vault, established in 1907 are seen on Main Street next to Kober's Dry Goods Store. Fort Bidwell is the gateway to the North Warner Mountains. The 2010 US Census for the Fort Bidwell ZIP code, shows 214 persons living in the District with 149 housing units, 96 occupied.63 11.2 Fort Bidwell Fire Protection District Background 11.2.1 Fort Bidwell Fire Protection District Overview The Fort Bidwell Fire Protection District (FBFPD) is a California special district for fire protection. The commissioners are elected by voters in the District for four year terms. The District may also be known as the Bidwell Fire Protection District but the Fort Bidwell FPD is the official name of the District. The District is an autonomous, local government under the laws of California, and is not a department of Modoc County. Operations are conducted by the Fort Bidwell Volunteer Fire Department. The District was founded in February 18,1946. The District gets about $ 7,500.00 per year as its calculated share of the property taxes on owners within the district. This includes secured, unsecured, supplemental, homeowner's exemption, and timber tax income. This tax money just covers Workman's Compensation and other required insurance, and utilities. Other costs are borne from fund raisers and donations to the Fort Bidwell Volunteer Fire Department. Donations to the Fort Bidwell Fire Protection District are IRS deductible because the District is a government body. 62 Fort Bidwell Fire Protection District, February 22, 2017. 63 Fort Bidwell Fire Protection District, http://gsmall.us/FBVFD/FBFireDistrict/index.html, April 29, 2017. 40 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 11.2.2 Contact Information Contact information for the Fort Bidwell Fire Protection District is as follows:64 Fort Bidwell Fire Protection District P.O. Box 296 Fort Bidwell, CA 96112 E-Mail: FBVFD@gsmall.us Phone: 530-279-2091 (Commissioner/Secretary) 11.2.3 Commissioners65 Commissioners for the Fort Bidwell Fire Protection District are as follows: Stuart Benner (expires 12/2020) Susan Craig (expires 12/2018) Greg Small (expires 12/2020) Meetings of the Fort Bidwell Volunteer Fire Department and Fort Bidwell Fire Protection District are held jointly on the second Tuesday of each month at 7 pm in the Fort Bidwell Civic Club building, 54825 Main Street. The meetings last about an hour. Meeting notices are posted at the Post Office and on the website: (http://gsmall.us/FBVFD/Meetings/) 11.2.4 Equipment66 The District reports the following equipment: 5320 Ford Type 6 1994 500 gal pumper 5340 Ford Type 6 1978 300 gal Wildland Engine 5330 Ford Type 2 1993 3200 gal Water Tender 64 Fort Bidwell Fire Protection District, February 22, 2017. 65 Fort Bidwell Fire Protection District, February 22, 2017. 66 Fort Bidwell Fire Protection District, February 22, 2017. 41 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 11.2.5 Financial Information The Modoc County Auditor shows the following information for the Fort Bidwell Fire Protection District. FORT BIDWELL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 22067 Account Title Credit/Debit REVENUE 4010 Current Secured Taxes 7,690.26 4020 Current Unsecured Taxes 311.15 4021 Supplemental Tax 25.86 4030 Prior Secured Taxes 341.78 4040 Prior Unsecured Taxes 8.45 4042 Prior Year Delinquent 00 4090 Timber Yield Tax 27.62 4200 Interest 69.89 4560 Homeowner Property Tax Relief (HOPTR) 108.70 TOTAL REVENUE 8,583.71 EXPENSES 7035 Worker’s Comp Fund 2,241.00 7101 Insurance-General 1,520.67 7130 Maintenance/Improvement of Structure 2,758.74 7160 Office Expense 0 TOTAL EXPESES 6,520.41 The Modoc County Auditor reports a Fund Balance Available of $8992.01 for the Fort Bidwell Fire Protection District. The District notes the following regarding finances, “The District must spend every tiny penny it gets. Any momentary fund balance is a fluke awaiting a bill.” 68 67 Modoc County Auditor, Trial Balance, May 10, 2017. 68 Fort Bidwell Fire Protection District, February 22, 2017. 42 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 11.3 Fort Bidwell FPD MSR Determinations MSR-1) Little additional development is expected within the Fort Bidwell Fire Protection District area. Planning, Zoning and Building Permits are managed by the County of Modoc. The District should maintain communication with the County Planning Department regarding actions or permits within the District. MSR-2) There is no specific information available on the Fort Bidwell FPD to determine if it is a Disadvantaged Unincorporated Community (DUC). However, based on a median household income of $20,125 data as stated in the 2010 Census, this area is lower than the 80% of the statewide median household income of $57,708. There are no nearby cities that could annex the area. MSR-3) The equipment is adequate for the District. Training volunteers remains a priority. MSR-4) The District depends on the small amount of tax revenue it receives each year to maintain insurance coverage for the District and the Volunteers. MSR-5) The District notes that cooperation with other fire districts in the Surprise Valley “is very good within the constraints of all volunteer groups.” MSR-6) The Commissioners meet regularly and provided a very helpful response to Modoc LAFCo for this report. 11.4 Fort Bidwell FPD SOI Determinations The recommendation for the Fort Bidwell Fire Protection District Sphere of Influence is that the SOI remain the same as the District Boundary. The Determinations are as follows: SOI-1] No additional lands are expected to be annexed to the Fort Bidwell Fire Protection District. SOI-2] The need for the fire protection service of the Fort Bidwell Fire Protection District will continue. The District should maintain equipment and training to the maximum extent possible. SOI-3] Fire protection services are adequate for a rural area and need to be maintained in the future. The tradition of volunteer service will be a challenge to maintain. SOI-4] Fort Bidwell is not a full service community and children are sent to school in Cedarville. The Volunteer Fire Department helps to maintain a sense of community by promoting local events such as the Memorial Day Picnic. SOI-5] There is no information to determine whether Fort Bidwell is a DUC. However, based on a median household income of $20,125 data as stated in the 2010 Census, this area is lower than the 80% of the statewide median household income of $57,708. 43 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 12 LAKE CITY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 12.1 Lake City Community Background Lake City (formerly, Tri-Lake City) is a census-designated place located 8.5 miles north- northwest of Cedarville at an elevation of 4626 feet. The first post office at Lake City opened in 1868. The population was 61 at the 2010 census. There were 34 households, out of which 6 (17.6%) had children under the age of 18 living in them, 14 households (41.2%) were made up of individuals and 7 (20.6%) had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 1.79. There were 19 families (55.9% of all households); the average family size was 2.32. There were 50 housing units of which 31 (91.2%) were owner-occupied, and 3 (8.8%) were occupied by renters. The homeowner vacancy rate was 2.9%; the rental vacancy rate was 25.0%. There were 55 people (90.2% of the population) living in owner- occupied housing units and 6 people (9.8%) living in rental housing units. The small size of Lake City and the close proximity to Cedarville mean that the residents depend on Cedarville for most services. The Fire Protection District provides a sense of community identity. 12.2 Lake City Fire Protection District Background 12.2.1 Lake City FPD Contact Information The Lake City Fire Protection District returned the Modoc LAFCo Questionnaire and stated that everything was the same as before so the previous information will be reported for the equipment. The contact information for the Lake City Fire Protection District is as follows: Mailing Address: Lake City Fire District, 42165 Co Rd 1, Lake City, CA 96115 Phone: 530-279-6364 12.2.2 Lake City FPD Board of Directors The Lake City Fire Protection District Board of Directors are as follows: 69 Commissioner-John Erquiaga Commissioner-Lee Gorzell Commissioner-James “Bucky” Harris The Board meetings are held on the first Tuesday of each month.70 69 Modoc County Auditor/Clerk/Elections, Amanda R. McKinney, Deputy Clerk Accountant I, Phone: 530-233-6205, amandamckinney@co.modoc,ca.us, May 2, 2017. 70 Lake City FPD, Star Route Box 5, Lake City CA 96115, John Erquiaga, Fire Chief, April 3, 2009. 44 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 There are eight volunteer fire fighters. The fire fighters meet on the first Thursday of each month for training.71 12.2.3 Equipment Previously the Lake City FPD reported that six vehicles were available for fire protection services as follows:72 5130 Ford 1968 1500 gal tender 5131 GMC 1966 1500 gal tender; 4x4 5133 Ford 1964 1500 gal tender 5140 Chevy 1979 Pickup w/50 gal slip-on pumper 5141 Ford 2000 F-350 300 gal foam 5121 Ford 1975 Class A Pumper and foam 5133 Freightliner 1985 4000 gal Water Tender 12.2.4 Financial Information The Modoc County Auditor shows the following information for the Lake City Fire Protection District. Lake City Fire Protection District 225, May 201773 Account Title Credit/Debit REVENUE 4010 Current Secured Taxes 5,123.01 4020 Current Unsecured Taxes 198.22 4021 Supplemental Tax 16.48 4030 Prior Secured Taxes 216.34 4040 Prior Unsecured Taxes 5.35 4090 Timber Yield Tax 10.87 4200 Interest 30.42 4560 Homeowner Property Tax Relief (HOPTR) 69.24 5450 Refunds 0 Total Revenue 5,669.93 EXPENSES 7035 Worker’s Compensation Fund 5,503.00 7101 Insurance-General 0 Total Expenses 5,503.00 The Modoc County Auditor reports a Fund Balance Available of $4,522.57.74 71 Lake City FPD, Star Route Box 5, Lake City CA 96115, John Erquiaga, Fire Chief, April 3, 2009. 72 “Modoc County Community Wildfire Protection Plan”, May 2008, p.32-33. 73 Modoc County Auditor, Trial Balance, May 10, 2017. 74 Modoc County Auditor, Trial Balance, May 10, 2017. 45 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 12.3 Lake City FPD MSR Determinations MSR-1) The Lake City area has no community sewer or water system. This will limit growth and development. Planning, Zoning and Building Permits are managed by the County of Modoc and the District should maintain communication with the County Planning Department regarding these matters. MSR-2) There is no specific information on the Lake City area to determine if it is a Disadvantaged Unincorporated Community (DUC). However, based on a median household income of $29,464 data as stated in the 2010 Census, this area is lower than the 80% of the statewide median household income of $57,708. There is no incorporated city which could annex this area in any case. MSR-3) The Lake City Fire Department has fire-fighting equipment. Training volunteers and training with other districts for both fire and medical emergencies should be maintained. MSR-4) The Lake City Fire Protection District has minimal financial resources. A timely merger with another fire protection district such as the Cedarville FPD could allow for better fire protection and better use of finances. MSR-5) The Lake City Fire Protection District does cooperate with other Fire Protection Districts in the area. Even if the Lake City FPD were to join with another District, such as the Cedarville FPD, it would be good to maintain the fire station and equipment in Lake City. MSR-6) The Board of Directors has three members and meets regularly. It would be good to work with the County of Modoc and/or other fire protection districts to get a website. The return of the Questionnaire to Modoc LAFCo was most helpful. 12.4 Lake City FPD SOI Determinations SOI-1] No additional lands are expected to be annexed to the Lake City Fire Protection District. SOI-2] There is a need for fire protection services in the Lake City area. SOI-3] The fire protection services in the Lake City area appear to be insufficiently funded. SOI-4] The Lake City area is a neighborhood rather than a full service economic or social community. Residents of Lake City depend on Cedarville for most services. SOI-5] There is no information to determine whether the Lake City area is a DUC. However, based on a median household income of $29,464 data as stated in the 2010 Census, this area is lower than the 80% of the statewide median household income of $57,708. 46 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 13 LIKELY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 13.1 Likely Community Background Likely is located 18 miles south of Alturas along Highway 395. The 2010 US Census reported that Likely had a population of 63. There were 34 households, out of which 4 (11.8%) had children under the age of 18 living in them, 11 households (32.4%) were made up of individuals and 8 (23.5%) had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 1.85. There were 21 families (61.8% of all households); the average family size was 2.29. There were 46 housing of which 29 (85.3%) were owner-occupied, and 5 (14.7%) were occupied by renters. The homeowner vacancy rate was 0%; the rental vacancy rate was 37.5%. There were 55 people (87.3% of the population) living in owner-occupied housing units and 8 people (12.7%) living in rental housing units. 13.2 Likely Fire Protection District Background 13.2.1 Likely Fire Protection District Contact Information and Board of Directors The contact information and the Board of Directors for the Likely Fire Protection District are shown below: Likely Fire District, P.O. Box 515, Likely, CA 96116 Phone: 530-233-4817, Fax: 530-233-519075 Likely Fire Protection District Board of Directors: 76 President-Zachery Hannah Board Member/Secretary-Dan Travertini Board Member-Kenneth McGarva Board Member-John Abbate In the past the Likely Fire Protection District was active and cooperated with fire districts in Lassen County as well as in Modoc County. However, the District did not respond to the Modoc LAFCo Questionnaire in 2017. 13.2.2 Likely Fire Protection District Equipment The following fire protection equipment was reported in 2010: The Likely FPD has six vehicle available for fire protection services housed in two fire stations as follows:77 75 http://www.firedepartment.net/directory/california/modoc-county/likely/likely-volunteer-fire-protection-district, May 23, 2017. 76 Modoc County Auditor/Clerk/Elections, Amanda R. McKinney, Deputy Clerk Accountant I, Phone: 530-233-6205, amandamckinney@co.modoc,ca.us, May 2, 2017. 47 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 4421 Ford 1949 300 gal; 500 gpm 4422 LaFrance 1969 500 gal; 1250 gpm 4423 LaFrance 1970 500 gal; 1250 gpm 4425 LaFrance 1979 750 gal; 1250 gpm 4430 Peterbilt 1995 3500 gal; 1000 gpm tanker 4450 Ford 1995 200 gal; 250 gpm Medical/Jaws 4451 Dodge 1976 Medical and Support equipment All vehicles with water have portable foam equipment 13.2.3 Likely Fire Protection District Finances The Modoc County Auditor supplied the following information on the Likely Fire Protection District. Likely Fire Protection District 226, May 201778 Account Title Credit/Debit REVENUE 4010 Current Secured Taxes 29,477.11 4020 Current Unsecured Taxes 1,260.11 4021 Supplemental Tax 104.73 4030 Prior Secured Taxes 1,374.77 4040 Prior Unsecured Taxes 33.99 4090 Timber Yield Tax 68.81 4200 Interest 640.51 4560 Homeowner Property Tax Relief (HOPTR) 440.18 4790 Federal Aid-Other 3,516.15 Total Revenue 36,916.36 EXPENSES 7035 Worker’s Compensation Fund 4,348.16 7060 Communications 578.87 7101 Insurance-General 0 7120 Maintenance of Equipment 4,426.32 7160 Office Expense 116.55 7180 Professional/Specialized 4,150.00 7220 Small Tools 103.98 7255 Transportation/Travel/Training 156.00 7260 Utilities 5,383.37 Total Expenses 19,263.25 The Modoc County Auditor reported that the Likely Fire Protection District had a Fund Balance Available of 73,212.75. 77 “Modoc County Community Wildfire Protection Plan”, May 2008, p.31. 78 Modoc County Auditor, Trial Balance, May 10, 2017. 48 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 13.3 Likely FPD MSR Determinations MSR-1) The Likely Fire Protection District is not expected to increase in population. The District should remain in contact with the Modoc County Planning Department regarding Planning, Zoning and Building regulations and proposed changes. MSR-2) There is no specific information regarding the community of Likely being a Disadvantaged Unincorporated Community (DUC). However, based on a median household income of $17,283 data as stated in the 2010 Census, this area is lower than the 80% of the statewide median household income of $57,708. MSR-3) The Likely Fire Protection District has fire protection equipment and an active training program for both fire and medical emergencies. MSR-4) The financial information presented by the Modoc County Auditor shows the advantage of a larger fire protection district with more tax revenue and a smaller percentage of the budget used for insurance. MSR-5) The Likely Fire Protection District does cooperate with other fire protection districts through the Modoc Fire Chiefs Association. MSR-6) The Board of Directors should have returned the questionnaire to Modoc LAFCo. Inability to return the questionnaire makes the District appear less competent to manage its affairs. Administration is necessary no matter how small the district. 13.4 Likely FPD SOI Determinations SOI-1] The Likely Fire Protection District is not expected to annex additional land. SOI-2] The need for the Likely Fire Protection District will continue. SOI-3] Fire protection services are adequate for a rural area but will need to be maintained in the future with continuing training programs and cooperation with other districts. SOI-4] The Likely community does not provide commercial, medical, social, educational and other services. As is the case in many rural areas, the Fire Protection District is the last community institution to remain and thus to provide an identity for the area. SOI-5] There is no information to determine whether Likely is a DUC. However, based on a median household income of $17,283 data as stated in the 2010 Census, this area is lower than the 80% of the statewide median household income of $57,708. 49 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 14 LOOKOUT FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 14.1 Lookout Community Background Lookout (formerly, Whitley's Ford) is located 11 miles west of Adin at an elevation of 4144 feet. The Whitley's Ford post office operated from 1874 to 1875. The Lookout post office opened in 1880. The original name honors James W. Whitley, a local hotelier. The name Lookout recalls how Native Americans used nearby hills as observation points.79 The 2010 US Census reported that Lookout had a population of 84. There were 31 households, of which 7 (22.6%) had children under the age of 18 living in them, 7 households (22.6%) were made up of individuals and 3 (9.7%) had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.71. There were 22 families (71.0% of all households); the average family size was 3.14. There were 46 housing units, of which 26 (83.9%) were owner-occupied, and 5 (16.1%) were occupied by renters. The homeowner vacancy rate was 3.7%; the rental vacancy rate was 0%. There were 70 people (83.3% of the population) living in owner-occupied housing units and 14 people (16.7%) living in rental housing units. 14.2 Lookout Fire Protection District Background The Lookout Fire Protection District provided no updated information to the Modoc LAFCo. Previous information will be included until it can be updated. 14.2.1 Lookout Fire Protection District Contact Information and Board of Directors Contact information and the Board of Directors for the Lookout Fire Protection District is as follows: Lookout Fire Protection District P.O. Box 174 Lookout, CA 96054 Phone: 530-294-1002 The Board Meetings are held the first Friday of each month at 7:00 p.m. at the Lookout Fire Hall located at the corner of Main Street and County Road 93A in Lookout, California.80 Lookout Fire Protection District Board of Directors: 81 Board Member-Linda Moore Board Member-Linda Tucker Board Member-Patty Rogers 79 Durham, David L. (1998). California's Geographic Names: A Gazetteer of Historic and Modern Names of the State. Clovis, Calif.: Word Dancer Press. p. 396. ISBN 1-884995-14-4. 80 Lookout FPD, PO Box 174, Lookout CA 96054, 3/24/2009. 81 Modoc County Auditor/Clerk/Elections, Amanda R. McKinney, Deputy Clerk Accountant I, Phone: 530-233-6205, amandamckinney@co.modoc,ca.us, May 2, 2017. 50 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 14.2.2 Lookout Fire Protection District Equipment Lookout FPD has six vehicles available for fire protection as follows:82 4820 International 1968 700 gal 4821 Ford 1976 500 gal 4830 Utica 1966 1000 gal 4831 GMC 1968 1000 gal 4840 International 1965 500 gal 4841 Dodge 1978 250 gal Quick Response 14.2.3 Lookout Fire Protection District Financial Information The Modoc County Auditor provided the following information on the Lookout Fire Protection District. Lookout Fire Protection District 227, May 201783 Account Title Credit/Debit REVENUE 4010 Current Secured Taxes 8,278.02 4020 Current Unsecured Taxes 314.55 4021 Supplemental Tax 26.14 4030 Prior Secured Taxes 350.43 4040 Prior Unsecured Taxes 8.66 4090 Timber Yield Tax 4.07 4200 Interest 117.89 4560 Homeowner Property Tax Relief (HOPTR) 109.89 4790 Federal Aid-other 44,068.75 5410 Other Sales/current services 0 Total Revenue 53,278.40 EXPENSES 7035 Worker’s compensation fund 3,412.00 7060 Communications 1,151.31 7101 Insurance General 3,936.00 7120 Maintenance of Equipment 4,052.56 7160 Office Expense 250.19 7180 Professional/specialized 37.52 7250 Transportation and travel 1,973.17 7250 Utilities 1,532.50 7870 Machinery and equipment 1,208.82 Total Expenses 17,554.07 According to the Modoc County Auditor the Lookout Fire Protection District had a Fund Balance Available of $2,490.47. 84 82 “Modoc County Community Wildfire Protection Plan”, May 2008, p.32. 83 Modoc County Auditor, Trial Balance, May 10, 2017. 84 Modoc County Auditor, Trial Balance, May 10, 2017. 51 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 14.3 Lookout FPD MSR Determinations MSR-1) Little growth is expected in Lookout because there is no sewer or water service available. Planning, Zoning and Building permits are managed Modoc County. MSR-2) There is no specific information on the Lookout community to show if it is a Disadvantaged Unincorporated Community (DUC). However, based on a median household income of $18,036 data as stated in the 2010 Census, this area is lower than the 80% of the statewide median household income of $57,708. MSR-3) The Lookout FPD has fire-fighting equipment. Training volunteers and training with other districts should be maintained. MSR-4) The Lookout FPD does not appear to have adequate funds for the long- term. A discussion with the Adin FPD could be beneficial if the districts could work together and maintain both fire stations. MSR-5) The Lookout FPD does cooperate with other fire protection districts through the Modoc Fire Chiefs Association. A greater level of working together with the Adin FPD could benefit both districts in the future. MSR-6) With no communication from the Board of Directors of the Lookout FPD it is difficult to know that true status of the District. In addition to maintaining a level of volunteer responders it is also necessary to provide administration for the District. 14.4 Lookout FPD SOI Determinations The recommendation for the Lookout FPD is that the Sphere of Influence remain the same as the District Boundary. However, it would be appropriate for the Lookout FPD to communicate with the Adin FPD to see if the districts could work together in the future. SOI-1] No additional lands are expected to be annexed to the Lookout Fire Protection District. SOI-2] The need for the fire protection service of the Lookout Fire Protection District will remain. The District needs to be forward thinking to provide the best possible service to the residents with limited resources. SOI-3] Fire protection services appear to be marginal but are still needed. SOI-4] Lookout is a small community with few services. Most residents depend on Adin or Alturas for comprehensive services. SOI-5] There is no information to determine whether Lookout is a DUC. However, based on a median household income of $18,036 data as stated in the 2010 Census, this area is lower than the 80% of the statewide median household income of $57,708. 52 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 15 TULELAKE MULTI-COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 15.1 Tulelake Community Background Newell is a census-designated place (CDP) in Modoc County. It is located 50 miles west-northwest of Alturas at an elevation of 4,042 feet. The population was 449 at the 2010 census. Seven miles to the northwest is Tulelake. Tulelake is a city in Northeastern Siskiyou County, at an elevation of 4,066 feet above sea level. The town is named after nearby Tule Lake. The population was 1,010 at the 2010 census, down from 1,020 at the 2000 census. Even though these two towns are in different counties they have worked together in many ways. 15.2 Tulelake Multi-County Fire Protection District Background 15.2.1 Tulelake Multi-County Fire Protection District Contact Information The Tulelake Multi-County Fire Protection District provided the following information:85 Physical Address:86 Tulelake Multi County Fire District, 1 Ray Oehlerich Way, Tulelake, CA 96134 Mailing Address: Tulelake Multi County Fire District, PO Box 274, Tulelake, CA 96134 Phone: 530-598-2098 (John Prosser, President of Commissioners) Phone: 530-598-2661 (Nick Macy, Commissioner) Fax: 530-664-3771 E-Mail: nick@MacysFlyingService.com 15.2.2 Tulelake Multi-County Fire Protection District Board of Directors The Tulelake Multi-County Fire Protection District Board of Directors is as follows: 87 Secretary-Steve Scott Board Member-Craig Bettandorff Board Member-John Prosser Board Member-Richard Takacs Board Member-Nick S. Macy Board Member-Earl Danosky 85 Modoc LAFCo Questionnaire, Tulelake Multi-County FPD, March 24, 2017. 86 http://www.firedepartment.net/directory/california/siskiyou-county/tulelake/tulelake-multi-county-fire-district, May 23, 2017. 87 Modoc County Auditor/Clerk/Elections, Amanda R. McKinney, Deputy Clerk Accountant I, Phone: 530-233-6205, amandamckinney@co.modoc,ca.us, May 2, 2017. 53 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 15.2.3 Tulelake Multi-County Fire Protection District Equipment The Tulelake Multi-County Fire Protection District previously reported the following equipment: 88 4911 International 1964 750 gal pumper/ladder 4912 FMC/GMC 1980 1200 gal foam pumper/ladder 4921 International 1973 750 gal pumper/ladder 4940 Ford 1982 Rescue w/light medical, Jaws, lift-bags 4931 Ford 1974 Utility w/porta power 4951 Ford 1982 250 gal w/foam 4952 International 1970 250 gal; Jaws 4961 K.W. 1973 4000 gal tender 4962 Pete 1971 4000 gal tender 15.2.4 Tulelake Multi-County Fire Protection District Financial Information The Tulelake Multi-County Fire Protection District funds are kept with the Siskiyou County Auditor. The Siskiyou County Auditor showed the following Adjusted Budget for the District: Tulelake Multi-County Fire Protection District Budget 2016-201789 Revenue 501110 Secured 70,000 501120 Current Unsecured 3,000 501120 Supplemental 500 501210 Prior Secured 0 501220 Prior unsecured 500 501250 Prior supplemental 0 Total Taxes 74,000 530100 Interest 2,400 540620 Homeowner’s Property Tax Relief (HOPTR) 1,000 550120 Special Assessments 24,500 552600 Other Services 24,000 Total Charges for Services 48,500 560100 Other Sales 500 Total Revenue 126,400 Expenses 611100 Regular Wages 14,000 623100 Workers’ Compensation 22,000 728000 Special Departmental Expense 60,000 Total Expenses 96,000 The above information is a budget not actual expenditures or income. 88 “Modoc County Community Wildfire Protection Plan”, May 2008, p.32 89 Siskiyou County Auditor, May 23, 2017. 54 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 15.3 Tulelake Multi-County FPD MSR Determinations MSR-1) Since the Tulelake Multi-County FPD includes land in two counties, the General Plan and land use regulations of the respective county (Siskiyou or Modoc) will govern the land use within that part of the District. MSR-2) There is no specific information to determine the existence of Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities (DUCs) within the District. Both Tulelake and Newell have their own sewer and water systems. MSR-3) The Tulelake Multi-County FPD has equipment and volunteers. They were able to respond to a large hay and equipment barn fire on February 23, 2017.90 MSR-4) The Tulelake Multi-County FPD manages finances through the Siskiyou County Auditor. There appears to be sufficient tax revenue to support the District. The District does have a special tax for fire protection. MSR-5) The Tulelake Multi-County FPD does cooperate with other fire protection districts in both Modoc and Siskiyou counties. Fire Departments from Merrill and Malin also responded to the February 2017 fire. 91 MSR-6) The Board of Directors did respond to the Modoc LAFCo questionnaire but did not provide much information regarding the District. It would help the District to have a website to make information known to the public. 15.4 Tulelake Multi-County FPD SOI Determinations The recommendation for the Tulelake Multi-County FPD is for the Sphere of Influence to remain the same as the District boundary. The Determinations are as follows: SOI-1] No additional lands are expected to be annexed to the Tulelake Multi- County FPD. SOI-2] The need for the fire protection service provided by the Tulelake Multi- County FPD will continue. SOI-3] Fire protection services can always be improved. The District should maintain the maximum number of trained volunteers possible. SOI-4] Tulelake and Newell have a shared history and work together as much as possible. There are more services available in Tulelake due to the larger population. SOI-5] There is no information regarding DUCs in the District area. 90 https://kobi5.com/tag/tulelake/, May 29, 2017. 91 https://kobi5.com/tag/tulelake/, May 29, 2017. 55 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 16 WILLOW RANCH FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 16.1 Willow Ranch Community Background Willow Ranch (formerly, Willowranch) is 33.3 miles north-northeast of Alturas at an elevation of 4731 feet. The Modoc County General Plan 1988 Background Report states that New Pine Creek is in the Goose Lake Basin and “traverses the California-Oregon Border identifying more closely with Oregon than Modoc County.” There is an elementary school in New Pine Creek.92 The population of New Pine Creek was expected to be 197 in 2000 and there were 33 dwelling units in 1985.93 The County of Modoc Housing Element 2003-2008 adopted May 9, 2006, states that the Community of New Pine Creek has 17 available parcels (4.25 acres) which would allow 17 additional dwelling units. The primary service constraint to growth is the lack of community water and wastewater collection and treatment systems.94 16.2 Willow Ranch Fire Protection District Background 16.2.1 Willow Ranch FPD Contact Information and Board of Directors The contact information and Board of Directors for the Willow Ranch FPD is listed below: Willow Ranch Fire Protection District: Contact Patti Carpenter at (530)946-4188 Willow Ranch Fire Protection District Board of Directors: 95 Commissioner-Raymond Cloud Commissioner/Secretary-Patti Carpenter Commissioner-Linda Perry 16.2.2 Willow Ranch FPD Equipment The Willow Ranch FPD previously reported the following equipment: 96 5520 Van Pelt 1977 1000 gal 5530 Van Pelt 1951 1100 gal 5540 Chevy 1986 4x4. 150 gal; Type 6 5541 Chevy 1980 4x4, sm brush/medical response 92 County of Modoc, “Modoc County General Plan 1988 Background Report” P. 168. 93 County of Modoc, “Modoc County General Plan 1988 Background Report” P. 176. 94 County of Modoc, Housing Element 2003-2008, May 9, 2006, P. 29. 95 Modoc County Auditor/Clerk/Elections, Amanda R. McKinney, Deputy Clerk Accountant I, Phone: 530-233-6205, amandamckinney@co.modoc,ca.us, May 2, 2017. 96 “Modoc County Community Wildfire Protection Plan”, May 2008, p.33. 56 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 16.2.3 Willow Ranch Fire Protection District Finances Willow Ranch Fire Protection District 228, May 201797 Account Title Credit/Debit REVENUE 4010 Current Secured Taxes 6,074.74 4020 Current Unsecured Taxes 232.67 4021 Supplemental Tax 19.34 4030 Prior Secured Taxes 253.95 4040 Prior Unsecured Taxes 6.28 4200 Interest 61.28 4560 Homeowner Property Tax Relief (HOPTR) 81.28 Total Revenue 6,729.94 EXPENSES 7035 Worker’s compensation fund 2,560.00 7101 Insurance General 00 7260 Utilities 564.66 Total Expenses 3,124.66 The Modoc County Auditor reports a Fund Balance Available of $6,670.08. 16.3 Willow Ranch FPD MSR Determinations MSR-1) There is little growth expected within the Willow Ranch community because there are no community sewer or water facilities. Planning, Zoning and Building Permits are managed by the County of Modoc. MSR-2) There is no specific information to determine whether Willow Ranch is a Disadvantaged Unincorporated Community (DUC). MSR-3) The Willows Ranch FPD has fire-fighting equipment. Training for volunteers must be maintained for both fire and medical emergencies. MSR-4) The Willow Ranch FPD has minimal income and does not pay for General Insurance. MSR-5) The Willow Ranch FPD does cooperate with other fire protection districts through the Modoc Fire Chiefs Association. MSR-6) The Board of Directors did not respond to the Modoc LAFCo questionnaire. 97 Modoc County Auditor, Trial Balance, May 10, 2017. 57 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 16.4 Willow Ranch FPD SOI Determinations The recommendation for the Willow Ranch Fire Protection District is for the Sphere of Influence to be the same as the District boundary. The Determinations are as follows: SOI-1] No additional lands are expected to be annexed to the Willow Ranch Fire Protection District. SOI-2] The need for the fire protection service of the Willow Ranch Fire Protection District will continue and service should be maintained. SOI-3] Fire protection services have minimal funding ways to work with another district may have to be explored in the future. SOI-4] The community of Willow Ranch depends on the community of New Pine Creek, Oregon for most services. SOI5] There is no information to determine whether Willow Ranch is a DUC. 58 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 17 CITY OF ALTURAS FIRE DEPARTMENT 17.1 City of Alturas Background Alturas is the county seat of Modoc County. The population was 2,827 at the 2010 US Census. Alturas is located on the Pit River, east of the center of Modoc County, at an elevation of 4370 feet. Modoc LAFCo has adopted a separate MSR and Sphere of Influence Report for the City of Alturas. This report will include brief information on the City of Alturas Fire Department only. 17.2 City of Alturas Fire Department 17.2.1 City of Alturas Fire Department Contact Information The contact information for the Alturas City Fire Department is as follows: Alturas City Fire Department Keith Jacques, Fire Chief 103 S. Howard Alturas, CA 96101 Phone: 530-233-5596/cell 530-640-0550 E-Mail: keithj@citlink.net Fax: 530-233-3559 Additional Contact: Eric Hunter, Fire Marshal: 530-640-4500 Note: The Governing Body is the Alturas City Council. 17.2.2 City of Alturas Fire Department Staff and Equipment The Alturas Fire Department has one paid Fire Marshal and 40 volunteer fire fighters.98 The volunteers have a Chief, two Assistant Chiefs, two Captains, and four Lieutenants. There are two members trained as Emergency Medical Technicians, one EMT I trained in Basic Life Support and one EMT II trained in Advanced Life Support. The Sheriff’s Office manages the Dispatch for the entire County. Approximately 80 percent or more of the calls are for medical emergencies. The Fire Department has the following vehicles in addition to other miscellaneous equipment: 98 City of Alturas, http://www.cityofalturas.us/departments/fire/index.php, May 29, 2017. 59 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 Engine 7125: 1988 Pierce Pumper, Type One, 1250 gpm pumper, 750-gallon booster tank Engine 7126: 1976, International Pumper, Type One, 1000 gpm pumper Engine 7129: 1969 International Pumper Type One 1000 gpm pumper/ladder truck Engine 7148: 1990 International Wildland Apparatus, 500 GPM pump, 750-gallon booster tank. Rescue 7150: 1996 Kodiak Rescue, Type Three, light-duty rescue/service company New equipment: 1995 One ton pick-up truck and 75 foot aerial ladder. 17.2.3 Alturas City Fire Department Financing The City of Alturas Fire Department is funded by the City General Fund. There are no special taxes, assessments or Development Impact fees to offset the impacts of growth upon fire protection. 60 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 18 OTHER MODOC FIRE PROTECTION AGENCIES In addition to the fire protection districts and the City of Alturas Fire Department the County of Modoc has the following organizations which provide fire protection to specific areas of the County: 1. Alturas Indian Rancheria 2. USDA Modoc National Forest 3. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) 4. CALFIRE The National Forest, the BLM, and CALFIRE provide fire protection for natural resources but do not provide assistance in the case of structure fires or medical emergencies. 61 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 19 COMPARISON OF FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS It is beneficial to compare the fire protection districts to get an understanding of the different situation for each district. The following table shows an estimated population for each district and the tax revenue for each district. Comparison of Modoc County Fire Protection Districts Population and Income District Estimated Income Response to Population (Revenue) Modoc 2016-201799 LAFCo 1 Adin FPD 272 $47,168.63 2 Alturas Rural FPD 300 $78,651.73 3 California Pines CSD* 520 yes 4 Canby FPD 315 $18,718.54 5 Cedarville FPD 514 $49,302.65 yes 6 Davis Creek FPD 439 $9,086.76 yes 7 Eagleville FPD 59 $8,638.98 8 Fort Bidwell FPD 214 $8,583.71 yes 9 Lake City FPD 61 $5,669.93 yes 10 Likely FPD 63 $36,916.36 11 Lookout FPD 84 $53,278.40 12 Tulelake Multi-County FPD** 1,500 $126,400.00 yes 13 Willow Ranch FPD 197 $6,729.94 14 City of Alturas*** 2,827 yes * California Pines CSD is different because it is a CSD providing several services. **Information reported by Siskiyou County, may not be exactly comparable. ***City of Alturas is not comparable to a single purpose district. The following table compares the fire protections districts by the fund balance available and the amount spent on workers compensation insurance and general insurance. The purpose of this table is to show that a larger fire protection district could be beneficial. 99 Modoc County Auditor, Trial Balance, May 10, 2017. 62 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 Comparison of Modoc County Fire Protection Districts Insurance Cost100 District Fund Workers General Balance Compensation Insurance 1 Adin FPD $40,860.82 $3,198.00 $5,019.00 2 Alturas Rural FPD $104,212.91 $8,684.20 $5,661.00 3 California Pines CSD* 4 Canby FPD $8,810.32 $2,766.00 $4,761.00 5 Cedarville FPD $96,627.70 $6,496.00 $3,581.50 6 Davis Creek FPD $3,808.33 ** ** 7 Eagleville FPD $12,827.13 $4,311.06 $2,479.93 8 Fort Bidwell FPD $8,992.01 $2,241.00 1,520.67 9 Lake City FPD $4,522.57 $5,503.00 0 10 Likely FPD $73,212.75 $4,348.16 0 11 Lookout FPD $2,490.47 $3,412.00 $3,936.00 12 Tulelake Multi-County FPD*** 13 Willow Ranch FPD $6,670.08 $2,560.00 0 14 City of Alturas**** * California Pines CSD is different because it is a CSD and provides several services. ** Davis Creek FPD, only budget item is listed as Special Department Expense. ***Information reported by Siskiyou County, not exactly comparable. ****City of Alturas is not comparable to a single purpose district. Alturas Rural FPD and Cedarville FPD have the largest fund balances. They also have the largest Workers Compensation cost indicating that they have the most volunteers. These would be the two districts that should combine with smaller districts in the future. Although the existing fire protection districts may be able to continue for the short term, there are several that are clearly not sustainable for the long term due to lack of funds and also lack of volunteers and board members. 100 Modoc County Auditor, Trial Balance, May 10, 2017. 63 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 ABBREVIATIONS BLM Bureau of Land Management BLS Basic Life Support CALFIRE California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection CDP Census Designated Place CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CKH Act Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 CPR Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation CSA County Service Area CSD Community Services District DUC Disadvantaged Unincorporated Community FPD Fire Protection District HOPTR Homeowner Property Tax Relief JPA Joint Powers Agreement LAFCo Local Agency Formation Commission MSR Municipal Service Review PPE Personal Protective Equipment SOI Sphere of Influence USFS United States Forest Service 64 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 DEFINITIONS Agriculture: Use of land for the production of food and fiber, including the growing of crops and/or the grazing of animals on natural prime or improved pasture land. Bond: An interest-bearing promise to pay a stipulated sum of money, with the principal amount due on a specific date. Funds raised through the sale of bonds can be used for various public purposes. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): A State Law requiring State and local agencies to regulate activities with consideration for environmental protection. If a proposed activity has the potential for a significant adverse environmental impact, an environmental impact report (EIR) must be prepared and certified as to its adequacy before taking action on the proposed project. Chaparral: Spanish word meaning “where the scrub oak grows”. A diverse plan (shrub) community with some of the more common species being chamise, manzanita, Christmasberry, California scrub oak, mountain mahogany, and many species of ceanothus. Community Facilities District: Under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 2082 (Section 53311, et seq.) a legislative body may create within its jurisdiction a special tax district that can finance tax-exempt bonds for the planning, design, acquisition, construction, and/or operation of public facilities, as well as public services for district residents. Special taxes levied solely within the district are used to repay the bonds. Defensible Space: That area which lies between a residence and an oncoming wildfire where the vegetation has been modified to reduce the wildfire threat and which provides an opportunity for fire fighters (and the homeowner) to safely defend the residence. Environmental Impact Report (EIR): A report required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act that assesses all the environmental characteristics of an area, determines what effects or impact will result if the area is altered or disturbed by a proposed action, and identifies alternatives or other measures to avoid or reduce those impacts. (See California Environmental Quality Act.) Federal Responsibility Area (FRA): Area that is the appropriate Federal agency’s financial responsibility of preventing and suppressing fires (e.g. National Forest, National Park Service, Department of defense, etc.). Firebrand: Any burning material such as leaves, twigs, glowing embers that is carried aloft by the convective heat in a smoke column and falls some distance away from the main fire front that could start another fire. Firebreak: An existing barrier, or one constructed before a fire occurs, from which all of the flammable materials have been removed; designed to stop or check creeping or running but not spotting fires. Fire Hazard: Fuel complex, defined by volume, type, condition, arrangement, and location, that determines the degree of both ease of ignition and of fire suppression difficulty. Fire Season: The period of mid-May through October when vegetation cures, dries out, and is most flammable. HAZMAT: A material (such as flammable or poisonous material) that would be a danger to life or to the environment if released without precautions. 65 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 Impact Fee: A fee, also called a development fee, levied on the developer of a project by a county, or other public agency as compensation for otherwise-unmitigated impacts the project will produce. California Government Code Section 77000, et seq., specifies that development fees shall not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged. To lawfully impose a development fee, the public agency must verify its method of calculation and document proper restrictions on use of the fund. Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO): A five-or seven-member commission within each county that reviews and evaluates all proposals for formation of special districts, incorporation of cities, annexation to special districts or cities, consolidation of districts, and merger of districts with cities. Each county’s LAFCO is empowered to approve, disapprove, or conditionally approve such proposals. The LAFCO members generally include two county supervisors, two city council members, and one member representing the general public. Some LAFCOs include two representatives of special districts. Local Responsibility Area (LRA): Land which is not under State or Federal financial responsibility for preventing and suppressing fires such as the incorporated area of a city. Mello-Roos Bonds: Locally issued bonds that are repaid by a special tax imposed on property owners within a community facilities district established by a governmental entity. The bond proceeds can be used for public improvements and for a limited number of services. Named after the program’s legislative authors. Sierrian Mixed Conifer Forest: A forest type found throughout the Sierra-Nevada Mountain Range consisting of a wide variety of tree species, including ponderosa pine, Jeffrey pine, sugar pine, white fire, Douglas-fir, California red fire and incense cedar. Slash: Debris such as tree tops, branches, leaves and bark generated from tree cutting or other vegetation manipulation practices. Snag: Standing dead tree or section thereof. Spotting: Behavior of a fire producing sparks or embers that are carried by the updraft and wind and start new fires beyond the main fire. Spotting usually occurs with low humidity. State Responsibility Area (SRA): Areas of the State in which the financial responsibility of preventing and suppressing fires has been determined by the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection to be primarily the responsibility of the State. Urban Intermix: An intermingling of structures and natural forest fuels within a forest setting. Wildfire: Any unwanted fire occurring in a wildland setting. Wildland: Uncultivated land, other than fallow, neglected or maintained for such purposes as wood or range-forage production, wildlife, recreation, protective watershed cover, and wilderness. Wildlife Habitat: Vegetation, climate and other natural conditions suited to the life needs for an animal species to survive and reproduce. 66 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 REFERENCES Adin CSD, 2012. Adin Community Services District, August 31, 2011. Adin Fire Protection District, http://adinfire.org/, May 1, 2017. Adin Fire Protection District, http://www.adinfire.org/about.html, May 1, 2017 Adin Fire Protection District, http://adinfire.org/equipment.html, May 1, 2017 Adin Fire Protection District, http://adinfire.org/staff.html, May 1, 2017 California Pines CSD, HC4 Box 43002, Alturas CA 96101, March 23, 2017. California Pines Community Services District, https://cpcsd.specialdistrict.org/board-members, April 29, 2017. California Pines Community Services District, https://cpcsd.specialdistrict.org/contact-us, April 29, 2017. California Pines Community Services District, https://cpcsd.specialdistrict.org/our-mission, April 29, 2017. California Pines Community Services District, https://cpcsd.specialdistrict.org/services, April 29, 2017. Cedarville Fire Protection District, Audit for year Ending June 30, 2014, Prepared by Monica Derner, Certified Public Accountant, 1030 N. Main Street #101, Alturas CA 96101, 530- 233-4984, monica@mdernercpa.com, www.dernercpa.com., January 26, 2015. City of Alturas, http://www.cityofalturas.us/departments/fire/index.php, May 29, 2017. County of Modoc, Auditor, Trial Balance, Lisa M. Phillips, Accountant Auditor II, Modoc County Auditor's Office, Phone: 530.233.6231, Fax: 530.233.6666, May 10, 2017. County of Modoc, Auditor/Clerk/Elections, Amanda R. McKinney, Deputy Clerk Accountant I, Phone: 530-233-6205, amandamckinney@co.modoc,ca.us, May 2, 2017. County of Modoc, Housing Element 2003-2008, May 9, 2006, P. 29. County of Modoc, “Modoc County General Plan 1988 Background Report” Drury, Wells; Aubrey Drury (1913). California tourist guide and handbook: authentic description of routes of travel and points of interest in California. Western Guidebook Company. p. 248. http://books.google.com/books?id=yQtFAAAAIAAJ. Retrieved 2009-06-16. Durham, David L. (1998). California's Geographic Names: A Gazetteer of Historic and Modern Names of the State. Clovis, Calif.: Word Dancer Press. ISBN 1-884995-14-4. Fort Bidwell Fire Protection District, February 22, 2017. Fort Bidwell Fire Protection District, http://gsmall.us/FBVFD/FBFireDistrict/index.html, April 29, 2017. 67 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 Gudde, Erwin; William Bright (2004). California Place Names (Fourth ed.). University of California Press. p. 3. ISBN 0-520-24217-3. https://kobi5.com/tag/tulelake/, May 29, 2017. http://realestate.yahoo.com/California/Davis_Creek/neighborhoods;_ylt=AvErqpt0fc8PQdhddYvP HnykF7kF http://www.firedepartment.net/directory/california/modoc-county/likely/likely-volunteer-fire- protection-district, May 23, 2017. http://www.firedepartment.net/directory/california/siskiyou-county/tulelake/tulelake-multi-county- fire-district, May 23, 2017. Kean, David. W (1993). Wide Places in the California Road - Volume 2 of 4: The Mountain Counties. Sunnyvale, CA: Concord Press. pp. 10. ISBN 1-884261-01-9 Lake City FPD, Star Route Box 5, Lake City CA 96115, John Erquiaga, Fire Chief, April 3, 2009. Lookout FPD, PO Box 174, Lookout CA 96054, 3/24/2009. “Modoc County Community Wildfire Protection Plan”, May 2008. Modoc Fire Chiefs Association, Phone: 530-233-1151, January 18, 2008. Modoc LAFCo, California Pines CSD Questionnaire, March 24, 2017. Modoc LAFCo, Cedarville Volunteer FPD Questionnaire, March 24, 2017. Modoc LAFCo Questionnaire, Tulelake Multi-County FPD, March 24, 2017. Pease, Robert W. (1965). Modoc County; University of California Publications in Geography, Volume 17. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. pp. 84–85, 127. Siskiyou County Auditor, Annemarie Zediker, Siskiyou County Auditor's Office, Assistant Auditor- Controller, Office: (530) 842-8027, Fax (530) 842-8077, azediker@co.siskiyou.ca.us, May 23, 2017. US Census Bureau, https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045216/06049,06, April 25, 2017. U.S. Geological Survey Geographic Names Information System: Adin, California. PREPARERS John Benoit, Modoc LAFCo Executive Officer PO Box 2694, Granite Bay CA 95746 Phone: 916-797-6003 E-Mail: johnbenoit@surewest.net Christy Leighton, Planning Consultant 555 East Willow Street, Willows CA 95988 Phone: 530-934-4597 E-Mail: christyleighton@sbcglobal.net 68 MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 ·|}þ 139 kj kj Modoc County Lassen County ·|}þ ·|}þ 299 139 69 tSh As Modoc Local Agency Formation Commission ADIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 2 1 8 0 7 1 2 9 6 1 1 1 2 0 5 2 1 1 2 1 4 3 1 1 2 2 3 4 1 1 7 8 9 1 2 8 7 0 1 2 9 6 1 1 1 2 0 5 2 1 1 2 1 4 3 1 1 2 2 3 4 1 1 7 8 9 1 2 8 7 0 2 1 9 1 6 15 R 1 2 0 o 2 ney Flat 1 1 2 R 1 4 3 d 1 Q 2 3 4 u R a 1 u i 2 l s S h p r C in 7 r 1 g e 8 e R 1 k 9 d Rd 2 1 8 0 7 1 2 9 6 1 1 2 1 5 2 0 1 2 1 4 1 3 1 1 2 3 2 4 1 1 7 8 9 1 2 8 7 0 1 2 9 6 1 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28Redw 3 8 5 2 3 9 4 3 3 1 3 4 0 Look 2 ou 1 t Ha 1 ckam ore Rd 35 3 1 6 12 09 daoR ytnuoC 3 6 7 1 3 5 8 2 3 9 4 3 3 1 3 4 0 3 1 2 5 1 3 1 1 6 2 3 6 7 1 3 5 8 2 3 4 9 3 10 3 3 4 3 1 2 5 1 3 1 1 6 2 3 6 7 1 3 5 2 8 3 4 3 9 3 1 3 4 0 3 1 2 5 1 3 1 1 6 2 3 6 1 7 32 5 8 3 4 3 9 C 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 Lookout Road 87 2 2 0 9 2 2 1 8 dR rem arK 22 27 2 2 3 6 2 2 4 5 1 3 9 0 2 2 0 9 2 2 1 8 2 2 2 7 A78 daoR 2 2 3 6 2 2 4 5 1 3 9 0 2 2 0 9 2Co8unty R Co oa un d ty 2 89 Road 89 State Highway 2 1 99 OaCeWik Ca dalloSt na r Sw Adl S tSt amts Wa Ce R Mc lnJu ntd D ut er nip owStn i SAer St del t S l S t t Stg nriSp A County Road 88 din 2 2 2 7 2 A 6 s 2 h 3 Valley R 2 2 5 4 d 1 3 9 0 2 2 0 9 28 21 2 2 2 7 2 2 3 6 2 2 4 5 1 3 9 0 2 2 0 9 2 2 1 8 3 2 1 8 5 2 0 7 3 1 2 9 4 3 6 1 1 1 0 5 3 2 3 4 2 Bieber Dum p Rd 1 2 1 3 1 2 5 4 Bi 3 eber Lookout Rd 3 1 1 2 1 6 2 3 4 1 3 1 6 7 8 1 9 Susa 3 1 2 5 8 n 2 7 0 ville Rd 1 2 6 1 3 4 9 3 Andrews Rd 3 1 1 2 3 4 0 5 2 Le H n u a S n r t u d 3 1 1 s 2 R 2 5 1 4 R 3 a d n d ville R 3 1 1 2 1 6 d 2 3 4 3 1 1 6 7 1 8 9 5 dR ttessaB 3 A 1 2 8 2 7 0 lbaug 33 4 h R 1 2 9 6 1 d Arm strong Rd 3 B 1 3 4 1 0 u 5 tte Creek 3 R 1 2 2 5 1 d 3 14 3 1 1 1 2 6 2 3 4 3 1 1 6 7 1 8 9 5 3 1 2 8 2 7 A 0 sh V 3 a 3 lley 1 2 4 9 R 6 1 d 3 1 1 2 3 4 0 5 2 1 3 1 2 2 1 5 4 3 3 1 1 2 1 6 2 3 4 3 1 1 6 7 1 8 9 3 1 2 8 5 2 7 0 3 1 2 4 9 3 6 1 Bunselmeier Rd 22 2 3 5 9 2 2 3 4 8 3 34 2 3 d 7 R kcirreD 2 3 2 6 5 2 3 5 6 1 dR retneC niknuP 3 3 6 0 1 2 3 5 9 2 2 3 4 8 3 2 3 3 7 4 2 3 2 6 5 2 3 1 5 6 McClellan R 3 d 6 0 31 2 3 5 9 2 2 3 4 8 3 2 3 3 7 4 2 3 6 2 5 2 3 5 1 6 3 3 0 6 1 2 3 9 2 5 2 3 8 3 4 2 3 7 4 3 2 3 6 2 5 2 3 5 1 6 3 3 0 1 6 2 3 9 5 2 2 3 4 8 3 2 1 2 3 8 5 0 7 9 2 1 2 M6 1 UC 2 K 8 V 3 9 AL 3 4 LEY RD 1 1 2 2 3 0 5 2 7 4 3 1 2 2 1 3 4 3 1 6 2 5 SPRING GULCH RD 1 2 3 M 2 1 2 1 5 6 4 3 ATHE 30 W 3 1 1 7 B 1 8 6 9 S OY D R S D PRING 1 2 R 8 2 7 3 0 D 5 9 2 1 2 9 3 2 6 1 4 3 8 1 1 3 2 2 0 5 3 4 2 7 1 1 2 2 3 1 4 2 3 6 5 1 1 2 2 3 2 3 4 5 1 6 1 1 7 3 3 6 8 9 0 1 HAY 5 DE 1 8 2 2 3 7 0 9 2 N HILL R 9 1 2 2 3 D 6 4 1 8 3 1 1 2 2 3 0 5 3 2 7 4 1 A 1 n 2 1 2 3 d 3 4 2 e 6 5 rson Ran 1 c 3 h Rd 1 2 2 3 2 1 4 5 6 31 1 7 1 3 6 8 9 0 HAYDE 1 2 8 2 3 N 5 7 0 9 2 HILL CO 1 2 9 2 3 6 4 1 8 3 1 1 2 2 3 0 5 3 2 7 4 1 1 2 3 2 1 4 2 3 5 6 1 1 2 3 2 2 1 3 4 6 5 1 1 3 7 3 6 8 9 1 0 1 2 2 3 8 5 7 0 9 2 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 8018 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 htroN 93 pihsnwoT Range 07 East Range 08 East Range 10 East Modoc County Fire Protection Districts kjTu kj lela N k e e well Willow RanchkjFort B kj idwell Davis Creekkj ·|}þ 139 ·|}þ 395 L kj ake City Legend 4 ·|}þ Modoc County kjCanby kj Altura C s edarville kj299 kj Communities Eaglevillekj Highways Lookout kj Adinkj kjLi M L k a e o s l d y s o e c n C C o o R Se o c a t d io s nal Grid A S d p i h n e F re ir e o f P In ro fl t u e e c n ti c o e n District A Fi d re in Protection District So S u o r u c rc e e : : M M o o d do o c ( c M L L A A D FC F B o C & o M) 0 0.5 1 2Miles Map Created 7/5/2017 L A A do F p C t o e d R : e solution: htroN 04 pihsnwoT htroN 83 pihsnwoT Range 09 East Adin Fire Protection District Parcels MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 Modoc Local Agency Formation Commission ALTURAS RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 1 1 3 3 6 7 9 8 0 1 1 2 2 5 3 8 7 9 0 2 1 2 4 2 9 3 6 1 8 3 1 1 2 3 2 3 0 5 2 7 4 1 1 2 2 3 2 1 4 3 6 5 1 1 2 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 1 3 6 3 7 8 9 0 1 1 2 5 2 8 3 7 0 9 2 1 4 2 2 9 3 6 1 8 3 1 1 3 2 2 3 0 5 2 7 4 1 1 2 2 2 3 1 4 3 6 5 1 1 1 2 2 3 2 3 4 5 6 1 1 6 7 3 3 8 9 0 1 1 2 5 8 2 3 7 0 9 2 1 2 4 9 2 3 6 1 8 3 1 1 2 3 2 3 5 0 2 7 4 2 1 C 1 1 2 o 2 3 4 3 u 6 5 nty Roa 1 d 3 5 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 1 6 1 7 3 3 8 9 0 C 1 ount 1 y 8 2 5 2 7 3 0 9 2 Ro A331 daoR ytnuoC ad 1 2 4 2 3 1 9 1 1 8 3 6 F 8 ra 1 n 0 kli 1 2 3 n 2 3 5 2 7 4 Canyo 1 1 2 n 2 2 3 1 4 3 6 5 Rd 1 1 1 2 2 3 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 2 3 7 0 5 9 8 2 1 2 2 3 6 1 4 8 3 9 1 2 2 3 5 2 1 7 3 4 0 3 1 2 5 2 2 4 3 1 6 1 County R kj 1 o 2 ad 2 5 17 1 2 3 3 L 4 6 1 a C k C o e 3 u 3 o 6 0 7 0 1 n u C t n y t y R i t R o y 3 a o 5 8 2 d a d 0 1 2 8 1 8 3 5 4 9 3 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 17 16 15 14 13 1 1 8 9 1 2 7 0 2 1 1 6 1 3 3 1 3 7 1 3 1 7 1 1 3 6 7 8 0 0 9 6 1 8 1 9 9 8 0 C C ou a nt n y y R o d n 7 0 Cre 1 e 2 8 2 k 3 7 R 1 0 5 2 2 9 5 8 d 2 2 3 2 7 0 0 9 2 C 8 9 1 a 7 lif N orn o i 1 a 2 2 r 9 3 1 1 6 4 2 t 1 2 3 8 9 P 3 6 2 h 4 6 1 9 8 3 i 8 2 n e 1 W s 1 B e 5 lv C 1 s d 2 C 1 r 0 2 3 o t 2 0 1 2 3 2 3 1 7 w 2 4 o 2 3 1 5 2 S 7 4 0 2 7 d 5 u e t n r ·|}þ 2 F t 3 l y A 9 a 5 i t 2 3 9 r R 1 2 1 R p 6 5 2 1 1 2 2 4 2 o 1 6 d 1 2 2 d 4 3 3 1 1 r 4 3 6 t Coun 1 ty Rd 75 R 7 d 6 1 1 2 3 2 2 1 1 2 3 1 3 2 4 6 5 1 1 2 2 2 1 3 4 6 5 2 3 4 5 18 County Rd 75 B 1 3 7 i 3 g 9 3 6 3 0 7 1 1 6 1 3 0 7 1 S 1 8 1 9 0 a 8 9 g 8 e Rd 1 2 2 3 1 7 0 5 2 9 2 3 8 2 5 1 7 2 0 9 2 2 8 7 0 9 1 2 2 3 9 1 6 4 2 3 2 1 8 9 3 1 4 2 6 9 2 8 3 1 6 1 8 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 1 1 2 0 3 2 5 0 2 3 7 4 0 1 2 5 2 2 7 4 5 2 7 dR edistseW 1 1 2 2 3 1 1 1 2 2 4 2 3 6 3 5 1 1 1 2 4 2 3 2 6 5 1 4 3 6 kj12 1 1 2 2 3 2 1 2 3 2 1 A 4 3 5 6 1 2 1 3 2 1 4 5 6 2 4 3 5 l C t 3 o u 0 O u 1 l 1 d 7 3 r n 9 1 1 3 8 6 I 7 3 1 m 1 1 8 3 6 9 7 0 t a 1 8 a 9 0 y gr a s R nt T d 2 3 r 9 l 2 1 5 8 1 2 2 7 3 5 Bo 2 wm 1 an 6 R 2 d 2 7 8 5 8 0 9 2 0 7 0 9 1 2 2 3 9 1 2 6 2 4 3 1 9 8 1 3 2 2 4 9 6 1 8 3 6 1 8 1 1 2 2 3 1 0 3 5 1 2 2 2 3 7 1 4 1 2 2 3 0 5 7 2 4 0 5 7 2 1 1 2 2 3 1 1 1 4 2 2 2 3 3 6 1 5 1 2 2 1 2 4 3 6 1 5 4 6 3 1 1 2 2 3 1 1 2 2 1 2 3 4 3 5 1 6 1 2 2 2 3 1 4 5 6 3 2 4 5 1 3 1 3 7 8 6 1 1 9 7 1 0 3 1 3 1 3 8 7 6 9 0 8 1 9 0 D 1 3 r 2 7·|}þ y 2 0 2 9 C 2 8 5 1 9 8 9 2 2 1 3 2 r 2 7 8 5 0 9 7 e 2 0 9 ek 3 B 3 1 2 2 9 a 6 4 1 1 8 2 9 2 3 1 2 6 s 2 9 1 4 8 3 6 1 8 in Rd 1 1 2 2 3 0 1 5 3 1 2 7 2 4 2 0 3 1 5 1 2 2 3 7 2 4 0 5 2 7 1 1 2 3 2 1 1 4 2 1 3 5 6 2 2 1 3 4 3 1 1 2 2 6 2 5 1 4 3 6 1 1 2 3 2 1 2 1 1 3 5 6 4 2 2 2 3 3 4 1 1 5 2 1 2 6 2 3 4 5 Wa 2 2 r 3 7 n 0 9 2 e 6 1 1 3 r 3 8 9 1 6 C M 0 1 7 3 1 8 9 0 o o un u t 1 a 2 n 2 3 7 i 1 n 8 3 t y R 5 2 8 2 i 3 d 0 1 5 8 R 2 9 2 2 g 7 0 9 e o -L a in 2 2 d e 3 2 7 4 2 4 1 2 9 2 3 6 5 1 4 1 2 8 9 3 2 6 1 8 2 2 3 3 6 5 1 3 1 2 2 0 3 5 1 2 1 3 2 7 2 4 0 5 2 7 D C e 2 2 3 4 e e 5 6 2 1 p 1 2 2 1 3 d 4 1 1 3 2 2 6 2 5 C C 1 4 3 6 a r o e 1 u r e 3 8 3 n 6 0 6 1 v 7 3 1 k 3 t 9 0 1 6 1 1 3 y 7 3 8 R 9 i 0 1 l R d 5 l o e a 2 kj 3 1 d 9 2 5 2 2 8 3 7 1 2 0 5 2 9 3 8 2 7 0 1 9 2 9 4 2 3 1 2 2 3 4 1 9 2 2 3 8 3 4 9 6 1 8 3 6 1 8 3 31 32 33 34 3 C 5 ounty 3 R 6 d 72 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 7 8 9 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 18 17 16 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8·|}þ 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 8 9 10 11 12 19 20 21 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 395 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 17 16 15 14 13 30 29 28 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 20 21 22 23 24 31 32 33 3 3 6 0 7 1 2 3 9 5 2 8 2 3 8 3 Red C wood C u 9 4 a b n G H y a i b l o l t e o n n 3 3 2 E Da 4 w 7 n 1 c 0 B h W a o P s o i in o g 2 e d o w 3 2 n 5 6 a 1 r 1 d 3 2 1 6 5 1 2 3 3 6 7 0 1 2 3 5 9 8 2 2 3 4 9 8 3 2 3 1 3 7 4 0 2 3 1 2 6 5 1 12 2 3 1 5 6 3 3 6 7 0 1 2 3 kj 5 8 9 2 Lik 2 3 4 9 8 3 ely 2 3 1 3 7 4 0 2 3 1 2 6 5 1 2 3 1 1 5 6 2 3 3 6 7 0 1 2 3 5 9 2 8 2 3 4 9 8 3 2 3 1 3 7 4 0 2 3 1 2 6 5 1 2 3 1 1 5 6 2 2 3 5 9 8 2 2 3 4 8 9 3 2 3 1 3 7 4 0 2 3 1 2 6 5 1 2 3 1 1 5 6 2 1 6 1 7 8 9 5 1 8 2 7 0 1 2 4 9 6 1 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 Lik 1 e 8 ly 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 17 16 15 14 13 30 29 28 1 3 9 0 2 2 0 9 2 2 1 8 2 2 2 7 2 2 3 6 2 2 4 5 1 3 9 0Mod 2 o 0 c/L 2 a 1 ssen 22 Cou 2 n 3 tyLi 2 2 n 4 5 e 1 3 9 0 2 2 0 9 2 2 1 8 2 2 2 7 2 2 3 6 2 2 4 5 1 3 9 0 2 2 0 9 2 2 1 8 2 2 2 7 2 2 3 6 2 2 4 5 2 2 0 9 2 2 1 8 2 2 2 7 2 2 3 6 2 2 4 5 3 6 1 3 5 2 3 4 3 70 htroN 34 pihsnwoT Range 11 East Range 12 East Range 14 East Modoc County Fire Protection Districts kjTu kj lela N k e e well Willow RanchkjFort B kj idwell ·|}þ 139 Davis Creek ·|}þ 39 kj 5 L kj ake City Legend 4 ·|}þ Modoc County kjCanby kj Altura C s edarville kj299 kj Communities Eaglevillekj Highways Lookout kj Adinkj kjLi M L k a e o s l d y s o e c n C C o o R Se o c a t d io s nal Grid A S l p tu h r e a r s e R of u I r n a f l l u F e ir n e c P e rotection District A Fi l r t e u r P a r s o R te u c r t a io l n District So S u o r u c rc e e : : M M o o d do o c ( c M L L A A D FC F B o C & o M) 0 0.5 1 2Miles Map Created 7/6/2017 L A A do F p C t o e d R : e solution: htroN 44 pihsnwoT htroN 24 pihsnwoT Range 13 East Range 15 East htroN 14 pihsnwoT Alturas Rural Fire Protection District City of Alturas Boundary Parcels MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 Modoc Local Agency Formation Commission CALPINES COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT PROVIDING FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES 3 2 1 1 6 5 2 Pit R 7 3 i 3 v 6 0 1 er Rd 3 2 5 8 2 9 2 3 4 9 8 3 27 C C 3 1 3 4 0 i o n u d n e t r y P R it o R a 2 3 d 1 d 2 6 5 1 83 ·|}þ 139 3 1 1 6 2 ·|}þ 2 2 9 5 9 kj C 3 o 6 unty 7 1 Road 1 C 75 30 anby C 3 2 5 8 2 9 enterville R 2 3 4 9 d 8 3 3 3 4 2 1 7 0 96 daoR ytnuoC 3 2 1 2 1 6 5 3 2 1 1 6 5 2 3 3 0 6 7 1 County Road 70 5 2 8 9 32 North W 2 3 4 e 9 8 3 st St 2 3 1 3 7 4 0 2 3 1 6 5 1 2 57 daoR ytnuoC Cou 12 nt 2 3 y 1 5 6 Road 230 7 3 3 6 0 1 Lagana Rd 2 3 5 9 2 8 4 2 9 3 8 3 County Road 261 2 3 7 1 3 4 0 25 1 2 3 3 4 6 County 1 1 3 3 R 8 9 1 0 oad 85 2 1 9 2 3 7 0 2 ·|}þ 139 1 2 3 2 6 1 3 8 1 2 2 3 5 2 7 4 1 2 2 3 4 3 6 5 1 2 2 3 3 4 5 6 1 1 3 3 8 9 0 1 1 2 2 3 7 0 9 2 1 2 2 3 6 1 8 3 1 2 2 3 5 2 7 4 Bi 1 g L 4 akes Rd 2 2 3 3 6 5 1 2 2 3 3 4 5 6 1 1 3 3 8 9 0 1 1 C 7 2 anyo 0 n Cr 2 eek 9 Rd 32 Califor 2 ni 1 a Pin 1 2 e 3 s 6 8 3 Blvd 2 1 2 3 2 5 7 4 Co 3 u 1 2 2 5 n 4 3 6 ty Road 3 7 6 2 1 2 2 3 4 5 1 1 3 3 8 9 0 1 2 1 2 9 3 G 7 0 2 raves Reservoir 1 2 2 3 6 1 8 3 1 2 2 3 5 2 7 4 1 2 1 1 2 4 3 1 1 6 7 8 9 2 1 5 8 0 7 1 2 4 9 6 1 15 1 2 3 0 R 2 oney Flat R 1 d 1 2 2 1 4 3 13 Q 24 ua 1 L 1 il 2 o S w p e ri r n g R u R s d 1 h 8 1 6 C 7 9 reek Rd 2 1 5 8 0 7 1 2 4 9 6 1 1 1 2 3 5 0 2 1 2 1 2 4 1 3 1 2 1 1 3 4 2 1 1 6 7 8 9 2 1 5 8 0 7 Coun 9 ty Road 1 2 4 7 6 1 1 1 2 1 3 0 2 5 23 1 1 G 2 1 4 raven Res 1 e 3 rv 1 2 o 1 2 4 ir Rd B 7 ayley R 6 e 1 s 1 e 8 9 rvoir Rd 1 5 2 8 7 0 1 4 9 2 6 1 1 1 2 3 0 5 2 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 36 31 Dutch Flat Rd 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 12 7 8 9 10·|}þ 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 139 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 24 19 County R 2 o 0 ad 89 21 Adin 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 kj 25 30 29 County Road 89 State Highway 22998 County Road 88 27 26 Ash Valley 25 30 29 28Modoc 2 C 7 ounty 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 36 ·|}þ31 32 33·|}þ 34 35 36 31 32 La 33 ssen C 34 ounty 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 1 299 6 5 4 139 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 71 htroN 04 pihsnwoT Range 09 East Range 10 East Range 12 East Modoc County Fire Protection Districts kjTu kj lela N k e e well Willow RanchkjFort B kj idwell ·|}þ 139 Davis Creek ·|}þ 39 kj 5 L kj ake City Legend 4 ·|}þ Modoc County kjCanby kj Altura C s edarville kj299 kj Communities Eagle kj ville Highways Lookout kj kjAdin kjLi L k M a e o s l d y se oc n C C o o R Se o c a t d io s nal Grid C Sp a h lp e in re e s o f C I o n m flu m en u c n e ity Services District C Fi a re lp P in r e o s te C c S ti D on Service Area So S u o r u c rc e e : : M M o o d do o c ( c M L L A A D FC F B o C & o M) 0 0.5 1 2Miles Map Created 7/7/2017 L A A do F p C t o e d R : e solution: htroN 14 pihsnwoT Range 11 East htroN 93 pihsnwoT Calpines CSD Fire Protection Service Area Parcels MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 Mowitz Rd Tickner Rd Airpo C rt r R ow d der Flat Rd H ·|}þ 1 o 3 w 9 ards Gulch Front L a o g v e e R ne d ss Rd Blacks Canyon Rd Weitcher Rd C ounty R oad 67 ·|}þ 299 County Road 76 kj Centerville Rd 96 daoR ytnuoC C ounty R oad 70 57 daoR ytnuoC Pit River Rd Big Lakes Rd Canyon Creek Rd California Pines Blvd County Road 85 ·|}þ 139 County Road 72 Loop Roney Flat Rd State Highway 139 County Road 71 h Flat R d Dutch Flat Acomia A L s iver h y leyL n a reK ra Corral m G ie atl A i B n lp g e in l e la L B ow a ie rse Pint n o B Ca e rl a s v be e r r g Si Joi e nes rra Canyon Ec B h W a o s o in odward Devi C ls oho Hilton idge Cub Pigeon 72 onimalaP Modoc Local Agency Formation Commission CANBY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 1 2 1 3 4 2 1 7 8 19 1 2 8 7 0 2 9 1 16 1 1 2 0 5 2 1 1 2 1 4 3 12 13 24 1 1 7 8 9 1 2 8 7 0 1 2 9 6 1 10 2 1 2 5 1 2 4 3 11 1 1 2 2 3 4 18 Pio 1 n 7 ee 9 r Rd 1 2 8 7 0 9 1 2 6 1 1 1 2 0 5 2 1 1 2 1 4 3 1 2 3 4 12 57 daoR ytnuoC 1 1 7 8 9 1 2 8 7 0 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30Canby 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 County Road 83 35 32 3 1 6 3 6 1 3 5 2 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 2 5 3 1 6 C oun 6 ty R oad 175 31 3 5 2 3 4 3 34 3 2 3 1 6 3 6 1 5 3 4 3 3 3 4 35 2 3 1 6 3 6 1 3 5 2 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 14 15 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 13 18 17 16 14 13 18 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 25 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 30 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 13 13 18 17 16 15 14 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 25 36 31 30 3 2 2 9 3 2 3 8 2 3 7 4 2 3 6 5 2 3 5 6 3 3 0 1 2 3 9 2 2 3 8 3 2 3 7 4 26 35 25 3 B 6 irch 30 31 3 2 2 9 Owens 28 33 Redw ood 4Gable 3 2 4 7 3 2 5 6 2 3 5 6 3 3 0 1 2 3 9 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 11 1 1 2 6 5 9 Hilton 3 Da wn 10 2 11 1 12 6 5 htroN 24 pihsnwoT Range 09 East Range 10 East Range 11 East Modoc County Fire Protection Districts kjTu kj lela N k e e well Willow RanchkjFort B kj idwell Davis Creekkj ·|}þ 139 ·|}þ 395 L kj ake City Legend 4 ·|}þ Modoc County kjCanby kj Altura C s edarville kj299 kj Communities Eaglevillekj Highways Lookout kj Adinkj Canby kjLikely R S (M e o D c a t d B io s & n M al ) Grid C Sp a h n e b r y e F o ir f e I n P fl r u o e te n c c t e ion District Fire Protection District So S u o r u c rc e e : : M M o o d do o c c L L A A FC F o Co 0 0.5 1 2Miles Map Created 7/7/2017 L A A do F p C t o e d R : e solution: htroN 34 pihsnwoT htroN 14 pihsnwoT Canby Fire Protection District Parcels MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 Modoc Local Agency Formation Commission CEDARVILLE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 2 3 7 4 2 3 6 5 2 3 5 6 5 8 4 9 3 10 1 2 1 1 1 Cou 2 nty Road 17 6 7 5 8 B 51 daoR ytnuoC 4 9 1 3 0 1 2 1 1 1 2 7 6 8 5 4 9 1 3 0 1 2 1 15 3 2 1 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 15 23 10 11 12 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 County R 2 o 1 ad 19 22 24 19 20 21 22 23 County Road 20 0 1 2 2 3 3 5 2 7 4 1 2 2 3 4 3 2 6 5 1 2 2 3 3 1 4 5 6 ·|}þ 299 6 2 3 9 2 County Road 2 3 8 3 25 5 2 3 7 4 4 2 3 6 5 3 2 3 5 6 2 D 6 ee C p 3 3 0 C 1 1 7 e 8 re d ek a R 2 r 3 d 9 2 v dR yellaV esirpruS il kj 5 l 1 8 e 7 C C C o o o u u u n 3 n n 4 3 t t t y y y 32 dao R R ytnuoC R R 2 o o o 8 1 9 a a a 6 d d d 1 2 2 4 1 6 3 C 2 1 7 0 34 1 42 daoR ytnuoC 3 5 0 1 2 0 5 3 3 0 1 6 7 18 32 29 5 1 8 7 ·|}þ 299 2 3 8 4 3 1 9 6 1 3 1 0 5 2 3 7 4 1 2 1 1 4 2 3 6 5 en iL etatS adaveN /ain ro 1 1 2 0 5 2 1 1 2 1 4 3 1 1 2 2 3 4 1 7 1 8 9 8 1 2 7 0 Warner Mo 1 un 6 tain 2 R 1 idge 9 -Line 1 1 2 0 5 2 1 1 1 2 4 C 3 ounty Roa 1 d 3 3 9 0 1 27 2 2 3 0 9 2 Laxaq 3 2 u 2 3 1 8 e Rd County R 34 oad 28 0 20 21 2 2 3 2 7 4 2 2 3 3 6 5 filaC 27 Parke 26 r Creek Rd 25 30 29 28 27 26 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 3 3 4 3 2 5 3 1 6 3 Sh 1 ields 6 Creek Rd 3 5 2 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 2 5 1 7 8 1 C 8 7 ounty Road 1 9 2 6 9 10 Surp 1 ris 5 e Valley Rd County Ro 1 1 1 a 4 d 30 1 1 2 3 7 8 9 1 1 0 5 1 1 1 4 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 19 20 21 22 23 24 22 23 County Road 33 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 30 29 28 27 26 25 27 26 0 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 31 32 33 34 Co 35 unty Road 3 3 6 4 34 35 3 2 3 7 4 2 2 3 W 6 5 1 arner Rd West Warner 25 36 5 3 3 0 1 4 2 3 9 2 3 2 3 8 3 2 27 34 Trl tim m uS 1 2 3 6 5 18 6 7 5 1 8 7 4 1 9 6 1 3 1 0 5 14 1 2 1 Co kj unty 1 1 1 R 2 3 oad 35 18 17 16 10 C 3 1 o 5 unty Road 37 1 2 1 1 4 73 htroN 24 pihsnwoT Range 14 East Range 15 East Range 17 East Modoc County Fire Protection Districts kjTu kj lela N k e e well Willow RanchkjFort B kj idwell Davis Creekkj ·|}þ 139 ·|}þ 395 L kj ake City Legend 4 ·|}þ Modoc County kjCanby kj Altura C s edarville kj299 kj Communities Eagle kj ville Highways Lookout kj Adinkj L M a o s d se oc n C C o o kjLikely R Se o c a t d io s nal Grid C Sp e h d e a r r e vi l o le f I F n i f r l e u e P n r c o e tection District C Fi e re d a P r r v o il t l e e ction District So S u o r u c rc e e : : M M o o d do o c ( c M L L A A D FC F B o C & o M) 0 0.5 1 2Miles Map Created 7/7/2017 L A A do F p C t o e d R : e solution: htroN 34 pihsnwoT Range 16 East htroN 14 pihsnwoT Cedarville Fire Protection District Parcels MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 Modoc Local Agency Formation Commission DAVIS CREEK FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT State Line 3 2 2 4 2 7 2 2 3 3 6 5 2 2 3 4 5 6 1 3 3 9 0 1 C 29 o 2 3 r 0 2 ral Cree 2 2 3 k 1 8 3 Rd 2 2 3 2 7 4 2 2 3 3 6 5 2 2 3 4 5 6 1 3 3 9 0 1 2 3 2 9 2 0W estside Rd 2 3 3 5 26 2 2 3 4 5 6 3 6 7 1 Pine 3 5 c 8 2 reek C 3 4 9 3 anyon 3 1 R 3 4 0 d 2H 3 1 5 1 ighgra 3 1 d 1 6 2 e Rd 3 6 7 1 3 5 8 2 3 4 9 3 3 1 3 4 0 3 1 2 5 1 3 1 1 6 2 1 1 2 2 3 3 1 1 5 0 3 2 7 4 0 5 2 Mu 1 1 l 2 1 d 2 3 4 1 1 o 3 2 6 5 1 o 4 n Rd 1 1 1 2 2 3 2 3 1 1 4 1 5 6 2 3 1 6 7 1 3 3 8 1 9 6 0 7 1 8 29So 1 5 2 8 3 u 7 1 0 5 2 8 t 7 h Ma 3 in 3 1 4 2 R 2 9 1 6 4 1 8 9 d 6 1 1 3 2 2 3 1 1 0 3 5 2 7 4 0 5 1 1 2 2 2 3 1 1 1 2 4 3 6 5 1 4 3 C 6 o 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 u 3 4 5 2 3 nty R 1 o 1 6 3 8 3 7 a 9 6 1 0 7 1 d 8 1 1 2 8 2 8 7 5 9 1 9 32 1 5 8 7 4 9 16 0 1 2 6 1 9 kj Co W u ·|}þ n 3 1 1 2 3 2 t 3 0 9 y 1 5 1 2 7 4 i 0 5 5 3 R l o l a o d 2 1 w 1 1 3 2 2 2 3 1 1 4 1 3 3 6 5 1 4 C Ra 1 1 2 1 2 n 3 1 2 3 1 4 1 5 6 2 3 c 1 h 1 3 3 8 1 1 9 6 7 3 0 1 8 9 0 8Fa 1 1 n 2 2 3 7 7 5 d 0 2 2 9 2 a 0 9 ngo Pa 2 1 2 s 2 3 1 6 1 1 s 4 9 2 8 3 6 8 Rd 1 2 2 3 1 5 2 1 3 2 7 2 4 0 5 2 7 2 M 6 1 i 2 l 1 3 l 4 1 3 2 2 2 1 5 C 4 3 6 ree F k 3 2 6 4 o R 1 2 B 1 1 3 2 d 5 1 2 id 2 3 4 r w 5 ell t Cre ek B R 1 d 9 1 6 3 1 i C 8 1 3 7 3 1 8 d 9 o C 0 0 o u un n w ty t y 2 R o 9 R ad 2 8 e 2 o 2 1 9 2 0 3 a 1 7 0 2 kj d l 5 7 l Sa 2 gehorn Rd 24 Fe 1 2 2 3 1 2 4 6 1 8 e 9 3 6 1 Re L 3 a 3 k s 4 e 2 A e 7 n 1 2 n 1 1 r i 2 5 2 e 0 v 5 R 2 d oir Rd 1 0 2 2 3 1 1 2 4 2 3 6 5 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 2 3 7 4 1 1 3 5 0 2 3 6 5 1 1 2 1 4 2 3 5 6 1 1 1 2 3 3 3 0 1 1 6 7 8 2 3 9 2 1 5 8 7 2 3 8 3 1 4 9 6 2 3 7 4 1 1 3 5 0 2 3 6 5 1 1 2 1 4 2 3 5 6 1 1 1 3 2 3 3 0 1 0 29 28 2 2 2 7 W estside Rd 12 1 La 3 keshore Rd 1 7 8 17 8 kj Da 2 3 1 8 4 3 9 v 6 is 2 3 C 1 1 3 7 4 0 5 ree 2 3 1 2 k 6 5 1 14 2 3 1 1 1 5 6 2 3 1 2 2 5 8 7 9 0 2 1 4 2 9 8 6 1 10 1 3 2 2 F 5 7 2 ossett 2 S 1 1 2 2 p 1 4 3 6 rings Rd 1 1 2 2 1 2 3 5 4 Surp 1 rise 9 Valley 1 6 7 Rd 3 8 0 2 1 0 7 8 5 4 0 2 2 5 5 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 Coun 2 t 4 y Road 19 68 20 21 22County 2 R 3 oad 11 24 32 33 34 35 36 31 3536 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 5 4 3 2 1 6 21 1 3 1 2 2 3 3 0 4 5 2 7 4 3 1 1 2 2 3 2 5 1 4 3 6 5 3 1 1 2 2 3 1 6 2 3 4 5 6 3 1 1 3 6 7 3 1 8 9 0 1 3 1 2 5 2 8 3 2 7 0 9 2 3 1 4 2 2 9 3 3 6 1 8 3 3 1 1 3 2 2 3 4 0 5 2 7 4 3 1 1 2 2 2 5 3 1 4 3 6 5 3 1 1 1 2 2 6 3 2 3 4 5 6 3 1 1 7 6 3 1 8 3 9 0 1 1 3 2 5 8 2 3 7 2 0 9 2 3 1 2 4 9 2 3 3 6 1 8 3 3 1 1 2 3 2 4 3 5 0 2 7 4 Co 2 unty 1 3 1 R 1 2 5 2 3 4 o 3 6 5 ad 53 3 1 1 1 2 6 2 3 3 2 4 5 6 19 3 1 6 7 3 1 3 V 8 0 C 1 all o ey u V n 1 i 7 e 3 t 5 8 y w 2 2 2 3 0 9 2 R R d o A331 daoR ytnuoC ad 3 1 1 2 2 3 3 6 9 4 1 1 8 3 F 8 ra 1 n 0 kl 3 i 1 3 2 n 2 4 3 5 2 7 4 Canyo 3 1 1 2 n 2 5 2 3 1 4 3 6 5 Rd 3 1 1 1 2 2 6 3 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 8 2 3 7 0 5 9 8 2 1 2 9 2 3 6 1 4 8 3 9 1 1 2 2 3 0 5 2 1 7 3 4 0 1 1 2 2 3 1 4 3 1 6 2 5 1 kj 2 1 5 1 1 1 C 2 3 o 2 2 3 L u 4 n 6 ty Ro a ad 17 7 ke 3 3 6 0 0 1 7 C C i o t C u y 3 5 n 8 2 o t u y n 2 R t 8 y 3 o 3 9 R a 4 d o a 1 d 8 15 1 3 0 34 3 1 2 5 1 1 1 2 1 2 4 3 6 1 1 2 3 1 2 1 3 4 6 2 15 1 3 0 1 2 1 1 1 2 6 7 5 8 4 9 1 3 0 1 2 1 1 1 2 6 7 5 8 4 9 1 3 0 1 2 1 1 1 2 6 7 5 8 4 9 1 3 0 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 7 0 1 2 6 1 1 2 5 2 1 2 4 3 1 2 3 4 1 1 3 8 9 0 C 2o0 1 2 u 7 9 nty R 1 o 2 2 6 a 1 8 d 1 15 9 2 2 2 7 1 0 4 23 13 15 2 C 2 3 2 3 r 7 4 owder 3 F 5 l 1 a 2 4 t A 6 2 2 ir 3 p B o C rt i r o R g w d 1 d 3S e 1 r 3 A F a 6 2 la 2 i t 4 g r 5 R p e d ort 1 1 3 3 8 9 0 1 6 1 2 2 3 7 5 0 9 2 1 2 2 3 4 6 1 8 3 3 3 4 1 2 2 5 2 S 7 picer M laeT 2 2 u 6 3 le Pheasant 3 1 2 5 D 4 e liatniP e P 3 r 1 H a 6 licneP r M C i 1 t 2 ll r 3 2 5 h t a i 4 o d u l E regiT l p l g a k k e r a d r 1 1 O 3 8 6 9 l 3 1 d 0 Imagran 3 t 5 2 1 2 2 7 9 Bowm 0 an 1 2 2 3 6 4 1 8 3 2 1 2 3 7 3 5 2 4 Sta 2 te 3 H 1 2 3 2 4 i 6 5 ghwa P y 1 a 3 2 3 r 6 2 2 k 9 1 4 5 e 9 r Cree 1 1 3 D k 6 3 8 9 0 r 1 y Creek 5 1 2 2 B 7 0 9 3 a 2 sin A 2 1 l 2 1 3 p 6 8 4 3 ineM 1 2 2 c 3 5 3 2 7 4 Ken 1 n 4ey 2 2 3 2 3 6 5 1 D 1 3 2 2 r 3 6 5 4 y Cr C 6 e o e 2 3 u k 9 2 n t B y a R s o i 2 n 3 a 8 3 d 5 25 2 3 7 4 4 2 3 6 5 3 2 3 5 6 2 C Dee e 1 6 7 p 8 Cr hgiH 8 d e niaM e kj 1 5 k 7 a 1 4 9 6 r 42 daoR ytnuoC v 1 3 1 5 0 ill 0 e 1 74 htroN 64 pihsnwoT Range 12 East Range 13 East Range 15 East Modoc County Fire Protection Districts kjTu kj lela N k e e well Willow RanchkjFort B kj idwell ·|}þ 139 Davis Creek ·|}þ 39 kj 5 L kj ake City Legend 4 ·|}þ Modoc County kjCanby kj Altura C s edarville kj299 kj Communities Eaglevillekj Highways Lookout kj Adinkj kjLi M L k a e o s l d y s o e c n C C o o R Se o c a t d io s nal Grid D Sp a h vi e s r e C r o e f e In k f F lu i e re n c P e rotection District D Fi a r v e i P s r C o r t e e e c k tion District So S u o r u c rc e e : : M M o o d do o c ( c M L L A A D FC F B o C & o M) 0 0.5 1 2Miles Map Created 7/7/2017 L A A do F p C t o e d R : e solution: htroN 74 pihsnwoT htroN 54 pihsnwoT Range 14 East Range 16 East htroN 44 pihsnwoT Davis Creek Fire Protection District Parcels MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 Modoc Local Agency Formation Commission EAGLEVILLE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 County Road 31 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 18 17 16 15 14 13 15 14 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 19 20 21 22 Co 2 u 3nty Road2 433 22 23 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 30 29 28 27 26 25 27 26 0 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 31 32 33 34 35 County Road 3 3 6 4 34 35 2 3 8 3 2 3 7 4 2 3 6 5 2 3 5 6 3 3 0 1 2 3 9 2 2 3 8 3 2 3 7 4 2 3 6 5 6 7 5 8 4 9 1 3 0 1 2 1 1 1 2 10C 3 ounty Road 37 1 2 1 32 Eagleville kj 1 2 2 4 9 6 1 8 1 1 3 2 2 0 5 2 7 1 2 1 2 1 2 4 3 6 West W 1 arner Rd 1 1 2 2 2 3 4 5 5 8 1 2 2 7 0 9 1 4 2 9 2 6 1 8 1 1 3 2 2 0 5 2 7 1 1 2 2 2 1 4 3 6 1 Sum 2 mit Trl 1 1 2 2 3 4 5 1 1 3 3 8 9 0 6 1 1 2 2 3 7 0 9 5 2 1 2 2 3 6 1 8 4 3 1 2 2 3 5 2 7 4 3 2Cou 3 1 2 n 2 5 t 4 3 y 6 Road 40 25 1 2 3 3 1 4 6 53 daoR ytnuoC S C u 6 r o pr u is 1 1 3 3 e n 8 9 0 1 V ty al le R y R o d ad 5 3 2 38 1 2 2 7 0 9 1 2 2 6 1 8 33 4 1 2 2 3 5 2 7 3 4 1 2 2 3 4 3 6 2 5 e n iL e ta tS a d a v e N /a in ro fila C 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 11 33 34 35 36 32 33 34 35 36 4 3 2 Jess Valley Rd 1 5 4 3 2 1 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 0 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 9 10 11 12 8 9 10 11 12 21 16 15 14 Blue Lake Rd 13 17 16 15 14 13 3 3 0 1 2 3 9 2 2 3 8 3 2 3 7 4 2 3 6 5 2 3 5 6 3 3 0 1 2 3 9 2 28 33 34 27 26 35 21 22 23 24 20 21 22 23 Mo 24 doc C W o arn u e n r R t d y 5 4 Cou 3 nty Road 42 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 28 27 26 25 29 28 27 26 25 6 Lassen County 33 34 35 36 32 33 34 35 36 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 4 3 2 1 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 9 10 11 12 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 16 15 14 13 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 21 22 23 24 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 28 27 26 25 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 33 34 35 36 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 75 htroN 04 pihsnwoT Range 14 East Range 15 East Range 17 East Modoc County Fire Protection Districts kjTu kj lela N k e e well Willow RanchkjFort B kj idwell Davis Creekkj ·|}þ 139 ·|}þ 395 L kj ake City Legend 4 ·|}þ Modoc County kjCanby kj Altura C s edarville kj299 kj Communities Eagle kj ville Highways Lookout kj Adinkj kjLi L k M a e o s l d y se oc n C C o o R Se o c a t d io s nal Grid E S a p g h l e e r v e i ll o e f F In ir fl e u e P n ro c t e ection District E Fi a r g e l e P v ro ill t l e e ction District So S u o r u c rc e e : : M M o o d do o c ( c M L L A A D FC F B o C & o M) 0 0.5 1 2Miles Map Created 7/7/2017 L A A do F p C t o e d R : e solution: htroN 14 pihsnwoT Range 16 East htroN 93 pihsnwoT Eagleville Fire Protection District Parcels MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 Modoc Local Agency Formation Commission FORT BIDWELL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT California/Oregon State Line 30 29 28 27 23 24 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 Highgrade Rd 0 26 25 6 Pinec 5 reek Canyon 4 Rd 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 35 ·|}þ 395 3 1 6 1 7 8 1 8 7 1 9 6 1 1 0 5 1 1 1 4 1 1 2 3 7 C 1 oun 8 ty Road 2 1 8 7 1 9 6 1 1 0 5 1 1 1 4 1 1 2 3 1 7 8 1 8 7 1 9 6 1 1 0 5 1 1 3 0 5 1 1 1 4 D331 daoR ytnuoC 13 12 1 3 9 0 2 2 0 9 2 2 1 8 2 2 2 7 2 2 3 6 2 2 4 5 19Bi 3 dw 0 ell Creek Trl 2 2 0 9 2 2 1 8 2 2 2 7 2 2 3 6 2 2 4 5 1 3 9 0 2 2 0 9 2 2 1 8 2 2 2 7 2 2 3 1 1 2 2 3 7 4 0 5 2 2 2 3 3 1 6 2 1 2 5 1 4 3 2 2 3 4 1 5 1 1 6 2 2 3 4 Fanda 7 3 n 6 1 g 1 1 3 3 8 o 9 0 1 Pass Rd 3 5 1 8 2 2 2 3 7 0 9 2 3 4 1 9 3 2 2 3 6 1 8 3 3 1 3 1 4 2 2 0 3 5 2 7 4 3 1 2 5 1 2 2 3 1 4 3 6 5 Mill 3 C 6 ree 1 1 1 2 2 k 3 2 3 4 5 6 Rd 3 6 3 1 3 0 C 1 1 1 7 o 8 9 unty Surprise V alley Rd Road 3 2 2 24 C 5 o 3 un 2 t 2 y R 2 9 oa 0 d 1 2 8 7 kj F dR nrohegaS o 4 r Su t r 3 p 1 B 2 9 3 r 6 1 is i e d Va w lle 3 e y 4 R L l ak l d e 1 1 3 A 2 n 0 5 2 nie Rd Fee Re 3 1 2 5 1 2 s 1 4 3 ervoir Rd 3 1 1 1 6 2 2 2 3 4 5 1 C 8 ou 3 n 6 1 1 3 7 t 3 y 9 0 C 1 R ou o n ad ty 8 6 R Ba o r a re 3 d l 5 1 2 2 2 S 3 7 0 9 1 2 prings Rd 3 4 1 3 9 2 2 3 6 1 8 3 3 1 3 4 1 2 2 0 5 3 2 7 4 en iL etatS adaveN /ain ro filaC 27 26 25 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 6 5 4 3 2 0 34 35 36 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 7 8 9 10 11 3 2 1 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 18 17 16 15 14 20 0 1 1 2 2 0 5 2 7 1 1 2 1 2 4 3 6 Co 1 1 2 2 u 2 3 4 5 ntyR 2 2 3 0 9 2 5 2 2 3 8 1 3 4 2 2 3 2 7 4 3 2 2 3 3 2 6 5 3 2 6 2 4 5 1 Surprise V 3 alle 0 y Rd 31 6 19 3 2 5 3 1 6 25 Cou 2 nty 4 Road 15A 3 1 0 9 County Road 7 31 6 2 2 3 0 9 2 5 2 2 3 1 8 3 4 2 2 3 2 7 4 3 2 2 3 3 6 5 2 76 htroN 64 pihsnwoT Range 14 East Range 15 East Range 17 East Modoc County Fire Protection Districts kjTu kj lela N k e e well Willow RanchkjFort B kj idwell Davis Creekkj ·|}þ 139 ·|}þ 395 L kj ake City Legend 4 ·|}þ Modoc County kjCanby kj Altura C s edarville kj299 kj Communities Eagle kj ville Highways Lookout kj Adinkj L M a o s d se oc n C C o o kjLikely Sectional Grid F S o p r h t e B re id w of e I l n l f F lu ir e e n P ce rotection District F F o ir r e t P B r i o d t w e e c l t l ion District So S u o r u c rc e e : : M M o o d do o c ( c M L L A A D FC F B o C & o M) 0 0.5 1 2Miles Map Created 7/5/2017 L A A do F p C t o e d R : e solution: htroN 74 pihsnwoT Range 16 East htroN 54 pihsnwoT Fort Bidwell Roads Fire Protection District Parcels MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 Modoc Local Agency Formation Commission LAKE CITY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 22 23 24 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 2 3 7 4 2 3 6 5 2 3 5 6 5 8 4 9 1 3 0 Foss 2 1 e 1 tt Spring 1 s Rd 12 Fandang 6 o 7 Pass Rd 8 5 4 6 7 5 8 4 9 1 3 0 1 2 1 3 2 1 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 18 17 16 15 14 20 1 1 2 0 5 2 1 1 2 1 4 3 1 1 2 2 3 4 2 2 3 0 9 2 2 2 3 8 1 3 2 2 3 2 7 4 2 2 3 3 6 5 3 2 2 6 4 5 Surprise 3 Val 0 ley Rd 31 19 0 0 3 2 6 5 24 3 1 0 9 County Road 7 31 2 2 3 0 9 2 2 2 3 1 8 3 2 2 3 2 7 4 2 2 3 3 6 5 35 2 3 3 7 4 2 3 6 2 5 25Co 3 u 1 6 nty Road 11 5 1 8 7 1 4 9 6 1 1 3 0 5 1 1 2 1 4 C 1 1 1 o 2 3 unty R 7 oa 6 d 13 1 2 1 14 1 1 3 2 1 County Road 15A 6 7 18 5 1 8 7 4 1 9 6 3 1 1 0 5 2 1 1 1 4 en iL etatS adaveN 1 1 0 5 1 1 1 4 Co 1 u 3 n 1 t 2 y Road 52 2 2 0 9 2 2 1 8 La 2 k 7 e C 2 it 2 y Canyon Rd 2 2 3 6 2 2 4 5 3 0 0 A31 daoR ytnuoC 28 2 2 6 3 2 2 4 5 1 3 9 0 2 2 0 9 2 2 1 8 2 2 2 7 2 2 3 6 /ain ro filaC kj 31 22 23 24 32 33 34 35 36 Lake City 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 County Road 15 2 3 7 4 2 3 6 5 2 3 5 6 5 8 4 9 3 10 1 2 1 1 12 County C Roa o d 17 unty Roa 6 7 d 16 Surprise Valley Rd 5 8 9 County Road 15 B 4 1 3 0 1 2 1 1 1 2 7 6 8 5 4 9 1 3 0 1 2 1 County Road 18 15 3 2 1 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 15 23 10 11 12 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 County R 21 oad 19 22 24 19 20 21 22 23 County Road 20 d 1 2 2 3 3 5 2 7 4 McKenn 2 e 3 1 2 3 y 4 2 6 5 McKen 1 n 3 ey 2 2 3 1 5 4 6 ·|}þ 299 2 3 C 9 2 6 ounty Roa 2 3 d 8 3 2 5 5 34 27 Sta 4 te Hig C h o w u a n 2 3 y t 6 5 y 2 R 9 3 9 oad 25 2 3 5 6 2 De 6 ep C 3 3 C 0 1 1 7 e 8 re D d e u a k n R c r a 8 hgiH v d n 2 i niaM 9 l 3 kj 5 l 2 1 e 7 C C o o u u n n 3 t 4 3 t y y 32 daoR ytn R uoC R 2 o o 8 1 9 a a 6 d d 2 1 1 43 1 2 1 0 7 5 34 42 daoR ytnuoC 3 0 0 1 St 2 a 0 5 te High 3 3 w 0 1 6 7 a 1 y 8 299 32 29 5 1 8 7 ·|}þ 299 2 3 8 4 3 1 9 6 1 3 1 0 5 2 3 7 4 1 2 1 L 1 4 an 2 3 d 6 5 fill 77 htroN 44 pihsnwoT Range 14 East Range 15 East Range 17 East Modoc County Fire Protection Districts kjTu kj lela N k e e well Willow RanchkjFort B kj idwell ·|}þ 139 Davis Creek ·|}þ 39 kj 5 L kj ake City Legend 4 ·|}þ Modoc County kjCanby kj Altura C s edarville kj299 kj Communities Eagle kj ville Highways Lookout kj Adinkj L M a o s d se oc n C C o o kjLikely R Se o c a t d io s nal Grid L S a p k h e e r C e i t o y f F In ir f e lu P en ro c t e ection District L F a ir k e e P C ro it t y ection District So S u o r u c rc e e : : M M o o d do o c ( c M L L A A D FC F B o C & o M) 0 0.5 1 2Miles Map Created 7/7/2017 L A A do F p C t o e d R : e solution: htroN 54 pihsnwoT Range 16 East htroN 34 pihsnwoT Lake City Fire Protection District Parcels MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 Modoc Local Agency Formation Commission LIKELY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 3 1 1 3 2 2 1 1 3 3 4 0 5 4 7 2 0 5 23 3 1 1 2 2 3 1 1 5 1 2 C 4 6 5 1 4 oun 1 1 t 3 2 y 3 6 ·|}þ 2 1 2 3 R 1 1 2 A 1 4 5 6 2 3 9 i o rp 9 a o d r 6 t 7 R 3 6 1 d 1 3 3 7 1 1 6 8 9 7 0 1 8 3 1 5 3 2 2 8 2 5 1 7 2 8 9 0 7 3 4 9 1 4 2 3 2 9 3 1 6 1 3 8 6 County Road 261 A 3 1 3 1 2 3 2 3 4 1 0 l 5 1 2 7 4 5 0 t dR edistseW ur 3 a 3 5 1 1 2 2 2 5 1 1 1 4 2 3 6 s 1 4 ·|}þ 39 kj 5 13 3 1 2 1 2 6 1 1 2 1 4 5 3 2 3 C 6 ounty 3 1 1 3 6 3 7 1 1 6 9 8 7 R 0 1 P 8 o in a e d C 5 3 r 1 2 6 2 5 3 8 1 2 e 5 7 0 8 9 2 7 ek Bl 2 v 2 1 3 d 1 8 4 3 9 1 3 4 9 6 C 3 6 ounty Road 57 3 1 1 3 2 1 3 1 2 4 0 3 5 2 0 4 5 7 3 1 1 2 2 2 3 1 1 5 1 2 4 6 3 5 1 4 3 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 1 6 2 3 1 4 5 6 3 2 3 1 6 1 7 3 1 1 3 8 7 9 6 0 8 1 3 5 1 8 2 2 2 3 1 7 8 5 0 9 2 7 3 4 1 9 2 3 2 3 1 6 9 4 1 8 3 6 P 3 1 a 3 1 2 4 2 3 0 1 5 1 r 2 3 7 4 k 0 5 er Cr 3 e 1 2 1 2 5 2 1 3 4 e 3 1 1 6 2 5 1 k 4 Rd 3 1 1 1 2 6 2 2 3 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 2 3 1 6 1 7 3 3 8 9 1 6 0 7 1 8 War 8 ner 1 M 5 2 2 3 7 o 0 5 1 9 8 u 2 n 7 tain Rid 2 g 1 e 4 - 9 L 2 3 1 i 4 1 9 n 8 3 6 e 6 C 3 o C u 1 1 n 2 o 2 3 0 5 1 1 2 3 t 7 u 4 y 0 5 n R ty o R a 1 2 1 d 2 2 o 1 3 4 1 3 1 2 6 5 a 1 2 4 d 5 2 7 7 1 1 3 3 8 9 0 1 6 1 1 3 7 8 9 0 20 1 2 3 8 7 2 1 2 9 5 2 8 S 0 7 9 urprise 2 Va 8 lley 1 2 9 3 R 1 6 2 4 2 9 d 1 3 6 1 8 C C 1 1 o 5 o 0 u 3 1 u 1 2 3 2 4 n 0 5 2 n 7 t t y y R R o o 0 a a 1 1 2 2 d 2 d 1 4 3 0 6 2 2 8 9 1 1 2 2 1 3 2 4 5 0 1 2 1 2 3 2 2 3 5 2 0 7 7 2 4 S C 2 w 2 1 1 2 6 a o 3 1 4 l 3 e u 5 R n 2 d 6 t 2 y 3 Ro 2 1 a 2 1 1 5 2 d 4 3 7 2 2 3 4 2 5 6 7 Ba 1 yle 8 6 1 3 y 9 0 Re 1 3 3 s 9 0 1 ervo 2 ir 0 R 5 1 G 8 d 2 7 r 9 2 a 9 v 2 3 e 0 2 s Rese 1 4 2 9 2 rv 6 1 8 oi 2 r 3 2 1 3 8 1 1 3 2 2 0 5 2 7 C 2 2 3 o 2 7 4 unt B 2 y 1 1 2 2 e 1 4 3 6 R e 2 2 3 o t 3 6 5 a C d a1 m 6 1 1 2 2 0 2 p 3 4 5 2 2 R 3 4 5 6 d 1 6 1 7 3 8 9 0 3 1 3 1 9 0 L ·| 8 }þ y 3 n 9 2 2 5 e 5 0 9 ta 2 1 3 2 0 7 2 9 Rd 1 4 2 2 9 6 8 1 2 2 3 1 8 3 1 1 2 2 3 0 5 7 2 2 2 3 2 7 4 1 1 2 2 2 1 4 3 6 2 2 3 3 6 5 1 1 2 1 2 2 3 4 5 2 2 3 4 5 6 1 6 1 3 7 8 9 0 1 3 3 9 0 1 1 5 2 2 8 7 0 9 2 2 3 9 0 2 1 2 4 9 2 6 1 8 2 2 3 1 8 3 1 1 2 3 2 0 5 2 7 2 2 3 2 7 4 11 1 2 2 2 4 3 6 Wes 2 2 t 3 W 3 6 1 5 arner 1 R 1 2 2 d 2 3 4 5 2 2 3 4 5 6 1 5 2 8 2 7 0 9 C 1 3 3 9 l 0 1 ea 1 2 4 2 9 r 6 1 8 Lak 2 2 3 e 0 9 2 R 1 1 2 3 2 0 5 2 d 7 2 2 3 1 8 3 1 1 2 2 2 1 4 3 6 Summ 2 2 it 3 Trl 2 7 4 1 1 2 2 1 3 4 5 2 2 2 3 3 6 5 1 1 3 3 8 9 6 0 1 6 7 31 5 1 2 8 2 3 7 0 5 9 2 32 16 4 2 9 2 3 E 1 4 8 3 a 33 g 1 1 l 3 2 2 3 0 5 2 e 7 3 4 v 34 ill 1 1 2 2 2 3 e 1 4 2 3 6 5 kj 35 1 1 2 2 1 3 2 1 3 4 5 6 36 1 1 3 3 0 6 8 9 0 1 o 3 3 435 2 3 1 6 3 6 1 3 5 2 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 2 5 3 1 6 3 6 1 3 5 2 3 4 3 Count 3 y 3 4 Road 1 3 2 5 5 1 3 1 6 3 6 1 3 5 2 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 2 5 3 1 6 3 5 2 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 2 5 3 1 6 1 7 8 1 8 7 1 9 6 1 1 0 5 1 1 1 4 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 0 5 2 1 1 2 1 4 3 1 1 2 2 3 4 1 1 7 8 9 1 2 8 7 0 1 2 9 6 1 1 1 2 0 5 2 1 1 2 1 4 3 1 1 2 2 3 4 Bru 1 1 7 s 8 9 Rd kj 1 T 2 8 7 0 he L In i d k i 1 a 2 9 e 6 1 n l R y d 1 1 0 2 5 2 West Valley 1 2 R 1 3 d 14 Jess 1 1 V 2 2 3 4 alley Rd 1 7 1 8 9 Old 1 B 7 lue L 2 ake 0 8 Rd 1 2 9 6 1 1 1 2 0 5 2 11 1 Bl 4 ue 2 L 3 ake Rd 1 1 2 2 3 4 1 2 8 7 0 1 2 9 6 1 1 1 2 0 5 2 1 1 2 1 4 3 1 1 2 2 3 4 1 3 3 9 0 1 2 2 3 0 9 2 2 2 3 1 8 3 2 2 3 2 7 4 35 2 2 Co 3 6 unty Road 42 2 3 4 2 6 5 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 Mo 25 doc 3 0 Coun 29 ty 28 27 26 25 29 28 27 26 25 6 5 4 3 2 1 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 La 3 s 6 sen 3 1 Cou 3 n 2 ty 33 34 35 36 32 33 34 35 36 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 2 3 3 7 4 2 3 6 2 5 2 3 1 5 6 3 3 6 0 1 2 3 9 5 2 2 3 8 4 3 2 3 7 3 4 2 3 6 2 5 2 3 1 5 6 3 3 6 0 1 2 3 5 9 2 33 2 4 8 ·| 3 }þ 95 27 3 34 2 3 6 2 5 2 3 1 5 6 1 3 3 7 0 1 16 2 3 9 2 15 2 3 8 3 14 2 3 7 4 13 2 3 6 5 1 2 8 3 5 6 1 5 7 8 1 4 9 6 1 1 3 0 5 1 1 2 1 4 1 1 1 3 2 1 6 7 8 1 5 8 7 4 1 9 6 1 1 3 0 5 1 2 1 1 4 1 1 1 2 3 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 22 23 24 25 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 32 33 4 3 3 4 3 2 5 3 1 6 3 6 1 3 5 2 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 2 5 3 1 6 3 6 1 3 5 2 3 4 3 34 3 3 2 5 3 1 6 78 htroN 04 pihsnwoT Range 12 East Range 13 East Range 15 East Modoc County Fire Protection Districts kjTu kj lela N k e e well Willow RanchkjFort B kj idwell Davis Creekkj ·|}þ 139 ·|}þ 395 L kj ake City Legend 4 kjCanby kj Altura C s edarville kj ·|}þ 299 kj Communities Modoc County Eaglevillekj Highways Lookout kj Adinkj kjLi M L k a e o s l d y s o e c n C C o o R Se o c a t d io s nal Grid L S i p k h e e ly r e F i o re f I P nf r l o u t e e n c c ti e on District L F i i k re e l P y rotection District So S u o r u c rc e e : : M M o o d do o c ( c M L L A A D FC F B o C & o M) 0 0.5 1 2Miles Map Created 7/6/2017 L A A do F p C t o e d R : e solution: htroN 24 pihsnwoT htroN 93 pihsnwoT Range 14 East Range 15 East htroN 14 pihsnwoT Likely Fire Protection District Parcels MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 ·|}þ 139 ·|}þ 139 kj kj Modoc County Lassen County ·|}þ ·|}þ 299 139 79 Sth As Modoc Local Agency Formation Commission LOOKOUT FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 1 1 1 2 3 Roun 1 6 d 7 8 Mountain 1 5 8 R 7 d 9Lo 1 v 4 6 eness Lo 3 gging 1 1 0 5 Road 1 1 2 1 4 1 1 1 2 3 1 6 7 8 17 Lo 8 okout 5 Hackamore Rd 1 9 4 6 1 1 3 5 0 1 1 2 1 4 1 1 1 2 3 1 6 7 8 Pit Rive 1 5 8 r 7 Rd 1 4 9 6 1 1 3 5 0 1 1 2 1 4 1 1 1 2 3 6 1 7 8 1 5 8 7 1 4 9 6 1 1 3 0 5 2 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 County Road 85 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 R 28 oad 85A 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 7 Lava Rim Rd 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 3 2 2 6 5 4 1 3 3 9 0 1 2 2 3 9 0 2 2 2 3 8 1 3 22 2 3 W 7 4 hitehorse 2 2 3 6 3 5 Rd 2 3 2 4 6 5 1 3 3 9 0 1 2 2 3 0 9 2 2 2 3 8 1 3 2 2 3 2 7 4 2 2 3 3 6 5 25 2 3 4 6 09 daoR ytnuoC 1 3 3 9 0 1 2 2 3 0 9 2 3 2 2 3 1 8 2 2 3 2 7 4 2 3 2 3 5 6 Dutc 2 h 5 F 2 3 l 4 a 6 t Rd 1 3 3 9 0 1 3 2 2 2 0 9 2 3 2 1 3 8 2 3 2 2 4 7 2 2 3 3 6 5 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 1 2 3 5 2 4 1 3 1 7 8 0 9 2 2 1 8 9 0 7 1 2 2 9 6 1 8 1 1 2 2 0 5 2 7 1 1 2 2 1 4 3 6 1 1 3 2 2 2 4 5 Wi 1 d 8 o 1 S 7 h w 9 eph 3 e V rd 0 R a C d l o le un y t y R R d oa 1 2 d 2 8 7 0 9 93 1 2 2 9 6 1 8 1 R dR remarK 5obert 1 2 s 2 0 2 7 Re L serv o o 1 ir 1 o Rd k 1 2 2 4 3 6 out 1 1 2 2 2 3 4 5 1 1 7 3 8 9 0 1 2 8 2 7 0 9 Cou 1 2 9 2 n 6 1 8 ty Road 8 1 1 2 7 2 0 5 2 7 26 1 1 2 1 4 3 1 1 2 2 2 3 4 5 1 1 7 3 8 9 0 29 1 8 2 A 7 0 din County Road 89 OaW Ca Cekillo n d Sw al art AdSt S S am tt s 1 RCe 2 Mc 9 dnD 2 ter Ju ow S ni etS niA t pedll r S St ttS 6 gnriSp 1 8 1 1 2 2 0 5 2 7 2 1 2 11 3 4 6 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 1 1 8 9 1 2 7 0 1 2 6 1 1 2 5 2 1 2 4 3 1 2 3 4 1 1 8 9 1 2 7 0 1 2 6 1 1 2 5 2 1 2 4 3 1 2 3 4 Buns 1 e 1 8 9 lme S ie u r s R a 1 2 n d 7 0 ville Rd 1 2 6 1 Andre ws Rd 1 2 5 2 Su 1 2 s 4 3 anville R 1 2 d 3 4 1 1 8 9 1 2 7 0 1 2 6 1 Arm strong R d 2 1 2 5 2 3 1 5 6 3 3 0 1 6 2 3 9 2 5 2 3 8 3 4 3 2 3 4 7 2 3 2 6 5 2 3 1 5 6 3 3 6 0 1 2 3 5 9 2 2 3 4 8 3 34 2 3 7 dR kcirreD 2 3 2 6 5 2 3 5 6 1 dR retneC niknuP 3 3 6 0 1 2 3 5 9 2 2 3 4 8 3 2 3 3 7 4 3 2 2 5 6 2 3 1 5 6 M c 3 Cl 1 e 6 llan R 3 d 0 2 3 5 9 2 2 3 8 4 3 2 3 3 7 4 htroN 04 pihsnwoT Range 06 East Range 07 East Range 09 East Modoc County Fire Protection Districts kjTu kj lela N k e e well Willow RanchkjFort B kj idwell Davis Creekkj ·|}þ 139 ·|}þ 395 L kj ake City Legend 4 kjCanby kj Altura C s edarville kj ·|}þ 299 kj Communities Modoc County Eaglevillekj Highways Lookout kj Adinkj kjLi M L k a e o s l d y s o e c n C C o o R Se o c a t d io s nal Grid L S o p o h k e o re u t o F f i I r n e f l P u r e o n t c e e ction District L F o ir o e k P o r u o t tection District So S u o r u c rc e e : : M M o o d do o c ( c M L L A A D FC F B o C & o M) 0 0.5 1 2Miles Map Created 7/7/2017 L A A do F p C t o e d R : e solution: htroN 14 pihsnwoT htroN 93 pihsnwoT Range 08 East Lookout Fire Protection District Parcels MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 California/Oregon State Line ·|}þ 139 Kowolowski Rd County Road 102 County Road 101 ytnuoC uoyiksiS ytnuoC codoM Chandler Rd ·|}þ 139 Rim Rd 80 211 daoR ytnuoC County Road 107A County Road 107 401 daoR ytnuoC County Road 105 C C o o u u n n ty t y R R o o a a d d 1 1 0 0 5 6 A County Road 105B 011 daoR ytnuoC 311 daoR ytnuoC County Road 100 Horse Mountain Rd 111 daoR ytnuoC C C ou ou n n t t y y R R o o a a d d 1 5 9 5 9 County Road 114 Great Northern Rd County Road 120 County Roa 531 daoR ytnuoC d 123 121 daoR ytnuoC County Road 140 Old Alturas Hwy County Road 124 County Road 132 County Road 193 Craig Cave Clear Lake 211 daoR ytnuoC Modoc Local Agency Formation Commission TULE LAKE JOINT FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 23 24 dR lliH 19 Kandra R O d ke 2 e 0 fe Rd 21 Zlab 2 e 2 k Rd dR snikAT Z s l c a h b i 2 r e 3 k k y R R d d 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 3 2 5 6 3 2 6 5 31E W 3 e 0 st Rd dR regnaG 2 3 9 2 dR sniksaH dR relsneF 2 3 8 3 dR esoR 3 dR nedloG 4 27 dR tsoY 2 3 6 5 dR anilvaH Tule 25 l dR ttocS ak 36 e 3 3 0 1 2 3 9 2 28 33 2 3 7 4 2 3 6 5 2 3 5 6 3 3 1 0 2 3 9 2 3 2 3 8 34 27 3 2 5 6 2 3 5 6 County Road 104 1 2 1 1 1 2 6 7 8 5 4 9 Bergman Rd 1 3 0 2 11 Coun tS niaM ty 1 R W d righ 12 t Rd 7 6 5 8 4 9 1 3 0 1 2 1 1 1 2 Coun 6 ty 7 Road 114 8 5 9 4 1 3 0 1 2 1 1 1 2 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 dR ytnuoC codoM 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 27 30 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 26 25Newell 29 28 27 26 25 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 County Road 124 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 20 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 21 22 23 24 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 35 36 Rd 10 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 2 3 7 1 Co 8 Rd 10 Hill Rd 1 8 7 1 9 6 1 1 0 5 1 1 1 4 1 1 3 2 1 7 8 1 8 7 1 9 6 1 1 0 5 1 1 1 4 1 1 2 3 1 7 8 1 8 7 16 9 County Road 136 1 1 0 5 1 1 1 4 1 1 2 3 23 24 19 20 Lyon 2 s 1 Rd 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 htroN 74 pihsnwoT Range 04 East Range 05 East Range 06 East Modoc County Fire Protection Districts kjTu kj lela N k e e well Willow RanchkjFort B kj idwell Davis Creekkj ·|}þ 139 ·|}þ 395 L kj ake City Legend 4 kjCanby kj Altura C s edarville kj ·|}þ 299 kj Communities Modoc County Eaglevillekj Highways Lookout kj Adinkj Tule Lak kj e L i J ke o l i y nt R S (M e o D c a t d B io s & n M al ) Grid T S u p l h e e L re a k o e f J In T f lu F e ir n e c P e rotection District Fire Protection District So S u o r u c rc e e : : M M o o d do o c c L L A A FC F o Co 0 0.5 1 2Miles Map Created 7/6/2017 L A A do F p C t o e d R : e solution: htroN 84 pihsnwoT htroN 64 pihsnwoT Tule Lake Joint Fire Protection District Parcels MODOC LAFCo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS MSR AND SOI Adopted October 10, 2017 Modoc Local Agency Formation Commission WILLOW RANCH FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT State Line 20 23 24 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 Pinecreek Canyon Rd 29 26 25 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 5 32 3 2 35 3 1 6 1 7 8 1 8 7 1 9 6 1 1 0 5 1 1 1 4 13 1 P 2 inecreek Cany 7 on R 1 d 8 County R 8 oad 2 17 1 9 6 1 1 0 5 1 1 1 4 29 0 Willo 2 w 1 Ranch R 1 d 6 9 kj W 27·|}þ i 3 1 1 2 l 9 0 5 2 l 5 ow 2 6 R South W a 1 1 2 1 4 3 nch 1 1 2 2 2 3 4 5 1 3 3 9 6 0 1 2 2 3 0 5 9 2 2 2 3 1 4 8 3 2 2 3 2 7 3 4 2 2 3 3 6 2 5 Mill C 36 r 2 e 2 4 5 1 ek Rd 30 Bidw 1 6 e 3 C l 9 l 1 C o ree u k n Rd ty Road 2 2 2 3 2 0 9 5 2 4 Sur 2 2 p 3 1 8 4 3 rise Va 3 La 4 k l e l e An 2 n 2 y ie 2 3 7 R R d d 2 2 3 2 3 6 5 1 32 8 5 4 9 3 1 3 4 0 35 2 illow 1 Ra 1 nch Rd 3 1 1 6 2 7 F 1 1 a 8 9 ndang 1 o 7 8 P 20 ass Rd 1 9 2 6 1 1 1 2 0 5 2 1 1 2 1 4 3 1 1 2 2 3 4 1 1 7 8 9 20 1 8 7 kj dR nrohegaS Fort 1 2 9 6 1 Bidwe 1 1 2 l 0 5 2 l 1 2 11 4 3 17 16 15 14 13 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 0 20 21 22 23 24 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 29 28 2 2 2 W 7 estside Rd County Road 133C 3 2 3 8 2 3 7 4 2 3 6 5 2 3 5 6 5 8 4 9 1 3 0 2 F 1 o 1 ssett S 1prings 12 Rd 6 7 8 5 4 4 3 2 1 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 L 0 akesh 12ore L 1 a 3 ke sh o re R d 1 7 8 17 8 Davi 1 9 s 6 Cree 1 1 k 0 5 1 1 1 4 1 1 2 3 2 2 0 9 2 2 8 1 2 2 7 2 2 2 3 6 2 2 4 5 3 S 1 0 ur 9 prise Valley Rd 20 0 County Road 68 kj Coun 24 ty Road 19 68 20 21 22 23 24 32 33 34 35 36 31 30 29 25 30 29 28 27 26 C 2 o 5 unty Road 11 5 4 3 2 1 6 3 6 7 1 3 5 8 2 3 4 9 3 3 1 3 4 0 C o 2 unty 3 R 5 oad 3 1 6 12 3 6 7 1 3 5 8 2 A 3 3 1 d a o R yt 9 33 4 Frankl 3 i 3 4 10 3 1 2 5 1 3 1 1 6 2 1 8 2 7 0 1 2 9 6 1 1 1 2 0 5 2 1 1 2 1 4 3 County 1 1 2 2 3 R 4 oad 7 13 0 0 81 htroN 64 pihsnwoT Range 13 East Range 15 East Modoc County Fire Protection Districts kjTu kj lela N k e e well Willow RanchkjFort B kj idwell ·|}þ 139 Davis Creek ·|}þ 39 kj 5 L kj ake City Legend 4 ·|}þ Modoc County kjCanby kj Altura C s edarville kj299 kj Communities Eaglevillekj Highways Lookout kj Adinkj kjLi M L k a e o s l d y s o e c n C C o o R Se o c a t d io s nal Grid W Sp il h lo e w re R o a f n In c f h lu F e i n re c e Protection District W Fir il e lo P w r o R te a c n t c io h n District So S u o r u c rc e e : : M M o o d do o c ( c M L L A A D FC F B o C & o M) 0 0.5 1 2Miles Map Created 7/7/2017 L A A do F p C t o e d R : e solution: htroN 74 pihsnwoT htroN 54 pihsnwoT Range 14 East Range 16 East Willow Ranch Fire Protection District Parcels