LAFCO
Bridgeport Public Utility District
Read the report at Local Agency Formation Commissions ↗
2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
Municipal Service Review & Sphere of Influence Report
Approved | October 10,2024
PREPARED BY:
Mono County Local Agency Formation Commission
PO Box 347
Mammoth Lakes, Ca 93546
(760) 924-1800
https://monocounty.ca.gov/lafco
Contract Staff
Resource Concepts Inc.
Bauer Planning and Environmental Services, Inc.
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
T
T
ab
a
le
b
o
l
f
e
C o
o
nt
f
e n
C
ts
o
...
n
...
t
..
e
....
n
...
t
...
s
.. ....................................................................................................................... i
Executive Summary – Municipal Service Review ......................................................................................... iii
1. Growth and Population Projections for the Affected Area ............................................................... iii
2. Location & Characteristics of Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities ................................... iii
3. Infrastructure Needs and Deficiencies .............................................................................................. iii
4. Financial Ability of Agencies to Provide Services .............................................................................. iv
5. Opportunities for Shared Facilities and Resources ............................................................................ v
6. Accountability for Community Service Needs, Including Governmental Structure and Operational
Efficiencies. ............................................................................................................................................. v
Executive Summary – Sphere of Influence Findings .................................................................................... vi
1. Present and Planned Land Uses ........................................................................................................ vi
2. Present and Probable Need for Public Facilities and Services .......................................................... vi
3. Present Capacity of Public Facilities and Adequacy of Public Services ............................................. vi
4. Social or Economic Communities of Interest .................................................................................... vi
5. Present and Probable Need for District Services of Any DUCs ......................................................... vii
Executive Summary – Sphere of Influence Recommendation .................................................................... vii
I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1
Municipal Service Reviews ..................................................................................................................... 1
Relationship Between MSRs and Spheres of Influence .......................................................................... 1
Revised MSR Requirements ................................................................................................................... 1
2023-2025 MSR/SOI Update Process and Approach.............................................................................. 1
Public Utility Districts ............................................................................................................................. 3
II. District Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 3
Figure 1 – District Boundaries ................................................................................................................ 4
III. Municipal Service Review Analysis and Determinations ......................................................................... 5
1. Growth and Population Projections for the Affected Area ................................................................ 5
Table 1: Buildout Figures ........................................................................................................................ 6
Figure 2 – Land Use Designations Map .................................................................................................. 7
2. Location & Characteristics of Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities .................................... 8
i
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
Figure 3: CaLAFCO Statewide DUC Map ................................................................................................. 9
3. Infrastructure Needs and Deficiencies ............................................................................................... 9
4. Financial Ability of Agencies to Provide Services ............................................................................. 12
Table 2 – Water Activity Revenues and Expenses – Fiscal Year 2021-2022 ......................................... 13
5. Opportunities for Shared Facilities ................................................................................................... 15
6. Accountability for Community Service Needs, Including Governmental Structure and Operational
Efficiencies. ........................................................................................................................................... 16
Table 3 – Board Roster ......................................................................................................................... 16
Table 4. Website Compliance Checklist ................................................................................................ 16
IV. Sphere of Influence Recommendation .................................................................................................. 20
1. Present and Planned Land Uses ....................................................................................................... 20
2. Present and Probable Need for Public Facilities and Services ......................................................... 20
3. Present Capacity of Public Facilities and Adequacy of Public Services ............................................ 21
4. Social or Economic Communities of Interest ................................................................................... 21
5. Present and Probable Need for Public Facilities and Services of Any DUCs .................................... 21
V. Sphere of Influence Recommendation ................................................................................................... 22
Figure 4 – District Sphere of Influence ................................................................................................. 23
VI. References ............................................................................................................................................. 24
References Consulted ........................................................................................................................... 24
Persons Consulted ................................................................................................................................ 24
VII. Endnotes ............................................................................................................................................... 25
ii
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
Executive Summary – Municipal Service Review
The Mono County General Plan Land Use Element allows for significant additional growth in
1. GrowBritdhg eapnordt VPaollpeyu. lation Projections for the Affected Area
Growth is anticipated to occur primarily in and adjacent to existing developed areas. Development
on lands designated for agricultural uses would create new pockets of development away from
currently developed areas.
Visitors to the area will continue to increase demand for services.
In 2020, there were 170 households in the Bridgeport Valley. The population in the area served
by the Bridgeport PUD is projected to increase to 581 by 2030, creating an increased demand for
services. This growth is based on a 0.5% population increase year over year. This figure was used
as a conservative estimate based on the population declining slightly between 2010 and 2020.
Future development in the Bridgeport Valley will likely be limited to the Bridgeport Townsite and
residential subdivisions. The Mono County Housing Element identifies six large parcels in the
Bridgeport Valley (totaling approximately 243.53-acres) as key housing sites with the potential to
provide more than 52 additional units of future housing stock (housing unit estimate does not
include the Milk Ranch Road parcel and the Bureau of Land Management land exchange parcel).
Recent changes to State law create a potential for increased density on residential parcels in the
Bridgeport Valley (up to three units: a main residence, an ADU and JADU). These changes have
the potential to increase the demand for BPUD's water and sewer services.
No part of the Bridgeport Valley, nor any area contiguous to it, is designated as a DUC per the
2. LocaCtaiLoAnFC &O sCtahteawriadcet DeUrCis mtiacps. of Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities
Communities in Mono County are geographically isolated from one another, so it is rare for
communities to be located within or adjacent to the SOI of service-providing district and not
receive services from such district.
The replacement of existing equipment and/or the purchase of additional equipment may be
3. Infrnaesetdreudc ttou mreai nNtaeien dors i nacnreda sDe ethfiec qiueanlictyie osf service provided by the district.
The CDBG Grant funded Phase Two “2024 Special District Needs Assessment Report” made the
following conclusions about the capacity constraints and opportunities of the BPUD:
“The current Bridgeport PUD water and sewer systems serve the majority of the Bridgeport
o
community, but opportunities exist for infill development and extending infrastructure to
allow for additional residential development in established residential areas.”
“…Some increased density may be supported with the existing system, however, the system
o
cannot support development of full key sites with increased density to allow ADU and JADU
development.”
iii
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
“During the high demand summer months, the water system production is limited by the
o
capacity of the water treatment plant, which currently operates near capacity during these
times. The source water wells in the system have the ability to produce more water than they
currently do, if not limited by the water treatment maximum flows.”
“The sewer system in Bridgeport appears to have additional disposal capacity, but less than
o
the water system based on the capacity analyses. The current discharge volume could be
investigated to better understand the actual flows, which could impact the available capacity.
Some residential properties are currently undevelopable due to lack of sewer infrastructure
and lot size.”
“Capacity Improvement Recommendations: In considering next steps and possible capital
o
improvement projects to improve or increase the water and sewer systems capacities, our
summary for the community of Bridgeport is the following:
1) Water system treatment capacity should be increased.
2) Consideration of developer-constructed water distribution systems and extensions.
3) Additional sewer infrastructure (collection systems) should be considered to extend
collection to undeveloped lots and opportunities for increased density.”
“Specific area and system improvements will be addressed in Phase 3 of the project – Capacity
o
Improvement Projects Summary.”
The CDBG Grant-funded Phase 3 “CIP” identified nine potential capacity improvement priority
projects to increase the water and sewer system capacity. Mono County LAFCO recommends the
district review the analysis and recommendations in the final CIP.
The PUD’s future financing will continue to rely heavily on use charges and property tax revenues.
4. Financial Ability of Agencies to Provide Services
The adequacy of property tax revenues to fund local facilities and services has steadily declined
over time. There is a need to ensure that property tax assessments are kept current.
The district has no recent long-term planning documents that identify needed capital facilities and
the costs associated with developing those facilities.
The district should consider developing long-term financial planning documents to ensure that it
will have adequate funding sources both in the short-term and long-term.
The Bridgeport Valley is a discrete geographic area within Mono County; there is no duplication
of service efforts or overlapping or inefficient service boundaries.
Integrated planning, especially long-range planning, is an important part of cost avoidance.
The Bridgeport Valley includes other special district service providers that have administrative
costs associated with the overall management of those districts. There could be some duplication
of services among the districts, particularly in areas such as personnel management, insurance,
risk management, financial management services, fleet maintenance, etc. Further studies would
be necessary to determine whether there are opportunities to reduce costs.
All funding mechanisms have inherent limitations that may prevent their implementation, use or
restructure.
iv
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
Each sewer and water customer pays monthly sewer and water fees, based on the type of
connection. The district periodically reviews and adjusts its monthly charges in order to ensure
that they are sufficient to cover operating costs. Usage fees are increased annually, based on the
Consumer Price Index.
The district should continue to seek grant funding.
The PUD Board has identified the desire to investigate the possibility of reducing rates for PUD
customers. Current rates reflect a change in conjunction with construction of a water treatment
facility.
Due to geographic distances between communities in the county, sharing facilities among water
5. Oppaonrdt suenwietri eprso vfoidre rSs hisa nroet dpo Fssaibcliel.i ties and Resources
Bridgeport includes other special district service providers, as well as the County, that require
facilities to support their services. There may be other opportunities for shared facilities among
the districts and the County. Further studies would be necessary to determine whether there are
opportunities to reduce costs.
6. Ac coThuen PtUaDb ciloimtyp lfieosr w Citoh mthem muinnimituym S reerqvuiirceem Nenetse fdosr ,o Ipnenc lmuedeitninggs G anodv peurbnlimc reecnotradsl. Per the
Structruerseul tas nodf tOhep e“rWaetbisoitnea Cl oEmffpilciainecne cCiheesc.k list there is room for improvement regarding the
following elements:
Compliance with SB 272, requiring the special district’s enterprise system catalog to be
o
posted on their website. SB 272 requires local agencies to publish a catalog listing all
software that meets specific requirements. A Streamline (link above) is free tool used by
other districts to comply with this requirement.
Full compliance with AB 2257, specifically BPUD agendas are posted to the webpage,
o
however they are not searchable or machine readable (aka Optical Character Recognition
(OCR) searchable).
Compliance with State Controller Reports: Specifically posting
o
(1) The Financial Transaction Report (a link to the controller’s “By the Numbers”
website posted on the website);
(2) Compensation Report (a link to the controller’s public pay website posted in a
conspicuous location on the website).
A separate evaluation of compliance with CA Gov Code 7405 is needed. This code section
o
requires state governmental entities to comply with the accessibility requirements of
section 508 of the Federal rehabilitation act of 1973.
The district seeks to inform the community and affected groups of district activities and services.
The PUD is managed by an elected Board of Directors and a General Manager.
The district has no long-term planning documents that address how to maintain current service
levels while providing for the needs of future development. Any future development costs for
v
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
development will be the responsibility of the development (developer) and not the ratepayers
of the district unless constructed under a grant.
The district’s Maintenance Goals and Priority Worksheet provides minimal information on
equipment and facility needs for the future.
In regions of the county with separate, distinct communities that are geographically remote from
each other, public services are most logically provided by a combination of several single purpose
special districts.
If further study indicated that consolidation of services in Bridgeport under one service provider
could save money and if Bridgeport residents were in favor of consolidation, fire protection, water
and sewer services, and other local services could be provided by one multi-purpose agency in
the future. The district has shown little interest in consolidation at this time.
–
Executive Summary Sphere of Influence Findings
Present land uses in the area served by the Bridgeport PUD includes residential, commercial, and
1. Ppruebsliec nuts easn idn Pthlea ncnomedm uLnaitny do fU Bsreidsg eport. The planned land uses for the area are similar.
Development will be concentrated primarily within and adjacent to existing development although
land use designations for the Bridgeport Valley allow for the conversion of agricultural lands to
residential uses with large lot sizes.
Future development in the Bridgeport Valley will likely be limited to the Bridgeport Townsite and
residential subdivisions. The Mono County Housing Element identifies six large parcels in the
Bridgeport Valley (totaling approximately 243.53-acres) as key housing sites with the potential to
provide more than 52 additional units of future housing stock (housing unit estimate does not
include the Milk Ranch Road parcel and the Bureau of Land Management land exchange parcel).
Recent changes to State law create a potential for increased density on residential parcels in the
Bridgeport Valley (up to three units: a main residence, an ADU and JADU). These changes have the
potential to increase the demand for BPUD's water and sewer services.
Bridgeport has an existing and continuing need for public facilities and services to serve existing and
2. Pprlaensneend td eavnedlo pPmreonbt ainb tlhee Nareeea.d for Public Facilities and Services
The district currently provides an adequate level of service but has needs to develop long-term
3. Pprlaensneinngt d Cocaupmaecnittsy t oo pf rPojuecbtl fiuct uFrae cwialitteire asn da nsedw eArd deemquanadcsy a nodf iPmuprbolviecm Seenrtsv niceeedse d to meet
current and future projected demand. LAFCO recommends the BPUD review the capacity analysis and
system improvement recommendations specified in the CDBG Grant-funded Phase 3 “CIP.”
The Bridgeport Valley area exhibits some social and economic interdependence with development in
4. SNoecviaadla o. Trh iEs cinotenrodempeincd Cenocme hmasu nnoi rteileesva oncf eI innt deerteersmt ining the sphere of influence for the district.
Development in surrounding areas, such as Swauger Creek and Willow Springs, shares some social
and economic communities of interest with the communities in the Bridgeport Valley.
vi
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
The BPUD provides domestic water and fire flow services to Bridgeport Valley. However, there are no
5. DPUrCess,e ans dt eafinnded P bryo CbaLaAbFlCeO NDUeCe dM afop,r w Ditihsint roirc atd Sjaecrevnti ctoe sth oe fe xAisntiyng D SOUIC. s
–
The Sphere of Influence for the Bridgeport Public Utility District encompasses privately owned land
Eplaxnenecdu fotri dveeve lSopummentm wiathriny the Scopmhmeunriety oof fB rIidngfelpuoret, ni.ec. eth eR Beridcgoepmortm Toewnnsditea, tthieo Envans
Tract, the Bridgeport Reservoir subdivision, and the Bridgeport Indian Colony housing. It should be noted
that the Bridgeport Reservoir subdivision lies approximately 6,854 feet from the nearest water or sewer
line owned by the district and may be cost prohibitive to connect to the system.
vii
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
I. Introduction
The Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 (CKH) requires Local Agency
MForumnaitcioinp aClo mSemrivssiicones R (LeAvFiCeOws)s t o conduct comprehensive reviews of all municipal services in each
county in California and to periodically update that information. The purpose of the Municipal Service
Reviews (MSR) is to gather detailed information on public service capacities and issues.
The CKH requires LAFCOs to develop and determine the Sphere of Influence (SOI) for each applicable local
Rgoevlearntimoennstahl iapg eBnecyt wtheaet np rMovSidRess saenrvdic eSsp ohre fraecsili toiefs Inreflaluteedn tcoe d evelopment. Government Code
Section 56076 defines a SOI as “a plan for the probable physical boundaries and service area of a local
agency.” MSRs must be completed prior to the establishment or update of SOIs (§56430(a)). SOIs must be
reviewed and updated as necessary, but not less than once every five years (§56425).
The information and determinations contained in an MSR are intended to guide and inform SOI decisions.
MSRs enable LAFCO to determine SOI boundaries and to establish the most efficient service provider for
areas needing new service. They also function as the basis for other government reorganizations. Section
56430, as noted above, states that LAFCO can conduct these reviews “before, in conjunction with, but no
later than the time it is considering an action to establish a SOI.”
The Bridgeport Public Utility District MSR is being conducted in response to, and in conjunction with, an
update of the SOI for the district.
California Senate Bill 244, passed in 2011 and in effect since 2012, significantly revised the requirements
Rfoer MviSsResd. S MincSeR th Re perqeuviiorues mMSeRn ftosr the district dates to 2010, this is the first review written to the new
requirements.
The 2003 LAFCO Municipal Service Review Guidelines detailed nine determinations necessary to an MSR,
each consisting of between five and forty-nine elements. These requirements have been streamlined. The
new requirements, pared down to a list of seven, still review land use, demographics, present and future
service needs as compared with capacity, and the financial ability of agencies to provide services. They
additionally require agencies to give special consideration to Communities of Interest and Disadvantaged
Unincorporated Communities (DUCs) during the review.
The last comprehensive update of the MSRs & SOIs for all Special Districts in Mono County occurred in
2200029/32-02100.2 D5u eM toS tRhe/ SleOngIt hU opf dtiamtee b Petrwoeceens usp adantdes ,A LpAFpCrOo ias cuhsin g a unique approach to update the
MSRs and SOIs of sixteen Special Districts in unincorporated Mono County (list below).
1. Antelope Valley Fire Protection District
2. Birchim Community Services District
3. Bridgeport Fire Protection District
4. Bridgeport Public Utility District
5. Chalfant Valley Fire/Community Services District
6. Hilton Creek Community Services District
1
Bridgeport Public Utility District
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
7. June Lake Fire Protection District
8. June Lake Public Utility District
9. Lee Vining Fire Protection District
10. Lee Vining Public Utility District
11. Long Valley Fire Protection District
12. Mono City Fire Protection District
13. Paradise Fire Protection District
14. Wheeler Crest Community Services District
15. Wheeler Crest Fire Protection District
16. White Mountain Fire Protection District
This work was partially funded by a California Development Block Grant (CDBG) awarded to the County by the
California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) in February 2021. Resource Concepts,
Inc. (RCI) was awarded the contract for this work through an RFP process approved by the Board of Supervisors
on May 10, 2022. The intent of this three-phase project was to better understand the exact opportunities and
limitations of special districts, as these limitations are a potential barrier to housing production in
unincorporated Mono County. The final CIP deliverables were finalized in June 2024 and were approved by the
Board of Supervisors in June 2024. The deadline for grant funds to be expended was June 16, 2024.
• Phase One conducted extensive data gathering from Districts and summarize (in table form) the updates
necessary for 2023/2024 Reports for sixteen Special Districts. Implementing the revisions was not part of
RCI’s scope of work so updates were made by LAFCO staff.
• Phase two included a needs assessment for the key sites (identified in the Mono County Housing
Element) and communities within each special district. RCI performed a more thorough investigation of
infrastructure barriers and opportunities within the communities of Bridgeport, Crowley Lake, June Lake,
and Lee Vining, and the key sites identified in the Housing Element.
• Phase 3 included developing a key sites Capacity Improvement Plan (CIP) with recommendations for
Bridgeport, Crowley Lake, June Lake, and Lee Vining communities.
The remaining eleven Special Districts in both the unincorporated County and the Town of Mammoth Lakes will
be completed via a contract with Bauer Planning and Environmental Services, Inc. (BPES, Inc.) and LAFCO staff
time (as needed).
1. Mammoth Community Water District
2. Mammoth Lakes Fire Protection District
3. Mammoth Lakes Mosquito Abatement District
4. Southern Mono Hospital District
5. Town of Mammoth Lakes
6. Mammoth Lakes Community Service Area
7. County Service Area #1
8. County Service Area #2
9. County Service Area #5
10. Countywide CSA
11. Antelope Valley Water District (LAFCO Staff)
2
Bridgeport Public Utility District
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
As a Public Utility District (PUD), the district is authorized to provide lighting, power, heat,
Ptraunbspliocr tUattioilni,t tye lDepihsotrniec stesr vice, other methods of communication, garbage disposal, golf courses, fire
protection, mosquito abatement, parks and recreation, building for public purposes, and drainage
improvements. Mono County has three PUDs, all three provide services to the unincorporated Mono
County communities of Bridgeport, Lee Vining, and June Lake.
II. District Overview
GENERAL INFORMATION
Agency Type Public Utility District (PUD)
Date Formed 1947
Location/Community The district boundaries include approximately 177 acres of land within the
community of Bridgeport (see Figure 1). The district includes private non-
agricultural lands within the Bridgeport Valley.
Population Served Population data from the 2020 US Census and California Department of
Finance population estimates show the population of the Bridgeport Valley
to be 553 in 2020 and 575 in 2010 (Data.Census.gov). In 2020,
there were 170 households in the Bridgeport Valley.
Last MSR/SOI Update 2010
Services Provided • The District provides water for domestic use and fire flow protection to
the community of Bridgeport and the Bridgeport townsite.
• The nearest sewer line is currently located over one mile away from the
nearest edge of the Evans Tract so the district only provides water.
• The district also provides water and sewer services to the Bridgeport
Indian Colony housing on a contract basis.
• The district currently has 258 water connections and 96 sewer
connections.
Other Services As a Public Utility District, the district is authorized to provide lighting, power,
heat, transportation, telephone service, other methods of communication,
garbage disposal, golf courses, fire protection, mosquito abatement, parks
and recreation, building for public purposes, and drainage improvements.
Website
http://bridgeportpud.com/ubweb/
Independent/
Independent
Dependent
District Personnel The district currently has three (3) full time employees: one (1) administrative
assistant, one (1) Field and Operations Manager (Grade 1 Operator) , and one
(1) Operator in Training.
District Issues/ • High monthly rates for ratepayers.
Concerns • Lack of redundant water operator staffing.
• High maintenance level for water treatment facility.
3
Bridgeport Public Utility District
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
Figure 1 – District Boundaries
4
Bridgeport Public Utility District
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
In order to prepare and to update SOIs in accordance with California Senate Bill 244, CKH §56425 &
§I5I6I4. 3M0(au) rneqiuciriep thael C Somemrvissiiocne t oR coenvduicet wa s eArvincea relyvieswi so f athne dm uDniceiptael sremrviciens parotviiodend sin the
county or other appropriate area designated by the Commission. The Commission shall include in the area
designated for service review the county, the region, the subregion, or any other geographic area as is
appropriate for an analysis of the service or services to be reviewed, and shall prepare a written statement
of its determinations with respect to each of the following:
1. Growth and population projections for the affected area.
2. Location & characteristics of any disadvantaged unincorporated communities in or contiguous to
the sphere of influence.
3. Present and planned capacity of public facilities, adequacy of public services, and infrastructure
needs or deficiencies including needs or deficiencies related to sewers, municipal and industrial
water, and structural fire protection in any disadvantaged, unincorporated communities within or
contiguous to the sphere of influence.
4. Financial ability of agencies to provide services.
5. Status of, and opportunities for, shared facilities.
6. Accountability for community service needs, including governmental structure and operational
efficiencies.
7. Any other matter related to effective or efficient service delivery, as required by commission
policy.
These seven factors are listed below and analyzed in the discussions that follow.
Purpose: To evaluate service needs based on existing and anticipated growth patterns and
1. Growpotphul aatniodn pProojpecutiloantsi.o n Projections for the Affected Area
Development in the Bridgeport Valley is currently concentrated in the community of Bridgeport and in
Esmxaisllteirn agr eaans do fA rnestiidceinptaiatle dde vGerloopwmtehn tP aatt tRearnnchse irnia Barnidd Tgweipno Lratk es. Future growth is anticipated to
occur primarily in and adjacent to existing developed areas. Development on lands designated for
agricultural uses would create new pockets of development away from currently developed areas. The
Mono County General Plan Housing Element 2019-2027 provides for the following buildout in the
Bridgeport Valley:
5
Bridgeport Public Utility District
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
Table 1: Buildout Figures
The Mono County Land Use Element provides for substantial additional development in Bridgeport. The
Padladintinoneadl dLeavnedlo pUmseenst allowed by the plan would be a mix of residential uses and commercial uses
within the town of Bridgeport. Residential development could also occur throughout the valley on
agricultural lands. The Bridgeport Valley has a development credits program that allows a certain
number of units to be developed per parcel, depending on the size of the parcel and the ownership.
Figure 2 shows land use designations in the Bridgeport Valley. The Bridgeport Valley is prominently
characterized by large Agriculture (AG) parcels with a combination of large Open Space (OS) and
Resource Management (RM) parcels. The Bridgeport townsite is predominantly Commercial (C),
Commercial Lodging (CL), and Multi-Family Residential (MFR) uses. The Valley’s residential land uses
(Single Family Residential (SFR), Rural Residential (RR) and MFR) are located in residential subdivisions to
the north and south of the Bridgeport Townsite.
Development of the large AG parcels in the Bridgeport Valley are subject to a development credit
programs which seeks to promote the retention of large agricultural parcels for farming purposes and
requiring clustered residential development on smaller parcels. Additional development in the
Bridgeport Valley would be limited to the Bridgeport Townsite and nearby residential subdivisions to the
north and south of the Townsite.
The Mono County Housing Element identifies six parcels in the Bridgeport Valley (totaling approximately
243.53-acres) as key housing sites with the potential to provide more than 52 additional units of future
housing stock (housing unit estimate does not include the Milk Ranch Road parcel or the Bureau of Land
Management land exchange parcel).i
6
Bridgeport Public Utility District
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
Figure 2 – Land Use Designations Map
In response to the State-wide housing crisis, recent changes in State law have streamlined the
regulations and simplified the process necessary to construct Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU). A new
type of dwelling unit, a Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit (JADU) has been established in State law that
would allow residential land use designated parcels to construct a total of three housing units: a main
residence an ADU, and a JADU. Mono County General Plan Land Use Element, Chapter 16 – Accessory
Dwelling Units reflects these changes and defines a JADU and ADU as:
“Junior accessory dwelling unit” means a unit that is no more than 500 square feet in size and
contained entirely within an existing single-family structure. A junior accessory dwelling unit may
include separate sanitation facilities, or may share sanitation facilities with the existing
structure. The junior accessory dwelling unit must contain cooking facilities.”
"Accessory Dwelling Unit” (also referred to as "dependent," “Secondary Housing,” or "granny
unit") means residential occupancy of a living unit located on the same parcel as the primary
residential unit. It provides complete, independent living facilities for one or more persons
including permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation on the same
parcel as the primary unit is situated. An Accessory Dwelling Unit shall meet the minimum
regulations for an efficiency dwelling unit in the California Building Code.”
7
Bridgeport Public Utility District
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
The implementation of these regulations in the Bridgeport Valley has the potential to increase the
demand for residential water and sewer service.
In addition to the projected residential growth, the Bridgeport Valley’s population experiences significant
Sseeaassoonanl ainl cPreoapseusl adtuieo tno tourism and second homeowners. The Bridgeport Valley and surrounding areas
accommodate large numbers of recreational users and are a vacation destination for outdoor activities
such as fishing and hiking.
Population data from the 2020 US Census and California Department of Finance population estimates
Pshoopwu tlhaet ipoonp uPlartoiojen cotfi tohnes B ridgeport Valley to be 553 in 2020 and 575 in 2010 (Data.Census.gov). In
2020, there were 170 households in the Bridgeport Valley. The population in the area served by the
Bridgeport PUD is projected to increase to 581 by 2030, creating an increased demand for services. This
growth is based on a 0.5% population increase year over year. This figure was used as a conservative
estimate based on the population declining slightly between 2010 and 2020.
The Mono County General Plan Land Use Element allows for significant additional growth in
DetermBirnidagteipoonrts V alley.
Growth is anticipated to occur primarily in and adjacent to existing developed areas. Development
on lands designated for agricultural uses would create new pockets of development away from
currently developed areas.
Visitors to the area will continue to increase demand for services.
In 2020, there were 170 households in the Bridgeport Valley. The population in the area served
by the Bridgeport PUD is projected to increase to 581 by 2030, creating an increased demand for
services. This growth is based on a 0.5% population increase year over year. This figure was used
as a conservative estimate based on the population declining slightly between 2010 and 2020.
Future development in the Bridgeport Valley will likely be limited to the Bridgeport Townsite
and residential subdivisions. The Mono County Housing Element identifies six large parcels in
the Bridgeport Valley (totaling approximately 243.53-acres) as key housing sites with the
potential to provide more than 52 additional units of future housing stock (housing unit
estimate does not include the Milk Ranch Road parcel or the Bureau of Land Management land
exchange parcel).
Recent changes to State law create a potential for increased density on residential parcels in the
Bridgeport Valley (up to three units: a main residence, an ADU and JADU). These changes have
the potential to increase the demand for BPUD's water and sewer services.
Senate Bill 244, passed in 2011, requires LAFCO identify Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities
2(D.U LCos)c wahtieonn m &ak iCngh MarSaR cdteeterrimstinicasti oonfs D(Giosvaedrnvmaenntta Cgoedde sUecntiionnc 5o6r4p30o(ar)a),t SeOdI dCeotemrmminuatnioitnise s
(Government Code section 56425(e)(5)) and certain city annexations. DUCs are defined in the bill as “a
fringe, island, or legacy community in which the median household income is 80 percent or less than the
statewide median household income.
CaLAFCO created an online map identifying DUCs in every California county based on the most recent
and accurate household income data released by the Census Bureau on December 10, 2020. The
8
Bridgeport Public Utility District
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
purpose of CaLAFCO’s DUC Map is to enable any LAFCO that has not already identified DUCs within their
respective county to utilize it as the source of the most recent household income data and DUC
designations. No part of the Bridgeport, nor any area contiguous to it, is designated as a DUC (See Figure
3, below).
The intent of SB 244 is “to encourage investment in these communities and address the complex legal,
financial, and political barriers that contribute to regional inequity and infrastructure deficits within
disadvantaged unincorporated communities.” As communities in Mono County are geographically
isolated from one another, it is rare for communities to be located within or adjacent to the SOI of a
service-providing district and not receive services from such district.
ii
Figure 3: CaLAFCO Statewide DUC Map
No part of the Bridgeport Valley, nor any area contiguous to it, is designated as a DUC per the
DetermCainLAaFtCioOn ssta tewide DUC map.
Communities in Mono County are geographically isolated from one another, so it is rare for
communities to be located within or adjacent to the SOI of service-providing district and not
receive services from such district.
Purpose: To evaluate the infrastructure needs and deficiencies of a district in terms of capacity,
3. Infrcaosntdriutiocnt uorf efa Ncileiteieds,s s aernvdice D qeufailcitiye, nancdie lsev els of service and its relationship to existing and
planned service users.
The district provides water and sewer services to the community of Bridgeport, and the Bridgeport
Stoewrnvsiictee.s T Phreo nveiadreesdt s ewer line is currently located over one mile away from the nearest edge of the
Evans Tract, so the district only provides water. The district also provides water and sewer services to the
Bridgeport Indian Colony housing on a contract basis. The district currently has 286 water connections
and 96 sewer connections.
9
Bridgeport Public Utility District
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
The district’s water supply is ground water from three wells in the Bridgeport Valley.
Water Supply
The district’s storage capacity is 535,000 gallons in storage tanks. The district’s storage capacity is
Wadeaqtueart eS ttoo rmaegeet domestic and fire flow needs.
The district’s water is treated with chlorine. The district’s water is tested regularly. With the occasional
Wexcaetpetrio Qn uofa hliitgyh saanndd cTorneteantmt, tehne td istrict’s water quality is excellent.
The district’s water distribution system includes 8-inch trunk lines down Main and Kirkwood Streets, with
6W-inacthe rfe Dedisetrr liinbeust biorann ching off of the main lines. A 6-inch line also extends to the Evans Tract, with 4-
inch and 2-inch feeder lines serving the developed areas. The district requires the minimum of a 6-inch
line in new developments for fire flow purposes. An approximately 4-mile extension may be needed to
serve up to 15 new connections for a potential U.S. Forest Service housing project which is currently in
the planning phase.
Information on water demand is contained in the California State Division of Water Resources Annual
Wrepaotret ra nDde tmhea rnedp ort prepared by RO Anderson Engineering in 2003. The district has indicated that the
water system can accommodate the remaining undeveloped lots within its boundaries based upon the
preliminary engineering report prepared by Walters Engineering in 2000 (about 30 homes) and nothing
more.
The district utilizes sewer ponds to treat the effluent. The district has indicated that the sewer system can
Sacecwomemr Sodeartvei cthee remaining undeveloped lots within its boundaries (about 30 homes) and nothing more
as indicated in the preliminary engineering report prepared by Walters Engineering in 2000.
The district currently has three (3) full time employees: one (1) administrative assistant, one (1) Field
Danids tOrpicetr aPtieornsso Mnannealg er (Grade 1 Operator) , and one (1) Operator in Training. The District has held
joint training classes in Bridgeport with other Special Districts in the past.
The district has planning documents that detail future water and sewer capabilities based on the existing
DSpihsetrreic otf PInlaflnuennicneg a reas in the System Capabilities Report prepared by R.O. Anderson in 2003 for the
USDA Loan/Grant, and the Preliminary Engineering Report in 2000 for the CDBG Grant prepared by
Walters Engineering. In addition, the annual report to the State Division of Water Resources references
actual water usage by the district, and the annual report to Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control
Report references the actual gallons of wastewater treated.
The district has a Maintenance Goals and Priority Worksheet but no recent long-term planning
documents. The district has not indicated whether or how it plans to meet future water and sewer
demands in Bridgeport. To serve development at buildout, as well as to maintain or increase the quality
of service provided to current customers, the district may need to expand or renovate existing facilities
and replace or purchase additional equipment.
10
Bridgeport Public Utility District
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
The District has indicated the following issues or concerns:
District Issues of Concern
• High monthly rates for ratepayers.
• Lack of redundant water operator staffing.
• High maintenance level for water treatment facility.
The CDBG Grant-funded Phase 2 “Special District Needs Assessment Report” for Bridgeport made the
f2o0llo2w4i nSgp ceocnicalul sDioinsts raibcot uNt etheed csa pAascsiteys csomnsetrnatin Rtse apnodr otp apnordt uCnIitPie s of the BPUD:
• “The current Bridgeport PUD water and sewer systems serve the majority of the Bridgeport
community, but opportunities exist for infill development and extending infrastructure to allow for
additional residential development in established residential areas. The foregoing analysis reveals
that some increased density may be supported with the existing system, however, the system
cannot support development of full key sites with increased density to allow ADU and JADU
development.
• During the high demand summer months, the water system production is limited by the capacity
of the water treatment plant, which currently operates near capacity during these times. The
source water wells in the system have the ability to produce more water than they currently do, if
not limited by the water treatment maximum flows.
• The sewer system in Bridgeport appears to have additional disposal capacity, but less than the
water system based on the capacity analyses. The current discharge volume could be investigated
to better understand the actual flows, which could impact the available capacity. Some residential
properties are currently undevelopable due to lack of sewer infrastructure and lot size.
• Capacity Improvement Recommendations: In considering next steps and possible capital
improvement projects to improve or increase the water and sewer systems capacities, our
summary for the community of Bridgeport is the following:
1) Water system treatment capacity should be increased.
2) Consideration of developer-constructed water distribution systems and extensions.
3) Additional sewer infrastructure (collection systems) should be considered to extend
collection to undeveloped lots and opportunities for increased density.
• Specific area and system improvements will be addressed in Phase 3 of the project – Capacity
Improvement Projects Summary.”
The district needs to develop long-term planning documents that project current and future water
Determdeinmaatniod nwsi thin the district’s boundaries and analyze the water and sewer systems in terms of
supply, distribution capabilities, and treatment capabilities.
The expansion and renovation of existing facilities may be needed to maintain or increase the
quality of service provided by the district, as well as to serve development at build-out. The district
has no long-term plans.
The replacement of existing equipment and/or the purchase of additional equipment may be
needed to maintain or increase the quality of service provided by the district. The district has no
long-term plans.
11
Bridgeport Public Utility District
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
The CDBG Grant-funded Phase Two “2024 Special District Needs Assessment Report” made the
following conclusions about the capacity constraints and opportunities of the BPUD:
“The current Bridgeport PUD water and sewer systems serve the majority of the Bridgeport
o
community, but opportunities exist for infill development and extending infrastructure to
allow for additional residential development in established residential areas.”
“…Some increased density may be supported with the existing system, however, the system
o
cannot support development of full key sites with increased density to allow ADU and JADU
development.”
“During the high demand summer months, the water system production is limited by the
o
capacity of the water treatment plant, which currently operates near capacity during these
times. The source water wells in the system have the ability to produce more water than they
currently do, if not limited by the water treatment maximum flows.”
“The sewer system in Bridgeport appears to have additional disposal capacity, but less than
o
the water system based on the capacity analyses. The current discharge volume could be
investigated to better understand the actual flows, which could impact the available
capacity. Some residential properties are currently undevelopable due to lack of sewer
infrastructure and lot size.”
“Capacity Improvement Recommendations: In considering next steps and possible capital
o
improvement projects to improve or increase the water and sewer systems capacities, our
summary for the community of Bridgeport is the following:
1) Water system treatment capacity should be increased.
2) Consideration of developer-constructed water distribution systems and extensions.
3) Additional sewer infrastructure (collection systems) should be considered to extend
collection to undeveloped lots and opportunities for increased density.”
“Specific area and system improvements will be addressed in Phase 3 of the project –
o
Capacity Improvement Projects Summary.”
The CDBG Grant funded Phase 3 “CIP” identified nine potential capacity improvement priority
projects to increase the water and sewer system capacity. Mono County LAFCO recommends the
district review the analysis and recommendations in the final CIP.
4. Financial Ability of Agencies to Provide Services
Purpose: To evaluate factors that affect the financing of needed improvements.
Financing Constraints and Opportunities
Overview: Expenses for special districts generally fall into one of three categories: (1) acquisition
of facilities and major capital equipment, (2) employee expenses, and (3) ongoing operations and
maintenance costs. The primary criteria that should be considered when evaluating adequacy of
potential funding sources is availability, adequacy to meet the need, equity between existing and
future residents, stability, and ability to cover on-going operating and maintenance costs.
The district’s main sources of revenue are service/use charges and property taxes. The district manager
considers the fiscal health of the district to be fair. The district participates in some cost sharing with the
Bridgeport Fire District. Fire hydrants and main line valves are repaired on a 50/50 percent basis. The
district participates in some purchasing options with Mono County. Items such as fuel are purchased
12
Bridgeport Public Utility District
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
from Mono County. New vehicle purchases will also be coordinated with Mono County (State
Purchasing).
The PUD is heavily dependent on use charges and property taxes for its revenue. These fees and charges
are reviewed periodically to ensure that they are adequate. Use charges for water and sewer services are
increased annually, based on the Consumer Price Index. The district obtained a USDA Rural Development
Grant/Loan in 2001 for numerous infrastructure improvements previously detailed. Prior to obtaining that
grant/loan, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) evaluated the district’s current and long
term financial funding sources. Because the district has a 30 plus year loan with USDA, long-term financial
planning was a requirement. The district currently sets aside a yearly amount of money as required by the
USDA. The exception to the USDA evaluation would be any new governmental regulations such as arsenic
removal that could not be anticipated in any long-term financial plan. The district is repaying a loan (15-
20 years remaining) for a water main replacement to a housing tract.
Operating Revenues $712,576
Table 2 – NWona-tOepre rAatcitnigv Rietyve Rnueevs enues and E xpens es – F$is29c,a6l4 8Y ear 2021-2022
Total Revenues $742,224
Expenses
Depreciation $252,186
Other operating expenses $466,058
Non-operating expenses $77,587
Total Expenses $795,831
Excess Revenues over expense ($53,607)
Capital Contributions $15,974
Change in net position ($37,633)
Net position, beginning of year $7,676,219
Net position, end of year $7,638,586
Purpose: To identify practices or opportunities that may aid in eliminating unnecessary costs.
Cost Avoidance Opportunities
Overview: Cost avoidance opportunities are defined as actions to eliminate unnecessary costs
derived from, but not limited to, duplication of service efforts, higher than necessary
administration/operation cost ratios, use of outdated or deteriorating infrastructure and
equipment, underutilized equipment or buildings or facilities, overlapping/inefficient service
boundaries, inefficient purchasing or budgeting practices, and lack of economies of scale.
Generally, in Mono County each community area is a discrete geographic area and, as a result, there is no
duplication of service efforts or overlapping or inefficient service boundaries. The Bridgeport Valley is its
own discrete geographic area; the nearest communities are located in the Antelope Valley, approximately
13
Bridgeport Public Utility District
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
20 miles to the north, and the Mono Basin, approximately 20 miles to the south.
The district has no recent long-term planning documents to identify needed improvements and the costs
associated with developing those facilities. The district has not developed service demand projections for
the future.
The PUD is managed and administered by an elected board of directors and a general manager. Bridgeport
includes other special district service providers that have administrative costs associated with the overall
management of those districts. There could be some duplication of services among the districts,
particularly in areas such as personnel management, insurance, risk management, financial management
services, fleet maintenance, etc. Further studies would be necessary to determine whether there are
opportunities to reduce costs.
Purpose: To identify opportunities to positively impact rates without decreasing service levels.
Opportunities for Rate Restructuring
As noted in the “Financing Constraints and Opportunities” section, the district’s funding includes property
taxes, connection fees, customer use/service charges, and grants. Each of these categories has inherent
constraints that prevent an agency from restructuring them.
In California, the maximum property tax assessed on any land is generally 1% of the property’s value.
Property Taxes
Each district water customer pays a monthly flat fee for water usage. Different types of uses (residential,
Ccoumstmoemrceiar lU, irsreig/aSteiornv)i caere C chhaarrggeeds d ifferent rates. The district does not utilize water meters. Each sewer
district customer pays a monthly use charge, which is also based on the type of connection (single family
unit, commercial use, motel room, etc.). The district also charges other fees related to water and sewer
service, such as connection fees and will-serve fees.
The district periodically reviews and adjusts its water and sewer charges in order to ensure that the district
is collecting sufficient funds to cover its operating costs. Usage fees are a flat rate based on an increase to
satisfy grant requirements for the arsenic treatment facility. The current monthly rates for residential
service are: $94.96 for water and $78.54 for sewer for a single-family residence. There are no current
plans for an annual increase.
Grant money is a one-time source that is useful in funding certain special projects but may be too
uGnrraenlitasb le or variable for ongoing expenses or recurring needs. The district has applied for and received
grant funding in the past.
The PUD’s future financing will continue to rely heavily on use charges and property tax revenues.
Determinations
The adequacy of property tax revenues to fund local facilities and services has steadily declined
over time. There is a need to ensure that property tax assessments are kept current.
The district has no recent long-term planning documents that identify needed capital facilities and
the costs associated with developing those facilities.
The district should consider developing long-term financial planning documents to ensure that it
14
Bridgeport Public Utility District
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
will have adequate funding sources both in the short-term and long-term.
The Bridgeport Valley is a discrete geographic area within Mono County; there is no duplication
of service efforts or overlapping or inefficient service boundaries.
Integrated planning, especially long-range planning, is an important part of cost avoidance. The
district has no long-range plans that address the demands imposed by growth within the district.
The Bridgeport Valley includes other special district service providers that have administrative
costs associated with the overall management of those districts. There could be some duplication
of services among the districts, particularly in areas such as personnel management, insurance,
risk management, financial management services, fleet maintenance, etc. Further studies would
be necessary to determine whether there are opportunities to reduce costs.
All funding mechanisms have inherent limitations that may prevent their implementation, use or
restructure.
Each sewer and water customer pays monthly sewer and water fees, based on the type of
connection. The district periodically reviews and adjusts its monthly charges in order to ensure
that they are sufficient to cover operating costs. Usage fees are a flat rate based on an increase
to satisfy grant requirements for the arsenic treatment facility. The current monthly rates for
residential service are: $94.96 for water and $78.54 for sewer for a single-family residence. There
are no current plans for an annual increase. The district should continue to seek grant funding.
Purpose: To evaluate the opportunities for a jurisdiction to share facilities and resources to develop
5. Oppmoorrteu enffiitciieenst fsoerrv iSceh daerlievedr yF saysctielmitsi.e s
Sharing facilities and resources can result in a more efficient and cost-effective delivery of
resources.
Due to the geographic distance between most communities in the county, sharing facilities among water
Sanhda sreinwger F daisctirlicittise iss nwoti tpho sOsitbhlee.r Water or Sewer Districts
Currently, the district does not share any facilities. Bridgeport includes other special district service
Sprhoavridienrgs, Faasc iwlietille sa sw tihteh OCotuhnetry ,E tnhtaitt ireesq wuiriet hfianc itlihtiees B troi dsguepppoorrtt tVhaeilrl esye rvices. There may be
opportunities for shared facilities among the districts and the County. Further studies would be necessary
to determine whether there are opportunities to reduce costs.
Due to geographic distances between communities in the county, sharing facilities among water
Determaninda steiwoenrs p roviders is not possible.
Bridgeport includes other special district service providers, as well as the County, that require
facilities to support their services. There may be other opportunities for shared facilities among
the districts and the County. Further studies would be necessary to determine whether there are
opportunities to reduce costs.
15
Bridgeport Public Utility District
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
6. Accountability for Community Service Needs, Including Governmental
Structure and Operational Efficiencies.
Purpose: To evaluate the accessibility and levels of public participation associated with an agency’s
Local Adcecciosiuonn-tmabakilinitgy a annd dm Ganoavgeermneannt pcreo cesses.
Overview: Districts are subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act for meetings, agendas and minutes.
They are also subject to the Public Records Act. As such, Special districts are required to adopt
budgets at open public meetings and to file their budgets with the county auditor. They are
required to have annual or biennial independent audits. Complying with the minimum open
meeting and information requirements is not sufficient to allow an adequate amount of visibility
and accountability. Outreach efforts, including convenient meeting times, additional notice of
meetings and dissemination of district information, are desirable.
The PUD complies with the minimum open meetings and public information requirements. The district is
governed by a five-member Board of Directors that meets monthly. Meeting notices and agendas are
posted at the district office, at the post office, on the community bulletin board, and on the district’s
website. The district also disseminates information to its customers through notices sent with the billing.
The district maintains a website where agendas are available (http://bridgeportpud.com/) and meets the
minimum requirements of SB 929 for posting agendas, financial statements, compensation, and
enterprise systems.
BOARD MEMBER POSITION TERM EXPIRES
Table 3 – Board Roster
Kenneth Reynolds President 11/30/2022
Jeff Simpson Board Member 11/30/2024
Donna Lee Simensen Board Member 11/30/2026
Vacant Board Member -
Vacant Treasurer -
Special Districts are required to comply with a variety of local, State, and Federal requirements, including:
1. Adopting budgets at open public meetings;
2. Filing budgets with the County Auditor;
3. Annual or biennial independent audits;
4. Ralph M. Brown Act for meetings, agendas and minutes; and
5. Public Records Act.
Table 4 (below) is the “California Website Compliance Checklist” from the Golden State Risk Management
Authority that outlines the various State and Federal transparency requirements.iii Complying with the
minimum open meeting and information requirements is not sufficient to allow an adequate amount of
visibility and accountability. Outreach efforts, including convenient meeting times, additional notice of
meetings and dissemination of district information, are desirable.
PUBLIC RECORDS ACT
Table 4. Website Compliance Checklist
16
Bridgeport Public Utility District
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
☒YES ☐ NO SB 929 – THE SPECIAL DISTRICT HAS CREATED AND MAINTAINS A
WEBSITE
• Passed in 2018, all independent special districts must have a website
that includes contact information (and all other requirements) by Jan.
2020.
• Hardship exemptions are allowed but they are limited.iv
YES NO SB 272 – THE SPECIAL DISTRICT’S ENTERPRISE SYSTEM CATALOG IS
☐ ☒
POSTED ON THEIR WEBSITE
• All local agencies must publish a catalog listing all software that
meets specific requirements – free tool at
https://www.getstreamline.com/sb272
YES NO AB 2853 (OPTIONAL) - THE SPECIAL DISTRICT POSTS PUBLIC RECORDS
☐ ☒
TO THE WEBSITE.
• This bill allows Districts to refer PRA requests to your site, if the
content is displayed there, potentially saving time and money.
THE BROWN ACT
☒ YES ☐ NO AB 392: AGENDAS ARE POSTED TO OUR WEBSITE AT LEAST 72 HOURS
IN ADVANCE OF REGULAR MEETINGS, 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF
SPECIAL MEETINGS.
• This 2011 update to the Act, originally created in 1953, added the
online posting requirement.
☐ YES ☒ NO AB 2257: A LINK TO THE MOST RECENT AGENDA IS ON OUR HOME
PAGE, AND AGENDAS ARE SEARCHABLE, MACHINEREADABLE AND
PLATFORM INDEPENDENT.
• Required by Jan. 2019— text-based PDFs meet this requirement,
Microsoft Word docs do not.
*BPUD agendas are posted but are not searchable or machine readable (aka Optical Character Recognition (OCR) searchable.
STATE CONTROLLER REPORTS
YES NO FINANCIAL TRANSACTION REPORT: A LINK TO THE CONTROLLER’S “BY
☐ ☒
THE NUMBERS” WEBSITE IS POSTED ON OUR WEBSITE.
• Report must be submitted within seven months after the close of
the fiscal year. Districts can add the report to their website annually,
but posting a link is easier.
YES NO COMPENSATION REPORT: A LINK TO THE CONTROLLER’S PUBLICPAY
☐ ☒
WEBSITE IS POSTED IN A CONSPICUOUS LOCATION ON OUR WEBSITE.
• Report must be submitted by April 30 of each year. Districts can also
add the report to their website annually, but posting a link is easier.
HEALTHCARE DISTRICT WEBSITES
YES NO N/A AB 2019: IF THE SPECIAL DISTRICT IS A HEALTHCARE DISTRICT, A
☐ ☐ ☒
WEBSITE IS MAINTAINED THAT INCLUDES ALL ITEMS ABOVE, PLUS
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS.
17
Bridgeport Public Utility District
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
• Including budget, board members, MSR, grant policy and recipients,
and audits.
OPEN DATA
YES ☐ NO N/A AB 169: ANYTHING POSTED ON THE SPECIAL DISTRICT’S WEBSITE THAT
☐ ☒
IS CALLED “OPEN DATA” MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS FOR OPEN DATA.
• Defined as “retrievable, downloadable, indexable, and electronically
searchable; platform independent and machine readable” among
other things.
SECTION 508 ADA COMPLIANCE
YES ☐ NO TBD CA GOV CODE 7405: STATE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES SHALL COMPLY
☐ ☒
WITH THE ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 508 OF THE
FEDERAL REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973
• Requirements were updated in 2018.
Purpose: To evaluate the quality of public services in comparison to cost.
Evaluation of Management Efficiencies
Overview: As defined by OPR, the term “management efficiency,” refers to the organized provision
of the highest quality public services with the lowest necessary expenditure of public funds. An
efficiently managed entity (1) promotes and demonstrates implementation of continuous
improvement plans and strategies for budgeting, managing costs, training and utilizing personnel
and customer service and involvement, (2) has the ability to provide service over the short and
long term, (3) has the resources (fiscal, manpower, equipment, adopted service or work plans) to
provide adequate service, (4) meets or exceeds environmental and industry service standards, as
feasible considering local conditions or circumstances, (5) and maintains adequate contingency
reserves. “Management Efficiency” is generally seen as organizational efficiency including the
potential for consolidation.
The purpose of management is to effectively carry out the principal function and purpose of an
agency. Good management will ensure that the agency’s mission is accomplished and that the
agency’s efforts are sustainable into the future. Unfortunately, “good management” is a relatively
subjective issue, and one that is hard to quantify.
The PUD is managed by an elected Board of Directors and a General Manager. The district has no recent
long-term planning documents.
Purpose: To consider the advantages and disadvantages of various government structures to
Governpmroevindet Ssetrrvuiccet. ure Options
Overview: Government Code §56001 declares that it is the policy of the State to encourage orderly
growth and development essential to the social, fiscal, and economic well being of the State. The
Code further states that “this policy should be effected by the logical formation and modification
of the boundaries of local agencies, with a preference granted to accommodating additional
growth within, or through the expansion of, the boundaries of those local agencies which can best
accommodate and provide necessary governmental services.”
18
Bridgeport Public Utility District
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
For local agency consolidations to occur there has to be significant (and popularly desired) cost
savings or an increase in service.
The Bridgeport Valley is isolated from the nearest community by 20 miles and terrain that is often
hazardous in winter. Geographic constraints make it infeasible for the Bridgeport PUD to consolidate with
another district. The service area of the Bridgeport PUD overlaps the boundaries of the Bridgeport Fire
Protection District (FPD). The FPD provides fire protection services to developed areas within the
Bridgeport Valley. LAFCO policy generally promotes the consolidation of districts where they overlap,
however, the two districts only overlap in the community of Bridgeport. The FPD serves areas outside of
the community. Consolidation between the two districts is therefore not recommended.
The PUD complies with the minimum requirements for open meetings and public records. Per the
Determreisnualttsi oofn tsh e “Website Compliance Checklist” from the Golden State Risk Management Authority,
there is room for improvement regarding the following elements:
Compliance with SB 272, requiring the special district’s enterprise system catalog to be
o
posted on their website. SB 272 requires local agencies to publish a catalog listing all
software that meets specific requirements. A Streamline (link above) is free tool used by
other districts to comply with this requirement.
Full compliance with AB 2257, specifically BPUD agendas are posted to the webpage,
o
however they are not searchable or machine readable (aka Optical Character Recognition
(OCR) searchable).
Compliance with State Controller Reports: Specifically posting
o
(1) The Financial Transaction Report (a link to the controller’s “By The Numbers”
website posted on the website);
(2) Compensation Report (a link to the controller’s public pay website posted in a
conspicuous location on the website).
A separate evaluation of compliance with CA Gov Code 7405 is needed. This code section
o
requires state governmental entities to comply with the accessibility requirements of
section 508 of the Federal rehabilitation act of 1973.
The district seeks to inform the community and affected groups of district activities and services.
The PUD is managed by an elected Board of Directors and a General Manager.
The district has no long-term planning documents that address how to maintain current service
levels while providing for the needs of future development. Any future development costs will
be the responsibility of the development (developer) and not the ratepayers of the district
unless constructed under a grant.
The district’s Maintenance Goals and Priority Worksheet provides a minimal information on
equipment and facility needs for the future.
In regions of the county with separate, distinct communities that are geographically remote from
each other, public services are most logically provided by a combination of several single purpose
special districts.
19
Bridgeport Public Utility District
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
If further study indicated that consolidation of services in Bridgeport under one service provider
could save money and if Bridgeport residents were in favor of consolidation, fire protection, water
and sewer services, and other local services could be provided by one multi-purpose agency in
the future. The district has shown little interest in consolidation at this time.
In determining the sphere of influence for each local agency, Government Code §56425 requires the Local
IAVge.n Scyp Fhoremraeti oonf CIonmfmluisesionnc teo Rcoenscidoemr amnd epnredpaaret iao wnritten statement of its determination with
respect to four required findings. Each of the required findings is discussed below as it pertains to the
Bridgeport Public Utility District.
1. Present and Planned Land Uses
Present land uses in the Bridgeport Valley include residential, commercial, and public uses in the
Dcoimscmuusnsiitoy nof Bridgeport, residential and resort uses at Rancheria and Twin Lakes, and agricultural uses
in the Bridgeport Valley. The Mono County GIS estimates that there are approximately 448 parcels in the
district, including 328 developed parcels (residential or commercial parcels valued at $10,000 or more).
Population data from the 2000 US Census and California Department of Finance population estimates
show the Population in the Bridgeport Valley was approximately 553 in 2020. In 2020, there were 170
households in the Bridgeport Valley. Table 1 (above) shows the buildout figures for the Bridgeport Valley.
Present land uses in the area served by the Bridgeport PUD includes residential, commercial, and public
Fusiensd inin tghe community of Bridgeport. The planned land uses for the area are similar. Development will be
concentrated primarily within and adjacent to existing development although land use designations for
the Bridgeport Valley allow for the conversion of agricultural lands to residential uses with large lot sizes.
Future development in the Bridgeport Valley will likely be limited to the Bridgeport Townsite and
residential subdivisions. The Mono County Housing Element identifies six large parcels in the Bridgeport
Valley (totaling approximately 243.53-acres) as key housing sites with the potential to provide more
than 52 additional units of future housing stock (housing unit estimate does not include the Milk Ranch
Road parcel or the Bureau of Land Management land exchange parcel).
Recent changes to State law create a potential for increased density on residential parcels in the
Bridgeport Valley (up to three units: a main residence, an ADU and JADU). These changes have the
potential to increase the demand for BPUD's water and sewer services.
2. Present and Probable Need for Public Facilities and Services
Bridgeport has an existing need for water and sewer services. The buildout allowed by the General Plan
Dwiilsl ccruesasteio an g reater demand for those services in the future.
Bridgeport has an existing and continuing need for public facilities and services to serve existing and
Fplianndniendg d evelopment in the area.
20
Bridgeport Public Utility District
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
3. Present Capacity of Public Facilities and Adequacy of Public Services
The district provides a good level of water and sewer services to its customers. The district has no long-
tDeirsmc upslasnioninn g documents and has only minimally identified needed improvements to meet present
demands.
The district has a number of latent powers that would allow it to provide additional services within
Bridgeport, i.e. lighting, power, heat, transportation, telephone service, other methods of
communication, mosquito abatement, garbage disposal, golf courses, fire protection, parks and
recreation, building for public purposes, and drainage improvements.
The district currently provides an adequate level of service but has needs to develop long-term planning
Fdoincudminegnt s to project future water and sewer demands and improvements needed to meet current and
future projected demand. LAFCO recommends the BPUD review the capacity analysis and system
improvements recommendations specified in the CDBG Grant-funded Phase 3 “CIP.”
4. Social or Economic Communities of Interest
Due to the physical geography of the Bridgeport Valley and northern Mono County, communities in the
DBriisdcgeupsosrito Vna lley tend to interact socially and economically with communities to the north in Nevada,
rather than with communities in Mono County. Development in surrounding areas, such as Swauger Creek
and Willow Springs, shares some social and economic communities of interest with the communities in
the Bridgeport Valley.
The Bridgeport Valley area exhibits some social and economic interdependence with development in
FNienvaddina.g T his interdependence has no relevance in determining the sphere of influence for the district.
Development in surrounding areas, such as Swauger Creek and Willow Springs, shares some social and
economic communities of interest with the communities in the Bridgeport Valley.
5. Present and Probable Need for Public Facilities and Services of Any DUCs
For an update of a sphere of influence of a special district that provides public facilities or services related
Dtoi ssecwuesrssi,o mnu nicipal and industrial water, or structural fire protection, that occurs pursuant to subdivision
(g) on or after July 1, 2012, the present and probable need for those public facilities and services of any
disadvantaged unincorporated communities within the existing sphere of influence.
The BPUD provides domestic water and fire flow services to Bridgeport Valley. However, there are no
DFUinCds,i nasg d efined by CaLAFCO DUC Map, within or adjacent to the existing SOI.
21
Bridgeport Public Utility District
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
The Sphere of Influence for the Bridgeport Public Utility District encompasses privately owned land
Vpla.n Snepd hfoer rdeev eolofp mIennft lwuitehinn cthee cRomemcuonmity mof Berindgdepaotrti, oi.en. the Bridgeport Townsite, the Evans
Tract, the Bridgeport Reservoir subdivision, and the Bridgeport Indian Colony housing.
22
Bridgeport Public Utility District
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
Figure 4 – District Sphere of Influence
23
Bridgeport Public Utility District
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
VI. References
BPUD records
References Consulted
Boyle Engineering Corporation
Bridgeport Public Utility District Wastewater System Evaluation. March 2005.
California State Controller
Special Districts Annual Report, Fiscal Year 2021-2022
California State Department of Finance
Demographic Research Unit, population and housing estimates and projections
California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research
Cortese-Knox Act
Guidelines on Municipal Service Reviews
California Local Agency Formation Commission
CaLAFCO Statewide DUC Map using ACS 5-Year Data (2015-19) Updated March 2022.
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/View/index.html?appid=4319a8066745442cbe7de6af1d13f98a
CaLAFCO. https://calafco.org/sites/default/files/resources/MSRGuidelines-FINAL.pdf
California Regional Water Quality Control Board.
Water Quality Control Plan for the Lahontan Region (Basin Plan). 1995.
Mono County Local Agency Formation Commission
Bridgeport Public Utility District Sphere of Influence Report. February 2009
Mono County Planning Department
Mono County General Plan.2023.
Mono County General Plan, Revised Land Use Element and Land Development Regulations. 2023.
Mono County Housing Element. 2019-2027.
Mono County Master Environmental Assessment. 2009
Senate Bill 244, California Legislative Information:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201120120SB244
U.S. Census. 2020 Decennial Census. Bridgeport CSD Profile.
Bridgeport Public Utility District
Persons Consulted
Jeff Simpson, Board President
24
Bridgeport Public Utility District
MONO COUNTY LAFCO Final Report | Approved October 10, 2024
Bridgeport Public Utility District
VII. Endnotes
i Mono County Housing Element 2019-2027, “Bridgeport Valley Community Profile – Key Sites,” Pages 56-60.
ii CaLAFCO Statewide DUC Map using ACS 5-Year Data (2015-19) Updated March 2022.
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/View/index.html?appid=4319a8066745442cbe7de6af1d13f98a
iii Golden State Risk Management Authority “California Website Compliance Checklist”
https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/4515944/website-compliance-8.5x11-single-side.pdf
iv Golden State Risk Management Authority “California Website Compliance – SB 929” https://gsrma.org/news-
and-information/california-website-compliance-sb-929/
25
Bridgeport Public Utility District