LAFCO
Napa County RCD MSR and SOI Review (2023)
Read the report at Local Agency Formation Commissions ↗
Local Agency Formation Commission of Napa County
Political Subdivision of the State of California
We Manage Government Boundaries, Evaluate Municipal Services, and Protect Agriculture
Napa County Resource Conservation District
Municipal Service Review and Sphere of Influence Review
Prepared in accordance with Government Code §56425 and §56430
Final Report October 2023
LAFCO of Napa County
Commissioners Staff / Administrative Office
Margie Mohler, Chair, City Member Brendon Freeman, Executive Officer
Anne Cottrell, Vice Chair, County Member Dawn Mittleman Longoria,
Kenneth Leary, Commissioner, Public Member Assistant Executive Officer
Beth Painter, Commissioner, City Member Gary Bell, Commission Counsel
Belia Ramos, Commissioner, County Member Stephanie Pratt, Clerk/Jr. Analyst
Mariam Aboudamous, Alternate Commissioner,
City Member
Joelle Gallagher, Alternate Commissioner, 1754 Second Street, Suite C
County Member Napa, California 94559
Eve Kahn, Alternate Commissioner, Public Member www.napa.lafco.ca.gov
Napa County Resource Conservation District MSR & SOI Review 2023 LAFCO of Napa County
Contents
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ 4
II. AGENCY OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................ 4
Boundary and Population ............................................................................................................ 5
Service Boundary Issues ............................................................................................................. 7
III. MISSION AND GOALS .......................................................................................................... 8
Mission ........................................................................................................................................ 8
Strategic Plan .............................................................................................................................. 8
Goals ........................................................................................................................................... 9
IV. DISTRICT OPERATIONS .................................................................................................... 11
Public Accountability................................................................................................................ 11
Governance and Staffing........................................................................................................... 12
Services and Programs .............................................................................................................. 12
Cooperative Efforts ................................................................................................................... 14
V. FINANCES .............................................................................................................................. 15
Budget Preparation.................................................................................................................... 15
Financial Policies ...................................................................................................................... 15
Revenues and Expenses ............................................................................................................ 15
Current Agreements .................................................................................................................. 16
Audited Financial Statements ................................................................................................... 17
Financial Issues ......................................................................................................................... 19
VI. MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW DETERMINATIONS................................................... 21
Growth and Population Projections .......................................................................................... 21
Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities, Adequacy of Public Services, and
Infrastructure Needs or Deficiencies ........................................................................................ 21
Financial Ability to Provide Services ....................................................................................... 22
Status and Opportunities for Shared Facilities.......................................................................... 22
Accountability for Community Service Needs, Including Government Structure and
Operational Efficiencies............................................................................................................ 22
Location and Characteristics of Any Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities within or
Contiguous to the Existing Sphere of Influence ....................................................................... 22
Other Local Policy Issues ......................................................................................................... 23
Adoption of Sphere of Influence and Subsequent Reviews ...................................................... 25
Jurisdictional Boundary and Land Use Authorities .................................................................. 26
Present and Planned Land Use .................................................................................................. 26
1
Napa County Resource Conservation District MSR & SOI Review 2023 LAFCO of Napa County
Present and Probable Need for Public Facilities and Services ................................................. 26
Present Capacity and Adequacy of Public Services ................................................................. 26
Social and Economic Communities of Interest ......................................................................... 26
Present and Probable Need for Public Services for Disadvantaged Unincorporated
Communities ............................................................................................................................. 27
2
Napa County Resource Conservation District MSR & SOI Review 2023 LAFCO of Napa County
We wish to express appreciation to the following Napa RCD staff for their assistance:
Lucas Patzek, Executive Director
Frances Knapczyk, Program Director
3
Napa County Resource Conservation District MSR & SOI Review 2023 LAFCO of Napa County
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of a municipal service review (MSR) is to provide an inventory and analysis for improving
efficiency, cost-effectiveness, accountability, and reliability of public services provided by cities and
special districts. An MSR evaluates the structure and operation of these agencies, highlights agency
accomplishments, and discusses possible areas for improvement and coordination. MSRs are used by the
Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) when reviewing and, as appropriate, updating a sphere of
influence (SOI), and can be used by subject agencies when considering changes in their operations. 1
This report comprehensively reviews municipal services provided by, and the sphere of influence of, the
Napa County Resource Conservation District (Napa RCD), an independent special district. The Commission
most recently prepared an MSR for Napa RCD in 2016. Napa RCD’s SOI was originally established by the
Commission in 1985 and most recently reviewed in 2016. This report includes determinative statements
based on factors required to be considered as part of the MSR component and also includes a
recommendation to affirm the District’s SOI with no changes. A map depicting Napa RCD’s current
jurisdictional boundary and SOI is included in this report as Figure 1.
II. AGENCY OVERVIEW
Napa RCD is charged with protecting and restoring natural resources
within a jurisdictional boundary that includes most of Napa County
and a small portion of Solano County. The origins of conservation
districts date back to the national “Dust Bowl” crisis of the 1930s as
drought and attendant soil losses destroyed millions of acres of
cropland. On April 27, 1935, in response to the Dust Bowl, Congress established the Soil Conservation
Service as part of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for the purpose of conserving
natural resources on agricultural lands. To deliver these services locally, state governments began
adopting legislation to allow for the formation of conservation districts to provide assistance and
leadership in the management of soil and water resources.
In 1945, Napa RCD was formed under California’s Soil Conservation District Act to provide non-regulatory
soil and water conservation services to farmers and ranchers in Napa County.2 Over the years the range
of services provided by Napa RCD has expanded to include soil, water, forest, and habitat conservation
services for non-agricultural lands, general watershed conservation services for all residents, and public
education related to conservation. Table 13 provides an agency profile for Napa RCD. Napa RCD enjoys a
special partnership with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS) which spans the history of the organization. The agencies share an office, and frequently
work together to provide locally led technical and funding assistance to land managers to implement
conservation practices on private lands.
1 This report is presented as part of a process mandated by §56425 and §56430 of the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg
Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000.
2 This legislation was reorganized in 1975 as part of the Resource Conservation District Act.
3 Range of services and programs are listed in greater detail in “Services and Programs.
4
Napa County Resource Conservation District MSR & SOI Review 2023 LAFCO of Napa County
Today, Napa RCD’s jurisdictional boundary includes most of Napa County with the exception of those
portions of the City of Napa that were incorporated as of
Table 1 1945. Napa RCD’s jurisdictional boundary also
NCRCD: Agency Profile encompasses a small portion of Solano County known as
District Formation: 1945 “Cullinan Ranch.” This approximate 2,070-acre area is
Public Resources located in southwestern Solano County and was annexed
Enabling Legislation:
Code, Division 9 to Napa RCD in 1952. Cullinan Ranch is owned by the
District Type: Independent United States Fish and Wildlife Service and is comprised of
District Boundary: 506,200 acres tidal wetlands providing habitat for a number of native
District Sphere: 507,500 acres fish, plants, and wildlife species. Figure 1 provides a map
depicting Napa RCD’s current SOI and jurisdictional
Staff: 14 FTE
boundary.
FY 22/23 Budget: $4.166 million
Services Provided: Conservation
Boundary and Population
Napa County covers approximately 505,850 acres, of which 94% are unincorporated lands. Although Napa
RCD has jurisdiction throughout Napa County (except where noted in the City of Napa), the District’s
priority is the conservation, protection, and restoration of agricultural, rural, grazing, farming, parks, and
open space land – which constitutes the majority of land in Napa County.
5
Napa County Resource Conservation District MSR & SOI Review 2023 LAFCO of Napa County
Figur e 1
6
Napa County Resource Conservation District MSR & SOI Review 2023 LAFCO of Napa County
Table 3
Population Projections According to the California Department of
Conservation, urban growth resulted in the conversion
Jurisdiction 2015 2025 2040
of 696 acres of agricultural lands in Napa County
American 20,500 22,600 25,280
between 2010 and 2016.4 More recent statistics show
Canyon
an increase in agricultural land of 353 acres between
Calistoga 5,200 5,400 5,600
2016 and 2018. In this same period urban land
Napa 78,800 82,800 86,715
increased by 103 acres. These trends are expected to
St. Helena 5,900 6,100 6,800 marginally decrease over the next 15 years as
Yountville 3,000 3,300 3,535 population growth in Napa County is projected to
Unincorporated 26,900 28,400 30,120 increase 0.9 percent as shown in Table 3.
Total 140,300 148,600 158,050
Napa County, like many other regions in California, is
Source: ABAG-MTC 2040 Projections
subject to residential and commercial development to
accommodate demands of a growing population. Although local policies have slowed the premature
encroachment of urban uses onto open space and agricultural lands, the gradual expansion of urban
boundaries and intensification of development underscores the need for Napa RCD to contend with
population growth and urban encroachment in a conscientious method that addresses watershed
conservation and agricultural needs. In spite of controls on urban encroachment, the Napa County
environment has been affected by rural development, such as wineries. This form of development can
disrupt habitat corridors and increase the need for fuels management and firefighting to reduce fire risks.
Service Boundary Issues
Napa RCD desires to annex portions of the City of Napa that were incorporated as of 1945, which have
been excluded from its boundary since its formation as an independent special district in 1945. This gap
area is included in Napa RCD’s SOI and is wholly within the City of Napa. Other than this gap area, Napa
RCD’s service area includes all of Napa County. Napa RCD has a long history of programming throughout
the City of Napa, including providing technical assistance, educational programs, and monitoring
programs. Annexation of this area is considered logical and orderly development, and would allow for
Napa RCD’s boundary to accurately reflect the geographic scope of current programming and would
provide the following community benefits: the ability for any City of Napa resident to serve on Napa RCD’s
governing board; the ability for Napa RCD to locate its office anywhere within the City of Napa; and the
ability for Napa RCD Board of Directors to convene a meeting anywhere within the City of Napa.
4 This includes lands classified by the California Department of Conservation as grazing land, prime farmland,
farmland of statewide importance, unique farmland, and farmland of local importance.
7
Napa County Resource Conservation District MSR & SOI Review 2023 LAFCO of Napa County
III. MISSION AND GOALS
Mission
Napa RCD has adopted the following mission statement: “To
support and empower everyone in Napa County to conserve,
protect, and restore natural resources and sustainably manage
working lands.”
Strategic Plan
Napa RCD has prepared a Strategic Plan that identifies and
promotes service objectives from 2020 through 2024, and it is preparing to complete a new Strategic Plan
in the current fiscal year. According to Napa RCD’s 2020-2024 Strategic Plan, the primary focus in the next
two years will be on the following actions:
• “Creating ongoing opportunities for all community members to learn from and inspire each
other as we actively participate in stewarding our shared resources.
• Providing education, technical assistance, and financial
support to help landowners steward their agricultural
land, forest land, open spaces, and urban properties.
• Collecting information about the health of our watersheds
and sharing that information with community leaders and
land managers to help them make sound management
decisions for working lands and natural resources.
• Restoring rivers and streams, supporting native
vegetation and wildlife habitat, and implementing state-
of-the-art agricultural and rangeland practices as well as
sustainable wildfire management projects.
• Partnering with other organizations — in Napa County, regionally, and statewide — on large-
scale approaches to the most pressing natural resource challenges of our time, including
climate change.
• Reflecting Napa RCD’s full commitment to community and conservation through our
operations at every level.”
8
Napa County Resource Conservation District MSR & SOI Review 2023 LAFCO of Napa County
Goals
Napa RCD’s 2020-2024 Strategic Plan is organized in terms of the following specific goals and focus areas:
Goal 1: The communities of Napa County effectively plan for and monitor the health of our watersheds
so they provide safe drinking water, sustainable irrigation, and intact natural habitat for native fish,
wildlife, and plants.
• Collect, assess, and communicate data and information on the
health of Napa County’s watersheds.
• Proactively share watershed health information with partner
organizations, community leaders, and residents to inform
decision-making.
• Develop a plan to most beneficially use Napa RCD’s Huichica
Creek Sustainable Demonstration Farm property in pursuit of the
vision, mission, and goals expressed above.
• Increase Napa RCD’s leadership in climate change response and
resilience.
• Collaborate with other local organizations to explore the creation of a “Conservation Blueprint”
guiding restoration activities for Napa County.
• Provide technical guidance to the Napa County Groundwater Sustainability Agency.
• Collaborate with community partners to plan for increased availability and access to locally
produced food in Napa County.
Goal 2: The wild and working lands of Napa County provide environmental and community benefit and
are managed in ways that prepare us and build resiliency for climate change.
• Assist private and public landowners and managers
in implementing best management practices in erosion
control, water management and conservation, soil
health, invasive species management, forest health,
and climate-smart agriculture. Proactively share
watershed health information with partner
organizations, community leaders, and residents to
inform decision-making.
• Implement in-stream and riparian restoration projects in local watersheds.
• Implement programs to restore native terrestrial habitats in Napa County.
• Work with local and regional partners to implement best landscape management practices to
minimize wildfire impacts on human life and property in the urban-wildlands interface and restore
natural fire regime patterns in undeveloped areas consistent with a changing climate.
• Expand programs to assist urban residents of Napa County in implementing conservation
measures with a focus on climate change mitigation and resilience.
9
Napa County Resource Conservation District MSR & SOI Review 2023 LAFCO of Napa County
Goal 3: Napa County develops a shared culture of conservation that
includes all community members.
• Partner with a diverse array of organizations, including new
community partners, to assess community interest, needs, and
assets related to natural resources.
• Engage all segments of the Napa County community in the work of
Napa RCD.
• Expand youth education programming and youth volunteer
programs.
• Expand adult education and volunteer programs to reach
throughout the county.
Goal 4: Diverse revenue streams allow Napa RCD to advance its mission and vision.
• Revisit indirect cost rate to be able to incorporate appropriate expenditures into grant and
contract cost accounting.
• Cultivate increased support from local governments for restoration and watershed monitoring.
• Become a truly county-wide district by annexing portions of the City of Napa that were
incorporated as of 1945.
• Seek additional private funding for Napa RCD programs.
• Increase connections, coordination, collaboration, and partnerships with higher education and
science institutions.
• Develop and implement fee-for-service programs for activities such as irrigation evaluations, tree
planting, and climate change mitigation.
• Develop a strategic marketing and communications plan to support Napa RCD’s revenue goals.
Goal 5: The Napa RCD Board of Directors and staff have the capacity and tools to implement the
strategic plan goals.
• Develop and support a diverse, skilled, and engaged Board of Directors.
• Continue to hire and retain a highly skilled professional staff.
• Sustain Napa RCD’s excellent organizational culture.
• Ensure Napa RCD has the space and equipment needed to reach its goals.
10
Napa County Resource Conservation District MSR & SOI Review 2023 LAFCO of Napa County
In addition to its Strategic Plan, Napa RCD’s Board of Directors unanimously passed a Climate Emergency
Resolution in 2022 to acknowledge climate change as one of the greatest challenges of our time and
commit the District to the reduction in countywide greenhouse gas emissions to net-zero no later than
2030. The resolution describes key actions which Napa RCD will support and undertake in response to the
climate emergency, including:
• It will supply technical expertise, research-based best practices, and collaboration for a regional
climate action plan coordinated among public and private entities.
• It will design and deliver objective, science-based programs and advisory services that encourage
climate change mitigation in areas such as forest health, watershed sustainability, and
regenerative agriculture.
• It will make its outreach, community engagement, and education efforts more effective and
efficient.
• It will reduce climate pollutants associated with its internal operations.
IV. DISTRICT OPERATIONS
Public Accountability
Napa RCD coordinates a public education program consisting of newsletters, website, demonstration
projects, tours, workshops, presentations to schools and community groups, field trips, development of
fact sheets and guides, and other activities. In addition, Napa RCD pursues interest from local news media
and invites media representatives to workshops and events.
Napa RCD maintains a primary website, https://naparcd.org, as a resource for a broad range of service
information. Board meetings are conducted on the second Thursday of each month at the Napa Valley
Transit Authority’s (NVTA’s) Board Room and are open to the public. Napa RCD provides an annual
summary of projects, initiatives, and financial standing in its Annual Report.
11
Napa County Resource Conservation District MSR & SOI Review 2023 LAFCO of Napa County
Governance and Staffing
Napa RCD is governed by an independent board of directors that includes seven Directors appointed in-
lieu of election by the Napa County Board of Supervisors. The roles of Napa RCD’s Board of Directors are
to establish priorities, set policies and guidelines, and oversee general operations. Additionally, Associate
Directors serve the organization in an advisory capacity. The Board of Directors meets on the second
Thursday of every month. Meetings are posted on-site at NVTA and Napa RCD’s office, on Napa RCD’s
website, and distributed virtually via email notification.
The Board of Directors appoints an Executive Director who is responsible for managing services and
overseeing staff. Napa RCD’s staff is comprised of thirteen conservation scientists and outreach and
administrative professionals. Staff for Napa RCD is currently comprised of the following positions:
• Coordinator, Youth Education & • Program Manager, Conservation
Forestry • Project Manager, Community
• Environmental Scientist II Engagement
• Environmental Scientist III • Project Manager, Conservation
• Executive Director • Project Manager, Education
• Forestry Program Manager II • Project Manager, Forestry
• Principal Program Manager, Forestry • Sustainable Agriculture Program
• Program Director Manager II
Services and Programs
Pursuant to Division 9 of the State of California Public Resources Code, Napa RCD is authorized to operate
“for the purposes of soil and water conservation, the control of runoff, the prevention and control of soil
erosion, and erosion stabilization, including, but not limited to, these purposes in open areas, agricultural
areas, urban development, wildlife areas, recreational developments, watershed management, the
protection of water quality and water reclamation, the development of storage and distribution of water,
and the treatment of each acre of land according to its needs.” Napa RCD provides services in conjunction
with the USDA’s local NRCS office. This includes sharing an office space,
vehicles, equipment, and staff resources. The two agencies work
together in their outreach efforts to introduce emerging conservation
methods, technologies and science to land managers and residents in
Napa County. These agencies also work together in providing leadership
in facilitating community and land management forums to encourage the
formulation of effective and practical conservational policies and
practices. Napa RCD services emphasize public education and
information and therefore the District does not have the typical physical
infrastructure associated with other special districts.
The services that Napa RCD provides help our community achieve conservation goals by providing
technical assistance, educational programs, monitoring programs, and funding sources on issues ranging
from fisheries to forest health, soil management, water conservation and quality, and more. We work
directly with landowners, land managers, government agencies, non-profits, local schools, and individual
or groups of community members. Services and programs provided by Napa RCD include the following:
12
Napa County Resource Conservation District MSR & SOI Review 2023 LAFCO of Napa County
• Community Engagement
School Programs – offering K-12 classes opportunities to get outdoors, improve
o
environmental literacy, and take stewardship action
Internships & Scholarships – enhancing local conservation workforce
o
Events – responding to community needs to build stewardship skills and create
o
community
Garden Programming – advancing climate-smart landscaping
o
Volunteer Programs – connecting community to action via trash cleanups, habitat
o
restoration, and community science
• Forest Health
Forest Planning – providing technical
o
assistance and planning at a variety of
geographic scales to facilitate stewardship
and access to cost-share funding
Tree Planting & Maintenance – taking a
o
science-based approach to planting,
maintaining, and monitoring trees for long
term success
Wildfire Recovery & Resiliency – creating
o
connections to funding for recovery, and
building resiliency at the property- and watershed-scale through project planning and
implementation
• Sustainable Agriculture
Irrigation Efficiency – providing technical assistance, assessments, and cost-share related
o
to drip irrigation efficiency and water security
Soil Health & Carbon Farming - providing technical assistance, assessments, and cost-
o
share related to carbon sequestration
Habitat Projects - providing technical assistance, assessments, and cost-share related to
o
enhancing pollinator and other habitat on farms
LandSmart – providing farmers with pathway to compliance for local water quality
o
regulations
• Watershed Enhancement
Environmental Monitoring – monitoring
o
critical indicators of watershed health and
project impact, including fish, and wildlife,
vegetation, water quality, streamflow, and
stream channel characteristics
Fish Passage remediating artificial barriers to
o
fish migration and restoring in-stream habitat
and riparian corridors
Habitat Projects – assessing potential of all
o
properties to provide essential habitat
Road Storm-Proofing – reducing sediment
o
deliver from dirt roads, a key pollutant in waterways
13
Napa County Resource Conservation District MSR & SOI Review 2023 LAFCO of Napa County
Cooperative Efforts
Napa RCD provides individual services to land managers primarily in conjunction with NRCS as well as
other organizations. Special demonstration projects, applied conservation research, and general
community outreach are used to introduce emerging conservation approaches and technologies to
landowners and community leaders. Napa RCD participates in a number of cooperative efforts with public,
private, and volunteer organizations with respect to protecting and restoring natural resources in Napa
County. An existing memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Sonoma RCD, Gold Ridge RCD, and
Mendocino RCD allows Napa RCD to implement the LandSmart conservation program, which
encompasses much of its work related to planning and implementation of sustainable agriculture projects.
This MOU involves staff from each RCD working closely together along with shared grants, information,
and documents. Additionally, Napa RCD is an active member of several regional partnerships and
programs, including the North Coast Soil Hub, North Bay Forest Improvement Program, Inner Coast
Collaborative under the Regional Forest and Fire Capacity (RFFC) Program, and North Coast RCD Durable
Collaboration. At the state level, Napa RCD is a member of the California Association of Resource
Conservation Districts and the California Special Districts Association.
Other organizations Napa RCD regularly works with include the following:
• American Canyon Community and Parks Foundation
• California Coastal Commission
• California Department of Conservation
• California Department of Fish and Wildlife
• California Department of Food and Agriculture
• California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE)
• California State Coastal Conservancy
• California State Parks
• California State Regional Water Quality Control Boards
• Calistoga Joint Unified School District
• City of American Canyon
• City of Napa
• City of St Helena
• County of Napa*
• Friends of the Napa River
• Land Trust of Napa County
• Napa Communities Firewise Foundation
• Napa County Farm Bureau
• Napa County Farmworker Foundation
• Napa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District**
• Napa County Park and Open Space District
• Napa Green
• Napa Valley Grapegrowers
• Napa Valley Unified School District
• Napa Valley Vintners
• UC Cooperative Extension
• United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service
• And many more
14
Napa County Resource Conservation District MSR & SOI Review 2023 LAFCO of Napa County
*Since 1991, Napa RCD has had a contractual agreement with the County of Napa. Initially, the
contract covered technical reviews of agricultural erosion control plans. Over time, the agreement
has evolved to include assisting the County with watershed education, trainings and workshops,
specific watershed assessment and monitoring studies, and forestry and fire resiliency planning and
project implementation.
**Napa RCD has had a contractual relationship with the Napa County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District since the early 2000’s to assist with implementation of the Napa Countywide
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program, stream monitoring, and stream maintenance.
V. FINANCES
Budget Preparation
Napa RCD’s Executive Director works with staff in March and April of each fiscal year to draft a budget
based upon anticipated revenues and expenses in accordance with the District’s budget preparation
policy. Napa RCD maintains a Standing Finance Committee that reviews the draft budget prior to it being
presented to the Board of Directors as part of a public hearing that generally occurs in May each year. A
final budget is presented to Napa RCD’s Board of Directors for adoption in June.
Financial Policies
Napa RCD has 11 financial policies:
• Budget Preparation • Reimbursement
• Fixed Asset • Cal-Card Usage
• Fund Balance • Purchasing
• Revenue Recognition • Procurement of Professional Services
• Fee for Service • Procurement of Construction Services
• Petty Cash
Napa RCD regularly reviews policies to identify gaps, and adopts new policies as needed. A schedule for
periodic policy review and update is tracked and monitored.
Revenues and Expenses
Napa RCD’s major source of revenue is fee-for-service contracts and grants. In current and past few years,
Napa RCD holds approximately 15 fee-for-service contracts and 25 grants at any given time.
Typically, Napa RCD holds fee-for-service contracts with the following organizations:
• CAL FIRE
• City of Napa
• City of St Helena
• County of Napa
• Napa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
15
Napa County Resource Conservation District MSR & SOI Review 2023 LAFCO of Napa County
Typical grantors include the following:
• CAL FIRE
• California Coastal Commission
• California Coastal Conservancy
• California Department of Conservation
• California Department of Fish and Wildlife
• California Department of Food and Agriculture
• California Department of Water Resources
• California Water Resources Control Board
• California Wildlife Conservation Board
• United States Environmental Protection Agency
• United States National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
• United States Natural Resources Conservation Service
Additional revenue sources for Napa RCD include donations and property taxes. Although revenue sources
are typically short-term, they have consistently increased over the past several years. Major expense
categories are:
• Personnel
• Professional Services
• Supplies related to operating natural resource programs.
Napa RCD’s adopted budgets have averaged $2.75 million over the past five fiscal years. Its adopted
budget for the 2022-2023 fiscal year totals $4.167 million. This amount represents Napa RCD’s total
approved expenses or appropriations for the fiscal year. Revenues are budgeted at $4.585 million and
primarily expected to be drawn from contracts, grants, donations, and property tax proceeds. Napa RCD’s
adopted revenues and expenses for the last five fiscal years are provided below.
Category 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23
Adopted Revenues $1,705,514 $2,229,329 $2,406,662 $3,363,582 $4,585,298
Adopted Expenses $1,795,870 $2,029,941 $2,032,987 $2,948,479 $4,166,992
Difference ($90,356) $199,388 $373,675 $415,103 $418,306
Current Agreements
Napa RCD currently holds the following grant agreements, contracts, joint powers agreements (JPAs), and
professional services agreements to implement services and programs. When funding for the contract
comes from a source other than the contracting entity, the funding source is noted in parentheses.
• CAL FIRE: Implement North Bay Forest Improvement Program
• CAL FIRE: Professional Services Agreement
• California Coastal Commission: Stream Watch
• California Coastal Conservancy: Wildfire Resiliency Enhancement
• California Department of Conservation: Regional Forest and Fire Capacity Program
• California Department of Food & Agriculture: HSP & SWEEP Technical Assistance
• California Trout: Sulphur Creek Fish Passage Barrier Restoration (CDFW and SCC)
• California Wildlife Conservation Board: Carbon Farm Planning
16
Napa County Resource Conservation District MSR & SOI Review 2023 LAFCO of Napa County
• CARCD: Monarch education for youth (USFS)
• Carneros/Huichica Streamgages
• City of Napa: Parks & Recreation Support
• City of Napa: Water Division Support
• City of St Helena: York Creek Monitoring
• County of Napa Groundwater Sustainability Agency: Technical Advisory Group
• County of Napa: JPA with Planning, Building and Environmental Services for support of
Conservation Regulations, Forestry, Watershed Education, and Watershed Monitoring
• County of Napa Public Works: Napa River Restoration Montioring (USEPA)
• County of Napa Wildlife Conservation Commission: Monarch Habitat Enhancement
• Gasser Foundation: Fish Passage Barrier Prioritization & Planning
• Land Trust of Napa County: Technical Assistance
• Napa County Ag Commissioner: Weed Management Area (CDFA)
• Napa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District: Fisheries and River Restoration
Monitoring (SCC)
• Napa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District: Watershed Maintenance Support,
Napa River Monitoring Support, Outfall Monitoring, Napa Countywide Stormwater Support
• Napa County Farm Bureau: Monitoring for Napa River and Sonoma Creek Waste Discharge
Requirements
• National Association of Conservation Districts: Forestry and Ag Technical Assistance (USDA
NRCS)
• Napa Communities Firewise Foundation: On-call Technical Assistance
• Napa Green: Technial Assistance
• Private Foundation: General Support & Communications Capacity Building
• Treasury Wine Estates: Soil Health (USDA WSARE)
• Tuleyome: Knoxville OHV Road Improvements (Napa County Measure A)
• UC ANR: Cover Crop Research (USDA WSARE
• USDA Farm Services Agency: Emergency Fire Restoration Program
• USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service: Contribution Agreement for irrigation Technical
Assistance
• USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service: Conservation Innovation Grant for North Coast
Soil Health Hub
Audited Financial Statements
Napa RCD has annual independent audits and periodically changes auditors as required by law. Larry Bain,
CPA, completed Napa RCD’s 2016-2017, 2017-2018, and 2018-2019 audits. Beginning with its fiscal year
2019-2020 audit, Napa RCD contracted with Napa County for auditing services through Brown Armstrong
Accountancy Corporation. Napa RCD engages the Napa County Auditor-Controller in preparing for its
annual audit and presenting results to its Board of Directors.
Recent audits reveal that revenues have exceeded expenditures in four of the past five fiscal years. Actual
revenues and expenses for Napa RCD over the last five fiscal years are provided below.
17
Napa County Resource Conservation District MSR & SOI Review 2023 LAFCO of Napa County
Category 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Actual Revenues $1,494,384 $1,381,042 $1,487,718 $2,198,450 $1,958,532
Actual Expenses $1,486,348 $1,289,881 $1,502,637 $2,111,693 $1,886,867
Difference $8,036 $91,161 ($14,919) $86,757 $71,665
Napa RCD’s 2020-2021 audit identifies that the District received revenues totaling $1.959 million and
incurred expenses totaling $1.887 million, resulting in a total operating income of $71,665 during the fiscal
year. Napa RCD received approximately 80% of its revenue from federal, state, and local grants and
contracts. The remaining portion of Napa RCD’s revenue is drawn from its proporational share of property
tax assessments, and interest on investment funds. Total grants and contributions increased by about 33%
after 2018-19. Audited revenue amounts by sources are summarized below.
Revenue Sources 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Taxes $312,649 $341,639 $365,276 $392,623 $402,920
Intergovernmental $967,114 $811,190 $784,683 $1,453,163 $1,209,479
Other: Charges for $214,621 $228,213 $337,759 $161,629 $346,133
Services, Other Grants,
Sales, and
Donations/Contributions
Total $1,494,384 $1,381,042 $1,487,718 $2,198,450 $1,958,532
Approximately 67% of Napa RCD’s expenditures relate to staff salaries and benefits. The remaining 33%
of Napa RCD’s expenses relate to grant services and supplies.
18
Napa County Resource Conservation District MSR & SOI Review 2023 LAFCO of Napa County
As shown in Table 4, Napa RCD had $2.045 million
in total assets and $0.921 million in total liabilities Table 4
as of June 30, 2021. Napa RCD had $1.383 million Balance Sheet Ending June 30, 2021
in current assets including cash, accounts Assets Amount
receivable, and short-term investments. Long- Current Assets $1,382,986
term assets totaled $0.662 million. Napa RCD Capital assets, net of
$472,555
maintains a fund balance that is reasonable to depreciation
cover anticipated operating expenses for Deferred outflows -
$189,682
approximately three months. Napa RCD has pensions
sufficient current assets to meet current liabilities Total Assets $2,045,223
with a ratio of 8.7:1. Long-term debt is in the form Current Liabilities $158,233
of compensated absences.
Non-Current Liabilities $762,961
Total Liabilities $921,194
Napa RCD has established $475,000 of its fund
Deferred inflows of
balance for budget stabilization. Napa RCD’s $84,532
resources-pensions
unassigned general fund balance as of June 30,
Total Deferred Inflows of
2021 totaled $584,906, which is available for any $84,532
Resources
purpose. Napa RCD’s fund balance policy ensures
Invested in Capital Assets,
the District maintains an adequate total fund $472,555
net of related debt
balance equivalent to a minimum of two months
Unrestricted equity $566,942
operating expenses. While not technically
Total Net Assets $1,039,497
categorized as reserves, this fund balance amount
serves a similar purpose to ensure Napa RCD is Source: NCRCD Audited Financial Statements,
2020-2021 (Brown Armstrong, CPAs)
protected against significant economic
downturns and unforeseen emergencies. Napa
RCD’s unassigned fund balance at the end of each
of the last five fiscal years is provided below.
2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Committed Fund Balance $475,000 $475,000 $475,000 $475,000 $475,000
Unassigned Fund Balance $235,035 $326,319 $334,707 $422,062 $584,906
Total $710,035 $801,319 $809,707 $897,062 $1,059,906
Financial Issues
A key financial issue for Napa RCD is that its revenue stream is heavily dependent on competitive grant
funding. The dependency on grants to fund its service operations requires extensive work by Napa RCD
to continually apply and maintain due to increasing competition. Additionally, many grant programs limit
indirect cost rates which make it difficult for the agency to recoup its costs. The result is that Napa RCD is
financially reliant on a revenue stream that is subject to fluctuations and imposes burdensome cost
restrictions. Its other main revenue source is property tax-based assessments that increase slowly and
may be subject to fluctuations in the economy. Napa RCD completed a fund development strategy in 2014
which focused on diversification of funding sources through pursuing private foundations and donors.
Since then, Napa RCD has made several strides towards acquiring general support and project funding
from local and regional foundations, and has increased its donations from individuals steadily each year
through participation in the Napa Valley Give! Guide. This year Napa RCD launched the Million Trees
19
Napa County Resource Conservation District MSR & SOI Review 2023 LAFCO of Napa County
Program to support forest stewardship projects and has raised more funding from individual private
donors than it ever has before. Another key component to financial security is regional partnership
development, such as LandSmart, North Coast Soil Hub, North Bay Forest Improvement Program, and
Inner Coast Regional Fire and Forestry Collaborative, and development of direct funding relationships
between state agencies and these collaborations.
20
Napa County Resource Conservation District MSR & SOI Review 2023 LAFCO of Napa County
VI. MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW DETERMINATIONS
The following determinations address the service and governance factors enumerated for consideration
by the Commission under G.C. §56430 as well as required by local policy. These factors range in scope
from considering infrastructure needs and deficiencies to relationships with growth management policies.
The determinations serve as independent conclusions of the Commission on the key issues underlying
growth and development within the affected community and are based on information collected,
analyzed, and presented in this report and are specific only to Napa RCD.
Growth and Population Projections
a) Napa RCD’s jurisdictional boundary includes most of Napa County with the exception of an
approximate 1,300-acre inhabited portion of the City of Napa. While specific population projections
are not available, all 140,300 people currently residing in Napa County (as estimated by the
Association of Bay Area Governments) benefit from Napa RCD’s conservation services.
b) The Association of Bay Area Governments projects an annual
population growth rate for Napa County of 0.6 percent over the
next 10 years. Although limited, this projected growth rate will
contribute to the intensification of land uses and result in the
continued demand for conservation services in Napa County.
c) It is the policy of the County of Napa to direct urban development
to the incorporated areas and to preserve surrounding lands for
agricultural and open-space uses through restrictive zoning
standards. This policy is reflected in the land use policies of the five
incorporated cities and town and helps to ensure that agriculture
and open-space remain predominant land uses within Napa RCD’s
jurisdictional boundary.
Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities, Adequacy of Public Services, and
Infrastructure Needs or Deficiencies
a) Napa RCD does not own or maintain substantial
infrastructure or equipment. Napa RCD relies on staff resources
to deliver information and technical assistance to private
landowners, organizations, and local jurisdictions involving its
conservation services.
b) Napa RCD has made a measurable investment in staff over
the last 20 years. The increase in staff corresponds with Napa
RCD’s decision to expand the scope of its conservation services
to address watershed and urban resource management issues.
21
Napa County Resource Conservation District MSR & SOI Review 2023 LAFCO of Napa County
Financial Ability to Provide Services
a) Napa RCD is primarily funded by intergovernmental revenues, including contracts and grants. The
dependency on contracts and grants to fund its conservation services makes Napa RCD financially
reliant on a revenue stream that is subject to fluctuations. Napa RCD would benefit from securing a
more stable source of revenues.
b) Napa RCD serves as an instrument in securing federal and state grants that would not be otherwise
available to fund conservation services in Napa County.
Status and Opportunities for Shared Facilities
a) Napa RCD maintains a long-standing partnership with the United States Department of Agriculture’s
Natural Resources Conservation Service. This partnership, which includes the sharing of office space,
equipment, and staff resources, is formalized through a memorandum of understanding, and helps to
coordinate and enhance local conservation activities.
b) Napa RCD works with local agencies, citizens, and organizations on a variety of watershed protection
and flood prevention projects in Napa County. These projects range from monitoring stream flows to
organizing volunteer stewardship groups and help to connect private and public interests to serve
common conservation goals.
Accountability for Community Service Needs, Including Government Structure and Operational
Efficiencies
a) Napa RCD is the only public agency authorized to provide a full range of soil and water conservation
services within its jurisdictional boundary. The conservation services provided by Napa RCD are
important in restoring and protecting the community’s natural resources.
Location and Characteristics of Any Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities within or
Contiguous to the Existing Sphere of Influence
a) No disadvantaged unincorporated communities meeting the definition under State law and local
policy have been identified anywhere in Napa County. Furthermore, there are no disadvantaged
unincorporated communities located within the immediate vicinity of the portion of Napa RCD that
extends into Solano County.
22
Napa County Resource Conservation District MSR & SOI Review 2023 LAFCO of Napa County
Other Local Policy Issues
a) Do agency operations affect the Agricultural Preserve and the voter
approved Measure P?
Napa RCD provides a positive impact on these established land use
ordinances by providing needed technical assistance for the long-
term viability of agriculture in the County. Napa RCD does not have
any land use planning function.
b) Does the agency have any existing outside service agreements?
No.
c) Are there joint power agreements (JPA) involving the direct provision of public services?
Napa RCD is a participant in a variety of JPAs as noted in the report section “Current Agreements”. As
noted, Napa RCD has a variety of cooperative agreements with relevant service providers.
d) Does the agency affect the growth goals and policies of the land use authorities in Napa County?
Special districts, such as Napa RCD, have no authority over land use and hence no direct participation
on the policy level that would connect the activities of the District with regional growth. However,
Napa RCD’s services support the preservation of agricultural and open space lands consistent with the
growth goals and policies of the County of Napa.
e) Do agency operations affect climate change?
Napa RCD’s programs focus on conserving, protecting, and restoring natural resources and sustainably
managing working lands. Napa County, its residents, economy, and environment have experienced
adverse and severe effects associated with climate change, including more severe wildfire seasons,
rising temperatures, and severe droughts. This has motivated a shift both in the demand for Napa
RCD’s programs and their design.
For instance, the agricultural
sector has been demanding more
financial and technical assistance
related to water conservation and
climate-friendly practices. Napa
RCD has responded by securing
additional state and federal grant
funding to provide this support.
For instance, Napa RCD was
awarded funding to provide
technical assistance to
prospective applicants and
awardees of CDFA's Climate Smart
Agriculture programs, as well as funding under a CA Wildlife Conversation Board block grant to
support carbon farm plan implementation across the county. To date, Napa RCD has utilized grant
funding to complete 78 carbon farm plans covering 4,900 acres in Napa County using a methodology
it pioneered for vineyards in partnership with neighboring resource conservation districts, UC
23
Napa County Resource Conservation District MSR & SOI Review 2023 LAFCO of Napa County
Cooperative Extension, and USDA. It has also conducted 179 irrigation evaluations and helped many
growers implement new irrigation management methods and technologies to improve on-farm water
use efficiency. Napa RCD is co-located and has a unique relationship with the USDA NRCS and has
been increasingly supporting the federal agency in deploying its assistance programs, primarily the
Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) and Conservation Stewardship Program (CSP), as
demand for them has grown.
Motivated by more frequent and severe wildfires and significant tree die-offs resulting from climate
stressors, Napa RCD has significantly expanded its forest health program over the last five years. Its
primary focus is on providing technical and financial assistance to private and public forestland
owners, educating community members, and supporting
collaboration and capacity-building in this area. Napa
RCD partnered with resource conservation districts and
non-profits in neighboring counties to develop the North
Bay Forest Improvement Program to support planning
and implementation of forest management projects on
private properties. Napa RCD also helped secure a
Regional Conservation Partnership Program to increase
USDA funded technical and financial assistance related to
vegetative fuels management in the region. Napa RCD
was awarded a block grant from the CA Department of
Conservation to administer Regional Forest and Fire
Capacity Program to support technical capacity building, peer networking to advance the
dissemination of best practices, and coordination. Following the 2020 wildfires, Napa RCD became
the technical assistance provider to the USDA for its Emergency Forest Restoration Program
deployment in Napa County.
Is climate change expected to affect agency operations
in the future?
In 2022, Napa RCD adopted a resolution committing to
action on the global climate emergency with the goal of
achieving net zero climate pollution by or before 2030.
Napa RCD acknowledges that climate change is one of
the greatest challenges of our time and is expected to
impact our entire society and biological support systems,
and through its resolution describes key actions it will
support and undertake in response in the coming years.
24
Napa County Resource Conservation District MSR & SOI Review 2023 LAFCO of Napa County
These actions are anticipated to include:
• Supplying technical expertise, research-based best
practices, and collaboration for a regional climate action
plan coordinated among public and private entities.
• Designing and delivering objective, science-based
programs and advisory services that encourage climate
change mitigation in areas such as forest health,
watershed sustainability, and regenerative agriculture.
• Making outreach, community engagement, and
education efforts more effective and efficient.
• Reducing climate pollutants associated with internal
operations.
f) Does the agency enhance or hinder housing goals, including affordable housing and workforce
housing?
Special districts, such as Napa RCD, have no authority over land use and hence no direct participation
on the policy level that would connect the activities of the District with housing goals.
g) Is the agency identified in regional transportation plans?
No.
h) Are there cumulative service impacts related to current and planned development?
No. Napa RCD has no land use authority.
VII. SPHERE OF INFLUENCE REVIEW
The analysis conducted as part of the municipal service review portion of this study identifies that Napa
RCD is providing an adequate and effective level of conservation services within its jurisdictional
boundary. These conservation services have been instrumental in enhancing and restoring natural
resources for the benefit of both rural and urban areas and have contributed to the preservation of local
agricultural and open space lands. Napa RCD has developed sufficient capacities and service programs to
continue to provide an effective level of conservation services within its existing SOI. Based on outreach
to resource conservation districts in neighboring counties, no additional areas beyond Napa RCD’s existing
SOI appear to require services that could be provided by the District within the timeframe of this SOI
review.
Adoption of Sphere of Influence and Subsequent Reviews
Napa RCD’s SOI was originally adopted by the Commission in 1985. The SOI was designated to include all
incorporated and unincorporated lands in Napa County as well as approximately 2,070 acres in Solano
County, the latter of which was annexed into Napa RCD in 1952. The Commission affirmed Napa RCD’s
SOI with no changes in 2007 and 2016 as part of comprehensive reviews.
25
Napa County Resource Conservation District MSR & SOI Review 2023 LAFCO of Napa County
Jurisdictional Boundary and Land Use Authorities
Napa RCD’s SOI encompasses approximately 507,500 total acres. Of this amount, approximately 1,300
contiguous acres are located outside Napa RCD’s jurisdictional boundary. This portion of the SOI
represents the City of Napa’s incorporated boundary as of 1945, which was excluded from Napa RCD at
the time of its formation. Annexation of these 1,300 acres would require Napa RCD to submit an
application to the Commission, including associated application fees along with a final map and
geographic description consistent with the requirements of the State Board of Equalization. A map
depicting Napa RCD’s current SOI and jurisdictional boundary is provided in this report as Figure 1.
Napa RCD operates under the land use authorities of seven local jurisdictions. These jurisdictions include
the Counties of Napa and Solano, Cities of American Canyon, Calistoga, Napa, St. Helena, and the Town of
Yountville. In addition, the Federal Government owns a substantial portion of unincorporated land in
northeast Napa County, including the shoreline of Lake Berryessa. The State of California also owns a
substantial portion of unincorporated wetlands in south Napa County. These lands are not subject to local
land use policies.
VIII. SPHERE OF INFLUENCE RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Commission affirm Napa RCD’s existing SOI, which includes all lands in Napa
County as well as the Cullinan Ranch area in Solano County. Pursuant to California Government Code
§56425(e), the following statements have been prepared in support of the recommendation:
Present and Planned Land Use
The present and future land uses in the area are planned for in the general plans prepared by the seven
land use authorities whose jurisdictions overlap the jurisdictional boundary of Napa RCD. The exercise of
Napa RCD’s conservation services, which benefit both urban and non-urban areas, will not affect the level
or type of development identified in the general plans of the land use authorities.
Present and Probable Need for Public Facilities and Services
Napa RCD’s provision of conservation services helps to ensure the protection and restoration of natural
resources, which are essential to the social and economic health of the area.
Present Capacity and Adequacy of Public Services
Napa RCD has developed policies, service plans, and programs to provide adequate and effective
conservation services for the area.
Social and Economic Communities of Interest
The social and economic health of the area is measurably enhanced by the conservation services provided
by Napa RCD.
26
Napa County Resource Conservation District MSR & SOI Review 2023 LAFCO of Napa County
Present and Probable Need for Public Services for Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities
No disadvantaged unincorporated communities meeting the definition under State law and local policy
have been identified anywhere in Napa County. Furthermore, there are no disadvantaged unincorporated
communities located within the immediate vicinity of the portion of Napa RCD that extends into Solano
County.
27