LAFCO
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District
Read the report at Local Agency Formation Commissions ↗
Notice of Exemption
To:lif Office of Planning and Research From: San Luis Obispo LAFCO
PO Box 3044, 1400 Tenth Street, Room 222 Rob Fitzroy, Executive Officer
Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 1042 Pacific St. Suite A
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
(805) 781-5795
'r'/ County Clerk rfitzroy@slo.lafco.ca.gov
County of San Luis Obispo
County Government Center
San Luis Obispo, CA 93408
Project Title:LAFCO File No. 1-S-24 I Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District Municipal Service Review and
Sphere of Influence Study
Project Location:Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District (CSLRCD) covers more than 463,024 acres in San
Luis Obispo County, along the coastal communities from Morro Bay to Oso Flaco including San Luis Obispo
Description of Nature, Purpose, & Beneficiaries of Project: The Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) has
prepared a Municipal Service Review (MSR) and Sphere of Influence (SOI) Study for the Coastal San Luis Resource
Conservation District pursuant to Government Code Section 56430 and Section 56425. The SOI is a 20-year growth
boundary that includes areas that may be served by the District in the future. State law requires the MSR to be
completed either prior to or concurrent with, the SOI study. The MSR evaluates the public services provided by the
District and is used as the basis for any changes to the SOI. The Commission took action to reaffirm CSLRCD's SOI to
remain coterminous to the service area boundary as depicted in Attachment A, Exhibit C of the LAFCO July 17,
2025, staff report found on the LAFCO website at 1 v . The Commission also established that
,i
CSLRCD exercises a number of general powers when operating the District as allowed under Public Resources Code
Sections 9401-9420.
Name of Public Agency Approving Project:The San Luis Obispo County LAFCO conducted a noticed public hearing
on July 17, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. in the Board of Supervisors Chambers in San Luis Obispo at the County Government
Center. Additional information is available on the LAFCO website at '1ll.J2Ll �1,i_f�c,.�qy.
Exemption Status: (check one)
0
Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(l); 15268); � Categorical Exemption: Section 15306
0
Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); 15269(a)); Statutory Exemptions: State code number
D
Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); 15269 (b)(c)); � Other: General Rule Exemption, Section 15061(b)(3)
Reasons Why Project is Exempt:It has been determined with certainty that the MSR and SOI Study is categorically
exempt under Class 6, Section 15306 and the MSR and SOI Study also qualifies for a general rule exemption under
Section 15061(b)(3). There is no possibility that this MSR and SOI Study may have a significant effect on the
environment because there are no land use changes associated with the documents; therefore, the CSLRCD MSR
and SOI Study is found to be exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15306 and Section 15061(b)(3) of the State
Guidelines. LAFCO will file this Notice of Exemption upon approval of the MSR and SOI Study.
di
/4 \/2
7 1
Rob Fitzroy, Executive Officer Date
/ /
Exhibit B | Resolution No. 2025 - 07
Page 1 of 4
Service Review Determinations per Government Code Section 56430
for the Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District
1. Growth and population projections for the affected area
In 2020, the total population within CSLRCD was estimated at 173,643. By 2050, it is
expected that the total population within the CSLRCD will be approximately 195,722. This
equates to a growth rate of approximately 0.42% per year.
2. The location and characteristics of any disadvantaged unincorporated communities
within or contiguous to the sphere of influence
CSLRCD’s SOI and service area boundary includes eleven areas that meet the criteria for
a DUC as defined in Government Code Section 56033.5. The location and characteristics
of the eleven DUCs are described in Table 3 and Figure 2 of the “Population Profile”
section of this report.
3. Present and planned capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public services,
including infrastructure needs or deficiencies, including needs or deficiencies related to
sewers, municipal and industrial water, and structural fire protection in any
disadvantaged, unincorporated communities within or contiguous to the sphere of
influence.
CSLRCD provides comprehensive, integrated services addressing wildlife, water, climate,
and agriculture. The CSLRCD manages and implements many projects, which are mostly
funded by state and federal grants. In addition, CSLRCD also offers professional services,
which are charged by a fee. The District employs an Executive Director as well as
additional personnel such as a Director of Finance, a Programs Manager, Project
Managers, Restoration Specialists, and Technicians as needed to support various grants
and projects dependent on available funding. CSLRCD owns in fee title two properties,
which were acquired for the purpose of wetland restoration and conservation, as well as
two vehicles used to facilitate their work for the Oceano Dunes project. At present, the
District has both the ability and the capacity to serve its service area. As the RCD does not
Exhibit B | Resolution No. 2025 - 07
Page 2 of 4
provide water, sewer, or fire protection services, the District is not responsible for
ensuring that these services are adequately provided to the communities within the
District’s boundaries.
4. Financial ability of agencies to provide services
CSLRCD’s operating ratio, liquidity ratio, and net position were used to analyze the
District’s financial health. CSLRCD’s operating ratio, which measures the ratio of annual
operating revenues to annual operating expenses, indicated a healthy financial position
in only three of the last five years audited. The District’s liquidity ratio, which measures
current assets against current obligations, indicated a healthy financial position across all
five audited years. The District’s net position, which is the difference between the
agency's assets and liabilities, decreased over the last five-year audited period and
therefore indicated financial deterioration. Overall, the District has been successful in
obtaining grant funding for its programs and appears to have adequate financial
resources to deliver its services.
5. Status of and opportunities for shared facilities
CSLRCD has a long history of developing partnerships with local, state, and federal
agencies to assist the District in accomplishing locally developed projects and priorities.
6. Accountability for community service needs, including governmental structure and
operational efficiencies
CSLRCD is governed by a seven-member Board of Directors that is appointed to four-year
terms by the County Board of Supervisors. Regularly scheduled monthly Board meetings
are held, and all meetings are open to the public and are publicly posted a minimum of
72 hours prior to the meeting in accordance with the Brown Act. CSLRCD maintains an up-
to-date website that contains District information, documents, and updates.
7. Any other matter related to effective or efficient service delivery
There are no other matters related to the efficiency of services.
Exhibit B | Resolution No. 2025 - 07
Page 3 of 4
Sphere of Influence Determinations per Government Code Section
56425 for the Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District
1. Present and planned land uses in the area, including agricultural and open-space lands.
Land uses within CSLRCD’s existing coterminous SOI and service area boundary are
planned for in the general plans prepared by the six land use authorities whose
jurisdictions overlap with the service area boundary of CSLRCD. These jurisdictions
include the County and the Cities of Arroyo Grande, Grover Beach, Morro Bay, Pismo
Beach, and San Luis Obispo. Reaffirmation of the District’s SOI is recommended.
2. Present and probable need for public facilities and services in the area.
The CSLRCD provides a unique and vital service to the coastal communities of the County.
The District was established to conserve soil and water, control runoff, prevent and
control soil erosion, manage watersheds, protect water quality, and develop water
storage and distribution, and serves as an essential liaison between a variety of private
and public stakeholders in accomplishing local conservation projects. There is a present
and probable future need for these services within the District’s coterminous SOI and
service area boundary, and reaffirmation of the District’s SOI is recommended.
3. Present capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public services that the agency
provides or is authorized to provide.
At present, the CSLRCD has adequate grant funding and staffing to provide service within
the District’s coterminous SOI and service area boundary. In addition, the District has
successfully developed partnerships with local, state, and federal agencies to assist in
accomplishing locally developed projects and priorities. Reaffirmation of the District’s SOI
is recommended.
4. Existence of any social or economic communities of interest in the area if the
commission determines that they are relevant to the agency.
There are no social or economic communities of interest within the District’s coterminous
SOI and service area boundary. Reaffirmation of the District’s SOI is recommended.
Exhibit B | Resolution No. 2025 - 07
Page 4 of 4
5. For an update of the sphere of influence of a city or special district that provides public
facilities or services related to sewers, municipal and industrial water, or structural fire
protection, the present and probable need for those public facilities and services of any
disadvantaged unincorporated communities within the existing sphere.
Eleven DUCs were identified within the CSLRCD’s coterminous SOI and service area
boundary as seen in Figure 2. Although these DUCs were identified, CSLRCD does not
provide public facilities or services related to wastewater, municipal or industrial water,
or structural fire protection, and therefore, no infrastructure deficiencies to a DUC would
result from changes to the CSLRCD’s SOI or service area boundary. Reaffirmation of the
District’s SOI is recommended.
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District
Municipal Service Review
and Sphere of Influence Study
Prepared by
the San Luis Obispo Local Agency Formation Commission
Adopted July 17, 2025
Resolution No. 2025-07
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District 2
MSR & Sphere Study
TABLE OF CONTENTS
About LAFCO _________________________________________________________ 4
Authority and Objectives ___________________________________________________________ 4
Regulatory Responsibilities _________________________________________________________ 4
Planning Responsibilities ___________________________________________________________ 5
LAFCO Decision-Making ____________________________________________________________ 6
SLO LAFCO ______________________________________________________________________ 7
Acknowledgments ________________________________________________________________ 8
District MSR & Sphere Study _____________________________________________ 9
Overview _____________________________________________________________________ 9
At A Glance __________________________________________________________________ 10
Background __________________________________________________________________ 10
Sphere of Influence & Service Area Boundary _______________________________________ 11
Population Profile _____________________________________________________________ 13
Present and Planned Land Use ___________________________________________________ 15
Accountability ________________________________________________________________ 16
Services & Capacity ____________________________________________________________ 16
Finance ______________________________________________________________________ 20
Determinations ______________________________________________________ 26
Service Review Determinations _____________________________________________________ 26
Sphere of Influence Determinations _________________________________________________ 28
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District 3
MSR & Sphere Study
List of Figures
Figure 1: CSLRCD Boundary Map ............................................................................................................ 12
Figure 2: Countywide Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities Map ........................................... 15
Figure 3: Revenues vs. Expenditures ...................................................................................................... 22
Figure 4: Operating Ratio (FY 2018-2019 to 2022-2023) ....................................................................... 22
Figure 5: Liquidity Ratio (FY 2018-2019 to 2022-2023) .......................................................................... 24
List of Tables
Table 1: District Profile ........................................................................................................................... 10
Table 2: Population Projections (Medium Scenario) .............................................................................. 13
Table 3: Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities with CSLRCD .................................................... 14
Table 4: CSLRCD Board of Directors........................................................................................................ 16
Table 5: CSLRCD Projects and Programs ................................................................................................. 18
Table 6: Audited Assets .......................................................................................................................... 23
Table 7: Audited Liabilities ...................................................................................................................... 24
Table 8: Audited Net Position ................................................................................................................. 25
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District 4
MSR & Sphere Study
ABOUT LAFCO
Authority and Objectives
Local Agency Formation Commissions (LAFCOs) were established in 1963 and are considered regional
subdivisions of the State of California responsible for providing regional growth management services
in all 58 counties. LAFCOs’ authority is codified under the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government
Reorganization Act of 2000 (CKH), with principal oversight provided by the Assembly Committee on
Local Government. LAFCOs are comprised of locally elected and appointed officials with regulatory and
planning powers delegated by the Legislature to coordinate and oversee the establishment, expansion,
and organization of cities and special districts and their municipal service areas.
Regulatory Responsibilities
LAFCOs’ principal regulatory responsibility involves approving or disapproving all jurisdictional changes
involving the establishment, expansion, and reorganization of cities, towns, and most special districts
in California. The Government Code defines “special district” to mean any agency of the State formed
pursuant to general law or special act for the local performance of governmental or proprietary
functions within limited boundaries. All special districts in California are subject to LAFCO oversight
with the following exceptions: school districts, community college districts, assessment districts,
improvement districts, community facilities districts, and air pollution control districts. LAFCOs are also
tasked with overseeing the approval process for cities, towns, and special districts to provide new or
extended services beyond their jurisdictional boundaries through contracts, agreements, or
annexation. LAFCOs also oversee special district actions to either activate new service functions and
service classes or divest existing services. LAFCOs generally exercise their regulatory authority in
response to applications submitted by affected agencies, landowners, or registered voters. Recent
amendments to CKH also authorize and encourage LAFCOs to initiate jurisdictional changes to form,
consolidate, and dissolve special districts consistent with community needs.
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District 5
MSR & Sphere Study
Planning Responsibilities
LAFCOs inform their regulatory actions, in part, through two central planning responsibilities: (a)
making sphere of influence determinations and (b) preparing municipal service reviews. With these
reports and other relevant information in the record, LAFCO makes decisions on a variety of matters,
including but not limited to annexations to cities and special districts, city incorporations, activation of
powers for special districts, dissolutions of special districts, etc.
Sphere of Influence
A Sphere of Influence (SOI) is defined by Government Code Section 56425 as a plan for the probable
physical boundary and service area of a local agency or municipality. A SOI is generally considered a 20-
year, long-range planning tool. LAFCOs establish, amend, and update spheres for all applicable
jurisdictions in California every five years, or as necessary. When updating a SOI, LAFCOs are required
to consider and prepare a written statement of their determinations concerning each of the following
five factors:
1) The present and planned land uses in the area, including agricultural and open-space lands.
2) The present and probable need for public facilities and services in the area.
3) The present capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public services that the agency provides
or is authorized to provide.
4) The existence of any social or economic communities of interest in the area if the commission
determines that they are relevant to the agency.
5) For an update of a sphere of influence of a city or special district that provides public facilities
or services related to sewers, municipal and industrial water, or structural fire protection, that
occurs pursuant to subdivision (g) on or after July 1, 2012, the present and probable need for
those public facilities and services of any disadvantaged unincorporated communities within
the existing sphere of influence.
The intent in preparing the written statements is to orient LAFCOs in addressing the core principles
underlying the sensible development of local agencies consistent with the anticipated needs of the
affected communities.
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District 6
MSR & Sphere Study
Municipal Service Reviews
Municipal Service Reviews (MSR) in contrast, are intended to inform, among other activities, SOI
determinations. LAFCOs also prepare MSRs regardless of making any specific sphere determinations in
order to obtain and furnish information to contribute to the overall orderly development of local
communities. When updating an MSR, LAFCOs are required to consider and prepare written
statements of their determinations concerning each of the following seven factors:
1) Growth and population projections for the affected area.
2) The location and characteristics of any disadvantaged unincorporated communities within or
contiguous to the sphere of influence.
3) Present and planned capacity of public facilities, adequacy of public services, and infrastructure
needs or deficiencies including needs or deficiencies related to sewers, municipal and industrial
water, and structural fire protection in any disadvantaged, unincorporated communities within
or contiguous to the sphere of influence.
4) Financial ability of agencies to provide services.
5) Status of, and opportunities for, shared facilities.
6) Accountability for community service needs, including governmental structure and operational
efficiencies.
7) Any other matter related to effective or efficient service delivery, as required by commission
policy.
LAFCO Decision-Making
LAFCO decisions are legislative in nature and, therefore, are not subject to an outside appeal process;
only courts can overturn LAFCO decisions. LAFCOs also have broad powers with respect to conditioning
regulatory and planning approvals, so long as not establishing any terms that directly affect land use
density or intensity, property development, or subdivision requirements.
LAFCOs are generally governed by a board comprised of county supervisors, city council members,
independent special district members, a representative of the general public, and an alternate member
for each category. SLO LAFCO is governed by a seven-member board comprised of two county
supervisors, two city council members, two independent special district members, one representative
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District 7
MSR & Sphere Study
of the general public, and an alternate member for each category. All members serve four-year terms
and must exercise their independent judgment on behalf of the interests of residents, landowners, and
the public as a whole. LAFCO members are subject to standard disclosure requirements and must file
annual statements of economic interests. LAFCOs are independent of local government with their own
staff. All LAFCOs, nevertheless, must appoint their own Executive Officers to manage agency activities
and provide written recommendations on all regulatory and planning actions before the Commission.
In addition, all LAFCOs must also appoint their own legal counsel.
SLO LAFCO
Regular Commissioners
Chair Steve Gregory City Member
Vice Chair Heather Moreno County Member
Dawn Ortiz-Legg County Member
Ed Waage City Member
Ed Eby Special District Member
Navid Fardanesh Special District Member
David Watson Public Member
Alternate Commissioners
Bruce Gibson County Member
Carla Wixom City Member
Vacant Special District Member
Michael Draze Public Member
Staff
Rob Fitzroy Executive Officer
Imelda Marquez-Vawter Senior Analyst
Morgan Bing Analyst
Melissa Morris Commission Clerk
Holly Whatley Legal Counsel
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District 8
MSR & Sphere Study
Contact Information
San Luis Obispo LAFCO’s office is located at 1042 Pacific St, Suite A, in the City of San Luis Obispo. The
LAFCO office is open by appointment to discuss proposals or other matters and can be scheduled by
calling 805-781-5795. Additional information is also available online by visiting slo.lafco.ca.gov.
Acknowledgments
San Luis Obispo LAFCO gratefully acknowledges the time and effort of staff with the Coastal San Luis
Resource Conservation District in assisting with the preparation of this report, and includes, but is not
limited to, the following:
Hallie Richard, Interim General Manager
Shelly Rachels, Director of Finance
Dominic Roques, CSLRCD Board President
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District 9
MSR & Sphere Study
DISTRICT MSR & SPHERE STUDY
Overview
This report represents San Luis Obispo LAFCO’s scheduled municipal service review for the Coastal San
Luis Resource Conservation District (CSLRCD), located in the southwestern portion of the County of San
Luis Obispo (County). The report has been prepared by staff consistent with the requirements of the
government code. The purpose of this report is to produce an independent assessment of municipal
services in this area over the next five years or as necessary, relative to the Commission’s regional
growth management duties and responsibilities as established by the State Legislature. This includes
evaluating the current and future relationship between the availability, demand, and adequacy of
services within the service areas of the CSLRCD, subject to the Commission’s oversight. The information
generated as part of the report will be used by the Commission in (a) guiding subsequent sphere of
influence updates, (b) informing future boundary changes, and – if merited – (c) initiating government
reorganizations, such as special district formations, consolidations, and/or dissolutions.
The period for collecting data to inform the Commission’s analysis and related projections on
population growth and service demands has been set to cover any major updates and changes since
the last time the MSR was updated in 2014. The financial analysis has been set to cover the last five-
year audited fiscal year period. The timeframe for the report has been generally oriented to cover the
next five to seven-year period, with the former (ten years) serving as the analysis anchor as
contemplated under State law.
The document outline serves to inform all the state-mandated requirements outlined in Government
Code Sections 56430 and 56425. Written determinations have been included as the concluding chapter
of this document.
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District 10
MSR & Sphere Study
At A Glance
Table 1: District Profile
Agency Name Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District
Formation 1953
Legal Authority Public Resources Code Division 9
Office Location 1203 Main Street, Suite B, Morro Bay, CA 93442
Website https://www.coastalrcd.org/
Executive Director Hallie Richard, Executive Director
Employees 11
Public Meetings The Board of Directors holds its regular meetings on the fourth Friday
of each month at 12:00 PM.
Board of Directors Seven members appointed to four-year terms by the County of San Luis
Obispo Board of Supervisors.
District Service Area > 463,024 acres
Population Estimate 173,643
Background
In 1935, the federal government passed the Soil Conservation Act in response to the devastation of the
Dust Bowl. The Act was passed to form the Soil Conservation Service (later renamed the Natural
Resources Conservation Services) to provide conservation assistance to ranchers, farmers, and other
private landowners. Conservationists quickly realized that a centrally governed federal agency in
Washington could not be as responsive to local needs, so local counterparts of the Soil Conservation
Service were established under state law to be controlled by local boards of directors. And so were
born the Soil Conservation Districts, now known as Resource Conservation Districts (RCDs).
Public Resources Code Division 9 established RCDs to conserve soil and water, control runoff, prevent
and control soil erosion, manage watersheds, protect water quality, and develop water storage and
distribution. RCDs are special districts of the State of California, established to be locally governed
agencies with their own locally appointed or elected, independent boards of directors. RCDs across
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District 11
MSR & Sphere Study
California serve as local hubs for conservation, connecting people with the technical, financial, and
educational assistance they need to conserve and manage natural resources. RCDs are a vital link
between federal, state, and local programs, helping these agencies meet their conservation goals.
The Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District (CSLRCD) began as the Arroyo Grande Resource
Conservation District and was established in 1953. The District provides integrated services addressing
wildlife, water, climate, and agriculture. CSLRCD uses diverse means to protect, implement, conserve,
and restore natural resources and serves as a focal point for local conservation efforts through
collaboration with private and public landowners, land managers, public agencies, interest groups, and
others.
Sphere of Influence & Service Area Boundary
CSLRCD’s existing Sphere of Influence (SOI) is coterminous with its service area boundary and is
depicted in the boundary map in Figure 1 below. The District covers more than 463,024 acres along the
coastal communities from Morro Bay south to Oso Flaco, including San Luis Obispo. The District’s
boundaries overlap five cities, including Morro Bay, San Luis Obispo, Pismo Beach, Arroyo Grande, and
Grover Beach; five Community Services Districts, six County Service Areas, two cemetery districts, the
Port San Luis Harbor District, South County Sanitation District, and Nipomo Lighting District. CSLRCD is
bordered to the north and east by the Upper Salinas Las Tablas Resource Conservation District, by the
Cachuma Resource Conservation District and County of Santa Barbara to the south, and by the Pacific
Ocean to the West. CSLRCD wishes to retain their current coterminous SOI and therefore changes to
the District’s SOI are not being studied as part of this MSR and Sphere Study.
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District 12
MSR & Sphere Study
Figure 1: CSLRCD Boundary Map
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District 13
MSR & Sphere Study
Population Profile
Table 2 shows population projections for the cities and communities located within the CSLRCD service
area boundary. Based upon this data, in 2020, the total population within CSLRCD was estimated at
173,643. By 2050, it is expected that the total population within the CSLRCD will be approximately
195,722. This equates to a growth rate of approximately 0.42% per year.
Table 2: Population Projections (Medium Scenario)1
Local Agencies 2020 2030 2040 2050 Percent Annual Percent
within CSLRCD Change in Change in
Population Population
(2020 to 2050) (2020 to 2050)
Arroyo Grande 18,436 19,505 20,158 20,449 10.92% 0.36%
Grover Beach 12,706 14,536 14,934 15,091 18.77% 0.63%
Morro Bay 10,757 11,715 12,092 12,261 13.98% 0.47%
Pismo Beach 8,074 9,486 9,901 10,079 24.83% 0.83%
San Luis Obispo 47,106 49,759 51,105 51,672 9.69% 0.32%
Avila Beach 1,508 1,578 1,643 1,671 10.81% 0.36%
Los Osos 14,764 17,541 18,842 19,154 29.73% 0.99%
Nipomo 17,032 17,651 18,292 18,598 9.19% 0.31%
Oceano 6,868 7,572 7,924 8,054 17.27% 0.58%
Other 36,392 37,936 38,284 38,693 6.32% 0.21%
Unincorporated
Total 173,643 187,279 193,175 195,722 12.72% 0.42%
Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities
LAFCO is required to evaluate Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities (DUCs) as part of this MSR,
including the location and characteristics of any such community. Per California Senate Bill 244, a DUC
1 2020 US Census Data and San Luis Obispo Council of Governments 2050 Regional Growth Forecast (Figure 116 & Figure
118)
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District 14
MSR & Sphere Study
is defined as any area with 12 or more registered voters where the median household income (MHI) is
less than 80 percent of the statewide MHI. The legislative intent is to prohibit selective annexations by
cities of tax-generating land uses while leaving out underserved, inhabited areas with infrastructure
deficiencies and a lack of access to reliable potable water, wastewater, and fire protection services.
To identify the MHI for locations within the unincorporated areas of the County, and to identify those
that meet the DUC MHI threshold, LAFCO used U.S. Census American Community Survey (ACS) five-
year reports for Census Block Groups (CBG) and Census Designated Places (CDP) data. Once a CBG or a
CDP meets the DUC MHI threshold, LAFCO then verifies that those areas are inhabited as specified in
Government Code Section 56033.5 using registered voter data from the County Clerk-Recorder.
Using this methodology, eleven DUCs were identified within the CSLRCD service area boundary as seen
in Figure 2. Although these DUCs were identified, CSLRCD does not provide public facilities or services
related to wastewater, municipal or industrial water, or structural fire protection, and therefore, no
infrastructure deficiencies to a DUC would result from changes to the CSLRCD’s SOI or service area
boundary. Table 3 below contains additional information about each DUC within the District’s
boundary.
Table 3: Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities with CSLRCD
DUC MHI 2 Registered Voters 3
Los Osos DUC Area No. 1 $64,479 1,006
Los Osos DUC Area No. 2 $63,281 1,157
Los Osos DUC Area No. 3 $62,001 1,164
San Luis Obispo DUC Area No. 1 $9,233 64
San Luis Obispo DUC Area No. 2 $59,318 23
Oceano DUC Area No. 1 $48,264 935
Oceano DUC Area No. 2 $45,494 1,280
Oceano DUC Area No. 3 $62,000 69
Nipomo DUC Area No. 1 $50,298 783
2 American Community Survey Data from 2016-2020 in 2021 inflation/adjusted dollars
3 County of San Luis Obispo Clerk Recorder GIS Data from October 2023
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District 15
MSR & Sphere Study
Nipomo DUC Area No. 2 $59,063 644
Nipomo DUC Area No. 3 $64,537 1,277
Figure 2: Countywide Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities Map
Social or Economic Communities of Interest in the Area
There are no District relevant social or economic communities of interest in the area served.
Present and Planned Land Use
The present and planned land uses in the area are planned for in the general plans prepared by the six
land use authorities whose jurisdictions overlap CSLRCD’s service area boundary. These jurisdictions
include the County and the Cities of Arroyo Grande, Grover Beach, Morro Bay, Pismo Beach, and San
Luis Obispo.
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District 16
MSR & Sphere Study
Accountability
CSLRCD’s governance authority is established under the Resource Conservation District Law Act of
Division 9 of the California Public Resources Code and codified under Public Resources Code Sections
9001 – 9972. Governance of CSLRCD is independently provided by a seven-member Board of Directors
appointed to four-year terms by the County Board of Supervisors. The Board of Directors meets on the
fourth Friday of each month at 12:00 PM at the UC Cooperative Extension Auditorium at 2156 Sierra
Way in San Luis Obispo, CA. The public may participate in meetings in person or via Zoom. Every agenda
for a regular meeting provides an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the board.
Staff reports, meeting minutes, and resolutions are available to the public upon request. CSLRCD
maintains an up-to-date website that contains district contact information, the current agenda,
financial transaction reports, compensation reports, and an enterprise system catalog in compliance
with Senate Bill 272.
Table 4: CSLRCD Board of Directors
Board Member Title Term Expiration
Neil Havlik President November 2026
Jean-Pierre Wolff Vice President November 2026
Dan Chesini Director November 2028
Ron Munds Director November 2028
Linda Chipping Director November 2028
Dominic Roques Director November 2028
Lexie Bell Director November 2026
Chris Bersbach Associate Director
Jeana Cadby Associate Director
Services & Capacity
Active Services
Public Resources Code Division 9 established RCDs to conserve soil and water, control runoff, prevent
and control soil erosion, manage watersheds, protect water quality, and develop water storage and
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District 17
MSR & Sphere Study
distribution. The Public Resources Code identifies a range of services that an RCD may provide, and a
complete listing of the powers afforded to RCDs is located in Public Resources Code Sections 9401 -
9420. Authorized services granted to RCDs under current law include, but are not limited to:
• Conducting surveys and research, disseminating information, and partnering
• Accepting and implementing grants and gifts for conservation work
• Acquiring lands, easements, and property
• Contracting, accepting contributions, and using contributions
• Making improvements and conducting operations of public/private lands
• Performing education, outreach, and demonstration projects
• Developing annual and long-range plans
• Accepting and managing projects within districts
• Maximizing funding opportunities by working with Federal/State/Private Sources,
cooperating with other districts, an association of districts, or other regional area groups
• Provide coordinated representation of districts before Federal, State, and Local Government
Agencies
Government Code Section 56425(i) provides that “when adopting, amending, or updating a sphere of
influence for a special district, the commission shall establish the nature, location, and extent of any
functions or classes of services provided by existing districts.” Government Code Section 56050.5
defines a latent service or power as “those services, facilities, functions, or powers authorized by the
principal act under which the district is formed, but that are not being exercised, as determined by the
commission pursuant to subdivision (i) of Government Code Section 56425.” Therefore, once the
Commission has established what services are being provided pursuant to § 56425 (i), all other services,
functions and powers become “latent services or powers” by operation of law. The CSLRCD exercises
all powers listed in Division 9 of the Public Resources Code Sections 9401-9420; as such, there are no
powers that would become latent by operation of law. In other words, all powers in sections 9401-
9420 are active.
The MSR and SOI Study provides discussions on present and long-term service demands and resource
capabilities of the local agency. LAFCO reviews and evaluates 1) the resources and services that are
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District 18
MSR & Sphere Study
currently available, and 2) the ability of the CSLRCD to expand such resources and services in line with
increasing demands. An adequate ability to provide service should be documented to support areas in
the sphere envisioned for eventual annexation and service by a jurisdiction. If warranted, different
governance options may be reviewed for the District, including potential jurisdictional changes such as
consolidation, reorganization, and dissolution. As previously mentioned, CSLRCD does not wish to make
any SOI adjustments at this time; therefore, no areas are being studied for possible inclusion into the
District.
Service Delivery & Performance
CSLRCD provides comprehensive, integrated services addressing wildlife, water, climate, and
agriculture. The District uses diverse means to protect, conserve, and restore natural resources while
serving as a focal point for local conservation efforts and collaborating with private and public land
owners, land managers, public agencies, interest groups, and others. The CSLRCD manages and
implements many projects, which are mostly funded by grants. In addition, CSLRCD also offers
professional services, which are charged by a fee. Table 5 below highlights some of the District’s recent
projects, project partnerships, and funding sources. Additional information on the District’s projects,
programs, and services is available on their website.
Table 5: CSLRCD Projects and Programs
Project Summary Partners Funders
Oceano Dunes Improve air quality on the Nipomo • California State Parks • CA Department of
Restoration Project Mesa by reduction of fine-particle • California Conservation Parks & Recreation
dust that comes from the dunes Corps • Oceano Dune
through ecological restoration • American Conservation District
Experience
Stenner Creek Enhances water quality, aquatic • Cal Poly
Watershed and riparian habitat, agricultural • Pacific Watersheds • CA Department of
Enhancement viability, and public access through Associates Conservation
Project improved rural ranch roads and • Wildlife
improving 30+ stream crossings Conservation Board
along 10 miles of Stenner creek.
Arroyo Grande Creek Increase the sustainability and • Creek Lands • Bureau of
Cooperative equity of water resources in the Conservation Reclamation
Watershed watershed through increased water • City of Arroyo Grande • SLO County Flood
Management quality monitoring, expanding the • SLO County Flood Control Zone 1/1A
Program existing MOU group, developing Control Zone 1/1A
outreach materials, and updating • Natural Resources
the existing Watershed Conservation Service
Management Plan.
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District 19
MSR & Sphere Study
Morro Bay Improve water quality in the Morro • Cal Poly • State Water
Watershed On-farm Bay watershed by reducing • Camp San Luis Obispo Resources
Water Quality sedimentation and nutrient loads. • Morro Bay National Control Board
Enhancement Estuary Program
Project • Private Landowners
Central Coast Development of a publicly • CA Department
• SLO County Planning
Regional Fine-scale accessible fine-scale vegetation of Fish & Wildlife
& Building
Vegetation Mapping map of San Luis Obispo, Monterey, • State Coastal
• Tuckman Geospatial
Program and San Benito Counties for the Conservancy
• CA Native Plant
purpose of data-driven natural
Society
resource management and
• CSUMB
conservation.
• Cal Poly
Central Coast Soil Collaboration between four • Upper Salinas Las • Carbon Cycle
Hub Central Coast RCDs to provide Tablas RCD Institute
technical and financial support to • Cachuma RCD • California
Central Coast agriculture • Ventura County RCD Association of
community. RCDs
Permit Preparation Provides technical assistance to • Project Proponents • Project Proponents
and Compliance partners, project proponents, and • Private Landowners • Private
landowners to develop CEQA Landowners
documents and regulatory
permits.
Staffing & Personnel
The CSLRCD employs an Executive Director who runs the day-to-day operations of the RCD. The
Executive Director reports to the Board of Directors at the monthly board meetings. The District also
employs additional personnel such as a Director of Finance, a Programs Manager, Project Managers,
Restoration Specialists, and Technicians as needed to support various grants and projects dependent
on available funding.
Capital Facilities and Equipment
CSLRCD owns in fee title two properties, which were acquired for the purpose of wetland restoration
and conservation. Chorro Flats, a suite of agricultural parcels acquired in 1995, is located in the historic
Chorro Creek floodplain. When the property was acquired, Chorro Creek had a levee along the far side
of the property. The levee hydrologically disconnected the creek from the floodplain, resulting in
increased sediment deposits into Morro Bay. Restoration activities included breaching the levee and
creating secondary channels that allowed the flows to reconnect to the floodplain. In its first eight
years, the reconnected floodplain captured more than 20,000 cubic yards of sediment. The Los Osos
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District 20
MSR & Sphere Study
Wetland Property, acquired by CSLRCD in 2015 with the objective of restoration, is similarly located on
the historic floodplain of Warden and Los Osos creeks. CSLRCD wrote a Restoration Plan in 2018 and
implemented restoration activities in 2021. In addition to the two properties, CSLRCD owns two
vehicles and leases one vehicle, which they use to facilitate their work on the Oceano Dunes Project.
Shared Services and Facilities
Table 5 above exemplifies the numerous local, state, and federal partnerships the CSLRCD has
developed and maintained throughout its history. Due to the diversity of the District’s projects and the
large service area within which they work, the District routinely works alongside multiple agencies to
accomplish various goals and provide expertise where needed. The District also relies upon their
partners to fill gaps in the capacity in which they lack and avoid redundancy in their efforts.
Opportunities for further coordination may include:
• Continued coordination between CSLRCD and Upper Salinas Las Tablas Resource Conservation
District and Cachuma Resource Conservation District. At various times in their histories, the
Board of Directors of each District has discussed the advantages and disadvantages of
consolidation. At this time, the Districts do not wish to consolidate; however, opportunities for
coordination, such as shared contract staff, may allow for more efficient provision of services.
• Continued coordination between CSLRCD and the County of San Luis Obispo. Through a
partnership with the County, CSLRCD offers an Alternative Review Program, which is an
alternative, low-cost grading review process for eligible projects within the District. This
program is underutilized, and further coordination between the County and District should
occur to ensure the service is utilized effectively and efficiently.
• Continued coordination between CSLRCD and state entities/agencies such as the State Water
Resource Control Board and the California Department of Parks and Recreation
Finance
LAFCO is required to make a determination regarding the financial ability of the CSLRCD to provide
public services. This section provides a general overview of financial health and provides a context for
the financial determinations. LAFCO uses three financial indicators to help evaluate the District’s
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District 21
MSR & Sphere Study
general health; those are an assessment of Revenues & Expenditures (Operating Ratio), Assets and
Liabilities (Liquidity Ratio), and Net Position. The audited financial statement reports from the District
for the fiscal years (FY) 2018-2019 through FY 2022-2023 are the primary source of information for this
section.
Budget
The District Board of Directors adopts an annual budget on a basis consistent with generally accepted
accounting principles. The budget provides a framework for the District to address the following issues:
reserves, revenues, expenditures, transfer authority, fiscal management, investments, capital
improvements, and rates and fees. The District’s annual budgets show revenues at least equal to
expenditures without relying on reserves.
Audited Financial Statements
CSLRCD hires an outside accounting firm to perform an annual audit in accordance with established
governmental accounting standards. This includes auditing CSLRCD’s financial statements with respect
to verifying overall assets, liabilities, and net position. These audited statements provide quantitative
measures in assessing CSLRCD’s short and long-term fiscal health with a specific focus on delivering
its active service functions. LAFCO has used the five most recent audited financial statements to
conduct its evaluation of the District’s Financial Health, separated into three categories (Revenues and
Expenditures, Assets and Liabilities, and Net Position).
Revenues and Expenditures
The CSLRCD’s principal source of revenue is from state and federal grants for conservation projects.
The District also receives funding through local government and non-government grants, fees charged
for services, and interest income. The District does not receive any property tax funding. As shown in
Figure 3 below, the District experienced an increase in revenues from FY 2018-2019 to FY 2019-2020,
and from FY 2021-2022 to FY 2022-2023, with a decrease in revenue in FY 2020-2021 due to a decrease
in grant funding. The District’s total expenditures have experienced an overall increase in the last five
fiscal years. The District’s principal expenses are for professional services of contractors, materials for
conservation projects, and for salaries of District staff.
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District 22
MSR & Sphere Study
Figure 3: Revenues vs. Expenditures
$1,600,000.00
$1,354,654.00
$1,344,667.00
$1,364,349.00
$1,400,000.00
$1,309,556.00
$1,200,000.00
$1,024,613.00
$1,010,690.00
$910,133.00
$1,000,000.00 $848,374.00
$887,788.00
$836,409.00
$800,000.00
$600,000.00
$400,000.00
$200,000.00
$0.00
FY 18-19 FY 19-20 FY 20-21 FY 21-22 FY 22-23
Total Revenue Total Expenditures
Figure 4 presents CSLRCD’s operating ratios over the last five audited years, which measure the ratio
of annual operating revenues to annual operating expenses. Operating ratio is used as an indicator of
the District’s financial health. A ratio of 1.0 means the agency is breaking even, a ratio of less than 1.0
indicates insufficient operating revenue to cover operating expenses, and a ratio greater than 1.0
means the agency can pay all its operating expenses and has revenue left over to spend on other items.
Figure 4: Operating Ratio (FY 2018-2019 to 2022-2023)
FY 22 - 23 1.03
FY 21 - 22 0.99
FY 20 - 21 1.01
FY 19 - 20 1.01
FY 18 - 19 0.98
0.94 0.95 0.96 0.97 0.98 0.99 1 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District 23
MSR & Sphere Study
Agency Assets and Liabilities
An agency’s assets provide current, future, or potential economic benefits for the entity. An agency
asset is, therefore, something that is owned by the agency or something that is owed to the agency. In
this section, agency assets will be reviewed in two separate categories as defined below:
1) Current Assets: cash and other assets that are expected to be converted to cash within a year
2) Capital Assets: long-term investments that are not expected to become cash within an
accounting year
CSLRCD’s audited assets at the end of FY 2022-2023 totaled $2,070,835 and are 6% higher than the
five-year average amount of $1,949,912. Assets classified as current, with the expectation they could
be liquidated within a year, represented 31% of total assets or $644,217, and are primarily tied to cash
and cash equivalents. Assets classified as capital assets make up the remainder of the total, $1.4 million,
and are primarily attributed to land and equipment. Overall, all assets for CSLRCD have increased by
7.5% over the corresponding 5-year audited period.
Table 6: Audited Assets
Percent
Change
5-yr
Category FY 18-19 FY 19-20 FY 20-21 FY 21-22 FY 22-23 (FY 18-19
Average
to FY 22-
23)
Current
$485,429 $435,677 $439,944 $531,075 $644,217 33% $507,268
Assets
Capital
$1,441,444 $1,459,637 $1,449,909 $1,435,611 $1,426,618 -1% $1,442,644
Assets
Total Assets $1,926,873 $1,895,314 $1,889,853 $1,966,686 $2,070,835 7.5% $1,949,912
An agency’s liability is something the agency owes, usually a sum of money. Liabilities are settled over
time through the transfer of economic benefits, including money, goods, or services. In this section,
agency liabilities will be reviewed in two separate categories as defined below:
1) Current Liabilities: are an agency's short-term financial obligations due to be paid within a year.
2) Non-Current Liabilities: are an agency’s long-term financial obligations that are due more than
a year away.
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District 24
MSR & Sphere Study
CSLRCD’s audited liabilities at the end of FY 2022-2023 totaled $334,560 and were 1.2% higher than
the five-year average amount of $150,501. The increases are due to increased accounts payable and
accrued payroll liabilities. Liabilities classified as current, which represent obligations owed in the near
term, account for 83%, or $279,138, of the total liabilities. Non-current liabilities represent the
remaining total, or $55,422, and are largely related to the office lease and compensated absences.
Overall liabilities have increased by 4.6% over the corresponding 5-year audited period.
Table 7: Audited Liabilities
5-yr % 5-yr
Category FY 18-19 FY 19-20 FY 20-21 FY 21-22 FY 22-23
Change Average
Current
$37,475 $54,846 $85,053 $99,544 $279,138 6.4% $111,211
Liabilities
Non-Current
$22,572 $13,272 $17,823 $87,362 $55,422 1.5% $39,290
Liabilities
Total
$60,047 $68,118 $102,876 $186,906 $334,560 4.6% $150,501
Liabilities
Figure 5 presents the District’s liquidity ratios over the last five-year audited period, which measures
current assets against current/near-term obligations. The liquidity ratio is another indicator of the
District’s financial health. A ratio of less than 1.0 indicates insufficient short-term resources to cover
short-term liabilities, and anything over 1.0 indicates good financial health (the higher the number, the
greater the degree of liquidity).
Figure 5: Liquidity Ratio (FY 2018-2019 to 2022-2023)
FY 22-23 2.31
FY 21-22 5.34
FY 20-21 5.17
FY 19-20 7.94
FY 18-19 12.95
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District 25
MSR & Sphere Study
Agency Net Position
The government-wide financial statements utilize a net position presentation. Net position is the
difference between assets and liabilities and is one way to measure the District’s financial health or
financial position. Overtime increases or decreases in the District’s net assets are one indicator of
whether its financial health is improving or deteriorating. CSLRCD’s audited net position at the end of
FY 2022-2023 totaled $1,736,275 and is 3.3% lower than the five-year average amount of $1,794,825.
A portion of the District’s net position, 82%, reflects its net investment in capital assets (e.g., land and
equipment), with the remainder categorized as restricted, 10%, and unrestricted, 8%. Overall, the
District’s net position has decreased by 6.1% over the corresponding 5-year audited period.
Table 8: Audited Net Position
5-yr % 5-yr
Category FY 18-19 FY 19-20 FY 20-21 FY 21-22 FY 22-23
Change Average
Net
Investment in $1,441,444 $1,459,637 $1,449,909 $1,435,611 $1,426,618 -1% $1,442,644
Capital Assets
Restricted $182,292 $178,335 $171,483 $170,193 $170,193 -6.6% $174,499
Unrestricted $226,022 $183,362 $165,585 $173,976 $139,464 -38.3% $177,682
Total Net
$1,849,758 $1,821,334 $1,786,977 $1,779,780 $1,736,275 -6.1% $1,794,825
Position
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District 26
MSR & Sphere Study
DETERMINATIONS
Service Review Determinations
As set forth in Government Code Section 56430(a) — In order to prepare and to update the SOI in
accordance with Government Code Section 56425, the commission shall conduct a service review of
the municipal services provided in the county or other appropriate area designated by the commission.
The commission shall include in the area designated for a service review the county, the region, the
sub-region, or any other geographic area as is appropriate for an analysis of the service or services to
be reviewed, and shall prepare a written statement of its determinations with respect to each of the
following:
1. Growth and population projections for the affected area
In 2020, the total population within CSLRCD was estimated at 173,643. By 2050, it is expected
that the total population within the CSLRCD will be approximately 195,722. This equates to a
growth rate of approximately 0.42% per year.
2. The location and characteristics of any disadvantaged unincorporated communities within or
contiguous to the sphere of influence
CSLRCD’s SOI and service area boundary includes eleven areas that meet the criteria for a DUC
as defined in Government Code Section 56033.5. The location and characteristics of the eleven
DUCs are described in Table 3 and Figure 2 of the “Population Profile” section of this report.
3. Present and planned capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public services, including
infrastructure needs or deficiencies including needs or deficiencies related to sewers,
municipal and industrial water, and structural fire protection in any disadvantaged,
unincorporated communities within or contiguous to the sphere of influence.
CSLRCD provides comprehensive, integrated services addressing wildlife, water, climate, and
agriculture. The CSLRCD manages and implements many projects which are mostly funded by
state and federal grants. In addition, CSLRCD also offers professional services, which are
charged by a fee. The District employs an Executive Director as well as additional personnel
such as a Director of Finance, a Programs Manager, Project Managers, Restoration Specialists,
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District 27
MSR & Sphere Study
and Technicians as needed to support various grants and projects dependent on available
funding. CSLRCD owns in fee title two properties, which were acquired for the purpose of
wetland restoration and conservation as well as two vehicles used to facilitate their work for
the Oceano Dunes project. At present, the District has both the ability and the capacity to serve
its service area. As the RCD does not provide water, sewer, or fire protection services, the
District is not responsible for assuring that these services are adequately provided to the
communities within the District’s boundaries.
4. Financial ability of agencies to provide services
CSLRCD’s operating ratio, liquidity ratio, and net position were used to analyze the District’s
financial health. CSLRCD’s operating ratio, which measures the ratio of annual operating
revenues to annual operating expenses, indicated a healthy financial position in only three of
the last five years audited. The District’s liquidity ratio, which measures current assets against
current obligations, indicated a healthy financial position across all five audited years. The
District’s net position, which is the difference between the agency's assets and liabilities,
decreased over the last five-year audited period and therefore indicated financial deterioration.
Overall, the District has been successful in obtaining grant funding for its programs and appears
to have adequate financial resources to deliver its services.
5. Status of and, opportunities for, shared facilities
CSLRCD has a long history of developing partnerships with local, state, and federal agencies to
assist the District in accomplishing locally developed projects and priorities.
6. Accountability for community service needs, including governmental structure and
operational efficiencies
CSLRCD is governed by a seven-member Board of Directors that are appointed to four-year
terms by the County Board of Supervisors. Regularly scheduled monthly Board meetings are
held and all meetings are open to the public and are publicly posted a minimum of 72 hours
prior to the meeting in accordance with the Brown Act. CSLRCD maintains an up-to-date
website that contains District information, documents, and updates.
7. Any other matter related to effective or efficient service delivery
There are no other matters related to the efficiency of services.
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District 28
MSR & Sphere Study
Sphere of Influence Determinations
In order to carry out its purposes and responsibilities for planning and shaping the logical and orderly
development of local governmental agencies to advantageously provide for the present and future
needs of the county and its communities, the commission shall develop and determine the sphere of
influence of each local agency, as defined by Government Code Section 56036, and enact policies
designed to promote the logical and orderly development of areas within the sphere. In determining
the sphere of influence of each local agency, the commission shall consider and prepare a written
statement of its determinations with respect to the following:
1. Present and planned land uses in the area, including agricultural and open-space lands.
Land uses within CSLRCD’s existing coterminous SOI and service area boundary are planned for
in the general plans prepared by the six land use authorities whose jurisdictions overlap with
the service area boundary of CSLRCD. These jurisdictions include the County and the Cities of
Arroyo Grande, Grover Beach, Morro Bay, Pismo Beach, and San Luis Obispo. Reaffirmation of
the District’s SOI is recommended.
2. Present and probable need for public facilities and services in the area.
The CSLRCD provides a unique and vital service to the coastal communities of the County. The
District was established to conserve soil and water, control runoff, prevent and control soil
erosion, manage watersheds, protect water quality, and develop water storage and distribution
and serves as an essential liaison between a variety of private and public stakeholders in
accomplishing local conservation projects. There is a present and probable future need for
these services within the District’s coterminous SOI and service area boundary and
reaffirmation of the District’s SOI is recommended.
3. Present capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public services that the agency provides
or is authorized to provide.
At present, the CSLRCD has adequate grant funding and staffing to provide service within the
District’s coterminous SOI and service area boundary. In addition, the District has successfully
developed partnerships with local, state, and federal agencies to assist in accomplishing locally
developed projects and priorities. Reaffirmation of the District’s SOI is recommended.
Coastal San Luis Resource Conservation District 29
MSR & Sphere Study
4. Existence of any social or economic communities of interest in the area if the commission
determines that they are relevant to the agency.
There are no social or economic communities of interest within the District’s coterminous SOI
and service area boundary. Reaffirmation of the District’s SOI is recommended.
5. For an update of a sphere of influence of a city or special district that provides public facilities
or services related to sewers, municipal and industrial water, or structural fire protection, the
present and probable need for those public facilities and services of any disadvantaged
unincorporated communities within the existing sphere.
Eleven DUCs were identified within the CSLRCD’s coterminous SOI and service area boundary
as seen in Figure 2. Although these DUCs were identified, CSLRCD does not provide public
facilities or service related to wastewater, municipal or industrial water, or structural fire
protection and therefore no infrastructure deficiencies to a DUC would result from changes to
the CSLRCD’s SOI or service area boundary. Reaffirmation of the District’s SOI is recommended.