LAFCO
Clear Cr CSD MSR SOI Update Approved June 2023
Read the report at Local Agency Formation Commissions ↗
Shasta Local Agency Formation Commission
Municipal Service Review & Sphere of
Influence Update
Clear Creek
Community Services District
Commission Approved
June 2023
SHASTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
Commissioners
Patrick Jones, County Member - District 5 Supervisor
Kevin Crye, County Member & Vice Chair - District 1 Supervisor
Stan Neutze, City Member & Vice Chair - City of Anderson
Pamelyn Morgan, City Member – City of Shasta Lake
Ronnean Lund, Special District Member - Anderson Cottonwood Irrigation District
Irwin Fust, Special District Member & Chair - Clear Creek Community Services District
Larry Russell, Public Member
Alternate Members:
Mary Rickert, County Member - District 3 Supervisor
Mike Dacquisto, City Member - City of Redding
Fred Ryness, Special District Member – Burney Water District
Michael Spenser, Public Member
Shasta LAFCO Staff:
George Williamson, AICP, Executive Officer
Kathy Bull, Office Manager
James M. Underwood, Legal Counsel
Planwest Partners Staff:
Jason Barnes, GIS Analyst
Cosette McCave, Services Specialist
Acknowledgements:
LAFCO staff would like to thank contributors to this Municipal Service Review. Input
instrumental in completing this report was provided by CSD General Manager Paul Kelley
and Administrative Assistant Kayla Faulks. The District Board also participated in the review
and provided beneficial additions and clarifications.
Clear Creek Community Services District
Municipal Service Review & Sphere of Influence Update
Table of Contents
Municipal Service Review ....................................................................................................... 1
Sphere of Influence Update .................................................................................................... 1
Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1
Community Services Districts Overview .......................................................................................... 1
Principal Act .................................................................................................................................. 1
Service Review Determinations ...................................................................................................... 1
Sphere of Influence Determinations ............................................................................................... 2
Uses of the Report ......................................................................................................................... 2
Review Methods ............................................................................................................................ 3
California Environmental Quality Act .............................................................................................. 3
Common Topics for an Agency Profile ............................................................................................. 4
Agency Profile ........................................................................................................................ 5
Formation ...................................................................................................................................... 5
CSD Boundary and Sphere .............................................................................................................. 5
Other Service Providers .................................................................................................................. 5
Existing and Planned Land Uses ...................................................................................................... 6
Growth and Population .................................................................................................................. 7
Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities ................................................................................. 7
Municipal Services ......................................................................................................................... 7
Financial Overview ....................................................................................................................... 13
Accountability and Governance .................................................................................................... 15
Municipal Service Review Determinations .................................................................................... 16
Sphere of Influence Determinations ............................................................................................. 17
Figures
Figure 1: Clear Creek CSD Boundary and Sphere of Influence ...................................................................... 8
Figure 2: Clear Creek CSD Land Uses ............................................................................................................. 9
Tables
Table 1: Clear Creek CSD Overview Summary ............................................................................................... 5
Table 2: Clear Creek CSD Budgets ............................................................................................................... 14
Table 3: Board of Directors ......................................................................................................................... 15
Shas ta LAFCO MSR/SOI Update
Clear Creek CSD Commission Approved June 2023
2
Clear Creek Community Services District
Municipal Service Review & Sphere of Influence Update
MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW
SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE
Introduction
Municipal Services Reviews (MSRs) provide agency infrastructure, management, services
& boundary information. The report is for Shasta Local Agency Formation Commission’s
(LAFCO) use in conducting a statutorily required MSR review process. The Cortese-Knox-
Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 (CKH Act) requires that the
Commission conduct periodic reviews for cities & special districts in Shasta County
(Government Code § 56425).
State law also requires that, prior to Sphere of Influence (SOI) adoption, LAFCO must
conduct a review of municipal services provided by that local agency (Government Code
§56430). This report provides LAFCO with a tool to study current & future public service
conditions comprehensively & evaluate organizational options for accommodating
growth, preventing urban sprawl, & ensuring that critical services are provided efficiently.
Community Services Districts Overview
Community Services Districts are independent special districts under Community Services
District Law (Government Code §61000, et seq.). They can provide several community
services including water, wastewater, solid waste disposal, fire protection services, parks
and recreation, street maintenance and other services to unincorporated areas.
Principal Act
The CSD principal act is the Community Services District Law (Government Code §61000,
et seq.) which authorizes CSDs to provide up to 31 types of governmental services within
their boundaries. Clear Creek CSD is authorized to provide water services. Other services,
facilities, functions or powers enumerated in the District’s principal act but not identified in
the formation resolution are “latent,” meaning that they are authorized by the principal
act under which the District is formed but are not being exercised. Latent powers and
services activation require LAFCO authorization as indicated in Government Code
§25213.5.
Service Review Determinations
Government Code §56430 requires LAFCO to conduct a review of municipal services
provided in the county by region, sub-region or other designated geographic area, as
appropriate, for the service or services to be reviewed and prepare a written statement of
determination with respect to each of the following topics:
(1) Growth and population projections for the affected area;
(2) The location and characteristics of any disadvantaged unincorporated
communities within or contiguous to the SOI;
(3) Present and planned capacity of public facilities, adequacy of public services and
infrastructure needs or deficiencies (including needs or deficiencies related to
sewers, municipal and industrial water and structural fire protection in any
disadvantaged, unincorporated communities within or contiguous to the SOI);
Shas ta LAFCO MSR/SOI Update
Clear Creek CSD Commission Approved June 2023
1
Clear Creek Community Services District
Municipal Service Review & Sphere of Influence Update
(4) Financial ability of agencies to provide services;
(5) Status of, and opportunities for, shared facilities;
(6) Accountability for community service needs, including governmental structure and
operational efficiencies; and
(7) Any other matter affecting or related to effective or efficient service delivery, as
required by Commission policy.
This service review provides a Community Services District overview along with an agency
profile. The report also includes service review and sphere of influence determinations for:
Clear Creek Community Services District
State Guidelines and Commission policies encourage stakeholder cooperation in the
municipal service review preparation. It also provides a basis to evaluate and make
changes to the Sphere of Influence, if appropriate.
Sphere of Influence Determinations
A SOI is a LAFCO-approved boundary that designates an agency’s probable physical
service area. Spheres are planning tools used to provide guidance for individual boundary
change proposals and are intended to encourage efficient provision of organized
community services, discourage urban sprawl and premature conversion of agricultural
and open space lands and prevent overlapping jurisdictions and duplication of services.
LAFCO is required to establish SOIs for all local agencies and enact policies to promote the
logical and orderly development of areas within the SOIs. Furthermore, LAFCO must update
those SOIs every five years. In updating the SOI, LAFCO is required to conduct a MSR and
adopt related determinations. In addition, in adopting or amending an SOI, LAFCO must
make the following determinations:
(1) Present and planned area land uses, including agricultural and open-space lands;
(2) Present and probable need for public facilities and services in the area;
(3) Present capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public services that the
agency provides or is authorized to provide;
(4) Existence of any social or economic communities of interest in the area if the
Commission determines that they are relevant to the agency; and
(5) Present and probable need for public facilities and services related to sewers,
municipal or industrial water, or structural fire protection of any disadvantaged
unincorporated communities in the existing SOI (effective July 1, 2012).
Uses of the Report
This service review provides the opportunity to identify trends relating to the adequacy,
capacity and cost of providing services in rural areas of Shasta County. Service reviews
may identify district boundary changes, where appropriate, to extend services; evaluate
consolidation feasibility, where appropriate and implement other measures to address
Shas ta LAFCO MSR/SOI Update
Clear Creek CSD Commission Approved June 2023
2
Clear Creek Community Services District
Municipal Service Review & Sphere of Influence Update
community water and wastewater service needs. The potential uses of this report are
described below.
To Update Spheres of Influence
This MSR serves as the basis for an SOI update which considers territory LAFCO believes
represents an agency’s appropriate future jurisdiction and service area. All boundary
changes, such as annexations, must be consistent with an affected agency’s SOI with
limited exceptions.
To Consider Jurisdictional Boundary Changes
LAFCO is not required to initiate any boundary changes based on service reviews.
However, LAFCO, other local agencies (including cities, special districts, or the County), or
the public may subsequently use this report together with additional research and analysis,
where necessary, to pursue changes in jurisdictional boundaries.
Resource for Further Studies
Other entities and the public may use this report for further study and analysis of issues
relating to Community Services Districts and municipal services in Shasta County.
Review Methods
The following information was considered in the service review:
o Agency-specific data: responses to LAFCO Requests for Information from Clear Creek
CSD, maps, district plans and agency correspondence;
o Land Use and Shasta County General Plan data: Shasta County Resource
Management –Planning Division;
o Demographic data: U.S. Census; CA Dept. of Finance; CA Water Resources Board;
o Finances: budgets, rates and fees; and
o Other Reports and Assessments: State Water Resources Control Board citation.
The information gathered was analyzed and applied to make the required determinations
for the agency and reach conclusions about the focus issues identified in the service
review. All information gathered for this report is filed by LAFCO for future reference.
California Environmental Quality Act
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is contained in Public Resources Code
§21000 et seq. Under this law, public agencies are required to evaluate the potential
environmental effects of their actions. MSRs are statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to
§15262 (feasibility or planning studies) and categorically exempt pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines §15306 (information collection). It should be noted that when LAFCO acts to
update an SOI, CEQA requirements must be satisfied. The lead agency for CEQA
compliance would most likely be LAFCO.
Shas ta LAFCO MSR/SOI Update
Clear Creek CSD Commission Approved June 2023
3
Clear Creek Community Services District
Municipal Service Review & Sphere of Influence Update
Common Topics for an Agency Profile
Several topics are evaluated in an agency profile. Those topics are defined in this section
and discussed further in the agency profile.
Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities
LAFCO is required to evaluate disadvantaged unincorporated communities (DUCs) as part
of its municipal service review process. Per California Senate Bill 244, a DUC is defined as
any area with 12 or more registered voters where the median household income (MHI) is
less than 80 percent of the statewide MHI. Within a DUC, three basic services are evaluated:
water, sewer and fire protection.
The most recently available data for US Census Block Groups, Tracts and Places from the
US Census American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Data is used to determine
disadvantaged communities in the region of interest. Using this information, each district or
agency is evaluated to determine whether it is a DUC, or in the case of cities, whether there
are DUCs within the city’s SOI. In many cases, Census Block Groups are larger than Districts.
In these cases, LAFCO’s evaluation is conducted with caution to avoid overlooking DUCs.
Shasta County Growth Projections
When reviewing population data, it is important to distinguish between population
changes that affect the entire County and unincorporated area, which can be affected
by annexations and other boundary changes. The unincorporated area currently makes
up about 38% of the County’s total population. The California Department of Finance
projects the County’s population will increase from 179,412 to 188,154, between 2020 and
2030, an average annual growth rate of 0.49%1. If the unincorporated area’s portion of the
County remains near 38%, the population would increase from 68,177 to 71,499.
According to the most recent California Department of Finance estimate, the Shasta
County population decreased by 0.1% from 2018 to 20192. This could be the result of recent
wildfires. For report purposes an annual population growth estimate of 0.17% to 0.49% is
used to predict the future population range that may be served by the CSD during this MSR
cycle.
Existing and Planned Land Uses
Land use within the unincorporated portion of the districts is subject to the Shasta County
General Plan and Zoning Regulations, which was last updated in 2004. A land use figure is
included in the agency profile, showing the types and distribution of county land use
designations in the CSD boundary and sphere of influence.
Governance and Accountability
Clear Creek CSD operates as an independent special district under an elected Board of
Directors pursuant to Community Services District Law (Government Code §61000, et seq.).
1 California Department of Finance, Projections, P-1: State Population Projections (2010-2060), Total Population by
County (1-year increments).
2 California Department of Finance, E-1 Cities, Counties, State Population Estimates– January 1, 2018, 2019, May 2019.
Shas ta LAFCO MSR/SOI Update
Clear Creek CSD Commission Approved June 2023
4
Clear Creek Community Services District
Municipal Service Review & Sphere of Influence Update
AGENCY PROFILE
This section profiles the Community Services District listed below. Included in the profile is a
description of the agency’s organizational development, tables listing key service
information and maps showing jurisdictional boundaries.
Clear Creek Community Services District
Clear Creek CSD
The Clear Creek CSD serves the communities of Happy Valley, Olinda and Cloverdale
southwest of the City of Redding and west of the City of Anderson.
Table 1: Clear Creek CSD Overview Summary
Primary Contact Paul Kelley General Manager, Paul.kelley@clearcreekcsd.org
Address: 5880 Oak Street, Anderson, CA 96007
Website www.clearcreekcsd.org
Services Provided Water
Population: 9,000 Service Area Size: 21,800 acres
Customers 2,700
Formation
The Clear Creek CSD was formed in the mid-1960s to provide water for domestic use,
irrigation, sanitation, industrial use, individual use, fire protection and recreation. It includes
approximately 21,800 acres. The District was created to supply the District inhabitants with
water for domestic use, irrigation, sanitation, industrial use, fire protection, commercial
services and recreation.
CSD Boundary and Sphere
The CSD boundary is shown in Figure 1.
• Clear Creek CSD Boundary - 21,800 acres
• Clear Creek Boundary and SOI - 31,640 acres
• Clear Creek SOI only (outside district) - 9,840 acres
Annexations and Detachments since last MSR
None
Shas ta LAFCO MSR/SOI Update
Clear Creek CSD Commission Approved June 2023
5
Clear Creek Community Services District
Municipal Service Review & Sphere of Influence Update
Other Service Providers
Several other service providers operate within Clear Creek. These are described below.
Fire protection services and emergency medical services are provided by the Happy
Valley Fire Protection District. The HVFPD operates two fire stations within the boundaries of
the CCCSD, one on Palm Avenue and one on Cloverdale Road. The outer areas and SOI
areas of CCCSD are serviced by Shasta County Fire (CSA #1). Happy Valley Fire Protection
District has mutual and automatic aid agreements with Cal Fire, Shasta County Fire (CSA
#1) and the Anderson Fire Protection District.
Western Shasta Resource Conservation district encompasses approximately 1.7 million
acres bounded on the east by the watershed divide between eastern and western Shasta
County; the north by the Siskiyou County line; the west by the Trinity County line; and the
south by the Tehama County line. The District serves a population of 64,000. They provide
support for projects in wetland and riparian habitat restoration, habitat mitigation and fire
protection, including increasing forest health and defensible space.
The Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation District (ACID) is located south of the City of Redding
and extends to northern Tehama County. It encompasses the City of Anderson and the
Town of Cottonwood. A small easterly portion of the Clear Creek CSD, less than 5 %, is
located within ACID’s boundary and SOI. ACID provides supplemental water under long-
term agreements with the Bella Vista Water District, the City of Shasta Lake and the Shasta
Community Services District (CSD). They also provide water to the communities of Anderson
and Cottonwood, as well as some residents in south Redding.
Centerville CSD is located west of the City of Redding and north of Clear Creek CSD. The
Centerville CSD provides water services to residents of Centerville and a small portion of
residents within the overlapping City of Redding boundary.
Igo-Ono CSD provides irrigation water, drawing primarily from Rainbow Lake. It is adjacent
to the District’s western border. Clear Creek CSD provides water services to the Igo-Ono-
Platina Elementary School located within the Igo-Ono CSD. Consolidation of the two
districts could only be considered with the consent of both districts. This would allow Clear
Creek CSD to potentially extend potable water service into the Igo-Ono area. However,
Igo-Ono could propose activation of this power independently.
Existing and Planned Land Uses
Land Use
Shasta County Land Use designations in Clear Creek CSD shown in Figure 2. Land use
includes Rural Residential, Mixed Use, Agricultural, Public Facility, Public Land and Suburban
Residential. The public facilities within the District includes the Happy Valley Fire District
Station, The Happy Valley School District, Richard W Curry West Central Landfill and the
Northern California Veterans Cemetery in the west and West Valley Volunteer Fire
Department in the south. The District boundary includes two unincorporated communities
of Cloverdale and Olinda. These communities are related to the District Mixed Use land
use.
The land use in the eastern SOI area includes Rural Residential, Commercial, Suburban
Residential, Industrial, Public Facility, Agricultural and Open Space. The District’s SOI and
the City of Anderson’s boundary overlaps in the Clear Creek CSD’s eastern SOI area. To
Shas ta LAFCO MSR/SOI Update
Clear Creek CSD Commission Approved June 2023
6
Clear Creek Community Services District
Municipal Service Review & Sphere of Influence Update
the south, the District’s SOI includes Rural Residential and Agricultural and the public facility
is the Anderson Landfill. The western part of the SOI includes Rural Residential and
Agricultural. North of the District within the SOI includes Public Land and Rural Residential.
To the east of the District is fairly flat, developed land with some forested areas separating
it from the City of Anderson and Cottonwood. South of the District includes flat land with
blocks of agricultural land. The southern District boundary is just north of the Tehama County
line. The west of the District includes more forested, mountainous areas with scattered
rolling hills and water features. North and Northwest of the District includes the
unincorporated communities of Centerville, Girvan, Igo and the City Redding, as well as
forested public lands. The north District’s north border generally follows Clear Creek.
Zoning
Zoning in the CSD varies with predominantly Rural Residential, Agriculture and Unclassified.
Growth and Population
According to the most recently available American Community Survey 5-year estimate,
the Clear Creek area population is 6,900.
Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities
The Shasta County 2021 Median Household Income (MHI) was approximately $54,667. This
is 68% of the California 2021 MHI of $80,440.
The Clear Creek CSD contains the Clear Creek- Census Designated Place (CDP), however
it is smaller than CSD. Getting MHI for the CSD requires some projections, since income data
only comes at the Census Block Group level. The surrounding block groups are large and
extend beyond the district boundary. The average MHI for the main block groups that
intersect the district boundary is approximately $59,154, which is 74% (less than 80) of
statewide MHI (ACS 2019). This indicates that the District would be considered a DUC.
Municipal Services
Clear Creek CSD provides water services to the Clear Creek community and surrounding
area within the CSD Boundary which is shown in Figure 1.
Shas ta LAFCO MSR/SOI Update
Clear Creek CSD Commission Approved June 2023
7
Clear Creek Community Services District
Municipal Service Review & Sphere of Influence Update
Figure 1. CSD Boundary and Sphere of Influence.
Shas ta LAFCO MSR/SOI Update
Clear Creek CSD Commission Approved June 2023
8
Clear Creek Community Services District
Municipal Service Review & Sphere of Influence Update
Figure 2. Land Uses
Shas ta LAFCO MSR/SOI Update
Clear Creek CSD Commission Approved June 2023
9
Clear Creek Community Services District
Municipal Service Review & Sphere of Influence Update
Water Services
Water Supply
The District’s primary water supply is surface water from the Whiskeytown Reservoir. This is
part of the Clear Creek South Unit of the Trinity River Project. The District's current total
allowable water allotment, through the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation’s Central Valley Project
(CVP) and the Districts contract water is up to 15,300 acre-feet (ac-ft) annually, subject to
reduction due to drought. The 15,300 ac-ft CVP water is subject to availability each year.
The District maintains three wells for water needs during drought and were last used in
January 2023.
Storage and Infrastructure
The District has four storage tanks with a total capacity of 5.282 Million Gallons (MG). There
is 2.5 MG available for emergency storage and 2.5 MG available for flow equalizing. The
Clearwell Tank can hold 1 MG and provides about 0.5 MG of flow equalizing storage as
filter trains Cycle on/off depending on the water surface elevation. Clearwell can provide
0.5 MG of emergency storage into the Muletown Conduit when the WTP is offline. The 4 MG
Main tank is divided between flow equalizing and emergency storage components. The
0.25 MG Control Tank and 0.032 MG Well Tank contribute small volumes to flow equalization
and emergency storage requirements.
The District has three wells located in the Lawrence A. Russell South District Well Field at the
southern boundary of the District. Each of the wells can produce 1,500 gallons per minute
(gpm). The wells are used mostly for emergencies and provide supplemental supply during
drought years when the surface water supply is reduced. To help the District be self-
sufficient during years of water shortages, a 350,000 gallon tank was constructed at the
South Booster Station just north of the South District Well Field.
The Water Treatment Plant Backwash Pond Repair Project is currently in review by FEMA.
The project’s definition and funding from FEMA/CalOES and the state is pending. The
project is meant to repair the ponds, improve the maintenance and make them more
resilient to emergencies. The project should be underway in a couple of years.
The water treatment plant’s actuators are still being worked on. There are 55 actuators and
valves that have been identified as problematic and need to be replaced in one to two
years at most. Another 24 of the actuators and valves will need to be a part of a five-year
plan or a Water Treatment Improvement Project. Two of the 38 actuators have been
ordered and will be replaced within the next three months. Of the 38 actuators and valves,
20 will need to be subcontracted out due to project size and equipment needed.
Demand
The District currently serves 2,700 customers and two out of District customers being National
Park service connections. The Bureau of Reclamation allocates 15,300 ac-ft per year by
contract to the District, but the water supply was affected by drought in 2022. The amount
of water delivered to customers and billed in 2022 was 1,800 ac-ft. Which was purchased
and well water since the Bureau allocation was zero.
Shas ta LAFCO MSR/SOI Update
Clear Creek CSD Commission Approved June 2023
10
Clear Creek Community Services District
Municipal Service Review & Sphere of Influence Update
Rates
The District maintains a rate and fee structure for water services. For Domestic and
Agricultural Service, the base service charge is $56.05 per dwelling plus additional fees. The
base service charge plus the additional charges spelled out below come to the total
monthly Domestic Service Rates of $66.86 plus the current water usage rate – the 2022
drought rate was $1.04/HCF (Hundred Cubic Feet). The Domestic and Agricultural water
usage rates are $.72/HCF and $.71/HCF respectively.
A charge of $7.55 is charged for filtration plant repayment to all active and inactive service
connections, including each additional unit. The rate also applies to hydrant meter
installations. A backwash recycle project fee of $0.38 is billed to all active and inactive
services connections, including all other dwellings on the property. The fee also applies to
hydrant meter installations.
A WIIN act repayment reserve fee of $1.88 is billed to all active and inactive service
connections, including each additional dwelling on the property will be billed. The fee also
applies to hydrant meter installations. A state loan repayment reserve fee of $1.00 is billed
to all active and inactive service connections, each dwelling on the property will be billed.
The fee also applies to hydrant meter installations.
When in effect, there is a CVP restoration fee from US Fish and Wildlife Service for M&I and
agricultural deliveries. The rate for M&I is $0.05 per HCF and $0.25 per HCF for agricultural.
A fee of $37.10 will be charged for all returned items per the NSF Check/ACH fee. For
Customers who have backflow control devices will be charged $61.63 annually for testing
and inspection. The fee will be added to the monthly billing at $5.14 per month.
The turn on and transfer fee for new accounts is $54.31. Homeowners will pay a water
deposit of $70.00 and renters will pay a water deposit of $120.00. A late charge of 1.5% of
the balance will be placed on the account twenty days after billing. Rates were adopted
on July 1, 2022.
Shas ta LAFCO MSR/SOI Update
Clear Creek CSD Commission Approved June 2023
11
Clear Creek Community Services District
Municipal Service Review & Sphere of Influence Update
Drought Conditions – 2022
The District receives its annual water supply from the Central Valley Project (CVP) through
a Bureau of Reclamation contract. In February 2022, the District received notice that it
would receive 0 (Zero) acre-feet (AF) of the CVP surface water allocation for both
Agriculture and Municipal & Industrial use. As a result of the zero water allocation, the
District executed an agreement for 1,100 AF of supplemental water from the McConnell
Foundation. The District utilized the groundwater wells to serve the remaining customer
water demands to the extent feasible. The combined water available was projected to
supply approximately 60% of the 2019 water demand for the District’s 2,700 customers.
Clear Creek CSD Drought Planning and Water Shortage Policy (summary)
The Clear Creek CSD Drought Planning and Water Shortage Policy - 2010.
During years of shortage, municipal and industrial (M&I) deliveries will remain at 100% of
historical use until agricultural is reduced below 75% of contract entitlement. From there,
M&I and agricultural water allocations will be reduced equally until the M&I allocation
reaches 75% of historical use. M&I will not be reduced again until the agricultural allocation
is reduced below 25% of the contract entitlement. If agricultural allocation is reduced to
25%, then M&I can be reduced below 75%. The M&I allocation reductions are subject to a
minimum public health and safety water supply level based on the extent supplies are
available. During times of extraordinary circumstance during severe and continuing
drought, the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) has the power to reallocate
available M&I water among Central Valley Project (CVP) contractors, considering the
contractors non-CVP water. The M&I Water Shortage Policy Environmental Assessment (EA)
identifies Clear Creek CSD’s public health and safety water supply level as 3,063 acre-feet.
The EA gives the District a total allocation of 8,283 acre-feet per year. Subject to the
Bureau’s water shortage policy.
The District has five stages in the Drought Contingency Plan. The Alert Stage is immediately
put into effect as soon as the Bureau makes the allocation announcement in January for
the next water year beginning March 1st if warranted. The Alert Stage is triggered by less
than 100% M&I and 75% agricultural allocation. This stage helps to encourage customers to
fix leaks, be aware of their usage and not waste water. The District will immediately inform
schools, large irrigation users, Veteran’s Cemetery, West Central Landfill and W.E.S. Camp
of the situation and request they take immediate water conservation measures.
Stage I of the plan seeks to obtain a 10% reduction through voluntary programs. The District
communicates the Stage I items with customers through billing inserts, newspaper
advertising, website notices and verbal communication. This stage will be triggered by 75%
M&I and 50% agricultural allocation. The District will not accept agricultural applications for
new projects.
Stage II, III and IV use a combination of pricing surcharges based on usage above a 2019-
2020 baseline year allotment to the customers and District operational decisions that
directly affect water production. Stage II is triggered by allocations of 75% M&I and 45%
agricultural supply. Stage III is triggered by allocations of 75% M&I and 25% agricultural
supply. Stage IV is triggered by allocations of 50% M&I and 10% agricultural supply. The final
Shas ta LAFCO MSR/SOI Update
Clear Creek CSD Commission Approved June 2023
12
Clear Creek Community Services District
Municipal Service Review & Sphere of Influence Update
stage is the Health and Safety level. This stage is triggered by an allocation of 50% and 0%
agricultural supply.
The District recently passed Ordinance 2021-03 in which it rescinded the Alert Stage of
Ordinance 2020-02. Ordinance 2021-03 declared Stage IV Health and Safety of the
drought planning and water shortage policy. The District is accepting new service
applications that are granted upon the condition that all water consumption is used inside
the residence for human consumption, sanitation and fire protection. Supply will not be
provided for any new landscaping or other outside demands until the Ordinance is
rescinded or amended. The District adopted ordinance 2022-01 that declared emergency
conditions based on the zero allocation for the 2022-2023 year. With improving conditions
on water supply in early 2023 and a 100 percent allocation from the Bureau the District
adopted ordinance 2023-06 rescinding all water shortage conditions.
Financial Overview
Clear Creek CSD is primarily funded through base rates & water sales.
The District’s most recent audit lists current and other assets of $1,306,564 and capital assets
– net of $4,981,193. The deferred outflows of resources totaled $700,522. Other liabilities
were at $676,878 and long-term debt, due in more than one year, was $3,775,614. That
brought the total liabilities to $4,543,492. The deferred inflows of resources totaled $749,587.
The total net position was $1,695,200 with the net investment in capital assets at $3,036,016,
restricted funds at $660,313 and unrestricted funds at -$2,001,129 for a total net position of
$1,695,200. This compares to the 2020 net position of $1,641,247.
The District’s capital assets include their water treatment plant at Whiskeytown Lake along
with a holding tank, a water tank with a 4 million gallon capacity and booster station, a
water tank with a 1 million gallon capacity and booster station, three ground water wells,
approximately 100 miles of pipeline and smaller assets such as pressure relief valves and
others. The District also owns an administrative building, two shops, a large storage building
for equipment, multiple vehicles, equipment and water system supplies and materials for
repairs.
The District’s total operating revenues were $2,420,337 and expenses were $2,796,246,
creating a total net operating loss of -$375,909. The property taxes and other income
equaled $491,760 and the interest and other expenses equaled $61,989. The total
nonoperating revenues totaled $429,862.
The District had an audit performed for FY 2021, which noted overstatements of: $32,693 for
interest; $35,920 for cash and cash equivalents; and $27,480 for customer deposits. The
audit also noted understatements of: $29,623 for payroll; $31,860 for accounts; $20,983 for
grants; and $13,378 for deferred outflows of resources – pensions. While important for
accounting, they are relatively small in reference to the overall budget.
For FY 22-23, the District implemented new accounting software to better and more
accurately track revenues and expenses. There have been internal control changes for
accounts payable by having invoices first reviewed by bookkeeping for purchase orders,
accuracy and identifying expense accounts, the General Manager then reviews and
approves the documents and finally the District Directors sign checks and review expenses
prior to sending payments.
Shas ta LAFCO MSR/SOI Update
Clear Creek CSD Commission Approved June 2023
13
Clear Creek Community Services District
Municipal Service Review & Sphere of Influence Update
Debt
The District’s current debt includes money for the Water Treatment Plant Filtration Plant and
Backwash Pond Project, the purchase of and payments on a Dump Truck and Trailer, WIIN
Act loan for project costs.
Table 2: Clear Creek CSD Budgets
FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022
INCOME
Water Sales $1,250,525 $1,250,525 $1,203,435
Water Service $281,000 $281,000 $281,000
Interest $1,075 $1,075 $1,075
General Property Tax/Assessments $410,000 $410,350 $400,000
Other Designated Revenue $683,000 $683,000 $661,000
TOTAL INCOME $2,625,600 $2,625,950 $2,546,510
EXPENSE
Water Costs $218,000 $218,800 $198,800
Transmission and Distribution $432,500 $426,374 $417,374
Treatment $397,500 $393,500 $383,400
Administrative/Customer Accts $1,276,900 $1,275,500 $1,245,186
Wells & Regulatory $77,000 $77,200 $78,200
SUB-TOTAL EXPENSES $2,401,900 $2,391,374 $2,322,960
Other Expenses/Designated $223,700 $234,576 $223,550
TOTAL EXPENSES/TRANSFERS $2,625,600 $2,625,950 $2,546,510
NET INCOME/(LOSS) $0 $0 $0
The Board of Directors is responsible for establishing and maintaining an internal
accounting control system, with Finance Committee, consisting of two Board members
and the District Manager to provide oversight and assistance and participate in annual
budget process. In addition, statements are reviewed by the full Board of Directors.
The District maintains investment policies, procedures and a reserve fund. The Board has
adopted and maintains reserves as follows:
• Designated Reserves (operations, facilities and emergency needs)
• Obligated Reserves (tied to infrastructure improvements)
• Restricted Reserves (required and used for payment of debt service)
District revenues sources used to provide and finance infrastructure services include
property taxes, special taxes, service charges, fees, assessments and grants.
Shas ta LAFCO MSR/SOI Update
Clear Creek CSD Commission Approved June 2023
14
Clear Creek Community Services District
Municipal Service Review & Sphere of Influence Update
Accountability and Governance
As noted earlier, Clear Creek CSD is governed by an independent Board of Directors
elected to staggered 4-year terms (Table 4). Meetings are currently held monthly. The
District maintains a website that is currently in compliance with state law regarding special
district websites. Board meeting agendas are available at least 72 hours in advance and
meeting minutes are available after adoption by the Board. Notices are also posted at
District offices 5880 Oak Street, Anderson.
Table 3: Clear Creek CSD Board of Directors
Member Title Current Term Expiration
Beverly Fickes Chairman November 2026
Terry Lincoln Vice Chair November 2026
Irwin Fust Director November 2024
Pam Beaver Director November 2024
Scott McVay Director November 2024
Budgets are approved annually by the Board of Directors which then establishes the
scope of work and improvements that can be performed. Annual budgets and audits are
available upon request to the District. Annual reporting is provided to the State Controller’s
Office per state law.
The District maintains various reserves consistent with their Reserve Policy. There are two
major reserve types: designated or restricted. The designated reserves include:
Operations & Maintenance; Filter Plant Reserve
Backwash Recycle Project WIIN Act Reserve and State Loan Reserve.
The restricted reserves are based upon certain legal or contractual commitments for
specific capital improvement funding.
Standing Committees (Agriculture, Finance, Personnel, Planning and Steering,) meet on an
as-needed basis. Non-emergency meeting agendas are posted at least 72 hours in
advance and special or emergency meetings meeting agendas are posted at least 24
hours in advance.
Staff
The District employs a General Manager and ten staff members. This includes the
Administrative Assistant, Bookkeeper /Accountant,
Account Clerk, Water Treatment Chief Plant Operator,
Distribution Supervisor, Distribution Operator III,
Distribution Operator II, Distribution Operator I,
Water Treatment and Distribution Operator III and Water Treatment Operator III.
The General Manager is responsible for hiring and evaluating the Administration,
Distribution and Treatment employees. The General Manager and division supervisors for
each department collaborate on hiring and evaluating their employees. The division
supervisors report to the General Manager.
Shas ta LAFCO MSR/SOI Update
Clear Creek CSD Commission Approved June 2023
15
Clear Creek Community Services District
Municipal Service Review & Sphere of Influence Update
Sphere of Influence
The current SOI includes public lands to the north along Clear Creek and agricultural lands
to the south near the Tehama County border and to the southeast. These land designations
may not require municipal water services from the District and may be considered for a SOI
reduction.
These are areas where there are no other services provider if there is ever a future need
and as such should remain in the SOI. Along SR 273 there is a small portion of Anderson SOI
that overlaps with the District, which could result in a duplication of services. The District SOI
along this portion SR 273 is reduced to eliminate the overlap.
Municipal Service Review Determinations
(1) Growth and population projections for the affected area
a) There are approximately 9,000 residents in the District.
b) The County has an annual growth rate of 0.49%. The District is expected to have a
similar growth rate.
(2) The location and characteristics of any disadvantaged unincorporated communities
within or contiguous to the sphere of influence
a) The Shasta County 2021 Median Household Income (MHI) was approximately
$54,667. This is 68% of the California 2021 MHI of $80,440. The District’s MHI is
approximately $59,154 which is 73% of the statewide MHI. This qualifies the District as
a DUC. Census blocks to the North and West have higher MHI’s and do not qualify
as DUCs.
3) Present and planned capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public services,
including infrastructure needs or deficiencies.
a) The Water Treatment Plant Backwash Pond Repair Project is in review and the
funding and definition from FEMA/CalOES and the State of California are pending.
This project is for repairing the ponds, improving maintenance and making them
more resilient to emergencies.
b) The water treatment plant has 38 actuators and valves identified as problematic
and in need of replacement within one to two years. Two of the 38 actuators have
been ordered and will be replaced within the next few months. Of those 38, 20 will
need to be subcontracted due to size and equipment needed.
c) There are currently no plans to provide wastewater services.
d) County Service Area (CSA) #1 - Happy Valley Fire District offers fire protection, fire
suppression and emergency medical services to the District.
4) Financial ability of agencies to provide services.
a) The District implemented new accounting software for FY 22-23 to better and more
accurately track revenues and expenses. The District’s invoices must be reviewed
by bookkeeping, the general manager reviews and approves documents and the
District Directors sign the checks and review the expenses before sending payments.
Shas ta LAFCO MSR/SOI Update
Clear Creek CSD Commission Approved June 2023
16
Clear Creek Community Services District
Municipal Service Review & Sphere of Influence Update
5) In July 2022, the District passed new water rates. The Base Rate for all customers is $56.05
plus infrastructure and project repayment of $10.81 plus the current Usage rate/HCF.
Status of and, opportunities for, shared facilities
a) The District provides water services to a school facility in the Igo-Ono CSD, as that
district only provides untreated irrigation water.
b) The Centerville, Igo-Ono, Clear Creek and Shasta CSDs are all located in the same
geographic area of Shasta County and all provide a single service, water. There is
increasing state legislation for water systems consolidation and State Water resources
Control Board actions to implement this legislation. Should the Districts be interested,
there may be State support to consolidate water systems in this portion of western
Shasta County. Centerville and Clear Creek CSDs share a water treatment plant.
6) Accountability for community service needs, including governmental structure and
operational efficiencies.
a) The Clear Creek CSD is a single service water provider in a rural area of Shasta
County, the largest community services provider is the County. The Happy Valley
Fire District provides fire protection and suppression in the area. Wastewater is
provided by individual onsite systems. No municipal wastewater system is
currently under consideration.
b) The General Manager has helped to progress improvements on the water
treatment plant, start to update the drought contingency plan, improve
distribution system maintenance, implement grant funded improvements,
introduce a new accounting software, implement internal control changes and
update the water services and usage rates.
7) Any other matter related to effective or efficient service delivery.
a) None noted.
Sphere of Influence Determinations
In order to carry out its purposes and responsibilities for planning and shaping the logical
and orderly development of local governmental agencies, to advantageously provide for
the present and future needs of the county and its communities, the commission shall
develop and determine the sphere of influence, as defined by GC § 56036 and enact
policies designed to promote the logical and orderly development of areas within the
sphere. In determining each local agency’s SOI, the commission shall consider and
prepare a written statement of its determinations with respect to the following:
(1) Present and planned land uses in the area, including agricultural and open-space
lands.
a) Land use within the District includes Rural Residential, Mixed Use, Agricultural, Public
Facility, Public Land and Suburban Residential. The public facilities include the
Richard W Curry West Central Landfill and the Northern California Veterans
Cemetery in the west, the Happy Valley Fire District Station, Multiple School Facilities
for the Happy Valley School district and a CSA #1 Shasta County Fire Department
Station #5 to the south. There are two unincorporated communities in the District
boundary, Cloverdale and Olinda.
Shas ta LAFCO MSR/SOI Update
Clear Creek CSD Commission Approved June 2023
17
Clear Creek Community Services District
Municipal Service Review & Sphere of Influence Update
b) The District’s eastern SOI land use includes Rural Residential, Commercial, Suburban
Residential, Industrial, Public Facility, Agricultural and Open Space. The eastern SOI
overlaps with the City of Anderson’s boundary. The District’s southern SOI land use
includes Rural Residential and Agricultural and Public Facility which is the Anderson
Landfill. The western part of the SOI includes Rural Residential and Agricultural. North
of the District within the SOI includes Public Land and Rural Residential.
c) The southern and northern areas within the SOI have land uses that do not typically
require water services. However, Centerville CSD has similar land uses within their SOI
and the Board made an argument for keeping those lands within it.
d) There are no changes in planned land uses at this time.
(2) Present and probable need for public facilities and services in the area.
a) Currently, the water treatment plant needs improvements. Those improvements are
in the process of being completed and funded.
b) The two out of District customers, National Park service connections, are proposed
to remain within the SOI.
(3) Present capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public services that the agency
provides or is authorized to provide.
a) Despite being affected by drought in 2022, the District maintains good water
quality and has supply to meet current and future average daily demand.
b) The District water supply is considered adequate to meet current demand.
(4) Existence of any social or economic communities of interest in the area if the
commission determines that they are relevant to the agency.
a) No social or economic communities of interest identified in the SOI.
(5) For an update of a sphere of influence of a city or special district that provides public
facilities or services related to sewers, municipal and industrial water, or structural fire
protection, the present and probable need for those public facilities and services of any
disadvantaged unincorporated communities within the existing sphere.
a) The City of Anderson overlaps the Clear Creek CSD SOI. Due to the City providing a
broad range of municipal serves, compared to the single water service provided by
the CSD, the overlap is removed from the CSDs SOI.
b) No disadvantaged unincorporated communities between the existing District
boundaries and the SOI.
Shas ta LAFCO MSR/SOI Update
Clear Creek CSD Commission Approved June 2023
18