LAFCO
Scfpd 1 Executive Officer Report with SOI
Read the report at Local Agency Formation Commissions ↗
Sierra LAFCo Staff Report – November 28, 2018
Sierra Co. FPD #1 Sphere and Regional Annexation
Sierra County FPD #1 – Regional
LAFCO File No. 2018-0001
Summary
This proposal to adopt a Municipal Service Review, Update the Sphere of Influence and to
annex 115,627 acres more or less of contiguous unincorporated inhabited territory to the Sierra
County Fire Protection District #1. The LAFCO adopting resolutions approving this Municipal
Service Review, Sphere of Influence and Regional Annexation are attached as Attachment #1,
Attachment #2 and Attachment #3, respectively for the Commission’s consideration. The
Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 submitted Resolution 2018-01 adopted on July 13,
2018 (See Attachment #4). This Resolution contains a Plan for Services and a Justification
Statement.
A Map and Geographic description showing the subject territory is included herein as Exhibits A
and B to the adopting annexation resolution (Resolution 2018-0003). Sierra County and the
SCFPD #1 have both adopted property tax resolutions agreeing to a property Tax Exchange for
this Annexation (see Exhibit C and D for the adopting resolutions (Attachment #3)).
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Commission approve this proposal to adopt the Municipal Service
Review, the Sphere of Influence and to annex the additional 115,627 acres more or less in one
large unincorporated area into the Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 subject to conditions
as set forth in the staff report and proposed draft Resolution 2018-0003 (Attachments 1,2 & 3).
In the published public notice it has been disclosed that the Commission may authorize the
extension of any special benefit assessments, taxes or fees into the annexation territory. A
protest proceeding for the annexation will be required since there were over 1000 registered
voters and (or) landowners to be notified. The Commission will direct a protest hearing to be
conducted within 30-days of approval of the annexation.
Suggested motions:
• Adopt proposed Resolution 2018-0001 adopting a municipal service review for the Sierra
County Fire Protection District #1
• Adopt proposed Resolution 2018-0002 adopting a Sphere of Influence for the Sierra
County Fire Protection District #1
• Adopt proposed Resolution 2018-0003 approving this Annexation and determining that
this proposed annexation to the Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 qualifies for an
exemption to the California Environmental Quality Act under Class 20.
Proposal and History
For the most part, Sierra County territory is included within a Fire Protection District or is otherwise
protected by a fire protection district. The unincorporated territory in the eastern portion of Sierra
County while not within the SCFPD #1 is protected albeit not within a fire district. While new
development is not proposed at this time, it is the desire of the County, SCFPD #1 and LAFCo
that all private properties are served by a fire protection agency. The district passed a resolution
initiating this Sphere amendment and annexation process (See Attachment #4).
1
Sierra LAFCo Staff Report – November 28, 2018
Sierra Co. FPD #1 Sphere and Regional Annexation
Relationship to Other Projects
LAFCo is required to adopt a Municipal Service Review and Sphere of Influence Document
including determinations, which is attached as Attachment #5.
No entitlement proposals which would affect this proposal are known to LAFCo or are currently
pending in the Annexation proposal.
Organized Community Services
Following is a discussion of existing and proposed service provision to the project:
Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 and Emergency Response Services
The Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 was formed in 1930. The SCFPD #1
accomplishes this mission through fire suppression, fire prevention, intervention, medical
assistance, and education. Sierra County Fire Protection District No. 1 maintains high
standards of training and education for its volunteers. Volunteers act and perform in a
safe, courteous, and professional manner, creating strong bonds and professional
relationships within the community and with neighboring fire departments. District
members are part of a team that takes pride in representing the SCFPD #1 mission
through dedication and integrity.
Board of Directors
The District’s board is composed of five appointed members. The board members meet in the
evening of the second Tuesday of the month and as needed and are rotated between the Calpine
and Sierraville fire stations within the district.
Personnel
The Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 has 19 fire fighters and 22 total personnel including
the paid secretary and mechanic. The average age of the volunteers is 50. There are six
EMT/Paramedic personnel. Many of the up to 40 volunteers have full-time jobs outside the
District so mid-week and mid-day staffing levels are low.1
There are three stations Sierraville, Sattley and Calpine within the district each having a
separate department under the Sierra County Fire Protection District #1.
Dispatch
The Sierra County Sheriff’s Department provides dispatch
Collaboration
The Department does provide service to areas outside the District boundaries only by Mutual
Aid (Truckee, Sierra City, Loyalton, Beckwourth, Sierra Valley [Vinton/Chilcoot], Loyalton. The
District notes that service is to areas within the proposed annexation to areas not served by any
District/Department.
For the year July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017 the District received 84 EMS calls and 12 fire calls.
Ambulance services are provided by Eastern Plumas Ambulance north of Little Truckee Summit
1 Sierra LAFCo, Fire Protection District Questionnaire, June 1, 2018.
2
Sierra LAFCo Staff Report – November 28, 2018
Sierra Co. FPD #1 Sphere and Regional Annexation
and Truckee Fire Department south and west of Little Truckee Summit and near Stampede
Reservoir.
Sphere of Influence
The subject territory is not within the SCFPD#1 Fire District sphere of influence. A Municipal
Service Review and Sphere of Influence Update has been prepared and are to be considered in
conjunction with the SCFPD #1 annexation.
Boundary
The boundaries for the proposal are consistent with existing assessor parcel lines meaning no
split lines of assessment have been identified.
The territory in the annexation includes approximately 115,627 unincorporated acres more or
less within the annexation area including a total of 944 assessor’s parcels and 373 registered
voters totaling 1317. This annexation does not include territory within the incorporated
City of Loyalton.
LAFCo staff has also provided notice of the public hearing. There was no testimony against the
annexation at the public hearing where the SCFPD #1 initiated the annexation.
CEQA Compliance
This annexation would qualify for Categorical Exemption to CEQA under Class 20 (Changes in
organization of local agencies where the changes do not change the geographical area in which
previously existing powers are exercised). The annexation would also qualify for Categorical
Exemption under the same category in as much as the subject territory is already receiving
structural fire and emergency services from the District. Appropriate language to this effect has
been included in the draft Resolution of Approval, which also include direction to staff to file a
Notice of Exemption shown as Attachment #6.
Compliance with Applicable Plans
The County is the applicable land use authority. The project area is generally within the eastern
portion of Sierra County and generally designated Agriculture, Open Space and Forestry in the
Sierra County General Plan.
GOVERNING LAW AND LAFCo POLICY
Generally, Government Code §56000 et seq. governs proceedings. The proposal largely
complies with LAFCo’s legal and policy requirements, as summarized below:
GOVERNING LAW
LAFCo is charged with applying the policies and provisions of the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Act to
its decisions regarding annexations, incorporations, Annexations, and other changes of
government.
Factors to be considered in the review of a proposal shall include, but not be limited to, all of the
following Section 56668 of the Government Code:
(a) Population, and population density; land area and land use; per capita assessed
valuation; topography, natural boundaries, and drainage basins; proximity to other
populated areas; the likelihood of significant growth in the area, and in adjacent
incorporated and unincorporated areas, during the next 10 years.
3
Sierra LAFCo Staff Report – November 28, 2018
Sierra Co. FPD #1 Sphere and Regional Annexation
The subject territory is inhabited; land use is described above. Adjacent properties are
planned and zoned for variety of uses but mostly Forestry and Agriculture. There is a
low likelihood of significant growth in the annexation territory.
(b) The need for organized community services; the present cost and adequacy of
governmental services and controls in the area; probable future needs for those
services and controls; probable effect of the proposed incorporation; formation,
annexation, or exclusion and of alternative courses of action on the cost and adequacy
of services and controls in the area and adjacent areas. “Services,” as used in this
subdivision, refers to governmental services whether or not the services are services,
which would be provided by local agencies subject to this division, and includes the
public facilities necessary to provide those services.
The area is in agricultural and forestry uses; fire protection and emergency response
services are necessary for health and safety reasons.
(c) The effect of the proposed action and of alternative actions, on adjacent areas, on
mutual social and economic interests, and on the local governmental structure of the
county.
Annexation of the territory to the Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 will have
negligible impact on adjacent areas, interests, and upon the local governmental
structure.
(d) The conformity of both the proposal and its anticipated effects with both the adopted
commission policies on providing planned, orderly, efficient patterns, of urban
development, and the policies and priorities set forth in Section 56377.
Analysis of the project’s consistency with adopted LAFCo policies is addressed in a
subsequent section of this report.
(e) The effect of the proposal on maintaining the physical and economic integrity of
agricultural lands, as defined by Section 56016.
This annexation is not expected to have an adverse effect on the surrounding
agricultural areas.
(f) The definiteness and certainty of the boundaries of the territory, the nonconformance
of proposed boundaries with lines of assessment or ownership, the creation of islands
or corridors of unincorporated territory, and other similar matters affecting the
proposed boundaries.
The boundaries of the subject territory include the territory as depicted on the map
attached to the adopting resolution.
(g) Consistency with city or county general and specific plans.
As discussed in the above section on Planning Consistency, the current land use does
not conflict with the County’s General Plan.
(h) The sphere of influence of any local agency witch may be applicable to the proposal
being reviewed.
All of the subject territory is within the Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 sphere of
influence, as amended and updated.
(i) The comments of any affected local agency or other public agency.
None received
(j) The ability of the newly formed or receiving entity to provide the services which are the
subject of the application to the area, including the sufficiency of revenues for those
services following the proposed boundary change.
The District has provided documentation of its plans for serving the subject territory in its
plan for services attached as Exhibit C of the District’s initiating resolution (See
Attachment #4)
4
Sierra LAFCo Staff Report – November 28, 2018
Sierra Co. FPD #1 Sphere and Regional Annexation
(k) Timely availability of water supplies adequate for projected needs as specified in
Section 65352.5
N/A
(l) The extent to which the proposal will affect a city or cities and the county in achieving
their respective fair shares of the regional housing needs as determined by the
appropriate council of governments consistent with Article 10.6 (commencing with
section 65580) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7.
The proposed annexation will neither assist nor detract from the County’s ability to
achieve its RHNA targets.
(m) Any information or comments from the landowner or owners, voters, or residents of
the affected territory.
No comments have been received to date.
(n) Any information relating to existing land use designations.
This issue is discussed in a preceding section of the report.
(o) The extent to which the proposal will promote environmental justice. As used in this
subdivision, "environmental justice" means the fair treatment of people of all races,
cultures, and incomes with respect to the location of public facilities and the provision
of public services.
Because no change in the present use of the property will result from the Annexation,
this proposal will neither promote nor detract from environmental justice.
SIERRA LAFCo GENERAL POLICIES
Communication between local agencies is encouraged. Consistent
Urban development proposals shall include annexation to a city or district
Not
where possible.
Applicable
The proposal does not involve an urban development proposal.
LAFCo will discourage urban sprawl and will normally deny proposals that
result in sprawl.
Consistent
This proposal will not result in urban sprawl as characterized in LAFCo
policy.
Environmental consequences (CEQA) shall be considered.
This annexation qualifies for a categorical exemption to CEQA, as discussed Consistent
above.
LAFCo will encourage applications that improve the regional balance
between jobs and housing. Not
This proposal will neither improve nor detract from the regional jobs/housing Applicable
balance.
LAFCo will favor proposals that promote compact urban form and infill
development. Not
The proposed annexation will result in annexation of both developed and Applicable
undeveloped areas.
Government structure should be simple, accessible, and accountable.
The Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 appears to operate as an
Consistent
accessible and accountable agency as documented in the Municipal Service
Review.
5
Sierra LAFCo Staff Report – November 28, 2018
Sierra Co. FPD #1 Sphere and Regional Annexation
Agencies must provide documentation that they can provide service
within a reasonable period of time. Consistent
The District has documented that it can provide the needed services.
Efficient services are obtained when proposals:
a. Utilize existing public agencies.
b. Consolidate activities and services.
c. Restructure agency boundaries to provide more logical, effective, and Consistent
efficient services.
This proposal will result in the territory receiving fire and emergency services
from an existing fire district.
Adverse impacts on adjacent areas, social and economic interests and the
local government structure must be mitigated.
Consistent
There does not appear to be adverse impacts on other areas, interests or
agencies, which require mitigation.
Conformance with general and specific plans required.
Consistent
The present use of the property appears to be consistent with the County’s
General Plan.
Boundaries:
a. Definite boundaries are required.
b. Boundaries that are favored:
• Create logical boundaries & eliminate islands or illogical
boundaries.
• Follow natural or man-made features and include logical service
areas.
c. Boundaries that are disfavored: Consistent
• Split neighborhoods or communities.
• Result in islands, corridors, or peninsulas.
• Are drawn for the primary purpose of encompassing revenue-
producing territories.
• Create areas where it is difficult to provide services.
The boundaries of the proposal are subject to the landowner’s willingness to
be part of the district. A protest proceeding will be required.
Revenue neutrality is required for all proposals. Consistent
Agricultural and Open Space Land conservation standards are:
a. The proposal must lead to planned, orderly and efficient development.
b. An approved Sphere of Influence Plan is required.
Not
c. Findings with respect to alternative sites are required.
Applicable
d. Impact on adjacent agricultural/open space lands must be assessed.
This proposal will not result in conversion of Agricultural, Forestry or Open
Space lands.
Need for services must be established, and exists when:
a. A public health and safety threat exists.
b. The residents have requested extension of non-growth-inducing
community services. Consistent
c. The subject area is likely to be developed for urban use within 5 years.
Annexation of the subject territory will ensure the area will receive fire and
emergency response services.
6
Sierra LAFCo Staff Report – November 28, 2018
Sierra Co. FPD #1 Sphere and Regional Annexation
Exceptions are justified on the following grounds:
a. Unique
b. Standards conflicts
c. Quality/Cost
d. No alternative is available
ANNEXATION POLICIES--GENERAL
Proposals must be consistent with LAFCo general policies. Consistent
A proposal must be consistent with the agency’s Sphere Plan and Master
Service Element.
Consistent
The project is consistent with the sphere of influence as updated Sierra
LAFCo on November 28, 2018
Sphere non-compliance must be addressed.
Consistent
n/a
Contiguity generally required.
Consistent
The territory is contiguous to the boundaries of the District.
Piecemeal annexations are discouraged.
This proposal will result in annexation of a large underserved area to the Consistent
west albeit services are already provided by the SCFPD#1.
Annexations to eliminate islands are encouraged and normally are Not
approved. Applicable
Not
Roadway Annexations
Applicable
Adverse impact of annexation on other agencies or service recipients is
cause for denial.
Consistent
Annexation of the territory does not appear likely to result in any potential
adverse impacts on other agencies or residents.
Action options include:
Approval
Conditional approval to maximize the efficiency of service and meet
other policy objectives
Denial
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC AND FROM AFFECTED AGENCIES
None received
7
Sierra LAFCo Staff Report – November 28, 2018
Sierra Co. FPD #1 Sphere and Regional Annexation
Technical Factors of Consideration
Location:
The subject territory is located in eastern Sierra County in a variety of land use types
including structures, forest, open space and agricultural lands.
Population:
There are more than 12 registered voters in the annexation area
Property Tax Apportionment:
The County approved Resolution 2018-124 on November 6th, 2018 and the District
approved Resolution 2018-4 on November 13th, 2018.
Base Property Tax:
The base property tax revenue currently allocated to local taxing agencies shall
not be changed as a result of this reorganization excepting there shall be an
exchange of $86,045.14 of the County’s ($43,190.79) and County Service Areas
4 ($4,932.76), 5($2,584.38), & 4A5A ($35,337.21) Base to the Sierra County Fire
Protection District #1.
Future Incremental Property Tax:
There shall be an exchange of .07894969 per cent of the increment with in the affected tax
rat areas and divided between the County General Funds’ and County Service Areas 4, 5, &
4A5A share of future property increment to the Sierra County Fire Protection District #1.
California Environmental Quality Act:
These annexations and detachments are exempt from CEQA , Class 20 since this change
of organization do not change the geographical area in which previously existing powers are
exercised (See Attachment #6, Notice of Exemption)
cc:
Sierra County Fire Protection District #1
8
SIERRA
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
(LAFCo)
SIERRA COUNTY
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT # 1
(SCFPD1)
MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW (MSR)
AND
SPHERE OF INFLUENCE (SOI)
Adopted
November 28, 2018
Resolution 2018-0001 - Municipal Service Review
Resolution 2018-0002 – Sphere of Influence
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1 Local Agency Formation Commission Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Purpose of a Municipal Service Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.3 Purpose of a Sphere of Influence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.3.1 Sphere of Influence Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.3.2 Sphere of Influence Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.3.3 Possible Approaches to the Sphere of Influence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.3.4 SOI Update Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.3.5 SOI Amendments and CEQA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.4 Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities (DUCs) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2 SIERRA COUNTY COMMUNITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.1 Community Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.2 Community Demographics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.3 Population Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.4 Sierra County Communities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.5 Schools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.6 Churches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.7 Community Event . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3 SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.1 Formation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.2 Mission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.3 Board of Commissioners . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.4 Personnel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.5 Fire Stations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.6 Response Time and Call Volume . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.7 Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
3.8 Budget . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3.9 Audit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.9.1 Net Position . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
3.9.2 Expenditures Compared to Budget . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3.9.3 Cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
3.9.4 Capital Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
3.9.5 Risk Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
3.10 Proposed Annexation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
3.11 Agreement with City of Loyalton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
4 MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
4.1 Growth and Population Projections for the Sierra County
Fire Protection District #1 Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
4.1.1 Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 Area
Population Projections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
4.1.2 MSR Determinations on Growth and Population
Projections for the Sierra County Fire Protection District #1. . . . . . . . 26
4.2 Location and Characteristics of any Disadvantaged Unincorporated
Communities (DUC) within or Contiguous to the Sierra County
Fire Protection District #1 SOI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
4.2.1 Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 Area Disadvantaged
Unincorporated Community Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
4.2.2 MSR Determinations on Disadvantaged Unincorporated
Communities near Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 . . . . . . . 27
4.3 Capacity and Infrastructure for the Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 27
4.3.1 Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 Infrastructure . . . . . . . . . . 27
4.3.2 MSR Determinations on Infrastructure for Sierra County
Fire Protection District #1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
1
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
4.4 Financial Ability to Provide Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
4.4.1 Financial Considerations for Sierra County
Fire Protection District #1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
4.4.2 MSR Determinations on Financing for Sierra County
Fire Protection District #1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
4.5 Status of and Opportunities for Shared Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
4.5.1 Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
4.5.2 MSR Determinations on Shared Facilities for Sierra County
Fire Protection District #1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
4.6 Accountability for Community Service Needs, Governmental
Structure and Operational Efficiencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
4.6.1 Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 Government Structure . . . . 29
4.6.2 MSR Determinations on Local Accountability and Governance . . . . . 29
5 SPHERE OF INFLUENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
5.1 Recommendation for Sierra County Fire Protection District #1
Sphere of Influence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
5.2 Present and Planned Land Uses in the Sierra County Fire Protection
District #1, Including Agricultural and Open Space Lands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
5.2.1 County General Plans for Sierra County
Fire Protection District #1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
5.2.2 SOI Determinations on Present and Planned Land Use for
Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
5.3 Present and Probable Need for Public Facilities and Services in the
Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
5.3.1 Municipal Service Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
5.3.2 SOI Determinations on Facilities and Services Present and
Probable Need for Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 . . . . . . . 30
5.4 Present Capacity of Public Facilities and Adequacy of Public Services . . . . . 31
5.4.1 Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 Capacity Background . . . . . 31
5.4.2 SOI Determinations on Public Facilities Present and Future
Capacity for Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
5.5 Social or Economic Communities of Interest for Sierra County Fire
Protection District #1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
5.5.1 Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 Community Background . . . 32
5.5.2 SOI Determinations on Social or Economic Communities of
Interest for the Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 area . . . . . . 32
5.6 Disadvantaged Unincorporated Community Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
5.6.1 Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
5.6.2 Sierra County Disadvantaged Unincorporated Community Status . . 32
APPENDIX A FIRE PROTECTION RESPONSE AND STAFFING ISSUES . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
ACRONYMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
DEFINITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
PREPARERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
MAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
2
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Local Agency Formation Commission Background
The Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, as
amended (“CKH Act”) (California Government Code §§56000 et seq.), is LAFCo’s
governing law and outlines the requirements for preparing Municipal Service Reviews
(MSRs) for periodic Sphere of Influence (SOI) updates. MSRs and SOIs are tools
created to empower LAFCo to satisfy its legislative charge of
discouraging urban sprawl, preserving open-space and prime agricultural
lands, efficiently providing government services, and encouraging the
orderly formation and development of local agencies based upon local
conditions and circumstances (§56301).
CKH Act Section 56301 further establishes that
one of the objects of the commission is to make studies and to obtain and
furnish information which will contribute to the logical and reasonable
development of local agencies in each county and to shape the
development of local agencies so as to advantageously provide for the
present and future needs of each county and its communities.
Based on that legislative charge, LAFCo serves as an arm of the State; preparing and
reviewing studies and analyzing independent data to make informed, quasi-legislative
decisions that guide the physical and economic development of the state (including
agricultural uses) and the efficient, cost-effective, and reliable delivery of services to
residents, landowners, and businesses.
While SOIs are required to be updated every five years, they are not time-bound as
planning tools by the statute, but are meant to address the “probable physical
boundaries and service area of a local agency” (§56076). SOIs therefore guide both the
near-term and long-term physical and economic development of local agencies their
broader county area, and MSRs provide the near-term and long- term time-relevant data
to inform LAFCo’s SOI determinations.
1.2 Purpose of a Municipal Service Review
As described above, MSRs are designed to equip LAFCo with relevant information and
data necessary for the Commission to make informed decisions on SOIs. The CKH Act,
however, gives LAFCo broad discretion in deciding how to conduct MSRs, including
geographic focus, scope of study, and the identification of alternatives for improving the
efficiency, cost-effectiveness, accountability, and reliability of public services.
The purpose of a Municipal Services Review (MSR) in general is to provide a
comprehensive inventory and analysis of the services provided by local municipalities,
service areas, and special districts. A MSR evaluates the structure and operation of the
local municipalities, service areas, and special districts and discusses possible areas for
improvement and coordination. The MSR is intended to provide information and analysis
to support a sphere of influence update.
1
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
A written statement of the study’s determinations must be made in the following areas:
1. Growth and population projections for the affected area; 1
2. The location and characteristics of any disadvantaged unincorporated
communities within or contiguous to the sphere of influence; 2
3. Present and planned capacity of public facilities, adequacy of public services,
and infrastructure needs or deficiencies including needs or deficiencies related to
sewers, municipal and industrial water, and structural fire protection in any
disadvantaged, unincorporated communities within or contiguous to the sphere of
influence; 3
4. Financial ability of agencies to provide services; 4
5. Status of, and opportunities for, shared facilities; 5
6. Accountability for community service needs, including governmental structure
and operational efficiencies.6
The MSR is organized according to these determinations listed above. Information
regarding each of the above issue areas is provided in this document.
1.3 Purpose of a Sphere of Influence
1.3.1 Sphere of Influence Background
In 1972, LAFCos were given the power to establish SOIs for all local agencies under
their jurisdiction. As defined by the CKH Act, “’sphere of influence’ means a plan for the
probable physical boundaries and service area of a local agency, as determined by the
commission” (§56076). SOIs are designed to both proactively guide and respond to the
need for the extension of infrastructure and delivery of municipal services to areas of
emerging growth and development. Likewise, they are also designed to discourage
urban sprawl and the premature conversion of agricultural and open space resources to
urbanized uses.
The role of SOIs in guiding the State’s growth and development was validated and
strengthened in 2000 when the Legislature passed Assembly Bill (“AB”) 2838 (Chapter
761, Statutes of 2000), which was the result of two years of labor by the Commission on
Local Governance for the 21st Century, which traveled up and down the State taking
testimony from a variety of local government stakeholders and assembled an extensive
set of recommendations to the Legislature to strengthen the powers and tools of LAFCos
to promote logical and orderly growth and development, and the efficient, cost-effective,
1 California Government Code Section 56430. (a) (1)
2 California Government Code Section 56430. (a) (2)
3 California Government Code Section 56430. (a)(3).
42 CCaalliiffoorrnniiaa GGoovveerrnnmmeenntt CCooddee SSeeccttiioonn 5566443300.. ((aa))( (42))
53 CCaalliiffoorrnniiaa GGoovveerrnnmmeenntt CCooddee SSeeccttiioonn 5566443300.. ((aa))((53)).
64 CCaalliiffoorrnniiaa GGoovveerrnnmmeenntt CCooddee SSeeccttiioonn 5566443300.. ((aa))((46)).
75 CCaalliiffoorrnniiaa GGoovveerrnnmmeenntt CCooddee SSeeccttiioonn 5566442350 .( (ea))((15))
86 CCaalliiffoorrnniiaa GGoovveerrnnmmeenntt CCooddee SSeeccttiioonn 5566442350 .( (ea))((26)) .
2
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
and reliable delivery of public services to California’s residents, businesses, landowners,
and visitors.
The requirement for LAFCos to conduct MSRs was established by AB 2838 as an
acknowledgment of the importance of SOIs and recognition that regular periodic updates
of SOIs should be conducted on a five-year basis (§56425(g)) with the benefit of better
information and data through MSRs (§56430(a)). A MSR is conducted prior to, or in
conjunction with, the update of a SOI and provides the foundation for updating it.
1.3.2 Sphere of Influence Requirements
LAFCo is required to make five written determinations when establishing, amending, or
updating an SOI for any local agency that address the following (California Government
Code §56425(c)):
1. The present and planned land uses in the area, including agricultural and open-
space lands. 7
2. The present and probable need for public facilities and services in the area. 8
3. The present capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public services that the
agency provides or is authorized to provide. 9
4. The existence of any social or economic communities of interest in the area if the
commission determines that they are relevant to the agency. 10
5. For an update of an SOI of a city or special district that provides public facilities
or services related to sewers, municipal and industrial water, or structural fire
protection, the present and probable need for those public facilities and services
of any disadvantaged unincorporated communities within the existing sphere of
influence. 11
1.3.3 Possible Approaches to the Sphere of Influence
LAFCo may recommend government reorganizations to particular agencies in the
county, using the SOIs as the basis for those recommendations. Based on review of the
guidelines of Calaveras LAFCo as well as other LAFCos in the State, various conceptual
approaches have been identified from which to choose in designating an SOI. These
seven approaches are explained below:
1. Coterminous Sphere:
A Coterminous Sphere is a sphere for a city or special district that is the same as its
existing boundaries. The districts in this report will have a Sphere of Influence that is the
same as the district boundary.
7 California Government Code Section 56425 (e)(1)
8 California Government Code Section 56425 (e)(2)
9 California Government Code Section 56425 (e)(3)
10 California Government Code Section 56425 (e)(4)
11 California Government Code Section 56425 (e)(5)
3
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
4
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
2. Annexable Sphere:
A sphere larger than the agency’s boundaries identifies areas the agency is expected to
annex. The annexable area is outside its boundaries and inside the sphere.
3. Detachable Sphere:
A sphere that is smaller than the agency’s boundaries identifies areas the agency is
expected to detach. The detachable area is the area within the agency bounds but not
within its sphere.
4. Zero Sphere:
A zero sphere indicates the affected agency’s public service functions should be
reassigned to another agency and the agency should be dissolved or combined with one
or more other agencies.
5. Consolidated Sphere:
A consolidated sphere includes two or more local agencies and indicates the agencies
should be consolidated into one agency.
6. Limited Service Sphere:
A limited service sphere is the territory included within the SOI of a multi-service provider
agency that is also within the boundary of a limited purpose district which provides the
same service (e.g., fire protection), but not all needed services. Territory designated as a
limited service SOI may be considered for annexation to the limited purpose agency
without detachment from the multi-service provider.
This type of SOI is generally adopted when the following conditions exist:
a. The limited service provider is providing adequate, cost effective and
efficient services.
b. The multi-service agency is the most logical provider of the other
services.
c. There is no feasible or logical SOI alternative.
d. Inclusion of the territory is in the best interests of local government
organization and structure in the area.
Government Code §56001 specifically recognizes that in rural areas it may be
appropriate to establish limited purpose agencies to serve an area rather than a single
service provider, if multiple limited purpose agencies are better able to provide efficient
services to an area rather than one service district.
Moreover, Government Code Section §56425(i), governing sphere determinations, also
authorizes a sphere for less than all of the services provided by a district by requiring a
district affected by a sphere action to “establish the nature, location, and extent of any
functions of classes of services provided by existing districts” recognizing that more than
one district may serve an area and that a given district may provide less than its full
range of services in an area.
5
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
7. Sphere Planning Area:
LAFCo may choose to designate a sphere planning area to signal that it anticipates
expanding an agency’s SOI in the future to include territory not yet within its official SOI.
1.3.4 SOI Update Process
LAFCo is required to establish SOIs for all local agencies and enact policies to promote
the logical and orderly development of areas within the SOIs. Furthermore, LAFCo must
update those SOIs every five years. In updating the SOI, LAFCo is required to conduct a
municipal service review (MSR) and adopt related determinations.
This report recommends an SOI options for the Sierra County Fire Protection District #1.
Development of actual SOI update will involve additional steps as follows:
1) Opportunity for public input at a Sierra LAFCo public hearing
2) Consideration of changes requested by Sierra LAFCo Commissioners
LAFCo must notify affected agencies 21 days before holding a public hearing to consider
the SOI and may not update the SOI until after that hearing. The Sierra LAFCo
Executive Officer must issue a report including recommendations on the SOI
amendments and updates under consideration at least five days before the public
hearing.
1.3.5 SOI Amendments and CEQA
LAFCo has the discretion to limit SOI updates to those that it may process without
unnecessarily delaying the SOI update process or without requiring its funding agencies
to bear the costs of environmental studies associated with SOI expansions. Any local
agency or individual may file a written request for an SOI amendment. The request must
state the nature of and reasons for the proposed amendment, and provide a map
depicting the proposal.
LAFCo may require the requester to pay a fee to cover LAFCo costs, including the costs
of appropriate environmental review under CEQA. LAFCo may elect to serve as lead
agency for such a review, may designate the proposing agency as lead agency, or both
the local agency and LAFCo may serve as co-lead agencies for purposes of an SOI
amendment. Local agencies are encouraged to consult with LAFCo staff early in the
process regarding the most appropriate approach for the particular SOI amendment
under consideration.
Certain types of SOI amendments are usually exempt from CEQA review. Examples are
SOI expansions that include territory already within the bounds or service area of an
agency, SOI reductions, and zero SOIs.
6
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
SOI expansions for limited purpose agencies that provide services (e.g., fire protection,
levee protection, cemetery, and resource conservation) needed by both rural and urban
areas are typically not considered growth-inducing and are likely exempt from CEQA.
Similarly, SOI expansions for districts serving rural areas (e.g., irrigation water) are
typically not considered growth-inducing.
Remy et al. write
In City of Agoura Hills v. Local Agency Formation Commission (2d
Dist.1988) 198 Cal.App.3d480, 493-496 [243 Cal.Rptr.740] (City of
Agoura Hills), the court held that a LAFCo’s decision to approve a city’s
sphere of influence that in most respects was coterminous with the city’s
existing municipal boundaries was not a “project” because such action did
not entail any potential effects on the physical environment.12
1.4 Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities (DUCs)
SB 244 requires LAFCos to consider disadvantaged unincorporated communities when
developing spheres of influence. Upon the next update of a sphere of influence on or
after July 1, 2012, SB 244 requires LAFCo to include in an MSR (in preparation of a
sphere of influence update):
1) The location and characteristics of any disadvantaged unincorporated
communities within or contiguous to the sphere; and
2) The present and planned capacity of public facilities, adequacy of public
services and infrastructure needs or deficiencies including needs or deficiencies
related to sewers, municipal and industrial water, and structural fire protection in
any disadvantaged unincorporated community within or contiguous to the sphere
of influence.
In determining spheres of influence, SB 244 authorizes LAFCo to assess the feasibility
of and recommend reorganization and consolidation of local agencies to further orderly
development and improve the efficiency and affordability of infrastructure and service
delivery.
The Disadvantaged Unincorporated Community status is determined by whether or not
the Median Household Income is lower than 80% of the State of California Median
Household Income (MHI).
12 Remy, Michael H., Tina A. Thomas, James G. Moose, Whitman F. Manley, Guide to CEQA, Solano Press Books, Point
Arena, CA, February 2007, page 111.
7
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
2 SIERRA COUNTY COMMUNITY
2.1 Community Background
As of the 2010 Census, the population of Sierra County was 3,240 making it California's
second-least populous county. The county seat is Downieville, and the only incorporated
city is Loyalton. Sierra County was formed from parts of Yuba County in 1852. The
county derives its name from the Sierra Nevada.
Prior to the California Gold Rush, the area was home to both the Maidu and the Washoe
peoples. They generally summered in the higher elevations to hunt and fish, and
returned to lower elevations for the winter months. After the discovery of gold in the
Sierra foothills sparked the California Gold Rush, more than 16,000 miners settled in
Sierra County between 1848 and 1860. Most mining settlements in the county sprung up
along the North and Middle Forks of the Yuba River, both of which had rich deposits of
gold. While some of the mining boom towns faded away once gold fever died down,
other settlements such as Downieville and Sierra City have remained.
The Bald Mountain drift mine in Forest City was founded in 1864, and was the largest of
its kind in the state at the time. The Monte Cristo Mine was located in 1854. The largest
quartz-mine is the Sierra Buttes Gold Mine was located in 1850 near Sierra City. The
Gold Bluff Mine was located near Downnieville in 1854. By 1880 the county was
"crushing" 70,000 tons of quartz and had 266 miles of mining ditches.13
2.2 Community Demographics14
Sierra County is a truly rural County. In 2010, the total population in Sierra County was
reported to be 3,240 people, an 8.9% decrease over the previous decade. The
population was composed primarily of permanent adult residents with 82% of the
population over 18 years of age and a 74% home ownership rate. As of 2009, there
were 2,295 housing units reported. With a land area of 610,163 acres, the population
density averages less than four persons per square mile. Population densities correlate
nearly exclusively to the transportation corridors including Highway 49, and 89 and the
vast Sierra Valley, which has long been a population and economic center with deep
roots in agriculture.
Population density also correlates to Local Responsibility Areas (LRA) for fire protection
within the County. State Responsibility Areas (SRA) acres are exclusively interspersed
among Federal lands and are Federal Responsibility Areas (FRA). Direct Protection
Areas (DPA) with some LRA around Downieville and in the Sierra Valley.
Based on current economic forecasts, Sierra County growth projections through 2020
are expected to decrease by up to -1%. The 2010 census data shows an actual
population shrink rate of 8.9% for the period 2000 to 2010. Assuming the range of
potential growth through 2020, using the current average rate (-8.9 %) and the projected
rate (-1%) from State sources, the 2020 population in Sierra County will range from
2,952 to 3,208 people (CAL FIRE Unit Plan).
13 Gilbert, Frank; Wells, Harry (1882). Illustrated History of Plumas, Lassen & Sierra Counties, with California from 1513 to
1850. San Francisco: Fariss & Smith. pp. 478–483.
14 Sierra County Community Wildfire Protection Plan Update, December 2014, page 21.
8
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
2.3 Population Data15
The following table shows that the population of Sierra County has continued to decline
since the 2010 Census as predicted. The State of California has increased in population
at the same time.
Population Decline in Sierra County
Sierra
California
County
Population, Census, April 1, 2010 37,253,956 3,240
Population estimates, July 1, 2017 39,536,653 2,999
Population, percent change - April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2017 6.1% -7.4%
The following table shows that the population of Sierra County is substantially different
from that of the State of California. There are far fewer young people and many more old
people in Sierra County.
Population Age Groups in Sierra County
Sierra
California
County
Persons under 5 years, percent 6.3% 3.6%
Persons under 18 years, percent 23.2% 15.2%
Persons 65 years and over, percent 13.6% 28.8%
The following table shows that the median household income in Sierra County is less
than that for the State of California. However, the per capita income and percent of
people in poverty is not that different from the State of California. This is due to fewer
persons per household and the small population of Sierra County.
Income and Poverty in Sierra County
Sierra
California
County
Median household income (in 2016 dollars), 2012-2016 $63,783 $43,984
Per capita income in past 12 months (in 2016 dollars), 2012-2016 $31,458 $31,873
Persons in poverty, percent 14.3% 14.4%
15 US Census Bureau, https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/CA,sierracountycalifornia/PST045217, June 20, 2018.
9
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
2.4 Sierra County Communities
There are many small communities within Sierra County including the following:
• Calpine, elevation of 5,689 feet, with a 2010 population of 205.
• Downieville, the County Seat, with a 2010 population of 282.
• Loyalton, an incorporated city, with a 2010 population of 769.
• Sattley, formerly known as Church's Corners, with a 2010 population of 49.
• Sierra Brooks with a population of 31216
• Sierra City, northeast of the Downieville, with a 2010 population of 221.
• Sierraville, at the southern end of the huge Sierra Valley, with a 2010 population
of 200.
• Verdi, elevation of 7,349 feet just across the state line from Verdi NV, 2010
population 162.
2.5 Schools
Downieville School is a K-12 school, located in Downieville, the Sierra County Seat. It
serves the communities of Downieville, Sierra City Goodyear’s Bar and surrounding rural
areas. 17 Loyalton Elementary school (K-6) and Loyalton High School (7-12) are located
in Loyalton and serve students within the City and also the surrounding areas including
parts of Plumas County.18
2.6 Churches
Sierra County has numerous churches, a partial list is shown below:
• Sierraville Community Church
• Community Church of Loyalton
• The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Loyalton
• Loyalton Assembly of God
• Downieville Assembly of God
• Immaculate Conception, Downieville
2.7 Community Event
The Sierra County Chamber of Commerce sponsors the Downieville 4th of July Parade and
Foot Races19 described as follows:
Parade is ALWAYS on the actual 4th of July at noon!
Watch it coming and going up and down Main Street. All parade entries
welcome!!
Enter your kids, dogs, families, cars; it’s exciting for all ages! Be creative!
The ultimate small town parade ends with the infamous “Downieville
Fireless Fireworks”!
Enter the Foot races down Main Street. All ages welcome-from one to
one hundred! Pull up a curb and watch the fun!
Family fun in a traditional small town celebration style! 20
16 www.statisticalatias.com Sierra County July 2018
17 http://www.downievilleschool.com/, June 27, 2018.
18 https://sierracountyofficeofeducation.org/, June 27, 2018.
19 https://sierracountychamber.com/, June 27, 2018.
10
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
Likewise, the City of Loyalton sponsers a 4th of July parade followed by a
community picknic near Sierra Brooks.
Sierraville’s biggest event is the “Tour de Manure” involving about 500
participants in a one day bicycle journey through Sierra Valley.
3 SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
3.1 Formation
The Sierra County Board of Supervisors formed the Sierra County Fire Protection
District #1 by Resolution on July 30, 1930.21
3.2 Mission
The following Mission Statement is shown on the District’s website
(http://www.sierracountyfireprotectiondistrict1.org/):22
Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 protects, preserves, and ensures
the continued health, safety, and wellbeing of its community -- the life and
property preservation of all persons residing, working, or existing within
the District, reaching from the Yuba Pass to Verdi.
SCFPD #1 accomplishes this mission through fire suppression, fire
prevention, intervention, medical assistance, and education. Sierra
County Fire Protection District No. 1 maintains high standards of training
and education for its volunteers. Volunteers act and perform in a safe,
courteous, and professional manner, creating strong bonds and
professional relationships within the community and with neighboring fire
departments. Our district members are part of a team that takes pride in
representing the SCFPD #1 mission through dedication and integrity.
3.3 Board of Commissioners
The Board of Supervisors appoints the District Board of Commissioners. The Board
Chair is rotates to the next person on the list on January 1st of each year. Terms of
office are indefinite in which 2 are appointed from Sierraville, 2 from Calpine and 1 from
Sattley at this time. The following citizens sit on the Board of Commissioners for the
District:23
Riz Martinetti, Chair
Tom Archer
Rick Maddalena
Bill Copren
Shawn Burt
20 https://sierracountychamber.com/event-2881033, June 27, 2018.
21 Sierra County Board of Supervisors, Resolution of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Sierra, State of California,
Declaring the result of the Election for the Formation of Fire Protection District in Fifth Supervisorial District., July 30,
1930.
22 Sierra County Fire Protection District #1, http://www.sierracountyfireprotectiondistrict1.org/, June 25, 2018.
23 Sierra County Fire Protection District #1
http://www.sierracountyfireprotectiondistrict1.org/download/agendas/agendas_2017/12.12.2017-Agenda-Form.pdf, June
25, 2018.
11
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
The meetings are held on the evening of the second Tuesday of the month and as
needed and are rotated between the Calpine and Sierraville fire stations in the District.
3.4 Personnel
The Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 has 19 fire fighters and 22 total personnel
including the paid contract secretary and mechanic. During the annual Sierraville VFD
fundraiser (Tour de Manure) the volunteer roster can climb to 40 for the one day event.
The average age of the volunteers is 50. There are six EMT/Paramedic personnel. Many
volunteers have full-time jobs outside the District so mid-week and mid-day staffing
levels are low.24
The Department is organized as follows:
• District Chief (Jeff McCollum) and 4 Battalion Chiefs:
• Sierraville (Dan Wentling, also serves as chief in Jeff McCollum’s absence)
• Sattley (Jay Huebert)
• Calpine (Angela Haick)
• Training (James (Bull) Asher)
Dispatch is provided by the Sierra County Sheriff. A discussion of fire protection
response and staffing is shown in Appendix A at the end of this report.
3.5 Fire Stations
There are three Fire Stations:
• Sierraville (built in mid 1960s’)
• Sattley (Built in mid-1970’s)
• Calpine (built in early 1990’s)
The three fire departments are described on the District’s website as follows:25
Sierraville Fire and Rescue
P.O. Box 252 / 102 E Main Street, Sierraville, CA 96126 (530) 994-3344
Sierraville Fire is a not for profit organization designed to provide fire and
rescue services within the community and to support the efforts of its
volunteers by fundraising, public safety, fostering a progressive
community, through leadership, education, and responsible resource
management.
Calpine Fire Department
129 County Road, P.O. Box 141, Calpine, CA 96124 530.994.3941
24 Sierra LAFCo, Fire Protection District Questionnaire, June 1, 2018.
25 Sierra County Fire Protection District #1, http://www.sierracountyfireprotectiondistrict1.org/team-members/, June 25,
2018.
12
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
The Calpine Volunteer Fire Department was formed in the late 1920’s. In
1930 , the Calpine Volunteer Fire Department was incorporated into the
Sierra County Fire Protection District #1. The Calpine Volunteer Fire
Department is a not for profit organization that currently has 8 active
members and a community based support organization
Sattley Volunteer Fire Department
Sattley CA
The Sattley Fire Department is an all-volunteer, nonprofit organization
that serves the community of Sattley as well as the larger community
within the fire district. Rather than maintaining its own not for profit
status, it has merged with Sierraville in that aspect of management.
The District notes that 26
All of the above listed stations are in reasonable condition although
exterior paint is desperately needed at Calpine and Sattley. ADA
modifications are needed in Sierraville (bathrooms). The upstairs in
Calpine can be finished, made accessible, and placed in service for
training and dry storage.
The District also owns an old building in Calpine and a second in Sattley
that can house reserve apparatus, small equipment, and supplies. Both
buildings have extensive maintenance needs.
3.6 Response Time and Call Volume27
The Department described the response time as follows:
Our initial response is usually within 5 minutes with a typical travel time of
another 5-10 minutes bringing our typical response time to 10 to 15
minutes. We do not meet suggested NFPA standards but believe our
response time is similar to the other fire agencies in Sierra County. We
have several back county settings where homes are NOT accessible in
the winter and are more than 45 minute response in the summer
(Jackson Meadows/Webber Lake/Independence Lake/Ground Hog
Rock).
The Department does provide service to areas outside the District boundaries only by
Mutual Aid (Truckee, Sierra City, Loyalton, Beckwourth, Sierra Valley [Vinton/Chilcoot],
Loyalton. The District notes that there are at time request for service to areas not served
by any District/Department and these are the areas proposed for Annexation.
For the year July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017 the District received 84 EMS calls and 12 fire
calls. Ambulance services are provided by Eastern Plumas Ambulance north of Little
Truckee Summit and Truckee Fire Department south and west of Little Truckee Summit
and near Stampede Reservoir.
26 Sierra LAFCo, Fire Protection District Questionnaire, June 1, 2018.
27 Sierra LAFCo, Fire Protection District Questionnaire, June 1, 2018.
13
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
The District has an ISO (Insurance Services Office) rating of 6 for areas served by
hydrants and 6x for those not so served effective 2014. Improvement to a 5 would not be
likely according to the District. (A rating of 1 is the best and 10 is the worst.)
The District has mutual aid agreements for personnel and equipment as follows:
Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 Mutual Aid Agreements28
Department/District Agreement Response Time
Loyalton Fire Department Mutual Aid 15 minutes
Sierra Valley Fire District Mutual Aid 30 minutes
Sierra City Fire District Mutual Aid 40 minutes
Beckwourth Fire District Auto Aid (limited area) 20 minutes
Truckee Fire Mutual Aid (limited area) 20 minutes to those areas.
Tahoe National Forest Cooperative 5 minutes
Additional ambulance service is through Care Flight who has a helicopter stationed at
Beckwourth.29
3.7 Equipment
The following is the list of equipment for the Sierra County Fire Protection District #1:
Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 Equipment 201830
Station Equip Type Make/Model Year Capacity
Assigned Number
Sierraville E21 Type 1 4x4 HME/Weststates 2001 1,500 gpm
Sierraville B28 Type 3 4x4 Int/ Paoletti 1991 500 gpm
Sierraville R27 Light Ford F550 2017 4
Rescue 4x4 passenger
Sierraville G-7 (Reserve) Type 3 Int/ BME 1981 400 gpm
Sierraville WT-18 Type 1 Kenworth 1973 4,000
Water Gallon
Tender
Calpine E-30 Type 1 Pierce 1989 1,500 gpm
Calpine B-46 Type 3 Int 1998 4,000
Gallon
Calpine WT-20 Type 1 Peterbuilt 1980 4,000
Water Gallon
Tender
Calpine R23 Light Dodge 1989 2
Rescue 4x4 passenger
Calpine E-24 (surplus) Squirt Int 1971
Sattley E-48 Type 1 Ford 8000 1981 1,000
Sattley E-9 Type 6 4x4 Dodge 1970 400 gpm
Sattley WT-51 Type 1 Peterbuilt 1981 4,000
Water Gallon
Tender
Sattley R27B Light Ford 1988 2
(Reserve) Rescue Passenger
Sierraville Command SUV Jeep/Cherokee 1994 4
28 Sierra LAFCo, Fire Protection District Questionnaire, June 1, 2018.
29 Maddalena, Richard, E-mail tk.rick.07@gmail.com, June 19, 2018.
30 Sierra LAFCo, Fire Protection District Questionnaire, June 1, 2018.
14
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
8200 Passenger
Sierraville Fleet Maint Utility Chev/Utility 1983
The Department offers the following comments on equipment needs:
The District states the following plans for equipment upgrades:
The service box on R27B will be mounted on a newer chassis and will
replace R-23. As an alternative, the District may choose to purchase a
previously owned light rescue. This is the highest priority for investment.
Sattley E-9 will be replaced with a Type 6 or larger engine as the
opportunity arises. All three water tenders will need to be replaced as
funds allow. The highest non-apparatus need is for a set of battery
operated cutting/spreading equipment (with rams) to replace antiquated
hydraulic equipment. Also as a priority are needs for more hand held
radios, pagers, replacement computers (for training and record keeping),
and some wildland and structure PPE.
3.8 Budget
A Budget is a plan for spending. The Audit will show actual funds on hand or spent.
The following table shows the Sierra County FPD #1 Budget for 2017-18.
The income for the District for 2017-2018 is as follows:
Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 Budget 2017-201 Income
Tax Income 130,000.00
USDA Grant 50,100.00
USDA Loan 51,300.00
Workmans Comp Refund 9,160
Rental Income 1,200.00
Equipment Reimbursement
Mitigation Fees
Interest Income
Budget Carry Over 3,500.00
Totals 235,260
In and Out Income
MSR/SOI
Cost Recovery
Capital Expense
Fire Truck
Calpine Fire House
Annexation Plan from years past fund held for this purpose ($30,000.00)
The District reports that the District expects approximately $10,000 per year in donations
and that each Fire Department within the District conducts fundraisers. These funds are
not shown in the District budget and are totally under control of each Fire Department.
They expect to raise $19,000 per year. 31
31 Sierra LAFCo, Fire Protection District Questionnaire, June 1, 2018.
15
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
The table on the following page shows the expenses Budget for the District.
16
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 Budget 2017-2018 Expenses
1.0 General
1.1 Audit $4,000.00
1.2 Clerical (labor) 12,000.00
1.3 Office Expense (operating supplies for the office 1,000.00
1.4 Fire House Maintenance 9,140.00
1.5 Bank Fee 50.00
2.0 EMS
2.1 EMS Training 5,000.00
2.2 EMS Medical Supplies 3,500.00
3.0 Communication
3.1 Repeater Site Rental 1,660.00
3.2 Web Site (Rental etc.) 160.00
3.3 Communication Consulting and System Repairs 6,000.00
3.4 Radio and Repeater Batteries 1,000.00
4.0 Fire Protection
4.1 Personal Protection Equipment 2,000.00
4.2 Grant Expense -
4.3 Operating Supplies for Fire and Rescue 1.000.00
4.4 Portable Equipment (Fire Ext. Etc.) 13,000.00
4.5 Equipment Repair and Maintenance (other than vehicles) 1,000.00
4.6 Fire Training 2,000.00
4.7 Fire Protection Verdi 6,000.00
5.0 Insurance
5.1 Work Compensation 19,649.00
5.2 Liability, Vehicle, Facility Loss 12.000.00
6.0 Vehicle Repairs
6.1 Fuel 6,201.00
6.2 Labor 7,000.00
6.3 Parts, Tires 5,000.00
6.4 Pump Testing (Every other year) 3,500.00
6.5 Taxes and Licenses 1,000.00
6.6 Outside Repair Services 5,000.00
6.7 USDA Loan-Monthly Payment 6,000.00
7.0 Utilities
7.1 Electric 4,000.00
7.2 Propane 3,500.00
7.3 Water 500.00
7.4 Trash and Solid Waste 1,200.00
7.5 Telephone 800.00
8.0 Capital Asset Expenses
8.1 USDA Rescue Truck Grant/Loan 162,400.00
TOTAL $306,260.00
17
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
3.9 Audit
3.9.1 Net Position
The Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 has a current audit prepared by an outside
auditor. The following table shows the determination of the Net Position for the District.
Sierra County Fire Protection District #1
Statement of Activities and Governmental Fund Revenues, Expenditures and
changes in Fund Balances June 30,201632
GENERAL ADJUST- STATEMENT
FUND MENTS OF NET
POSITION
ASSETS
Cash * 244,804 - 244,804
Accounts receivable-other - -
Capital assets** - 797,854 797,854
Less, accumulated depreciation - (533,606) (533,606)
Total Assets 244,804 264,248 509,052
LIABILITIES
Accounts Payable 2,058 - 2,058
Total liabilities 2,058 - 2,058
FUND BALANCES/NET POSITION
Fund Balances
Restricted 7,757 (7,757) -
Committed 32,443 (32,443) -
Unassigned 202,546 (202,546) -
Total fund balances 242,746 (242,746) -
Total liabilities and fund balances 244,804
Net position
Net investment in capital assets 264,248 264,248
Restricted 7,757 7,757
Unrestricted 234,989 234,989
Total Net Position 506,994 506,994
*The District maintains certain portions of its funds with Sierra County. The remainder is
in a checking or savings account.
**Capital assets include equipment, vehicles, land and buildings.
The table on the following page shows the comparison between the Budget and the
amount of money actually spent. The District stayed within the Budget overall.
32 Sierra County Fire Protection District #1, Financial Statements and Independent Auditor’s Report for the year ended
June 30, 2016, Prepared by Robert W. Johnson, 6234 Birdcage Street, Citrus Heights, California 95610, Phone: 916-723-
2555, October 28, 2016, Page 3.
18
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
3.9.2 Expenditures Compared to Budget
Sierra County Fire Protection District #1
Statement of revenues and expenditures compared to Budget
For the year ended June 30, 201633
Budget Actual Favorable’
(Unfavorable)
Variance
Revenues
Tax revenue 122,000 127,121 5,121
Mitigation fees - 3,319 3,319
Fire income - - -
Accident income - 2,304 2,304
Interest income - 615 615
Grant income - 21,611 21,611
Donation income - - -
Rental income 1,200 1,200 -
Other income - - -
TOTAL REVENUES 123,200 156,170 32,970
Expenditures
Fire Protection 6,950 3,518 3,432
Fire protection Verdi 5,405 5,405 -
Operating supplies - 468 (468)
Vehicle Expense 37,500 26,218 11,282
Compensation insurance 15,000 19,196 (4,196)
Insurance-liability 12,000 10,445 1,555
Utilities 9,400 9,865 (456)
Building maintenance 17,000 3,500 13,500
Communications 7,950 2,343 5,607
EMS Supplies 4,600 1,115 3,485
EMS training 7,000 997 6,003
Audit 3,600 3,600 -
Clerical 8,000 7,275 725
Property tax roll fees - 11,596 (11,596)
Office expense 1,200 210 990
Taxes and licenses 1,000 - 1,000
Bank fee 95 40 55
Grant expenditures - 23,039 (23,039)
Capital outlay - - -
Total expenditures 136,700 128,821 7,879
Excess of revenues/(expenditures) (13,500) 27,349 40,849
For all categories combined, the District spent less than was budgeted for the year
ending June 30, 2016.
33 Sierra County Fire Protection District #1, Financial Statements and Independent Auditor’s Report for the year ended
June 30, 2016, Prepared by Robert W. Johnson, 6234 Birdcage Street, Citrus Heights, California 95610, Phone: 916-723-
2555, October 28, 2016, Pages 5-6.
19
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
3.9.3 Cash34
The audit provides the following information on cash management for Sierra County Fire
Protection District #1:
Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 Cash on June 30, 2016
Cash with County $101,077
Checking $9,241
Savings $134,486
Total $244,804
3.9.4 Capital Assets35
The audit examines the capital assets and notes any changes for the fiscal year.
However for the year ended June 30, 2016 there were no changes noted for Capital
Assets for Sierra County Fire Protection District #1.
Sierra County Fire Protection District #1
Changes in Capital Assets for the year ended June 30, 2016
Balance, Additions Transfer/ Balance
Beginning Disposals End of
of year year
Equipment 59,652 - - 59,652
Vehicles 426,790 - - 426,790
Land and Buildings 311,412 - - 311,412
Total $797,854 - - $797,854
3.9.5 Risk Management36
The audit reports that the Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 purchased
commercial insurance coverages to provide for the risk of loss related to theft, damage
and destruction of assets and injuries to employees.
3.10 Proposed Annexation
The Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 has been working on a plan to annex areas
of the County which are not now within the District. Three documents have been
prepared to explain this proposal and process and they are included below in this report:
1. Annexation Talking Points
2. Annexation Q and A 7-10-18
3. Open Annexation Letter
34 Sierra County Fire Protection District #1, Financial Statements and Independent Auditor’s Report for the year ended
June 30, 2016, Prepared by Robert W. Johnson, 6234 Birdcage Street, Citrus Heights, California 95610, Phone: 916-723-
2555, October 28, 2016, Page 10.
35 Sierra County Fire Protection District #1, Financial Statements and Independent Auditor’s Report for the year ended
June 30, 2016, Prepared by Robert W. Johnson, 6234 Birdcage Street, Citrus Heights, California 95610, Phone: 916-723-
2555, October 28, 2016, Page 10.
36 Sierra County Fire Protection District #1, Financial Statements and Independent Auditor’s Report for the year ended
June 30, 2016, Prepared by Robert W. Johnson, 6234 Birdcage Street, Citrus Heights, California 95610, Phone: 916-723-
2555, October 28, 2016, Page 12.
20
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
1. ANNEXATION TALKING POINTS
WE (THE SIERRA CO. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1) ARE WORKING ON THE
PERSPECTIVE THAT:
ALL DEVELOPED PROPERTIES IN THE EASTERN PART OF THE COUNTY
DESERVE FIRE PROTECTION SERVICE,
THAT ALL VOLUNTEER FIRE FIGHTER’S SHOULD BE ASSURED OF PROTECTION
UNDER WORKER’S COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY
AND THAT WE “SIERRA CO. FPD #1” MAY BE THE BEST POSITION TO PROVIDE
SERVICE EITHER THROUGH AGREEMENTS OR SERVICE CONTRACTS.
BACKGROUND:
From the early 1930’s to mid-1970’s all of Sierra Co. that was east of the Gold Lake
Highway was In Sierra Co. FPD #1 (SCFPD#1) except the City of Loyalton. In the early
70’s a number of property owner opted out of the District as the felt exposed to
increasing taxes. Proposition 13 changed the taxing structure in 1978.
The District has been considering annexation for a number of years with a focus on the
newer portion of Verdi CA.
Consideration has been given renewed energy because of changes in how Washoe
County manages Volunteers (change status to “support” (providing water, food, and
mop-up) and wildland suppression rather than EMS and Structure Protection which will
be done by paid staff). Coldsprings, Galena, Gerlach, and Verdi Volunteer are either
gone or re-missioned to “support”
The District met with N. Verdi residents: They do not see themselves as ready to create
their own Volunteer Department and are not in a position to replace Verdi NV
Volunteers.
The District met with Truckee Meadows FPD (for Washoe County) with Sierra Co.
Committee. Protection cost will increase to be similar to the cost of Nevada properties.
They have challenges serving CA (different Mission – Cal Fire has wildland
responsibility, different laws for enforcement and investigation, different priorities for
equipment and staff). Committed to getting Sierra Co. got information to work with.
Problems focused on I-80 and Highway 395.
Contact from property owner in Loyalton Pines area. Not in a District, Difficult to get
insurance. Pay full $150/year in Cal-Fire’s prevention fee. There is a history of problems
knowing our responders will go into “no-man’s land” as good neighbors but may/ will not
be covered by District’s workman’s compensation provider.
District got feedback from County Committee that if we trigger LAFCO we should
consider annexation of all of eastern portion of the County excluding the City of Loyalton:
21
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
SERVICE PLAN:
Create a Service Rate Area to include all of Verdi CA to gain enough resources to cover
the cost of service VIA Truckee Meadows Fire.
Create a 2nd Service Rate Area to include Sierra Co. portion of long valley to cover the
cost of service VIA Truckee Meadows Fire or Sierra Valley Fire.
Expand area served by Loyalton fire to include nearby ranches and Loyalton Pines.
Replace existing 1991 and 1992 agreements thereby taking away the risk for Loyalton
Fire and those called to support them.
Extend the District’s existing mitigation fee ($1.25) to new portions of the District.
INFORMATION NEEDED and CONCERNS TO BE ADDRESSED:
Impacts to County Staff to support LAFCO analysis (cost, mapping, meetings etc)
Stakeholder involvement--- need thoughts/ input refine proposal/ define alternatives and
perhaps buy in.
• Board of Supervisors (involves 4 districts)
• Loyalton City
• Sierra Brooks
• Loyalton Pines
• Verdi CA
• Long Valley
• Cooperating Agencies
• Other special districts (hospital, irrigation, domestic water)—not School
Negotiations with County and LAFCO about District’s share to sustain the agreement
CONTACTS: BILL COPREN, RICK MADDALENA, JEFF McCOLLUM
Other Board Members: TOM ARCHER, SHAWN BURT, RITZ MARTINETTI
22
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
2. CONCEPTUAL ANNEXATION PLAN 7/10/18
1. Create a special assessment area to include all of Verdi, California to generate the
additional resources necessary to cover the cost of fire protection VIA Truckee Meadows
Fire Protection District. Follow with annexation of this area.
2. Create a second special assessment area to include Sierra County portion of long
valley to cover the cost of service VIA Truckee Meadows Fire or Sierra Valley
Fire. Follow with annexation of this area
3. Annex areas near Loyalton and contract with Loyalton Fire Department to include
nearby ranches and Loyalton Pines and Sierra Brooks
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS:
Q -1 Will the property owners involved with this annexation pay more for services?
A-1 Property owners with properties in the Verdi Area and the Long Valley special assessment
areas will be expected to pay for the services rendered by Truckee Meadow FPD. These cost
are unknown at this time but will be close to the rates paid by property owners in the
unincorporated portions of Washoe County for structure protection and emergency medical
service.
Q-2 Will mitigation fees be assessed on new construction in the newly annexed areas?
A-2 Yes. Sierra County collects a mitigation fee from the construction of new homes, attached
garages and new commercial and industrial structures that expand the fire exposure for the
District. The rate is $1.25 per square foot. The money can only be used to pay for equipment
and capital improvements and must be expended within 5 years of collection. The mitigation
fee is intended to have new construction reimburse a proportional cost of the equipment and
facilities paid for at the time of the new construction by the existing rate payers.
Q-3 What share of the existing property taxes will be routed to the District upon annexation.
A-4 The final share will be determined by LAFCO. The District expects that the share will be
similar to the average share, about 7.8% of the 1% for tax rate areas that are currently in the
District.
Q-4 Will the District be developing new facilities in the newly annexed area?
A-4 That depends on the needs of the area. For example, water for fire suppression in and near
Verdi CA might be developed with mitigation funds. Areas near Loyalton might best be served
by updated apparatus.
Q-5 What are the options for the various areas?
A-5 There does not appear to be any good options. A committee of residents from areas near
Loyalton explored developing a new fire protection district for Loyalton and the neighboring
communities. That effort was short lived as the cost of operating such a district were
disclosed.
23
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
Q-6 Who is the decision maker for these annexation possibilities?
A-6 The Decision to allow and annexation or creations of a new District rest with LAFCO. LAFCO
also will approve the negotiated tax structure necessary to support fire protection in the newly
served areas.
Q-7 Who pays for the LAFCO effort?
A-7 The party requesting a decision from LAFCO will need to pay for the cost of assembling
LAFCO and the studies that LAFCO may require. That is the SCFPD#1 with help from the
Hospital District.
Q-8 Is there a “bottom line” for the SCFPD#1 to complete the annexation?
A-8 There appears to be few if any financial reasons for annexation and that has never been the
motive of the District. Three things must happen for the District to want to pursue annexation.
1. The property owners of the area to be annexed must want to be included in the
District. This “public will” can be sensed through public meetings before the district
commission and before LAFCO. A public vote may be necessary to establish new
special assessment areas (as is being considered for the Verdi and Long Valley
areas).
2. There must be a means of providing the desired service such as contracts for service
with Truckee Meadow FPD (for Verdi CA and Long Valley) and through the Loyalton
City FD for those areas where Loyalton is the obvious first responder.
3. The financial burden of providing service must be at least “neutral” to the existing
rate payers of the District.
3. OPEN ANNEXATION LETTER
OPEN LETTER
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1 ANNEXATON UPDATE
Responding to requests from communities in the eastern part of Sierra County that are
not within a fire protection district, the Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 has
decided to pursue annexation of all of that part of eastern Sierra County that is not within
a district. With help from Sierra County Planning Department, the SCFPD#1 is in the
process of preparing a resolution to the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO)
to annex all of the unserved areas including Long Valley, Verdi, Sierra Brooks, and
Loyalton Pines. The City of Loyalton will be excluded from the expanded District. The
resolution will follow legal notice in the Mountain Messenger and a public hearing before
the District Commission.
Recent developments include:
Sierra County has identified an ad-hoc committee (Supervisors Roan and Adams) to
negotiate the portion of the real property taxes that will be transferred to the District.
24
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
Supervisors Roen and Hubner, Sierra County Staff, and two District Commissioners
have again met with Chief Moore of Truckee Meadows Fire Protection District.
Staff work from Sierra County Assessor’s office (Laura Marshal and her staff) was
presented to Chief Moore to demonstrate the compatibility of funds available from the
County Tax Roles (at 7.8% of the 1% tax rate) with rates paid for similar service within
Washoe County. It appears that additional funds will be necessary from “Benefit
Assessment Areas” for both Verdi CA, and Long Valley. The expressions for support
from those residents and the estimates provided by Chief Moore indicate that adequate
funds can be generated to pay for the desired Structure Fire and Emergency Medical
Service.
A consultant to guide the LAFCO process has been identified to assist both the County
and the District in this effort.
Over three years ago, the District established three decision parameters to guide their
efforts.
A. They must be invited.
B. There must be a means to provide service.
C. The cost of service must not impact existing property owners within the District.
As we engaged property owners of the involved areas through 8 public meetings, we
added the goal to “strengthen Loyalton Fire Department” as a collateral benefit.
The District has concluded that these criteria can be met. We also believe that Loyalton
Fire Department will be strengthen by receiving additional revenue under a Service
Agreement that routes funds from out of City areas through the District to the
Department. With this recent progress noted above, the District will continue on the
annexation road with a goal of completing the annexation by December 2018.
Rick Maddalena/ William Copren, Sierra Co. FPD #1
25
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
3.11 Draft Points of Agreement with the City of Loyalton
The City of Loyalton would not be included in the Sierra County FPD #1 but the District
and the City would work together to make sure that all areas are protected. The following
Draft Agreement has been prepared by the District and the City:
CITY OF LOYALTON AND SIERRA COUNTY FPD#1
DRAFT POINTS OF AGREEMENT 10/10/2017
A. All properties should have access to structure fire protection and
EMS.
B. All property owners should pay a comparable price for service.
None should have a free ride. None should pay more than others
on the basis of values at risk.
C. The Volunteers are the most valued resources. They should have
access to quality training, equipment, supplies, and apparatus.
The governing bodies will continue to publicly support their efforts
as they recruit, train, and respond to incidents.
D. The City of Loyalton will continue to govern the Loyalton Volunteer
Fire Department by appointing officers, establishing standards and
guidelines, and approving budgets and major acquisitions.
E. The Loyalton Fire Department will retain all of its identify as a Fire
Department including the opportunity to recruit and retain
volunteers, provide training, establish standards and guidelines,
own, operate, and maintain apparatus and equipment, and
designate officers. They will recruit volunteers from the areas they
serve.
F. The facilities used by Loyalton VFD at Sierra Brooks will continue
to be owned by Sierra County and (leased? Rented?) to the City
for fire protection purposes.
G. Under laying land?
H. All equipment, supplies, and apparatus owned by the City of
Loyalton and or Loyalton Fire Department for fire suppression or
EMS will remain the property of those parties.
I. All equipment, supplies, and apparatus listed as properties
transferred to the City of Loyalton or Loyalton VFD under the 1991
agreement have been sufficiently depreciated or replaced. There
is no longer a need to tract this equipment.
26
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
J. The agreement will need to have a map exhibit (call it “Exhibit A”)
that will show the service area, and the State Responsibility Area
within the Service Area. The service area boundary along Hwy 49
needs some attention (Harriot Lane? Robinson Barn? )
considering “closest resource”.
K. A new mutual aid agreement will be needed to clarify
responsibility boundaries.
L. Assuming LAFCO’s support and decision and as mutually agreed
to between the City of Loyalton and the SCFPD #1, the SCFPD#1
will annually transfer 85 percent of the tax base it receives from
Sierra County for the properties shown on the Agreement’s Exhibit
A to the City of Loyalton as full payment for the Services rendered
under this agreement. These funds will likely increase through
time as property values increase but my decline as they did in the
recession of 2007-2011.
M. The City of Loyalton will, in turn, pass all of these funds to the
Loyalton Fire Department accounts along with City revenue
CURRENTLY budgeted for Fire Suppression and EMS for
services within the City. (Excluding funds currently routed to the
City by the existing 1991 and 1992 contracts which will become
null and void). This is to be mutually agreed upon by the City of
Loyalton and the SCFPD #1.
N. The SCFPD#1 will not be party to Loyalton’s Cost Recovery
program or Forest Service Cooperative agreement. They will not
be entitled to an overhead assessment on these or other out of
area agreements with the State or Local Government.
O. The agreement should have a clause that allows for amendments.
For example, would Loyalton want SCFPD#1 to use its cost
recovery system for services within the Service Area.
27
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
4 MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW
4.1 Growth and Population Projections for the Sierra County Fire Protection
District #1 Area37
Purpose: To evaluate service needs based on existing and anticipated growth
patterns and population projections.
4.1.1 Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 Area Population Projections
The General Plan for Sierra County was updated in 2012. At that time, the State
projected that the population of the County would increase. However, the General Plan
anticipated a low growth rate for the County.38 In fact, the population of the County has
continued to decline since the General Plan was prepared in 2012. 39
4.1.2 MSR Determinations on Growth and Population Projections for the Sierra
County Fire Protection District #1
1-1) The population of Sierra County is expected to remain the same or to decline
slightly in the future. The county has 28.8% of the population 65 and older.
1-2) Growth and development in the County are managed according to the General
Plan. The Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 should maintain close contact
with the Sierra County Planning Department.
4.2 Location and Characteristics of any Disadvantaged Unincorporated
Communities (DUC) within or Contiguous to the Sierra County Fire
Protection District #1 SOI 40
Purpose: To comply with the State Law to examine any unincorporated areas
which could be provided with better services by annexing to an adjacent city.
4.2.1 Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 Area Disadvantaged
Unincorporated Community Status
The Median Household Income (in 2016 dollars) for California was $63,783 and 80
percent of this would be $51,026. The Median Household Income for Sierra County is
$43,984, well below the level for Disadvantaged Unincorporated Community status.
However, there is no incorporated city which the area can be annexed into.
37 California Government Code Section 56430. (a) (1)
38 Sierra County, General Plan 2012, Land Use Element, Page 1-6.
39 US Census Bureau, https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/CA,sierracountycalifornia/PST045217, June 20, 2018.
40 California Government Code Section 56430. (a) (2)
28
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
4.2.2 MSR Determinations on Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities near
Sierra County Fire Protection District #1
2-1) Although the population of Sierra County would qualify as a DUC, annexation to
an incorporated city is not an option for this area.
4.3 Capacity and Infrastructure for the Sierra County Fire Protection District #1
Purpose: To evaluate the present and planned capacity of public facilities,
adequacy of public services, and infrastructure needs or deficiencies including
needs or deficiencies related to sewers, municipal and industrial water, and
structural fire protection in any disadvantaged, unincorporated communities
within or contiguous to the sphere of influence.41
4.3.1 Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 Infrastructure
The Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 infrastructure is described above in this
report. The District has adequate equipment and works to maintain it.
4.3.2 MSR Determinations on Infrastructure for Sierra County Fire Protection
District #1
3-1) The Sierra County FPD #1 has three fire stations with equipment and volunteers
for each station.
4.4 Financial Ability to Provide Services42
Purpose: To evaluate factors that affect the financing of needed improvements
and to identify practices or opportunities that may help eliminate unnecessary
costs without decreasing service levels.
4.4.1 Financial Considerations for Sierra County Fire Protection District #1
The Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 maintains a budget and has an audit from
an outside auditor as required by the State Law. The District allows the individual fire
departments to do additional fund raising for local needs. The District receives a share of
the County’s 1% property tax and has not needed to pass additional parcel taxes so far.
It would be beneficial to post the audit and the budget on the District website.
41 California Government Code Section 56430. (a) (3)
42 California Government Code Section 56430. (a) (4)
29
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
4.4.2 MSR Determinations on Financing for Sierra County Fire Protection District
#1
4-1) The Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 maintains a budget and has
resources to meet the obligations of the District.
4-2) The District uses the services of an outside auditor to prepare an audit as
required by the State Law.
4-3) The District has received grants and loans from the USDA and other State and
Federal Agencies for equipment.
4-4) The District should make financial information available on the District website.
4-5) The increasing complexities of managing the existing District plus the
complexities of managing contracts for protection of additional areas will increase
the probability that a paid or part time paid District Chief will be needed in the
near future.
4.5 Status of and Opportunities for Shared Facilities43
Purpose: To evaluate the opportunities for a jurisdiction to share facilities and
resources to develop more efficient service delivery systems.
4.5.1 Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 Facilities
The Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 has three fire stations. The District
cooperates with State and Federal agencies and cooperates with other Fire Protection
Districts and agencies for mutual aid agreements. If the District were to expand to the
eastern part of Sierra County as proposed the District would have an agreement with the
City of Loyalton regarding sharing revenue and equipment.
4.5.2 MSR Determinations on Shared Facilities for Sierra County Fire Protection
District #1
5-1) The District coordinates with the County for budgeting and collection of taxes.
5-2) The District serves three fire departments and coordinates the communications,
training and management.
5-3) If the District were to annex additional areas it would be able to integrate these
areas into the management system of the District.
43 California Government Code Section 56430. (a)(5)
30
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
31
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
4.6 Accountability for Community Service Needs, Governmental Structure and
Operational Efficiencies44
Purpose: To consider the advantages and disadvantages of various government
structures that could provide public services, to evaluate the management
capabilities of the organization and to evaluate the accessibility and levels of
public participation associated with the agency’s decision-making and
management processes.
4.6.1 Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 Government Structure
The Sierra County FPD #1 has a full Board of Commissioners and meets the
requirements for special district management. The District has an outside auditor
perform the required audits. The District prepares and manages the budget each fiscal
year. The District maintains appropriate insurance for buildings and workers. The District
maintains a website for the benefit of the volunteers and the public.
4.6.2 MSR Determinations on Local Accountability and Governance
6-1) The Sierra County FPD #1 has a full Board of Commissioners.
6-2) The District contracts with an outside auditor to perform the required audits.
6-3) The District Board holds regular meetings and rotates the meetings between the
two fire stations in the District.
6-4) The District prepares a Budget each year and manages the finances within the
Budget.
6-5) The District has been successful to obtain grants and loans from the USDA Rural
Development and other State and Federal agencies to upgrade equipment and
equip those apparatus with tools, hose, and safety gear.
6-6) The District maintains appropriate insurance for facilities and personnel.
6-7) The District maintains a website for the public. It is important to keep the website
up to date.
44 California Government Code Section 56430. (a)(6).
32
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
5 SPHERE OF INFLUENCE
5.1 Recommendation for Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 Sphere of
Influence
The Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 should have an annexable sphere which
would include the eastern part of Sierra County with the exception of the City of
Loyalton. The adoption of an annexable sphere does not automatically mean that the
additional area is annexed to the District. The District must still apply for annexation and
the annexation must be approved by the Sierra Local Agency Formation Commission
after all the requirements are met.
5.2 Present and Planned Land Uses in the Sierra County Fire Protection
District #1, Including Agricultural and Open Space Lands45
5.2.1 County General Plans for Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 Area
The Sierra County General Plan was prepared in 2012 and states the following
regarding development: 46
It is the County's goal to direct development toward those areas which are already
developed, where there are necessary public facilities and where a minimum of growth
inducement and environmental damage will occur. The pattern of land uses sought by
the County is a system of distinct and cohesive rural clusters amid open land.
5.2.2 SOI Determinations on Present and Planned Land Use for Sierra County
Fire Protection District #1
1-1] Sierra County has jurisdiction over land use planning. The District should
maintain contact with the Sierra County Planning Department regarding possible
changes in land use.
1-2] Since Sierra County has a negative growth rate, significant changes in land use
are not anticipated in the near future.
45 California Government Code Section 56425 (e)(1)
46 Sierra County, General Plan 2012, Page ii.
33
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
5.3 Present and Probable Need for Public Facilities and Services in the Sierra
County Fire Protection District #1 Area47
5.3.1 Municipal Service Background
There is a need for fire protection and emergency medical services within the Sierra
County Fire Protection District #1 and also in the Eastern part of the County. This is
evidenced by the many calls to the fire departments.
5.3.2 SOI Determinations on Facilities and Services Present and Probable Need
for Sierra County Fire Protection District #1
2-1] There will be a continuing need for Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 for
emergency medical service and fire protection.
2-2] There is also a need for this service in the Eastern part of Sierra County which is
not now included in the District.
5.4 Present Capacity of Public Facilities and Adequacy of Public Services48
5.4.1 Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 Capacity Background
The Sierra County FPD #1 has adequate capacity to serve the area within the District.
The capacity is enhanced with mutual aid and automatic aid agreements. The District
receives numerous calls from areas outside of the District but within Sierra County. It
would be better if the Eastern Sierra County area could be within the District and
contribute to the needed capacity.
5.4.2 SOI Determinations on Public Facilities Present and Future Capacity for
Sierra County Fire Protection District #1
3-1] The Sierra County FPD #1 has adequate capacity in funding, equipment and
volunteers to serve the District.
3-2] If additional area were annexed to the District the Board of Commissioners would
work with the residents to develop capacity for that area of the District.
3-3] The future capacity of the District may depend on the future of volunteer fire
fighters and emergency response personnel. Rural areas such as Sierra County
will depend on volunteers as long as possible. However, the training
requirements are always increasing, the physical requirements are strenuous for
an aging volunteer force, and the modern work environment is no longer as
hospitable to volunteers compared to older economies with self-employed
volunteers.
47 California Government Code Section 56425 (e)(2)
48 California Government Code Section 56425 (e)(3)
34
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
5.5 Social or Economic Communities of Interest for Sierra County Fire
Protection District #149
5.5.1 Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 Community Background
Sierra County is small in population and the communities within the County are all quite
small so the population does identify with the County as a community. The community of
Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 would be open to including additional area in
the Fire Protection District because they are already within the same County.
5.5.2 SOI Determinations on Social or Economic Communities of Interest for the
Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 area.
4-1] In many ways the County of Sierra functions as one social and economic
community. Even though there are many smaller hamlets within the County many
services are provided by the County to the whole community.
4-2] The annexation of the Eastern part of Sierra County to the Sierra County Fire
Protection District #1 would represent a truer picture of this rural and scattered
community.
5.6 Disadvantaged Unincorporated Community Status50
5.6.1 Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities
The Median Household Income (in 2016 dollars) for California was $63,783 and 80
percent of this would be $51,026. The Median Household Income for Sierra County is
$43,984, well below the level for Disadvantaged Unincorporated Community status.
However, there is no incorporated city which the area can be annexed into.
5.6.2 Sierra County Disadvantaged Unincorporated Community Status
5-1] Although the population of Sierra County would qualify as a DUC, annexation to
an incorporated city is not an option for this area.
49 California Government Code Section 56425 (e)(4)
50 California Government Code Section 56425 (e)(5)
35
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
APPENDIX A FIRE PROTECTION RESPONSE AND STAFFING ISSUES
1 Fire Protection Issues
The following is a general discussion of fire protection issues including Mutual Aid,
Dispatch, Response Time, Staffing and Water Supply:
2 Mutual Aid Issues
Most of the fire protection and EMS providers primarily serve their own jurisdictions.
Given the critical need for rapid response, however, there are extensive mutual aid
efforts that cross jurisdictional boundaries. Mutual aid refers to reciprocal service
provided under a mutual aid agreement, a pre-arranged plan and contract between
agencies for reciprocal assistance upon request by the first-response agency. In
addition, the jurisdictions rely on automatic aid primarily for coverage of areas with street
access limitations and freeways.
Automatic aid refers to reciprocal service provided under an automatic aid agreement, a
prearranged plan or contract between agencies for an automatic response for service
with no need for a request to be made.
3 Fire and EMS Dispatch Issues
Dispatch for fire and medical calls is increasingly becoming regionalized and specialized.
This increased regionalization and specialization is motivated by the following factors:
1) Constituents increasingly expect emergency medical dispatching (EMD), which
involves over-the-phone medical procedure instructions to the 911 caller and
requires specialized staff.
2) Paramedics increasingly rely on EMD, which also involves preparing the
paramedic enroute for the type of medical emergency and procedures.
3) Dispatch technology and protocols have become increasingly complex.
4) Modern technology has enabled better measurement and regulatory oversight of
fire department (FD) response times, and increased pressure for FDs to meet
response time guidelines.
5) FDs need standard communication protocols due to their reliance on mutual aid.
6) Dispatching of calls from cell phones may be inefficient due to multiple transfers,
length of time the caller spends on hold or lack of location information.
Response times are further delayed when callers that are unfamiliar with the area
are unable to describe rural locations to the dispatch personnel.
7) NFPA recommends a 60-second standard for dispatch time, the time between
the placement of the 911 call and the notification of the emergency responders.
The Center for Public Safety Excellence recommends a 50-second benchmark
for dispatch time.
36
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
8) There are clear economies of scale in providing modern fire and medical
dispatch services.
4 Fire and EMS Response Time Issues
Response times reflect the time elapsed between the dispatch of personnel and the
arrival of the first responder on the scene. For fire and paramedic service, there are
service standards relating to response times, dispatch times, staffing, and water flow.
Particularly in cases involving patients who have stopped breathing or are suffering from
heart attacks, the chances of survival improve when the patient receives medical care
quickly.
Similarly, a quick fire suppression response can potentially prevent a structure fire from
reaching the “flashover” point at which very rapid fire spreading occurs—generally in
less than 10 minutes.51
The guideline established by the National Fire Protection Association52 (NFPA) for fire
response times is six minutes at least 90 percent of the time, with response time
measured from the 911-call time to the arrival time of the first-responder at the scene.53
The fire response time guideline established by the Center for Public Safety Excellence
(formerly the Commission on Fire Accreditation International) is 5 minutes 50 seconds at
least 90 percent of the time.54
5 Fire Protection Staffing Issues
For structure fires, NFPA recommends that the response team include 14 personnel—a
commander, five water supply line operators, a two-person search and rescue team, a
two-person ventilation team, a two-person initial rapid intervention crew, and two support
people.
The NFPA guidelines require fire departments to establish overall staffing levels to meet
response time standards, and to consider the hazard to human life, firefighter safety,
potential property loss, and the firefighting approach.
NFPA recommends that each engine, ladder or truck company be staffed by four on-
duty firefighters, and that at least four firefighters (two in and two out), each with
protective clothing and respiratory protection, be on scene to initiate fire-fighting inside a
structure. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standard requires
that when two firefighters enter a structure fire, two will remain on the outside to assist in
rescue activities.55
51 NFPA Standard 1710, 2004.
52 The National Fire Protection Association is a non-profit association of fire chiefs, firefighters, manufacturers and
consultants.
53 Guideline for a full structure fire is response within ten minutes by a 12-15 person response team at least 90 percent of
the time.
54 Commission on Fire Accreditation International, 2000.
55 United States, 29 CFR 1910.134.
37
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
For emergency medical response with advanced life support needs, NFPA recommends
the response team include two paramedics and two basic-level emergency medical
technicians.
6 Firefighter Certification
According to the California State Fire Marshal, all volunteer and call firefighters must
acquire Firefighter I certification; however, there is no time limit as to how long they may
work before attaining certification. Firefighter I certification requires completion of the
259–hour Firefighter I course, which includes training on various fire ground tasks,
rescue operations, fire prevention and investigation techniques, and inspection and
maintenance of equipment. In addition to the course, Firefighter I certification also
requires that the applicant have a minimum of six months of volunteer or call experience
in a California fire department as a firefighter performing suppression duties. 56
7 Fire Protection Water Supply Issues
For structure fires, NFPA recommends the availability of an uninterrupted water supply
for 30 minutes with enough pressure to apply at least 400 gallons of water per minute.
8 Planning and Management
Pre-planning for future capital improvement needs is considered a best management
practice, which is recommended for all public agencies regardless of size. Fire protection
districts should have a formal capital improvement plan (CIP). CIPs can be tailored to
the needs of the agency, but should include a list of anticipated replacement and
improvement needs with an anticipated timeline for completion and a financial plan for
achieving those goals. It is recommended that a CIP have a planning horizon of at least
five years and be updated annually to reflect current conditions.
56 State Fire Marshall, Course Information and Required Materials, 2007, p. 44.
38
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
ACRONYMS
AB Assembly Bill
ALS Advanced Life Support
BLS Basic Life Support
CALFIRE California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection
CDP Census Designated Place
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CIP Capital Improvement Plan
CKH Act Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000
County Sierra County
CPR Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation
CSA County Service Area
CSD Community Services District
District Sierra County Fire Protection District #1
DPA Direct Protection Areas (Fire Protection)
DUC Disadvantaged Unincorporated Community
EMD emergency medical dispatching
EMS Emergency Medical Service
ER Emergency Room
FD Fire Department
FPD Fire Protection District
FRA Federal Responsibility Areas (Fire Protection)
HOPTR Homeowner Property Tax Relief
HPP Hospital Preparedness Program
ISO Insurance Services Office
JPA Joint Powers Agreement
39
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
LAFCo Local Agency Formation Commission
LRA Local Responsibility Areas (Fire Protection)
MSR Municipal Service Review (LAFCo)
NEMT Non-Emergency Medical Transport
NFPA National Fire Protection Association
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration
PPE Personal Protective Equipment
SB Senate Bill
SCFPD1 Sierra County Fire Protection District #1
SOI Sphere of Influence (LAFCo)
SRA State Responsibility Areas (Fire Protection)
USDA United States Department of Agriculture
USFS United States Forest Service
40
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
DEFINITIONS
Advanced Life Support (ALS) is a set of life-saving protocols and skills that extend
Basic Life Support to further support the circulation and provide an open airway and
adequate ventilation (breathing).57
Agriculture: Use of land for the production of food and fiber, including the growing of
crops and/or the grazing of animals on natural prime or improved pasture land.
Automatic aid refers to reciprocal service provided under an automatic aid agreement,
a prearranged plan or contract between agencies for an automatic response for service
with no need for a request to be made.
Basic life support (BLS) is a level of medical care which is used for victims of life-
threatening illnesses or injuries until they can be given full medical care at a hospital. It
can be provided by trained medical personnel, including emergency medical technicians,
paramedics, and by laypersons who have received BLS training.58
Bond: An interest-bearing promise to pay a stipulated sum of money, with the principal
amount due on a specific date. Funds raised through the sale of bonds can be used for
various public purposes.
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): A State Law requiring State and local
agencies to regulate activities with consideration for environmental protection. If a
proposed activity has the potential for a significant adverse environmental impact, an
environmental impact report (EIR) must be prepared and certified as to its adequacy
before taking action on the proposed project.
Community Facilities District: Under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 2082
(Section 53311, et seq.) a legislative body may create within its jurisdiction a special tax
district that can finance tax-exempt bonds for the planning, design, acquisition,
construction, and/or operation of public facilities, as well as public services for district
residents. Special taxes levied solely within the district are used to repay the bonds.
Environmental Impact Report (EIR): A report required pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act that assesses all the environmental characteristics of an area,
determines what effects or impact will result if the area is altered or disturbed by a
proposed action, and identifies alternatives or other measures to avoid or reduce those
impacts. (See California Environmental Quality Act.)
Federal Responsibility Area (FRA): Area that is the appropriate Federal agency’s
financial responsibility of preventing and suppressing fires (e.g. National Forest, National
Park Service, Department of defense, etc.).
57 https://www.bing.com/search?q=advanced%20life%20support%20definition&qs=n&form=QBRE&sp=-
1&pq=advanced%20life%20support%20definition&sc=7-32&sk=&cvid=D11E5029B93146B7869ACA307E67579C,
January 2, 2018.
58
https://www.bing.com/search?q=basic+live+support+definition&form=EDGHPT&qs=PF&cvid=38ca9c6b47eb4231b7b6aa
c376766e92&refig=5bfd9a1d03bb425c8f0e610c8131c9c7&cc=US&setlang=en-US, January 2, 2018.
41
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
Fire Season: The period of mid-May through October when vegetation cures, dries out,
and is most flammable.
HAZMAT: A material (such as flammable or poisonous material) that would be a danger
to life or to the environment if released without precautions.
Impact Fee: A fee, also called a development fee, levied on the developer of a project
by a county, or other public agency as compensation for otherwise-unmitigated impacts
the project will produce. California Government Code Section 77000, et seq., specifies
that development fees shall not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the
service for which the fee is charged. To lawfully impose a development fee, the public
agency must verify its method of calculation and document proper restrictions on use of
the fund.
Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo): A five-or seven-member commission
within each county that reviews and evaluates all proposals for formation of special
districts, incorporation of cities, annexation to special districts or cities, consolidation of
districts, and merger of districts with cities. Each county’s LAFCO is empowered to
approve, disapprove, or conditionally approve such proposals. The LAFCO members
generally include two county supervisors, two city council members, and one member
representing the general public. Some LAFCOs include two representatives of special
districts.
Local Responsibility Area (LRA): Land which is not under State or Federal financial
responsibility for preventing and suppressing fires such as the incorporated area of a
city.
Mello-Roos Bonds: Locally issued bonds that are repaid by a special tax imposed on
property owners within a community facilities district established by a governmental
entity. The bond proceeds can be used for public improvements and for a limited number
of services. Named after the program’s legislative authors.
Mutual aid: Mutual aid refers to reciprocal service provided under a mutual aid
agreement, a pre-arranged plan and contract between agencies for reciprocal
assistance upon request by the first-response agency.
Spotting: Behavior of a fire producing sparks or embers that are carried by the updraft
and wind and start new fires beyond the main fire. Spotting usually occurs with low
humidity.
State Responsibility Area (SRA): Areas of the State in which the financial
responsibility of preventing and suppressing fires has been determined by the State
Board of Forestry and Fire Protection to be primarily the responsibility of the State.
42
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
REFERENCES
Commission on Fire Accreditation International, 2000.
Gilbert, Frank; Wells, Harry (1882). Illustrated History of Plumas, Lassen & Sierra Counties, with
California from 1513 to 1850. San Francisco: Fariss & Smith. pp. 478–483.
https://www.bing.com/search?q=advanced%20life%20support%20definition&qs=n&form=QBRE&
sp=-1&pq=advanced%20life%20support%20definition&sc=7-
32&sk=&cvid=D11E5029B93146B7869ACA307E67579C, January 2, 2018.
https://www.bing.com/search?q=basic+live+support+definition&form=EDGHPT&qs=PF&cvid=38c
a9c6b47eb4231b7b6aac376766e92&refig=5bfd9a1d03bb425c8f0e610c8131c9c7&cc=U
S&setlang=en-US, January 2, 2018.
http://www.downievilleschool.com/, June 27, 2018.
Maddalena, Richard, E-mail tk.rick.07@gmail.com, June 19, 2018.
NFPA (National Fire Protection Association) Standard 1710, 2004.
Remy, Michael H., Tina A. Thomas, James G. Moose, Whitman F. Manley, Guide to CEQA,
Solano Press Books, Point Arena, CA, February 2007, page 111.
Sierra County Board of Supervisors, Resolution of the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Sierra, State of California, Declaring the result of the Election for the Formation of Fire
Protection District in Fifth Supervisorial District., July 30, 1930.
Sierra County Chamber of Commerce, https://sierracountychamber.com/, June 27, 2018.
Sierra County Chamber of Commerce, https://sierracountychamber.com/event-2881033, June 27,
2018.
Sierra County, Community Wildfire Protection Plan Update, December 2014, page 21.
Sierra County Fire Protection District #1, Financial Statements and Independent Auditor’s Report
for the year ended June 30, 2016, Prepared by Robert W. Johnson, 6234 Birdcage
Street, Citrus Heights, California 95610, Phone: 916-723-2555, October 28, 2016.
Sierra County Fire Protection District #1, http://www.sierracountyfireprotectiondistrict1.org/, June
25, 2018.
Sierra County Fire Protection District #1
http://www.sierracountyfireprotectiondistrict1.org/download/agendas/agendas_2017/12.1
2.2017-Agenda-Form.pdf, June 25, 2018.
Sierra County Fire Protection District #1, http://www.sierracountyfireprotectiondistrict1.org/team-
members/, June 25, 2018.
Sierra County, General Plan 2012
Sierra County Office of Education, https://sierracountyofficeofeducation.org/, June 27, 2018.
Sierra LAFCo, Fire Protection District Questionnaire, June 1, 2018.
43
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
State of California, Fire Marshall, Course Information and Required Materials, 2007, p. 44.
United States, 29 CFR 1910.134.
US Census Bureau,
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/CA,sierracountycalifornia/PST045217, June
20, 2018.
PREPARERS
John Benoit, LAFCo Consultant
PO Box 2694, Granite Bay CA 95746
Phone: 916-797-6003 E-Mail: johnbenoit@surewest.net
Christy Leighton, Planning Consultant
555 East Willow Street, Willows CA 95988
Phone: 530-934-4597 E-Mail: christyleighton@sbcglobal.net
44
SIERRA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
SIERRA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT #1
Adopted MSR - Resolution 2018-0001 November 28, 2018
Adopted SOI - Resolution 2018-0002 November 28, 2018
MAP
·|}þ 70 kj Beckwourth Ca Rd l ne pi nL teirraH dR yellaV arreiS Dyson Ln ·|}þ 49 S oc tt Rd H J a ·|}þ u 3 l 9 n l 5 e c lu ti j o a n h dR ·|}þ 89 edistseW kj kjCalpine Loyalton Rd Calpine
·|}þ 49 kj Sattley Smithneck Rd Dog Valley Rd
Yuba
Pass Rd Sierraville kj
Nichols Mill Rd ·|}þ 89 Henness Pass Rd Henness Pass Rd
§¨¦
·|}þ 80 89
Truckee kj UV Donner Pass UV 267 89 UV 267 Soda Springs Source: Modoc LAFCo UV North 28
45
reviR eekcurT
Range 17 East
1112 7 8 9 10 11 12 6 7 8 5 9 4 1 3 0 1 2 1 1 1 2 6 7 5 8 9 4 1 3 0 1 2 1 1 1 2 6 7 5 8 4 9 1 3 0 1 2 1 1 1 2 6 7 5 8 9 4 10 3 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 7 8 1413 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 19 1 3 2 2 2 11 4 5 6 32 2 3 1 1 1 4 5 6 2 3 1 3 3 1 9 6 0 7 1 8 2 2 3 0 9 1 5 8 2 7 2 2 3 1 8 1 4 9 3 6 2 2 1 3 1 2 7 5 3 4 0 2 2 3 1 1 3 2 6 5 1 4 1 1 2 2 3 2 3 4 1 5 6 1 6 7 8 1 3 3 9 0 1 1 2 2 3 7 5 0 8 9 2 1 4 9 2 6 2 3 1 8 3 2 3 7 4 2 3 2 1 1 0 5 3 1 1 2 5 1 2 4 6 232 2 3 1 1 1 4 5 6 2 3 31 C 3 ol 0 1 d 1 6 9 7 S 8 tream 2 3 2 1 5 0 8 2 9 7 2 3 1 1 4 9 3 6 28 2 2 3 1 1 3 2 7 4 0 5 2 2 3 1 1 2 3 6 5 1 4 3 1 1 1 6 2 3 2 2 5 4 3 1 3 1 6 7 0 9 1 8 2 2 3 1 5 8 9 0 2 7 2 3 2 1 4 9 1 3 8 6 2 3 2 1 1 3 7 4 2 0 5 3 2 1 1 2 2 5 6 1 4 3 3 1 2 1 2 1 6 2 5 3 4 3 3 1 1 6 7 1 0 9 8 2 3 2 1 5 8 9 2 0 7 3 2 2 1 4 9 3 8 1 6 2 3 2 1 3 1 2 4 7 0 5 2 35 2 2 1 L 1 3 6 1 o 4 ng Vall 1 e 2 2 3 y 3 1 4 5 6 C 1 r 2 eek 3 3 1 6 7 0 1 1 8 9 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 30
3 2 1 2 5 6 1 2 3 5 6 1 1 2 3 3 0 1 6 7 2 3 9 2 5 8 2 3 8 3 4 9 2 3 7 1 4 3 0 11 2 3 6 5 2 2 3 5 1 6 12 1 3 3 9 0 1 5 2 3 9 2 20 4 2 3 8 3 3 2 3 7 4 2 2 3 6 5 1 2 3 5 6 6 3 3 0 1 5 2 3 9 2 4 2 3 8 3 3 2 3 7 4 2 3 2 5 6 1 3 2 6 5 6 3 3 1 0 5 3 2 2 9 4 33 28 3 3 2 4 7 2 3 2 5 6 1 3 2 6 5 6 3 3 1 0 5 2 3 9 2 4 2 3 8 3 3 2 3 2 7 4 3 2 5 6 1 36 25 7 3 6 1
14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 18
2 2 3 6 2 2 4 5 1 3 9 0 2 2 0 9 2 2 1 8 2 2 2 7 2 2 3 6 25 24 1 2 7 0 1 2 6 1 1 2 5 2 1 2 4 3 24 13 1 1 8 9 1 2 7 0 1 2 6 1 1 2 5 2 1 2 4 3 1 2 3 4 1 1 8 9 1 2 7 0 1 2 6 1 1 2 5 2 1 2 4 3 1 2 3 4 1 1 8 9 1 2 7 0 1 2 6 1 1 2 5 2 1 2 4 3 1 2 3 4 1 3 9 0
35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 31
1 1 2 2 M 1 4 3 i R d i d v 1 l 2 1 e e 2 4 r 1 Y 3 uba 1 6 7 1 8 9 1 5 8 2 7 0 1 4 9 2 6 1 Hay 1 1 3 2 0 p 5 2 ress 1 1 C 1 2 2 4 3 reek 1 1 2 1 2 3 4 7 1 1 6 8 9 1 8 2 5 7 0 1 2 9 4 6 1 34 1 2 1 3 3 5 2 0 5 2 1 1 3 2 3 4 1 6 1 2 1 3 1 3 4 2 1 17 8 3 5 2 16 4 9 33 3 15 1 3 0 4 1 1 2 3 1 4 5 1 1 3 1 2 3 6 7 3 1 6 1 8 3 1 5 8 2 7 3 9 1 4 3 6 3 1 3 4 5 10 3 1 1 2 5 1 4 3 1 1 1 6 2 3 3 1 6 7 1 8 3 1 5 8 2 7 3 1 4 9 3 6 3 1 1 3 4 0 5 3 1 1 2 5 1 4 3 1 1 1 6 2 3 1 1 6 7 8 9
26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 30
35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 31
2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 6
1
2
1 1
3
4 Cany 1
2
1 o 3
4
2 n C 1 r 8 ee
1
7 k
9
1
2
8 7
0
1
2
9 6
1
1 1 0 5 R M i
2
ve i
2
d r dle Yuba 1
2
1 1
3
4 1 1
2
2 3
4
1
1
7 8
9
1 8
2
7
0
1 9
2
6
1
1 1
2
0 5
2
1 1
2
1 4
3
1 1
2
2 3
4 1
5 8
7 1
4 9
6
1
1
3 0
5
1
1
2 1
4
1
1
1 2
3
6
1
7
8 1
5 8
7 1
4 9
6
1
1
3 0
5
1
1
2 1
4
1
1
1 2
3 1
6 7
8 1
5 8
7 1
4 9
6
1
1
3 0
5
1
1
2 1
4 13
1 1 2
19
1 7 8
26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 30
35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 31
2Le1gen6d 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 32 33 34435 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 6
11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 7 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 18 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 19 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 23 24 30 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 29 28 0207.5 126 2M2il5es 30 29 28 27 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 31 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32 33 34 35 36 6 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 1 7 8 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 18 17 16 15 14 13 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 19
htroN
02 T
LAFCo File 2018-0001
Sierra County Fire Protection District #1
north east area Annexation
Range 13 East Range 14 East Range 15 East Range 16 East
kj Communities Sierra County County Boundary Sierra County Fire Pr P o lu te m c a ti s o kj P C no o rDto u kjlia B n s e t t c y r kw ic o t u r # thkj 1Vkjin C t h o i n lckjoot Dow S n i kj i e ev r i r llkj a e County S kj ierr C a a C lp it in y ekj kjSakjtt S le i L e y o rr y a a v kj lt i o lle n Goodyears Parcels Bar Nevada County Truckeekj kjNevada City Placer County kjGrass Valley
htroN 22 T htroN 12 T
htroN 91
T
htroN
81
T
North East Area Annexation Point of Beginning
Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 Sphere of Influence Highways Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 Roads North East Area Annexation Sierra County Fire Protection District #1 Sectional Grid North East Area Annexation and Sphere of Influence Sierra LAFCo Resolution: 2018-0001 (MDB&M) Adopted: Source: Sierra LAFCo Map Created 6/21/2018