LAFCO
Benicia Final MSR
Read the report at Local Agency Formation Commissions ↗
City of Benicia
Municipal Service Review
Solano LAFCO
Prepared By:
Michelle McIntyre, Amy Million, and Suzanne Thorsen
Acknowledgment:
Renata Di Battista, Christina Ratcliffe, and Abigail Urrutia
February 27, 2017
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR i February 27, 2017
Table of Contents
Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................... 1-1
1.0: Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1-2
1.1 – Role and Responsibility of LAFCO ........................................................................... 1-2
1.2 – Purpose of this Municipal Service Review ................................................................ 1-2
1.3 – Uses of the Municipal Service Review ...................................................................... 1-3
1.4 – Sphere of Influence .................................................................................................. 1-3
1.5 – California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) ........................................................... 1-4
2.0: Executive Summary .................................................................................................... 2-1
3.0: City Profile & History .................................................................................................. 3-1
4.0: Growth and Population Projections .......................................................................... 4-1
4.1 – Population................................................................................................................. 4-1
4.1.1 – Growth Trends ............................................................................................. 4-1
4.1.2 – Population Projections ................................................................................. 4-1
5.0: Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities ......................................................... 5-1
6.0: Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities .................................................. 6-1
6.1 – Animal Control .......................................................................................................... 6-1
6.2 – Fire ........................................................................................................................... 6-1
6.3 – Law Enforcement ...................................................................................................... 6-2
6.4 – Parks and Recreation ............................................................................................... 6-4
6.4.1 – Types of Parks and Facilities ....................................................................... 6-4
6.4.2 – Current and Future Park Needs ................................................................... 6-5
6.4.3 – Proposed Park Facilities .............................................................................. 6-6
6.5 – Public Works ............................................................................................................. 6-9
6.5.1 – Transportation and Circulation ..................................................................... 6-9
6.5.2 – Transit Services ......................................................................................... 6-11
6.6 – Solid Waste ............................................................................................................ 6-11
6.7 – Stormwater ............................................................................................................. 6-12
6.7.1 – Benicia’s Stormwater Management Program ............................................. 6-14
6.8 – Wastewater ............................................................................................................. 6-15
6.9 – Water ...................................................................................................................... 6-16
6.9.1 – Historical Water Use .................................................................................. 6-16
6.9.2 – Projected Usage ........................................................................................ 6-19
7.0: Financial Ability to Provide Services ........................................................................ 7-1
7.1 – General Fund ............................................................................................................ 7-1
7.2 – Enterprise Funds ...................................................................................................... 7-4
7.2.1 – Wastewater Funds ....................................................................................... 7-4
7.2.2 – Water Funds ................................................................................................ 7-5
7.3 – Capital Improvements ............................................................................................... 7-6
7.3.1 – Assessment Districts ................................................................................... 7-7
7.3.2 – Benefit Districts ............................................................................................ 7-7
7.3.3 – Capital License Tax ..................................................................................... 7-7
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR ii February 14, 2017
7.3.4 – Development Agreement ............................................................................. 7-7
7.3.5 – General Obligation Bonds ............................................................................ 7-8
7.3.6 – Park Dedication/Quimby Act ........................................................................ 7-8
7.3.7 – School Impact Fees ..................................................................................... 7-8
7.3.8 – State and Federal Grants............................................................................. 7-8
7.3.9 – Traffic Mitigation Fee ................................................................................... 7-8
7.3.10 – Wastewater Capacity Fund ........................................................................ 7-9
7.3.11 – Water Capacity Fund ................................................................................. 7-9
8.0: Status and Opportunities for Shared Facilities ........................................................ 8-1
8.1 – Shared Facilities ....................................................................................................... 8-1
8.1.1 – Animal Services ........................................................................................... 8-1
8.1.2 – Fire .............................................................................................................. 8-1
8.2 – Open Space and Recreation Services ...................................................................... 8-1
8.3 – Police Department .................................................................................................... 8-2
8.4 – Solid Waste .............................................................................................................. 8-2
8.5 – Stormwater ............................................................................................................... 8-2
8.6 – Transportation Services ............................................................................................ 8-2
8.7 – Water & Wastewater ................................................................................................. 8-3
8.8 – Management Efficiencies ......................................................................................... 8-3
9.0: Government Structure and Accountability ............................................................... 9-1
9.1 – Government Structure .............................................................................................. 9-1
9.2 – Accountability ........................................................................................................... 9-1
10.0: LAFCO Policies Affecting Service Delivery .......................................................... 10-1
11.0: Summary of Findings & Determinations .............................................................. 11-1
12.0: References ............................................................................................................... 12-1
List of Tables
Table 4-1: Population Growth in Benicia and Solano County Since 1970...................................... 4-1
Table 4-2: Solano Cities and County—Population Projections 2010–2040 ................................... 4-1
Table 5-1: Median Household Income by Census Track ...................................................................... 5-1
Table 6-1: Existing Park Land per Capita .................................................................................................... 6-6
Table 6-2: Existing and Future Parks and Recreation Facilities within City Limits ....................... 6-7
Table 6-3: Future Roadway Improvements ................................................................................................ 6-9
Table 6-4: Contracted Water Supply ......................................................................................................... 6-17
Table 6-5: Baseline Treated Water Demand Forecast by Category ............................................... 6-20
Table 6-6: Baseline Raw Water Demands ................................................................................................ 6-20
Table 6-7: Total Raw Water Demand Forecasts .................................................................................... 6-21
Table 7-1: Statement of Revenues for the Past Five Years and Current Year ............................... 7-1
Table 7-2: Statement of Expenditures for the Past Five Years and Current Year ........................ 7-2
Table 7-3: Sewer Rates from January 17, 2013–June 30, 2017 ........................................................... 7-4
Table 7-4: Water Service Rates to Residential Users .............................................................................. 7-5
Table 7-5: Additional Volume Charges to Residential Users ..............................................................7 -5
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR iii February 27, 2017
Table 7-6: Water Service Rates to Commercial and Industrial Users ...............................................7 -5
Table 7-7: Additional Volume Charges to Commercial and Industrial Users ............................... 7-6
List of Exhibits
Exhibit 1: City of Benicia, City Boundary and Sphere of Influence 2016 ............................................. v
Exhibit 2: General Fund Revenues and Expenditures ............................................................................. 7-3
List of Attachments
Attachment 1: List of Parks and Facilities, Map of Parks in Benicia……………….…………………………1
Attachment 2: Citywide Organizational Chart……………………………………………….…………………………2
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR iv February 14, 2017
Exhibit 1: City of Benicia, City Boundary and Sphere of Influence 2016
.;
.;
.;
.;
.;
.;
.;
.;
.;
.;
.;
.;
.;
.;
.;
.;
.;
.;
.;
/
I
I .. t .
' '\
' t.,
'
' l '
'
' I
'
'
~egend
-·-·-··
City of Benicia
Eii City Boundary
City Boundary and Sphere of Influence
Water
2016
_ - _ -- __ - :.. Sphere of Influence
Railroads
05
M1les
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR v February 27, 2017
Introduction
Acronyms and Abbreviations
ABAG Association of Bay Area Governments
BART Bay Area Rapid Transit
BUSD Benicia Unified School District
CAD Computer aided dispatch
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CIP Capital improvement program
CKH Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000
DUC Disadvantaged unincorporated community
DWR California Department of Water Resources
ELAP Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program
EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
ERP Enterprise Resource Planning System
JPA Joint powers agreement
LAFCO Local Agency Formation Commission
SOI Sphere of influence
Mgd million gallons per day
MHI Median household income
MOU Memorandum of understanding
MS4 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System
MSR Municipal service review
NBA North Bay Aquaduct
NPDES National Pollution Discharge Elimination System
PCI Pavement condition index
SCWA Solano County Water Agency
SID Solano Irrigation District
SOI Sphere of influence
SOLTrans Solano Transit
STA Solano Transportation Authority
SWMP Storm Water Management Plan
SWP State Water Project
SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board
WTP Water Treatment Plant
WWTP Wastewater Treatment Plant
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 1-1 February 27, 2017
Introduction
1.0: Introduction
1.1 – Role and Responsibility of LAFCO
The fundamental role of a Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) is to implement the
Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg (CKH) Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 (Government
Code Section 56000, et seq.), providing for the logical, efficient, and most appropriate
formation of local municipalities, service areas, and special districts. The CKH requires all
LAFCOs, including Solano LAFCO, to conduct a Municipal Service Review (MSR) prior to
updating the spheres of influence (SOI) of the various cities and special districts in Solano
County (Government Code Section 56430). CKH requires an MSR and SOI update every 5
years.
1.2 – Purpose of this Municipal Service Review
This MSR will provide Solano LAFCO with an informational document and make
determinations for each of the seven elements prescribed by CKH. This MSR evaluates the
structure and operation of the City and discusses possible areas for improvement,
coordination, or changes to the SOI as appropriate. The purpose of the MSR is to collect
data in order to provide a comprehensive analysis of service provision by the City of Benicia
(City). The boundaries of the City and proposed SOI are shown in Exhibit 1. Key sources for
this study included agency-specific information gathered by reviewing strategic plans,
general plans, websites, financial reports, agency audits, research, personal communication,
and the Municipal Service Review Guidelines published by the Governor’s Office of Planning
and Research.
The report contains one section for each of the following seven elements as prescribed by
CKH:
Growth and Population Projections for the Affected Area. This section reviews projected
growth within the existing service boundaries of the City and analyzes the City’s plans to
accommodate future growth.
The location and characteristics of any disadvantaged unincorporated communities
within or contiguous to the sphere of influence. A disadvantaged unincorporated
community is defined as inhabited territory with a median household income of 80 percent
or less of the statewide median income.
Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities and Adequacy of Public Services
Including Infrastructure Needs or Deficiencies. This section discusses the services
provided including the quality and the ability of the City to provide those services, including
a discussion of capital improvement projects currently underway and projects planned for
the future where applicable.
Financial Ability of Agencies to Provide Services. This section reviews the City’s fiscal data
and rate structure to determine viability and ability to meet service demands. It also
addresses funding for capital improvement projects.
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 1-2 February 14, 2017
Introduction
Status of and Opportunities for Shared Facilities. This section examines efficiencies in
service delivery that could include sharing facilities with other agencies to reduce costs by
avoiding duplication.
Accountability for Community Service Needs, including Government Structure and
Operational Efficiencies. This section examines the City’s current government structure,
and considers the overall managerial practices. It also examines how well each agency makes
its processes transparent to the public and invites and encourages public participation.
Matters Related to Effective or Efficient Service Delivery Required by Commission
Policy. This section includes a discussion of any Solano LAFCO policies that may affect the
ability of each agency to provide efficient services.
1.3 – Uses of the Municipal Service Review
The MSR is used to examine the operations of a local agency, identify those agencies that
may be unable to perform their mandated services, or identify ways to provide more
effective and efficient services. Government Code Section 56375 allows LAFCO to take action
on recommendations found in the MSR, such as initiating studies for changes of
organization, updating the SOI, or initiating a change of organization.
Studies in anticipation of a change of organization are useful to identify potential issues that
may arise during the process. Issues can range from legal barriers to fiscal constraints to
concerns of residents and landowners. A study would allow more focused analysis and the
opportunity to resolve issues or options before beginning the process.
The MSR also provides the necessary information to help LAFCO make decisions on a
proposed SOI update. In evaluating the SOI, the MSR provides the information necessary to
determine if the agency has the capability to serve a larger area. The MSR discusses the
financial condition of the agency, source of revenues, and projected expenses. It also
includes a discussion of the projected infrastructure needs that would allow for expansion of
those services. The MSR, however, does not address the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), but it is one requirement for the SOI update. That requires a separate analysis.
Alternatively, the MSR can recommend changes of organization such as consolidation,
dissolution, merger, establishment of a subsidiary district, or the creation of a new agency
that typically involves a consolidation of agencies. Those changes of organization may also
require an environmental review, a property tax sharing agreement, and an election.
1.4 – Sphere of Influence
The SOI is defined as “a plan for the probable physical boundaries and service areas of a
local agency” (Government Code Section 56076). The SOI represents one of the most
important tools LAFCO uses to “carry out its purposes and responsibilities for planning and
shaping the logical and orderly development and coordination of local government
agencies” (Government Code Section 56425).
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 1-3 February 27, 2017
Introduction
CKH requires LAFCO to adopt an SOI for each city and special district in the County. The SOI
serves much the same function for LAFCO as general plans serve for cities and counties: it
guides the Commission in its consideration of annexations and other forms of
reorganizations. The sphere represents the logical extent of the agency’s boundary in the
next 5 to 20 years. However, since LAFCO is required to update and review the sphere every
5 years, the sphere in all practicality has a 5-year planning horizon. When adopting the SOI,
the Commission must make the following determinations:
Present and planned land uses in the area. This consists of a review of current and
planned land uses, including agricultural and open-space, based on planning documents.
Present and probable need for public facilities and services. This includes a review of the
services available in the area and the need for additional services.
Present Capacity of Public Facilities. This section includes an analysis of the capacity of
public facilities and the adequacy of public services that the agency provides or is authorized
to provide.
Social or economic communities of interest. This section discusses the existence of any
social or economic communities of interest in the area if the Commission determines that
they are relevant to the agency. These are areas that may be affected by current services
provided by the Agency or areas that may receive services in the future.
Present and probable need for services to disadvantaged communities. The Commission
must also consider services to disadvantaged communities which are defined as inhabited
areas within the SOI whose median household income is less than or equal to 80 percent of
the statewide median income.
An SOI may be amended or updated. An amendment is a relatively limited change to the
SOI to accommodate a specific project. Amendments can add or remove territory, address a
change in provision of services by an agency, or revise a plan for services when it becomes
impractical. Solano LAFCO’s policy defines a SOI amendment as requests that are less than
40 acres in aggregate for the agency in the last 12 months.
An update is a comprehensive review of the SOI that includes the map and relevant portions
of one or more MSRs. The review allows for the identification of areas that are likely to
receive services and to exclude those territories that are not or will not be served in the SOI.
1.5 – California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq., also known as the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), requires public agencies to evaluate the potential environmental effects
of their actions. This MSR is exempt from CEQA under Class 6 categorical exemption. CEQA
Guidelines Section 15306 states that “Class 6 consists of basic data collection, research,
experimental management, and resource evaluation activities that do not result in a serious
or major disturbance to an environmental resource.”
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 1-4 February 14, 2017
Executive Summary
2.0: Executive Summary
The City of Benicia is located in southern Solano County approximately 35 miles northeast of
San Francisco and 57 miles southwest of Sacramento. The City is built on a peninsula of land
that reaches south from the main body of Solano County and creates a prominent bend in
the Carquinez Strait; Benicia lies on the north shore of the Carquinez Strait. From this
peninsula, highway and railroad bridges span the Strait to connect Benicia with the Contra
Costa County cities of Martinez and Concord.
The City boundary and SOI area is made up primarily of rolling hills, rising to an elevation of
1,160 feet. On the southern boundary of the City, the land slopes down to the Carquinez
Strait. The eastern city limits are bordered by the marshlands of Suisun Bay. The City of
Vallejo is located generally west of Benicia. To the north, the City’s SOI extends to the Tri-
City and County Open Space Area.
Benicia was founded by Robert Semple in 1846 who named the City after General Vallejo’s
wife, Francisca Benicia Carillo de Vallejo. In 1850 Benicia was incorporated, named the
county seat for Solano County, became the state capital, and was established as a port of
entry by the United States Congress. Benicia remained the state capital for only one year,
and the county seat was moved to Fairfield nine years later in 1859.
Section 4 of this report provides population data for the City. Benicia grew as an industrial
center during the 1860s and experienced stable growth due to industrialization through the
First World War. By the 1920s; however, the decline of local industries reduced the
employment base and led to a population loss. During World War II, Benicia’s arsenal
prominence and productivity increased and there was a surge in the City’s population. By the
late 1960s, residential expansion was underway with the development of Southampton
Subdivision. In 1970, Benicia’s population reached 8,783 and by 2010, Southhampton
Subdivision was largely built out and the City’s population stood at 26,997. The Association
of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) projects that between the year 2010 and 2040, Benicia’s
population will increase by 16.3 percent or approximately 4,403 new residents to 31,400.
Section 5 examines the possible locations of disadvantaged unincorporated communities. In
reviewing the Census income data for Benicia’s city boundary as well as the SOI area, there
are no disadvantaged unincorporated communities within or contiguous to the City’s
boundary and SOI.
Section 6 of the report covers an extensive discussion on the City’s public facilities. The City
is responsible for myriad municipal services, including animal control, fire protection, law
enforcement, parks and recreation, public works, solid waste, stormwater, wastewater, and
water.
Section 7 discusses the City’s financial ability to provide services. In addition to the five-year
statement of revenues and expenditures, the section discusses Measure C, a 1-cent-on-the-
dollar sales tax increase that went into effect on April 1, 2015. In addition to allocating
sufficient revenue to sustain current service levels, the City Council dedicated more than half
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 2-1 February 27, 2017
Introduction
the estimated revenue to be collected in the first two years ($4 million) to address
infrastructure improvements. The section goes on to address enterprise funds as well as
planned improvement projects that have been prioritized by the City.
Section 8 discusses the status of and opportunities for shared facilities. An identification and
examination of opportunities for shared facilities and resources may determine if public
service costs can be reduced. The report identifies that the City works with other agencies to
provide solid waste, transportation, animal services, fire suppression, law enforcement, and
open space, however; the report notes that because of Benicia’s somewhat isolated location,
it is not always feasible or cost-effective to share services with other agencies. The City also
uses a competitive bidding process when obtaining outside services and capital
improvement construction. The City’s budget and planned improvements are reviewed and
adopted annually by the City Council through a project priority system as part of the public
budget process.
Section 9 reviews Benicia’s governmental structure and accountability. It notes that the City
has a Council-Manager form of government with a separately elected Mayor and Council.
The Council is responsible for governing as well as establishing the overall priorities and
direction of the City’s municipal government. There are ample opportunities for public
involvement and input; citizens are encouraged to attend regularly scheduled meetings and
serve on boards, commissions, and committees. The City communicates to its citizens via its
website, Twitter feed, Facebook page, Nextdoor, and in-person outreach. The City holds
public meetings in compliance with the Brown Act.
Finally, Section 10 discusses LAFCO policies that may affect the City’s service delivery and its
future plan for providing service include the LAFCO’s Sphere of Influence Policy, the
Commission’s adopted Standards, and the Out of Area Service Policy.
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 2-2 February 14, 2017
City Profile
3.0: City Profile & History
The City of Benicia is a general law city and has a Council-Manager form of government with
a separately elected Mayor and a four member city council, elected to four-year terms. The
Council appoints the City Manager and Attorney and also confirms the Mayor’s
appointments to all city boards, committees, and commissions. The City Clerk and Treasurer
are elected.
The City is staffed with eleven departments: City Manager, City Attorney, Economic
Development, Administrative Services, Finance, Parks and Community Services, Library, Fire,
Police, Community Development, and Public Works.
Until the 1820s, the north shore of the Carquinez Strait was home to tribal Native Americans,
including the Patwin, Karki, and Huichiun groups, who found the area suitable for settlement
because of the presence of fresh water, areas of high ground, and abundant supply of
shellfish, salmon, and meal.
The first Europeans to visit the area arrived in 1772. By 1823, the lands along the north shore
of the Carquinez Strait, including Benicia, were part of the San Francisco de Solano Mission.
Following Mexico’s independence from Spain in 1821, Mexico took jurisdiction over the
former Spanish territory in California. In 1844, Benicia was part of the 84,000-acre Rancho
Suscol land grant owned by Mariano Guadalupe Vallejo, a Mexican military commander.
During this period, Native American populations in the area diminished significantly and the
land was put to use for cattle ranching and farming.
Following the Bear Flag Revolt of 1846, Robert Baylor Semple obtained interest in a portion
of Rancho Suscol and established a new town, Benicia, on the north shore of the Carquinez
Strait. Jasper O’Farrell was hired to survey and prepare the first plat of Benicia, which was
completed in July 1847. A five-mile stretch of shoreline was selected and a grid system of
streets established. The City was oriented in a northeast-southwest line originating at First
Street, with a succession of blocks on each side. Streets were assigned names in alphabetical
order in the east-west direction and numerical order in the north-south direction. Settlement
of Benicia in the following years was influenced not only by the O’Farrell plat, but also by the
shoreline and extensive marshes that were interspersed through the eastern part of the
community. A ferry service was developed and by November 1847, Benicia was settled with
approximately 15 homes.
Following discovery of gold at Sutter’s mill in 1848, Benicia became a waypoint for
thousands of miners making their way to and from the Sierras. The City’s population grew
and the downtown area along lower First Street developed with hotels, saloons, and
gambling houses. In 1850, Benicia was one of the two first cities to be incorporated in the
State of California, became the Solano County seat, and was designated by Congress as an
official port of entry. The same year, the Pacific Mail Steamship Company, the first major
industrial works constructed in California, set up operations in Benicia.
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 3-1 February 27, 2017
Introduction
In 1849, approximately 345 acres were deeded to the Federal Government for the purpose of
establishing a military post, the Benicia Arsenal. It was designated as one of five major U.S.
arsenals in 1852 and remained in operation through the 1960s.
Educational institutions were established in Benicia as well: the Young Ladies Seminar and
Blake’s School for Boys were founded in 1852; St. Catherine’s Academy was founded in 1854;
and the College of St. Augustine opened in 1867. None of these institutions remain in
operation today though some buildings remain and have been converted to other uses.
In 1852, Benicia constructed a government building that was designated the new state
capital in 1853. Additional development of the downtown in support of the legislature
followed; however, because of the lack of facilities the capital was moved to Sacramento in
1854.
The City grew as an industrial center during the 1860s, with the opening of several
businesses such as the Benicia Flouring Mill, Benicia Cement Works, and four tanneries. By
the end of the 1880s, Benicia was the tanning capital of the west and home to the Matthew
Turner Shipyard and Benicia Agricultural Works.
Because of its location along the Carquinez Strait, Benicia became a transportation center at
the beginning of the Gold Rush era, providing ferry service to transport passengers and
goods between San Francisco and interior areas such as Sacramento and the Sierras. The
completion of the Central Pacific Railroad, which traversed the waterfront and Benicia
Arsenal and terminated at the Carquinez Strait, greatly increased commercial transport and
expanded industrial opportunities for the City.
Benicia experienced stable growth that was due to industrialization through the First World
War. By the 1920s however, the decline of local industries reduced the employment base
and led to population loss; Benicia’s total population diminished by approximately 30
percent in the period from 1920 to 1936.
The establishment of new train routes and advent of the automobile changed the City’s role
as a transportation center as automobile ferries were established to serve those commuting
to employment on the other side of the Carquinez Strait.
World War II saw an increase in the Benicia Arsenal’s prominence and productivity, as well as
a surge in the City’s population. By 1944, Benicia’s population swelled to 8,300. The Arsenal
was re-activated during the Korean War. While military operations scaled back during
peacetime, Benicia experienced population growth during the baby boom period following
World War II, resulting in the expansion of residential areas and the construction of
educational and civic facilities.
The 1960s brought further changes. Construction of the Martinez Bridge—along with I-680
and I-780, which traversed the City in both the east-west and north-south directions—
changed travel patterns and led to suburbanization of the hills above Benicia. Commercial
centers shifted north to Military Highway, where they were accessible by vehicle and
provided convenient off-street parking. The Benicia Arsenal was closed in 1961 and the City
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 3-2 February 14, 2017
City Profile
of Benicia subsequently annexed the land, which would later become the Benicia Industrial
Park. In 1966, Humble Oil Company began construction on an oil refinery on 400 acres in the
northern portion of the Arsenal, today known as the Valero Refinery. Submerged lands were
transferred to the California Land Commission with an agreement for Benicia to operate a
deep-water port, now AMPORTS, which was leased to Benicia Industries in 1966. Residential
expansion was underway as well and in 1964, plans were announced for development of the
Southampton Subdivision.
Since the 1960s, Benicia’s growth has continued largely in accord with the land use
framework set forth for the Benicia Industrial Park and Southampton Subdivision. By 2010,
Southampton Subdivision was largely built out and the City’s population stood at 26,997.
The downtown has retained much of its historic character, though industrial sites have been
replaced by parks, natural areas, and new housing. Historic preservation efforts for
downtown Benicia began in the early 1970s, culminating in the adoption of the Downtown
Historic Conservation Plan (1990) and the Arsenal Historic Conservation Plan (1993).
Following a period of substantial population growth, the City of Benicia established a 20-
year growth boundary in 2003 to limit development north of Lake Herman Road. Today, the
Benicia Industrial Park is the economic engine of the community, while the historic
downtown and waterfront parks represent the local identity and host community gatherings.
The City has a 20-year urban growth boundary, established by voter initiative (Measure K) in
2003 which will sunset at the end of 2023.
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 3-3 February 27, 2017
Growth and Population Projections
4.0: Growth and Population Projections
4.1 – Population
4.1.1 – Growth Trends
The City’s population grew significantly from a population of 8,783 in 1970 to a population
of 24,437 in 1990. The population boom increased the City’s population by approximately
782 new residents per year. Since the 1990s, the City’s percent change in population has
slowed down significantly. Between 1990 and 2000, the City’s population grew by 2,428 new
residents or an average of 243 persons per year. Between 2000 and 2010, the City’s
population grew by just 132 new residents; an average of 13 persons per year.
Table 4-1: Population Growth in Benicia and Solano County Since 1970
BENICIA1 SOLANO COUNTY2
YEAR Population Percent Change Population Percent Change
1970 8,783 — 169,941 —
1980 15,376 75% 235,203 38%
1990 24,437 59% 340,421 45%
2000 26,865 10% 394,542 16%
2010 26,997 0.5% 413,344 4.8%
Sources:
1 http://www.bayareacensus.ca.gov/cities/Benicia.htm accessed 12-21-2015.
2 http://www.bayareacensus.ca.gov/counties/SolanoCounty.htm accessed 11-2-2015.
4.1.2 – Population Projections
ABAG prepares population projections for the nine Bay Area counties and their jurisdictions.
ABAG projects that between the year 2010 and 2040, Benicia’s population will increase by
16.3 percent from 26,997 to 31,400 or approximately 4,403 new residents. This equates to
adding, on average, approximately 147 new residents per year for the next 30-year time
frame. In comparison, Solano County as a whole is expected to grow by nearly 24 percent in
the same time frame.
Table 4-2: Solano Cities and County—Population Projections
2010–2040
Percent Change
between
Community 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2040 2010 & 2040
Benicia 26,997 27,600 28,300 29,000 29,700 31,400 16.3%
Dixon 18,351 18,700 19,000 19,400 19,800 20,700 12.8%
Fairfield 105,321 111,500 117,900 124,400 131,400 146,500 39.1%
Rio Vista 7,360 7,500 7,900 8,300 8,400 8,800 19.6%
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 4-1 February 27, 2017
Growth and Population Projections
Percent Change
between
Community 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2040 2010 & 2040
Suisun City 28,111 28,900 29,800 30,700 31,600 33,700 19.9%
Vacaville 92,428 95,300 98,200 101,700 105,500 109,700 23.3%
Vallejo 115,942 118,100 121,000 124,200 126,200 128,600 13.7%
Unincorporated 18,834 19,700 20,600 21,500 22,600 23,700 31.1%
Solano County 413,344 427,300 442,700 459,200 475,200 511,600 23.8%
Source: ABAG Population Projections 2013.
Findings & Determinations
4.1 Benicia had a population of 26,997 in 2010 with only a 0.5% increase from 2000.
4.2 ABAG projects that by 2040, Benicia’s population will increase by 4,403 residents to
31,400. That averages to about 0.5% annually, which is consistent with recent
growth.
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 4-2 February 14, 2017
Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities
5.0: Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities
The Commission is required to provide written determinations with respect to the location
and characteristics of any disadvantaged unincorporated communities within or contiguous
to the SOI. The California Government Code Section 56033.5 defines a disadvantaged
unincorporated community as an inhabited territory (12 or more registered voters) with an
annual median household income that is less than 80 percent of the statewide annual
median household income (MHI).
According to the Census, the MHI for the State in 2013 dollars was $61,094. The Census also
provides MHI data at the County and census tract levels. There are several census tract areas
within the city limits as well as the areas adjacent to the City of Benicia. As indicated in Table
5-1, there are no census tract areas with income less than 80 percent of the State’s MHI
within or surrounding the city. Therefore, there are no disadvantaged unincorporated
communities within or contiguous to the boundaries or SOI of Benicia.
Table 5-1: Median Household Income by Census Track
Percentage of State
Census Track MHI MHI
2505.02 $72,692 119%
2506.04 $95,761 157%
2506.05 $99,722 163%
2520.00 $63,729 104%
2521.02 $72,981 119%
2521.03 $63,315 104%
2521.04 $145,625 238%
2521.05 $97,536 160%
2521.06 $82,500 135%
2521.07 $88,617 145%
2521.08 $79,375 130%
Source: http://www.census.gov/censusexplorer/censusexplorer.html accessed 4-26-2016.
Findings & Determinations
5.1 There are no disadvantaged unincorporated communities within or contiguous to
Benicia’s SOI.
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 5-1 February 27, 2017
Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities
6.0: Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities
6.1 – Animal Control
The City’s Police Department is responsible for animal control within the City of Benicia. The
Police Department staffs one full-time animal control officer. Animal shelter facilities are
located at the City’s Corporation Yard on East Second Street. In 2014, 1,027 calls were
received for animal control services. Additional after-hour services are provided through an
agreement with the Solano County Sheriff’s Office. In addition, a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) with Solano County has been established for the animal shelter
services.
Finding/Determination
6.1.1 The Benicia Police Department is responsible for animal control. The City has an after
hour services agreement with the Solano County Sheriff’s office for animal control
and the City has a MOU with Solano County for animal shelter services. Animal
Control services are adequate
6.2 – Fire
Services provided by the City Fire Department include fire suppression, fire prevention, basic
and advanced life support medical services, technical rescue services, disaster preparedness,
code enforcement, and weed abatement services.
Fire suppression and emergency medical services are provided by the City Fire Department
from two fire stations. Fire Station #11 is located near the Downtown at 150 Military West
and Station #12 is located in Southampton at 601 Hastings.
Standard response times are dependent on the nature of the emergency services and the
established agreements or requirements. Response standards to emergency medical calls
are set through a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) with the Solano County Emergency Services
Cooperative. The standard is to arrive on-scene of a medical emergency within 7 minutes of
the time of the dispatch at least 90 percent of the time. Response standards to fire
suppression calls are established through the National Fire Protection Association and are
based upon a number of factors. Historical data on these responses show an average
response time of 5 to 7 minutes. The response time standards for both EMS and Fire
Suppression calls comply with the standards.
The average Fire Department daily staffing level is eight firefighters per day plus a Chief
Officer. This staffing level is established in a MOU between the City and the Benicia
Firefighter’s Association, Local 1186. The Department’s staffing allows engine companies
three staff members, including a captain, engineer, and paramedic firefighter; and it allows
rescue companies two staff members, including an engineer and paramedic firefighter or
firefighter.
The department is an “all-risk” fire department and provides a variety of emergency and
non-emergency services to the community. The total request for service (call) for fiscal year
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 6-1 February 27, 2017
Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities
2015-2016 was 2,465. The breakdown of those calls for the same fiscal year was 61.22
percent medical, 5.80 percent rescue, and 32.98 percent other types of calls.
To provide for future buildout of the Benicia Industrial Park, located within the city limits
south of Lake Herman Road on the vacant, 527-acre “Northern Gateway” property, an
additional fire station may be needed. A proposed fire station and training facility may be
built and staffed as the industrial park develops to meet response and service standards. The
timing of a new fire station will be based on when, where, and how the Northern Gateway
site develops in the future. Future funding for development and staffing of the station are
not yet determined but may be established through development agreements, fees, and/or
assessments.
Findings & Determinations
6.2.1 Services provided by the Benicia Fire Department include fire suppression, fire
prevention, basic and advanced life support medical services, technical rescue
services, disaster preparedness, code enforcement, and vegetation management
services.
6.2.2 Fire suppression and emergency medical services are provided by the City Fire
Department from two fire stations.
6.2.3 The average Fire Department daily staffing level is eight firefighters per day plus a
Chief Officer. The Department’s staffing allows engine companies three staff
members, including a captain, engineer, and paramedic firefighter; and it allows
rescue companies two staff members, including an engineer and paramedic
firefighter or firefighter.
6.2.4 The total request for service (call) for fiscal year 2015-2016 was 2,465. The
breakdown of those calls for the same fiscal year was 61.22 percent medical, 5.80
percent rescue, and 32.98 percent other types of calls.
6.2.5 To provide for future buildout of the Benicia Industrial Park located on the vacant,
527-acre Northern Gateway property, an additional fire station and additional
staffing may be needed to meet response and service standards.
6.3 – Law Enforcement
Police protection services are provided by the Benicia Police Department located adjacent to
the City Hall on East L Street. The department currently divides the City into four designated
beats or areas of patrol assignment. Determinations of these beats are based on
geographical boundaries. Although Benicia’s residential areas are largely built out, future
development of the Northern Gateway site, which is the last remaining large development
site, could have a significant impact on the current beat structure.
Currently, average emergency response times are tracked and available through the
department’s automated computer aided dispatch (CAD) system. The program was last
updated during the budget cycle 2013–2015 to include a new auditing process for police
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 6-2 February 14, 2017
Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities
reports and to streamline state reporting requirements. The information is monitored by the
department. Based on crime rate, citizen complaints, and citizen polls, the level of service
and response times are adequate and meet the needs of the community. For in-progress or
life-threatening emergency calls (Priority 1) the average response time from 2013 to 2014
was 6 minutes and 21 seconds.
The Benicia Police Department currently has 51 full- and part-time staff members. Thirty-two
staff members are sworn officers. The current ratio is about 1.18 sworn officers per 1,000
population. This ratio compares with other cities similar in size and staffing: Dixon 1.36,
Pinole 1.41, and Hercules at 0.96.
The need for additional officers and equipment is based on the City’s planned growth and
projected land use. To staff one additional beat 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, the
department would need to hire five patrol officers (to cover days off, training, vacations, and
sick leave) and one non-sworn person. The non-sworn position would be support personnel to
facilitate the projected increase in calls for service and comprehensive reporting. The addition
of personnel would not occur all at once but would gradually increase, commensurate with the
demand created by new development. A commensurate number of police vehicles will also be
needed to keep pace with the anticipated hiring of the additional officers. Other costs such as
fuel and police officer training would also increase with demand created by new development.
The additional officers, vehicles, and equipment are not currently budgeted but would be
included in the appropriate two-year budget cycle when the need dictates.
Currently, the police station is located in a former school building built in 1942 and
remodeled in 1962 to house the police. The police station is inadequate both in size and in
modern police function. Police operations are located in two separate buildings, including a
temporary building used for investigations. The temporary building is out of compliance
with the City of Benicia’s building codes. At this time, funding is not available to construct a
new police station.
Findings & Determinations
6.3.1 Average emergency response times are tracked and available through the
department’s automated computer aided dispatch (CAD) system. The program was
last updated during the budget cycle 2013-2015 to include a new auditing process
for police reports and to streamline state reporting requirements.
6.3.2 For in-progress or life-threatening emergency calls (Priority 1) the average response
time from 2013-2014 was 6 minutes and 21 seconds.
6.3.3 The Benicia Police Department currently has 51 full- and part-time staff members.
Thirty-two staff members are sworn officers. The current ratio is about 1.18 sworn
officers per one-thousand population, and is consistent with nearby cities of similar
size.
6.3.4 The police station is inadequate both in size and in modern police function. Police
operations are located in two separate buildings, including a temporary building
used for investigations. The temporary building is out of compliance with the City of
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 6-3 February 27, 2017
Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities
Benicia’s building codes. At this time, funding is not available to construct a new
police station.
6.4 – Parks and Recreation
The City of Benicia Parks & Community Services Department is responsible for providing
park and community services programs for the citizens of Benicia. The General Plan contains
planning policies concerning the financing and construction of park facilities. The plan
includes a quantitative and qualitative inventory of existing park and outdoor recreation
facilities, identification of potential open space areas, and an inventory of existing outdoor
recreation facilities.
Within the city limits are 48 parks, facilities, and public access areas totaling 1,248 acres.
These include state facilities, a regional park, community parks, neighborhood parks, and
other outdoor recreation improvements. Table 6-1 lists existing and future parks and
recreation facilities within the city limits.
6.4.1 – Types of Parks and Facilities
Regional Parks. A regional park (250–1,000 acres) generally serves one or more
communities and accommodates a variety of activities designed to enhance the use and
experience of the natural environment. Uses may include open space areas, trails, nature
centers, and camping. The General Plan established a standard of 10-acres per 1,000 people
for regional parks. Benicia has one regional park (Lake Herman), but there are also two state-
owned parks that serve as regional facilities: Benicia State Recreation Area (State Park Road)
and the State Capitol Historic Park (115 West G Street).
Community Parks. Community parks are typically large-scale (30–100 acres) and are
intended to serve users within walking and driving distance. Their amenities are oriented to
both adults and children, often providing specialized facilities such as swimming pools,
tennis courts, community centers, and sports fields. Community parks in Benicia are the
primary resource for activities sponsored by the Parks and Community Services Department.
The General Plan established a standard of 2.5 acres per 1,000 people for community parks.
Facilities in this category include the Community Park (540 Rose Drive) and the West 9th
Street Park and Launch Ramp (southwest corner of West 9th Street and West 10th Street).
Public Special Use Facilities. Special use facilities are generally single purpose in nature,
having a unique or important indoor or outdoor recreational purpose. Examples in Benicia
include the Senior Center (187 East L Street), James Lemos Swim Center (181 East J Street),
Community Center (370 East L Street), and the City Cemetery (Riverhill Drive).
Neighborhood Parks. Neighborhood parks are small-scale parks (2–15 acres), which ideally
serve a neighborhood within a radius of approximately one-half mile. They usually
emphasize child-oriented facilities, providing a variety of play spaces and associated
amenities. The General Plan established a one-half mile-radius standard for neighborhood
parks and a population ratio of 3.5 acres per 1,000 people. Examples of neighborhood parks
in Benicia include Southampton Park (southeast corner of Panorama Drive and Chelsea Hills
Drive) and Willow Glen Park (600 Block of West K Street).
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 6-4 February 14, 2017
Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities
Waterfront Park. A waterfront park serves the entire community and accommodates
activities appropriate to the characteristics of the site such as low impact outdoor
recreational activities, community events and festivals, and enjoyment of the surrounding
natural environment. The waterfront parks designation does not include permanent sports
fields, courts, equipment, or buildings, except for a public restroom and similar amenities.
Walkways, benches, drinking fountains, and trash receptacles are permitted. This park
designation was established in November 2004 by an advisory vote of the citizens of Benicia.
A byproduct of this initiative created the Benicia Urban Waterfront Enhancement and Master
Plan, adopted by City Council in October 2014. The initiative established a 16-acre project
site located to the west of First Street, south of B Street, with the Marina channel to the east
and the Carquinez Strait to the south, encompassing the First Street Green. The First Street
Green will preserve the marshlands within its boundaries, thereby protecting the wildlife that
relies on this ecologically sensitive habitat.
Open Space Areas. An open space area is typically a large undeveloped area, preserved in
its natural state, to serve as a greenbelt divider or environmental resource, to promote public
health and safety, and to provide those types of outdoor recreation that do not substantially
alter or destroy the natural environment. Low-intensity outdoor recreational uses such as
hiking and picnicking are often compatible with open space areas. These facilities are
attractive to local and region-wide visitors. Examples of open space areas in Benicia include
the Southampton Open Space and the Benicia/Vallejo Buffer Zone.
Pocket Parks. Pocket parks are small green islands, landscaped with park amenities, such as
a drinking fountains, benches, and play equipment. These parks are typically remainder
parcels of subdivisions. Examples of pocket parks in Benicia include Arneson Park (Southwest
corner of West 4th Street and West I Street) and Gull Point (Gull Point Court).
Linear Parks and Trails. A linear park is a strip of land established for purposes of walking,
hiking, bicycling, horseback riding, and boating and often includes a natural or man-made
linear resource such as a stream drainage, bluff line, ridge, utility and creek rights-of-ways, or
service road. A system of off-road bikeways and pedestrian paths at both the neighborhood
and community-wide scale often provide safe and pleasant transportation connections, as
well as opportunities for outdoor recreation. Segments of the Bay Area Ridge Trail, Bay Trail,
and Great Delta Trail have been designated linear parks and trails in Benicia.
6.4.2 – Current and Future Park Needs
The City Parks, Trails & Open Space Master Plan (adopted in July 1997) compared acreages
of existing and planned parkland in relation to both the existing and projected population of
the City. Using the standard ratios shown in Table 6-1, the City has more than adequate
regional parkland but is deficient in community and neighborhood parks. The Parks, Trails &
Open Space Master Plan identified a shortfall of 35 acres of neighborhood parks and 18
acres of community parks.
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 6-5 February 27, 2017
Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities
Table 6-1: Existing Park Land per Capita
Standard
Park Type Acres Acres/1,000 people (Acres/1,000 people)
Regional Park 577 21.0 10.0
Community Park 50 1.8 2.5
Neighborhood Parks 79 2.9 3.5
Recreational Facilities 10 0.4 —
TOTAL 716 26.1 —
Source: Table 2-14 of the 1999 Benicia General Plan
Since the adoption of the Parks, Trails & Open Space Master Plan two neighborhood parks
have been completed. St. Catherine’s Wood Neighborhood Park is approximately 0.5 acre
and is located north of the Solano Square Shopping Center. The park includes a playground,
entry plaza, and seating area. Water’s End, formerly referred to as Park D-7 prior to
construction, was the second neighborhood park completed. Located in the northeastern
portion of the Southampton development, this park is 3.5 acres in size. The park includes a
playground, a basketball court, and seating areas.
The table with details of all parks and facilities and a map of the locations is included as
Attachment 1.
6.4.3 – Proposed Park Facilities
The following list of park sites was obtained from the 1997 Parks, Trails & Open Space
Master Plan, which recommends the development of new park and outdoor recreation
facilities to keep pace with the growth of the City, including the proposed parks listed below.
Bottle Hill Park. This 0.5-acre neighborhood park, in the southeastern portion of the
downtown area, will provide panoramic views of the Carquinez Strait, and sheltered areas for
a tot lot and picnic facilities.
Hastings Drive Neighborhood Park. This proposed 10-acre park is located in the
Southampton open space in the central western portion of the Southampton development.
The site contains a small drainage channel and is surrounded by existing homes. The Braito
Pathway runs through the proposed park site within a trail easement linking the Rose Drive
and Hastings Drive bikeways. The topography in the area would require terracing for
additional facilities. The park will include a multi-purpose playing field, tennis court,
basketball courts, playground, grass play area, picnic area, path, and benches.
Perth Way Neighborhood Park. This is a proposed 8-acre neighborhood park located in
the open space in the eastern portion of the Southampton development. The site is relatively
flat but high in elevation, providing views toward Suisun Bay. Planned facilities include a
multi-purpose playing field, tennis court, basketball court, playground, grass play area, picnic
area, path, and benches.
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 6-6 February 14, 2017
Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities
Table 6-2: Existing and Future Parks and Recreation Facilities within City Limits
Category Name Acreage
Regional Parks Lake Herman 577.0
Waterfront Parks Waterfront Park (First Street Green*) 16.0
Community Parks and Benicia Community Park 50.0
Facilities
Benicia Middle School 8.0
City Cemetery 24.0
City Gym 0.5
City Park 4.5
Clock Tower 0.5
Community Center 3.5
First Street Peninsula Pier 2.0
Fitzgerald Field 4.0
Jack London Park 7.7
James Lemos Swim Center 1.0
Little League Field 4.0
West 9th Street Park 6.0
Neighborhood Parks Bottle Hill Park (future) 0.5
Bridgeview Park 4.5
Channing Circle Park 2.5
Civic Center Park (East K Street) 3.5
Duncan Graham Park 2.0
Ethelree Saraiva Park 0.5
Francesca Terrace Park 5.0
Gateway Park 0.5
Hastings Drive Neighborhood Park (future) 10.0
Matthew Turner Park 2.5
Overlook Park 3.5
Perth Way Neighborhood Park (future) 8.0
St. Catherine’s Wood Neighborhood Park 0.5
Skillman Park 3.0
Solano Park 2.0
Southampton Park 6.0
Willow Glen Park 4.5
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 6-7 February 27, 2017
Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities
Table 6-2: Existing and Future Parks and Recreation Facilities within City Limits
Category Name Acreage
Waters End Park 3.5
Small Scale Public Access Arneson Park 0.5
Areas
Bardoni Public Access 0.5
Benicia Views II 0.5
Gull Point 0.5
John’s Place Public Access & Median 0.5
Kevin McCall Public Access 0.5
Turnbull Park 0.5
West 8th Street Public Access 0.5
West 11th Street Public Access 0.5
West 13th Street Public Access 0.5
West C Street Public Access 0.5
West E Street 0.5
West F Street. 0.5
SUBTOTAL 777.7
State Parks and Facilities Benicia State Capitol Historic Park 1.5
Benicia State Recreation Area 469.0
TOTAL 1,248.2
Note:
* First Street Green (3.0 acres) is included in the total acreage of the of the Waterfront Park created by Measure C.
Determinations
6.4.1 Within the city limits are 48 parks, facilities, and public access areas totaling 1,248
acres. These include state facilities, a regional park, community parks, neighborhood
parks, and other outdoor recreation improvements.
6.4.2 The City has more than adequate regional parkland but is deficient in community
and neighborhood parks. The Parks, Trails & Open Space Master Plan identified a
shortfall of 35 acres of neighborhood parks and 18 acres of community parks and
since the Parks, Trails & Open Space Master Plan, two neighborhood parks have
been added with facilities appropriate to the size of the parks.
6.4.3 The City’s 1997 Parks, Trails & Open Space Master Plan recommends the
development of new park and outdoor recreation facilities keep pace with the
growth of the City.
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 6-8 February 14, 2017
Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities
6.5 – Public Works
The City’s Public Works Department is responsible for the operation, maintenance, design,
construction, and repair of the City’s public infrastructure. The Public Works Department is
subdivided into five areas: administration, engineering, water treatment operations,
wastewater treatment operations, and maintenance.
6.5.1 – Transportation and Circulation
The City of Benicia contains two interstate freeways (Interstate 780 and Interstate 680), ten
major arterial streets, and many collector and local streets. Caltrans is responsible for the
maintenance of Interstates 780 and 680. A major segment of the transcontinental railroad
system is along the easterly border of the City and is owned and operated by the Union
Pacific Railroad.
The City’s objectives for roadway performance are stated in General Plan Policy 2.20.1 of the
Circulation Element:
• Policy 2.20.1: Maintain at least Level of Service “D” on all city roads, street
segments, and intersections.
Level of Service D is intended to have functioning intersections, but short queues develop
and cars may have to wait through one cycle during short peaks.
Improvements to the local street network are included in the City’s Traffic Impact Fee
Program where future development pays its fair share of costs to address the future capacity
needs of development. The need to improve roadway and parking facilities is carefully
balanced with the need to control traffic congestion in Benicia and the goal of maintaining a
walkable community. Continued enhancement of the City’s small-town atmosphere of
pedestrian-friendly streets and neighborhoods depends on favorable traffic conditions that
can only be maintained through a balanced transportation system.
The Pavement Condition Index (PCI) is a measure of the condition of the city’s roadways. On
a scale of 0 to 100 with 100 being the best. The value is calculated from a visual survey of
pavement distress. Various distress combinations result in points deducted from the starting
value of 100. The current PCI is 58. The goal of the Public Works Department to increase
the average PCI to 63 in five years.
Roadway improvements to adequately serve the City’s needs over the next 20-years are
listed in the following section. Other transportation projects, such as freeway mainline
improvements, park & ride lots, and major transit improvements, are included in the long-
range plans of the Solano Transportation Authority. These projects are dependent on
cooperation with outside agencies and shared funding sources.
Table 6-3: Future Roadway Improvements
Streets Interchanges
Widen/extend Industrial Way from I-680 to Lake Improve Lake Herman/I-680 interchange with
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 6-9 February 27, 2017
Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities
Table 6-3: Future Roadway Improvements
Streets Interchanges
Herman Rd new signals, bridge widening and possible ramp
modifications
Extend Bayshore Road from Park Rd to Improve Bayshore/Industrial/I-680 split
Industrial Way interchange with new frontage road connection.
Widen East 2nd St from Industrial Way to Lake Install I-780 auxiliary lanes between E 2nd & E
Herman Rd 5th.
Widen Columbus Pkwy from Benicia Rd to I-780 Install I-780 auxiliary lanes between Military
West & Columbus Pkwy
Widen State Park Rd overcrossing at I-780 Improve/widen I-780 ramps at Southampton
Road
Widen East 2nd St. from I-780 to Military East Improve/widen I-780 ramps at East 2nd St.
Widen East 5th St. from I-780 to Military East Install traffic signals at remaining freeway ramps
with stop controls.
Widen Park Rd between Bayshore and Industrial Construct improvements identified by the
Way Solano Transportation Authority as required.
Widen Park Rd between Adams and new
connector road
Construct connector road between
E 2nd St and Park Rd
New traffic signal and intersection
improvements citywide
Enhance First St. corridor
Convert Bayshore Road from private to public
ownership
Note:
Some of these improvements are located within Caltrans jurisdiction and require coordination to be fully implemented.
In addition to those projects above, the City of Benicia has proposed the Industrial Park
Transportation and Employment Center Plan. The Benicia Industrial Park is a significant
employment center in Solano County. Home to over 600 firms employing more than 5,000
workers, which comprises over a third of the total jobs in Benicia, the Industrial Park serves
as the economic engine for the city, contributing approximately two-thirds of the city’s sales
tax revenue. The Park is strategically located, served by I-680, a private deep water port, and
Union Pacific Railroad mainline and spurs. In addition, SolTrans local buses and FAST
intercity express buses both service the Park, and a bus transit hub is currently under
construction.
The Benicia Industrial Park has been recognized as a Priority Development Area (PDA) by the
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 6-10 February 14, 2017
Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities
Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). PDAs are places that local jurisdictions have
identified within their communities where new development will support the day-to-day
needs of residents and workers in a pedestrian-friendly environment served by transit. While
the addition of residential uses is not anticipated as part of the Industrial Park’s PDA
designation, as an employment-based PDA, the Industrial Park has the added goal of
advancing employment growth by attracting new business and providing for the renovation
of established areas.
6.5.2 – Transit Services
As of December 2010, the City of Benicia ceased independent operation of a public transit
system. Through a joint powers agreement between the City of Benicia, the City of Vallejo,
and the Solano Transportation Authority, Solano County Transit (SolTrans) was created to
build a unified public transit system in southern Solano County. SolTrans provides a fixed
route between Benicia and Vallejo as well as express bus service to Walnut Creek and El
Cerrito North del Norte regional BART stations. General transit within Benicia is provided
through a SolTrans branded dial-a-ride service.
In addition, SolTrans provides paratransit bus service, and administers local and intercity Taxi
Scrip Programs with direct service between cities in Solano County for ambulatory ADA
paratransit qualified individuals.
Regional transit services are coordinated through the Solano Transportation Authority, which
includes the Capital Corridor train service, regional bus service, and other local agency
services.
Findings & Determinations
6.5.1 The City’s Public Works Department is responsible for the operation, maintenance,
design, construction, and repair of the City’s public infrastructure.
6.5.2 Improvements to the local street network are included in the City’s Traffic Impact Fee
Program where future development pays its fair share of costs to address the future
capacity needs of development. Measure C revenues will assist with some long term
maintenance and replacement costs.
6.5.3 Other transportation projects, such as freeway mainline improvements, park & ride
lots, and major transit improvements are included in the long-range plans of the
Solano Transportation Authority.
6.5.4 Through a joint powers agreement between the cities of Benicia and Vallejo, and the
Solano Transportation Authority, Solano County Transit (SolTrans) was created to build
a unified public transit system in southern Solano County.
6.6 – Solid Waste
The Public Works Department and the City Manager’s Office each share a role in managing
solid waste within the City. The City Manager’s Office is responsible for managing curbside
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 6-11 February 27, 2017
Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities
garbage collection through a contract with a local franchised hauler, Republic Services. The
Public Works Department is responsible for street sweeping services.
Solid waste is taken to Keller Canyon Landfill in Pittsburg, California. The landfill accepted
46,244 tons of waste from Benicia in 2014. The facility has a permitted fill area of 244 acres with
a remaining capacity of 58.6 million cubic yards as of March 2012. It is projected that the landfill
will reach capacity in 2078. The remaining permitted disposal capacity at the landfill is adequate
to handle the projected waste generation through buildout of the General Plan, particularly in
light of the State’s waste diversion requirements. The City’s Franchise Agreement guarantees
continued waste disposal capacity for the existing and future community.
Determinations
6.6.1 The City has a contract with Republic Services, a local franchised hauler, for curbside
garbage collection.
6.6.2 Solid waste is taken to Keller Canyon Landfill in Pittsburg, California. It is projected
that the landfill will reach capacity in 2078.
6.6.3 The remaining permitted disposal capacity at the landfill is adequate to handle the
projected waste generation through buildout of the General Plan.
6.7 – Stormwater
The Benicia Public Works Department is responsible for the design, construction, operation,
and maintenance of storm drain facilities within the city limits. The facilities include drainage
inlets, manhole structures, culverts, open ditches, pump stations, and portions of Sulphur
Springs Creek, a large drainage channel. Concurrent with development, these facilities are
installed, upgraded, or replaced as needed.
The City of Benicia is along the north shore of the Carquinez Strait, where the combined
flows of the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers have cut a deep gorge through the Coast
Range. The Strait is a crucial link in northern California’s inland waterway, connecting San
Pablo Bay and San Francisco Bay to the west with the Sacramento and San Joaquin River
deltas to the east. Through the Strait, ocean-going ships can reach the Port of Benicia or
continue on to the Central Valley ports of Sacramento and Stockton. All the City’s
stormwater is conveyed both by natural and man-made channels, and by drainage culverts
to the Carquinez Strait.
The boundaries of the drainage watershed located within the City of Benicia are the
Carquinez Strait (southerly), the Lake Herman/Sky Valley/Paddy Creek areas (northerly), the
City of Vallejo (westerly), and Suisun Bay (easterly). The watershed includes the following
sub-basins:
• Goodyear Slough/Industrial Park (northeasterly section)
• Benicia Urban Areas
• Sulphur Springs Creek/Lake Herman
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 6-12 February 14, 2017
Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities
All the sub-basins are served by natural or constructed drainage systems, such as creeks,
ditches, and storm drain culverts. The terrain within the sub basins is quite diverse. There are
steep hills north of Military and Interstate 780. Flat and rolling terrain extends to the south
and east including most of the industrial park. The climate in Benicia is similar to that
experienced countywide—typically dry in the summer with mostly seasonal rainfall between
October and April. The ten-year average annual precipitation over the basin is 19.01 inches.
General area-wide storms of two or three days in duration are typical.
The Goodyear Slough/Industrial Park sub-basin is a flat area directly connected with the
westerly boundary of Suisun Bay.
The Benicia Urban Area sub-basin consists of numerous small drainage areas that drain
portions of the Southampton area, the Arsenal area, and the areas south of the I-780
freeway, including Downtown. The most intensively developed areas within the Benicia city
limits include the downtown area with a central commercial district and the area along
Southampton Road, with medium- to high-density residential land uses and a commercial
shopping center. The total land area is approximately 13 square miles.
The Sulphur Springs Creek/Lake Herman sub-basin consists of the area upstream of Lake
Herman between the cities of Vallejo and Benicia, the Paddy Creek area, and the major
portions of the Benicia Industrial Park. The area upstream of Lake Herman consists of the Sky
Valley area with portions in the City of Vallejo, Solano County, and a portion within the City
of Benicia’s SOI. Lake Herman is the major body of water in the drainage basin and is located
on Sulphur Springs Creek about two miles north of downtown Benicia. Sulphur Springs
Creek is the main channel traversing the basin with the area north of Lake Herman called Sky
Valley. The watershed includes Sulphur Springs Mountain range to the west as well as lesser
ridges to the north, east, and south. Sulphur Springs Mountain has a peak elevation of 1,000
feet. The Lake Herman sub-basin covers an area approximately 10 square miles.
The primary land use in the Sulphur Springs Creek/Lake Herman sub-basin north of Lake
Herman is agricultural; there are several beef cattle ranches, a small dairy, and an abandoned
walnut orchard. Syar Industries, an aggregate mining firm, has facilities near the western end
of the watershed. The majority of its operations lie outside the watershed; however, in
December of 2014, the Solano County Planning Commission approved a use permit and
reclamation plan to expand the quarry pit to 211 acres from 113 acres and double the
extraction rate to 4 million tons annually. The City provided comments on the project during
the Environmental Impact Report process. The mitigation measures identified for the project
reduced the impacts to a less-than-significant level.
The primary land use south of Lake Herman is industrial located within the Benicia Industrial
Park. The final phases of the Southampton residential development also drain into Sulphur
Springs Creek south of Lake Herman with storm flows regulated by two detention basins.
In addition to several ranch homes, there are several residences within the watershed located
on Lake Herman Road west of the lake. The Hiddenbrooke residential subdivision, located in
the City of Vallejo, was constructed in Upper Sky Valley with a golf course that has been
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 6-13 February 27, 2017
Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities
operating since 1991. This entire area drains into a retention basin and ultimately into Lake
Herman.
6.7.1 – Benicia’s Stormwater Management Program
The City of Benicia is required by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
under the provisions of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase
II regulations and the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Phase II General Permit
requirements to develop and implement a Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP). The
SWMP is intended to reduce pollutants that may be present in stormwater runoff from
streets and property within the city limits.
The City intends to control and manage its stormwater in compliance with the provisions of
the State General Stormwater Permit by applying for coverage under the Phase II General
Permit as regulated by the SWRCB San Francisco Bay Region 2.
The City of Benicia has adopted a Stormwater Management and Discharge Control
Ordinance, Chapter 15.64 of the Benicia Municipal Code, to address stormwater control
within the City. Several key components of the Program include the following:
• Public Education and Outreach
• Public Participation/Involvement
• Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination
• Construction Site Storm water Runoff Control
• Post-Construction Storm water Management
• Pollution Prevention for Municipal Operations
The City provides a detailed annual report on the progress and effectiveness of the Program
and identifies necessary changes to the Program based on performance. In addition, the
State General Permit requires development of a guidance document and implementation of
tasks annually. The City has implemented a number of the elements, including recycling
programs, educational documents, storm drain mapping, street sweeping, drainage inlet
cleaning, storm drain stenciling, and annual outfall monitoring.
Determinations
6.7.1 The Benicia Public Works Department is responsible for the design, construction,
operation, and maintenance of storm drain facilities within the city limits.
6.7.2 All the City’s stormwater is conveyed both by natural and man-made channels, and
by drainage culverts to the Carquinez Strait.
6.7.3 All the sub-basins are served by natural or constructed drainage systems, such as
creeks, ditches, and storm drain culverts.
6.7.4 The City of Benicia has adopted a Stormwater Management and Discharge Control
Ordinance to address stormwater control within the City.
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 6-14 February 14, 2017
Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities
6.7.5 The State General Permit requires development of a guidance document and
implementation of tasks annually. The City has implemented a number of the
elements including recycling programs, educational documents, storm drain
mapping, street sweeping, drainage inlet cleaning, storm drain stenciling, and annual
outfall monitoring.
6.7.6 Measure C revenues will assist with some long term maintenance and replacement
costs.
6.8 – Wastewater
The City of Benicia owns and operates the facilities providing wastewater collection,
treatment, and discharge for its service area, which is coterminous with the city limits. The
City’s wastewater system currently serves approximately 8,900 residential (single- and multi-
unit dwellings) and 609 commercial/industrial connections. The system includes the
treatment plant, approximately 150 miles of pipeline, 23 pumping stations, and a 1,300-foot-
long deep-water outfall to the Carquinez Strait.
The Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) is located on seven and a half acres of land in the
southeast section of the City at 614 East Fifth Street. Discharges from the plant are regulated
by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region, through a
NPDES permit.
The plant was originally built in 1958, and provided primary level (removal of grit and solids)
treatment only. It was upgraded to include secondary (biological removal of most of the
remaining pollutants) treatment in 1978. In 1998, the plant was again upgraded to address
reliable capacity, odors, and noise. The most recent project (2003 Infiltration and Inflow
Improvements Project) included installing a three-mile-long, main trunk relief sewer pipeline
to convey intercepted wet weather flows from the far western side of the City to the plant. In
addition, modifications were made to the WWTP to accommodate peak wet weather flows,
including new screening structures, upgraded disinfection/dechlorination facilities, and
larger effluent pumps. The main objective of this project was to minimize sanitary sewer
overflow within the lower portions of the City. Repair and replacement of old sewer pipelines
will continue to be scheduled on an annual basis to reduce infiltration and inflow from the
system over time.
The plant treats an average dry weather flow capacity of 4.5 million gallons per day (mgd)
and has a sustained wet weather secondary treatment capacity of 11 mgd. Currently, the
plant discharges an average dry weather flow of approximately 2.0 mgd (2015 data). Plant
capacity is a function of both flow (volume of water) and loading (pollutant concentration).
Capacity of the plant is adequate to handle wastewater generated by both existing and
projected uses within the city limits, as defined by the 1999 General Plan for the 2020
planning horizon, including Pine Lake area.
Wastewater is transported to the plant via two main interceptors. A 36-inch interceptor
enters the plant from the west. The land use in this area is primarily residential with both
single- and multiple-family dwellings, and some light commercial. The area is near buildout
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 6-15 February 27, 2017
Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities
with only small infill parcels remaining. A 24-inch interceptor enters the plant from the east
serving primarily commercial and industrial uses, including the Benicia Industrial Park, and
Pine Lake area. The City’s sanitary sewer pipelines have adequate capacity to convey
wastewater collected from existing customers discharging to the system and for limited
degrees of rainfall-dependent infiltration and inflow.
Future large-scale development, including Northern Gateway property, will require
additional analysis of the collection system to determine capacity constraints and identify
needed improvements to accommodate the increase in wastewater to be conveyed.
Findings & Determinations
6.8.1 The City of Benicia owns and operates the facilities providing wastewater collection,
treatment, and discharge within the city limits.
6.8.2 The plant treats an average dry weather flow capacity of 4.5 million gallons per day
(mgd) and has a sustained wet weather secondary treatment capacity of 11 mgd.
Currently, the plant discharges an average dry weather flow of approximately 2.0
mgd (2015 data).
6.8.3 Capacity of the plant is adequate to handle wastewater generated by both existing
and projected uses within the city limits.
6.8.4 Future development of the Northern Gateway property will require additional
analysis of the collection system to determine capacity constraints and identify
needed improvements to accommodate the increase in wastewater to be conveyed.
6.9 – Water
The City of Benicia owns and operates the facilities providing potable water to users within
its service area, which is coterminous with the city limits. The treatment facility is located off
Lake Herman Road. Water is pumped to the treatment plant through the Transmission Main
that runs along I-680 from Cordelia to the treatment plant. At the Water Treatment Plant
(WTP), the raw water is distributed through the Diversion Structure for treatment or by
gravity flow to Lake Herman. The treatment plant operates under regulatory oversight of the
State Water Resources Control Board—Division of Drinking Water and has a rated hydraulic
capacity of 12 million gallons per day. The raw water transmission system consists of two
pumps stations and approximately 18 miles of pipeline. The treated water distribution
system consists of three pump stations, five reservoirs, nine pressure-reducing stations, and
approximately 160 miles of pipelines. The City maintains emergency storage at Lake Herman
with a capacity of 1,390 acre-feet at full pool. Lake Herman has an average yield of 500 to
1,000 acre-feet annually with no yield during dry years. The lake also provides storage for
excess water delivered through the North Bay Aqueduct (NBA).
6.9.1 – Historical Water Use
The City contracts to receive Delta water via the NBA through agreements with the Solano
County Water Agency (SCWA) for State Water Project (SWP) water and with the California
Department of Water Resources (DWR) for Settlement Water. The City also receives Lake
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 6-16 February 14, 2017
Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities
Berryessa water from the SWP through agreements with the City of Vallejo and the Solano
Irrigation District (SID). Approximately half the City’s raw water demand is sold to and used
by the Valero Benicia Refinery for industrial cooling and boiler use. The remaining raw water
is treated at the City’s WTP for its municipal demand. Water stored in Lake Herman is
captured through stormwater runoff or impounded from excess raw water diversion from
the WTP.
Table 6-4: Contracted Water Supply
Source Contract Amount (AFY)
State Water Project 16,075
Settlement Water 10,500
Vallejo Agreement 1,100
Solano Irrigation District Agreement 2,000
Lake Herman 500*
Total 30,175
Note:
* Based upon historical observation)
State Water Project (SWP): The City receives SWP water through an agreement with SCWA.
SCWA is a State Water Contractor and maintains an agreement with the DWR for the SWP
water (called Table A water), and in turn contracts with cities in Solano County to provide
this supply. The water supply for the SWP comes from Lake Oroville in Butte County and
water rights for flows in the Sacramento and San Joaquin River systems. The SWP contract
runs to year 2035 and is renewable. The City’s current SWP contract amount is 17,200 acre-
feet per year (AFY), with 16,075 AFY guaranteed after the cities of Rio Vista or Dixon connect
to the NBA.
Water Rights Settlement: The City of Benicia, along with the cities of Fairfield and Vacaville,
asserted a priority right with the State of California for water from the Sacramento-San
Joaquin Delta pursuant to the Watershed-of-Origin Statute.
DWR diverts water under an appropriative right that allows diversion of water that is not
needed to meet in-Delta needs or outflow needs. The City is able to pump Settlement Water
whenever the water restriction Term 91 is lifted, normally during the winter months. In
California, courts have held that appropriative water rights may be limited under the Public
Trust Doctrine.
Vallejo Agreement: The City currently has an active water purchase agreement with the City
of Vallejo. The agreement was executed in 1962 and has been amended twice. The second
amendment extended the expiration date of the agreement to February 28, 2025. The City
anticipates this agreement will be renewed at its expiration.
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 6-17 February 27, 2017
Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities
In the agreement, the City will purchase 1,100 AFY of Vallejo’s Solano Project “call” water
from Lake Berryessa. The agreement also provides that the City can receive up to 3 million
gallons per day (mgd) of the water as treated water, in lieu of raw water, by means of an
interconnection between the Benicia and Vallejo treated water systems, which does not
currently exist. Currently, the City can only receive raw water from Vallejo by means of the
Cordelia Pump Station and Cordelia Transmission Main. In order to receive treated water, a
new interconnection would be required. The agreement provides that shortages (reductions)
experienced by Vallejo may be passed on to Benicia.
Solano Irrigation District (SID): SID is the holder of a contractual right to receive
entitlements from the Solano Project as a Participating Agency of the SCWA under the terms
of a Participating Agency Contract providing for the delivery of and allotment of 141,000
AFY from the Solano Project to SID. In March 2009, the City entered into a purchase
agreement with the SID to provide 2,000 AFY of “carry-over.” Water will be provided through
water deliveries from Lake Berryessa and the Putah South Canal of the Solano Project. There
is no specified date of termination of the agreement as long as SID maintains the adequate
water rights from SCWA, and payments to SID are met. The agreement is subject to a
reduction in supply based on drought conditions.
The SID water was purchased as an alternative raw water supply and to improve drinking
water quality when the water drawn from the Delta through the North Bay Aquaduct (NBA)
is high in total organic carbon. This water source can be counted towards the total water
available, but was not intended to increase availability for future growth. Any new water use
of any significance would have to be analyzed in this context.
Lake Herman: Lake Herman is located in the hills between the cities of Benicia and Vallejo
and has an approximate storage capacity of 1,400 acre-feet. The dam that created Lake
Herman was constructed in 1905 and raised in 1943 to its current height of 116 feet above
sea level. Lake Herman is part of the Sulphur Spring Creek watershed. The average yield of
its watershed is 500 AFY to 1,000 AFY, with no yield in dry years. The lake serves as terminal
storage for excess supply delivered to the City through the NBA.
Pumped raw water from the NBA or Putah South Canal is delivered to the City’s treatment
facility at a diversion structure. Since the pump stations operate at a fixed speed, surplus
flow not needed at the plant is diverted by gravity to Lake Herman through a 24-inch-
diameter pipeline. The City has the ability to pump water from Lake Herman back to the
treatment facility through the Lake Herman Pump Station. This is typically done during
emergencies when supply from the NBA or Putah South Canal is not available. The pump
station has a total pumping capacity of 9.6 mgd.
Water Reuse Project (Proposed): The City of Benicia is has proposed a Water Reuse Project
which would allow the City to produce about 2,000 acre feet per year (AFY), or 650 million
gallons, of recycled water at the Benicia Wastewater Treatment Plant. By sending all or most
of that water to one of the City’s largest water users, the Refinery, the City is able to
accomplish a number of objectives:
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 6-18 February 14, 2017
Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities
Increases annual potable water supply available to residents and businesses by 2,000 acre
feet, which represents 20 to 25 percent of the City’s overall water needs. During periods
when SWP supply is not limited, this water can be banked in Lake Berryessa for use during
times of shortages, thus reducing the need to purchase imported water at premium rates.
The highly-treated recycled water produced would meet State of California rules for
unrestricted non-potable use for industrial, irrigation, dust control, and residential
use. Recycled water will be available to citizens, construction contractors and for irrigation
of parks and other locations near the pipeline
A year-round, high-demand water reuse customer allows cost-effective production of
recycled water, because of lower pipeline construction costs and economies of scale. It has
an additional benefit of reducing discharge to the San Francisco Bay and the activities
associated with complying with current and future discharge regulations. Flexibility can be
built into the recycled water project to serve smaller, seasonal, irrigation or industrial
customers now and in the future.
Because a lower level of treatment meets Valero’s needs, this recycled water project is less
expensive than one studied in 2008. In 2008, the need for higher recycled water quality was
driven by using recycled water in Valero’s boiler feed water system, which required highly
treated recycled water using reverse osmosis. The current study targets recycled water use in
the Refinery’s cooling tower system only, and water quality that can be achieved with less-
expensive treatment.
The tertiary treated water produced at the treatment plant will assist the City in complying
with potential nutrient regulations for continued discharge to the San Francisco Bay. The
project implements the goals and policies of the City’s General Plan and Strategic Plan in
relation to achieving sustainability, ensuring an adequate water supply and promoting water
conservation.
6.9.2 – Projected Usage
The City of Benicia’s 2012 Water Systems Master Plan developed a baseline forecast for
treated water demands assuming that no additional conservation from 2009–11 levels would
occur in the future. Baseline water demand forecasts presented in the 2010 Urban Water
Management Plan were used for the water demand. Forecast consumption for the various
land use categories were summarized to provide the baseline treated production projection
shown in Table 6-5.
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 6-19 February 27, 2017
Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities
Table 6-5: Baseline Treated Water Demand Forecast by Category
Water Consumption (AFY)
Water Use Category 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
Single-Family Residential 2,701 2,743 2,786 2,830 2,876 2,909
Multi-Family Residential 467 474 482 489 497 503
Commercial/Institutional 381 387 393 399 406 410
Industrial 89 90 92 93 95 96
Irrigation 536 544 553 562 571 577
Other 9 9 9 9 10 10
Total 4,183 4,247 4,315 4,382 4,455 4,505
The total amount of raw water supply the City is projected to need, based on treated water
demands and raw water projections at the baseline level, and is shown in Table 6-6. Raw
water projections include raw water for the Valero refinery and operations raw water used
for treatment processes at the water and surplus raw water supply that bypasses the
treatment plant and is stored in Lake Herman for future emergency use. The projected total
raw water demands are expected to increase from approximately 10,863 AFY in 2010 to
11,940 AFY in 2035, an increase of over 1,077 AFY.
Table 6-6: Baseline Raw Water Demands
Raw Water Demands (AFY)
Type 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
Treated Water 4,183 4,247 4,315 4,382 4,455 4,505
Valero Raw Water 4,792 5,296 5,800 5,800 5,800 5,800
Operations and Emergency 441 441 441 441 441 441
Raw Water
Unaccounted For Water 1,447 1,109 1,173 1,180 1,188 1,194
Total Raw Water Demand 10,863 11,093 11,729 11,803 11,884 11,940
High, baseline, and low raw water demand projections were developed to examine the City’s
supply needs for water (Table 6-7). These projections include both production demands and
Valero’s raw water demands. The high demand assumes industrial treated water use is twice
that in baseline conditions, no significant savings from conservation programs occur, and the
projected Valero raw water demand is 10 percent over baseline values shown in Table 6-5.
The baseline case is based on historical data regarding Valero’s raw water demand and
assuming current levels of conservation and 100 percent planned buildout as phased; with
Valero’s raw water demand curve remaining relatively flat at levels extrapolated from
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 6-20 February 14, 2017
Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities
historical use data. The low demand assumes that additional conservation activities cause a
decrease from the baseline demands by 10 percent and that buildout for treated water
supply is 80 percent of baseline construction; which is equivalent to a total of 18 percent
reduction in treated water demand, and a 10-percent reduction in non-potable demands.
Table 6-7: Total Raw Water Demand Forecasts
Annual Demand (AFY)
Scenarios 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
Baseline Scenario
Treated Water Demand 4,183 4,247 4,315 4,382 4,455 4,505
Valero Raw Water Demand 4,792 5,296 5,800 5,800 5,800 5,800
Operations & Emergency 441 441 441 441 441 441
Demand
Unaccounted For Water 1,447 1,109 1,173 1,180 1,188 1,194
Total Demand 10,863 11,093 11,729 11,803 11,884 11,940
High Demand Scenario
Treated Water Demand 4,272 4,337 4,407 4,475 4,550 4,601
Valero Raw Water Demand 5,271 5,826 6,380 6,380 6,380 6,380
Operations & Emergency 441 441 441 441 441 441
Demand
Unaccounted For Water 1,447 1,109 1,173 1,180 1,188 1,194
Total Demand 11,431 11,713 12,401 12,476 12,559 12,616
Low Demand Scenario
Treated Water Demand 3,012 3,058 3,107 3,155 3,208 3,244
Valero Raw Water Demand 4,313 4,766 5,220 5,220 5,220 5,220
Operations & Emergency 441 441 441 441 441 441
Demand
Unaccounted For Water 1,302 998 1,056 1,062 1,069 1,075
Total Demand 9,024 9,219 9,779 9,834 9,894 9,935
Findings & Determinations
6.9.1 Benicia owns and operates the facilities providing potable water to users within the
city limits.
6.9.2 The City contracts to receive Delta water via the NBA through agreements with the
Solano County Water Agency for State Water Project (SWP) water and with the
California Department of Water Resources for Settlement Water. The City also
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 6-21 February 27, 2017
Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities
receives Lake Berryessa water from the SWP through agreements with the City of
Vallejo and the Solano Irrigation District.
6.9.3 The City maintains emergency storage at Lake Herman with a capacity of 1,390 acre-
feet at full pool. Lake Herman has an average yield of 500 to 1,000 acre-feet annually
with no yield during dry years.
6.9.4 Approximately half the City’s raw water demand is sold to and used by the Valero
Benicia Refinery.
6.9.5 The City’s total water supply (contracted and by right)is 30,175 AFY.
6.9.6 The projected total raw water demands are expected to increase from approximately
10,863 AFY in 2010 to 11,940 AFY in 2035. Even with the additional demand the city
has adequate supply from a diversity of sources to meet those demands.
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 6-22 February 14, 2017
Financial Ability to Provide Services
7.0: Financial Ability to Provide Services
The City of Benicia offers a full range of services to its residents and businesses. This includes
police, fire, street and facilities maintenance, library, parks and community services, as well as
general administration. Although primarily funded out of the General Fund, some additional
department support comes from Special Revenues, such as Gas Tax and Traffic Mitigation,
which support street resurfacing and traffic calming measures. In addition, Benicia has
always been active in seeking grants and state entitlement funds. These funds help the
departments maintain the City’s quality of life.
The City’s remaining vacant land is close to existing services, including the 527-acre
Northern Gateway property west of I-680.
7.1 – General Fund
The General Fund is the primary operating fund of the City. The fund accounts for all
revenues, expenditures, transfers, and other activity not accounted for in other city funds.
The City continues to experience flattening or declining revenues coupled with rising
employee retirement benefit and workers’ compensation costs. In the past, these challenges
were met through employee contract negotiations, cost containment measures, inter fund
loans, and drawdowns of reserve balances. Despite these measures, without additional
‐ ‐
action, budgeted General Fund reserves will fall below the key levels set in the City’s Reserve
Policy in future budgets. Per the General Fund’s 10-year forecast, the City reserve levels will
remain at or close to the 20 percent reserve policy for the next five years. Beyond the next
five years, as expenditures continue to outpace revenues, the City will need to address this
structural deficit by reducing expenditures and/or seeing increased revenues. City
management will work with the Council to discuss long term budget stabilization measures
to restore fund reserves, eliminate operating deficits, and deliver services efficiently and
‐
effectively to the citizens of Benicia in a sustainable manner.
The City adopts a two year budget to allow for better fiscal planning. The current budget is
the 2015-17 budget. Table 7-1 and Table 7-2 outline the City’s revenues and expenditures,
broken down by major categories, over the past five fiscal years starting in FY2010–11 and
continuing through to the most recent budgeted year, FY2015–16. Note that FY 2015-16
actuals are draft amounts, as these are unaudited as of November 10, 2016.
Table 7-1: Statement of Revenues for the Past Five Years and Current Year
FY10-11 to FY15–16 Revenues
FY15–16 FY15-16
Revenue Source Budget Actuals* FY14–15 FY13–14 FY12–13 FY11–12 FY10–11
Taxes
Property 15,678,000 15,580,028 15,152,388 14,291,376 11,835,074 12,659,984 12,162,807
Sales 7,932,600 8,992,100 5,892,568 6,371,951 7,085,187 6,217,952 6,150,614
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 7-1 February 27, 2017
Financial Ability to Provide Services
Table 7-1: Statement of Revenues for the Past Five Years and Current Year
FY10-11 to FY15–16 Revenues
FY15–16 FY15-16
Revenue Source Budget Actuals* FY14–15 FY13–14 FY12–13 FY11–12 FY10–11
Utility users 6,308,850 4,594,385 4,318,066 4,739,792 4,825,055 5,087,381 5,027,163
Franchise tax 2,233,600 2,079,543 2,200,664 1,859,241 1,637,825 1,598,207 1,570,184
Other 905,000 1,106,213 1,070,045 965,749 931,059 839,480 844,334
Licenses and 370,500 480,554 539,451 391,987 331,830 277,267 315,208
permits
Fines and 79,500 102,280 82,198 92,633 125,016 184,084 99,898
forfeitures
Use of money 34,745 801,087 490,006 437,227 311,010 437,602 570,763
and property
Revenue from 30,000 258,354 382,439 382,457 2,050,280 2,229,811 2,240,416
other agencies
Current service 2,132,000 2,197,690 1,761,507 1,712,085 1,423,705 1,308,688 1,222,815
charges
Community — 44,736 37,721 38,197 — — —
donations
Other 103,435 140,528 86,189 179,912 507,168 161,397 471,900
Note:
* For FY 2015–16 actual revenues are draft amounts, as the audit has not been finalized as of Nov. 10, 2016.
Table 7-2 outlines the City’s annual expenditures, by department, from the 2010–2011 fiscal
year through the current year.
Table 7-2: Statement of Expenditures for the Past Five Years and Current Year
FY15–16 FY15–16
EXPENDITURES Budget Actuals** FY14-15 FY13–14 FY12–13 FY11–12 FY10–11
Current
Administration 4,620,620 $4,212,645 $3,930,343 $3,074,350 2,943,896 2,957,695 3,101,146
Public safety––police 8,952,310 8,545,510 8,257,338 8,231,407 8,078,683 7,874,874 8,252,596
Public safety–fire 7,344,790 7,482,751 6,870,350 6,449,095 6,490,519 6,193,078 6,555,355
Parks and community 5,282,390 5,005,501 4,985,127 4,839,940 4,619,097 4,561,963 4,807,911
services
Community 1,394,355 1,342,025 1,079,054 931,502 1,010,550 —* —*
Development
Public Works 2,298,975 2,133,662 1,786,668 1,177,976 1,160,546 2,009,147* 2,469,041*
Library 1,361,905 1,264,161 1,238,938 1,196,032 1,204,180 1,165,025 1,211,576
Economic 679,035 744,461 572,719 537,493 599,745 443,384 458,470
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 7-2 February 14, 2017
Financial Ability to Provide Services
Table 7-2: Statement of Expenditures for the Past Five Years and Current Year
FY15–16 FY15–16
EXPENDITURES Budget Actuals** FY14-15 FY13–14 FY12–13 FY11–12 FY10–11
Development
General 1,010,205 528,614 722,030 2,899,981 2,821,213 2,863,369 2,606,994
Capital outlay 2,760,000 415,396 214,588 406,691 248,754 207,940 198,058
Debt Service
Principal 390,990 341,761 326,668 312,139 — — —
Interest and fiscal — 49,229 69,736 86,945 11,749 18,312 91,960
charges
Note:
* For FY 2010–11 & FY 2011–12, Public Works and Community Development were combined as one department
** For FY 2015-16 Actuals, amounts are drafts, as the audit has not been finalized as of Nov. 10, 2016.
It should be emphasized that despite the anticipated long-term structural deficit, balancing
measures utilized thus far have achieved notable results. The most recent proposed General
Fund budget for FY2016–17 will allow the City to continue providing existing services and is
the first budget since the 2008 recession that departments were not recommending
reductions in order to maintain the City’s General Fund reserve policy of 20 percent over the
course of the two-year budget cycle. Exhibit 2 compares the revenues and expenditures
from FY2010–11 to the most recent budgeted year, FY2015–16. As shown, following the
period of the recession, the City’s general fund remained relatively stagnant but in FY2015–
16 the expenditures and revenues increased.
Exhibit 2: General Fund Revenues and Expenditures
Exhibit 1: General Fund Revenues and Expenditures
40,000,000
35,000,000
30,000,000
25,000,000
20,000,000
15,000,000
10,000,000
5,000,000
0
Budgeted
FY2010-11 FY2011-12 FY2012-13 FY2013-14 FY2014-15
FY2015-16
Revenues 30,676,102 31,001,853 31,063,209 31,462,607 32,013,242 35,808,230
Expenditures 29,753,107 28,294,787 29,188,932 30,143,551 30,053,559 36,095,575
Revenues Expenditures
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 7-3 February 27, 2017
Financial Ability to Provide Services
The effect of the recession was more than a temporary period of economic contraction as it
reshaped Benicia’s fiscal landscape. Projects that are funded through the General Fund have
faced serious cutbacks or funding deferral over the past decade. In response to the City’s
financial situation and its citizens’ desire to maintain their quality of life, in 2014 the City
Council placed Measure C on the ballot. Measure C is a 1-cent-on-the-dollar sales tax
increase that goes directly to the City of Benicia and cannot be appropriated by county or
state government. Measure C went into effect on April 1, 2015 and was projected to
generate $3.7 million annually. For the 2015/2016 fiscal year, the projected impacts are
slightly higher at $4.4 million. The City Council adopted an allocation plan for Measure C to
provide assurance that the revenue would be used as intended. In addition to allocating
sufficient revenue to sustain current service levels, the City Council dedicated more than half
the estimated revenue to be collected in the first two years ($4 million) to address badly
needed infrastructure improvements such as playground equipment replacement, road
maintenance (including pothole repair) sidewalk repair, equipment for fire and police
operations, and pool repairs.
An updated General Fund 10-year forecast presented February 2015, showed the positive
impact Measure C revenues had on reversing the budget deficit. In addition, the Measure C
Sales Tax added capital funding for the General Fund. Furthermore, with the addition of
Measure C revenues, the City will be able to initiate a limited number of key projects during
the next two budget cycles.
7.2 – Enterprise Funds
By definition, an enterprise activity charges direct fees for services. Customers that consume
goods or services such as drinking or irrigation water, waste disposal, or electricity, pay a fee.
Rates are set by a governing board and there is a nexus between the costs of providing
services and the rates customers pay.
7.2.1 – Wastewater Funds
The Wastewater Funds account for the operating revenues, expenses, debt service, and
capital improvement costs related to providing the safe and reliable removal of wastewater
generated within the City. Wastewater rates also pay for some non point source pollution
prevention and other federal and state environmental programs related to water discharge
‐
treatment systems.
Consistent with Benicia Municipal Code 13.52.040, the current monthly sewer rates for each
equivalent dwelling unit are shown in Table 7-3.
Table 7-3: Sewer Rates from January 17, 2013–June 30, 2017
Year Rate
January 17, 2013–June 30, 2013 $45.88
July 1, 2013–June 30, 2014 $50.01
July 1, 2014–June 30, 2015 $53.26
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 7-4 February 14, 2017
Financial Ability to Provide Services
Year Rate
July 1, 2015–June 30, 2016 $55.39
July 1, 2016–June 30, 2017 $56.49
7.2.2 – Water Funds
The Water Funds account for the operating revenues, expenses, debt service, and capital
improvement costs related to the utility. Operating activity includes costs for water supply
contracts, storage, and the negotiation and management of untreated water supply to
Valero Refining Company, costs related to Federal and State water quality, and
environmental mandates.
For fiscal year ending June 30, 2015, the City’s water utility fund collected $9.0 million in user
fees to sustain the system. The system has $34.9 million in capital assets, net of accumulated
depreciation, financed with $11.0 million of long-term debt. The fund made $1.7 million in
debt service payments for the year. The net position decreased by $.3 million due to
increased operating costs and the added costs of purchasing additional water as a result of
the drought experienced throughout the state.
Consistent with Benicia Municipal Code 13.12.010, the current water rates are shown in Table
7-4 through Table 7-7.
Table 7-4: Water Service Rates to Residential Users
Service Charge 01/17/13– July 1, 2013– 07/01/14– 07/01/15– 07/01/16–
(per unit, per month) 06/30/13 06/30/14 06/30/15 06/30/16 06/30/17
Single-family dwelling $14.77 $16.68 $18.60 $19.86 $20.56
Multifamily dwelling $11.09 $12.52 $13.96 $14.91 $15.43
Table 7-5: Additional Volume Charges to Residential Users
Volume Charge 01/17/13– July 1, 2013– 07/01/14– 07/01/15– 07/01/16–
(per unit, per month) 06/30/13 06/30/14 06/30/15 06/30/16 06/30/17
0–8 hundred cubic feet $1.46 $1.65 $1.84 $1.97 $2.04
8–30 hundred cubic feet $2.30 $2.60 $2.90 $3.10 $3.21
Over 30 hundred cubic feet $2.46 $2.78 $3.10 $3.31 $3.43
Table 7-6: Water Service Rates to Commercial and Industrial Users
Monthly Service Charge 01/17/13– July 1, 2013– 07/01/14– 07/01/15– 07/01/16–
(per meter) 06/30/13 06/30/14 06/30/15 06/30/16 06/30/17
5/8- or ¾-inch $19.08 $21.54 $24.02 $25.65 $26.55
1-inch $33.90 $38.27 $42.67 $45.57 $47.16
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 7-5 February 27, 2017
Financial Ability to Provide Services
Monthly Service Charge 01/17/13– July 1, 2013– 07/01/14– 07/01/15– 07/01/16–
(per meter) 06/30/13 06/30/14 06/30/15 06/30/16 06/30/17
1½-inch $76.24 $86.07 $95.97 $102.50 $106.09
2-inch $135.50 $152.98 $170.57 $182.17 $188.55
3-inch $304.85 $344.18 $383.76 $409.86 $424.21
4-inch $541.93 $611.84 $682.20 $728.59 $754.09
6-inch $1,219.32 $1,376.61 $1,534.92 $1,639.29 $1,696.67
Table 7-7: Additional Volume Charges to Commercial and Industrial Users
Volume Charge 01/17/13– July 1, 2013– 07/01/14– 07/01/15– 07/01/16–
(per unit, per month) 06/30/13 06/30/14 06/30/15 06/30/16 06/30/17
0–30 hundred cubic feet $1.99 $2.25 $2.51 $2.68 $2.77
Over 30 hundred cubic feet $2.33 $2.63 $2.93 $3.13 $3.24
7.3 – Capital Improvements
The last Capital Improvement Program (CIP) was created in 2009 and covered projects from
2009–2014. Currently, the City does not have a CIP.
The most recently adopted City budget, FY2015–17, prioritizes improvement projects, and
categorizes them into four levels. Level 1 is designated for projects that are a high priority
and are recommended to be funded with one-time revenues from the General Fund. There
are three projects that fall under Level 1: the Enterprise Resource Planning System (ERP), the
Arsenal, and St. Augustine repairs. The appropriations for these projects are anticipated to
be $1.35 million.
The items in Level 2 were recommended for funding and reviewed as part of the budget
process. These items are included in the adopted FY2015 17 budget. Generally, items in
Level 2 are those that staff have already received Council’s direction to proceed and/or they
–
are mandated by an outside authority; the project can be completed with existing staffing
and resource levels; and/or because it is a notable project that represents a core department
function that will be completed during the next budget cycle.
The City’s 13 departments have outlined 38 projects that fall into the Level 2 category. The
appropriations for these projects are anticipated to be $14.42 million during the FY2015–17.
A quarter of these funds go into the Water Meter Replacement Program, which is one of the
38 projects. This project is sponsored by the Public Works Department and will be funded by
the Water Fund. Examples of other projects included in this level are the Fire and Community
Development departments’ update of the Uniform Codes every three years and the Library’s
update of its cataloging system. While not routine, day to day endeavors, these projects are
representative of the department’s core functions.
‐ ‐
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 7-6 February 14, 2017
Financial Ability to Provide Services
Level 3 projects are those that were not proposed to be in the most recent annual
budget. They were included in the project list because staff acknowledges that they are
high-priority projects; however, staff also recognizes that the City lacks sufficient resources
to complete these projects at this time. Five projects on this list are considered top priorities
in this level, should funding become available during the biennial funding.
Finally, Level 4 are items that the City currently does not have the financial resources, staff or
time available to undertake. They remain on the list as projects for consideration in future
budget cycles.
7.3.1 – Assessment Districts
Assessment districts may be established by the City Council to finance needed public
improvements. Establishment of assessment districts requires the approval of two-thirds of
all property owners in the proposed district. With this approval, an assessment district issues
bonds to pay for the improvements and assesses the property owners for the annual debt
service of the bonds. Examples of projects financed this way include: storm drainage
facilities, street improvements (curb, gutter, sidewalk, pavement), and water and sewer
mains.
7.3.2 – Benefit Districts
Properties within a benefit district contribute funds as development occurs. When sufficient
funds accumulate, improvements are built (typically, after a majority of the properties
develop, the remaining area is converted to an assessment district to fund the balance of the
total costs so that the improvements can be completed before complete buildout of the
district). Examples of improvements funded with this method in Benicia are street paving and
widening.
7.3.3 – Capital License Tax
The City collects a construction license tax at the time of issuance of building permits for
residential structures and commercial facilities. Revenues from this tax are used solely for
public facilities and buildings. Examples of public projects funded through the Capital
License Tax program are Citywide ADA improvements to City—owned facilities.
7.3.4 – Development Agreement
A development agreement between the City and a developer specifies the standards and
conditions that will apply for the life of a development project. A development agreement
may allow, for example, a developer to increase density on his or her property in exchange
for the provision of additional parkland or funding for park development. Development
agreements will continue to provide a portion of park acquisition and development funding.
Examples of parkland acquired through development agreements are the Benicia
Community Park, Waters End Park, and Skillman Park. Other public facilities provided
through a development agreement include trails, water-sewer extensions, paving, and street
widening.
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 7-7 February 27, 2017
Financial Ability to Provide Services
7.3.5 – General Obligation Bonds
General Obligation Bonds are issued by the City to finance the acquisition and construction
of public capital facilities and real property. General Obligation Bond measures must be
passed by a two-thirds majority of the voters within the municipality. General Obligation
Bond funding is derived from increased local property taxes. The City has funded wastewater
treatment plant improvements facilities through General Obligation Bonds.
7.3.6 – Park Dedication/Quimby Act
The City’s Park Land Dedication Ordinance, which incorporates provisions of the Quimby Act
requires, as a condition of approval of a tentative map, the dedication of land or payment of
an in lieu fee to be used for the purposes of acquiring and developing parkland. The amount
of dedicated parkland required is equivalent to 5 acres for every 1,000 persons in the
development. Because of the requirements of the Park Dedication Ordinance, all new
developments will continue to contribute a portion of the parkland necessary to serve that
development. In Benicia, several parks were developed under the requirements of the City’s
Park Dedication Ordinance including Bridgeview, Southampton Park, Benicia Community
Park, Gateway Park, Skillman Park, Solano Park, and Jack London Park.
7.3.7 – School Impact Fees
The City collects a school impact fee on all new residential and commercial development in
the City. This fee is a pass—through to the school district and is authorized per state law
(Proposition 1A, 1998). No school impact fee revenues accrue to the city
7.3.8 – State and Federal Grants
The City actively pursues state and federal grants for public infrastructure and facilities such
as parks. A recent example is the procurement of State funding for improvements to the
City’s First Street Pier for parking and pedestrian improvements. The City seeks grants to
implement Climate Action Plan strategies and projects that reduce greenhouse gas
emissions and prepare the City for climate change. These include but are not limited to the
following: electric vehicle infrastructure planning and installation, sea level rise assessments
and adaptation planning, active transportation, renewable energy, and energy efficiency
projects. The City has received grant funds from the California Energy Commission, the State
Coastal Conservancy, and other state and federal agencies. The City also receives monies for
transportation improvements from the State Gas Tax, Assembly Bill 2928, and the
Transportation Development Act.
7.3.9 – Traffic Mitigation Fee
The City collects traffic impact fees for all new residential, commercial, and industrial uses in
accordance with the Citywide Traffic Impact Fee Program. The fee program identifies the
intersection and roadway improvements citywide necessary to mitigate the impacts from
development buildout in accordance with the General Plan. Each new development is
charged its fair share of costs based upon the incremental increase in traffic generated from
that development. Only capital improvement projects identified in the fee program can use
this revenue source.
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 7-8 February 14, 2017
Financial Ability to Provide Services
7.3.10 – Wastewater Capacity Fund
The Wastewater Capacity Fund is used to increase the capacity needs of the City utilities as
defined by demand growth from development. The fee is expected to pay for all or a portion
of the costs of providing public services to the new development. The City has had very little
new development in the last decade, especially since the 2008 Recession. The majority of the
working capital reserves are from earlier developments. The balances in these funds are
finite as the City is essentially built out.
7.3.11 – Water Capacity Fund
The Water Capacity fund is used to increase the capacity needs of the city utilities as defined
by demand growth from development. The fee is expected to pay for all or a portion of the
costs of providing public services to the new development.
Findings & Determinations
7.1 Between FY 2010–11 and FY 2014–15, the City’s general fund remained relatively
stagnant but in FY 2015–16, the expenditures and revenues increased. Revenues
kept pace with expenses.
7.2 In 2014, Measure C was approved by the voters. Measure C is a 1 cent-on-the-dollar
sales tax increase that goes directly to the City of Benicia. Measure C went into effect
‐
on April 1, 2015 and was projected to generate $3.7 million annually.
7.3 The City Council has allocated half the revenue for the first two years of Measure C to
needed infrastructure improvements such as playground equipment replacement,
road maintenance (including pothole repair) sidewalk repair, equipment for fire and
police operations, and pool repairs.
7.4 The City’s Park Land Dedication Ordinance, which incorporates provisions of the
Quimby Act requires, as a condition of approval of a tentative map, the dedication of
land or payment of an in lieu fee to be used for the purposes of acquiring and
developing parkland. The amount of dedicated parkland required is equivalent to 5
acres for every 1,000 persons in the development.
7.5 The last Capital Improvement Program (CIP) was created in 2009 and covered
projects from 2009–2014. At this point in time the City does not have a CIP, but
prioritizes improvement projects biennially as part of the comprehensive budget
planning process.
7.6 The most recently adopted two-year City budget, FY2015–17, prioritizes
improvement projects and categorizes them into four levels.
7.7 The city collects a number of fees that go directly to maintaining and upgrading
infrastructure to keep pace with the needs of development. The City has received
grant funds from the California Energy Commission, the State Coastal Conservancy,
and other state and federal agencies. The City also receives monies for transportation
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 7-9 February 27, 2017
Financial Ability to Provide Services
improvements from the State Gas Tax, Assembly Bill 2928, and the Transportation
Development Act.
7.8 General Obligation Bonds are issued by the City to finance the acquisition and
construction of public capital facilities and real property. The City has funded
wastewater treatment plant improvements facilities through General Obligation
Bonds.
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 7-10 February 14, 2017
Status and Opportunities for Shared Facilities
8.0: Status and Opportunities for Shared Facilities
8.1 – Shared Facilities
Identification and examination of opportunities for shared facilities and resources may
determine if public service costs can be reduced. The benefits of sharing costs for facilities
can be numerous, including pooling of funds for economies of scale; reduced service
duplications and costs; diversion of administrative functions of some facilities; and providing
better overall service. Maximizing the opportunities to share facilities allows for a level of
service that may not otherwise be possible under normal funding constraints.
Examples of the City and other agencies benefiting from sharing costs of a municipal service
include:
8.1.1 – Animal Services
The Police Department employs one full-time Animal Control Officer who provides animal
control services to the community. The City of Benicia has a financial agreement with Solano
County in which Solano County provides after-hours animal control services and animal
sheltering.
8.1.2 – Fire
The Benicia Fire Department is an “all risk agency” providing services in the areas of fire
prevention and suppression, emergency medical services, technical rescue, and hazardous
materials incident response. These services are provided by a dedicated staff operating from
two fire stations within the community. The Fire Department enhances services to Benicia by
responding to requests for aid from other agencies through mutual aid agreements. In
return, resources are provided to Benicia when needed. Mutual Aid is requested through
dispatch as the need is recognized. The Fire Department also manages automatic response
agreements with neighboring agencies. Adjacent fire jurisdictions respond simultaneously to
areas of Benicia that are close to their fire station. Each jurisdiction is automatically
dispatched upon receiving the initial 911 call.
8.2 – Open Space and Recreation Services
The City of Benicia has a Joint Use Agreement with Benicia Unified School District (BUSD),
which allows for city recreation programming at Benicia Middle School, and BUSD use of city
recreation facilities.
The City of Benicia worked with the City of Vallejo to establish the Vallejo-Benicia Open
Space Buffer, a permanent open space buffer between the two cities that also houses a Bay
Area Ridge Trail segment.
The Solano Open Space Committee (previously Tri-City and County Cooperative Planning
Group) JPA was entered into and became effective in 1995 by the Cities of Benicia, Fairfield,
Vallejo and the County of Solano. The JPA plans for 10,000 acres of open space land
between the three cities, with the shared goal to plan for, manage, and maintain the land for
open space preservation, conservation and enhancement uses, agricultural production, and
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 8-1 February 27, 2017
Status and Opportunities for Shared Facilities
regional parkland and recreation. Solano Land Trust has partnered with the JPA to acquire,
manage, and develop trailheads and trails in some of the associated acreage.
The City also has cooperative relationship with State Parks, which has two parks wholly or
partially within the City’s boundaries, including an ongoing landscape maintenance
agreement for a portion of the Benicia Capitol State Historic Park.
The City contracts special event and Farmers’ Market management through Benicia Main
Street.
8.3 – Police Department
The Police Department provides police services to the City of Benicia and currently sees no
viable option to contract out any police-related service. However, the Police Department
does have agreements with surrounding law enforcement agencies to provide mutual aid. In
addition, the police department participates in a regional SWAT team and narcotic task
force, which provide additional resources to the community.
8.4 – Solid Waste
The City contracts with Republic Services to provide street sweeping, collection of residential
recyclables, yard waste, garbage, hazardous waste, and commercial refuse in the City of
Benicia. Solid waste is deposited to the Potrero Hills Landfill. The Potrero Hills Landfill
receives waste from Sierra foothill counties and Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Mendocino,
Napa, Sacramento, Santa Clara, San Mateo, Solano, and Yolo Counties. The City anticipates
that there will be continued shared use of the Potrero Hills Landfill by these cities.
8.5 – Stormwater
City policies require private developers to pay impact fees and install infrastructure
necessary to mitigate storm drainage impacts from new developments. Storm drainage
discharge occurs in locations managed by different public agencies, e.g., the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers. These trends will continue as new development occurs in the City. The City is
part of a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) and has a Phase II small NPDES
permit.
8.6 – Transportation Services
Solano County Transit (Soltrans) operates the local transit services for cities of Benicia and
Vallejo. Solano Transportation Authority (STA) manages the SolanoExpress Bus service and
coordinates with local transit agencies to plan, fund and improve intra-county transit
connections. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) governs the freeways
that connect the municipalities and the associated off-ramps. Communication and assistance
between Benicia and Caltrans is necessary and frequent. All projects impacting state facilities
are accomplished under a state encroachment permit or project approval process with
review and approval by Caltrans. No additional opportunities for shared services have been
identified.
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 8-2 February 14, 2017
Status and Opportunities for Shared Facilities
8.7 – Water & Wastewater
Water and wastewater services are provided to Benicia residents and businesses by the City
of Benicia. The City provides water service within city limits. The City of Benicia is separated
from nearby cities and there are no feasible or cost-effective opportunities for sharing water
and wastewater treatment facilities. The City operates an Environmental Laboratory
Accreditation Program (ELAP)-certified lab.
8.8 – Management Efficiencies
The City uses a budget procedure and competitive bidding process to ensure avoidance of
unnecessary costs associated with obtaining outside services and capital improvements
construction. The City’s budget and capital improvements program are reviewed and
adopted annually as part of a public process that involves hearings before the City Council.
One measure of management efficiency is whether the city does long range planning. It
completed an urban water management plan in 2015, a stormwater management plan, and
sewer system management plan in 2009. The City reviews its strategic plan during every
budget cycle. During the FY 2015-2017 the City council agreed to extend the FY 2013-2015
Strategic Plan through FY 2015-17.
The management structure of the City providing services to its lands and residents is
efficient and effective, providing ongoing oversight and administration of essential
government services. No opportunities for changes in management structures or
organization have been identified that would result in additional efficiencies.
Findings & Determinations
8.1 The City collaborates with a number of other agencies in the areas of animal services,
fire suppression, open space and recreation services, police, solid waste, stormwater,
transportation, water, and wastewater. Cooperative agreements are in place to
reduce costs and to provide enhanced services for major service responsibilities of
the city.
8.2 The current management structure provides effective oversight and administration of
essential government services. No opportunities for changes in management
structures or organization have been identified that would result in additional
efficiencies.
8.3 While the City does not have a Capital improvement Plan, the City is dedicated to
long range planning. The City adopts a two year budget in odd numbered years,
including the most recent fiscal plan for FY 2015-2017. In addition the City has
adopted an Urban Water Management Plan, a stormwater management plan, and a
sewer system management plan. Extensive planning is an important indicator of
management efficiency.
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 8-3 February 27, 2017
Government Structure and Accountability
9.0: Government Structure and Accountability
9.1 – Government Structure
The City of Benicia is a general law city and has a Council-Manager form of government with
a separately elected Mayor and a four member city council. The Mayor is elected to a four-
year term, and, separately, the remaining four members of the City Council are elected at
large for alternating four-year terms. The Council appoints the City Manager and Attorney
and also confirms the Mayor’s appointments to all city boards, committees, and
commissions. The City Clerk and Treasurer are separately elected.
The Council is responsible for governing as well as establishing the overall priorities and
direction for the City’s municipal government. The Council’s responsibilities include adoption
of city ordinances and policies; establishing short- and long-term goals for the City; and
adoption of the City’s budget, including approval of programs, projects, contracts,
agreements, and services. Actions of the Council are regulated in accordance with applicable
statutes and city procedures.
The City is staffed with eleven departments: City Manager, City Attorney, Economic
Development, Administrative Services, Finance, Parks and Community Services, Library, Fire,
Police, Community Development, and Public Works. City Hall, the primary location for City
administrative functions, is located at 250 East L Street and is open from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00
p.m., Monday through Friday.
9.2 – Accountability
Council meetings are held on the first and third Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. at City
Hall. There are ample opportunities for public involvement and input at regularly scheduled
meetings. The agenda and packets are posted on the City’s website and available for public
review. Public notices are published in accordance with the Brown Act, other applicable
statutes and regulations, and city procedures. Council meetings along with many boards,
committees, and commission meetings can be viewed via Comcast Channel 27, AT&T
U-Verse Channel 99, or via the City’s streaming video on its website.
Benicia has adopted City’s Open Government Ordinance, Title 4, of the Benicia Municipal
Code which states it is the goal of the City to, “make it easier for people to access city
government so that they may be more informed about what their city is doing and so that
they may be involved in a more meaningful and knowledgeable way. Open meetings, easier
access to public records, ethical guidelines and a watchdog commission will help increase
the public trust and confidence in the city government and will increase the public
awareness and knowledge about their government. A well-educated public and ethical
officials are essential to good government.”
The City provides information to the citizens via its website, Twitter feed, Facebook page,
and Nextdoor—a free social networking service for neighborhoods. In addition to its online
presence, the City also provides in-person outreach. For example, recently, the City had a
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 9-1 February 27, 2017
Government Structure and Accountability
staffed booth at the local farmers market to answer any questions citizens may have with
regard to proposed water-rate changes.
There are myriad boards, commissions, and committees that provide abundant opportunities
for citizen participation and involvement in their governmental affairs. The City’s website has
a list of the boards and commissions, including those listed below, as well as a posting of
open seats for those who want to serve. Applications are available online.
Council/Commission/Board Meetings Time
Arts and Culture Commission 2nd Thursday 7:00 p.m.
Benicia Zoning Administrator
Meet as necessary
Hearing
1st, 3rd & 4th Tuesdays
City Council 7:00 p.m.
(Click for Calendar)
City Council/School Board
Quarterly 8:30 a.m.
Liaison
3rd Tuesday of October
Civil Service Commission 2009, January 2010, April 6:30 p.m.
2010, and July 2010
Community Sustainability
3rd Monday 6:00 p.m.
Commission
Design Review see Historic Preservation
Economic Development Board 4th Wednesday 5:30 p.m.
Finance Committee 4th Thursday 9:00 a.m.
Historic Preservation see Historic Preservation
Historic Preservation Review 4th Thursday 6:30 p.m.
Housing Authority Board 4th Wednesday 6:00 p.m.
Human Services Board 2nd Monday 7:15 p.m.
Board of Library Trustees 2nd Tuesday 6:30 p.m.
Open Government
Quarterly 5:00 p.m.
Commission
Parks, Recreation& Cemetery 2nd Wednesday 6:30 p.m.
Planning Commission 2nd Thursday 7:00 p.m.
Sky Valley Open Space
Quarterly 7:00 p.m.
Committee
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 9-2 February 14, 2017
Government Structure and Accountability
Traffic, Pedestrian & Bicycle
Quarterly 7:00 p.m.
Safety
Youth Action Coalition 4th Wednesday 3:30 p.m.
Youth Commission Bi Weekly Wednesday 5:00 p.m.
Youth Master Plan Steering
1st Wednesday 4:00 p.m.
Committee
Findings & Determinations
9.1 The City of Benicia is a general law city and has a Council-Manager form of
government with a separately elected Mayor and four council members.
9.2 The Council is responsible for governing as well as establishing the overall priorities
and direction for the City’s municipal government.
9.3 The City is staffed by eleven departments, including City Manager, City Attorney,
Economic Development, Administrative Services, Finance, Parks and Community
Services, Library, Fire, Police, Community Development, and Public Works.
9.4 Council meetings along with many boards, committees, and commission meetings
can be viewed via Comcast Channel 27, AT&T U-Verse Channel 99 or via the City’s
streaming video on its website.
9.5 Public notices are published in accordance with the Brown Act, other applicable
statutes and regulations, and City procedures.
9.6 The City provides information to the citizens via its website, Twitter feed, Facebook
page, Nextdoor, and in-person outreach. Transparency and outreach enhance
accessibility and accountability of city governance.
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 9-3 February 27, 2017
LAFCO Policies Affecting Service Delivery
10.0: LAFCO Policies Affecting Service Delivery
In the future, as the City elects to extend its service boundary area, some of LAFCO’s policies
should be considered. These policies include the Sphere of Influence (SOI) policy, the
Commission’s adopted Standards, and the Out of Area Service Agreement Policy. LAFCO
staff should be consulted early in the process to ensure policy specific requirements are met.
The Commission’s SOI policy requires that the City update or amend its sphere every five
years or as necessary. Additionally, the City may designate areas in its SOI as near-term or
long-term. Near-term SOI areas are those the City intends to annex in 0 to 5 years, while
long-term SOI areas are those the City intends to annex in the next 5 to 20 years.
The Commission has adopted eleven Standards in conjunction with the factors enumerated
in GC §56668 to act as a guideline to measure the appropriateness and correctness of a
proposal. Some Standards are quantitative in that specific information and minimum
submittal requirements are stipulated. Other standards are qualitative and require specific
documentation by the applicant. In deciding change of organization proposals, the
Commission needs to make determinations on the degree of compliance or non-compliance
for each Standard citing fact to support each determination. In addition, the Commission has
determined that six of the Standards (numbers 1–6) are mandatory; LAFCO must make
determinations of full compliance with the mandatory Standards to approve a proposal. The
other five Standards (numbers 7–11) are discretionary; LAFCO may make determinations of
less than full compliance with one or more of the discretionary standards and still have the
discretion to approve or deny a proposal.
There are instances when a city may desire to extend services outside its jurisdictional
boundaries for a specified service(s). GC §56133 describes the conditions that authorize
LAFCO to approve out-of-area service extensions. Generally, out-of-area service requests
within an agency’s SOI are permissible so long as it is an anticipation of a later change of
organization. For areas outside of an agency’s SOI, the Commission must make a finding that
there is an existing or impending threat to the health or safety of the public or the residents
of the affected territory.
Findings & Determinations
10.1 LAFCO’s Sphere of Influence, adopted Standards and Out of Area Service Agreement
are policies the City will have to consider if they propose to extend services to future
service delivery areas.
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 10-1 February 27, 2017
Summary of Determinations
11.0: Summary of Findings & Determinations
4.1 Benicia had a population of 26,997 in 2010.
4.2 ABAG projects that by 2040, Benicia’s population will increase by 4,403 residents to
31,400. That averages to about 0.5% annually, which is consistent with recent
growth.
5.1 There are no disadvantaged unincorporated communities within or contiguous to
Benicia’s SOI.
6.1.1 The Benicia Police Department is responsible for animal control. The City has an after
hour services agreement with the Solano County Sheriff’s office for animal control
and the City has a MOU with Solano County for animal shelter services. Animal
Control services are adequate
6.2.1 Services provided by the Benicia Fire Department include fire suppression, fire
prevention, basic and advanced life support medical services, technical rescue
services, disaster preparedness, code enforcement, and vegetation management
services.
6.2.2 Fire suppression and emergency medical services are provided by the City Fire
Department from two fire stations.
6.2.3 The average Fire Department daily staffing level is eight firefighters per day plus a
Chief Officer. The Department’s staffing allows engine companies three staff
members, including a captain, engineer, and paramedic firefighter; and it allows
rescue companies two staff members, including an engineer and paramedic
firefighter or firefighter.
6.2.4 The total request for service (call) for fiscal year 2015-2016 was 2,465. The
breakdown of those calls for the same fiscal year was 61.22 percent medical, 5.80
percent rescue, and 32.98 percent other types of calls.
6.2.5 To provide for future buildout of the Benicia Industrial Park located on the vacant,
527-acre Northern Gateway property, an additional fire station and additional
staffing may be needed to meet response and service standards.
6.3.1 Average emergency response times are tracked and available through the
department’s automated computer aided dispatch (CAD) system. The program was
last updated during the budget cycle 2013-2015 to include a new auditing process
for police reports and to streamline state reporting requirements.
6.3.2 For in-progress or life-threatening emergency calls (Priority 1) the average response
time from 2013-2014 was 6 minutes and 21 seconds.
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 11-1 February 27, 2017
Summary of Determinations
6.3.3 The Benicia Police Department currently has 51 full- and part-time staff members.
Thirty-two staff members are sworn officers. The current ratio is about 1.18 sworn
officers per one-thousand population, and is consistent with nearby cities of similar
size.
6.3.4 The police station is inadequate both in size and in modern police function. Police
operations are located in two separate buildings, including a temporary building
used for investigations. The temporary building is out of compliance with the City of
Benicia’s building codes. At this time, funding is not available to construct a new
police station.
6.4.1 Within the city limits are 48 parks, facilities, and public access areas totaling 1,248
acres. These include state facilities, a regional park, community parks, neighborhood
parks, and other outdoor recreation improvements.
6.4.2 The City has more than adequate regional parkland but is deficient in community
and neighborhood parks. The Parks, Trails & Open Space Master Plan identified a
shortfall of 35 acres of neighborhood parks and 18 acres of community parks and
since the Parks, Trails & Open Space Master Plan, two neighborhood parks have
been added with facilities appropriate to the size of the parks.
6.4.3 The City’s 1997 Parks, Trails & Open Space Master Plan recommends the
development of new park and outdoor recreation facilities keep pace with the
growth of the City.
6.5.1 The City’s Public Works Department is responsible for the operation, maintenance,
design, construction, and repair of the City’s public infrastructure.
6.5.2 Improvements to the local street network are included in the City’s Traffic Impact Fee
Program where future development pays its fair share of costs to address the future
capacity needs of development. Measure C revenues will assist with some long term
maintenance and replacement costs.
6.5.3 Other transportation projects, such as freeway mainline improvements, park & ride
lots, and major transit improvements are included in the long-range plans of the
Solano Transportation Authority.
6.5.4 Through a joint powers agreement between the cities of Benicia and Vallejo, and the
Solano Transportation Authority, Solano County Transit (SolTrans) was created to build
a unified public transit system in southern Solano County.
6.6.1 The City has a contract with Republic Services, a local franchised hauler, for curbside
garbage collection.
6.6.2 Solid waste is taken to Keller Canyon Landfill in Pittsburg, California. It is projected
that the landfill will reach capacity in 2078.
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 11-2 February 14, 2017
Summary of Determinations
6.6.3 The remaining permitted disposal capacity at the landfill is adequate to handle the
projected waste generation through buildout of the General Plan.
6.7.1 The Benicia Public Works Department is responsible for the design, construction,
operation, and maintenance of storm drain facilities within the city limits.
6.7.2 All the City’s stormwater is conveyed both by natural and man-made channels, and
by drainage culverts to the Carquinez Strait.
6.7.3 All the sub-basins are served by natural or constructed drainage systems, such as
creeks, ditches, and storm drain culverts.
6.7.4 The City of Benicia has adopted a Stormwater Management and Discharge Control
Ordinance to address stormwater control within the City.
6.7.5 The State General Permit requires development of a guidance document and
implementation of tasks annually. The City has implemented a number of the
elements including recycling programs, educational documents, storm drain
mapping, street sweeping, drainage inlet cleaning, storm drain stenciling, and annual
outfall monitoring.
6.7.6 Measure C revenues will assist with some long term maintenance and replacement
costs.
6.8.1 The City of Benicia owns and operates the facilities providing wastewater collection,
treatment, and discharge within the city limits.
6.8.2 The plant treats an average dry weather flow capacity of 4.5 million gallons per day
(mgd) and has a sustained wet weather secondary treatment capacity of 11 mgd.
Currently, the plant discharges an average dry weather flow of approximately 2.0
mgd (2015 data).
6.8.3 Capacity of the plant is adequate to handle wastewater generated by both existing
and projected uses within the city limits.
6.8.4 Future development of the Northern Gateway property will require additional
analysis of the collection system to determine capacity constraints and identify
needed improvements to accommodate the increase in wastewater to be conveyed.
6.9.1 Benicia owns and operates the facilities providing potable water to users within the
city limits.
6.9.2 The City contracts to receive Delta water via the NBA through agreements with the
Solano County Water Agency for State Water Project (SWP) water and with the
California Department of Water Resources for Settlement Water. The City also
receives Lake Berryessa water from the SWP through agreements with the City of
Vallejo and the Solano Irrigation District.
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 11-3 February 27, 2017
Summary of Determinations
6.9.3 The City maintains emergency storage at Lake Herman with a capacity of 1,390 acre-
feet at full pool. Lake Herman has an average yield of 500 to 1,000 acre-feet annually
with no yield during dry years.
6.9.4 Approximately half the City’s raw water demand is sold to and used by the Valero
Benicia Refinery.
6.9.5 The City’s total water supply (contracted and by right)is 30,175 AFY.
6.9.6 The projected total raw water demands are expected to increase from approximately
10,863 AFY in 2010 to 11,940 AFY in 2035. Even with the additional demand the city
has adequate supply from a diversity of sources to meet those demands.
7.1 Between FY 2010–11 and FY 2014–15, the City’s general fund remained relatively
stagnant but in FY 2015–16, the expenditures and revenues increased. Revenues
kept pace with expenses.
7.2 In 2014, Measure C was approved by the voters. Measure C is a 1 cent-on-the-dollar
sales tax increase that goes directly to the City of Benicia. Measure C went into effect
‐
on April 1, 2015 and was projected to generate $3.7 million annually.
7.3 The City Council has allocated half the revenue for the first two years of Measure C to
needed infrastructure improvements such as playground equipment replacement,
road maintenance (including pothole repair) sidewalk repair, equipment for fire and
police operations, and pool repairs.
7.4 The City’s Park Land Dedication Ordinance, which incorporates provisions of the
Quimby Act requires, as a condition of approval of a tentative map, the dedication of
land or payment of an in lieu fee to be used for the purposes of acquiring and
developing parkland. The amount of dedicated parkland required is equivalent to 5
acres for every 1,000 persons in the development.
7.5 The last Capital Improvement Program (CIP) was created in 2009 and covered
projects from 2009–2014. At this point in time the City does not have a CIP, but
prioritizes improvement projects biennially as part of the comprehensive budget
planning process.
7.6 The most recently adopted two-year City budget, FY2015–17, prioritizes
improvement projects and categorizes them into four levels.
7.7 The city collects a number of fees that go directly to maintaining and upgrading
infrastructure to keep pace with the needs of development. The City has received
grant funds from the California Energy Commission, the State Coastal Conservancy,
and other state and federal agencies. The City also receives monies for transportation
improvements from the State Gas Tax, Assembly Bill 2928, and the Transportation
Development Act.
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 11-4 February 14, 2017
Summary of Determinations
7.8 General Obligation Bonds are issued by the City to finance the acquisition and
construction of public capital facilities and real property. The City has funded
wastewater treatment plant improvements facilities through General Obligation
Bonds.
8.1 The City collaborates with a number of other agencies in the areas of animal services,
fire suppression, open space and recreation services, police, solid waste, stormwater,
transportation, water, and wastewater. Cooperative agreements are in place to
reduce costs and to provide enhanced services for major service responsibilities of
the city.
8.2 The current management structure provides effective oversight and administration of
essential government services. No opportunities for changes in management
structures or organization have been identified that would result in additional
efficiencies.
8.3 While the City does not have a Capital improvement Plan, the City is dedicated to
long range planning. The City adopts a two year budget in odd numbered years,
including the most recent fiscal plan for FY 2015-2017. In addition the City has
adopted an Urban Water Management Plan, a stormwater management plan, and a
sewer system management plan. Extensive planning is an important indicator of
management efficiency.
9.1 The City of Benicia is a general law city and has a Council-Manager form of
government with a separately elected Mayor and four council members.
9.2 The Council is responsible for governing as well as establishing the overall priorities
and direction for the City’s municipal government.
9.3 The City is staffed by eleven departments, including City Manager, City Attorney,
Economic Development, Administrative Services, Finance, Parks and Community
Services, Library, Fire, Police, Community Development, and Public Works.
9.4 Council meetings along with many boards, committees, and commission meetings
can be viewed via Comcast Channel 27, AT&T U-Verse Channel 99 or via the City’s
streaming video on its website.
9.5 Public notices are published in accordance with the Brown Act, other applicable
statutes and regulations, and City procedures.
9.6 The City provides information to the citizens via its website, Twitter feed, Facebook
page, Nextdoor, and in-person outreach. Transparency and outreach enhance
accessibility and accountability of city governance.
10.1 LAFCO’s Sphere of Influence, adopted Standards and Out of Area Service Agreement
are policies the City will have to consider if they propose to extend services to future
service delivery areas.
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 11-5 February 27, 2017
References
12.0: References
Document Citations
Annual Solid Waste Disposal Capacity Report for the City of Benicia. City of Benicia, 2013.
Benicia General Plan. City of Benicia, 1999.
Benicia Parks, Trails and Open Space Master Plan. Prepared by EDAW, Inc., 1997.
Benicia Police Department Annual Report. City of Benicia, 2014.
Benicia: Portrait of an Early California Town. Robert Brueggemann, 1980.
City of Benicia Historic Context Statement. City of Benicia, 2011.
City of Benicia Public Works FY2015-2017 Adopted Budget. City of Benicia 2015.
City of Benicia Water System Master Plan. Prepared by NV5, Inc., 2012.
Practical Guide for Quality Management of Pavement Condition Data Collection. Linda
Pierce, Ginger McGovern and Kathryn Zimmerman. February 2013.
Personal Communications
Eleccion, Gina. Management Analyst. City of Benicia Police and Fire Departments.
Giuliani, Mario. Economic Development Manager. City of Benicia Economic Development
Division.
Gregory, Jeff. Waste Water Treatment Plant Superintendent. City of Benicia Public Works
Department.
Porteshawver, Alex. Climate Action Plan Coordinator. Community Development Department.
Rahill, Timothy. Chief Business Official. Benicia Unified School District.
Randall, Victor. Management Analyst. City of Benicia Parks and Community Services.
Riley, Jason. Principal Civil Engineer. City of Benicia Public Works Department.
Rovanpera, Scott. Water Treatment Plant Superintendent. City of Benicia Public Works
Department.
Urrutia, Abigail. Assistant Finance Director. City of Benicia Finance Department.
Williams, Sharon. Interim Management Analyst. City of Benicia Public Works Department.
Solano LAFCO—Benicia MSR 12-1 February 27, 2017