All bodies  ›  Local Agency Formation Commissions  ›  Eastside WD

LAFCO

Eastside WD

Local Agency Formation Commissions · stanislaus-msr-unknown-eastsidewd · Msr · 2024-07-24

Read the report at Local Agency Formation Commissions ↗

MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEW AND SPHERE OF INFLUENCE UPDATE FOR THE: EASTSIDE WAT ER DISTRICT Prepared By: Stanislaus Local Agency Formation Commission 1010 Tenth Street, Third Floor Modesto, CA 95354 Phone: (209) 525-7660 Adopted: July 24, 2024 STANISLAUS LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS Amy Bublak, City Member Richard O’Brien, City Member Vito Chiesa, County Member Terry Withrow, County Member Ken Lane, Public Member Javier Lopez, Alternate City Member Mani Grewal, Alternate County Member Bill Berryhill, Alternate Public Member STAFF Sara Lytle-Pinhey, Executive Officer Javier Camarena, Assistant Executive Officer Jennifer Vieira, Commission Clerk Shaun Wahid, Commission Counsel TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ..........................................................................................................1 Service Review Factors and Sphere of Influence Update Process .................................. 1 Sphere of Influence Update Process ............................................................................... 2 Service Review – Eastside Water District ..........................................................3 Authority ..........................................................................................................................3 Background .....................................................................................................................3 Purpose ...........................................................................................................................3 Governance .....................................................................................................................3 Formation ........................................................................................................................3 Location and Size ............................................................................................................3 Sphere of Influence .........................................................................................................3 Personnel ........................................................................................................................4 Classification of Services ................................................................................................. 4 Services ..........................................................................................................................4 Support Agencies ............................................................................................................5 Funding Sources .............................................................................................................5 Service Review Determinations .........................................................................................6 Growth and Population Projections .................................................................................. 6 Location and Characteristics of Disadvantaged, Unincorporated Communities ............... 6 Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities, Adequacy of Public Services ............ 6 Financial Ability of Agencies to Provide Services ............................................................. 7 Status of, and Opportunities for, Shared Facilities ........................................................... 7 Accountability for Community Service Needs .................................................................. 7 Any Other Matter Related to Effective or Efficient Service Delivery ................................. 7 Sphere of Influence Update – Eastside Water District .....................................8 Sphere Determinations .......................................................................................................8 Present and Planned Land Uses .....................................................................................8 Present and Probable Need for Public Facilities and Services ......................................... 8 Present Capacity of Public Facilities and Adequacy of Public Services ........................... 8 Communities of Interest in the Area ................................................................................. 9 Need for Facilities and Services in Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities ........... 9 District Summary Profile ............................................................................................................ 10 Map: Eastside Water District Boundary & SOI .......................................................................... 11 References ...............................................................................................................................1 2 This page left blank intentionally. Municipal Service Review and Sphere of Influence Update For the Eastside Water District Introduction The Cortese/Knox/Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 Act (CKH Act) requires the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) to update the Spheres of Influence (SOI) for all applicable jurisdictions in the County. A Sphere of Influence is defined by Government Code 56076 as “...a plan for the probable physical boundary and service area of a local agency, as determined by the Commission.” The Act further requires that a Municipal Service Review (MSR) be conducted prior to or, in conjunction with, the update of a Sphere of Influence (SOI). The legislative authority for conducting Service Reviews is provided in Government Code Section 56430 of the CKH Act. The Act states, that “in order to prepare and to update spheres of influence in accordance with Section 56425, the commission shall conduct a service review of the municipal services provided in the county or other appropriate area...” A Service Review must have written determinations that address the following factors in order to update a Sphere of Influence. These factors were recently amended to include identification of disadvantaged unincorporated communities within or contiguous to the sphere of influence of an agency. Service Review Factors to be Addressed 1. Growth and Population Projections for the Affected Area 2. The Location and Characteristics of Any Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities Within or Contiguous to the Sphere of Influence 3. Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities, Adequacy of Public Services, and Infrastructure Needs or Deficiencies Including Needs or Deficiencies Related to Sewers, Municipal and Industrial Water, and Structural Fire Protection in Any Disadvantaged, Unincorporated Communities Within or Contiguous to the Sphere of Influence 4. Financial Ability of Agencies to Provide Services 5. Status of, and Opportunities for, Shared Facilities 6. Accountability for Community Service Needs, Including Governmental Structure and Operational Efficiencies 7. Any Other Matter Related to Effective or Efficient Service Delivery, as Required by Commission Policy State Guidelines and Commission policies encourage cooperation among a variety of stakeholders involved in the preparation of a Service Review. This Service Review will analyze the existing and future services for the Eastside Water District. The Service Review will also provide a basis for the District and LAFCO to evaluate, and if appropriate, make changes to the Sphere of Influence. DRAFT MSR & SOI Update – Eastside Water District Page 1 Sphere of Influence Update Process A special district is a government agency that is required to have an adopted and updated Sphere of Influence. Section 56425(g) of the CKH Act calls for Spheres of Influence to be reviewed and updated every five years, as necessary. Stanislaus LAFCO processes the Service Review and Sphere of Influence Updates concurrently to ensure efficient use of resources. For rural special districts, which do not have the typical municipal level services to review, this Service Review will be used to determine what type of services each district is expected to provide and the extent to which they are actually able to do so. The Sphere of Influence will delineate the service capability and expansion capacity of the agency, if applicable. DRAFT MSR & SOI Update – Eastside Water District Page 2 Service Review – Eastside Water District Authority This review will cover the Eastside Water District, a “single purpose” district, which is generally located east of the City of Turlock, within both Stanislaus and Merced Counties. The District was organized under the California Water Code, Division 13, §34000 – 38501. In addition, the District is considered a “landowner voter district”, as the board members are elected by landowners within the District’s boundaries. Background No resource is more vital to California than water. From the agricultural areas, urban centers, industrial plants, to open space and recreational areas, the distribution of water has been critical to all land uses. In California, there are hundreds of special water districts with a great diversity of purposes, governance structures, and financing mechanisms. Some districts are responsible for one type of specific duty, as in the case of the water district reviewed in this report, while other districts provide a wide range of public services. Purpose Water Districts are formed for purposes such as: to produce, store and distribute water for irrigation, domestic, industrial and municipal uses; drain and reclaim lands; collect, treat and dispose of sewage, waste and storm water; generate hydroelectric power; allocate water to crops and acreage; and, for districts that adopt a groundwater management plan, the same power given to water replenishment districts by the water code to protect groundwater from contamination. Governance Nine board members, elected by landowners within the District boundaries, govern the District. Meetings are held monthly at Cortez Hall located at 12937 North Cortez Avenue in Turlock. Formation The Eastside Water District was formed on October 14, 1985. Location and Size The District’s boundary currently encompasses approximately 73,000 acres, and is located in the southeastern portion of Stanislaus County and in the northeastern portion of Merced County. Sphere of Influence The District’s original Sphere of Influence, as adopted in 1988, included approximately 2,700 acres of expansion areas in addition to the District’s current boundaries. These areas are generally located west of Hawkins Road and to the south and east of Meikle Road. The District DRAFT MSR & SOI Update – Eastside Water District Page 3 added 2,400 acres to its sphere of influence in 2019. The District’s boundary and Sphere of Influence are both generally located in the eastern part of Stanislaus County and cover areas in Merced County as well. The area is generally south of the Tuolumne River, east of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad and along both the north and south sides of the Stanislaus/Merced County line (See Map on page 12). This Service Review will cover the District’s existing boundary and Sphere of Influence (SOI). Personnel There are no paid employees working for the District. However, the District does contract out for engineering, legal, grant management, and a District Secretary for monthly recordkeeping services. Classification of Services The District is authorized to provide the functions or classes of services (e.g. irrigation water and groundwater protection) as identified in this report. Due to recent changes in the Cortese-Knox- Hertzberg Act, the Districts would have to seek LAFCO approval to exercise other latent powers not currently provided. Services When formed, the District’s stated purpose was to study the means to obtain surface water to supplement the groundwater, and to eventually develop reliable source(s) of irrigation water. As a result of recent legislation, the District will also be monitoring groundwater levels throughout its boundaries as part of the California Statewide Groundwater Elevation Monitoring (CASGEM) program and groundwater management planning with the East Turlock Sub-basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency JPA. Over the years, the District has undertaken a series of initiatives/activities in order to stabilize and/or restore groundwater levels: 1990 ................. Irrigation Master Plan 1994 ................. Groundwater Master Plan 1995-present .... Pilot Surface Water Incentive Program 1997 ................. Turlock Basin Groundwater Management Plan 1998-2000 ........ Operated the Monte Vista Pilot Recharge Program 2001 ................. Obtained a $200,000 Grant from the Department of Water Resources to finance an “Eastside Water District Groundwater Multiple Resources Integration Planning Study”. 2003 ................. Prepared a “Supplemental Water Supply Plan”, as part of the above listed Grant, to identify alternatives for the provision of supplemental water supplies and the means in which to deliver the water to the District. 2006 ................. In partnership with the Turlock Irrigation District (TID), constructed and continues to operate the East Avenue Pilot Recharge Project. 2008 ................. As a member of the Turlock Groundwater Basin Association, retained Timothy J. Durbin to prepare an “Assessment of Future Groundwater Impacts Due to Assumed Water Use Changes in the Turlock Groundwater Basin.” 2008 ................. Groundwater Master Plan Update DRAFT MSR & SOI Update – Eastside Water District Page 4 2011 ................. District and TID established a network of wells to monitor groundwater levels as part of CASGEM, the California statewide monitoring program. 2014 ................. Potential Managed Aquifer and Recovery of Diffused Surface Water Program (DSWP) Report by Wood-Rodgers, Provost & Pritchard, and E- PUR 2015 ................. DSWP Design Plans (30%) by Provost & Pritchard 2015 - 2016 ...... Water Charge Analysis Report and Proposition 218 Election Report & Results. 2017 ................. Joined the Counties of Merced and Stanislaus, the Ballico-Cortez Water District, and Merced Irrigation District in forming the East Turlock Subbasin (ETS) Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA) 2018 …… ......... ETS GSA JPA and the West Turlock Subbasin GSA began jointly assembling a Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) in compliance with the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) of 2014. 2022 …. ........... ETS GSA JPA and West Turlock Subbasin GSA jointly submitted a GSP in January of 2022. In addition, the District maintains a website (www.eastsidewaterdistrict.com) that provides current information on District programs and activities. Support Agencies The District maintains a positive collaborative relationship with other agencies, as necessary. These agencies include the: City of Turlock, neighboring Irrigation Districts (Merced, Modesto, and Turlock), Agricultural Water Management Council (AWMC), Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA), State Department of Water Resources, and United States Geological Service. Funding Sources The District’s source of revenue is derived from charging an assessment of $2.00 per acre, per year, to the landowners within the District boundaries. The money collected is utilized to carry out studies to bring water to the District and for general operational purposes. In 2016, the District began collecting per-acre charges to fund its Diffused Surface Water Program (DSWP). In five of ten years beginning in 2016, the District will charge up to $40.32 per acre as a capital improvement charge to build the DSWP; for a total of up to $175.88 ($176.00) per acre over this period. Also, during that period, a Proposition 218 election authorized an operational per acre charge of up to 10% of accumulated capital charges to fund both the operation of DSWP capital improvements and to comply with the SGMA. DRAFT MSR & SOI Update – Eastside Water District Page 5 Written Determinations – Eastside Water District The following provides an analysis of the seven categories or components required by Section 56430 for a Service Review for the Eastside Water District: 1. Growth and Population Projections for the Affected Area The District serves a rural agricultural area that is located in both Stanislaus and Merced County, generally east of Turlock. The area is designated as Agriculture on both the Merced and Stanislaus County General Plans and does not expect any significant population growth. 2. The Location and Characteristics of Any Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities Within or Contiguous to the Sphere of Influence There are no disadvantaged unincorporated communities, as defined by Government Code Section 56033.5 within or contiguous to the District’s Sphere of Influence. 3. Present and Planned Capacity of Public Facilities, Adequacy of Public Services, and Infrastructure Needs or Deficiencies Including Needs or Deficiencies Related to Sewers, Municipal and Industrial Water, and Structural Fire Protection to Any Disadvantaged, Unincorporated Communities Within or Contiguous to the Sphere of Influence The District is involved in the following projects. • Engineering, technical assistance, and construction of diversion facilities from TID’s main and highline canals to provide periodic surface water deliveries to landowners. • The ETS GSA JPA was formed in March 2017. EWD led the five (5) members of the JPA. Many of the EWD projects were incorporated into the GSP that was submitted in January of 2022. • Mustang Creek Flood Control Basin Project (Previously Mustang Creek Flood Control Recharge Project). • Upland/Waterford Pipeline Project completed a feasibility analysis. The District has initiated landowner meetings in the area to explore alternatives for flood flow capture opportunities on Mustang and Dry Creeks. Continued water purchases from MID for recharge on Dry Creek. • The East Turlock Area Upland Pipeline Project which serves EWD landowners and recharge the groundwater basin. • Infrastructure upgrades to existing side gates on the Highline Canal to deliver replenishment water. • Sand Creek Watershed Flood Attenuation and Recharge Project. EWD has obtained land for the project. Concepts are being developed for programmatic implementation which include flood flow dispersal and flood MAR from local drainages and ditches. Currently, the District has both the ability and the capacity to serve its service area and has no unmet infrastructure needs or deficiencies. Additionally, the District is not a provider of sewer, municipal and industrial water, or structural fire protection services. DRAFT MSR & SOI Update – Eastside Water District Page 6 4. Financial Ability of Agencies to Provide Services At present time, the District appears to have the necessary financial resources to fund adequate levels of service within its boundaries. There is no overlapping or duplication of services within the District boundaries. 5. Status of, and Opportunities for, Shared Facilities Other than being responsible for the Mustang Creek Flood Control Project owned by Merced County, the District does not share any facilities with other agencies or Districts. 6. Accountability for Community Service Needs, Including Governmental Structure and Operational Efficiencies To more fully represent landowners within the District, the Board of Directors were expanded from seven to a nine-member board of directors in 2022. The Board of Directors, elected by the landowners, governs the District. The Board is subject to the provisions of the Brown Act requiring open meetings. The District provides up to date information through its website (www.eastsidewaterdistrict.com). The District does not have a traditional management structure, as it does not employ full- time personnel. It does however employ consultants for engineering, legal, and secretarial services on a contractual basis to perform the necessary administrative and operational duties for the District. 7. Any Other Matter Related to Effective or Efficient Service Delivery, as Required by Commission Policy None. DRAFT MSR & SOI Update – Eastside Water District Page 7 Sphere of Influence Update In determining a sphere of influence (SOI) of each local agency, the Commission shall consider and prepare determinations with respect to each of the following factors, pursuant to Government Code Section 56425: 1. The present and planned land uses in the area, including agricultural and open-space lands. 2. The present and probable need for public facilities and services in the area. 3. The present capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public services that the agency provides or is authorized to provide. 4. The existence of any social or economic communities of interest in the area if the commission determines that they are relevant to the agency. 5. For an update of a sphere of influence of a city or special district that provides public facilities or services related to sewers, municipal and industrial water, or structural fire protection, the present and probable need for those public facilities and services of any disadvantaged unincorporated communities within the existing sphere of influence. The following determinations for the Eastside Water District’s Sphere of Influence update are made in conformance with Government Code Section 56425 and local Commission policy. Determinations: 1. Present and Planned Land Uses in the Area, Including Agricultural and Open-Space Lands The Eastside Water District’s Sphere of Influence (SOI) totals approximately 73,500 acres. Territory within the District’s Sphere of Influence consists of agricultural and rural land use areas. These uses are not expected to change. In addition, the District does not have the authority to make land use decisions, nor does it have authority over present or planned land uses within its boundaries or sphere of influence area. The responsibility for land use decisions within these areas is retained by the counties of Stanislaus and Merced. 2. Present and Probable Need for Public Facilities and Services in the Area The District is presently meeting the needs of its customers. The future need to identify and subsequently obtain surface water to supplement the groundwater and to develop reliable source(s) of irrigation water to its customers will not likely diminish. 3. Present Capacity of Public Facilities and Adequacy of Public Services that the Agency Provides or is Authorized to Provide The District currently has the capacity to continue its efforts to stabilize and/or restore groundwater levels within its existing Sphere of Influence. DRAFT MSR & SOI Update – Eastside Water District Page 8 4. The Existence of Any Social or Economic Communities of Interest in the Area if the Commission Determines That They are Relevant to the Agency There are no known communities of interest within the District’s boundaries or Sphere of Influence. 5. For an Update of a Sphere of Influence of a City or Special District That Provides Public Facilities or Services Related to Sewers, Municipal and Industrial Water, or Structural Fire Protection, the Present and Probable Need for Those Public Facilities and Services of Any Disadvantaged Unincorporated Communities Within the Existing Sphere of Influence As the District does not provide services related to sewers, municipal and industrial water or structural fire protection, this factor is not applicable. DRAFT MSR & SOI Update – Eastside Water District Page 9 DISTRICT SUMMARY PROFILE District: EASTSIDE WATER DISTRICT Location: Southeastern Stanislaus County and Northeastern Merced County Service Area: Approximately 73,000 acres (with approximately 460 acres outside the current District boundaries but within the proposed Sphere of Influence). Population*: 818 Land Use: Agricultural Date of Formation: October 14, 1985 Enabling Act: California Water Code, Division 13, Section 34000 et. seq. (Water District Act) Governing Body: 9 Member Board of Directors, elected by landowners within District boundaries Administration: No paid employees. However, the District does contract out for engineering, legal, grant management services, and secretary services. District Services: Groundwater monitoring, recharge projects, the pursuit of surface water supplies to supplement groundwater use, and related studies. Budget: Fiscal Year 2022-2023 Revenues: $902,541 Expenses: $1,113,894 Revenue Sources: Property Assessments ($2 per acre) DSWP Capital Improvement Per Acre Charge (up to $175.88 or $176.00) DSWP Operational Per Acre Charge (up to $16.01) *Source: Population estimated using growth estimates from Stanislaus County Housing Element and Merced County Housing Element. DRAFT MSR & SOI Update – Eastside Water District Page 10 DRAFT MSR & SOI Update – Eastside Water District Page 11 TCIRTSID RETAW EDISTSAE :PAM ECNEULFNI FO EREHPS & YRADNUOB REFERENCES REFERENCES 1. Eastside Water District, “Diffused Surface Water Project Progress Report on Expenditures”, July 20, 2019. 2. Eastside Water District website (www.eastsidewaterdistrict.com). 3. California Department of Water Resources website (www.water.ca.gov). 4. Agricultural Water Management Council website (www.agwatercouncil.org). 5. Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA) Website (www.acwanet.com). 6. Stanislaus LAFCO, “Municipal Service Review and Sphere of Influence Update for the Eastside Water District”, December 4, 2019. 7. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) website (www.usgs.gov). 8. State of California Legislative Analyst’s Office Report – “Water Special Districts: A Look at Governance and Public Participation, March 2002”. 9. Eastside Water District “Financial Statements with Independent Auditor’s Report”, Years ended June 30, 2021 and 2020. INDIVIDUALS AND AGENCIES CONTACTED 1. Karen Whipp, Board Secretary, Eastside Water District DRAFT MSR & SOI Update – Eastside Water District Page 12