LAO
Supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package (Updated)
Read the report at Legislative Analyst's Office ↗
To: Agency Secretaries
Department Heads
Boards and Commissions
The Supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package is now available on the Legislative
Analyst’s Office’s website at: www.lao.ca.gov. This report contains statements of legislative
intent that were adopted during deliberations on the 2012-13 budget package.
Please distribute your responses to the supplemental report, and any other report or
document you are required to submit, to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee (JLBC), as
follows:
Two Hard Copies of the Report and Transmittal Letter to:
Hon. Mark Leno, Chair
Joint Legislative Budget Committee
1020 N Street, Room 553
Sacramento, CA 95814
Attention: Ms. Peggy Collins.
One Hard Copy of the Report and Transmittal Letter to:
Mr. Gregory Schmidt, Secretary of the Senate
Room 400, Sacramento, CA 95814.
An Electronic Copy of the Report and Transmittal Letter to Each of the Following:
Joint Legislative Budget Committee: Peggy.Collins@sen.ca.gov
for distribution to the JLBC Members.
Legislative Analyst's Office: Tina.McGee@lao.ca.gov
925 L Street, Suite 1000, Sacramento, CA 95814.
Office of the Chief Clerk of the Assembly: Amy.Leach@asm.ca.gov
Mr. E. Dotson Wilson, Chief Clerk of the Assembly
Room 3196, State Capitol, Sacramento, CA 95814.
Legislative Counsel Bureau: Jim.Lasky@lc.ca.gov
Ms. Diane Boyer-Vine, Legislative Counsel
925 L Street, Suite 900, Sacramento, CA 95814
Attention Mr. Jim Lasky.
In the report, as well as in your transmittal letter to Senator Leno, please cite the 11-digit
budget item number(s) and the budget year or other statutory reference to which the
response relates.
If you have any questions, you may contact our office at (916) 445-4656.
LAO
70 YEARS OF SERVICE
Supplemental Report of the
2012-13 Budget Package
Containing Statements of Intent
And Requests for Studies
Adopted by the Legislature
Compiled by the
L E G I S L A T I V E A N A L Y S T ’ S O F F I C E
Revised January 2013
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
Table of Contents
L , J , e .......................................................................3
egisLative udiciaL xecutive
Item 0509‑001‑0001—Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development .........3
Item 0530‑001‑0001—Office of Systems Integration .........................................................3
Item 0840‑001‑0001—State Controller’s Office .................................................................4
Item 0860‑001‑0001—Board of Equalization .....................................................................4
Item 0890‑001‑0228—Secretary of State ............................................................................5
s c s ..........................................................................6
tate and onsumer ervices
Item 1110‑001‑XXXX—Department of Consumer Affairs ................................................6
Item 1760‑001‑0666—Department of General Services .....................................................6
B , t , & H ............................................................8
usiness ransportation ousing
Item 2150‑001‑0298—Department of Financial Institutions ..............................................8
Item 2150‑001‑0299—Department of Financial Institutions ..............................................8
Item 2660‑001‑0042—California Department of Transportation ......................................8
Item 2740‑001‑0044—Department of Motor Vehicles .......................................................8
r ............................................................................................................9
esources
Item 3360‑001‑0465—California Energy Commission ......................................................9
Item 3940‑001‑0193—State Water Resources Control Board ............................................9
Item 3560‑001‑0001—State Lands Commission ................................................................9
Item 3760‑001‑0565—State Coastal Conservancy ...........................................................10
Item 3900‑001‑0001—Air Resources Board .....................................................................10
Item 3790‑001‑0392—Department of Parks and Recreation ........................ERRATA 11‑1
H H s ..........................................................................12
eaLtH and uman ervices
Item 4265‑001‑0001—Department of Public Health ........................................................12
e ..........................................................................................................13
ducation
Item 6110‑001‑0001—Department of Education ..............................................................13
Item 6440‑001‑0001—University of California ................................................................13
L W d ............................................................15
aBor and orkforce eveLopment
Item 7350‑001‑0001—Department of Industrial Relations ...............................................15
Item 7350‑001‑3078—Department of Industrial Relations ...............................................15
t r m .......................................................................16
ax eLief and isceLLaneous
Item 9210‑001‑0001—Aid to Local Government .............................................................16
c o .................................................................................................17
apitaL utLay
Item 0250‑301‑0668—Judicial Branch—Capital Outlay ..................................................17
Item 0250‑301‑3138—Judicial Branch—Capital Outlay .................................................18
Item 0250‑302‑0668—Judicial Branch—Capital Outlay ..................................................24
LegisLative anaLyst’s Office 1
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
Item 2665‑304‑0890—High‑Speed Rail Authority—Capital Outlay ................................25
Item 2665‑304‑6043—High‑Speed Rail Authority—Capital Outlay ................................25
Item 2665‑305‑0890—High‑Speed Rail Authority—Capital Outlay ................................25
Item 2665‑305‑6043—High‑Speed Rail Authority—Capital Outlay ................................25
Item 2665‑306‑0890—High‑Speed Rail Authority—Capital Outlay ...............................25
Item 2665‑306‑6043—High‑Speed Rail Authority—Capital Outlay ...............................26
Item 3540‑301‑0001—Department of Forestry and Fire Protection—Capital Outlay ......26
Item 3790‑301‑0263—Department of Parks and Recreation—Capital Outlay .................27
Item 3790‑301‑6051—Department of Parks and Recreation—Capital Outlay .................27
Item 3860‑301‑6052/Reimbursements—Department of Water Resources—
Capital Outlay ...........................................................................................................28
Item 3860‑302‑6052—Department of Water Resources—Capital Outlay ........................29
Item 3960‑301‑0001—Department of Toxic Substances Control—Capital Outlay .........30
Item 5225‑001‑0001—Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation—Capital Outlay 30
Item 6110‑301‑0660—Department of Education—Capital Outlay ..................................30
2 LegisLative anaLyst’s Office
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
L , J , e
egisLative udiciaL xecutive
Item 0509‑001‑0001—Governor’s Office of Business and Economic
Development
1. Implementing Legislation Related to the Office. On or before April 1, 2013,
the Director of the Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development
(GO‑Biz) shall submit a report describing, among other things, GO‑Biz’s
progress in implementing Chapter 475, Statutes of 2011 (AB 29, J. Pérez), and
reorganization legislation related to GO‑Biz, GO‑Biz’s role in furthering business
and economic development in California to date, the filled or vacant status of the
office’s positions, and any recommended legislative actions to improve GO‑Biz’s
performance. The Director of GO‑Biz is encouraged to reutilize all or part of
any other existing reports concerning its activities, as appropriate, to fulfill this
reporting requirement.
Item 0530‑001‑0001—Office of Systems Integration
1. Los Angeles Eligibility Automated Determination, Evaluation, & Reporting
(LEADER) Replacement System (LRS). The Department of Social Services (DSS)
and the Office of Systems Integration (OSI) will conduct regularly scheduled
briefings with legislative staff regarding the administration’s efforts to develop
LRS and to migrate the Consortium‑IV (C‑IV) counties to the newly developed
LRS. The timing and specific topics of these briefings will be determined
in consultation with legislative staff and the Legislative Analyst’s Office.
Additionally, DSS and OSI will offer updates regarding LRS development and
C‑IV migration during budget subcommittee hearings each year until both efforts
have been completed and officially closed out by the California Technology
Agency.
2. Case Management, Information & Payrolling System (CMIPS II). The OSI is
required to report to the budget committees of the Legislature by February 1, 2013
on the following pertaining to CMIPS II:
(a) A description of specific performance issues, programmatic challenges, and
technical difficulties that led to a development delay in 2011‑12, identifying the
cause or causes of a delay.
(b) For each cause of a delay, a description of corrective measures, and their com‑
ponents, that were adopted as a result.
LegisLative anaLyst’s Office 3
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
(c) When the issue is associated with the vendor performance, a description
of efforts to resolve the issues, including decisions on recoupment of costs
(for example, those associated with damages), adjustment of timelines, and
amendments to one or more contracts.
(d) An estimate of the costs caused by any and all delays, by fiscal year and over
the course of the full contract.
Item 0840‑001‑0001—State Controller’s Office
1. Fraudulent Claims Detection and Prevention Program. The State Controller
shall report to the Legislature by November 1, 2013, on the outcomes related to
the 17.9 two‑year limited‑term positions authorized to develop and implement
a Fraudulent Claims Detection and Prevention Program. The report to
the Legislature shall include, but not be limited to: (a) a description of the
Fraudulent Claims Detection and Prevention Program, (b) the effectiveness of
the Fraudulent Claims Detection and Prevention Program as measured by the
total dollar value of savings as a result of fraudulent detection and prevention
measures implemented, (c) the total number and dollar value of properties
on claims detected as fraud through the implementation of automation tools,
(d) the total number and dollar value of properties on claims detected as fraud
through implementation of manual research protocols, and (e) a summary and
recommendation for the level of ongoing resources and associated costs needed to
establish and maintain an efficient and effective Fraudulent Claims Detection and
Prevention Program. The report shall be provided to the fiscal committees of the
Legislature, the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, the Department of Finance,
and the Legislative Analyst’s Office.
Item 0860‑001‑0001—Board of Equalization
1. Tax Gap II Initiative. The Board of Equalization (BOE) shall report to the fiscal
committees of both houses of the Legislature by January 10, 2014, regarding the
results of the funding of education and outreach efforts undertaken as part of the
Tax Gap II initiative. The report shall include, but not be limited to, a qualitative
assessment of the program, analysis of the role of the activities with respect to the
department’s efforts to close the tax gap, and appropriate performance metrics,
including the benefits and costs associated with the program.
2. State Responsibility Area (SRA) Fire Prevention Fee. The BOE shall report to
the Legislature and the Department of Finance no later than December 1, 2013,
regarding the use of resources required to comply with legislation authorizing
the SRA Fire Prevention Fee. The report shall include, but not be limited to, a
schedule of authorized positions, expenditures, workload requirements, and
4 LegisLative anaLyst’s Office
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
revenues attributable to the program. The report shall include actual data and
results for 2012‑13 and estimates for 2013‑14.
3. Centralized Revenue Opportunity System (CROS) Project. On or before
December 1 each year, beginning in 2012 and concluding the year following
completion, the BOE shall report to the fiscal Committees of each house of the
Legislature regarding the outcomes related to the CROS Project implementation.
The report shall include, but not be limited to: (a) actual revenue generated by
the Project, (b) actual expenditures, and (c) an updated implementation timeline
that includes a review of the various implementation steps, including technology
solution procurement, data conversion processes, the status of legacy systems, and
results of efforts to enhance audit and collection activities.
Item 0890‑001‑0228—Secretary of State
1. Flexible Purpose Corporations. The Secretary of State shall report to the
Legislature by June 30, 2013, on the (1) number of entities that have filed for the
status of a flexible purpose corporation, per the requirements of Chapter 740,
Statutes of 2011 (SB 201, DeSaulnier) and (2) workload required by the Secretary of
State to fulfill the requirements of Chapter 740.
LegisLative anaLyst’s Office 5
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
s c s
tate and onsumer ervices
Item 1110‑001‑XXXX—Department of Consumer Affairs
1. Business and Professions Code Section 35. The Department of Consumer Affairs
shall prepare a report describing its implementation of Business and Professions
Code Section 35. No later than October 1, 2012, the department shall report to the
appropriate subcommittee the following:
(a) A list of the boards that have statutes, rules, regulations, or agreements
allowing military experience to be used to meet professional licensure
requirements and a description of the statutes, rules, regulations, or
agreements.
(b) A list of the boards that do not have statutes, rules, regulations, or agreements
allowing military experience to be used to meet professional licensure
requirements with an explanation from the boards on why they do not have
statutes, rules, regulations, or agreements.
(c) If the board has decided not to accept military experience, an explanation from
the board about why they do not accept military experience.
(d) A description of the department’s actions to direct the boards to implement
this code section, including any memoranda to boards or other evidence of the
department’s actions.
(e) A description of how the department has interacted with the Department of
Veterans Affairs and the Military Department regarding this issue.
Item 1760‑001‑0666—Department of General Services
1. State Mail and Postage Expenditures. The Department of General Services
(DGS) shall examine current state expenditures for mail and postage and report
to the Legislature not later than January 1, 2013 the amount of money that could
be saved by adopting enterprise‑wide mail best practices including but not
limited to use of presort mail opportunities to maximize postage discounts, using
modern technology to identify lowest rates, depositing postage funds in interest‑
earning postage accounts, reviewing and redesigning mailings for postage
savings, and assessing the potential for digital mail technologies.
2. Board of Equalization (BOE) Relocation and Consolidation. The DGS shall
undertake a preliminary study of the possible relocation and consolidation of
6 LegisLative anaLyst’s Office
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
BOE headquarters and annexes in the Sacramento region. No later than June 30,
2013, the department shall report to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee
the following: (a) a business case, prepared either by DGS or BOE, examining
the benefits and costs of consolidating BOE headquarters and annexes in
the Sacramento region, (b) a planning timetable for acquiring or building
consolidated facilities for BOE, (c) a complete set of options it will consider
to provide such facilities as part of its overall planning process, (d) funding
recommendations needed to carry out the facility planning process, (e) any
recommendations on statutory authorizations necessary to move forward with
the planning process, and (f) an examination of the potential future uses or plans
for the current BOE building at 450 N Street in Sacramento.
LegisLative anaLyst’s Office 7
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
B , t , & H
usiness ransportation ousing
Item 2150‑001‑0298—Department of Financial Institutions
1. Financial Institutions Examiner Positions. No later than May 1, 2014, the
Department of Financial Institutions shall submit to the appropriate budget
committees of each house a report that includes an updated estimate of the
number of bank examiner positions needed to properly carry out its stated
mission.
Item 2150‑001‑0299—Department of Financial Institutions
1. Credit Union Examiner Positions. No later than May 1, 2014, the Department of
Financial Institutions shall submit to the appropriate budget committees of each
house a report that includes an updated estimate of the number of credit union
examiner positions needed to properly carry out its stated mission.
Item 2660‑001‑0042—California Department of Transportation
1. Sustainable Pavements. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)
shall report, at the time of budget hearings, on the progress of the Sustainable
Pavement Initiative. Caltrans shall include an update on its efforts, and the
efforts of the federally led Sustainable Pavement Program, including progress on
technology development and mitigation strategies.
Item 2740‑001‑0044—Department of Motor Vehicles
1. Automated Driver’s Licensing Exam Testing. No later than May 1, 2014, the
Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) shall submit to the appropriate budget
committees of each house a report that includes an updated estimate of the staff
and salary savings that will occur from the implementation of the automated
driver licensing exams at DMV field offices.
8 LegisLative anaLyst’s Office
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
r
esources
Item 3360‑001‑0465—California Energy Commission
1. State’s Energy Programs. The Legislative Analyst’s Office shall develop a
report by December 1, 2012 that lists all programs and funding related to energy
efficiency in state government. The list shall include but not be limited to: funding
directed by the California Public Utilities Commission directly to its regulated
Investor Owned Utilities (including the Electricity Procurement Investment
Charge), AB 118 funds, California Energy Commission funds, and Air Resources
Program funds (both existing and future Cap and Trade Programs). The report
shall list all programs funded by these multiple resources and shall include a
preliminary assessment of priority, overlap, and redundancy.
Item 3940‑001‑0193—State Water Resources Control Board
1. Lake Tahoe Regional Compact Study. To prepare for the possible eventuality of
Nevada withdrawing from the Tahoe Regional Compact as set forth in Nevada
Senate Bill 271 and instead establishing a Nevada Tahoe Regional Planning
Agency, the California Research Bureau is directed to report to the Legislature by
February 1, 2013 on the advisability and the necessary steps to be taken in case
it is necessary for California to consider reestablishing the statues that created
the California Tahoe Regional Planning Agency in order to protect the economic
growth and environmental attributes in the region.
2. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Program. On or before May
2013, the State Water Resources Control Board shall report to the Legislature on
the long‑term funding plan for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System program taking into account the shift in costs and fees from once‑through
cooling facilities to other facilities and demonstrate how the costs of the program
will achieve sustainability and equitable funding across the program areas.
Item 3560‑001‑0001—State Lands Commission
1. Effectiveness of Limited-Term Positions. The State Lands Commission shall
submit to the Legislature by January 10, 2014, a report which evaluates the General
Fund impact of four three‑year, limited‑term Royalty Recovery and Revenue
Assurance auditor positions within the Mineral Resources Management Program
and five three‑year, limited‑term Lease Compliance and Revenue Enhancement
auditor positions within the Lease Compliance and Revenue Recovery Program
of the Land Management Division. The report shall include but not be limited to:
an evaluation of the return on investment to the General Fund for each auditor
LegisLative anaLyst’s Office 9
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
position; an evaluation of whether these additional positions are ensuring
accuracy and timely processing of reported royalties as well as ensuring that the
state is receiving revenue in accordance with the terms of its leases and applicable
law; and recommendations to the Legislature regarding permanent staffing levels
within the Mineral Resources Management Program and the Lease Compliance
and Revenue Recovery Program.
Item 3760‑001‑0565—State Coastal Conservancy
1. Ocean Data Projects. The Ocean Protection Council shall, by January 10, 2013,
report on their efforts to secure a memorandum of understanding with and
between the relevant departments, boards, commissions, and conservancies
within the California Natural Resources Agency; the State Water Resources
Control Board; and the California Technology Agency for the purposes of
establishing a single web‑based, publically accessible portal for viewing,
exchanging, and disseminating scientific and geospatial information about
California’s ocean and coast. The memorandum shall not adversely affect any
California entity’s authority to conduct independent data management activities
or develop data viewing or exchange tools for specialized applications or internal
use. The report will include steps taken to coordinate efforts of the state agencies
through the memorandum.
Item 3900‑001‑0001—Air Resources Board
1. AB 32 Cost of Implementation Fee. The Administration shall include, as part
of the Governor’s January budget display, activities funded by the AB 32 Cost
of Implementation Fee. The budget display shall include a separate schedule for
climate change activities funded by the AB 32 Cost of Implementation Fee from
the newly created AB 32 Cost of Implementation Fee Fund. The display shall
also include a list of all departments receiving AB 32 Cost of Implementation Fee
funds, total positions supported by this fund, and the total amount of funding
being proposed in the Governor’s budget from the AB 32 Cost of Implementation
Fee Fund.
2. AB 32 Program Updates. The California Air Resources Board (CARB)
shall submit to the Legislature an AB 32 program update every six months
summarizing key program activities. Each update should highlight developments
since the previous update, provide advance notice of anticipated major milestones,
and include current statewide greenhouse gas (GHG) emission updates. These
developments may include, but are not limited to, board hearings and release of
significant documents, key support contracts, lawsuits, compliance milestones,
and other actions that have the potential to substantially affect the success and
effectiveness of the program.
10 LegisLative anaLyst’s Office
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
The scope of the program updates should include: significant activities related
to CARB’s GHG reduction measures (for example, cap‑and‑trade, low‑carbon
fuel standard, or advanced clean cars), including an analysis of which programs
are having the greatest impact in terms of GHG reductions per dollar spent; key
developments on supporting activities such as updates to the AB 32 Scoping
Plan, cap‑and‑trade auction fund regulations, coordination with entities
outside of California like the Western Climate Initiative, and SB 375 sustainable
communities plans; and the amount of cap‑and‑trade auction funds deposited
into the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund and the current balance in that fund.
3. AB 32 Fiscal and Resource Reports. Each year, beginning January 10, 2013,
CARB shall provide the Legislature an AB 32 fiscal report. This annual report
is to be retrospective and is intended to quantify the major revenue and CARB
expenses for the AB 32 program for the prior fiscal year. The scope of the annual
fiscal report should include: the AB 32 cost of implementation fee revenue, loans
repaid, and overall AB 32 program expenses (staff, operations, and contracts) for
the prior fiscal year; the total cap‑and‑trade auction funds; a summary of CARB
AB 32 expenditures; the balance for the prior fiscal year; and allowance auction
prices in order to asses trends. The annual fiscal report should include an update
on activities and findings of the Market Surveillance Committee, as well as track
and detail all expenses and revenues, including the following categories: all AB 32
costs, all cap‑and‑trade costs, low‑carbon fuel standards, Renewable Portfolio
Standards, Green Building strategy, and Landfill methane capture.
In addition, CARB shall provide two resource reports each year to the Legislature
that quantify the CARB AB 32 staffing and operations expenses, as well as CARB
contracts, by major AB 32 program area. First, CARB shall provide a prospective
resource report with anticipated expenses each year by January 10. Second,
CARB shall provide a retrospective resource report each year on or before
January 10. The scope of the resources reports is to include the CARB resources
(staffing, operations, and contracts) that were used to support major AB 32
program areas (cap‑and‑trade, low‑carbon fuel standard, cost of implementation
fee, and the update to AB 32 Scoping Plan). In addition, CARB is to provide an
estimate of the combined resources for the other climate change‑related activities
(implementation of adopted regulations and coordination with other agencies).
LegisLative anaLyst’s Office 11
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
Item 3790-001-0392—Department of Parks and Recreation
1. Concession Contracts. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5080.20, the
following concession proposals are approved as described below:
a. Morro Bay State Park (SP)—Café/Marina Concession
The department may bid a new concession contract for the operation,
maintenance, and improvement to the marina and restaurant at Morro Bay SP.
The proposed provisions of the new contract to include improvements to the
marina structures at an estimated cost of $1.3 million based on the results of a
1996 feasibility projection increased by inflation. A new 30-year contract term
is recommended to amortize the capital investment. The rent will be based on
an update of the 1996 feasibility study, and final outcome of the City of Morro
Bay’s dredging project.
It is anticipated the new feasibility study update will be completed during the
spring of 2012 with a new concession contract implemented by fall 2012.
b. Old Town San Diego State Historic Park (SHP)—Period Style Restaurant Concession
The department may bid a new contract for the operation and maintenance of
a food service concession to include on-premises sale of alcoholic beverages
located in Old Town San Diego SHP.
The new concession contract will be for a term of up to ten years for a period
style restaurant at 2734 Calhoun Street in Old Town San Diego SHP. Annual
rent to the state will be the greater of a guaranteed flat rate or a percentage
of gross receipts. Proposers will be required to bid a minimum annual rent
of $80,000 or 10 percent of monthly gross receipts whichever is greater, and
commit up to $100,000 in facility improvements to include a new roof and
updated plumbing.
It is anticipated the new concession contract will be implemented during the fall of 2013.
c. Old Town San Diego SHP—Parking Management Concession
The department may bid a new concession contract for the operations of a
parking management plan including automated fee collections at up to seven
parking lots surrounding Old Town San Diego SHP.
The new concession contract will have a term of up to ten years, and a capital
investment to install, operate, and maintain automated hourly pay machines
to collect entrance fees at up to seven department owned or managed parking
LegisLative anaLyst’s Office ERRATA PAgE 11-1
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
lots and complete any necessary parking lot modifications to comply with the
Americans with Disabilities Act. The contract may also include a provision
for parking validation by Old Town San Diego SHP’s concession businesses.
The rental fee, terms, and conditions, including capital investment projection,
will be based on the recommendations of an economic feasibility study. It is
anticipated that the feasibility study will be completed by summer 2012.
d. Old Town San Diego SHP—Historic Style Specialty Retail Concession
The department may bid a new concession contract for the operation and
maintenance of a period-style specialty retail store located at 2711 San Diego
Avenue in Old Town San Diego SHP.
The new concession contract will for a term of up to ten years and annual rent
to the department will be the greater of a guaranteed flat rate or a percentage
of gross receipts. Proposers will be required to bid a minimum annual rent
of $120,000 or 14 percent of monthly gross receipts, whichever is greater,
and commit up to $10,000 in facility improvements to include refinishing
hardwood flooring, replace entrance threshold, and replace HVAC.
It is anticipated that the new concession contract will be implemented during
the fall of 2012.
2. Operating Agreements. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5080.40, the
following operating agreement proposal is approved as described below:
a. Morro Bay SP—Amendment to Operating Agreement With County of San Luis Obispo
The department may amend the existing 20-year operating agreement with
the County of San Luis Obispo that expires in 2019. The proposed amendment
is primarily focused on three elements of the operating agreement:
i) Rent to the department from the Morro Bay SP Golf Course; and
ii) Transfer ownership of a portion of Pecho Valley Road from County to
department to facilitate the collection of day use fees at Montana de Oro
SP.
iii) Extension of the operating agreement for an additional five years to
facilitate the county’s interest in a new ten-year concession contract for
portions of the golf course operation.
The proposed amendment authorizes the department to reduce the rental rate
paid by the county at Morro Bay SP Golf Course from 10 percent of monthly
receipts to 5 percent of monthly receipts. The rent reduction compensates
ERRATA PAgE 11-2 LegisLative anaLyst’s Office
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
the county for relinquishing a portion of Pecho Valley Road to facilitate the
department’s collection of vehicle day use fees at Montana de Oro SP. In
addition, the county proposes to enter into a ten-year concession contract
beginning in 2014 for portions of the golf course operation. The proposed
concession contract term extends beyond the current term of the operating
agreement. As a result, approval to extend the operating agreement five years
will provide for a ten-year concession contract term.
LegisLative anaLyst’s Office ERRATA PAgE 11-3
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
H H s
eaLtH and uman ervices
Item 4265‑001‑0001—Department of Public Health
1. Consideration of Military Experience for Professional Licensure. The
Department of Public Health (DPH) shall prepare a report describing how
professional licensure programs under the jurisdiction of DPH address military
experience. No later than October 1, 2012, the department shall report the
following:
(a) A list of the professional licensure programs that have enacted rules or
regulations allowing military experience to be used to meet professional
licensure or certification requirements and a description of the rules or
regulations, or copies of the rules or regulations.
(b) A list of the professional licensure programs that have not enacted rules or
regulations allowing military experience to be used to meet professional
licensure or certification requirements with an explanation from the
professional licensure programs on why they have not enacted rules and
regulations.
(c) If the professional licensure program has decided not to accept military
experience, an explanation from the professional licensure program about why
they do not accept military experience.
(d) A description of the department’s actions to direct the professional licensure
programs to address military experience, including any memoranda to boards
or other evidence of the department’s actions.
(e) A description of how the department has interacted with the Department of
Veterans Affairs and the Military Department regarding this issue.
(f) A description of any other departments or agencies the department has
worked with on this issue, including but not limited to the Department of
Consumer Affairs.
12 LegisLative anaLyst’s Office
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
e
ducation
Item 6110‑001‑0001—Department of Education
1. Department of Defense Program for Construction, Renovation, Repair, or
Expansion of Public Schools Located on Military Installations. It is the intent
of the Legislature that, no later than August 1, 2012, the California Department
of Education (CDE) and the Office of Public School Construction, in consultation
with the State Allocation Board, submit to the United States Department of
Defense a request to waive all required state or local matching funds for the
purpose of securing for California school districts any and all available federal
funds for the construction, renovation, repair, or expansion of school facilities
eligible for federal funds pursuant to the United States Department of Defense
Program for Construction, Renovation, Repair or Expansion of Public Schools
Located on Military Installations (Section 8109 of Public Law 112‑10) in the
following school districts:
(a) Travis Unified School District.
(b) Fallbrook Union Elementary School District.
(c) Muroc Joint Unified School District.
It is the intent of the Legislature that the CDE, in pursuit of the waiver, include
acknowledgement of any state or local investments in on‑base school facilities,
such as state or local bond funds, or discretionary state or local funding expended
on school facility modernization, construction, or deferred maintenance on behalf
of the applicable schools within the school districts. It is further the intent of the
Legislature that any federal facilities funding received as a result of a successful
waiver application be expended at the specified school district for on‑base school
facility projects for which the federal waiver is applicable. Enactment of this
section shall in no way commit the State of California or the school districts to
any allocation or appropriation for school facility construction, renovation, repair,
or expansion projects.
Item 6440‑001‑0001—University of California (UC)
1. Audit Report. It is the intent of the Legislature, and in follow‑up to State Audit
Report 2010‑105, that by July 31, 2012, UC provide to the appropriate legislative
budget subcommittees and LAO the recommendations of the systemwide
working group established to examine variation in funding across the system.
LegisLative anaLyst’s Office 13
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
Further, it is the intent of the Legislature that UC identify the amount of revenues
from the general funds and tuition budget that each campus received in 2012‑13
for specific types of students (such as undergraduate, graduate, and health
sciences) and explain any differences in the amount provided per student among
the campuses to the appropriate legislative budget subcommittees and LAO by
January 1, 2014.
14 LegisLative anaLyst’s Office
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
L W d
aBor and orkforce eveLopment
Item 7350‑001‑0001—Department of Industrial Relations
1. Implementation of Chapter 706, Statutes of 2011. The Department of Industrial
Relations shall report to the Director of Finance and the Joint Legislative
Budget Committee by January 10, 2017, on the status of the implementation of
Chapter 706, Statutes of 2011 (SB 459, Corbett). The report shall include, but is not
limited to, an accounting of the number of:
(a) Investigations of alleged willful misclassification of individuals as
independent contractors conducted and the average time spent by department
staff per investigation.
(b) Total incidents of willful misclassification of individuals as independent
contractors, detailed by industry.
(c) Citations issued and penalties collected for willful misclassification of
individuals as independent contractors.
Item 7350‑001‑3078—Department of Industrial Relations
1. Employee/Employer Education and Outreach Campaign. The department shall
prepare a report describing its progress in implementing the Employee/Employer
Education and Outreach campaign by no later than March 10, 2013. Specifically,
the department shall:
(a) Describe the status of each of the efforts proposed in BCP 12‑04 to be
conducted by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement and the Division
of Occupational Safety and Health, including accomplishments thus far and
plans for the remainder of the campaign.
(b) Describe the performance measurements that will be used to determine if the
various education and outreach efforts were successful, and if feasible, any
baseline indicators that will be used to compare outcomes associated with any
of the efforts.
LegisLative anaLyst’s Office 15
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
t r m
ax eLief and isceLLaneous
Item 9210‑001‑0001—Aid to Local Government
1. Triple Flip and Vehicle License Fee (VLF) Swap Shortfall. On or before
January 1, 2013, the Department of Finance and the Legislative Analyst’s Office
shall submit reports to the Legislature (a) addressing the conditions under which
local governments may be compensated in cases where there are insufficient
Educational Revenue Augmentation Funds to offset fully the fiscal effect of
the Triple Flip and VLF Swap shift and (b) outlining one or more alternative
mechanisms for such compensation.
16 LegisLative anaLyst’s Office
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
c o
apitaL utLay
Item 0250‑301‑0668—Judicial Branch—Capital Outlay
1. Butte County—New North Butte Courthouse. The amount of $54,016,000
is provided for the construction phase to construct a new courthouse in
Butte County. The new 67,443 gross square foot (gsf) building will house five
courtrooms. Total estimated project cost is $65,064,000 without financing:
$3,351,000 for acquisition, $3,339,000 for preliminary plans, $4,358,000 for working
drawings, and $54,016,000 (CCCI 5680) for construction. The construction amount
includes $46,121,000 for the construction contract, $2,356,000 for contingency,
$1,096,000 for architectural and engineering fees, and $4,443,000 for other project
costs. Acquisition was completed in November 2010, and preliminary plans in
November 2011. Construction will begin in March 2013 and be completed by
October 2014, pending reconfirmation of both the detailed cost and scope of the
project.
2. Kings County—New Hanford Courthouse. The amount of $109,055,000 is
provided for the construction phase to construct a new courthouse in Kings
County. The new 144,460 gsf building will house 12 courtrooms. Total estimated
project cost is $124,329,000 without financing: $701,000 for acquisition, $6,231,000
for preliminary plans, $8,342,000 for working drawings, and $109,055,000
(CCCI 5680) for construction. The construction amount includes $93,938,000 for
the construction contract, $4,799,000 for contingency, $2,045,000 for architectural
and engineering fees, and $8,273,000 for other project costs. Acquisition was
completed in May 2011, and preliminary plans in April 2012. Construction will
begin in May 2013 and be completed by January 2016, pending reconfirmation of
both the detailed cost and scope of the project.
3. Sutter County—New Yuba City Courthouse. The amount of $62,687,000 is
provided for the construction phase to construct a new courthouse in Sutter
County. The new 78,701 gsf building will house seven courtrooms. Total
estimated project cost is $71,679,000 without financing: $756,000 for acquisition,
$3,543,000 for preliminary plans, $4,693,000 for working drawings, and $62,687,000
(CCCI 5680) for construction. The construction amount includes $53,877,000 for the
construction contract, $2,752,000 for contingency, $1,181,000 for architectural and
engineering fees, and $4,877,000 for other project costs. Acquisition was completed
in April 2011, and preliminary plans in December 2011. Construction will begin in
July 2013 and be completed by December 2014, pending reconfirmation of both the
detailed cost and scope of the project.
LegisLative anaLyst’s Office 17
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
4. Yolo County—New Woodland Courthouse. The amount of $139,031,000 is
provided for the construction phase to construct a new courthouse in Yolo
County. The new 163,066 gsf building will house 14 courtrooms. Total estimated
project cost is $161,452,000 without financing: $5,411,000 for acquisition, $7,371,000
for preliminary plans, $9,639,000 for working drawings, and $139,031,000
(CCCI 5680) for construction. The construction amount includes $119,899,000 for
the construction contract, $6,126,000 for contingency, $2,505,000 for architectural
and engineering fees, and $10,501,000 for other project costs. Acquisition
was completed in December 2011, and preliminary plans in February 2012.
Construction will begin in July 2013 and be completed by August 2015, pending
reconfirmation of both the detailed cost and scope of the project.
Item 0250‑301‑3138—Judicial Branch—Capital Outlay
1. El Dorado County—New Placerville Courthouse. The amount of $1,084,000 is
provided for completion of the acquisition phase to construct a new courthouse
in El Dorado County. Continuous appropriation authority was granted per
Chapter 10, Statutes of 2009, (SBX2 12, Steinberg), which expired on July 1, 2012.
Appropriation authority for acquisition is $2,795,000 of which $1,711,000 has been
spent. The new 87,642 gross square foot (gsf) building will house six courtrooms.
Total estimated project cost is $91,073,000 without financing: $2,795,000 for
acquisition, $4,037,000 for preliminary plans, $5,404,000 for working drawings,
and $78,837,000 (CCCI 5680) for construction. The construction amount includes
$69,983,000 for the construction contract, $3,499,000 for contingency, $1,325,000
for architectural and engineering fees, and $4,030,000 for other project costs.
Acquisition is scheduled to be completed in October 2012. Construction will
begin in March 2015 and be completed by November 2016. The cost estimate for
the construction phase will be reduced based upon recent Judicial Council action
taken on April 24, 2012. In addition, the design and construction schedule is
currently under review and will be submitted with a future funding request.
2. Inyo County—New Inyo County Courthouse. The amount of $696,000 is
provided for completion of the acquisition phase to construct a new courthouse
in Inyo County. Continuous appropriation authority was granted per Chapter 10,
Statutes of 2009, (SBX2 12, Steinberg), which expired on July 1, 2012. Appropriation
authority for acquisition is $1,449,000 of which $753,000 has been spent. The
new 28,774 gsf building will house two courtrooms. Total estimated project
cost is $33,704,000 without financing: $1,449,000 for acquisition, $1,463,000 for
preliminary plans, $1,959,000 for working drawings, and $28,833,000 (CCCI 5680)
for construction. The construction amount includes $25,612,000 for the
construction contract, $1,281,000 for contingency, $480,000 for architectural and
engineering fees, and $1,460,000 for other project costs. Acquisition is scheduled
to be completed in March 2013. The cost estimate for the construction phase will
18 LegisLative anaLyst’s Office
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
be reduced based upon recent Judicial Council action taken on April 24, 2012. In
addition, the design and construction schedule is currently under review and will
be submitted with a future funding request.
3. Kern County—New Delano Courthouse. The amount of $749,000 is provided
for completion of the acquisition phase to construct a new courthouse in Kern
County. Continuous appropriation authority was granted per Chapter 10, Statutes
of 2009, (SBX2 12, Steinberg), which expired on July 1, 2012. Appropriation
authority for acquisition is $1,620,000 of which $871,000 has been spent. The
new 39,780 gsf building will house three courtrooms. Total estimated project
cost is $41,666,000 without financing: $1,620,000 for acquisition, $1,892,000 for
preliminary plans, $2,533,000 for working drawings, and $35,621,000 (CCCI 5680)
for construction. The construction amount includes $31,485,000 for the
construction contract, $1,574,000 for contingency, $621,000 for architectural and
engineering fees, and $1,941,000 for other project costs. Acquisition is scheduled to
be completed in June 2013, and preliminary plans by April 2013. The cost estimate
for the construction phase will be reduced based upon recent Judicial Council
action taken on April 24, 2012. In addition, the design and construction schedule
is currently under review and will be submitted with a future funding request.
4. Kern County—New Mojave Courthouse. The amount of $113,000 is provided
for completion of the acquisition phase to construct a new courthouse in Kern
County. Continuous appropriation authority was granted per Chapter 10, Statutes
of 2009, (SBX2 12, Steinberg), which expired on July 1, 2012. Appropriation
authority for acquisition is $1,037,000 of which $924,000 has been spent. The
new 40,655 gsf building will house three courtrooms. Total estimated project
cost is $44,010,000 without financing: $1,037,000 for acquisition, $1,899,000 for
preliminary plans, $2,543,000 for working drawings, and $38,531,000 (CCCI
5680) for construction. The construction amount includes $34,295,000 for the
construction contract, $1,715,000 for contingency, $623,000 for architectural and
engineering fees, and $1,898,000 for other project costs. Acquisition is scheduled
to be completed in June 2013. The cost estimate for the construction phase will
be reduced based upon recent Judicial Council action taken on April 24, 2012. In
addition, the design and construction schedule is currently under review and will
be submitted with a future funding request.
5. Los Angeles County—New Eastlake Juvenile Courthouse. The amount of
$13,772,000 is provided for completion of the acquisition phase to construct a
new courthouse in Los Angeles County. Continuous appropriation authority
was granted per Chapter 10, Statutes of 2009, (SBX2 12, Steinberg), which
expired on July 1, 2012. Appropriation authority for acquisition is $25,820,000
of which $12,048,000 has been spent. The new 65,513 gsf building will house
five courtrooms. Total estimated project cost is $90,312,000 without financing:
LegisLative anaLyst’s Office 19
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
$25,820,000 for acquisition, $2,859,000 for preliminary plans, $3,829,000 for
working drawings, and $57,804,000 (CCCI 5680) for construction. The construction
amount includes $51,438,000 for the construction contract, $2,572,000 for
contingency, $939,000 for architectural and engineering fees, and $2,855,000 for
other project costs. Acquisition is scheduled to be completed in May 2013. The cost
estimate for the construction phase will be reduced based upon recent Judicial
Council action taken on April 24, 2012. In addition, the design and construction
schedule is currently under review and will be submitted with a future funding
request.
6. Los Angeles County—New Glendale Courthouse. The amount of $14,308,000 is
provided for completion of the acquisition phase to construct a new courthouse
in Los Angeles County. Continuous appropriation authority was granted per
Chapter 10, Statutes of 2009, (SBX2 12, Steinberg), which expired on July 1,
2012. Appropriation authority for acquisition is $16,764,000 of which $2,456,000
has been spent. The new 99,592 gsf building will house eight courtrooms.
Total estimated project cost is $126,675,000 without financing: $16,764,000 for
acquisition, $4,934,000 for preliminary plans, $6,606,000 for working drawings,
and $98,371,000 (CCCI 5680) for construction. The construction amount includes
$87,450,000 for the construction contract, $4,374,000 for contingency, $1,620,000
for architectural and engineering fees, and $4,927,000 for other project costs.
Acquisition is scheduled to be completed in August 2012. The cost estimate for
the construction phase will be reduced based upon recent Judicial Council action
taken on April 24, 2012. In addition, the design and construction schedule is
currently under review and will be submitted with a future funding request.
7. Los Angeles County—New Mental Health Courthouse. The amount of
$33,457,000 is provided for completion of the acquisition phase to construct a
new courthouse in Los Angeles County. Continuous appropriation authority
was granted per Chapter 10, Statutes of 2009, (SBX2 12, Steinberg), which
expired on July 1, 2012. Appropriation authority for acquisition is $35,553,000
of which $2,096,000 has been spent. The new 43,445 gsf building will house
three courtrooms. Total estimated project cost is $84,239,000 without financing:
$35,553,000 for acquisition, $2,160,000 for preliminary plans, $2,892,000
for working drawings, and $43,634,000 (CCCI 5680) for construction. The
construction amount includes $38,827,000 for the construction contract, $1,941,000
for contingency, $709,000 for architectural and engineering fees, and $2,157,000 for
other project costs. Acquisition is scheduled to be completed in May 2013. The cost
estimate for the construction phase will be reduced based upon recent Judicial
Council action taken on April 24, 2012. In addition, the design and construction
schedule is currently under review and will be submitted with a future funding
request.
20 LegisLative anaLyst’s Office
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
8. Los Angeles County—New Santa Clarita Courthouse. The amount of $1,166,000
is provided for completion of the acquisition phase to construct a new courthouse
in Los Angeles County. Continuous appropriation authority was granted per
Chapter 10, Statutes of 2009, (SBX2 12, Steinberg), which expired on July 1, 2012.
Appropriation authority for acquisition is $2,412,000 of which $1,246,000 has been
spent. The new 54,750 gsf building will house four courtrooms. Total estimated
project cost is $63,476,000 without financing: $2,412,000 for acquisition, $2,656,000
for preliminary plans, $3,542,000 for working drawings, and $54,866,000
(CCCI 5680) for construction. The construction amount includes $49,644,000 for
the construction contract, $2,482,000 for contingency, $87,000 for architectural and
engineering fees, and $2,653,000 for other project costs. Acquisition is scheduled
to be completed in March 2014. The cost estimate for the construction phase will
be reduced based upon recent Judicial Council action taken on April 24, 2012. In
addition, the design and construction schedule is currently under review and will
be submitted with a future funding request.
9. Mendocino County—New Ukiah Courthouse. The amount of $3,466,000 is
provided for completion of the acquisition phase to construct a new courthouse
in Mendocino County. Continuous appropriation authority was granted per
Chapter 10, Statutes of 2009, (SBX2 12, Steinberg), which expired on July 1, 2012.
Appropriation authority for acquisition is $5,673,000 of which $2,207,000 has been
spent. The new 113,757 gsf building will house nine courtrooms. Total estimated
project cost is $121,627,000 without financing: $5,673,000 for acquisition, $5,259,000
for preliminary plans, $7,041,000 for working drawings, and $103,654,000
(CCCI 5680) for construction. The construction amount includes $92,073,000 for
the construction contract, $4,604,000 for contingency, $1,726,000 for architectural
and engineering fees, and $5,251,000 for other project costs. Acquisition is
scheduled to be completed in October 2012. The cost estimate for the construction
phase will be reduced based upon recent Judicial Council action taken on
April 24, 2012. In addition, the design and construction schedule is currently
under review and will be submitted with a future funding request.
10. Nevada County—New Nevada City Courthouse. The amount of $12,675,000
is provided for the completion of the acquisition phase to construct a new
courthouse in Nevada County. Continuous appropriation authority was granted
per Chapter 10, Statutes of 2009, (SBX2 12, Steinberg), which expired on July 1,
2012. Appropriation authority for acquisition is $17,934,000 of which $5,259,000
has been spent. The new 83,782 gsf building will house six courtrooms. Total
estimated project cost is $102,827,000 without financing: $17,934,000 for acquisition,
$3,739,000 for preliminary plans, $5,006,000 for working drawings, and $76,148,000
(CCCI 5680) for construction. The construction amount includes $67,798,000 for
the construction contract, $3,390,000 for contingency, $1,227,000 for architectural
and engineering fees, and $3,733,000 for other project costs. Acquisition is
LegisLative anaLyst’s Office 21
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
scheduled to be completed in August 2013. The cost estimate for the construction
phase will be reduced based upon recent Judicial Council action taken on
April 24, 2012. In addition, the design and construction schedule is currently
under review and will be submitted with a future funding request.
11. Placer County—New Tahoe Area Courthouse. The amount of $2,800,000
is provided for the completion of the acquisition phase to construct a new
courthouse in Placer County. Continuous appropriation authority was granted
per Chapter 10, Statutes of 2009, (SBX2 12, Steinberg), which expired on July 1,
2012. Appropriation authority for acquisition is $6,564,000 of which $3,764,000
has been spent. The new 12,500 gsf building will house one courtroom. Total
estimated project cost is $22,493,000 without financing: $6,564,000 for acquisition,
$753,000 for preliminary plans, $1,009,000 for working drawings, and $14,167,000
(CCCI 5680) for construction. The construction amount includes $12,541,000 for
the construction contract, $627,000 for contingency, $247,000 for architectural and
engineering fees, and $752,000 for other project costs. Acquisition is scheduled to
be completed in October 2012. The cost estimate for the construction phase will
be reduced based upon recent Judicial Council action taken on April 24, 2012. In
addition, the design and construction schedule is currently under review and will
be submitted with a future funding request.
12. Plumas County—New Quincy Courthouse. The amount of $738,000 is provided
for the completion of the acquisition phase to construct a new courthouse in
Plumas County. Continuous appropriation authority was granted per Chapter 10,
Statutes of 2009, (SBX2 12, Steinberg), which expired on July 1, 2012. Appropriation
authority for acquisition is $1,884,000 of which $1,146,000 has been spent.
The 29,089 gsf building will house two courtrooms in Plumas County. Total
estimated project cost is $34,669,000 without financing: $1,884,000 for acquisition,
$1,534,000 for preliminary plans, $2,055,000 for working drawings, and $29,196,000
(CCCI 5680) for construction. The construction amount includes $25,867,000 for
the construction contract, $1,293,000 for contingency, $504,000 for architectural
and engineering fees, and $1,532,000 for other project costs. Acquisition is
scheduled to be completed in August 2012. The cost estimate for the construction
phase will be reduced based upon recent Judicial Council action taken on
April 24, 2012. In addition, the design and construction schedule is currently
under review and will be submitted with a future funding request.
13. Riverside County—New Hemet Courthouse. The amount of $414,000 is provided
for the completion of the acquisition phase to construct a new courthouse
in Riverside County. Continuous appropriation authority was granted per
Chapter 10, Statutes of 2009, (SBX2 12, Steinberg), which expired on July 1,
2012. Appropriation authority for acquisition is $5,563,000 of which $5,149,000
has been spent. The new 116,303 gsf building will house nine courtrooms in
22 LegisLative anaLyst’s Office
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
Riverside County. Total estimated project cost is $118,582,000 with $5,563,000 for
acquisition, $4,974,000 for preliminary plans, $6,659,000 for working drawings,
and $101,386,000 (CCCI 5680) for construction. The construction amount includes
$90,274,000 for the construction contract, $4,514,000 for contingency, $1,633,000
for architectural and engineering fees, and $4,965,000 for other project costs.
Acquisition is scheduled to be completed in January 2013. The cost estimate for
the construction phase will be reduced based upon recent Judicial Council action
taken on April 24, 2012. In addition, the design and construction schedule is
currently under review and will be submitted with a future funding request.
14. Sacramento County—New Sacramento Criminal Courthouse. The amount of
$15,000,000 is provided for the completion of the acquisition phase to construct
a new courthouse in Sacramento County. Continuous appropriation authority
was granted per Chapter 10, Statutes of 2009, (SBX2 12, Steinberg), which expired
on July 1, 2012. Appropriation authority for acquisition is $21,932,000 of which
$6,932,000 has been spent. The 405,500 gsf building will house 44 courtrooms
in Sacramento County. Total estimated project cost is $451,959,000 without
financing: $21,932,000 for acquisition, $17,124,000 for preliminary plans,
$22,924,000 for working drawings, and $389,979,000 (CCCI 5680) for construction.
The construction amount includes $349,771,000 for the construction contract,
$17,489,000 for contingency, $5,621,000 for architectural and engineering fees, and
$17,098,000 for other project costs. Acquisition is scheduled to be completed in
February 2013. The cost estimate for the construction phase will be reduced based
upon recent Judicial Council action taken on April 24, 2012. In addition, the design
and construction schedule is currently under review and will be submitted with a
future funding request.
15. Santa Barbara County—New Santa Barbara Criminal Courthouse. The
amount of $8,602,000 is provided for the completion of the acquisition phase to
construct a new courthouse in Santa Barbara County. Continuous appropriation
authority was granted per Chapter 10, Statutes of 2009, (SBX2 12, Steinberg),
which expired on July 1, 2012. Appropriation authority for acquisition is
$19,041,000 of which $10,439,000 has been spent. The new 97,266 gsf building
will house eight courtrooms. Total estimated project cost is $132,077,000 without
financing: $19,041,000 for acquisition, $5,058,000 for preliminary plans, $6,772,000
for working drawings, and $101,206,000 (CCCI 5680) for construction. The
construction amount includes $89,996,000 for the construction contract, $4,500,000
for contingency, $1,660,000 for architectural and engineering fees, and $5,050,000
for other project costs. Acquisition will be completed in June 2013. The cost
estimate for the construction phase will be reduced based upon recent Judicial
Council action taken on April 24, 2012. In addition, the design and construction
schedule is currently under review and will be submitted with a future funding
request.
LegisLative anaLyst’s Office 23
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
16. Siskiyou County—New Yreka Courthouse. The amount of $406,000 is provided
for the completion of the acquisition phase to construct a new courthouse in
Siskiyou County. Continuous appropriation authority was granted per Chapter 10,
Statutes of 2009, (SBX2 12, Steinberg), which expired on July 1, 2012. Appropriation
authority for acquisition is $2,213,000 of which $1,807,000 has been spent. The
new 69,213 gsf building will house five courtrooms. Total estimated project
cost is $77,829,000 without financing: $2,213,000 for acquisition, $3,578,000 for
preliminary plans, $4,790,000 for working drawings, and $67,248,000 (CCCI 5680)
for construction. The construction amount includes $59,524,000 for the
construction contract, $2,976,000 for contingency, $1,174,000 for architectural and
engineering fees, and $3,574,000 for other project costs. Acquisition was scheduled
to be completed in June 2012. The cost estimate for the construction phase will
be reduced based upon recent Judicial Council action taken on April 24, 2012. In
addition, the design and construction schedule is currently under review and will
be submitted with a future funding request.
17. Stanislaus County—New Modesto Courthouse. The amount of $6,860,000
is provided for the completion of the acquisition phase to construct a new
courthouse in Stanislaus County. Continuous appropriation authority was
granted per Chapter 10, Statutes of 2009, (SBX2 12, Steinberg), which expired
on July 1, 2012. Appropriation authority for acquisition is $14,766,000 of which
$7,906,000 has been spent. The new 301,464 gsf building will house 26 courtrooms.
Total estimated project cost is $277,164,000 without financing: $14,766,000 for
acquisition, $11,959,000 for preliminary plans, $16,009,000 for working drawings,
and $234,430,000 (CCCI 5680) for construction. The construction amount includes
$208,156,000 for the construction contract, $10,408,000 for contingency, $3,926,000
for architectural and engineering fees, and $11,940,000 for other project costs.
Acquisition is scheduled to be completed in August 2012. The cost estimate for
the construction phase will be reduced based upon recent Judicial Council action
taken on April 24, 2012. In addition, the design and construction schedule is
currently under review and will be submitted with a future funding request.
Item 0250‑302‑0668—Judicial Branch—Capital Outlay
1. Santa Clara County—New Family Justice Center. The amount of $208,144,000
is provided for the construction phase to construct a new courthouse in Santa
Clara County. The new 233,906 gross square foot (gsf) building will house
20 courtrooms. Total estimated project cost is $237,667,000 without financing:
$3,775,000 for acquisition, $11,111,000 for preliminary plans, $14,637,000
for working drawings, and $208,144,000 (CCCI 5680) for construction. The
construction amount includes $179,214,000 for the construction contract, $9,160,000
for contingency, $4,375,000 for architectural and engineering fees, and $15,395,000
for other project costs. Acquisition was completed in June 2011, and preliminary
24 LegisLative anaLyst’s Office
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
plans in June 2012. Construction will begin in July 2013 and be completed by July
2015, pending reconfirmation of both the detailed cost and scope of the project.
Item 2665‑304‑0890—High‑Speed Rail Authority—Capital Outlay
1. Statewide—Phase I and II Segment Environmental and Preliminary
Engineering Work. The amount of $252,527,000 is provided for the acquisition
and design phases to complete the environmental and preliminary engineering
work for the high‑speed rail systems phase I and II as defined in Proposition 1A
of 2008. The last environmental report is expected to be completed in December
2014. (Also see Item 2665‑304‑6043, Item 2665‑305‑6043, and Item 2665‑305‑0890.)
Item 2665‑304‑6043—High‑Speed Rail Authority—Capital Outlay
1. Statewide—Phase I and II Segment Environmental and Preliminary
Engineering Work. The amount of $252,527,000 is provided for the acquisition
and design phases to complete the environmental and preliminary engineering
work for the high‑speed rail systems phase I and II as defined in Proposition 1A
of 2008. The last environmental report is expected to be completed in December
2014. (Also see Item 2665‑304‑0890, Item 2665‑305‑6043, and Item 2665‑305‑0890.)
Item 2665‑305‑0890—High‑Speed Rail Authority—Capital Outlay
1. Statewide—Phase I and II Segment Environmental and Preliminary
Engineering Work. The amount of $252,527,000 is provided for the acquisition
and design phases to complete the environmental and preliminary engineering
work for the high‑speed rail systems phase I and II as defined in Proposition 1A
of 2008. The last environmental report is expected to be completed in December
2014. (Also see Item 2665‑304‑6043, Item 2665‑304‑0890, and Item 2665‑305‑6043.)
Item 2665‑305‑6043—High‑Speed Rail Authority—Capital Outlay
1. Statewide—Phase I and II Segment Environmental and Preliminary
Engineering Work. The amount of $252,527,000 is provided for the acquisition
and design phases to complete the environmental and preliminary engineering
work for the high‑speed rail systems phase I and II as defined in Proposition 1A
of 2008. The last environmental report is expected to be completed in December
2014. (Also see Item 2665‑304‑6043, Item 2665‑304‑0890, and Item 2665‑305‑0890.)
Item 2665‑306‑0890—High‑Speed Rail Authority—Capital Outlay
1. Central Valley Counties—Initial Operating Segment, Section 1. The amount
of $5,849,752,000 is provided for the acquisition and construction of the first
LegisLative anaLyst’s Office 25
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
approximately 130‑mile section of the high‑speed rail system in the Central Valley.
This section will extend from Madera to just north of Bakersfield and includes
multiple viaducts, bridges, over and underpasses, and a tunnel as well as the
acquisition of over 1,100 parcels. This project is being done using a design‑build
delivery method at a total estimated project cost of $5,849,752,000: $936,540,000 for
acquisition and $4,913,212,000 for construction. Acquisition is expected to begin
in August 2012 and is scheduled to be completed in May 2015. Construction is
expected to begin January 2013 and be completed in November 2017. (Also see
Item 2665‑306‑6043.)
Item 2665‑306‑6043—High‑Speed Rail Authority—Capital Outlay
1. Central Valley Counties—Initial Operating Segment, Section 1. The amount
of $5,849,752,000 is provided for the acquisition and construction of the first
approximately 130‑mile section of the high‑speed rail system in the Central Valley.
This section will extend from Madera to just north of Bakersfield and includes
multiple viaducts, bridges, over and underpasses, and a tunnel as well as the
acquisition of over 1,100 parcels. This project is being done using a design‑build
delivery method at a total estimated project cost of $5,849,752,000: $936,540,000 for
acquisition and $4,913,212,000 for construction. Acquisition is expected to begin
in August 2012 and is scheduled to be completed in May 2015. Construction is
expected to begin January 2013 and be completed in November 2017. (Also see
Item 2665‑306‑0890.)
Item 3540‑301‑0001—Department of Forestry and Fire Protection—
Capital Outlay
1. Statewide: Replace Communications Facilities, Phase IV. The budget provides
$6,815,000 for construction to replace existing telecommunications infrastructure
at Deadwood Peak, Strawberry Peak, and Telegraph Hill Communications
Facilities with new telecommunications towers, vaults, and other supporting
infrastructure. The scope of work includes installation of new emergency backup
generators; fuel systems; multipurpose alarms; heating, venting, and cooling
systems; and very high frequency and microwave communication equipment
complete with all necessary accessories. Site work includes demolition of replaced
structures, extension of utilities, road and site paving, and security fencing as site
needs dictate. Preliminary plans and working drawings were funded in budget
year 2006‑07. The total estimated project cost is $8,649,000 (CCCI 5393), including
preliminary plans ($745,000), working drawings ($1,089,000), and construction
($6,815,000). The amount for construction includes $227,000 for contingency,
$892,000 for project administration, $4,543,000 for construction contracts, $385,000
for agency‑retained items, and $768,000 for other project costs. Preliminary plans
commenced in April 2007 and were completed in May 2010. Working drawings
26 LegisLative anaLyst’s Office
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
commenced June 2010 and were completed in July 2012. Construction is scheduled
to start in April 2013 and be completed by January 2016.
Item 3790‑301‑0263—Department of Parks and Recreation—
Capital Outlay
1. Statewide, Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) Opportunity Purchase/Pre-Budget
Schematics. The budget provides $2,000,000 for property appraisals, preparation
of budget cost estimates and schematics, and purchase of real property in‑
holdings and/or parcels adjacent or near State Vehicular Recreation Areas that are
supported by the OHV Motor Recreation Program, or parcels available through tax
default that fall within the department’s Five Year Plan for program expansion.
2. Hollister Hills State Vehicular Recreation Area, Infrastructure and
Rehabilitation. The budget provides $5,935,000 for construction to provide
improvements to basic infrastructure and visitor facilities. Total project cost is
$6,504,000 (CCCI 5296) including preliminary plans ($153,000), working drawings
($416,000), and construction ($5,935,000). The amount for construction includes
$5,935,000 for construction contracts, $369,000 for contingency, $263,000 for project
administration, and $36,000 for agency‑retained items. Construction is scheduled
to begin December 2012 and be completed April 2014.
Item 3790‑301‑6051—Department of Parks and Recreation—
Capital Outlay
1. El Capitan State Beach, Construct New Lifeguard Headquarters. The budget
provides $7,864,000 for construction and equipment to demolish the existing
lifeguard headquarters and construct a new lifeguard headquarters in the day
use area. Total estimated project cost is $9,067,000 including preliminary plans
($591,000), working drawings ($612,000), construction ($7,766,000), and equipment
($98,000). The amount for construction includes $6,641,000 for construction
contracts, $464,000 for contingency, $585,000 for project administration, and
$76,000 for agency‑retained items. Construction is scheduled to begin January
2013 and be completed April 2014.
2. Donner Memorial State Park, Enhance Museum Exhibits. The budget provides
$881,000 for working drawings and construction to provide durable, long‑lived,
interpretive, educational exhibit enhancements for the new museum building.
Total estimated project cost is $1,050,000 including preliminary plans ($169,000),
working drawings ($463,000), and construction ($418,000). The amount for
construction includes $418,000 for agency‑retained items. Working drawings are
scheduled to begin May 2012 and be completed February 2013. Construction is
scheduled to begin June 2013 and be completed June 2014.
LegisLative anaLyst’s Office 27
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
Item 3860‑301‑6052/Reimbursements—
Department of Water Resources—Capital Outlay
1. Feather River Early Implementation Project. The budget provides $47,389,000
from Section 5096.821(b) of Proposition 1E for state cost‑share funding for
construction of the Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency’s Feather River Levee
Strengthening Early Implementation Project, which will restore 100‑year flood
protection for significant portions of the Sutter‑Yuba City basin and will constitute
a first phase in achieving the objective of 200‑year flood protection by 2025.
2. West Sacramento Project (General Reevaluation Report). The budget provides
$813,000 from Section 5096.821(b) of Proposition 1E and $575,000 Reimbursement
Authority to fund the nonfederal share of development of the West Sacramento
Project General Reevaluation Report.
3. West Sacramento Early Implementation Project. The budget provides
$75,530,000 from Section 5096.821(b) of Proposition 1E for state cost‑share funding
for construction of the West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency’s South Area
Plan Levee Improvement projects, which will provide a 200‑year level of flood
protection for the city of West Sacramento.
4. Sutter Basin Feasibility Study. The budget provides $457,000 from
Section 5096.821(b) of Proposition 1E and $170,000 Reimbursement Authority to
continue the Sutter Basin Feasibility Study, which will investigate measures to
improve the level of flood protection for the Yuba City basin to at least a 200‑year
level.
5. Rock Creek/Keefer Slough: Feasibility Study. The budget provides $420,000 from
Section 5096.821(b) of Proposition 1E and $225,000 Reimbursement Authority
to fund the nonfederal share of a feasibility study of the Rock Creek and Keefer
Slough in order to improve the level of flood protection for the communities of
Chico and Nord, State Routes 99 and 32, and surrounding agricultural land.
6. Lower Cache Creek, Yolo County, Woodland Area Project. The budget provides
$585,000 from Section 5096.821(b) of Proposition 1E and $400,000 Reimbursement
Authority to fund the nonfederal share of a feasibility study of the lower portion
of Cache Creek in order to improve the level of flood protection for the urban
Woodland area and the surrounding vicinity within Yolo County.
7. Folsom Dam Modifications Project. The budget provides $12,806,000 from
Section 5096.821(b) of Proposition 1E and $5,336,000 Reimbursement Authority
to continue construction of the Folsom Dam Modifications Project, which will
28 LegisLative anaLyst’s Office
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
enhance the flood release capability of Folsom Dam and increase the level of
protection from flooding to Sacramento.
8. Frazier Creek/Strathmore Creek: Feasibility Study. The budget provides
$570,000 from Section 5096.821(b) of Proposition 1E and $375,000 Reimbursement
Authority to fund the non‑federal share of a feasibility study of the Frazier and
Strathmore Creeks to improve the level of flood protection for the community
of Strathmore, State Routes 28 and 65, bridges, railroads, and surrounding
agricultural lands.
9. White River/Deer Creek: Feasibility Study. The budget provides $570,000 from
Section 5096.821(b) of Proposition 1E and $375,000 Reimbursement Authority to
fund the nonfederal share of a feasibility study of the White River and Deer Creek
to improve the level of flood protection for the community of Earlimart, State
Route 99, roads, bridges, railroads, and agricultural lands in Tulare County.
10. Merced County Streams Project, Bear Creek Unit. The budget provides $383,000
from Section 5096.821(b) of Proposition 1E and $188,000 Reimbursement Authority
for the nonfederal share of the General Reevaluation Report, which will identify
alternatives and improvements to bring the level of flood protection for the city of
Merced up to at least a 200‑year level.
11. Lower San Joaquin River. The budget provides $858,000 from Section 5096.821(b)
of Proposition 1E and $560,000 Reimbursement Authority for the nonfederal share
of the Lower San Joaquin River Feasibility Study to identify a feasible project for
flood damage reduction along the Lower San Joaquin River, and to provide at
least 200‑year level flood protection for the metropolitan Stockton, Lathrop, and
Manteca areas.
12. Sacramento River Flood Control System Evaluation. The budget provides
$390,000 of Section 5096.821(b) of Proposition 1E to fund the nonfederal share of
this evaluation, which will assess the existing level of flood protection provided by
the nonurban levees within the Sacramento River Valley and prioritize deficiencies.
Item 3860‑302‑6052—Department of Water Resources—Capital Outlay
1. Delta Flood Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Recovery Project. The
budget recharacterizes $20,000,000 from Section 5096.821(c) of Proposition 1E that
was originally appropriated as support for this project by Chapter 1, Statutes of
2008 (SBX2 1, Perata) to capital outlay. This funding will be used to construct and
fully furbish up to three waterside transfer facilities for emergency response in
the Sacramento‑San Joaquin Delta.
LegisLative anaLyst’s Office 29
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
Item 3960‑301‑0001—Department of Toxic Substances Control—
Capital Outlay
1. Stringfellow Pyrite Canyon Treatment Facility. The budget provides $40,106,000
for construction of the Stringfellow Pyrite Canyon Treatment Facility to treat
contaminated groundwater at the Stringfellow site. Total estimated project cost
is $46,354,000 including acquisition ($1,550,000), preliminary plans ($3,063,000),
working drawings ($1,635,000), and construction ($40,106,000). The amount
for construction includes $33,303,000 for construction contracts, $1,665,000 for
contingency, $2,092,000 for project administration, and $3,046,000 for other items.
Construction is scheduled to begin July 2012 and be completed March 2014.
Item 5225‑001‑0001—Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation—
Capital Outlay
1. Folsom State Prison, Represa—Folsom Women’s Facility, Construction. The
amount of $2,834,000 is provided for construction for a project that will renovate
and improve the former Folsom Transitional Treatment Facility for the mission
of housing approximately 400 female inmates. The project will include repair of
existing buildings and mechanical systems, and conversion of existing building
space to provide for health care and program space. The total estimated project
cost is $2,834,000, including $955,000 for construction contracts, $79,000 for
contingency, $584,000 for agency‑retained items, $202,000 for other project costs,
and $1,014,000 for Group II equipment. Construction will begin in July 2012 and
be completed in June 2013.
Item 6110‑301‑0660—Department of Education—Capital Outlay
1. California School for the Deaf, Riverside—New Gymnasium and Pool Center.
A supplemental appropriation of $4,591,000 is provided for the new gymnasium
and pool center project at the California School for the Deaf Riverside. The
additional funds are primarily provided to adjust for the increase in the
California Construction Cost Index since the initial appropriation in 2007‑08 and
to meet the Leadership in Energy and Environment Design standards developed
by the United States Green Building Council. The project scope includes: a
gymnasium (45,000 sf) with main and auxiliary gyms, wrestling room, PE/
Health classroom, storage, offices, locker rooms, air conditioning, and restrooms.
The pool facility (23,000 sf) includes a regulation 25 meter pool with a separate
wading area, and pool equipment consisting of a solar water heater, pumps, and a
water filtration/sanitation system. The project additionally incorporates: a visual
message system, bleachers, a shower area, restrooms, outdoor lighting, parking,
and road realignment. The total estimated project cost is $29,974,000. In 2008,
the Pooled Money Investment Board froze access to interim financing for this
30 LegisLative anaLyst’s Office
supplemental Report of the 2012-13 Budget Package
project. When interim financing becomes available once more, the duration for
construction is expected to be 21 months. The resulting buildings shall be subject
to Field Act and ADA regulations.
2. California School for the Deaf, Riverside—Academic Support Cores, Bus Loop,
and Renovation. A supplemental appropriation of $1,510,000 is provided for
the academic support cores, bus loop, and renovation project at the California
School for the Deaf, Riverside. The additional funds are primarily provided to
make adjustments to the bus loop configuration, install a new water heating
system, and adjust the acoustics of buildings to take into consideration the needs
of students with hearing aids or cochlear implants. The project includes: design
and construction of six support cores for early childhood education (ECE),
elementary and high school academic areas, construction of three classrooms,
and construction of a new ECE bus loop. The project also includes: renovation of
the office and education areas for the Pachappa III, Rubidoux I, and K2 buildings;
renovation of water coils in the social hall; and installation of new hot water
boilers and decommissioning of old facility boiler plant. The total estimated
project cost is $11,893,000. In 2008, the Pooled Money Investment Board froze
access to interim financing for this project. When interim financing becomes
available once more, the duration for working drawings and construction is
expected to be approximately 33 months. The resulting buildings will be subject
to Field Act and ADA regulations.
LegisLative anaLyst’s Office 31