LAO
The 2017-18 Budget: Overview of the Governor's Criminal Justice Budget
The 2017-18 Budget: Overview of the Governor's Criminal Justice Budget
Translate Our Website
This Google ™ translation feature provided on the Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO) website is for informational purposes only.
The LAO is unable to guarantee the accuracy of this translation and is therefore not liable for any inaccurate information resulting from the translation application tool.
Choose your language:
×
Skip to main content
Home -->
Policy Areas
Capital Outlay, Infrastructure
Criminal Justice
Economy and Taxes
Education
Environment and Natural Resources
Health and Human Services
Local Government
State Budget Condition
Transportation
Other Government Areas
Publications
The Budget
Propositions and Initiatives
Staff
Careers
About Us
Search
The Governor's budget for 2017-18 proposes total expenditures of $16.1 billion for judicial and criminal justice programs. In this post, we describe recent trends in state spending on criminal justice and provide an overview of the major changes in the Governor's proposed budget for criminal justice programs in 2017-18.
LAO Contact
Drew Soderborg
See More Publications Like This
Back to the Top
-->
Tweet
January 27, 2017
The 2017-18 Budget
Overview of the Governor s
Criminal Justice Budget
The primary goal of California s criminal justice system is to provide public safety by deterring and preventing crime, punishing individuals who commit crime, and reintegrating criminals back into the community. The state s major criminal justice programs include the court system, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), and the Department of Justice (DOJ). The Governor s budget for 2017-18 proposes total expenditures of $16.1 billion for judicial and criminal justice programs. Below, we describe recent trends in state spending on criminal justice and provide an overview of the major changes in the Governor s proposed budget for criminal justice programs in 2017-18.
Expenditure Trends
Total Spending Declined Between 2010-11 and 2012-13 . . . Over the past decade, total expenditures on judicial criminal justice programs has varied. As shown in Figure 1, criminal justice spending declined between 2010-11 and 2012-13, primarily due to two factors. First, in 2011 the state realigned various criminal justice responsibilities to the counties, including the responsibility for certain low-level felony offenders. This realignment reduced state correctional spending. Second, the judicial branch particularly the trial courts received significant one-time and ongoing General Fund reductions.
. . . But Has Increased Since Then. Since 2012-13, overall spending on criminal justice programs has increased. This was largely due to additional funding for CDCR and the trial courts. For example, increased CDCR expenditures resulted from (1) increases in employee compensation costs, (2) the activation of a new health care facility, and (3) costs associated with increasing capacity to reduce prison overcrowding. During this same time period, General Fund augmentations were provided to the trial courts to partially offset reductions made in prior years.
Governor s Budget Proposals
Total Proposed Spending of $16.1 Billion in 2017-18. As shown in Figure 2, the Governor s 2017-18 budget includes a total of $16.1 billion from all fund sources for judicial and criminal justice programs. This is an increase of $294 million (2 percent) over the revised 2016-17 level of spending. General Fund spending is proposed to be $12.9 billion in 2017-18, which represents an increase of $74 million (less than 1 percent) above the revised 2016-17 level.
Figure 2
Judicial and Criminal Justice Budget Summary
(Dollars in Millions)
Actual
2015-16
Estimated
2016-17
Proposed
2017-18
Change From 2016-17
Actual
Percent
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
$10,321
$10,913
$11,272
$359
3.3%
General Fund a
10,021
10,665
10,964
300
2.8
Special and other funds
300
248
307
59
23.8
Judicial Branch
$3,381
$3,618
$3,631
$13
0.4%
General Fund
1,585
1,773
1,654
-119
-6.7
Special and other funds
1,796
1,845
1,976
131
7.1
Department of Justice
$739
$825
$858
$33
4.0%
General Fund
198
222
215
-6
-2.8
Special and other funds
541
603
643
39
6.5
Board of State and Community Corrections
$185
$223
$122
-$101
-45.3%
General Fund
68
112
29
-82
-73.7
Special and other funds
117
111
93
-18
-16.6
Other Departments b
$230
$254
$244
-$9
-3.7%
General Fund
60
88
69
-19
-21.2
Special and other funds
170
166
175
9
5.6
Totals, All Departments
$14,855
$15,832
$16,127
$294
1.9%
General Fund
11,932
12,859
12,933
74
0.6
Special and other funds
2,924
2,973
3,194
220
7.4
a Does not include revenues to General Fund to offset corrections spending from the federal State Criminal Alien Assistance Program.
b Includes Office the Inspector General, Commission on Judicial Performance, Victims Compensation and Government Claims Board, Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training, State Public Defender, funds provided for trial court security, and debt service on general obligation bonds.
Note: Detail may not total due to rounding.
Major Budget Proposals. The most significant new criminal justice spending included in the Governor s budget is a proposal to shift responsibility for the provision of inpatient psychiatric services at three state prisons from the Department of State Hospitals (DSH) to CDCR. The Governor s budget transfers $250 million in General Fund support from DSH to CDCR to support this shift in responsibility. (We note that because DSH is not considered a criminal justice program, the corresponding $250 million reduction to the department s budget is not depicted in Figure 1 or 2.) In addition, the budget includes various smaller augmentations for other departments. For example, the Governor s budget includes $45 million associated with Proposition 56 (2016) for DOJ to enforce tobacco related laws and for grants to local law enforcement for efforts to reduce sales of tobacco products to minors. These augmentations are proposed to be offset by decreases in some department s budgets. For example, the budget for the Board of State and Community Corrections is proposed to decline by $101 million in 2017-18 largely due to the expiration of various limited term grant programs.
Subscribe
| California State Legislature
| Online Voter Registration
| Privacy Policy
| Accessibility
Legislative Analyst's Office | The California Legislature's Nonpartisan Fiscal and Policy Advisor
925 L Street, Suite 1000 Sacramento, CA 95814 | (916) 445-4656