Fiscal Outlook: In-Home Supportive Services (ihss)

Fiscal Outlook: In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) Translate Our Website This Google ™ translation feature provided on the Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO) website is for informational purposes only. The LAO is unable to guarantee the accuracy of this translation and is therefore not liable for any inaccurate information resulting from the translation application tool. Choose your language: × Skip to main content Home --> Policy Areas Capital Outlay, Infrastructure Criminal Justice Economy and Taxes Education Environment and Natural Resources Health and Human Services Local Government State Budget Condition Transportation Other Government Areas Publications The Budget Propositions and Initiatives Staff Careers About Us Search The 2019-20 Budget: California's Fiscal Outlook See a list of this year's fiscal outlook material, including the core California's Fiscal Outlook report, on our fiscal outlook budget page . LAO Contact Jackie Barocio See More Publications Like This Back to the Top --> Tweet November 14, 2018 The 2019-20 Budget California’s Fiscal Outlook In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) We estimate General Fund expenditures for IHSS to be $3.8 billion in 2018 19, slightly increasing to about $3.9 billion in 2019 20. It is important to note that the small net growth in state IHSS expenditures in 2019 20 masks a number of cost increases and expected savings. Specifically, in 2019 20, most of the estimated growth in state IHSS costs is expected to be offset by General Fund savings resulting from the statutorily scheduled 7 percent reduction of IHSS service hours triggered by the expiration of the current managed care organization (MCO) tax at the end of 2018 19. After 2019 20, we project that IHSS expenditures will grow at a higher rate, reaching over $5.6 billion by 2022 23. Overall, between 2018 19 and 2022 23, the projected average annual growth of IHSS General Fund expenditures is about 11 percent making IHSS one of the fastest growing programs in the state. To a large degree, this growth is due to projected caseload and hours-per-consumer growth and the implementation of statutorily scheduled statewide minimum wage increases that significantly increase the average cost per consumer. Below, we discuss the major factors that affect General Fund IHSS spending over the outlook period, which extends from 2018 19 through 2022 23. Growth in Caseload and Hours Per Case Increase State IHSS Costs. As shown in Figure 1, the number of IHSS cases has steadily increased over much of the past 20 years. Prior to 2009 10, the IHSS caseload grew, on average, by 7.5 percent annually. However, between 2009 10 and 2013 14, IHSS caseload remained relatively flat. In more recent years, growth in IHSS caseload has increased steadily again, averaging about 5 percent annually. Similarly, over the past five years, IHSS hours per case has steadily increased annually by 4 percent on average. We note that this recent growth in IHSS service hours is higher than historical growth trends. This, in part, may be due to IHSS service hours being temporarily reduced in some years and restored in others, resulting in IHSS service hours fluctuating by a greater amount year to year relative to average growth trends. Taking into account historical trends, we assume that overall IHSS caseload will increase by 5.8 percent annually and hours per case will increase by 2.5 percent annually through 2022 23. Rising Statewide Minimum Wage Increases Hourly Cost of Care. The enacted statewide minimum wage increases set to gradually raise the state s minimum wage to $15 per hour by 2022 and increase by inflation thereafter will increase wages for IHSS providers. Since the current average wage for IHSS providers ($11.71 per hour) is over the current statewide minimum wage of $11.00 per hour, we project that the major costs of the scheduled minimum wage increases will begin when wages increase to $12 per hour and above, beginning in 2019. When statewide minimum wage reaches $15 per hour in 2022, we estimate the cumulative costs of the minimum wage increases to total about $1.5 billion General Fund per year, increasing thereafter with growth in caseload, hours per consumer, and overtime costs. Under Current Law, Expiration of the MCO Tax Triggers 7 Percent Reduction of IHSS Service Hours in 2019 20. As previously mentioned, the reason the net increase in IHSS costs in 2019 20 is more modest is mainly due to the estimated savings from the triggering of the 7 percent reduction in IHSS service hours. Since 2016 17, the General Fund has supported the restoration of IHSS service hours, which were previously reduced by 7 percent, so long as the MCO tax is in place. Under current law, the MCO tax is set to expire at the end of 2018 19. Given this expected expiration of the MCO tax, our outlook projections assume that the General Fund support for the restoration of service hours will not be included beginning in 2019 20. We estimate that discontinuing General Fund support and reinstituting the 7 percent reduction on IHSS service hours would result in General Fund savings of roughly $300 million annually (increasing annually thereafter with growth in caseload, hours per consumer, and IHSS wages). For further discussion of the MCO tax, please reference the Medi-Cal Fiscal Outlook online post. Administration Scheduled to Release Report of 1991 Realignment and IHSS County Costs. In 2017 18, a new IHSS county maintenance of effort (MOE) referred to as the 2017 IHSS MOE was established. The 2017 IHSS MOE increased counties share of cost in the IHSS program from $1.1 billion in 2016 17 to about $1.8 billion in 2017 18. Moreover, relative to the prior county MOE, the 2017 IHSS MOE is expected to grow at a faster rate year to year. (We anticipate that the 2017 IHSS MOE will grow by 7 percent annually beginning in 2019 20 through at least 2022 23.) In effect, this increase in county contributions to IHSS costs effectively decreases our projected state General Fund share of cost for the IHSS program by hundreds of millions of dollars annually. We note that when the 2017 IHSS MOE was initially implemented, there was concern that 1991 realignment the revenue source used to cover IHSS county MOE costs would no longer be able to fully cover IHSS county costs in the long term. Consequently, the 2017 18 budget agreement required the Department of Finance (DOF) to review and report on the funding structure of 1991 realignment as part of its January 2019 budget proposal. In anticipation of the DOF report, our report Reevaluating the 1991 Realignment assesses whether 1991 realignment achieves its intended benefits and evaluates the ability of 1991 realignment to meet its funding obligations over time. Subscribe | California State Legislature | Online Voter Registration | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Legislative Analyst's Office | The California Legislature's Nonpartisan Fiscal and Policy Advisor 925 L Street, Suite 1000 Sacramento, CA 95814 | (916) 445-4656