LAO
The 2021-22 Budget: Educator Workforce Proposals
Read the report at Legislative Analyst's Office ↗
analysis full
gutter
The 2021-22 Budget:
Educator Workforce Proposals
FEBRUARY 2021
In this post, we analyze the Governor’s as his proposals to provide additional professional
proposals to address teacher shortages, as well development for school staff.
Teacher Shortages
Below, we provide background on teacher the demand for teachers was low. Certain subject
shortages, describe the Governor’s proposals areas and types of schools are more likely to rely on
related to these issues, assess these proposals, underprepared teachers:
and offer associated recommendations.
• Special Education, Science, and Math Are
Background More Likely to Reflect Shortages. In reports
required by the U.S. Department of Education,
California Has About 300,000 School
California has identified shortages of special
Teachers. In 2018-19, about 295,000 full-time
education, science, and math teachers nearly
equivalent teachers were employed in California’s
every year since 1990-91. Special education
public school system. This is an increase of
teachers tend to have higher rates of turnover
9.8 percent over the 2010-11 level (the low point
due to several factors, such as the increased
during the Great Recession).
Coupled with the effects of
Figure 1
declining student enrollment, the
statewide student-to-teacher Share of Underprepared Teachers Is Low, but Increasing
ratio, in turn, has dropped every Share of Teacher Workforce on Emergency Credentials
year since its peak in 2010-11
6%
(23:1). In 2018-19, this ratio was
about 21:1—comparable to the
5
level prior to the Great Recession.
Some Districts Unable to
4
Find Credentialed Teachers.
Despite recent growth in the
3
teacher workforce, some school
districts in the state are unable
2
to find credentialed teachers. As
Figure 1 shows, almost 3 percent
1
of the teacher workforce
(about 8,700 teachers) had an
emergency credential in 2018-19.
2003-04 2006-07 2009-10 2012-13 2015-16 2018-19
The share of teachers on
emergency credentials has risen
every year since 2009-10, when
2021-22 LAO Budget Series 1
analysis full
gutter
risk of lawsuits and considerable reporting In Recent Years, State Has Funded Various
requirements to comply with federal special Programs to Address Teacher Shortages.
education law. Teacher shortages in science Figure 2 on the next page describes the programs
and math are attributed to a shortage of that have received one-time state funding since
undergraduates in science, technology, 2016-17 to address teacher shortages. Some
engineering, and math (STEM) majors and the programs are aimed at increasing the supply of
high salaries that these graduates can receive teachers. For instance, the Classified School
in other professions. Employee Teacher Credentialing Program
• Low-Income Urban Schools and (Classified Program) provides financial support
Rural Schools Rely More Heavily on for classified staff to pursue their teaching
Underprepared Teachers. Staffing difficulties credential. Other programs focused on improving
appear most pronounced in low-income urban or accelerating teacher preparation, particularly in
schools, as well as rural schools. National high-need subject areas. The Teacher Residency
research shows that between 1987 to Grant Program funds the expansion of residency
2016, about one-quarter of public schools programs in special education, bilingual education,
accounted for almost half of all public school and STEM fields that provide teacher candidates
teacher turnover. Schools most affected by more support and classroom experience by
high teacher turnover were those with higher first teaching alongside a mentor teacher. Other
shares of low-income students programs, such as the Golden State Teacher
and/or students of color, as well as those Grant Program, target the recruitment of special
in urban or rural areas. In California, higher education teachers in schools with higher shares of
teacher turnover also is reported in these underprepared teachers.
types of schools. Substantial Federal Emergency Relief
Has Been Provided to Schools Within the
Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Could
Past Year. In response to the pandemic, the
Worsen Teacher Shortages. A national survey
federal government passed two emergency relief
of teachers from November 2020 found that
packages providing significant one-time funding
27 percent of teachers were considering taking a
for K-12 public education. The Coronavirus Aid,
leave of absence, leaving the teaching profession,
Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, signed
or retiring early in response to the pandemic.
into law on March 27, 2020, allocated $1.5 billion
Data in California is consistent with this finding.
to California public schools based on numbers of
According to the California State Teachers’
low-income and disadvantaged children. These
Retirement System, which manages the state’s
federal funds are available until September 30,
pension system for teachers, 3,202 California
2022 and could be used on a variety of activities
teachers retired in the second half of 2020—a
including maintaining continuity of school services
26 percent increase relative to 2019. Although the
(such as teacher recruitment and retention). Signed
pandemic appears to have accelerated teachers
into law on December 27, 2020, the second federal
leaving the workforce, data on teachers entering
relief package allocated an additional $6 billion to
the workforce—such as district hiring of new
California public schools under the same allocation
teachers and enrollment in teacher preparation
formula and broad range of allowable uses as the
programs in 2020-21—are not yet available.
CARES funding. Schools must spend these funds
Anecdotal evidence, however, suggests that
by September 30, 2023.
enrollment in teacher preparation programs is
higher for 2020-21 relative to the prior year, which Governor’s Proposals
could mitigate other pandemic-related impacts in
Provides $225 Million One Time for Previously
subsequent years.
Funded Teacher Programs. The Governor’s
budget provides additional funding for three
previously funded programs:
2021-22 LAO Budget Series 2
analysis full
gutter
Figure 2
State Has Provided $190 Million Since 2016-17 to Address Teacher Shortages
General Fund Unless Otherwise Indicated (In Millions)
Program Year Description Funding Allocation Amount
Teacher Residency 2018‑19 Supports establishing and expanding CTC competitively awards grants to $51a
Grant Program teacher residency programs in districts, COEs, and school‑university
special education, STEM, and partnerships. There are two grant
bilingual education. types: (1) planning grants of up to
$50,000 and (2) residency grants of
up to $20,000 per resident in the new
or expanded program.
Local Solution Grants 2018‑19 Provided funding to local efforts to CTC competitively awarded grants of up 50
recruit and retain special education to $20,000 per participant to districts,
teachers. COEs, and schools. Grantees
required to provide a dollar‑for‑dollar
match.
Classified School 2016‑17 and Provides financial assistance to CTC competitively awarded grants of 45
Employee Teacher 2017‑18 classified school employees, such $4,000 per participant per year for up
Credentialing Program as instructional aides, to pursue to five years to districts, COEs, and
teaching credentials. schools.
Golden State Teacher 2020‑21 Provides financial assistance to CSAC awards funds to participating 15b
Grant Program students enrolled in teacher teachers. This program was federally
preparation programs who commit funded.
to working in special education at a
school with a high share of teachers
on emergency credentials.
Integrated 2016‑17 Supported expanding integrated CTC competitively awarded planning 10
Undergraduate programs that allow participants grants of up to $250,000 to
Teacher Preparation to earn a bachelor’s degree and universities.
Grants a teaching credential within four
years. Programs focused on special
education, STEM, and bilingual
education received funding priority.
California Educator 2017‑18 Assisted districts with recruiting and California Center on Teaching Careers 9
Development Program preparing teachers, principals, and competitively awarded grants to
other schools leaders. 26 districts, COEs, and schools. This
program was federally funded.
California Center on 2016‑17 Established a statewide teacher CTC competitively awarded grant to 5
Teaching Careers recruitment center to recruit Tulare COE to operate center.
qualified and capable individuals
into the teaching field, particularly
to low‑income schools in special
education, STEM, and bilingual
education.
Bilingual Teacher 2017‑18 Supported teachers pursuing CDE competitively awarded grants to 5
Professional authorization to teach bilingual and eight districts and COEs.
Development Program multilingual classes.
Total $190
a
Program initially received $75 million. The 2020-21 Budget Act swept $23 million in unused funds.
b
Program initially received $90 million in 2019‑20 budget, but funds were swept as part of 2020‑21 budget.
STEM = science, technology, engineering, and math; CTC = Commission on Teacher Credentialing; COE = county office of education; CSAC = California Student Aid Commission; and
CDE = California Department of Education.
2021-22 LAO Budget Series 3
analysis full
gutter
• Teacher Residency Grant Program School districts, county offices of education
($100 Million Proposition 98). Funding is (COEs), and charter schools that have not
for another round of awards to establish new previously received funding would receive
and expand existing teacher residencies. priority for funding.
The proposal also includes several changes
to the program rules. Most notably, the Assessment
proposal allows the Commission on Teacher
First Round of Funding for Teacher
Credentialing (CTC) to expand the subject
Residency Grant Was Not Fully Exhausted. Of
areas eligible for grant funding to include
the $50 million provided in 2018-19 specifically for
other shortage areas identified by CTC. Unlike
special education residency programs, CTC was
previous funding, the Governor’s proposal
only able to award $27 million in the first funding
does not allocate a specific amount of funding
round. The CTC subsequently released a second
for each shortage area. (The initial funding for
request for proposals to award the remaining funds,
the program provided $50 million for special
but these funds were swept in the 2020-21 budget
education and $25 million for both STEM and
package due to the state’s fiscal condition. The
bilingual education.)
$25 million set aside for STEM and bilingual
• Golden State Teacher Grant Program
education, however, has been exhausted.
($100 Million Non-Proposition 98
Residency Programs May Improve
General Fund). The California Student Aid
Preparation but Are Challenging to Initiate
Commission would award grants of up to
and Sustain. Research suggests that teachers
$20,000 to each teacher candidate agreeing
prepared through residency programs tend to feel
to teach in a priority school for four years.
more prepared than other beginning teachers and
A teacher candidate must be enrolled in a
typically remain teaching in the same district for
teacher preparation program to receive a
a longer period of time. Despite these potential
grant and agree to repay the grant if they
benefits, however, residency programs can be
fail to complete the service commitment. In
difficult to develop and financially sustain. For
contrast to the funding provided in 2020-21,
example, the districts we spoke to mentioned they
the Governor’s proposal includes two main
had challenges establishing a reliable partnership
program changes. First, rather than limiting
with the university, attracting residents due to the
the program to special education candidates,
appeal of other preparation pathways (such as
grants would be available for candidates
internship programs) that allow teacher candidates
pursuing credentials to teach bilingual
to earn a teaching salary while completing their
education, STEM, special education, multiple
program, and sustaining funding for the program
subject instruction, and other shortage areas
after the residency grant ends.
identified by CTC. Second, the Governor
proposes to change the definition of a priority Classified Program Is in High Demand. The
school to one in which 55 percent or more of Classified Program is oversubscribed. The initial
its student population is either low income or two rounds of funding provided enough financial
an English learner. (Under current law, priority assistance to support 2,260 classified employees.
schools are defined based on having a high However, an additional 6,000 classified employees
share of teachers on emergency credentials.) requested to participate, and applications from
After accounting for funding that can be used 27 school districts and COEs remain unfunded.
for administration and outreach, the proposed Administrators we spoke to viewed the program
funding would support up to 4,925 grants. as a long-term recruitment and “grow-your-own”
retention strategy. Administrators also noted that,
• Classified Program ($25 Million
compared to the current teacher workforce, the
Proposition 98). Funding would support at
participants in the Classified Program are more
least an additional 1,041 participants with
likely to be from the local community and share
grants of up to $24,000 over five years.
2021-22 LAO Budget Series 4
analysis full
gutter
the same racial and ethnic backgrounds as the possible that the program might provide grants
students they serve. to some teachers who would have taught at a
Classified Program Not Targeted to Statewide low-income school even without the grant.
Shortage Areas. Although applicants were Given Recent Influx of One-Time Federal
required to demonstrate a need for credentialed Funding, Schools Have Broad Options for
teachers in their applications, those with greater Teacher Recruitment and Retention. With a total
need did not receive priority in the application of $7.5 billion available across the two federal
process. As a result, several districts participating emergency relief packages, California public
in the program have relatively low shares of schools will have significant one-time resources
underprepared teachers. Of the 23 districts that available to spend in 2021-22. This is particularly
applied individually (not part of a larger consortium), the case for low-income school districts, which
14 had a lower percentage of teachers on received significantly more funding per student
emergency credentials than the statewide average. under the federal allocation formulas. Given the
Seven districts have both lower shares of teachers flexibility and local control over these federal funds,
on emergency credentials and lower shares of schools have a broad range of options to hire
low-income students than the statewide averages. and retain qualified, prepared teachers, including
This differs from most other teacher-related state teacher service awards, signing bonuses, or
programs, which target resources to subject areas student debt payments. These approaches may be
and school districts where teacher shortages are more responsive to local needs than state-funded
most pronounced. initiatives, such as those proposed by the Governor.
Evaluation of Classified Program to Be
Recommendations
Released This Summer. As statutorily required,
CTC has contracted with an independent program Reduce Proposed Teacher Residency Grant
evaluator to complete and submit to the Legislature Program Augmentation to $50 Million, Reject
an evaluation of the Classified Program by Expanding to Other Shortage Areas. We
July 1, 2021. Although the evaluation will not be recommend the Legislature provide $50 million
available for the 2021-22 budget deliberations, (half the amount proposed by the Governor) for
CTC shared with us their intent to incorporate any new residency programs in 2021-22—roughly
notable evaluation findings into the next application equivalent to the amount of funds awarded thus
process. far. Given the challenges in building and sustaining
Impact of Golden State Teacher Grant these programs, we believe this amount is sufficient
Remains Unknown, Could Be Limited. At the to address additional demand for new residency
time of this analysis, the first round of Golden State programs. We also believe the current program
Teacher Grants had not been awarded. As such, rules are more appropriately targeted than the
the state cannot yet measure the effect of the Governor’s proposed change in addressing
program on teacher supply. Several programmatic long-standing shortage areas. As such, we
elements of the grants, however, could limit their recommend the Legislature reject the proposed
effects. Although teacher candidates agree to change to broaden the funding to other subject
teach in a low-income school to receive funding, areas as identified by CTC.
there is no guarantee they will ultimately teach at Target Classified Program to Shortage Areas.
a low-income school. For instance, the teacher Given the substantial demand for the Classified
candidate may not be able to secure employment Program, we recommend the Legislature approve
at a low-income school due to reasons beyond the Governor’s proposal to provide $25 million
their control. Furthermore, there is no guarantee for this program. In addition, we recommend
the teacher candidates would repay grant funding if several modifications to ensure the program is
they are unable to meet the program requirements. more directly targeted toward addressing teacher
Moreover, the effectiveness of this grant as a shortage areas. Specifically, we recommend giving
recruitment incentive is limited. For example, it is priority to districts with higher shares of teachers
2021-22 LAO Budget Series 5
analysis full
gutter
on emergency credentials and higher shares of low-income schools. Furthermore, the low-income
low-income students. After reviewing the findings schools intended to benefit from this program
of the forthcoming evaluation, the Legislature also have access to significant one-time federal funding
may want to revisit program rules in subsequent that provides broader flexibility to address these
years. long-standing recruitment challenges. Should the
Reject Golden State Teacher Grant Proposal. Legislature be interested in incentive funding for
We recommend the Legislature reject the teachers, we suggest focusing efforts on expanding
Governor’s proposal to augment the Golden State the total supply of teachers in shortage areas. For
Teacher Grant Program. Given that the first round instance, the Legislature could instead consider
of grant funding has not yet been allocated in the targeting funding to expand enrollment in the
current year, the effect of the program on teacher integrated teacher preparation programs at the
supply remains uncertain. Moreover, by mainly undergraduate level. Many other states currently
focusing on teacher candidates still in preparation offer this route into teaching. Under this approach,
programs prior to securing a teaching job, the the state could increase the total supply of teachers
proposal cannot guarantee that grant funds will by encouraging more undergraduate students to
effectively address recruitment challenges in pursue teaching in a high-need subject when they
might have otherwise pursued another profession.
Professional Development
Below, we provide background on professional local general purpose funding (mainly through
development for teachers, describe the Governor’s the Local Control Funding Formula). In addition,
proposals to provide additional professional the federal government provides $210 million
development for teachers and other school staff, to California annually to support professional
and offer issues for the Legislature to consider. development activities. All districts receive this
federal funding, but a majority of the funds go to
Background
low-income districts and schools. Additionally,
Professional Development Activities Are the state provides districts funding for mandated
Locally Determined and Funded. Teachers and school staff trainings on HIV prevention education
other school staff negotiate with their school and mandated reporting of child abuse.
district on the amount of required time dedicated Districts Have a Variety of Options for
to professional development each year. If these Providing Professional Development. School
activities occur when school is not in session, the districts have a variety of options for choosing
district typically compensates staff at a negotiated how to provide training and resources to their
hourly or daily rate. If teachers attend professional employees. Many districts develop their own
development during the school day, the district training and resources based on the specific
generally must pay the cost of hiring a substitute needs of their workforce. For example, some
teacher. The topics of the professional development districts set aside time for professional learning
also can be decided through collective bargaining. communities, where teachers from the same
Outside of the negotiated activities, teachers and grade level or subject area work collaboratively to
school staff may voluntarily participate in additional improve their teaching skills throughout the school
professional development opportunities. This time year. In addition, districts can obtain professional
may also be compensated as determined in the development from a variety of local and state
local collective bargaining agreement. educational agencies, public universities, and
Districts Receive Some Federal and State various agencies associated with the statewide
Funding for Professional Development. Districts system of support. For instance, the University of
primarily fund professional development through California receives $7.6 million ongoing (state and
2021-22 LAO Budget Series 6
analysis full
gutter
federal funds) to support professional development Issues for Legislative Consideration
in core subject areas through the Subject Matter
Block Grant Approach Would Give Districts
Projects. These options can be free of charge or on
Flexibility to Address Greatest Needs. In the fall
a fee-for-service basis. Districts also may receive
of 2019, the California Department of Education
training from various private entities, including
conducted a survey of school staff to identify the
private universities and nonprofit organizations.
key barriers to accessing professional development.
Governor’s Proposals Respondents most commonly identified a lack of
time as a major barrier, followed by the cost of
Provides $320 Million One Time for Various
participating in training. Under the Governor’s block
Professional Development Initiatives. Figure 3
grant proposal, districts would have flexible funding
summarizes the Governor’s professional
to help address these underlying challenges.
development proposals, which include both
For instance, districts can use this funding to
previously funded and new initiatives.
compensate staff for time spent on trainings and
Figure 3
Governor’s Budget Proposes $320 Million for Educator Professional Development
One-Time Proposition 98 Unless Otherwise Indicated (In Millions)
Proposed
Program Proposal Amount
Previously Funded
Educator Effectiveness Provides grants to schools based on counts of teachers (estimated to be $800 per teacher). $250
Block Grant Funds could be used for training in a broad array of topics, including core academic subjects,
social‑emotional learning, school climate, inclusive practices, and English learner supports.
Available through 2024‑25. Last funded in 2015‑16.
30
MTSSa Provides schools grants to support MTSS implementation, including site‑specific coaching and
staff compensation to complete training. Last funded in 2018‑19.
8
Early Math Initiative Funds development of training and resources to improve math skills for children age eight and
under. Received federal funding in 2018‑19.
7
University of California Provides $5 million for teacher training on learning recovery in core subject areas (such as math
Subject Matter Projects and language arts) and $2 million for training in ethnic studies. Received federal funding in
2020‑21. This program also receives $7.6 million ongoing through a mix of federal and state
funds.
Subtotal ($295)
Newly Funded
Social-emotional learning Provides funding to Orange and Butte COEs, in partnership with another educational entity or $20
consortia, to develop resources, convene professional learning communities, and provide
ongoing training on social‑emotional learning and trauma‑informed practices.
Ethnic studies Provides funding for one or more COEs to provide training on developing or expanding ethnic 5
studies courses, including those aligned with the Model Curriculum to be adopted by SBE by
March 31, 2021.
Subtotal ($25)
Total $320
a
MTSS is framework that integrates academic, social, and behavioral interventions in a multitiered approach. The broadest tier provides general supports for all students, with tiers
escalating in intervention based on student needs.
MTSS = multitiered system of support; COEs = county offices of education; and SBE = State Board of Education.
2021-22 LAO Budget Series 7
analysis full
gutter
cover other associated training costs. By providing for example, provides training resources in an
some flexibility over the focus of trainings, this area where relatively few training resources exist.
approach also allows for professional development Providing training on the forthcoming ethnic studies
to be targeted to areas that would most benefit the model curriculum is reasonable, given elements of
teachers and other staff at each local school. the guidance will be new to schools. We are less
Recent Federal Funds Could Also Support clear, however, on how the funding for Subject
Professional Development Activities. Since the Matter Projects would address existing gaps. The
recent federal funds can also support professional proposal includes $5 million for learning recovery
development activities, the Legislature may in core subject areas, but it is unclear how this
want to consider how the Governor’s proposals would differ from other training currently provided
complement these funds and other funding through the program. Furthermore, the $2 million
dedicated to professional development. Providing provided to the Subject Matter Projects for ethnic
block grant funding specifically for professional studies appears duplicative of the Governor’s other
development would allow districts to use federal or proposal on ethnic studies.
local funds for other local activities. Alternatively, Consider Requiring Clear Deliverables and
the Legislature could provide less funding for Expectations Tied With Funding for Targeted
professional development and direct schools to Proposals. The Governor’s budget includes very
rely on existing federal and local funds to cover few details on the deliverables and expected
these activities. This would free up one-time activities to be funded under the subject-specific
Proposition 98 funds that the Legislature could proposals. For instance, the Early Math Initiative
dedicate to its other K-12 priorities. proposal does not specify the types of activities
Most Targeted Proposals Are Addressing to be supported with additional funding. The
Specific Gaps in Training. Given most decisions Subject Matter Projects proposal does not clarify
about professional development are made locally, how the proposed one-time augmentation would
we think directing most professional development be used differently than ongoing funding currently
funding to districts makes sense. To the extent the provided to the program. The proposed funding for
Legislature wants to dedicate state-level funding social-emotional learning also lacks detail regarding
to develop additional training resources, we think it the level of support this funding would provide for
should consider whether the additional resources schools. The Legislature may want to establish a
are addressing existing gaps in training. Most of clear set of deliverables and expectations for each
the targeted proposals in the Governor’s budget proposal that is approved to ensure funds are spent
address existing gaps. The Early Math Initiative, as intended and achieve the desired outcomes.
2021-22 LAO Budget Series 8
analysis full
gutter
LAO Publications
This report was prepared by Amy Li, and reviewed by Edgar Cabral and Anthony Simbol. The Legislative Analyst’s
Office (LAO) is a nonpartisan office that provides fiscal and policy information and advice to the Legislature.
2021-22 LAO Budget Series 9