LAO
The 2022-23 Budget: CalHR California Leads Proposal
Read the report at Legislative Analyst's Office ↗
The 2022-23 Budget:
CalHR California Leads Proposal
FEBRUARY 2022
Summary. In this post, we analyze the terminating state civil service employees. The State
Governor’s proposal to provide 43 permanent Personnel Board is tasked by the Constitution to
positions and $7.6 million ($6.3 million General oversee the implementation of the merit principle
Fund) in 2022-23 and $6.8 million ($5.5 million in state government.
General Fund) ongoing for the Department of State Jobs Organized Into Classifications
Human Resources (CalHR) to implement specific That Establish Salary Ranges. The state civil
proposals recommended by a taskforce established service is comprised of more than 240,000 full-time
by the Governor aimed at finding ways to make the equivalent employees. These employees work in a
state a better employer. As part of this initiative, the variety of jobs across state government. State jobs
proposal would seek to improve statewide data on are organized into about 4,500 classifications.
the workforce to inform a statewide diversity, equity, Each classification defines the minimum
and inclusion strategy. We recommend that the qualifications needed for a candidate to be hired or
Legislature approve the proposal and encourage the promoted. In addition, a salary range is established
Legislature to exercise ongoing legislative oversight for each classification. These salary ranges
of the process to ensure that the administration’s determine the minimum and maximum salaries that
policies meet legislative objectives and priorities. an employee may earn in that job classification.
CalHR Oversees Non-Merit Personnel
Background
Policies. CalHR is responsible for managing
Civil Service Based on Merit Principle.
non-merit-related state personnel policies, including
California’s current system of state civil service
issues related to recruitment, selection, salaries,
employment dates back to the November 1934
benefits, position classification, and training.
election, when voters approved Proposition 7,
In addition, as we discuss in greater detail below,
adding what is now Article VII to the State
CalHR represents the Governor in the collective
Constitution. The Constitution requires that all
bargaining process and reports information to the
appointments and promotions within the civil
Legislature about the state workforce. In 2021-22,
service be made under a general system based
CalHR’s budget comprised $119.3 million
on merit determined by competitive examination.
($13.7 million General Fund) and 372.9 positions.
All state employees are in the civil service unless
Collective Bargaining Process Determines
specifically exempted by the Constitution. As a
Changes in Salaries. The Ralph C. Dills Act
result, practically all of the state’s non-higher
authorizes collective bargaining between state
education executive branch employees—outside
employees and the Governor. The state’s
of the very top ranks of management (such as
4,500 job classifications are organized into
department directors and deputy directors)—are
21 bargaining units. Each bargaining unit is
in the civil service. In the more than 80 years since
represented by a union in the collective bargaining
the voters first established the civil service, a variety
process. The Governor is represented by CalHR.
of statutes, decisions, rules, practices, and case
Through the collective bargaining process, the
law have built upon the constitutional framework
state and its employees agree to terms and
of a merit-based civil service system. Collectively,
conditions of employment, including salary
these civil service rules establish the state’s
increases that increase the salary ranges of state
policies for hiring, promoting, disciplining, and
job classifications.
2022-23 Budget Series
1
CalHR Reports on Specific Demographic Hiring and Training Processes. The proposal
Information of the State Workforce. Through includes components, discussed below, intended to
statute, CalHR is required to submit to the Legislature improve the state’s hiring process and trainings.
reports regarding demographic information about the
• Adopt Anonymous Hiring (Three Positions).
state workforce. These reports include the Annual
In an effort to remove implicit bias from
Census of Employees in State Civil Service (fulfilling
the hiring decision-making process, the
requirements established under Government Code
administration proposes adopting an
Sections 19237; 19402; 19405; 19792 subdivisions
anonymous hiring process whereby certain
(h), (i), and (j); and 19792.5 subdivisions (a) and (b);
personal information from job applicants’
and 19793) and the Women’s Earnings in State Civil
resumes or applications would be redacted
Service report (in accordance with Section 19827.2
prior to hiring managers viewing the
of the Government Code). In addition, the CalHR
documents Implementing this policy would
website includes demographic statistical reports for
require updates to the Examination and
each department as well as statewide (these data
Certification Online System.
are compiled as part of a requirement established
• Establish Statewide Apprenticeship
under Section 19797 of the Government Code that
Programs (Ten Positions). The state currently
each state department annually update and assess
has very limited apprenticeships available that
its equal employment opportunity plan, including
are targeted to state service jobs—generally
identifying racial/ethnic and gender groups that are
limited to trades, like mechanics. Under the
underrepresented in the department).
proposal, CalHR would work to develop more
“California Leads as an Employer” Taskforce.
varied apprenticeship programs in an effort
In September 2019, the Governor established a
to establish a pipeline for job applicants who
taskforce to provide recommendations to improve
historically have been underrepresented in
the state workplace across four areas: sexual
certain job classifications.
harassment and discrimination prevention and
• Update CalCareers (Three Positions).
response, diversity and inclusion, public safety
CalCareers is the online portal used by job
diversity, and racial and gender pay equity.
applicants to search and apply for state jobs.
The taskforce consisted of representatives from
Under the proposal, CalHR would make a
within the executive branch of state government.
number of updates to the system intended to
The taskforce submitted its recommendations to
make the system more user-friendly, secure,
the Governor in July 2021. The recommendations
and accessible.
that the taskforce made to the Governor are not
• Statewide Employee Engagement Program
public; however, the administration indicates that
(Three Positions). Employee engagement is
the proposal discussed in this analysis is based on
important because it improves employee morale
a number of those recommendations.
and general job satisfaction. The administration
Proposal proposes developing a statewide employee
engagement program.
Proposal to Begin Diversity, Equity, and
Inclusion Effort in the State Workforce. • Establish Equal Employment and
The administration requests 43 permanent positions Opportunity Academy (Four Positions).
and $7.6 million ($6.3 million General Fund) in In an effort to keep equal employment
2022-23 and $6.8 million ($5.5 million General opportunity professionals in state government
Fund) ongoing in order for CalHR to implement apprised of employment and civil rights laws,
specific policy recommendations proposed by the the administration proposes establishing an
administration’s taskforce. We provide a high-level academy that will provide trainings to these
summary of the major components of the proposal individuals and provide ongoing guidance
below. The overarching goal of these proposals is to departments on departmental policies.
to take initial steps towards making the state a more The proposal highlights seven specific training
equitable, diverse, and inclusive place to work. courses that CalHR would develop and provide.
2022-23 Budget Series
2
Improvements to Data Collection and Especially considering the sheer size of state
Systems. The proposal includes components, government along with the more rigid and
discussed below, intended to improve state bureaucratic nature of the state civil service, taking a
human resources data collection, maintenance, multipronged approach to address diversity, equity,
and analysis. and inclusion in the state workplace makes sense.
• Create New Unit to Collect and Analyze The administration’s intention of making this an
Data (Seven Positions). The administration iterative process also makes sense. Much of the
proposes establishing a new unit under work proposed under this request could inform future
CalHR’s Financial Management Division. policies and initiatives to advance the overall goal of
The unit would focus on collecting and making the state a better place to work. From the
analyzing demographic and other data perspective of legislative oversight, this has an added
to support the administration’s efforts to benefit of giving the Legislature multiple opportunities
establish a diverse and inclusive workforce. to evaluate the progress the administration is making
In the short term, the unit would focus on towards its goals. Our comments below focus on the
gender and racial pay equity issues across data collection efforts under the proposal because
all classifications and all departments. we think that any successful effort to establish a
statewide diversity, equity, and inclusion strategy
• Improving Statewide Tracking of
would require significant improvements to the data
Training (Three Positions). Currently,
currently collected.
a centralized record of what trainings an
employee has received during their state Existing Data Are Problematic… Federal law
service is not accessible to all departments. (Public Law 88-352, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
The administration proposes creating a 1964) requires each state and local government to
system that would allow all departments to maintain specific demographic data on its workforce
share and access employee training history. to report these data to the U.S. Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission. The data that CalHR
Development of Diversity, Equity, and
currently collects and makes public about the
Inclusion Strategic Plan (Five Positions).
demographic composition of the state civil service
The administration intends to use much of the
are collected using a form (known as CalHR Form
lessons it learns through the establishment of
1070) designed to comply with federal law. This
the above described initiatives to develop a
form asks employees to identify their gender—either
statewide strategic plan aimed at making the
“male” or “female”—and their race/ethnicity. When
state a diverse, equitable, and inclusive place to
identifying their race/ethnicity, employees may
work. As this plan is developed, we anticipate
only select one option from among 20 categories,
that the administration would submit more budget
including “multiple races (non-Hispanic or Latino).”
requests to the Legislature.
There is no “other” or “not listed” option. In addition,
an employee can choose to not self-identify.
LAO Comments
However, the form specifies that, if an employee
Proposal Reflects Start of a Multipronged
does not self-identify, “the department is required to
and Multiyear Initiative to Address Big Issue.
visually identify under federal law.” The data collected
This request is a major budgetary request for
using this form are problematic for a few reasons.
CalHR and initiates a process for major policy
First, the race/ethnicity and gender options available
changes in the department’s role in overseeing
might not reflect how the employee actually identifies.
the state’s workforce. The request attempts to
For example, there is no option for an employee
improve or establish a variety of state programs
who identifies their gender to be non-binary or
with the overarching aim of making the state a
for an employee to identify their race/ethnicity as
better employer and making the state workforce
Middle Eastern/North African. Second, there is no
more representative of the public that it serves.
standardized guidance given to departments as
to how they should visually identify employees.
2022-23 Budget Series
3
The form states that “if you elect not to provide the Administration’s Proposal Should Allow
information requested, CalHR will not be able to for Better Data and Analyses Going Forward
effectively evaluate the representation of the state to Inform State Policy. A major feature of this
civil service workforce.” The administration indicates proposal is that it should allow the state to collect
that, as of January 31, 2022, 14 percent of state better data. These improved data would allow
employees’ race/ethnicity was visually identified the state to better identify where there might be
by management. diversity issues with the state’s recruiting, hiring,
…But Identify Potential Issues of Diversity in and promoting processes. This proposal in and
the Workforce. Notwithstanding the problematic of itself would not lead to the implementation
origins of some of the demographic data collected of a plan to address any diversity, equity, and
by CalHR, a number of observations can be made inclusion issues, however. Instead, we understand
that suggest the state can improve racial/ethnic that this proposal would lead to improved data
and gender representation in the state service. collection and analysis that would, in turn, identify
Overall, the state workforce is not representative issues—either within certain classifications or more
of the demographic composition of the state broadly—and inform future proposals submitted
population. For example, although Hispanic or to the Legislature by the administration. In other
Latino people accounted for 37 percent of the state words, this is the first in likely a series of requests
working-age population in 2021, only 26 percent of from the administration to implement a broader, yet
state employees were identified to be Hispanic or to be fully defined, initiative to improve the diversity,
Latino at that time. Some classifications have higher equity, and inclusivity of the state workforce.
concentrations of different racial/ethnic groups than
LAO Recommendations
others. For example, although 40 percent of the entire
Approve Proposal. We raise no objections
state workforce was White in 2021, 68 percent of the
to the merits of the proposal and think that
state’s firefighters were White at that time. Similarly,
it is a reasonable first step in identifying and
although 26 percent of the state workforce was
addressing diversity, equity, and inclusion issues in
identified as Hispanic or Latino in 2021, 49 percent
the state workforce. However, the administration’s
of correctional officers were Hispanic or Latino at
work in developing this diversity, equity, and
that time.
inclusion policy is in its infancy. As such, as we
There also is significant variation in gender diversity
discuss below, we think that legislative oversight
by classification. Specifically, certain classifications
of the process as CalHR more fully develops
are more or less likely to be filled by men or
the state’s specific policies in this area will be
women. For example, in 2021, 75 percent of the
very important.
31,347 state jobs that were considered to be office
Provide Legislative Oversight of Process.
and administrative support occupations were filled by
This proposal, in conjunction with four other
women while 86 percent of the 43,980 state jobs that
proposals to augment CalHR’s budget, constitute
were considered to be protective service occupations
a significant increase in CalHR’s resources and
were filled by men. Because compensation in
staffing levels in 2022-23. Relative to 2021-22, these
state employment is determined by an employee’s
proposals would increase CalHR’s appropriation
classification, the fact that demographic trends vary
authority by 15 percent and its position authority
across state classifications means that compensation
by 22 percent—a large and fast increase in staffing.
varies across state employees, depending on their
While we understand the proposal is informed by
race/ethnicity and gender. For example, the most
the findings of the California Leads as an Employer
recent Women’s Earnings in State Civil Service
taskforce, because the full taskforce report is not
report identified that the median woman in state
publicly available, assessing how the administration
service earns about 14 percent less than the median
decided to pursue certain policy recommendations
man in state service. The report explains that this
from the report over others is difficult. Because
pay gap exists primarily because women tend to
the proposal is to fund the initial stages of what
work in classifications that are lower paid than the
ultimately would be a more developed initiative,
classifications that men dominate.
we anticipate that the administration will submit
2022-23 Budget Series
4
additional proposals related to diversity, equity, the positions requested for 2022-23; (2) its progress
and inclusion in the state workforce over the next in developing a diversity, equity, and inclusion
several years. The policies that will be developed in strategy; (3) any changes it would recommend to
the future as a result of this proposal likely will have existing legislative reporting requirements of CalHR
significant implications for the state as an employer. regarding the demographic makeup of the state
As such, we think it is important that the Legislature workforce in light of new data made available from the
actively oversee the development of this policy implementation of this proposal; (4) any challenges
going forward. it experiences in the implementation of the initial
Due to the iterative nature of this initiative—and stages of the initiative; and (5) what the administration
its current early stage of development—going sees as its next steps in its overarching plan to
forward, we recommend that the Legislature make the state a better employer. Going forward, we
require regular, reporting on its progress. recommend that the Legislature continue to require
Specifically, we recommend that the Legislature the administration to provide regular reporting on the
require the administration to report to the Legislature progress of this initiative.
on or before January 10, 2023 (1) its progress in filling
2022-23 Budget Series
5
2022-23 Budget Series
6
2022-23 Budget Series
7
LAO PUBLICATIONS
This post was prepared by Nick Schroeder, and reviewed by Ginni Bella Navarre and Carolyn Chu. The Legislative
Analyst’s Office (LAO) is a nonpartisan office that provides fiscal and policy information and advice to the Legislature.
2022-23 Budget Series
8