All bodies  ›  Legislative Analyst's Office  ›  The 2025-26 California Spending Plan: Proposition 4

LAO

The 2025-26 California Spending Plan: Proposition 4

Legislative Analyst's Office · lao-5076 · Post · 2025-10-16

The 2025-26 California Spending Plan: Proposition 4 Translate Our Website This Google ™ translation feature provided on the Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO) website is for informational purposes only. The LAO is unable to guarantee the accuracy of this translation and is therefore not liable for any inaccurate information resulting from the translation application tool. Choose your language: × Skip to main content Home --> Policy Areas Capital Outlay, Infrastructure Criminal Justice Economy and Taxes Education Environment and Natural Resources Health and Human Services Local Government State Budget Condition Transportation Other Government Areas Publications The Budget Propositions and Initiatives Staff Careers About Us Search LAO Contacts Rachel Ehlers Sonja Petek Helen Kerstein Brian Metzker Gokce Sencan See More Publications Like This Back to the Top --> Tweet October 16, 2025 The 2025-26 California Spending Plan Proposition 4 Introduction In July 2024, the Legislature approved Chapter 83 (SB 867, Allen), authorizing a $10 billion bond measure entitled the Safe Drinking Water, Wildfire Prevention, Drought Preparedness, and Clean Air Bond Act of 2024. Largely designed to increase the state s resilience to the impacts of climate change, the measure was placed on the statewide ballot as Proposition 4 and subsequently approved by voters in November. This bond measure builds on significant funding for climate-related programs principally from the General Fund the state made in recent years. This post describes the first year of implementation funding for Proposition 4 as authorized by the 2025-26 budget package. We begin with a high-level summary, then provide an overview of each of the major Proposition 4 categories. Overview Budget Package Provides $3.5 Billion for First Year of Proposition 4 Implementation. As shown in Figure 1, the budget package authorizes the state to spend $3.5 billion, or slightly more than one-third, of the $10 billion climate bond in 2025-26. This amount was approved via three different 2025 budget actions: (1) $181 million provided through Chapter 2 (AB 100, Gabriel) in April 2025 (these funds were available for departments to spend during the final few months of 2024-25), (2) $2.9 million through Chapter 5 (AB 102, Gabriel), and (3) $3.3 billion through Chapter 104 (SB 105, Weiner). This total is higher than the $2.7 billion the administration had proposed in the January budget proposal , reflecting legislative augmentations. As shown in the figure, the proportion of total bond funding provided in 2025-26 varies by category, with notably higher shares for Park Creation and Outdoor Access and Climate Smart Agriculture compared to Coastal Resilience and Extreme Heat Mitigation. In most cases, the rationale for providing no appropriation or only a small amount of funding for certain programs in 2025-26 is because departments need to substantively update program guidelines or develop a new program, or because funding still is available for similar purposes from previous budget appropriations. Figure 1 Proposition 4 Expenditure Plan: 2025 26 Budget Package (Dollars in Millions) Category Bond Total 2025 26 Percent of Total Safe Drinking Water, Drought, Flood, and Water Resilience $3,800 $1,199 32% Wildfire and Forest Resilience 1,500 598 a 40 Coastal Resilience 1,200 279 23 Biodiversity and Nature Based Climate Solutions 1,200 390 33 Clean Energy 850 275 33 Park Creation and Outdoor Access 700 466 67 Extreme Heat Mitigation 450 110 25 Climate Smart Agriculture 300 153 51 Totals $10,000 $3,470 35% a $181 million of this amount was provided through Chapter 2 of 2025 (AB 100, Gabriel) and was available for administering departments to expend beginning in April 2025. Some Funding Will Help Offset Impacts of General Fund Reductions. To help address the state s budget deficit, the Governor proposed reducing about $300 million from nine prior General Fund appropriations for environmental programs and providing at least as much funding from Proposition 4 for similar activities. The final budget package includes both these reductions and bond allocations. As such, the bond funds will help mitigate the programmatic impacts of the state providing less General Fund than it had originally planned for certain activities. In some cases, however, the bond-supported programs and, therefore, the projects that ultimately will end up being funded may differ slightly from those that might have been funded with the General Fund, so this approach does not represent a dollar-for-dollar backfill in all cases. Please see our companion post, The 2025-26 Spending Plan: Natural Resources and Environmental Protection, for a list of the reductions. Timing for Future Allocations of Funding Still to Be Determined. The Governor s Proposition 4 proposal had presented a multiyear spending approach that included both 2025-26 appropriations and planned amounts for future years through 2039-40. In contrast, the final budget package only approves the initial year of Proposition 4 funding. Approves New Staff to Administer Bond Programs. The budget package also authorizes nearly 80 new positions across 12 departments to administer Proposition 4-funded programs, as displayed in Figure 2. As shown, the number of new positions range from 13 at the Department of Conservation to one each at the Tahoe Conservancy and California Conservation Corps. The number of new positions for a particular department depends both on the amount of workload anticipated in 2025-26 as well as the degree to which the department had preexisting positions that can be redirected to work on Proposition 4. Many departments those shown in the figure as well as others will rely on existing authorized positions that previously were funded with other sources (such as prior bonds) to help implement Proposition 4 programs. Both the new and existing positions working on Proposition 4 programs will be paid for using a portion of the bond funds approved in 2025-26. (As of this writing, the administration was still developing department-specific position and funding totals associated with administering Proposition 4 in 2025-26.) Figure 2 Budget Package Approves New Positions to Implement Proposition 4 Department Number of New Positions Department of Conservation 13.0 California Department of Fish and Wildlife 12.0 California Energy Commission 11.5 Department of Parks and Recreation 10.0 California Department of Food and Agriculture 9.0 California Natural Resources Agency 6.0 Wildlife Conservation Board 5.0 Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation 4.0 Governor’s Office of Emergency Services 4.0 Department of Water Resources 3.0 Tahoe Conservancy 1.0 California Conservation Corps 1.0 Total 79.5 Budget Trailer Legislation Authorizes Emergency Rulemaking to Accelerate Implementation. In order to help expedite bond implementation, budget trailer legislation Chapter 106 of 2025 (AB 149, Committee on Budget) authorizes administering departments to use emergency regulations to develop and adopt guidelines and selection criteria for Proposition 4-funded programs. This will allow departments to move more quickly compared to if they had to adopt regulations following the normal process set forth in the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), but is not as streamlined as the Governor s initial proposal to exempt Proposition 4 programs from the APA altogether. Summary of Specific Spending Categories Safe Drinking Water, Drought, Flood, and Water Resilience As shown in Figure 3, the spending plan includes $1.2 billion in 2025-26 or about one-third of the $3.8 billion authorized by Proposition 4 for water-related activities. The largest appropriations are $232 million (49 percent of the bond total) for the Dam Safety and Climate Resilience Local Assistance Program administered by the Department of Water Resources (DWR); $183 million (32 percent) for water quality and safe drinking water, administered by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); and $153 million (40 percent) for water use and recycling, also administered by SWRCB. Some of the funding for dam safety and water recycling replaces prior General Fund support that was reduced to help solve the 2025-26 budget deficit. Another notable appropriation is $123 million (83 percent of the total) for DWR s Flood Control Subventions Program. Proposition 4 dedicates $160 million for Salton Sea restoration projects and $10 million to establish a Salton Sea Conservancy pursuant to Chapter 771 of 2024 (SB 583, Padilla); the 2025-26 spending plan appropriates $148 million to DWR for restoration projects and $1.6 million for the new conservancy. Figure 3 Proposition 4 Expenditure Plan: Safe Drinking Water, Drought, Flood, Water Resilience (Dollars in Millions) Purpose Code Section Implementing Departments Bond Total 2025 26 Amount Percent of Bond Total a Water Quality, Safe Drinking Water $610 $194 32% Water quality, safe drinking water 91011(a) SWRCB $585 $183 32 Tribal water infrastructure 91011(a)(8)(B) SWRCB 25 11 45 Flood Risk and Stormwater Management $1,140 $419 37% Sacramento San Joaquin Delta levees 91021(a) DWR $150 — — Flood Control Subventions Program 91021(b) DWR 150 123 83% State Plan of Flood Control projects 91021(c) DWR 250 63 25 Dam safety 91022 DWR 480 232 49 Urban stormwater management 91023 SWRCB 110 1 1 Rivers, Lakes, Streams; Watershed Resilience $605 $238 40% Integrated regional water management 91031 DWR $100 $0.5 0.5% Los Angeles River Watershed—Lower 91032(a) RMC 40 0.6 2 Los Angeles River Watershed—Upper 91032(b) SMMC 40 20 51 Riverine Stewardship Program 91032(c) DWR 50 1.1 2 Santa Ana River Conservancy Program 91032(d) SCC 25 10 41 Urban Streams Restoration Program 91032(e) DWR 25 1.3 5 Wildlife refuges and wetland habitat areas 91032(f) CNRA 25 0.2 1 Lower American River Conservancy Program 91032(g) WCB 10 3 30 Coyote Valley Conservation Program 91032(h) SCC 25 3 12 West Coyote Hills Program 91032(i) SCC 25 — — California Mexico rivers and coastal waters 91032(j) SWRCB 50 47 94 Clear Lake Watershed 91032(k) CNRA 20 1.9 10 Salton Sea Management Program 91033(a) DWR/CNRA 160 148 93 Salton Sea Conservancy 91033(b) SSC 10 1.6 17 Streamflow Enhancement Program $150 $31 21% Streamflow Enhancement Program 91040(a) WCB $100 $21 21% Habitat Enhancement and Restoration Program 91040(b) WCB 50 11 21 Other $1,295 $317 25% Groundwater management 91012(a) DWR $386 $30 8% Multibenefit Land Repurposing Program 91013 DOC 200 32 16 Water reuse and recycling 91014 SWRCB 386 153 40 Water Storage Investment Program 91015 CWC 75 74 100 Brackish desalination, salinty management 91016 DWR 63 0.2 0.3 Water data management, stream gages 91017 SWRCB/DWR 15 8 56 Regional conveyance projects and repairs 91018 DWR 75 2.7 4 Water conservation—agricultural and urban 91019 DWR 75 0.3 0.5 Nature and climate education and research 91045 CNRA 20 15.1 76 Totals $3,800 $1,199 32% a Percent of total available funding after accounting for estimated statewide bond costs (which the administration estimates at less than 1 percent). Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding. SWRCB = State Water Resources Control Board; DWR = Department of Water Resources; RMC = San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy; SMMC = Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy; SCC = State Coastal Conservancy; CNRA = California Natural Resources Agency; WCB = Wildlife Conservation Board; SSC = Salton Sea Conservancy; DOC = Department of Conservation; and CWC = California Water Commission. Wildfire and Forest Resilience Proposition 4 includes a total of $1.5 billion for a variety of activities related to wildfire and forest resilience. Figure 4 shows how the budget appropriates $598 million 40 percent of this total in 2025-26. The largest category of funding is $200 million for six state conservancies and two other recipients the Wildfire Conservancy and California Fire Foundation to improve and restore chaparral landscapes, forests, and watersheds in the state. The Legislature enacted AB 100 in April 2025, which included $171 million of the $200 million in this category. That allowed these funds to be available for expenditure starting in the latter part of 2024-25. Other large categories of funding include $92 million for the forest health program, including $10 million from AB 100 for a fire resiliency center to be run by the Karuk Tribe (which was also available starting in April 2025); $91 million for regional projects implemented by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy (SMMC), and Sierra Nevada Conservancy; and $81 million for local fire prevention grants. Figure 4 Proposition 4 Expenditure Plan: Wildfire and Forest Resilience (Dollars in Millions) Purpose Code Section Implementing Departments Bond Total 2025 26 Amount Percent of Bond Total a Wildfire Mitigation Grant Program 91510 OES $135 $13 10% Regional Forest and Fire Capacity Program 91520(a) DOC 185 10 5 Regional projects 91520(b) CalFire, SNC, SMMC 170 91 b 53 Forest health program 91520(c) CalFire 175 92 c 52 Local fire prevention grants 91520(d) CalFire 185 81 44 Fire training center 91520(e) CalFire 25 3 10 Forest health and watershed projects 91520(f) Parks 200 33 17 Fuel reduction, structure hardening, defensible space, reforestation, acquisitions 91520(g) CalFire 50 30 60 Watershed improvement, forest health, biomass utilization, chaparral and forest restoration, and workforce development 91520(h) SNC 34 31 d 92 91520(i) TC 26 24 d 92 91520(j) SMMC 34 32 d 94 91520(k) SCC 34 31 d 92 91520(l) RMC 34 31 d 92 91520(m) SDRC 26 24 d 92 91520(n) WC 15 14 d 93 91520(o) CFF 15 14 d 93 Infrastructure for vegetative waste 91530 DOC 50 11 21 Fire ignition detection technology 91535 CalFire 25 23 92 Reducing risk from electricity transmission 91540 TBD 35 — — Demonstrated jobs projects 91545(a) CCC 50 10 20 Totals $1,500 $598 40% a Percent of total available funding after accounting for estimated statewide bond costs (which the administration estimates at less than 1 percent). b Of the $91 million for regional projects in 2025 26, CalFire receives $31 million, SNC receives $45 million, and SMMC receives $15 million. c Of the $92 million for the forest health program in 2025 26, $10 million was included for the Karuk Tribe fire resiliency center from Chapter 2 of 2025 (AB 100, Gabriel) and was available to expend beginning in April 2025. d Provided through AB 100 starting in April 2025. OES = Governor’s Office of Emergency Services; DOC = Department of Conservation; CalFire = California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection; SNC = Sierra Nevada Conservancy; SMMC = Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy; Parks = Department of Parks and Recreation; TC = Tahoe Conservancy; SCC = State Coastal Conservancy; RMC = San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy; SDRC = San Diego River Conservancy; WC = Wildfire Conservancy; CFF = California Fire Foundation; TBD = to be determined; and CCC = California Conservation Corps. Coastal Resilience Proposition 4 authorizes a total of $1.2 billion for coastal resilience activities. As shown in Figure 5, the 2025-26 spending plan includes $279 million, or about one-quarter of the total. Much of this funding will flow through the State Coastal Conservancy, including: $63 million (19 percent of the total in the bond) for coastal resilience projects and programs; $41 million (48 percent) for sea-level rise, flood management, and wetland restoration projects in the San Francisco Bay Area; and $36 million (48 percent) for dam removal and water infrastructure, including $5.5 million for the Potter Valley Project in Mendocino County and $20 million for the Matilija Dam removal in Ventura County. The spending plan also includes $43 million for the Ocean Protection Council $23 million for ocean and coastal resilience and $20 million to continue implementation of Chapter 236 of 2021 (SB 1, Atkins) related to sea-level rise planning. Figure 5 Proposition 4 Expenditure Plan: Coastal Resilience (Dollars in Millions) Purpose Code Section Implementing Departments Bond Total 2025 26 Amount Percent of Bond Total a Coastal resilience projects and programs 92010(a) SCC $330 $63 19% San Francisco Bay programs 92010(b) SCC 85 41 48 Coastal/flood management for developed shoreline 92015 SCC 350 33 10 Ocean and coastal resilience 92020 OPC 135 23 17 Implementing SB 1 92030 OPC 75 20 27 Implementing Sea Level Rise Adaptation Strategy 92040 Parks 50 24 48 Island ecosystems; fisheries; kelp ecosystems 92050 CDFW/CNRA 75 36 48 Dam removal and water infrastructure 92060 SCC 75 35 46 Hatchery upgrades, Central Valley Chinook salmon 92070 CDFW 25 5 20 Totals $1,200 $279 23% a Percent of total available funding after accounting for estimated statewide bond costs (which the administration estimates at less than 1 percent). Note: Numbers may not add due to rounding. SCC = State Coastal Conservancy; OPC = Ocean Protection Council; SB 1 = Chapter 236 of 2021 (SB 1, Atkins); Parks = Department of Parks and Recreation; CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife; and CNRA = California Natural Resources Agency. Biodiversity and Nature-Based Climate Solutions Proposition 4 includes a total of $1.2 billion for a variety of activities related to supporting biodiversity and nature-based climate activities. Figure 6 shows how the budget appropriates $390 million one-third of this total in 2025-26. The largest category of funding is $256 million for the Wildlife Conservation Board to support projects that protect and enhance fish and wildlife resources and habitats. Assembly Bill 149 allocates $20 million from this category to address invasive mussel infestations, such as the golden mussel, and makes some associated policy changes to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife s (CDFW s) mussel prevention programs. Another large category of funding includes $84 million allocated across nine state conservancies to increase the public s access to and reduce the climate change impacts on communities, fish and wildlife, and natural resources. Figure 6 Proposition 4 Expenditure Plan: Biodiversity and Nature Based Climate Solutions (Dollars in Millions) Purpose Code Section Implementing Department Bond Total 2025 26 Amount Percent of Bond Total a Fish and Wildlife Resources and Habitats $870 $297 34% Fish and wildlife resources and habitats 93010 WCB $668 $256 39% Wildlife crossings and corridors 93030 WCB 100 21 21 San Andreas Corridor Program 93030 WCB 80 — — Southern Ballona Creek watershed 93050 WCB 22 20 92 Climate Change Risk Reduction and Public Access b $320 $84 26% Baldwin Hills Conservancy 93020(a)(1) $48 $13 27% California Tahoe Conservancy 93020(a)(2) 29 5 19 Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy 93020(a)(3) 11 2 21 Sacramento San Joaquin Delta Conservancy 93020(a)(4) 29 4 15 San Diego River Conservancy 93020(a)(5) 48 8 17 San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy 93020(a)(6) 48 10 22 San Joaquin River Conservancy 93020(a)(7) 11 5 49 Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy 93020(a)(8) 48 25 53 Sierra Nevada Conservancy 93020(a)(9) 48 10 21 Tribal Nature Based Solutions $10 $9 95% Tribal Nature Based Solutions Program 93040 CNRA $10 $9 95% Totals $1,200 $390 33% a Percent of total available funding after accounting for estimated statewide bond costs (which the administration estimates at less than 1 percent). b The applicable conservancy is the implementing department. WCB = Wildlife Conservation Board and CNRA = California Natural Resources Agency. Clean Energy Proposition 4 includes a total of $850 million for activities related to clean energy. As shown in Figure 7, the 2025-26 budget allocates roughly one-third of this total $275 million to the California Energy Commission (CEC) in 2025-26, primarily to support port infrastructure needed for the development of wind turbines off the California coast. Of the $228 million for offshore wind, $43 million is provided to backfill a reduction of a like amount of General Fund that the Legislature had appropriated for the Offshore Wind Waterfront Facility Improvement Program in 2022-23 and then reduced through this year s budget package. The budget bill also includes language requiring CEC to report by January 10, 2026 on the use of Proposition 4 funds for offshore wind. The rest of the funding provided in 2025-26 $47 million is directed to the Distributed Energy Backup Assets (DEBA) program to support microgrids and various clean energy and storage projects. The budget bill prioritizes these dollars for projects receiving federal funding, including reserving $12.5 million of the total DEBA funding to pay for the cost share for water utility projects that have received U.S. Department of Energy Grid Resilience and Innovation Partnerships program grants. The budget package defers allocation of the $325 million included in the bond for energy transmission projects to a future year. Figure 7 Proposition 4 Expenditure Plan: Clean Energy (Dollars in Millions) Purpose Code Section Implementing Departments Bond Total 2025 26 Amount Percent of Bond Total a Public financing of transmission projects 94520 TBD $325 — — Distributed Energy Backup Assets 94530 CEC 50 $47 93% Development of offshore wind generation 94540 CEC 475 228 48 Totals $850 $275 32% a Percent of total available funding after accounting for estimated statewide bond costs (which the administration estimates at less than 1 percent). TBD = to be determined and CEC = California Energy Commission. Park Creation and Outdoor Access Proposition 4 includes a total of $700 million for a variety of activities related to supporting park creation and outdoor access activities. Figure 8 shows how the budget appropriates $466 million about two-thirds of this total in 2025-26. The largest category of funding is $190 million for the Statewide Parks Program, to be implemented by the Department of Parks and Recreation (Parks) likely through its Statewide Park Development and Community Revitalization Program. Other large categories of funding include $119 million for projects largely implemented by Parks (with some funding for CDFW and SMMC) that expand outdoor recreation and reduce climate impacts on disadvantaged communities, and $84 million to help address deferred maintenance at state parks. Figure 8 Proposition 4 Expenditure Plan: Park Creation and Outdoor Access (Dollars in Millions) Purpose Code Section Implementing Departments Bond Total 2025 26 Amount Percent of Bond Total a Statewide Park Program 94010(a) Parks $200 $190 96% Reducing climate impacts on disadvantaged communities and expanding outdoor recreation 94020 CDFW, Parks, SMMC 200 119 b 60 Enhancing natural resource value and expanding trail access 94030 SCC, WCB 100 56 c 56 Deferred maintenance 94040 Parks 175 84 49 Nature education facilities 94050 CNRA 25 17 70 Totals $700 $466 67% a Percent of total available funding after accounting for estimated statewide bond costs (which the administration estimates at less than 1 percent). b Of the $119 million for reducing climate impacts on disadvantaged communities and expanding outdoor recreation in 2025 26, CDFW receives $10 million, Parks receives $107 million, and SMMC receives $2 million. c Of the $56 million for enhancing natural resource value and expanding trail access in 2025 26, SCC receives $51 million and WCB receives $5 million. Parks = Department of Parks and Recreation; CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife; SMMC = Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy; SCC = State Coastal Conservancy; WCB = Wildlife Conservation Board; and CNRA = California Natural Resources Agency. Extreme Heat Mitigation Proposition 4 authorizes $450 million for activities to mitigate the impacts of extreme heat. As shown in Figure 9, the budget package allocates $110 million of this funding in 2025-26, equivalent to 25 percent of the total available in the bond. As shown, some activities received a higher share of first-year funding than others. For example, the Urban Greening Program was allocated 47 percent of total funds ($47 million), whereas the Transformative Climate Communities Program received less than 1 percent ($1 million) of its bond total for 2025-26. These distinctions are due to the administration anticipating needing more time to build capacity within the administering departments and/or the grantee communities before launching new grant cycles. Figure 9 Proposition 4 Expenditure Plan: Extreme Heat Mitigation (Dollars in Millions) Purpose Code Section Implementing Departments Bond Total 2025 26 Amount Percent of Bond Total a Extreme Heat and Community Resilience Program 92510 LCI $50 $23 46% Transformative Climate Communities Program 92520 LCI 150 1 1 Urban Greening Program 95230 CNRA 100 47 47 Urban forests 92540 CalFire 50 0.5 1 Community resiliency centers 92550 LCI 60 0.8 1 Fairground updates 92560 CDFA 40 38 95 Totals $450 $110 25% a Percent of total available funding after accounting for estimated statewide bond costs (which the administration estimates at less than 1 percent). LCI = Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation; CNRA = California Natural Resources Agency; CalFire = California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection; and CDFA = California Department of Food and Agriculture. Climate Smart Agriculture Proposition 4 includes a total of $300 million for a variety of activities related to supporting climate smart agriculture. Figure 10 shows how the budget appropriates $153 million 51 percent of this total in 2025-26. The largest category of funding is $74 million to improve the climate resilience of agricultural lands through two existing programs administered by the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) the Healthy Soils Program ($36 million) and the State Water Efficiency and Enhancement Program ($38 million). Other large categories of funding include $20 million to fund various invasive species activities and projects, $20 million to support farmers markets, and $19 million to fund urban agricultural projects all implemented by CDFA. Figure 10 Proposition 4 Expenditure Plan: Climate Smart Agriculture (Dollars in Millions) Purpose Code Section Implementing Department Bond Total 2025 26 Amount Percent of Bond Total a Climate Resilience of Agricultural Lands $105 $74 71% Soil health and carbon sequestration 93510(a) CDFA $65 $36 56% State Water Efficiency and Enhancement Program 93510(b) CDFA 40 38 95 Food Systems and Market Access $90 $38 43% b Certified mobile farmers’ markets 93540(a) CDFA $20 $10 48% Year round certified farmers’ markets 93540(b) CDFA 20 10 48 Urban agriculture projects 93540(c) CDFA 20 19 95 Regional farm equipment sharing 93540(d) CDFA 15 0.2 1 Tribal food sovereignty 93540(e) CDFA 15 0.2 1 Other $105 $41 39% Invasive Species Account 93520 CDFA $20 $20 100% Conservation and enhancement of farmland and rangeland 93530 DOC 15 7 47 Increasing land access and tenure 93550 DOC 30 — — Deployment of vanpool vehicles and related facilities 93560 CalVans 15 — — Research farms at postsecondary education institutions 93570 CDE 15 14 93 Low Income Weatherization Program—farmworker housing 93580 CSD 10 0.2 — Totals $300 $153 51% a Percent of total available funding after accounting for estimated statewide bond costs (which the administration estimates at less than 1 percent). CDFA = California Department of Food and Agriculture; DOC = Department of Conservation; CalVans = California Vanpool Authority; CDE = California Department of Education; and CSD = Department of Community Services and Development. Subscribe | California State Legislature | Online Voter Registration | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Legislative Analyst's Office | The California Legislature's Nonpartisan Fiscal and Policy Advisor 925 L Street, Suite 1000 Sacramento, CA 95814 | (916) 445-4656