LAO
The 2026-27 Budget: California Student Aid Commission
Read the report at Legislative Analyst's Office ↗
analysis full
2026-27 BUDGET
The 2026-27 Budget:
California Student Aid Commission
GABRIEL PETEK | LEGISLATIVE ANALYST | FEBRUARY 2026
SUMMARY
Brief Covers the California Student Aid Commission (CSAC). This brief provides an update on cost
estimates for the Cal Grant program and analyzes the Governor’s budget proposal for the Middle Class Scholarship
(MCS) program.
Cal Grant and MCS Costs Have Increased Over the Past Decade. Since 2015-16, spending has increased by
more than $600 million for the Cal Grant program and by more than $950 million for the MCS program. We analyze the
underlying drivers of this higher spending. For the Cal Grant program, much of the increase is attributable to several
policy changes the state made over the past decade, together with tuition increases that the two public university
systems have implemented. (Cal Grants cover full tuition at in-state public universities.) These changes have resulted
both in larger Cal Grant award amounts and more students being eligible for Cal Grant awards. Similarly, the state
revamped the MCS program in 2022-23, which generally increased award amounts and expanded program eligibility.
The eligibility changes resulted in a seven-fold increase in the number of MCS recipients.
Cal Grant Spending Continues to Increase Under Governor’s Budget. The Governor’s budget revises 2025-26
Cal Grant spending upward by $107 million (3.8 percent) relative to the enacted level. From the revised 2025-26 level,
the Governor’s budget increases Cal Grant spending by $337 million (12 percent), bringing total program spending to
$3.2 billion in 2026-27. Though the Governor does not propose any further Cal Grant expansions, tuition increases at
the public universities continue to raise Cal Grant costs. CSAC also assumes that the number of recipients will continue
to increase in 2026-27, particularly in the California Community College (CCC) Expanded Entitlement and High School
Entitlement programs.
Governor’s Budget Proposes a Reduction in MCS Award Coverage. MCS awards reflect a certain percentage
of students’ remaining cost of attendance after accounting for their available resources (including any gift aid they
receive). MCS awards cover 35 percent of a student’s remaining cost of attendance in 2025-26. In 2026-27, the
Governor proposes reducing award coverage to 17.5 percent. The administration estimates that this would reduce
program spending from $1.1 billion in 2025-26 to $513 million in 2026-27 (a $541 million reduction in spending).
Last year, the state adopted a new budgetary approach for the MCS program. Under the new budgetary approach,
the state began funding the MCS program one year in arrears. As a result, the state would not achieve the identified
General Fund savings until 2027-28.
Recommend Legislature Consider Adopting Proposal to Reduce MCS Award Coverage. Given projected
out-year budget deficits, the Legislature likely will have to consider budget-balancing proposals over the next couple
of years. The Governor, however, has only one proposed budget solution in all of higher education that would help
balance the budget in 2027-28. Beyond facing a deficit, the MCS program has certain drawbacks. It has significant
overlap with the Cal Grant program, but is less targeted to lower-income students, while being more complex to
convey and administer than other financial aid programs. For all these reasons, reducing MCS award coverage could
be among the least disruptive choices the Legislature faces.
Consider Funding Program Using More Standard Budget Practice. The new budgetary approach of paying
for MCS one year in arrears creates a debt obligation for the state. We recommend the Legislature give high priority to
retiring this debt once one-time funding becomes available. The state could still set MCS award coverage in advance to
provide greater clarity for campuses and students. However, rather than funding the program one year in arrears, the
state could budget based on an estimate of MCS program costs for the coming fiscal year. It could then allow CSAC to
access a small loan towards the end of the fiscal year if the budget appropriation falls short of covering program costs
and then true up the actual cost the following year. This is how the state budgets for the Cal Grant program.
www.lao.ca.gov 1
analysis full
2026-27 BUDGET
INTRODUCTION
Brief Focuses on CSAC Budget. CSAC is two largest programs. The first section focuses on
the primary state agency that administers student the Cal Grant program whereas the second section
financial aid programs. This brief analyzes the focuses on the MCS program. Our CSAC Budget and
Governor’s 2026-27 budget proposals for CSAC. Changes in CSAC General Fund Spending tables
The brief contains two sections covering CSAC’s provide more detail on CSAC’s budget.
CAL GRANTS
In this section, we first provide background on Cal Grants Have Financial and Academic
the Cal Grant program and discuss trends over the Eligibility Criteria. Students apply for Cal Grant
past decade. We then discuss the Governor’s cost awards by submitting a Free Application for
estimates for the program in the current year and the Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) or, in certain cases,
budget year. a California Dream Act Application (CADAA).
Background
Figure 1
Cal Grant Program Is the State’s
Cal Grant Amounts Vary by Award Type,
Longest-Standing and Largest Financial Aid
Sector, and Student Characteristics
Program. The state created the Cal Grant program
Maximum Annual Award for a New, Full-Time
to increase college access by making college more
Undergraduate Student, 2026-27
affordable for California students with financial
need. The program gives these students choice in
Tuition Awards
where they attend school, as students can use their
Cal Grant A and B
Cal Grant award at any of the state’s three public UC $15,588
segments, private nonprofit institutions, and private Nonprofit institutions 9,358
WASC-accredited for-profit institutions 8,056
for-profit institutions. The program began in 1956 with
CSU 6,838
600 students receiving awards to assist with the cost
Other for-profit institutions 4,000
of college. In 2024-25, the program served more than
Cal Grant C
450,000 students and spent $2.5 billion. Private institutions $2,462
Grant Amounts Vary by Award Type and Access Awardsa
Segment. As Figure 1 shows, there are three types Cal Grant A
Students with dependent children $6,000
of Cal Grant awards (Cal Grant A, B, and C) that cover
Foster youth 6,000
certain kinds of college costs. Cal Grant A awards
Cal Grant B
cover full systemwide tuition and fees at public
Students with dependent children $6,000
universities and a fixed amount of tuition at private
Foster youth 6,000
universities. Cal Grant B awards provide the same Other students 1,648
amount of tuition coverage as Cal Grant A awards in Cal Grant C
most cases, while also providing an “access award” Students with dependent children $4,000
for nontuition costs such as food and housing. Cal Foster youth 4,000
Other CCC students 1,094
Grant C awards, which are only available to students
Private institution students 547
enrolled in career technical education programs, a Access awards generally may cover any living cost, including housing,
provide lower amounts of tuition and nontuition food, transportation, books, and supplies. Cal Grant C awards for
students attending private institutions may cover only books, supplies,
coverage. Across all award types, larger amounts of
and equipment. Students attending private for-profit institutions are
nontuition coverage are available to students with ineligible for “students with dependent children” and “foster youth”
awards.
dependent children as well as current and former
WASC = Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
foster youth. (The Cal Grant Award Coverage table
provides more detail.)
2 LEGISLATIVE ANALYST’S OFFICE
analysis full
2026-27 BUDGET
To qualify for an award, students must demonstrate Trends
“financial need,” which, for most students, is
Number of Cal Grant Recipients and
determined through a federal calculation using
Spending Have Been Rising. As Figure 2 on
information submitted on the FAFSA. (This financial
the next page shows, the number of Cal Grant
need calculation is used for many needs-based
recipients and Cal Grant spending have increased
financial aid programs across the country.)
over the past decade. The number of recipients
Students have financial need if their total cost of
grew from approximately 328,000 in 2015-16
attendance exceeds their Student Aid Index, which
to 453,000 in 2024-25—a 3.7 percent average
is a proxy for what households can contribute
annual increase. Spending grew from $1.9 billion
toward college costs. In addition, students must
to $2.5 billion over the same period—a 3.1 percent
have household income and assets below specified
average annual increase. Growth in both recipients
Cal Grant caps. The state uses these caps both to
and spending were particularly high in 2024-25
target aid and contain program costs. The income
(the most recent year of actual data). In 2024-25,
and asset caps vary by family size and are adjusted
Cal Grant recipients increased by 13 percent and
annually for inflation. In the 2025-26 award year,
spending increased by 8.7 percent.
the annual household income cap for a dependent
Notable Policy Changes Have Contributed
student from a family of four is $135,900 to qualify
to Higher Cal Grant Costs. As Figure 3 on the
for Cal Grant A or C awards and $71,500 to qualify
next page shows, there have been multiple policy
for Cal Grant B awards. Beyond financial criteria,
changes to the Cal Grant program over the past
students must also meet a minimum grade point
decade. These changes have increased both award
average (GPA) requirement to qualify for a Cal
amounts and number of recipients. In most cases,
Grant. The specific GPA requirement varies by
the state directly adopted a policy change, but
award type. Most award types require a minimum
the universities themselves have adopted tuition
high school GPA of 2.0 or 3.0 or a minimum
increases, which has the effect of increasing
community college GPA of 2.0 or 2.4.
award amounts. In the rest of this section, we look
Most Cal Grants Are Entitlements, but Some
at what changes the state and universities have
Are Awarded Competitively. In 2001-02, the
made that are contributing to rising Cal Grant
state began guaranteeing Cal Grants to recent
costs. Understanding these underlying factors is
high school graduates as well as transfer students
important for budget makers, especially as the
under age 28 who met the financial and academic
state faces projected deficits and a structural
criteria. In 2021-22, the state began guaranteeing
budget imbalance. This information could help
Cal Grants to community college students
the Legislature this year or in future years as it
regardless of their time out of high school or age. In
contemplates how to accommodate growing
2024-25, the state provided a total of approximately
Cal Grant costs amidst its other budget priorities.
425,000 Cal Grant entitlement awards (consisting of
Tuition Increases at UC and CSU Are
196,000 new awards and 229,000 renewal awards
Resulting in Larger Cal Grant Awards.
for continuing students). Besides the entitlement
One reason Cal Grant spending is higher is
awards, the state has a small number of competitive
because students are receiving larger Cal Grant
Cal Grant awards for students who do not qualify
awards. Larger awards are due in part to the tuition
for entitlement awards—typically older students
increases the University of California (UC) and
who enroll directly at four-year universities. This
California State University (CSU) have adopted,
program provides a fixed number of new awards
which translate directly into higher Cal Grant tuition
(13,000 annually). CSAC uses a scoring system to
awards. Both UC and CSU raised tuition for all
select students for competitive awards. A student’s
undergraduates in 2017-18. Both UC and CSU
score is based on multiple factors, including GPA,
also have taken action more recently to implement
household income and size, parental education,
tuition increases. At UC, a new multiyear tuition
and family/environmental indicators (such as
policy first took effect in 2022-23, then was revised
students experiencing homelessness).
and extended through 2032-33. Under both the
www.lao.ca.gov 3
analysis full
2026-27 BUDGET
Figure 2
Cal Grant Recipients and Spending Grew More Quickly in 2024-25 Than Previous Years
(Dollars in Millions)
$3,000 500,000
450,000
2,500 Recipients
400,000
Spending
350,000
2,000
300,000
1,500 250,000
200,000
1,000
150,000
100,000
500
50,000
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25
Figure 3
Several Policy Changes Are Impacting Cal Grant Costs
State Actions University Actions
State creates
Cal Grant A
Cal Grant A and B access award for State creates
tuition awards students with Cal Grant A UC adopts CSU adopts
increase at UC and dependent children. access award multiyear policy multiyear policy to
CSU due to tuition for foster youth. to increase increase tuition
increases. Cal Grant B and C tuition annually. annually.
access award Cal Grant B and C Cal Grant A and B Cal Grant A and B
Cal Grant C access increases for students access award tuition awards tuition awards
award increases for with dependent increases begin increasing begin increasing in
CCC students. children. for foster youth. in tandem. tandem.
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25
State creates State requires
Policy changes shaded in gray impacted the number of Cal Grant public high
Cal Grant recipients. All other policy changes impacted Community College schools to have
Cal Grant award amounts. Expanded Entitlement seniors complete
program. FAFSA or
CADAA (or
opt out).ª
ª This policy change was adopted in 2021 and first applied to high school seniors graduating in spring 2023. The impact on Cal Grant costs began in 2023-24.
FAFSA = Free Application for Federal Student Aid and CADAA = California Dream Act Application.
4 LEGISLATIVE ANALYST’S OFFICE
analysis full
2026-27 BUDGET
original and revised UC tuition policies, tuition Cal Grant Eligibility Increased Substantially
charges increase annually for new undergraduates With Creation of CCC Expanded Entitlement
(while staying flat for continuing undergraduates Program. Beyond Cal Grant awards becoming
for up to six years). Annual increases are tied larger, Cal Grant spending also has increased
to a three-year rolling average of the California due to more recipients. Some of the growth in
Consumer Price Index and capped at 5 percent. recipients is due to the state creating the CCC
The CSU Board of Trustees also recently adopted a Expanded Entitlement program in 2021-22. Prior to
multiyear tuition policy. Under CSU’s policy, tuition this program, students were eligible for a Cal Grant
charges increase 6 percent annually for all students entitlement award if they had just graduated high
beginning in 2024-25 and extending through school or were one year out of high school (under
2028-29. We estimate that larger Cal Grant awards the High School Entitlement program). These
from UC and CSU tuition increases account for students could use their award at CCC, UC, CSU,
roughly one-quarter of the growth in Cal Grant costs or private institutions. Students who were a few
between 2015-16 and 2024-25. years out of high school and under age 28 were
State Also Increased and Expanded Access also eligible for a Cal Grant entitlement award
Awards for Student Parents. In 2019-20, the state once they transferred from CCC to UC, CSU, or
increased the access award amount for students private institutions (under the Transfer Entitlement
with dependent children from $1,648 to $6,000 for program). All students age 28 or older were
Cal Grant B awards and from $1,094 to $4,000 for ineligible for Cal Grant entitlement awards, though
Cal Grant C awards. Additionally, that same year, they could apply for a fixed number of competitive
the state created the Cal Grant A access award awards. The CCC Expanded Entitlement program
for students with dependent children. This allowed expanded Cal Grant eligibility by (1) allowing
student parents receiving a Cal Grant A tuition students to receive a Cal Grant entitlement award
award to also qualify for an access award of $6,000. at CCC regardless of how many years they had
(Originally, these larger access awards were only been out of high school and (2) allowing students
available to students at UC, CSU, and CCC but of any age to keep their Cal Grant entitlement
were extended to students at private nonprofit award upon transferring from CCC to UC or CSU.
institutions in 2022-23.) In 2024-25, approximately These two eligibility expansions have resulted in a
34,000 students with dependent children received considerable increase in Cal Grant recipients.
access awards (with 3,177 students receiving Cal CCC Expanded Entitlement Program Is Large
Grant A awards, 28,433 students receiving Cal Contributor to Higher Cal Grant Spending.
Grant B awards, and 2,437 students receiving Cal In 2024-25, an estimated approximately 157,000
Grant C awards). In the same year, the state spent students are receiving Cal Grant awards under the
$108 million on the new Cal Grant A access awards CCC Expanded Entitlement program, accounting
and higher Cal Grant B and C access awards for for 35 percent of all Cal Grant recipients that
students with dependent children. year. Since the program’s inception, associated
Similarly, State Increased Access Awards costs have increased considerably each year—
for Foster Youth. As with the access awards for rising from $82 million in 2021-22 to $335 million
students with dependent children, in 2021-22, in 2024-25. The continuing annual growth in
the state increased the access awards for current program spending is likely due to it not yet having
and former foster youth students from $1,648 to reached full implementation, as the number of
$6,000 for Cal Grant B awards and from $1,094 program recipients transferring their awards to
to $4,000 for Cal Grant C awards. The state also UC and CSU is continuing to increase. Of the
made foster youth eligible for the Cal Grant A access $335 million in spending in 2024-25, we estimate
award of $6,000. (While originally available only to that about half would have occurred under the
foster youth at UC, CSU, and CCC, these awards Transfer Entitlement and Competitive programs.
were extended to foster youth at private nonprofit The remainder, however, would not have occurred
institutions in 2022-23.) In 2024-25, approximately absent the policy change.
4,000 foster youth students received a Cal Grant
access award with an associated cost of $14 million.
www.lao.ca.gov 5
analysis full
2026-27 BUDGET
FAFSA Requirement for California High cost estimates. Since budget enactment, spending
School Seniors Also Is Likely Impacting Cal is coming in higher than budgeted in all program
Grant Costs. Starting with the 2023-24 financial areas (except for competitive awards), with the
aid cycle (spring 2023 high school graduates), largest increases in the High School Entitlement
the state required local educational agencies and CCC Expanded Entitlement programs.
to confirm all graduating high school seniors Higher spending in the High School Entitlement
complete and submit the FAFSA or CADAA (or program is due to an 8.1 percent increase in the
opt out). According to a PPIC report, during the expected number of recipients. For the CCC
2023-24 financial aid cycle, the number of FAFSA Expanded Entitlement program, higher spending
and CADAA applications submitted by high school is particularly concentrated at CSU (due to more
graduates increased by 16 percent for the UC/CSU recipients transferring to CSU and their average
deadline (March 2, 2023) and by 11 percent for the awards increasing).
CCC deadline (September 2, 2023). Additionally, Governor’s Budget Reflects Further
the report found that the largest increase in Spending Increases in 2026-27. The Governor
applications was from the state’s lowest-income does not propose any further Cal Grant policy
students. Unlike the CCC Expanded Entitlement expansions, but the proposed budget covers
Program, this policy change did not make more higher anticipated Cal Grant costs in 2026-27.
students eligible for Cal Grants. However, the Specifically, the Governor’s budget provides a
increase in high school students completing $337 million (12 percent) ongoing General Fund
the FAFSA and CADAA, especially those from augmentation (over the revised 2025-26 spending
low-income families, likely is still increasing the level). Figure 4 summarizes the projected changes
number of Cal Grant recipients and spending. for 2026-27 by segment and award type. The higher
This is because eligible Cal Grant students who spending reflects a 9.1 percent projected increase
may not have previously applied for financial in recipients and a 2.3 percent projected increase in
aid are now applying. The number of recipients average Cal Grant award amounts, primarily due to
for Cal Grant High School Entitlement awards UC’s and CSU’s planned tuition increases. (Under
increased by 1.3 percent in 2023-24 and by CSAC’s estimates, $65 million of the Cal Grant
5.6 percent in 2024-25. spending increase in 2026-27 is attributable to
Bulk of Cal Grant Growth Over the Past covering higher tuition costs at UC and CSU.)
Decade Is Attributable to Policy Changes. From Cost Estimates Will Be Updated at May
2015-16 to 2024-25, Cal Grant spending increased Revision. CSAC prepared the Cal Grant cost
by $636 million. We estimate roughly half of this estimates underlying the Governor’s budget in
growth is due to larger Cal Grant award amounts, October 2025. In the spring, CSAC plans to update
including the tuition increases at UC and CSU and its estimates based on more recent program data
changes relating to access awards for students for the 2025-26 award cycle. The administration is
with dependent children and foster youth. We expected to update its Cal Grant spending levels at
estimate that about one-quarter of this growth is the May Revision accordingly. Given the projected
attributable to more students being eligible for a Cal out-year deficits, covering existing Cal Grant costs
Grant award under the CCC Expanded Entitlement could be challenging even if estimates come in
program. The remainder of the increase in spending lower in May. As a result, the state will likely not
is primarily driven by underlying Cal Grant caseload have the capacity for further program expansion
growth at UC and CSU. over the next few years.
Governor’s Budget Cost Estimates
Current-Year Cal Grant Spending Revised
Upward. The Governor’s budget adjusts 2025-26
Cal Grant spending upward by $107 million
(3.8 percent) to align with CSAC’s most recent
6 LEGISLATIVE ANALYST’S OFFICE
analysis full
2026-27 BUDGET
Figure 4
Cal Grant Spending Is Estimated to Be Up 12 Percent in 2026-27
Reflects Cost Estimates in Governor’s Budget (Dollars in Millions)
Change From 2025-26
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27
Actual Revised Proposed Amount Percent
Totals $2,496 $2,898 $3,235 $337 11.6%
By Segment:
California Community Colleges $1,082 $1,232 $1,365 $133 10.8%
California State University 844 1,026 1,188 161 15.7
University of California 315 362 388 26 7.3
Private nonprofit institutions 228 247 261 14 5.8
Private for-profit institutions 25 30 33 2 7.3
Other public institutions 1 1 —a —a -63.7
By Program:
High School Entitlement $1,762 $2,044 $2,317 $273 13.4%
CCC Expanded Entitlement 426 515 562 46 9.0
Competitive 148 150 155 5 3.2
Transfer Entitlement 145 167 180 12 7.4
Cal Grant C 16 21 22 1 4.6
By Award Type:
Cal Grant B $1,170 $1,379 $1,558 $179 13.0%
Cal Grant A 1,310 1,498 1,656 157 10.5
Cal Grant C 16 21 22 1 4.6
By Renewal or New:
Renewal $1,662 $1,940 $2,219 $279 14.4%
New 834 958 1,016 58 6.1
a Less than $500,000.
Notes: Data reflect California Student Aid Commission estimates.
MIDDLE CLASS SCHOLARSHIPS
In this section, we first provide background on assistance under the Cal Grant program. First
the MCS program and discuss program trends. We implemented in 2014-15, students with household
then describe the Governor’s proposal for 2026-27 incomes of up to $100,000 could have 40 percent
awards, assess the proposal, and provide two of their tuition covered (when combined with all
associated recommendations. other public financial aid). Tuition coverage was
graduated downward as household income rose,
Background
with students receiving 10 percent tuition coverage
Original MCS Program Covered Partial at $150,000.
Tuition Costs for Higher-Income Students.
Original MCS Program Did Not Require
During the Great Recession, UC and CSU notably
Students to Demonstrate Financial Need.
raised tuition, partly in response to declines in
Whereas most federal and state financial aid
state funding. Cal Grants generally covered these
programs require undergraduates to demonstrate
tuition increases for students from low- and
financial need, the original MCS program did not.
middle-income households. In 2013, the Legislature
To be eligible for MCS awards, students only had to
created the original MCS program to provide partial
have household income and assets under specified
tuition coverage for higher-income UC and CSU
program caps. These income and asset caps were
students who generally did not qualify for tuition
adjusted annually for inflation. They did not vary
www.lao.ca.gov 7
analysis full
2026-27 BUDGET
by family size. State law capped spending for the This parent contribution is one-third of the expected
original MCS program at $117 million annually and parent contribution calculated according to the
directed CSAC to prorate award amounts to remain federal student aid index methodology. After
under the cap, if needed. making all of these deductions, this formula derives
Revamped MCS Program Retained a Few Key the student’s remaining costs. (Page 19 of this
Aspects of Original Program. In 2021, the state CSAC MCS 2024-25 handbook shows illustrative
adopted legislation revamping the MCS program, MCS award amounts for students at different
with implementation beginning in the 2022-23 segments with different levels of financial means.)
academic year. Under the revamped program, MCS Award Coverage Has Been Determined
students still do not have to demonstrate financial in Two Ways. Under the revamped program,
need. Moreover, students still are subject to the every student receives the same percentage
original income and asset cap rules. In 2025-26, the of their remaining costs covered (except foster
maximum annual household income for dependent youth, who receive awards that cover 100 percent
students to qualify for an MCS award is $234,000. of their remaining costs). From 2022-23 through
This income level equates to roughly the top 90th 2024-25, CSAC determined what percentage of
percentile of households in California (meaning each student’s remaining costs to cover based
only about one in ten households makes above on the annual MCS appropriation. In 2022-23,
that level). Lastly, under the revamped program, award coverage was 26 percent, followed by
students at private universities remain ineligible for 36 percent in 2023-24, and 35 percent in 2024-25.
MCS awards. Using this approach, CSAC could not finalize the
Revamped MCS Program Contains Two Key percentage of award coverage until August when
Policy Changes. One major change was shifting it received enrollment rosters from campuses. This
from focusing only on tuition coverage to focusing issue made it challenging for campuses to inform
on a student’s total cost of attendance. Under the students of their estimated MCS award amounts
revamped program, students may use their MCS prior to the start of the academic year. As a result,
awards for tuition or nontuition expenses, such as students often did not know their full financial aid
housing and food. A second major change was package prior to the start of the academic year.
expanding eligibility to students receiving Cal Grant To help mitigate this issue, in 2025-26, rather than
awards. For Cal Grant recipients (who already have setting the appropriation for MCS and adjusting
their tuition, and, in some cases, a portion of their award coverage accordingly, the state locked
nontuition costs covered), MCS provides additional in the percentage of award coverage that year
aid for nontuition costs. Though less notable given at 35 percent. The state is now responsible for
relative magnitude, the revamped program also covering whatever is the associated cost.
expanded eligibility to CCC students in bachelor’s Last Year, State Began Funding Program in
degree programs. Arrears. The state also adopted a new budgetary
Revamped MCS Award Calculation Is More approach for the MCS program last year. Under the
Complex. Calculating each student’s award new budgetary approach, the state began funding
amount involves several steps. Starting with a the MCS program one year in arrears. As a result,
student’s total cost of attendance, CSAC deducts the state will pay for the cost of MCS awards for
the student’s available resources, consisting of the 2025-26 academic year in 2026-27. The state
other need-based and non-need-based gift aid. is covering costs in 2025-26 using a General
The formula also deducts a student contribution Fund loan.
from part-time work earnings. Specifically, the
Trends
MCS calculation assumes a student works
MCS Recipients and Costs Increased
15 hours per week, 39 weeks per year, at the
Substantially Under Revamped Program. As
state minimum wage rate, as adjusted annually.
Figure 5 shows, the revamped program resulted in
For dependent students with household
a sharp increase in the number of MCS recipients
incomes of more than $100,000, the MCS
and the amount of spending. For the eight years
calculation also deducts a parent contribution.
8 LEGISLATIVE ANALYST’S OFFICE
analysis full
2026-27 BUDGET
Figure 5
Spending and Recipients Have Increased Significantly Under Revamped MCS Program
(Dollars in Millions)
$1,200 400,000
350,000
1,000
300,000
800
250,000
600 200,000
150,000
400
100,000
Recipients
200
50,000
Spending
2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25
Note: The shaded region represents the revamped MCS program.
MCS = Middle Class Scholarships.
in which the state implemented the original MCS due to expanded eligibility, some is due to higher
program, the program gave awards to an average enrollment at UC and CSU. Specifically, from
of about 56,000 recipients each year. The state 2021-22 (the year before MCS was revamped)
appropriated approximately $100 million annually to 2024-25, resident undergraduate enrollment
over this period. In 2024-25 (three years into the increased by 7.5 percent and 2.1 percent at UC and
revamped program), the program gave awards to CSU, respectively.
more than 350,000 recipients—about a seven-fold Average MCS Award Amount Increased by
increase. In 2024-25, the state provided $1 billion About Half Between Original and Revamped
General Fund for the MCS program—reflecting Program. Across all MCS recipients, the average
about a ten-fold increase. MCS award in 2024-25 was $3,673—50 percent
Increase in MCS Spending Stems Primarily higher than in 2021-22. In 2024-25, the average
From Expanding Eligibility to Cal Grant MCS award for CSU students was 70 percent
Recipients. In 2024-25, about 190,000 (55 percent) higher than it had been under the original program.
MCS recipients were also Cal Grant recipients By comparison, the average MCS award for UC
(that is, students who were not eligible for awards students was slightly lower than under the original
under the original program). These recipients program. These changes in average award amounts
account for roughly 80 percent of the increase in are due to switching the program from partial
MCS spending. Though much of the increase in tuition coverage to a share of remaining cost
MCS recipients under the revamped program is of attendance.
www.lao.ca.gov 9
analysis full
2026-27 BUDGET
Proposal year in arrears. Given this budgetary approach,
the state would not achieve the identified one-time
Governor Proposes Reducing Award
General Fund savings until 2027-28.
Coverage to 17.5 Percent in 2026-27. The
Governor’s budget reduces MCS award coverage
Assessment
by half—from 35 percent to 17.5 percent—for the
Impact of Reducing Award Coverage Would
2026-27 award year. This is the only proposed
Vary Among Students. At the proposed award
higher education budget solution. The solution
coverage of 17.5 percent, the average MCS award
does not come with any associated new out-year
amount is expected to decrease by about half.
obligations (unlike certain other solutions that
Our office estimates the average award in 2026-27
effectively push out costs). The proposed funding
would be $1,432 at CSU, $1,586 at UC, and $2,198
level is $513 million ongoing General Fund. The
at CCC. Estimating the impact of lower MCS awards
reduction in award coverage would decrease MCS
is difficult given the specific impact will depend on
spending by $541 million, resulting in a like amount
each student’s unique financial situation. On the
of General Fund savings. The administration scores
one hand, students with higher MCS awards may
the $541 million as one-time savings. (For the past
be more sensitive to the reduction than students
three years, the state has supported the program
with smaller MCS awards. On the other hand, as
using a mix of ongoing and one-time General
Figure 6 shows, students with higher awards are
Fund.) The Governor’s budget maintains the new
likely to be from households with higher incomes.
budgetary approach of funding MCS awards one
Figure 6
MCS Program Serves Fewer High-Income Students but at Higher Award Amounts
2023-24
80,000 $5,000
Number of Recipients
4,500
70,000
Average Award Amount 4,000
60,000
3,500
50,000
3,000
40,000 2,500
2,000
30,000
1,500
20,000
1,000
10,000
500
$0 or Less $1 $25,001 $50,001 $75,001 $100,001 $125,001 $150,001 $175,001 $200,001
to to to to to to to to to
25,000 50,000 75,000 100,000 125,000 150,000 175,000 200,000 217,000
Household Income
Note: 2023-24 is the most recent data available on MCS recipients by income bracket.
MCS = Middle Class Scholarship.
10 LEGISLATIVE ANALYST’S OFFICE
analysis full
2026-27 BUDGET
These students tend to receive less gift aid, Program Is More Challenging to Convey and
resulting in larger MCS awards than students from Administer Than Other State Aid Programs.
lower-income households. Higher-income students Unlike other state financial aid programs, MCS
may be less affected by a reduction to their MCS is not a set award amount. Additionally, as a
awards because they have more financial resources “last-dollar-in” program, the award amount is
to substitute the loss in award amount. Though the subject to variability as long as any component
impact of the award reduction will be felt differently of the formula still could potentially change.
among students, students might work a couple This makes it challenging for students and families
more hours per week or take out larger loans to to plan ahead, as they will likely not know the
compensate for smaller MCS awards. award amount prior to the start of the academic
Program Has Considerable Overlap With Cal year. As a result, the impact of the program on a
Grant Program. When MCS was originally created, student’s decision to attend college may be limited.
it was targeted to help moderate-income students The complex and multicomponent nature of the
who did not receive Cal Grants cover tuition costs. MCS formula also makes it more cumbersome
Thus, the original MCS program was intended for campuses to administer than other financial
to have little, if any, overlap with the Cal Grant aid programs.
program. When the MCS program was revamped Funding Program in Arrears Could Put State
in 2022-23 and eligibility was extended to Cal in Challenging Budget Situation. Under the new
Grant recipients, program overlap became notable. budgetary approach for the program, the state is
In 2024-25, 55 percent of MCS recipients also providing MCS awards to students in one year but
received a Cal Grant award. This creates multiple paying for those awards a year later. To do so, the
inefficiencies. It leads to higher administrative costs state is using a General Fund cash loan to cover
for the state as it is administering two financial the payments to students. This approach only
aid programs that are serving much of the same works if the state is in a strong cash position. If the
population. Similarly, campuses must administer state’s cash position weakens, which has happened
two programs and issue two different awards to during previous fiscal downturns, the state could
many of the same students. Lastly, students receive find that internal borrowing is no longer an option.
two different awards for largely the same purpose In this situation, the state might decide to turn to
(and they might not understand the distinction external borrowing. Such borrowing would come
between the awards). As the Legislature prepares with interest, resulting in higher program costs at a
for potential out-year deficits, it likely will want time when the state has fewer budgetary resources.
to begin identifying where efficiencies can be In turn, the impact on the rest of the budget would
achieved and duplicative or overlapping programs be exacerbated. Paying for awards in the year the
can be streamlined. costs are incurred would mitigate this situation, as
MCS Does Not Target Aid Based on Financial the state would not have to rely on borrowing to
Need. Requiring financial need criteria to be met cover annual program costs.
has long been used by governments to target
Recommendations
assistance to those most likely to benefit from it.
Consider Adopting Proposal to Reduce
In contrast, MCS does not have a financial need
MCS Award Amounts Given Projected Budget
eligibility component, and its income and asset
Deficits. Both our office and the administration
thresholds are much higher than those the Cal
are projecting notable out-year budget deficits.
Grant program uses. As a result, the program is less
The Governor’s budget, however, has only one
targeted to lower-income students. Lower-income
proposed budget solution in the higher education
students, however, are the ones least likely to
area addressing these deficits. Given the state’s
be able to attend and complete college without
fiscal outlook, the Legislature likely will need to
financial support.
consider not only this MCS proposal but many other
budget-balancing proposals over the next couple
www.lao.ca.gov 11
analysis full
2026-27 BUDGET
of years. Given the MCS program has significant the way it pays for other state programs—in the
overlap with the Cal Grant program, is less targeted year in which the costs are generated. Even funding
to lower-income students, and is more complex MCS in the traditional way, the state could still set
to convey and administer than other financial the award coverage percentage for each award
aid programs, reducing MCS award coverage year. Setting award coverage would provide greater
could be among the least disruptive choices the clarity to campuses and students. As it does with
Legislature faces. other state programs, the state could budget
Consider Funding Program Using More based on an estimate of MCS program costs for
Standard Budget Practice. Paying for MCS the coming fiscal year. It could then allow CSAC
costs one year in arrears effectively creates a to access a small loan towards the end of the
debt obligation for the state. Once one-time fiscal year if the budget appropriation falls short of
funding becomes available, we recommend the covering program costs. The state could then true
Legislature give high priority to retiring this debt. up the actual cost the following year. This would be
We recommend the state return to paying for MCS similar to how the Cal Grant program is funded.
LAO PUBLICATIONS
This report was prepared by Natalie Gonzalez, and reviewed by Jennifer Pacella and Ross Brown. The Legislative
Analyst’s Office (LAO) is a nonpartisan office that provides fiscal and policy information and advice to the Legislature.
To request publications call (916) 445-4656. This report and others, as well as an e-mail subscription service, are
available on the LAO’s website at www.lao.ca.gov. The LAO is located at 925 L Street, Suite 1000, Sacramento,
California 95814.
12 LEGISLATIVE ANALYST’S OFFICE