LHC
Opening the Doors of Government: Biennial Report 2003-2004
Read the report at Little Hoover Commission ↗
L H C
ITTLE OOVER OMMISSION
O D
PENING OORS
THE OF
G
OVERNMENT
B R 2003-2004
IENNIAL EPORT
Contents
Citizen Government
Members.....................................4
Resources/Staff............................6
Performance Agenda
When Reform is a Must................7
Assessing Reorganization.............9
Practical and Research-based Reforms
Summary of Projects..................11
Results
Measuring Results.......................17
A Shared Understanding.............23
Legislation...................................35
Consulting with Experts..............37
Reports from 1962-2004.............51
Reorganization Plans..................59
The Little Hoover Commission
... provides citizen and public oversight.
The Commission is bipartisan and independent of the executive and legislative branches.
The members are appointed by the Governor and the legislative leadership and are
unpaid. Through a public and deliberative process these citizens scrutinize government
programs and policies and make recommendations for improvement.
... drives a performance agenda.
The Commission consistently focuses on ways to accomplish more with the same or
fewer resources. The Commission’s reviews are predicated on the potential for forceful
leadership, clear and measurable goals, and the strategic pursuit of priorities to drive
performance.
... develops practical and research-based reforms.
The Commission over the last two years completed major reviews of the public health
system, parole policies, drug and alcohol programs, and how evidence-based strategies
could improve public safety grants. The Commission also examined how the State
could break the political logjams that prevent fundamental reforms from being developed,
refined and implemented. Each report contains methodical and practical steps that
research indicates would result in improved outcomes, such as lower crime and fewer
premature deaths.
... gets results.
Broad agreement has been reached on refocusing public health functions and a physician
public health officer has been appointed. State correctional officials have adopted the
Commission’s recommendation that their agencies be held accountable for preparing
inmates for release so public safety can be improved beyond the prison gate. And the
California Performance Review advanced literally scores of Commission recommendations
– from improving the management of state assets, to reforming personnel practices to
bolstering programs for abused children. These are just a few examples of the measurable
results attributable to the Commission’s efforts.
Biennial Report 2003-04
MICHAEL E. ALPERT, CHAIRMAN
(D-Rancho Santa Fe)
Originally appointed by Assembly Speaker Willie L. Brown, Jr. in May
1994. Reappointed by the Senate Rules Committee in August 1997,
February 1999 and January 2003. Retired partner in the law firm of
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. Former chief deputy commissioner of the
California Department of Corporations. Served as vice chairman of
the Commission from 1995 to 2001, elected chairman in 2001.
STANLEY R. ZAX, VICE CHAIRMAN
(DTS-Beverly Hills)
Appointed by the Senate Rules Committee in March 1994. Reappointed
in January 1998 and January 2002. Chairman and president of Zenith
Insurance Company. Elected vice chairman of the Commission in
2001.
State of California
LITTLE HOOVER COMMISSION
January 26, 2005
Dear Governor and Members of the Legislature:
State government is at the threshold of foundational reforms that could strengthen and restore
the ability of government to serve Californians. Just as state leaders cannot step away from this
challenge, they must proceed smartly with the right reforms in a meaningful way.
It has taken a deep financial crisis, high-profile failures, plummeting public confidence, and a
change in leadership to bring California to this moment of opportunity. The Commission be-
lieves its work of the last two years, summarized in this report, identifies practical and
research-based reforms. The specific recommendations are predicated on a common approach:
Set clear goals, establish strategic priorities and focus on outcomes.
For example, drug and alcohol addiction costs the General Fund $11 billion a year. Some of
those dollars are spent on prevention, law enforcement and treatment. But most of the costs –
such as health care and corrections – result from demands on public services that could be
reduced by allocating resources based on evidence and managing efforts based on outcomes.
Similarly, the State spends hundreds of millions of dollars on public safety grants to fund pro-
grams that have not been proven to work. The State must strategically target these resources to
programs that work in communities with the greatest problems. Improving the performance of
these efforts will save lives and reduce the demand on public services.
These are examples of how the Commission has strategically focused its efforts on two policy
areas where the poor performance of some government programs increases demands on other
programs. The resulting recommendations identify ways to save substantial public resources by
better spending existing public resources.
In the area of public safety, the Commission identified an evidence-based model that should
replace the now defunct Office of Criminal Justice Planning. Similarly, if the performance of the
State’s parole policies were elevated to just the national average, the State would save hundreds
of millions of dollars and improve the safety of virtually every community in California.
In the area of health and human services, the Commission identified ways to improve drug and
alcohol treatment programs, the foster care system, acupuncture regulation, and public health
programs. The Commission also proposed a fundamental redesign of the health and human
service delivery system to improve the quality of services.
Finally, the Commission – believing that California is “governable” – developed a critical path,
based on the lessons learned from failed reform efforts that could be used to resolve intransigent
problems – such as the dysfunctional state-local relationship and the complex, unreliable and
obsolete revenue system. In a more focused review, the Commission examined the approach of
the California Performance Review and recommended ways to refine the administration’s essen-
tial initiative to transform the bureaucracy.
The results of the Commission’s efforts – and projects that were previously completed – are
documented in the report. These results represent a substantial and specific return on the
State’s investment. But ultimately, the Commission is an investment in democracy. By empow-
ering a group of citizens to evaluate government policies, the State acknowledges the imperative
of disciplining government to the public interest and making it responsive to the will of the
people. We faithfully and proudly execute that charge.
Citizen Government
DAVID J. EPSTEIN
The Commission is...
(DTS-Indian Wells)
Appointed by Governor Gray Davis in January
Volunteer
2002. In the practice of law for 35 years,
specializing in helping state government to Commissioners are not paid,
identify and collect abandoned financial assets. but dedicate hundreds of hours
over the course of a year to
understanding and improving
DANIEL W. HANCOCK public programs.
(D-Milpitas)
Appointed by Assembly Speaker Cruz Informed
Bustamante in July 1997. Reappointed by
A small staff enables these
Speaker Robert M. Hertzberg in January 2001.
volunteers to be effective by
Strategic advisor and former president of Shapell
analyzing information,
Industries of Northern California.
organizing meetings, drafting
documents and providing full-
WELTON C. MANSFIELD time representation for the
Commission.
(R-Newport Beach)
Appointed by Assembly Speaker Herb J. Wesson,
Jr. in January 2003. Retired executive vice Public
president and managing director of Foote, Cone
Through open hearings and
and Belding.
advisory committee meetings,
the Commission openly
examines government
EUGENE “MITCH” MITCHELL operations. It invites experts,
consumers, advocates, and
(R-Carlsbad)
federal, state and local officials
Appointed by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger
to assess the State’s
in April 2004. Vice president of public policy
performance and explore ways
and communications, San Diego Regional
to improve efficiency and
Chamber of Commerce.
effectiveness.
Independent
STUART G. MOLDAW
The Commission, by statute, is
(DTS-Atherton)
not part of the executive
Appointed by Governor Gray Davis in March branch or the legislative
2002. Chairman of the Gymboree Corporation. branch. Its members are
appointed by the Governor and
the Legislature.
Empowered
CHARLES S. POOCHIGIAN
SENATOR The Commission has the
authority to select its own
(R-Fresno)
topics, has access to
Appointed by Assembly Speaker Curt Pringle in
government records and is
March 1996. Reappointed by Speaker Antonio
charged with making public
Villaraigosa in 1997, and reappointed by the
recommendations to the
Senate Rules Committee in 1999. Elected to the
Governor and Legislature.
14th State Senate District in 1998.
4
LESLIE “TEDDIE” RAY
The Commission is...
(D-Laguna Beach)
Appointed by Governor Gray Davis in
Bipartisan
November 2003. Former real estate agent
and member of the Board of Directors of Policy debates benefit from,
Planned Parenthood of Orange and San but also are limited by, partisan
Bernardino Counties. perspectives. The
Commission’s work balances
those debates with a venue
designed to forge diverse
JOSPEH RODOTA
opinions into an agreed upon
(R-Sacramento)
course of action.
Appointed by Governor Arnold
Schwarzenegger in April 2004. Former
Focused
cabinet secretary and deputy chief of staff for
Governor Wilson. CEO of Forward Legislators are confronted by
Observer. every public issue of the day
and the perennial work of
budget making. Executive
L C
EGISLATORS WHO SERVED ON THE OMMISSION THROUGH
branch agencies are confronted
2003-04 L S
THE END OF THE EGISLATIVE ESSION with the day-to-day challenges
of operating bureaucracies.
PATRICIA BATES
The Commission informs both
ASSEMBLYWOMAN through its focused and
(R-Laguna Niguel) detailed examination of public
programs.
Appointed by Assembly Speaker Herb J.
Wesson, Jr. in March 2003. Elected to the
73rd State Assembly District in 1998. Former Commissioners
who served in the
2003-2004 Session
Jennifer A. Openshaw (D-Playa del
CHRISTINE KEHOE
Rey) Served from July 2001 to April
ASSEMBLYWOMAN 2004.
(D-San Diego)
Stanley M. Zimmerman (D-Beverly
Appointed by Assembly Speaker Herb J. Hills) Served from January 2000 to
Wesson, Jr. in February 2003. Elected to the April 2004.
76th State Assembly District in 1998. Served
Richard R. Terzian (R-Los Angeles)
one year as Assembly Speaker pro Tempore.
Served from May 1986 to November
2003.
JOHN VASCONCELLOS Assemblyman Juan Vargas (D-San
Diego) Served from February 2001to
SENATOR
March 2003.
(D-Santa Clara)
H. Eric Schockman (D-Sherman Oaks)
Appointed by the Senate Rules Committee in
Served from January 2000 to January
February 1997. Elected to the 13th State
2003.
Senate District in 1996 after serving in the
Assembly for 30 years.
AS OF DECEMBER 2004, THE COMMISSION HAD THREE VACANCIES. IN JANUARY 2005, SENATOR LIZ FIGUEROA
WAS APPOINTED TO THE COMMISSION BY THE SENATE RULES COMMITTEE AND ASSEMBLYMAN MIKE GORDON WAS
APPOINTED TO THE COMMISSION BY ASSEMBLY SPEAKER FABIAN NUNEZ.
5
Commission Resources
Commission staff...
A modest investment in state funds allows the Commission to A staff of nine civil service
leverage the time and talent of its members, researchers, employees arrange meetings,
conduct research, draft reports,
practitioners, consumers and other Californians to contribute
advocate for recommendations,
to Commission efforts. Commissioners serve as volunteers and
and perform related
as such receive no compensation for their service.
administrative functions on
behalf of the Commission.
The Little Hoover Commission received $907,000 from the
General Fund for fiscal year 2003-04. Mid-year cuts reduced James P. Mayer
Executive Director
that appropriation by $117,500. At the same time, the
Nancy Lyons
Legislature requested the Commission to conduct a study of
Deputy Executive Director
acupuncture regulation and earmarked $250,000 from the
Toby Ewing
Acupuncture Special Fund to pay for the Commission's study.
Project Manager
About $91,000 of that was used to pay for technical analyses
Hattie Rees Hanley
by university researchers and the balance covered most of the
Project Manager
Commission’s direct expenses.
Peter McNamee
Project Manager
The 2004-05 Budget Act allocated $907,000 from the General Sherry Robyn
Fund to the Commission and subsequently its budget was Legislative Coordinator
adjusted for increased retirement and compensation costs. The Carole D’Elia
$117,500 reduction from the previous year was restored because Research Analyst
of the Commission’s role in reorganization plans and improving Kate Martin
Research Analyst
performance in general.
Linda Mata
Executive Secretary
Throughout the budget crisis, the Commission has continuously
found ways to become internally efficient and has returned
unspent funds at the end of the fiscal year. A Fair and Open Process
Public hearings: The Commission
conducts hearings to gather
testimony and discuss issues with
Salary
Savings General experts and interested parties. All
Facilities 1% Expenses witnesses are encouraged to submit
Printing 8% 1% Administrative & written testimony, which is made
1% Budget Services available to the public and is posted
Travel Expenses 4% on the Web site.
1%
Advisory committees: For most
projects the Commission
establishes an advisory committee
of experts, advocates and other
stakeholders. Through a series of
meetings, the committee helps the
Commission to understand policy
issues from various perspectives
and allows interested parties to
Personnel communicate their concerns to the
84% Commission. The Commission puts
particular emphasis on seeking out
those most affected by policies.
6
Reform
When is a must
Recommendations requiring renewed consideration.
During the past two years, the Commission has made numerous recommendations that would
reduce costs, increase the efficiency of public services and improve the lives of Californians. As
the State enters its fifth year with a budget shortfall, many critical recommendations deserve
renewed consideration. These recommendations fall within the rubric of four essential elements
that should be considered in transforming government: Forceful leadership, clear goals, strategic
priorities and improving performance and productivity. The most critical Commission
recommendations from the past four years are highlighted below.
Leadership
(cid:1) Create a public health department and appoint a California Surgeon General. The Commission
found that the State’s public health leadership and organizational structure is ill-prepared to
fulfill the primary obligation of reducing injury and death from threats that individuals cannot
control. The Governor and the Legislature should create a public health department – separate
from Medi-Cal and other insurance programs that serve the poor – to focus on emerging
threats, with physician and science-based leadership and an advisory board linking California’s
health assets and experts. The department should be led by a California Surgeon General
reporting directly to the Governor.
(cid:1) Designate a leader for California’s foster care system. California taxpayers spend billions
annually to serve children in foster care. Yet despite this enormous price tag, the State
continues to fail these children. At both the state and local level, there is an unwillingness to
take responsibility for reforming the foster care system. The Governor and the Legislature
should designate a leader with appropriate authority and guidance to reform foster care and
be held accountable for improvements.
Goals
(cid:1) Use a critical path for reform to achieve public goals. Despite numerous attempts, the State
has failed to solve fundamental problems that prevent it from achieving public goals. Despite
widespread agreement that California’s revenue system is overly complex, unreliable and
obsolete and the dysfunctional state-local government relationship hinders the delivery of
efficient public services, policy-makers have not succeeded in meaningful reforms in these
areas. The Commission, with the benefit of hindsight from those who had been a part of
prior reform efforts, developed a critical path that can be used to develop technically sound
and politically supported improvements. State leaders should use this critical path to resolve
some of the most contentious issues.
7
Strategic Priorities
(cid:1) Develop a unified strategy to cost-effectively reduce alcohol and drug abuse. Some $11 billion
is spent from the state General Fund responding to the problems created by abuse or addiction.
Yet the State’s efforts to reduce alcohol and drug abuse through prevention, treatment and
law enforcement programs are fragmented and not focused on cost-effectively curtailing the
expense and misery of abuse and addiction. State and local leaders need to come together to
link alcohol and drug prevention, treatment and law enforcement efforts into a statewide
strategy guiding a three-pronged attack on substance abuse.
(cid:1) Develop a strategic effort to protect Californians. California is not efficiently or effectively
using available resources to help communities reduce crime and violence and the abuse of
drugs and alcohol. The multitude of grant programs administered by the now-defunct Office
of Criminal Justice Planning should be strategically aligned to apply evidence-based strategies
to respond to community priorities. A California Public Safety Council, a reconstitution of
the California Council on Criminal Justice, should be established to aggressively align state
efforts for crime prevention.
Productivity and Performance
(cid:1) Transfer responsibility for parolees to communities. California’s parole system is a billion-
dollar failure. While parole policies are a challenge for all states, California is seriously out of
sync with the rest of the nation. The goals for parole – public safety and successful reintegration
– are undermined by the way the State supervises and assists parolees and the lack of
community involvement in re-entry. To maximize public safety, communities must assume
greater responsibility for reintegrating parolees, and the State should provide the leadership
and funding to make those efforts successful. As a first-step, the State should transfer
responsibility for non-violent female parolees to communities.
(cid:1) Improve delivery of health and human services with existing resources. California annually
spends nearly one-third of its General Fund expenditures on health and human services.
But the demand for public health and human services far outpaces capacity. An overly
complex organizational structure, perverse funding incentives and weak oversight undermine
efforts to better serve more Californians with limited resources. The State should shift health
and human services responsibilities to counties and clarify the authority for service delivery.
The state bureaucracy should be reorganized to support local efforts and counties should be
accountable for outcomes. Funding should be realigned so that communities can provide
services more effectively and efficiently.
(cid:1) Improve the quality of services to immigrants. California is home to some 8.6 million
immigrants. The faster that newcomers are integrated into California’s communities, economy
and social fabric, the sooner they prosper and the state benefits. The State invests tremendous
resources helping immigrants get settled and address unmet needs. But the State has not
monitored the quality of those services or their utility in moving immigrants to independence.
Improving the State’s response to immigrants and their ability to achieve self-sufficiency
would benefit these residents, their communities and help the State live within its means.
8
Reorganization
Assessing
The Little Hoover Commission plays an integral role in the reorganization of government in two
vital ways -- through its independent reviews of state programs and policies and through its
review of reorganization plans submitted by Governors. As of December 2004, five Governors
had proposed 29 reorganization plans. The Commission reviewed 26 of those plans. Those
reorganization plans are listed on pages 59-60.
According to state law, the Governor has the authority to examine the organization of executive
branch agencies and determine what changes may be necessary to promote more efficient and
effective government services. The reorganization process can be used to consolidate, transfer or
abolish programs and agencies. The process can be used to create new agencies, but the process
cannot be used to create new functions.
The law requires the Governor to submit any reorganization plan to the Little Hoover Commission
“at least 30 days prior” to submitting the plan to the Legislature. The Commission’s role in the
reorganization process is only advisory. The Commission reviews the plan, holds one or more
public hearings, and reviews written public comments.
The Commission assesses the plan based on its broad mandate to assist policy-makers in
“promoting economy, efficiency and improved service in the transaction of the public business,”
and makes recommendations to the Governor and the Legislature. The Commission’s
recommendations must be made within 30 days of the plan being submitted to the Legislature.
In other words, the Commission typically has 60 days to review a plan and complete its report.
In January 2005, the Commission received Governor's Reorganization Plan 1, Reforming California's
Boards and Commissions and Governor's Reorganization Plan 2, Reforming California's Youth
and Adult Correctional Agency.
Like many previous reorganization plans, some elements of these plans are based on prior
Commission findings and recommendations. The 2005 reform plans were born out of the work of
the Governor's California Performance Review team, which in 2004 was tasked with developing
recommendations to increase the performance and functionality of state government. The
Commission expects subsequent reorganization plans based on the work of the CPR team to be
submitted throughout 2005.
The California Performance Review published its findings and recommendations in August 2004
and drew from 29 Commission studies to inform its recommendations. Some of the key
Commission recommendations revisited in the CPR report are detailed on the following page.
9
The California Performance Review relied on Commission recommendations in the following areas:
Personnel. In 1979, 1995 and 1999, the Commission recommended reforms in the recruitment,
classification, selection and training of state employees, as well as how personnel functions are
distributed across departments. Many CPR recommended reforms parallel Commission proposals.
Technology. In 2000, the Commission called for cabinet-level leadership and a coordinated
infrastructure to make better use of technology to improve government performance. The CPR
advanced those recommendations in calling for the creation of a technology division and the
appointment of a chief technology officer for the State.
Budgeting. In 1995 the Commission urged the State to use performance metrics to set goals and
monitor results and the adoption of performance budgeting to address fiscal and performance
deficiencies. Consistent with these recommendations, the CPR called for the use of performance-
based management and budgeting in all departments.
Corrections. The Independent Review Panel chaired by former Governor Deukmejian, in its
review of California’s corrections system, drew upon four Commission reports and echoed its
concern that correctional policies fail to protect public safety. Mirroring many of the Commission’s
proposals, Governor Schwarzenegger issued Governor’s Reorganization Plan 2 to reorganize
correctional functions, proposing changes in incarceration, drug treatment, inmate education,
job training and parole policies to better prepare inmates for release and ensure public safety.
Foster Care. The CPR specifically recommends that the State designate a leader for foster care,
charged with coordinating state efforts to service children and their families and enhancing
accountability, a recommendation the Commission first made in 1999 after previous efforts to
improve collaboration faltered.
Public Health. The Commission proposed that public health functions be consolidated, led by a
physician who reports to the Governor, and charged with promoting science-based policies and
practices. Citing the Commission’s work, the CPR made consistent recommendations calling for
consolidated public health functions and a more empowered state public health officer.
School Construction. To address the cost and shortage of classroom space, the Commission
recommended integrating the school facility approval process. The CPR advanced this proposal
to streamline the approval process and reduce costs.
Infrastructure. The CPR cites three Commission reports on the State’s management of real
property. The Commission recommended that the State develop an inventory of state owned and
leased property and the creation of a public corporation to improve property management. The
CPR advances the Commission’s recommendation for a public corporation and calls for improved
use of technology to manage the State’s property inventory.
10
In pursuit of
Economy & Efficiency
A summary of Commission reports published in 2003-2004.
The past two years have been tumultuous for California. Virtually every aspect of government
has been overshadowed by an acute budget crisis that threatens the prosperity of the Golden
State. The failure to resolve this crisis further eroded the trust that Californians should have in
their government to provide quality services at an affordable cost.
At this critical juncture, the Commission focused its charge to promote efficiency, economy and
improved service on areas of government where its recommendations, if implemented, could
have the greatest impact on the most pressing problems.
Given the need for fundamental reform, the Commission explored how state leaders could go
about breaking through the political gridlock: Governing the Golden State: A Critical Path to
Improve Performance and Restore Trust examined why previous reform efforts failed and outlined
a process that the Governor and Legislature could employ to resolve persistent problems such as
the dysfunctional state-local relationship. Historic Opportunities: Transforming California State
Government reviewed the potential of reforms such as those identified by the California Performance
Review to improve the State’s performance.
The fiscal crisis also laid bare the debilitating defects in how the State organizes, manages and
funds public efforts to keep people safe, healthy and self-sufficient. In Real Lives, Real Reforms:
Improving Health and Human Services, the Commission described a strategy for redesigning more
than $60 billion in services to California’s most vulnerable populations. Within the rubric of
human services, the Commission published four additional reports: To Protect & Prevent: Rebuilding
California’s Public Health System; For Our Health & Safety: Joining Forces to Defeat Addiction;
Still in Our Hands: A Review of Efforts to Reform Foster Care in California; and, Regulation of
Acupuncture: A Complementary Therapy Framework.
The fiscal crisis also raised the imperative for improving the performance of the State’s public
safety policies, which are largely paid for from the General Fund. The Commission’s examination
of the State’s billion-dollar parole system found that the State was releasing 125,000 parolees a
year in ways that did not protect the public. In Back to the Community: Safe and Sound Parole
Policies, the Commission outlined a strategy for realigning existing resources, incentives,
responsibilities and programs in ways that have proven to reduce crime, violence and substance
abuse. In a follow-up study on female parolees, Breaking the Barriers for Women on Parole, the
Commission detailed how the State could begin this fundamental shift by relying on community-
based corrections for the smaller and less violent population of female offenders.
Finally, in its report, Improving Public Safety: Beyond the Office of Criminal Justice Planning, the
Commission recommended replacing the agency that has failed to strategically support local
crime-fighting efforts with a new structure that would target resources to programs proven to
work and to communities with the greatest problems. These 10 studies are highlighted on the
following pages.
11
Government Reform
Governing the Golden State:
A Critical Path to Improve Performance
and Restore Trust
July 2004
California faces critical challenges that policy-
makers must address for the State to regain
prosperity, improve the performance of
government and rebuild public trust. But efforts
to solve these problems over several years – from
an obsolete revenue system to a dysfunctional
state-local relationship – have failed to yield
necessary reforms. Governing the Golden State
examines those efforts to assess how California
leaders could more successfully resolve these
issues.
With the benefit of hindsight, the report defined
a continuum for sustainable prosperity that
includes a robust economy, a reliable revenue
system, a rigorous budget process, quality public
services and public support. The report distilled
a critical path that would enable the leadership
of California government to achieve a permanently
balanced budget while delivering the highest quality public services at an affordable cost.
The Little Hoover Commission report …offers a strategic plan for how to achieve reform.
The governor and legislative leaders need to keep the report handy, not on the back
shelf, to remind them – nag them – that this effort cannot begin soon enough.
- Los Angeles Times editorial
Historic Opportunities: Transforming California
State Government
December 2004
The California Performance Review (CPR) was created to examine
state operations and recommend reforms for a transformation of
state government. The CPR – and the public debate it sparked –
elevated a painful, undeniable truth: State government needs to
be re-engineered to be more responsive and accountable to the
public, to focus its priorities and to improve its performance.
Historic Opportunities identifies essential elements that should be
considered in the development of formal proposals resulting from
the CPR, by the Legislature in its deliberations, and by voters
when weighing the merits of reforms, particularly if asked to enact
them directly.
12
Public Safety
Back to the Community: Safe & Sound Parole Policies
November 2003
California’s parole policies are profoundly
out of sync with those in all other states.
California parolees are among the least
successful nationally in completing their
term of supervision. The costs and
consequences are significant – the State
spends $1.5 billion dealing with felons who
have completed their initial prison terms
and the correctional system’s focus on
punishment alone does not adequately
protect Californians.
The reforms detailed in Back to the Community would direct state and local agencies to fashion a
cohesive system of state, county and community agencies, focused on making the best use of
existing resources to reduce crime, violence and drug abuse.
The Little Hoover Commission rightly condemns the parole system as a “billion dollar
failure.” ...To improve parole success and protect communities, the state must expand
drug and alcohol treatment, education and vocational training behind bars.
- Sacramento Bee editorial
Breaking the Barriers for Women on Parole
December 2004
A follow-up study on women parolees, Breaking the Barriers, urged policy-
makers to reform the way California incarcerates women offenders and
supervises them on parole to improve public safety, reduce costs and
break the cycle of crime. The numbers of female inmates are increasing
more rapidly than their male counterparts, a trend that has highlighted
the lack of policies and procedures geared toward women.
The report recommends the State provide more opportunities for inmates
to prepare for their imminent release, rely more on community corrections
alternatives for non-violent drug offenders and transition responsibility
for parolees to communities, beginning with female offenders, whose
families are often extensively involved in public and charitable health
and human service programs.
Improving Public Safety: Beyond the Office of Criminal Justice Planning - July 2003
Over the last decade, several Commission projects involved the Office of Criminal Justice Planning,
particularly those related to coordinating state efforts and assisting local agencies. The Commission was
struck by widespread opinion among state and community leaders that OCJP failed to provide the
leadership necessary for stakeholders, public officials, researchers and others to define a common vision
and manage programs to reach shared goals. Improving Public Safety recommended the State abolish
OCJP and assign its grant programs to more competent departments. It also recommended establishing
a Public Safety Council to help streamline, coordinate and consolidate grant programs.
13
Health & Human Services
Real Lives, Real Reforms:
Improving Health & Human Services
May 2004
California's health and human service system is
unsustainable. Despite annual investments of
some $60 billion, outcomes are poor and
demographics suggest that a growing number of
Californians will turn to public programs for
assistance.
Real Lives, Real Reforms recommends comprehensive reforms to focus public resources on building
effective, efficient, community-based systems of care. The report urged the Governor and
Legislature to establish clear goals and priorities for children, adults and families and support a
reform process that fundamentally reshapes state operations, state-local relations, funding and
accountability.
To Protect & Prevent: Rebuilding California’s Public Health System
April 2003
There is broad agreement among local officials, the medical community and other first responders
that the public health system in California is not as robust as it must be. Poor communications
and obsolete procedures hobble the ability of laboratories, medical providers and public health
authorities to protect the public. Experts and technologies are not tapped. Key positions are
unfilled and authorities and responsibilities are unclear.
To Protect & Prevent recommended the State develop expert leadership, establish standards,
increase training, improve communications and strengthen laboratory and other capacities
essential to the public health infrastructure. It recommended core public health functions be
consolidated into a single state department with a surgeon general providing expert and focused
leadership and reporting directly to the Governor. It also recommended that the State re-establish
a volunteer public health board to provide expert involvement and public accountability to the
government's efforts.
I commend the Commission for putting together this powerful report calling for reorganizaiton
of the California public health system. As a physician who has worked for more than 20
years in local, state and national and international public health, and who has responsibility
for the health and safety of thousands of employees in the U.S. and abroad, I fully support
these recommendations. If implemented, I truly believe that lives can be saved.
- T. Warner Hudson, M.D., FACOEM, FAAFP, Director, Health, Safety and Environement,
DSTOutput Member, Disaster Subcommittee of American College of Occupational &
Environmental Medicine
14
For Our Health & Safety: Joining Forces to Defeat Addiction
March 2003
The abuse of alcohol and other drugs has an enormous impact
on the health and well-being of Californians, and tremendous
fiscal costs on government. From prisons to emergency rooms,
addiction costs billions each year. In California, existing
resources could be better used if prevention, treatment and
enforcement efforts were better coordinated.
For Our Health & Safety recommends how state and community
leaders could employ sound science to better respond to one of
the most costly and harmful problems facing California.
Specifically, the State must develop a strategy that uses prevention, treatment and law enforcement
where those tools have proven they can do the most to reduce the consequences of abuse and
addiction.
The state Little Hoover Commission’s recent report, like a RAND Corp. study, shows that
drug treatment programs mean less spending on both incarceration and social programs
down the road....Treatment rather than jail is a more cost-effective and less harmful
approach. The voters agree. The governor should go along.
- Orange County Register editorial
Still In Our Hands: A Review of Efforts to Reform Foster Care in California
February 2003
The Commission has a long-standing interest in ensuring that California's most vulnerable
residents receive adequate protection, nurturing and care. In 1999, the Commission detailed
the perils that face children who are neglected or abused. In 2003, the Commission analyzed
what progress, if any, had been made in reforming the foster care system. It found that
considerable action was taken, but almost no progress was made and that the greatest obstacle
to meaningful reform was the unwillingness on the part of both state and local leaders to take
responsibility.
With no one in charge, the foster care system fumbles forward, and often backward, and costs
children and families their happiness, their prosperity and even their lives. Still In Our Hands
recommends the establishment of strong and supported leadership for the foster care system
along with focused citizen oversight at both the state and county level.
Regulation of Acupuncture: A Complementary Therapy Framework - September 2004
In 2002, the Governor and the Legislature asked the Commission to assess some long-standing and
contentious issues regarding the State’s regulation of the acupuncture profession. Specifically, the
Commission was asked to review the scope of practice and educational requirements for acupuncturists,
the process for accrediting acupuncture schools and for examining licenses.
Regulation of Acupuncture recommends ways to amend the scope of practice to resolve ambiguities in
California law. The report concludes that educational requirements are adequate, the Accreditation
Commission of Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine should validate the quality of acupuncture training
schools but California should continue to rely on its own examination. The Commission also identified
opportunities for the State’s consumer protection agencies to safeguard patients.
15
16
Results
Measuring
Improving lives and making the most of existing resources.
The Commission’s goal is not simply to make recommendations, but to assist in making reforms.
In the past two years, working with the public, community officials, government leaders and
members of the Legislature, the Commission has played a major role in turning recommendations
into results. The list below identifies measureable results in the areas of public safety, alcohol
and drug treatment, public health, foster care, mental health and immigrant integration. In
virtually all cases, these improvements were made possible by public or community officials who
saw value in the Commission’s work. These leaders deserve credit and have the Commission’s
appreciation.
Public Safety
Protecting Public Safety. After a decade of recommendations from the Commission and other
blue ribbon panels, officials with the Department of Corrections acknowledged that fundamental
reforms are necessary. The Commission's finding that California's parole system was a billion-
dollar failure put California's correctional policies in the national spotlight and required corrections
officials to acknowledge their responsibility to prepare inmates for release. Nearly 100 newspapers,
radio and television stations in California, as well as the New York Times and the NewsHour with
Jim Lehrer featured the findings and recommendations from the Commission's report. Legislative
hearings were held. Prompted by this and other high-profile indications of failure, the Governor
established the Independent Review Panel on Corrections chaired by former Governor Deukmejian.
Corrections officials have acknowledged that incarceration alone does not protect public safety
and that programs that treat addiction and provide education and job skills are necessary to
break the cycle of crime. The Independent Review Panel endorsed many of the Commission's
recommendations.
Result: The administration is implementing reforms that have the potential to bolster
offender preparation prior to release by establishing a department dedicated to preparing
offenders for release.
Promoting national awareness of public safety challenges. The American Bar Association has
recommended national reforms consistent with the Commission’s recommendations in California.
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy challenged the legal community to improve the
nation’s attention to prisons and corrections policies. In response, the American Bar Association
formed the Kennedy Commission to respond to the challenge. The Little Hoover Commission was
invited to advise the Kennedy Commission during its work. Ultimately, the Kennedy Commission
cited the Commission in its final report and made parallel recommendations for graduated
sanctions for parole violations and diversion opportunities for less serious offenses.
Result: The Kennedy Commission endorsed recommendations of the Little Hoover
Commission and increased national attention on the need to improve corrections and
public safety policies.
17
Strategic alignment of crime prevention. After issuing a report finding that the Office of Criminal
Justice Planning was poorly managed and often failed to provide the leadership necessary to
help communities fight crime, violence and drug abuse, the agency was abolished. As
recommended by the Commission, OCJP programs were reassigned to agencies with subject
matter and administrative expertise.
Result: An ineffective bureaucracy that for years had failed the critical task of protecting
communities from crime was eliminated.
Balancing prevention and law enforcement efforts. As the
Legislature grappled with budget cuts during the past two
“The Little Hoover Commission
sessions, the Commission's analysis of youth crime and
reports are extremely useful, not
only to statewide policy-makers, but violence prevention was used to assess how best to judge
also to local government leaders. the effectiveness of prevention and law enforcement
The reports are concise, easily read strategies.
and understood and contain policy
recommendations that are non- Result: Throughout the budget crisis, the State
partisan. maintained most of its investment in youth crime and
The research is invaluable from a violence prevention programs.
policy perspective and provides an
opportunity for policy-makers, both Preventing youth crime and violence. Based on the
at the state and local level, to use
Commission's work, local leaders in Alameda County
the recommendations in a very
developed a strategic approach to violence prevention. In
practical way to solve problems. I
have used Commission reports on developing their plan, local leaders drew from the
violence prevention and Commission’s work on youth crime and violence prevention
immigration extensively to help to identify priorities and improve programs. The
devise strategies for policy
Commission provided assistance to the effort at the early
direction.”
stages of its developments.
Anna Caballero, Mayor of Salinas
Result: Alameda County has developed a Violence
Prevention Blueprint to improve public safety and
respond to the needs of community members.
Alcohol & Drug Treatment
Bringing attention to underlying drug and alcohol addiction problems. The Commission's report
on alcohol and drug programs called for linking prevention, treatment and law enforcement
efforts into a unified strategy to reduce the effects of drug and alcohol addiction. The Commission
was asked to brief the deputy director for demand reduction of the Office of the National Drug
Policy Control. In California, the Coalition of Alcohol and Drug Associations (CADA), a statewide
coalition of consumers, providers, educators and advocates representing the voice for alcohol
and drug abuse services called on the Governor to bring all stakeholders together to maximize
California's efforts in reducing substance abuse. CADA's seven-point policy plan provided to the
Governor and the Legislature encouraged the implementation of all the Commission's
recommendations.
Result: The Commission's recommendations are the basis of a reform agenda that has
been championed by a broad statewide coalition of alcohol and drug treatment stakeholders.
18
Implementing outcome-based standards for alcohol and drug treatment. The Department of Alcohol
& Drug Programs established an Outcome Monitoring Program Implementation Workgroup, as
recommended by the Commission to act as an advisory board for the implementation of the
California Outcomes Monitoring System (CalOMS) project.
Result: Stakeholders had an improved opportunity for input on the development of the
CalOMS system.
Public Health
Improving California’s public health protections. The
Commission analysis of public health preparedness
“This report is a “Code Blue” for the
has increased attention on the need to bolster
California Public Health system, but for
emergency preparedness. The Commission’s report
much more. Thanks to dedicated staff and
on public health found that the State’s public health magnificent history, California still has
resources were in disarray, underutilized and lack arguably the strongest health department in
the ongoing support of senior officials needed to the country, despite the neglect and
subordination it has suffered. Sadly, nearly
prevent public health threats and respond to
every other large health department in the
emergencies. The Commission’s report spurred
nation is suffering from similar problems of
changes in how the State utilizes public health
diffusion of energy and Claocnkt roof ls aunpdp oPrrte. v eYnetti,on
resources. Public Health in this nation could be
resuscitated with genuine political support
Result: The Governor and Legislature have drawn
and leadership, and the structural repairs the
from the Commission’s work to craft reform report identifies. The Commission’s report
proposals, including those offered by the should be required reading at every school
California Performance Review, that will save of public health and of government in the
nation.”
lives, reduce costs and limit unnecessary harm.
Richard Jackson, MD, MPH,
California Public Health Officer
Advancing research on public health threats. The
former director, U.S. Centers for Disease
California Endowment invested $500,000 to assess
California’s ability to respond to the public health
threats documented by the Commission. The foundation’s investment provided California with
the most comprehensive assessment to date of local preparedness for public health emergencies.
The Commission’s work, bolstered by the foundation-supported research, unearthed deficiencies
in planning, coordination and collaboration between federal, state and local officials.
Results: California is better informed about potential public health threats and where
improvements are needed to shore up emergency preparedness.
Enhancing scrutiny of consumer protection activities. In response to the Commission’s report on
the regulation of acupuncture, the Legislature’s Joint Committee on Boards, Commissions and
Consumer Protection is calling for improved standards for acupuncture practices. The Commission
documented that the Acupuncture Board has not required licensed acupuncturists to adhere to
national guidelines to prevent the spread of disease or cross contamination. The legislative
committee has increased its scrutiny of the State Acupuncture Board and called for legislative
reforms to ensure consumers are adequately protected.
Result: Statewide standards to ensure the safe delivery of acupuncture will improve,
preventing public health threats.
19
Foster Care
Identifying new resources to support foster youth. Prompted by the Commission’s work, California’s
Employment Training Panel adopted new policies allowing emancipating foster youth to participate
in training programs funded by the panel. The panel funds job training for workers facing
multiple barriers to employment. The action creates additional opportunities for young adults
leaving foster care to develop the skills needed for self-sufficiency and independence.
Result: Emancipating foster youth have improved access to training and employment
opportunities.
Improving the foster care system. The Commission helped
guide California’s outcomes and accountability system for
“I was privileged to author many
the child welfare system. AB 636, authored by
important bills to improve the lives
Assemblymember Darrell Steinberg, required the Health
of foster children in California. I
was motivated to take on these and Human Services Agency to form a task force to develop
issues largely because of the Little an outcomes and accountability system for the child
Hoover Commission’s outstanding welfare system. The Commission participated in
work and call to action. Keep doing
discussions leading to the strongest effort ever to improve
what you are doing Little Hoover
outcomes for children in the child welfare system.
Commission. The Legislature and
Governor would be wise to follow
Result: California developed a system for monitoring
more of your recommendations.”
quality and promoting improvements in the system
Darrell S. Steinberg, California State
that serves some 40,000 children each year.
Assemblyman 1998-2004
Enhancing oversight of foster care. The Commission’s
work led to new requirements for the California Mental Health Planning Council to ensure that
children in foster care receive adequate mental health care. Under AB 376, authored by
Assemblymember Judy Chu, the California Mental Health Planning Council was given specific
duties to monitor the quality of mental health services for children in foster care, advocate to
reduce stigma and improve advocacy. The requirements in AB 376 were drawn from the
Commission’s work on health and human services and its call to make better use of existing
resources to improve oversight and accountability.
Result: The State has bolstered its oversight of California’s foster care system, ensuring
that more children will receive the services they need to succeed.
Making child welfare information accessible. Prompted by the Commission, the Department of
Social Services has improved procedures for sharing information with the public. Prior to the
change, department staff informed the public that to view licensing information they must be
present in the licensing office where those materials are maintained. Family members would be
required to visit multiple licensing offices around the State to view information on multiple
providers. An inquiry from the Commission led to changes in regulations to make it clear that
the public can request copies of public information be sent through the mail. The department
also issued new training requirements for its licensing personnel to ensure public requests for
information are responded to appropriately.
Result: Parents and family members have improved access to public information and are
better able to ensure their children and family members are well served in licensed facilities.
20
Mental Health
Defining a statewide agenda for children’s mental health. The Commission’s report on children’s
mental health brought together children’s advocates to explore the Commission’s findings and
craft a strategic effort to implement its recommendations. Meeting in San Francisco, and with
the support and leadership of Assemblymember Leland Yee, Assemblymember Helen Thomson
and San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown, over 100 delegates and stakeholders used the Commission’s
report to define an agenda for reform.
Result: The Commission’s report broadened awareness of the challenges facing families
who need mental health services for their children and guided a reform agenda.
Guiding community mental health planning
and programs. The Commission helped Yolo
“The Little Hoover Commission was instrumental
County design a strategy to build a
in facilitating a complete redesign of Yolo County’s
community mental health system that mental health program delivery system. Yolo
maximizes available resources, tailors care County, like many California counties, has been
to needs and invests in prevention. Faced stressed by the need to provide mental health
services to an increasing client population with
with a budget deficit, county officials
greater acuity in their illnesses, while receiving the
contacted the Commission to help guide
same or less funding.
downsizing in the county’s mental health
The executive director of the Commission and one
system. The Commission worked with county
of the Commission’s senior analysts were
leaders, community organizations, mental invaluable in their assistance to this collaborative
health consumers, service providers and community/staff/provider process by providing a
others to use the opportunity to redesign neutral outside perspective, informed by
experience with other California counties. As we
county services to boost prevention efforts,
reached the end of the process, Commission staff
tailor services to needs and make better use
were key in bringing consensus on contentious
of existing revenues.
issues and tying reforms together into realistic and
achievable recommendations.
Result: Yolo County is better prepared to
Since the issuance of the panel’s report, Yolo
address continuing budget challenges and
County has been able to implement most of the
improve its mental health system.
recommendations contained therein, and continues
to benefit from the report’s many insights.”
Improving access to mental health care. The
John Clark
Commission assisted the Board of Behavioral Deputy County Administrative Officer
Sciences in streamlining its testing Yolo County
procedures to be more responsive to licensing
applicants. Prior to the changes, applicants
faced unnecessary delays in taking a licensing exam. The board’s streamlined administrative
practices allowed it to better respond to shortages of licensed personnel in mental health fields.
Result: An artificial barrier to mental health care is removed, permitting more Californians
to access quality services.
21
Immigrant Integration
Shaping international dialogue on immigrant integration policies. The Commission’s report on
immigrant integration in California is informing immigration policy discussions for the European
Union. The Migration Policy Group in Brussels invited the Commission to participate in an
international conference on immigration policy. The Migration Policy Group was formed to advise
the European Parliament on building a unified immigration policy for the member nations of the
European Union. Two of five delegates invited from the United States were identified because of
their contributions to the Commission’s report.
Result: Commission’s work supports international policies on immigration and immigrant
integration.
Supporting community efforts to bolster immigrant integration. The San Diego Association of
Governments has used the Commission’s report on immigrant integration to improve local, state
and federal partnerships in serving immigrants and addressing the impacts they have on the
communities around San Diego. The Commission’s report – with its emphasis on the rights and
responsibilities of immigrants and communities – helped members of the San Diego Association
of Governments find common ground on issues that have been divisive.
Result: Community leaders in the San Diego region are better equipped to address unresolved
conflicts and ongoing challenges.
22
Change begins with
A Shared Understanding
To explain, to inspire and to guide is to initiate change.
Public understanding is essential to government accountability and improved performance. The
Commission dedicates a portion of its resources to public discussion of its conclusions to help
the public and policy-makers understand how public programs are functioning and can be
enhanced. The Commission receives requests for presentations from public officials, civic and
business leaders, the academic community and others, from foreign countries, Washington, D.C.,
other state governments and California’s largest cities and smallest communities. In each venue,
the Commission shares strategies with individuals and organizations that can improve public
programs. This chronology documents these efforts.
January 2003
Public Policy Institute of California Little Hoover Commission Projects and Procedures
San Francisco Discussed the Commission's projects and efforts to measure its
effectiveness. The discussion explored ways to increase the
impact of projects and how to evaluate such efforts.
California Partnership for Children, Children's Mental Health
Children's Mental Health Policy Board Provided opening and closing remarks and participated in a
San Francisco day-long conference organized around the findings and
recommendations in the Commission's report. Participants
included Assemblyman Leland Yee, Mayor Willie Brown and
Assemblywoman Helen Thomson.
Western Stream Migrants Forum Immigrant Integration
Mesa, Arizona Detailed Commission recommendations to medical professionals
from throughout the western United States at this federally
sponsored conference on improving health care services to
migrant workers.
Enhancing Democracy
By themselves, and as a precursor to actual reforms, the Commission’s projects provide these benefits:
Build Awareness. The Commission’s reports are easy-to-understand analyses of state and local operations.
The Commission is regularly asked to speak before university classes, foundations, non-profit organizations
and other entities striving to understand how government operates.
Inspire Improvement. The Commission’s charge is to encourage improvement in public services. The
Commission dedicates considerable energy to encouraging state and local policy-makers and the public to
demonstrate the leadership necessary to take on challenges and make improvements.
Guide Reformers. The Commission is consistently called upon to provide expert testimony and consultation
before legislative hearings, policy briefings and statewide meetings focused on implementing Commission
recommendations or exploring other ways to make improvements.
Provide Accountability. The Commission seeks to improve the performance of public agencies through
accountability for how directives are fulfilled and resources are spent. Through public presentations the
Commission provides public accountability for its own efforts.
23
February 2003
University of California Researchers Teacher Workforce
Santa Cruz Reviewed draft report and met with researchers examining the
impact of mentoring programs on new teachers serving schools
with large numbers of immigrant children. The researchers had
consulted with the Commission throughout their project because
of the Commission's work on teacher preparation.
March 2003
County Alcohol & Drug Program Alcohol & Drug Treatment
Administrators Association of Discussed Commission findings and recommendations and
California identified the significance for county program administrators.
Sacramento
California Welfare Outcomes and Foster Care
Accountability Systems Task Force Participated in a task force formed by the California Health &
Sacramento Human Services Agency to develop an outcome and
accountability system for the child welfare system as required by
AB 636 (Steinberg).
California Foster Youth Services Foster Care
Training Conference Discussed Commission findings and recommendations at an
Los Angeles annual training conference for staff that coordinate educational
services for foster youth.
Los Angeles Community Service Prevention/Foster Care/Mental Health/Drug Treatment
Providers Presented the Commission's work on prevention, mental health,
Los Angeles foster care and drug abuse to community service providers in
the harbor area of Los Angeles. The forum was organized by the
Los Angeles Unified School District to focus on how the service
providers, working through the schools, could sustain or
improve services despite budget cuts.
Youth Development Network Youth Crime and Violence Prevention
San Diego Discussed Commission recommendations aligned with the goals
of the network, an outgrowth of a youth development summit
sponsored by Senator Dede Alpert.
April 2003
California Agricultural Leadership Affordable Housing
Program At the request of Assemblyman Joe Canciamilla and Senator
Sacramento Mike Machado, outlined the Commission's work, and its
affordable housing study in particular to the 30 industry and
government leaders participating in the program.
Schwab Foundation Symposium on Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment
Youth Addiction Discussed Commission findings and recommendations and
Sacramento responded to questions from participants. Following the
symposium, briefed the deputy director for Demand Reduction,
Office of the National Drug Policy Control, on the Commission's
work.
California Department of Alcohol and Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment
Drug Programs Meeting Discussed Commission findings and recommendations to state,
Sacramento local and non-profit alcohol and drug program leaders at a
meeting sponsored by the Department of Alcohol and Drug
Programs (ADP). Participants discussed integration of services
and disparity of standards between ADP programs and prison-
based programs.
24
California Association of Alcohol and Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment
Drug Program Executives (CAADPE) Discussed Commission findings and recommendations with the
Sacramento legislative director for CAADPE, including opportunities for
implementation of recommendations through the Legislature.
State Assembly Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment
Sacramento Testified before the Assembly Budget Subcommittee on Health
and Human Services on the Commission's findings and
recommendations.
California Association of Alcohol and Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment
Drug Program Executives (CAADPE) Presented Commission findings and recommendations at the
Sacramento annual convention of CAADPE and advocated the organization's
potential role in implementing the recommendations.
Western Regional Child Abuse and Foster Care
Neglect Conference Provided the keynote address at this 22nd annual conference
Davis, California sponsored by the University of California, Davis on the
Commission's efforts to improve outcomes for abused and
neglected children and led a workshop outlining strategies to
improve accountability and enhance outcomes.
Accessing Health Services for Children Foster Care
in Foster Care, Northern California Discussed the Commission's efforts to implement its
Task Force recommendations and the Commission's work on human
Oakland services redesign.
California Mental Health Advocates for Foster Care
Children and Youth Discussed the Commission's findings and recommendations and
Asilomar, California challenged the audience to increase expectations of existing
citizen review panels and to identify and partner with the
Commission to remove barriers to health care, education and
other services needed by foster youth.
Sacramento Unified School District Foster Care
Sacramento Discussed with school district staff strategies to improve
opportunities for foster youth and former foster youth to obtain
job training, mentors and other support services to enhance
their opportunities to be self-sufficient.
Governor's Office Public Health
Sacramento Discussed Commission findings and recommendations with the
Governor's staff and a chief deputy from the Department of
Health Services.
California Senate Public Health
Sacramento Discussed Commission findings and recommendations with
Senator Deborah Ortiz, chair of the Senate Health and Human
Services Committee and her staff.
May 2003
California Association of Local Affordable Housing
Housing Finance Agencies Participated in the spring conference focusing on housing and
Sacramento land use legislation under consideration, California's changing
demographics and trends in affordable housing construction.
State Senate Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment
Sacramento Testified before the Senate Budget Subcommittee on Health,
Human Services, Labor and Veterans Affairs on Commission
findings and recommendations regarding the targeting of
resources to clients posing the greatest social and financial costs
to the State.
25
Nevada County Superintendent of Foster Care
Schools Discussed options for establishing a citizen's review panel to
Grass Valley build public support for children's programs and improve public
accountability with the Nevada County superintendent of
schools.
U.S.-European Policy Dialogue of the Immigrant Integration
Migration Policy Group Discussed Commission findings and recommendations with
Brussels, Belgium representatives from each nation within the European Union to
formulate a shared statement on immigration and to draft
supporting policy proposals for the European Parliament.
California Task Force to implement Mental Health
the Eliminating Barriers Initiative Participated in a task force to implement the federal initiative
Sacramento that would reduce stigma and discrimination experienced by
people with mental health needs and identified opportunities to
leverage the federal initiative to create a Mental Health Advocacy
Commission.
California Conference of Local Health Public Health
Officers Discussed Commission findings and recommendations with
Sacramento conference participants.
State Senate and Assembly Public Health
Sacramento Discussed Commission recommendations with conference
Assemblymembers Patricia Bates, vice chair of Assembly
Appropriations Committee; Dario Frommer, chair of Assembly
Health Committee; Robert Pacheco, vice chair of Assembly
Health Committee; Keith Richman, and Senator Aanestad, vice
chair of Senate Health Committee.
June 2003
Adolescent Substance Abuse Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment
Treatment Assessment Invited by the Public Health Institute to participate in a panel to
Sacramento discuss the design of a system of care for substance abusing
adolescents that would incorporate all necessary services,
sustain public support and attract necessary funding.
Mendocino County Officials Children's Mental Health
Ukiah Facilitated an ad hoc meeting of officials to identify and
implement strategies to improve services to children with mental
health needs.
Sacramento City Unified School Foster Care
District and the Governor's Mentoring As part of a limited on-going support effort, met with
Partnership representatives from the school district and the mentoring
Sacramento partnership to develop a strategy to recruit 100 additional
mentors for foster youth in Sacramento schools.
Children's Advocates Foster Care
Sacramento Facilitated a meeting of children's advocates to discuss proposals
for improving public awareness and advocacy relating to
outcomes for children and families.
California Department of Alcohol and Foster Care
Drug Programs Discussed a research project to examine whether children
Sacramento enrolled in Healthy Families are receiving adequate drug
treatment and mental health services through their providers
with the director and staff from the Department of Alcohol and
Drug Programs.
26
Immigration Museum for New Immigrant Integration
Americans Discussed Commission findings and recommendations in the
San Diego keynote speech at the inaugural conference of the museum. The
goal of the conference was to foster dialogue among policy-
makers, foundations, business and civic leaders and
representatives of immigrant organizations in the San Diego
region.
Mental Health Summit for Law Mental Health
Enforcement Discussed Commission recommendations with national experts
Sacramento meeting to discuss strategies for diverting mental health clients
from the criminal justice system.
Council of Mentally Ill Offenders Mental Health
Sacramento Discussed opportunities before the council, created as a result of
a Commission recommendation, to improve state and local
programs serving offenders with mental health needs.
Yolo County Officials Mental Health
Woodland Advised officials and a committee of community members on
strategies for restructuring mental health services to address
revenue shortfalls and improve outcomes for clients and
community members. Agreed to participate in weekly meetings.
July 2003
Child Welfare Outcome and Foster Care
Accountability Task Force Participated in a task force under the direction of the Health and
Sacramento Human Services Agency to develop a proposal to present to the
Legislature to create a Child Welfare Outcome and
Accountability System.
August 2003
Foster Youth Foster Care
Tehama County Discussed challenges facing children in foster care with foster
youth to identify strategies the Commission could pursue to
improve outcomes for children in out-of-home placements.
September 2003
Sutter Health System and Sutter Mental Health
Medical Foundation Explored opportunities to improve mental health care within the
Sacramento primary care field with representatives from health
organizaitons.
California Center for Health Public Health
Improvement Discussed with the chief executive officer the potential for
Sacramento private sector leadership in stemming hospital-acquired
infections.
State Assembly Public Health
Sacramento Assisted Assembly Health Committee staff in planning an
interim hearing on implementing the Commission's
recommendations to create a public health department led by a
surgeon general.
27
October 2003
California Partnership for Children Children's Mental Health
Sacramento Advocated for implementation of the Commission's
recommendations.
California Grand Jurors' Association Citizen Oversight
Ventura Discussed Commission’s mission and work at the annual
conference of an all-volunteer, educational, not-for-profit
corporation that trains new grand jurors and educates the
public about the civil oversight role of grand juries.
China State Law and Administrative Citizen Oversight
Training Delegation Met with 25 government officials from different ministries,
Sacramento bureaus and other organizations in China's central government
to discuss the role of the Commission as an independent state
oversight agency.
Sacramento, Placer and Yolo County Mental Health
Mental Health Organizations Participated in the first "Walk for Mental Health," a joint effort
Sacramento sponsored by multi-county mental health organizations as a first
step toward communities working to overcome the stigma of
mental health needs – a recommendation from the Commission's
report.
California Medical Association Public Health
Sacramento Discussed implementation of the Commission's
recommendations with the medical association leadership.
Sixth Annual California Prevention Youth Crime and Violence Prevention
Summit Presented Commission’s prevention-related recommendations
San Jose from various reports to representatives from organizations,
agencies and volunteers working in partnership to advance
primary prevention work concerning alcohol, tobacco and other
drug problems in California communities.
November 2003
California Youth Connection Foster Care
Sacramento Participated as a panelist at a policy conference organized by
current and former foster youth.
The Pacific Institute for Community Immigrant Integration
Organizing (PICO) Met with officials from PICO, a group organizing a series of focus
Sacramento groups in the central valley and Los Angeles, regarding the
Commission's recommendation to link rights and responsibilities
in immigrant policies as a way to explore attitudes toward
licensing undocumented immigrant drivers.
State Senate Special Districts
Sacramento Testified at a Senate Local Government Committee interim
hearing on special districts examining governance issues
addressed in the Commission's report.
Monterey County Elected Officials Youth Crime & Violence Prevention
Monterey Met with elected officials at a meeting convened by the League of
California Cities Latino Caucus to address escalating problems
of youth and gang violence.
2003 Violence Prevention Priority Area Youth Crime & Violence Prevention
Convening Presented the Commission's work on youth violence prevention
Costa Mesa at a conference sponsored by The California Wellness
Foundation.
28
December 2003
State Assembly Public Health
Sacramento Testified before the Assembly Veterans Affairs Committee
Oversight Hearing on the California National Guard regarding
the Commission's recommendation for improving chain of
command, communication and establishing coordinated practice
drills to prepare for public health emergencies.
Association of California Water Special Districts
Agencies Annual Conference Discuss with conference attendees how to increase the visibility
San Diego and accountability of districts, including whether legislation is
needed.
Violence Prevention Institute Youth Crime & Violence Prevention
Oakland Assisted the institute with a meeting to develop an Alameda
County violence prevention plan, part of an ongoing effort
spearheaded by Alameda County Supervisor Nate Miley.
January 2004
State Senate Parole Reform
Sacramento Testified at an informational hearing on parole convened by the
Senate Select Committee on the Correctional System.
State Assembly Parole Reform
Sacramento Discussed legislative proposals to implement the Commission's
recommendations with Assemblymembers Lori Hancock and
Mark Leno.
State Senate Public Health
Sacramento Testified before the Senate Health and Human Services
Committee hearing on the Commission's recommendations for
rebuilding public health.
California National Guard Public Health
Sacramento Met with a colonel from the California National Guard to discuss
the Commission's findings and recommendations focusing on
chain of command and integration with strategic partners during
public health emergencies.
February 2004
State Senate and Assembly Parole Reform
Sacramento Testified at a joint legislative hearing on the children of
incarcerated parents.
Association of California Cities Allied Parole Reform
with Prisons Annual Conference Discussed the Commission's findings and recommendations at
Sacramento this conference hosted by the Chamber of Commerce.
State Assembly Parole Reform
Sacramento Provided lead testimony for an Assembly Public Safety
Committee informational hearing to explore potential
educational reforms in prisons.
29
March 2004
California Performance Review Government Reorganization
Sacramento Discussed the Commission's findings and recommendations with
staff of the California Performance Review, with a particular
emphasis on the Commission's work on human services
redesign.
California State Association of Parole Reform
Counties (CSAC) Administration of Discussed the Commission's findings and recommendations with
Justice Policy Committee California county leaders.
Sacramento
State Assembly Parole Reform
Sacramento Testified at an Assembly Public Safety hearing on improving
transitional educational services for prison inmates.
County Health Executives Association Public Health
of California Discussed the Commission's findings and recommendations with
Sacramento ranking health officials from California counties and three large
cities.
April 2004
American Bar Association's Kennedy Parole Reform
Commission Chairman Michael Alpert testified before the American Bar
Sacramento Association's Kennedy Commission on findings and
recommendations from the Commission's work on public safety
issues, including the parole system, prison policies, juvenile
justice, youth crime and violence prevention and alcohol and
drug treatment.
State Senate Parole Reform
Sacramento Testified at the Senate Public Safety Committee hearing on
measures authored by Senator Charles Poochigian relating to
prison inmate work credits and a risk assessment process to
reduce recidivism.
May 2004
Business, Transportation & Housing Affordable Housing
Agency Met with Sunne McPeak, agency secretary, to discuss the
Sacramento Commission's work and its continuing interest in advancing
policies to develop an adequate supply of housing, including
affordable housing.
Housing Stakeholders Affordable Housing
Sacramento Participated in meeting of housing stakeholders convened by
Sunne Wright McPeak, secretary, Business, Transportation and
Housing Agency.
Health & Human Services Agency Human Services Redesign
Sacramento Discussed Commission findings and recommendations with Kim
Belshé, secretary, Health & Human Services Agency.
State Senate Human Services Redesign
Sacramento Discussed Commission findings and recommendations with
Assemblymember Lois Wolk, chair, Assembly Committee on
Human Services.
30
California Performance Review Human Services Redesign
Sacramento Discussed Commission findings and recommendations with Paul
Miner, chief deputy cabinet secretary and other members of the
California Performance Review.
California State Association of Human Services Redesign
Counties (CSAC) Discussed Commission findings and recommendations with
Sacramento executives from the California State Association of Counties.
Civic Leaders Human Services Redesign
Sacramento and Yolo Counties Discussed Commission findings and recommendations and
opportunities for local efforts to improve health and human
services with a group of civic leaders from Yolo and Sacramento
counties involved in health and human services.
State Senate Parole Reform
Sacramento Testified at the Senate Public Safety Committee on a
Commission-supported bill to reform and expand education
programs in prisons.
California Correctional Officials Parole Reform
Sacramento At the invitation of the California Correctional Peace Officers
Association, attended a presentation by a national expert on
evidence-based strategies for prisoners and parolees.
Journal of History & Economic Parole Reform
Thought (JEHT) Foundation Advised the president and staff of the JEHT Foundation on how
Sacramento it could fund community-based efforts to implement the
Commission's recommendations.
Governor's Independent Review Panel Parole Reform
Sacramento Met with Joe Gunn, executive director of the Governor's
Independent Review Panel, which developed recommendations
for restructuring the State's correctional system.
State Senate Parole Reform
Sacramento Provided an update to Senator Gloria Romero, chair, Select
Committee on the California Correctional System, on the women
and parole study.
June 2004
State Assembly Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment
Sacramento Testified at the Assembly Public Safety Committee hearing on a
measure that would provide drug treatment, rather than
confinement, for parolees of the California Youth Authority who
have been charged with non-violent drug possession.
Expert Panel to Review the California Governing the Golden State
Department of Aging Structure Participated on an expert panel chaired by Assemblymember
Sacramento Lynn Daucher to review and evaluate options for structural
realignment for state administered programs serving older
Californians.
Ventura County Board of Supervisors Human Services Redesign
Ventura County Discussed the Commission's findings and recommendations.
The board unanimously passed a resolution supporting the
recommendations and wrote letters of support to the Governor
and the Commission.
State Assembly Parole Reform
Sacramento Testified at the Assembly Public Safety Committee on a
Commission-supported bill that would require the Department of
Corrections and others to determine how to best encourage
inmates to complete educational, vocational and substance
abuse programs.
31
State Assembly Public Health
Sacramento Testified before the Assembly Health Committee on a measure
based upon the Commission's recommendation to create a
Department of Public Health within the Health and Human
Services Agency to be headed by a State Health Officer.
PolicyLink School Facilities
Sacramento Participated in a round table discussion sponsored by the non-
profit organization PolicyLink that explored ways to improve
school construction. Commission recommendations were cited
and endorsed.
July 2004
Next Ten Project Governing the Golden State
Monterey Presented Commission findings and recommendations to senior
advisors of the Next Ten Project at the Panetta Institute. The
Next Ten Project is conducting regional meetings with
community leaders to build understanding and support for
structural solutions to the State's budget and revenue problems.
California Council for Environmental Governing the Golden State
and Economic Balance Presented Commission findings and recommendations and
Lake Tahoe discussed the Commission's role in a government reorganization
process.
Corrections Leadership Summit Parole Reform
Sacramento Attended portions of a week-long summit convened by Rod
Hickman, secretary, Youth and Adult Correctional Agency to
discuss with staff and management the recommendation of the
Independent Review Panel (IRP). Several key recommendations
of the IRP were based on Commission recommendations.
August 2004
State Council on Developmental Government Reorganization
Disabilities Discussed the Commission's role in reviewing government
Sacramento reorganization plans.
San Diego Association of Governments Immigrant Integration
(SANDAG) Presented Commission findings and recommendations to the
San Diego SANDAG Borders Committee in a special session held to explore
the impact of undocumented immigrants on the San Diego
region.
September 2004
James Irvine Foundation Governing the Golden State
San Francisco Discussed the Commission's recommendations with
representatives from the James Irvine Foundation, which is
funding projects that build community support for persistent
public problems.
Foundation Consortium Human Services Redesign
San Francisco Presented the Commission's recommendations on improving
state and county government relationships to the board of
directors of the Foundation Consortium, an alliance of corporate,
private, community and family foundations that share a
common vision.
32
State Senate Parole Reform
Sacramento Testified at the first of a series of hearings held by the Senate
Prison Oversight Committee to explore recommendations by the
Independent Review Panel and the Commission regarding the
structure of the Youth and Adult Correctional Agency.
October 2004
Housing Users Statistics Group Affordable Housing
Berkeley Presented Commission findings and recommendations regarding
structural barriers to the development of an adequate supply of
housing at the second annual meeting of the Housing Users
Statistics Group convened by the Berkeley Program on Housing
and Urban Policy.
Children's Roundtable Foster Care Foster Care
Task Force Discussed Commission's work on reforms in child welfare
Sacramento services with task force members at a seminar sponsored by the
Children's Advocacy Institute.
December 2004
State Senate and Assembly Acupuncture Regulation
Sacramento Testified before the Joint Committee on Boards, Commissions
and Consumer Protection on the Commission's conclusions
regarding acupuncture at a hearing that is part of the sunset
review process for the Acupuncture Board.
Executive Fellows Government Reorganization
Sacramento Discussed Commission's work on government reorganization
with recent university graduates selected to work as executive
fellows in the offices of department directors.
Department of Consumer Protection Government Reorganization
Sacramento Met with the director and staff to discuss the Commission's work
on government reorganization.
State Senate Government Reorganization
Sacramento Met with the staff of the newly formed Senate Committee on
Government Modernization, Efficiency and Accountability to
discuss the Commission's work on government reorganization.
CEO Roundtable Meeting of the San Government Reorganization
Diego Chamber of Commerce Discussed the Commission's work on government reorganization
San Diego with business leaders in the San Diego region.
Public Safety Grant Program Manager Office of Criminal Justice Planning
Sacramento Met with the official who is managing the grant programs once
administered by the Office of Criminal Justice Planning to
discuss the Commission's recommendations for reforming how
those grants are managed.
33
34
Legislation
2003-04
For the purpose of assisting the Governor and Legislature.
The Commission supported 17 bills during the 2003-04 Legislative Session that would implement
its recommendations. The measures were in the areas of affordable housing, children’s services,
drug and alcohol abuse treatment, parole, prisons and public health. Of those 17 bills, two were
signed into law, six were vetoed, one failed passage in policy committee, seven failed passage in
fiscal committee, and one was amended into language unrelated to Commission recommendations.
Affordable Housing Children’s Services
AB 389 (Montañez) – Requires a database AB 380 (Steinberg) – Enables counties in the
and inventory be maintained to capture Children's System of Care program to
information on brownfields. Combines systematically collect and maintain data that
provisions of SB 493 (Cedillo) enacting the demonstrates specific outcomes of CSOC.
Calif. Land Reuse & Revitalization Act of Substantially amended to become
2004. Signed by Governor, Chapter 705. Assemblymember Chan's bill regarding the
California Children & Families Commission.
AB 1426 (Steinberg) – Dedicates housing Failed to pass in Senate.
bond funds for designated communities
that meet the voluntary affordable SB 693 (Murray) – Establishes an
housing production standards. Vetoed. undersecretary of foster care coordination
within the Health and Human Services
SB 493 (Cedillo) – Reestablishes funding to Agency. Failed to pass in Assembly
the Cleanup Loans and Environmental Appropriations.
Assistance to Neighborhoods Account
(CLEAN) to make loans available for SB 1343 (Escutia) – Requires Superintendent
encouraging the cleanup and of Public Instruction to establish a task force
redevelopment of brownfields. Failed to to develop recommendations for an Infant
pass in Assembly Appropriations. and Toddler Care Master Plan. Vetoed.
Drug & Alcohol Abuse Treatment
SB 744 (Dunn) – Requires Department of
Housing and Community Development to
AB 2483 (Chan) – Increases the coordination
hear appeals on applications for the
and availability of substance abuse
construction of affordable housing
treatment for adolescents by establishing
developments. Failed to pass in Assembly.
pilot programs in four counties. Failed to
pass in Assembly Appropriations.
SB 519 (Vasconcellos) – Provides drug
treatment, rather than confinement, for
parolees of the California Youth Authority
who have been charged with non-violent
drug possession. Vetoed.
35
Parole Prisons
AB 854 (Koretz) – Expands purpose of AB 1219 (Montañez) – Creates an educational
imprisonment to include education and job board within the Department of Corrections,
training strategies proven to increase public which will appoint a superintendent of
safety and reduce recidivism. Signed by correctional education and establish
Governor, Chapter 747. standards for inmate education. Vetoed.
AB 2815 (Hancock) – Establishes pilot AB 1914 (Montañez) – Enacts the Prison
programs to provide pre-release planning Education Act; requires a newly constituted
information to local agencies so they may committee to develop and implement a plan
target resources and enhance the work of for providing transitional educational services
PACT in reintegrating inmates back into the for inmates, including, but not limited to,
community. Failed to pass in Assembly counseling and placement services. Vetoed.
Appropriations.
Public Health
SB 1660 (Poochigian) – Requires Department
of Corrections and others to determine how to
SB 858 (Ortiz) – Creates the Department of
best encourage inmates to complete
Public Health within the Health and Human
educational, vocational, and substance abuse
Services Agency; transfers specified programs
programs. Failed to pass in Assembly
and responsibilities from the Dept. of Health
Appropriations.
Services to DPH; establishes a 13-member
Public Health Board to provide involvement of
SB 1715 (Poochigian) – Requires Department
the programs administered by DPH. Failed to
of Corrections to begin the recidivism risk
pass in Assembly Appropriations.
assessment process at the time of
incarceration, rather than waiting until the
SB 1487 (Speier) – Requires hospitals to
time of an inmate's parole. Failed to pass in
collect and provide data concerning hospital-
Senate Appropriations.
acquired infections to the Office of Statewide
Health Planning & Development and the
Department of Health Services. Vetoed.
36
Consulting Experts
with
Over 500 experts and consumers have advised the Commission.
The following people testified at the Commission’s public hearings, served on advisory committees,
expert panels or focus groups, or advised the Commission with their expertise. The list reflects
their titles and positions at the time they participated in the Commission study process. Under
the Little Hoover Commission’s process, hearing witnesses and advisory committee members
provide advice and information but do not vote or comment on the final product.
Witnesses for Hearings on Foster Care
Gwen Bartholomew, Co-Founder Charlene Chase, Director Joyce R. Lewis, Vice President
Grandma’s Angels Santa Barbara County Department National Foster Parent Association
of Social Services
Berisha Black, Emancipation Linda Lewis, Executive Director
Ombudsman Patricia Curry, Commissioner Western Child Welfare Law Center
Los Angeles County Department of Los Angeles County Commission for
Children and Family Services Children and Families Stephen Mayberg, Ph.D., Director
CA Department of Mental Health
Anita M. Bock, Former Director Jaci Davis, Member
Los Angeles County Department of California Youth Connection Dennis McFall, Director
Children and Family Services Behavioral Health Services
Sweet Alice Harris Siskiyou County
Yvonne Brathwaite Burke Founder and Executive Director
Supervisor, Second District Parents of Watts Stuart Oppenheim
Los Angeles County Board of Northern Regional Director
Supervisors Grantland Johnson, Secretary Human Services Agency, San Mateo
Health and Human Services Agency County
Alice Bussiere, Staff Attorney
Youth Law Center Marjorie Kelly, Interim Director Sylvia Pizzini, Deputy Director
Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services
Child and Family Services Division, CA Department of Social
Services
Witnesses for Hearings on Alcohol & Drug Treatment
Richard Browne George J. Doane, Deputy Director James P. Gray, Judge
Director of Program Development & Division of Law Enforcement Orange County Superior Court
Technical Assistance, Los Angeles California Department of Justice
County Department of Health Melody Heaps, President
Services Michael Falasco, Legislative Liaison Treatment Alternatives for Safe
Wine Institute
Communities
Victor Capoccia, Ph.D., Program
Officer Suzanne Gelber, Ph.D., President
Substance Abuse Policy Research SGR Health, Ltd. and The Avisa Dellena Hoyer-Johnson
Program Group The Effort
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Alice Gleghorn, Ph.D., Director of C. Kathryn Icenhower, Ph.D.
Timothy P. Condon, Ph.D. Research, Epidemiology and Grants Executive Director
Associate Director Community Substance Abuse SHIELDS for Families Project, Inc.
National Institute on Drug Abuse Services
San Francisco Department of Public Martin Iguchi, Ph.D., Director
National Institutes of Health
Health Drug Policy Research Center, RAND
Karen S. Dalton, DrPH, CJM
Amalia Gonzalez del Valle Gary Jaeger, M.D., President
Director, Correctional Services
Project Director California Society of Addiction
Division
Contra Costa Substance Abuse Medicine
Los Angeles County Sheriff’s
Services Division
Department
37
Kathryn Jett, Director Andrew McGuire, Executive Director Tina Nunes Ober
CA Department of Alcohol & Drug Trauma Foundation Deputy District Attorney
Programs Santa Clara County District
A. Thomas McLellan, Ph.D., Director Attorney’s Office
Bill Kelly, Commander Treatment Research Institute
Sacramento County Sheriff’s University of Pennsylvania Rosalie Pacula, Ph.D., Economist
Department Narcotics Unit Drug Policy Research Center, RAND
Joseph D. McNamara, Ph.D.,
John D. Larson, Deputy Director Research Fellow Michael Prendergast, Ph.D.
Department of Alcohol & Drug Hoover Institution, Stanford UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse
Programs University Programs
Santa Clara County Criminal Justice Research Group
Toni J. Moore
Douglas Longshore, Ph.D. Director, Alcohol and Drug Richard A. Rawson, Ph.D.
Research Sociologist Programs Associate Director
Integrated Substance Abuse Sacramento County Department of UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse
Programs Health & Human Services Programs
UCLA Department of Psychiatry and
Biobehavioral Sciences David W. Rinaldo, Ph.D., Partner
James Mosher, J.D.
SGR Health, Ltd. and The Avisa
Senior Program Director
Patrick N. Lunney, Director Group
Division of Legal Policy Analysis
Division of Law Enforcement
Pacific Institute for Research and
CA Department of Justice Gary Sanchez
Evaluation
Deputy Probation Officer
Stephen V. Manley, Judge Santa Clara County Probation
Verdia Nix
Superior Court Department
County of Santa Clara
Allen Sawyer, Interim Executive
Director, Governor’s Office of
Criminal Justice Planning
Little Hoover Commission Alcohol & Drug Treatment Advisory Committee
Daniel N. Abrahamson Ed Carlson Carmen Delgado
Director of Legal Affairs Substance Abuse Program Officer Assistant Deputy Director
Drug Policy Alliance Charles and Helen Schwab Program Operations Division
Foundation CA Department of Alcohol and Drug
Sarah Angel, Assembly Fellow Programs
with the office of Jennifer Cassulo
Assembly Member Jenny Oropeza Executive Assistant Steve De Ross
CAADPE Assistant Chief Probation Officer
Gayl M. Anglin, Ph.D. Sacramento County
UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Alexandra Cox
Programs Drug Policy Alliance Chuck Deutschman, Director
Contra Costa County Substance
Judy Appel Michael Cunningham Abuse Services Division
Deputy Director of Legal Affairs Department of Alcohol and Drug
Drug Policy Alliance Programs Gary Dunlap, CADC Executive
Director
Tom Aswad, Member Sherry Daley, Public Policy CAADAC
Contra Costa Alcohol and Other Coordinator
Drugs Advisory Board California Association of Alcoholism David Farabee, Ph.D.
and Drug Abuse Counselors UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse
Susan Blacksher, Executive Director Programs
California Association of Addiction Karen S. Dalton, DrPH, CJM,
Recovery Resources Director David Feinberg, Manager
Correctional Services Division Residential & Outpatient Programs
Verda Bradley, Ph.D, LCSW Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Compliance Branch
Dual Diagnosis Services Department Department of Alcohol and Drug
Department of Mental Health Programs
Los Angeles County Warren Daniels, CADC Chairman
CCBADC Beth Finnerty, MPH
Michael K. Brady, Consultant to UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse
Senator John Burton David Deitch, Ph.D. Programs
Clinical Professor of Psychiatry/
Director, Addiction Training Center
University of California, San Diego
38
Thomas Freese, Ph.D., Co-Director Christopher Lewis, Licensing & Henry Richards, Ph.D.
Pacific Southwest Addiction Certification Division PBSI/The Washington Institute for
Technology Transfer Center CA Department of Alcohol & Drug Mental Illness Research and
Integrated Substance Abuse Programs Training
Programs, UCLA
Rebecca Lira, Deputy Director of David W. Rinaldo, Ph.D., Partner
Venus L. Garth, Chief Licensing & Certification SGR Health, Ltd. and The Avisa
Work Services Branch, Welfare to CA Department of Alcohol and Drug Group
Work Division Programs
CA Department of Social Services Terry Robinson, Program Director
Daniel Macallair, Vice President Children & Family Futures
Suzanne Gelber, Ph.D., President Center for Juvenile & Criminal
SGR Health, Ltd. and The Avisa Justice Al Rodriguez, Manager, Alcohol,
Group Drug & Mental Health Services,
Al Medina, Administrator Santa Barbara County
Brian Greenberg, Ph.D. Alcohol and Drug Programs
Vice President & Director of San Diego County Louis Romero, Supervising Assistant
Development Public Defender, Sacramento
Walden House Helyne Meshar, Executive Director County Public Defender’s Office
CAADPE
Christine Grella, Ph.D. Jim Rowland, Chief Probation
Associate Research Psychologist Charles Moore, M.D., Medical Officer, Napa County
UCLA Drug Abuse Research Center Director, Chemical Dependency
Recovery Program, Kaiser Suzanne Salazar, Deputy District
Frederick Heacock, Deputy Director Permanente Medical Group Inc. Attorney, Sacramento County
Alcohol, Drug & Mental Health District Attorney’s Office
Services, Yolo County Toni J. Moore, Director
Alcohol and Drug Programs Prentice E. Sanders, Chief of Police
Sue Heavens Sacramento County Department of San Francisco Police Department
Youth Treatment Analyst, OPSA Health & Human Services
CA Department of Alcohol & Drug Del Sayles-Owen
Programs Maria Morfin CA Department of Alcohol and Drug
Program Manager Programs
Sharon Jackson, Deputy Director Sacramento County Alcohol & Drug
Parole and Community Services Services Division David Smith, Founder
Division Haight Ashbury Free Clinics
Department of Corrections Rod Mullen, President & CEO
Amity Foundation Trisha Stanionis, Executive Director
Gary Jaeger, M.D., President The Effort
California Society of Addiction Marcus Nieto
Medicine Research Program Specialist Elizabeth Stanley-Salazar, MPH
California Research Bureau Vice President
Ross Jamison, Research Consultant Director of Public Policy
Center on Juvenile and Criminal Sue North, Chief of Staff Phoenix Houses of California, Inc.
Justice Senator John Vasconcellos
Antonia Taylor
Les Johnson Patrick Ogawa, Director Work Support Services
CA Department of Alcohol and Drug Los Angeles County Alcohol and Department of Social Services
Programs Drug Program Administration
Department of Health Services Sushma Taylor, Ph.D., Co-Chair
Guy Howard Klopp California Perinatal Treatment
Policy, Planning, Evaluation Joseph Ossmann Network, Center Point, Inc.
Training Manager Manager, Proposition 36 Unit
Sacramento County Alcohol & Drug Board of Prison Terms Craig Toni, Parole Agent III
Services Division Parole and Community Services
Martin Prisco Division
Victor Kogler, Consultant Department of Alcohol & Drug Department of Corrections
Former Director, Alcohol and Drug Programs
Programs Don Troutman
Santa Barbara County Ruth Range CSTL, Inc.
League of Women Voters
Jim L’Etoile, Assistant Director Children’s Lobby Joan Ellen Zweben, Ph.D.,
Office of Substance Abuse Executive Director
Department of Corrections Gary E. Ransom, Judge The 14th Street Clinic & EBCRP
Sacramento County Superior Court
Department of Psychiatry, UCSF
Richard A. Rawson, Ph.D.
Associate Director, UCLA Integrated
Substance Abuse Programs
39
Witnesses for Hearing on Public Health
Raymond J. Baxter, Ph.D. Steve Hon, President Carmen R. Nevarez, M.D., M.P.H.
Senior Vice President, Community County Health Executives Association President, California Conference of
Benefit, Kaiser Permanente of California Medical Directors and Vice President
of External Relations
Lester Breslow, M.D., M.P.H. Loren Arthur Johnson, M.D. Public Health Institute
Member, Los Angeles County Public Immediate Past President
Health Commission California Chapter of the American Roger C. On, M.D.
Former Dean, UCLA School of Public College of Emergency Physicians Practicing Cardiologist and
Health (CAL/ACEP) Assistant Clinical Professor of
Medicine, UCLA School of Medicine
Richard J. Burton, M.D., M.P.H. Philip R. Lee
Former Associate Director Former Assistant Secretary, The Honorable Keith S. Richman,
CA Department of Health Services U.S. Health & Human Services M.D., M.P.H., Member of the
Agency, Consulting Professor, California State Assembly
David M. Carlisle, M.D., Ph.D. Stanford University
Director, Office of Statewide Health Robert Ross, M.D., President and
Planning and Development Jack C. Lewin, M.D. CEO, California Endowment
Chief Executive Officer
C. Duane Dauner, President California Medical Association Jeffrey L. Rubin, Chief
California Healthcare Association Disaster Medical Services Division
Poki Stewart Namkung, M.D., M.P.H. Emergency Medical Services
Jonathan E. Fielding, M.D., M.P.H. President, California Conference of Authority
Director of Public Health and Health Local Health Officers
Officer, Los Angeles County Director of Public Health and Health James B. Simpson, J.D., General
Department of Health Services Officer, City of Berkeley Counsel, Public Health Institute
George R. Flores, M.D., M.P.H.
Consultant, California Endowment
Little Hoover Commission Public Health Advisory Committee
Steve Andriese, President Sheriff Michael S. Carona Jonathan E. Fielding, M.D., M.P.H.
Emergency Medical Services Orange County Sheriff’s Office Director of Public Health and Health
Administrator Association of Officer, Los Angeles County
California Colonel Charlie Cross Department of Health Services
California National Guard
Vicki Bermudez, R.N. George R. Flores, M.D., M.P.H.
Regulatory Policy Specialist Mark DiCamillo, Director Consultant, California Endowment
California Nurses Association The Field Institute
Greg Franklin, M.H.A., Deputy
Mike Boyd, Associate Director Catherine Dower, J.D. Director, Health Information and
U.C. Davis Medical Center Center for Health Professions Strategic Planning, California
U.C. San Francisco Department of Health Services
Lester Breslow, M.D., M.P.H.
Member, Los Angeles County Public Eileen Eastman, M.A. Calvin Freeman, President
Health Commission Executive Secretary California Public Health Association,
Former Dean, UCLA School of California Conference of Local North
Public Health Health Officers, California
Department of Health Services Kimberly Gates, M.P.P., Assistant
Kelly Brooks Secretary, California Health &
Legislative Analyst, Health & Bob Eisenman, Ph.D. Human Services Agency
Human Services, California State Director, Strategy and External
Association of Counties Relations Derrick A. Green
National Facility Services Department of Veterans Affairs
Doug Buchanan Kaiser Permanente
Mountain Valley EMS Agency Joseph M. Hafey, M.P.A.
President and CEO
Richard J. Burton, M.D., M.P.H. Public Health Institute
Former Associate Director
CA Department of Health Services
40
Peter Hansel, Chief Consultant John Miller, Staff Director Don Sloma, M.P.H.
Senate Health & Human Services Senate Committee on Health & Executive Director, Washington
Former Principal Consultant Human Services State Board of Health
Senate Office of Research
Carol Mordhorst, Public Health Daniel R. Smiley
Sydney Harvey, Ph.D. Director, Department of Public Chief Deputy Director
President, California Association of Health, Mendocino County California Emergency Medical
Public Health Laboratory Directors Services Authority
Director, Los Angeles County Public Poki Stewart Namkung, M.D.,
Health Lab M.P.H., President, California Gerald Solomon, J.D.
Conference of Local Health Officers Public Health Foundation
Steve Hon, President Director of Public Health and Health Enterprises
County Health Executives Officer, City of Berkeley
Association of California Marion Standish
Bruce Pomer, Executive Director Senior Program Officer
T. Warner Hudson, M.D., FACOEM, Health Officers Association California Endowment
FAAFP, Director, Health, Safety and Public Health Advocacy and
Environment, DST Output Consulting, Pomer & Associates James W. Stratton, M.D., M.P.H.
Medical Epidemiologist
Richard J. Jackson, M.D., M.P.H., Judith Reigel, Executive Officer Office of Environmental Health
Director, National Center for County Health Executives Hazard Assessment
Environmental Health Association of California
U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Kenneth Takata
Prevention Kevin Reilly, D.V.M., D.P.V.M. Public Health Lab Director
Deputy Director, Prevention Services Department of Health and Human
Fred Johnson, President California Department of Health
Services, Sacramento County
California State Rural Health Services
Association Verdie L. Thompson, R.N., M.S.N.
Arthur L. Reingold, M.D. Public Health Nursing Chair,
Loren Arthur Johnson, M.D. Professor and Head of Epidemiology California Public Health Association,
Immediate Past President U.C. Berkeley, School of Public North
California Chapter of the American Health
College of Emergency Physicians Terri Thorfinnson, Director of Policy
(CAL/ACEP) Roger Richter California Primary Care Association
Senior Vice President of Professional
Dallas Jones, Director Services, California Healthcare
Stephen Waterman, M.D.
Governor’s Office of Emergency Association
Senior Medical Epidemiologist
Services
U.S. – Mexico Border Infectious
Rebecca Stark Rivas
Disease Coordinator, CDC
Neal D. Kohatsu, M.D., M.P.H. The PICO California Project
Medical Director
Medical Board of California Debby Rogers, Health Consultant Major Daniel Weber
Senate Republican Caucus California National Guard
Philip R. Lee, M.D., Former
Assistant Secretary for Health, U.S. Roger Rosenberg Brigadier General Stephen Wyman,
Health and Human Services HOAC Administrator, Health M.D., California National Guard
Consulting Professor, Stanford Officers Association of California
University Alan Zelicoff, M.D., Senior Scientist,
Kenneth I. Shine, M.D., Director Center for Arms
Jack C. Lewin, M.D. RAND Center for Domestic and Control and National Security
Chief Executive Officer International Health Security Sandia National Laboratories
California Medical Association Immediate Past President, Institute
of Medicine
41
Witnesses for the Hearing on the Office of Criminal Justice Planning
Alan R. Brown, Ph. D. Patti Giggans, Executive Director The Honorable Bill Lockyer
Arizona Prevention Resource Center Los Angeles Commission on California Attorney General
Assaults Against Women
Suzie Cohen, Consultant Wayne K. Strumpfer
Suzie Cohen & Associates Denise C. Herz, Ph.D., Associate Interim Executive Director
Professor, Department of Criminal Office of Criminal Justice Planning
Cabell C. Cropper, Executive Justice and Criminalistics
Director, National Criminal Justice California State University, Arturo Venegas, Jr., Chief of Police,
Association Los Angeles (Retired), Sacramento Police
Department and member, California
Elaine M. Howle Council on Criminal Justice
California State Auditor
Witnesses for Hearings on Parole Reform
Rulette Armstead, Assistant Chief Andy Hsia-Coron, Chair Shirley Poe, East Bay District
San Diego Police Department Professional Educators and Administrator, California
Librarians Department of Corrections
Nina Salarno Ashford, Consultant California State Employees Parole and Community Services
Crime Victims United of California Association Division
Ernest Austin, Founder Michael P. Jacobson, Ph.D., The Honorable Larry Reid
Ex-Offender Action Network Professor Council Member, City of Oakland
Department of Law and Police
The Honorable Jerry Brown Science Richard Rimmer, Deputy Director
Mayor, City of Oakland John Jay College of Criminal Justice Department of Corrections
Parole & Community Services
Lance Corcoran Peter Jensen, Undersecretary Division
Executive Vice President Youth and Adult Correctional
California Correctional Peace Agency Harriet Salarno, Chair/President
Officers Association Crime Victims United of California
Ron Owens, Community Liaison
Susan Fisher, Executive Director Mayor’s Office, City of Oakland Marvin Speed, Executive Officer
Doris Tate Crime Victims Bureau Board of Prison Terms
The Honorable Don Perata
Frances Hesselbein Member of the California State Jeremy Travis, Senior Fellow
Chair, Board of Governors Senate Urban Institute
Leader to Leader Institute Justice Policy Center
(formerly the Peter F. Drucker
Foundation) Richard L. Word, Chief of Police
City of Oakland
Participants in a Meeting with Local Law Enforcement on Parole Reform
Richard J. Barrantes, Commander Bob Blankenship, Chief of Police Richard L. Word, Chief of Police
Los Angeles County Sheriff’s (Retired) City of Oakland
Department City of Redding
Lou Blanas, Sheriff Albert Nájera, Chief of Police
Sacramento County City of Sacramento
42
Little Hoover Commission Parole Reform Advisory Committee
Ernest Austin, Founder Stephen Goya, Regional Ron Owens, Community Liaison
Ex-Offender Action Network Administrator, Department of Mayor’s Office, City of Oakland
Corrections Parole and Community
James Austin, Ph.D., Director Services Division Greg Pagan, Assembly Committee on
George Washington University Public Safety
Institute on Crime, Justice and Simon Haines, Chief Counsel
Corrections Senate Public Safety Committee David Panush
Assistant Fiscal Policy Advisor
Bob Blankenship Ross D. Hutchings, Executive Senator John L. Burton's Office
Representing the League of Director, California Probation, President Pro Tempore
California Cities and the California Parole & Correctional Association
Police Chiefs Association Mark Peterson, Sergeant
Sharon Jackson Sacramento County Sheriff’s
Tim Brown, Executive Director Assistant Deputy Director Department
Loaves & Fishes Department of Corrections, Parole &
Community Services Division Ruben Ramos, EDD Representative
Ken Cater, Chief Deputy Department of Corrections
Commissioner Edward Jagels Parole & Community Services
Board of Prison Terms Kern County District Attorney Divison
Bubpha Chen Jim L’Etoile, Assistant Director Richard Rimmer, Deputy Director
Research Program Specialist III Department of Corrections Department of Corrections
Department of Corrections Research Office of Substance Abuse Parole & Community Services
Branch Division
Jim Lindburg, Legislative Advocate
Arthur Chung, Chief Friends Committee on Legislation Sharon Rocco, Parole Agent III
Department of Corrections Department of Corrections
Offender Information Services Tim Lockwood, Acting Chair Parole & Community Services
Department of Corrections Research Division
Karen Dalton PH, CJM, Director Branch
Los Angeles County Sheriff Eluid Romero, Attorney
Department Dan Macallair, Executive Director Sacramento County Public
Correctional Services Division Center on Juvenile & Criminal Defender’s Office
Justice
Connie Erlich Paul Seave, Director
Administrative Representative Rick Mandella Department of Justice, Office of
Youthful Offender Parole Board Board of Prison Terms Attorney General
Council on Mentally III Offenders Crime & Violence Prevention Center
Ben Fairow, Lieutenant
Oakland Police Department Jerome Marsh Don Specter, Director
Assistant Regional Parole Prison Law Office
Susan Fisher, Executive Director Administrator
Doris Tate Crime Victims Bureau Department of Corrections Norma Suzuki, Executive Director
Parole and Community Services Chief Probation Officers of CA
Raul Galindo, Chair Division
Youthful Offender Parole Board Susan Turner, Ph.D., Associate
Keith Matsuo, Regional Parole Director
Mike Gallegos, Deputy Director Administrator, Department of RAND Public Safety & Justice
California Youth Authority Corrections, Parole and Community
Parole Services & Community Services Division Max Vanzi, Principal Consultant
Corrections Senate Office of Research
Marcus Nieto
Millicent Gomes, Mental Health Research Program Specialist Steve Weinrich, Sergeant
Administrator, Department of California Research Bureau City of Sacramento Police
Corrections, Parole and Community Department
Services Division
Mary Wiberg, Executive Director
Commission on Status of Women
43
Witnesses for Hearings on Human Services Redesign
Dion Aroner Jerry Doyle, President Pat Leary, Legislative Representative
Legislator-in-Residence Chief Executive Officer California State Association of
Institute of Industrial Relations EMQ Children and Family Services Counties
University of California, Berkeley Alisa Drakodaidis
Raymond J. Merz, Director
Todd Bland, Director Acting Assistant Administrative Department of Health and Human
Legislative Analyst’s Office Officer Services
Social Services Section Chief Administrative Office Placer County
Service Integration Branch
Catherine Camp, Former Director Los Angeles County Terri Parker, Executive Director
California Mental Health Directors California Housing Finance Agency
Association Margaret Dunkle, Senior Fellow
Health Insurance Reform Project Elliott Robinson, Director
Charlene Chase, Director George Washington University Department of Social Services
Department of Social Services Monterey County
Santa Barbara County B. Timothy Gage, Former Director
California Department of Finance Jean M. Ross, Executive Director
California Budget Project
Participants in a Roundtable Discussion on Human Services Redesign
Lewis Butler Emery “Soap” Dowell John Kamensky
Chairman of the Board Director, Access Dental Plan (HMO) Associate Partner and Senior Fellow
Ploughshares Fund Former Director, Sutter Medical IBM Center for the Business of
Founder, California Tomorrow Foundation and Blue Cross of Government
California
Susan Sherry, Executive Director
Robert Hertzberg Center for Collaborative Policy
Former Speaker of the California
State Assembly
Little Hoover Commission Human Services Redesign Advisory Committee
Bonnie Armstrong, Senior Fellow Alisa Drakodaidis Frank Mecca, Executive Director
Foundation Consortium for Acting Assistant Administrative County Welfare Directors
California’s Children & Youth Officer, Chief Administrative Office Association
Service Integration Branch
Bud Bautista, Director Los Angeles County Edward P. Melia, M.D.
Health and Human Services Agency
Children’s System of Care Margaret Dunkle, Senior Fellow Elliot Robinson, Director
Placer County Health Insurance Reform Project Department of Social Services
George Washington University Monterey County
Charlene Chase, Director
Department of Social Services Yolie Flores Aguilar, Executive Pat Ryan, Executive Director
Santa Barbara County Director, Children’s Planning California Mental Health
Council, Los Angeles Directors Association
Judy Chynoweth, Executive Director
Foundation Consortium Megan Hafenstein, Legislative Aide Rusty Selix, Executive Director
Assemblymember Cindy Montañez Mental Health Association in
Richard Dana California and
Mutual Assistance Network of Jim L’Etoile, Chief California Council of Community
Del Paso Heights California Department of Mental Health Agencies
Corrections
Carmen Delgado Office of Substance Abuse Programs Steve Trippe, Executive Director
Assistant Deputy Director New Ways to Work
Program Operations Division Pat Leary, Legislative Representative
California Department of Alcohol California State Association of Stewart Wakeling, Executive
and Drug Programs Counties Director
Juvenile Justice Coordinator
Jerry Doyle, President Raymond C. Mastalish Community Partnership for Families
Chief Executive Officer Executive Director of San Joaquin County
EMQ Children and Family Services California Commission on Aging
Nancy Westergaard, Consultant
Sara McCarthy, Consultant Office of Assemblyman Leland Yee
Senate Office of Research
44
Witnesses for Hearings on Governing the Golden State
Donna Arduin, Director Russell Hancock Joe Peters, Secretary/Treasurer
State of California President & Chief Executive Officer California Farm Bureau Federation
Department of Finance Joint Venture: Silicon Valley
Network The Honorable Scott Peters
Mark Baldassare, Ph.D. Council Member, City of San Diego
Director of Research Bill Hauck, Director
Public Policy Institute of California California Business Roundtable The Honorable Keith S. Richman,
M.D., M.P.H.
John Bohn Elizabeth Hill Member of the California State
Chairman and Chief Executive Legislative Analyst Assembly
Officer
GlobalNet Venture Partners, LLC Peter Hutchinson William J. Rosendahl
President Chairman
The Honorable Joseph Canciamilla Public Strategies Group, Inc. California Commission on Tax Policy
Member of the California State in the New Economy
Assembly Perry Kenny, Past President
California State Employees Tom Stallard, Executive Director
Michael Coleman Assocation Valley Vision
Principal
CaliforniaCityFinance.com Lucy Killea, Ph.D. Steven C. Szalay
Former Legislator, California State Executive Director
Carl Demaio, Executive Director Senate California State Association of
The Performance Institute Counties
J. J. McClatchy, CEO
B. Timothy Gage, Former Director McClatchy Management The Honorable John Upton,
State of California Council Member, City of South Lake
Department of Finance Chris McKenzie Tahoe and Former President,
Executive Director California State Association of
League of California Cities Counties
Little Hoover Commission Governing the Golden State Advisory Committee
Paul Arevelo, City Manager Lucy Killea, Ph.D. Joe Peters, Secretary/Treasurer
City of West Hollywood Former Legislator, California State California Farm Bureau Federation
Senate
Kent Briggs, Executive Director Jean Ross, Executive Director
Council of State Governments - Kenneth Larson, Director of Public California Budget Project
West Policy, CA Association of Nonprofits
Fred Silva
Matthew A. Cahn, Ph.D., Professor Steve Levy, Director Senior Advisor on Governmental
Calfiornia State University at Center for Continuing Study of Relations
Northridge California Economy Public Policy Institute of California
Ralph Carmona, Director, Public J. J. McClatchy, CEO Dwight Stenbakken
Relations McClatchy Management Director of Legislation, Policy
Sacramento Metropolitan Utility Development, Grassroots
District Chris McKenzie, Executive Director League of California Cities
League of California Cities
John Decker, Staff Director Steven C. Szalay, Executive Director
Senate Office of Research Peter Mehas, Ed.D, Superintendent California State Association of
Fresno County Office of Education Counties
John Ellwood, Ph.D.
Professor of Public Policy Roger Noll, Ph.D., Director John Upton, Member, South Lake
University of California at Berkeley Center for Research on Economic Tahoe City Council and Former
Development & Policy Reform President, California State
Timothy Hodson, Ph.D. Stanford Univeristy Association of Counties
Director, Center for California
Studies George M. Passantino Roger Valine, President
California State University - Public Affairs Director, Reason Vision Service Plan
Sacramento Foundation
45
Little Hoover Commission Governing the Golden State Focus Group Participants
Nick Bollman, President & Chief Bill Hauck, President Jennifer Swenson, Consultant
Executive Officer, Center for California Business Roundtable Senate Committee on Local
Regional Leadership Government
Steve Keil, Legislative Coordinator
Bruce E. Cain, Ph.D., Director California State Association of Steven Szalay, Executive Director
Center for Governmental Studies Counties California State Association of
University of California at Berkeley Counties
Chris McKenzie, Executive Director
Michael Coleman, Principal League of California Cities Caprice Young, Chief Executive
CaliforniaCityFinance.com Officer
Marianne O'Malley Charter Schools Association
Marney Cox, Chief Economist Principal Fiscal & Policy Analyst
San Diego Association of Legislative Analyst's Office Bud Wendell, Principal
Governments Management Communications and
Jean Ross, Executive Director Strategic Communications
Lenny Goldberg, Member California Budget Project Consultant,
California Commission on Tax Policy Joint Venture: Silicon Valley
in the New Economy and Executive Peter Schaafsma, Staff Director Network
Director, California Tax Reform Assembly Republican Fiscal
Association Committee
Witnesses for Hearings on Acupuncture
Shari Asplund, Vice Chair Norman R. Hertz, Ph.D., Former Steven Rosenblatt, M.D., Ph.D.,
California Acupuncture Board Chief, Office of Examination L.Ac., Co-Founder and Former
Resources, California Department of Clinical Director, UCLA
Sandra Bressler, J.D., Vice Consumer Affairs Acupuncture Clinic; Former
President, Center for Medical and Director, Complementary Medicine
Regulatory Policy, California Medical Lixin Huang, President Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical
Association American College of Traditional Center
Chinese Medicine, and President of
Brian C. Fennen, L.Ac., Executive the Council of Colleges of Alan Trachtenberg, M.D., M.P.H.
Director, Council of Acupuncture Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine Former Planning Chair, NIH
and Oriental Medicine Associations Consensus Conference on
Gary Klapman, M.D., L.Ac. Acupuncture, Medical Director,
Richard G. Fong, D.C., L.Ac. Office of Pharmacologic and
Michelle Lau, L.Ac., President Alternative Therapies, U.S. Public
Harley Goldberg, D.O. Council of Acupuncture and Health Service, Center for
Director of Complementary and Oriental Medicine Associations Substance Abuse Treatment
Alternative Medicine, The
Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Marilyn Nielsen, Executive Officer Penelope Ward
California Acupuncture Board Director of Professional Services
Christina Herlihy, Ph.D. Accreditation Commission for
Chief Executive Officer Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine
National Certification Commission (ACAOM)
for Acupuncture and Oriental
Medicine Pei Li Zhong-Fong, L.Ac., Chair
California Acupuncture Board
Little Hoover Commission Acupuncture Advisory Committee
Marilyn Allen Sandra Bressler, J.D., Vice DaRen Chen, L.Ac., QME, OMD
American Acupuncture Council President President, Academy of Chinese
Center for Medical and Regulatory Medicine
Shari Asplund, Vice Chair Policy
California Acupuncture Board California Medical Association John Chen, PharmD, Ph.D., OMD,
L.Ac.
Matthew Bauer, L.Ac. Jackson Chau, L.Ac., President
La Verne Acupuncture California Certified Acupuncturists Andrew S. Cho, J.D., M.P.H.
Association Vice President, South Baylo
University
46
Benjamin Dierauf, L.Ac. Yong Sup Lee, L.Ac. Betsy Smith, Director of State
CA State Oriental Medical Executive Vice President Relations, National Certification
Association/Acupuncture & Association of Korean Oriental Commission for Acupuncture &
Integrative Medicine College – Medicine and Acupuncture of Oriental Medicine
Berkeley California (AKOMAC)
Angela Tu, L.Ac., OMD
Alex Feng, L.Ac., Ph.D. Fred Lerner, DC, Ph.D., Chairman Diablo Acupuncture & Pain Control
National Board of Acupuncture Clinic
Brian Fennen, L.Ac., Executive Orthopedics
Director, Council of Acupuncture & Jeanne Tumanjan, L.Ac., Former
Oriental Medicine Associations Brian Chee Loh, L.Ac., OMD, Member, California Acupuncture
President Board
Andrew Fitzcharles, MS, L.Ac. United California Practitioners of
Los Gatos Oriental Medicine Chinese Medicine Michael Turk, L.Ac.
East/West Health Center
Zhi Dao Guan Neal S. Miller, L.Ac., CCAA, CCOMD
Clinic for Traditional Chinese Studio City Oriental Medical Center Raymond Victorio, L.Ac., DOM (FL)
Medicine President, Acupuncture &
Howard Moffet, MPH, L.Ac. Integrative Medicine College,
Thomas R. Haines, Ph.D. Research Project Manager Berkeley
Director, Academic Affairs Kaiser Permanente – Division of
Pacific College of Oriental Medicine Research and Former Member, Penelope Ward
California Acupuncture Board Director of Professional Services
Christina S. Herlihy, MA, Ph.D. Accreditation Commission for
Chief Executive Officer Will Morris, OMD, L.Ac., Academic Acupuncture & Oriental Medicine
National Certification Commission Dean (ACAOM)
for Acupuncture & Oriental Emperor’s College of Traditional OM
Medicine David Wells, DC, L.Ac.
Marilyn Nielsen, Executive Officer Former President, Council of
Lixin Huang, President, Council of California Acupuncture Board Acupuncture & Oriental Medical
Colleges of Acupuncture and Associations
Oriental Medicine, American College Robin Martin Okada, Study
of Traditional Chinese Medicine Coordinator Kristy Wiese, Deputy Director
Department of Psychiatry and Legislative and Regulatory Review
Linda S. Jordan, OMD, L.Ac., RN Behavioral Sciences, Stanford Unit, CA Department of Consumer
University, School of Medicine Affairs
Deke Kendall, OMD, Ph.D., L.Ac.
Director for Education and Research
David Pacheco, Principal Consultant Bill Wong, Chief of Staff, Office of
National Guild for Acupuncture and
Assembly Business & Professions Assemblymember Judy Chu
Oriental Medicine
Committee
Wen Shuo Wu, L.Ac., Dean of
John Jung Min Kim, L.Ac., OMD,
Rebecca Patchin, M.D. Acupuncture Oriental Medicine,
Ph.D.
Chair, Council on Legislation Southern California University of
California Medical Association Health Sciences (SCUHS)
Gary Klapman, M.D., L.Ac.
Former Member, California
Ted Priebe, OMD, QME, L.Ac., Benjamin Chi-Kuo Yang, C.A., OMD,
Acupuncture Board and Chair of the
President L.Ac.
Acupuncture Board Task Force
National Oriental Medicine Member of National Advisory
Accrediting Agency Council for Complimentary &
John Kolenda, L.Ac.
Alternative Medicine NIH
Former Board Exam Liaison,
Steven Rosenblatt, M.D., Ph.D., Member of Industrial Medical
California Acupuncture Board and
L.Ac., Co-Founder and Former Council
Drug and Alcohol Detoxification
Clinical Director, UCLA State of California
Subject Matter Expert
Acupuncture Clinic; Former
Director, Complementary Medicine Ron Zaidman, MBA, Co-Founder
Howard Kong, L.Ac., President
Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical and President, Five Branches
California State Oriental Medical
Center Institute
Association
Elad Schiff, M.D., Fellow Pei Li Zhong-Fong, L.Ac., Chair
Marete Kunze, L.Ac., OMD
Program in Integrative Medicine California Acupuncture Board
Long Life Medical Clinic
College of Medicine, University of
Arizona and Former Chair, Israel's Laura Zuniga, Senior Consultant
Michelle Lau, L.Ac., President
Complementary Medicine Task Assembly Republican Caucus
Council of Acupuncture and
Force
Oriental Medicine Associations
47
Witnesses for Hearings on Women & Parole
Cindy Marie Absey John Dovey John Surbeck, Judge
Victim/Witness Director Warden Allen County Superior Court
San Luis Obispo County California Institution for Women Fort Wayne, IN
District Attorney's Office
Phyllis Gonzalez Robin Taylor
Elizabeth Belzer Mentee Attorney Mentor
Women's Programs Coordinator Volunteers in Parole, Inc. Volunteers in Parole, Inc.
Alameda County Sheriff's Office
Jo Ann Gordon Casondra Tshimanga
Barbara E. Bloom, Ph.D. Warden MOMS Program Alumna
Associate Professor, Department of California Rehabilitation Center
Criminal Justice Administration Curtis L. Watson, Undersheriff
California State University, Sonoma Stephen V. Manley, Judge Alameda County Sheriff's Office
and, Project Director, National Santa Clara County Superior Court
Institute of Corrections, Gender- Jeanne S. Woodford, Director
Responsive Principles Project Richard Rimmer Department of Corrections
Acting Chief Deputy Director
Susan Burton, Executive Director Department of Corrections Mike Zimmerman
A New Way of Life Re-entry Project Field Operations Division Executive Director
Volunteers in Parole
Participants on Expert Panels on Housing, Employment and Substance Abuse Treatment for the
Women & Parole Study
Kenneth Allen, Program Manager Victoria Eberle Karen Johnson
HALT/RSAT Program California Department of California Department of
Rio Cosumnes Correctional Center Corrections Corrections
Office of Substance Abuse Programs Office of Substance Abuse Programs
Judy Appel
Deputy Director of Legal Affairs Linda Evans, Organizer Tim Jones
Drug Policy Alliance All of Us or None Oakland Housing Authority
Legal Services for Prisoners with
Elizabeth Belzer Children Marilyn Kalvelage
Women's Programs Specialist Assistant Deputy Director
Alameda County Sheriff's Office Millicent Gomes, Mental Health California Department of
Administrator, California Corrections
Marguerite Buchanan, Program Department of Corrections Parole & Community Services
Director Parole and Community Services Division
Catherine Center, Burlingame Division
Delores Lyles
Bill Burke Arlene Wilson Grant Program Manager
Employment Development Sacramento Region Community Dr. J. Alfred Smith, Sr. Training
Department Foundation Academy
Workforce Development Branch Allen Temple Baptist Church
Jodi Green
Susan Burton, Executive Director Sacramento Sheriff’s Department Peggy Merical, Program Director
A New Way of Life Re-entry Project Quinn Cottages
Judy Harris, Deputy Parole
Yvonne Cooks, Community Liaison Administrator, California Charr Lee Metsker, Chief
Legal Services for Prisoners with Department of Corrections, Parole & Employment & Eligibility Branch
Children Community Services Division California Department of Social
Services
Reneca Corbin Fred Haywood, California
A New Way of Life Re-entry Project Department of Corrections, Parole & Toni J. Moore, Director
Community Services Division Alcohol & Drug Programs
Sharon DeCray, Family Services Sacramento County Department of
Manager Cynthia Hunt Health & Human Services
Alameda County Housing Authority Quinn Cottages
Rod Mullen, President & CEO
Matthew Doherty, Program Officer David Husid Amity Foundation
Corporation for Supportive Housing
48
Joe Ossmann, Parole Agent III Del Sayles-Owen, Deputy Director Renee Smith, LCSW
California Department of Office of Criminal Justice Director of Criminal Justice
Corrections Collaboration Programs
Parole & Community Services CA Department of Alcohol and Drug Walden House, Treasure Island
Division Programs
Cecelia Lakatos Sullivan
Gloria Ramirez, Resident Ken Shoenlau
Quinn Cottages Southern California Sober Living Robert Tobin, Executive Director
Coalition Cottage Housing
Denise Sassoon, Program Manager
Providence Place Karen Shouldis Dyana Wheeler, Resident
Mental Health Systems, Inc. Quinn Cottages
Witnesses for Hearings on Government Reorganization
John M. Basler Tim Hodson, Executive Director Lenny Mendonca, Chairman
former Vice President Center for California Studies Bay Area Economic Forum
Support Services, Pacific Bell California State University,
Sacramento Leon C. Panetta, Director
Joseph E. Bodovitz Leon & Sylvia Panetta Institute for
former Executive Director Elizabeth M. Imholz, Director Public Policy
California Coastal Commission West Coast Office, Consumers California State University,
former Executive Director, California Union Monterey
Public Utilities Commission
Jacqueline Jacobberger, President Carolyn Purcell, CEO
Bruce Cain, Director League of Women Voters Purcell Ventures, LLC
Institute of Government Studies former Chief Information Officer,
University of California, Berkeley J. J. Jelincic, President State of Texas
California State Employees
Carole D. Chesbrough Association Susan Robison, Consultant
Chief Deputy Commissioner National Conference of State
Department of Financial Institutions John M. Kamensky Legislatures
Associate Partner and Senior Fellow
John W. Ellwood, Professor IBM Center for the Business of Lester M. Salamon
Goldman School of Public Policy Government founding Director and Principal
University of California, Berkeley Research Scientist
Joanne Corday Kozberg, Co-Chair Center for Civil Society Studies
Robert C. Fellmeth California Performance Review Johns Hopkins Institute for Policy
Executive Director Commission Studies
Center for Public Interest Law Regent, University of California
University of San Diego former Secretary, State and Anne Sheehan, Executive Director
Consumer Services Agency California Performance Review
Judith Frank, Member Commission
California Health Facilities Robin MacGillivray, President Chief Deputy Director for Policy,
Financing Authority Business Communications Services California Department of Finance
former Member and Chair, SBC West
California State Parks and Thomas H. Stanton, Fellow
Recreation Commisison Margarita Maldonado, Bargaining Center for the Study of American
Chair, Unit 1, SEIU Local 1000 Government
Steven B. Frates, President California State Employees Johns Hopkins University
Center for Government Analysis Association
Senior Fellow, Rose Institute for Robert M. Stern, President
State and Local Government, Stuart McKee, National Technology Center for Governmental Studies
Claremont McKenna College Officer former General Counsel, Fair
U.S. Public Sector, Microsoft Political Practices Commission
Edward K. Hamilton, Chairman Corporation
Hamilton, Rabinovitz & Alschuler, former Chief Information Officer, Paul H. Turner, Senior Program
Inc. State of Washington Manager Greenlining Institute
Bill Hauck, Co-Chair Maurice P. McTigue, Director
California Performance Review Government Accountability Project
Commission Mercatus Center, George Mason
President, California Business University
Roundtable
49
Additional Experts Consulted for the Government Reorganization Review
Eugene Bardach, Professor of Public Stephen Goldsmith, former Mayor Richard Paul, Policy Staff
Policy, Richard & Rhoda Goldman City of Indianapolis Senate Committee on Governmental
School of Public Policy Professor of Public Administration, Organization, State Senate
University of California, Berkeley Ash Institute on Innovation and
Democratic Governance, Kennedy Jeffrey Pfeffer
Robert D. Behn, Lecturer in Public School of Government, Harvard Thomas D. Dee II Professor of
Policy, Kennedy School of University Organizational Behavior
Government, Harvard University Graduate School of Business
Sean Hecht, Executive Director Stanford University
Robert Boerner, Consultant Environmental Law Center
National Conference of State School of Law Lisa Rawlins, Senior Vice President
Legislatures University of California, Los Angeles Warner Bros. Entertainment
first Executive Director, California
David Brady, Deputy Director and Ruth Holton, former Director Film Commission
Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution California Common Cause
Stanford University Clifford Rechtschaffen
Edward Howard, Chief Consultant Professor of Law and Director
Lester Breslow, Dean Emeritus Joint Committee on Boards, Environmental Law, Golden Gate
School of Public Health Commissions and Consumer University
University of California, Los Angeles Protection, State Senate
former Chair, California Public Jan Sharpless, former Member and
Health Board Steve Kolodney, Vice President Chair, Air Resources Board
Strategic Business Development Member, Western Electricity
Jonathan D. Breul, Senior Fellow CGI-AMS Coordinating Council
IBM Center for the Business of former Chief Information Officer,
Government State of Washington Fred Silva, Senior Advisor
former Director, Washington State Governmental Relations
John Carver, President Department of Information Services Public Policy Institute of California
Carver Governance Design, Inc.
Rich Koppes, Counsel Larry Singer, Senior Vice President
Effie Poy Yew Chow, former Member Jones Day and Strategic Insight Officer, Sun
White House Commission on former Chief Counsel, CalPERS Microsystems, Inc.
Complementary and Alternative former Chief Information Officer,
Medicine Policy Peter V. Lee, President and Chief State of Georgia
Executive Officer Executive Director, Georgia
David Davenport Pacific Business Group on Health Technology Authority
Distinguished Professor of Public former Member, Managed Health
Policy and Pepperdine University Care Improvement Task Force Hannah Sistare, Executive Director
Research Fellow, Hoover Institution, National Commission on the Public
Stanford University Kenneth Levine, Assistant Director Service, Brookings Institution
Sunset Commission, State of Texas Fellow, National Academy of Public
Soap Dowell, former Chair Administration
Managed Risk Medical Insurance Paul C. Light, Senior Fellow
Board Governance Studies, Brookings Peter L. Szanton, President
Institution Szanton Associates
Christine Essel, Chair Director, Center for Public Service Fellow and Chair of Board of
California Film Commission Brookings Institution Trustees, National Academy of
Senior Vice President, Paramount Public Administration
Pictures Ronald C. Moe, Fellow
Center for the Study of American Paul Volcker, former Chairman
Richard Figueroa, Member Government, Johns Hopkins Board of Directors, Federal Reserve
Managed Risk Medical Insurance University System
Board Chairman, National Commission on
Jill Kaiser Newcom, Executive the Public Service
Mark A. Forman, Executive Vice Director, League of Women Voters
President, Worldwide Services, and former Member, Sacramento Richard D. Young
Cassatt Corporation and former Arts Commission Director of Governmental Research
Chief Information Officer, U.S. Office Institute for Public Service and
of Management and Budget David Osborne, Senior Partner Policy Research
Public Strategies Group University of South Carolina
Nick Franklin, Senior Vice President
Public Affairs Jacquelyn Paige, Executive Director
PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc. California Health Policy and Data
Advisory Commission
50
Over 40 years of
Independent Oversight
The Commission has published 177 reports recommending improvements within virtually every agency in
California government. The Commission's work is chronicled below by subject area. The Commission also
routinely publishes biennial reports documenting its work as well as the Legislative responses. Additionally,
five Governors have proposed 29 reorganization plans. The Commission reviewed 26 of these plans. A list
of these plans follows the list of reports. All Commission reports are available to the public. Those marked
with an asterisk (*) can be downloaded from the Commission's Web site at www.lhc.ca.gov.
Government Organization and Reform
Historic Opportunities: Transforming California State Government (Report 176 - 2004)*
Governing the Golden State: A Critical Path to Improve Performance and Restore Trust (Report 174 -
2004)*
We The People: Helping Newcomers Become Californians (Report 166 - 2002)*
Special Districts: Relics of the Past or Resources for the Future? (Report 155 - 2000)*
Boards and Commissions: California’s Hidden Government (Report 97 - 1989)
Findings & Recommendations Concerning Reorganization of the Executive Branch of California State
Government (Report 1 - 1962)
Consumer Protection
Regulation of Acupuncture: A Complementary Therapy Framework (Report 175 - 2004)*
Consumer Protection: A Quality of Life Investment (Report 146 - 1998)*
Comments and Recommendations Regarding Professional and Business Licensing (Report 35 - 1979)
An Examination of the Department of Professional and Vocational Standards (Report 12 - 1967)
Economic Development & Business
Workers' Compensation: Containing the Costs (Report 120 - 1993)
A Review of the Current Problems in California’s Workers’ Compensation System (Report 87 - 1988)
A Review of the Organization and Administration of California’s Overseas Trade and Investment Offices
(Report 83 - 1987)
A Report on the Liability Insurance Crisis in the State of California (Report 74 - 1986)
A Study of the Department of Industrial Relations (Report 14 - 1969)
51
Education
Teach Our Children Well (Report 160 - 2001)*
Open Doors and Open Minds: Improving Access and Quality in California’s Community Colleges (Report
154 - 2000)*
The Charter Movement: Education Reform School by School (Report 138 - 1996)*
A Chance to Succeed: Providing English Learners with Supportive Education (Report 122 - 1993)*
K -12 Education in California: A Look At Some Policy Issues (Report 100 - 1990)
A Report on Crime and Violence in California’s Public School System (Report 91 - 1988)
A Review of Crime on University of California Campuses (Report 82 - 1987)
Report on the Role of the State Department of Education in California's K -12 Public Education System
(Report 48 - 1982)
School Facilities
To Build a Better School (Report 153 - 2000)*
Recommendations for Improving the School Facility Program in Los Angeles Unified School District (Report
153a - 1999)*
No Room for Johnny: A New Approach to the School Facilities Crisis (Report 117 - 1992)
Costs and Casualties of K -12 Education in California (Report 111 - 1991)
A Review of Impact Fees Used to Finance School Facilities (Report 67 - 1985)
A Report on the Los Angeles Unified School District (Report 45 - 1981)
Additional Funding for the Los Angeles Unified School District (Report 44 - 1980)
Study of the Utilization of Public School Facilities (K through 12) (Report 33 - 1978)
A Study of the School Building Aid Program (Report 20 - 1973)
School Finance
Dollars and Sense: A Simple Approach to School Finance (Report 143 - 1997)*
Coping with Education Budget Cuts (Issue Paper) (Report 118 - 1992)
A Report on the Financial Management and Accountability in the State’s K-12 Public School System
(Report 85 - 1987)
A Report on the Lack of Financial Accountability and Responsibility in the State's K-12 Public School
System (Report 75 - 1986)
A Review of Use of Lottery Funds in the State's K -12 Public School System (Report 73 - 1986)
Inadequate Financial Accountability in California's Community College System (Report 69 - 1986)
California's K -12 Education Funding Report (Report 54 - 1983)
Report on the San Juan Unified School District (Report 47 - 1982)
52
Environmental Protection & Natural Resources
Timber Harvest Plans: A Flawed Effort to Balance Economic and Environmental Needs (Report 126 -
1994)*
Beyond Bottles and Cans: Reorganizing California's Recycling Efforts (Report 125 - 1994)*
CAL-EPA: An Umbrella for the Environment (Report 110 - 1991)
Report on Solid Waste Management: The Trashing of California (Report 96 - 1989)
Control of Pesticide Residues in Food Products - A Review of the California Program of Pesticide Regulation
(Report 64 - 1985)
A Review of the Organization and Management of the State "Superfund" Program for Cleaning Up Hazardous
Waste Sites (Report 61 - 1984)
A Review of California's Vehicle Emission Control Program (Report 24 - 1975)
Gaming
Card Clubs in California: A Review of Ownership Limitations (Report 163 - 2002)*
Follow-up Review of the Organization, Operation and Performance of the California State Lottery (Report
98 - 1989)
A Review of the Organization, Operation and Performance of the California State Lottery (Report 94 - 1989)
A Review of the Organization, Operation and Performance of the California State Lottery (Report 77 - 1987)
Horse Racing in California: Revenue and Regulation (Report 49 - 1982)
Health & Human Services
Real Lives, Real Reforms: Improving Health and Human Services (Report 173 - 2004)*
To Protect & Prevent: Rebuilding California’s Public Health System (Report 170 - 2003)*
Being There: Making a Commitment to Mental Health (Report 157 - 2000)*
Positioning California for Health Care Reform (Report 123 - 1993)
California's Coordination of AIDS Services (Report 104 - 1990)
Office of Special Health Care Negotiations (Report 51 - 1983)
Health Care Delivery System Reform (Report 43 - 1980)
Administration of the Mental Health & Developmental Disabilities Programs (Report 39 - 1979)
The Status of Health Planning in California - A Supplementary Report (Report 36 - 1979)
Supplemental Report on Developmental Disabilities Program, Department of Health (Report 32 - 1977)
Supplemental Report on State Hospitals, Department of Health (Report 27 - 1977)
Supplemental Report on Licensing & Certification, Department of Health (Report 26 - 1977)
A Study of the Administration of State Health Programs (Report 25 - 1976)
53
Health & Human Services, continued
Alcohol & Drug Programs
For Our Health & Safety: Joining Forces to Defeat Addiction (Report 169 - 2003)*
Coordinating the Spending on Drug Prevention Programs (Report 112 - 1991)*
A Report on the Coordination of Funding for Drug Programs in the State of California (Report 89 - 1988)
Accessibility of the Disabled Population of Substance Abuse Treatment (Report 79 - 1987)
Children
Still in Our Hands: A Review of Efforts to Reform Foster Care in California (Report 168 - 2003)*
Young Hearts & Minds: Making a Commitment to Children’s Mental Health (Report 161 - 2001)*
Now in Our Hands: Caring For California’s Abused & Neglected Children (Report 152 - 1999)*
Caring For Our Children: Our Most Precious Investment (Report 148 - 1998)*
Enforcing Child Support: Parental Duty - Public Priority (Report 142 - 1997)*
Mending Our Broken Children: Restructuring Foster Care in California (Report 115 - 1992)*
Runaway/Homeless Youths: California's Efforts to Recycle Society's Throwaways (Report 101 - 1990)
Children’s Services Delivery System in California – Final Report (Report 84 - 1987)
Children’s Services Delivery System in California Preliminary Report – Phase I (Report 78 - 1987)
Medi-Cal
A Prescription for Medi-Cal (Report 106 - November 1990)
Review of the State’s Medi-Cal Program and the Effects of the Reforms (Report 81 - 1987)
Medi-Cal Reform (Report 41 - 1979)
Administration of the Medi-Cal Program – Second Supplementary Report (Report 37 - 1979)
An Analysis of Community Hospital Medi-Cal Audits (Report 34 - 1978)
Supplemental Report on Medi-Cal Program, Department of Health (Report 31 – 1977)
Senior Citizens
Long-Term Care: Providing Compassion Without Confusion (Report 140 - 1996)*
Unsafe in Their Own Homes: State Programs Fail to Protect Elderly from Indignity, Abuse and Neglect
(Report 113 - 1991)*
Skilled Nursing Homes: Care Without Dignity (Report 109 - 1991)*
The Snail's Pace of Reforming Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly (Report 108 - 1991)*
The Medical Care of California’s Nursing Home Residents: Inadequate Care, Inadequate Oversight (Report
93 - 1989)
A Report on Community Residential Care for the Elderly (Report 92 - 1989)
54
New and Continuing Impediments to Improving the Quality of Life and the Quality of Care in California’s
Nursing Homes (Report 80 - 1987)
Follow-Up Report on Conditions in Community Residential Care Facilities in California (Report 63 - 1985)
Community Residential Care in California – Community Care as a Long Term Care Service (Report 57 -
1983)
The Bureaucracy of Care – Continuing Policy Issues for Nursing Home Services and Regulation (Report 55
- 1983)
Infrastructure
Housing & Land Use
Rebuilding the Dream: Solving California’s Affordable Housing Crisis (Report 165 - 2002)*
Making Land Use Work: Rules to Reach Our Goals (Report 136 - 1995)*
Meeting the Needs of California's Homeless: It Takes More Than a Roof (Report 95 - 1989)
Administration of the HUD-701 Comprehensive Planning Assistance Grant Program by the State of California
(Report 22 - 1974)
Technology
Better.Gov: Engineering Technology-Enhanced Government (Report 156 - 2000)*
Review of State’s Efforts to Meet Year 2000 Computer Change (Report 145 - 1998)*
A Review of the Organization and Management of State Telecommunications (Report 65 - 1985)
Transportation
Transportation: Keeping California Moving (Report 114 - 1992)
A Report on the Planning, Operation and Funding of California’s Highway System (Report 88 - 1988)
Review of the Department of Transportation's Highway Planning and Development Process (Report 53 -
1983)
Century Freeway Report (Report 50 - 1982)
Century Freeway Report (Report 46 - 1981)
Study of the California Department of Transportation (Report 29 - 1977)
Preliminary Findings of Subcommittee on California Division of Highways Excess Right of Way (Report 19
- 1972)
Study of the California Department of Motor Vehicles (Report 30 - 1977)
The California State Highway Commission and its Relationship to the State Transportation Agency, the
Department of Public Works and Division of Highways (Report 11 - 1966)
Engineering Costs in the Division of Highways (Report 7 - 1965)
55
Personnel Issues
Of the People, By the People: Principles for Cooperative Civil Service Reform (Report 150 - 1999)*
Too Many Agencies, Too Many Rules: Reforming California's Civil Service (Report 133 - 1995)*
The Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) Costly, Slow and Unsure (Report 103 - 1990)
State Employee Air Travel Report (Report 58 - 1984)
Personnel Management in the State Service (Report 40 - 1979)
Should Social Security Coverage Be Continued for California State Employees (Report 28 - 1977)
Study of Salaries of Executive and Administrative Positions in California Government (Report 18 - 1972)
A Pilot Study of California State Employee Workmen’s Compensation and Other Work -Related Disability
Benefits (Report 16 - 1970)
Report on California Statutory Salaries of Executive Branch of Government (Report 13 - 1968)
Management Manpower Requirements (Report 6 - 1965)
Findings and Recommendations Concerning Organization for Central Staff Services (Report 2 - 1963)
Procurement
California's $4 Billion Bottom Line: Getting Best Value Out of the Procurement Process (Report 121 -
1993)*
A Review of Government Competition with Private Enterprise (Report 68 - 1986)
Los Angeles County Contracting Out Report (Report 56 - 1983)
Property and Asset Management
Cada: An Opportunity to Advance and Protect the State’s Investment (Report 149 - 1999)*
California’s Real Property Management: A Cornerstone for Structural Reform (Report 137 - 1995)*
Squeezing Revenues Out of Existing State Assets (Report 116 - 1992)*
Real Property Management in California: Moving Beyond The Role of Caretaker (Report 105 - 1990)
A Review of the State Controller's Office Move to the Capitol Bank of Commerce Building (Report 76 - 1986)
California State Government's Management of Real Property (Report 70 - 1986)
A Review of State-Owned Land Parcel in Contra Costa County (Report 62 - 1984)
Report on Local California Fairs Receiving State Financial Support (Report 17 - 1971)
Study of the Need for a Materials Management System (Report 15 - 1970)
Findings and Recommendations Concerning Automotive Fleet Management (Report 3 - 1963)
56
Public Safety
Breaking The Barriers for Women on Parole (Report 177 - 2004)*
Back to the Community: Safe & Sound Parole Policies (Report 172 - 2003)*
Improving Public Safety: Beyond the Office of Criminal Justice Planning (Report 171 - 2003)*
Be Prepared: Getting Ready for New and Uncertain Dangers (Report 162 - 2002)*
Never Too Early, Never Too Late…To Prevent Youth Crime & Violence (Report 159 - 2001)*
Beyond Bars: Correctional Reforms to Lower Prison Costs and Reduce Crime (Report 144 - 1998)*
Boot Camps: An Evolving Alternative to Traditional Prisons (Report 128 - 1995)*
The Juvenile Crime Challenge: Making Prevention a Priority (Report 127 - 1994)*
Putting Violence Behind Bars: Redefining the Role of California's Prisons (Report 124 - 1994)*
A Review of the Operation and Performance of the Office of the State Public Defender (Report 90 - 1988)
Review of Cost Savings Associated with Conversion of Guadalupe College into a Women's Prison (Report 52
- 1983)
Resources and Energy
When Consumers Have Choices: The State’s Role in Competitive Utility Markets (Report 139 - 1996)*
Report on California's Fish and Game Commission and Department of Fish and Game (Report 99 - 1990)
A Study of the Organization and Coordination of Electric Energy Planning and Electric Utility Regulation
in California (Report 59 - 1984)
A Study of the California State Public Utilities Commission (Report 23 - 1974)
The Use of Boards and Commissions in the Resources Agency (Report 8 - 1965)
Revenue, Taxation and Budgeting
Budget Reform: Putting Performance First (Report 135 - 1995)*
State Fiscal Condition (Report 132 - 1995)*
Review of the Organization and Operation of the State of California’s Major Revenue and Tax Collection
Functions and Cash Management Activities (Report 71 - 1986)
A Review of Selected Taxing and Enforcing Agencies' Programs to Control the Underground Economy
(Report 66 - 1985)
The Tax Appeals System in California (Report 38 - 1979)
The Internal Auditing Program in the Executive Branch of California State Government (Report 21 - 1974)
Statement of the Commission's 1967 Legislative Interests, (placing top priority on unification of tax collection
activities, procedural changes that will result in direct economies in the operation of the State Government,
etc.) (Report 10 - 1966)
Program Budgeting (Report 9 - 1966)
Need for Revenue Unification (Report 5 - 1964)
57
58
Reorganization Plans
Year Governor Reorganization Plan Objective Commission Legislative
Recommendation Outcome
2002 Davis Create a Labor and Workforce Development Agency to include Allow plan to take Plan went into
EDD, Department of Industrial Relations, the Workforce Investment effect but establish and effect
Board and Agricultural Labor Relations Board (Report 164)* measure goals
1998 Wilson Create a Department of Managed Care, abolish the Department of Reject Rejected
Corporations and expand the role and rename the Department of
Financial Institutions (Report 147)*
1995 Wilson Merge the Office of State Fire Marshal with the Department of Allow plan to take Plan went into
Forestry and Fire Protection (Report 134)* effect effect
Merge the State Police with the California Highway Patrol (Report Allow plan to take Plan went into
130)* effect effect
Reorganize the California Energy Commission and related Implement the plan with Rejected
governmental functions (Report 131)* two modifications
1991 Wilson Create an Environmental Protection Agency and transfer several Implement and then Plan went into
departments and functions into the new agency modify the plan effect
1985 Deukmejian Create a cabinet-level Department of Waste Management Plan not submitted to Rejected
the Commission
Create a Department of Waste Management, a State Waste Implement the plan Rejected
Commission and three Regional Waste Boards subject to seven
amendments
1984 Deukmejian Transfer civil service position classification function from the State Allow plan to take Plan went into
Personnel Board to the Department of Personnel Administration effect effect
1981 Brown Create a Department of Personnel Administration Allow plan to take Plan went into
effect effect
1980 Brown Transfer licensing and regulation of mobile home industry from Allow plan to take Plan went into
DMV to the Department of Housing and Community Development effect effect
1979 Brown Create the Youth and Adult Correctional Agency and consolidate Allow plan to take Plan went into
correctional programs into the new agency effect effect
Create a central agency for personnel administration Allow plan to take Rejected
effect
Transfer and rename the Fair Employment Practices Commission Allow plan to take Plan went into
and transfer, rename and elevate the Division of Fair Employment effect effect
Practices from the Department of Industrial Relations to the State
and Consumer Services Agency
1978 Brown Abolish the Division of Industrial Safety and the Occupational Allow plan to take Plan went into
Health Branch in the Department of Health and consolidate functions effect effect
in a new Division of Occupational Safety and Health Administration
in the Department of Industrial Relations
1977 Brown Abolish the Office of Narcotics and Drug Abuse and transfer Allow plan to take Plan went into
functions to the Health Department's Division of Substance Abuse effect effect
and create an Advisory Council on Narcotics and Drug Abuse
59
Year Governor Reorganization Plan Objective Commission Legislative
Recommendation Outcome
1976 Brown Merge the Office of Alcoholism with the Department of Alcoholic Concurred with the plan Rejected
Beverage Control (ABC) and move the ABC into the Health and but urged extending
Welfare Agency effective date
Brown Create a new Environmental Quality Agency and consolidate all air, Not officially submitted Was not
water quality and solid waste programs into the new agency submitted
1975 Brown Consolidate the Divisions of Labor Law Enforcement and Industrial Allow plan to take Plan went into
Welfare into a Division of Labor Standards Enforcement effect effect
Brown Create a new Environmental Quality Agency and consolidate all air, Withdrawn Was not
water quality and solid waste programs into the new agency submitted
1971 Reagan Rename the Resources Agency to Environment and Resources Not submitted** Rejected
Agency and create a Department of Environmental Protection within
the agency
Abolish the State Board of Dry Cleaners Not submitted** Rejected
Rename water quality control boards Not submitted** Rejected
1970 Reagan Rename the Department of Professional and Vocational Standards to Allow plan to take Plan went into
Department of Consumer Affairs effect effect
Establish a single state Department of Health within the Human Allow plan to take Plan went into
Relations Agency to administer Medi-Cal and consolidate functions effect effect
from numerous health-related departments
1969 Reagan Change staff titles and organization names in the Department of Allow plan to take Plan went into
Professional and Vocational Standards effect effect
Rename the Department of Harbors & Waterways to Department of Allow plan to take Plan went into
Navigation & Ocean Development and rename the Harbors and effect effect
Watercraft Commission to Navigation and Ocean Development
Commission
Eliminate 32 boards, commissions, committees and advisory Allow plan to take Plan went into
councils, transferring some functions to other departments and effect effect
reconfigure the membership of several other government entities
1968 Reagan Establish four agencies in the executive branch: Business & No recommendation Plan went into
Transportation, Resources, Human Relations, Agriculture and effect
Services
*Reports on these reorganization plans can be downloaded from the Commission's Web site at
www.lhc.ca.gov. All other reorganization plan reviews are available by contacting the Commission.
**In 1970, legislation was passed eliminating the Commission's review of reorganization plans. Three
plans were submitted directly to the Legislature in 1971 by Governor Reagan. All three plans were rejected
by the Legislature. In 1972, the Legislature restored the Commission's role in reviewing reorganization
plans.
60
Commission Information
Contact Us Commission was modeled Bureau of State Audits
925 L Street, Suite 805 after a panel created by the In 1993, when Proposition
Sacramento, CA 95814 U.S. Congress in 1947 to 140 required the Legislature to
Phone: (916) 445-2125 review the organization of reduce its budget, the state
Fax: (916) 322-7709 federal agencies that was Auditor General was
chaired by, and informally eliminated. That same year
E-Mail named after, former President the Bureau of State Audits was
little.hoover@lhc.ca.gov Herbert Hoover. Almost from created - headed by the State
its inception, the California Auditor and under the
Web Site counterpart was known as the direction of the Little Hoover
“Little Hoover Commission.” Commission.
www.lhc.ca.gov/lhc.html
How Topics are Selected The Commission provides
Where Our Name
One aspect of the some oversight of the bureau.
Came From
Commission’s independence is The organizational alignment
The Commission is formally its ability to select its own reflects the independence of
the Milton Marks “Little topics for review. The the Bureau of State Audits and
Hoover” Commission on Commission encourages the Little Hoover Commission,
California State Government policy-makers and the public which is necessary for both
Organization and Economy. to suggest topics for entities to effectively pursue
As a member of the Assembly, Commission study. Over the their statutory missions.
state Senator Marks authored course of a year, the
the legislation to create the Commission selects three to
Commission. The five issues to explore.
“Democracy itself is a process of change, and satisfaction
and complacency are enemies of good government.”
Governor Edmund G. “Pat” Brown,
addressing the inaugural meeting of the Little Hoover Commission,
April 24, 1962, Sacramento, California
Cover image of the exterior doors of the second floor of the State Capitol provided courtesy of California
State Capitol Museum, California Legislature. David Dodd, Photographer.