LHC
Health Care Delivery System Reform
Read the report at Little Hoover Commission ↗
--- Page 1 ---
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor
COMMISSION ON CALIFORNIA STATE GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION AND ECONOMY
11th & L BUILDING, SUITE 550, (916) 445-2125
SACRAMENTO 95814
May 12, 1980
Chairman
NATHAN SHAPELL
Beverly Hills
Vice-Chairman
RICHARD D HAYDEN
Assemblyman, Cupertino
Honorable Edmund G. Brown Jr.
ALFRED E. ALQUIST
Governor
Senator, San Jose
MAURICE RENE CHEZ
State Capitol
Los Angeles
Sacramento, CA
95814
JACK R. FENTON
Assemblyman, Montebello
DIXON R. HARWIN
Dear Governor:
Beverly Hills
NANCIE BROOKE KNAPP
Los Angales
As you well know, this Commission has for the past five years reported
MILTON MARKS
Senator, San Francisco
to you and the Legislature on the gravity of the problems in the health
JAMES F. MULVANEY
care system in the State of California. We have conducted study after
San Diego
MANNING J. POST
study, held numerous public hearings, and issued report after report
Los Angeles
urging that administrative and legislative action be taken immediately
PHILIP J. REILLY
Mission Viero
to remedy the many problems in the health care system which are all
RICHARD S. TRUGMAN
reflected in the Medi-Cal program. These problems include:
Beverly Hills
JEAN KINDY WALKER
Modesto
lack of control over fraud and abuse
L H. HALCOMB
<b>Executive Director</b>
excessive provision of services without appropriate
iustification
uneven quality of care
unrestrained inflation driven by excessive capital
investment
irrational variation in range of payments to hospitals
for the same service
waste and mismanagement in the provision of service.
Governor, you are well aware of these problems and our efforts to find
reasonable solutions. We have pointed out consistent failures of the
Legislature, and until recently the Administration, which include:
failure to enact legislation which would bring State
health planning activities into compliance with
Federal health planning laws
failure to provide legislative authorization and
administrative support to implement an effective
program against consistent fraud and abuse
• rejection of authority for the Department of Health
Services to provide services to Medi-Cal beneficiaries
on a prudent buyer basis
--- Page 2 ---
Honorable Edmund G. Brown Jr.
-2-
May 12, 1980
failure to reform Certificate-of-Need laws which would effectively
contain excessive capital investments in hospital and out-patient
services
rejection of procedures to limit hospital cost inflation.
We are cognizant of the many problems attendant to the revised Medi-Cal claims
processing system. Abandonment of this system, however, would cost many millions
of dollars of taxpayer funds for an interim processing contract, cause possible
litigation, and delay receiving the substantial fiscal benefits of more stringent
cost controls. This Commission has long been on record as a strong advocate of
a fiscal intermediary system which would effectively control overpayments and
fraudulent claims and otherwise provide fiscal integrity and management control.
It is essential that this system be maintained.
The fiscal intermediary contract awarded in September 1978 represented adminis-
trative cost savings of $50-70 million and, at the same time, a potential savings
of many hundredsof millions of dollars of Medi-Cal payments to providers. In
our opinion, although all problems have not been resolved, the operation of the
system has improved considerably in recent weeks, and it is reasonable to expect
that it will meet the system's objectives in the near future. The computer pro-
grams for the payment of physicians have undergone several tests which preliminarily
indicate that the fiscal intermediary is capable of handling the substantially
increased workload of bringing the State's Medi-Cal physicians on line by June 1.
Although more time would be helpful for further testing, we believe it necessary
that the plan become operational on June 1 as called for by legislation and
administrative determination.
Every effort should be maintained by the contractor, the Department of Health
Services, the State Controller and the providers to resolve remaining problems.
The proposed interim payments to providers, together with the Director of Health
Services decision to allow physicians to utilize either the existing or revised
payment forms, should contribute much to the orderly implementation of the more
stringent controls which are inherent in the revised payment process.
The March 1980 audit report of the Department of Health Services confirmed the
findings of similar audits in 1978 which indicated in those hospitals audited
that 37 percent of the Medi-Cal payments for hospital services were inappropriate
and in some cases appeared to be outright fraudulent. These payments total many
millions of dollars.
The taxpayers and citizens of this State are confronted with a crisis of major
proportion. At the present rate of growth in the cost of the health care
delivery system (Medi-Cal alone is currently consuming more than $4 billion),
the State will neither be able to provide essential services to the medically
disadvantaged nor will those not covered by such programs be able to afford
needed health services. This crisis would be aggravated further with the passage
of Proposition 9 on June 3.
--- Page 3 ---
May 12, 1980
-3-
Honorable Edmund G. Brown Jr.
Since the influence of health lobbies has been so effective in blocking needed
reform through the traditional legislative and administrative processes, we
call upon you, Governor Brown, to find other means immediately of insuring that
all citizens of the State will have access to needed health care at a reasonable
cost. Special interest groups have used the initiative process to great success.
Others have attained their goals through well organized and well financed
political action committees. You must use the resources of your Office to take
the lead, by whatever means, to bring about the necessary reform in the California
health care delivery system.
The members of this Commission are available and willing to assist you and your
Administration in this most important effort.
Sincepely.
MATHAN SHAPELL'
Chairman
.
.