OIG
March 2024 Local Inquiry Team Case Blocks
Read the report at CDCR ↗
Amarik K. Singh
OIG OFFICE of the Inspector General
INSPECTOR GENERAL Neil Robertson
Chief Deputy
Inspector General
March 2024 Local Inquiry Team Case Blocks
Independent
Published in May 2024 Prison Oversight
From March 1, 2024, through March 31, 2024, the OIG’s Local
Inquiry Team monitored and closed eight cases. This document
presents all monitored and closed cases during this period.
OIG Case Number Rating Assessment
24-0073852-INQ Poor
Case Summary
On January 25, 2023, an officer allegedly threatened to issue and subsequently issued
an incarcerated person a rules violation report for failing to take down a covering on
his cell window while the incarcerated person used the restroom.
Case Disposition
The hiring authority conducted an inquiry and found insufficient evidence to sustain
the allegation.
Overall Inquiry Assessment
Overall, the department performed poorly. The investigator failed to obtain all
records of departmental policies and procedures relevant to the allegations and cell
assignment logs and failed to include these documents as supporting exhibits to the
inquiry report. The investigator also failed to include the rules violation report, notice
of staff complaint, notices of interview, and the advisements of rights for all staff as
supporting exhibits to the inquiry report. The Office of Internal Affairs’ Allegation
Investigation Unit manager failed to identify the investigator’s omissions and approved
the investigator’s inquiry report as adequate. The department caused unreasonable
delays by failing to timely conduct interviews. The investigator was assigned to the
inquiry on February 6, 2023, but did not complete the first interview until July 9, 2023,
153 days thereafter. Overall, the department completed the inquiry untimely on
October 17, 2023, 260 days from the date the Centralized Screening Team received
the complaint on January 30, 2023, and 170 days beyond the department’s goal.
Page 1 of 5
10111 Old Placerville Road, Suite 110, Sacramento, California 95827
5
Telephone: (916) 288-4233
5
www.oig.ca.gov
Amarik K. Singh
OIG OFFICE of the Inspector General
INSPECTOR GENERAL Neil Robertson
Chief Deputy
Inspector General
March 2024 Local Inquiry Team Case Blocks
Independent
Published in May 2024 Prison Oversight
OIG Case Number Rating Assessment
23-0058494-INQ Poor
Case Summary
Between March 10, 2023, and May 31, 2023, two nurses and a psychiatric technician
allegedly discussed an incarcerated person’s confidential information with other
medical staff causing the incarcerated person mental distress.
Case Disposition
The hiring authority conducted an inquiry and found insufficient evidence to sustain
the allegations.
Overall Inquiry Assessment
Overall, the department performed poorly. The investigator failed to communicate
with the OIG about interviewing the incarcerated person who submitted the
complaint. The hiring authority initially failed to document a finding regarding the
allegation against the psychiatric technician but remedied the error after the OIG
notified the hiring authority of the oversight. The department also unreasonably
delayed the inquiry and ultimately failed to timely complete the inquiry. The California
Correctional Health Care Services’ Staff Misconduct Team submitted the inquiry report
to the Office of Internal Affairs’ Allegation Investigation Unit manager on August
28, 2023, but the manager did not review the report until October 3, 2023, 36 days
thereafter, but the California Correctional Health Care Services’ Staff Misconduct
Team did not forward the inquiry report to the hiring authority for review until
October 31, 2023, 28 days thereafter. The hiring authority then took an additional
115 days to render a decision on February 23, 2024, regarding the allegations,
258 days from the date the Centralized Screening Team received the complaint on
June 10, 2023, and 168 days beyond the department’s goal.
OIG Case Number Rating Assessment
24-0073842-INQ Poor
Case Summary
On September 2, 2023, an officer allegedly acted unprofessionally and made
inappropriate comments toward an incarcerated person when the officer refused to
provide the incarcerated person and her cellmate with extra toilet paper while they
were both menstruating.
Case Disposition
The hiring authority conducted an inquiry and found insufficient evidence to sustain
the allegation.
Page 2 of 5
10111 Old Placerville Road, Suite 110, Sacramento, California 95827 5 Telephone: (916) 288-4233 5 www.oig.ca.gov
Amarik K. Singh
OIG OFFICE of the Inspector General
INSPECTOR GENERAL Neil Robertson
Chief Deputy
Inspector General
March 2024 Local Inquiry Team Case Blocks
Independent
Published in May 2024 Prison Oversight
Overall Inquiry Assessment
Overall, the department performed poorly. The investigator failed to interview a
second incarcerated person who was a pertinent witness of the inquiry and the
cellmate of the incarcerated person who submitted the complaint. The investigator
should have interviewed the second incarcerated person to inquire if she heard the
officer make inappropriate comments toward the incarcerated person who submitted
the complaint and determine if her testimony would have corroborated video-recorded
evidence that showed the officer providing them with extra toilet paper. The Office
of Internal Affairs’ Allegation Investigation Unit manager reviewed and approved
the inquiry report as adequate but failed to identify and remedy the omissions in
the inquiry.
OIG Case Number Rating Assessment
24-0072729-INQ Satisfactory
Case Summary
On September 27, 2023, an officer allegedly allowed other incarcerated persons to
pack and transport an incarcerated person’s personal property in preparation for his
out-to-court appointment. Between September 27, 2023, and January 11, 2024, the
same officer allegedly allowed other incarcerated persons to steal the incarcerated
person’s stored property after it had been packed in containers and sealed with
packing tape.
Case Disposition
The hiring authority conducted an inquiry and found insufficient evidence to sustain
the allegation.
Overall Inquiry Assessment
Overall, the department performed satisfactorily.
OIG Case Number Rating Assessment
23-0068658-INQ Satisfactory
Case Summary
From October 25, 2023, through November 2023, an officer allegedly used verbally
abusive language and acted unprofessional toward an incarcerated person.
Page 3 of 5
10111 Old Placerville Road, Suite 110, Sacramento, California 95827 5 Telephone: (916) 288-4233 5 www.oig.ca.gov
Amarik K. Singh
OIG OFFICE of the Inspector General
INSPECTOR GENERAL Neil Robertson
Chief Deputy
Inspector General
March 2024 Local Inquiry Team Case Blocks
Independent
Published in May 2024 Prison Oversight
Case Disposition
The hiring authority conducted an inquiry and found insufficient evidence to sustain
the allegation.
Overall Inquiry Assessment
Overall, the department performed satisfactorily.
OIG Case Number Rating Assessment
23-0068675-INQ Satisfactory
Case Summary
On November 23, 2023, an officer allegedly refused to honor an incarcerated person’s
medical mobility restriction and acted unprofessional by shouting and using profanity
as he ordered the incarcerated person to sit on the ground during an alarm when she
could not physically do so.
Case Disposition
The hiring authority conducted an inquiry and found insufficient evidence to sustain
the allegation.
Overall Inquiry Assessment
Overall, the department performed satisfactorily.
OIG Case Number Rating Assessment
24-0073335-INQ Satisfactory
Case Summary
On January 28, 2024, an officer allegedly failed to make visual or verbal contact with
an incarcerated person during welfare checks.
Case Disposition
The investigator suspended the inquiry and referred it to the Office of Internal Affairs’
Allegation Investigation Unit for investigation after the investigator discovered
evidence of potential staff misconduct listed in the Allegation Decision Index. The OIG
did not monitor the investigation following the referral.
Overall Inquiry Assessment
Overall, the department performed satisfactorily.
Page 4 of 5
10111 Old Placerville Road, Suite 110, Sacramento, California 95827 5 Telephone: (916) 288-4233 5 www.oig.ca.gov
Amarik K. Singh
OIG OFFICE of the Inspector General
INSPECTOR GENERAL Neil Robertson
Chief Deputy
Inspector General
March 2024 Local Inquiry Team Case Blocks
Independent
Published in May 2024 Prison Oversight
OIG Case Number Rating Assessment
24-0075443-INQ Satisfactory
Case Summary
On February 29, 2024, an officer allegedly failed to respond to an incarcerated
person’s multiple reports that he had a medical emergency.
Case Disposition
The investigator suspended the inquiry after discovering evidence of staff misconduct
that could result in disciplinary action and referred the case to the Office of Internal
Affairs’ Allegation Investigation Unit for investigation after the OIG’s recommendation.
The OIG did not monitor the investigation following the referral.
Overall Inquiry Assessment
Overall, the department performed satisfactorily.
Page 5 of 5
10111 Old Placerville Road, Suite 110, Sacramento, California 95827 5 Telephone: (916) 288-4233 5 www.oig.ca.gov