OVSTA
Addendum to Staff Report
Hart System 6.2.1 (Prior Approval - September 22, 2006)
Read the report at Hart InterCivic ↗
ADDENDUM REPORT TO HART SYSTEM 6.2
HART SYSTEM 6.2.1
HART INTERCIVIC
SYSTEM 6.2.1
Ballot Now, version 3.3.11
BOSS, version 4.3.13
Rally, version 2.3.7
Tally, version 4.3.10
SERVO, version 4.2.10
eScan, version 1.3.14
JBC, version 4.3.1
eSlate/DAU, version 4.2.13
VBO, version 1.8.3
eCM Manager, version 1.1.7
Staff Review and Analysis
Prepared by:
Secretary of State Office of
Voting Systems Technology Assessment
August 24, 2006
I. Reason for Addendum
During the State examination and testing of the Hart System 6.2, June 26 – June 30,
2006, it was discovered that there was a defect in the results tape printed from the
Judge’s Booth Controller (JBC) at the close of the polls. The defect only occurred
during a primary election with split precincts where the JBC had been configured to
consolidate the vote results across that split. In these instances, the JBC would only
print the vote results from the first part of the split and would ignore all other vote
results from the other part of the split.
Hart Intercivic corrected this defect by modifying the JBC firmware, which resulted
in a change to the version number of that JBC from 4.2.13 to 4.3.1. Consequently,
the version number of the entire system was updated from 6.2 to 6.2.1. The system
modifications were submitted back to the federal Independent Testing Authority
(ITA) for review and evaluation with respect to continued compliance with the
federal Voting System Standards. Other than the modifications to the JBC firmware,
there were no changes to any other components of the System 6.2 voting system for
which approval had been previously requested.
This report is presented as a supplement to the Hart System 6.2 Staff Report (August
4, 2006). The report reviews additional testing conducted to verify the modifications
resolved the defect as intended and had no adverse affects on the rest of the voting
system.
II. Testing Information and Results
Federal qualification of the system by the Election Assistance Commission
(EAC) is still pending and must be issued before the Secretary of State can
approve this system for use in California.
Testing Overview
State examination and functional testing of this updated system was conducted by
Secretary of State staff in conjunction with the State’s technical consultant Mr. Paul
Craft at the Hart Intercivic office in Lafayette, Colorado on August 22, 2006.
Testing Process
The testing of the software upgrade was conducted by voting two test primary and
two test general elections on two different JBC’s. In one of the test primary and
general elections, the JBC was programmed to consolidate vote results. In the second
test primary and test general elections, the JBC was programmed to separately report
vote results for each part of the split. The same number of ballots was voted in each
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
SECRETARY OF STATE REPORT FOR HART CERTIFICATION OF SYSTEM 6.2.1
instance. All voting functions of the JBC were exercised during the test voting on the
eSlate, including printing authorization codes, voting provisional ballots, canceling
ballots, curbside voting and checking the status of a previously issued authorization
code.
Prior to testing, the installation of trusted software and firmware on all components of
the system was verified and documented. At the conclusion of each test election, the
vote results printed from the JBC were verified. Additionally, the vote results were
uploaded to Tally, tabulated according to proposed use procedures, and then verified
for accuracy.
Testing Results and Recommendation
All four test elections were successfully completed. Staff was able to verify that
updated JBC firmware resolved the previously noted error as intended. Further, no
adverse effects were noted with the remainder of the system as a result of this
modification.
The Secretary of State’s Office of Voting System recommends approval of the
amended Hart System 6.2.1 voting system as presented by the vendor for use in
California.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
SECRETARY OF STATE REPORT FOR HART CERTIFICATION OF SYSTEM 6.2.1