OVSTA
Hart Verity Voting 3.2 Voting System Volume Testing Report
Hart Verity Voting 3.2 Voting System
Read the report at Hart InterCivic ↗
Hart InterCivic Verity Voting 3.2
Voting System
Volume and Reliability Test Report
for
California Secretary of State
CAF-22009-FTR-04
Vendor Name Hart InterCivic
Vendor System Verity Voting 3.2
Prepared by:
4720 Independence St.
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
303-422-1566
www.SLICompliance.com
Accredited by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) for Selected Voting
System Test Methods or Services
California Secretary of State
Hart InterCivic Verity Voting 3.2
California Certification
Volume & Reliability Test Report v4.0
Revision History
Date Release Author Revision Summary
June 12, 2023 1.0 A. Nestico Initial Release
June 21, 2023 2.0 A. Nestico Update for typos
June 23, 2023 3.0 A. Nestico Update for CASOS comments
July 14, 2023 4.0 A. Nestico, Update for CASOS comments
M. Santos
Disclaimer
The information reported herein must not be used by the client to claim product
certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the
Federal Government.
Trademarks
• SLI Compliance is a registered trademark of Gaming Laboratories
International, LLC.
• All products and company names are used for identification purposes only
and may be trademarks of their respective owners.
Copyright 2023 by SLI ComplianceSM, a division of Gaming Laboratories International, LLC.
Volume and Reliability Test Report v4.0 Page 2 of 9
Document No. CAF-22009-FTR-04
California Secretary of State
Hart InterCivic Verity Voting 3.2
California Certification
Volume & Reliability Test Report v4.0
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 4
TESTING RESPONSIBILITIES ................................................................................................................ 4
EQUIPMENT USED .............................................................................................................................. 4
TEST PREPARATIONS ......................................................................................................................... 5
TEST ACTIVITIES............................................................................................................................... 6
EVALUATION OF TESTING .............................................................................................................. 8
Volume and Reliability Test Report v4.0 Page 3 of 9
Document No. CAF-22009-FTR-04
California Secretary of State
Hart InterCivic Verity Voting 3.2
California Certification
Volume & ReliabilityTest Report v4.0
INTRODUCTION
This Volume and Reliability Test Report details the work performed for the Volume
and Reliability testing on the Hart InterCivic Verity Voting 3.2 (Hart Verity Voting
3.2) voting system against the California Voting System Standards (CVSS).
The purpose of this test was to verify that voting equipment will operate reliably in
conditions approximating normal use by voters in a polling place on Election Day.
Testing Responsibilities
Staffing
SOS:
• Todd Ross
• Deborah Ledsinger
• Twenty temporary employees to vote test ballots.
Hart:
• Tyson Gosch
SLI:
• Alex Nestico
Location
The test was conducted in Woodland, California, at a facility provided by Yolo
County, California.
Facility
Yolo County Administration Building, 625 Court St Woodland, CA 95695
Equipment Used
The equipment included:
• 10 Verity Touch Writers
• 6 Verity Readers
• 20 Verity Scans
Verity Touch Writer
Verity Touch Writer is a touch-screen Ballot Marking Device (BMD) that prints
voter-marked ballots to a commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) printer.
Voters use the electronic touch display interface to privately and independently
make their selections on the ballot. Voters can also make selections with Verity
Volume and Reliability Test Report v4.0 Page 4 of 9
Document No. CAF-22009-FTR-04
California Secretary of State
Hart InterCivic Verity Voting 3.2
California Certification
Volume & Reliability Test Report v4.0
Access, an Audio-Tactile interface (ATI) component with three tactile buttons, one
audio port (for headphones), and one port for external two-switch devices. When
voters finish making their selections, they print the marked ballot.
Verity Reader
Verity Reader is an optional paper ballot review device suitable for use by all
voters, including non-disabled voters and voters with disabilities. Voters can insert
their marked paper ballot to visually verify how their ballot will be counted when the
ballot is cast in the Verity system, and/or hear audio read-back of their ballot
choices. (For voters with disabilities, Verity Reader offers the same accessibility
features as the Verity Touch Writer ballot marking device.)
Verity Scan
Verity Scan is Verity’s precinct tabulator scanning solution for paper ballots. Verity
Scan is paired with a purpose-built ballot box to ensure accurate, secure, and
private ballot scanning and vote casting.
When opening the polls, authorized users activate the Verity Scan device to
prepare it to receive marked paper ballots. Verity Scan indicates when it is
appropriate to insert ballots, and when ballots have been successfully cast. Verity
Scan records Cast Vote Records (CVRs) and audit log data in redundant, secure
storage locations, including the Verity vDrive. The Verity vDrive storage is portable
flash memory and allows the CVRs to be transferred to the Verity Count tabulation
and reporting system.
Test Preparations
Election Provisions
The election definition was the same general election used for functional testing.
• Approximately 2,000 single sheet ballots were scanned on each Verity
Scan.
• Approximately 100 blank ballots were marked and printed on each Touch
Writer.
• Approximately 800 ballots were verified on each Reader.
Hart supplied:
• Identical test decks of ballots, pre-marked in a pattern approved by the
Secretary of State .
• Additional blank ballots to replace any ballots that were damaged during the
test.
• Sufficient quantities of blank ballots or ballot paper to mark on the Touch
Writer machines.
Volume and Reliability Test Report v4.0 Page 5 of 9
Document No. CAF-22009-FTR-04
California Secretary of State
Hart InterCivic Verity Voting 3.2
California Certification
Volume & Reliability Test Report v4.0
Each device was prepared as follows:
• Each device was assigned a unique number.
• A label with that number was placed on the front of the device.
• Beginning with “1,” the numbers progressed sequentially and were three
inches high in order to allow the cameras to capture the number when
incident resolutions were filmed.
The machines were arranged to allow the Verity Scan units to be tested first,
followed by the Verity Touch Writers and then the Verity Readers.
Test Activities
All testing was accomplished in five phases:
• Environment setup
• Logging of devices, hashing of devices, and election loading
• Scanning of ballots on Verity Scan
• Voting of ballots on Verity Touch Writer
• Reading of Verity Touch Writer produced ballots on Verity Reader
On day 1, Hart set up all devices to be used for the scheduled.
On day 2 and 3, with Hart representatives present, California Secretary of State
(CASOS) and SLI Compliance representatives inventoried all devices as listed in
the “Equipment Used” section above. This included recording all serial numbers.
Next, all devices were verified to have the correct firmware by checking hash
codes of the installed firmware against the hash codes of record for the validated
firmware.
Twenty temporary employees were utilized to perform the testing.
Initially, 20 Verity Scans were utilized, with 1,000 ballots scanned through each. As
temporary employees finished their scanning, they were transferred to the Verity
Touch Writers where they voted and printed 100 ballots.
As each temporary employee finished creating their 100 Verity Touch Writer
Ballots and the preprinted ballots used in the Scan, they took those printed ballots
and verified them on Verity Readers.
Lastly, temporary employees then cast another 1,000 ballots through the Verity
Scan.
Volume and Reliability Test Report v4.0 Page 6 of 9
Document No. CAF-22009-FTR-04
California Secretary of State
Hart InterCivic Verity Voting 3.2
California Certification
Volume & Reliability Test Report v4.0
The table below provides a chronological view of the activities.
Table 1 – Hart Verity Voting 3.2 Volume Testing Activities
D D a a y y 2 1 -3 a nd 2
Hashes were taken from every Hart Verity device and validated against the
1
Trusted Build hashes to be running Trusted Build 3.2
A log of machine serial numbers and Physical Configuration Audit (PCA)
2
information was captured.
3 Photographed each Hart Verity device being tested
4 Checked-in temporary employees
Briefed temporary employees on the test objectives, their roles and
responsibilities, and provided them with the instructions a voter would be given on
5
how to scan ballots on the Verity Scan Device and how to mark ballots on the
Verity Touch Writer machine.
6 Temporary employees were briefed on how to operate the Scan machine.
The voters were instructed to signal any unexpected condition on a machine by
7
raising their hand.
8 SOS staff interviewed the voter and analyzed the event.
9 Took any steps necessary to continue voting and completed an incident report.
Incidents were categorized either as one of the substantive failures described in
10 the Protocol or as a non-substantive failure, such as voter error or a defective
ballot.
2 Hour Battery Test started on Verity Touch Writer Device #7 (W1500065606)
with Brother Printer HL-L6400DW (U64185D2N572273) using the Duracell
11
PowerSource 660 UPS (X22). The test started at 9:40 am and ended at 1:15 pm
with 27 ballots voted and approximately 100% battery power remaining.
Approximately 1,000 ballots were scanned on each Verity Scan machine over the
12
course of testing.
As a voter finished, the polls were closed on that machine and voters moved to a
13
Touch Writer
Voters marked approximately 100 ballots on each Verity Touch Writer machine
14
over the course of testing.
Voters read approximately 800 ballots on each Verity Reader machine over the
15
course of testing.
Approximately 1,000 additional ballots were scanned on each Verity Scan
16
machine over the course of testing.
17 Totals printed.
Volume and Reliability Test Report v4.0 Page 7 of 9
Document No. CAF-22009-FTR-04
California Secretary of State
Hart InterCivic Verity Voting 3.2
California Certification
Volume & Reliability Test Report v4.0
Media was removed from all Verity Scan machines as they were completed and
18
retained.
Ballots were removed from the ballot box and straightened. Ballots were boxed for
19
return to CASOS.
The total number of ballots processed on the device was entered on the inventory
20 sheet and marked with the label bearing the machine number indicating that
machine was complete.
Incident reports were logged and the number of machines experiencing each type
21
of substantive failure was recorded.
22 Closed polls on machines as necessary.
23 Secured and retained all media and artifacts.
All media from all devices and boxed ballots will be brought to the CASOS. Chain
24
of custody for ballots and media will be maintained by CASOS.
25 Testing was concluded by end of day June 7th, 2023.
Evaluation of Testing
Five distinct issues and issue types were noted during the testing.
1. Verity Reader Device #15 would report an error that “One or more
landmarks could not be located”. Restarting the Verity Reader device
allowed the scanning of two more ballots before the same issue was
reported. Reloading the election definition did not correct the issue. Next
step in troubleshooting would be calibration; however, the calibration kit is
currently not available. Verity Reader Device #15 was removed from testing.
To date, no proof of concept has been demonstrated to verify the calibration
kit would resolve the issue.
2. On Verity Scan, a paper jam message that displayed likely as a result of the
“voter” holding the ballot too long once the scanner started to pull it in. This
message was seen one time out of the 40,000 ballots cast on all Verity Scan
devices.
3. On Verity Scan, a “Your choices may not be properly marked” warning
message that displayed regardless of the choices being properly marked.
This message was seen two times out of the 40,000 ballots cast on all Verity
Scan devices. Second attempts at scanning the ballots were successful for
the two ballots that encountered this situation. The error rate for this issue
was “.00005”. This message can be caused by the ballot being inputted in a
skewed manner. Re-insertion of the ballot will correct the issue.
4. On Verity Scan, a “Could not read one or more barcodes” error message
that displayed regardless of the choices being properly marked. This
message was seen 21 times out of the 40,000 ballots cast on all Verity Scan
devices. Second attempts at scanning the ballots were successful for the 21
Volume and Reliability Test Report v4.0 Page 8 of 9
Document No. CAF-22009-FTR-04
California Secretary of State
Hart InterCivic Verity Voting 3.2
California Certification
Volume & ReliabilityTest Report v4.0
ballots that encountered this situation. The error rate for this issue was
“.000525”. This message can be caused by the ballot being inputted in a
skewed manner. Re-insertion of the ballot will correct the issue.
5. On Verity Scan, a “Ballot is not the correct length” error message that
displayed regardless of the choices being properly marked. This message
was seen three times out of the 40,000 ballots cast on all Verity Scan
devices. Second attempts at scanning the ballots were successful for the
three ballots that encountered this situation. The error rate for this issue was
“.000075”.
As directed by the California Secretary of State, this report does not include any
recommendation as to whether or not the system should be approved.
End of Volume and Reliability Test Report
Volume and Reliability Test Report v4.0 Page 9 of 9
Document No. CAF-22009-FTR-04