OVSTA
County of Los Angeles Vsap Tally 1.0 Consultant Software Testing Report
VSAP Tally Version 1.0
Read the report at Los Angeles County VSAP ↗
County of Los Angeles VSAP Tally 1.0
Central Tabulation System
Source Code Review Test Report
for California
LAC-18001-SCRTR-01
Prepared for:
Vendor Name County of Los Angeles
Vendor System VSAP Tally 1.0
Prepared by:
4720 Independence St.
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
303-422-1566
www.SLICompliance.com
Accredited by the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) for Selected Voting System Test
Methods or Services
County of Los Angeles
VSAP Tally 1.0
California Certification
Software Test Report v1.2
Copyright 2018 by SLI ComplianceSM, a Division of Gaming Laboratories International, LLC
Revision History
Date Release Author Revision Summary
7.11.2018 1.0 M. Santos Initial Release
7.12.2018 1.1 M. Santos Update for code version listing
7.16.2018 1.2 M. Santos Updates for CASOS comments
Disclaimer
The information reported herein must not be used by the client to claim product
certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal
Government.
Trademarks
• SLI is a registered trademark of SLI Compliance.
• All products and company names are used for identification purposes only and may
be trademarks of their respective owners.
California Certification Software Test Report Page 2 of 7
Report Number LAC-18001-SCRTR-01
County of Los Angeles
VSAP Tally 1.0
California Certification
Software Test Report v1.2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 4
REVIEW SPECIFICATIONS ......................................................................................................................... 4
SOURCE CODE REVIEW ................................................................................................................................ 4
REVIEW RESULTS....................................................................................................................................... 6
DISCREPANCIES ........................................................................................................................................... 6
VULNERABILITIES ......................................................................................................................................... 6
FINAL REPORT ............................................................................................................................................ 7
California Certification Software Test Report Page 3 of 7
Report Number LAC-18001-SCRTR-01
County of Los Angeles
VSAP Tally 1.0
California Certification
Software Test Report v1.2
INTRODUCTION
This report outlines the testing SLI Compliance (SLI) followed when performing
Software Testing on the County of Los Angeles VSAP Tally 1.0 (VSAP Tally 1.0)
system against the California Voting System Standards (CVSS).
The VSAP Tally 1.0 system consists of a central, high-speed, optical scan ballot
counter (tabulator) and is used for processing ballots. This ballot counter unit is
based on commercial off the shelf (COTS) hardware coupled with custom-made
ballot processing application software. It is used for high-speed, accurate, and
reliable centralized scanning and counting of paper ballots.
The VSAP Tally 1.0 code version for this release is “v1.1.2.2”.
REVIEW SPECIFICATIONS
The following are the specifications for source code testing conducted on the
VSAP Tally 1.0 system.
Source Code Review
The VSAP Tally 1.0 system includes proprietary software and firmware. The VSAP
Tally 1.0 voting system code base was tested to the applicable CVSS
requirements.
Review of the code included:
• Evaluate adherence to the applicable standards in sections 5 and 7 of the
CVSS
• Evaluate adherence to other applicable coding format conventions and
standards including best practices for the coding language used
• Analyze the program logic and branching structure
• Evaluate whether the system is designed in a way that allows meaningful
analysis, including:
o Whether the architecture and code is amenable to an external review
o Whether code analysis tools can be usefully applied
o Whether the code complexity is at a level that obfuscates its logic
Security considerations reviewed against the code base included:
• Search for exposures to commonly exploited vulnerabilities
• Evaluate the use and correct implementation of cryptography and key
management
• Analyze error and exception handling
California Certification Software Test Report Page 4 of 7
Report Number LAC-18001-SCRTR-01
County of Los Angeles
VSAP Tally 1.0
California Certification
Software Test Report v1.2
• Evaluate the likelihood of security failures being detected including:
o Evaluate whether audit mechanisms are reliable and tamper resistant
o Evaluate whether data that might be subject to tampering is properly
validated and authenticated
• Evaluate the risk that a user can escalate his or her capabilities beyond
those authorized
• Evaluate the design and implementation to ensure that sound, generally
accepted engineering practices are followed, checking to verify that code is
defensively written against:
o Bad data
o Errors in other modules
o Changes in environment
o User errors
o Other adverse conditions
• Evaluate for embedded, exploitable code (such as “Easter eggs”) that can
be triggered to affect the system
• Evaluate the code for dynamic memory access features which would permit
the replacement of certificated executable code or control data or insertion
of exploitable code or data.
• Evaluate the code for use of runtime scripts, instructions, or other control
data that can affect the operation of security relevant functions or the
integrity of the data.
Coding languages involved in the VSAP Tally 1.0 application are shown in Table 1.
Table 1 – County of Los Angeles VSAP Tally 1.0 System Components
Lines Tally 1.0
Language of Code Standard
Code Version
1. California Voting System Standards
2. The Go Programming Language Specification
GO 100,000
1.1.2.2 (golang.org/ref/spec)
3.
Effective Go(golang.org/doc/effective_go.html)
Source Code Review Tools utilized by SLI included:
• Module Finder: an SLI proprietary application used to parse module names
from C/C++ and VB code and populate the identified module names into the
review documents
• Understand: a commercial application used to review code to stated
requirements
California Certification Software Test Report Page 5 of 7
Report Number LAC-18001-SCRTR-01
County of Los Angeles
VSAP Tally 1.0
California Certification
Software Test Report v1.2
REVIEW RESULTS
Discrepancies
Discrepancies are reported such that the California Secretary of State is provided
with a basis for evaluating the extent to which the source code meets applicable
standards.
VSAP Tally 1.0 Source Code Review
No source code requirements were found to be at issue within the VSAP Tally 1.0
source code base reviewed; as a result, no discrepancies were written against the
code base.
Vulnerabilities
For any vulnerabilities discovered, SLI was tasked with identifying the particular
standards applicable to each vulnerability.
To the extent possible, reported vulnerabilities include an indication of whether the
exploitation of the vulnerability would require access by:
• Voter: Usually has low knowledge of the voting technology design and
configuration. Some may have more advanced knowledge. May carry out
attacks designed by others.
• Elections official insider: Wide range of knowledge of the voting technology
design and configuration. May have unrestricted access to voting
technology for long periods of time. Their designated activities include:
o Set up and pre-election procedures;
o Election operation;
o Post-election processing of results; and
o Archiving and storage operations.
• Vendor insider: With great knowledge of voting technology design and
configuration. They have unlimited access to voting technology before it is
delivered to the purchaser and, thereafter, may have unrestricted access
when performing warranty and maintenance service, and when providing
election administration services.
SLI will not verify or demonstrate exploitability of the vulnerability but the report of
the vulnerability will identify factors involved in the exploitation.
Any vulnerability theories developed by the source code review team members
shall, to the extent possible, be referred to the Secretary of State staff.
California Certification Software Test Report Page 6 of 7
Report Number LAC-18001-SCRTR-01
County of Los Angeles
VSAP Tally 1.0
California Certification
Software Test Report v1.2
VSAP Tally 1.0 source code vulnerability review
No vulnerabilities were identified within the VSAP Tally 1.0 code base.
Final Report
No discrepancy findings were determined for the VSAP Tally 1.0 code base.
No vulnerabilities were identified within the VSAP Tally 1.0 code base.
As directed by the California Secretary of State, this software testing report does
not include any recommendation as to whether or not the system should be
approved.
End of VSAP Tally 1.0 Software Test Report
California Certification Software Test Report Page 7 of 7
Report Number LAC-18001-SCRTR-01