SCO
City of Greenfield 06/07
Read the report at City of Greenfield 06/07 ↗
CITY OF GREENFIELD
Audit Report
GAS TAX FUND AND
TRAFFIC CONGESTION RELIEF FUNDS
July 1, 2005, through June 30, 2006
J C
OHN HIANG
California State Controller
June 2007
J C
OHN HIANG
California State Controller
June 8, 2007
Brent Green
Financial Consultant
City of Greenfield
45 El Camino Real
Greenfield, CA 93927
Dear Mr. Green:
The State Controller’s Office audited the City of Greenfield’s Gas Tax Fund and Traffic
Congestion Relief Fund (TCRF) allocations recorded in the Transportation Fund for the period of
July 1, 2005, through June 30, 2006.
Our audit disclosed that the city accounted for and expended its Gas Tax Fund and TCRF
allocations in compliance with requirements, and that no adjustments to the funds are required.
If you have any questions, please contact Steven Mar, Chief, Local Government Audits Bureau,
at (916) 324-7226.
Sincerely,
Original signed by
JEFFREY V. BROWNFIELD
Chief, Division of Audits
JVB/jj:vb
City of Greenfield Gas Tax Fund and Traffic Congestion Relief Funds
Contents
Audit Report
Summary .................................................................................................................................... 1
Background ................................................................................................................................ 1
Objective, Scope, and Methodology ........................................................................................ 1
Conclusion .................................................................................................................................. 2
Follow-Up on Prior Audit Findings ........................................................................................ 2
Views of Responsible Official ................................................................................................... 2
Restricted Use ............................................................................................................................ 2
Schedule 1—Reconciliation of Fund Balance ............................................................................ 3
City of Greenfield Gas Tax Fund and Traffic Congestion Relief Funds
Audit Report
Summary The State Controller’s Office (SCO) audited the City of Greenfield’s Gas
Tax Fund for the period of July 1, 2005, through June 30, 2006. We also
audited the Traffic Congestion Relief Fund (TCRF) allocations recorded
in the Transportation Fund for the period of July 1, 2000, through
June 30, 2006. The last day of fieldwork was February 22, 2007.
Our audit disclosed that the city accounted for and expended its Gas Tax
Fund and TCRF allocations recorded in the Transportation Fund in
compliance with requirements, and that no adjustments to the funds are
required.
Background The State apportions funds monthly from the highway users tax account
in the transportation tax fund to cities and counties for the construction,
maintenance, and operation of local streets and roads. The highway users
taxes are derived from state taxes on the sale of motor vehicle fuels. In
accordance with Streets and Highways Code Section 2101 and
Article XIX of the California Constitution, a city must deposit all
apportionments of highway users taxes in its Gas Tax Fund (also known
as the Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund). A city must expend
gas tax funds only for street-related purposes. We conducted our audit of
the city’s Gas Tax Fund under the authority of Government Code Section
12410.
Chapter 91, Statutes of 2000 (Assembly Bill 2928), as amended by
Chapter 656, Statutes of 2000 (Senate Bill 1662), established a Traffic
Congestion Relief Fund in the State Treasury for allocating funds
quarterly to cities and counties for street or road maintenance,
reconstruction, and storm damage repair. Cities must deposit funds
received into the city account designated for the receipt of state funds
allocated for transportation purposes. The city recorded its TCRF
allocations in the Transportation Fund. We conducted our audit of the
city’s TCRF allocations under the authority of Streets and Highways
Code Sections 2182 and 2182.1.
Objective, Our audit objective was to determine whether the city accounted for and
Scope, and expended the Gas Tax Fund and the TCRF in compliance with
Article XIX of the California Constitution and the Streets and Highways
Methodology
Code. To meet the audit objective, we determined whether the city:
• Properly deposited highway users tax apportionments and other
appropriate revenues in the Gas Tax Fund;
• Properly deposited TCRF allocations into an account designated for
the receipt of State funds allocated for transportation purposes;
• Expended funds exclusively for authorized street-related purposes;
and
• Made available unexpended funds for future expenditures.
-1-
City of Greenfield Gas Tax Fund and Traffic Congestion Relief Funds
We conducted our audit according to Government Auditing Standards,
issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. We did not audit
the city’s financial statements. We limited our audit scope to planning
and performing the audit procedures necessary to obtain reasonable
assurance that the city accounted for and expended the Gas Tax Fund and
the TCRF in accordance with the requirements of the Streets and
Highways Code. Accordingly, we examined transactions, on a test basis,
to determine whether the city expended funds for street purposes. We
considered the city’s internal controls only to the extent necessary to plan
the audit.
Conclusion Our audit disclosed that the city accounted for and expended its Gas Tax
Fund in compliance with Article XIX of the California Constitution and
the Streets and Highways Code for the period of July 1, 2005, through
June 30, 2006.
Our audit also disclosed that the city accounted for and expended its
TCRF allocations recorded in the Transportation Fund in compliance
with Article XIX of the California Constitution and the Streets and
Highways Code for the period of July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2006.
Follow-Up on Prior
The city satisfactorily resolved the findings noted in our prior audit
Audit Findings report, issued on December 2, 2000.
Views of We discussed the audit results with city representatives during an exit
conference on February 22, 2007. Brent Green, Finance Consultant,
Responsible
agreed with the audit results. Mr. Green further agreed that a draft audit
Official
report was not necessary and that the audit report could be issued as
final.
Restricted Use This report is intended for the information and use of city management
and the SCO; it is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone
other than these specified parties. This restriction is not intended to limit
distribution of this report, which is a matter of public record.
Original signed by
JEFFREY V. BROWNFIELD
Chief, Division of Audits
-2-
City of Greenfield Gas Tax Fund and Traffic Congestion Relief Funds
Schedule 1—
Reconciliation of Fund Balance
July 1, 2005, through June 30, 2006
TCRF Allocations
Gas Tax (recorded in the
Fund 1 Transportation Fund) 2
Beginning fund balance per city $ 190,324 $ —
Revenues 238,494 61,896
Total funds available 428,818 61,896
Expenditures (152,037) —
Ending fund balance per city 276,781 61,896
SCO adjustment — —
Ending fund balance per audit $ 276,781 $ 61,896
___________________________
1 The city receives apportionments from the state highway users tax account, pursuant to Streets and Highways
Code Sections 2105, 2106, 2107, and 2107.5. The basis of the apportionments for Sections 2105, 2106, and 2107
varies, but the money may be used for any street purpose. Streets and Highways Code Section 2107.5
apportionments are restricted to administration and engineering expenditures, except for cities with populations of
fewer than 10,000 inhabitants. Those cities may use the funds for rights-of-way and for the construction of street
systems.
2 Chapter 91, Statutes of 2000 (Assembly Bill 2928), as amended by Chapter 656, Statutes of 2000 (Senate Bill
1662), established the State Traffic Congestion Relief Fund (TCRF), which allocates funds to cities and counties
for street or road maintenance and reconstruction.
-3-
State Controller’s Office
Division of Audits
Post Office Box 942850
Sacramento, CA 94250-5874
http://www.sco.ca.gov
S07-GTA-004