SCO
Santa Cruz County 10/07
Read the report at Santa Cruz County 10/07 ↗
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
OFFICE OF EDUCATION
Report of Review
AUDIT RESOLUTION PROCESS
Fiscal Year (FY) 2003-04 and FY 2004-05
J C
OHN HIANG
California State Controller
October 2007
October 17, 2007
Michael Watkins
County Superintendent of Schools
Santa Cruz County Office of Education
809-H Bay Avenue
Capitola, CA 95010
Dear Mr. Watkins:
The State Controller’s Office reviewed the Santa Cruz County Office of Education’s (COE)
audit resolution process for local education agency exceptions noted in the annual audit reports.
The review covered fiscal year (FY) 2003-04 and FY 2004-05.
Our review disclosed that the Santa Cruz COE followed its audit resolution process for FY
2003-04 and FY 2004-05. As a result, the Santa Cruz COE was in compliance with Education
Code section 41020.
If you have any questions, please contact Casandra Moore-Hudnall, Chief, Financial Audits
Bureau, at (916) 322-4846.
Sincerely,
Original signed by
JEFFREY V. BROWNFIELD
Chief, Division of Audits
JVB/sk
cc: Barney Finlay,
Associate Superintendent, Santa Cruz County Office of Education
Scott Hannan, Director
School Fiscal Services Division
California Department of Education
Arlene Matsuura, Education Fiscal Services Consultant
School Fiscal Services Division
California Department of Education
Dan Troy, Principal Program Budget Analyst
Education Systems, Department of Finance
Santa Cruz County Office of Education Audit Resolution Process
Contents
Review Report
Summary ............................................................................................................................ 1
Background ........................................................................................................................ 1
Objective, Scope, and Methodology ................................................................................. 2
Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 2
Views of Responsible Officials .......................................................................................... 3
Restricted Use .................................................................................................................... 3
Santa Cruz County Office of Education Audit Resolution Process
Review Report
Summary The State Controller’s Office (SCO) reviewed the Santa Cruz County
Office of Education’s (COE) audit resolution process for local education
agency exceptions noted in the annual audit reports for fiscal year (FY)
2003-04 and FY 2004-05 Our review disclosed that the Santa Cruz COE
followed its audit resolution process for FY 2003-04 and FY 2004-05.
The last day of fieldwork was August 1, 2007.
Background Education Code section 41020(n) requires the State Controller to
annually select a sampling of county superintendents of schools to
perform a follow-up review of the audit resolution process. Results of
these reviews are reported to the Superintendent of Public Instruction and
the county superintendents of the schools that were reviewed.
Furthermore, Education Code section 41020(n) states that the State
Controller shall require auditors to categorize audit exceptions in the
audit report in such a manner that both the county superintendent of
schools and the Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI) can discern
which exceptions they are responsible for ensuring correction of by a
local education agency.
The Santa Cruz COE provides coordination of educational programs and
professional and financial supervision for 10 local education agencies
and one joint powers entity under its direct jurisdiction. In addition, the
county superintendent of schools maintains special schools and programs
countywide independent of the local education agencies.
County superintendents of schools are required to do the following:
Review, for each of their school districts, the audit exceptions relating
to attendance, inventory of equipment, internal control, and any
miscellaneous items, and determine whether the findings have been
corrected or an acceptable plan of correction has been developed
(Education Code section 41020(i));
Review audit exceptions related to attendance exceptions or issues
that shall include, but are not limited to, those related to revenue
limits, adult education, and independent study (Education Code
section 41020(j)(1));
Notify the local education agency and request the governing board of
the local education agency to provide to the county superintendent of
schools a description of the correction or plan of correction by
March 15 (Education Code section 41020(j)(2));
Review the description of the correction or plan of correction and
determine its adequacy and, if its response was not adequate, require
the local education agency to resubmit a portion of its response
(Education Code section 41020(j)(3)); and
-1-
Santa Cruz County Office of Education Audit Resolution Process
By May 15, certify to the SPI and the SCO that the county has
reviewed all applicable exceptions, and state that all exceptions have
been corrected or an acceptable plan for correction has been submitted
by the local education agency to the county superintendent, except as
noted in the certification. In addition, identify by local education
agency any attendance-related exceptions or exceptions involving
state funds, and require the local education agency to submit the
appropriate reporting forms to the SPI for processing (Education Code
section 41020(k)).
Objective, Our review was conducted under the authority of Education Code section
41020(n). Our review scope was limited to determining whether or not
Scope, and
the Santa Cruz COE followed its audit resolution process in resolving
Methodology
audit exceptions. Our review did not include an evaluation of the
sufficiency of the action taken by the local education agency and the
Santa Cruz COE to address each exception, nor did it assess the degree to
which each exception was addressed. Specifically, our review was
limited to the following procedures.
Verifying that the Santa Cruz COE addressed all attendance,
inventory of equipment, internal control, and miscellaneous
exceptions. However, with respect to exceptions based on sample
items, our review did not include a determination of whether or not
the exception results were properly quantified and addressed at a
districtwide or countywide level;
Verifying that the Santa Cruz COE notified local education agencies
that they must submit completed corrective action forms to the Santa
Cruz COE by March 15, 2005, and March 15, 2006, for FY 2003-04
and FY 2004-05 respectively. Our review did not include an
assessment of the local education agencies’ progress with respect to
taking corrective action;
Verifying that the Santa Cruz COE required the local education
agencies to submit the appropriate reporting forms to the SPI for any
attendance-related exceptions that affect state funding; and
Reviewing the May 15, 2005, and May 15, 2006, letters of
certification that the Santa Cruz COE sent to the SPI and the SCO
with respect to any resolved and unresolved audit exceptions.
Conclusion Our review disclosed that the Santa Cruz COE followed its audit
resolution process for FY 2003-04 and FY 2004-05. As a result, the
Santa Cruz COE was in compliance with Education Code section 41020
for FY 2003-04 and FY 2004-05.
-2-
Santa Cruz County Office of Education Audit Resolution Process
Views of We discussed our conclusion with Barney Finlay, Associate
Superintendent and Jean S. Gardner, Director of Fiscal Services, Santa
Responsible
Cruz COE, at an exit conference held on August 1, 2007. The Santa Cruz
Officials
COE representatives generally agreed with the conclusion and authorized
issuance of the final report.
Restricted Use This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Santa
Cruz COE, the California Department of Education, the California
Department of Finance, and the SCO; it is not intended to be and should
not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. This restriction
is not meant to limit distribution of this report, which is a matter of
public record.
Original signed by
JEFFREY V. BROWNFIELD
Chief, Division of Audits
-3-
State Controller’s Office
Division of Audits
Post Office Box 942850
Sacramento, California 94250-5874
http://www.sco.ca.gov
S08-COE-900