SCO
City of El Cajon 09/08
Read the report at City of El Cajon 09/08 ↗
CITY OF EL CAJON
Audit Report
SPECIAL GAS TAX STREET IMPROVEMENT FUND
July 1, 2006, through June 30, 2007
TRAFFIC CONGESTION RELIEF FUND
July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2007
J C
OHN HIANG
California State Controller
September 2008
J C
OHN HIANG
California State Controller
September 30, 2008
The Honorable Mark S. Lewis
Mayor of the City of El Cajon
200 E. Main Street
El Cajon, CA 92020-3996
Dear Mayor Lewis:
The State Controller’s Office audited the City of El Cajon’s Special Gas Tax Street Improvement
Fund for the period of July 1, 2006, through June 30, 2007. We also audited the Traffic
Congestion Relief Fund for the period of July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2007.
Our audit disclosed that the city accounted for and expended its Special Gas Tax Street
Improvement Fund and Traffic Congestion Relief Fund in compliance with requirements, and
that no adjustment to the funds is required.
If you have any questions, please contact Steven Mar, Chief, Local Government Audits Bureau,
at (916) 324-7226.
Sincerely,
Original signed by
JEFFREY V. BROWNFIELD
Chief, Division of Audits
JVB/vb
cc: Michael Shelton, Director of Finance
City of El Cajon
City of El Cajon Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund and Traffic Congestion Relief Fund
Contents
Audit Report
Summary ............................................................................................................................ 1
Background ........................................................................................................................ 1
Objective, Scope, and Methodology ................................................................................. 1
Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 2
Follow-Up on Prior Audit Findings ................................................................................. 2
Views of Responsible Official ........................................................................................... 2
Restricted Use .................................................................................................................... 2
Schedule 1—Reconciliation of Fund Balance ...................................................................... 3
City of El Cajon Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund and Traffic Congestion Relief Fund
Audit Report
Summary The State Controller’s Office audited the City of El Cajon’s Special Gas
Tax Street Improvement Fund for the period of July 1, 2006, through
June 30, 2007. We also audited the Traffic Congestion Relief Fund for
the period of July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2007.
Our audit disclosed that the city accounted for and expended its Special
Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund and Traffic Congestion Relief Fund in
compliance with requirements, and that no adjustment to the funds is
required.
Background The State apportions funds monthly from the highway users tax account
in the transportation tax fund to cities and counties for the construction,
maintenance, and operation of local streets and roads. The highway users
taxes derive from state taxes on the sale of motor vehicle fuels. In
accordance with Article XIX of the California Constitution and Streets
and Highways Code section 2101, a city must deposit all apportionments
of highway users taxes in its Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund.
A city must expend gas tax funds only for street-related purposes. We
conducted our audit of the city’s Special Gas Tax Street Improvement
Fund under the authority of Government Code section 12410.
Government Code section 14556.5 created a Traffic Congestion Relief
Fund (TCRF) in the State Treasury for allocating funds quarterly to cities
and counties for street or road maintenance, reconstruction, and storm
damage repair. Cities must deposit funds received into the city account
designated for the receipt of state funds allocated for transportation
purposes. The city recorded its TCRF allocations in the Traffic
Congestion Relief Fund. We conducted our audit of the city’s TCRF
allocations under the authority of Revenue and Taxation Code
section 7104.
Objective, Scope, Our audit objective was to determine whether the city accounted for and
and Methodology expended the Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund and the Traffic
Congestion Relief Fund in compliance with Article XIX of the California
Constitution and the Streets and Highways Code. To meet the audit
objective, we determined whether the city:
• Properly deposited highway users tax apportionments and other
appropriate revenues in the Special Gas Tax Street Improvement
Fund;
• Properly deposited TCRF allocations into an account designated for
the receipt of state funds allocated for transportation purposes;
• Expended funds exclusively for authorized street-related purposes;
and
• Made available unexpended funds for future expenditures.
-1-
City of El Cajon Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund and Traffic Congestion Relief Fund
We conducted this performance audit in accordance with generally
accepted government auditing standards. Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to
provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our
audit objectives. We believe that the evidence obtained provides a
reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit
objectives. We did not audit the city’s financial statements. We limited
our audit scope to planning and performing the audit procedures
necessary to obtain reasonable assurance that the city accounted for and
expended the Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund and the Traffic
Congestion Relief Fund in accordance with the requirements of the
Streets and Highways Code and Revenue and Taxation Code section
7104. Accordingly, we examined transactions, on a test basis, to
determine whether the city expended funds for street purposes. We
considered the city’s internal controls only to the extent necessary to plan
the audit.
Conclusion Our audit disclosed that the City of El Cajon accounted for and expended
its Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund in compliance with
Article XIX of the California Constitution and the Streets and Highways
Code for the period of July 1, 2006, through June 30, 2007.
Our audit also disclosed that the city accounted for and expended its
Traffic Congestion Relief Fund in compliance with Article XIX of the
California Constitution, the Streets and Highways Code, and Revenue
and Taxation Code section 7104 for the period of July 1, 2000, through
June 30, 2007.
Follow-Up on Prior The city satisfactorily resolved the findings noted in our prior audit
Audit Findings report issued on December 24, 2002.
Views of We discussed the audit results with city representatives during an exit
conference on July 18, 2008. Michael Shelton, Director of Finance,
Responsible
agreed with the audit results. Mr. Shelton further agreed that a draft audit
Official
report was not necessary and that the audit report could be issued as
final.
Restricted Use This report is intended for the information and use of city management
and the SCO; it is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone
other than these specified parties. This restriction is not intended to limit
distribution of this report, which is a matter of public record.
Original signed by
JEFFREY V. BROWNFIELD
Chief, Division of Audits
September 30, 2008
-2-
City of El Cajon Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund and Traffic Congestion Relief Fund
Schedule 1—
Reconciliation of Fund Balance
July 1, 2006, through June 30, 2007
Special Gas
Tax Street Traffic
Improvement Congestion
Fund 1 Relief Fund 2
Beginning fund balance per city $ 497,529 $ 441,738
Revenues 1,846,953 761,515
Total funds available 2,344,482 1,203,253
Expenditures (1,938,057) (370,016)
Ending fund balance per city 406,425 833,237
SCO adjustment — —
Ending fund balance per audit $ 406,425 $ 833,237
___________________________
1 The city receives apportionments from the state highway users tax account, pursuant to Streets and Highways
Code sections 2105, 2106, 2107, and 2107.5. The basis of the apportionments for Sections 2105, 2106, and 2107
varies, but the money may be used for any street purpose. Streets and Highways Code section 2107.5 restricts
apportionments to administration and engineering expenditures, except for cities with populations of fewer than
10,000 inhabitants. Those cities may use the funds for rights-of-way and for the construction of street systems.
2 Government Code section 14556.5 created a Traffic Congestion Relief Fund (TCRF) in the State Treasury for
allocating funds quarterly to cities and counties for street and road maintenance, reconstruction, and storm damage
repair. The TCRF allocations were recorded in the Traffic Congestion Relief Fund. The audit period was
July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2007.
-3-
State Controller’s Office
Division of Audits
Post Office Box 942850
Sacramento, CA 94250-5874
http://www.sco.ca.gov
C09-GTA-002