SCO
City of Rolling Hills Estates 09/08
Read the report at City of Rolling Hills Estates 09/08 ↗
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTATES
Audit Report
SPECIAL GAS TAX STREET IMPROVEMENT FUND
July 1, 2006, through June 30, 2007
TRAFFIC CONGESTION RELIEF FUND ALLOCATIONS
July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2007
J C
OHN HIANG
California State Controller
September 2008
J C
OHN HIANG
California State Controller
September 19, 2008
The Honorable Frank V. Zerunyan
Mayor of the City of Rolling Hills Estates
4045 Palos Verdes Drive North
Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274
Dear Mr. Zerunyan:
The State Controller’s Office audited the City of Rolling Hills Estates’ Special Gas Tax Street
Improvement Fund for the period of July 1, 2006, through June 30, 2007. We also audited the
Traffic Congestion Relief Fund allocations recorded in the General Fund for the period of
July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2007.
Our audit disclosed that the city accounted for and expended its Special Gas Tax Street
Improvement Fund and Traffic Congestion Relief Fund allocations recorded in the General Fund
in compliance with requirements and that no adjustment to the funds are required; however, we
identified a procedural finding.
If you have any questions, please contact Steven Mar, Chief, Local Government Audits Bureau,
at (916) 324-7226.
Sincerely,
Original signed by
JEFFREY V. BROWNFIELD
Chief, Division of Audits
JVB/wm
cc: Douglas R. Prichard, City Manager
City of Rolling Hills Estates
Michael Whitehead
Director of Administrative Services
City of Rolling Hills Estates
City of Rolling Hills Estates Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund and Traffic Congestion Relief Fund Allocations
Contents
Audit Report
Summary ............................................................................................................................ 1
Background ........................................................................................................................ 1
Objective, Scope, and Methodology ................................................................................. 1
Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 2
Follow-Up on Prior Audit Findings ................................................................................. 2
Views of Responsible Official ........................................................................................... 2
Restricted Use .................................................................................................................... 2
Schedule 1—Reconciliation of Fund Balance ...................................................................... 3
Finding and Recommendation .............................................................................................. 4
City of Rolling Hills Estates Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund and Traffic Congestion Relief Fund Allocations
Audit Report
Summary The State Controller’s Office audited the City of Rolling Hills Estates’
Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund for the period of July 1, 2006,
through June 30, 2007. We also audited the Traffic Congestion Relief
Fund (TCRF) allocations recorded in the General Fund for the period of
July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2007.
Our audit disclosed that the city accounted for and expended its Special
Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund and TCRF allocations recorded in the
General Fund in compliance with requirements and that no adjustments
to the funds are required; however, we identified a procedural finding.
Background The State apportions funds monthly from the highway users tax account
in the transportation tax fund to cities and counties for the construction,
maintenance, and operation of local streets and roads. The highway users
taxes derive from state taxes on the sale of motor vehicle fuels. In
accordance with Article XIX of the California Constitution and Streets
and Highways Code section 2101, a city must deposit all apportionments
of highway users taxes in its Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund.
A city must expend gas tax funds only for street-related purposes. We
conducted our audit of the city’s Special Gas Tax Street Improvement
Fund under the authority of Government Code section 12410.
Government Code section 14556.5 created a Traffic Congestion Relief
Fund in the State Treasury for allocating funds quarterly to cities and
counties for street or road maintenance, reconstruction, and storm
damage repair. Cities must deposit funds received into the city account
designated for the receipt of state funds allocated for transportation
purposes. The city recorded its TCRF allocations in the General Fund.
We conducted our audit of the city’s TCRF allocations under the
authority of Revenue and Taxation Code section 7104.
Objective, Scope, Our audit objective was to determine whether the city accounted for and
and Methodology expended the Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund and the TCRF
allocations recorded in the General Fund in compliance with Article XIX
of the California Constitution, the Streets and Highways Code, and
Revenue and Taxation Code section 7104. To meet the audit objective,
we determined whether the city:
• Properly deposited highway users tax apportionments and other
appropriate revenues in the Special Gas Tax Street Improvement
Fund;
• Expended funds exclusively for authorized street-related purposes;
and
• Made available unexpended funds for future expenditures.
-1-
City of Rolling Hills Estates Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund and Traffic Congestion Relief Fund Allocations
We conducted this performance audit in accordance with generally
accepted government auditing standards. Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to
provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our
audit objectives. We did not audit the city’s financial statements. We
limited our audit scope to planning and performing the audit procedures
necessary to obtain reasonable assurance that the city accounted for and
expended the Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund and the TCRF
allocations recorded in the General Fund in accordance with the
requirements of the Streets and Highways Code and Revenue and
Taxation Code section 7104. Accordingly, we examined transactions, on
a test basis, to determine whether the city expended funds for street
purposes. We considered the city’s internal controls only to the extent
necessary to plan the audit.
Conclusion Our audit disclosed that the City of Rolling Hills Estates accounted for
and expended its Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund in
compliance with Article XIX of the California Constitution and the
Streets and Highways Code for the period of July 1, 2006, through
June 30, 2007.
Our audit also disclosed that the city accounted for and expended its
Traffic Congestion Relief Fund allocations recorded in the General Fund
in compliance with Article XIX of the California Constitution, the
Streets and Highways Code, and Revenue and Taxation Code section
7104 for the period of July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2007, except as
described in the Finding and Recommendation section of this report. The
finding required no financial adjustment to the city’s accounting records.
Follow-Up on Prior
Our prior audit report, issued on June 25, 1999, disclosed no findings.
Audit Findings
Views of We discussed the audit results with Michael Whitehead, Director of
Administrative Services, by telephone on September 3, 2008.
Responsible
Mr. Whitehead agreed with our finding and will implement our
Official
recommendation.
Restricted Use This report is intended for the information and use of city management
and the SCO; it is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone
other than these specified parties. This restriction is not intended to limit
distribution of this report, which is a matter of public record.
Original signed by
JEFFREY V. BROWNFIELD
Chief, Division of Audits
September 19, 2008
-2-
City of Rolling Hills Estates Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund and Traffic Congestion Relief Fund Allocations
Schedule 1—
Reconciliation of Fund Balance
July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2007
Special Gas
Tax Street
Improvement TCRF
Fund 1 Allocations 2
Beginning fund balance per city $ 42,338 $ —
Revenues 552,935 59,887
Total funds available 595,273 59,887
Expenditures (595,273) (59,887)
Ending fund balance per city — —
SCO adjustment — —
Ending fund balance per audit $ — $ —
___________________________
1 The city receives apportionments from the state highway users tax account, pursuant to Streets and Highways
Code sections 2105, 2106, 2107, and 2107.5. The basis of the apportionments for Sections 2105, 2106, and 2107
varies, but the money may be used for any street purpose. Streets and Highways Code section 2107.5 restricts
apportionments to administration and engineering expenditures, except for cities with populations of fewer than
10,000 inhabitants. Those cities may use the funds for rights-of-way and for the construction of street systems.
2 Government Code section 14556.5 created a Traffic Congestion Relief Fund (TCRF) in the State Treasury for
allocating funds quarterly to cities and counties for street and road maintenance, reconstruction, and storm damage
repair. The TCRF allocations were recorded in the General Fund. The audit period was July 1, 2000, through
June 30, 2007.
-3-
City of Rolling Hills Estates Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund and Traffic Congestion Relief Fund Allocations
Finding and Recommendation
FINDING— The city records its Traffic Congestion Relief Fund (TCRF) allocations
and expenditures in the General Fund, a non-transportation type fund that
TCRF allocations
is not specifically designated for the receipt of state funds allocated for
recorded in the
transportation purposes.
General Fund
Revenues and Taxation Code section 7104(d) states that funds received
under this section (Traffic Congestion Relief Program funds) shall be
deposited as follows in order to avoid the commingling of those funds
with other local funds: “(1) In the case of a city, into the city account that
is designated for the receipt of state funds allocated for transportation
purposes.”
Recommendation
The city should account for TCRF transactions (allocations and
expenditures) in a fund designated for the receipt of state funds for
transportation purposes, such as the city’s Special Gas Tax Street
Improvement Fund.
City’s Response
The city concurs with the finding and will implement the
recommendation.
-4-
State Controller’s Office
Division of Audits
Post Office Box 942850
Sacramento, CA 94250-5874
http://www.sco.ca.gov
C08-GTA-013