SCO
City of Coalinga 03/09
Read the report at City of Coalinga 03/09 ↗
CITY OF COALINGA
Audit Report
SPECIAL GAS TAX STREET IMPROVEMENT FUND
July 1, 2005, through June 30, 2006
TRAFFIC CONGESTION RELIEF FUND ALLOCATIONS
July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2006
J C
OHN HIANG
California State Controller
March 2009
March 27, 2009
The Honorable Ron Lander
Mayor of the City of Coalinga
155 West Durian
Coalinga, CA 93210
Dear Mayor Lander:
The State Controller’s Office audited the City of Coalinga’s Special Gas Tax Street
Improvement Fund for the period of July 1, 2005, through June 30, 2006. We also audited the
Traffic Congestion Relief Fund (TCRF) allocations recorded in the Capital Expenditure Fund for
the period of July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2006.
Our audit disclosed that the city accounted for and expended its Special Gas Tax Street
Improvement Fund and TCRF allocations recorded in the Capital Expenditure Fund in
compliance with requirements, except the city understated the fund balance in the Special Gas
Tax Street Improvement Fund by $288,437 as of June 30, 2006, because it incurred ineligible gas
tax expenditures.
If you have any questions, please contact Steven Mar, Chief, Local Government Audits Bureau,
at (916) 324-7226.
Sincerely,
Original signed by
JEFFREY V. BROWNFIELD
Chief, Division of Audits
JVB/vb
cc: Robert Barron
Finance Director
City of Coalinga
City of Coalinga Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund and Traffic Congestion Relief Fund Allocations
Contents
Audit Report
Summary ............................................................................................................................ 1
Background ........................................................................................................................ 1
Objective, Scope, and Methodology ................................................................................. 1
Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 2
Views of Responsible Official ........................................................................................... 2
Restricted Use .................................................................................................................... 3
Schedule 1—Reconciliation of Fund Balance ...................................................................... 4
Finding and Recommendation .............................................................................................. 5
Attachment—City’s Response to Draft Audit Report
City of Coalinga Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund and Traffic Congestion Relief Fund Allocations
Audit Report
Summary The State Controller’s Office audited the City of Coalinga’s Special Gas
Tax Street Improvement Fund for the period of July 1, 2005, through
June 30, 2006. We also audited the Traffic Congestion Relief Fund
(TCRF) allocations recorded in the Capital Expenditure Fund for the
period of July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2006.
Our audit disclosed that the city accounted for and expended its Special
Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund and TCRF allocations recorded in the
Capital Expenditure Fund in compliance with requirements, except that
the city understated the fund balance in the Special Gas Tax Street
Improvement Fund by $288,437 as of June 30, 2006, because it incurred
ineligible gas tax expenditures.
Background The State apportions funds monthly from the highway users tax account
in the transportation tax fund to cities and counties for the construction,
maintenance, and operation of local streets and roads. The highway users
taxes derive from state taxes on the sale of motor vehicle fuels. In
accordance with Article XIX of the California Constitution and Streets
and Highways Code section 2101, a city must deposit all apportionments
of highway users taxes in its Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund.
A city must expend gas tax funds only for street-related purposes. We
conducted our audit of the city’s Special Gas Tax Street Improvement
Fund under the authority of Government Code section 12410.
Government Code section 14556.5 created a Traffic Congestion Relief
Fund in the State Treasury for allocating funds quarterly to cities and
counties for street or road maintenance, reconstruction, and storm
damage repair. Cities must deposit funds received into the city account
designated for the receipt of state funds allocated for transportation
purposes. The city recorded its TCRF allocations in the Capital
Expenditure Fund. We conducted our audit of the city’s TCRF
allocations under the authority of Revenue and Taxation Code
section 7104.
Objective, Scope, Our audit objective was to determine whether the city accounted for and
and Methodology expended the Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund and the TCRF
allocations recorded in the Capital Expenditure Fund in compliance with
Article XIX of the California Constitution and the Streets and Highways
Code. To meet the audit objective, we determined whether the city:
Properly deposited highway users tax apportionments and other
appropriate revenues in the Special Gas Tax Street Improvement
Fund;
Properly deposited TCRF allocations into an account designated for
the receipt of state funds allocated for transportation purposes;
-1-
City of Coalinga Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund and Traffic Congestion Relief Fund Allocations
Expended funds exclusively for authorized street-related purposes;
and
Made available unexpended funds for future expenditures.
We conducted this performance audit in accordance with generally
accepted government auditing standards. Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to
provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our
audit objectives. We believe that the evidence obtained provides a
reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit
objectives.
We did not audit the city’s financial statements. We limited our audit
scope to planning and performing the audit procedures necessary to
obtain reasonable assurance that the city accounted for and expended its
Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund and the TCRF allocations
recorded in the Capital Expenditure Fund in accordance with the
requirements of the Streets and Highways Code and Revenue and
Taxation Code section 7104. Accordingly, we examined transactions, on
a test basis, to determine whether the city expended funds for street
purposes. We considered the city’s internal controls only to the extent
necessary to plan the audit.
Conclusion Our audit disclosed that the City of Coalinga accounted for and expended
its Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund in compliance with
Article XIX of the California Constitution and the Streets and Highways
Code for the period of July 1, 2005, through June 30, 2006, except as
noted in Schedule 1 and described in the Finding and Recommendation
section of this report. The finding required an adjustment of $288,437 to
the city’s accounting records.
Our audit also disclosed that the city accounted for and expended its
TCRF allocations recorded in the Capital Expenditure Fund in
compliance with Article XIX of the California Constitution, the Streets
and Highways Code, and Revenue and Taxation Code section 7104 for
the period of July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2006.
Views of We issued a draft audit report on September 30, 2008. Robert Barron,
Finance Director, responded by letter dated October 30, 2008,
Responsible
disagreeing with the audit results. The city’s response is included in this
Official
final audit report as an attachment.
-2-
City of Coalinga Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund and Traffic Congestion Relief Fund Allocations
Restricted Use This report is intended for the information and use of city management
and the SCO; it is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone
other than these specified parties. This restriction is not intended to limit
distribution of this report, which is a matter of public record.
Original signed by
JEFFREY V. BROWNFIELD
Chief, Division of Audits
March 27, 2009
-3-
City of Coalinga Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund and Traffic Congestion Relief Fund Allocations
Schedule 1—
Reconciliation of Fund Balance
July 1, 2005, through June 30, 2006
Special Gas Traffic
Tax Street Congestion
Improvement Relief Fund
Fund 1 Allocation 2
Beginning fund balance per city $ — $ —
Revenues 307,610 76,233
Total funds available 307,610 76,233
Expenditures (307,610) (76,233)
Ending fund balance per city — —
SCO adjustment: 3
Finding—Ineligible expenditures 288,437 —
Ending fund balance per audit $ 288,437 $ —
___________________________
1 The city receives apportionments from the state highway users tax account, pursuant to Streets and Highways
Code sections 2105, 2106, 2107, and 2107.5. The basis of the apportionments for Sections 2105, 2106, and 2107
varies, but the money may be used for any street purpose. Streets and Highways Code section 2107.5 restricts
apportionments to administration and engineering expenditures, except for cities with populations of fewer than
10,000 inhabitants. Those cities may use the funds for rights-of-way and for the construction of street systems.
2 Government Code section 14556.5 created a Traffic Congestion Relief Fund (TCRF) in the State Treasury for
allocating funds quarterly to cities and counties for street and road maintenance, reconstruction, and storm damage
repair. The TCRF allocations were recorded in the Capital Expenditure Fund. The audit period was July 1, 2000,
through June 30, 2006.
3 See the Finding and Recommendation section.
-4-
City of Coalinga Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund and Traffic Congestion Relief Fund Allocations
Finding and Recommendation
FINDING— The City of Coalinga expended gas tax funds totaling $288,437 for dirt
alley paving projects during fiscal year (FY) 2005-06. Maintenance or
Ineligible gas tax
construction costs on alleys that have not been formally designated as
expenditures
part of the city’s street system are not eligible for funding under the
highway users tax program. The city was not able to provide
documentation showing that these dirt alleys were designated as part of
the city’s street system through a resolution by its governing body.
Therefore, these expenditures cannot be charged to the Special Gas Tax
Street Improvement Fund.
Streets and Highways Code section 1806 states:
(a) No city shall be held liable for failure to maintain any road until it
has been accepted in the city street system in accordance with
subdivision (b) or (c).
(b) Except as provided by section 989, or by section 57329 or 57385
of the Government Code, no public or private street or road shall
become a city street or road until the governing body, by resolution, has
caused the street or road to be accepted into the city street system.
(c) In lieu of the procedure set forth in subdivision (b), the governing
body of a city may, by ordinance, designate a city officer to accept, on
behalf of the governing body, streets and roads or portions thereof, into
the city street system and to record conveyances to the city of real
property interests for street and road uses and purposes. The designee
shall, prior to recording any conveyance under this section, affix a
certificate to the instrument stating the acceptance into the city street
system and designating the name or number, or both, of the city-street
or road.
Streets and Highways Code section 2101 states:
All moneys in the Highway Users Tax Account in the Transportation
Tax Fund and hereafter received in the account are appropriated for all
of the following:
(a) The research, planning, construction, improvement, maintenance,
and operation of public streets and highways (and their related public
facilities for nonmotorized traffic), including the mitigation of their
environmental effects, the payment for property taken or damaged for
such purposes, and the administrative costs necessarily incurred in the
foregoing purposes.
Due to these ineligible expenditures, the Special Gas Tax Street
Improvement Fund ending balance was understated by $288,437.
Recommendation
The city should reimburse the Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund
in the amount of $288,437 for the ineligible expenditures incurred for
dirt alley paving projects.
-5-
City of Coalinga Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund and Traffic Congestion Relief Fund Allocations
City’s Response
In your audit finding it states, “Maintenance or construction costs on
alleys that have not been formally designated as part of the City’s street
system are not eligible for funding under the highway users tax
program” The audit finding recommends that the City should reimburse
the Gas Tax Street Fund in the amount of $288,437. The City of
Coalinga respectfully contends that the alleys are part of City’s right
away and street system and accepts alley dedications with the approval
of Final Tract maps. The City engineer accepts streets, roads and
portions of with the Final Tract Map and the City Council records and
accepts right away with the approval of all maps. The City has accepted
alleyways as part of the overall system in all subdivision maps. [sic]
SCO’s Comments
The city did not provide us with any documentation to support its
assertions that the alleys are part of the city’s right away and street
system and whether these dedications and the Final Tract maps were
officially approved by the City Council. We made numerous attempts to
contact city officials to go over this matter and to obtain sufficient
documentation to resolve this finding, but were not successful. As such,
the finding and recommendation remain as stated.
-6-
City of Coalinga Special Gas Tax Street Improvement Fund and Traffic Congestion Relief Fund Allocations
Attachment—
City’s Response to
Draft Audit Report
State Controller’s Office
Division of Audits
Post Office Box 942850
Sacramento, CA 94250-5874
http://www.sco.ca.gov
S07-GTA-016