SCO
San Mateo County
Read the report at San Mateo County ↗
SAN MATEO COUNTY
OFFICE OF EDUCATION
Report of Review
AUDIT RESOLUTION PROCESS
Fiscal Year 2014-15 and Fiscal Year 2015-16
BETTY T. YEE
California State Controller
February 2018
BETTY T. YEE
California State Controller
February 5, 2018
Anne Campbell, Superintendent
San Mateo County Office of Education
101 Twin Dolphin Drive
Redwood City, CA 94065-1064
Dear Ms. Campbell:
The State Controller’s Office reviewed the San Mateo County Office of Education’s (COE) audit
resolution process for local education agency exceptions noted in the annual audit reports. The
review covered fiscal year (FY) 2014-15 and FY 2015-16.
Our review found that the San Mateo COE followed its audit resolution process for FY 2014-15
and FY 2015-16. As a result, the San Mateo COE was in compliance with California Education
Code section 41020.
If you have any questions, please contact Jim L. Spano, CPA, Assistant Division Chief, by
telephone at (916) 323-5849.
Sincerely,
Original signed by
JEFFREY V. BROWNFIELD, CPA
Chief, Division of Audits
JVB/as
cc: Priscilla Aquino-Dichoso, Administrator
District Business Services
San Mateo County Office of Education
Caryn Moore, Director
School Fiscal Services Division
California Department of Education
Thi Huynh, Administrator
School Fiscal Services Division
California Department of Education
Thomas Todd, Assistant Program Budget Manager
Education Systems Unit
California Department of Finance
San Mateo County Office of Education Audit Resolution Process
Contents
Review Report
Summary ............................................................................................................................ 1
Background ........................................................................................................................ 1
Objective, Scope, and Methodology ................................................................................. 2
Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 3
Views of Responsible Officials .......................................................................................... 3
Restricted Use .................................................................................................................... 3
San Mateo County Office of Education Audit Resolution Process
Review Report
Summary The State Controller’s Office (SCO) reviewed the San Mateo County
Office of Education’s (COE) audit resolution process for local education
agency (LEA) exceptions noted in the annual audit reports for fiscal year
(FY) 2014-15 and FY 2015-16. Our review found that the San Mateo COE
followed its audit resolution process for FY 2014-15 and FY 2015-16.
Background California Education Code section 41020(n) requires the State Controller
to annually select a sampling of county superintendents of schools for
which the SCO will perform a follow-up review of the audit resolution
process. Results of these reviews will be reported to the Superintendent of
Public Instruction (SPI) and the county superintendents of the schools that
were reviewed.
Furthermore, California Education Code section 41020(n) states that the
State Controller shall require auditors to categorize audit exceptions in the
audit report in such a manner that both the county superintendent of
schools and the SPI can discern the exceptions for which it is their
responsibility to ensure that the LEAs take action to correct.
The San Mateo COE provides coordination of educational programs and
professional and financial supervision for 23 LEAs under its jurisdiction.
In addition, the county superintendent of schools maintains special schools
and programs countywide, independent of the LEAs.
County superintendents of schools are required to do the following:
Review, for each of their school districts, audit exceptions relating to
attendance, inventory of equipment, internal control, and any
miscellaneous items, and determine whether the findings have been
corrected or an acceptable plan of correction has been developed
(California Education Code section 41020(i)(1));
Review audit exceptions related to the use of instructional materials
program funds, teacher misassignments, and school accountability
report cards. The county superintendents also must determine whether
the exceptions have been corrected or an acceptable plan of correction
has been developed (California Education Code section 41020(i)(2));
Review audit exceptions related to attendance, inventory of equipment,
internal control, and other miscellaneous exceptions. Attendance
exceptions or issues must include those related to local control funding
formula allocations pursuant to California Education Code section
42238.02, as implemented by section 42238.03, and independent study
(California Education Code section 41020(j)(1));
-1-
San Mateo County Office of Education Audit Resolution Process
Notify the LEA, and request that the governing board of the LEA
provide to the county superintendent of schools, a description of the
correction or plan of correction by March 15 of the subsequent year
(California Education Code section 41020(j)(2));
Review the description of the correction or plan of correction and
determine its adequacy and, if its response was not adequate, require
the LEA to resubmit that portion of its response that is inadequate
(California Education Code section 41020(j)(3));
By May 15 of the subsequent year, certify to the SPI and the SCO that
the county has reviewed all applicable exceptions, and state that all
exceptions have been corrected, or that an acceptable plan for
correction has been submitted by the LEA to the county superintendent,
except as noted in the certification. In addition, identify by LEA any
attendance-related exceptions or exceptions involving State funds, and
require the LEA to submit the appropriate reporting forms to the SPI
for processing (California Education Code section 41020(k));
Review LEAs’ unresolved prior year audit exceptions when the
California Department of Education defers to the county (California
Education Code section 41020(l)); and
Adjust subsequent local property tax requirements to correct audit
exceptions relating to LEA tax rates and tax revenues (California
Education Code section 41020(o)).
Objective, Scope, The objective of our review was limited to determining whether the San
Mateo COE followed its audit resolution process in resolving LEA audit
and Methodology
exceptions. Our review did not include an evaluation of the sufficiency of
the action taken by the LEA and the San Mateo COE to address each
exception, nor did it assess the degree to which each exception was
addressed.
The review period was FY 2014-15 and FY 2015-16.
To achieve our objective, we:
Verified that the San Mateo COE addressed all attendance, inventory
of equipment, internal control, and miscellaneous exceptions. In
addition, we verified whether the San Mateo COE addressed any
findings on instructional-materials program funds, teacher
misassignments, and school accountability report cards. However, with
respect to exceptions based on sample items, our review did not include
a determination of whether or not the exception results were properly
quantified and addressed at a districtwide or countywide level;
Verified whether the San Mateo COE notified LEAs that they must
submit completed corrective action forms to the San Mateo COE by
March 15, 2016, and March 15, 2017, for FY 2014-15 and
FY 2015-16, respectively. Our review did not include an assessment of
the LEAs’ progress with respect to taking corrective action;
-2-
San Mateo County Office of Education Audit Resolution Process
Verified whether the San Mateo COE required the LEAs to submit the
appropriate reporting forms to the SPI for any attendance-related
exceptions that affect State funding;
Reviewed the letters of certification due on May 15, 2016, and
May 15, 2017, that the San Mateo COE sent to the SPI and the SCO
with respect to any resolved and unresolved audit exceptions;
Verified whether the San Mateo COE followed up with unresolved
prior year audit exceptions that the SPI required the San Mateo COE to
conduct; and
Verified whether the San Mateo COE adjusted subsequent local
property tax requirements to correct audit exceptions related to LEA
tax rates and tax revenues.
Our review was conducted under the authority of California Education
Code section 41020(n).
Conclusion Our review found that the San Mateo COE followed its audit resolution
process for FY 2014-15 and FY 2015-16. As a result, the San Mateo COE
was in compliance with California Education Code section 41020 for FY
2014-15 and FY 2015-16. We made no additional determination regarding
the San Mateo COE’s audit resolution process beyond the scope of the
review outlined above.
Views of We discussed our conclusion with Priscilla Aquino-Dichoso,
Administrator, District Business Services, San Mateo COE, at an exit
Responsible
conference held on November 7, 2017. Ms. Dichoso agreed with the
Officials
conclusion, declined a draft report, and agreed that the report could be
issued as final.
Restricted Use
This report is intended solely for the information and use of the San Mateo
COE, the California Department of Education, the California Department
of Finance, and the SCO; it is not intended to be and should not be used
by anyone other than these specified parties. This restriction is not meant
to limit distribution of this report, which is a matter of public record.
Original signed by
JEFFREY V. BROWNFIELD, CPA
Chief, Division of Audits
February 5, 2018
-3-
State Controller’s Office
Division of Audits
Post Office Box 942850
Sacramento, CA 94250-5874
http://www.sco.ca.gov
S18-COE-9005