SCO
California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) - California Automated Travel Expense Reimbursement System (CalATERS) Travel Reimbursement Program.
CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR’S OFFICE
OF EMERGENCY SERVICES
Review Report
CALIFORNIA AUTOMATED TRAVEL EXPENSE
REIMBURSEMENT SYSTEM
TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM
July 1, 2016, through June 30, 2017
BETTY T. YEE
California State Controller
October 2019
BETTY T. YEE
California State Controller
October 30, 2019
Mark Ghilarducci, Director
California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services
3560 Schriever Avenue
Mather, CA 95655
Dear Mr. Ghilarducci:
The State Controller’s Office (SCO) has completed the review of the California Governor’s
Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) California Automated Travel Expense Reimbursement
System (CalATERS) Travel Reimbursement Program. The review period was July 1, 2016,
through June 30, 2017.
We reviewed the CalATERS Travel Reimbursement Program to determine whether CalOES has
effective internal controls to ensure that travel expense claims (TECs) are legal, proper, and in
accordance with CalATERS Travel Reimbursement Program guidelines; as well as to determine
whether CalOES maintains adequate documentation to support the CalATERS TECs submitted
to the SCO.
We found that CalOES has effective internal controls to ensure that TECs are legal, proper, and
in accordance with CalATERS Travel Reimbursement Program guidelines; and maintains
sufficient supporting documentation to support the TECs submitted to the SCO. However, we
found that, of the 100 sampled TECs, two were over-paid due to over-claimed mileage, totaling
$91.49, and an extra hotel night charge of $102.86.
If you have any questions, please contact Andrew Finlayson, Chief, State Agency Audits Bureau,
by telephone at (916) 324-6310.
Sincerely,
Original signed by
JIM L. SPANO, CPA
Chief, Division of Audits
JLS/as
California Automated Travel Expense Reimbursement System
California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services Travel Reimbursement Program
Contents
Review Report
Summary ............................................................................................................................ 1
Review Authority ............................................................................................................... 1
Background ........................................................................................................................ 1
Objectives, Scope, and Methodology ............................................................................... 2
Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 2
Follow-up on Prior Audit and Review Findings ............................................................. 2
Views of Responsible Officials .......................................................................................... 3
Restricted Use .................................................................................................................... 3
Finding and Recommendation .............................................................................................. 4
California Automated Travel Expense Reimbursement System
California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services Travel Reimbursement Program
Review Report
Summary The State Controller’s Office (SCO) has completed the review of the
California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services’s (CalOES)
California Automated Travel Expense Reimbursement System
(CalATERS) Travel Reimbursement Program. The review period was
July 1, 2016, through June 30, 2017.
Our review found that CalOES has effective internal controls to ensure
that travel expense claims (TECs) are legal, proper, and in accordance with
CalATERS Travel Reimbursement Program guidelines. CalOES
maintains adequate documentation to support CalATERS TECs submitted
to the SCO. However, CalOES approved TECs with unallowable claimed
amounts, as described in the Finding and Recommendation section of this
report.
We found that, of the 100 sampled TECs, two were over-paid due to over-
claimed mileage, totaling $91.49, and an extra hotel night charge of
$102.86.
Review We conducted the review pursuant to Government Code (GC)
section 12410, which states, “The Controller shall superintend the fiscal
Authority
concerns of the state. The Controller shall audit all claims against the state,
and may audit the disbursement of any state money, for correctness,
legality, and for sufficient provision of law for payment.” In addition, GC
section 12411 states that “The Controller shall suggest plans for the
improvement and management of the public revenues.”
CalATERS is the statewide travel reimbursement system used by the State
Background
of California. The system is administered by the California Department of
Human Resources (CalHR), the California Department of General
Services (DGS) and the SCO. Rules and regulations are passed from the
California Code of Regulations through CalHR, which disseminates them
to state agencies to enforce. DGS is responsible for establishing each state
agency’s access to CalATERS, in addition to procurement, as DGS
dictates how rental cars and hotels are procured. The SCO is responsible
for reimbursing employees based on their TECs entered into CalATERS.
State employees who travel on official state business are reimbursed for
expenses incurred while traveling.
In CalATERS, every employee has a unique log-on identity and password.
Two levels of review are required for every TEC. The first level is the
claimant’s supervising manager or approver as assigned by the agency.
Only department-assigned staff can be approvers, and they must be
granted access in the CalATERS system to be able to approve TECs.
Approvers not only approve the TEC in the system, but also physically
sign a hard copy of the CalATERS transmittal page with supporting
documentation. This signature confirms that the approver has reviewed the
documents contained in the supporting package, and that the package
includes all necessary supporting documentation.
-1-
California Automated Travel Expense Reimbursement System
California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services Travel Reimbursement Program
Once the authorized approver has approved the TEC, it is electronically
submitted to each department’s assigned accounting staff; the signed hard
copy is also forwarded to the department’s accounting staff. The
departmental accounting staff then compares the hard copy support to the
electronic TEC, validates that all necessary supporting documentation has
been submitted, and approves the TEC. The departmental accounting staff
has the ability to issue TEC payments of acceptable amounts if required
supporting documentation is not received; however, staff members cannot
add any additional dollar amounts to the TEC.
Objectives, Scope, The review period was July 1, 2016, through June 30, 2017. Our review
assessed CalOES’s CalATERS Travel Reimbursement Program to gain
and Methodology
reasonable assurance that payments are legal, proper, and are supported by
sufficient documentation. The review objectives were to determine
whether CalOES:
Has effective internal controls to ensure that TECs are legal, proper,
and in accordance with CalATERS Travel Reimbursement Program
guidelines; and
Maintains adequate documentation to support CalATERS TECs
submitted to the SCO.
To achieve our objective, we:
Reviewed CalOES’s policies and procedures for the CalATERS
Travel Reimbursement Program;
Interviewed CalOES management and key personnel to gain an
understanding of the operations and activities within their respective
divisions/units; and
Used statistical sampling based on attributes to determine the sample
size. The samples were selected using a computer-generated simple
random method. Performed tests to determine whether CalATERS
TECs were in compliance with program guidelines.
Conclusion Our review found that CalOES has effective internal controls to ensure
that TECs are legal, proper, and in accordance with CalATERS Travel
Reimbursement Program guidelines. CalOES maintains adequate
documentation to support CalATERS TECs submitted to the SCO.
However, CalOES approved TECs with unallowable claimed amounts, as
described in the Finding and Recommendation section of this report.
Follow-up on We have not previously conducted an audit or review of CalOES’s
Prior Audit and CalATERS Travel Reimbursement Program.
Review Findings
-2-
California Automated Travel Expense Reimbursement System
California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services Travel Reimbursement Program
Views of We discussed our review results with CalOES representatives during an
Responsible exit conference conducted on February 11, 2019. Sarah Stillwell, Deputy
Director, Finance and Administration; Ralph Zavala, Audit Chief; and
Officials
Michelle Lewis, Accounting Division Chief, agreed with the review
results. Mr. Zavala declined a draft review report and agreed that we could
issue the review report as final.
Restricted Use This review report is solely for the information and use of CalOES and
the SCO; it is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other
than these specified parties. This restriction is not intended to limit
distribution of this review report, which is a matter of public record, and
is available on the SCO website at www.sco.ca.gov.
Original signed by
JIM L. SPANO, CPA
Chief, Division of Audits
October 30, 2019
-3-
California Automated Travel Expense Reimbursement System
California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services Travel Reimbursement Program
Finding and Recommendation
FINDING— Our review found that two of the 100 sampled TECs contained amounts
for expenses that were not incurred and expenses entered in duplicate. One
Travel Expense
TEC over-claimed mileage, totaling $91.49, because a CalOES employee
Claims approved
inadvertently entered the same day’s mileage twice on the TEC. Another
with unallowable
TEC over-claimed a hotel night stay totaling $102.86 because the
claimed amounts
employee inadvertently entered a hotel stay on a Friday night. This
particular TEC included three weeks of travel.
Based on our review of all 100 sampled TECs, we believe that these two
TECs are anomalies and do not represent the overall effectiveness of
CalOES’ internal control over TECs. We reviewed other TECs for which
CalOES’ departmental accounting staff returned TECs for correction,
and/or reduced claims when incorrect amounts and unsupported or
unallowable expenses. We noted that these two errors occurred in TECs
that included more than one week of travel per TEC. Such TECs are rare
and, therefore, we did not expand the testing population.
CalOES has remedied both overpayments, and no further action is
neccesssary regarding these overpayments.
Recommendation
We recommend that CalOES:
Develop additional review procedures for TECs that include multiple
weeks; and
Ensure that all TECs adhere to CalATERS Travel Reimbursement
Program guidelines.
-4-
State Controller’s Office
Division of Audits
Post Office Box 942850
Sacramento, CA 94250
http://www.sco.ca.gov
S18-TVL-9005