All bodies  ›  State Controller's Office  ›  California Department of Education (cde) - Education Protection Account Recorded in the State General Fund -

SCO

California Department of Education (cde) - Education Protection Account Recorded in the State General Fund -

State Controller's Office · 2022-08-cadeptofeducation_epar_gf · State audit · 2022-08-12 · California Department of Education (CDE) - Education Protection Account Recorded in the State General Fund -

Read the report at California Department of Education (CDE) - Education Protection Account Recorded in the State General Fund - ↗

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Audit Report EDUCATION PROTECTION ACCOUNT RECORDED IN THE STATE GENERAL FUND July 1, 2017, through June 30, 2019 BETTY T. YEE California State Controller August 2022 BETTY T. YEE California State Controller August 12, 2022 The Honorable Tony Thurmond, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education 1430 N Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Mr. Thurmond: The State Controller’s Office audited the Education Protection Account (EPA), recorded in the State of California’s General Fund, for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2018, and June 30, 2019. Our audit found that the Proposition 30 incremental tax funds recorded in the EPA during the audit period were used and accounted for in a manner consistent with Article XIII, Section 36 of the California Constitution. If you have any questions, please contact Joel James, Chief, Financial Audits Bureau, by telephone at (916) 323-1573. Sincerely, Original signed by KIMBERLY TARVIN, CPA Chief, Division of Audits KT/ls The Honorable Tony Thurmond, -2- August 12, 2022 State Superintendent of Public Instruction cc: Mary Nicely, Chief Deputy Superintendent California Department of Education Alice Lee, Director Audits and Investigations Division California Department of Education Keely Martin Bosler, Director California Department of Finance Christopher Ferguson, Program Budget Manager Education Systems Unit California Department of Finance Ryan Miller, Program Budget Manager Forecasting Unit California Department of Finance Lizette Navarette, Executive Vice Chancellor Institutional Supports and Success California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office California Department of Education Education Protection Account Recorded in the State General Fund Contents Audit Report Summary ............................................................................................................................ 1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 1 Objective, Scope, and Methodology ................................................................................. 3 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 4 Views of Responsible Officials .......................................................................................... 4 Restricted Use .................................................................................................................... 4 Schedule—Education Protection Account – Transfers In, Expenditures, and Changes in Account Balances ....................................................................... 5 California Department of Education Education Protection Account Recorded in the State General Fund Audit Report Summary The State Controller’s Office (SCO) audited the Education Protection Account (EPA), recorded in the State of California’s General Fund, for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2018, and June 30, 2019. Our audit found that the Proposition 30 incremental tax funds recorded in the EPA during the audit period were used and accounted for in a manner consistent with Article XIII, Section 36 of the California Constitution. In November 2012, California voters approved Proposition 30, also known Background as “The Schools and Local Public Safety Protection Act of 2012.” The measure, enacted in Article XIII, Section 36, subdivision (f) of the California Constitution, imposed temporary, incremental tax increases to stabilize funding for public education. The EPA was created to receive the funds generated by Proposition 30, and to provide local education agencies (LEAs) and community college districts (CCDs) with general-purpose state aid funding pursuant to Article XIII, Section 36, subdivision (e)(3), paragraphs (A) and (B), of the California Constitution.1 The EPA is administered by the California Department of Education (CDE). It is a Special Account recorded in the State of California’s General Fund, and is accounted for under the modified accrual basis of accounting. Pursuant to Article XIII, Section 36, subdivision (e)(3) of the California Constitution, all money in the EPA is continuously appropriated for the support of LEAs and CCDs. Proposition 30 provided for a one-quarter cent sales tax increase that expired on December 31, 2016, and an increase in income taxes for wealthier taxpayers that ends on December 31, 2031. Proposition 30 funds are allocated quarterly; 89% is allocated to the State Superintendent of Public Instruction to provide general-purpose funding to LEAs, and 11% is allocated to the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges to provide general-purpose funding to CCDs. LEAs and CCDs are required to have annual independent financial and compliance audits. Specific audit procedures for verifying whether funds from the EPA have been properly disbursed and expended are included in the LEAs’ and CCDs’ audit guides. California Department of Finance’s Process to Calculate Proposition 30 Funds Available for Transfer to the Education Protection Account The California Department of Finance’s (DOF) Revenue and Taxation section is responsible for estimating the State’s major General Fund and special fund tax revenues for the Governor’s Budget. DOF monitors and reports on monthly receipts compared to estimates. DOF is responsible for estimating revenues for the State as a whole, and estimating the amount of funds that will be available for transfer into the EPA. DOF prepares the estimate by forecasting expected personal income tax and sales and use tax revenues. 1 LEAs include school districts, county offices of education, and charter schools. -1- California Department of Education Education Protection Account Recorded in the State General Fund DOF calculates its estimate in May. In mid-June, DOF provides a notification letter to the California State Controller of its Proposition 30 revenue estimate, which includes three estimated amounts. DOF’s first estimate is the initial estimate of Proposition 30 funds that will be available for the following fiscal year. The second estimate revises the prior fiscal year’s estimate of Proposition 30 funds based on updated information. The third estimate is the final estimate of Proposition 30 funds estimated two years prior. The adjustments from the revenue estimate revisions could be positive or negative. California Department of Education’s Process to Account For, Allocate, and Disburse Proposition 30 Funds to County Treasurers CDE allocates EPA funds to LEAs based on their proportionate share of the statewide revenue limit amount, which includes allowances for Necessary Small Schools and charter school general-purpose funding. If an LEA’s funding from local property taxes and the EPA exceeds the LEA’s revenue limit or charter school general-purpose entitlement, then the LEA’s EPA entitlement may be reduced, provided that it receives the minimum amount of $200 per unit of average daily attendance. CDE performs its allocation and disbursement calculations on a quarterly basis, factoring in the EPA funding requirement criteria. Each quarter, CDE also prepares a Notice of Apportionment, which includes a payment summary schedule by county of the amount transferred to each county treasurer. On its website, CDE provides a schedule of the EPA amounts that are to be disbursed by the county treasurers to each LEA. California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office’s Process to Account For, Allocate, and Disburse Proposition 30 Funds to County Treasurers The California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office (CCCCO) allocates EPA funds to CCDs based on their proportionate share of the statewide total computational revenue. The total computational revenue is the amount that CCDs are guaranteed to receive in state aid, offset by enrollment fees, local property taxes, and EPA revenues. The CCD’s EPA entitlement amount is a minimum of $100 per full-time equivalent student for those CCDs that receive more than their state entitlement amount from local property taxes and enrollment fees. CCCCO performs its allocation and disbursement calculations on a quarterly basis, factoring in the EPA funding requirement criteria. Each quarter, CCCCO also prepares a notification letter for the EPA’s apportionment, which includes a payment summary schedule by county of the amount transferred to each county treasurer. On its website, CCCCO provides a schedule of the EPA amounts that are to be disbursed by the county treasurers to each CCD. Objective, Scope, We conducted this performance audit to determine whether the Proposition 30 incremental tax funds recorded in the EPA for the fiscal and Methodology years ended June 30, 2018, and June 30, 2019, were used and accounted for in a manner consistent with Article XIII, Section 36 of the California Constitution. -2- California Department of Education Education Protection Account Recorded in the State General Fund To achieve our audit objective, we performed the following procedures:  We interviewed employees, completed internal control questionnaires, and performed walk-throughs of the processes used by DOF to calculate Proposition 30 funds available for transfer to the EPA.  We interviewed employees, completed internal control questionnaires, and performed walk-throughs of the processes used by CDE and CCCCO to account for, allocate, and disburse Proposition 30 funds to county treasurers.  We traced DOF’s calculations to supporting documentation and verified the accuracy of its estimates.  We verified the accuracy of the EPA allocations to CDE and CCCCO in accordance with the California State Constitution.  We verified the accuracy of CDE’s allocation to LEAs and disbursement of funds to county treasurers for individual LEAs.  We randomly selected representative, non-statistical samples of payments from county treasurers to individual LEAs to verify that payments were made correctly and in a timely manner. We did not project the results of testing to the intended (total) population.  We verified the accuracy of CCCCO’s allocation to CCDs and disbursement of funds to county treasurers for individual CCDs.  We applied analytical procedures to all payments from county treasurers to individual CCDs, in lieu of sampling, to verify that payments were made correctly and in a timely manner. We did not project the results to the intended (total) population. We limited our review of internal control to gaining an understanding of the processes established as follows:  By DOF to calculate Proposition 30 funds available for transfer to the EPA;  By CDE to account for, allocate, and disburse the Proposition 30 funds to the county treasurers; and  By CCCCO to account for, allocate, and disburse the Proposition 30 funds to the county treasurers. Our audit scope did not include assessing the efficiency or effectiveness of program operations. We did not audit the EPA’s financial statements. The legal authority to conduct this audit is set forth in Article XIII, Section 36, subdivision (g)(1) of the California Constitution, which requires SCO to audit the EPA “to ensure that those funds are used and accounted for in a manner consistent with this section.” We conducted this audit in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for -3- California Department of Education Education Protection Account Recorded in the State General Fund our findings and conclusions based on our audit objective. We believe that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objective. Conclusion Our audit found that the Proposition 30 incremental tax funds recorded in the EPA for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2018, and June 30, 2019, were used and accounted for in a manner consistent with Article XIII, Section 36 of the California Constitution. We also found that $6.3 million of disbursed EPA funds was illicitly obtained through fraud perpetrated by an organization falsifying enrollment data. CDE disallowed the funding, and, as a result of indictment allegations and arraignment cooperation, the $6.3 million in EPA funds was fully recovered. Final settlement hearings are in process. Views of CDE, CCCCO, and DOF each indicated, in separate emails, that they had no comments related to the information presented in this report. Responsible Officials Restricted Use This audit report is solely for the information and use of CDE, CCCCO, DOF, and SCO; it is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. This restriction is not intended to limit distribution of this audit report, which is a matter of public record and is available on the SCO website at www.sco.ca.gov. Original signed by KIMBERLY TARVIN, CPA Chief, Division of Audits August 12, 2022 -4- California Department of Education Education Protection Account Recorded in the State General Fund Schedule— Education Protection Account – Transfers In, Expenditures, and Changes in Account Balances for Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2018, and June 30, 2019 June 30, 2018 June 30, 2019 Transfers In To CDE for LEAs: Personal Income Tax $ 6 ,809,114,100 $ 7 ,697,384,830 Sales and Use Tax - - Subtotal 6,809,114,100 7,697,384,830 To CCCCO for CCDs: Personal Income Tax 841,575,900 951,362,170 Sales and Use Tax - - Subtotal 841,575,900 951,362,170 Total Transfers In 7,650,690,000 8,648,747,000 Expenditures Disbursements to County Treasurers: For LEAs 6,809,346,829 7,697,381,721 For CCDs 841,575,900 951,362,170 Total Expenditures 7,650,922,729 8,648,743,891 Excess (Deficiency) of Transfers In Over Expenditures ( 232,729) 3,109 Beginning Account Balance 232,749 2 0 Ending Account Balance1 $ 20 $ 3 ,129 __________________________ 1 Ending balances resulted from adjustments to LEA payments that were subsequently reallocated to other LEAs. -5- State Controller’s Office Division of Audits Post Office Box 942850 Sacramento, CA 94250 http://www.sco.ca.gov S21-P30-0001