California Public Utilities Commission Fiscal Audit Report

CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Fiscal Audit Report CALIFORNIA ADVANCED SERVICES FUND PROGRAM July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2021 M M. C ALIA OHEN California State Controller September 2023 MALIA M. COHEN CALIFORNIA STATE CONTROLLER September 25, 2023 Erika Contreras, Secretary of the Senate State Capitol, Room 305 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Ms. Contreras: Pursuant to Public Utilities Code section 912.2 and an interagency agreement between the State Controller’s Office and the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), the State Controller’s Office conducted a fiscal audit of the California Advanced Services Fund (CASF) Program for the period of July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2021. Our audit determined that: • In some instances, the CPUC did not maintain adequate internal control over processes related to the oversight and management of the CASF Program to ensure the reliability of recorded and reported information. • CASF Program recipients maintained adequate internal control over processes related to managing grant funds to ensure the reliability of recorded and reported information, except for in one instance, in which we identified control weaknesses for one grant recipient. • Except for the errors we identified, CASF Program revenues and expenditures were appropriate, allowable, and properly and accurately recorded. • The CPUC complied with reporting requirements per applicable laws, rules, regulations, and CPUC policies and procedures; and the reported CASF Program information was complete and accurate, except for the variances and errors we identified. If you have any questions, please contact Roochel Espilla, Chief, State Agency Audits Bureau, by telephone at (916) 323-5744, or by email at respilla@sco.ca.gov. Sincerely, Original signed by KIMBERLY TARVIN, CPA Chief, Division of Audits KT/ls 300 Capitol Mall, Suite 1850, Sacramento, CA 95814 | P.O. Box 942850, Sacramento, CA 94250 | Fax: 916.322.4404 sco.ca.gov Ms. Erika Contreras September 25, 2023 Page 2 of 3 cc: Sue Parker, Chief Clerk of the Assembly California State Assembly Cara L. Jenkins, Legislative Counsel California Office of Legislative Counsel Alice Busching Reynolds, President California Public Utilities Commission Karen Douglas, Commissioner California Public Utilities Commission Darcie L. Houck, Commissioner California Public Utilities Commission John Reynolds, Commissioner California Public Utilities Commission Genevieve Shiroma, Commissioner California Public Utilities Commission Rachel Peterson, Executive Director California Public Utilities Commission Michelle Morales, Director Administrative Services Division California Public Utilities Commission Lalaine Semana, Chief Accounting Office Administrative Services Division California Public Utilities Commission Shoaib Ur-Rehman, Accounting Administrator II Accounting Office Administrative Services Division California Public Utilities Commission Rob Osborn, Director Communications Division California Public Utilities Commission Maria Ellis, Deputy Director Communications Division California Public Utilities Commission Selena Huang, Program Manager Broadband, Video and Market Branch Communications Division California Public Utilities Commission Angela Young, Senior Analyst Broadband, Video and Market Branch Communications Division California Public Utilities Commission Risa Hernandez, Manager Carrier Oversight and Programs Branch Communications Division California Public Utilities Commission 300 Capitol Mall, Suite 1850, Sacramento, CA 95814 | P.O. Box 942850, Sacramento, CA 94250 | Fax: 916.322.4404 sco.ca.gov Ms. Erika Contreras September 25, 2023 Page 3 of 3 Jonathan Lakritz, Manager Consumer Programs Branch Communication Division California Public Utilities Commission Stacey Matamoros, Chief Client Solutions Section Information Technology Services Division California Public Utilities Commission Hank Brady, Director Office of Governmental Affairs California Public Utilities Commission Amanda Singh, Senior Legislative Consultant Office of Governmental Affairs California Public Utilities Commission Meghan Cook, Associate Legislative Consultant Office of Governmental Affairs California Public Utilities Commission Angie Williams, Director Utility Audits, Risk and Compliance Division California Public Utilities Commission Mariya “Masha” Vorobyova, Assistant Director Utility Audits, Risk and Compliance Division California Public Utilities Commission 300 Capitol Mall, Suite 1850, Sacramento, CA 95814 | P.O. Box 942850, Sacramento, CA 94250 | Fax: 916.322.4404 sco.ca.gov California Public Utilities Commission California Advanced Services Fund Program – Fiscal Audit Contents Audit Report Summary ............................................................................................................................ 1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 1 Audit Authority.................................................................................................................. 4 Objectives, Scope, and Methodology ............................................................................... 4 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 6 Follow-up on Prior Audit Findings .................................................................................. 7 Views of Responsible Officials .......................................................................................... 7 Restricted Use .................................................................................................................... 7 Schedule 1—California Advanced Services Fund Revenues, Expenditures, and Adjustments ................................................................................................. 8 Schedule 2—California Advanced Services Fund Program Revenues, Expenditures, and Audited Totals ............................................................. 9 Findings and Recommendations ........................................................................................... 10 Attachment A—2021 California Advanced Services Fund Annual Report Attachment B—California Public Utilities Commission’s Response to Draft Audit Report California Public Utilities Commission California Advanced Services Fund Program – Fiscal Audit Audit Report Summary The State Controller’s Office (SCO), pursuant to Public Utilities Code (PUC) section 912.2 and an interagency agreement with the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), conducted a fiscal audit of the CPUC’s California Advanced Services Fund (CASF) Program for the period of July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2021. Our audit determined the following: • In some instances, the CPUC did not maintain adequate internal control over processes related to the oversight and management of the CASF Program to ensure the reliability of recorded and reported information. • CASF Program grant recipients maintained adequate internal control over processes related to managing grant funds to ensure the reliability of recorded and reported information, except for in one instance, in which we identified control weaknesses for one grant recipient. • Except for the errors we identified, CASF Program revenues and expenditures were appropriate, allowable, and properly and accurately recorded. • The CPUC complied with reporting requirements per applicable laws, rules, regulations, and CPUC policies and procedures; and the reported CASF Program information was complete and accurate, except for the variances and errors we identified. Background CASF Program History The CPUC implemented the CASF Program on December 20, 2007, when it adopted Decision (D.) 07-12-054, in accordance with PUC section 701. The CPUC allocated $100 million to the program, funded by a 0.25% surcharge on revenues collected from end-users for intrastate telecommunications services, effective January 1, 2008. CASF Program grants support projects that provide broadband access to unserved and underserved areas of California. The CPUC adopted the CASF Program application requirements, timelines, and scoring criteria for parties to qualify for broadband project funding in Resolution T-17143, issued on June 12, 2008. The CASF Program was given a program sunset date of January 1, 2013, and codified in PUC section 281. Since 2008, the CASF Program has been expanded numerous times by enacted statutes and CPUC decisions. As of December 31, 2021, the following bills have shaped and expanded the CASF Program: • Senate Bill 1040 (Chapter 317, Statutes of 2010) extended the program sunset date to June 30, 2016; authorized the CPUC to collect an additional $125 million from telecommunication ratepayers; and created three subaccounts within the California Advanced Services Fund: the Broadband Infrastructure Grant Account (Infrastructure -1- California Public Utilities Commission California Advanced Services Fund Program – Fiscal Audit Account), the Broadband Infrastructure Revolving Loan Account (Infrastructure Loan Account), and the Rural and Urban Regional Broadband Consortia Grant Account (Consortia Account). • SB 740 (Chapter 522, Statutes of 2013) added an additional $90 million to the Infrastructure Account, increasing total CASF Program funding to $315 million. • Assembly Bill 1299 (Chapter 507, Statutes of 2013) established the Broadband Public Housing Account (Public Housing Account), which was funded by reallocating $20 million from the Infrastructure Account and $5 million from the Infrastructure Loan Account. Pursuant to AB 1299, any remaining funds not awarded from the Public Housing Account by December 31, 2016, would be returned to the original funding accounts, proportionally. • AB 1665 (Chapter 851, Statutes of 2017) eliminated the Infrastructure Loan Account as of January 1, 2018, and directed that funds remaining in that account be transferred to the Infrastructure Account; extended the Infrastructure Account to include funding to households for line- extension with the aggregate amount of grants awarded not to exceed $5 million (thus creating the Line Extension Program); created the Broadband Adoption Account (Adoption Account); and allocated $300 million to the Infrastructure Account, $10 million to the Consortia Account, and $20 million to the Adoption Account. The additional $330 million of funding is to be collected beginning January 1, 2018 and continuing through the 2022 calendar year. • SB 156 (Chapter 112, Statutes of 2021) amended PUC sections 281, 912.2, and 914.7 and added section 281.2 in order to revise the CASF Program. Specifically, the goal of providing broadband access to no less than 98% of California households by no later than December 31, 2026, was moved from the CASF Program to the Infrastructure Account. SB 156 also implemented the first year of a three-year $6 billion investment in broadband; and created the Federal Funding Account. This bill also required the CPUC, on or before April 1, 2023, and biennially thereafter, to conduct a fiscal and performance audit of the California Advanced Services Fund. • SB 4 (Chapter 671, Statutes of 2021) amended PUC section 281, extending the goal of the Infrastructure Account to approve funding for infrastructure projects that will provide broadband access to no less than 98% of California households by no later than December 31, 2032, rather than December 31, 2026. The bill also authorized the CPUC, through imposition of a surcharge, to collect up to $150 million per year. California Advanced Services Fund Accounts and Programs Pursuant to PUC section 281(c), five accounts were created within the CPUC’s California Advanced Services Fund, with the following purposes: • Infrastructure Account grants are used to build or upgrade broadband infrastructure in areas that are unserved by existing broadband providers. -2- California Public Utilities Commission California Advanced Services Fund Program – Fiscal Audit • Consortia Account grants to regional consortia (typically a group of several contiguous counties) are used to facilitate the deployment of broadband infrastructure by assisting infrastructure grant applicants in the project development or grant application process. • Public Housing Account grants and loans to low-income communities (including, but not limited to, publicly supported housing developments and other housing developments or mobile home parks with low-income residents, as determined by the CPUC) are used to build broadband networks offering free broadband service to these communities. • Adoption Account grants are used to provide digital literacy education to communities with limited broadband adoption and free broadband access to community training rooms or other public spaces. • Federal Funding Account grants are used to connect unserved and underserved communities by the applicable federal deadlines by funding last-mile infrastructure projects. Households and property owners that would otherwise not be able to afford line extensions to their properties can apply for grants from the Line Extension Program, which is funded by the Infrastructure Account. California tribes seeking technical assistance (including market studies, feasibility studies, and business plans) to improve voice and broadband communications can apply for money from the Tribal Technical Assistance Grant Program, which is supported by state operations funds from the California Advanced Services Fund. CASF Program Administration CPUC’s Communications Division performs administrative duties related to the CASF Program, including, but not limited to: • Reviewing CASF Program grant applications and recommending approval. Several CPUC decisions assign Communications Division staff members the task of approving applications that meet certain criteria for expedited review; • Reviewing grantee progress and completion reports, and approving grantee payment requests; • Monitoring the Telecommunications and User Fee Filing System (TUFFS) for electronic reporting and remittance of surcharges and user fees due to the CPUC from telecommunications corporations and Voice over Internet Protocol providers; and • Processing and validating broadband data collected from California’s service providers; providing expertise related to Geographic Information System mapping for the California Interactive Broadband Map; and managing related consultant contracts. As the lead agency for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Infrastructure Planning and CEQA Section of the CPUC’s Energy Division conducts environmental reviews for construction of broadband networks in accordance with CEQA. -3- California Public Utilities Commission California Advanced Services Fund Program – Fiscal Audit The Accounting Office of the CPUC’s Administrative Services Division is responsible for receiving and disbursing funds, reconciling surcharges recorded in TUFFS with remittances, and maintaining financial records in FI$Cal in accordance with the State Administrative Manual. California Advanced Services Fund Reporting PUC section 912.2 requires the CPUC to conduct biennial fiscal and performance audits of the California Advanced Services Fund. The reports must also include an update to the maps in the California Broadband Task Force’s final report, data on the types and numbers of jobs created as a result of the CASF Program, and information specified in PUC section 914.7. The CPUC’s annual reports on the California Advanced Services Fund provide the required update to the maps in the California Broadband Task Force’s final report; and other information required by PUC section 914.7, including expenditures, fund recipients, expected benefits, the status of approved projects, broadband adoption levels, efforts to leverage non- California Advanced Services Fund moneys, the California Advanced Services Fund balance, and the projected amount to be collected annually to fund approved projects. All CASF Program reports, including reports on fiscal and performance audits, are made available on the CPUC’s website. The CPUC issued the 2021 California Advanced Services Fund Annual Report in April 2022 (Attachment A). The report covers the period of January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2021. We did not audit the CPUC’s annual report but performed limited procedures necessary to achieve our audit objectives. Audit We conducted this audit at the request of the CPUC, in accordance with an interagency agreement between the SCO and the CPUC; and in Authority accordance with PUC section 912.2, which requires biennial fiscal and performance audits of the California Advanced Services Fund “to ensure that funds have been expended in accordance with the approved terms of the grant awards and loan agreements pursuant to Section 281 or 281.2,” and also requires that the audit findings be reported to the California State Legislature. In addition, Government Code (GC) section 12410 provides the SCO with general authority to audit the disbursement of state money for correctness, legality, and sufficient provisions of law for payment. Objectives, Scope, Our audit objectives were to determine whether: and Methodology • The CPUC maintained adequate internal controls over processes related to the oversight and management of the CASF Program to ensure the reliability of recorded and reported information; • CASF Program grant recipients maintained adequate internal controls over processes related to managing grant funds to ensure the reliability of recorded and reported information; -4- California Public Utilities Commission California Advanced Services Fund Program – Fiscal Audit • CASF Program revenues and expenditures were appropriate, allowable, and properly and accurately recorded; and • The CPUC complied with reporting requirements per applicable laws, rules, regulations, and CPUC policies and procedures, and the reported CASF Program information was complete and accurate. The fiscal audit period was July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2021. To achieve our audit objectives, we performed the following procedures: • We gained an understanding of and evaluated the CPUC’s Communications Division and the Accounting Office’s internal controls over operations and activities related to the CASF Program. • Upon gaining an understanding of the Communications Division and the Accounting Office’s internal controls over CASF Program revenue, we performed the following tests to determine whether the Communications Division and the Accounting Office properly recorded and reported revenue, and whether the total CASF Program revenue amounts for the audit period were accurate: o We reconciled the revenue data from the annual reports to FI$Cal records. o We obtained supporting documentation for Investment Income, totaling $9,756,110, and Other Revenue, totaling $7,758. o We traced bank statements and bank deposit reports from the State Treasurer’s Office, totaling $131,796,894, to FI$Cal records. o We judgmentally selected for testing $77,070 in debit transactions and $268,169 in credit transactions that were not traceable to bank statements and bank deposit reports. • Upon gaining an understanding of the Communications Division and the Accounting Office’s oversight of the CASF Program reporting and remittances, we judgmentally selected unpaid surcharge revenue transactions totaling $28,187 and adjustment transactions totaling $708,904 from the TUFFS report. • Upon gaining an understanding of the Communications Division and the Accounting Office’s management and oversight of CASF Program expenditures, we performed the following tests to determine whether the Communications Division and the Accounting Office properly recorded and reported CASF Program expenditures, and whether total CASF Program expenditure amounts for the audit period were accurate: o We reconciled the expenditure data from annual reports to FI$Cal records. o We reconciled the Communications Division’s Master Payment Voucher Log to the schedules of grant fund expenditures in the CPUC’s annual reports. o We traced grantee invoices, totaling $46,622,437, to the general ledger. -5- California Public Utilities Commission California Advanced Services Fund Program – Fiscal Audit o We judgmentally selected a sample of State Operations expenditures, totaling $1,667,298, based on the size of the transaction for each account in the California Advanced Services Fund. o We traced expenses from State Operations of Other State Agencies to the Department of Finance Pro Rata Library. • We judgmentally selected five grant recipients, and gained an understanding of and evaluated the internal controls over their operations and activities related to the CASF Program. • We judgmentally selected three out of five grant recipients and evaluated their management and oversight of CASF Program project and consortium expenditures. • We determined whether disbursements from the California Advanced Services Fund were in compliance with PUC section 281 and any other applicable laws, rules, regulations, and CPUC policies and procedures. We did not audit the CPUC’s financial statements. We limited our audit scope to planning and performing audit procedures necessary to achieve our audit objectives. Our consideration of internal control was limited to gaining an understanding of the transaction flows and financial management system, and determining the auditing procedures that were appropriate under the circumstances for the purpose of providing a conclusion based on our audit objectives. We conducted this performance audit in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. We believe that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. Conclusion Our audit determined the following: • In some instances, the CPUC did not maintain adequate internal control over processes related to the oversight and management of the CASF Program to ensure the reliability of recorded and reported information. We found the following internal control deficiencies: o The CPUC did not verify that the surcharge revenues reported by carriers, or subsequent adjustments made to those reported revenues, were accurate (Finding 1). o The CPUC did not maintain adequate documentation to support revenue and expenditure data in Annual Reports, and did not have well-established, step-by-step procedures for the compilation of annual reports (Finding 2). • CASF Program grant recipients, except for one Consortium grant recipient, maintained adequate internal control over processes related to managing grant funds to ensure the reliability of recorded and reported information (Finding 5). -6- California Public Utilities Commission California Advanced Services Fund Program – Fiscal Audit • Except for the following errors, CASF Program revenues and expenditures were appropriate, allowable, and properly and accurately recorded: o A total of $86,312 in surcharge revenues was applied to incorrect public-purpose program accounts (Finding 3); o A total of $9,100 in expenditures was inappropriately allocated to the CASF Program (Finding 4); and o A total of $168,161 in questionable expenditures was allocated to the CASF Program (Finding 4). • The CPUC complied with reporting requirements per applicable laws, rules, regulations, and CPUC policies and procedures, and the reported CASF Program information was complete and accurate, except for the following variances and errors: o Revenues were overstated by a net total of $76,748 (Findings 2 and 3); and o Expenditures were overstated by a net total of $6,846 (Findings 2 and 4). Follow-up on The CPUC satisfactorily resolved Finding 1 and did not resolve Finding 2 noted in our prior audit report for the period of January 1, 2016, through Prior Audit June 30, 2018, issued on February 17, 2021. Findings Views of We issued a draft report on July 13, 2023. CPUC representatives responded by letter dated July 31, 2023. The CPUC agreed with the audit Responsible results, and indicated that it has taken steps to correct the noted Officials deficiencies. This final audit report includes the CPUC’s response as Attachment B. Restricted Use This report is solely for the information and use of the California State Legislature, the CPUC, and the SCO; it is not intended to be, and should not be, used by anyone other than these specified parties. This restriction is not intended to limit distribution of this audit report, which is a matter of public record and is available on the SCO website at www.sco.ca.gov. Original signed by KIMBERLY TARVIN, CPA Chief, Division of Audits September 25, 2023 -7- California Public Utilities Commission California Advanced Services Fund Program – Fiscal Audit Schedule 1— California Advanced Services Fund Revenues, Expenditures, and Adjustments July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2021 July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2021 Cumulative 2019 2019 2020 2020 2021 Cumulative Totals in 2018 Annual Adjustments Annual Adjustments Annual Totals in 2021 Annual Report Report Applied Report Applied Report Annual Report Revenues Regulatory fees $ 340,845,578 $ 40,677,141 $ 106,596 $ 37,270,828 $ - $ 55,220,343 1 $ 4 74,120,481 Loan repayments and interest 37,131 5,953 1,175 (90) - 3 87 4 4,555 Investment income 8,349,915 4,563,721 - 4,290,174 (81,000) 983,215 18,106,026 Total revenues $ 349,232,624 $ 45,246,815 $ 107,771 $ 41,560,912 $ (81,000) $ 56,203,945 $ 4 92,271,062 2 Expenditures Infrastructure Account $ 107,608,717 $ 29,586,305 $ 9,418 $ 26,315,419 $ - $ 18,950,860 $ 1 82,470,719 Infrastructure Loan Account 1,187,916 350,306 - 475,673 - 6 2,013,901 Infrastructure Line Account - 89,493 - 159,146 - 150,546 399,184 Consortia Account 1 1,260,727 1,411,863 - 1,533,066 - 1,822,970 16,028,626 Public Housing Account 7,542,502 2,901,089 - 2,060,204 - 1,249,438 13,753,233 Adoption Account - 355,305 - 5,625,075 - 2,464,578 8,444,958 Total expenditures $ 127,599,862 $ 34,694,361 $ 9,418 $ 36,168,583 $ - $ 24,638,398 $ 2 23,110,621 3 __________________________ 1 Regulatory fees include adjustments, totaling $5,223,552, that have been added back into the final total revenues. 2 Total revenues has a $5 rounding variance. 3 Total expenditures has a $1 rounding variance. -8- California Public Utilities Commission California Advanced Services Fund Program – Fiscal Audit Schedule 2— California Advanced Services Fund Program Revenues, Expenditures, and Audited Totals July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2021 1st Interim 2nd Interim 3nd Interim Period Period Period (Unaudited (Audited (Audited by SCO) by SCO) by SCO) July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2021 January 1, 2008, July 1, 2010, January 1, 2016, SCO Finding Cumulative Total through through through Added to 2018 in 2018 Amount (Overstated)/Understated Audited June 30, 2010 December 31, 2015 June 30, 2018 Cumulative Balance Annual Report Reported Finding 2 Finding 3 Finding 4 Totals Revenue Regulatory fees $ 115,140,932 $ 140,407,693 $ 76,838,036 $ 8,458,917 $ 340,845,578 $ 133,274,908 $ 9,231 $ (86,312) $ - $ 133,197,827 Delinquent fees 161,024 129,432 - (290,456) - - - - - - Loan repayments and interest - 15,595 21,536 - 37,131 7 ,425 333 - - 7 ,758 Investment income 1 ,008,965 1 ,707,578 5 ,193,107 440,265 8,349,915 9 ,756,110 - - - 9 ,756,110 Total revenue $ 116,310,921 $ 142,260,298 $ 82,052,679 $ 8,608,726 $ 349,232,624 $ 143,038,443 $ 9,564 $ (86,312) $ - $ 142,961,695 Expenditures Infrastructure Account $ 78,007 $ 59,131,544 $ 41,603,902 $ 6,795,264 $ 107,608,717 $ 74,862,002 $ (921,519) $ - $ (9,100) $ 73,931,383 Infrastructure Loan Account - 40,977 429,910 717,029 1,187,916 825,985 0 - - 825,985 Infrastructure Line Account - - - - - 399,184 (198) - - 398,987 Consortia Account - 7 ,907,376 2 ,792,323 561,028 11,260,727 4 ,767,899 (151) - - 4 ,767,748 Public Housing Account - 290,081 7 ,292,770 (40,349) 7,542,502 6 ,210,731 (218) - - 6 ,210,513 Adoption Account - - - - - 8 ,444,958 (217) - - 8 ,444,741 Administrative costs 274,432 5 ,440,225 - ( 5,714,657) - - 76,000 - - 76,000 Pro-rata costs 228,658 1 ,760,849 - ( 1,989,507) - - 800,091 - - 800,091 Infrastructure loan account service - 289,975 - (289,975) - - - - - - Program costs - - - - - - 93,437 - - 93,437 Revenue transfers - - - - - - ( 44,972) - - ( 44,972) Total expenditures $ 581,097 $ 74,861,027 $ 52,118,905 $ 38,833 $ 127,599,862 $ 95,510,759 $ 2,254 1 $ - $ (9,100) $ 95,503,914 1 __________________________ 1 Total expenditures has a $1 rounding variance. -9- California Public Utilities Commission California Advanced Services Fund Program – Fiscal Audit Findings and Recommendations The CPUC had inadequate controls over the surcharge revenue FINDING 1— verification and collection processes. Specifically, the CPUC did not have The CPUC did not controls in place to verify that carriers accurately reported revenue subject verify that the to surcharges, or that carrier adjustments totaling $708,904 were valid and surcharge revenue appropriate. reported by carriers, and We requested the TUFFS detailed reports for July 2018 through June 2021 subsequent to determine whether CASF Program revenue amounts for the audit period adjustments made were accurately and appropriately reported. We planned to select to reported transactions from the population and request carrier documentation to revenue totals, substantiate the revenue reported in TUFFS and recorded in FI$Cal. Based were accurate on our review of the TUFFS data for the audit period, we determined that the CPUC had a balance of $30,215 in uncollected surcharge revenue for the CASF Program as of November 3, 2022. We selected all transactions greater than $1,000, totaling $28,187, to determine whether the CPUC had taken appropriate steps to collect the outstanding debts. For the same period, we selected collection adjustments greater than $1,000, totaling $708,904, to determine whether carriers provided supporting documentation to substantiate the decrease in adjusted revenue. We requested documentation from the Communications Division’s Carrier Oversight and Programs Branch to support that the CPUC had adequate oversight of surcharge revenue verification and collection processes. The CPUC does not verify revenue reported by carriers. Carriers self- report revenue, and TUFFS calculates the amount due the CASF Program. Carriers are responsible for remitting funds based on the calculated totals for each of the six public-purpose programs (PPPs). When carriers fail to remit the total amount due for any of the PPPs, the Accounts Receivable Unit creates an account receivable based on the TUFFS report. The Accounting Office and the Communications Division are responsible for monitoring and collecting the accounts receivable. When carriers adjust the amount of surcharge revenue that they report, they are not required to submit documentation to support the adjusted value. According to the CPUC, it lacked adequate staff resources to verify and audit surcharge revenues from carriers. Furthermore, Carrier Oversight and Programs Branch staff members stated that many carriers bundle telecommunication services; therefore, it is difficult to determine the actual amount of revenue subject to surcharges because federal rules allow surcharges only on voice services. However, as the CPUC operates on an honor system, there is a risk that carriers will underreport or incorrectly report revenue. Without periodic reviews of the revenues received, the CPUC cannot determine whether surcharge revenue for the CASF Program is accurately reported, fully received, and effective in supporting the purpose of the CASF Program. In addition, the CPUC does not have review procedures to verify that adjustments reported by carriers are valid and appropriate. In February 2021, the California Department of Finance issued an audit report for its performance audit of CPUC’s accounts receivable workbook. The report identified weaknesses in accounts receivable and collection -10- California Public Utilities Commission California Advanced Services Fund Program – Fiscal Audit practices. In response to the audit results, the CPUC’s Carrier Oversight and Programs Branch established a process by which to confirm the revenue reporting methodologies of telecommunication carriers. The CPUC performed a review of telecommunication carriers’ revenue reporting methodologies and updated the surcharge mechanism to prevent misapplied revenue; however, we did not test this process or establish its effectiveness in verifying surcharge revenue reported by telecommunication carriers because the process is outside the scope of our audit. For the misapplied surcharge revenue, totaling $28,187, we found that two carriers paid incorrect amounts to various PPPs, rather than remitting funds to the CASF Program. The CPUC’s Accounts Receivable Unit cannot move money from one program to another; if a program is underpaid, the carrier must make additional payments to the underpaid program until fully paid. Once the carrier remits the total amount due with interest, it can request a refund from the CPUC. We requested documentation to confirm that the CPUC had followed up on the misapplied surcharge revenue; however, the CPUC did not send collection letters or emails for the $26,867 unpaid balance, and collection efforts for the $1,320 unpaid balance ended after approximately 29 months. On October 24, 2022, the CPUC issued D.22-10-021, updating the surcharge mechanism for funding the State’s universal PPPs. The new mechanism allows carriers to report the number of access lines into the remittance system, TUFFS. The new TUFFS will generate the total amount of surcharge owed and it will internally allocate the surcharge amount into each PPP account, which will prevent misapplied revenue. Although we identified weaknesses in internal controls over the surcharge revenue verification and collection processes, we acknowledge that the CPUC has performed a review of telecommunication carriers’ revenue reporting methodologies and updated the surcharge mechanism to prevent misapplied revenue. GC sections 13400 through 13407 require state agencies to establish and maintain systems of internal control, as fraud and errors are more likely to occur from a lack of effective systems of internal control when active monitoring measures are not maintained to ensure that controls are functioning properly. Recommendation We recommend that: • The CPUC review CASF Program surcharge revenue remitted by carriers to ensure that the new mechanism is effective in collecting all the revenue that the CPUC is entitled to receive; and • The CPUC establish procedures for reviewing supporting documentation to substantiate all revenue adjustments. -11- California Public Utilities Commission California Advanced Services Fund Program – Fiscal Audit FINDING 2— The CPUC did not maintain adequate documentation to support revenue and expenditure data presented in the California Advanced Services Fund Inadequate Annual Reports (Annual Reports) for calendar years 2019, 2020, and documentation to 2021. In addition, the CPUC did not have well-established, step-by-step support revenue procedures for the compilation of annual reports. If not mitigated, these and expenditure control deficiencies leave the CPUC at risk of maintaining and reporting data in the Annual inaccurate and unsupported CASF Program financial data in its Annual Reports Reports. We reviewed multiple reports and worksheets provided by the CPUC in order to verify amounts presented in the Annual Reports. We discovered discrepancies in the fiscal year data when we attempted to recreate the FI$Cal reports and could not generate the original revenue and expenditure totals reported in the Annual Reports for the audit period. We worked extensively with the CPUC’s Accounting Office to reconcile the Annual Reports to FI$Cal records, but variances existed for each fiscal year in our audit period. Some of those variances were adjusted in subsequent Annual Reports; however, the CPUC did not explain or document all of the variances. See Schedule 1 for adjustments to annual revenues and expenditures for the audit period. We reconciled the Annual Reports to current financial records, and identified $9,564 in understated revenues and $2,254 in understated expenditures. See Schedule 2 for the audited totals. Those variances appear to be a result of timing differences between when the reports were compiled and when current data was provided. According to the Accounting Office, many prior-year corrections were made when staff closed out fiscal year (FY) 2020-21. The process caused timing differences, and variances between historical and current financial records. Reports generated to compile the Annual Report are a snapshot of a point in time, and additional revenues and expenditures may be recorded afterwards. Therefore, original source documentation is essential to supporting revenue and expenditure amounts. Infrastructure Account used to record all non-specific CASF Program expenditures We noted significant variances in the Infrastructure Account (see Schedule 2). Those variances appear to be a result of statewide general administrative expenditures (pro rata), supplemental pension payments, and program expenditures. The Communications Division grouped all expenditures that were not allocated to specific CASF Program activities to the Infrastructure Account for the presentation of the Annual Report. We did not test all expenditures that were grouped with the Infrastructure Account. However, we noted that the SCO’s CASF Program fiscal audit for the period of July 1, 2010, through December 31, 2015, found that administrative and pro rata charges should have been equitably allocated to all of the accounts within the California Advanced Services Fund, rather than to the Infrastructure Account. -12- California Public Utilities Commission California Advanced Services Fund Program – Fiscal Audit Reporting Errors We noted the following errors in the Annual Reports: • 2020 – Table 9: The Infrastructure Funds payment amount was overstated by $20,741; this amount was disallowed by the CPUC but was included in the total payment amount. • 2021 – Table 13: The Line Extension Program payment amount was overstated by $172,548; only $120,000 of $292,548 was expended for the project in calendar year 2021. • 2021 – Attachment E: Payments from the Adoption Account (to iFoster, Inc.) were understated by $100,000 due to a data entry error. • 2021 – Attachment E: Total reported payments from the Adoption Account did not include payments, totaling $34,304, made to UNDA Digital Movement. Lack of detailed procedures During our review of the CPUC’s internal control processes, we determined that the CPUC did not have detailed procedures for compiling the Annual Report that included instructions for maintaining all supporting documentation. Although some documentation was maintained, the CPUC’s Communications Division did not provide us with all documentation to support the Annual Report totals. According to Communications Division representatives, the procedures are currently being developed and will be finalized in the Financial Information and Payment Processes Section of the California Advanced Services Fund Administrative Manual. Informal procedures consisted of the Communications Division obtaining approval from the Accounting Office for revenue and expenditure data. However, the Communication Division did not provide documentation of the Accounting Office’s approval for FY 2018-19. In addition, the emails sent by the Accounting Office for FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21 did not clearly communicate approval of final figures used in the Annual Reports, and there was no explanation for the various adjustments made to the summaries attached. The SCO’s fiscal audit of the CASF Program for the period of January 1, 2016, through June 30, 2018, found that the Communications Division did not maintain the original documentation used to create and support the 2018 Annual Report. We noted in our report: If [Communications Division] staff members had generated and maintained accounting reports since the inception of the program, they would have been able to authenticate prior-year revenues and expenditures. Timing differences in prior periods could be appropriately adjusted into the current period and more accurately reported at fiscal year-end. It is important that the CPUC maintains and reports accurate financial data for the CASF Program in its Annual Reports. Maintaining adequate documentation and noting adjustments would ensure that Annual Report data is supported. Variances that exist between historical and current data should be explained; and fund balances should be updated to ensure that the CPUC stays within its budgetary constraints, and that there are sufficient funds to meet outgoing payments. -13- California Public Utilities Commission California Advanced Services Fund Program – Fiscal Audit Having up-to-date, sufficiently detailed procedures is essential in maintaining effective internal controls over any complex accounting process. Furthermore, detailed procedures mitigate the risk of noncompliance with laws, rules, and regulations; reduce the risk of omitting important steps and making errors in processes; ensure consistency and uniformity of processes; provide clarity on how to perform tasks; and clearly describe duties and responsibilities of the staff members and units involved. GC section 13402 states: Agency heads are responsible for the establishment and maintenance of a system or systems of internal control, and effective and objective ongoing monitoring of the internal controls within their state agencies. This responsibility includes documenting the system, communicating system requirements to employees, and ensuring that the system is functioning as prescribed and is modified, as appropriate, for changes in conditions. Recommendation We recommend that the Communications Division establish processes and step-by-step procedures for the compilation of the Annual Report. These processes and procedures should include those for: • Maintaining all supporting documentation used to compile the Annual Report, including notes on discrepancies and adjustments to reported totals; • Properly identifying and reporting CASF Program pro rata and administrative expenditures in the Annual Report; • Ensuring that the California Advanced Services Fund ending balance and beginning balance of the subsequent Annual Report are accurate and updated with prior-period adjustments; and • Obtaining and documenting formal approval of the final figures presented in the Annual Reports by the Accounting Office. FINDING 3— The CPUC lacked adequate internal control over reconciliation processes to ensure that surcharge revenues were properly recorded and reported. Surcharge The CPUC does not have sufficiently detailed procedures for reconciling revenues were FI$Cal data to TUFFS data. As a result, the CPUC applied California overstated by Advanced Services Fund surcharge revenues to incorrect PPPs, resulting $86,312 in an $86,312 overstatement. Overstated surcharge revenues We reviewed bank statements and State Treasurer’s Office bank deposit reports for the audit period, and traced all transactions, totaling $131,796,894, to FI$Cal cash receipts reports. We selected for testing $77,070 in debit transactions and $268,169 in credit transactions that did not tie to the bank statements or to State Treasurer’s Office bank deposit reports. From our selection, we identified transactions totaling $86,312 that had been incorrectly applied to the CASF Program. These transactions were keyed into the FI$Cal system with incorrect PPP fund codes. -14- California Public Utilities Commission California Advanced Services Fund Program – Fiscal Audit Lack of detailed procedures The CPUC adopted the FI$Cal accounting system in FY 2018-19. According to the Accounting Office’s Accounts Receivable Unit, the Accounting Office did not have any procedures that outline monthly processes for reconciling FI$Cal data to TUFFS data until July 2020. However, these procedures were not sufficiently detailed, and we identified errors that occurred after July 2020. Although FI$Cal has automated controls that require transactions to be approved prior to posting and prevent the same individual from both posting and approving a transaction, there is still a risk that transactions could be posted to an incorrect PPP fund code. Misapplied revenue could negatively impact the other PPP funds and compromise the integrity of the CPUC’s financial records. Having up-to-date, sufficiently detailed procedures is essential in maintaining effective internal controls over any complex accounting process. Furthermore, detailed procedures mitigate the risk of noncompliance with laws, rules, and regulations; reduce the risk of omitting important steps and making errors in processes; ensure consistency and uniformity of processes; provide clarity on how to perform tasks; and clearly describe duties and responsibilities of the staff members and units involved. GC section 13402 states: Agency heads are responsible for the establishment and maintenance of a system or systems of internal control, and effective and objective ongoing monitoring of the internal controls within their state agencies. This responsibility includes documenting the system, communicating system requirements to employees, and ensuring that the system is functioning as prescribed and is modified, as appropriate, for changes in conditions. Recommendation We recommend that the CPUC: • Establish step-by-step procedures for reconciling TUFFS data to FI$Cal data; and • Reverse surcharge revenue totaling $86,312 applied to the CASF Program and apply it to the appropriate PPP fund code. FINDING 4— The CPUC incorrectly charged the Infrastructure Account for carrier expenses totaling $9,100 because the Accounting Office did not have Misallocated costs supporting documentation showing that the charges were for a different totaling $9,100 and PPP. In addition, we questioned whether carrier expenses, totaling questioned costs $168,181, were appropriately charged to the CASF Program because we totaling $168,181 were unable to determine which PPP the expenditures were for. were charged to the CASF Program -15- California Public Utilities Commission California Advanced Services Fund Program – Fiscal Audit Misallocated costs We analyzed CASF Program expenditures for the audit period and noted that cumulative expenses for four telecommunication carriers more than doubled between FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21. We judgmentally selected transactions totaling $177,281 for testing. We found that multiple one-time charges were listed on one carrier’s invoices for mobile devices. We obtained the purchase order for the devices and verified that those charges were for Fund 0462, Public Utilities Commission Utilities Reimbursement Account, recorded in the State’s General Fund. According to Accounting Office staff members, the devices had been ordered for the CalSPEED statewide mobile wireless drives test project. The CPUC inadvertently charged the devices to the CASF Program because the carrier had included the charges for the devices in a telephone bill instead of creating a separate bill. When the voucher was processed, the Accounting Office did not have the purchase order or supporting documentation from the Carrier Oversight and Programs Branch indicating that the expenses should be charged to a different PPP fund. A staff member from the Information Technology Department confirmed that they approve carrier invoices without verifying which program should be charged. The carrier has recurring expenses that are charged to the CASF Program; as a result, these expenses were overlooked. Questioned costs We questioned the remaining charges, totaling $168,181, because we could not determine the validity of the remaining carrier expenses or determine with certainty which program should be charged. GC section 13402 states: Agency heads are responsible for the establishment and maintenance of a system or systems of internal control, and effective and objective ongoing monitoring of the internal controls within their state agencies. This responsibility includes documenting the system, communicating system requirements to employees, and ensuring that the system is functioning as prescribed and is modified, as appropriate, for changes in conditions. Recommendation We recommend that the CPUC determine which program carrier charges belong to, and reverse all charges incorrectly allocated to the CASF Program. FINDING 5— A consortium did not maintain adequate internal controls over its CASF A consortium did Program grant funds. Risks associated with inadequate internal controls were further increased when the CPUC allowed the consortium to act as not maintain its own fiscal agent. If not mitigated, the control deficiencies will prevent adequate internal the CPUC from ensuring that consortium expenditures are appropriate, controls over allowable, and properly and accurately recorded. CASF Program grant funds -16- California Public Utilities Commission California Advanced Services Fund Program – Fiscal Audit Lack of adequate internal controls Prior to April 2021, the consortium maintained a separate fiscal agent. The responsibilities of the fiscal agent’s executive director included reviewing and approving consortium expenditures and reimbursement requests. We identified several instances in which invoices included in payment requests were dated after approval by the fiscal agent. For example, the payment request for start-up costs indicated that the fiscal agent reviewed and approved expenses on November 4, 2019. However, the payment request included expenses incurred on November 21, 2019, 17 days later. We also noted that the payment request packages were created and submitted by the consortium’s executive director instead of the fiscal agent. Per the consortium’s grant application, the fiscal agent’s administrative assistant assists the fiscal agent in processing CASF Program reimbursement requests. However, we found no indication that the administrative assistant or fiscal agent had prepared payment request packages. In addition, no timesheets were provided for hours charged for the fiscal agent’s two employees. There was no indication that the hours billed had been certified or reviewed by another individual. Due to the lack of certification and review, the consortium was able to exceed the budgeted amount for the fiscal agent’s administrative assistant by $3,000 in the first year of the grant period Reduced program oversight The CPUC allowed the consortium to be its own fiscal agent as of April 27, 2021. Although the CASF Program guidelines do not explicitly state that a consortium cannot be its own fiscal agent, approving the consortium’s request increased the risks associated with a lack of segregation of duties. The payment request packages are now prepared, reviewed, approved, and submitted by the consortium’s executive director, who also performs a majority of the consortium’s activities and invoices a majority of the costs. The consortium’s executive director also maintains all of the consortium’s records. The lack of adequate segregation of duties increases the risks associated with managing grant funds, and the risk that recorded and reported information cannot be relied upon. GC sections 13400 through 13407 require state agencies to maintain effective systems of internal control. Internal control systems are necessary to ensure that public resources are adequately safeguarded, monitored, and administered. These systems must be routinely monitored and evaluated, and improved when necessary. Oversight processes for the prevention and detection of fraud and errors are essential to ensuring that internal controls are functioning properly. Fraud and errors are more likely to occur when oversight is not maintained to ensure that controls are functioning properly. -17- California Public Utilities Commission California Advanced Services Fund Program – Fiscal Audit Recommendation We recommend that the CPUC: • Direct its CASF Program grant recipients to separate conflicting fiscal duties to the greatest extent possible. Adequate segregation of duties provides a stronger system of internal control whereby the functions of each individual are subject to the review of another. If it is not possible to segregate fiscal duties fully and appropriately, the CPUC should direct the recipients to implement compensating controls. For example, if an individual responsible for preparing invoices and payment requests also approves them, then another authorized individual, who is independent of preparing invoices and payments requests, should perform and document a detailed review to provide additional control. Compensating controls may also include dual authorization requirements; and • To reduce the risks associated with a lack of segregation of duties, reconsider allowing the consortium to act as its own fiscal agent. -18- California Public Utilities Commission California Advanced Services Fund Program – Fiscal Audit Attachment A— 2021 California Advanced Services Fund Annual Report 1 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 1 Projects Awarded in 2021 .................................................................................................................................... 2 CASF Program Goal and Broadband Deployment Progress ................................................................................. 3 CASF Team Key Accomplishments ....................................................................................................................... 5 Legislation in 2021 Modifying the CASF ...........................................................................................7 Plans for 2022 ................................................................................................................................9 Overview and Financial Information............................................................................ 10 A. Financial Information ........................................................................................................... 10 B. Served and Unserved Areas of the State ............................................................................... 14 C. Progress in Meeting Broadband Deployment Goals ............................................................... 16 D. Broadband Adoption Levels ................................................................................................. 17 Broadband Infrastructure Grant Account ................................................................... 21 A. Infrastructure Grants Awarded in 2021 ................................................................................. 21 B. Infrastructure Funds Expended in 2021 and Expected Benefits .............................................. 23 C. Total Infrastructure Projects Awarded Since 2008 ................................................................. 24 D. Rural Digital Opportunity Fund ............................................................................................. 27 E. Line Extension Program ........................................................................................................ 27 Rural and Urban Regional Broadband Consortia Grant Account ........................... 29 A. Consortia Grants Awarded in 2021 ....................................................................................... 30 B. Consortia Funds Expended in 2021 ....................................................................................... 31 C. Consortia Account Benefits .................................................................................................. 32 D. Total Consortia Grants Awarded Since Inception ................................................................... 32 Broadband Adoption Account ..................................................................................... 34 A. Adoption Grants Awarded in 2021 ........................................................................................ 35 B. Adoption Account Funds Allocated and Expended in 2021 .................................................... 36 C. Adoption Account Benefits ................................................................................................... 36 D. Total Adoption Account Projects Awarded ............................................................................ 37 Broadband Public Housing Account ........................................................................... 39 A. Public Housing Grants Awarded in 2021 ................................................................................ 39 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT B. Public Housing Account Funds Expended in 2021 .................................................................. 40 C. Public Housing Account Benefits........................................................................................... 40 D. Total Public Housing Account Projects Awarded ................................................................... 41 Tribal Technical Assistance ........................................................................................... 43 A. Tribal Technical Assistance Grants Awarded ......................................................................... 43 B. Tribal Assistance Program Benefits ....................................................................................... 43 Federal Funding Account .............................................................................................. 45 Attachments A – H .......................................................................................................... 46 Attachment A: Wireline and Fixed Wireless Served Status by County as of December 2020............ 47 Attachment B: CASF Infrastructure Account Projects as of December 2021 .................................... 50 Attachment C: Consortia Account Reported Benefits Funded by CASF ........................................... 54 Attachment D: Consortia Account Projects as of December 31, 2021 ............................................. 61 Attachment E: Adoption Account Projects as of December, 2021 ................................................. 64 Attachment E-1: Adoption Account Digital Literacy Projects Status as of December, 2021 .............. 70 Attachment E-2: Adoption Account Call Center Projects Status as of December, 2021 .................... 76 Attachment E-3: Adoption Account Broadband Access Projects Status as of December, 2021 ......... 77 Attachment F-1: Public Housing Adoption Projects as of December 2021 ....................................... 78 Attachment F-2: Public Housing Infrastructure Projects as of December 2021 ................................ 82 Attachment G: Public Housing Completed Projects Costs and Participation as of December 2021 ... 91 Attachment H: Tribal Technical Account Funded Projects as of December 2021 ............................. 95 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT Executive Summary Since 2008, the California Advanced Services Fund (CASF) has helped close the Digital Divide in California by providing subsidies to build and expand broadband facilities to unserved areas of the state. The program has funded fiber-optic, fixed wireless, hybrid fiber-coaxial, and copper facility- based projects with a goal of making broadband available to 98 percent of households in each consortia region by 2032. This report presents financial and programmatic highlights, including revenues, expenditures, approved projects, and expected benefits. It also provides updates on unserved/served areas and broadband adoption in the state. In 2021, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) approved 21 new infrastructure grants totaling approximately $93.0 million, two consortia grants totaling $537,555, 33 adoption grants totaling $1.4 million, and 21 Tribal technical assistance grants totaling $1.3 million. In 2021 the state legislature passed significant broadband legislation to help bridge the digital divide and provide reliable and affordable internet access to all Californians. Senate Bill (SB) 156 (Chapter 112, Statutes of 2021) expands the state’s broadband fiber infrastructure and increases internet connectivity for families and businesses. The goal of this investment is to provide equitable access to high-speed broadband to unserved and underserved populations in California. The $6.05 billion is allocated for the following: • $3.25 billion for an open-access statewide broadband middle-mile network, • $2 billion for broadband last-mile infrastructure projects, • $750 million for a loan loss reserve to support local government broadband infrastructure development, and • $50 million for local agency technical assistance grants including funding for Tribal entities. The CPUC is implementing these investments through the Broadband Deployment Proceeding (Rulemaking (R.) 20-09-001) and through the CASF Proceeding (R.20-08-021). 1 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT Projects Awarded in 2021 Table 1 details the CASF total projects and awards since inception in 2008 and in 2021. CASF expenditure data, including project payments and administrative expenses, are provided in Table 4 on page 11. Table 1: CASF Projects and Awards as of December 31, 2021 In 2021 Since 2008 CASF Account Total Total Projects Total Projects Total Awarded Awarded Infrastructure 21 $93,043,622 108 $347,936,938 Infrastructure Loan 0 $0 1 $600,295 Infrastructure Line 1 $292,548 2 $297,778 Extension Program Tribal Tech. Assistance 21 $1,340,550 30 $1,878,550 Consortia 2 $537,555 47 $18,730,027 Adoption 33 $1,422,887 212 $16,844,043 Pub. Housing 0 $0 450 $13,940,626 Total 78 $96,637,162 848 $400,228,257 Figure 1: Deployment of Anza Electric’s CASF Connect Anza project, Riverside County 2 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT Figure 2: Deployment of Race Telecommunications’ CASF fiber-to-the-premises project in Mono County CASF Program Goal and Broadband Deployment Progress The statutory goal of the CASF Infrastructure Grant Account is to provide broadband access to 98 percent of households in each consortia region by December 31, 2032 (See Map 1 on the following page for the locations of the consortia regions.). Data for fixed broadband availability as of December 31, 2020, reveal the following: • Infrastructure Grant Account Goal: Statewide, 97.4 percent of households are served at least 25 Mbps downstream and 3 Mbps upstream. This has increased from 97.2 percent reported last year. There are only two consortia regions that meet the 98% deployment goal, which is a decrease from the three consortia regions that met the goal last year.1 • Broadband Adoption at 25 Mbps/3 Mbps: Approximately 83.3 percent of California households subscribe to broadband speeds at or above 25/3 Mbps. 1 Last year, the 98 percent goal was based on 6 Mbps downstream and 1 Mbps upstream. SB 156, enacted on July 20, 2021, revised definition of “served” from 6 Mbps downstream and 1 Mbps upstream to 25 Mbps downstream and 3 Mbps upstream. 3 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT Map 1: California Broadband Consortia Regions 4 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT CASF Team Key Accomplishments Broadband Infrastructure Account: • 21 grants totaling $93,043,623 were awarded to applicants to build broadband infrastructure to 3,962 households in 17 counties. • Reimbursements for project construction for 18 previously approved projects totaled $17,468,947 for 2021. • Six projects completed across Imperial, Monterey, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Siskiyou counties. • Rural Digital Opportunity Fund (RDOF) Kicker and Nearby grant applications received to leverage CASF funding under D.21-01-003: RDOF Kicker applications – received 28 applications, as of June 3, 2021, from seven o different service providers totaling $165,196,629. RDOF Nearby applications - received 27 applications, as of June 3, 2021, from seven o service providers totaling $80,635,013. Line Extension Program: • Approved Line Extension grant to serve 250 low-income residents at the San Jerardo Farmworkers Cooperative in Monterey County. Broadband Adoption Account: • Grants approved to 33 projects for 10 applicants in eight counties serving 9,318 participants. Broadband Consortia Account: • Grants approved to two consortia groups to assist infrastructure grant applicants with project development, or the grant application process required to deploy broadband infrastructure. Tribal Technical Assistance: • Awarded 21 grants to 11 Tribes totaling approximately $1,340,550 for feasibility studies, market studies, and business plans. Broadband Mapping: • Collection of data from over 160 Broadband Providers around the state. • Broadband subscription data is now being collected at the subscriber address level instead of the census block level as done previously.2 • The successful implementation of the Broadband Data Portal to streamline the Data Collection progress. Additionally, the annual CASF workshop was conducted in order to consult with regional consortia, stakeholders, local governments, existing facility-based broadband providers, and consumers regarding unserved areas and cost-effective strategies to achieve the broadband access goal. 2 For the 2021 data collection, 71 of the 165 submitting Internet Service Providers (ISPs) provided data at the address level as opposed to the census block level. All broadband subscription data is expected to be collected at the address level in the 2022 data collection. 5 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT Introduction The goal of the CASF is to encourage deployment of high-quality advanced communications services to all Californians, that will promote economic growth, job creation, and the substantial social benefits of advanced information and communications technologies. The program consists of the following active accounts: • The Broadband Infrastructure Grant Account (Infrastructure Account) provides grants to deploy broadband to unserved households. Line Extension Program (LEP) provides grants to individual low-income o households or property owners to offset the costs of connecting to an existing or proposed facility-based broadband provider. • The Broadband Adoption Account (Adoption Account) provides grants to increase publicly available or after-school broadband access and digital inclusion, such as digital literacy training programs. • The Rural and Urban Regional Broadband Consortia Account (Consortia Account) provides grants to regional consortia (typically a group of several contiguous counties) to facilitate the deployment of broadband infrastructure by assisting infrastructure grant applicants in the project development or grant application process. • The Broadband Public Housing Account (Public Housing Account) provides broadband connectivity grants to “low-income communities” which includes, but is not limited to, publicly supported housing developments, and other housing developments or mobile home parks with low-income residents, as determined by the commission. In the past, the account provided grants both for broadband connectivity AND adoption only in publicly supported housing communities. • The Tribal Technical Assistance program provides grants to Tribes to develop market studies, feasibility studies and business plans to pursue improved communications. The Federal Funding Account was established in 2021 by SB 156.3 More background and historical information about each CASF account is available at https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/industries-and-topics/internet-and-phone/california-advanced-services- fund. 3 SB 156 is codified at Pub. Util. Code, § 281. 6 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT Legislation in 2021 Modifying the CASF In July 2021, SB 156 made the following modifications to the CASF: • Establishes as the goal of the Broadband Infrastructure Grant Account, rather than the entire CASF program, by not later than December 31, 2026, to approve funding for infrastructure projects that will provide broadband access to no less than 98% of California households in each consortia region. • Redefines an “unserved area” as an area for which there is no facility-based broadband provider offering at least one tier of broadband service at speeds of at least 25 Mbps downstream, 3 Mbps upstream, and prioritizes unserved areas where internet connectivity is available only at speeds at or below 10 Mbps downstream and 1 Mbps upstream or areas with no internet connectivity. • Eliminates the right of first refusal opportunity for incumbents. Eliminates the requirement that any proposed middle-mile infrastructure be indispensable for last-mile service in order to be funded. • States that the CPUC may only fund projects that deploy infrastructure capable of providing broadband access at speeds of a minimum of 100 Mbps downstream and 20 Mbps upstream. • Requires each entity that receives funding or financing for a project pursuant to the CASF program using a licensed contractor or subcontractor with a contract or subcontract in excess of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) to report specified information monthly to the CPUC, and for the CPUC to post that information on its internet website. • Establishes the Federal Funding Account in the CASF to implement a program to expeditiously connect unserved and underserved communities by applicable federal deadlines. • Authorizes the CPUC to provide information regarding the implementation of the CASF program in the biennial fiscal and performance audit, as applicable, or as a separate report. • Extends program eligibility for Public Housing Account grants to low-income communities in any housing development or in mobile home parks with low-income residents. Additionally, and related to CASF program goals, SB 156: • Establishes the Office of Broadband and Digital Literacy within the California Department of Technology (CDT) and charges that office with the oversight of the acquisition and management of contracts for the development and construction of, and for the maintenance and operation of, a statewide open-access middle-mile broadband network. The bill charges the CPUC, in collaboration with a third-party administrator, to provide to the office the locations for the broadband network.4 4 In the Broadband Deployment Proceeding (Rulemaking (R.) 20-09-001), on August 6, 2021, the CPUC opened a public comment process to collect recommendations for the locations for a statewide open-access middle-mile broadband network. On November 16, 2021, the CPUC provided an initial list of locations to the CDT. 7 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT • Establishes the Broadband Loan Loss Reserve Fund in the State Treasury to continuously appropriate moneys in that fund to the CPUC to fund costs related to the financing of the deployment of broadband infrastructure by a local government agency or nonprofit organization. In July 2021, AB 164 (Budget Act of 2021) provided the following funding: • $22,397,000 payable from the Coronavirus Fiscal Recovery Fund of 2021 appropriated for the purposes of providing support and technical assistance for the Commission to facilitate completion of the statewide broadband middle-mile network, the allocation of CASF funds for last mile projects, and the formation of municipal entities and agreements for financing of broadband infrastructure. • $500,000,000 payable from the Coronavirus Fiscal Recovery Fund of 2021 appropriated in this item are for completing and supporting construction of last mile broadband infrastructure. In October 2021, SB 4 made the following modifications to the CASF: • Establishes the date to meet the 98% goal as detailed in SB 156 as December 2032. • Specifies that CASF funds may be used to support projects that deploy broadband infrastructure to unserved nonresidential facilities used for local and state emergency response activities, including, but not limited to, fairgrounds. • Deletes the minimum cumulative appropriation for each of the CASF accounts and authorizes the CPUC to set these appropriation amounts. • Increases the cap on the annual amount of funds the CASF can collect per year to $150 million, until 2032. 8 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT Plans for 2022 • The CPUC will set forth funding allocations for the active CASF accounts, except for the Federal Funding Account. • Changes established by SB 156 and SB 4 for the Broadband Infrastructure Account and the Broadband Public Housing Account will be implemented in the CASF Proceeding, as well as additional programmatic changes to improve program efficacy. New grant cycles for these accounts will be opened in 2022. • The Broadband Adoption Account guidelines will be modified in the CASF Proceeding to improve program performance. A new grant cycle will be opened in 2022. • Staff will conduct an online-only CASF workshop in April 2022, to consult with regional consortia, stakeholders, local governments, the federal government, existing facility-based broadband providers, and consumers regarding unserved areas of the state and cost-effective strategies for expanding access to broadband. • Staff anticipates that the disposition of the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund (RDOF) Kicker applications will be completed. • Pursuant to the Executive Director’s letter of December 23, 2021, CASF infrastructure grant applications are to be postponed from the current date of February 28, 2022, to the third quarter of 2022 with the exact date to be announced in a subsequent letter or CPUC decision. Postponing the upcoming application deadline until after the Commission implements key changes in the CASF from SB 156, SB 4, and Assembly Bill (AB)14 will allow the Commission and stakeholders to better achieve the goals of the program. • The Federal Funding Account will be established in 2022 through the Broadband Infrastructure Deployment Proceeding. • Additionally, specific to changes brought forth by recent legislation and related to the CASF: Specific to the provision of funds through AB 164 (Budget Act of 2021) for the o purpose of providing support and technical assistance to broadband deployment efforts and related to the CASF, in 2022, the CPUC is establishing the Local Agency Technical Assistance (LATA) program in the CASF proceeding. The LATA program will be implemented by a new branch in the CPUC Communication Division named the Broadband Deployment Branch. This new program will not replace the existing Tribal Technical Assistance program, rather it will add another broadband grant option for California Tribes. Specific to additional authority granted by AB 164, the CPUC is establishing a o Broadband Loan Loss Reserve Fund (LLR) to fund costs related to the financing of broadband infrastructure deployment by a local agency or nonprofit organization. The CPUC is establishing the LLR under the new Broadband Deployment Branch, in the CASF proceeding. 9 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT Overview and Financial Information This section provides an overview of the CASF financial information including revenues, expenditures, and fund balance. It also provides information about the areas that remain unserved and information on broadband adoption levels, as required by Public (Pub.) Utilities (Util.) Code section 914.7(a), (g). A. Financial Information The CPUC tracks CASF financial information in the Financial Information System for California (FI$Cal), which is a statewide information technology system for accounting, budget, and cash management for all state agencies. Table 2 provides the total authorized budget for each of the CASF accounts as of June 30, 2021. Table 2: CASF Total Authorized Budget as of June 2021 CASF Account Total Authorized Budget Infrastructure Grant5 $565,000,000 Infrastructure Line Extension $5,000,000 Consortia $25,000,000 Broadband Adoption $20,000,000 Public Housing $25,000,000 Tribal Technical Assistance $5,000,000 Total $645,000,000 1. CASF Revenues Collected as of June 30, 2021 The CASF collected and earned approximately $56.2 million in Fiscal Year (FY) 2020-21 and has an accumulated total revenue of approximately $492.2 million since 2008 as presented in Table 3. Table 3: CASF Revenues Collected as of June 30, 2021 Revenues FY 2008-20 FY 2020-21 Total as of 06/30/2021 Regulatory Fees $418,900,138 $55,220,3436 $474,120,481 Investment Income $17,122,810 $983,215 $18,106,026 Other Revenue $44,169 $387 $44,555 Total Revenues $436,067,117 $56,203,945 $492,271,062 5 AB 1665 eliminated the $5 million Infrastructure Revolving Loan Account and required the transfer of the remaining unencumbered moneys as of January 1, 2018 into the Broadband Infrastructure Grant Account. Pub. Util. Code, § 281(h)(1). 6 FY 2020-21 regulatory fees include adjustments of deposits not remitted to SCO, voucher corrections and Plan of Financial (PFA) adjustments made in Fiscal Year 2018 and Fiscal Year 2019. These adjustments totaled $5,223,552 and have been added back into Fiscal Year 2020 final revenue figures. 10 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT 2. CASF Expenditure and Fund Balance in Fiscal Year 2020-21 Table 4 presents expended funds for each of the CASF accounts as of June 30, 2021. The expenses in Table 4 are grouped into three major categories:  Local Assistance – payments to grantees for approved CASF projects and services;  State Operations – staff salaries and benefits, travel, training, consultant services, and administrative overhead costs, etc.; and,  State Operations of Other State Agencies – statewide general administrative expenditures and supplemental pension payments, etc. In Fiscal Year (FY) 2020-21, the CASF expended approximately $24.6 million in funds and has expended a total of approximately $223 million since inception of the program as presented in Table 4. Table 4: CASF Funds Expended and Fund Balance as of June 30, 2021 Total as of Account FY 2008-20 FY 2020-21 06/30/2021 Infrastructure Grant Account – Local Assistance $145,622,324 $15,366,093 $160,988,417 Infrastructure Grant Account – State Operations $14,992,776 $3,028,497 $18,021,273 State Operations - Other State Agencies $2,904,759 $556,270 $3,461,029 Infrastructure Grant Account Sub Total $163,519,859 $18,950,860 $182,470,719 Infrastructure Loan Account – Local Assistance $335,354 $0 $335,354 Infrastructure Loan Account – State Operations $1,678,541 $6 $1,678,547 Infrastructure Loan Account Sub Total $2,013,895 $6 $2,013,901 Infrastructure Line Account – Local Assistance $0 $5,230 $5,241 Infrastructure Line Account – State Operations $248,638 $145,316 $393,943 Infrastructure Line Account Sub Total $248,638 $150,546 $399,184 Consortia Grant Account – Local Assistance $12,346,352 $1,375,611 $13,721,963 Consortia Grant Account – State Operations $1,859,304 $447,359 $2,306,663 Consortia Grant Account Sub Total $14,205,656 $1,822,970 $16,028,626 Pub. Housing Grant Account – Local Assistance $10,858,046 $809,846 $11,667,892 Pub. Housing Grant Account – State Operations $1,645,749 $439,592 $2,085,341 Pub. Housing Account Sub Total $12,503,795 $1,249,438 $13,753,233 Adoption Grant Account – Local Assistance $5,200,855 $2,062,386 $7,263,241 Adoption Grant Account – State Operations $779,525 $402,192 $1,181,717 Adoption Account Sub Total $5,980,380 $2,464,578 $8,444,958 Total CASF Funds Expended $198,472,223 $24,638,398 $223,110,621 11 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT As of June 30, 2021, CASF retained a net fund balance in excess of $101 million as presented in Table 5. Table 5: Status of CASF Fund Balance as of June 30, 2021 2008-20 2020-21 Beginning Fund Balance $237,594,894 Total Source of Funds $436,067,117 $56,203,945 Total Disbursement of Funds -$198,472,224 -$24,638,396 Available Fund, Ending $237,594,894 $269,160,443 Outstanding Encumbrances /Commitments -$108,068,515 Loan to General Fund7 -$60,000,000 Net Ending Fund Balance $237,594,894 $101,091,9288 3. Projected CASF Revenue Collection Through 2022 The CPUC collects CASF funds through a surcharge assessed on intrastate telecommunications services, which is commonly referred to as the billing base. Due to the decline of the billing base in recent years, the CPUC adopted Resolution T-17709, increasing the surcharge rate from 0.56 percent to 1.019 percent effective December 1, 2020, to December 31, 2022, or upon further revision by the CPUC. The revised surcharge rate was expected to generate an annual revenue of $66 million. However, due to the continuing decline of the billing base, the revenue shortfall has increased from $59 million projected in Resolution T-17709 to over $74 million by the end of 2022 calendar year. Table 6 presents the projected revenue from July 2021 through December 2022. The annual projections are based on actual reported surcharges for reporting periods December 2020 to December 2021. Table 6: Surcharge Revenue and Estimated Collection Through 2022 Fiscal Year (FY) Projected Surcharge Revenue FY 2021-22 $56,238,000 FY 2022-23(Through 12/31/2022) $25,647,5009 Total $81,885,500 7 Per 2020 Budget Act item 8660-011-3141, $60 million was transferred as a loan to the State’s General Fund in Fiscal Year 2020-21. This $60 million loan has been repaid in full as of the beginning of FY 2021-22. 8 The Governors proposed budget on January 10, 2022, shows the CASF FY 2020-21 fund balance of $87.448 million. The discrepancy is due to prior period adjustments not included in the Governors proposed budget. CASF staff will work with the CPUC’s Budget Office to correct this omission for the May Revision. 9 Half of DOF’s revenue projection for Fiscal Year 2021-22 due to prior CASF surcharge collection date of December 31, 2022. 12 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT 4. Surcharge update Pub. Util. Code section 281.1 was codified by the passage of AB 14 (Stats. 2021, Ch. 658, Sec. 2, Effective October 8, 2021) stating “Beginning January 1, 2022, the CPUC may impose the surcharge pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 281 to fund the California Advanced Services Fund pursuant to Section 281 until December 31, 2032.” Pub. Util. Code section 281(d)(4) was codified by the passage of SB 4 (Stats. 2021, Ch. 671, Sec. 2, Effective October 8, 2021) authorizing “For the period described in Section 281.1, the CPUC may collect a sum not to exceed one hundred fifty million dollars ($150,000,000) per year.” Furthermore, on March 1, 2021, the CPUC initiated R.21-03-002 to update Surcharge Mechanisms, addressing the need for a sustainable and cost-effective method to fund the state’s Universal Service Public Purpose Programs (PPPs).10 CASF staff is actively evaluating various alternatives in updating the CASF surcharge in conjunction with these recent events. 10 More information on R.21-03-002 is provided at https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/industries-and-topics/internet-and- phone/telecommunications-surcharges-and-user-fees/surcharge-and-fee-proceeding. 13 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT B. Served and Unserved Areas of the State 97.4 percent of California Existing statute defines an unserved household as one for households are in census blocks which no facility-based provider offers broadband service with access to wireline or fixed at speeds of at least 25/3 Mbps. Only areas with unserved households are eligible for CASF Infrastructure grants. wireless broadband service at The latest data available as of December 31, 2020, indicate 25/3 Mbps or above as of that 97.4 percent of California households are in census December 2020. blocks with access to fixed (wireline and fixed wireless) broadband service at served speeds (25/3 Mbps and above). Map 2, on the following page, shows the served and unserved areas of the state as of December 31, 2020. Figure 3: CASF Adoption Account EveryoneOn Opportunity Connect digital literacy project 14 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT Map 2: Served and Unserved Areas at 25/3 Mbps as of December 31, 2020 15 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT C. Progress in Meeting Broadband Deployment Goals Table 7 provides the percentages of served and unserved households by consortia region as of December 31, 2020. Served households are those that receive broadband speeds of at least 25/3 Mbps or above, while unserved households are those that receive speeds less than 25/3 Mbps. Priority unserved households are those that received speeds less than 10/1. Table 7 shows that the Bay Area (San Francisco, San Mateo, and Santa Clara counties) and Los Angeles Equity Action League Consortium have met the 98 percent goal. Table 7: Remaining Unserved Households in Each Consortium Region STATE of CALIFORNIA Fixed Consumer Broadband Deployment CALIFORNIA Public Utilities Commission Maximum Advertised Speeds As of December 31, 2020 Served Households (Speeds Unserved Households Priority Unserved All are at least 25 Mbps down (Speeds less than 25 Mbps Households (Speeds less Households AND 3 Mbps up) down OR 3 Mbps up AND than 10 Mbps down OR 1 Consortium (CA DoF greater than 10 Mbps down Mbps up) 1/1/2021) AND 1 Mbps up) Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent California 13,339,672 12,986,178 97.4 % 98,632 0.7 % 254,862 1.9 % Bay Area (no consortium: SF, San Mateo and Santa Clara) 1,291,667 1,267,614 98.1 % 3,533 0.3 % 20,520 1.6 % Pacific Coast Consortium Region* 538,031 521,247 96.9 % 5,508 1.0 % 11,276 2.1 % Central Coast Consortium Region* 244,422 233,285 95.4 % 2,665 1.1 % 8,472 3.5 % Central Sierra Consortium Region 64,673 57,947 89.6 % 3,385 5.2 % 3,341 5.2 % Connected Capital Area Consortium Region* 688,295 669,821 97.3 % 5,511 0.8 % 12,963 1.9 % East Bay Consortium Region 1,136,852 1,112,522 97.9 % 7,247 0.6 % 17,083 1.5 % Eastern Sierra Consortium Region 49,280 43,912 89.1 % 1,912 3.9 % 3,456 7.0 % Gold Country Consortium Region* 272,715 261,266 95.8 % 4,877 1.8 % 6,572 2.4 % Inyo / Mono Consortium Region 13,683 12,235 89.4 % 218 1.6 % 1,230 9.0 % Inland Empire Consortium Region* 1,400,843 1,361,953 97.2 % 11,873 0.8 % 27,017 1.9 % Los Angeles Digital Equity Action League Consortium* 3,382,896 3,335,595 98.6 % 7,843 0.2 % 39,458 1.2 % North Bay / North Coast Consortium Region* 378,962 362,053 95.5 % 6,445 1.7 % 10,464 2.8 % Northeast California Consortium Region* 217,351 195,758 90.1 % 11,237 5.2 % 10,356 4.8 % Orange County (no consortium) 1,058,090 1,025,880 97.0 % 1,543 0.1 % 30,667 2.9 % Redwood Coast Consortium Region* 73,498 66,106 89.9 % 2,354 3.2 % 5,038 6.9 % San Joaquin Valley Consortium Region* 1,272,302 1,235,277 97.1 % 13,077 1.0 % 23,948 1.9 % Southern Border Consortium Region* 1,211,776 1,183,641 97.7 % 7,619 0.6 % 20,516 1.7 % Upstate California Consortium Region* 44,336 40,066 90.4 % 1,785 4.0 % 2,485 5.6 % Sources: Broadband deployment data collected from Internet Service Providers and validated by the California Public Utilities Commission.The CPUC defines "broadband service'' as Internet connectivity with download / upload speeds of at least 200 Kbps in one direction. Such service is considered "available" if the provider can provision new requests for service within 10 business days. Household data is based on the California Department of Finance, January 1, 2021 estimate. *Currently activeconsortia. (An enlarged version of Table 7 is available in Attachment A, page 49.) 16 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT D. Broadband Adoption Levels Table 8 on the following page provides broadband adoption levels for each county as of December 31, 2020. The data is aggregated at the census tract level and staff analyzes data as reported by providers.11 However, census tracts are not granular enough to evaluate adoption at specific households or within adoption project areas. Providers also report adoption levels by consumer connections,12 instead of households. Pursuant to recent legislation, including SB 156, SB 4, AB 41, and SB 28, codified in Pub. Util. Code Sections 281(b)(4), 281.6 and 5895, the CPUC is authorized to collect information from broadband service providers. Specific to video franchise holders, the Commission is directed to collect data at a more granular level (on the actual locations served by the holder of a state franchise).13 Given the increasing state-wide and national focus on the necessity of more granular data for broadband deployment, adoption, and affordability, the Commission is instituting a more granular data collection from broadband providers in order to identify actual locations served (at the address level). Map 3 on page 20 depicts broadband adoption by county at minimum speeds of 25/3 Mbps. Figure 4: Deployment of Race Telecommunications’ CASF fiber-to-the-premises Bright Fiber project in Nevada County 11 D.16-12-025 directs staff to collect broadband adoption data. 12 Consumer connections include subscriptions to housing units, including unoccupied housing units. 13 Pub. Util. Code, § 5895 (a). 17 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT Table 8: Broadband Adoption of at least 25/3 Mbps by County as of December 31, 2020 STATE of CALIFORNIA Fixed Broadband Adoption CALIFORNIA Public Utilities Commission As of December 31, 2020 Households Offered Consumer Connections Broadband Adoption All Households Broadband Internet (At least 25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps Rate (At least 25 Mbps down and County (CA DoF Access Service (At least 25 up) 3 Mbps up) 1/1/2021) Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) Number Number Percent California 13,339,672 12,986,178 10,818,881 83.3% Alameda 585,588 576,648 481,487 83.5% Alpine* 481 124 288 232.3% Amador 15,448 13,731 7,189 52.4% Butte 79,384 75,377 58,540 77.7% Calaveras 18,518 16,850 13,085 77.7% Colusa 7,569 6,617 2,077 31.4% Contra Costa 398,387 387,078 346,994 89.6% Del Norte 10,061 9,360 7,936 84.8% El Dorado 76,578 71,862 51,470 71.6% Fresno 315,997 306,787 230,008 75.0% Glenn 10,501 9,750 4,299 44.1% Humboldt 57,263 53,912 39,482 73.2% Imperial 51,004 46,027 33,871 73.6% Inyo 8,125 7,345 6,212 84.6% Kern 276,769 266,978 212,683 79.7% Kings 44,860 42,737 30,140 70.5% Lake 26,266 23,699 13,944 58.8% Lassen 9,410 7,676 2,557 33.3% Los Angeles 3,382,896 3,335,595 2,747,121 82.4% Madera 46,537 44,763 26,413 59.0% Marin 105,395 102,340 88,912 86.9% Mariposa 8,126 6,350 294 4.6% Mendocino 35,567 31,681 17,449 55.1% Merced 82,951 78,731 56,341 71.6% Modoc 3,877 1,335 68 5.1% Mono* 5,558 4,890 9,157 187.3% Monterey 127,268 120,345 91,551 76.1% Napa 48,684 46,170 38,777 84.0% Sources: CPUC broadband data collection as of December 2020; ; household data is based on the California Department of Finance, January 1, 2021 estimate. Broadband internet access service is assumed to be deployment to all households in census blocks where at least onehousehold is offered service at speeds exceeding 200 kbps in at least one direction. Broadband Adoption Rate is defined as the percentage of consumerfixed broadband access connections over the total households offered Broadband internet access service. * Due to high percentage of vacant, seasonal, recreational, or occasional use consumer connections, the number of consumer connections is greater than the count of households which can results in adoption rates exceeding 100%. 18 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT STATE of CALIFORNIA Fixed Broadband Adoption CALIFORNIA Public Utilities Commission As of December 31, 2020 Households Offered Consumer Connections Broadband Adoption All Households Broadband Internet (At least 25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps Rate (At least 25 Mbps down and County (CA DoF Access Service (At least 25 up) 3 Mbps up) 1/1/2021) Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) Number Number Percent Nevada 42,895 40,440 28,219 69.8% Orange 1,058,090 1,025,880 932,070 90.9% Placer 151,405 147,989 115,789 78.2% Plumas 8,819 8,106 3,054 37.7% Riverside 751,584 733,240 698,141 95.2% Sacramento 552,252 538,867 445,420 82.7% San Benito 19,487 18,733 12,872 68.7% San Bernardino 649,259 628,713 583,924 92.9% San Diego 1,160,772 1,137,614 980,491 86.2% San Francisco 376,352 375,054 264,203 70.4% San Joaquin 238,577 232,866 185,430 79.6% San Luis Obispo 109,471 107,399 84,879 79.0% San Mateo 266,650 262,513 226,536 86.3% Santa Barbara 152,067 143,464 126,418 88.1% Santa Clara 648,665 630,047 542,961 86.2% Santa Cruz 97,667 94,207 75,624 80.3% Shasta 71,219 66,252 43,434 65.6% Sierra 1,479 908 125 13.8% Siskiyou 19,738 15,044 3,431 22.8% Solano 152,877 148,796 126,391 84.9% Sonoma 189,316 181,862 144,512 79.5% Stanislaus 173,311 170,173 126,956 74.6% Sutter 32,303 31,335 24,047 76.7% Tehama 24,904 21,968 9,425 42.9% Trinity 6,174 2,834 754 26.6% Tulare 142,580 136,154 87,672 64.4% Tuolumne 22,458 20,959 13,334 63.6% Ventura 276,493 270,384 244,307 90.4% Yolo 76,555 73,883 51,954 70.3% Yuba 27,185 25,736 18,163 70.6% Sources: CPUC broadband data collection as of December 2020; ; household data is based on the California Department of Finance, January 1, 2021 estimate. Broadband internet access service is assumed to be deployment to all households in census blocks where at least onehousehold is offered service at speeds exceeding 200 kbps in at least one direction. Broadband Adoption Rate is defined as the percentage of consumerfixed broadband access connections over the total households offered Broadband internet access service. * Due to high percentage of vacant, seasonal, recreational, or occasional use consumer connections, the number of consumer connections is greater than the count of households which can results in adoption rates exceeding 100%. 19 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT Map 3: Broadband Adoption of at least 25/3 Mbps by County as of December 31, 2021 20 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT Broadband Infrastructure Grant Account As of June, 2021, the Infrastructure Account had a total approved budget of $560 million, not inclusive of the Line Extension Program, to deploy broadband to unserved households. A. Infrastructure Grants Awarded in 2021 The CPUC approved 21 new infrastructure projects for approximately $93 million in total grant funding. Table 9 provides details of the approved projects, including the number of unserved households in each project and project cost per household. Map 4 on the following page illustrates the locations of the projects. Table 9: Grants Awarded in 2021 Grant Unserved Cost per Project Name Grant Recipient County Amount Households Household 1 River Oaks Charter San Benito $745,365 41 $17,334 2 Mountain Shadows Charter San Bernardino $1,878,703 101 $18,419 3 Darlene Road Charter Ventura $705,410 6 $135,604 4 Kingswood Estates Charter Placer $967,536 34 $19,351 5 Placer/Sutter Counties Digital Path Sutter, Placer $415,438 279 $1,525 6 Smith River Frontier Del Norte $1,428,479 55 $25,972 7 Crescent City Frontier Del Norte $497,427 18 $27,634 8 Garberville/Alderpoint Frontier Humboldt $3,719,164 48 $77,483 Piercy/Leggett/ 9 Frontier Mendocino $7,042,365 361 $19,508 Laytonville Knights Colusa, Sutter, 10 Landing/Robbins/ Frontier $5,112,222 36 $142,006 Yolo Grimes Cuyama/Maricopa/Santa Kern, Santa 11 Frontier $12,426,909 103 $120,650 Maria/Orcutt Barbara Humboldt, 12 Mad River Frontier $8,023,898 105 $76,418 Trinity Hoopa Valley Broadband 13 Hunter Humboldt $8,223,340 1,198 $6,864 Initiative Buckeye & Banner 14 Nevada County Fiber Nevada $621,280 28 $22,189 Mountain South Plumas Sierra 15 Sierra Valley Plumas, Sierra $4,887,905 140 $34,914 Telecom Plumas Sierra 16 Mohawk Valley Plumas $1,941,754 7 $277,393 Telecom Plumas Sierra 17 Southern Lassen Lassen $11,108,189 138 $80,494 Telecom Long Valley-Spring Plumas Sierra 18 Plumas $5,016,256 19 $264,013 Garden Telecom 19 Gigafy Arbuckle Race Telecom Colusa $4,565,100 480 $9,511 20 Gigafy Backus #2 Race Telecom Kern $6,151,870 266 $23,127 21 Gigafy Nevada City Race Telecom Nevada $7,565,012 499 $15,160 Total $93,043,622 3,962 21 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT Map 4: Location of 2021 Approved Infrastructure Projects 22 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT B. Infrastructure Funds Expended in 2021 and Expected Benefits The CPUC made $17.5 million in The CPUC made approximately $17.5 million in payments to 18 projects in 2021. payments in 2021 for previously approved These projects will provide infrastructure projects. Table 10 below lists the broadband access to an estimated payments made to providers for the specific projects. 16,265 households. The expected benefits of funds expended in 2021 can be expressed as the number of households that will receive broadband access. An estimated 16,265 potential households are expected to receive broadband access from the payments to projects that are listed in Table 10. The award recipients for these projects will provide service based on agreed-upon pricing plans for a minimum of two years, in addition to waiving installation fees, in accordance with CASF rules.14 Table 10: Funds Expended in 2021 Completion Payment Project Name Payment Recipient County Status Amount 1 Connect Anza Phase II Anza Electric Cooperative Riverside Complete $453,005 Bright Fiber Broadband 2 Bright Fiber Network, Inc. Nevada Ongoing $2,869,394 Project. 3 El Dorado North Cal.Net El Dorado Ongoing $404,121 Tuolumne, 4 Tuolumne and Mariposa Cal.Net Ongoing $669,387 Mariposa 5 Highland Orchid Drive Charter San Bernardino Complete $151,093 6 Country Meadows Charter San Bernardino Complete $2,120,391 7 Villa Montclair Charter San Bernardino Complete $526,693 8 Taft Cluster Frontier CA Kern Ongoing $124,770 9 Northeast Project Phase I Frontier, CA Lassen, Modoc Ongoing $435,955 Happy Valley Tel Co. (TDS 10 Olinda Shasta Ongoing $976,384 Telecom) Hoopa Valley Broadband 11 Hunter Communications Humboldt Ongoing $2,881,669 Initiative 12 Light Saber LCB Communications Santa Clara Ongoing $150,935 13 Lake Davis Plumas-Sierra Tel. Plumas Ongoing $277,501 Elysian Valley- 14 Plumas-Sierra Tel. Lassen Ongoing $698,562 Johnstonville 15 Keddie Plumas-Sierra Tel. Plumas Ongoing $586,442 14 D.18-12-018, Appendix 1 at p. 19. 23 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT Completion Payment Project Name Payment Recipient County Status Amount 16 Mohawk Vista Plumas-Sierra Tel. Plumas Ongoing $408,583 Happy Camp to Somes Bar 17 Siskiyou Telephone Co. Shasta Complete $3,645,085 Fiber Connectivity 18 Paradise Road Surfnet Communications Monterey Complete $88,977 Total $ 17,468,947 C. Total Infrastructure Projects Awarded Since 2008 The CPUC has awarded approximately $348 million to fund 108 broadband infrastructure projects (not including rescinded projects) since the beginning of the program in 2008 through December 31, 2021. The 108 projects include last-mile, hybrid,15 and middle-mile projects that provide (or will provide) broadband access to 327,938 estimated potential households. Table 11: Total CASF Infrastructure Projects Awarded 2008 – 2021 Approved Estimated Completed Ongoing Amount Awarded Projects Potential Households* Last-Mile 78 45 33 $165,896,830 65,950 Middle-Mile 7 6 1 $54,486,468 256,819 Hybrid 23 2 21 $127,553,640 5,169 Total 108 53 55 $347,936,938 327,938 *Based on estimated potential households provided in the CPUC resolutions approving projects. Figure 5: Deployment of LCB Communications’ CASF Light Saber Project in Santa Clara County 15 Hybrid projects are last-mile projects that include middle-mile infrastructure. 24 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT Map 5: Locations of All CASF Approved Projects as of December 31, 2021 25 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT 1. Project Subscriptions as of December 31, 2021 The CPUC is required to report the number of formerly unserved households subscribed to broadband in CASF project areas.16 The CPUC collects this information through annual data requests to Infrastructure grantees for all last-mile and hybrid projects. Grantees provided subscription data for 57 projects. Grantees did not respond to the data request for four projects; for these projects, subscription data from the project completion reports was used.17 Altogether, the provided data indicated that as of December 31, 2021, there were a total of 26,256 subscribers to completed CASF projects. Attachment B provides the household subscriptions (both projected and actual) for each completed last-mile or hybrid project as well as project funding and status. 2. Cost per Household as of December 31, 2021 The CPUC is required to report the cost per household for each Infrastructure project.18 Attachment B provides the cost per household of each project as of December 31, 2021. Table 12 below shows the average cost per household for all approved last-mile, middle-mile, and hybrid projects. The cost per household is calculated by dividing the total amount awarded by the total estimated potential households in the project. However, this amount does not reflect the full cost of connecting a household as the CASF awards did not subsidize 100 percent of project costs prior to the passage of AB 1665. Among the projects, Plumas-Sierra Telecommunication’s Mohawk Valley project has the highest cost per household at $277,393 while MCC Telephony of the West’s Kernville Interconnect project has the lowest at $31 per household. Table 12: Average Cost Per Household of CASF Projects Total Estimated Total Amount Average Cost per Approved Projects Potential Awarded Household Households* Last-Mile 78 $165,896,830 65,950 $2,515 Middle-Mile 7 $54,486,468 256,819 $212 Hybrid 23 $127,553,640 5,169 $24,677 * Based on estimated potential households provided in the CPUC resolutions approving projects. 16 Pub. Util. Code, § 914.7(i). 17 There is nothing in statue that compels grantees to report on actual subscriptions after the project has been completed and has been paid. Staff has this matter under consideration given that actual subscription data is required to assess program efficacy. 18 Pub. Útil. Code, § 914.7(h). 26 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT D. Rural Digital Opportunity Fund Pub. Util. Code, section 914.7(m) requires the CPUC to provide “..[a]dditional details on efforts to leverage non-California Advanced Services Fund moneys.” In 2021, D.21-01-003, the CPUC published rules for the CASF-RDOF “Kicker” Funding Initiative and the “Nearby” RDOF- Funded Project Initiative processes. The Decision set program rules and solicited applications for funding to leverage up to $2 billion under the Federal Communications Commission’s Rural Digital Opportunity Fund (RDOF) program. To further deployment of broadband and realize universal service goals, the CPUC created both the Kicker and Nearby funding programs, that utilize existing CASF funds to promote universal service goals for broadband. 1. RDOF Kicker applications: Received 28 applications, as of June 3, 2021, from seven different service providers totaling $165,196,629. 2. RDOF Nearby applications: Received 27 applications as of June 3, 2021, from seven service providers totaling $80,635,013. Program rules and application requirements for leveraging RDOF funding can be found on the CPUC website at the Broadband Federal Funding page: https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/industries-and- topics/internet-and-phone/rdof-broadband-federal-funding. Additional information on the program is displayed graphically on the California RDOF Map (FCC Rural Digital Opportunity Fund – Phase I Results) at: https://www.broadbandmap.ca.gov/federalfunding/. E. Line Extension Program The Line Extension Program (LEP) is a program within the Broadband Infrastructure Grant Account that subsidizes the cost of connecting an individual household or property to an existing or proposed facility-based broadband provider.19 The program was established by AB 1665, which provided a total funding allocation of $5 million, and was implemented by D.19-04-022. The CPUC approved one application in September 2021 for Cruzio Media Inc. to build a line extension project to serve 64 extremely low-income residences (average annual income of $14,359) and two community buildings at the San Jerardo Farmworkers Cooperative near Salinas (Monterey County). The total award of $292,548 will provide internet access to 250 permanent residents and up to 100 additional seasonal farmworkers. The historic employee-owned housing cooperative, located in a remote agricultural region near Salinas, has faced innumerable infrastructure challenges. In addition to the lack of broadband service, the cooperative cannot rely on safe drinking water. Completion of this project will provide crucial connectivity for adult residents and will enable approximately 70 school-aged students to stay connected with their classwork and studies. The project is on track to be completed in 2022. 19 Pub. Util. Code, § 281(f)(6)(A). 27 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT Table 13: Grants Awarded for Line Extension Projects Completion Project Name Payment Recipient County Payment Status Completed Dec 1 Arias Line Extension Audeamus, dba Sebastian Fresno $5,230 2020 San Jerardo Housing 2 Cruzio Media Inc. Monterey 2022 $292,548 Cooperative Total $297,778 Figure 6: The San Jerardo Housing Cooperative (location of a line extension grant) 28 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT Rural and Urban Regional Broadband Consortia Grant Account Pursuant to AB 1665, the Consortia Account has a $10 million budget to support eligible consortia activities.20 Consortia grants are distributed in cycles, and there have been five cycles to date - in 2011, 2016, 2019, 2020, and 2021. Further, Map 1 on page 4 of this report illustrates the distribution of 20 consortia groups currently funded or formerly funded, by county. Four of the 58 counties have never been represented by a regional consortium. They are San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, and Orange counties. The CASF funds grantees for the following consortia activities consistent with Pub. Util. Code section 281:21  Collaborating with the CPUC to engage regional consortia, local officials, Internet The CPUC awarded two (2) new Service Providers, stakeholders, and consumers regarding priority areas and cost- projects with approximately effective strategies to achieve the broadband $537,555 in total funding in 2021. access goal.  Identifying potential CASF infrastructure projects, along with other opportunities, where providers can expand and improve their infrastructure and service offerings to achieve the goal of broadband deployment to 98 percent of households in each consortia region.  Assisting infrastructure applicants in the project development or grant application process.  Conducting the following activities provided they lead to infrastructure applications: Supporting project permitting activities. o Engaging local government officials and communities to better understand and o explain regional broadband needs and solutions. Conducting an inventory of public assets (e.g., rights-of-ways, publicly owned o towers, public utility poles, equipment housing, publicly owned property) and aggregate demand, including speed tests and the identification and updates of priority areas.  Assisting the CPUC in publicizing requests for wireline testing volunteers in areas, as needed. 20 AB 1665 authorized an additional $10 million for the Consortia Account supplementing the previously authorized $15 million. 21 The CPUC approved Decision (D).18-10-032 adopting revised rules and guidelines for the Consortia Account. 29 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT A. Consortia Grants Awarded in 2021 On December 18, 2020, the CPUC released a fifth solicitation (i.e., 2021 cycle) to accept applications for regions that are not currently represented or funded by CASF. For the 2021 cycle, the CPUC received four applications and approved one new grant award of $300,000 for this round.22 In addition, the CPUC approved a grant award of $237,555 in 2021 for the 2020 cycle.23 Table 14 provides details of the two projects including the name of grantee, project locations, amount approved, and anticipated completion dates. These projects are expected to facilitate broadband deployment by assisting CASF infrastructure applicants in project development or the grant application process in the respective consortia regions. Table 14: Consortia Account, 2020 & 2021 Cycle Awards Approved Anticipated Approved Consortium Project Name County Completion Date Budget Tahoe Basin Connected Tahoe Lake Tahoe Basin Project Project Area 1 12/31/22 $237,555 Los Angeles Advancing Equitable 2 Digital Equity Broadband Los Angeles 12/31/22 $300,000 Action League Deployment Project Consortium Total $537,555 22 Resolution T-17738, issued August 19, 2021. 23 Resolution T-17726, issued April 15, 2021. The CPUC previously approved two grant awards in Resolution T-17708 for the 2020 cycle. The grant award approved in Resolution T-17726 is in addition to the prior two awards. 30 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT B. Consortia Funds Expended in 2021 The CPUC disbursed $863,801 to 12 consortia in 2021, including $145,762 to 2016 cycle projects, $677,897 to 2019 cycle projects, and $40,142 to 2020 cycle projects. Table 15 shows the payments in 2021 and total payments, as of December 31, 2021, to the consortia groups approved for funding in the 2016, 2019, and 2020 cycles. There were no payments to the 2021 cycle project, because the project commenced only recently. Table 15: Consortia Account, 2016, 2019 & 2020 Cycle Disbursement Summary Payments in Total Paid as Consortium CY 2021 of 12/31/21 1 Broadband Consortium of the Pacific Coast $184,483.95 $489,376.08 2 Central Coast Broadband Consortium $37,234.27 $310,861.15 3 Central Sierra Connect Broadband Consortium $30,634.86 $249,000.00 4 Connected Capital Area Broadband Consortium $147,976.07 $573,906.77 5 East Bay Broadband Consortium $0 $262,490.87 6 Eastern Sierra Connect Regional Broadband Consortium $0 $65,513.47 7 Gold Country Broadband Consortium $84,092.64 $433,999.74 8 Inland Empire Regional Broadband Consortium $34,912.46 $599,998.69 9 Inyo Mono Broadband Consortium $0 $53,277.33 10 Los Angeles County Regional Broadband Consortium $0 $594,543.91 11 North Bay/North Coast Broadband Consortium $183,197.00 $503,933.68 12 Northeast California Connect Consortium $20,529.10 $317,047.10 13 Redwood Coast Connect Broadband Consortium $78,096.61 $195,540.75 14 San Joaquin Valley Regional Broadband Consortium $5,690.56 $60,330.09 15 Southern Border Broadband Consortium $0 $109,369.48 16 Tahoe Basin Project $40,142.04 $233,285.86 17 Upstate California Connect Consortium $16,811.20 $291,431.20 Total $863,800.76 $5,343,906.17 Figure 7 (above): Steve Blum of the Central Coast Broadband Consortium presenting on the Connected Central Coast Middle-Mile project 31 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT C. Consortia Account Benefits For 2021, the disbursements to consortia groups, representing 46 out of 58 counties in California, were for the following activities: Identifying potential CASF infrastructure projects, along with other opportunities, o where providers can expand and improve their infrastructure and service offerings to achieve the CASF program goal. Providing information and data about broadband availability and demand o aggregation to local broadband providers and informing them about the CASF funding opportunity. Inventorying regional broadband assets or mapping broadband availability in the area. o Collaborating with the CPUC to engage regional consortia, local officials, ISPs, stakeholders, o and consumers regarding priority areas and cost-effective strategies to achieve the broadband access goal. To assess Consortia Account benefits, staff sent consortia grantees a data request on January 4, 2022, requesting outcomes of consortia deployment efforts in 2021. The following provides a summary of the responses: Nine of the 13 active consortia grantees responded detailing their efforts in o deployment, as shown in Attachment C on page 54. Four consortia24 did not respond and staff followed up with these consortia. o Nine consortia receiving Consortia grants (Pacific Coast, Connected Capital Area, o Central Coast, Inland Empire, Los Angeles Digital Equity Action League, North Bay North Coast, Northeastern California Connect, Tahoe Basin Project, and Upstate California Connect) reported that they are assisting infrastructure grant applicants in the project development or grant application process in 2021. D. Total Consortia Grants Awarded Since Inception As of December 31, 2021, the Consortia Account has awarded approximately $18.7 million since the beginning of the program. It has approximately $6.3 million25 in remaining funds. The $18.7 million includes all grants awarded in cycles in 2011, 2016, 2019, 2020, and 2021. In addition, the CPUC hosted regional consortia learning community summits and CASF public workshops since the program’s inception. The Consortia Account reimbursed consortia members $74,683 for participating in these summits and workshops as of December 31, 2021.26 See Attachment D on page 61 for a list of all grants awarded to consortia in the five cycles. Table 16, below, lists the active consortia grants as of December 31, 2021. 24 Gold Country Broadband Consortium, Redwood Coast Connect Broadband Consortium, San Joaquin Valley Regional Broadband Consortium, and Southern Border Broadband Consortium. Grantees are not obligated to report. 25 The $6.3 million includes approved Consortia awards as of December 31, 2021. The $6.8 million does not include incurred and future state operations. 26 There was no workshop travel reimbursement in 2021. Due to COVID-19 pandemic, in-person travel to attend the CASF workshop was not required. 32 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT Table 16: List of Active Consortia Grants as of December 2021 Consortium Counties Active Grant(s) 1 Broadband Consortium of the Pacific San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, 2019 Cycle Grant Coast Ventura 2 Monterey, Santa Cruz, San 2016 Cycle Grant Central Coast Broadband Consortium Benito 2019 Cycle Grant 3 Connected Capital Area Broadband Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo, Yuba 2019 Cycle Grant Consortium 4 Gold Country Broadband Sierra, Nevada, Placer, El 2019 Cycle Grant Consortium Dorado, Eastern Alpine 5 Inland Empire Regional Broadband San Bernardino, Riverside 2019 Cycle Grant Consortium 6 Los Angeles Digital Equity Action Los Angeles 2021 Cycle Grant League Consortium 7 North Bay/North Coast Broadband Mendocino, Marin, Napa, 2019 Cycle Grant Consortium Sonoma 8 Northeast California Connect Butte, Lassen, Modoc, Plumas, 2019 Cycle Grant Consortium Shasta, Siskiyou, Tehama 9 Redwood Coast Connect Broadband Humboldt, Del Norte, Trinity 2019 Cycle Grant Consortium 10 San Joaquin, Stanislaus, Merced, San Joaquin Valley Regional Madera, Fresno, Tulare, Kings, 2020 Cycle Grant Broadband Consortium and Western Kern 11 Southern Border Broadband San Diego, Imperial 2020 Cycle Grant Consortium 12 Tahoe Basin Project Lake Tahoe Basin Area 2020 Cycle Grant 13 Upstate California Connect Glenn, Colusa, Lake 2019 Cycle Grant Consortium 33 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT Broadband Adoption Account Eligible applicants for the Adoption Account are local governments, senior centers, schools, public The Adoption Ac count approved libraries, nonprofit organizations (inclusive of public housing nonprofit organizations), and community- 33 projects in 2021 awarding based organizations with programs to increase approximately $1.4 million in publicly available or after-school broadband access total grant funding. and digital inclusion, such as digital literacy training programs. The Adoption Account provides funding for two types of projects: • Digital Inclusion: Projects providing digital literacy training and public education to communities with limited broadband adoption including low-income communities, senior communities, and communities facing socioeconomic barriers to broadband adoption. • Broadband Access: Projects providing free broadband access in community training rooms or other public space, such as local government centers, senior centers, schools, public libraries, non-profit organizations, and community-based organizations, as well as funding community outreach, such as analysis, comparison of Internet plans and call centers that will increase broadband access and adoption. Prior to recent legislation, the Broadband Adoption Account was authorized $20 million to provide grants for digital inclusion and broadband access projects. Funding was fully allocated at the end of the January 1, 2021, application cycle.27 Figure 8: CASF Adoption Account Broadband Access project – Contra Costa County El Sobrante Library 27 The CPUC will set forth a funding allocation for the Adoption Account and is expecting to open a new application cycle in 2022. 34 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT A. Adoption Grants Awarded in 2021 The Adoption Account had one application window in 2021 due to limited available funding.28 The CPUC approved 33 projects totaling $1,422,887 in grants.29 Table 17 provides a summary of the types of approved projects. Table 17: Summary of Approved Projects in 2021 Digital Broadband Call Total Literacy Access Center Approved Projects 31 1 1 Funding $675,609 $38,718 $708,560 $1,422,887 Attachment E on page 64 shows the projects approved in 2021 and all projects approved since the program’s inception in 2018. It provides project details including project name, grantee, project location, grant amount, payments made, and completion date (if applicable). Table 18 specifies grants by county. Table 18: Grants by County in 2021 Grant County Amount Alameda $68,489 Los Angeles $131,606 Marin $69,368 Multiple $708,560 San Diego $38,718 San Francisco $111,476 Santa Clara $144,943 Sonoma $149,728 Total: $1,422,887 Figure 9: CASF Adoption Account Piedmont Gardens Digital Literacy project 28 In a letter dated October 28, 2020, the CPUC notified parties that available funding for Adoption Account grants in the January 1, 2021, cycle is limited to $1,329,545 after subtracting funds from previous grant awards and state operations costs from the authorized $20 million. 29 Resolution T-17732, issued June 4, 2021, awarded grant funding to 28 projects totaling $1,329,545. Given that one grantee did not accept its grant award for one project, and another grantee withdrew from its funded project, the CPUC was able to fund five additional projects through an expedited review process. 35 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT B. Adoption Account Funds Allocated and Expended in 2021 The CPUC continued to reimburse for previously approved Adoption Account projects. Table 19 shows that the CPUC expended $2,032,044 in funding across 13 counties in 2021. Table 19: Funds Expended by County in 2021 County Payments Alameda $274,460.39 Contra Costa $22,756.55 Kings $20,694.78 Los Angeles $60,231.45 Marin $2,127.00 Monterey $24,739.23 Multiple $1,393,505.65 Nevada $39,386.00 Riverside $14,970.75 San $61,182.42 Francisco San Mateo $8,740.00 Santa Clara $82,846.83 Figure 10: CASF Adoption Account Center for Elders’ Santa Cruz $26,402.60 Independence digital literacy project Total: $2,032,044 C. Adoption Account Benefits The Adoption Account benefits can be expressed as the number of people receiving training through the digital literacy projects and the number of people provided broadband access through the broadband access projects. Staff sent data requests to grantees to learn the number of people who have benefited from projects.30 A summary of the data collected is provided in the following bullet points. These numbers will continue to increase as most of the projects are ongoing. 1. Digital Literacy: 12,737 people completed eight hours or more of digital literacy training and 12,112 new broadband subscriptions from the 179 projects awarded as of December 31, 2021. 2. Broadband Access: 42,661 people were provided broadband access and 8,532 new broadband subscriptions from the 28 projects as of December 31, 2021. 3. Broadband Call Center: 14,788 new broadband subscriptions resulted from five projects awarded as of December 31, 2021. 30 Staff sent out requests to 65 grantees and received responses from 47 grantees. Project participation information was also acquired for 13 grantees who did not respond by referring to recently provided reports. There is no participation information from five grantees (follow-up emails were not responded to). Note that grantees are not obligated to report. 36 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT D. Total Adoption Account Projects Awarded Since inception, the CPUC has approved a total of 178 Adoption Account Digital Literacy projects, 28 Adoption Account Broadband Access projects and five Call Center projects throughout California. Of the 178 Digital Literacy projects approved, four are completed and 174 are ongoing. Of the 28 Broadband Access projects approved, seven are completed and 21 are ongoing. Of the five Call Center projects approved, one is completed and four are ongoing. Table 20: CASF Adoption Account Grants Summary (As of 12/31/2021) Calendar Projects Funding Projects Total Grant Type Payments Year Submitted Requested Awarded Awarded Pre-2021 Digital Literacy 219 $15,801,065 147 $6,678,307 $1,138,977 Broadband Access 37 $4,012,569 27 $1,030,216 $338,450 Call Center 4 $2,886,460 4 $2,712,633 $1,273,665 2021 Digital Literacy 44 $1,398,341 31 $675,609 $0 Broadband Access 3 $543,568 1 $38,718 $0 Call Center 2 $2,204,429 1 $708,560 $0 Totals Digital Literacy 263 $17,199,407 178 $7,353,916 $1,138,977 Broadband Access 40 $4,556,136 28 $1,068,934 $338,450 Call Center 6 $5,090,889 5 $3,421,193 $1,273,665 Totals 309 $26,846,432 211 $11,844,043 $2,751,092 Outside CDE Funding* $5,000,000 $5,000,000 Funding Funding Total $16,844,043 $7,751,092 *For the distribution of computing devices in schools and school districts in response to the COVID-19 pandemic (Resolution T-17697, issued May 12, 2020). 37 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT Map 6: Location of All Approved Broadband Adoption Account Projects31 31 Not inclusive of Broadband Adoption projects serving multiple counties. 38 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT Broadband Public Housing Account Since the first application window in 2015, through December 2020, the Broadband Public Housing Account (Public Housing Account) has provided grants for broadband connectivity and adoption in publicly supported housing communities (PSCs). An eligible applicant included a PSC that is wholly owned by a public housing agency or an incorporated non-profit organization (501(c)(3) that has received public funding to subsidize housing construction or maintenance costs of housing occupied by residents whose annual income qualifies as “low” or “very low” according to federal poverty guidelines. In 2016, SB 745 limited the CPUC’s awarding of Public Housing Account infrastructure grants to “unserved” PSCs. The Public Housing Account consisted of the following allocations: Infrastructure Projects: $20 million in grant funding to finance infrastructure projects connecting PSCs with Internet Adoption Projects: $5 million in grant funding to finance broadband adoption projects for residents in PSCs.32 SB 156, effective July 21, 2021, made changes to the Public Housing Account. SB 156 revised Public Housing Account grant eligibility requirements to provide grants for broadband connectivity to low-income communities including but not limited to, publicly supported housing developments, and other housing developments or mobile home parks with low-income residents, as determined by the CPUC. Broadband adoption projects in public housing are no longer funded through the Public Housing Account but can instead are funded through the CASF Broadband Adoption Account. The CPUC intends to implement the legislative changes to the Public Housing Account in 2022 and is expecting to open a new application cycle in 2022. The following section details the Public Housing Account grants awarded, and funds expended under rules in place prior to the enactment of SB 156. A. Public Housing Grants Awarded in 2021 The CPUC did not hold an application round or issue any Public Housing Account grant awards in 2021 given that Pub. Util. Code section 281(i)(7) required any remaining Public Housing Account funds (not awarded) to be transferred to the Broadband Infrastructure Account on December 31, 2020.33 Attachment F1 (Public Housing Account adoption projects) and F2 (Public Housing Account infrastructure projects) list all projects approved since Public Housing Account inception in 2015. These attachments provide project details including project name, grantee, project location, grant amount, payments made, and completion date or projected completion date. 32 The CPUC has fully allocated the $5 million funding for Public Housing Account adoption projects as of October 17, 2018. 33 Pub. Util. Code, § 281(i)(7), effective at the end of 2020 but since removed. 39 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT B. Public Housing Account Funds Expended in 2021 The CPUC continued to reimburse for previously approved Public Housing Account projects. Table 21, below, shows that the CPUC expended approximately $433,738 in funding across 7 counties in 2021. Table 21: Fund Expended by County in 2021 County Payments Alameda $17,260 Contra Costa $24,690 Fresno $129,393 Los Angeles $30,029 Marin $80,112 Santa Clara $96,904 Sonoma $55,350 Total $433,738 Figure 11: CASF Public Housing Account project Housing Authority of the County C. Public Housing Account Benefits of Kern – Green Gardens MDF room. 1. Infrastructure Projects Under rules prior to SB 156, the 306 infrastructure projects completed to date (out of 322 awarded) provide free broadband connectivity to 20,379 public housing units, at an average cost of $422 per housing unit.34 Completed projects are expected to provide residents Internet service speeds of at least 6 Mbps downstream and 1.5 Mbps upstream. The Public Housing Account subsidized project costs for inside wiring installation and equipment required for inside network (both wired and wireless) construction; maintenance or operational costs such as the ongoing cost of an ISP circuit are not subsidized. The CPUC requires grantees to maintain the installed networks for a five-year period after project completion and to report network performance information. 35 Further, the CPUC requires grantees to submit quarterly post-completion network services performance reports for five years that provide the percentage of uptime,36 the number of unique log-ons by individuals,37 and the amount of data used.38 34 Grantees may charge up to $20 per month for broadband service (Decision (D.)20-08-005, Section 1.11, Proposed Pricing). No grantees are known to charge residents for the service. 35 D.20-08-005, Section IX, ‘Project Status and Reporting.’ 36 The time or percentage the network services are up and operational. 37 The number of individual devices that have logged-in and accessed the network in a month to use the Internet. 38 Data usage occurs whenever an individual stream, download, upload, use apps, or open browsers. 40 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT 2. Adoption Projects Table 22 below summarizes the Public Housing Account Adoption Project participation and costs. The 111 adoption projects completed to date (out of 128 awarded) provided digital literacy training to 5,268 public housing residents (the total resident population for all completed project locations is 29,101). The total average cost is $568 per resident trained. Grantees are required to provide project outcomes including the number of residents trained and the number of residents trained who subscribe to broadband. Of those who completed the digital literacy training, 93 percent subscribe to broadband. Table 22: Summary of Project Participation and Costs Percent Percent Average Projects Total Total Total Residents of Total Trained that Cost per Completed Awarded Payments Residents Trained Residents Subscribe to Resident Trained Broadband Trained 111 $3,597,391 $2,993,769 29,101 5,268 24% 93% $568 See Attachment G for completed projects costs and participation as of December 31, 2021. D. Total Public Housing Account Projects Awarded Since 2015, the CPUC has approved a total of 322 Public Housing Account infrastructure projects and 128 Public Housing Account adoption projects throughout California. Of the 322 infrastructure projects approved, 306 are completed and 16 are in progress (these projects were delayed due to the COVID-19 safety restrictions). Of the 128 adoption projects approved, 112 are completed and 16 are in progress. These in progress projects are often halted and picked up again due to COVID-19 safety restrictions as common areas used for on-site instruction have been closed and some projects have had to shift to digital training methods. Table 23: CASF Public Housing Grants Summary (As of 12/31/2021) Calendar Projects Total Funding Projects Total Grant Type Payments Year Submitted Requested Awarded Awarded* Pre-2021 Infrastructure 496 $15,159,273 322 $9,269,606 $8,538,986 Adoption 169 $6,170,389 128 $4,671,020 $2,833,185 2021 Infrastructure 0 $0 0 $0 $132,782 Adoption 0 $0 0 $0 $300,956 Totals Infrastructure 496 $15,159,273 322 $9,269,606 $8,671,768 Adoption 169 $6,170,389 128 $4,671,020 $3,134,141 Total 665 $21,329,662 450 $13,940,626 $11,805,909 41 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT Map 7: Location of All Approved Public Housing Account Projects 42 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT Tribal Technical Assistance In D.20-08-005, the CPUC established the Technical Tribal Assistance Grant39 to provide technical assistance grants to California Tribes to support Tribal broadband needs and increase access. In D.20-08-005, the CPUC adopted guidelines that established quarterly application windows, eligibility, performance, and payment requirements for technical assistance grants. The CPUC authorized up to $5,000,000 in CASF state operations funds for technical assistance grants up to $150,000 per fiscal year per Tribe. California Tribes, with or without federal recognition, that demonstrate Tribal leadership are eligible for technical assistance grants. The Tribal Technical Assistance program approved 21 projects in Eligible applicants40 can request funding for the 2021 awarding approximately following types of technical assistance, including but not limited to: $1.3 million in total grant A. Feasibility Studies funding. B. Market Studies C. And/or Business Plans A. Tribal Technical Assistance Grants Awarded The CPUC held its first application window starting on October 1, 2020. During 2021, the CPUC awarded 21 grants to 11 Tribes totaling approximately $1,340,550 for feasibility studies, market studies, and business plans. Altogether, 30 grants have been awarded to 16 tribes for a total funding allocation of approximately $1,878,550. The Tribes have up to 24 months to complete their projects. See Attachment H on page 95 for a list of funded projects. B. Tribal Assistance Program Benefits These grants were designed to advance the goals of Pub. Util. Code section 281 by providing technical assistance to California Tribes to develop market studies, feasibilities studies, and/or business plans which support Tribes in their pursuit of improved communications. Each approved applicant has attested to advancing the CASF program goals and other program criteria as specified in D.20-08-005. 39 D.20-08-005 at pp. 15-17 and Appendix 1 established rules and eligibility criteria for the Tribal Technical Assistance Grant. 40 Eligible applicants are California Tribes with or without federal recognition, that demonstrates Tribal Leadership support, such as a letter from the Tribal Administrator, chair, or council. (D.20-08-005, Appendix 1, p. 3.) 43 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT Map 8: Tribal Technical Assistance Grantees 44 2 0 2 1 C A L I F O R NIA AD V A NC E D S E R V I C E S F U ND ANN U A L R E P O RT Federal Funding Account On July 20, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom signed SB 156 into law. Among other things, SB 156 created the Federal Funding Account (FFA). SB 156 directs the CPUC to use state or federal moneys deposited into the FFA to expeditiously connect unserved and underserved communities via last-mile broadband infrastructure.41 SB 156 further states that the CPUC must allocate one billion dollars ($1,000,000,000) to urban counties and one billion dollars ($1,000,000,000) to rural counties. The CPUC must initially allocate five million dollars ($5,000,000) in each county and the remaining moneys based on each county’s proportionate share of the households without access to broadband internet access service with at least 100 megabits per second download speeds.42 The CPUC began program implementation by issuing a ruling on September 23, 2021, in the Broadband Deployment Proceeding to request public comments on a staff proposal of FFA rules and guidelines. On November 11, 2021, the CPUC issued a further ruling requesting public comments on a proposed definition of “urban” and “rural” for the apportionment of FFA funds. A proposed decision regarding the FFA implementation was issued on March 2, 2022. 41 SB 156 allocated to the FFA moneys California will receive from the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds established in the America Rescue Plan Act (2021). 42 Pursuant to the most recent broadband data collection, as of July 1, 2021, as identified and validated by the CPUC. 45 Attachments A – H Attachment A: Wireline and Fixed Wireless Served Status by County as of December 2020 47 Attachment B: Infrastructure Account Projects as of December 2021 50 Attachment C: Consortia Account Projects as of December 2021 54 Attachment D: Consortia Account Reported Benefits as of December 2021 61 Attachment E: Adoption Account Projects as of December, 2021 64 Attachment E-1: Adoption Account Digital Literacy Projects Status as of December, 2021 70 Attachment E-2: Adoption Account Call Center Projects Status as of December, 2021 76 Attachment E-3: Adoption Account Broadband Access Projects Status as of December, 2021 77 Attachment F-1: Public Housing Adoption Projects as of December 2021 78 Attachment F-2: Public Housing Infrastructure Projects as of December 2021 82 Attachment G: Public Housing Completed Projects Costs and Participation as of Dec 2021 91 Attachment H: Tribal Technical Account Funded Projects as of December 2021 95 46 Attachment A: Wireline and Fixed Wireless Served Status by County as of December 2020 STATE of CALIFORNIA Fixed Consumer Broadband Deployment CALIFORNIA Public Utilities Commission Maximum Advertised Speeds As of December 31, 2020 Served Households (Speeds Unserved Households Priority Unserved are at least 25 Mbps down (Speeds less than 25 Mbps Households (Speeds less All Households AND 3 Mbps up) down OR 3 Mbps up AND than 10 Mbps down OR 1 County (CA DoF greater than 10 Mbps down Mbps up) 1/1/2021) AND 1 Mbps up) Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent California 13,339,672 12,986,178 97.4 % 98,632 0.7 % 254,862 1.9 % Alameda 585,588 576,648 98.5 % 1,287 0.2 % 7,653 1.3 % Alpine 481 124 25.8 % 254 52.8 % 103 21.4 % Amador 15,448 13,731 88.9 % 1,192 7.7 % 525 3.4 % Butte 79,384 75,377 95.0 % 547 0.7 % 3,460 4.4 % Calaveras 18,518 16,850 91.0 % 725 3.9 % 943 5.1 % Colusa 7,569 6,617 87.4 % 579 7.6 % 373 4.9 % Contra Costa 398,387 387,078 97.2 % 4,588 1.2 % 6,721 1.7 % Del Norte 10,061 9,360 93.0 % 223 2.2 % 478 4.8 % El Dorado 76,578 71,862 93.8 % 2,140 2.8 % 2,576 3.4 % Fresno 315,997 306,787 97.1 % 2,386 0.8 % 6,824 2.2 % Glenn 10,501 9,750 92.8 % 217 2.1 % 534 5.1 % Humboldt 57,263 53,912 94.1 % 825 1.4 % 2,526 4.4 % Imperial 51,004 46,027 90.2 % 1,125 2.2 % 3,852 7.6 % Inyo 8,125 7,345 90.4 % 14 0.2 % 766 9.4 % Kern 276,769 266,978 96.5 % 2,766 1.0 % 7,025 2.5 % Kings 44,860 42,737 95.3 % 474 1.1 % 1,649 3.7 % Lake 26,266 23,699 90.2 % 989 3.8 % 1,578 6.0 % Lassen 9,410 7,676 81.6 % 1,094 11.6 % 640 6.8 % Los Angeles 3,382,896 3,335,595 98.6 % 7,843 0.2 % 39,458 1.2 % Madera 46,537 44,763 96.2 % 572 1.2 % 1,202 2.6 % Marin 105,395 102,340 97.1 % 679 0.6 % 2,376 2.3 % Mariposa 8,126 6,350 78.1 % 913 11.2 % 863 10.6 % Mendocino 35,567 31,681 89.1 % 654 1.8 % 3,232 9.1 % Merced 82,951 78,731 94.9 % 2,534 3.1 % 1,686 2.0 % Modoc 3,877 1,335 34.4 % 1,234 31.8 % 1,308 33.7 % Mono 5,558 4,890 88.0 % 204 3.7 % 464 8.3 % Monterey 127,268 120,345 94.6 % 1,646 1.3 % 5,277 4.1 % Napa 48,684 46,170 94.8 % 1,627 3.3 % 887 1.8 % Sources: Broadband deployment data collected from Internet Service Providers and validated by the California Public Utilities Commission.The CPUC defines "broadband service'' as Internet connectivity with download / upload speeds of at least 200 Kbps in one direction. Such service is considered "available" if the provider can provision new requests for service within 10 business days. Household data is based on the California Department of Finance, January 1, 2021 estimate. 47 STATE of CALIFORNIA Fixed Consumer Broadband Deployment CALIFORNIA Public Utilities Commission Maximum Advertised Speeds As of December 31, 2020 Served Households (Speeds Unserved Households Priority Unserved are at least 25 Mbps down (Speeds less than 25 Mbps Households (Speeds less All Households AND 3 Mbps up) down OR 3 Mbps up AND than 10 Mbps down OR 1 County (CA DoF greater than 10 Mbps down Mbps up) 1/1/2021) AND 1 Mbps up) Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Nevada 42,895 40,440 94.3 % 642 1.5 % 1,813 4.2 % Orange 1,058,090 1,025,880 97.0 % 1,543 0.1 % 30,667 2.9 % Placer 151,405 147,989 97.7 % 1,619 1.1 % 1,797 1.2 % Plumas 8,819 8,106 91.9 % 209 2.4 % 504 5.7 % Riverside 751,584 733,240 97.6 % 4,003 0.5 % 14,341 1.9 % Sacramento 552,252 538,867 97.6 % 3,885 0.7 % 9,500 1.7 % San Benito 19,487 18,733 96.1 % 299 1.5 % 455 2.3 % San Bernardino 649,259 628,713 96.8 % 7,870 1.2 % 12,676 2.0 % San Diego 1,160,772 1,137,614 98.0 % 6,494 0.6 % 16,664 1.4 % San Francisco 376,352 375,054 99.7 % 663 0.2 % 635 0.2 % San Joaquin 238,577 232,866 97.6 % 2,094 0.9 % 3,617 1.5 % San Luis Obispo 109,471 107,399 98.1 % 302 0.3 % 1,770 1.6 % San Mateo 266,650 262,513 98.4 % 1,396 0.5 % 2,741 1.0 % Santa Barbara 152,067 143,464 94.3 % 3,452 2.3 % 5,151 3.4 % Santa Clara 648,665 630,047 97.1 % 1,474 0.2 % 17,144 2.6 % Santa Cruz 97,667 94,207 96.5 % 720 0.7 % 2,740 2.8 % Shasta 71,219 66,252 93.0 % 2,779 3.9 % 2,188 3.1 % Sierra 1,479 908 61.4 % 269 18.2 % 302 20.4 % Siskiyou 19,738 15,044 76.2 % 3,581 18.1 % 1,113 5.6 % Solano 152,877 148,796 97.3 % 1,372 0.9 % 2,709 1.8 % Sonoma 189,316 181,862 96.1 % 3,485 1.8 % 3,969 2.1 % Stanislaus 173,311 170,173 98.2 % 950 0.5 % 2,188 1.3 % Sutter 32,303 31,335 97.0 % 335 1.0 % 633 2.0 % Tehama 24,904 21,968 88.2 % 1,793 7.2 % 1,143 4.6 % Trinity 6,174 2,834 45.9 % 1,306 21.2 % 2,034 32.9 % Tulare 142,580 136,154 95.5 % 3,213 2.3 % 3,213 2.3 % Tuolumne 22,458 20,959 93.3 % 508 2.3 % 991 4.4 % Ventura 276,493 270,384 97.8 % 1,754 0.6 % 4,355 1.6 % Yolo 76,555 73,883 96.5 % 904 1.2 % 1,768 2.3 % Yuba 27,185 25,736 94.7 % 387 1.4 % 1,062 3.9 % Sources: Broadband deployment data collected from Internet Service Providers and validated by the California Public Utilities Commission.The CPUC defines "broadband service'' as Internet connectivity with download / upload speeds of at least 200 Kbps in one direction. Such service is considered "available" if the provider can provision new requests for service within 10 business days. Household data is based on the California Department of Finance, January 1, 2021 estimate. 48 STATE of CALIFORNIA Fixed Consumer Broadband Deployment CALIFORNIA Public Utilities Commission Maximum Advertised Speeds As of December 31, 2020 Served Households (Speeds Unserved Households Priority Unserved All are at least 25 Mbps down (Speeds less than 25 Mbps Households (Speeds less AND 3 Mbps up) down OR 3 Mbps up AND than 10 Mbps down OR 1 Households Consortium greater than 10 Mbps down Mbps up) (CA DoF AND 1 Mbps up) 1/1/2021) Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent California 13,339,672 12,986,178 97.4 % 98,632 0.7 % 254,862 1.9 % Bay Area (no consortium: SF, San Mateo and Santa Clara) 1,291,667 1,267,614 98.1 % 3,533 0.3 % 20,520 1.6 % Pacific Coast Consortium Region* 538,031 521,247 96.9 % 5,508 1.0 % 11,276 2.1 % Central Coast Consortium Region* 244,422 233,285 95.4 % 2,665 1.1 % 8,472 3.5 % Central Sierra Consortium Region 64,673 57,947 89.6 % 3,385 5.2 % 3,341 5.2 % Connected Capital Area Consortium Region* 688,295 669,821 97.3 % 5,511 0.8 % 12,963 1.9 % East Bay Consortium Region 1,136,852 1,112,522 97.9 % 7,247 0.6 % 17,083 1.5 % Eastern Sierra Consortium Region 49,280 43,912 89.1 % 1,912 3.9 % 3,456 7.0 % Gold Country Consortium Region* 272,715 261,266 95.8 % 4,877 1.8 % 6,572 2.4 % Inyo / Mono Consortium Region 13,683 12,235 89.4 % 218 1.6 % 1,230 9.0 % Inland Empire Consortium Region* 1,400,843 1,361,953 97.2 % 11,873 0.8 % 27,017 1.9 % Los Angeles Digital Equity Action League Consortium* 3,382,896 3,335,595 98.6 % 7,843 0.2 % 39,458 1.2 % North Bay / North Coast Consortium Region* 378,962 362,053 95.5 % 6,445 1.7 % 10,464 2.8 % Northeast California Consortium Region* 217,351 195,758 90.1 % 11,237 5.2 % 10,356 4.8 % Orange County (no consortium) 1,058,090 1,025,880 97.0 % 1,543 0.1 % 30,667 2.9 % Redwood Coast Consortium Region* 73,498 66,106 89.9 % 2,354 3.2 % 5,038 6.9 % San Joaquin Valley Consortium Region* 1,272,302 1,235,277 97.1 % 13,077 1.0 % 23,948 1.9 % Southern Border Consortium Region* 1,211,776 1,183,641 97.7 % 7,619 0.6 % 20,516 1.7 % Upstate California Consortium Region* 44,336 40,066 90.4 % 1,785 4.0 % 2,485 5.6 % Sources: Broadband deployment data collected from Internet Service Providers and validated by the California Public Utilities Commission.The CPUC defines "broadband service'' as Internet connectivity with download / upload speeds of at least 200 Kbps in one direction. Such service is considered "available" if the provider can provision new requests for service within 10 business days. Household data is based on the California Department of Finance, January 1, 2021 estimate. *Currently activeconsortia. 49 Attachment B: CASF Infrastructure Account Projects as of December 2021 Potential Cost per Approval; Project Total Total Households Completion No. Recipient Project Name County Estimated Household Resolution1 Type2 Awarded3 Payments Subscribed6 or Expected7 Households4 5 Anza Electric Connect Anza 12/17/2015; Last- Complete 1 Riverside $2,662,450 $2,662,450 3,751 $710 1982 Coop. Phase I T-17503 Mile Dec. 2017 Anza Electric Connect Anza 5/31/2018; Last- Complete 2 Riverside $1,796,070 $1,796,070 413 $4,349 338 Coop. Phase II T-17581 Mile 2021 Alta/Blue Nevada; 2/20/2009; Last- Complete 3 AT&T California $56,628 $56,628 236 $240 133 Canyon Placer T-17195 Mile May 2011 11/21/2008; Last- Complete 4 AT&T California Blanchard Mariposa $35,816 $24,963 123 $291 144 T-17182 Mile May 2011 4/16/2009; Last- Complete 5 AT&T California Clovis Fresno $36,393 $36,393 125 $291 144 T-17199 Mile June 2012 2/20/2009; Last- Complete 6 AT&T California Comptche Mendocino $18,392 $9,364 97 $190 138 T-17195 Mile May 2011 3/12/2009; Last- Complete 7 AT&T California Easton Fresno $49,869 $36,354 9 $5,541 73 T-17196 Mile June 2012 11/21/2008; Last- Complete 8 AT&T California Grenada Siskiyou $57,596 $20,150 275 $209 123 T-17182 Mile May 2011 11/21/2008; Last- Complete 9 AT&T California Hopland Mendocino $61,952 $22,306 328 $189 255 T-17182 Mile May 2011 3/12/2009; Last- Complete 10 AT&T California Lodi San Joaquin $137,416 $45,541 35 $3,926 242 T-17196 Mile June 2012 11/21/2008; Last- Complete 11 AT&T California Mt. Wilson Los Angeles $2,420 $859 15 $161 20 T-17182 Mile May 2011 2/20/2009; Last- Complete 12 AT&T California Warner Springs San Diego $93,896 $43,985 66 $1,423 62 T-17195 Mile May 2011 Tranquility and 5/6/2010; Last- Complete 13 Audeamus Fresno $1,154,496 $1,154,494 585 $1,973 189 West Fresno T-17265 Mile Oct. 2012 12/3/2015; Bright Fiber Bright Fiber T-17495; T- Last- 14 Network (Race Nevada $16,086,789 $14,540,691 1,941 $8,288 235 2022 Broadband 17565; T- Mile Telecom.) 17633 CA Broadband 12/3/2009; Middle- Complete 15 Coop. (Inyo Digital 395 Multiple T-17232; $29,223,432 $26,980,442 28,127 $1,039 MM Mile Sep. 2015 Networks) T-17408 ǂA mador Amador; 11/10/2016; Last- 16 Cal.Net Calaveras and Calaveras; $2,862,388 4,878 $587 In progress 2022 T-17501 Mile Alpine Alpine 1/14/2016; T-17497; El Dorado Last- 17 Cal.Net El Dorado T-17591; $1,238,550 $1,154,907 1,537 $806 In progress 2022 North Mile T-17603; T-17622 18 Cal.Net El Dorado El Dorado 6/23/2016; Last- $1,256,524 1,350 $931 In progress 2022 South and East T-17498 Mile Tuolumne and Tuolumne; 12/15/2016; Last- 19 Cal.Net $3,608,224 $669,387 7,711 $468 In progress 2022 Mariposa Mariposa T-17502 Mile Calaveras 7/29/2010; Last- Complete 20 Poker Flat* Calaveras $640,698 $527,676 409 $1,566 399 Telephone Co. T-17282 Mile July 2016 CalNeva Coalinga- 5/11/2017; Last- Complete 21 Fresno $511,170 $511,170 5,480 $93 864 Broadband Huron Gigabit T-17563 Mile Dec. 2019 22 Charter Brookside Los Angeles 11/3/2020; Last- $848,063 207 $4,097 In progress 2022 Communications Country Club Min. Review Mile Country Charter Meadows San 11/3/2020; Last- 23 $2,120,390 $2,120,391 295 $7,188 221 2022 Communications Mobile Home Bernardino Min. Review Mile Park Country Squire Charter 12/19/2019; Last- 24 Mobile Home Riverside $267,943 99 $2,706 In progress 2022 Communications T-17680 Mile Park 25 Charter Darlene Road Ventura 9/23/2021; Last- $705,410 6 $135,604 In progress 2022 Communications T-17747 Mile 26 Charter El Dorado Ventura 11/3/2020; Last- $1,445,032 160 $9,031 In progress 2022 Communications Estates Min. Review Mile Foothill Charter 11/3/2020; Last- 27 Terrace Mobile Los Angeles $444,388 308 $1,443 In progress 2022 Communications Min. Review Mile Home Village Charter Highland San 12/19/2019; Last- Complete 28 $197,185 $151,093 115 $1,715 76 Communications Orchid Drive Bernardino T-17680 Mile Sep, 2020 Charter Kingswood 11/18/2021; Last- 29 Placer $967,536 34 $19,351 In progress 2022 Communications Estates T-17748 Mile Los Alisos and 30 Charter Los Robles Orange 11/3/2020; Last- $1,021,655 334 $3,059 In progress 2022 Communications Min. Review Mile Mobile Estates 50 Potential Cost per Approval; Project Total Total Households Completion No. Recipient Project Name County Estimated Household Resolution1 Type2 Awarded3 Payments Subscribed6 or Expected7 Households4 5 Monterey Charter San 11/3/2020; Last- 31 Manor Mobile $784,322 87 $9,015 In progress 2022 Communications Bernardino Min. Review Mile Home Village Mountain Charter Shadows San 9/23/2021; Last- 32 $1,878,703 101 $18,419 In progress 2022 Communications Mobile Home Bernardino T-17747 Mile Community 33 Charter Plaza Village Orange 11/3/2020; Last- $622,811 163 $3,821 In progress 2022 Communications Mobile Estates Min. Review Mile 34 Charter River Oaks San Benito 11/18/2021; Last- $745,365 41 $17,334 In progress 2022 Communications T-17748 Mile Silver Wheel 35 Charter Ranch Mobile Ventura 12/19/2019; Last- $912,047 65 $14,031 In progress 2022 Communications T-17680 Mile Home Charter Soboba Springs 11/3/2020; Last- 36 Riverside $907,817 217 $4,183 In progress 2022 Communications Mobile Estates Min. Review Mile Villa Montclair Charter San 11/3/2020; Last- Complete 37 Mobile Home $543,530 $526,693 62 $8,767 35 Communications Bernardino Min. Review Mile 2021 Park Citizens Telecom. 7/23/2015; Middle- Complete 38 of CA (Frontier Petrolia Humboldt $202,557 $202,557 138 $1,468 MM T-17484 Mile Feb. 2016 Comm.) Citizens Telecom. ǂ 3/12/2009; Last- Complete 39 of CA (Frontier Birds Landing Solano $100,444 $99,130 69 $1,456 10 T-17196 Mile Mar. 2010 Comm.) Citizens Telecom. 3/12/2009; Last- Complete, 40 of CA (Frontier Livingston Merced $62,000 $39,555 234 $265 36 T-17196 Mile Nov. 2009 Comm.) Citizens Telecom. 9/29/2016; Last- Complete 41 of CA (Frontier Shingletown Shasta $545,690 $454,825 1,017 $537 971 T-17522 Mile May 2017 Comm.) Equal Access 12/5/2019; Last- 42 Cruzio Media Santa Cruz $2,445,153 263 $9,297 In progress 2022 Santa Cruz T-17674 Mile Central Valley CVIN and 10/14/2010; Middle- Complete 43 Independent Multiple $6,659,967 $6,312,983 206,764 $32 MM CENIC T-17295 Mile May 2014 ǂNetwork Placer/Sutter 1/14/2021; Last- 44 Digital Path Sutter, Placer $415,438 279 $1,489 In progress 2022 Counties T-17720 Mile Foresthill 10/3/2013; Last- Complete 45 Big Dipper Placer $117,000 $117,000 84 $1,393 21 Telephone Co. T-17409 Mile July 2016 46 Frontier Smith River Del Norte 2/11/2021; Last- $1,428,479 55 $25,972 In progress 2022 T-17715 Mile Frontier 47 California Crescent City Del Norte 9/23/2021; Last- $497,427 18 $27,635 In progress 2022 T-17747 Mile (Frontier Comm.) Frontier Cuyama/Maric 48 California opa/Santa Kern, Santa 12/16/2021; Hybrid $12,426,909 103 $120,650 In progress 2022 Barbara T-17554 (Frontier Comm.) Maria/Orcutt Frontier 7/12/2018; Last- Completed 49 California Desert Shores Imperial $1,262,567 $998,107 596 $2,118 65 T-17614 Mile 2021 (Frontier Comm.) Frontier Garberville/ 12/16/2021; 50 California Humboldt Hybrid $3,719,164 48 $77,483 In progress 2022 Alderpoint T-17749 (Frontier Comm.) Frontier Knights Colusa, 12/16/2021; 51 California Landing/Robbi Hybrid $5,112,222 36 $142,006 In progress 2022 Sutter, Yolo T-17754 (Frontier Comm.) ns/ Grimes Frontier San 7/12/2018; Completed 52 California Lytle Creek Hybrid $1,458,886 $730,852 339 $4,303 234 Bernardino T-17613 2021 (Frontier Comm.) Frontier Humboldt, 12/16/2021; 53 California Mad River Hybrid $8,023,898 105 $76,418 In progress 2022 Trinity T-17749 (Frontier Comm.) Frontier Northeast Lassen; 12/19/2019; 54 California Hybrid $10,912,973 $435,955 329 $33,170 In progress 2022 Project Phase I Modoc T-17671 (Frontier Comm.) Frontier 55 California Piercy/Leggett Mendocino 12/16/2021; Hybrid $7,042,365 361 $19,508 In progress 2022 /Laytonville T-17749 (Frontier Comm.) Frontier 11/21/2008; Last- Complete 56 California Prattville Plumas $41,192 $9,923 171 $241 41 T-17182 Mile June 2016 (Frontier Comm.) Frontier 12/19/2019; Last- 57 California Taft Cluster Kern $399,702 $139,314 41 $9,749 35 2022 T-17668 Mile (Frontier Comm.) Frontier 9/12/2019; Last- 58 California Weimar Placer $692,889 $156,606 148 $4,682 22 2022 T-17660 Mile (Frontier Comm.) 51 Potential Cost per Approval; Project Total Total Households Completion No. Recipient Project Name County Estimated Household Resolution1 Type2 Awarded3 Payments Subscribed6 or Expected7 Households4 5 Frontier Comm. 59 of the Southwest Alpine Alpine 11/10/2011; Last- $95,919 381 $252 442 Complete Underserved T-17348 Mile May 2012 (Frontier Comm.) San Bernardino Frontier Comm. County Project 60 of the Southwest (Havasu Palms San 6/9/2011; Last- $168,171 3,732 $45 153 Complete Bernardino T-17322 Mile Nov. 2012 (Frontier Comm.) and Black Meadow) Frontier Comm. 61 West Coast Del Norte Del Norte 9/22/2011; Last- $68,168 313 $218 55 Complete Underserved T-17341 Mile March 2012 (Frontier Comm.) Happy Valley Tel. 10/3/2013; Last- 62 Co. (TDS Olinda Shasta T-17411; $2,296,667 $976,384 1,908 $1,204 520 2022 Mile Telecom) T-17517 Hoopa Valley 1/14/2021: 63 Hunter Broadband Humboldt Hybrid $8,223,340 $2,881,669 1198 $6,864 In progress 2022 T-17717 Initiative 5/10/2018; Last- 64 Inyo Networks Bolinas Marin $1,868,881 571 $3,273 In progress 2022 T-17608 Mile 7/14/2016; Last- Complete 65 Inyo Networks Nicasio Marin $1,491,078 $1,491,078 216 $6,903 211 T-17523 Mile Aug. 2019 Hwy 36 11/20/2009; Humboldt- Humboldt; Middle- Complete 66 IP Networks T-17227; $5,753,240 $5,753,240 527 $10,917 MM ǂT rinity Trinity Mile May 2012 T-17352 Counties Klamath River 10/17/2013; Rural 67 Karuk Tribe Humboldt T-17418; Hybrid $17,422,572 $1,620,220 616 $28,283 In progress 2022 Broadband T-17690 Initiative LCB 6/15/2017; 68 Light Saber Santa Clara Hybrid $1,076,062 $968,456 150 $7,174 137 2022 Communications T-17545 Kernville 9/10/2009; Middle- 69 MCC Telephony Kern $285,992 9,179 $31 MM 2022 Interconnect T-17221 Mile ǂB uckeye & 70 Nevada County Banner Nevada 12/16/2021; Last- $621,280 28 $22,189 In progress 2022 Fiber Mountain T-17752 Mile South Pinnacles Pinnacles 10/31/2013; Last- Complete 71 San Benito $195,299 $180,277 47 $4,155 24 Telephone Co. Monument* T-17420 Mile Dec. 2014 Plumas-Sierra Plumas-Sierra 2/25/2010; Middle- Complete 72 Telecom Multiple $1,721,280 $1,721,280 960 $1,793 3,822 Telecom. T-17230 Mile March 2014 ǂM iddle Mile Plumas-Sierra Elysian Valley- 12/5/2019; 73 Telecom. Johnstonvill e Lassen T-17677 Hybrid $3,574,494 $1,274,839 82 $43,591 5 2022 Plumas-Sierra 12/5/2019; 74 Keddie Plumas Hybrid $1,512,163 $770,445 36 $42,005 11 2022 Telecom. T-17672 Plumas-Sierra 12/5/2019; 75 Lake Davis Plumas Hybrid $1,118,873 $935,431 125 $8,951 6 2022 Telecom. T-17675 76 Plumas-Sierra Long Valley- Plumas 12/16/2021; Hybrid $5,016,256 19 $264,013 In progress 2022 Telecom. Spring Garden T-17750 77 Plumas-Sierra Mohawk Valley Plumas 12/16/2021; Hybrid $1,941,754 7 $277,393 In progress 2022 Telecom. T-17750 Plumas-Sierra 12/5/2019; 78 Mohawk Vista Plumas Hybrid $2,183,427 $984,056 120 $18,195 58 2022 Telecom. T-17673 Plumas-Sierra Plumas Eureka- 12/5/2019; 79 Plumas Hybrid $1,270,872 $447,960 51 $24,919 22 2022 Telecom. Johnsville T-17678 Plumas-Sierra 12/17/2020; 80 Scott Road Lassen; Sierra Hybrid $3,707,475 61 $60,778 In progress 2023 Telecom. T-17712 Plumas-Sierra 12/16/2021; 81 Sierra Valley Plumas, Sierra Hybrid $4,887,905 140 $34,914 In progress 2022 Telecom. T-17752 Plumas-Sierra Southern 12/16/2021; 82 Lassen Hybrid $11,108,189 138 $80,494 In progress 2022 Telecom. Lassen T-17750 11/20/2009; Ponderosa Last- Complete 83 Auberry Fresno T-17236; $1,154,780 $614,118 1,043 $1,107 443 Cablevision Mile Sep. 2015 T-17274 84 Ponderosa Beasore- Madera 12/19/2013; Last- $1,755,042 32 $54,845 140 2022 Telephone Co. Central Camp T-17424 Mile Ponderosa 10/31/2013; Last- Complete 85 Big Creek Fresno $898,574 $692,952 79 $11,374 344 Telephone Co. T-17423 Mile Aug. 2017 4/10/2014; Ponderosa Last- Complete 86 Cressman Fresno T-17428; $1,027,380 $911,972 70 $14,677 18 Telephone Co. Mile May 2018 T-17551 10/31/2013; Last- Complete 87 Race Telecom. Boron Kern $3,426,357 $2,880,819 892 $3,841 417 T-17416 Mile March 2015 Five Mining Kern; San 1/14/2016; Last- Complete 88 Race Telecom. $2,037,721 $2,037,721 202 $6,397 120 Communities Bernardino T-17488 Mile Sep. 2017 52 Potential Cost per Approval; Project Total Total Households Completion No. Recipient Project Name County Estimated Household Resolution1 Type2 Awarded3 Payments Subscribed6 or Expected7 Households4 5 Gigafy 12/16/2021; 89 Race Telecom. Colusa Hybrid $4,565,100 480 $9,511 In progress 2022 Arbuckle T-17751 8/13/2015; Last- Complete 90 Race Telecom. Gigafy Backus Kern $2,239,991 $1,887,103 253 $8,854 159 T-17480 Mile Feb. 2017 91 Race Telecom. Gigafy Backus Kern 12/16/2021; Last- $6,151,870 266 $23,127 In progress 2022 #2 T-17751 Mile 1/28/2016; Last- Complete 92 Race Telecom. Gigafy Mono Mono $6,580,007 $5,564,690 399 $16,491 159 T-17477 Mile Sep. 2018 Gigafy Nevada 12/16/2021; Last- 93 Race Telecom. Nevada $7,565,012 499 $15,160 In progress 2022 City T-17751 Mile Gigafy North 12/1/2016; Last- Complete 94 Race Telecom. Mono $3,124,490 $3,124,490 444 $7,037 229 395 T-17541 Mile Sep. 2018 Gigafy 8/18/2016; Last- Complete 95 Race Telecom. Sonoma $7,687,016 $7,687,016 458 $16,784 104 Occidental T-17524 Mile Sep. 2018 7/13/2017; San Last- 96 Race Telecom. Gigafy Phelan T-17525; $36,690,800 $35,197,226 7,606 $4,824 3,608 2022 Bernardino Mile T-17658 97 Race Telecom. Gigafy Colusa 12/17/20; Hybrid $7,603,656 588 $12,931 In progress 2022 Williams T-17716 10/17/2013; Last- Complete 98 Race Telecom. High Desert Kern $12,583,343 $10,600,963 4,371 $2,879 3774 T-17415 Mile Sep. 2017 Mojave Air and 99 Race Telecom. Space Port Kern 6/24/2010; Last- $506,199 $494,419 4 Complete T-17279 Mile Nov. 2012 Project Mono County 6/26/2014; Last- Complete 100 Race Telecom. Mono $4,650,593 $3,913,818 727 $6,397 755 Underserved T-17433 Mile Sep. 2017 Happy Camp 12/15/2016; Siskiyou to Somes Bar Completed 101 Siskiyou T-17539; Hybrid $3,645,085 $3,645,085 37 $98,516 5 Telephone Co. Fiber April 2021 T-17623 Connectivity Sunesys (Crown Connected 4/10/2014; Middle- Complete 102 Multiple $10,640,000 $5,596,943 11,124 $956 MM Castle / Level 3) Central Coast T-17429 Mile May 2018 ǂ Surfnet 4/10/2014; Last- Complete 103 Paradise Road Monterey $177,954 $177,954 278 $640 14 Communications T-17430 Mile Mar 2021 5/7/2015; Ultimate Internet San Last- Complete 104 Helendale T-17478; $1,814,045 $1,812,759 2,279 $796 1,801 Access Bernardino Mile Mar. 2017 T-17557 San Ultimate Internet 5/7/2015; Last- Complete 105 Wrightwood Bernardino; $1,937,380 $1,667,981 1,857 $1,043 1,203 Access T-17475 Mile Mar. 2018 Los Angeles 10/31/2013; Last- Complete 106 Willits Online Boonville* Mendocino $122,931 $122,652 605 $203 3 T-17422 Mile May 2016 Covelo & 3/12/2009; Last- Complete 107 Willits Online Mendocino $108,000 $102,025 800 $135 149 Laytonville* T-17183 Mile Jan. 2011 Winterhaven 10/4/2013; Winterhaven Last- 108 Telephone Co. Imperial T-17410; $2,063,967 $1,287,286 961 $2,148 233 2022 Underserved Mile (TDS Telecom) T-17521 TOTAL $347,936,938 $172,814,141 327,938 26,256 Primarily a middle mile project approved prior to CASF rule changes pursuant to AB 1665. ǂ* Based on the project completion report (no data received). 1 Some projects are approved through the Ministerial Review process and are denoted with "Min. Review" 2 Projects are categorized as last-mile, middle-mile, or hybrid. Hybrid projects are last-mile projects that include middle-mile infrastructure. 3 Award amounts reflect changes (e.g. supplemental funding awarded) made after original project approval. 4 Household estimates are from CPUC resolutions approving projects. 5 Cost per household for each project is calculated by dividing the total award by the estimated potential households. 6 Subscription data for Last Mile and Hybrid projects gathered via data requests issued to award recipients. Middle Mile and projects not completed are indicated as such. 7 Completion dates reflect when the CPUC received the completion report. Actual project construction may have completed prior to the completion report. 53 Attachment C: Consortia Account Reported Benefits Funded by CASF43 • Broadband Consortium of the Pacific Coast Outcomes in Deployment • Continued meeting with stakeholders and municipalities online. In total, conducted 12 stakeholder advisory meetings. • Continued participation in the Southern California Digital Divide working group. Conducted municipal briefings. Developed the Santa Barbara County & local municipality's regional broadband strategy. • Focused on developing models for regional standards. While waiting for the process of CPUC rulemaking, sought to align municipalities to place a focus on last-mile, middle-mile, and areas of need. Distributed the best practices checklist to local municipalities. • Continued to provide stakeholders with ongoing status of funding timelines and opportunities, eligibility maps, and revised gap analysis. Assisted industry partners in pursuing projects within local municipal boundaries. • Placed a focus on leveraging middle-mile in Ventura County as a trigger to last-mile development. Also focused on using the Chumash efforts as a catalyst for the North Santa Barbara County Fiber Ring. • Assisted industry partners in pursuing CASF infrastructure projects within local municipal boundaries. Participated in developing CASF infrastructure applications, including the CASF Rural Digital Opportunity Fund (RDOF) kicker project, Frontier Communications, June 3, 2021 (e.g., Carpinteria, Gaviota, Goleta, Lompoc, Los Alamos, & Solvang), and Cuyama rural area project. • Supported project permitting activities. Created standards for permitting and deployment. Continued efforts to develop a regional geographic information system (GIS) platform for managing regional fiber assets. • Established a demonstration project for collaborative regional planning among municipalities, to focus on the joint development of middle-mile municipal networks and sharing of data to identify priority areas within communities. • Assisted Charter Communications with community outreach for speed testing. Distributed letters to Oxnard Pacific Mobile Estates residents and received feedback. • Central Coast Broadband Consortium Outcomes in Deployment • Conducted ongoing communications with internet service providers (ISPs), local governments, county offices of education, the Rural County Representatives of California (RCRC), Joint powers authorities (JPAs), and other nonprofits to discuss funding opportunities, as well as areas of need. • Met with seven ISPs multiple times, and 34 other groups including County Offices of Education, digital equity taskforces local governments, supervisors from all districts, school districts, state agencies, tech experts, transportation agencies, energy providers, etc. to identify projects and funding opportunities. • Identified 15 priority areas, including San Benito camp, San Juan Bautista, Watsonville-Hollister, Buena Vista, San Jerardo, Pajaro Valley USD, River Oaks, Bonny Doon, Davenport, Gonzales, 43 To assess Consortia Account benefits, CPUC Staff sent consortia grantees a data request on January 4, 2022, requesting outcomes of consortia deployment efforts in 2021. The account benefits listed in Attachment C are based on Consortia grantees reported information. 54 Monterey County/San Benito infill, Golden State in San Benito County, Golden State in Monterey County, City of Salinas, and City of Watsonville infill. • Conducted meetings with ISPs, local governments, the California Emerging Technology Fund (CETF), and Governor's office. Provided mapping data and guidance to relevant entities in the region. Analyzed funding streams for local agencies as well as ISPs. • Participate in developing six broadband infrastructure applications. One application for the San Jerardo Co-op project (i.e., through the CASF Line Extension Program (LEP)) was approved for funding. • Provided assistance to seven ISPs/agencies in three RDOF projects for bid (e.g., Surfnet, Etheric, and Golden State). Tracked changes to the CASF program to advise potential applicants about opportunities. Provided mapping and data analysis for all potential projects identified above. • Identified Federal funding sources and explored for 2022 projects and beyond. Provided comments to state regarding $6 billion investment in middle and last-mile infrastructure. Collaborated with Monterey and Santa Cruz counties to allocate the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding to last-mile projects. • Collaborated with agencies and ISPs, attended, and participated in the planning of the California Economic Summit in November, and convened a group of technical experts from across the state to develop plans regarding regional middle-mile routes. Provided mapping of data for uncovered communities and populations due to COVID-19 distance working and learning. • Performed ongoing interaction with CA Forward and CETF on statewide broadband coverage, maintained an ongoing dialogue with the California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) and Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) about conduit placement, participated in the California Economic Summit working group for broadband, and assembled the middle mile expert group to discuss regional needs. • Met with Salinas Valley five city groups to explore public broadband network development. • Connected Capital Area Broadband Consortium Outcomes in Deployment • Incorporated broadband improvement as priorities within regional economic, education, land use, transportation, and workforce development plans. Continuously provided local governments and service providers with information that promotes broadband deployment and access. • Partnered with CETF to produce the Getting Connected: A Broadband Deployment and Adoption Resource Guide. Partnered with Yuba County to create the Yuba County Strategic Master Broadband Plan. Prepared the Sutter Health Broadband Research Study for communities of concern. Maintained momentum behind the inclusion of broadband as a priority within the Greater Sacramento Region Prosperity Strategy. • Researched local zoning and permitting issues and proposed improvements to streamline broadband expansion. Participated in CalTrans workshops on permit processes to help improve the availability of data and consistency in processes to support broadband infrastructure deployment. • Worked with CPUC on the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) pilot to assure ground truth speed testing results were incorporated into Federal Communications CPUC (FCC) mapping. • Updated inventory, gaps, and priority geographies for unserved households in the region. • Continued referencing and enhancing the Strategic Broadband Corridors Report. Collaborated with the Sacramento Area Council of Governments to update local corridors and partnered with the state to ensure that relevant data was incorporated into state planning efforts throughout 2021. 55 • Identified and shared CASF and other resources available to prioritized geographies to support broadband infrastructure projects. Reissued a reverse request for proposal (RFP) process, among other approaches, to seek providers to develop projects in selected priority areas. • Provided outreach targeted to RDOF to encourage applications. Informed potential providers where targets could be and explored if the provider could be a good fit for the application. • Provided information on broadband infrastructure needs to state legislature and the Governor's Office to inform funding proposals. This included participating in the Assembly Speaker's workgroup with local governments, service providers, and CA Forward on local priorities. • Provided ongoing support to two applicants that were submitted in 2020 (e.g., Frontier and Digital Path). While CASF funding was not open for new applications in 2021, remained in contact with providers to raise awareness of gaps and opportunities so that they will be prepared when CASF funding is available again. • Actively and consistently promoted ground truth speed testing as a key activity for residents and advocates. Direction for conducting ground truth speed testing was included in monthly E-Connect e-Newsletters (i.e., distributed to 2,630 individuals). • Inland Empire Regional Broadband Consortium Outcomes in Deployment • Conducted 15 broadband planning consultations with counties of Riverside and San Bernardino and cities of Riverside, Beaumont, Cathedral City, Chino, Colton, Fontana, Joshua Tree, Moreno Valley, Rancho Cucamonga, Riverside, Palm Springs, Twentynine Palms, and Yucca Valley. • Participated in 18 regional stakeholder meetings to discuss strategy for unserved areas, improved broadband deployment, and potential CASF grants in the region. • Utilized CPUC broadband maps as relevant to the region. Updated the Inland Empire Broadband Plan to include additional unserved priority areas in need of broadband deployment with potential for CASF broadband infrastructure grant applications. • Identified priority unserved areas, including: (1) approximately 50 unserved mobile home parks in the Inland Empire; (2) Aguanga, Lake Mathews, Mecca, Ripley, Thermal, and Whitewater in Riverside County; and (3) Glen Helen, Morongo Basin, Mojave Desert Region, Searles Valley in San Bernardino County. • Identified 14 potential CASF broadband infrastructure projects for the next funding round. Worked with both Riverside and San Bernardino counties to determine the availability of leveraged funding to help potentially deploy broadband in unserved areas. • Provided input and information to stakeholders about broadband usage, demand, and unmet needs, especially in unserved areas and impacts identified from the COVID-19 pandemic. Provided information to stakeholders and ISPs about federal and state broadband programs. • Worked with ISPs, Riverside and San Bernardino counties, and regional agencies, including the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), in preparing items for public agencies to address with ISPs that could result in streamlined broadband permitting for cities, counties, CalTrans, and other responsible agencies, with emphasis on potential CASF grant application priority unserved areas in the region. • Assisted 11 ISPs by providing CASF broadband infrastructure grant information, discussing priority unserved areas in the region, and reviewing the CPUC Broadband Map to identify additional CASF eligible unserved areas in the region. 56 • Assisted one (1) ISP with five CASF broadband infrastructure applications: four CASF applications in San Bernardino County and one CASF application in Riverside County. Also assisted two ISPs with two potential CASF Line Extension Grant applications. • Worked with ISPs to keep them informed about the CASF grant program, including the CPUC rulemaking and updates to the program guidelines, as well as other applicable state and federal broadband grant opportunities that could assist them in providing broadband for unserved areas in Riverside and San Bernardino counties. • Supported permitting for two CASF broadband infrastructure grant projects. Provided information on improving broadband permitting and implementing dig-once policies. Updated the inventory of unserved mobile home parks for distribution to ISPs to aggregate demand for potential CASF grant applications. • Publicized and participated in the CPUC wireline testing survey project led by California State Chico. Provided stakeholders with CalSpeed home broadband study outreach materials. • Los Angeles Digital Equity Action League Consortium Outcomes in Deployment • Identified and reached out to potential members representing county systems, as well as geographic sub-regions of Los Angeles County, interested in closing the digital divide. • Convened the first stewardship committee meeting and set dates for future stewardship bi-monthly meetings. Developed a draft of the group's proposed guiding principles. • Conducted five task force meetings with between 20-40 stakeholders each meeting. Addressed permitting issues in an infrastructure task force meeting. • Worked with Los Angeles County’s broadband advisory task force and met regularly with the county chief information officer (CIO) to help inform and advance the development of the county's priority areas. • Facilitated connections between Los Angeles City, Los Angeles County, Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), and the Corporation for Education Network Initiatives in California (CENIC) team around opportunities to use light pole structures to expand infrastructure for last-mile projects. • Developed a gap analysis of broadband availability. The next step is to overlay that map with an asset map. • North Bay North Coast Broadband Consortium Outcomes in Deployment • Maintained the involvement and commitment of communities and stakeholders through written updates and progress reports. • Developed an implementation project plan for the following communities: Piercy, Leggett, Branscomb, Westport, Cleone, Fort Bragg, Caspar, Mendocino, Little River, Albion, Elk, Manchester, Point Arena, Anchor Bay, Gualala, Comptche, Philo/Navarro, Boonville, and Yorkville. • Worked with communities and other stakeholders to identify, assess, and document unmet broadband needs and demands based on the latest CPUC availability data and maps. • Identified and assessed capabilities of ISPs willing to take on a project and match them to priority projects. Assisted CASF infrastructure applicants in the project development process. • Developed a broadband action plan based on the assessment completed previously to identify and apply for CASF grant funding to deploy broadband in priority areas and implemented an action plan using future grant funding. 57 • Completed an initial draft of the road map and action plan, including identification of potential grant opportunities. Held first meeting with over 25 partners to gather broadband requirements from county businesses, health sector agencies, and other local government sectors. • Continued to develop a municipal broadband business plan that will identify infrastructure projects and other opportunities (i.e., leverage funding, collaborating with other stakeholders). • Conducted an analysis of permitting requirements for broadband construction projects to identify issues raised by providers, potential inefficiencies impeding broadband deployment, and how to streamline permitting for broadband infrastructure projects. • Conducted an inventory of public assets and aggregate demand. Completed creating a database of county assets that will be utilized for broadband deployment. • Supported CalSpeed testing and received 1,002 speed tests in 2021. The results will identify unserved communities near publicly available assets and support the infrastructure design process for grant applications. • Northeastern California Connect Consortium and Upstate California Connect Consortium Outcomes in Deployment • Hosted a Spring Annual Summit containing broadband content on April 15, 2021. Hosted the third Annual Broadband Summit for the North State on July 29, 2021. Convened the ISP Roundtable meeting on October 21, 2021. • Disseminated information about California Governor’s infrastructure investment assembly bill (AB) 156. Promoted the Emergency BB Benefit Program. Announced the State's 18-project sites for the open-access middle-mile network. Distributed information regarding the formation of the Golden State Connect Authority (GSCA). Promoted CA Forward's webinar "Federal Infrastructure Funds for CA: Broadband and Beyond”. • Disseminated a press release to North State leaders announcing the completion of master broadband plans for the communities of Alturas (Modoc County), Chester (Plumas County), Corning, Red Bluff (Tehama County), and Susanville (Lassen County). • Made presentations to Benton Institute, CA Forward, and Broadband for All workgroup. • Coordinated with regional tribes for broadband expansion. • Worked with county leadership in Butte, Siskiyou, Lassen, Modoc, Tehama, Colusa, Glenn, and Lake, and ISPs to identify new areas for possible deployment. • Met/held conference calls with supervisors and staff of counties of Butte, Lassen, Modoc, Plumas, Siskiyou, Tehama, Colusa, Glenn and Lake, and council members and/or staff of towns/cities of Chico, Paradise, Redding, Dunsmuir, Mount Shasta, Weed, and Yreka to discuss broadband efforts including CASF infrastructure grant projects, implementing policies to support broadband deployment, and broadband service/speed validation, among other broadband related topics. • Worked with county leadership and ISPs to identify new areas for possible deployment. Conducted continuous assessment based on current and future deployments. Introduced ISPs to new areas where they have not worked previously. Provided supporting economic and demographic data for local ISPs for CASF funding applications. • Followed up on the CPUC review of the three CASF project applications and assisted applicants through this process. Assisted ISPs with previously submitted applications and updated data, letters of support, and other requests for resubmittal for further consideration for CASF funding. Monitored CASF funds, budget-related items, and resubmittal process information, and provided information to ISPs and regional partners. 58 • Updated county priority areas based on the most current CPUC California Broadband Mapping data. Created an ArcGIS online map for the region for comparison of unserved areas versus the Broadband for All draft network proposal. Created CASF and United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) eligibility maps for the region using December 2020 data. Created a map of the City of Bigg with 25/3 served status, power pole locations, and middle mile. Developed a model to assess the direct impact of broadband (25/3) on median household income, poverty, educational attainment, and other indicators. • Communicated with city, county, and statewide elected officials informing them about the recent order released by the FCC that creates the eligibility criteria and other important rules for the Emergency Broadband Benefit. • Communicated with the North State leadership and ISPs regarding broadband funding: U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA), NTIA, USDA, and the California Governor's 21- 22 budget. • Continued outreach about the CASF application process and rules, maps of eligible areas, along with other relevant data/information that assisted ISPs to carry out business assessments for potential project applications. • Continued working with important broadband stakeholders such as CPUC, CETF, California Telehealth Network (CTN), CalTrans, RCRC, California Broadband Council (CBC), CA Forward, CENIC, and economic development organizations and chambers of commerce across the consortium region. • Continued working with the department of education, health agencies, county and city, non-profit leadership to prepare for private/public partnerships for CASF applications. • Continued the CalSpeed outreach. Developed social media campaign to promote CalSpeed testing and home study. Facilitated volunteer sign-ups. Marketed through public official monthly outreach quarterly newsletters and website. • Tahoe Basin Project Outcomes in Deployment • Facilitated and coordinated with the City of South Lake Tahoe and Placer County to revise Policy J- 4 to meet their new jurisdictional needs and adopt a dig once policy. Met with all jurisdictions and key stakeholders in the region to identify connectivity gaps and how to improve connectivity policies, and opportunity areas. • Established a basin-wide Broadband Committee to convene all jurisdictions and key stakeholders. • Worked with a GIS contractor to update maps for each jurisdiction for wireline, cellular, speed test, and public works project data. Completed maps and proposed projects for three jurisdictions. Involved with planning efforts for the other two jurisdictions. • Developed and conducted a basin-wide campaign to collect feedback on connectivity issues and gather speed test data. Maintained contact with residents and gathered feedback. Assisted a jurisdiction with survey configuration for their broadband action team. • Continued to work with providers to improve speeds, reliability, and capacity of broadband infrastructure. Met with ISPs to discuss funding availability and buildout potential. • Facilitated and coordinated conversations with the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA), United States Forest Service (USFS), and local jurisdictions about adding innovative technology options, and discussed permitting efforts, connectivity gaps, and construction on public lands. • Developed and implemented cost-effective strategies for broadband deployment based on the available infrastructure and geographic barriers. Continued to collect and map data to develop 59 build-out plans with local jurisdictions. Provided proposed projects to El Dorado County, Placer County, and the City of South Lake Tahoe and continued to work in collaboration with other jurisdictions to develop projects. • Worked with ISPs to develop projects and grant applications and assisted in identifying match funding. • Conducted an inventory of public assets and dig once opportunity projects. Mapped potential projects for broadband expansion and opportunities to share with potential CASF grant applicants, where feasible. • Engaged stakeholders, businesses, and public agencies to better understand and explain broadband needs and opportunities. Planed a basin-wide outreach campaign in September to better understand broadband needs of residents, visitors, and businesses. • Publicized and advertised wireline testing via social network channels and local publications. Collected and analyzed all data gathered by volunteers and staff and made wireline results available to assist local ISPs in decision making. 60 Attachment D: Consortia Account Projects as of December 31, 2021 Grants Approved in 2011, 2016, and 2019 Cycles44 3rd Resolution, 1st Approved Resolution, 2nd Approved Resolution, Approval; Approved Approval; CONSORTIUM Grants Approval; Grants (Completion Grants (Completion (2011-2013) (Completion Date) (2016) Date/Expected) (2019) Date/Expected) T-17355, California’s One Million 1 $450,000 2/16/2012; - - - - New Internet User Coalition (Feb 2014) T-17445, T-17669, Broadband Consortium of T-17550, 1/19/2017 2 $300,000 6/12/2014; $251,500 $450,000 10/24/2019 the Pacific Coast (May 2019) (June 2016) (Oct 2022) T-17349, T-17669, Central Coast Broadband T-17529, 8/18/2016 3 $450,000 12/2/2011; $274,500 $450,000 10/24/2019 Consortium (Sep 2021) (Dec 2013) (Oct 2022) T-17355, Central Sierra Connect T-17544, 12/1/2016 4 $450,000 2/16/2012; $249,000 - - Consortium (Dec 2020) (Feb 2014) T-17355, T-17669, Connected Capital Area T-17538, 11/10/2016 5 $448,301 2/16/2012; $298,750 $438,560 10/24/2019 Broadband Consortium (Dec2018) (Feb 2014) (Oct 2022) T-17349, East Bay Broadband T-17529, 8/18/2016 6 $450,000 12/2/2011; $292,680 - - Consortium (Sep 2019) (Dec 2013) T-17355, Eastern Sierra Connect T-17550, 1/19/2017 7 $450,000 2/16/2012; $126,700 - - Consortium (Feb 2019) (Feb 2014) T-17355, T-17669, Gold Country Broadband T-17538, 11/10/2016 8 $450,000 2/16/2012; $300,000 $423,010 10/24/2019 Consortium (May2019) (Feb 2014) (Oct 2022) T-17355, T-17669, Inland Empire Broadband T-17538, 11/10/2016 9 $450,000 2/16/2012; $300,000 $450,000 10/24/2019 Consortium (Dec2018) (Feb 2014) (Oct 2022) Inyo-Mono Broadband T-17537, 10/27/2016 10 - - $105,216 - - Consortium (Jun 2019) Los Angeles County T-17349, T-17544, 12/1/2016 11 Regional Broadband $2,310,000 12/2/2011; $600,000 - - (Jun 2018) Consortium (Dec 2013) T-17445, T-17669, North Bay/North Coast 6/12/2014; T-17544, 12/1/2016 10/24/2019 12 Broadband Consortium $250,000 (June 2016) $260,000 (Jan 2019) $450,000 (Dec 2022) T-17349, T-17669, Northeast California T-17550, 1/19/2017 13 $449,991 12/2/2011; $296,518 $355,387 10/24/2019 Connects Consortium (Jun 2020) (Dec 2013) (Oct 2022) T-17349, T-17669, Redwood Coast Connect T-17537, 10/27/2016 14 $450,000 12/2/2011; $208,000 $416,025 10/24/2019 Consortium (Nov2019) (Dec 2013) (Oct 2022) T-17355, San Diego Imperial Regional 15 $450,000 2/16/2012; - - - - Broadband Consortium (Feb 2014) T-17349, San Joaquin Valley Regional T-17537, 10/27/2016 16 $450,000 12/2/2011; $180,000 - - Broadband Consortium (Nov2019) (Dec 2013) Southern Border Broadband T-17561, 4/6/2017 17 - - $450,000 - - Consortium (May 2020) T-17440, T-17529, 8/18/2016 18 Tahoe Basin Projects $167,000 5/15/2014; $200,000 - - (Jan 2019) (May 2016) T-17349, T-17669, Upstate California Connect T-17550, 1/19/2017 19 $448,184 12/2/2011; $274,680 $318,530 10/24/2019 Consortium (Jun 2020) (Dec 2013) (Dec 2022) Total $8,873,476 $4,667,484 $3,751,512 footnote: 2011 cycle Consortia grants are complete. The status of 2016 and 2019 cycle Consortia grants are show on the following pages. 44 2011 cycle Consortia grants are complete. The status of 2016 and 2019 cycle Consortia grants are show on the following pages. 61 Status of 2016 Cycle Grants as of December 2021 START END APPROVED REMAINING CONSORTIUM COUNTIES EXTENSION DATE DATE BUDGET BUDGET Broadband Consortium San Luis Obispo, Santa 1 2/19/17 2/19/19 5/1/19 $251,500 $316 of the Pacific Coast Barbara, Ventura Central Coast Broadband Monterey, Santa Cruz, 2 9/18/16 9/8/21 $274,500 $31,789 Consortium San Benito Amador, Calaveras, Central Sierra Connect 3 Tuolumne, Mariposa, 1/1/17 1/1/20 12/31/20 $249,000 $0 Broadband Consortium Western Alpine Connected Capital Area Sacramento, Sutter, 4 12/10/16 12/10/18 $298,750 $652 Broadband Consortium Yolo, Yuba East Bay Broadband Alameda, Contra Costa, 5 9/18/16 9/18/19 $292,680 $30,189 Consortium Solano Eastern Sierra Connect 6 Regional Broadband Eastern Kern 2/19/17 2/19/19 $126,700 $61,187 Consortium Sierra, Nevada, Placer, El Gold Country Broadband 7 Dorado, Eastern 12/10/16 12/10/18 5/1/19 $300,000 $0 Consortium Alpine San Bernardino, Inland Empire Regional 8 Riverside 12/10/16 12/10/18 $300,000 $0 Broadband Consortium Inyo Mono Broadband 9 Mono, Inyo 11/27/16 11/27/18 6/30/19 $105,216 $51,939 Consortium Los Angeles County Five sub-regions of Los 10 Regional Broadband Angeles 1/1/17 1/1/18 6/30/18 $600,000 $5,456 Consortium North Bay/North Coast Mendocino, Marin, 11 1/1/17 1/1/19 $260,000 $4,276 Broadband Consortium Napa, Sonoma Butte, Lassen, Modoc, Northeast California 12 Plumas, Shasta, 2/19/17 2/19/19 6/30/20 $296,518 $0 Connect Consortium Siskiyou, Tehama Redwood Coast Connect Humboldt, Del Norte, 13 11/27/16 11/27/18 11/30/19 $208,000 $18,353 Broadband Consortium Trinity San Joaquin, Stanislaus, San Joaquin Valley 14 Merced, Madera, Fresno, 11/27/16 11/27/19 $180,000 $119,669 Regional Broadband Kings, Tulare, Consortium Western Kern Southern Border 15 San Diego, Imperial 5/6/17 5/6/20 $450,000 $340,631 Broadband Consortium 16 Tahoe Basin Project Lake Tahoe Basin 9/18/16 9/18/18 1/1/19 $200,000 $6,856 Upstate California 17 Glenn, Colusa, Lake 2/19/17 2/19/19 6/30/20 $274,620 $0 Connect Consortium Total $4,667,484 $671,313 62 Status of 2019 Cycle Grants as of December 2021 PROJECT START END APPROVED REMAINING CONSORTIUM COUNTIES NAME DATE DATE BUDGET BUDGET Broadband San Luis Obispo, Developing the 4th 1 Consortium of the Santa Barbara, 11/1/2019 10/31/2022 $450,000 $211,808 Utility Pacific Coast Ventura Counties Central Coast Monterey, Santa Connected Central Coast 2 Broadband Cruz, San Benito 11/1/2019 10/31/2022 $450,000 $381,850 Phase III Consortium Counties Capital Area Connected Capital Sacramento, Sutter, 3 Broadband Consortium 11/1/2019 10/31/2022 $438,560 $162,751 Area Broadband Yolo, Yuba Counties 2019- Consortium 2022 Gold Country Sierra, Nevada, Gold Country 4 Broadband Placer, El 11/1/2019 10/31/2022 $423,010 $289,010 Broadband Consortium Dorado, Alpine Consortium Project Counties Inland Empire Inland Empire San Bernardino, 5 Regional Broadband Broadband Riverside 11/1/2019 10/31/2022 $450,000 $150,001 Consortium Implementation Counties North Bay/North Mendocino, Marin, Project 100/20 by 2025 6 Coast Broadband Napa, Sonoma 11/1/2020 10/31/2022 $450,000 $201,791 Consortium Counties Reducing the Digital Butte, Lassen, Northeast California 7 Divide in Modoc, Plumas, 7/1/2020 12/31/2022 $355,387 $334,858 Connect Consortium Northeastern Shasta, Siskiyou, California Tehama Counties Redwood Coast Redwood Coast Humboldt, Del 8 Connect 11/1/2019 10/31/2022 $416,025 $410,131 Connect Broadband Norte, Trinity Deployment Consortium Counties Support Upstate California Reducing the Digital Glenn, Colusa, Lake 9 Connect Divide in Upstate 7/1/2020 12/31/2022 $318,530 $301,719 counties Consortium California Total $3,751,512 $2,443,919 Awards Approved under CPUC Resolutions T-17708, T-17726, and T-17738 PROJECT GEOGRAPHIC START END APPROVED REMAINING CONSORTIUM NAME AREA DATE DATE BUDGET BUDGET San Joaquin Valley San Joaquin Valley San Joaquin, Regional Broadband Regional Broadband Stanislaus, Merced, 1 Consortium Consortium Madera, Fresno, 11/1/2020 12/31/2022 $450,000 $450,000 Project Tulare, Kings, and Western Kern Southern Border Southern Border San Diego and 2 Broadband Broadband Imperial 11/1/2020 12/31/2022 $450,000 $450,000 Consortium Consortium Project Tahoe Basin Project Connected Tahoe Lake Tahoe Basin 3 4/15/2021 12/31/2022 $237,555 $197.413 Project Area 4 Los Angeles Advancing Los Angeles 9/1/2021 12/31/2022 $300,000 $300,000 Digital Equity Equitable Action League Broadband Consortium Deployment Project Total $1,437,555 $1,397,413 63 Attachment E: Adoption Account Projects as of December, 2021 Completion Payments in Award Recipient Project Location Grant Amount Total Paid Date or 2021 Date Expected 1 Boys & Girls Club of San Computer Lab Reinvestment San Marcos $ 38,718 6/3/2021 12/3/2023 Marcos Burbank Housing Senior Connection Initiative - Bell 2 Windsor $ 14,867 6/3/2021 12/3/2023 Management Corporation Manor Sr. Apartments. 3 Burbank Housing Senior Connection Initiative - Sonoma $ 3,664 6/3/2021 12/3/2023 Management Corporation Cabernet Sr. Apartments Burbank Housing Senior Connection Initiative - 4 Cotati $ 9,155 6/3/2021 12/3/2023 Management Corporation Charles Street Village 5 Burbank Housing Senior Connection Initiative - Fitch Healdsburg $ 12,266 6/3/2021 12/3/2023 Management Corporation Mt. Sr. Apartments. Burbank Housing Senior Connection Initiative - Oak 6 Sonoma $ 6,415 6/3/2021 12/3/2023 Management Corporation Ridge Sr. Apartments 7 Burbank Housing Senior Connection Initiative - Park Healdsburg $ 5,041 6/3/2021 12/3/2023 Management Corporation Land Sr. Apartments Burbank Housing Senior Connection Initiative - 8 Sonoma $ 6,415 6/3/2021 12/3/2023 Management Corporation Sonoma Creek Sr. Apartments 9 Burbank Housing Senior Connection Initiative - Sonoma $ 6,904 6/3/2021 12/3/2023 Management Corporation Village Green Sr. Apartments Burbank Housing Senior Connection Initiative - 10 Windsor $ 10,965 6/3/2021 12/3/2023 Management Corporation Vinecrest Sr. Apartments. 11 California Department of Mitigation efforts against COVID- $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 5/7/2020 12/31/2020 Education 19 California State University, Fresno State Call Center: Central 12 15 counties see list below $ 487,500 $ 275,265 $ 275,265 9/12/2019 3/12/2023 Fresno Foundation California Region 13 California State University, Fresno State Parent University - Caruthers, Huron, Kerman, $ 54,480 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 Fresno Foundation FRESNO COUNTY Riverdale, Raisin City, Laton Biola, Del Rey, Firebaugh, California State University, Fresno State Parent University - 14 Mendota, Parlier, San Joaquin $ 71,516 $ 302 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 Fresno Foundation FRESNO COUNTY and Sanger 15 California State University, Fresno State Parent University - G Te o h ld ac e h n a H pi i , l l T s, a G ft, r e M en o a ja c v r e e , s , $ 54,480 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 Fresno Foundation KERN COUNTY McFarland Arvin, California City, Lamont, California State University, Fresno State Parent University - 16 Lost Hills, McFarland, $ 71,516 $ 230 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 Fresno Foundation KERN COUNTY Rosamond, Shafter, and Taft Armona, Avenal, Corcoran, California State University, Fresno State Parent University - Grangeville, Home Garden, 17 $ 71,516 $ 20,695 $ 20,988 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 Fresno Foundation KINGS COUNTY Kettleman City, Lemoore, and Stratford Armona, Avenal, Corcoran, California State University, Fresno State Parent University - Grangeville, Home Garden, 18 $ 54,480 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 Fresno Foundation KINGS COUNTY Kettleman City, Lemoore, and Stratford Anwahnee, Chowchilla, 19 California State University, Fresno State Parent University - Coarsegold, Fairmead, Madera $ 71,516 $ 329 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 Fresno Foundation MADERA COUNTY Acres, Madera Ranchos, Oakhurst, and Parksdale Bass Lake, Nipinnawasee, Park California State University, Fresno State Parent University - 20 Wood, Rollings Hill, Yosemite $ 54,480 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 Fresno Foundation MADERA COUNTY Lakes, Madera County 21 California State University, Fresno State Parent University - S E o a n st o S ra o , n C o e r d a, a r G R ro id v g e e la , n C d o , lumbia, $ 54,480 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 Fresno Foundation MARIPOSA COUNTY Jamestown Ballico, Delhi, Dos Palos, California State University, Fresno State Parent University - 22 Gustine, Livingston, Planada, $ 71,516 $ 266 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 Fresno Foundation MERCED COUNTY South Dos Palos, and Winton 23 California State University, Fresno State Parent University - Atwater, Livingston, Los Banos, $ 54,480 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 Fresno Foundation MERCED COUNTY Le Grand, Snelling, Santa Nella Castroville, Gonzales, Soledad, California State University, Fresno State Parent University - 24 Greenfield, King City, Las $ 54,480 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 Fresno Foundation MONTEREY COUNTY Lomas 25 California State University, Fresno State Parent University - S A a r n o m Ju a a s n , R B i a c u h t m ist a a r , k H , T o r ll e i s s t P er in , os, $ 54,480 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 Fresno Foundation SAN BENITO COUNTY San Benito County August, Country Club, Escalon, California State University, Fresno State Parent University - French Camp, Garden Acres, 26 $ 71,516 $ 295 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 Fresno Foundation SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY Kennedy, Lincoln Village, and Lockeford 27 California State University, Fresno State Parent University - Lathrop, Lodi, Manteca, $ 54,480 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 Fresno Foundation SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY Stockton, Collierville, Dostown Arroyo Grande, Nipomo, San California State University, Fresno State Parent University - 28 Miguel, Templeton, Shandon, $ 54,480 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 Fresno Foundation SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY Pismo Beach Bret Harte, Bystrom, Hughson, 29 California State University, Fresno State Parent University - Keyes, Newman, Shackelford, $ 71,516 $ 293 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 Fresno Foundation STANISLAUS COUNTY Waterford, and West Modesto 64 Completion Payments in Award Recipient Project Location Grant Amount Total Paid Date or 2021 Date Expected California State University, Fresno State Parent University - Ceres, Oakdale, Patterson, 30 $ 54,480 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 Fresno Foundation STANISLAUS COUNTY Riverbank, Turlock, Grayson 31 California State University, Fresno State Parent University - Dinuba, Lindsay, Tulare, Visalia, $ 54,480 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 Fresno Foundation TULARE COUNTY Woodlake, Cutler Earlimart, Exeter, Farmersville, California State University, Fresno State Parent University - 32 Goshen, Orosi, Pixley, Terra $ 71,516 $ 266 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 Fresno Foundation TULARE COUNTY Bella, Tiption 33 California State University, Fresno State Parent University - B V e a a ll r e y V , a E ll l e P y, o B rt o a o l, t M jac id k, p C in a e t s h , eys $ 54,480 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 Fresno Foundation TUOLUMNE COUNTY Mono Vista Catholic Charities of Los 34 Digital Education Center Canoga Park $ 83,248 $ 36,455 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 Angeles, Inc. Center for Elders' 35 Digital Equity for Seniors-Berkeley Berkeley $ 35,817 $ 5,973 $ 14,928 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 Independence Center for Elders' 36 Digital Equity for Seniors-Concord Concord $ 31,731 $ 7,933 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 Independence 37 Center for Elders' Digital Equity for Seniors-Guardian El Sobrante $ 26,964 $ 6,741 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 Independence Center for Elders' Digital Equity for Seniors-Josie 38 Oakland $ 28,326 $ 7,182 $ 14,264 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 Independence Barrow Center for Elders' Digital Equity for Seniors-San 39 San Leandro $ 31,731 $ 6,987 $ 14,920 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 Independence Leandro Center for Elders' $ 40 Digital Equity for Seniors-San Pablo Oakland $ 35,137 $ 8,384 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 Independence 17,168 41 Christian Church Homes Beth Eden Housing Oakland $ 16,034 12/31/2019 6/30/2023 (CCH) Christian Church Homes 42 Garfield Park Village Santa Cruz $ 26,086 $ 5,479 $ 5,479 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 (CCH) 43 Christian Church Homes JL Richard & Irene Cooper Terrace Oakland $ 28,383 12/31/2019 6/30/2023 (CCH) Christian Church Homes Percy Abrams & Sister Thea 44 Emeryville $ 25,971 12/31/2019 6/30/2023 (CCH) Bowman Manor Christian Church Homes 45 Plaza De Las Flores Sunnyvale $ 32,100 $ 5,479 $ 5,479 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 (CCH) Christian Church Homes 46 Providence Senior Housing San Francisco $ 17,297 $ 2,387 $ 2,387 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 (CCH) Christian Church Homes 47 Roy C Nichols Housing Oakland $ 4,650 $ 965 $ 965 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 (CCH) Christian Church Homes 48 Saint Mary's Garden Oakland $ 29,603 $ 5,479 $ 5,479 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 (CCH) Christian Church Homes 49 Southlake Oakland $ 34,824 $ 5,479 $ 5,479 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 (CCH) Cerritos Library Broadband Access 50 City of Cerritos Cerritos $ 9,563 $ 6,216 $ 8,607 12/31/2019 6/30/2023 Improvement 51 City Of Oakland Human East Oakland Seniors Digital Oakland $ 20,373 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 Services Department Inclusion City Of Oakland Human West Oakland Seniors Digital 52 Oakland $ 20,373 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 Services Department Inclusion 53 City of Palmdale In Library Laptop Check Out Palmdale $ 17,800 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 City of Salinas, Salinas 54 El Gabilan Library Connects! Salinas $ 50,783 $ 12,696 $ 12,696 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 Public Library 55 City of San Leandro San Leandro Main Library Digital San Leandro $ 27,165 6/3/2021 12/3/2023 Inclusion Program San Leandro Manor Branch Library 56 City of San Leandro San Leandro $ 22,551 6/3/2021 12/3/2023 Digital Inclusion Program South San Francisco Digital Literacy 57 City of South San Francisco South San Francisco $ 41,895 $ 8,740 $ 8,740 5/11/2020 11/11/2023 Project Latino Digital Literacy-Bishop 58 City of Sunnyvale Sunnyvale $ 58,033 $ 19,800 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 Elementary School 59 City of Sunnyvale Latino Digital Literacy-Columbia Sunnyvale $ 58,033 $ 19,637 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 Middle School Latino Digital Literacy-Ellis 60 City of Sunnyvale Sunnyvale $ 40,657 $ 14,776 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 Elementary School 61 City of Sunnyvale Latino Digital Literacy-Lakewood Sunnyvale $ 40,657 $ 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 Elementary School 12,164 Latino Digital Literacy-San Miguel 62 City of Sunnyvale Sunnyvale $ 58,033 $ 20,450 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 Elementary School 63 City of Sunnyvale Latino Digital Literacy-Vargas Sunnyvale $ 58,033 $ 19,475 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 Elementary School COACHELLA VALLEY Computer Literacy & Technology 64 Indio $ 7,059 12/31/2019 6/30/2023 HOUSING COALTION Training - Pueblo Nuevo 65 COACHELLA VALLEY Computer Literacy & Technology Indio $ 10,629 12/31/2019 6/30/2023 HOUSING COALTION Training - Vila Hermosa 65 Completion Payments in Award Recipient Project Location Grant Amount Total Paid Date or 2021 Date Expected 66 Community Bridges Bridging the Digital Divide Watsonville $ 32,174 $ 20,924 $ 27,941 7/12/2019 12/4/2020 67 Community Housing Hotel Essex: Digital Literacy in San Francisco $ 14,180 7/3/2020 1/3/2024 Partnership Supportive Housing Community Housing The Civic Center Hotel: Digital 68 San Francisco $ 25,555 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 Partnership Literacy in Emergency Shelter 69 Community Housing The Senator Hotel: Digital Literacy San Francisco $ 14,180 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 Partnership in Supportive Housing 70 Compass Family Services Compass Family Digital Inclusion San Francisco $ 27,909 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 71 Contra Costa County El Sobrante Library Reconstruction El Sobrante $ 27,588 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 Library-El Sobrante Library County of Sonoma - Human Bridging the Digital Gap Among 72 Services Department - West Guerneville $ 25,027 6/3/2021 12/3/2023 Older Adults - Guerneville County Community Services 73 Curry Senior Center Connected At Home San Francisco $ 29,935 $ 10,606 $ 17,106 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 Delivering Innovation in DISH Supportive Housing Digital 74 Supportive Housing San Francisco $ 17,228 9/11/2020 3/11/2024 Literacy Program-Camelot (DISH), a Project of Tides Delivering Innovation in DISH Supportive Housing Digital 75 Supportive Housing San Francisco $ 17,228 $ 4,307 $ 4,307 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 Literacy Program-Star (DISH), a Project of Tides 76 EAH Inc. 100 Kings Circle-Cloverdale Cloverdale $ 24,505 6/3/2021 12/3/2023 77 EAH Inc. 100 Ned's Way-Tiburon Tiburon $ 18,850 10/21/2021 4/21/2024 78 EAH Inc. 1535 W. San Carlos Street-San Jose San Jose $ 24,505 6/3/2021 12/3/2023 79 EAH Inc. 16170 Monterey Road-Morgan Hill Morgan Hill $ 14,626 8/6/2021 2/6/2024 80 EAH Inc. 164 N San Pedro Road-San Rafael San Rafael $ 22,620 6/3/2021 12/3/2023 81 EAH Inc. 1777 Newbury Drive-San Jose San Jose $ 24,505 6/3/2021 12/3/2023 82 EAH Inc. 235 E. Dunne Avenue-Morgan Hill Morgan Hill $ 14,703 6/3/2021 12/3/2023 83 EAH Inc. 355 Race Street-San Jose San Jose $ 24,505 6/3/2021 12/3/2023 84 EAH Inc. 37 Miwok Way-Mill Valley Mill Valley $ 18,850 10/21/2021 4/21/2024 85 EAH Inc. 600 A Street P.O. Box 1055-Pt. Pt. Reyes Station $ 9,048 6/3/2021 12/3/2023 Reyes Station 86 EAH Inc. 605 Willow Road-Menlo Park Menlo Park $ 22,243 10/21/2021 4/21/2024 87 EAH Inc. 638 21st Street -Oakland Oakland $ 18,773 8/6/2021 2/6/2024 88 EAH Inc. 990 College Ave.-St. Helena St. Helena $ 24,505 6/3/2021 12/3/2023 89 EAH Inc. Estrella Vista Emeryville $ 24,505 $ 4,861 $ 4,861 9/11/2020 3/11/2024 90 EAH Inc. Fellowship Plaza Saratoga $ 24,505 $ 2,723 $ 2,723 9/11/2020 3/11/2024 91 EAH Inc. Mackey Terrace Novato $ 18,850 $ 2,127 $ 2,127 9/11/2020 3/11/2024 92 EAH Inc. Markham Plaza I San Jose $ 24,505 $ 2,723 $ 2,723 9/11/2020 3/11/2024 93 EAH Inc. Markham Plaza II San Jose $ 24,505 $ 2,723 $ 2,723 9/11/2020 3/11/2024 94 Eden Housing, Inc. Alta Mira Family Hayward $ 27,619 $ 5,519 $ 5,519 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 95 Eden Housing, Inc. Ashland Village San Leandro $ 31,419 $ 5,482 $ 5,482 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 96 Eden Housing, Inc. Cambrian Center San Jose $ 34,143 $ 7,280 $ 7,280 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 97 Eden Housing, Inc. East Bluff Pinole $ 30,965 $ 6,980 $ 6,980 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 98 Eden Housing, Inc. Eden Issei Terrace Hayward $ 25,023 $ 5,254 $ 5,254 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 99 Eden Housing, Inc. Eden Lodge San Leandro $ 32,554 $ 5,516 $ 5,516 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 100 Eden Housing, Inc. Eden Palms San Jose $ 48,217 $ 5,520 $ 5,520 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 101 Eden Housing, Inc. Estabrook Place San Leandro $ 17,933 $ 4,483 $ 4,483 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 102 Eden Housing, Inc. Ford Road Plaza San Jose $ 29,376 $ 5,519 $ 5,519 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 103 Eden Housing, Inc. Rivertown Place Antioch $ 25,732 $ 6,104 $ 6,104 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 104 Eden Housing, Inc. Virginia Lane Concord $ 30,057 $ 6,825 $ 6,825 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 105 Empowering Success Now Bilingual Digital Literacy Fontana $ 78,397 $ 19,599 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 66 Completion Payments in Award Recipient Project Location Grant Amount Total Paid Date or 2021 Date Expected EngAGE, Inc. (formerly EngAGE in Digital Literacy - 106 More than Shelter for San Clemente $ 11,608 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 Cotton's Point Senior Apartments Seniors) 107 E M n o g r A e G th E an , I S n h c e . l ( te fo r r f m or e rly EngAGE in Digital Literacy - Pomona $ 12,372 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 Olivera Senior Apartments Seniors) EngAGE, Inc. (formerly 108 More than Shelter for EngAGE in Technology Los Angeles $ 15,272 9/11/2020 3/11/2024 Seniors) 109 E M n o g r A e G th E an , I S n h c e . l ( te fo r r f m or e rly EngAGE in Technology Compton $ 14,889 9/11/2020 3/11/2024 Seniors) Episcopal Community 1180 4th Street: Digital Literacy in 110 San Francisco $ 14,180 $ 1,570 $ 1,570 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 Services of San Francisco Supportive Housing Episcopal Community Auburn and Minna-Lee: Digital 111 San Francisco $ 10,635 $ 2,659 $ 2,659 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 Services of San Francisco Literacy in Supportive Housing Episcopal Community The Alder: Digital Literacy in 112 San Francisco $ 15,953 $ 3,264 $ 3,264 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 Services of San Francisco Supportive Housing Episcopal Community The Crosby: Digital Literacy in 113 San Francisco $ 17,725 $ 1,200 $ 1,200 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 Services of San Francisco Supportive Housing Episcopal Community The Elm: Digital Literacy in 114 San Francisco $ 10,635 $ 1,312 $ 1,312 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 Services of San Francisco Supportive Housing Episcopal Community The Henry: Digital Literacy in 115 San Francisco $ 14,180 $ 2,127 $ 2,127 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 Services of San Francisco Supportive Housing Episcopal Community The Mentone: Digital Literacy in 116 San Francisco $ 14,180 $ 1,562 $ 1,562 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 Services of San Francisco Supportive Housing Episcopal Community The Rose and Hillsdale: Digital 117 San Francisco $ 7,090 $ 1,773 $ 1,773 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 Services of San Francisco Literacy in Supportive Housing 118 EveryoneOn Opportunity Connect Los Angeles $ 33,615 9/11/2020 3/11/2024 119 EveryoneOn Opportunity Connect San Jose $ 33,615 9/11/2020 3/11/2024 120 EveryoneOn Opportunity Connect San Buenventura $ 28,936 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 121 EveryoneOn Opportunity Connect Los Angeles $ 32,154 6/3/2021 12/3/2023 122 EveryoneOn Opportunity Connection Stockton $ 32,888 12/31/2019 6/30/2023 123 Exeter Unified School Community Learning Center Exeter $ 46,759 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 District Felton Institute dba Family Expanding Digital Literacy for the 124 Service Agency of San San Francisco $ 71,764 6/3/2021 12/3/2023 Aging Francisco Felton Institute dba Family The Tech Squad: Connecting Our 125 Service Agency of San San Francisco $ 99,715 $ 24,786 $ 24,786 10/19/2020 4/19/2023 Disconnected Seniors Francisco 126 First Community Housing Access for All - Campbell Campbell $ 25,233 12/31/2019 6/30/2023 127 First Community Housing Access for All - Morgan Hill Morgan Hill $ 27,503 12/31/2019 6/30/2023 128 First Community Housing Access for All - Mountain View Mountain View $ 9,019 12/31/2019 6/30/2023 129 First Community Housing Access for All - Redwood City Redwood City $ 17,969 12/31/2019 6/30/2023 130 First Community Housing Access for All - San Jose 1 San Jose $ 10,835 12/31/2019 6/30/2023 131 First Community Housing Access for All - San Jose 2 San Jose $ 35,448 12/31/2019 6/30/2023 132 Goodwill of Silicon Valley Digital Inclusion Program San Jose $ 88,400 $ 22,100 $ 22,100 9/11/2020 3/11/2024 133 Hamilton Families Family Digital Literacy Antioch $ 24,823 $ 2,848 $ 2,848 9/11/2020 3/11/2024 134 Hamilton Families Family Digital Literacy San Francisco $ 24,310 $ 1,573 $ 1,573 9/11/2020 3/11/2024 135 Hamilton Families Family Digital Literacy San Francisco $ 24,310 $ 2,056 $ 2,056 9/11/2020 3/11/2024 136 Hartnell College Digital Literacy in Castroville Castroville $ 60,402 $ 8,004 $ 8,004 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 137 Hartnell College Digital Literacy in King City King City $ 59,127 $ 4,039 $ 4,039 12/31/2018 6/30/2023 Human Good: Piedmont 138 Piedmont Gardens Digital Literacy Oakland $ 13,643 $ 3,362 $ 3,362 7/9/2020 1/9/2024 Gardens 139 human-I-T human-I-T Connect $ 750,525 $ 750,525 $ 750,525 9/17/2019 12/31/2020 We service rural and urban cities 140 human-I-T human-I-T Connect $ 708,560 6/3/2021 12/3/2023 throughout the entire state. 141 human-I-T human-I-T Connect (130 Pine Ave) Long Beach $ 68,138 $ 17,035 $ 17,035 9/27/2019 1/12/2023 142 human-I-T human-I-T Connect (200 Spring St.) Los Angeles $ 68,138 $ 17,035 $ 17,035 9/27/2019 1/12/2023 67 Completion Payments in Award Recipient Project Location Grant Amount Total Paid Date or 2021 Date Expected human-I-T Connect (4525 Sheila 143 human-I-T Commerce $ 68,138 $ 17,035 $ 17,035 9/27/2019 1/12/2023 St.) 144 iFoster, Inc. Digital Literacy for Foster Youth $ 539,247 $ 134,812 $ 34,812 2/27/2020 8/27/2023 Inglewood Public Library - Inglewood Public Library Digital 145 Inglewood $ 19,412 $ 2,912 $ 19,412 12/31/2018 6/1/2021 Children's Services Literacy Project Library Foundation of Los 146 Cybernauts at LAPL Los Angeles $ 97,750 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 Angeles 147 Lutheran Social Services M Liv o e s s a i T ca h F ro a u m g i h ly D A i p gi t t s a : l I L m it p e r r o ac v y in a g n d San Francisco $ 23,992 9/11/2020 3/11/2024 (LSS) of Northern California Access Transition Age Youth Digital Lutheran Social Services 148 Literacy and Job Readiness Training Sacramento $ 11,230 9/11/2020 3/11/2024 (LSS) of Northern California in Sacramento 149 Monument Impact Conectate y Avanza Concord $ 84,297 $ 82,967 12/31/2018 12/15/2019 150 Monument Impact Conectate y Avanza Concord $ 74,803 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 Nevada County Community Public Access Upgrade - Penn Nevada City, Grass Valley, 151 $ 23,152 $ 7,343 $ 13,131 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 Library Valley Library Truckee, Penn Valley Nevada County Community Public Access Upgrade - Truckee Nevada City, Grass Valley, 152 $ 19,403 $ 10,024 $ 14,875 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 Library Library Truckee, Penn Valley Nevada County Community Public Access Upgrade, Grass Valley Nevada City, Grass Valley, 153 $ 23,152 $ 11,401 $ 17,189 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 Library Library Truckee, Penn Valley Nevada County Community Public Access Upgrade, Madelyn Nevada City, Grass Valley, 154 $ 20,075 $ 10,618 $ 15,637 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 Library Helling Library Truckee, Penn Valley 155 Oakland Adult and Career Mobile Classroom - Oakland Adult Oakland $ 8,883 $ 6,662 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 Education (OACE) and Career Education (OACE) Oakland Unified School Get Connected Oakland- OUSD 156 Oakland $ 8,737 $ 5,833 $ 5,833 7/12/2019 12/31/2020 District District 1 High Schools Oakland Unified School Get Connected Oakland- OUSD 157 Oakland $ 9,854 $ 7,953 $ 7,953 7/12/2019 12/31/2020 District District 2 High Schools Oakland Unified School Get Connected Oakland- OUSD 158 Oakland $ 3,171 $ 2,377 $ 2,377 7/12/2019 12/31/2020 District District 3 High Schools Oakland Unified School Get Connected Oakland- OUSD 159 Oakland $ 47,655 $ 34,065 $ 36,738 12/31/2018 6/30/2020 District District 5 High Schools Oakland Unified School Get Connected Oakland- OUSD 160 Oakland $ 47,655 $ 33,565 $ 36,238 12/31/2018 6/30/2020 District District 6 High Schools Oakland Unified School Get Connected Oakland- OUSD 161 Oakland $ 47,647 $ 32,257 $ 34,930 12/31/2018 6/30/2020 District District 7 High Schools 162 Opportunity Junction Technology Center Antioch $ 39,243 $ 27,738 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 163 Parent, Family Engagement Community Digital Literacy Downey, CA $ 82,890 12/31/2019 6/30/2023 and Community Services Parent, Family Engagement El Monte, CA Community Digital 164 El Monte $ 52,028 12/31/2019 6/30/2023 and Community Services Literacy 165 Parent, Family Engagement Fullerton, CA Community Digital Fullerton $ 52,028 12/31/2019 6/30/2023 and Community Services Literacy Parent, Family Engagement Montebello, CA Community Digital 166 Montebello $ 52,028 12/31/2019 6/30/2023 and Community Services Literacy 167 Parent, Family Engagement Wilmington, CA Community Digital Wilmington, CA $ 52,028 12/31/2019 6/30/2023 and Community Services Literacy 168 Reading and Beyond RaB Broadband Access (Mosqueda) Fresno $ 40,472 $ 2,475 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 169 Reading and Beyond RaB Broadband Access 1.0 (N Fresno $ 40,472 $ 3,261 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 Location) 170 Reading and Beyond RaB Digital Literacy 1.0 (Mosqueda) Fresno $ 73,639 $ 4,782 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 171 Reading and Beyond RaB Digital Literacy 1.0 (N Fresno $ 73,639 $ 6,027 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 Location) REDWOOD CITY 172 DLP/Redwood City Main Library Redwood City $ 79,488 $ 34,410 7/12/2019 12/31/2022 LIBRARY FOUNDATION 173 REDWOOD CITY Redwood City Main Library Redwood City $ 22,747 $ 7,891 7/12/2019 12/31/2022 LIBRARY FOUNDATION Create, learn and tinker in Marina 174 Sacramento Public Library Sacramento $ 97,542 5/11/2020 11/11/2023 Vista 175 San Diego Futures SDFF Digital Literacy Program San Diego $ 98,992 $ 10,105 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 Foundation 176 ScholarMatch Project Connect San Francisco $ 94,963 $ 94,962 12/31/2018 6/30/2020 177 Self-Help Enterprises (SHE) Almond Court Wasco $ 22,325 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 178 Self-Help Enterprises (SHE) Goshen Village Goshen $ 32,251 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 179 Self-Help Enterprises (SHE) Parksdale Village 2 Madera $ 26,579 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 180 Self-Help Enterprises (SHE) Sand Creek Orosi $ 30,833 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 68 Completion Recipient Project Location Grant Amount Payments in Total Paid Award Date or 2021 Date Expected 181 Sequoia Living Eastern Park Apartments Digital San Francisco $ 19,856 6/3/2021 12/3/2023 Literacy 182 Sequoia Living Town Park Towers Digital Literacy San Jose $ 19,856 6/3/2021 12/3/2023 183 Sequoia Living Western Park Apartments Digital San Francisco $ 19,856 6/3/2021 12/3/2023 Literacy 184 Sigma Beta Xi, Inc. Digital Divide Outreach Moreno Valley $ 59,883 $ 14,971 $ 4,971 12/31/2019 6/30/2023 185 Sikh Gurdwara San Jose Gurdwara Digital Inclusion San Jose $ 25,843 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 SURGE: Technology & 186 SoLa I CAN Foundation Entrepeneurship Development Los Angeles $ 87,081 9/11/2020 3/11/2024 Center 187 SoLa I CAN Foundation S E U nt R re G p E en : e T u e r c s h h n ip o l D og e y v e & lo pment Los Angeles $ 82,750 9/11/2020 3/11/2024 Center Southeast Community Barrio Action Tech Center - 188 Los Angeles $ 41,650 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 Development Corporation Broadband Access 189 Southeast Community Barrrio Action Tech Center - Digital Los Angeles $ 72,640 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 Development Corporation Literacy Southeast Community Bell Gardens Tech Center- 190 Bell Gardens $ 41,650 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 Development Corporation Broadband Access 191 Southeast Community Bell Gardens Tech Center-Digital Bell Gardens $ 72,640 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 Development Corporation Literacy Southeast Community 192 Bell Tech Center-Broadband Bell $ 12,685 $ 10,782 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 Development Corporation 193 Southeast Community Bell Tech Center-Digital Literacy Bell $ 83,466 $ 3,211 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 Development Corporation Southeast Community Cudahy Tech Center - Broadband 194 Cudahy $ 41,650 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 Development Corporation Access 195 Southeast Community Cudahy Tech Center - Digital Cudahy $ 72,640 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 Development Corporation Literacy Southeast Community Whittier Tech Center-Broadband 196 Whittier $ 12,685 $ 10,782 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 Development Corporation Access 197 Southeast Community Whittier Tech Center-Digital Whittier $ 83,466 $ 40,431 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 Development Corporation Literacy Tabernacle Community 198 Westside Courts Digital Bridge San Francisco $ 18,850 $ 2,765 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 Development Corporation Tech Exchange (fiscally 199 sponsored by Oakland Tech Hub Oakland $ 97,750 $ 2,092 12/31/2018 6/30/2022 Public Education Fund) The League of Women Pacoima, Van Nuys, Los 200 Voters of Los Angeles Digital + Civic Literacy $ 18,850 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 Angeles Education Fund The San Jose Public Library 201 Access San Jose San Jose $ 46,320 $ 11,580 $ 11,580 9/11/2020 3/11/2024 Foundation The San Jose Public Library 202 Access San Jose San Jose $ 68,803 $ 17,201 $ 17,201 9/11/2020 3/11/2024 Foundation Connecting Californians to 203 United Ways of California Various $ 1,414,725 $ 232,904 $ 232,904 9/12/2019 3/12/2023 Affordable, High-Speed Internet Ventura Unified School 204 Internet Empowerment Ventura $ 42,063 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 District (VUSD) 205 Vermont Slauson Local VSEDC Digital Project Los Angeles $ 56,798 6/5/2020 12/5/2023 Development Corporation Vietnamese American Vietnamese Community Digital 206 Community Center of the Oakland $ 109,081 $ 44,709 $ 59,709 3/19/2019 9/19/2022 Equity East Bay (VACCEB) 207 V VO IE L T U N N A T M A E R S Y E VIVO Computer Training for San Jose $ 64,793 9/11/2020 3/11/2024 Broadband Access FOUNDATION Wintriss Technical Schools Gen-Connect Digital Literacy 208 Inc. dba The League of San Diego $ 53,584 9/11/2020 3/11/2024 Project Amazing Programmers 209 WISE & Healthy Aging WISE Connections Santa Monica $ 99,452 6/3/2021 4/30/2024 Girls on the Mic: Digital Literacy 210 Women's Audio Mission Oakland $ 77,550 $ 38,775 $ 77,550 12/31/2018 3/1/2021 &Technology Training for Girls 211 Y Be M ac C h A ò o C f o G m re m at u e n r i t L y o ng Youth Institute - Tech Tutor Long Beach $ 62,335 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 Development Digital Learning Academy at 212 YWCA Greater Los Angeles Angeles Mesa Empowerment Los Angeles $ 32,450 7/12/2019 1/12/2023 Center Totals: $ 16,844,043 $ 2,032,044 $ 7,751,092 69 Attachment E-1: Adoption Account Digital Literacy Projects Status as of December, 2021 Note: All Digital Literacy projects listed are those approved since inception in 2018 up to December 30, 2021. Grantees were requested to report to the CPUC the expected benefits of each project up to and including CY 2021. Number Number of Number of Number of Assumed of People Projected Projected New Recipient Project Project Status Who Have Subscriptions Participants Broadband Start Date* Completed per per Subscriptions Training Application Application Burbank Housing Management Senior Connection Initiative - 1 12/3/2021 Ongoing 0 0 15 50 Corporation Bell Manor Sr. Apartments. Burbank Housing Management Senior Connection Initiative - 2 12/3/2021 Ongoing 0 0 2 10 Corporation Cabernet Sr. Apartments Burbank Housing Management Senior Connection Initiative - 3 12/3/2021 Ongoing 0 0 8 30 Corporation Charles Street Village Burbank Housing Management Senior Connection Initiative - 4 12/3/2021 Ongoing 0 0 5 40 Corporation Fitch Mt. Sr. Apartments. Burbank Housing Management Senior Connection Initiative - 5 12/3/2021 Ongoing 0 0 5 20 Corporation Oak Ridge Sr. Apartments Burbank Housing Management Senior Connection Initiative - 6 12/3/2021 Ongoing 0 0 3 15 Corporation Park Land Sr. Apartments Burbank Housing Management Senior Connection Initiative - 7 12/3/2021 Ongoing 0 0 5 20 Corporation Sonoma Creek Sr. Apartments Burbank Housing Management Senior Connection Initiative - 8 12/3/2021 Ongoing 0 0 5 20 Corporation Village Green Sr. Apartments Burbank Housing Management Senior Connection Initiative - 9 12/3/2021 Ongoing 0 0 10 35 Corporation Vinecrest Sr. Apartments. California State University, Fresno State Parent University - 10 6/30/2019 Ongoing 82 130 40 160 Fresno Foundation FRESNO COUNTY California State University, Fresno State Parent University - 11 12/5/2020 Ongoing 35 39 30 240 Fresno Foundation FRESNO COUNTY California State University, Fresno State Parent University - 12 6/30/2019 Ongoing 5 88 40 160 Fresno Foundation KERN COUNTY California State University, Fresno State Parent University - 13 12/5/2020 Ongoing 1 0 30 240 Fresno Foundation KERN COUNTY California State University, Fresno State Parent University - 14 6/30/2019 Ongoing 18 46 40 160 Fresno Foundation KINGS COUNTY California State University, Fresno State Parent University - 15 12/5/2020 Ongoing 0 0 30 240 Fresno Foundation KINGS COUNTY California State University, Fresno State Parent University - 16 6/30/2019 Ongoing 43 17 40 160 Fresno Foundation MADERA COUNTY California State University, Fresno State Parent University - 17 12/5/2020 Ongoing 19 0 30 240 Fresno Foundation MADERA COUNTY California State University, Fresno State Parent University - 18 12/5/2020 Ongoing 1 0 30 240 Fresno Foundation MARIPOSA COUNTY California State University, Fresno State Parent University - 19 6/30/2019 Ongoing 17 29 40 160 Fresno Foundation MERCED COUNTY California State University, Fresno State Parent University - 20 12/5/2020 Ongoing 17 0 30 240 Fresno Foundation MERCED COUNTY California State University, Fresno State Parent University - 21 12/5/2020 Ongoing 12 25 30 240 Fresno Foundation MONTEREY COUNTY California State University, Fresno State Parent University - 22 12/5/2020 Ongoing 4 3 30 240 Fresno Foundation SAN BENITO COUNTY California State University, Fresno State Parent University - 23 6/30/2019 Ongoing 0 0 40 160 Fresno Foundation SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY California State University, Fresno State Parent University - 24 12/5/2020 Ongoing 9 72 30 240 Fresno Foundation SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY Fresno State Parent University - California State University, 25 SAN LUIS OBISPO 12/5/2020 Ongoing 0 0 30 240 Fresno Foundation COUNTY California State University, Fresno State Parent University - 26 6/30/2019 Ongoing 6 42 40 160 Fresno Foundation STANISLAUS COUNTY California State University, Fresno State Parent University - 27 12/5/2020 Ongoing 10 0 30 240 Fresno Foundation STANISLAUS COUNTY California State University, Fresno State Parent University - 28 6/30/2019 Ongoing 49 118 40 160 Fresno Foundation TULARE COUNTY California State University, Fresno State Parent University - 29 12/5/2020 Ongoing 62 36 30 240 Fresno Foundation TULARE COUNTY California State University, Fresno State Parent University - 30 12/5/2020 Ongoing 0 0 30 240 Fresno Foundation TUOLUMNE COUNTY 70 Number Number of Number of Number of Assumed of People Projected Projected New Recipient Project Project Status Who Have Subscriptions Participants Broadband Start Date* Completed per per Subscriptions Training Application Application Catholic Charities of Los 31 Digital Education Center 6/30/2019 Ongoing 0 249 250 250 Angeles, Inc. Center for Elders' Digital Equity for Seniors- 32 1/12/2020 Ongoing 3 16 0 96 Independence Berkeley Center for Elders' Digital Equity for Seniors- 33 1/12/2020 Ongoing 0 0 0 78 Independence Concord Center for Elders' Digital Equity for Seniors- 34 1/12/2020 Ongoing 0 2 0 57 Independence Guardian Center for Elders' Digital Equity for Seniors-Josie 35 1/12/2020 Ongoing 8 14 0 63 Independence Barrow Center for Elders' Digital Equity for Seniors-San 36 1/12/2020 Ongoing 3 17 0 78 Independence Leandro Center for Elders' Digital Equity for Seniors-San 37 1/12/2020 Ongoing 11 20 0 93 Independence Pablo Christian Church Homes 38 Beth Eden Housing 6/30/2020 Ongoing 0 0 0 33 (CCH) Christian Church Homes 39 Garfield Park Village 1/12/2020 Ongoing 6 12 38 58 (CCH) Christian Church Homes JL Richard & Irene Cooper 40 6/30/2020 Ongoing 0 0 0 59 (CCH) Terrace Christian Church Homes Percy Abrams & Sister Thea 41 6/30/2020 Ongoing 0 0 0 53 (CCH) Bowman Manor Christian Church Homes 42 Plaza De Las Flores 1/12/2020 Ongoing 8 12 53 80 (CCH) Christian Church Homes 43 Providence Senior Housing 1/12/2020 Ongoing 5 10 27 41 (CCH) Christian Church Homes 44 Roy C Nichols Housing 1/12/2020 Ongoing 4 6 6 10 (CCH) Christian Church Homes 45 Saint Mary's Garden 1/12/2020 Ongoing 11 12 46 69 (CCH) Christian Church Homes 46 Southlake 1/12/2020 Ongoing 10 12 60 92 (CCH) City Of Oakland Human East Oakland Seniors Digital 47 1/12/2020 Ongoing 0 11 0 56 Services Department Inclusion City Of Oakland Human West Oakland Seniors Digital 48 1/12/2020 Ongoing 0 0 0 56 Services Department Inclusion San Leandro Main Library 49 City of San Leandro 12/3/2021 Ongoing 0 0 100 83 Digital Inclusion Program San Leandro Manor Branch 50 City of San Leandro Library Digital Inclusion 12/3/2021 Ongoing 0 0 50 56 Program South San Francisco Digital 51 City of South San Francisco 11/11/2020 Ongoing 0 20 0 135 Literacy Project South San Francisco Digital 52 City of South San Francisco 11/11/2020 Ongoing 0 20 0 135 Literacy Project Latino Digital Literacy-Bishop 53 City of Sunnyvale 6/30/2019 Ongoing 2 12 50 125 Elementary School Latino Digital Literacy- 54 City of Sunnyvale 6/30/2019 Ongoing 3 15 50 125 Columbia Middle School Latino Digital Literacy-Ellis 55 City of Sunnyvale 6/30/2019 Ongoing 9 16 50 75 Elementary School Latino Digital Literacy- 56 City of Sunnyvale 6/30/2019 Ongoing 9 19 50 75 Lakewood Elementary School Latino Digital Literacy-San 57 City of Sunnyvale 6/30/2019 Ongoing 5 11 50 125 Miguel Elementary School Latino Digital Literacy-Vargas 58 City of Sunnyvale 6/30/2019 Ongoing 12 20 50 125 Elementary School Computer Literacy & COACHELLA VALLEY 59 Technology Training - Pueblo 6/30/2020 Ongoing 0 0 0 30 HOUSING COALTION Nuevo Computer Literacy & COACHELLA VALLEY 60 Technology Training - Vila 6/30/2020 Ongoing 0 0 0 40 HOUSING COALTION Hermosa 61 Community Bridges Bridging the Digital Divide 1/12/2020 Completed 0 80 40 80 Community Housing Hotel Essex: Digital Literacy in 62 1/3/2021 Ongoing 0 0 20 40 Partnership Supportive Housing Community Housing The Civic Center Hotel: Digital 63 12/5/2020 Ongoing 0 0 20 90 Partnership Literacy in Emergency Shelter Community Housing The Senator Hotel: Digital 64 12/5/2020 Ongoing 0 0 20 40 Partnership Literacy in Supportive Housing 71 Number Number of Number of Number of Assumed of People Projected Projected New Recipient Project Project Status Who Have Subscriptions Participants Broadband Start Date* Completed per per Subscriptions Training Application Application Compass Family Digital 65 Compass Family Services 12/5/2020 Ongoing 0 28 0 70 Inclusion County of Sonoma - Human Bridging the Digital Gap 66 Services Department - West Among Older Adults - 12/3/2021 Ongoing 0 0 0 67 County Community Services Guerneville 67 Curry Senior Center Connected At Home 1/12/2020 Ongoing 14 43 66 72 Delivering Innovation in DISH Supportive Housing 68 Supportive Housing (DISH), a Digital Literacy Program- 3/11/2021 Ongoing 0 7 0 45 Project of Tides Camelot Delivering Innovation in DISH Supportive Housing 69 Supportive Housing (DISH), a 12/5/2020 Ongoing 0 8 0 45 Digital Literacy Program-Star Project of Tides 70 EAH Inc. 100 Kings Circle-Cloverdale 12/3/2021 Ongoing 30 1 10 65 71 EAH Inc. 100 Ned's Way-Tiburon 4/21/2022 Ongoing 0 0 0 50 1535 W. San Carlos Street-San 72 EAH Inc. 12/3/2021 Ongoing 5 8 10 65 Jose 16170 Monterey Road-Morgan 73 EAH Inc. 2/6/2022 Ongoing 20 1 0 39 Hill 164 N San Pedro Road-San 74 EAH Inc. 12/3/2021 Ongoing 5 3 10 60 Rafael 75 EAH Inc. 1777 Newbury Drive-San Jose 12/3/2021 Ongoing 5 5 10 65 235 E. Dunne Avenue-Morgan 76 EAH Inc. 12/3/2021 Ongoing 4 7 10 39 Hill 77 EAH Inc. 355 Race Street-San Jose 12/3/2021 Ongoing 2 7 10 65 78 EAH Inc. 37 Miwok Way-Mill Valley 4/21/2022 Ongoing 0 0 0 50 600 A Street P.O. Box 1055-Pt. 79 EAH Inc. 12/3/2021 Ongoing 7 3 10 24 Reyes Station 80 EAH Inc. 605 Willow Road-Menlo Park 4/21/2022 Ongoing 0 0 0 59 81 EAH Inc. 638 21st Street -Oakland 2/6/2022 Ongoing 8 7 0 50 82 EAH Inc. 990 College Ave.-St. Helena 12/3/2021 Ongoing 8 1 10 65 83 EAH Inc. Estrella Vista 3/11/2021 Ongoing 10 25 0 65 84 EAH Inc. Fellowship Plaza 3/11/2021 Ongoing 15 41 0 65 85 EAH Inc. Mackey Terrrace 3/11/2021 Ongoing 5 25 0 50 86 EAH Inc. Markham Plaza I 3/11/2021 Ongoing 5 24 0 65 87 EAH Inc. Markham Plaza II 3/11/2021 Ongoing 5 17 0 65 88 Eden Housing, Inc. Alta Mira Family 1/12/2020 Ongoing 10 20 72 67 89 Eden Housing, Inc. Ashland Village 1/12/2020 Ongoing 20 20 101 77 90 Eden Housing, Inc. Cambrian Center 1/12/2020 Ongoing 16 17 59 89 91 Eden Housing, Inc. East Bluff 1/12/2020 Ongoing 25 36 71 75 92 Eden Housing, Inc. Eden Issei Terrace 1/12/2020 Ongoing 25 34 36 55 93 Eden Housing, Inc. Eden Lodge 1/12/2020 Ongoing 16 19 54 82 94 Eden Housing, Inc. Eden Palms 1/12/2020 Ongoing 17 16 145 151 95 Eden Housing, Inc. Estabrook Place 1/12/2020 Ongoing 9 20 23 35 96 Eden Housing, Inc. Ford Road Plaza 1/12/2020 Ongoing 6 6 61 68 97 Eden Housing, Inc. Rivertown Place 1/12/2020 Ongoing 5 9 65 57 98 Eden Housing, Inc. Virginia Lane 1/12/2020 Ongoing 20 28 69 71 99 Empowering Success Now Bilingual Digital Literacy 6/30/2019 Ongoing 33 363 150 600 EngAGE in Digital Literacy - EngAGE, Inc. (formerly More 100 Cotton's Point Senior 12/5/2020 Ongoing 0 6 0 35 than Shelter for Seniors) Apartments EngAGE, Inc. (formerly More EngAGE in Digital Literacy - 101 12/5/2020 Ongoing 0 7 0 42 than Shelter for Seniors) Olivera Senior Apartments EngAGE, Inc. (formerly More 102 EngAGE in Technology 3/11/2021 Ongoing 0 0 0 42 than Shelter for Seniors) 72 Number Number of Number of Number of Assumed of People Projected Projected New Recipient Project Project Status Who Have Subscriptions Participants Broadband Start Date* Completed per per Subscriptions Training Application Application EngAGE, Inc. (formerly More 103 EngAGE in Technology 3/11/2021 Ongoing 0 0 0 42 than Shelter for Seniors) Episcopal Community Services 1180 4th Street: Digital Literacy 104 1/12/2020 Ongoing 0 2 0 40 of San Francisco in Supportive Housing Episcopal Community Services Auburn and Minna-Lee: Digital 105 1/12/2020 Ongoing 0 10 0 30 of San Francisco Literacy in Supportive Housing Episcopal Community Services The Alder: Digital Literacy in 106 1/12/2020 Ongoing 0 17 0 45 of San Francisco Supportive Housing Episcopal Community Services The Crosby: Digital Literacy in 107 1/12/2020 Ongoing 0 0 0 50 of San Francisco Supportive Housing Episcopal Community Services The Elm: Digital Literacy in 108 1/12/2020 Ongoing 0 5 0 30 of San Francisco Supportive Housing Episcopal Community Services The Henry: Digital Literacy in 109 1/12/2020 Ongoing 0 0 0 40 of San Francisco Supportive Housing Episcopal Community Services The Mentone: Digital Literacy 110 1/12/2020 Ongoing 0 6 0 40 of San Francisco in Supportive Housing Episcopal Community Services The Rose and Hillsdale: Digital 111 1/12/2020 Ongoing 0 10 0 20 of San Francisco Literacy in Supportive Housing 112 EveryoneOn Opportunity Connect 12/5/2020 Ongoing 14 12 0 180 113 EveryoneOn Opportunity Connect 3/11/2021 Ongoing 10 50 0 120 114 EveryoneOn Opportunity Connect 3/11/2021 Ongoing 0 0 0 120 115 EveryoneOn Opportunity Connect 12/3/2021 Ongoing 0 0 100 102 116 EveryoneOn Opportunity Connection 6/30/2020 Ongoing 0 0 0 102 Felton Institute dba Family Expanding Digital Literacy for 117 Service Agency of San 12/3/2021 Ongoing 0 2 100 750 the Aging Francisco Felton Institute dba Family The Tech Squad: Connecting 118 Service Agency of San 4/19/2021 Ongoing 3 22 0 500 Our Disconnected Seniors Francisco 119 First Community Housing Access for All - Campbell 6/30/2020 Ongoing 0 13 0 50 120 First Community Housing Access for All - Morgan Hill 6/30/2020 Ongoing 0 8 0 40 121 First Community Housing Access for All - Mountain View 6/30/2020 Ongoing 0 10 0 15 122 First Community Housing Access for All - Redwood City 6/30/2020 Ongoing 0 6 0 25 123 First Community Housing Access for All - San Jose 1 6/30/2020 Ongoing 0 3 0 15 124 First Community Housing Access for All - San Jose 2 6/30/2020 Ongoing 0 6 0 40 125 Goodwill of Silicon Valley Digital Inclusion Program 3/11/2021 Ongoing 139 244 0 480 126 Hamilton Families Family Digital Literacy 3/11/2021 Ongoing 0 26 0 70 127 Hamilton Families Family Digital Literacy 3/11/2021 Ongoing 0 13 0 70 128 Hamilton Families Family Digital Literacy 3/11/2021 Ongoing 0 20 0 70 129 Hartnell College Digital Literacy in Castroville 6/30/2019 Ongoing 90 0 83 130 Hartnell College Digital Literacy in King City 6/30/2019 Ongoing 113 0 165 Human Good: Piedmont Piedmont Gardens Digital 131 1/9/2021 Ongoing 0 7 0 80 Gardens Literacy human-I-T Connect (130 Pine 132 human-I-T 3/27/2020 Ongoing 0 33 0 416 Ave) human-I-T Connect (200 133 human-I-T 3/27/2020 Ongoing 0 34 0 416 Spring St.) human-I-T Connect (4525 134 human-I-T 3/27/2020 Ongoing 0 33 0 416 Sheila St.) Digital Literacy for Foster 135 iFoster, Inc. 8/27/2020 Ongoing 10,789 2,037 0 12,500 Youth** Inglewood Public Library - Inglewood Public Library 136 6/30/2019 Completed 0 30 0 360 Children's Services Digital Literacy Project Mosaica Family Apts: Lutheran Social Services (LSS) 137 Improving Lives Through 3/11/2021 Ongoing 0 20 0 66 of Northern Californa Digital Literacy and Access Transition Age Youth Digital Lutheran Social Services (LSS) 138 Literacy and Job Readiness 3/11/2021 Ongoing 0 5 0 30 of Northern Californa Training in Sacramento 73 Number Number of Number of Number of Assumed of People Projected Projected New Recipient Project Project Status Who Have Subscriptions Participants Broadband Start Date* Completed per per Subscriptions Training Application Application Conectate y Avanza (Connect 139 Monument Impact 6/30/2019 Completed 26 314 35 272 and Advance) Conectate y Avanza (Connect 140 Monument Impact 12/5/2020 Ongoing 0 310 and Advance) Mobile Classroom - Oakland 141 Oakland Adult and Career Adult and Career Education 6/30/2019 Ongoing 25 80 Education (OACE) (OACE) 142 Opportunity Junction Technology Center 6/30/2019 Ongoing 6 206 45 300 Parent, Family Engagement and 143 Community Digital Literacy 6/30/2020 Ongoing 0 0 0 225 Community Services, Inc. Parent, Family Engagement and El Monte, CA Community 144 6/30/2020 Ongoing 0 0 0 130 Community Services, Inc. Digital Literacy Parent, Family Engagement and Fullerton, CA Community 145 6/30/2020 Ongoing 0 0 0 130 Community Services, Inc. Digital Literacy Parent, Family Engagement and Montebello, CA Community 146 6/30/2020 Ongoing 0 18 0 130 Community Services, Inc. Digital Literacy Parent, Family Engagement and Wilmington, CA Community 147 6/30/2020 Ongoing 0 0 0 130 Community Services, Inc. Digital Literacy RaB Digital Literacy 1.0 148 Reading and Beyond 6/30/2019 Ongoing 0 187 270 1800 (Mosqueda) RaB Digital Literacy 1.0 (N 149 Reading and Beyond 6/30/2019 Ongoing 0 176 270 1800 Location) REDWOOD CITY LIBRARY DLP/Redwood City Main 150 1/12/2020 Ongoing 0 0 0 2080 FOUNDATION Library 151 Sacramento Public Library Create, learn and tinker in 11/11/2020 Ongoing 0 800 Marina Vista 152 San Diego Futures Foundation SDFF Digital Literacy Program 1/12/2020 Ongoing 57 309 50 960 153 Self-Help Enterprises (SHE) Almond Court 1/12/2020 Ongoing 0 36 0 36 154 Self-Help Enterprises (SHE) Goshen Village 1/12/2020 Ongoing 0 37 0 64 155 Self-Help Enterprises (SHE) Parksdale Village 2 1/12/2020 Ongoing 0 42 0 48 156 Self-Help Enterprises (SHE) Sand Creek 1/12/2020 Ongoing 0 32 0 60 Eastern Park Apartments 157 Sequoia Living 12/3/2021 Ongoing 0 0 0 50 Digital Literacy Town Park Towers Digital 158 Sequoia Living 12/3/2021 Ongoing 0 0 0 50 Literacy Western Park Apartments 159 Sequoia Living 12/3/2021 Ongoing 0 0 0 50 Digital Literacy 160 Sikh Gurdwara San Jose Gurdwara Digital Inclusion 12/5/2020 Ongoing 0 9 0 70 SURGE: Technology & 161 SoLa I CAN Foundation Entrepeneurship Development 3/11/2021 Ongoing 0 0 0 3300 Center Southeast Community Barrrio Action Tech Center - 162 12/5/2020 Ongoing 0 320 Development Corporation Digital Literacy 163 Southeast Community Bell Gardens Tech Center- 12/5/2020 Ongoing 0 320 Development Corporation Digital Literacy Southeast Community Bell Tech Center-Digital 164 6/30/2019 Ongoing 15 397 300 630 Development Corporation Literacy 165 Southeast Community Cudahy Tech Center - Digital 12/5/2020 Ongoing 0 320 Development Corporation Literacy Southeast Community Whittier Tech Center-Digital 166 6/30/2019 Ongoing 0 113 300 630 Development Corporation Literacy Tabernacle Community 167 Westside Courts Digital Bridge 1/12/2020 Ongoing 0 17 0 50 Development Corporation The League of Women Voters 168 Digital + Civic Literacy 1/12/2020 Ongoing 27 180 of Los Angeles Education Fund The San Jose Public Library 169 Access San Jose 3/11/2021 Ongoing 0 49 0 160 Foundation The San Jose Public Library 170 Access San Jose 3/11/2021 Ongoing 0 29 0 400 Foundation 171 Ventura Unified School District Internet Empowerment 12/5/2020 Ongoing 60 120 (VUSD) Vermont Slauson Local 172 VSEDC Digital Project 12/5/2020 Ongoing 0 260 50 180 Development Corporation 74 Number Number of Number of Number of Assumed of People Projected Projected New Recipient Project Project Status Who Have Subscriptions Participants Broadband Start Date* Completed per per Subscriptions Training Application Application Vietnamese American Vietnamese Community Digital 173 Community Center of the East 9/19/2019 Ongoing 100 205 75 200 Equity Bay (VACCEB) VIETNAMESE VIVO Computer Training for 174 VOLUNTARY 3/11/2021 Ongoing 54 33 0 240 Broadband Access FOUNDATION Wintriss Technical Schools Inc. Gen-Connect Digital Literacy 175 dba The League of Amazing 3/11/2021 Ongoing 0 27 0 192 Project Programmers 176 WISE & Healthy Aging WISE Connections 12/3/2021 Ongoing 0 0 486 540 Girls on the Mic: Digital 177 Women's Audio Mission Literacy &Technology Training 6/30/2019 Completed 0 4517 900 1800 for Girls YMCA of Greater Long Beach 178 Youth Institute - Tech Tutor 1/12/2020 Ongoing 50 662 50 660 ò Community Development Digital Learning Academy at 179 YWCA Greater Los Angeles Angeles Mesa Empowerment 1/12/2020 Ongoing 0 62 0 100 Center Totals 12,112 12,737 5,993 47,727 *Projects are required to start at the latest six months after approval (after the ramp up period) ** iFoster subscriptions were achieved through the Lifeline Pilot (D.19-04-021) which provides free smartphones and service to foster youth 75 Attachment E-2: Adoption Account Call Center Projects Status as of December, 2021 Note: All Call Center projects listed are those approved since inception in 2018 up to December 31, 2021. Grantees were requested to report to the CPUC the expected benefits of each project up to and including CY 2021. Number of Assumed Number of New Projected Recipient Project Project Type Status Broadband Subscriptions Start Date* Subscriptions per Application California State Fresno State Call Center: 1 University, Fresno 3/12/2020 Call Center Ongoing 5,147 2,500 Central California Region Foundation 2 human-I-T human-I-T Connect 3/17/2020 Call Center Completed 3,947 3,947 3 human-I-T human-I-T Connect 12/3/2021 Call Center Ongoing 2,246 3,634 4 Sigma Beta Xi, Inc. Digital Divide Outreach 6/30/2020 Call Center Ongoing 1,839 2,500 Connecting Californians to United Ways of 5 Affordable, High-Speed 3/12/2020 Call Center Ongoing 1,609 7,255 California Internet Total: 14,788 *Projects are required to start at the latest six months after approval (after the ramp up period) 76 Attachment E-3: Adoption Account Broadband Access Projects Status as of December, 2021 Note: All Broadband Access projects listed are those approved since inception in 2018 up to December 31, 2021. Grantees were requested to report to the CPUC the expected benefits of each project up to and including CY 2021. Number of Number of Number of Number of Assumed People Projected Projected New Recipient Project Project Status Provided Subscriptions Participants Broadband Start Date* Broadband per per Subscriptions Access Application Application Boys & Girls Club of San 1 Computer Lab Reinvestment 12/3/2021 Ongoing 0 750 200 3000 Marcos Cerritos Library Broadband Access 2 City of Cerritos 6/30/2020 Ongoing 0 1,144 0 8930 Improvement 3 City of Palmdale In Library Laptop Check Out 1/12/2020 Ongoing 1 1 11310 89040 City of Salinas, Salinas Public 4 El Gabilan Library Connects! 1/12/2020 Ongoing 0 1,265 256 8000 Library Contra Costa County 5 El Sobrante Library Reconstruction 6/30/2019 Ongoing 214 2,394 44 6000 Library-El Sobrante Library Exeter Unified School 6 Community Learning Center 12/5/2020 Ongoing 55 850 200 600 District Library Foundation of Los 7 Cybernauts at LAPL 1/12/2020 Ongoing 0 1,842 250 10000 Angeles Nevada County Community Public Access Upgrade - Penn 8 6/30/2019 Ongoing 46 4,247 63 2994 Library Valley Library Nevada County Community Public Access Upgrade - Truckee 9 6/30/2019 Ongoing 44 3,025 63 9598 Library Library Nevada County Community Public Access Upgrade, Grass 10 6/30/2019 Ongoing 53 2,540 63 15080 Library Valley Library Nevada County Community Public Access Upgrade, Madelyn 11 6/30/2019 Ongoing 79 3,420 63 34733 Library Helling Library Oakland Unified School Get Connected Oakland- OUSD 12 1/12/2020 Completed 429 429 642 540 District District 1 High Schools Oakland Unified School Get Connected Oakland- OUSD 13 1/12/2020 Completed 371 371 868 609 District District 2 High Schools Oakland Unified School Get Connected Oakland- OUSD 14 1/12/2020 Completed 74 74 248 196 District District 3 High Schools Oakland Unified School Get Connected Oakland- OUSD 15 6/30/2019 Completed 623 623 610 610 District District 5 High Schools Oakland Unified School Get Connected Oakland- OUSD 16 6/30/2019 Completed 552 552 886 886 District District 6 High Schools Oakland Unified School Get Connected Oakland- OUSD 17 6/30/2019 Completed 1,055 1,055 888 888 District District 7 High Schools RaB Broadband Access 18 Reading and Beyond 6/30/2019 Ongoing 0 384 120 510 (Mosqueda) RaB Broadband Access 1.0 (N 19 Reading and Beyond 6/30/2019 Ongoing 0 218 120 510 Location) REDWOOD CITY 20 Redwood City Main Library 1/12/2020 Ongoing 0 0 0 13800 LIBRARY FOUNDATION 21 ScholarMatch Project Connect 6/30/2019 Completed 0 2,265 495 1500 SURGE: Technology & 22 SoLa I CAN Foundation Entrepeneurship Development 3/11/2021 Ongoing 0 0 0 7500 Center Southeast Community Barrio Action Tech Center - 23 12/5/2020 Ongoing 0 0 0 1900 Development Corporation Broadband Access Southeast Community Bell Gardens Tech Center- 24 12/5/2020 Ongoing 0 0 0 1900 Development Corporation Broadband Access Southeast Community 25 Bell Tech Center-Broadband 6/30/2019 Ongoing 121 779 700 1200 Development Corporation Southeast Community Cudahy Tech Center - Broadband 26 12/5/2020 Ongoing 0 0 0 1900 Development Corporation Access Southeast Community Whittier Tech Center-Broadband 27 6/30/2019 Ongoing 42 113 700 1900 Development Corporation Access Tech Exchange (fiscally 28 sponsored by Oakland Public Tech Hub 6/30/2019 Completed 4,773 14,320 400 1500 Education Fund) Totals: 8,532 42,661 19,189 225,824 *Projects are required to start at the latest six months after approval (after the ramp up period) 77 Attachment F-1: Public Housing Adoption Projects as of December 2021 Completion Date or Grant Payments Total Recipient Project City Residents Planned Amount 2021 Paid Completion Date 1 Bayview Hunters Point Dr. George W. Davis Senior San Francisco 130 $41,555 $21,905 6/30/222 Multipurpose Senior Services, Inc. Residence Armstrong Place Senior 2 BRIDGE Housing Corporation San Francisco 152 $36,970 $34,593 12/31/2017 Housing 3 BRIDGE Housing Corporation Chestnut Creek Senior South San 55 $24,250 $24,250 6/30/2019 Housing Francisco 4 BRIDGE Housing Corporation Chestnut Linden Court Oakland 410 $34,170 $30,038 6/30/2019 5 BRIDGE Housing Corporation Emeryvilla Emeryville 46 $23,550 $23,550 6/30/2019 Geraldine Johnson Senior 6 BRIDGE Housing Corporation San Francisco 74 $29,130 $27,382 12/31/2017 Housing 7 BRIDGE Housing Corporation Ironhorse at Central Oakland 251 $30,030 $25,399 6/30/2019 8 BRIDGE Housing Corporation Mandela Gateway Apartments Oakland 440 $34,510 $34,510 6/30/2019 9 BRIDGE Housing Corporation Natoma Family Apartments San Francisco 137 $25,550 $25,550 6/30/2019 10 BRIDGE Housing Corporation Richmond City Center Richmond 171 $25,630 $20,520 6/30/2019 11 BRIDGE Housing Corporation St. Joseph's Senior Apartments Oakland 103 $33,130 $33,130 12/31/2017 12 BRIDGE Housing Corporation Terraza Palmera at St. Josephs Oakland 171 $26,090 $23,881 6/30/2019 13 Christian Church Homes (CCH) Harrison Street Senior Oakland 100 $25,420 $25,420 5/31/2019 Housing 14 Christian Church Homes (CCH) Fargo Senior Center San Leandro 102 $42,000 $9,390 $28,450 6/30/2019 Sylvester Rutledge Manor - 15 Christian Church Homes (CCH) North Oakland Senior Oakland 69 $39,000 $7,870 $24,750 8/1/2019 Housing Westlake Christian Terrace 16 Christian Church Homes (CCH) Oakland 243 $49,500 $48,975 9/30/2019 East 17 Christian Church Homes (CCH) Westlake Christian Terrace Oakland 250 $49,500 $49,490 9/30/2019 West 18 EAH Housing Corporation Buchanan Park San Rafael 154 $34,460 $28,460 9/30/2019 19 EAH Housing Corporation Casa Adobe San Pablo 56 $20,390 $16,160 9/30/2019 20 EAH Housing Corporation Centertown San Rafael 180 $34,930 $34,930 12/31/2019 21 EAH Housing Corporation Cochrane Village Morgan Hill 318 $49,900 $49,219 $49,219 9/16/2020 22 EAH Housing Corporation Don de Dios San Rafael 267 $41,070 $41,070 12/31/2019 23 EAH Housing Corporation Drakes Way Larkspur 68 $10,500 $10,500 9/4/2020 24 EAH Housing Corporation Elena Gardens San Jose 362 $49,080 $49,080 12/20/2019 25 EAH Housing Corporation Golden Oaks Oakley 52 $19,090 $15,890 9/30/2019 26 EAH Housing Corporation Los Robles Union City 420 $49,930 $48,815 3/31/2020 27 EAH Housing Corporation Point Reyes Pt. Reyes Station 72 $16,165 $14,765 9/30/2019 28 EAH Housing Corporation Pollard Plaza San Jose 193 $49,935 $49,935 12/31/2019 29 EAH Housing Corporation Village Avante Morgan Hill 549 $49,990 $47,685 $47,685 9/29/2020 30 EAH Housing Corporation Floral Gardens Selma 143 $43,286 $41,979 $41,979 10/16/2020 31 EAH Housing Corporation Fountain West Fresno 196 $47,133 $40,012 $40,012 10/20/2020 32 EAH Housing Corporation Palm Court San Jose 69 $37,239 $37,239 5/20/2020 33 EAH Housing Corporation Riviera Apartments San Rafael 77 $24,960 $20,930 $20,930 5/20/2020 34 EAH Housing Corporation Rodeo Gateway Rodeo 55 $24,690 $24,690 $23,327 3/31/2020 35 EAH Housing Corporation San Clemente Place Corte Madera 212 $41,478 $41,478 $41,478 7/1/2020 36 EAH Housing Corporation Silver Oak Oakley 26 $14,680 $14,680 11/21/2019 37 EAH Housing Corporation The Oaks Walnut Creek 104 $18,513 $18,513 12/31/2019 38 EAH Housing Corporation Turina House San Rafael 91 $18,150 $17,704 $17,704 5/20/2020 39 EAH Housing Corporation Vista Park 1 San Jose 112 $37,311 $35,197 5/20/2020 40 EAH Housing Corporation Vista Park 2 San Jose 122 $37,311 $35,517 5/20/2020 78 Completion Date or Grant Payments Total Recipient Project City Residents Planned Amount 2021 Paid Completion Date 41 East Bay Asian Local California Hotel Oakland 166 $49,850 $11,672 3/31/2022 Development Corporation East Bay Asian Local 42 Hismen Hin-Nu Terrace Oakland 371 $49,994 $11,650 3/31/2022 Development Corporation 43 East Bay Asian Local Noble Tower Apartments Oakland 270 $50,000 $11,460 3/31/2022 Development Corporation 44 Eden Housing, Inc 801 Alma Family Apartments Palo Alto 156 $12,880 $12,880 1/31/2019 45 Eden Housing, Inc Altenheim Oakland 199 $19,380 $18,030 7/1/2018 46 Eden Housing, Inc Camphora Soledad 134 $21,040 $21,040 1/31/2019 47 Eden Housing, Inc Carlow Court Apartments Dublin 74 $12,880 $12,880 1/31/2019 48 Eden Housing, Inc Cottonwood Place Apartments Fremont 146 $16,015 $15,615 7/1/2018 49 Eden Housing, Inc Studio 819 Apartments Mountain View 61 $12,880 $12,830 7/1/2018 50 Eden Housing, Inc Weinreb Place Hayward 24 $12,351 $11,951 12/15/2017 51 Eden Housing, Inc Wexford Way Dublin 416 $12,880 $12,480 7/1/2018 Episcopal Community Services of Bishop Swing Community 52 San Francisco 135 $49,959 $41,612 6/30/2018 San Francisco House 53 Episcopal Community Services of Canon Barcus Community San Francisco 153 $49,520 $35,547 6/30/2018 San Francisco House Episcopal Community Services of 54 Canon Kip Community House San Francisco 103 $49,593 $36,092 6/30/2018 San Francisco 55 First Community Housing Curtner Studios Digital San Jose 200 $25,756 $22,712 3/10/2017 Connections 56 First Community Housing El Paseo Digital Connections San Jose 98 $21,030 $20,350 3/10/2017 57 First Community Housing Betty Ann Gardens San Jose 230 $38,910 $29,287 3/30/2020 58 First Community Housing Casa Feliz Studios San Jose 60 $36,700 $25,053 3/20/2020 59 First Community Housing Creekview inn San Jose 25 $19,705 $11,858 2/15/2020 60 First Community Housing Fourth Street Apts San Jose 250 $38,910 $27,062 3/30/2020 61 First Community Housing Japantown Senior Apts San Jose 85 $36,700 $27,069 3/30/2020 62 First Community Housing Orchard Parkview Sunnyvale 130 $36,700 $26,770 3/30/2020 63 Housing Authority of the County Carmelitos Housing Long Beach 1750 $28,210 $19,223 1/31/2018 of Los Angeles (HACoLA) Development Housing Authority of the County Harbor Hills Housing 64 Lomita 761 $28,210 $19,223 1/31/2018 of Los Angeles (HACoLA) Development 65 Housing Authority of the County Nueva Maravilla Housing Los Angeles 1471 $28,210 $19,223 1/31/2018 of Los Angeles (HACoLA) Development Extension Housing Authority of the County Request 66 Maplewood homes San Bernardino 962 $42,589 $21,043 of San Bernardino (HACSB) Under Review Extension 67 Housing Authority of the County Parkside Pines Colton 324 $36,519 Request of San Bernardino (HACSB) Under Review Extension Housing Authority of the County HACSB Digital Literacy Multiple Request 68 2760 $405,731 of San Bernardino (HACSB) Centers Project Locations Under Review 69 Jamboree Housing Corporation Puerto del Sol Apartments Long Beach 498 $23,567 $12,483 8/31/2017 70 Jamboree Housing Corporation Ceres Court Apartments Fontana 147 $12,798 $8,363 9/30/2018 71 Jamboree Housing Corporation Ceres Way Apartments Fontana 138 $11,877 $9,638 9/30/2018 72 Jamboree Housing Corporation Woodglen Vista Apartments Santee 432 $10,677 $10,637 9/30/2018 73 Long Beach Affordable Housing Grace Manor Carson 100 $25,007 8/30/2022 Coalition (LBAHC) Long Beach Affordable Housing 74 Metro West Apts Los Angeles 67 $25,347 8/30/2022 Coalition (LBAHC) 75 Long Beach Affordable Housing West Park Los Angeles 196 $34,561 8/30/2022 Coalition (LBAHC) 76 Mutual Housing California Lemon Hill Sacramento 282 $42,058 $25,118 8/31/2018 77 Mutual Housing California Mutual Housing at Sky Park Sacramento 258 $44,289 $27,997 8/31/2018 78 Mutual Housing California Mutual Housing at Spring Lake Woodland 335 $35,960 $24,763 8/31/2018 79 Completion Date or Grant Payments Total Recipient Project City Residents Planned Amount 2021 Paid Completion Date 79 Mutual Housing California Mutual Housing at the North Highlands 141 $49,533 $31,964 8/31/2018 Highlands 80 Mutual Housing California New Harmony Davis 195 $38,122 $26,251 8/31/2018 81 Mutual Housing California Owendale Davis 91 $25,670 $19,722 8/31/2018 Glen Ellen Mutual Housing 82 Mutual Housing California Sacramento 96 $34,250 $24,564 6/30/2019 Community 83 Mutual Housing California Moore Village Mutual Housing Davis 154 $41,700 $25,824 6/30/2019 Community 84 Mutual Housing California Mutual Housing at Dixianne Sacramento 184 $40,500 $22,764 6/30/2019 85 Mutual Housing California Mutual Housing at Norwood Sacramento 305 $49,848 $28,891 6/30/2019 Mutual Housing at River 86 Mutual Housing California Sacramento 581 $48,898 $29,246 6/30/2019 Garden 87 Mutual Housing California Mutual Housing on the Sacramento 168 $40,100 $27,524 6/30/2019 Greenway Tremont Green Mutual 88 Mutual Housing California Davis 94 $34,650 $23,272 6/30/2019 Housing Community 89 Mutual Housing California Twin Pines Mutual Housing Davis 80 $34,900 $22,411 6/30/2019 Community Victory Townhomes Mutual 90 Mutual Housing California Sacramento 70 $30,250 $21,217 6/30/2019 Housing Community 91 Oakland Housing Authority Lockwood Learning Center Oakland 804 $98,495 $61,280 3/31/2022 92 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Ocean View Manor Morro Bay 40 $13,575 $9,212 8/15/2019 93 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Oceanside Gardens Morro Bay 21 $7,883 $6,726 8/15/2019 Petaluma Ecumenical Properties 575 Vallejo Street Senior 94 Petaluma 46 $10,550 $7,023 11/9/2016 (PEP Housing) Apartments Adoption 95 Petaluma Ecumenical Properties 579 Vallejo Street Senior Petaluma 41 $9,430 $6,271 11/10/2016 (PEP Housing) Apartments Adoption Petaluma Ecumenical Properties Acacia Lane Senior 96 Santa Rosa 47 $10,190 $6,772 11/3/2016 (PEP Housing) Apartments Adoption 97 Petaluma Ecumenical Properties Casa Grande Senior Petaluma 60 $13,350 $9,030 11/17/2016 (PEP Housing) Apartments Adoption Petaluma Ecumenical Properties Caulfield Lane Senior 98 Petaluma 23 $5,220 $3,512 11/18/2016 (PEP Housing) Apartments Adoption 99 Petaluma Ecumenical Properties Kellgren Senior Apartments Petaluma 53 $11,650 $7,776 11/4/2016 (PEP Housing) Adoption Extension San Francisco Housing Request 100 Bayview Commons San Francisco 61 $23,716 Development Corporation Under Review Extension 101 San Francisco Housing Hunters Point East San Francisco 350 $45,967 Request Development Corporation Under Review San Francisco Housing 102 Hunters Point West San Francisco 496 $50,000 $31,660 7/31/2020 Development Corporation 103 San Francisco Housing Westbrook San Francisco 681 $50,000 11/30/2021 Development Corporation Satellite Affordable Housing Arboleda Apartments 104 Walnut Creek 92 $40,756 $40,756 6/30/2017 Associates Adoption 105 Satellite Affordable Housing Merritt Crossing Adoption Oakland 95 $50,000 $48,535 9/24/2017 Associates Satellite Affordable Housing Strawberry Creek Lodge 106 Berkeley 150 $49,970 $49,679 9/24/2017 Associates Adoption 107 Satellite Affordable Housing Amistad House Berkeley 63 $48,290 $47,875 10/30/2018 Associates Satellite Affordable Housing 108 Petaluma Avenue Homes Sebastapol 99 $48,350 $48,054 8/30/2018 Associates 109 Satellite Affordable Housing Satellite Central Oakland 196 $50,000 $49,807 8/30/2018 Associates Satellite Affordable Housing 110 Valdez Plaza Oakland 194 $50,000 $48,547 8/30/2018 Associates 111 Satellite Affordable Housing Beth Asher Oakland 53 $37,260 $33,479 7/31/2019 Associates Satellite Affordable Housing 112 Columbia Park Manor Pittsburg 87 $41,930 $39,991 7/31/2019 Associates 113 Satellite Affordable Housing Lakeside Senior Apartments Oakland 118 $46,360 $46,360 5/31/2019 Associates Satellite Affordable Housing 114 Lawrence Moore Manor Berkeley 50 $34,125 $31,527 7/31/2019 Associates 80 Completion Date or Grant Payments Total Recipient Project City Residents Planned Amount 2021 Paid Completion Date 115 Satellite Affordable Housing Linda Glen Oakland 44 $31,560 $29,978 7/31/2019 Associates Satellite Affordable Housing 116 Orchards Senior Homes Oakland 67 $34,230 $33,838 6/30/2019 Associates 117 Satellite Affordable Housing Sacramento Senior Homes Berkeley 41 $30,150 $28,770 7/31/2019 Associates Satellite Affordable Housing 118 Stuart Pratt Manor Berkeley 47 $27,910 $27,173 7/31/2019 Associates 119 Silvercrest, Inc. (non-profit) Parc Grove Commons Fresno 559 $38,894 $20,806 12/5/2017 120 Silvercrest, Inc. (non-profit) Parc Grove Northwest Fresno 381 $38,894 $16,161 12/5/2017 121 Silvercrest, Inc. (non-profit) Viking Village Fresno 121 $38,894 $18,504 12/5/2017 Tabernacle Community 122 Robert B Pitts Residences San Francisco 203 $49,400 $34,506 2/29/2020 Development Corporation 123 WARD Economic Development Rosa Parks Villas Los Angeles 75 $23,746 6/30/2022 Corporation WARD Economic Development 124 Tuelyn Terrace Los Angeles 85 $26,820 6/30/2022 Corporation 125 WARD Economic Development Ward Villas Los Angeles 140 $43,733 6/30/2022 Corporation West Sacramento Housing 126 Patio Apartments West Sacramento 56 $26,140 $12,918 12/21/2017 Development Corporation 127 West Sacramento Housing Washington Courtyards West Sacramento 279 $45,760 $41,188 7/15/2019 Development Corporation West Sacramento Housing 128 West Capitol Courtyards West Sacramento 155 $49,984 $42,928 7/15/2019 Development Corporation Totals: 29,101 $4,671,020 $300,956 $3,132,780 81 Attachment F-2: Public Housing Infrastructure Projects as of December 2021 Completion Date or Apartment Payments Total Recipient Project City Grant Planned Units 2021 Payment Completion Date 1 Abode Communities Laurel Village Los Angeles 80 $36,000 $29,370 3/7/2016 2 Affordable Housing Access Villa Mirage Rancho Mirage 98 $44,100 $44,100 10/27/2017 3 Affordable Housing Alliance II, Dudley Street Senior Pomona 84 $37,350 $37,351 3/15/2017 Inc. dba Integrity Housing Apartments Affordable Housing Alliance II, 4 Guest House Santa Ana 72 $32,400 $32,400 7/31/2018 Inc. dba Integrity Housing Affordable Housing Alliance II, 5 Dutton Flats Santa Rosa 41 $55,350 $55,350 $55,350 11/24/2021 Inc., dba Integrity Housing Affordable Housing Alliance II, 6 Stony Point Flats Santa Rosa 50 $56,750 2/28/2023 Inc., dba Integrity Housing 7 Better Opportunity Builders Villa Del Mar Fresno 48 $28,080 $7,020 2/28/2021 (BOB) Better Opportunity Builders 8 Brierwood Fresno 50 $47,730 $17,175 $17,175 2/28/2021 (BOB) 9 Burbank Housing Development Parklane Apartments Petaluma 90 $39,875 $38,710 9/16/2016 Corp. Burbank Housing Development 10 Crossroads Apartments Santa Rosa 79 $35,288 $35,288 8/14/2018 Corp. 11 Butterfield Retirement LP Butterfield Retirement Morgan Hill 114 $34,020 $34,020 9/20/2017 Cabrillo Economic Development 12 Montgomery Oaks Ojai 21 $12,600 $12,600 7/27/2016 Corporation 13 Cabrillo Economic Development Valle Naranjal Farmwork Piru 68 $30,600 $22,963 10/3/2016 Corporation Housing Chinatown Community 14 227 Bay San Francisco 50 $22,313 $22,063 5/31/2017 Development Center 15 Chinatown Community 990 Pacific San Francisco 92 $40,120 $39,285 11/20/2017 Development Center Northwest Manors II 16 Community Housing Works Pasadena 26 $15,600 $15,600 2/9/2017 (Mountain) 17 Community Housing Works Northwest Manors II Pasadena 18 $10,800 $10,800 1/18/2017 (Raymond) 18 Community Housing Works Cypress Cove Escondido 200 $85,000 $85,000 6/27/2017 19 Community Housing Works Mayberry Townhomes San Diego 70 $40,250 $40,250 6/27/2017 20 Community Housing Works North Park LGBT Senior San Diego 76 $34,200 $34,200 2/28/2018 21 Community Housing Works Cedar Nettleton Vista 67 $30,150 $30,076 1/15/2018 22 Community Housing Works Mission Cove Oceanside 138 $41,400 $41,400 7/10/2018 23 Community Housing Works Parks at Fig Garden Fresno 366 $75,000 $74,952 11/2/2018 24 Community Housing Works Sunridge Apartments Concord 198 $59,400 $59,400 11/9/2018 25 Concerned Citizens of South 1410 Apartments Los Angeles 12 $7,192 $7,192 11/6/2018 Central Los Angeles Concerned Citizens of South Central Avenue Village 26 Los Angeles 45 $24,438 $23,686 11/1/2015 Central Los Angeles Apartments 27 Concerned Citizens of South Gwen Bolden Manor Los Angeles 24 $14,399 $13,847 10/1/2015 Central Los Angeles Concerned Citizens of South 28 Juanita Tate Legacy Towers Los Angeles 118 $34,882 $33,694 6/30/2017 Central Los Angeles 29 Concerned Citizens of South One Wilkins Place Los Angeles 18 $10,605 $10,605 11/9/2018 Central Los Angeles Concerned Citizens of South 30 Roberta II Los Angeles 40 $22,255 $7,650 11/12/2018 Central Los Angeles 31 Concerned Citizens of South Roberta Stephens Los Angeles 40 $22,255 $10,350 11/9/2018 Central Los Angeles Apartments I Deep Green Housing and 32 Broadway Village II Los Angeles 50 $19,900 $18,650 2/3/2016 Community Development 33 EAH Housing Corporation Riviera San Rafael 28 $13,033 $12,333 3/8/2016 34 EAH Housing Corporation Rodeo Gateway Rodeo 50 $17,175 $15,313 3/10/2016 35 EAH Housing Corporation San Clemente Corte Madera 79 $31,923 $29,736 4/21/2016 36 EAH Housing Corporation Turina House San Rafael 28 $12,533 $11,833 3/9/2016 37 EAH Housing Corporation Floral Gardens Selma 56 $23,140 $23,140 4/12/2017 38 EAH Housing Corporation Fountain West Fresno 72 $30,793 $30,793 8/31/2017 82 Completion Date or Apartment Payments Total Recipient Project City Grant Planned Units 2021 Payment Completion Date 39 EAH Housing Corporation Palm Court San Jose 66 $26,128 $26,098 9/16/2016 40 EAH Housing Corporation Silver Oak Oakley 24 $12,573 $12,573 9/21/2016 41 EAH Housing Corporation The Oaks Apartments Walnut Creek 36 $15,428 $15,428 6/22/2017 42 EAH Housing Corporation Vista Park I San Jose 83 $30,608 $30,493 8/25/2016 43 EAH Housing Corporation Vista Park II San Jose 83 $30,608 $30,493 9/13/2016 44 EAH Housing Corporation Casa Adobe San Pablo 54 $21,288 $21,287 3/22/2017 45 EAH Housing Corporation Buchanan Park San Francisco 68 $30,125 $30,125 3/6/2018 46 EAH Housing Corporation Centertown San Rafael 60 $26,638 $26,638 12/7/2017 47 EAH Housing Corporation Don De Dios San Jose 70 $31,263 $31,013 6/28/2018 48 EAH Housing Corporation Drakes Way Larkspur 24 $13,833 $13,833 6/20/2019 49 EAH Housing Corporation Golden Oaks Oakley 50 $29,225 $28,975 11/14/2017 50 EAH Housing Corporation Elena Gardens San Jose 168 $66,860 $66,860 5/11/2017 51 EAH Housing Corporation Pollard Plaza San Jose 130 $49,650 $49,650 8/24/2017 52 EAH Housing Corporation Cochrane Village Morgan Hill 96 $40,620 $40,620 6/28/2019 53 EAH Housing Corporation Los Robles Union City 140 $42,000 $42,000 6/24/2019 Point Reyes 54 EAH Housing Corporation Point Reyes Family Homes 27 $16,200 $16,075 3/22/2018 Station 55 EAH Housing Corporation Village Avante Morgan Hill 112 $33,600 $33,600 6/6/2019 East Bay Asian Local Jack London Gateway 56 Oakland 61 $19,865 $19,865 12/19/2016 Development Corporation Senior 57 East Bay Asian Local Seven Directions Oakland 36 $13,753 $10,853 4/11/2016 Development Corporation East Bay Asian Local 58 Avalon Senior Emeryville 67 $27,925 $27,925 3/21/2017 Development Corporation 59 East Bay Asian Local Drasnin Manor Oakland 26 $13,633 $13,633 1/26/2017 Development Corporation East Bay Asian Local 60 Giant Road San Pablo 86 $38,115 $30,735 6/23/2017 Development Corporation 61 East Bay Asian Local Lillie Mae Jones Richmond 26 $11,580 $11,580 6/1/2017 Development Corporation East Bay Asian Local 62 Oak Park Oakland 35 $16,975 $16,975 1/25/2017 Development Corporation 63 East Bay Asian Local Prosperity Place (aka 1110 Oakland 71 $31,501 $26,094 11/17/2016 Development Corporation Jackson) East Bay Asian Local 64 Slim Jenkins Court Oakland 32 $15,300 $15,300 6/13/2017 Development Corporation 65 East Bay Asian Local Swans Market Oakland 18 $10,175 $10,175 6/1/2017 Development Corporation East Bay Asian Local 66 Effie's House Oakland 21 $12,175 $12,175 2/2/2017 Development Corporation 67 East Bay Asian Local Hugh Taylor House Oakland 43 $20,848 $20,848 2/9/2017 Development Corporation East Bay Asian Local 68 Madison Park Oakland 98 $42,605 $42,605 8/2/2017 Development Corporation 69 East Bay Asian Local Madrone Hotel Oakland 32 $18,088 $18,088 2/14/2018 Development Corporation East Bay Asian Local 70 Marcus Garvey Oakland 22 $13,050 $13,050 8/2/2017 Development Corporation 71 East Bay Asian Local San Pablo Hotel Oakland 144 $42,980 $42,980 3/23/2017 Development Corporation 72 Eden Housing, Inc Eden Essei Terrace Hayward 100 $36,575 $36,575 9/21/2017 73 Eden Housing, Inc Josephine Lum Lodge AB Hayward 78 $31,983 $31,983 12/28/2018 74 Eden Housing, Inc Josephine Lum Lodge CD Hayward 72 $29,505 $29,505 12/28/2018 75 Eden Housing, Inc Sequoia Manor Fremont 81 $33,975 $33,975 1/18/2018 76 Eden Housing, Inc Hayward Senior Hayward 60 $24,375 $24,375 4/4/2018 77 Eden Housing, Inc Jasmine Square Morgan Hill 72 $28,029 $28,029 1/10/2019 78 Eden Housing, Inc Warner Creek Novato 61 $25,358 $25,358 1/24/2018 83 Completion Date or Apartment Payments Total Recipient Project City Grant Planned Units 2021 Payment Completion Date 79 Eden Housing, Inc Wheeler Manor 650 5th Gilroy 21 $10,151 $10,151 11/27/2018 80 Eden Housing, Inc Wheeler Manor 651 6th Gilroy 90 $35,708 $35,708 11/27/2018 81 Eden Housing, Inc Tienda Drive Senior Lodi 80 $34,750 $34,625 9/14/2017 82 Eden South Bay, Inc. Camphora Apartments Soledad 44 $26,198 $26,198 6/17/2016 83 Episcopal Community Services of Bishop Swing Community San Francisco 135 $38,685 $38,685 1/24/2017 San Francisco House Episcopal Community Services of Canon Barcus Community 84 San Francisco 48 $21,408 $21,408 1/10/2017 San Francisco House 85 Episcopal Community Services of Canon Kip Community San Francisco 104 $30,848 $30,848 12/21/2016 San Francisco House 86 First Community Housing Casa Feliz Studios San Jose 60 $22,700 $16,200 1/6/2016 87 First Community Housing Craig Gardens San Jose 90 $26,100 $25,425 12/3/2015 88 First Community Housing El Paseo San Jose 98 $33,433 $32,733 2/17/2016 89 First Community Housing Los Esteros San Jose 246 $66,690 $63,340 1/26/2016 90 First Community Housing Murphy Ranch Morgan Hill 100 $34,838 $33,037 9/28/2015 91 First Community Housing Villa Montgomery Redwood City 58 $18,845 $18,395 3/11/2016 92 First Community Housing Bay Avenue Senior Capitola 109 $32,655 $26,148 1/28/2016 93 First Community Housing Betty Ann Gardens San Jose 76 $29,428 $29,048 6/21/2016 94 First Community Housing Creekview Inn San Jose 25 $8,150 $8,025 1/26/2016 95 First Community Housing Guadalupe Apartments San Jose 23 $13,583 $12,468 5/7/2016 96 First Community Housing Orchard Gardens Sunnyvale 62 $21,680 $17,330 6/8/2016 97 First Community Housing Paula Apartments San Jose 21 $10,152 $10,047 4/7/2016 98 First Community Housing Troy Apartments San Jose 30 $16,475 $15,425 5/12/2016 99 First Community Housing Curtner Studios San Jose 179 $53,533 $53,533 4/19/2017 100 First Community Housing Second Street Studios San Jose 135 $40,350 $40,350 1/23/2019 101 Global CVCAH Bay Family Moreno Valley 61 $26,840 $26,840 11/22/2016 102 Global CVCAH Clinton Apartments Mecca 59 $25,960 $25,960 3/1/2017 103 Global CVCAH La Amistad Mendota 81 $35,640 $35,640 11/10/2016 104 Global CVCAH Lincoln Family Mecca 57 $25,080 $25,080 3/1/2017 105 Global CVCAH Meridian Family Sacramento 47 $25,850 $25,850 7/7/2017 106 Global CVCAH Mirage Vista Pixley 55 $24,200 $24,200 11/23/2016 107 Global CVCAH Sunnyview I Delano 70 $29,750 $29,750 11/21/2016 108 Global CVCAH Sunnyview II Delano 70 $29,750 $29,750 11/21/2016 109 Global CVCAH Perris Isle Senior Moreno Valley 189 $85,050 $85,050 7/18/2017 110 HIP Housing Edgewater Isle San Mateo 92 $29,343 $21,893 3/30/2016 111 Housing Authority of Fresno Maldonado Migrant Center Firebaugh 64 $28,800 $7,200 3/31/2021 County Housing Authority of the City of 112 Dayton Square Fresno 66 $29,370 $15,114 $22,457 7/19/2021 Fresno, CA 113 Housing Authority of the City of El Cortez Fresno 48 $27,840 $27,840 9/25/2018 Fresno, CA Housing Authority of the City of Independent Towers 114 Los Angeles 196 $58,698 $58,690 5/26/2016 Los Angeles (Independent Square) 115 Housing Authority of the City of Union Towers Los Angeles 200 $60,000 $59,970 5/26/2016 Los Angeles San Fernando Gardens (Note for number of Housing Authority of the City of 116 Residents below: SF Pacoima 448 $200,978 $200,977 6/8/2017 Los Angeles Gardens has 1,692; field doesn't accept >1,000.) 117 Housing Authority of the City of Buena Vida Family Ventura 20 $11,925 $11,925 8/15/2018 San Buenaventura Housing Authority of the City of 118 Westview Ventura 100 $44,963 $44,963 4/19/2019 San Buenaventura 84 Completion Date or Apartment Payments Total Recipient Project City Grant Planned Units 2021 Payment Completion Date 119 Housing Authority of the County Baker Street Bakersfield 37 $22,200 $22,150 8/31/2017 of Kern Housing Authority of the County 120 Green Gardens Bakersfield 104 $31,200 $31,200 10/5/2017 of Kern 121 Housing Authority of the County Homer Harrison Delano 50 $30,000 $30,000 8/31/2017 of Kern Housing Authority of the County 122 Park Place Apartments Bakersfield 80 $36,000 $36,000 8/31/2017 of Kern 123 Housing Authority of the County Pinewood Glen Bakersfield 110 $33,000 $33,000 8/31/2017 of Kern Housing Authority of the County 124 Plaza Towers Bakersfield 117 $35,100 $35,100 8/31/2017 of Kern 125 Housing Authority of the County Plaza Towers Annex Bakersfield 82 $36,900 $36,900 8/31/2017 of Kern Housing Authority of the County 126 Quincy St. Apartments Delano 32 $19,200 $19,200 8/31/2017 of Kern 127 Housing Authority of the County Residence at Old Town Bakersfield 30 $18,000 $18,000 8/31/2017 of Kern Kern Housing Authority of the County Residence at West 128 Bakersfield 50 $30,000 $30,000 8/31/2017 of Kern Columbus 129 Housing Authority of the County Village Park Apartments Bakersfield 60 $27,000 $27,000 8/31/2017 of Kern Housing Authority of the County 130 Arivn FLC Bakersfield 88 $74,800 $74,800 11/13/2019 of Kern 131 Housing Authority of the County Monterey St Bakersfield 16 $15,808 $15,808 12/12/2019 of Kern Housing Authority of the County 132 Parkview Arvin 28 $27,300 $27,300 5/16/2019 of Kern 133 Housing Authority of the County Village Congressional Arvin 60 $51,000 $51,000 5/31/2019 of Kern Housing Authority of the County 134 Arvin Sun Gardens Arvin 50 $30,000 $30,000 5/31/2019 of Kern 135 Housing Authority of the County Parkside Garden Lompoc 48 $28,800 $28,800 1/31/2018 of Santa Barbara Apartments Housing Authority of the County 136 Lompoc Gardens I Lompoc 40 $33,800 $33,800 1/31/2018 of Santa Barbara 137 Housing Authority of the County Lompoc Gardens II Lompoc 35 $33,075 $33,075 1/31/2018 of Santa Barbara Housing Authority of the County 138 Miller Plaza Lompoc 24 $22,128 $22,128 1/31/2018 of Santa Barbara Extension 139 Long Beach Affordable Housing Beverly Manor LOS ANGELES 59 $26,550 $15,932 Request Coalition Under Review Extension Long Beach Affordable Housing Request 140 Grace Manor CARSON 38 $21,517 $12,286 Coalition Under Review Extension 141 Long Beach Affordable Housing Metro West Apartments Los Angeles 40 $18,176 $8,576 Request Coalition Under Review Extension Long Beach Affordable Housing Request 142 Acacia Street Apartments Inglewood 23 $12,487 Coalition Under Review Extension 143 Long Beach Affordable Housing Carlin Avenue Apartments Lynwood 15 $8,250 Request Coalition Under Review Extension Long Beach Affordable Housing Request 144 Louise Avenue Apartments LYNWOOD 14 $7,970 Coalition Under Review Extension 145 Long Beach Affordable Housing Raymond Avenue LONG BEACH 8 $4,730 Request Coalition Apartments Under Review Extension Long Beach Affordable Housing Somerset Avenue Request 146 PARAMOUNT 24 $12,440 Coalition Apartments Under Review 85 Completion Date or Apartment Payments Total Recipient Project City Grant Planned Units 2021 Payment Completion Date 147 Mary Elizabeth Inn Mary Elizabeth Inn San Francisco 92 $40,271 $40,121 10/19/2017 148 Mary Elizabeth Inn The Verona San Francisco 65 $28,278 $28,273 4/5/2017 149 Mercy Housing California Mather Veterans Village Mather 50 $21,663 $16,415 5/23/2016 150 Mercy Housing California Sunset Valley Duplexes Wheatland 88 $31,520 $29,320 1/14/2016 151 Mercy Housing California Land Park Woods Sacramento 75 $33,675 $33,550 6/22/2017 152 Mercy Housing California 180 Beamer Woodland 80 $35,675 $35,675 12/17/2018 153 Mercy Housing California 623 Vernon Roseville 58 $25,660 $25,660 10/25/2018 154 MidPen Housing Fetters Apartments Sonoma 60 $26,770 $26,770 2/7/2017 155 MidPen Housing Celestina Gardens Sonoma 40 $22,589 $22,589 12/31/2019 St. Stephens Senior 156 MidPen Housing Santa Cruz 40 $23,509 $23,509 5/22/2017 Housing 157 MidPen Housing Corporation Donner Lofts San Jose 102 $30,443 $30,443 5/18/2016 158 MidPen Housing Corporation Foster Square Foster City 66 $28,833 $28,833 8/22/2016 159 MidPen Housing Corporation Laguna Commons Fremont 64 $28,752 $28,432 8/30/2016 160 Mid-Peninsula The Farm, Inc University Avenue Senior East Palo Alto 41 $24,193 $24,193 7/14/2017 161 Mid-Peninsula The Farm, Inc. Onizuka Crossing Sunnyvale 58 $23,572 $23,572 4/26/2016 162 Mid-Peninsula The Farm, Inc. 6800 Mission Daly City 52 $23,400 $23,400 3/23/2017 163 Mid-Peninsula The Farm, Inc. Sequoia Belle Haven Menlo Park 90 $39,794 $39,794 2/20/2017 164 Mutual Housing California Lemon Hill Townhomes Sacramento 74 $31,885 $30,035 12/10/2015 165 Mutual Housing California Los Robles Sacramento 80 $35,288 $34,293 12/8/2015 Mutual Housing at Foothill 166 Mutual Housing California Sacramento 98 $43,575 $43,085 1/19/2017 Farms 167 Napa Valley Community Housing Arroyo Grande Villas Yountville 25 $20,625 $20,625 2/22/2018 168 Napa Valley Community Housing Magnolia Park Townhomes Napa 29 $23,925 $23,925 2/22/2018 169 Napa Valley Community Housing Mayacamas Village Napa 51 $41,565 $41,565 2/23/2018 170 Napa Valley Community Housing Napa Park Homes Napa 140 $63,700 $63,700 2/27/2018 171 Napa Valley Community Housing Oak Creek Terrace Napa 41 $30,955 $30,955 2/22/2018 172 Napa Valley Community Housing Pecan Court Apartments Napa 25 $23,875 $23,875 3/5/2018 173 Napa Valley Community Housing Silverado Creek Napa 102 $66,810 $66,810 2/20/2018 Apartments 174 Napa Valley Community Housing The Reserve of Napa Napa 117 $64,350 $64,350 2/21/2018 175 Napa Valley Community Housing Villa de Adobe Apartments Napa 16 $15,600 $15,600 2/21/2018 Northern Valley Catholic Social The Woodlands 176 Redding 20 $35,949 $33,672 7/31/2020 Service Apartments II 177 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Canyon Creek Apartments Paso Robles 68 $30,600 $30,600 8/30/2017 178 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Cawelti Court Arroyo Grande 28 $16,800 $16,800 8/30/2017 179 Peoples' Self-Help Housing College Park Lompoc 35 $21,000 $21,000 8/30/2017 Courtland Street 180 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Arroyo Grande 36 $21,600 $21,600 8/30/2017 Apartments 181 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Creekside Gardens Paso Robles 29 $17,400 $17,400 8/30/2017 182 Peoples' Self-Help Housing El Patio Hotel Ventura 42 $25,200 $25,200 8/30/2017 183 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Lachen Tara Avila Beach 29 $17,400 $17,400 8/30/2017 184 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Los Adobes de Maria I Santa Maria 65 $29,250 $29,250 8/30/2017 185 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Los Adobes de Maria II Santa Maria 52 $23,400 $23,400 8/30/2017 186 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Los Robles Terrace Paso Robles 40 $24,000 $24,000 8/30/2017 187 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Ocean View Manor Morro Bay 40 $24,000 $24,000 8/30/2017 188 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Oceanside Gardens Morro Bay 21 $12,600 $12,600 8/30/2017 189 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Pacific View Apartments Morro Bay 26 $15,600 $15,600 8/30/2017 190 Peoples' Self-Help Housing River View Townhomes Guadalupe 80 $36,000 $36,000 8/30/2017 86 Completion Date or Apartment Payments Total Recipient Project City Grant Planned Units 2021 Payment Completion Date 191 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Schoolhouse Lane Cambria 24 $14,400 $14,400 8/30/2017 Apartments 192 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Templeton Place Templeton 29 $17,400 $17,400 8/30/2017 193 Peoples' Self-Help Housing The Villas at Higuera San Luis Obispo 28 $16,800 $16,800 8/30/2017 194 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Victoria Hotel Santa Barbara 28 $16,800 $16,800 8/30/2017 195 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Dahlia Court Carpinetria 55 $52,250 $52,250 12/19/2018 196 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Dahlia Court II Carpinteria 33 $31,350 $31,350 11/5/2018 197 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Isle Vista Apartments Isla Vista 56 $30,800 $30,800 11/5/2018 198 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Ladera Street Apartments Santa Barbara 51 $28,050 $28,050 11/5/2018 199 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Mariposa Town Homes Orcutt 80 $76,000 $76,000 10/26/2017 200 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Rolling Hills Apartments Templeton 53 $49,025 $49,025 10/24/2019 201 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Storke Ranch Apartments Goleta 36 $27,180 $27,180 12/19/2018 202 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Victoria Street Bungalows Santa Barbara 16 $15,200 $15,200 6/7/2018 203 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Villa La Esperanza Goleta 83 $53,950 $53,950 12/19/2018 204 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Atascadero Gardens Atascadero 18 $10,800 $10,800 1/14/2019 205 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Belridge Street Apartments Oceano 12 $7,200 $7,200 11/26/2019 206 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Casas Las Granadas Santa Barbara 12 $7,200 $7,200 11/26/2019 207 Peoples' Self-Help Housing La Brisa Marina Oceano 16 $9,600 $9,600 2/1/2019 208 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Oak Forest Apartments Arroyo Grande 20 $12,000 $12,000 12/19/2018 209 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Sea Haven Apartments Pismo Beach 12 $7,200 $7,200 4/9/2019 210 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Creston Gardens Paso Robles 60 $27,000 $27,000 7/11/2018 211 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Juniper Street Apartments Arroyo Grande 14 $8,400 $8,400 4/30/2019 212 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Sequoia Apartments Morro Bay 12 $7,200 $7,200 2/1/2019 213 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Valentine Court I Santa Maria 35 $21,000 $21,000 12/19/2018 214 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Chapel Court Carpinteria 28 $16,800 $16,800 9/7/2019 215 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Sea Breeze Apartments Los Osos 29 $17,400 $17,400 7/26/2019 216 Peoples' Self-Help Housing South Bay Apartments Los Osos 75 $33,750 $33,750 7/26/2019 217 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Valentine Court II Santa Maria 18 $10,800 $10,800 5/10/2019 218 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Valentine Court III Santa Maria 9 $5,400 $5,400 5/10/2019 219 PEP Housing Casa Grande Petaluma 58 $24,029 $20,619 1/28/2016 220 PEP Housing Caulfield Lane Petaluma 22 $12,501 $9,661 1/28/2016 221 PEP Housing Mountain View Petaluma 24 $10,087 $9,617 2/2/2016 222 PEP Housing Sun House Senior Ukiah 42 $20,803 $20,803 9/15/2017 Kentfield 223 Petaluma Ecumenical Properties 10 Toussin (unincorporated 13 $7,557 $6,492 6/24/2015 (PEP Housing) Marin County) Petaluma Ecumenical Properties 224 1275 Lindberg Petaluma 16 $8,296 $7,161 6/25/2015 (PEP Housing) 225 Petaluma Ecumenical Properties 167 Edith Petaluma 24 $10,675 $9,300 6/23/2015 (PEP Housing) Petaluma Ecumenical Properties 226 210 Douglas Petaluma 24 $10,287 $9,197 6/23/2015 (PEP Housing) 227 Petaluma Ecumenical Properties 575 Vallejo Petaluma 45 $16,822 $14,566 6/22/2015 (PEP Housing) Petaluma Ecumenical Properties 228 579 Vallejo Petaluma 40 $12,295 $11,419 6/23/2015 (PEP Housing) 229 Richmond Housing Authority Friendship Manor Richmond 58 $25,152 $25,152 2/25/2019 230 Richmond Housing Authority Nevin Plaza Richmond 142 $41,520 $41,520 2/25/2019 231 Richmond Housing Authority Triangle Court Richmond 98 $43,080 $43,080 2/25/2019 San Francisco Housing 232 Bayview Commons San Francisco 29 $17,166 $17,166 11/16/2017 Development Corporation 87 Completion Date or Apartment Payments Total Recipient Project City Grant Planned Units 2021 Payment Completion Date 233 San Francisco Housing Hunters Point East San Francisco 89 $39,601 $39,601 6/4/2018 Development Corporation San Francisco Housing 234 Hunters Point West San Francisco 124 $36,967 $36,967 3/23/2018 Development Corporation 235 San Francisco Housing Westbrook Apartments San Francisco 227 $67,157 $66,941 8/30/2019 Development Corporation Satellite Affordable Housing 236 Columbia Park Manor Pittsburg 79 $21,225 $21,225 3/30/2017 Associates 237 Satellite Affordable Housing Lakeside Senior Oakland 100 $23,733 $23,734 3/2/2017 Associates Apartments Satellite Affordable Housing 238 Lawrence Moore Berkeley 46 $16,537 $16,537 5/28/2017 Associates 239 Satellite Affordable Housing Linda Glen Oakland 42 $15,520 $15,457 3/4/2017 Associates Satellite Affordable Housing 240 Otterbein Manor Oakland 44 $15,949 $15,847 4/26/2017 Associates 241 Satellite Affordable Housing Sacramento Senior Homes Berkeley 40 $16,844 $16,844 4/30/2017 Associates Satellite Affordable Housing 242 Amistad House Oakland 60 $22,235 $20,293 10/14/2016 Associates (SAHA) 243 Satellite Affordable Housing Petaluma Avenue Homes Sebastopol 45 $17,994 $17,994 12/2/2016 Associates (SAHA) Satellite Affordable Housing 244 Satellite Central Oakland 152 $33,461 $33,339 10/14/2016 Associates (SAHA) 245 Satellite Affordable Housing Valdez Plaza Oakland 150 $29,400 $26,394 8/31/2016 Associates (SAHA) Satellite Affordable Housing 246 Beth Asher Oakland 50 $30,125 $17,920 6/9/2017 Associates (SAHA) 247 Satellite Affordable Housing Stuart Pratt Berkeley 44 $26,638 $16,582 5/30/2017 Associates (SAHA) 248 Self Help Enterprises Almond Court Partners Wasco 36 $21,600 $21,600 4/19/2016 249 Self Help Enterprises Caliente Creek Partners ARVIN 46 $27,600 $26,600 4/20/2016 North Park Apartments 250 Self Help Enterprises BAKERSFIELD 104 $31,200 $31,200 5/5/2016 Housing Corporation 251 Self Help Enterprises Sunrise Villa Partners WASCO 44 $26,400 $26,400 4/19/2016 252 Self Help Enterprises Villa Hermosa Partners WASCO 40 $24,000 $24,000 4/22/2016 253 Self Help Enterprises Washington Plaza Partners EARLIMART 44 $26,400 $26,400 4/21/2016 254 Self Help Enterprises Rancho Lindo Partners LAMONT 44 $35,200 $35,200 4/13/2017 255 Self Help Enterprises Rolling Hills Partners NEWMAN 52 $28,600 $28,600 4/13/2017 Solinas Village aka Self 256 Self Help Enterprises MCFARLAND 52 $35,100 $35,100 4/13/2017 Help Communities 1, LLC 257 Self-Help Enterprises Cottonwood Creek Madera 40 $22,800 $22,800 4/20/2016 258 Self-Help Enterprises Lincoln Plaza Hanford 48 $24,000 $24,000 4/26/2016 259 Self-Help Enterprises Villa Del Rey Del Rey 48 $28,800 $28,800 4/22/2016 260 Self-Help Enterprises Gateway Village Modesto 48 $28,800 $28,800 5/2/2018 261 Self-Help Enterprises Goshen Village II Goshen 56 $25,200 $25,200 5/2/2018 262 Self-Help Enterprises Parksdale Village II Madera 48 $28,800 $28,800 5/2/2018 263 Self-Help Enterprises Sand Creek Orosi 60 $27,000 $27,000 5/2/2018 264 Self-Help Enterprises Villa de Guadalupe Orosi 60 $27,000 $27,000 5/2/2018 265 Self-Help Enterprises Viscaya Gardens Dinuba 48 $28,800 $28,800 5/2/2018 266 Silvercrest, Inc. (non-profit) Inyo Terrace Fresno 44 $25,960 $25,960 11/26/2018 267 Silvercrest, Inc. (non-profit) Parc Grove Commons Fresno 215 $64,400 $59,900 4/1/2016 268 Silvercrest, Inc. (non-profit) Parc Grove Northwest Fresno 148 $43,560 $43,560 4/1/2016 269 Silvercrest, Inc. (non-profit) Pacific Gardens Fresno 56 $28,800 $14,866 11/26/2018 270 Silvercrest, Inc. (non-profit) Yosemite Village Fresno 69 $44,850 $15,114 $15,114 2/28/2021 88 Completion Date or Apartment Payments Total Recipient Project City Grant Planned Units 2021 Payment Completion Date Extension Request 271 Skid Row Housing Trust Charles Cobb Apartments Los Angeles 76 $34,200 $6,373 $6,373 Under Review Extension Request 272 Skid Row Housing Trust New Genesis Apartments Los Angeles 106 $31,800 $13,612 $13,612 Under Review Extension Request 273 Skid Row Housing Trust Star Apartments Los Angeles 102 $30,600 $10,044 $10,044 Under Review 274 Surf Development Company Cypress Court Lompoc 60 $27,000 $27,000 1/31/2018 275 Surf Development Company Pescadero Lofts Goleta 33 $19,173 $19,173 1/31/2018 276 Surf Development Company Sandpiper Apartments Goleta 68 $30,600 $30,600 1/31/2018 277 Surf Development Company Santa Rita Village I Lompoc 36 $21,600 $21,600 1/31/2018 278 Surf Development Company Ted Zenich Gardens Santa Maria 24 $14,400 $14,400 1/31/2018 279 Surf Development Company Central Plaza Santa Maria 112 $61,040 $61,040 1/31/2018 280 Surf Development Company Leland Park Orcutt 16 $15,600 $15,600 1/31/2018 281 Surf Development Company Palm Grove Lompoc 40 $37,800 $37,800 1/31/2018 282 Surf Development Company Parkview Apartments Goleta 20 $15,210 $15,210 1/31/2018 283 Surf Development Company Creekside Village Los Alamos 39 $22,386 $22,386 12/27/2017 284 Surf Development Company Rancho Hermosa Santa Maria 47 $27,730 $27,730 12/27/2017 285 Surf Development Company Positano Apartments Goleta 130 $39,000 $39,000 11/19/2019 Sutter Community Affordable 286 Kristen Court Apartments Live Oak 56 $25,038 $24,299 12/14/2016 Housing 287 Swords to Plowshares Veterans The Fairfax Hotel San Francisco 43 $9,353 $8,909 10/29/2015 Rights Organization Swords to Plowshares Veterans 288 The Stanford Hotel San Francisco 130 $5,144 $4,462 9/18/2015 Rights Organization Tenderloin Neighborhood 289 Development Corporation Curran House San Francisco 67 $24,966 $24,865 6/6/2017 (TNDC) Tenderloin Neighborhood 290 Development Corporation Dalt Hotel San Francisco 179 $45,574 $45,547 6/26/2017 (TNDC) Tenderloin Neighborhood 291 Development Corporation Ritz Hotel San Francisco 88 $30,252 $30,252 6/1/2017 (TNDC) Tenderloin Neighborhood 292 Development Corporation SOMA Family Apartments San Francisco 74 $27,767 $27,767 6/29/2017 (TNDC) Tenderloin Neighborhood 293 Development Corporation SOMA Studios San Francisco 88 $31,344 $31,344 6/30/2017 (TNDC) Tenderloin Neighborhood 294 Development Corporation 430 Turk San Francisco 89 $35,215 $35,215 11/17/2017 (TNDC) Tenderloin Neighborhood 295 Development Corporation 939 Eddy San Francisco 36 $21,563 $21,462 12/8/2017 (TNDC) Tenderloin Neighborhood 296 Development Corporation 951 Eddy San Francisco 26 $15,037 $15,037 12/11/2017 (TNDC) Tenderloin Neighborhood 297 Development Corporation Aarti Hotel San Francisco 40 $23,972 $23,972 12/8/2017 (TNDC) Tenderloin Neighborhood 298 Development Corporation Alexander Residence San Francisco 179 $53,673 $53,673 12/15/2017 (TNDC) Tenderloin Neighborhood 299 Development Corporation Antonia Manor San Francisco 133 $39,726 $39,726 12/4/2017 (TNDC) Tenderloin Neighborhood 300 Development Corporation Buena Vista Terrace San Francisco 40 $23,640 $23,640 12/1/2017 (TNDC) 89 Completion Date or Apartment Payments Total Recipient Project City Grant Planned Units 2021 Payment Completion Date Tenderloin Neighborhood 301 Development Corporation Civic Center Residence San Francisco 212 $63,472 $63,472 2/23/2018 (TNDC) Tenderloin Neighborhood Folsom + Dore 302 Development Corporation San Francisco 98 $43,976 $43,976 9/27/2017 Apartments (TNDC) Tenderloin Neighborhood 303 Development Corporation Maria Manor San Francisco 119 $34,224 $32,795 12/15/2017 (TNDC) Tenderloin Neighborhood 304 Development Corporation Mosaica (Family) San Francisco 93 $41,170 $41,170 9/22/2017 (TNDC) Tenderloin Neighborhood 305 Development Corporation Mosaica (Senior) San Francisco 24 $14,220 $14,220 9/22/2017 (TNDC) Tenderloin Neighborhood 306 Development Corporation West Hotel San Francisco 106 $31,683 $31,683 12/8/2017 (TNDC) 307 The Banneker Homes, Inc. Banneker Homes San Francisco 108 $45,900 $45,900 8/23/2018 Visionary Home Builders of 308 Delta Plaza Stockton 30 $17,288 $17,288 4/3/2018 California, Inc 309 Visionary Home Builders of Villa Isabella Stockton 20 $11,925 $11,675 4/3/2018 California, Inc Visionary Home Builders of 310 Almond Terrace Ceres 46 $27,600 $27,600 11/28/2018 California, Inc 311 Visionary Home Builders of Dewey Apartments Stockton 10 $6,000 $5,750 4/3/2018 California, Inc Visionary Home Builders of Diamond Cove 312 Stockton 36 $21,600 $21,600 5/11/2018 California, Inc Townhomes I-A 313 Visionary Home Builders of Diamond Cove Stockton 24 $14,400 $14,360 6/4/2018 California, Inc Townhomes I-B Visionary Home Builders of Mountain View 314 Tracy 37 $22,200 $21,825 11/28/2018 California, Inc Townhomes 315 Visionary Home Builders of Villa Monterey Stockton 45 $27,000 $27,000 11/28/2018 California, Inc Visionary Home Builders of 316 Whispering Pines Sacramento 96 $43,200 $43,200 8/10/2018 California, Inc Extension 317 Ward Economic Development Rosa Parks Villas Los Angeles 60 $26,468 Request Corporation Under Review Extension Ward Economic Development Request 318 Tuelyn Terrace Los Angeles 90 $40,202 Corporation Under Review Extension 319 Ward Economic Development Ward Villas Los Angeles 120 $35,836 $6,600 Request Corporation Under Review West Sacramento Housing West 320 Patio Apartments 45 $16,875 $15,750 1/12/2016 Development Corporation Sacramento 321 West Sacramento Housing Washington Courtyards West 90 $23,100 $20,850 1/13/2016 Development Corporation Sacramento West Sacramento Housing West 322 West Capitol 125 $32,113 $32,113 1/12/2016 Development Corporation Sacramento Totals: 21,268 $9,269,606 $132,782 $8,678,367 90 Attachment G: Public Housing Completed Projects Costs and Participation as of December 2021 % Trained Cost per COMPL Total who Recipient Project Residents Grant Trained % Trained Resident DATE Payment Subscribe to Trained Broadband Armstrong Place Senior 1 BRIDGE Housing Corporation 12/31/2017 152 $36,970 $34,593 49 32.0% 92.0% $706 Housing 2 BRIDGE Housing Corporation Chestnut Creek Senior Housing 6/30/2019 55 $24,250 $24,250 38 69.0% 100.0% $638 3 BRIDGE Housing Corporation Chestnut Linden Court 6/30/2019 410 $34,170 $30,038 43 10.0% 100.0% $699 4 BRIDGE Housing Corporation Emeryvilla 6/30/2019 46 $23,550 $23,550 22 48.0% 95.0% $1,070 Geraldine Johnson Senior 5 BRIDGE Housing Corporation 12/31/2017 74 $29,130 $27,382 18 24.0% 100.0% $1,521 Housing 6 BRIDGE Housing Corporation Ironhorse at Central 6/30/2019 251 $30,030 $25,399 13 5.0% 85.0% $1,954 7 BRIDGE Housing Corporation Mandela Gateway Apartments 6/30/2019 440 $34,510 $34,510 62 14.0% 100.0% $557 8 BRIDGE Housing Corporation Natoma Family Apartments 6/30/2019 137 $25,550 $25,550 33 24.0% 100.0% $774 9 BRIDGE Housing Corporation Richmond City Center 6/30/2019 171 $25,630 $20,520 14 8.0% 100.0% $1,466 10 BRIDGE Housing Corporation St. Joseph's Senior Apartments 12/31/2017 103 $33,130 $33,130 42 41.0% 67.0% $789 11 BRIDGE Housing Corporation Terraza Palmera at St. Josephs 6/30/2019 171 $26,090 $23,881 34 20.0% 100.0% $702 12 Christian Church Homes Fargo Senior Center 6/30/2019 102 $42,000 $28,450 34 33.3% 79.0% $837 13 Christian Church Homes Harrison Street Senior Housing 5/31/2019 100 $25,420 $25,420 39 39.0% 85.0% $652 Sylvester Rutledge Manor - 14 Christian Church Homes 8/1/2019 69 $39,000 $24,750 21 30.4% 100.0% $1,179 North Oakland Senior Housing Westlake Christian Terrace 15 Christian Church Homes 9/30/2019 243 $49,500 $48,975 77 32.0% 62.0% $636 East Westlake Christian Terrace 16 Christian Church Homes 9/30/2019 250 $49,500 $49,490 64 26.0% 66.0% $773 West 17 EAH Housing Corporation Buchanan Park 9/30/2019 145 $34,460 $28,460 38 26.0% 100.0% $749 18 EAH Housing Corporation Casa Adobe 9/30/2019 57 $20,390 $16,160 33 58.0% 100.0% $490 19 EAH Housing Corporation Centertown 12/31/2019 147 $34,930 $34,930 48 33.0% 100.0% $728 20 EAH Housing Corporation Cochrane Village 9/16/2020 318 $49,900 $49,219 88 27.7% 100.0% $559 21 EAH Housing Corporation Don de Dios 12/31/2019 259 $41,070 $41,070 50 19.0% 100.0% $821 22 EAH Housing Corporation Drakes Way 9/4/2020 68 $10,500 $10,500 24 35.0% 100.0% $438 23 EAH Housing Corporation Elena Gardens 12/20/2019 365 $49,080 $49,080 73 20.0% 100.0% $672 24 EAH Housing Corporation Floral Gardens 10/16/2020 143 $43,286 $41,979 55 38.5% 100.0% $763 25 EAH Housing Corporation Fountain West 10/20/2020 196 $47,133 $40,012 51 26.0% 100.0% $785 26 EAH Housing Corporation Golden Oaks 9/30/2019 59 $19,090 $15,890 34 58.0% 100.0% $467 27 EAH Housing Corporation Los Robles 3/31/2020 356 $49,930 $48,815 79 22.0% 89.0% $618 28 EAH Housing Corporation Palm Court 5/20/2020 78 $37,239 $37,239 65 83.0% 100.0% $573 29 EAH Housing Corporation Point Reyes 9/30/2019 70 $16,165 $14,765 20 29.0% 100.0% $738 30 EAH Housing Corporation Pollard Plaza 12/31/2019 301 $49,935 $49,935 76 25.0% 100.0% $657 31 EAH Housing Corporation Riviera Apartments 5/20/2020 77 $24,960 $20,930 28 36.4% 100.0% $748 32 EAH Housing Corporation Rodeo Gateway 3/31/2020 55 $24,690 $23,327 43 78.2% 100.0% $542 33 EAH Housing Corporation San Clemente Place 7/1/2020 212 $41,478 $41,478 71 33.5% 100.0% $584 34 EAH Housing Corporation Silver Oak 11/21/2019 28 $14,680 $14,680 24 86.0% 100.0% $612 35 EAH Housing Corporation The Oaks 12/31/2019 99 $18,513 $18,513 25 25.0% 100.0% $741 36 EAH Housing Corporation Turina House 5/20/2020 91 $18,150 $17,704 26 28.6% 100.0% $681 91 % Trained Cost per COMPL Total who Recipient Project Residents Grant Trained % Trained Resident DATE Payment Subscribe to Trained Broadband 37 EAH Housing Corporation Village Avante 9/29/2020 549 $49,990 $47,685 134 24.4% 100.0% $356 38 EAH Housing Corporation Vista Park 1 5/20/2020 116 $37,311 $35,197 66 57.0% 100.0% $533 39 EAH Housing Corporation Vista Park 2 5/20/2020 132 $37,311 $35,517 65 49.0% 100.0% $546 40 Eden Housing, Inc 801 Alma Family Apartments 1/31/2019 156 $12,880 $12,880 38 24.0% 100.0% $339 41 Eden Housing, Inc Altenheim 7/1/2018 136 $19,380 $18,030 64 47.0% 100.0% $282 42 Eden Housing, Inc Camphora 1/31/2019 119 $21,040 $21,040 40 34.0% 100.0% $526 43 Eden Housing, Inc Carlow Court Apartments 1/31/2019 74 $12,880 $12,880 41 55.0% 100.0% $314 44 Eden Housing, Inc Cottonwood Place Apartments 7/1/2018 146 $16,015 $15,615 90 62.0% 88.0% $174 45 Eden Housing, Inc Studio 819 Apartments 7/1/2018 61 $12,880 $12,830 47 77.0% 83.0% $273 46 Eden Housing, Inc Weinreb Place 12/15/2017 24 $12,351 $11,951 19 79.0% 100.0% $629 47 Eden Housing, Inc Wexford Way 7/1/2018 416 $12,880 $12,480 136 33.0% 85.0% $92 Episcopal Community Services Bishop Swing Community 48 6/30/2018 135 $49,959 $41,612 75 56.0% 100.0% $555 of San Francisco House Episcopal Community Services Canon Barcus Community 49 6/30/2018 153 $49,520 $35,547 32 21.0% 100.0% $1,111 of San Francisco House Episcopal Community Services 50 Canon Kip Community House 6/30/2018 103 $49,593 $36,092 38 37.0% 100.0% $950 of San Francisco 51 First Community Housing Betty Ann Gardens 3/30/2020 230 $38,910 $29,287 25 11.0% 100.0% $1,171 52 First Community Housing Casa Feliz Studios 3/20/2020 60 $36,700 $25,053 19 32.0% 100.0% $1,319 53 First Community Housing Creekview inn 2/15/2020 25 $19,705 $11,858 9 36.0% 100.0% $1,318 Curtner Studios Digital 54 First Community Housing 3/10/2017 200 $25,756 $22,712 41 21.0% 100.0% $554 Connections 55 First Community Housing El Paseo Digital Connections 3/10/2017 98 $21,030 $20,350 22 22.0% 100.0% $925 56 First Community Housing Fourth Street Apts 3/30/2020 250 $38,910 $27,062 20 8.0% 100.0% $1,353 57 First Community Housing Japantown Senior Apts 3/30/2020 85 $36,700 $27,069 27 32.0% 100.0% $1,003 58 First Community Housing Orchard Parkview 3/30/2020 130 $36,700 $26,770 17 13.0% 100.0% $1,575 Housing Authority of the Carmelitos Housing 59 1/31/2018 1750 $28,210 $19,223 288 16.0% 36.0% $67 County of Los Angeles Development Housing Authority of the Harbor Hills Housing 60 1/31/2018 761 $28,210 $19,223 97 13.0% 33.0% $198 County of Los Angeles Development Housing Authority of the Nueva Maravilla Housing 61 1/31/2018 1471 $28,210 $19,223 285 19.0% 38.0% $67 County of Los Angeles Development 62 Jamboree Housing Corporation Ceres Court Apartments 9/30/2018 160 $12,798 $8,363 56 35.0% 71.0% $149 63 Jamboree Housing Corporation Ceres Way Apartments 9/30/2018 173 $11,877 $9,638 50 29.0% 90.0% $193 64 Jamboree Housing Corporation Puerto del Sol Apartments 8/31/2017 498 $23,567 $12,483 59 12.0% 80.0% $212 65 Jamboree Housing Corporation Woodglen Vista Apartments 9/30/2018 514 $10,677 $10,637 150 29.0% 30.0% $71 Glen Ellen Mutual Housing 66 Mutual Housing California 6/30/2019 100 $34,250 $24,564 28 28.0% 71.0% $877 Community 67 Mutual Housing California Lemon Hill 8/31/2018 258 $42,058 $25,118 24 9.0% 100.0% $1,047 Moore Village Mutual Housing 68 Mutual Housing California 6/30/2019 142 $41,700 $25,824 36 25.0% 72.0% $717 Community 69 Mutual Housing California Mutual Housing at Dixianne 6/30/2019 160 $40,500 $22,764 19 12.0% 89.0% $1,198 70 Mutual Housing California Mutual Housing at Norwood 6/30/2019 301 $49,848 $28,891 42 14.0% 71.0% $688 Mutual Housing at River 71 Mutual Housing California 6/30/2019 594 $48,898 $29,246 52 9.0% 73.0% $562 Garden 72 Mutual Housing California Mutual Housing at Sky Park 8/31/2018 246 $44,289 $27,997 24 10.0% 100.0% $1,167 92 % Trained Cost per COMPL Total who Recipient Project Residents Grant Trained % Trained Resident DATE Payment Subscribe to Trained Broadband 73 Mutual Housing California Mutual Housing at Spring Lake 8/31/2018 188 $35,960 $24,763 16 9.0% 100.0% $1,548 Mutual Housing at the 74 Mutual Housing California 8/31/2018 138 $49,533 $31,964 30 22.0% 100.0% $1,065 Highlands Mutual Housing on the 75 Mutual Housing California 6/30/2019 149 $40,100 $27,524 41 28.0% 85.0% $671 Greenway 76 Mutual Housing California New Harmony 8/31/2018 104 $38,122 $26,251 12 12.0% 100.0% $2,188 77 Mutual Housing California Owendale 8/31/2018 183 $25,670 $19,722 26 14.0% 100.0% $759 Tremont Green Mutual 78 Mutual Housing California 6/30/2019 94 $34,650 $23,272 25 27.0% 76.0% $931 Housing Community Twin Pines Mutual Housing 79 Mutual Housing California 6/30/2019 81 $34,900 $22,411 20 25.0% 90.0% $1,121 Community Victory Townhomes Mutual 80 Mutual Housing California 6/30/2019 95 $30,250 $21,217 21 22.0% 81.0% $1,010 Housing Community 81 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Ocean View Manor 8/15/2019 37 $13,575 $9,212 19 51.0% 100.0% $485 82 Peoples' Self-Help Housing Oceanside Gardens 8/15/2019 24 $7,883 $6,726 15 63.0% 100.0% $448 Petaluma Ecumenical Properties 575 Vallejo Street Senior 83 11/9/2016 46 $10,550 $7,023 28 61.0% 100.0% $251 (PEP Housing) Apartments Adoption Petaluma Ecumenical Properties 579 Vallejo Street Senior 84 11/10/2016 41 $9,430 $6,271 25 61.0% 100.0% $251 (PEP Housing) Apartments Adoption Petaluma Ecumenical Properties Acacia Lane Senior Apartments 85 11/3/2016 47 $10,190 $6,772 27 57.0% 100.0% $251 (PEP Housing) Adoption Petaluma Ecumenical Properties Casa Grande Senior 86 11/17/2016 60 $13,350 $9,030 36 60.0% 100.0% $251 (PEP Housing) Apartments Adoption Petaluma Ecumenical Properties Caulfield Lane Senior 87 11/18/2016 23 $5,220 $3,512 14 61.0% 100.0% $251 (PEP Housing) Apartments Adoption Petaluma Ecumenical Properties Kellgren Senior Apartments 88 11/4/2016 53 $11,650 $7,776 31 58.0% 100.0% $251 (PEP Housing) Adoption San Francisco Housing 89 Hunters Point West 7/31/2020 496 $50,000 $31,660 29 6.0% 100.0% $1,092 Development Corporation Satellite Affordable Housing 90 Amistad House 10/30/2018 63 $48,290 $47,875 39 62.0% 100.0% $1,228 Associates Satellite Affordable Housing Arboleda Apartments 91 6/30/2017 92 $40,756 $40,756 32 35.0% 100.0% $1,274 Associates Adoption Satellite Affordable Housing 92 Beth Asher 7/31/2019 53 $37,260 $33,479 35 66.0% 100.0% $957 Associates Satellite Affordable Housing 93 Columbia Park Manor 7/31/2019 87 $41,930 $39,991 40 46.0% 100.0% $1,000 Associates Satellite Affordable Housing 94 Lakeside Senior Apartments 5/31/2019 118 $46,360 $46,360 71 60.0% 100.0% $653 Associates Satellite Affordable Housing 95 Lawrence Moore Manor 7/31/2019 50 $34,125 $31,527 28 56.0% 100.0% $1,126 Associates Satellite Affordable Housing 96 Linda Glen 7/31/2019 44 $31,560 $29,978 26 59.0% 100.0% $1,153 Associates Satellite Affordable Housing 97 Merritt Crossing Adoption 9/24/2017 95 $50,000 $48,535 37 39.0% 100.0% $1,312 Associates Satellite Affordable Housing 98 Orchards Senior Homes 6/30/2019 67 $34,230 $33,838 34 51.0% 100.0% $995 Associates Satellite Affordable Housing 99 Petaluma Avenue Homes 8/30/2018 99 $48,350 $48,054 31 31.0% 100.0% $1,550 Associates Satellite Affordable Housing 100 Sacramento Senior Homes 7/31/2019 41 $30,150 $28,770 22 54.0% 100.0% $1,308 Associates Satellite Affordable Housing 101 Satellite Central 8/30/2018 196 $50,000 $49,807 116 59.0% 100.0% $429 Associates Satellite Affordable Housing Strawberry Creek Lodge 102 9/24/2017 150 $49,970 $49,679 67 45.0% 100.0% $741 Associates Adoption Satellite Affordable Housing 103 Stuart Pratt Manor 7/31/2019 47 $27,910 $27,173 25 53.0% 100.0% $1,087 Associates Satellite Affordable Housing 104 Valdez Plaza 8/30/2018 194 $50,000 $48,547 101 52.0% 100.0% $481 Associates 93 % Trained Cost per COMPL Total who Recipient Project Residents Grant Trained % Trained Resident DATE Payment Subscribe to Trained Broadband 105 Silvercrest, Inc. (non-profit) Parc Grove Commons 12/5/2017 559 $38,894 $20,806 61 11.0% 100.0% $341 106 Silvercrest, Inc. (non-profit) Parc Grove Northwest 12/5/2017 381 $38,894 $16,161 45 12.0% 100.0% $359 107 Silvercrest, Inc. (non-profit) Viking Village 12/5/2017 121 $38,894 $18,504 26 21.0% 100.0% $712 Tabernacle Community 108 Robert B Pitts Residences 2/29/2020 203 $49,400 $34,506 32 16.0% 100.0% $1,078 Development Corporation West Sacramento Housing 109 Patio Apartments 12/21/2017 56 $26,140 $12,918 13 23.0% 100.0% $994 Development Corporation West Sacramento Housing 110 Washington Courtyards 7/15/2019 279 $45,760 $41,188 59 21.0% 100.0% $698 Development Corporation West Sacramento Housing 111 West Capitol Courtyards 7/15/2019 155 $49,984 $42,928 84 54.0% 100.0% $511 Development Corporation 21,433 $3,597,392 $2,993,771 5,268 94 Attachment H: Tribal Technical Account Funded Projects as of December 2021 # Amount Project Award Grant Pro- Tribe Project Requested Type Amount Cycle jects Project 1: Technical Feasibility Study for Broadband 3 Big Valley Rancheria of Pomo Indians $49,750 Feasibility Study $49,750 Oct-20 Deployment Project 2: Feasibility Study to Investigate Potential Broadband Big Valley Rancheria of Pomo Indians $49,625 Market Study $49,625 Oct-20 Partnerships Project 3: Feasibility Study to Investigate Potential Broadband Big Valley Rancheria of Pomo Indians $50,625 Business Plan $50,625 Oct-20 Partnership 21/22 Klamath River Rural Broadband Initiative Broadband 1 Karuk Tribe $90,000 Market Study and Business Plan $90,000 Oct-20 Study Feasibility Study and Market 1 Lone Pine Paiute Shoshone Tribe $98,000 Working with Communities for Sustainable Broadband $98,000 Oct-20 Study Project 1: Technical Feasibility Study for Broadband 3 Middletown Rancheria Band $49,750 Feasibility Study $49,750 Oct-20 Deployment Project 2: Feasibility Study to Investigate Potential Broadband Middletown Rancheria Band $49,625 Market Study $49,625 Oct-20 Partnerships Project 3: Financial and Organizational Feasibility Study for Middletown Rancheria Band $50,625 Business Plan $50,625 Oct-20 Broadband Development Feasibility Study to analyze opportunities to purchase Feasibility Study and Business 1 Yurok Tribe $50,000 $50,000 Oct-20 established infrastructure assets Plan 1 Hoopa Valley Public Utilities District $149,850 Hoopa Valley Broadband Initiative Communications Studies Feasibility Study $149,850 Jan-21 1 La Jolla Band of Luiseno Indians $60,000 La Jolla Tribal Connectivity Project Feasibility Study $60,000 Jan-21 Project 1: Resighini Rancheria Broadband, Feasibility and Feasibility Study and Market 3 Resighini Rancheria $60,000 $60,000 Jan-21 Market Studies Study Project 2: Resighini Rancheria Broadband Fiber, Wireless and Resighini Rancheria $40,000 Feasibility Study $40,000 Jan-21 Network Engineering Study Project 3: Resighini Rancheria Broadband Regulatory and Resighini Rancheria $40,000 Business Plan $40,000 Jan-21 Carrier Outreach Support Project 1: Technical Feasibility Study for Broadband Feasibility Study and Market 3 Big Sandy Rancheria $49,750 $49,750 Apr-21 Deployment Study Project 2: Feasibility Study to Investigate Potential Broadband Big Sandy Rancheria $49,625 Feasibility Study $49,625 Apr-21 Partnerships Project 3: Financial and Organizational Feasibility Study for Big Sandy Rancheria $50,625 Business Plan $50,625 Apr-21 Broadband Development 1 Bishop Indian Tribal Council $100,900 Working With Communities For Sustainable Broadband Feasibility Study $104,200 Apr-21 1 Colorado River Indian Tribes $150,000 Working With Communities For Sustainable Broadband Feasibility Study $97,000 Apr-21 1 Fort Independence Tribe $150,000 Fort Independence Tribe Sustainable Broadband Feasibility Study $99,500 Apr-21 Project 1: Technical Feasibility Study for Broadband 3 Mechoopda Indian Tribe $49,750 Feasibility Study $49,750 Apr-21 Deployment Project 2: Feasibility Study to Investigate Potential Broadband Feasibility Study and Market Mechoopda Indian Tribe $49,625 $49,625 Apr-21 Partnerships Study Project 3: Financial and Organizational Feasibility Study for Mechoopda Indian Tribe $50,625 Business Plan $50,625 Apr-21 Broadband Development Project 1: Technical Feasibility Study for Broadband 3 Morongo Band of Mission Indians $49,750 Feasibility Study $49,750 Apr-21 Deployment Project 2: Feasibility Study to Investigate Potential Broadband Feasibility Study and Market Morongo Band of Mission Indians $49,625 $49,625 Apr-21 Partnerships Study Project 3: Financial and Organizational Feasibility Study for Morongo Band of Mission Indians $50,625 Business Plan $50,625 Apr-21 Broadband Development Project 1: Technical Feasibility Study for Broadband 3 Elk Valley Rancheria California $49,750 Feasibility Study $49,750 Jul-21 Deployment Project 2: Feasibility Study to Investigate Potential Broadband Feasibility Study and Market Elk Valley Rancheria California $49,625 $49,625 Jul-21 Partnerships Study Project 3: Financial and Organizational Feasibility Study for Elk Valley Rancheria California $50,625 Business Plan $50,625 Jul-21 Broadband Development 1 Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians $150,000 Technical Feasibility Study for Broadband Deployment Feasibility Study $90,000 Jul-21 30 Total: $2,038,750 $1,878,550 95 California Public Utilities Commission California Advanced Services Fund Program – Fiscal Audit Attachment B— California Public Utilities Commission’s Response to Draft Audit Report State Controller’s Office Division of Audits Post Office Box 942850 Sacramento, CA 94250 www.sco.ca.gov S23-CSF-0002