SCO
City of South Lake Tahoe
Read the report at City of South Lake Tahoe ↗
CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
Audit Report
SPECIAL GAS TAX STREET FUND
AND ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION
PROGRAM
October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024
M M. C
ALIA OHEN
C
ALIFORNIA
S
TATE
C
ONTROLLER
September 2025
MALIA M. COHEN
CALIFORNIA STATE CONTROLLER
September 2, 2025
Ms. Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance
City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Dear Ms. Tikhomirova:
The State Controller’s Office audited the City of South Lake Tahoe’s (the city) Special Gas Tax
Street Fund and the city’s Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program (RMRP) for the period
of October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024.
Our audit found that the city accounted for and expended its Special Gas Tax Street Fund and its
RMRP funds in compliance with requirements. Additionally, the city complied with its RMRP
maintenance-of-effort requirements.
If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact Efren Loste, Chief, Local
Government Audits Bureau, by telephone at 916-324-7226 or email at eloste@sco.ca.gov.
Sincerely,
Original signed by
Kimberly A. Tarvin, CPA
Chief, Division of Audits
KAT/rs
Copy: The Honorable Tamara Wallace, Mayor
City of South Lake Tahoe
Joe Irvin, City Manager
City of South Lake Tahoe
MAILING ADDRESS P.O. Box 942850, Sacramento, CA 94250
SACRAMENTO 3301 C Street, Suite 700, Sacramento, CA 95816 | 916.324.8907
LOS ANGELES 901 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 200, Monterey Park, CA 91754 | 323.981.6802
City of South Lake Tahoe Special Gas Tax Street Fund and Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program
Contents
Audit Report
Summary ............................................................................................................................ 1
Background ........................................................................................................................ 1
Audit Authority.................................................................................................................. 1
Objectives, Scope, and Methodology ............................................................................... 1
Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 3
Follow-up on Prior Audit Findings .................................................................................. 3
Views of Responsible Officials .......................................................................................... 4
Restricted Use .................................................................................................................... 4
Schedule—Reconciliation of Fund Balance ......................................................................... 5
City of South Lake Tahoe Special Gas Tax Street Fund and Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program
Audit Report
Summary The State Controller’s Office (SCO) audited the City of South Lake
Tahoe’s (the city) Special Gas Tax Street Fund and the city’s Road
Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program (RMRP) for the period of
October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024.
Our audit found that the city accounted for and expended its Special Gas
Tax Street Fund and RMRP funds in compliance with requirements.
Additionally, the city complied with its RMRP maintenance-of-effort
(MOE) requirements.
Background The State apportions funds monthly from the Highway Users Tax Account
(HUTA) in the Transportation Tax Fund to cities and counties for the
construction, maintenance, and operation of local streets and roads. The
highway users taxes derive from state taxes on the sale of motor vehicle
fuels. In accordance with Streets and Highways Code, cities must establish
individual Special Gas Tax Street Funds for the deposit of their HUTA
fund apportionments. Additionally, cities must expend their HUTA fund
apportionments only for street-related purposes in accordance with
Article XIX of the California Constitution and Streets and
Highways Code.
Senate Bill 1 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017), known as the Road Repair and
Accountability Act of 2017, created the RMRP to address deferred
maintenance on the state highway system and the local street and road
systems. Program funds are apportioned by formula to eligible cities and
counties pursuant to Streets and Highways Code (SHC) section 2032.
Article XIX of the California Constitution and SHC sections 2030 through
2038 provide the requirements for RMRP funding.
Audit Authority We conducted this audit in accordance with Government Code
section 12410, which provides the SCO with general authority to audit the
disbursement of state money for correctness, legality, and sufficient
provisions of law for payment.
Objectives, Scope, Our audit objectives were to determine whether the city:
and Methodology
• Accounted for and expended the Special Gas Tax Street Fund and
RMRP funds in compliance with Article XIX of the California
Constitution, Streets and Highways Code, and Government Code; and
• Was in compliance with the RMRP MOE requirements.
The audit period was October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024.
-1-
City of South Lake Tahoe Special Gas Tax Street Fund and Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program
To achieve our objectives, we completed the following procedures:
• We obtained an understanding and evaluated the effectiveness of the
city’s internal controls that are significant to the audit objective by
reviewing policies and procedures, interviewing key personnel,
completing an internal control questionnaire, reviewing the city’s
organization chart, and inspecting documents and records.
• We assessed the reliability of computer-processed data by reviewing
existing information about the data and the system that produced it; by
interviewing city officials knowledgeable about the data; and by
tracing data to source documents, based on auditor judgment and non-
statistical sampling. We determined that the data was sufficiently
reliable for the purposes of achieving our audit objectives.
• We conducted a risk assessment to determine the nature, timing, and
extent of substantive testing.
• We performed analytical procedures to identify and explain the
existence of unusual or unexpected account balances.
• We verified the accuracy of fund balances by performing a fund
balance reconciliation for the period of October 1, 2006, through
September 30, 2024; by recalculating the Special Gas Tax Street Fund
trial balance for the period of October 1, 2023, through September 30,
2024; and by recalculating the RMRP trial balance for the period of
October 1, 2017, through September 30, 2024.
• We verified that the components of and changes to fund balances were
properly computed, described, classified, and disclosed by scheduling
and analyzing the account balances.
• We reconciled the revenues recorded in the city’s ledger to the balance
reported in the SCO’s apportionment schedule for the period of
October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024, to determine whether
the city completely accounted for HUTA and RMRP fund
apportionments that it received.
• We reviewed the city’s Special Gas Tax Street Fund and RMRP assets
to verify that they were properly recorded and identified.
• We analyzed the system used to allocate interest and determined
whether the interest revenue allocated to the Special Gas Tax Street
Fund was fair and equitable, by interviewing key personnel and
recalculating all interest allocations for the audit period.
• We reviewed the fund cash and receivables accounts for unauthorized
borrowing to determine whether unexpended funds were available for
future street-related expenditures and protected from impairment.
• We compared the city’s RMRP project list with the list submitted to
the California Transportation Commission to ensure that actual RMRP
expenditures were for program projects approved by California
Transportation Commission.
-2-
City of South Lake Tahoe Special Gas Tax Street Fund and Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program
• We recalculated the city’s MOE contributions to verify that the city
was in compliance with RMRP MOE requirements.
• We verified that the expenditures incurred during the audit period
were supported by proper documentation and eligible in accordance
with the applicable criteria, by testing all expenditure transactions that
were equal to or greater than the significant item amount (calculated
based on materiality threshold), and by judgmentally selecting non-
statistical samples of other transactions for the following categories:
o Special Gas Tax Street Fund
▪ Services and supplies – We tested $70,971 of $483,304.
▪ Labor – We tested $486,261 of $981,737.
▪ Indirect costs – We tested $36 of $93,248.
o Snow Removal Fund
▪ Services and supplies – We tested $4,024,250 of $4,407,777.
▪ Labor – We tested $915,340 of $1,831,393.
▪ Indirect costs – We tested $181,947 of $319,898.
o RMRP
▪ Services and supplies – We tested all $519,161.
No errors were found.
We did not audit the city’s financial statements. We limited our audit scope
to planning and performing audit procedures necessary to obtain
reasonable assurance that the city accounted for and expended its Special
Gas Tax Street Fund and its RMRP funds in accordance with the criteria.
We conducted this performance audit in accordance with generally
accepted government auditing standards. Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to
provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our
audit objective. We believe that the evidence obtained provides a
reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our
audit objective.
Conclusion Our audit found that the city accounted for and expended its Special Gas
Tax Street Fund and its RMRP funds in compliance with Article XIX of
the California Constitution, Streets and Highways Code, and Government
Code for the period of October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024.
Additionally, the city complied with its RMRP MOE requirements.
Follow-up on Our prior audit report on the city for the period of October 1, 2005, through
Prior Audit September 30, 2006, issued on March 12, 2008, disclosed no findings.
Findings
-3-
City of South Lake Tahoe Special Gas Tax Street Fund and Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program
Views of We discussed the audit results with the city’s representatives during an exit
Responsible conference conducted on June 27, 2025. At the exit conference, the city’s
representatives agreed with the audit results.
Officials
Restricted Use This report is solely for the information and use of the city and the SCO;
it is not intended to be, and should not be, used by anyone other than these
specified parties. This restriction is not intended to limit distribution of this
report, which is a matter of public record and is available on the SCO
website at www.sco.ca.gov.
Original signed by
Kimberly A. Tarvin, CPA
Chief, Division of Audits
September 2, 2025
-4-
City of South Lake Tahoe Special Gas Tax Street Fund and Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program
Schedule—
Reconciliation of Fund Balance
October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024
Cities receive apportionments from the State HUTA, pursuant to SHC sections 2103, 2105, 2106, 2107,
and 2107.5. The basis of the apportionments varies, but the funds may be used for any street-related
purpose. SHC section 2107.5 restricts apportionments to administration and engineering expenditures,
except for cities with populations of fewer than 10,000 inhabitants. Those cities may use the funds for
rights-of-way and for the construction of street systems. Cities must establish individual Special Gas Tax
Street Funds for the deposit of their HUTA fund apportionments.
Cities also receive apportionments from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account of the State
Transportation Fund, pursuant to SHC section 2032(h). These funds may be used for basic road
maintenance, rehabilitation, and critical safety projects on local streets and roads systems. Furthermore,
SHC section 2036 establishes the MOE requirements, which cities must meet annually in order to remain
eligible for an allocation or apportionment of funds. The city’s required MOE contribution is $1,240,488.
The following table shows the beginning and ending balances for the city’s Special Gas Tax Street Fund
and RMRP:
-5-
B
R
T
L
E
A
E
R e c o n c ilia t io n o f F u n d B a la
e g in n in g f u n d b a la n c e , p e r c
e v e n u e s
o t a l f u n d s a v a ila b le
e s s : E x p e n d it u r e s
n d in g f u n d b a la n c e , p e r c it y
u d it a d ju s t m e n t
n d i n g f u n d b a l a n c e , p e r a
n c
it y
u d
e
i t
$
$
S p e
G a s T a x
F u n d
A m o u n t
1 4 7 ,9 5 8
1 ,6 7 7 ,3 8 6
1 ,8 2 5 ,3 4 4
1 ,5 5 8 ,2 8 9
2 6 7 ,0 5 5
-
2 6 7 , 0 5 5
c ia l G a s T a x S t r e
S n o w
R e m o v a l
F u n d A m o u n t
$ 3 ,7 6 0 ,8 6 1
4 ,5 3 4 ,8 8 6
8 ,2 9 5 ,7 4 7
6 ,5 5 9 ,0 6 8
1 ,7 3 6 ,6 7 9
-
$ 1 , 7 3 6 , 6 7 9
e t F u
F
$
$
n d
T o t a l
G a s T a x
u n d A m o u n t
3 ,9 0 8 ,8 1 9
6 ,2 1 2 ,2 7 2
1 0 ,1 2 1 ,0 9 1
8 ,1 1 7 ,3 5 7
2 ,0 0 3 ,7 3 4
-
2 , 0 0 3 , 7 3 4
P
C it y C a p it a l
r o je c t s F u n d
R M R P
A m o u n t
$ -
5 5 9 ,7 9 4
5 5 9 ,7 9 4
5 1 9 ,1 6 1
4 0 ,6 3 3
-
$ 4 0 , 6 3 3
State Controller’s Office
Division of Audits
Post Office Box 942850
Sacramento, CA 94250
www.sco.ca.gov
S25-GTA-0007