SCO
Santa Ana Unified School District Proposition 47 Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Fund Grant Expenditure
Read the report at Santa Ana Unified School District Proposition 47 ↗
SANTA ANA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Final Audit Report
PROPOSITION 47 SAFE NEIGHBORHOODS AND SCHOOLS
FUND GRANT EXPENDITURES
July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2023
M
ALIA
M. C
OHEN
C S C
ALIFORNIA TATE ONTROLLER
May 2026
S23-P47-0003
STATE CONTROLLER’S OFFICE | DIVISION OF AUDITS
Post Office Box 942850 | Sacramento, CA 94250
Sacramento Office: 3301 C Street, Suite 700 | Sacramento, CA 95816 | 916-324-8907
Monterey Park Office: 901 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 200 | Monterey Park, CA 91754 | 323-981-6802
www.sco.ca.gov
MALIA M. COHEN
CALIFORNIA STATE CONTROLLER
May 11, 2026
Ms. Katelyn Brazer Aceves, President
Board of Education
Santa Ana Unified School District
1601 East Chestnut Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92701-6322
Dear Ms. Brazer Aceves:
The State Controller’s Office conducted a performance audit of the Santa Ana Unified School
District’s Proposition 47 Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Fund grant expenditures for the
period of July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2023.
If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact Roochel Espilla, Chief, State
Agency Audits Bureau, by telephone at 916-323-5744. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Original signed by
Kimberly A. Tarvin, CPA
Chief, Division of Audits
MAILING ADDRESS P.O. Box 942850, Sacramento, CA 94250
SACRAMENTO 3301 C Street, Suite 700, Sacramento, CA 95816 | 916.324.8907
LOS ANGELES 901 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 200, Monterey Park, CA 91754 | 323.981.6802
Ms. Katelyn Brazer Aceves
May 11, 2026
Page 2 of 2
Copy: Hector Bustos, Vice President
Board of Education
Santa Ana Unified School District
Alfonso Alvarez, Ed.D., Clerk
Board of Education
Santa Ana Unified School District
Brenda Lebsack, Member
Board of Education
Santa Ana Unified School District
Valerie Magdaleno, Member
Board of Education
Santa Ana Unified School District
Lorraine M. Perez, Ed.D., Superintendent
Santa Ana Unified School District
Ron Hacker, Chief Business Official
Santa Ana Unified School District
Sue Tran, Budget Manager
Santa Ana Unified School District
Michele DeJournett, Executive Director of Support Services
Santa Ana Unified School District
Colleen Curtin, Deputy Director
Corrections Planning and Grant Programs
Board of State and Community Corrections
Juanita Reynaga, Senior Management Auditor
Board of State and Community Corrections
MAILING ADDRESS P.O. Box 942850, Sacramento, CA 94250
SACRAMENTO 3301 C Street, Suite 700, Sacramento, CA 95816 | 916.324.8907
LOS ANGELES 901 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 200, Monterey Park, CA 91754 | 323.981.6802
Office of the State Controller | Santa Ana Unified School District
Proposition 47 Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Fund Grant Expenditures
Final Audit Report
May 2026
CONTENTS
SUMMARY 1
BACKGROUND 1
AUDIT AUTHORITY 2
OBJECTIVE, SCOPE, AND METHODOLOGY 3
CONCLUSION 5
FOLLOW-UP ON PRIOR AUDIT FINDINGS 6
VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS 6
RESTRICTED USE 6
SCHEDULE 1—SUMMARY OF GRANT AWARD, AMOUNTS DISBURSED AND EXPENDED, AND AUDIT ADJUSTMENTS 7
SCHEDULE 2—PROGRAM COSTS BY FISCAL YEAR 8
FINDING AND RECOMMENDATION 10
ATTACHMENT—SANTA ANA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT’S RESPONSE TO DRAFT AUDIT REPORT 15
Office of the State Controller | Santa Ana Unified School District
Proposition 47 Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Fund Grant Expenditures
Final Audit Report
May 2026
SUMMARY
The State Controller’s Office (SCO) conducted a performance audit of Santa Ana Unified
School District’s (SAUSD) Proposition 47 Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Fund grant
expenditures for the period of July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2023. The purpose of the audit,
as required by Government Code (GC) section 7599.2(c), was to determine whether
Proposition 47 grant funds were disbursed and expended in accordance with program
guidelines and grant requirements, and with applicable laws and regulations.
Our audit determined that during the audit period, the Board of State and Community
Corrections (BSCC) awarded SAUSD with $2,756,857 in Proposition 47 grant funds. We also
determined that SAUSD expended $1,314,772 in Proposition 47 grant funds ($276,758 in
fiscal year [FY] 2019-20; $449,702 in FY 2020-21; $549,693 in FY 2021-22; and $38,619 in
FY 2022-23).
Our audit found instances in which SAUSD did not disburse or expend Proposition 47 grant
funds in accordance with program guidelines and grant requirements, or with applicable laws
and regulations. Specifically, we found that SAUSD did not adequately account for $129,698
(comprised of $123,404 in salaries and benefits, and $6,294 in related indirect costs) due to
inadequate documentation of time accounting and unapproved employee classifications.
BACKGROUND
Proposition 47 – Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Fund
On November 4, 2014, California voters approved Proposition 47, which reduces penalties for
certain offenders convicted of non-serious and nonviolent property and drug crimes. It also
allows some offenders to apply for reduced sentences. Proposition 47 established the Safe
Neighborhoods and Schools Fund, which is funded by savings that accrue to the State from
-1-
Office of the State Controller | Santa Ana Unified School District
Proposition 47 Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Fund Grant Expenditures
Final Audit Report
May 2026
implementation of the measure. This mandate is expected to save significant state corrections
dollars annually.
Savings resulting from Proposition 47 are transferred from the General Fund to the Safe
Neighborhoods and Schools Fund to be used in support of truancy reduction and drop-out
prevention programs for public school pupils in kindergarten through grade 12, increase victim
services grants, and support substance abuse and mental health treatment and diversion
programs for people in the criminal justice system.
Santa Ana Unified School District
SAUSD, located in Orange County, California, is the 10th largest school district in the state
and serves a predominantly low-income and English Learner student population. During the
audit period, SAUSD operated a total of 55 schools, including 32 elementary schools
(kindergarten through grade 5), eight intermediate schools (grades 6–8), and nine high schools
(grades 9–12). The district also operated three alternative schools, one charter school, one
career technical education school, and one secondary school under the Advanced Learning
Academy program.
In FY 2019-20, BSCC awarded SAUSD with $2,756,857 from the Proposition 47 Grants
Program. The grant term covered August 15, 2019, through May 15, 2023, and funds were
allocated to provide mental health services, substance use disorder treatment, diversion
programs, housing assistance, and job development at eight SAUSD school sites.
AUDIT AUTHORITY
We conducted this audit in accordance with GC section 7599.2(c), which requires the SCO,
every two years, to conduct an audit of the Proposition 47 Grants Program operated by BSCC
to ensure that “the funds are disbursed and expended solely according to this chapter” and to
report its findings to the Legislature. In addition, GC section 12410 provides the SCO with
-2-
Office of the State Controller | Santa Ana Unified School District
Proposition 47 Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Fund Grant Expenditures
Final Audit Report
May 2026
general authority to audit the disbursement of state money for correctness, legality, and
sufficient provisions of law for payment.
OBJECTIVE, SCOPE, AND METHODOLOGY
Our audit objective was to determine whether SAUSD disbursed and expended the
Proposition 47 grant funds in accordance with program guidelines and grant requirements, and
with applicable laws and regulations. The audit period was July 1, 2019, through
June 30, 2023.
To achieve our objective, we performed the following procedures:
• We identified the Proposition 47 Grants Program background, criteria, purpose, and
requirements by reviewing GC sections 7599 through 7599.2, and the California
Department of Finance fund classification and basis for the Safe Neighborhoods and
Schools Fund.
• We reviewed SAUSD’s Proposition 47 grant files, grant agreements, program guidelines,
program requirements, and invoices.
• We reviewed SAUSD’s claimed Proposition 47 grant expenditures and performed analytical
procedures and budgetary analyses to identify material cost components of each claim, any
errors, and any unusual or unexpected variances.
• We interviewed SAUSD’s key personnel; completed internal control questionnaires;
obtained and reviewed documents and records, policies and procedures, guidelines, grant
agreements, and grant processes; and traced transactions and activities through the
system to gain an understanding of SAUSD’s internal controls related to the Proposition 47
Grants Program; and we identified controls significant to our audit objective.
-3-
Office of the State Controller | Santa Ana Unified School District
Proposition 47 Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Fund Grant Expenditures
Final Audit Report
May 2026
Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the previous
paragraph and determining the auditing procedures that were appropriate under the
circumstances for the purpose of providing a conclusion based on our audit objective.
• We assessed the design and implementation of controls over SAUSD’s process for salaries
and benefits, subcontract costs, and data collection and evaluation costs.
• We verified that, during the audit period, BSCC awarded SAUSD with $2,756,857 in
Proposition 47 grant funds. Of the awarded amount, $1,314,772 was disbursed ($12,150 in
FY 2021-22, and $1,302,622 in FY 2022-23).
• We verified that SAUSD expended a total of $1,314,772 in Proposition 47 grant funds
($276,758 in FY 2019-20; $449,702 in FY 2020-21; $549,693 in FY 2021-22; and $38,619
in FY 2022-23).
• We selected a sample of transactions using judgmental (non-statistical) sampling and:
o Traced the transactions to supporting documentation, and performed analytical
procedures and budgetary analysis; and
o Tested compliance with applicable laws, regulations, policies and procedures, and
program requirements.
Our audit procedures included interviewing appropriate personnel and inspecting
documents, records, and grant agreements.
We chose judgmental sampling because it allows us to achieve our objectives for tests of
compliance in an efficient and effective manner, and because we did not project the results
to the intended (total) population.
• We tested $221,986 of $1,314,772 in total claimed program costs as follows:
o Salaries and benefits – We tested all $123,404.
-4-
Office of the State Controller | Santa Ana Unified School District
Proposition 47 Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Fund Grant Expenditures
Final Audit Report
May 2026
o Community-based organization subcontract costs – We tested $79,345 of $959,891.
o Data collection and evaluation costs – We tested $19,237 of $209,495.
• We assessed the reliability of computer-processed data for Proposition 47 grant
expenditures by interviewing SAUSD officials knowledgeable about the data; reviewing
existing information about the data and the system that produced it; and tracing data to
source documents, based on judgmental sampling. We determined that the data was
sufficiently reliable for the purposes of this report.
Our audit of the program was related solely to Proposition 47 grant expenditures, as required
by GC section 7599.2(c). We limited our audit scope to planning and performing audit
procedures necessary to achieve our audit objective. We did not examine the information-
system controls or the economy, efficiency, or effectiveness of the program.
We conducted this performance audit in accordance with generally accepted government
auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions
based on our audit objective. We believe that the evidence we obtained provides a reasonable
basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objective.
CONCLUSION
We found instances in which SAUSD did not disburse or expend Proposition 47 grant funds in
accordance with program guidelines and grant requirements. Specifically, we found that
SAUSD did not adequately account for $129,698, comprised of $123,404 in salaries and
benefits, and $6,294 in related indirect costs due to inadequate documentation of time
accounting and unapproved employee classifications.
These instances of noncompliance are quantified in the schedules and described in the
Finding and Recommendation section.
-5-
Office of the State Controller | Santa Ana Unified School District
Proposition 47 Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Fund Grant Expenditures
Final Audit Report
May 2026
FOLLOW-UP ON PRIOR AUDIT FINDINGS
We have not previously conducted an audit of SAUSD’s Proposition 47 grant expenditures.
VIEWS OF RESPONSIBLE OFFICIALS
We issued a draft report on December 5, 2025. An SAUSD representative responded by email
on December 11, 2025. SAUSD accepted the audit results. This final audit report includes
SAUSD’s response as an attachment.
RESTRICTED USE
This report is solely for the information and use of SAUSD, BSCC, and the SCO; it is not
intended to be, and should not be, used by anyone other than these specified parties. This
restriction is not intended to limit distribution of this report, which is a matter of public record
and is available on the SCO website at www.sco.ca.gov.
Original signed by
Kimberly A. Tarvin, CPA
Chief, Division of Audits
May 11, 2026
-6-
Office of the State Controller | Santa Ana Unified School District
Proposition 47 Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Fund Grant Expenditures
Final Audit Report
May 2026
SCHEDULE 1—SUMMARY OF GRANT AWARD, AMOUNTS DISBURSED
AND EXPENDED, AND AUDIT ADJUSTMENTS
July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2023
The following table summarizes the grant award, the amounts disbursed and expended, and
the audit adjustments during the audit period (monetary amounts are rounded to the nearest
whole dollar):
Fiscal Amount Amount Amount Amount Audit
Year Awarded Disbursed Expended Allowable Adjustment
2019-20 $2,756,857 $0 $276,758 $276,758 $0
2020-21 0 0 449,702 389,982 59,720
2021-22 0 12,150 549,693 502,291 47,402
2022-23 0 1,302,622 38,619 16,043 22,576
Total $2,756,857 $1,314,772 $1,314,772 $1,185,074 $129,698
-7-
Office of the State Controller | Santa Ana Unified School District
Proposition 47 Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Fund Grant Expenditures
Final Audit Report
May 2026
SCHEDULE 2—PROGRAM COSTS BY FISCAL YEAR
July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2020
Program Amount Amount Audit
Cost Element Expended Allowable Adjustment
Direct costs:
Salaries and benefits $0 $0 $0
Services and supplies 0 0 0
Professional services 0 0 0
Community-based organization
subcontract costs 189,285 189,285 0
Data collection and evaluation costs 83,541 83,541 0
Fixed assets and equipment 1,394 1,394 0
Other 756 756 0
Total direct costs 274,976 274,976 0
Total indirect costs 1,782 1,782 0
Total program costs $276,758 $276,758 $0
July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2021
Program Amount Amount Audit
Cost Element Expended Allowable Adjustment Reference
Direct costs:
Salaries and benefits $57,241 $0 $57,241 Finding
Services and supplies 0 0 0
Intentionally left blank
Professional services 0 0 0
Intentionally left blank
Community-based organization
subcontract costs 308,455 308,455 0
Intentionally left blank
Data collection and evaluation costs 78,280 78,280 0
Intentionally left blank
Fixed assets and equipment 0 0 0
Intentionally left blank
Other 0 0 0
Intentionally left blank
Total direct costs 443,976 386,735 57,241
Intentionally left blank
Total indirect costs 5,726 3,247 2,479 Finding
Total program costs $449,702 $389,982 $59,720
Intentionally left blank
-8-
Office of the State Controller | Santa Ana Unified School District
Proposition 47 Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Fund Grant Expenditures
Final Audit Report
May 2026
July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2022
Program Amount Amount Audit
Cost Element Expended Allowable Adjustment Reference
Direct costs:
Salaries and benefits $44,825 $0 $44,825 Finding
Services and supplies 3,135 3,135 0
Intentionally left blank
Professional services 0 0 0
Intentionally left blank
Community-based organization
subcontract costs 446,988 446,988 0
Intentionally left blank
Data collection and evaluation costs 47,674 47,674 0
Intentionally left blank
Fixed assets and equipment 0 0 0
Intentionally left blank
Other 0 0 0
Intentionally left blank
Total direct costs 542,622 497,797 44,825
Intentionally left blank
Total indirect costs 7,071 4,494 2,577 Finding
Total program costs $549,693 $502,291 $47,402
Intentionally left blank
July 1, 2022, through June 30, 2023
Program Amount Amount Audit
Cost Element Expended Allowable Adjustment Reference
Direct costs:
Salaries and benefits $21,338 $0 $21,338 Finding
Services and supplies 0 0 0
Intentionally left blank
Professional services 0 0 0
Intentionally left blank
Community-based organization
subcontract costs 15,163 15,163 0
Intentionally left blank
Data Collection and evaluation costs 0 0 0
Intentionally left blank
Fixed assets and equipment 0 0 0
Intentionally left blank
Other 0 0 0
Intentionally left blank
Total direct costs 36,501 15,163 21,338
Intentionally left blank
Total indirect costs 2,118 880 1,238 Finding
Total program costs $38,619 $16,043 $22,576
Intentionally left blank
-9-
Office of the State Controller | Santa Ana Unified School District
Proposition 47 Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Fund Grant Expenditures
Final Audit Report
May 2026
FINDING AND RECOMMENDATION
Finding—Inadequate Documentation and Unapproved Employee
Classification
SAUSD claimed $129,698, consisting of $123,404 in salaries and benefits and $6,294 in
related indirect costs, for the audit period. We determined that the entire amount is
unsupported or disallowed. Costs totaling $57,855 are unsupported because SAUSD did not
maintain adequate supporting documentation; costs totaling $71,843 are disallowed because
SAUSD did not comply with the grant agreement.
The following table summarizes the unsupported and disallowed salaries and benefits, the
related indirect costs, and the audit adjustment by fiscal year:
Calculation of Audit Adjustment FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 Total
Employee classification:
Program Manager -$55,454 $0 $0 -$55,454
Curriculum Specialist -1,787 -44,825 -21,338 -67,950
Total unallowable salaries
and benefits [A] -57,241 -44,825 -21,338 -123,404
Indirect cost rate [B] 4.33% 5.75% 5.80%
Intentionally left blank
Related indirect costs (A × B) [C] -2,479 -2,577 -1,238 -6,294
Audit adjustment (A + C) [D] -$59,720 -$47,402 -$22,576 -$129,698
Inadequate documentation
SAUSD claimed salaries and benefits for a Program Manager, a single-funded employee,
allowable per the grant agreement. The Program Manager’s time allocation was one full-time
equivalent (100 percent) dedicated to the Proposition 47 Grants Program. SAUSD claimed
$57,855, consisting of $55,454 in salaries and benefits and $2,401 in related indirect costs, for
the Program Manager. We questioned all $57,855 because SAUSD failed to maintain time
-10-
Office of the State Controller | Santa Ana Unified School District
Proposition 47 Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Fund Grant Expenditures
Final Audit Report
May 2026
accounting records or equivalent documentation (e.g. timesheets, semi-annual certifications) to
support salaries and benefits claimed during FY 2020-21. The BSCC Grant Agreement
requires time and attendance reports for all individuals reimbursed by Proposition 47 grant
funds. The BSCC Grant Administration Guide requires timesheets or timecards for BSCC-
grant funded personnel whose time was directly charged to the grant. The California
Department of Education’s California School Accounting Manual describes the methods for
documenting salaries charged to state programs, such as personnel activity reports or period
certification.
Without the required documentation, we could not verify that charges to the Proposition 47
Grants Program for salaries and benefits were supported by records that accurately reflect the
work performed, based on actual time spent and effort expended by the Proposition 47 grant-
funded employees, for activities directly related to work under the program; nor could we
determine whether the employees worked solely on Proposition 47 Grants Program activities.
Unapproved employee classification
SAUSD also claimed salaries and benefits for a multi-funded employee, allocating 0.33 full-
time equivalents to the Proposition 47 Grants Program. The employee was classified as
Curriculum Specialist, a position classification that was not included in the grant agreement
approved by the BSCC. By charging part of the employee’s time to the Proposition 47 Grants
Program, SAUSD altered the budgeted personnel structure and increased costs to the
program without obtaining BSCC approval. The BSCC Grant Agreement and the BSCC Grant
Administration Guide require that grantees receive prior approval for budget revisions involving
changes in personnel classifications, hours, or costs. Because SAUSD did not obtain BSCC’s
approval for the budget change, the total cost of $71,843 ($67,950 in salaries and benefits,
and $3,893 in related indirect costs) claimed during the audit period is disallowed.
-11-
Office of the State Controller | Santa Ana Unified School District
Proposition 47 Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Fund Grant Expenditures
Final Audit Report
May 2026
Criteria
BSCC Grant Agreement Number 505-19, Exhibit A – Scope of Work, Section 6, “Project
Records,” paragraph C. states, “Personnel and payroll records shall include the time and
attendance reports for all individuals reimbursed under the grant, whether they are employed
full-time or parttime.”
BSCC’s Grant Administration Guide (July 2020), Section 4, paragraph L, “Personnel
Changes,” states:
Whenever there are budget changes resulting from personnel changes, whether
temporary or permanent, the project must submit a modification, and explain the reason
for the shifting of personnel, the time period involved, the individuals involved, the
salaries paid, and the percentage of time worked. The project also must maintain
documentation in the payroll records of the shifting of personnel. During the grant
performance period, the Grantee may not add, remove, or change line items to/from the
Personal Services/Benefits category without prior BSCC approval [emphasis added]. A
modification will be necessary to add line items and to increase or decrease the amount
of grant funds budgeted to this category. The items added must be allowable expenses
programmatically. The organization’s Cost Allocation Plan may also require revision to
reflect budget changes and to bring the allocation of costs in alignment with current
expenditures.
BSCC’s Grant Administration Guide, Section 18, “Records,” begins “Agencies are required to
maintain accurate, complete, orderly, and separate records for each BSCC-funded grant.”
Item 1 of Section 18.D, “Payroll Records,” states, in part:
All grant-funded personnel who are directly charged to the grant (or listed as match)
either in whole or in part must maintain timecards/sheets that: 1) indicate the actual time
worked on each BSCC project and activity (on a daily basis); and 2) account for all the
-12-
Office of the State Controller | Santa Ana Unified School District
Proposition 47 Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Fund Grant Expenditures
Final Audit Report
May 2026
time worked by the employee during the pay period. Timecards/sheets must be signed
by the employee and their supervisor and should be customized to capture the various
activities performed by the employee/organization. . . .
The California Department of Education’s California School Accounting Manual (revised
January 2019), Procedure 905, “Documenting Salaries and Wages”, page 905-11, states,
in part:
. . . Salaries and Wages Charged to State Funded Programs
[Local educational agencies] are required to provide supporting documentation for
salaries and wages charged to state restricted programs (resources). . . .
How to Document State Restricted Salaries and Wages
In the absence of more stringent state program guidelines, when documenting salaries
and wages charged to state restricted programs, [local educational agencies] may use
the documentation methods described in “How to Document Federally Funded Salaries
and Wages” beginning on page 905-4. These methods include monthly [personnel
activity reports], periodic (semiannual) certifications, and the substitute system for time
accounting.
Recommendation
We recommend that SAUSD:
• Implement a robust system—including periodic semi-annual certifications for all single-
funded employees—for maintaining and regularly updating all required certifications and
documentation for salaries and benefits to ensure compliance with grant agreement
stipulations;
-13-
Office of the State Controller | Santa Ana Unified School District
Proposition 47 Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Fund Grant Expenditures
Final Audit Report
May 2026
• Review and verify all employee classifications and allocations with BSCC before claiming
their salaries and benefits to ensure that all multi-funded employee classifications are pre-
approved by the BSCC and to avoid unallowable costs;
• Work with BSCC to return any disallowed salaries, benefits, and related indirect costs; and
• Conduct periodic internal audits to monitor compliance with grant requirements and
promptly address any discrepancies to mitigate the risk of non-compliance and to
ensure the integrity of financial reporting.
-14-
Office of the State Controller | Santa Ana Unified School District
Proposition 47 Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Fund Grant Expenditures
Final Audit Report
May 2026
ATTACHMENT—SANTA ANA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT’S RESPONSE
TO DRAFT AUDIT REPORT
End of report
-15-