SCO
Rio Hondo Community College District
Health Fee Elimination
Read the report at Rio Hondo Community College District ↗
RIO HONDO COMMUNITY
COLLEGE DISTRICT
Audit Report
HEALTH FEE ELIMINATION PROGRAM
Chapter 1, Statutes of 1984, 2nd Extraordinary Session,
and Chapter 1118, Statutes of 1987
July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2003
S W
TEVE ESTLY
California State Controller
June 2005
S W
TEVE ESTLY
California State Controller
June 30, 2005
Rose Marie Joyce, Ph.D
Superintendent/President
Rio Hondo Community College District
3600 Workman Mill Road
Whittier, CA 90601
Dear Dr. Joyce:
The State Controller’s Office audited the claims filed by the Rio Hondo Community College
District for costs of the legislatively mandated Health Fee Elimination Program (Chapter 1,
Statutes of 1984, 2nd Extraordinary Session, and Chapter 1118, Statutes of 1987) for the period of
July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2003.
The district claimed $565,649 ($566,649 less a $1,000 penalty for filing a late claim) for the
mandated program. Our audit disclosed that none of the claimed costs are allowable because the
district claimed unallowable costs and understated claimed revenues. The State made no
payments to the district.
If you disagree with the audit findings, you may file an Incorrect Reduction Claim (IRC) with
the Commission on State Mandates (COSM). The IRC must be filed within three years
following the date that we notify you of a claim reduction. You may obtain IRC information at
COSM’s Web site at www.csm.ca.gov (Guidebook link), and obtain IRC forms by telephone at
(916) 323-3562 or by e-mail at csminfo@csm.ca.gov.
If you have any questions, please contact Jim L. Spano, Chief, Compliance Audits Bureau, at
(916) 323-5849.
Sincerely,
Original Signed By:
VINCENT P. BROWN
Chief Operating Officer
VPB:JVB/ams
cc: Teresa Dreyfuss, Vice President
Rio Hondo Community College District
Ed Monroe, Program Assistant
Fiscal Accountability Section
California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office
Jeannie Oropeza, Program Budget Manager
Education Systems Unit
Department of Finance
Rio Hondo Community College District Health Fee Elimination Program
Contents
Audit Report
Summary............................................................................................................................ 1
Background........................................................................................................................ 1
Objective, Scope, and Methodology................................................................................. 2
Conclusion.......................................................................................................................... 2
Views of Responsible Official........................................................................................... 2
Restricted Use.................................................................................................................... 3
Schedule 1—Summary of Program Costs............................................................................ 4
Findings and Recommendations........................................................................................... 6
Steve Westly • California State Controller
Rio Hondo Community College District Health Fee Elimination Program
Audit Report
Summary The State Controller’s Office (SCO) audited the claims filed by the
Rio Hondo Community College District for costs of the legislatively
mandated Health Fee Elimination Program (Chapter 1, Statutes of 1984,
2nd Extraordinary Session, and Chapter 1118, Statutes of 1987) for the
period of July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2003. The last day of fieldwork
was December 1, 2004.
The district claimed $565,649 ($566,649 less a $1,000 penalty for filing
a late claim) for the mandated program. The audit disclosed that none of
the claimed costs are allowable because the district claimed unallowable
costs and understated claimed revenue offsets. The State made no
payments to the district.
Background Education Code Section 72246 (repealed by Chapter 1, Statutes of 1984,
2nd Extraordinary Session (E.S.)) authorizes community college districts
to charge a health fee for providing health supervision and services,
direct and indirect medical and hospitalization services, and operation of
student health centers. This statute also required that health services for
which a community college district charged a fee during fiscal year (FY)
1983-84 had to be maintained at that level in FY 1984-85 and every year
thereafter. The provisions of this statute would automatically sunset on
December 31, 1987, reinstating the community college districts’
authority to charge a health service fee as specified.
Education Code Section 72246 (amended by Chapter 1118, Statutes of
1987) requires any community college district that provided health
services in FY 1986-87 to maintain health services at the level provided
during that year in FY 1987-88 and each fiscal year thereafter.
On November 20, 1986, the Commission on State Mandates (COSM)
determined that Chapter 1, Statutes of 1984, 2nd E.S., imposed a “new
program” upon community college districts by requiring any community
college district that provided health services for which it was authorized
to charge a fee pursuant to former Education Code Section 72246 in
FY 1983-84 to maintain health services at the level provided during that
year in FY 1984-85 and each fiscal year thereafter. This maintenance-of-
effort requirement applies to all community college districts that levied a
health service fee in FY 1983-84, regardless of the extent to which the
health service fees collected offset the actual costs of providing health
services at the FY 1983-84 level.
On April 27, 1989, COSM determined that Chapter 1118, Statutes of
1987, amended this maintenance-of-effort requirement to apply to all
community college districts that provided health services in FY 1986-87,
requiring them to maintain that level in FY 1987-88 and each fiscal year
thereafter.
Steve Westly • California State Controller 1
Rio Hondo Community College District Health Fee Elimination Program
Parameters and Guidelines establishes the state mandate and defines
reimbursement criteria. COSM adopted Parameters and Guidelines on
August 27, 1987, and amended it on May 25, 1989. In compliance with
Government Code Section 17558, the SCO issues claiming instructions
for mandated programs, to assist school districts in claiming
reimbursable costs.
Objective, We conducted the audit to determine whether costs claimed represent
increased costs resulting from the Health Fee Elimination Program for
Scope, and
the period of July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2003.
Methodology
Our audit scope included, but was not limited to, determining whether
costs claimed were supported by appropriate source documents, not
funded by another source, and not unreasonable and/or excessive.
We conducted the audit according to Government Auditing Standards,
issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and under the
authority of Government Code Section 17558.5. We did not audit the
district’s financial statements. We limited our audit scope to planning
and performing audit procedures necessary to obtain reasonable
assurance that costs claimed were allowable for reimbursement.
Accordingly, we examined transactions, on a test basis, to determine
whether the costs claimed were supported.
We limited our review of the district’s internal controls to gaining an
understanding of the transaction flow and claim preparation process as
necessary to develop appropriate auditing procedures.
Conclusion Our audit disclosed instances of noncompliance with the requirements
outlined above. These instances are described in the accompanying
Summary of Program Costs (Schedule 1) and in the Findings and
Recommendations section of this report.
For the audit period, the Rio Hondo Community College District claimed
$565,649 ($566,649 less a $1,000 penalty for filing a late claim) for
Health Fee Elimination Program costs. Our audit disclosed that none of
the claimed costs are allowable.
Views of We issued a draft audit report on April 22, 2005. On June 1, 2005, we
sent Teresa Dreyfuss, Vice President, an e-mail requesting a written
Responsible
response to the draft report, and we also left her a telephone message
Official
asking her to return our call. Ms. Dreyfuss did not respond.
Steve Westly • California State Controller 2
Rio Hondo Community College District Health Fee Elimination Program
Restricted Use This report is solely for the information and use of the Rio Hondo
Community College District, California Community Colleges
Chancellor’s Office, the California Department of Finance, and the SCO;
it is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these
specified parties. This restriction is not intended to limit distribution of
this report, which is a matter of public record.
Original Signed By:
JEFFREY V. BROWNFIELD
Chief, Division of Audits
Steve Westly • California State Controller 3
Rio Hondo Community College District Health Fee Elimination Program
Schedule 1—
Summary of Program Costs
July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2003
Actual Costs Allowable Audit
Cost Elements Claimed per Audit Adjustments Reference 1
July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2001
Salaries and benefits $ 311,072 $ 275,765 $ (35,307) Finding 1
Services and supplies 3,815 3,815 —
Indirect costs 68,469 33,087 (35,382) Findings 1, 4
Total health services costs 383,356 312,667 (70,689)
Less cost of services in excess of FY 1986-87 services (15,066) (15,066) — Finding 5
Subtotal 368,290 297,601 (70,689)
Less authorized health fees (209,832) (493,992) (284,160)
Subtotal 158,458 (196,391) (354,849)
Less offsetting savings/reimbursements — — —
Subtotal 158,458 (196,391) (354,849)
Less late claim (1,000) (1,000) —
Subtotal 157,458 (197,391) (354,849)
Adjustment to eliminate negative balance — 197,391 197,391
Total program costs $ 157,458 — $ (157,458)
Less amount paid by the State —
Allowable costs claimed in excess of (less than) amount paid $ —
July 1, 2001, through June 30, 2002
Salaries and benefits $ 320,199 $ 273,694 $ (46,505) Findings 1, 2
Services and supplies 44,624 44,624 —
Indirect costs 41,705 36,325 (5,380) Findings 1, 2, 4
Total health services costs 406,528 354,643 (51,885)
Less cost of services in excess of FY 1986-87 services — — — Finding 5
Subtotal 406,528 354,643 (51,885)
Less authorized health fees (186,999) (492,888) (305,889)
Subtotal 219,529 (138,245) (357,774)
Less offsetting savings/reimbursements (18,744) (18,744) —
Subtotal 200,785 (156,989) (357,774)
Less late claim — — —
Subtotal 200,785 (156,989) (357,774)
Adjustment to eliminate negative balance — 156,989 156,989
Total program costs $ 200,785 — $ (200,785)
Less amount paid by the State —
Allowable costs claimed in excess of (less than) amount paid $ —
Steve Westly • California State Controller 4
Rio Hondo Community College District Health Fee Elimination Program
Schedule 1 (continued)
Actual Costs Allowable Audit
Cost Elements Claimed per Audit Adjustments Reference 1
July 1, 2002, through June 30, 2003
Salaries and benefits $ 365,457 $ 303,198 $ (62,259) Findings 1, 2
Services and supplies 87,137 57,301 (29,836) Findings 1, 3
Indirect costs 31,682 54,184 22,502 Findings 1-4
Total health services costs 484,276 414,683 (69,593)
Less cost of services in excess of FY 1986-87 services — — — Finding 5
Subtotal 484,276 414,683 (69,593)
Less authorized health fees (276,870) (566,583) (289,713)
Subtotal 207,406 (151,900) (359,306)
Less offsetting savings/reimbursements — — —
Subtotal 207,406 (151,900) (359,306)
Less late claim — — —
Subtotal 207,406 (151,900) (359,306)
Adjustment to eliminate negative balance — 151,900 151,900
Total program costs $ 207,406 — $ (207,406)
Less amount paid by the State —
Allowable costs claimed in excess of (less than) amount paid $ —
Summary: July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2003
Salaries and benefits $ 996,728 $ 852,657 $ (144,071) Findings 1, 2
Services and supplies 135,576 105,740 (29,836) Findings 1, 3
Indirect costs 141,856 123,596 (18,260) Findings 1-4
Total health services costs 1,274,160 1,081,993 (192,167)
Less cost of services in excess of FY 1986-87 services (15,066) (15,066) — Finding 5
Subtotal 1,259,094 1,066,927 (192,167)
Less authorized health fees (673,701) (1,553,463) (879,762)
Subtotal 585,393 (486,536) (1,071,929)
Less offsetting savings/reimbursements (18,744) (18,744) —
Subtotal 566,649 (505,280) (1,071,929)
Less late claim (1,000) (1,000) —
Subtotal 565,649 (506,280) (1,071,929)
Adjustment to eliminate negative balance — 506,280 506,280
Total program costs $ 565,649 — $ (565,649)
Less amount paid by the State —
Allowable costs claimed in excess of (less than) amount paid $ —
_________________________
1 See the Findings and Recommendations section.
Steve Westly • California State Controller 5
Rio Hondo Community College District Health Fee Elimination Program
Findings and Recommendations
FINDING 1— The district claimed unallowable health services costs totaling $137,959
Unallowable health for the audit period. The related indirect cost is $16,749.
costs
The unallowable costs pertain to the following health services not
provided by Rio Hondo College in fiscal year (FY) 1986-87: blood
pressure, flu shots, and Hepatitis B shots. In addition, the district claimed
unallowable costs for physical examinations of athletes.
A summary of the adjustment is as follows.
Fiscal Year
2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 Total
Unallowable health costs:
Salaries and benefits $ (35,307) $ (42,605) $ (58,225) $ (136,137)
Supplies — — (1,822) (1,822)
Subtotal (35,307) (42,605) (60,047) (137,959)
Related indirect cost (7,676) (4,870) (4,203) (16,749)
Audit adjustment $ (42,983) $ (47,475) $ (64,250) $ (154,708)
Parameters and Guidelines specifies that community college districts be
reimbursed only for the costs of health services provided to the extent
that they were provided by the district in FY 1986-87.
Education Code Section 76355(d) states that authorized expenditures
shall not include physical exams for intercollegiate athletes.
Recommendation
We recommend the district ensure that it claims only costs for health
services reimbursable under the mandate program.
FINDING 2— The district claimed unallowable salary and benefit costs totaling $7,934
Unallowable salary for the audit period. The related indirect cost is $728.
and benefit costs
The unallowable costs relate to student workers’ salaries and benefits
funded by the federal work study program.
A summary of the adjustment is as follows.
Fiscal Year
2001-02 2002-03 Total
Salaries and benefits $ (3,900) $ (4,034) $ (7,934)
Related indirect cost (446) (282) (728)
Audit adjustment $ (4,346) $ (4,316) $ (8,662)
Parameters and Guidelines requires that all claimed costs be traceable to
source documents and/or worksheets that validate such costs.
Recommendation
We recommend the district ensure that all claimed costs are allowable
and supported.
Steve Westly • California State Controller 6
Rio Hondo Community College District Health Fee Elimination Program
FINDING 3— In FY 2002-03, the district claimed unallowable athletic insurance costs
Unallowable athletic totaling $28,014. The error occurred because the district’s staff believed
insurance costs these costs were eligible for reimbursement. The related indirect cost is
$1,961.
Education Code Section 76355(d) (formerly Section 72246(2)) states that
authorized expenditures for health services shall not include the cost of
athletic insurance.
Recommendation
We recommend the district ensure that all claimed costs are allowable
and supported.
FINDING 4— The district understated indirect costs by $1,178 for the audit period.
Understated indirect
The district claimed indirect costs based on indirect cost rate proposals
cost rate claimed
(ICRPs) prepared each fiscal year by an outside consultant. However, the
district did not obtain federal approval for its rates.
We calculated indirect cost rates using the methodology allowed by the
SCO claiming instructions. A summary of the audited and claimed
indirect cost rates is as follows.
Fiscal Year
2000-01 2001-02 2002-03
Allowable indirect cost rates 11.83% 11.41% 15.03%
Less claimed indirect cost rates (21.74)% (11.43)% (7.00)%
Indirect cost rate variance (9.91)% (0.02)% 8.03%
Based on the indirect cost rate variances, the audit adjustment is
summarized as follows.
Fiscal Year
2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 Total
Allowable direct cost claimed $ 279,580 $ 318,318 $ 360,499
Indirect cost rate variance × (9.91)% × (0.02)% × 8.03%
Audit adjustment $ (27,706) $ (64) $ 28,948 $ 1,178
Parameters and Guidelines allows community college districts to claim
indirect costs according to the SCO claiming instructions. The SCO
claiming instructions require that districts obtain federal approval of
ICRPs prepared according to Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
Circular A-21. Alternatively, districts may use form FAM-29C to
compute indirect cost rates. Form FAM-29C uses total expenditures
reported on the California Community Colleges Annual Financial and
Budget Report, Expenditures by Activity (CCFS-311).
Recommendation
We recommend the district use the SCO claiming instructions to
calculate indirect cost rates. The district should obtain federal approval
when it prepares ICRPs using OMB Circular A-21. Alternatively, the
district should use Form FAM-29C to prepare ICRPs.
Steve Westly • California State Controller 7
Rio Hondo Community College District Health Fee Elimination Program
FINDING 5— The district understated authorized health fee revenue by $879,762 for
Understated authorized the audit period.
health fee revenues
claimed The total number of students claimed for each semester in the audit
period did not reconcile to the actual student count data. The auditor
found that the number of health fee exemptions claimed included
academy and high school students. Consequently, the auditor used: the
district’s summary report R10709R printouts (actual student count by
unit load) and detail printouts of students by name and student number
for each semester to identify the student count; the district’s Computing
Services Report BOGGCTQ1 printouts to identify Board of Governors
Grants (BOGG) waivers; and apprenticeship program listings of student
to identify apprenticeship waivers. The district was unable to explain the
differences between the students counts claimed and the totals identified
in the R10709R and the detail student printouts. In addition, the district
believed that academy and high school students qualified for health fee
exemptions.
A summary of our adjustment to authorized health fee revenues is as
follows.
Semester
Fall Spring Summer Total
Fiscal Year 2000-01
Student enrollment 25,928 23,330 14,478
Less allowable health fee exemptions (6,040) (6,770) (2,845)
Subtotal 19,888 16,560 11,633
Authorized student health fee × $ (11) × $ (11) × $ (8)
Audited authorized health service fees $ (218,768) $ (182,160) $ (93,064) $ (493,992)
Claimed authorized health fee
revenues 209,832
Audit adjustment, FY 2000-01 (284,160)
Fiscal Year 2001-02
Student enrollment 23,834 24,582 13,104
Less allowable health fee exemptions (7,021) (7,800) (3,132)
Subtotal 16,813 16,782 9,972
Authorized student health fee × $ (12) × $ (12) × $ (9)
Audited authorized health service fees $ (201,756) $ (201,384) $ (89,748) (492,888)
Claimed authorized health fee
revenues 186,999
Audit adjustment, FY 2001-02 (305,889)
Fiscal Year 2002-03
Student enrollment 27,137 25,383 17,512
Less allowable health fee exemptions (7,440) (8,256) (3,657)
Subtotal 19,697 17,127 13,855
Authorized student health fee × $ (12) × $ (12) × $ (9)
Audited authorized health service fees $ (236,364) $ (205,524) $ (124,695) $ (566,583)
Claimed authorized health fee revenues 276,870
Audit adjustment, FY 2002-03 (289,713)
Total audit adjustment $ (879,762)
Steve Westly • California State Controller 8
Rio Hondo Community College District Health Fee Elimination Program
Parameters and Guidelines states that health fees authorized by the
Education Code must be deducted from costs claimed. Education Code
Section 76355(c) states that health fees are authorized from all students
except those who: (1) depend exclusively on prayer for healing; (2) are
attending a community college under an approved apprenticeship
training program; or (3) demonstrate financial need. (Pursuant to
Education Code Section 76355(a), authorized health fees increased by $1
effective with the summer 2001 session.)
Also, Government Code Section 17514 states that “costs mandated by
the State” means any increased cost that a district is required to incur. To
the extent that community college districts can charge a fee, they are not
required to incur a cost. In addition, Government Code Section 17556
states that COSM shall not find costs to be mandated by the State if the
district has the authority to levy fees to pay for the mandated program or
increased level of services.
Recommendation
We recommend the district ensure that allowable health services program
costs are offset by the amount of health service fee revenue authorized by
the Education Code.
Steve Westly • California State Controller 9
State Controller’s Office
Division of Audits
Post Office Box 942850
Sacramento, California 94250-5874
http://www.sco.ca.gov
C05-MCC-002