SCO
Ontario-Montclair School District
Emergency Procedures, Earthquake Procedures, and Disasters
Read the report at Ontario-Montclair School District ↗
ONTARIO-MONTCLAIR
SCHOOL DISTRICT
Audit Report
EMERGENCY PROCEDURES, EARTHQUAKE
PROCEDURES, AND DISASTERS PROGRAM
Chapter 1659, Statutes of 1984
July 1, 2001, through June 30, 2003
J C
OHN HIANG
California State Controller
January 2007
J C
OHN HIANG
California State Controller
January 31, 2007
Sharon P. McGehee, Ph.D., Superintendent
Ontario-Montclair School District
950 West D Street
Ontario, CA 91762
Dear Dr. McGehee:
The State Controller’s Office audited the costs claimed by the Ontario-Montclair School District
for the legislatively mandated Emergency Procedures, Earthquake Procedures, and Disasters
Program (Chapter 1659, Statutes of 1984) for the period of July 1, 2001, through June 30, 2003.
The district claimed and was paid $340,287 for the mandated program. Our audit disclosed that
$10,430 is allowable and $329,857 is unallowable. The unallowable costs occurred because the
district claimed unsupported costs. The district should return $329,857 to the State.
If you disagree with the audit findings, you may file an Incorrect Reduction Claim (IRC) with
the Commission on State Mandates (COSM). The IRC must be filed within three years following
the date that we notify you of a claim reduction. You may obtain IRC information at COSM’s
Web site, at www.csm.ca.gov (Guidebook link); you may obtain IRC forms by telephone, at
(916) 323-3562, or by e-mail, at csminfo@csm.ca.gov.
If you have any questions, please contact Jim L. Spano, Chief, Compliance Audits Bureau, at
(916) 323-5849.
Sincerely,
Original signed by:
JEFFREY V. BROWNFIELD
Chief, Division of Audits
JVB/vb:ams
Sharon P. McGehee, Ph.D., Superintendent -2- January 31, 2007
cc: Danielle Calise, Assistant Superintendent-Business Services
Ontario-Montclair School District
Elizabeth McNevin, Accountant
Ontario-Montclair School District
Herbert R. Fischer, Ph.D., County Superintendent of Schools
San Bernardino County Office of Education
Scott Hannan, Director
School Fiscal Services Division
California Department of Education
Arlene Matsuura, Education Fiscal Services Consultant
School Fiscal Services Division
California Department of Education
Gerry Shelton, Director
Fiscal and Administrative Services Division
California Department of Education
Jeannie Oropeza, Program Budget Manager
Education Systems Unit
Department of Finance
Ontario-Montclair School District Emergency Procedures, Earthquake Procedures, and Disasters Program
Contents
Audit Report
Summary............................................................................................................................ 1
Background........................................................................................................................ 1
Objective, Scope, and Methodology................................................................................. 1
Conclusion.......................................................................................................................... 2
Views of Responsible Official........................................................................................... 2
Restricted Use.................................................................................................................... 2
Schedule 1—Summary of Program Costs............................................................................ 3
Finding and Recommendation.............................................................................................. 4
Ontario-Montclair School District Emergency Procedures, Earthquake Procedures, and Disasters Program
Audit Report
Summary The State Controller’s Office (SCO) audited the costs claimed by the
Ontario-Montclair School District for the legislatively mandated
Emergency Procedures, Earthquake Procedures, and Disasters Program
(Chapter 1659, Statutes of 1984) for the period of July 1, 2001, through
June 30, 2003. The last day of fieldwork was October 18, 2006.
The district claimed and was paid $340,287 for the mandated program.
Our audit disclosed that $10,430 is allowable and $329,857 is
unallowable. The unallowable costs occurred because the district claimed
unsupported costs. The district should return $329,857 to the State.
Background Chapter 1659, Statutes of 1984, added and amended Education Code
Sections 35295, 35296, 35297, 40041.5, and 40042. The law requires
each school district and county superintendent of schools to establish an
earthquake emergency procedure in each school building under its
jurisdiction. In addition, the law requires that school districts allow
public agencies to use school buildings, grounds, and equipment for mass
care and welfare shelters during disasters or other emergencies affecting
public health and welfare. This law further eliminated school districts’
authority to recover direct costs from public agencies that use school
facilities during local emergencies.
On July 23, 1987, the Commission on State Mandates (COSM)
determined that Chapter 1659, Statutes of 1984, imposed a state mandate
reimbursable under Government Code Section 17561.
Parameters and Guidelines establishes the state mandate and defines
reimbursement criteria. COSM adopted Parameters and Guidelines on
March 23, 1989 (last amended on May 29, 2003). In compliance with
Government Code Section 17558, the SCO issues claiming instructions
for mandated programs to assist local agencies and school districts in
claiming reimbursable costs.
Objective, We conducted the audit to determine whether costs claimed represent
increased costs resulting from the Emergency Procedures, Earthquake
Scope, and
Procedures, and Disasters Program for the period of July 1, 2001,
Methodology
through June 30, 2003.
Our audit scope included, but was not limited to, determining whether
costs claimed were supported by appropriate source documents, were not
funded by another source, and were not unreasonable and/or excessive.
We conducted the audit according to Government Auditing Standards,
issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and under the
authority of Government Code Sections 12410, 17558.5, and 17561. We
did not audit the district’s financial statements. We limited our audit
scope to planning and performing audit procedures necessary to obtain
reasonable assurance that costs claimed were allowable for
reimbursement. Accordingly, we examined transactions, on a test basis,
to determine whether the costs claimed were supported.
-1-
Ontario-Montclair School District Emergency Procedures, Earthquake Procedures, and Disasters Program
We limited our review of the district’s internal controls to gaining an
understanding of the transaction flow and claim preparation process as
necessary to develop appropriate auditing procedures.
Conclusion Our audit disclosed an instance of noncompliance with the requirements
outlined above. This instance is described in the accompanying Summary
of Program Costs (Schedule 1) and in the Finding and Recommendation
section of this report.
For the audit period, the Ontario-Montclair School District claimed and
was paid $340,287 for costs of the Emergency Procedures, Earthquake
Procedures, and Disasters Program. Our audit disclosed that $10,430 is
allowable and $329,857 is unallowable.
For fiscal year (FY) 2001-02, the State paid the district $161,522. Our
audit disclosed that $3,209 is allowable. The district should return
$158,313 to the State.
For FY 2002-03, the State paid the district $178,765. Our audit disclosed
that $7,221 is allowable. The district should return $171,544 to the State.
Views of We issued a draft audit report on November 29, 2006. We contacted
Elizabeth McNevin, Accountant, by telephone on December 20, 2006.
Responsible
Ms. McNevin declined to respond to the draft report.
Official
Restricted Use This report is solely for the information and use of the Ontario-Montclair
School District, the San Bernardino County Office of Education, the
California Department of Education, the California Department of
Finance, and the SCO; it is not intended to be and should not be used by
anyone other than these specified parties. This restriction is not intended
to limit distribution of this report, which is a matter of public record.
Original signed by:
JEFFREY V. BROWNFIELD
Chief, Division of Audits
-2-
Ontario-Montclair School District Emergency Procedures, Earthquake Procedures, and Disasters Program
Schedule 1—
Summary of Program Costs
July 1, 2001, through June 30, 2003
Actual Costs Allowable Audit
Cost Elements Claimed per Audit Adjustment 1
July 1, 2001, through June 30, 2002
Salaries and benefits $ 152,705 $ 2,693 $ (150,012)
Materials and supplies 353 353 —
Total direct costs 153,058 3,046 (150,012)
Indirect costs 8,464 163 (8,301)
Total program costs $ 161,522 3,209 $ (158,313)
Less amount paid by the State (161,522)
Allowable costs claimed in excess of (less than) amount paid $ (158,313)
July 1, 2002, through June 30, 2003
Salaries and benefits $ 172,221 $ 6,957 $ (165,264)
Materials and supplies — — —
Total direct costs 172,221 6,957 (165,264)
Indirect costs 6,544 264 (6,280)
Total program costs $ 178,765 7,221 $ (171,544)
Less amount paid by the State (178,765)
Allowable costs claimed in excess of (less than) amount paid $ (171,544)
Summary: July 1, 2001, through June 30, 2003
Salaries and benefits $ 324,926 $ 9,650 $ (315,276)
Materials and supplies 353 353 —
Total direct costs 325,279 10,003 (315,276)
Indirect costs 15,008 427 (14,581)
Total program costs $ 340,287 10,430 $ (329,857)
Less amount paid by the State (340,287)
Allowable costs claimed in excess of (less than) amount paid $ (329,857)
_________________________
1 See the Finding and Recommendation section.
-3-
Ontario-Montclair School District Emergency Procedures, Earthquake Procedures, and Disasters Program
Finding and Recommendation
FINDING— The district claimed unallowable salary and benefit costs totaling $315,276.
The related indirect costs total $14,581. The unallowable costs occurred
Unallowable salary,
because the district did not support costs claimed with adequate source
benefit, and related
documentation.
indirect costs
For fiscal year (FY) 2001-02, the district claimed salary and benefit costs
by individual employee. For FY 2002-03, the district claimed these costs by
employee classification (such as principal, vice principal, and teacher). For
costs claimed by employee classification, the district claimed multiple
employees as one line item.
Updating System/Training Preparation
The district claimed unallowable salary and benefit costs totaling $21,670
for updating the earthquake emergency system and for training preparation.
The district claimed $2,543 that it supported only by employee
certifications. District employees did not complete the certifications
contemporaneously and did not identify the date on which the employee
performed the mandated activities. In addition, the district did not provide
any documentation to support $19,127 of the costs claimed.
Employee Training
The district claimed unallowable salary and benefit costs totaling $293,606
for employee training. The district claimed 2.0 hours per employee for both
fiscal years.
The district’s consultant provided employee certifications to support
training costs claimed. The certifications were comprised of school site
employee rosters signed by each school’s representative; the rosters
indicate that all school site employees attended 2.0 hours of training. The
district’s consultant requested that the district provide these employee
rosters on May 12, 2005, in response to our scheduled audit.
The district did not provide employee certifications for all costs claimed;
the remaining costs claimed were unsupported. On September 7, 2005, a
district representative confirmed that no additional records were available.
The employee certifications are insufficient documentation to support
training hours claimed. The certifications do not identify the training title,
subject, purpose, and location where training was conducted. In addition,
when training encompasses subjects broader than the reimbursable
activities, only the pro rata portion can be claimed. District schools
submitted documentation showing that training encompasses all disasters,
including earthquakes, floods, bomb threats, fallen aircraft, fires, civil
disturbances, chemical accidents, and violent intruders.
-4-
Ontario-Montclair School District Emergency Procedures, Earthquake Procedures, and Disasters Program
Parameters and Guidelines states:
To be eligible for mandated cost reimbursement for any fiscal year,
only actual costs may be claimed. Actual costs are those costs actually
incurred to implement the mandated activities. Actual costs must be
traceable and supported by source documents that show the validity of
such costs, when they were incurred, and their relationship to the
reimbursable activities. A source document is a document created at or
near the same time the actual cost was incurred for the event or activity
in question. Source documents may include, but are not limited to,
employee time records or time logs, sign-in sheets, invoices, and
receipts.
Evidence corroborating the source documents may include . . .
declarations. . . . However, corroborating documents cannot be
substituted for source documents.
To claim salary and benefit costs, Parameters and Guidelines requires
districts to:
Report each employee implementing the reimbursable activities by
name, job classification, and productive hourly rate. Describe the
specific reimbursable activities performed and the hours devoted to
each reimbursable activity performed.
To claim training costs, Parameters and Guidelines requires districts to:
Report the name and job classification of each employee [attending
training]. Provide the title, subject, and purpose (related to the mandate
of the training session), dates attended, and location. If the training
encompasses subjects broader that the reimbursable activities, only the
pro rata portion can be claimed. . . .
The following table summarizes the audit adjustment.
Fiscal Year
2001-02 2002-03 Total
Updating system/training preparation:
Employee certification $ (2,543) $ — $ (2,543)
Unsupported (2,007) (17,120) (19,127)
Total, updating system/training
preparation (4,550) (17,120) (21,670)
Employee training (145,462) (148,144) (293,606)
Total salary and benefit costs (150,012) (165,264) (315,276)
Related indirect costs (8,301) (6,280) (14,581)
Audit adjustment $ (158,313) $ (171,544) $ (329,857)
Recommendation
We recommend that the district support salary and benefit costs claimed
with actual time records and training records that meet the requirements
of Parameters and Guidelines.
-5-
State Controller’s Office
Division of Audits
Post Office Box 942850
Sacramento, California 94250-5874
http://www.sco.ca.gov
S05-MCC-042